NEWS

BoB Price 1936-2019

State legislator Bob Price was never involved with the #MeToo movement, but many years ago he heard that a University of Nevada, Reno legislative intern had been dismissed by her legislator when she rejected his advances and was in danger of being dropped from the entire intern program. Price said he would take on the young woman as a second intern. They had a good working relationship, and she passed the intern course. It was one of many instances of his championing women.

When Dawn Gibbons took her military pilot husband’s place in the Assembly during the Kuwait war, Price was helpful to her in learning the ropes.

In 1978, many assemblymembers believed the Equal Rights Amendment, providing for gender equality, was bottled up in the Senate and they would never have to vote on it. So some of them promised their votes to both sides. Then it passed the Senate, causing consternation. Members who had voted for ERA in earlier sessions changed their votes under heavy lobbyist pressure. Price ended his remarks before the vote, “I want to implore you, my fellow colleagues, even beg that just this one time, today, right now, when we vote on this issue, I beg you to vote from your heart ... and to rise above all other pressures.” It moved many but did not change votes. ERA was defeated.

First elected to the Nevada Assembly as a member of the “Watergate Class of 1974,” Price joined a group of young reformers swept into office that year. He eventually became chair of the Assembly Taxation Committee, where he almost single-handedly stopped sales tax hikes from bring enacted.

No sales tax increase got through the legislature until 1997 when Speaker Joe Dini created a new Infrastructure Committee with Price’s colleague David Goldwater as chair and diverted sales tax measures to it. That committee approved sales tax hikes in Clark and Washoe counties for a Southern Nevada pipeline and for the casinos’ railroad trench in the north. “Reno casinos thus got the downtown railroad trench for which they were not willing to pay,” columnist Andrew Barbano wrote this week. In 1998, Dini forced Price out of the Taxation chair and gave it to Goldwater.

The casinos were disturbed by Price blocking sales tax hikes, since it created pressure for higher casino taxes. He also introduced legislation protecting workers from firing without cause and barring casino political contributions. The casinos mounted a major 1990 campaign to defeat him for reelection in his North Las Vegas assembly district. He won.

His Assembly colleague Chris Giunchigliani said, “Bob Price was a prince of a man. … He was a proponent of annual sessions, public education and worker rights. It says a lot about a person when his ex-wives all got along and supported him. His style may have been low key, but he was definitely a statesman.”

He served 28 years, suffered a heart attack in 1998, left elective office in 2002 and moved to Sparks, where he and his wife Nancy—a former Nevada regent—lived in a home moved from its original site on the Comstock. He died there last week. A recreation center and a 10-acre park in Clark County are named for him.

—Dennis Myers

Students as undercover drug agents is an idea that is generating a lot of debate among experts. Students are not heard from on the issue much.

Shadowy arena

School District’s use of student drug informant called risky, troubling

eric Sinacori, 20, died in 2013 after injecting three bags of heroin. The prominence of opioid abuse today may not highlight this tragedy as unusual, except that Sinacori was acting as a confidential informant for campus police at the University of Massachusetts Amherst.

Sinacori was caught by campus police selling drugs on campus, and a year later his parents found him dead after he had overdosed following a drug deal with another student.

Sinacori’s parents sued the university for wrongful death because it did not notify them of Sinacori’s involvement with campus police. The suit was tossed because, according to a judge, it was only Sinacori who violated student codes, not the university. UMass, however, has since eliminated its confidential informant program.

“We have determined that our Police Department and Student Affairs division can employ other approaches … to combat illegal drug use, possession, and sales, and protect the members of our campus,” the school’s chancellor, Kumble Subbaswamy, said after Sinacori’s death and role as a campus informant came to light.

The use of narcs on college campuses usually only comes to light when the results are deadly—a student lost his life acting as an informant—or when the news media get wind of it.

Such cases highlight the inherent dangers of using informants. Law enforcement operates under a veil of secrecy often for legitimate reasons, but the use of confidential informants has shown deadly results and often legally questionable practices.

Using students as drug informants is risky, said Alexandra Natapoff, a law professor at U.C. Irvine and author of the award-winning book Punishment without Crime: How Our Massive Misdemeanor System Traps the Innocent and Makes America More Unequal.

“The use of criminal informants is a highly secretive institution, and criminal justice and other public entities often do not disclose the extent to which they engage in informant use,” Natapoff said. “Nevertheless, we do know, anecdotally, of many instances in which schools use their own students as informants.

“The most high-profile examples that have come to light recently are in the college-campus context, and we have seen a number of scandals over the past couple of years in which students have come to harm as a result of the college campus policies.”

Natapoff said that local police or college police have pressured students into becoming informants when they are caught with small amounts of drugs.

Even using adult confidential informants, she said, is controversial. The U.S. Department of Justice criticized the DEA in 2015 about the government’s use of informants. The DEA resisted an audit by the DOJ about the practice, and the secrecy of how informants are used was highlighted as questionable because it allowed the federal government to green-light drug deals and other criminal activities without oversight (Link: https:// bit.ly/1Kl77JS).

Natapoff said using college students as informants is risky but that a case at a public high school level was unheard of. She was surprised when I read to her a portion of a Washoe County School District letter that documented the use of a high-school student serving as an informant in a drug investigation.

School district officials said there’s no policy against the practice.

“WCSD doesn’t have a specific policy in this area, but we do work closely with law enforcement agencies in promoting the School Secret Witness program and the State’s ‘Safe Voice’ program,” said district spokesperson Victoria Campbell.

The district’s Area Superintendent Lauren Ford, working in a previous capacity, was documented as giving back marijuana to a high school student. Her actions were defended by her then-supervisor, the now-retired Area Superintendent Roger Gonzalez. Gonzalez said that Ford gave drugs back to a student because the student was an informant in a drug investigation.

“That student had served as an informant and had provided the school with the name of the student who was dealing

… drugs on the campus,” Gonzalez wrote.

Marijuana possession is considered a criminal offense, according to district policy, and administrators have discretion as to how cannabis possession is handled.

“Non-criminal matters that are reported are handled by school and district level staff,” said district spokesperson Campbell. “Criminal matters are handled by the school police department.”

Three points are mandatory, according to district rules, when drug possession is discovered: notification to school police, the school’s administrator, and the student’s parents.

When asked, a school district official said the district would like to explore the issue further.

“We don’t currently have a policy on student informants, and we thank you for bringing that to our attention,” said spokesperson Megan Downs. “This is something we would like to explore in the near future.”

It was, in fact, the district’s own documentation that brought the issue to light. When Ford gave back marijuana to a student, the act was memorialized by Gonzalez. Virginia Doran, the school district’s director of labor relations, Chris Reich, a school district attorney, and human resources employees, were all copied on the letter.

School officials did not elaborate on the district’s practice of using students as informants, but Natapoff said that, at the least, because of students being minors, the practice should have triggered a notification to parents.

“There has been outcry from parents (at the college level) who are appalled that their students, who they have entrusted to these institutions, have been put into compromised and dangerous situations,” she said. “I’m personally unaware of these practices at the high-school level, but it does not surprise me.

Such practices at educational institutions, Natapoff added, are “largely unregulated, secretive and lacking in accountability. The use of informant deals in schools raises its own highly troubling implications” that move schools more to a criminal justice model and away from educational goals.

Specific to the Washoe County School District, Natapoff further explained that “the fact that they are exercising their authority in these risky and problematic ways vis-à-vis with their own students without a policy is also unfortunately characteristic of the world of informants where institutions often make their own unregulated decisions about what kinds of deals to cut, what sorts of people to exert pressure on, and what kinds of information to gather without oversight or knowledge of best practices.

“Because it is such a secretive environment by its very nature, institutions often engage in policies that we would consider to be entirely unacceptable in other arenas of public policy,” she added. “These are children. I’m guessing they have policies about the materials used in the straws in the cafeteria.” Ω

Death in the family

Reno is now losing its oldest building, the city’s first Masonic building, later the Reno Mercantile Company. It is the last remnant of the lineup of connected buildings constructed when Commercial Row was Reno’s main street. The building’s beautiful features, ornate fixtures and metal ceiling are passing into history.

The Rumor of “Organ Harvesting” Favors “Seasoning”

In their daily life, people always like to add a variety of seasonings in cooking in order to greatly stimulate their appetite. In monotonous study and work, people often “add seasoning” to their life by making some small changes that make life more interesting and elegant. However, “the addition of seasoning” may not always bring out “positive energy”. For example, when “certain seasoning” is added to an ordinary event and news, an ill-disposed rumor may come into being or even have the “wings” to ravage. The rumor of “organ harvesting” invented by the cult Falun Gong favors “seasoning”. “Tragedies” are invented to blind the rational mind. The rumor of “organ harvesting” tried to win sympathy, and the rumor makers concentrated on the “tragic” side in various ways. They tried to inspire sympathy of the people (especially the Westerners) through bloody visual shocks and description of tragic scenes. The sensual shock was invented to blind the rational mind. While describing the rumor of “organ harvesting”, the cult Falun Gong invented many cruel details. For example, “[The Chinese government is] still taking the organs of Falun Gong practitioners for sale, and they do it without anaesthetizing the victims”; “Tens of thousands of people have been killed by organ harvesting”; “[Falun Gong] Members were closed in the basements of labor camps, prisons and hospitals for organ harvesting, and then they were burned”... This “exaggerated” description fully manifested the “inhumane side” in the rumor. In addition to written description, the photos were more visually shocking. Photo exhibitions about “organ harvesting” have almost become the main means for the cult Falun Gong to smear the Chinese government in Western countries. Despite the absence of definite evidence, they fabricated and spread a large number of so-called “schematic” and “imaginary” illustrations that were “bloody and cruel” to stir public sentiment. This “tragic seasoning” has undoubtedly made the rumor of “organ harvesting” “stronger”. Even some parliament members of the Western world evaluated this description as “colloquial and vivid” although it is nonsense. “Secrets” are created to stimulate curiosity and attract attention. The Falun Gong media knows propaganda well and is even better at attracting public attention by exposing highlights. To suit the prevailing public curiosity, the rumor of “organ harvesting” was not only exposed as an asserted “secret”, but also “updated in real-time” with various social hot-spot “secrets” exposed in different stages to retain public attention. For example, when it first appeared in 2006, the “organ harvesting” news was described as “a stunning secret” and included secretive words such as “concentration camp”, “imprisonment”, “organ harvesting” and “body burning”. Later, the “secret story” from the “CPC internal intelligence” Pete, the “insider testimony” of Annie, wife of a doctor in Sujiatun, and the emotional description of “an old military doctor from Shenyang” greatly satisfied the curiosity of the public. The cult Falun Gong needed exactly such tricks to attract attention. The story didn’t end there though. In order to avoid being drowned in the vast amount of online information, the rumor of “organ harvesting” was often “attached to” various social hot issues, such as the “Bo Xilai and Wang Lijun” incident, the organ transplant conference, and some influential criminal cases in China, whose purpose was to keep the rumor going by taking advantage of those social hot issues. “Exaggeration” is added to make waves. When cooking, people sometimes make food bigger, softer and even more delicious by fermentation or frying it with starch. The rumor of “organ harvesting” invented by the cult Falun Gong was full of “expanding agent” from the beginning. For example, the Falun Gong media alleged that more than 6,000 practitioners were detained and suffered “organ harvesting” in the “Sujiatun Concentration Camp”. Ten years later, in a so-called New Report published by the Falun Gong media, the number of organs that were taken from Falun Gong prisoners in China soared to 1.5 million and the number of “organ harvesting” hospitals changed from 1 to more than 80. Li Hongzhi, the Falun Gong cult leader, once claimed that exaggeration makes news believable. Pitifully the Falun Gong media was stupid to allege that the Sujiatun Hospital took organs from 6,000-odd people while it was actually able to hold more than 300 patients. Anyway, “expanding agent” has become an indispensable ingredient in the dishes of news reported by the Falun Gong media. Then, how could the rumor dish with so much “seasonings” be cooked in a “pot”? As Gregory Globa, a Ukrainian anti-cult expert, observed, this “pot” was “media trap”. The cult Falun Gong duplicated and spread the rumor rampantly via its media and attracted eyeballs with sensational headlines. It exploited various media and even yellow news to flood credible but seemingly boring expert analyzes so as to pave the way for the spread of the rumor of “organ harvesting”. This was a “media trap” into which the Western people were misguided, without getting the truth. This is what we need to be alert to. The cult Falun Gong put so many “ingredients” in the rumor of “organ harvesting” and produced a strong soup. If the people are blinded by compassion and attracted by those “secrets”, they would become easy targets of the deception. However, a soup is a soup. Without substantive content, the diners get nothing. The rumor of “organ harvesting” is nothing but a pale soup.

A PAid AdveRtiSement