UDIA NSW CEO Steve Mann reviews the NSW property market

By Isabelle Harris

New South Wales is no exception – sales settlements continue to track strongly, with significant year-on-year growth being recorded throughout 2021.

PEXA’s Senior Research Manager Mike Gill spoke to Urban Development Institute of Australia – NSW CEO Steve Mann at the recent PropertyX Connect event in Sydney to answer industry’s burning questions on current market performance, trends, and what we can expect to see in NSW over the coming months.

Steve: It’s definitely an exciting market in New South Wales right now. We’re seeing a lot of growth – in Sydney, this is likely largely because of record low interest rates and pent up demand, especially post COVID. It’s also been driven by first home buyers utilising Government incentives. This segment needed to come back as they’ve been out of the market for some time, in part due to rising actual prices and property affordability.

On the other hand, the media has reported that housing finance has gone through the roof, but I wouldn’t be so sure. When we look at the annual change it has gone up, but when you look at the change from the peak, most of the markets in Sydney and key regional markets in NSW, they haven’t hit the peak we saw in 2018 despite strong rebounds from the pandemic.

Steve: My view is that if we don’t act quickly and stimulate supply, we are going to have a deep housing affordability crisis. If we think about it, when do markets have strong prices? When supply doesn’t meet demand. For example, apartment completions are down 26% from the peak and approvals are down 64%, so there’s less apartments coming on the market.

This indicates we’re heading for a crisis which means we could have at minimum a 50% reduction in apartment supply, with the potential flow on effect of jobs being at risk. There’s certainly plenty of demand, but just not enough new supply coming online.

Steve: The Treasurer’s Property Tax reform proposal is to move away from Stamp Duty in NSW and provide an annual tax option. UDIA believes this reform would be broadly positive for the housing market, particularly apartments as it is based on the unimproved land value. For an owner occupier, the cross over period to choose Property Tax versus stamp duty for a house is about 11 years and for an apartment is about 33 years.

It will help with mobility for homeowners in the long run, where each lot will be given one choice to adopt Property Tax or not. However, there are a lot of other unintended consequences which need to be though through what will be a 20-30 year transition and it comes at a big price tag $11bn so it is far from a sure bet at this stage. The Treasurer wants the federal government to buy into it, but on the other hand we have Victoria who have just halved their stamp duty and they’re racing ahead of NSW in new land sales.

Looking back, I would’ve liked NSW to do a 50% stamp duty discount to start off with, but I think we still jumped into this proposed major reform too close to COVID-19. The decision on whether it will proceed should become clearer next month in the NSW budget.

Steve: What we should be looking at here instead is the conversation between APRA (Australian Prudential Regulation Authority) and RBA (Reserve Bank of Australia) – there’s an interesting debate there. The question is whose mandate says they need to think about housing prices? They’re both saying neither. Now the RBA governor is holding interest rates low until 2024, as he wants to wait for unemployment to improve and wages to increase.

However, the longer this standoff around who’ll measure house prices and ongoing supply issues, the longer prices will continue to go up. It’s something that really comes into the debate around moderating the housing market and we would be better off with smoother market growth across all stakeholders.