9 minute read

News

Next Article
Art of the State

Art of the State

Hawk spot

Associated Builders and Contractors television commercial supporting Joe Heck for U.S. Senate: “Heck voted for local control of Ne-vaw-da lands.”

Advertisement

times lauds states

Last week a New York Times editorial praised Nevada and other states that are using their clout to challenge federal marijuana prohibition policies:

“The drive to end prohibition comes after decades in which marijuana laws led to millions of people being arrested and tens of thousands sent to prison, a vast majority of whom never committed any violent crimes. These policies have had a particularly devastating effect on minority communities. Federal and state governments have spent untold billions of dollars on enforcement, money that could have been much better spent on mental health and substance abuse treatment. … States are driving the change in marijuana policy because they see the damage created by draconian drug laws on communities, families and state budgets. It’s time the federal government acknowledged these costs and got out of the way of states adopting more rational laws.”

Nevada anti-marijuana leader Pat Hickey responded, “The New York Times writer surely knows that marijuana legalization has not reduced racial disparities in drug arrests in Colorado, especially among Latino and African-American youth. It’s true that public monies would be better spent on mental health and substance abuse treatments, as opposed to more incarcerations. The problem with this poorly written initiative (Question 2), is that it does not earmark one penny of anticipated tax revenue to the establishment of a public health network needed to restrict youth access. Rationality would dictate that serious public policy decisions—such as recreational and commercial drug policy, criminal justice reform, and needed funding for education—would be better done in the open forum of the Nevada Legislature, with every interested party, and the public, engaged in the committee room.”

pot tale of tHe week

All during this campaign, prohibitionists have held Colorado’s legal, regulated market up as a bad example, often with false statistics and information that doesn’t check out with Colorado officials.

Many of them claim that Colorado’s governor and Denver’s mayor oppose the marijuana market in their state. For instance, in a June 22 Reno Gazette-Journal essay and a July 12 letter to the editor of the Elko Free Press, Genoa prohibitionist Jim Hartman said, “Democrats like Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper and Denver Mayor Michael Hancock” opposed regulated marijuana when it was on the ballot in Colorado.

That much was true but was incomplete. What he neglected to mention was that the views of both officials have evolved.

In May, Hickenlooper said if he could wave a magic wand and make regulated marijuana go away, “I don’t know if I would wave it. It’s beginning to look like it might work.”

And Mayor Hancock, while reserving final judgment on whether the original ballot measure was a good idea, last year told Inc. Magazine, “I am very proud of the industry that came to the table and went to work. The industry has investors and businessmen and women who are very legit. They’re putting their hard-earned money, many retirements and investments on the line for this industry.” —Dennis Myers

U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders campaigned for Hillary Clinton on the UNR campus last week.

PHOTO/KRISTIN MITRA

Delicate dance

Sanders backers not guaranteed to Clinton

since the democratic National Convention nominated Hillary Clinton for president, the Nevada supporters of Bernie Sanders have nursed their wounds, and many have stayed involved in activism. Some of those involved in the Bernie Sanders organization are now working for Clinton’s campaign.

Some of them have helped Black Lives Matter. Some even picketed President Obama’s Aug. 31 appearance at Lake Tahoe over his posture on the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP). They protested corporate welfare for Sheldon Adelson and the Oakland Raiders at the Nevada Legislature. They participated in the anti-Columbus Day protest in Reno.

“We have a lot of Sanders supporters here, from Carson City all the way down to Sacramento, and San Francisco has got a busload coming,” said Michelle Hartt at that protest. “It is a continuation, partly, of Bernie.”

Their issues often overlap with conservative issues, which is not unusual, as when liberals and conservatives battled the Oakland Raiders stadium subsidy. In the case of the TPP, both left and right worry about trade agreements overriding U.S. courts.

“It’ll give 12 countries power over America in making decisions, where corporations around the world can sue us,” Hartt said.

There are few states where the tension between Sanders supporters and the party regulars is as pronounced as Nevada, where Democratic officials muddied the reputation of the Sanders campaign by claiming chair-throwing and death threats were made by Sanders delegates at the Nevada Democratic Convention in May (“The riot that never was,” RN&R, May 26). But the regulars are likely to have to deal with the Sanders people for a long time to come. Hundreds of Sanders supporters across the country have run for office this year. At least 11 people who either worked for Sanders or endorsed him in Nevada ran for office.

Two U.S. House candidates—Lucy Flores and Rick Shepherd—lost their primaries. Six Democrats survived the primary and three Sanders-supporting independents running for various offices will also be on the general election ballot.

Shepherd says he’s not overly concerned about getting along with the party organization. The party, he said, is there to serve the people, not the other way around. “I don’t consider myself to be aligned with a particular party as much as I consider myself aligned with people and working to address problems,” he said. “If the party that I’m aligned with works with me on that behalf, then that’s great. If they don’t, that’s their fault and their failing.”

