Combating desensitization: Humans behind headlines

By Lilian Hakimi

In the U.S., 93 percent of adults get some form of news online. We live in a day and age where news is more accessible than ever. With one click of our phones we are exposed to events from all around the world instantly. Having so much information at our immediate convenience results in news being consumed at a higher and faster rate than ever before. Unfortunately, continuous and rapid coverage also exposes us to constant violence, creating a cycle where events can not be fully internalized and processed before we are informed of the next tragedy. This pattern is not conducive to building lasting societal empathy. The global rise in violence along with mass media consumption has resulted in desensitization, causing us to become emotionally indifferent to the struggles of others.

In an article published by the American Psychological Association, Dr. Jurell Riley, a psychiatric nurse practitioner, compares desensitization to trauma and calluses.

“Think about it like this, [when] we work with our hands a lot, we develop these calluses, and it helps you become desensitized and numb. It’s the same thing with your mind. We keep re-experiencing these traumatic situations, these shootings, and we’re building these calluses on our mind,” Riley said.

The problem with desensitization is that it normalizes crises, so what was once shocking is now ordinary. Within the first three weeks of January 2023, America had already seen 40 mass shootings. have had in the year. While each event is equally horrific, having to process 40 shootings in less than a month significantly lowers the emotional impact, especially for those not directly affected.

Desensitization is a natural response to traumatic events, in fact, it is a biological defense mechanism to adapt to trauma by not fully internalizing events. Dr. Bruce Harry, an associate professor of Clinical Psychiatry and Forensic Psychiatry at the University of Missouri, says that

Psychological Association, which reported a rise in stress levels related to personal safety. When asked about what adds stress to their lives over the past decade, 31 percent of Americans said mass shootings and gun people in our country would ever have to contend with. If only that were true,” Nason said.

If this cycle continues, we will paralyze any advancement in gun reform; once we become apathetic towards violence, the need for change will not be recognized.

How can we combat desensitization while practicing empathy? We can start by setting boundaries, particularly by limiting our intake of violent media to avoid compassion fatigue. We can build meaningful relationships and reach out to others to talk about a tragedy and process them completely. More specifically, we must practice emotional endurance and acknowledge the humanity behind these events and headlines. When you find yourself unable to have an empathetic response to a tragedy, try adopting a “think small” mindset and read individual stories to first build empathy with a single person.

POLICY: All editorials are unsigned and have been approved by the majority of the Bark staff.

Marin’s hypocrisy in fighting low-income housing

Marin’s socially progressive nature appears everywhere. It’s in the environmentally-conscious surcharges for plastic bags, the Pride flags waving above schools and storefronts, the teachings of social justice-oriented curriculum and its blue voting record. However, its democratic lean stops short of low-income housing.

Neighbors of planned low-income developments, which include units designated for households with an income approximately 50 percent of the county’s median income or $93,200, often spearhead the resistance.

Community-led efforts in Belvedere branded the partially low-income Mallard Pointe housing development “Bad for Belvedere.” In Mill Valley, residents belonging to the “Save Hauke Park” organization have waged a three-year long campaign against the construction of affordable housing units nearby.

These grassroots efforts are not the only challenge to low-income housing. Legislative obstacles, including State Senate Bill No. 106 from 2017, which exempted Marin from statewide housing quotas, have delayed the creation of affordable housing.

Since 1970, Marin’s population has expanded four times slower than California’s — by design. Through the ballot box, Marin voters have repeatedly defeated measures to increase the county’s long-term water supply, weaponizing a human need to deter future development. This culminated in the Marin Municipal Water District’s 2021 consideration of banning new water hookups, which would have effectively halted any low-income housing construction.

This resistance, whether systematic or community-led, falls under the “Not In My Backyard” mentality, or NIMBY. As financial advisor Dave Shore stated in a previous Bark article, “Everybody wants more low-income housing in someone else’s neighborhood.”

Frequently citing the risk of environmental damages, lowered property values and increased strain on public infrastructure, NIMBY proponents raise legitimate concerns around affordable housing but seldom acknowledge the available solutions and the impacted communities.

Environmental issues can be mitigated with high-density redevelopment, which in turn, according to a 2022 University of California Los Angeles study, benefits sustainability through reduced commutes and emissions.

Considering concerns over property values, a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill report concluded that, “Despite public perceptions of affordable housing negatively impacting nearby property values, there is evidence to suggest that the impact is minimal if at all.”

The worries surrounding infrastructure and resource strain are the most valid argument of NIMBY-ism. Yet, they neglect the reality that anti-development attitudes shift the burden of providing low-income housing to communities with less of a voice and often fewer resources.

According to Texas Southern University professor Robert Bullard, “The effect of NIMBY victories appears to have driven the unwanted facilities toward the more vulnerable groups. Black neighborhoods are especially vulnerable to the penetration of unwanted land uses — NIMBYism, like racism, creates and perpetuates privileges for [white people] at the expense of people of color.”

A BARK to all the singles on Feb. 14. You’ll always have Team Snapchat to wish you a Happy Valentine’s Day!

A BITE to Tom Brady retiring on the same day he did last year; is this a new annual tradition?

A BARK to the prom location. Wait ... I thought that was a furniture store.

A BITE to the CSU rounds of decisions. We’re tired of keeping up with all these dates and not hearing back! Where’s our (Cal)polygy?

This occurs in Marin as the lowest income, most densely populated and racially diverse community in the county, Marin City, contains the highest concentrations of low-income housing, with new developments planned. While the ongoing construction of affordable housing in Marin City fulfills the county’s state mandated quotas, it also distances wealthier residents from affordable housing.

Consequently, Marin City must deal with the legitimate burdens of providing low-income housing as it strains under-funded public resources.

Not only does the discriminatory construction of affordable housing risk damaging diverse communities and evade the responsibility of wealthier ones, but it also hurts those who work in them. For hourly wage earners, with Marin’s rent costs tied for the most expensive in the U.S., the prospect of living close to their workplaces is often impossible.

Even for Marin teachers and other school employees, these prices exclude nearly 43 percent from renting an average studio apartment where they work. While the obvious remedy is expanded local affordable housing, NIMBY-ism ignores this.

Beyond helping those who teach in Marin, lowincome housing also benefits students. A 2019 review of classroom integration concluded that greater socioeconomic diversity “can help reduce bias and counter stereotypes” and “promote more equitable access to resources.” This translates to lowincome students benefiting from learning in Marin’s classrooms while their peers simultaneously gain access to new perspectives.

Marin has the ability to promote this with lowincome housing, while also helping teachers and others who work in the county. However, efforts to redirect this affordable housing elsewhere defeat its purpose.

If Marin residents truly support social welfare programs as the liberals most claim to be, then they must genuinely support affordable housing. And while the addition of any new housing poses inherent challenges, these should not push residents away from supporting ethical developments — least of all should they motivate current residents to force housing upon other communities.

Have an opinion regarding anything that appears in the Bark or in general? We encourage our readers to submit letters to the editor. Letters to the Bark should be 500 words or fewer, typed if possible and signed. They may also be emailed to bark@redwoodbark.org.

A BARK to Congress using Taylor Swift’s lyrics in the Ticketmaster trial. You know us “All Too Well” (“Senator’s Version”).

A BITE to everyone wearing UGGs. Ughhhh.

A BARK to Redwood Mock Trial for beating Tam in round one. Not guilty!

A BITE to freshmen and sophomores organizing their own prom. Have fun at your middle school dance!

A BARK to ChatGPT. Guess

Redwood High School

395 Doherty Drive

Larkspur, CA 94939 www.redwoodbark.org

Editors-in-ChiEf

Chloe Bishop

Kelly Chuang

Sam Kimball

Shyla Lensing hEad Copy Editors

Rori Anderson

Dani Steinberg

Copy Editors

Sawyer Barta

Elsa Block

Alexandrea Coe

Ella Erwig

Charlotte Fishburne

Mia Ginsburg

Hannah Herbst

Ella Kharrazi

Lily Reese

Anna Royal

Sofia Ruliffson

Maya Winger opinion Editors

Ava Razavi

Aanika Sawhney fEaturE Editors

Coco Boyden

Matthew Marotto

LifEstyLEs Editors

Claire Silva

Mayson Weingart sports Editors

Stella Bennett

Isabella Wagner sports Editor-on-CaLL

Jordan Kimball nEws Editors

Erica Block

Kate DeForrest nEws Editor-on-CaLL

Ben Choucroun rEviEw Editors

Emily Block

Sydney Johnson vidEo Editor

Will Parsons podCast Editor

Caitlin Beard

BusinEss ManagErs

Gil Ladetzky

Sam Sumski

Wyatt Turkington soCiaL MEdia ManagErs

Cameryn Smith

Natalie Welch data anaLyst

Bowen Rivera wEB dEsignErs

Aidan Carney-Skytt

Harrison Lapic staff iLLustrators

Julia Frankus

Carsen Goltz

Calla McBride

MuLtiMEdia dEsignEr

Sarah Goody staff photographErs

Lauren Poulin

Cole Seifer who wrote this? sEnior staff writErs

A BITE to opening early college decisions. We don’t see any confetti...

A BARK to Shakira’s detective skills. Piqué is really going to be in a jam after this one.

A BITE to Phoebe Bridgers taking “Waiting Room” off of Spotify. How is this for the better?

BARKS and BITES are the collective opinions of the BARK staff concerning relevant issues. BARKS are in praise of accomplishments, while BITES criticize decisions or events.

Sophia Buckholtz

Gemma Favaloro

Justine Fisch

Ingrid Houtkooper

Sabrina Kizer

Gillian Reynolds

Maddie Sofnas

Ani Svendsen rEportErs

Arjun Aujla

Ava Carlson

Emilie Erickson

Pasha Fooman

Grace Gehrman

Lili Hakimi

Andie Johnston

Gabriella Rouas

Michael Seton

Kyler Wang advisEr

Erin Schneider