News

Meeting complaint against Schwartz

Reno personal property appraiser Joyce Newman has filed an open meeting complaint over state Treasurer Dan Schwartz’s handling of the adoption of regulations for the new state program that pays parents to take their children out of public school. Schwartz administers the program.

Newman said she signed up to receive notices of meeting agendas but that the delivery of them was spotty.

“When I became aware by checking the treasurer’s website that future hearings had been scheduled, I contacted the treasurer’s office to make sure I was still on the email distribution list,” she said in a prepared statement. “I received no response and received no more notices, including that for the October 20 ‘adoption hearing’ or for the hearing originally scheduled to adopt regulations on November 23. Additionally, the notice I received for the August 21 workshop was emailed on August 20—one day prior to the workshop. The Nevada Administrative Procedures Act NRS 233b.061(2) requires workshop notices to be sent ‘not less than 15 days before the workshop … to each person who has requested to be placed on a mailing list.’ ” • In related news, the public was given no notice of Assembly Concurrent Resolution 1 at this month’s special session of the Nevada Legislature. The lawmakers have always exempted themselves from the open meeting law. ACR 1 is a nonbinding measure that Republicans claim provides guidance on their legislative intent in creating the school grants program at the regular session of the legislature last May. An examination of legislative records indicates that ACR 1 was introduced in the Senate no earlier than 3:12 p.m. on Dec. 19 and was given final approval in the Assembly at 3:49 p.m. As a result of that 37-minute sprint, the public was given no opportunity to testify on the measure in legislative hearings. None were held. In addition, it was approved by the Senate on a voice vote, so no roll call is available to the public. • Additionally, the law firm of Lt. Gov. Mark Hutchison has added another lawsuit to the court load surrounding the new school grants program—this one to seek rapid court action on the earlier suits.

Two earlier lawsuits were filed to challenge the new law, one by a parents group, the other by the American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada.

“Families across Nevada right now are planning their children’s educational future and for thousands of households, the plan includes access to ESAs [education savings accounts],” Hutchison said in a prepared statement when the suit was filed on Dec. 22.

“On behalf of these families, we will seek an expedited decision to meet the timeline set forth by the law and, most importantly, to provide greater certainty for our students, parents, educators, and schools.”

But apparently signals got crossed in GOP ranks.

Republican Hutchison’s action prompted Republican Schwartz to freak out and issue his own statement: “The State Treasurer’s Office is baffled by Lt. Governor Hutchison’s recent legal maneuvers. We have complete confidence in Attorney General [Adam] Laxalt’s handling of the two cases already filed. Mr. Hutchison’s lawsuit amounts to little more than a side track to nowhere. Hoping to bypass the current cases, the Lieutenant Governor could well jeopardize the attorney general’s defense of Nevada’s ESA program, endangering very real benefits for the children and parents of Nevada.” (Hutchison’s statement made no reference to Laxalt.)

Hutchison said his action sought “expedited” action on the initial two lawsuits, while Schwartz said Hutchison is seeking to “bypass” those lawsuits.

Schwartz may have been distressed by being named as a defendant in the Hutchison suit—he mentioned it in his news release— though it is routine for administrators of programs to be named when programs are sued. • Finally, Treasurer Schwartz—who has accelerated the school grants program at every opportunity—said last week he may hold a “summit” meeting next spring on how to retool the program at the 2017 Nevada Legislature.

—Dennis Myers

Under pressure

Nevada newspapers move into partisan hands

On Dec. 10, it was announced that the Las Vegas Review-Journal had been by purchased by a newly formed Dennis Myers Delaware limited liability company that turned out to be a front group for billionaire Sheldon Adelson—who, to be sure, had been the first suspect on nearly everyone’s list of possible mystery buyers. That put the right wing billionaire—who has a history of using his Israeli newspaper as a political weapon—in control of the largest newspaper in the largest county of the state that holds the third presidential nominating event of 2016.

“I don’t like journalism.”

Sheldon Adelson Newspaper owner

But what concerns Democrats on the local level is that it is of a piece with another development that also reduces the party’s ability to get its message out—the acquisition of several small newspapers around the state by a corporation co-owned by a former right-wing Review-Journal publisher.

Battle Born Media, owned by former RJ publisher Sherman Frederick and Associated Press sportswriter Tim Dahlberg, has acquired the Ely Times, Mineral County Independent-News, Lincoln County Record, Eureka Sentinel, Mesquite Local News, and Sparks Tribune. Frederick is a climate change denier who once claimed President Obama was having an affair.

In the case of Adelson, his newspaper Israel Hayom (Israel Today) is essentially an adjunct of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s career.

If the Nevada newspaper is used in similar fashion, it would be a powerful tool in a state whose demographics have been moving steadily Democratic. The combination of the biggest print organ in the state and scattered small print outlets could have an impact on state political debate.

If Adelson and Battle Born use their newspapers as weapons, “It completely distorts [political dialogue] and essentially eliminates it,” said political analyst Fred Lokken.

There are indications that Adelson was taking steps in that direction even before taking ownership of the RJ. About a month before the ReviewJournal changed hands, while purchase talks were going on between the newspaper and Adelson representatives, RJ reporters were assigned to investigate three judges, including Elizabeth Gonzalez, who is presiding on a lawsuit against Adelson by one of his former Macau casino execs.

In 2014, Democratic lethargy and low turnout gave Republicans their most sweeping victory in Nevada since 1890, but expectations of

The Las Vegas Review-Journal found itself in the position of covering itself.

Democratic comeback in 2016 have been frequent, both because of public reaction to GOP policies and because of the state’s demographics.

“Clark County is the Democratic stronghold,” said one state legislator on background last week. “A relentless pounding [by the newspaper] could take away our demographic advantages.”

“Not necessarily,” Lokken said.

If Adelson turns the newspaper into a Republican mouthpiece, he said, the damage could be more to the newspaper itself than to the Democrats because it would lose credibility, akin to Fox News in broadcasting.

“It then represents an ideology,” Lokken said. “It ceases to become a newspaper and becomes propaganda and the public reacts accordingly.”

Fox tends to attract not an audience looking for information, but an audience that seeks confirmation of what it already believes.

“People who have not made up their minds will look somewhere else for a newspaper” if the RJ becomes a conservative mouthpiece, Lokken said.

After the RJ takeover, Adelson’s managers posted an editorial promising to make the newspaper “fair, unbiased and accurate”—not greatly different from the Fox News slogan, “fair and balanced.” It was not an assurance that heartened the staff of the newspaper, given that it came on the heels of those same managers stopping the presses to remove a quote from one of the stories they’d written. But it did make the point that eventually, a publisher can enforce his will on the newspaper he owns.

“I don’t like journalism,” Adelson said on Nov. 9 last year, according to Israel’s Haaretz. (On the same occasion, he also said, “The Palestinians are an invented people,” according to the Times of Israel.) But that hasn’t stopped him from acquiring more properties. “How Sheldon Adelson is buying up Israel’s media,” was a 2014 headline in the Washington Post.

His Las Vegas public image is divisive. The newspaper he now owns reported in 2005, “He spent $2 million to support local candidates, and his battle against the Culinary Union made him such a polarizing figure that his support for anyone was like the kiss of a black-widow spider. He was hated by a large segment of the voters.”

Adelson in 2012 virtually singlehandedly kept Newt Gingrich’s presidential campaign alive with millions of dollars when the candidacy had become hopeless. Such episodes make some believe there is no reason to worry about Adelson’s impact,

because his political judgment is so poor. In Time magazine last week, former RJ reporter Steve Friess wrote that Adelson’s history is of failed projects and unsuccessful political support. “He plunged $2 million to defeat three pro-labor Clark County Commission candidates amid his battles with the Culinary Union, and each won in landslides anyway,” he wrote.

When Adelson was outed as the new owner of the RJ, an Adelson “family statement” read, “This week, with each of the Republican candidates for president and the national media descending on Las Vegas for the year’s final debate, we did not want an announcement to distract from the important role Nevada continues to play in the 2016 presidential election.” Most PR experts would have known that secrecy would elevate, not diminish the news value of the purchase.

Nevertheless, having as publisher of the RJ one of the richest men on the planet, a man who has shown his willingness to spend freely to support his views, is certainly not good news for Nevada Democrats.

RJ editorials have long been fairly radical libertarian, and the good thing about the paper has been that—unlike some newspapers—it was not possible to detect those editorial views by reading its news pages. Some readers felt the editorials had become more moderate in recent months.

The RJ staff has laid the groundwork for readers to have a full sense of coming changes, posting a guide to the newspaper’s previous stances in its editorials and comparing them with Adelson’s known views. (Nevertheless, the newspaper still uses the industry-preferred term gaming for gambling.)

It is more difficult to track changes in the network of small newspapers under Battle Born’s ownership. Staffs have changed, and at the Sparks Tribune, liberal populist columnist Jake Highton was briefly cut loose but then brought back. Liberal columnist Andrew Barbano has had columns killed twice since the ownership change—one a piece about Republican legislator Michelle Fiore—which is twice as many times as in his previous 27-year history with the paper. It is difficult to trace any of this to Frederick’s influence. In many cases, the small newspapers exist in communities that were already strongly Republican. (This writer, at various times, has written for RJ properties, including the Boulder City Review, Las Vegas Business Press, Pahrump Valley Times, and Tonopah Times Bonanza.) Ω

Adelson “was hated by a large segment of the voters.”

Las Vegas Review Journal (2005)

School’s out

A carpenter worked in front of Pine Middle School on Dec. 29. At left is a Dumpster for asbestos, which became a problem when it was exposed by peeling tiles damaged by flooding caused by a pipe that burst, possibly as a result of seismic activity. Also working at the site are property restoration and environmental cleanup firms. Just east of the school building, students’ desks and other furnishings and loose property were being carried from the school and stored in a lineup of large metal storage containers. At press time it was not known how long the school will be closed for repairs.