9 minute read
NEws
from Aug. 9, 2018
Paul laxalt 1922-2018
Former Nevada governor and U.S. senator Paul Laxalt has died at a Virginia health care facility.
Advertisement
Former vice president Joe Biden tweeted that Laxalt was “someone with whom you could disagree without being disagreeable.”
Laxalt, a Republican, brought politics in Nevada up to date in the 1960s by introducing techniques like opinion surveys and modern precinct organizing. He served first as a district attorney, then as lieutenant governor, and lost his first U.S. Senate race after a recount before becoming governor in 1967.
His governorship was of greater import than his later senatorship. Particularly important were enactment of the state’s corporate gambling law, which closed out the family-owned casinos era and brought in massive capital that made the megaresorts possible, and establishment of the community college system. Historian Russ Elliott wrote that the corporate gambling law was a “mixed blessing … forcing [casino regulators] to distinguish between active and passive stockholders, in effect causing the state to lose control of the passive stockholders and making it more difficult to find hidden interests.”
He and neighboring governor Ronald Reagan were credited with creating the bi-state Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, though state legislators were just as instrumental. But TRPA functioned poorly. It became more successful after a 1981 restructuring.
Laxalt served one term as governor, left public life to start a Carson City casino hotel, then ran for the Senate in 1974, winning narrowly after a recount.
In the senate, he started off leading the fight against the Panama Canal treaties and against secondary labor union picketing of construction sites, losing both but making a favorable impression. But that splash of leadership on issues was never repeated. Later, he settled into a role as President Reagan’s friend. There is no Laxalt Act, or any legislation of consequence. Laxalt was helpful in getting the MX missile system in Nevada and Utah killed but grew out of touch with changing times in the state, particularly environmentalism. When opposition to nuclear waste developed, he warned Nevada against becoming a “peacenik” state. His political judgments included convincing Reagan to choose Richard Schweiker as running mate in the 1976 GOP primary race against Gerald Ford and convincing Reagan to make a last minute 1986 Nevada visit in a vain attempt to defeat Harry Reid for the senate.
Many hoped Laxalt would become more engaged in policy making and Senate business, but he did so only episodically, as when GOP leader Howard Baker in 1981 called on Laxalt to help win freshman conservatives to vote to raise the debt limit for President Reagan above the trillion dollar mark.
Laxalt looked half-heartedly at running for majority leader against Howard Baker (and passed), halfheartedly became general chair of the Republican National Committee (Frank Fahrenkopf handled daily duties), sued McClatchy Newspapers half-heartedly for reporting skimming went on at Laxalt’s Carson casino without Laxalt’s knowledge (he settled the case), and ran for president half-heartedly (and withdrew before a vote was cast). There was a feeling of unfulfilled potential about him. He never returned to Nevada to live—his Senate campaign slogan was “One of us”— and he’s little known to many in the state today. —Dennis Myers
U.S. Sen. Dean Heller with a group of soldiers at Nellis Air Force Base in Clark County.
Heller on veterans
Iraq, Afghan vets weren’t impressed
there was a time when it was fairly easy to learn how veterans’ groups felt about members of Congress. They issued report cards on the members’ voting records. However, most and possibly all veterans’ organizations have dropped this practice.
The last report card issued by a veterans’ group was released in 2010 by Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA). And in that report, Dean Heller of Nevada—then a member of the U.S. House—tied for the worst grade in the Nevada congressional delegation. Heller received a D compared to an A for Dina Titus, a B for Harry Reid, a C for Shelley Berkley, and a D for John Ensign.
Heller has been emphasizing veterans’ issues in his campaign for reelection to the U.S. Senate. A television commercial he’s running touting his veterans record has gotten wide news coverage. But in 2010, when IAVA ranked him on the way he voted and the bills he co-sponsored, he made what they considered the right decision on just 11 out of 18 occasions.
The IAVA report does not distinguish between a vote against veterans or failing to vote, treating them both as harmful to veteran needs, but we have tried to learn from congressional records which of the two he did.
What IAVA considered Heller’s mistakes were these: • In both Iraq and Afghanistan, the Pentagon violated enlistment contracts and kept servicepeople in the war zones past the end of their enlistments, a practice known as stop-loss. Congress passed legislation providing extra compensation but did not order an end to stop-lossing. And even the additional pay was initially paid only to servicepeople who were stop-lossed after Congress approved the extra money. In House vote 348 on June 16, 2009, Heller voted against a measure that would have paid the extra money to those who were stop-lossed earlier. • In 2009, HR 3082 contained money for homeless veterans, rural veterans and mental health treatment. Heller either voted against the measure or failed to vote on it during House vote 529. We were unable to learn which he did, but it cost him. • IAVA supported House vote 336, which was a vote on the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011. For IAVA it was important because of the frequency of rape in the military—3,200 reports of sexual assault involving servicemembers in 2009, 279 of them in combat zones, though the Pentagon estimated only about a fifth of such incidents were reported. IAVA said the measure “significantly strengthens the [Pentagon’s] military sexual trauma (MST) prevention programs … including requiring the creation of a sexual assault hotline and authorizing access to legal counsel for sexual assault victims.” Heller voted against the measure. • Heller also lost points with IAVA by failing to “take a leadership role” on some issues by not co-sponsoring specific measures. The four measures that were important to IAVA in 2010 were HR 1016, which provided for advance military appropriations to overcoming chronic congressional tardiness in approving the budget of the Department of Veterans Affairs “20 out of the past 23 years;” HR 4121, updating a disability claims process that was “outdated years before most [Iraq and Afghanistan] veterans were born;” HR 5933, providing for changes to the New GI Bill; and HR 5120 or HR 5400, which dealt with job opportunities for new veterans. Of these four priorities for Iraq and Afghan war veterans, Heller co-sponsored none.
The situation in the Nevada congressional delegation, in which Democrats have better records of support for veterans than Republicans, was common in most delegations and generally. During the 2008 presidential election between John McCain and Barack Obama, when Disabled American Veterans was still doing congressional report cards, we noted, “In 2006, Disabled American Veterans gave McCain a 20 percent rating. In 2006, Disabled American Veterans gave Obama an 80 percent rating. … In 2006 Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America gave Senator McCain a grade of D. In 2006 Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America gave Senator Obama a grade of B-plus.” (“McCain and veterans,” RN&R Newsview blog, Sept. 26, 2008).
In that article, we also gave the following 2006 IAVA rankings for
Nevada’s congressional delegation: John Ensign (R) D-minus, Jim Gibbons (R) C-plus, Jon Porter (R) C-plus, Harry Reid (D) A-minus, Shelley Berkley (D) A-minus.
This partisan distinction in veterans issues also complicates Heller’s efforts to portray himself in his reelection campaign as better able to help veterans. While Heller is co-chair of a bipartisan Senate VA backlog working group, that panel was made bipartisan because the Veterans Affairs backlog scandal made the issues so politically sensitive. Heller may be able to function productively within its confines, but in the rest of Congress, committees are not bipartisan, and neither is the full house. His ability to move his fellow Republicans on veterans’ issues, given their unfavorable voting records, may be very limited.
In addition, there has recently been criticism of the portrayal by members of Congress of federal veterans’ medical facilities as poor—by Heller, among others— when in fact, it is normally ranked well in professional studies. An article in the current Washington Monthly reports that politicians and journalists have repeatedly said the Department of Veterans Affairs “was, as the New York Times put it, ‘one of the largest, most complex and troubled cabinet agencies in the federal government.’ Other outlets described it as ‘scandal ridden’ and subject to ‘scathing reports’ of dangerously long wait times and substandard care.” But the Monthly reported that the nonprofit research group RAND Corporation “found that the quality of VA care was generally better than private health care. [This was] just the latest of scores of studies that have come to the same conclusion for nearly two decades now. ... [S]tudies like the RAND report are virtually ignored by the press. This isn’t just a Fox News problem. Consumers of neutral and even left-leaning news sources are largely unaware of the many studies
A 2010 showing the general excellence of America’s largest integrated veterans health care system, and the report does not favor Dean country’s only true example of socialized medicine. As the U.S. continues to debate what to do
Heller. about its unsustainable health care system—and as conservatives continue to push for ‘free market’ solutions, including privatizing the VA itself—the fact that a government-owned and -operated system is outperforming the private sector should be a major story. If VA care is as good or better than the alternative, how would pushing vets into private-sector care make them better off? But that question rarely gets asked, because too many people are unaware that the premise guiding these policies—that the private sector inevitably outperforms government—is false.” Ω
Commemoration
Standing before a portrait of her late husband, Dale Raggio chats with University of Nevada officials at the unveiling of a permanent display in the Raggio Building on the Reno campus. The display features photos and memorabilia about William Raggio, who served as district attorney and senator from Washoe County. His tenure included service as president of the National District Attorneys Association and decades as Republican leader of the Nevada Senate.
art classes camps events/exhibits lake mansion rentals
thursday, august 16, 6 pM - 9 pM paint & Sip with rené Magritte
Receive one-on-one creative guidance to paint your own 16” x 20” canvas masterpiece in a fun, social setting. This class is perfect for all artistic levels. Feel free to bring a snack and beverage. Students (ages 8+) will be painting Magritte’s “The Son of a Man”. $30. Register at artsforallnevada.org for this class and more!
Sunday, September 16, 1 pM SepteMber tea, SociaL, and tour
Guests will enjoy an elegant afternoon featuring finger sandwiches, tea and sweet treats. $30 per guest, limited to 40 guests, tickets online at artsforallnevada.org
rent the historic Lake Mansion or adjacent encLoSed paviLion and courtyard
“Reno’s First Address”, a unique and memorable venue for your 2018 or 2019 special event or meeting. Arts for All Nevada also hosts art birthday parties and Paint & Sips.
a non-profit charity founded in 1986
The Lake Mansion | 250 Court Street at Arlington Avenue, Reno
08.09.18 | RN&R | 9