For Carol Cizauskas, a Sanders organizer who was a Nevada delegate to the Democratic National Convention, John Kennedy had it right when he said, “Sometimes party loyalty asks too much.”

A “Bernie or Buster,” she was turned off by the promotion of militarism by Clinton’s organization at the Philadelphia convention, and when she arrived back in Reno she learned the local chapter of Progressive Democrats of America had circulated a flyer saying she had registered Green, which was untrue. She had been doing some work for PDA locally but felt that the Reno group was not a reflection of PDA national, which she had worked with in Sanders’ campaign. “PDA nationally was one of the main groups that convinced Bernie to run,” she said. “The Reno group is more conservative than PDA national, which is truly progressive where PDA Reno seems just another arm of the Washoe Democrats, not progressive at all.”

She helped organize several events, including a Black Lives Matter protest in Tahoe City, picketing of the Washoe Democratic headquarters, and a protest at a Hillary Clinton visit. She is now resting up from what she calls PTSD caused by “verbal violence perpetrated on us by the Nevada Democratic organization and the national Hillary organization at the [national] convention.” She finally did switch to the Green Party but said she and her husband may leave the state and hope to switch back to the Democrats in a state where it is less hostile to reformers.

Free to be

In some ways, the implosion of Trump’s candidacy has hurt Clinton with the Sanders loyalists. They no longer feel their votes are needed to defeat Trump, so they are free agents. Moreover, they have been doing a slow burn on the most recent Wikileaks emails released.

Earlier this year, leaked emails indicated that Sanders campaign complaints about favoritism toward Clinton by party officials who are supposed to remain neutral were valid.

In emails released in October, Clinton was quoted lauding a plan that would call for Social Security cuts and praised international trade with no restrictions. In addition, an eight-yearold message from a Citicorp executive proposing several cabinet officers—some of whom were, in fact, appointed by President Obama— has raised the hackles of Sanders supporters. This is exactly the kind of coziness with Wall Street that fueled the Sanders campaign.

In fact, it has been more than just the rank and file volunteers who are concerned about the next Clinton cabinet. Prominent figures like Robert Reich and Elizabeth Warren have made it clear they want to make sure that such a thing does not happen again, and they will be ready after the election to police who gets appointed. Warren, who says “personnel is policy,” and senators like Sherrod Brown, Jeff Merkley and—if he is elected—Russ Feingold are expected to be at the forefront of an effort to scrutinize Clinton appointees.

“When we talk about personnel, we don’t mean advisers who just pay lip service to Hillary’s bold agenda, coupled with a sigh, a knowing glance, and a twiddling of thumbs until it’s time for the next swing through the revolving door—serving government, then going back to the very same industries they regulate,” Warren said at a Center for American Progress Action Fund event. “We don’t mean Citigroup or Morgan Stanley or BlackRock getting to choose who runs the economy in this country so they can capture our government. No. This is about people who understand the urgency of the need for rebuilding opportunity in America now and will fight for it with everything they’ve got.”

Even Sanders himself has spoken up: “Hillary Clinton is sincere in a number of areas,” he told the New Republic. “In other areas, I think she is gonna have to be pushed, and that’s fine. That’s called the democratic process.”

If any Clinton appointments prompt battles, the Sanders grass roots could be brought into play.

Moreover, the Clintons’ well-known proclivity for revenge has rubbed the Sanders supporters the wrong way. One of the leaked emails indicates that after U.S. Rep. Tulsi Gabbard endorsed Sanders, she then received a message from former Clinton Foundation official and political fundraiser Darnell Strom telling her he would no longer “be raising money for your campaign.” Ω

Stealing candy

RENDEZVOUS

WITH THE

STARRING PETE STORM

OCTOBER 27 – 29

The story of one man's tribute to the King of Rock N' Roll and how it changed his life! For show tickets, visit our box office, call 855-CEI-SHOW or book online at Ticketmaster.com

By attending this event, you consent to be included in any and all media relative to your likeness, in production of this show.

Prohibitionists may be defending existing marijuana law, but they’re less careful of other laws. The Hershey Co. in Pennsylvania says it did not authorize use of its Kit Kat and Reese’s products in Nevada’s Question Two campaign. This image is of a mailing sent out by the “Protecting Nevada’s Children Political Action Committee” in Las Vegas. Hershey spokesperson Anna Lingeris told us, “We did not give permission to alter our famous product packaging. In fact, this is actually an infringement on our trademarks and famous trade dress.” Kellogg’s also told us that a “Pot Tarts” image is similarly “unauthorized.”

Visit the Box Office for show age restrictions. Entertainment subject to change without prior notice. Must be 21 or older to gamble. Know When To Stop Before You Start.® Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-522-4700. ©2016, Caesars License Company, LLC.

This article is from: