Aeropolis- Airport City, Mysore

SPA-M

SPA-M

Acknowledgements The past semester has been an extremely rewarding one in terms of learning and growing architecturally. It was also a very challenging period, what with the pandemic and the challenges that came with studying from home, but the college and the faculty have been extremely supportive during these trying times.

We would like to thank them for their patience and persistence with us during online discussions and reviews, but more importantly their commitment to help us in spite of our inability to attend college.

We would especially like to thank Asst. Prof.

Srikanth K S (Class Co-Ordinator), Prof. Pramod M G (M.Arch Co-Ordinator), Director Prof. Dr. Chidambaraswamy sir and Ar. Naveen Mahantesh for all their guidance and help in completing this project.

SPA-M

SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

A SHWETHASHREE | PRIYANKA V KHADI | SHASHANK P S

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

A FUTURE READY AIRPORT CENTRIC INTEGRATED TOWNSHIP

SPA-M

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

SPA-M

Mysore is one of the progressive Tier 2 cities of India where development is happening rapidly. According to a number of surveys being released by professional organizations across the country. Mysore regularly features in top 10 best cities to live in India. Shedding its image as a languid city renowned for being a pensioners paradise, the city has tripled its population over the past two decades. Mysore's proximity to the IT capital of India(Bangalore) has resulted in some of the latter's glow rubbing off on it.

The other factors that have gone in favor of Mysore are the absence of oppressive traffic snarls, high quality of life at an affordable rate and near zero pollution. The city enjoys a status of a garden city and has a number of large parks, green features and lakes within the historic core as well as around the areas developed in the mid-80's. While CO2 of the city currently has manageable emissions at 0.94 tons/capita, the situation could be impacted if the city responds to the major developments haphazardly without a systematic and carbon critical approach towards the new development.

Mysore Urban Development Authority(MUDA) is one of the largest supplier of infrastructure ready plots in Mysore. A number of such projects are designed in the past, and many more around the periphery are being implemented.

MUDA identifies a site for development and plans and implements the infrastructure ready plotted neighborhoods like Vijay Nagar, R T Nagar etc.,.

SPA-M

“Aerotropolis occupies a very particular interstitial place outside the city that is both sprawling and super-secure, high-tech and suburban, a virtual police state and yet also a curiously open public space” SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Chapter 2 – Introduction to site 2.1 Contextual study of growth of Mysore city 2.2 Delineation of site boundary and site area 2.3 Proximity and regional context 2.4 Site features and SWOT Analysis 2.5 Imageability 2.6 Land use 2.7 Airport development control regulations

19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Chapter 3 – Site analysis 3.1 Morphology 3.2 Land use and land cover 3.3 Mobility and transit 3.4 Hydrology 3.5 Blue and Green network 3.6 Economy and Commerce 3.7 Public Infrastructure 3.8 Site as layers

29 31 32 34 35 36 37 38

Chapter 4 – Design development 4.1 Edges as Delineators 4.2 Design geometry 4.3 Masterplan 1.0 4.4 Masterplan 2.0 4.5 Masterplan 3.0 4.6 Masterplan development process 4.7 Masterplan comparison

41 42 43 44 45 46 47

Chapter 5- Bye laws and Regulations 5.1 DCR Zones 5.2 Land use categories 5.3 Permitted land uses 5.4 Developmental control regulations 5.5 FAR Zones 5.6 Building height limits 5.7 Street design guidelines SPA-M 5.8 Street typologies and design factors 5.9 Design factors vs street typologies 5.10 Parking guidelines 5.11 Street elements guidelines 5.12 Public space guidelines

53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64

Chapter 6 – layers and Urban design moments 6.1 Land use 6.2 Sectors 6.3 UD Moment - Block design 6.4 Gateways and Corridors 6.5 UD Moment – Activated Urban Voids 6.6 Streets 6.7 UD Moment – Boulevards 6.8 Urban and Commercial centres 6.9 UD Moment – Plaza in commercial core 6.10 Green spaces 6.11 UD Moment – Stream green buffers 6.12 Mobility modes and Routes 6.13 Alternate Mobility modes and routes

SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

75 78 79 81 82 87 90 91 92 93 95 98 99

CONTENTS

DETAILS AND CONTENTS

Chapter 1 –Comparative case studies 1.1 City introduction – Memphis and Irving 1.2 Location w.r.t the city 1.3 Concepts and thrust areas 1.4 City w.r.t the Airport 1.5 Gateways and Corridors 1.6 Land use 1.7 Urban centers 1.8 Commercial centers 1.9 Transit modes and Paths 1.10 Alternate Transit modes and Paths 1.11 Green Infrastructure 1.12 Public Infrastructure 1.13 Important Takeaways 1.14 Sector Comparison – Chandigarh, Gandhinagar and Naya Raipur

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

SPA-M

SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIES

SPA-M

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

SPA-M

MEMPHIS AIRPORT CITY

CITY OF IRVING

SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

CITY IINTRODUCTION

CITY OF IRVING COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED

MEMPHIS AIRPORT CITY

SPA-M

Irving is a principal city in the U.S. state of Texas. Located in Dallas County, it is also an inner ring suburb of Dallas. The city of Irving is part of the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex. The city’s proximity to Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) International Airport ties Irving to the world’s major commercial centers, and makes it very attractive to international businesses and investors.

SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

PAGE 03

Located at the nexus of population and transportation in the U.S., the Memphis region boasts distinct geographical advantages that support aerotropolis development. These advantages are highlighted by a leading air cargo hub capable of reaching a global market, as well as a central position along the nation’s inland waterway system, and its highway and rail networks.

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

LOCATION W.R.T THE CITY

CITY OF IRVING

COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED

MEMPHIS AIRPORT CITY

SPA-M

The planning area is comprised of an approximately 50 square mile target zone surrounding MEM. Commonly referred to as “Airport City,” this is the core of Memphis Aerotropolis and the desired focus of aviation-related enterprises.

The airport is situated in the southern portion of the city and is abutted by the city on the east, north and the west.

Irving’s location at the center of the DallasFort Worth Metroplex and adjacent to the DFW Airport is one of the city’s greatest assets. Irving is surrounded by adjacent jurisdictions, with little or no area left to expand its physical boundary. The city borders the DFW Airport, and the cities of Dallas, Grand Prairie, Fort Worth, Farmers Branch, Carrollton, and Coppell.

PAGE 04

The airport is situated to the western portion of the city and is abutted by the city on the North west.

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

COMMUNITY

CONNECTIONS

CONCEPTS AND THRUST AREAS COMPETITIVENESS

CENTERS

COLLABARATION

CITY OF IRVING

CONNECTIONS

THRUST AREAS SAFETY AND SECURITY

NEIGHBORHOOD LIVABILITY

WORKFORCE EDUCATION AND TRAINING

MOBILITY CORRIDORS OPEN SPACE LINKAGES

REINFORCE AND MARKET BRAND

BUSINESS NICHES AND SUPPLY CHAINS COMMERCIAL REDEVEOPMENT

CORRIDORS THRUST AREAS

The vision is to create regional jobs through the sustained economic and community development of Airport City. It recommends investment in liveable neighbourhoods, efficient infrastructure, targeted redevelopment, and a lead organizational entity. The hallmarks of success are the Four “C’s”: Community, Connection, Competitiveness, and Collaboration.

Our vision for Irving is a city with…

1. Centres, Corridors and Connections 2. A Focus on International Development 3. High-Quality Places to Live, Work and Play 4. Nature and Sustainability Are Integrated into All Areas of Life 5. A Strong Foundation of Health and Education 6. Opportunities for Future Generations to Thrive 7. A Robust, Innovative Business Environment 8. Diverse Cultures to Celebrate and Build On

In total, ten development principles are structured to achieve the four hallmarks of success – community, connections, competitiveness, and collaboration, and most of all, the vision of jobs for Memphians. These principles take into account a realistic assessment of existing conditions, an SPA-M analysis of development opportunities and constraints, and a full appreciation of local and regional assets. Most importantly, they are derived from extensive stakeholder and community input.

COMMUNITY

TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE

HOUSING

COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED

MEMPHIS AIRPORT CITY

EQUITY AND OPPORTUNITY

ENVIRONMENT, OPEN SPACES AND PARKS

ECONOMY

GREEN ECONOMY

SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

PAGE 05

ORGANISATIONAL EFFICIENCY

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

CITY W.R.T THE AIRPORT

CITY OF IRVING

COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED

MEMPHIS AIRPORT CITY

SPA-M

PAGE 06

The airport is situated in the heart of the Airport city signifying increased interaction between the two entities

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

The airport is situated in on the outer edge of the city signifying interaction limited to the western edge of the city

SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

GATEWAYS AND CORRIDORS

CITY OF IRVING COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED

MEMPHIS AIRPORT CITY

Like in most American cities, the streets are aligned with the cardinal directions except when in conflict with natural features.

SPA-M Both cities use the ideas of controlled access through use of gateways and dedicated corridors.

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

PAGE 07

SPA-M

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

LAND USE

COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED

MEMPHIS AIRPORT CITY

CITY OF IRVING

Land Use

Parks and Flood plain 4%

Water 3%

Vacant 28%

Infrastructur e 27%

Industrial 4% Institution al 3% Commercial

9%

Single family residential

17% Multi family residential

5%

SPA-M

PAGE 08

In terms of land use. Both cities follow similar concepts of locating commercial and institutional areas towards nodes. While residential is relegated away from High traffic streets.

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

URBAN CENTERS

CITY OF IRVING COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED

MEMPHIS AIRPORT CITY

SPA-M

The main Urban centers are located at the intersection of important streets or modes of transport. Bellying the relationship between land use and transit.

While in Memphis, the important urban corridors are bifurcated by the airport, In Irving SPA-M it becomes beneficial that the airport is outside the main mass of the city.

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

PAGE 09

Examples of Urban centers from Memphis and Irving. While in Memphis it is dense and linear in nature, owing to the importance given to the road network, In Irving the pattern is more suburban in nature and spread out.

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

COMMERCIAL CENTERS

CITY OF IRVING

COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED

MEMPHIS AIRPORT CITY

SPA-M

PAGE 10

Both cities follow a typology based classification of commercial areas with different areas catering to specific sectors.

Proximity of certain sectors to the Airport becomes an important design consideration.

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

TRANSIT MODES AND PATHS

CITY OF IRVING COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED

MEMPHIS AIRPORT CITY

The road pattern in Irving has a more pronounced suburban nature, while in Memphis it’s predominantly Grid Iron.

The transit networks in both cities make use of multiple modes and paths enabling utmost coverage in terms of last mile connectivity.

Irving has an increased level of proliferation in terms of Rail transit compared to Memphis.

The anchor points for transit in both cities is none SPA-M the less the Airport.

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

PAGE 11

SPA-M

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

ALTERNATIVE TRANSIT MODES AND PATHS

CITY OF IRVING

COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED

MEMPHIS AIRPORT CITY

SPA-M

PAGE 12

Both cities have plans of expanding their bicycle route networks.

While in Irving, trail paths are predominantly only in Greenspaces, In Memphis they permeate throughout the city connecting different parts of the city with each other.

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE

CITY OF IRVING COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED

MEMPHIS AIRPORT CITY

SPA-M

SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

PAGE 13

Both cities have a stream network functioning as a border while also doubling as a Green corridor.

Irving has a lesser percentage of Public open spaces when compared to Private open spaces and this might be due to it’s suburban nature.

Memphis has a better network of green spaces which function as a connector or corridor as the city does not have any private gated communities within. It also has a larger percentage of conservation area in comparison with Irving.

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE

CITY OF IRVING

COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED

MEMPHIS AIRPORT CITY

PAGE 14

SPA-M

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

The public infrastructure in Memphis is spread out evenly, while it is concentrated towards the south in Irving due to differences in population density.

Irving has a more pronounced variation between a downtown and suburbs within itself compared to Memphis which has mostly uniform density and character.

SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED

IMPORTANT TAKEAWAYS

SPA-M

In terms of physical planning, the combination of Grid Iron and organic street networks from Irving, but not the suburban land use model.

The use of Green corridor in conjunction with waterbodies to link different parts of the city, which could be seen in both cities.

The physical proximity between the Airport and the city needs to be Subtly disjointed in the sense that the city should try to have an identity of it’s own not in cognizance with the airport like in Irving.

4. Bicycle path networks can help reduce carbon emissions while also decongesting city streets.

5. The use of Rail transit for better and efficient connectivity as in the case of Irving.

6. Land use zoning based on traffic patterns, proximity to services and needs of residents.

7. Use of dedicated freight and movement corridors to help prevent flow of traffic into suburban areas.

8. Use of water based Urbanism where the public spaces are designed around water places like in the case of Irving.

9. Sectoral classification of commercial areas and zoning based on it’s need for proximity to the airport.

10. Situating Industrial areas in direct connection with the airport so as to increase efficiency.

SPA-M

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

PAGE 15

1.

2.

3.

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

NAYA RAIPUR

GANDHINAGAR

COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED

COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIED

CHANDIGARH

PAGE 16

•

Sector size - 800m x 1200 m determined by maximum 10 minute walking distance from facilities

•

Introvert planning with sealing walls along main roads so as not to be disturbed by the fast vehicular traffic outside

•

Emphasis on family life and community living Schools along green belts safe for children, dispensaries, shopping, community centers, centrally located in 10 minutes walk and bus stops on main road within walking distance.

•

Parks within 300m

•

Meandering profile of the V4/V5 to enable slow carriageways Comfortable vehicular and pedestrian access right to the doorstep of the house Inter-sectoral connectivity along NS green belts.

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

•

•

•

The Regular pattern of main roads divides the city into rectangular sectors measuring one kilometer by 0.75 kilometers with an area of 75 hectares (190 acres).

Each of these sectors will accommodate, on an average, a residential community of about 7000 persons with the necessary facilities like schools, shopping, playgrounds, parks, etc.

Larger open spaces and playgrounds are available and accessible to the people within walking distance. Major facilities like primary and secondary schools, shopping center, health and community center, etc. are grouped along this cycle-pedestrian way, making them easily accessible to all without having to cross main vehicular SPA-M roads.

•

Pedestrians trails connect the nodal shopping educational and health facilities in the neighborhood.

•

MEGA BLOCK GRID SYSTEM - 800m X 800m SECTORS (21 NOS)

•

Inside all the residential sectors, large and geometrically irregular central open spaces are proposed to serve the neighborhood and connect them to the main entry points of the corresponding sector in 4 directions

•

An open space landscape system is proposed thus, with the formation of recreational green corridors within the neighborhood along drainage channels.

SECTOR COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY

PAGE 15

SPA-M

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

INTRODUCTION TO SITE

SPA-M

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

SPA-M

INTRODUCTION TO SITE

MYSURU Contextual study of growth of Mysore cityDelineation of site boundary and site areaProximity and regional contextSite features and SWOT AnalysisImageabilityLand useAirport development control regulations-

SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

DIRECTIONS OF GROWTH

INTRODUCTION TO SITE

EXTENT OF GROWTH

Mysuru city

Mysuru Nanjangud LPA boundary MYSORE IN 1990

MYSORE IN 1990

NH 766 connecting Mysore and Nanjangud

SPA-M MYSORE IN 2000

MYSORE IN 2010

OBSERVATIONS 1. Over the last 3 decades the city has grown in all directions except the south towards Nanjangud road 2. Main impetus pushing directional growth is the location of Highways / Corridors 3. Main factor for lack of growth towards the south is the presence of Varuna canal and large tracts of fertile agricultural lands

Aeropolis Mysore, midway between Mysuru and Nanjangud

MYSORE IN 2000

Nanjangud Town

MYSORE IN 2010

Kms MYSORE IN 2020

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

SPA-M

MYSORE IN 2020

CONTEXTUAL STUDY OF GROWTH OF MYSORE CITY

PAGE 19

LOCATION OF THE SELECTED SITE WITHIN THE LPA BOUNDARY OF MYSURU-NANJANGUD REGION

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

INTRODUCTION TO SITE

Aeropolis influence area Circle of diameter 10km Area – 7855 Hectares

Aeropolis site study area Perimeter – 28.5 km Area – 3500 Hectares

Mysore Airport Existing area – 178 hectares Proposed Area – 179 hectares Total – 358 hectares

SPA-M VARUNA CANAL NH 766

HADINARU ROAD

UDBUR ROAD

PAGE 20

VARUNA CANAL

SINDHUVALLI ROAD

STREAM

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

DEVALAPURA ROAD

SPA-M

VILLAGE ROADS

STREAMS

Stream network – 5.5 km long

Roads – 20.5 km long Varuna canal – 2.6 km long

DELINEATION OF SITE BOUNDARY AND SITE AREA A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

REGIONAL CONTEXT INTRODUCTION TO SITE

PROXIMITY

INFOSYS YELWALA COLUMBIA ASIA HINKAL

PALACE

BANNUR ROAD

TN PURA ROAD

H D KOTE ROAD

SPA-M DARIPURA KADAKOLA

THANDAVAPURA

Conurbation Area Rural Area

Site boundary Influence Area

NANJANGUD

SPA-M Kms

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

Kms

PAGE 21

Airport Area

PROXIMITY AND REGIONAL CONTEXT A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

INTRODUCTION TO SITE

STRENGTHS

WEAKNESS

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

1.

2.

3.

Presence of abundant undeveloped land for the Township Close Proximity to Airport Relatively flat topography Presence of many lakes and streams Close proximity to Physical infrastructure services such as STPs and Sub stations

Usage of Prime agricultural land for development Excessive building regulations due to Proximity to Airport Noise pollution from various Transportation modes

SPA-M

Site boundary Ring road NH 766 Varuna canal Railway line Water bodies Industrial area APMC Sewage Treatment plant SITE FEATURES

PAGE 22

OPPORTUNITIES 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Confluence of different modes of transit such as Rail, road and Air traffic Location at midway between Mysore and Nanjangud city Presence of several Industrial areas in close vicinity to the Site Passage of important transportation corridors Presence of picturesque natural surroundings will help in promoting tourism

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

THREATS 1.

2.

3.

SPA-M 4.

Increased traffic Congestion due to confluence of transit modes Creation of unregulated Urban villages which are chaotic and inequitable The Highway as a edge dividing the site into two separate parts Adverse impact on local ecology

SITE FEATURES AND SWOT ANALYSIS A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

SITE BOUNDARY

PATHS

EDGES

EDGES

LANDMARKS NODES DISTRICTS

RAILWAY TRACK AND VARUNA CANAL

MYSORE AIRPORT

INTRODUCTION TO SITE

DISTRCTS

PATHS

RING ROAD

KADAKOLA INDUSTRIAL AREA NH 766

SPA-M

NODES

APMC MARKET

LANDMARKS

BANDIPALYA CIRCLE

NANJANGUD TOLL GATE

SPA-M KADAKOLA TEMPLE

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

HD KOTE ROAD CIRCLE HOSAHUNDI ROAD CIRCLE

IMAGEABILIT Y

PAGE 23

KADAKOLA JUNCTION

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

INTRODUCTION TO SITE

RESIDENTIAL AREAS IN KUPPALUR

EXTENSION OF AIRPORT RESIDENTIAL AREAS IN HOASHUNDI AND LALITHADRIPURA

ENLARGEMENT OF SEWAGE PLANT AT RAYANAKERE

SPA-M

CONVENTION CENTER

EXISTING LAND USE

PROPOSED LAND USE 2031

PAGE 24

FILM CITY

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

SPA-M MAJOR CHANGES IN LAND USE

NEW RESIDENTIAL LAYOUTS

KADAKOLA INDUSTRIAL AREA

LAND USE A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

INTRODUCTION TO SITE

SECTION THROUGH AA’

APPROACH FUNNEL INNER HORIZONTAL SURFACE RUNWAY

TAKEOFF FUNNEL

A

AERODOME OBSTACLE LIMITATION SURFACES

SPA-M 9 8 7 6 5 4 3

2

1

A’

RING 03

RING 03

HEIGHT

RING 02

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

RING 01

RING 01

DISTANCE FROM AIRPORT

PAGE 25

AIRPORT

SPA-M HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS SURROUNDING DOMESTIC AIRPORTS IN INDIA

RING 02

AIRPORT DEVELOPMENTAL CONTROL REGULATIONS A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

SPA-M

“Aerotropolis not only leads to development of an ecosystem but also connects buisnessess, civilizations and regions.”

SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

SITE ANALYSIS

SPA-M

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

SPA-M

SPA-M

SITE ANALYSIS MorphologyLand use and land coverMobility and transitHydrologyBlue and Green networkEconomy and CommercePublic InfrastructureSite as layersA SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

SITE ANALYSIS

SPA-M 0

01

03

MORPHOLOGY URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

PAGE 29

SPA-M

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

INTRODUCTION TO SITE PAGE 30

SPA-M

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

SPA-M MORPHOLOGY A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

layouts water bodies 4% 3% Airport 5%

SITE ANALYSIS

Land cover and Land use Commercial Village Roads and Industrial settlements Streams and 2% Physical 2% canals 2% Infrastructur 1% e 0% Residential Farmland 42%

Natural vegetation 6%

Uncultivated 12%

SPA-M

Plantation 21% CULTIVATED FARMLAND – 1477.5 HECTARES CULTIVATED PLANTATIONS – 758 HECTARES UNCULTIVATED LAND – 429 HECTARES NATURAL VEGETATION – 201 HECTARES EXISTING AIRPORT – 188 HECTARES RESIDENTIAL LAYOUTS – 130 HECTARES

WATER BODIES – 103 HETARES COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL – 67 HECTARES VILLAGE SETTLEMENTS – 66 HECATRES ROADS – 61.6 HECTARES STREAMS AND CANALS – 24.5 HECTARES

0

01

SPA-M

03

KMS

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

TOTAL SITE AREA – 3508.8 HECTARES

PAGE 31

PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE – 3.2 HECTARES

LAND USE AND LAND COVER A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

INTRODUCTION TO SITE

Toll plaza on Nanjangud road

Varuna canal & railway track crossing NH 766

SPA-M

PAGE 32

Nanjangud road at Kadakola town

0

01

SPA-M

03

KMS

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

MOBILITY & TRANSIT A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

SITE ANALYSIS

SPA-M

The railway line that passes through the site connects Mysore and Chamarajnagar cities The Kadakola and Nanjangudu towns have various Industrial areas and employment centers which can make the site a daily stop for commuters travelling from Mysore as well as Chamarajanagar The industries in the Kadakola, Thandavapura and Nanjangud industrial areas also utilize the railway line to transport raw materials for their plants and finished products from their factories.

SPA-M MOBILITY AND TRANSIT URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

PAGE 33

Railway lines that Mysore to Chmarajanagara and Mangalore are unelectrified and of single track.

Currently there are 6 trains which connect Mysore to Chamarajnagar on daily basis. 5 of these are passenger trains, while one is an express train.

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

INTRODUCTION TO SITE

Yennehole lake

SPA-M Dalvoy lake

Varuna canal Aqueduct crossing NH 766

PAGE 34

Three important stream networks which run towards south to join Kabini 0

01

SPA-M

03

KMS

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

There are 24 unique catchment basins within the 78 Sqkm study area

HYDROLOGY A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

SITE ANALYSIS Varuna canal

SPA-M

Irrigation mini canals

0

01

SPA-M

03

KMS

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

Chamundi Hill reserve forest

PAGE 35

Stream side greenery

BLUE GREEN NETWORK A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

INTRODUCTION TO SITE

Kadakola Industrial area

SPA-M APMC, Mysore

PAGE 36

Shops on Mysore – Nanjangud road

0

01

SPA-M

03

KMS

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

TVS Factory at Kadakola

ECONOMY & COMMERCE A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

SITE ANALYSIS Lakshmi devi temple, Koodanahalli

SPA-M

Capitol fuels on NH 766

0

01

SPA-M

03

KMS

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

Primary Health center at Marse

PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE

PAGE 37

Govt HP School, Someshwarapura

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

INTRODUCTION TO SITE PAGE 38

SPA-M

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

SPA-M SITE AS LAYERS A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

SPA-M

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

SPA-M

Design development

SPA-M

Edges as DelineatorsDesign geometryMasterplan 1.0Masterplan 2.0Masterplan 3.0Masterplan development processMasterplan comparison-

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

HORIZONTAL AXES

OUTER RING ROAD NH 766

MYSORE HADINARU ROAD

RING ROAD DADADAHALLI ROAD

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

VERTICAL AXES

SPA-M

SPA-M

SPA-M

PROPOSED PERIPHERAL RING ROAD

CONCENTRIC RINGS

COMBINATORIAL GEOMETRY USING AXES AND RINGS

SPA-M

SPA-M USE OF EDGES AS DELINEATORS URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

PAGE 41

SPA-M

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

STEP 01 – IMPORTANT ROUTES AND EDGES NETWORK

STEP 02 – CONCENTRIX RING NETWORK THROUGH AIPRORT DCR

SPA-M SPA-M

SPA-M

PAGE 42

STEP 03 – LOCAL ROADS AND STREAM NETWORK

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

STEP 04 – PROBABLE CITY GEOMETRY AS A COMBINATION OF ROADS, DCR RINGS AND STREAM NETWORKS

SPA-M DESIGN GEOMETRY A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

AEROPOLIS MYSORE 1.0 Green cover

Airport

18%

20%

SPA-M

Fintech SEZ 11%

Residential 27%

AIRPORT TRANSIT CITY

Transit city 4% 7%

INTER MODAL TRANSIT

SPA-M

Logistics Hub 6%

Inter modal transit hub 7%

GREEN BUFFER

SPA-M

Commercial

LOGISTICS HUB AIRPORT – 372 LOGISTICS HUB – 120 TRANSIT HUB - 76 INTER MODAL TRANSIT – 136 GREEN COVER – 335 FINTECH SEZ – 207 COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL – 121 RESIDENTIAL – 508

RESIDENTIAL EAST

RESIDENTIAL WEST

9

FINTECH SEZ

TOTAL – 1875 HECTARES

6 5 4 3

2

1

0

01

03

PROPOSED MASTERPLANSPA-M 1.0

MASTERPLAN 1.0 URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

PAGE 43

COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

AEROPOLIS MYSORE 2.0 Green Buffer 13%

Airport 19%

Fintech SEZ 8% Residential 37% Commercial 6%

AIRPORT TRANSIT CENTER

Transit Center 4%

SPA-M

GREEN BUFFER

LOGISTICS HUB

Inter modal transit hub 6%

SPA-M Logistics Hub 7%

INTER MODAL TRANSIT AIRPORT – 372 LOGISTICS HUB – 136 TRANSIT HUB - 76 INTER MODAL TRANSIT – 120 GREEN COVER – 255 FINTECH SEZ – 156 COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL – 117 RESIDENTIAL – 720 TOTAL – 1952 HECTARES

RESIDENTIAL WEST

VILLAGES TO BE RETAINED AS REGULATED URBAN VILLAGES

RESIDENTIAL EAST

VILLAGES TO BE ACQUIRED THROUGH LAND POOLING AND ACQUISITION

3

PAGE 44

FINTECH SEZ

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

2

1

COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL

PROPOSED MASTERPLAN 2.0 SPA-M

MASTERPLAN 2.0 A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

AEROPOLIS MYSORE 2.0 Roads

Physical Infra 1%

Green Buffer 13%

10%

AGRICULTURAL ZONE AGRICULTURAL ZONE

Airport 18%

Residential 33%

Fintech SEZ 7%

TRANSIT CENTER TRANSIT CENTER

Transit Center 3%

SPA-M LOGISTICS HUB LOGISTICS HUB

Commercial 4%

CENTRAL PARK CENTRAL PARK

SPA-M

Inter modal transit hub 5%

AIRPORT AIRPORT

Logistics Hub 6%

AIRPORT – 372 LOGISTICS HUB – 128 TRANSIT HUB - 63 INTER MODAL TRANSIT – 108 GREEN COVER – 266 FINTECH SEZ – 148 COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL – 70 RESIDENTIAL – 673 PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE – 22 ROADS - 200

RESIDENTIAL EAST RESIDENTIAL EAST

INTER MODAL INTER MODAL TRANSIT TRANSIT

YENNEHOLE LAKE YENNEHOLEPRESERVE LAKE ECOLOGICAL ECOLOGICAL PRESERVE

TOTAL – 2050 HECTARES RESIDENTIAL WEST RESIDENTIAL WEST

URBAN VILLAGES

SPA-M 0

01

03

SPA-M

FINTECH SEZ FINTECH SEZ

MASTERPLAN 3.0 URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

PAGE 45

COMMERCIAL AND COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL INSTITUTIONAL

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

SPA-M SPA-M

SPA-M SPA-M MASTERPLAN 1.0

Main Design characteristics

PAGE 46

1. Use of edges as delineators of site boundary 2. Use of Concentric rings, a continuation of the Airport DCR 3. Use of Green belts dividing the concentric rings 4. A green space in the centre to act as a physical and social buffer between the city and the airport 5. Location of residential areas away from the NH 766

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

MASTERPLAN 2.0

MASTERPLAN 3.0

Main Design characteristics in addition to iteration 1.0 1.

Use of rigid man made geometry for edge delineation 2. Increasing the width of the green buffers between rings 3. Changing the location of Inter modal transit hub to be next to the Highway 4. Conversion of undeveloped area into Agricultural and Ecological preservation zones

Main Design characteristics in addition to iteration 2.0 1. Use of streets and canals as edge delineators 2. Creation of Urban villages to help them grow at their own pace 3. Green buffers along streams and Canals apart from concentric rings 4. Street geometry created by using existing streets or by following contour 5. Organic nature of city geometry indicating a development which has grown with nature

SPA-M MASTERPLAN DEVEOPMENT PROCESS A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

IRVING, TEXAS

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

AGRICULTURAL ZONE

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

MEMPHIS AEROCITY

TRANSIT CENTER CENTRAL PARK

LOGISTICS HUB

RESIDENTIAL EAST

AIRPORT INTER MODAL TRANSIT

RESIDENTIAL WEST

SPA-M

COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL

FINTECH SEZ

Water 3%

Physical Infra 1%

Roads

Green Buffer 13%

10% Vacant 28%

Airport 27%

Airport 18%

Residential 33%

SPA-M Institutional 3%

Single family residential

17%

Commercial 9% Industrial SPA-MMulti family residential…

4%

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

Transit Center 3%

Fintech SEZ 7% Commercial 4%

Inter modal transit hub 5%

Logistics Hub 6%

MASTERPLAN COMPARISON

PAGE 47

Parks and Flood plain 4%

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

SPA-M

SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

AEROPOLIS MYSORE FORM BASED CODES

LAYER WISE ANALYSIS

URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS

CO-ORDINATED BUILT FORM

LAND USE

RESIDENTIAL BLOCK DESIGN

STREET DESIGN

GATEWAYS AND CORRIDORS

URBAN VOIDS

PUBLIC SPACES

GREEN AND BLUE NETWORK

STREAM GREEN BUFFERS

MOBILITY MANAGEMENT

URBAN AND COMMERCIAL NODES

PLAZAS AND PUBLIC SPACES

MOBILITY MODES AND ROUTES

BOULEVARDS

PUBLIC TRANSIT

BUS STOPS

ALTERNATE MOBILITY NETWORKS

BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN NETWORKS

SPA-M

SPA-M FLOW CHART OF PRESENTATION PORTION OF AEROPOLIS MYSORE URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

SPA-M

SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

BYE-LAWS AND REGULATIONS

SPA-M

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

SPA-M

B Y E L AW S A N D R E G U L A T I O N

SPA-M

DCR ZonesLand use categoriesPermitted land usesDevelopmental control regulationsFAR ZonesBuilding height limitsStreet design guidelinesStreet typologies and design factorsDesign factors vs street typologiesParking guidelinesStreet elements guidelinesPublic space guidelines-

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS

SPA-M

Zone 01

Airport Within Zone 01

Zone 02

Zone 03

0

01

03

KMS

SPA-M

Urban Villages Within all Zones

DCR ZONES URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

PAGE 53

Zone 04

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS

AR - AIRPORT LH – LOGISTICS HUB IM – INTER MODAL TRANSIT

SPA-M

AE – AEROCITY CP – CENTRAL PARK GB – GREEN BUFFER R1 – SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL R2 – MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL C1 - COMMERCIAL C2 - COMMERCIAL C3 - COMMERCIAL M – MIXED USE COMMERCIAL P – PUBLIC/ SEMI PUBLIC

R2 – PLOTS ABOVE 1000SQM

U – URBAN VILLAGES

C1 – PLOTS NOT EXCEEDING 500 SQM

PAGE 54

S - SEZ

0

01

03

KMS

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

SPA-M

R1 – PLOTS OF SIZE 12M X 18M 15M X 24M AND 24M X 30M

WB – WATER BODIES

C2 – PLOTS BETWEEN 500 AND 2000 SQM

PU – PUBLIC UTILITIES

C3 – PLOTS EXCEEDING 2000SQM

LAND USE CATEGORIESA SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

IM – INTERMODAL TRANSIT

AE - AEROCITY

1.

1.

1.

1.

2.

3.

2.

3.

AIRPORT TERMINAL ATC TOWER HANGERS & ALLIED

2.

3.

4.

WAREHOU SES COLD STORAGES TRUCK TERMICALS LOGISTICS COMPANY OFFICES

2.

3.

4.

BUS TERMINAL RAILWAY STATION TRANSPOR T INFRASTRU CTURE OFFICES

4.

R1 – SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

ZONE 02 ZONE 03

2.

3.

NOT PERMITTED

RESIDENTIA L PLOTTED DEVELOPM ENTS VILLAS, SEMI DETACHED HOUSES

1.

2.

3.

APARTMEN T BLOCKS HOSTELS GROUP HOUSING PROJECTS

1.

2.

4.

NOT PERMITTED

C3 COMMERCIAL

M – MIXED USE COMMERCIAL

P – PUBLIC / SEMI PUBLIC

S - SEZ

CP, GB – GREEN SPACES

PU – PUBLIC UTILITIES

1.

2.

1.

2.

3.

3.

3.

NOT PERMITTED

C2 COMMERCIAL

NOT PERMITTED

2.

WAREHOU SES SMALL SCALE PROCESSI NG AND PACKAGIN G INDUSTRIES RECYCLIN G FACILITIES

C1 COMMERCIAL

HOTELS MALLS CONVENTI ON CENTERS EXHIBITION CENTERS

1.

1.

R2 – MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

5.

ZONE 04

6.

7.

8.

EATERIES AND RESTAURA NTS GYMS, ORPHANA GES, OLD AGE HOMES, CLINICS RETAIL SHOPS , HARDWAR E SHOPS MUTTON AND POULTRY STALLS. CYBER CAFÉ& INTERNET BROWSIN G USES FOR SMALL REPAIR CENTERSELECTRONI C, MECHANIC AL , AUTOMOBI LE, ETC PATHOLO GICAL LABS PHOTO STUDIO

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

SPA-M 9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

COMMERCIAL AND CORPORATE OFFICES RETAIL SHOPPING COMPLEXES, COMPUTER TRAINING INSTITUTES RESTAURANTS AND HOTELS, DARSHINIS CONVENTION CENTERS AND BANQUET HALLS FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS CINEMA AND MULTIPLEXES PLACES OF ASSEMBLY, EXHIBITIONS CENTERS ENTERTAINMENT AND AMUSEMENT CENTERS INSURANCE AND CONSULTING AND BUSINESS OFFICES NURSING HOMES AND POLY CLINICS/ DISPENSARIES /LABS HOSPITALS AND SPECIALTY HOSPITALS FUEL STATIONS AND PUMPS, LPG STORAGE KALYANA MANTAPAS

1.

SUB OFFICES OF UTILITIES 2. POLICE STATIONS, POST OFFICES 3. NURSERY CRÈCHES 4. GOVERNM ENT DISPENSAR IES 5. FIRE STATIONS 6. BILL COLLECTIO N CENTERS 7. PUBLIC LIBRARY 8. PLACES OF WORSHIP 9. COMMERCI AL COMPLEXE S 10. MULTI STOREY CAR PARKS

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

HIGHER PRIMARY SCHOOLS, INTEGRATE D RESIDENTIA L SCHOOLS. HEALTH CENTERS AND HOSPITAL. RESEARCH INSTITUTIO NS GOVERNM ENT BUILDINGS , AUDITORIU MS, CULTURAL COMPLEXE S, EDUCATIO NAL INSTITUTIO NS , COLLEGES

1.

OFFICE SPACE FOR FINTECH, IT AND BT INDUSTRIES

4.

5.

6.

PARKS HORTICULT URAL AND FLORICULT URAL GARDENS BURIAL GROUNDS AND CREMETARI A SPORT STADIUMS PLAYGROU NDS SWIMMIN G POOLS

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

ENERGY WATER TELECOMM UNICATIO N SUB STATIONS GAS AND GAS LINE TRANSFOR MERS MICROWA VE TOWERS SOLID WASTE MANAGEM ENT FACILITIES SUCH AS LAND FILL SITES.

SPA-M PERMITTED LAND USES URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS

LH – LOGISTICS HUB

PAGE 55

ZONE 01

AR - AIRPORT

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS PAGE 56

SPA-M

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

SPA-M DEVELOPMENTAL CONTROL REGULATIONS

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS

SPA-M

Airport

1.5

2

2.25

2.5

3

3.5

4

0

01

03

KMS

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

SPA-M

6

PAGE 57

5

FAR ZONES A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS

SPA-M

Airport

6M

9M

12M

18M

24M

PAGE 58

36M 0

01

03

KMS

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

SPA-M BUILDING HEIGHT LIMITS A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS

SPA-M STREET DESIGN GUIDELINES URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

PAGE 59

SPA-M

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

Street typologies are determined based on the width, intensity of use and the nature of activities in adjacent parcels and in the area.

P R O P O S E D

G U I D E L I N E S

G U I D E L I N E S

Road Hierarchy Map

F B C

BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS

STREET TYPOLOGIES

D E S I G N FAC T O R S

FBC GUIDELINES

P RO P O S E D ROA D S E C T I O N S LANDSCAPE

LANDSCAPE SERVICE ROAD

SPA-M

LANDSCAPE SERVICE ROAD

CARRIAGE WAY

CARRIAGE WAY

PAGE 60

LANDSCAPE

BICYCLE LANE

FOOTPATH

CARRIAGE WAY

LANDSCAPE

EXAMPLE 1

BICYCLE LANE FOOTPATH

CONCENTRIC RING ROAD

SPA-M EXAMPLE 2

RADIAL CONNECTOR ROADS

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

STREET TYPOLOGIES AND DESIGN FACTORS A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

Road Hierarchy/Regulat ion

Row (Width)

Carriage Way (Width)

Median(s)

Speed Limit

Bicycle Lanes

Footpath

On Street Parking

Landscape -each side (excluding ROW)

Arterial By-pass

45m

24m

3m

50-70 kmph

1.5m

1.5m

-

9m

State Highway

30m

24m

2m

40-60 kmph

1.5m

-

9m

Concentric Collector

30m

24m

1.5m

-

15m

Radial Connector Roads

24m

18m

-

30-40 kmph

1.5m

3m on each sides

6m

National Highway

24m

18m

2m

30-50 kmph

1.5m

-

12m

Sector Main Road

18m

12m

-

20-40 kmph

1.5m

-

-

Block Main Roads

15m

9m

-

20-30 kmph

3m

-

-

30-50 kmph

1.5m

1.5m

BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS

D E S I G N FAC T O R S V S R OA D T Y P O L O G Y

SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

1.5m

1.5m

1.5m 3m

PAGE 61

SPA-M

DESIGN FACTORS VS STREET TYPOLOGY A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS

PA R K I N G G U I D E L I N E S The amount of on-street and off-street parking should be calculated based on the city’s zonal regulations.

This can be adapted to the FBCs based on the extent of parking required.

ON STREET PARKING

OFF STREET PARKING

BI CYCLE PARKING

AUTO PARKING

The on-street parking is designated as a part of street design

The off street or the building level parking is defined within the private

Retail uses require a greater

Retail uses require a greater

guidelines.

property

proportion of short-term bicycle

proportion of short-term bicycle

parking near building entrances.

parking near building entrances.

Residential areas require long-term,

Residential areas require long-term,

secure parking.

secure parking.

Designated parking to be provided wherever possible in neighbourhoods no parking on 6m, one-side parking on 9 and

Number of parking spaces to be allotted

12m roads Two-side parking streets to be either shared surfaces or one-way

Typical off-street parking standards include:

Offices require a mix of both short-

Offices require a mix of both short-

streets for calmer traffic.

•

Area for parking

term and long-term bicycle parking.

term and long-term bicycle parking.

No parking at intersections.

•

Desired setbacks

Bicycle parking can be placed between the main walkway and

•

Size of parking spaces

the kerb.

•

Adjoining landscape.

SPA-M

CROSSWALKS Crosswalks should be designed to offer as much comfort and protection to pedestrians as possible.

Intersection crossings should be kept as compact as possible, facilitating eye contact by moving pedestrians directly into the driver’s field of vision.

VISIBILITY/SIGHT DISTANCE

PAGE 62

Intersections with insufficient visibility should be reconstructed to be more compact. Compact intersections place more activity within the sight triangle, giving all users better view of potential conflicts.

LEADING PEDESTRIAN INTERVAL A Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) typically gives pedestrians a 3–7 second head start when entering an intersection with a corresponding green signal in the same direction of travel. LPIs enhance the visibility of pedestrians in the intersection and reinforce their right-of-way over turning vehicles CORNER RADII SPA-M Corner radii directly impact vehicle turning speeds and pedestrian crossing distances. Minimizing the size of a corner radius is critical to creating compact intersections with safe turning speeds. While standard curb radii are 10–15 feet, many cities use corner radii as small as 2 feet.

PARKING GUIDELINES

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

S A F E

S T R E E T S

BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS

STREET ELEMENTS GUIDELINES There are many elements that need to come together to make streets that are welcoming, safe and inclusive of young children and their caregivers. These have been sub-divided on the basis of the five objectives for a healthy ITC neighbourhood.

ACTIVE FACADE ALONG ROUTING

SPA-M

LIGHTING

PRIVATE-PUBLIC INTERFACE

CROSSINGS

PROTECTIVE ELEMENTS FROM TRAFFIC

SPA-M

SOURCE: FBC Plicy Workbook World Resource Institute, India Design guidelines- BDP Delhi NACTO-National Association of City Transportation Officials/Intersection Design Elements

STREET ELEMENTS GUIDELINES URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

PAGE 63

ITC WAYFINDING

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS PAGE 64

SPA-M

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

SPA-M PUBLIC SPACE GUIDELINES A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS

This essentially includes open spaces or public areas which exist at different scales (city, neighborhood and street) and are accessible to all. This may include parks, playgrounds, squares, plazas, neighborhood parks etc. The streets on the other hand are also considered as linear public spaces of the city.

Interconnected hierarchy of public spaces

PROPOSED GUIDELINES

FBC GUIDELINES

AC C E S S I B L E P U B L I C S PAC E S

SPA-M

ECO SENSITIVE ZONE

CITY

CIVIC GREEN

URBAN GREEN WAY

H I E R A RC H Y O F P U B L I C S PAC E S

NEIGHBORHOOD

-

STREET

SPA-M

NEIGHBORHOOD GREEN TEMPORARY/INTERIM PARK RECREATIONAL PARKLET POCKET GREEN

PUBLIC SPACE GUIDELINES URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

PAGE 65

-

PLAZA

NEIGHBORHOOD

CITY

STREET & UNIT

-

RECREATIONAL PARK

PROPOSED GUIDELINES

FBC GUIDELINES

Public spaces (Based on Scale)

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS

CONTEXT • PRESENT CONDITION The natural conditions and the habitat of the place should be retained for maximum preservation of the area • ADJECENCIES The adjacent areas to public spaces should comprehend to the Adjacent and neighboring’s condition both man made and natural features • PLANNED CONDITION The space should respond to the future developments adjoining the area

PLACE • IDENTITY Incorporate the existing natural features of the place for design

• FEATURES Design features that will attract people to the public space and make it a destination, or community focal point.

All features should be designed as an integrated system with clear circulation connecting to defined spaces Provide a design solution that balances both recreation space and habitat restoration/conservation.

FUNCTIONS

MAIN PROGRAMME

COMFORT • SAFETY Provide visibility and active uses to encourage human interaction and promote a sense of personal safety.

• ENCLOSURE Frame spaces and/or pathways within parks with landscape, trees to define the spaces, create edges or to establish a transition from space to space.

• DESIGN AND LOCATION OF AMENITIES Amenities should be located in places that maximize use. Features should all support the overall park or open space concept and design.

SPA-M

KEY FEATURES

FLEXIBILITY • DIVERSE USES Spaces should be designed to be flexible to accommodate multiple types of programs and events.

In parks and open spaces large and small, consider events such as food festivals, markets, games, movies, concerts, art shows and/or sports etc. can be accommodated simultaneously when desired. Which would increase community interaction.

Design spaces that allow a diversity of programs in public spaces.

CONNECTIVITY • ACCESS: Encourage pedestrian movement, plan the areas accordingly Integrate universal access into site design. Consider children, seniors and individuals with disabilities.

• MULTIPLE CHOICES Locate public spaces in proximity and accessible to transportation options and connected to a network of streets and sidewalks.

• WAYFINDING Provide clear and creative wayfinding to connect different spaces.

Encourage Place making

SITE PLACEMENT

SIZE

• Focus on social gathering • Conservation of the local ecology

• Place for relaxation

• Regional destination

• Informal gathering

• SERVICE AREA – City and surrounding areas

• Unstructured recreation

PAGE 66

• Promote tourism activities in accordance to maintain the ecology and promote economy

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

• Sustainable tourism options – Nature trials

• Areas with abundance of natural flora and fauna – (YENNEHOLE LAKE)

Bird watching

• Open and covered seating areas

• Site and the surrounding area for 100m is a no construction zone to conserve the area

• Abundance of natural flora and fauna – Min ½ acre of area • Interventional area should not be more than 5 % of the total area

• Use of only sustainable materials for the design interventions

SPA-M PUBLIC SPACE GUIDELINES A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

MAIN PROGRAMME

KEY FEATURES

SITE PLACEMENT

SIZE

• Central Lawn area • Focus on social gathering • Walking paths • Community Gathering

• Place for relaxation

• Regional destination

• Informal gathering

• Open air theatre • SERVICE – City and the surrounding areas

• Unstructured recreation • Large Community gatherings

FUNCTIONS

MAIN PROGRAMME

• Network connector • Regional destination

• Serves sector plan areas • Open spaces network connector: linear and Continuous parks and open spaces

• Abundance of seating areas – Covered and open

• There should be a soft edge differentiating the park and the adjoining areas • Ideally four streets surrounded by activating uses • Should not be located behind uses • Must never be located in residual/surplus/left-over space

• Greater than 30 Acres

• Existing stream network incorporated in the plan

KEY FEATURES

SPA-M

SITE PLACEMENT

BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS

FUNCTIONS

SIZE

• Trails with walkways and bikeways • Active programming and exposure to nature along wide landscaped walkways and bikeways, commuting, recreational travel (biking, walking, jogging, etc.)

• Could act as neighborhood parks for the sectors.

• Lined by vegetative ground cover and trees • Good wayfinding signage with clear entries to trailheads

• Connector to other public spaces and natural areas

• May follow natural resources & recreational areas along road R.O.W.s

• Width – Minimum of 50 m • Buffer vegetation • Activities depending on the size and requirements

• Play areas

SPA-M PUBLIC SPACE GUIDELINES URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

PAGE 67

• Accommodates local daily uses

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS

FUNCTIONS • Focus on active play • Regional destination • Serves sector plan areas • Accommodates local daily uses • Accommodates larger group recreation (team sports)

MAIN PROGRAMME

KEY FEATURES • Playing courts and fields

• Primarily recreational program focused on active recreation • Supported by contemplative setting and social gathering spaces • Activities to accommodate all age groups

• Mix of hardscape and grassy open spaces • Mix of reserved and unreserved recreation spaces

• Multi-functional structures, including park furniture

SITE PLACEMENT

SIZE

• Placement facing adjacent community-oriented uses: recreation centers, libraries, etc.

• Building entrances facing the park visually and physically accessible

• Varies based on the community served

• Connected by two or more roads surrounding the area

PAGE 68

SPA-M

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

SPA-M PUBLIC SPACE GUIDELINES A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

MAIN PROGRAMME

KEY FEATURES

SITE PLACEMENT

SIZE

• Clear delineation between the public space and adjacent private realm

• Community gathering place • Regional destination • Serves areas in high pedestrian traffic zones • Accommodates local daily uses

• Focus on social gathering • Flexible program • Informal gathering • Unstructured recreation • Large community gatherings

• Large central hardscape as focal point • Abundance of seating options (sunny and shaded options) • Public art: explore interactive installations • Visitor amenities

• Maximize building entrances and windows facing onto the park: storefronts, multiple townhouse or apartment stoops and porches, primary building entrances • Seamless between the park and the street sidewalk

• Minimum of ½ acre • Ideal area of 1 to 1 ½ acre

BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS

FUNCTIONS

• Surrounded by minimum of two streets, ideally four streets • Surrounded by activating uses • Should not be located behind uses

SPA-M PUBLIC SPACE GUIDELINES URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

PAGE 69

SPA-M

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS

FUNCTIONS

MAIN PROGRAMME

KEY FEATURES

• Mix of social gathering, active recreation & contemplative areas

• Neighborhood gathering place • Local destination • Serves neighborhood/district

• Flexible program

• Lawn area surrounded by complementary uses

• Informal gathering

• Shaded seating and sunny areas

• Places for quiet contemplation

• Flexible play areas

• Unstructured recreation

• Consider public art

SITE PLACEMENT

SIZE

• Placement facing adjacent community-oriented uses: recreation centers, libraries, etc.

• Building entrances facing the park visually and physically accessible

• ½ Acre

• The area should be accessible by minimum two streets

• Local community gatherings

SPA-M

FUNCTIONS

MAIN PROGRAMME

KEY FEATURES

SITE PLACEMENT

SIZE

• Varies • Experimental place • Regional & local destination

• Engage with the community in creative ways to deliver places for social gathering, active and contemplative recreation while building a sense of community and belonging.

PAGE 70

• Defined in collaboration with the community

• Flexible program based on type of space

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

• Pilot activities for future park/public space

• Mixed use Facilities • High pedestrian flow

• Activities/structures inclusive and easy to participate

• Varies based on requirement

• Should be placed in a visible location

SPA-M PUBLIC SPACE GUIDELINES A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

MAIN PROGRAMME

KEY FEATURES

SITE PLACEMENT

SIZE

• Playing courts and fields • Place focus on active play • Local destination • Serves neighborhood/district • Connected to public spaces network • Accommodates smaller groups/ individual recreation

• Primarily recreational program focused on active recreation • Supported by contemplative setting and social gathering spaces • Activities to accommodate all age groups

• Mix of hardscape and grassy open spaces • Mix of reserved and unreserved recreation spaces • Consider central lawn as the focal point with sunny and shaded areas and surrounded by activating uses

• Placement facing adjacent community-oriented uses: recreation centers, libraries, etc.

• Building entrances facing the park visually and physically accessible

• Maximum area – 1/4th acre

• Face major sidewalk alongside storefronts

BYE LAWS AND REGULATIONS

FUNCTIONS

• Multi-functional structures, including park furniture

SPA-M

FUNCTIONS

• Place for pause

•

Local destination

• Serves Unit or a group of houses

MAIN PROGRAMME • Contemplative areas supported by social gathering and active recreation in smaller scale

• Flexible program • Places for quiet contemplation

KEY FEATURES

SITE PLACEMENT

SIZE

• Sunlit small gathering areas with a mix of shaded and sunny seating • Small scale green areas

• Maximize sun exposure in locations in-between tall buildings

• Maximum area – 1/4th acre

• Small play areas

SPA-M PUBLIC SPACE GUIDELINES URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

PAGE 71

• Contact with nature

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

SPA-M

SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

LAYERS & URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS

SPA-M

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

SPA-M

Layers and Urban design moments

SPA-M

Land useSectorsUD Moment - Block designGateways and CorridorsUD Moment – Activated Urban VoidsStreetsUD Moment – BoulevardsUrban and Commercial centresUD Moment – Plaza in commercial coreGreen spacesUD Moment – Stream green buffersMobility modes and RoutesAlternate Mobility modes and routes-

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS

KEYPLAN

AGRICULTURAL ZONE

SPA-M

TRANSIT CENTER

LOGISTICS HUB

CENTRAL PARK

SPA-M

INTER MODAL TRANSIT

STREAM GREEN SPACE

AEROPOLIS PHASE 1 SELECTED SITE FOR AEROPOLIS

URBAN VILLAGE

RESIDENTIAL WEST

INSTITUTIONAL

COMMERCIAL FINTECH SEZ 0

01

03

SPA-M

3508 HECTARES

AEROPOLIS PHASE 1 AREA

2160 HECTARES

AGRICULTURAL ZONE

1348 HECTARES

AIRPORT

372 HECTARES

In phase 01, only 2160 out of the 3508 hectares have been developed with the remaining 1348 hectares being earmarked for development in the future.

The presence and in large percentages of land being used by logistics hub, Transit centre and Fin tech SEZ showcase the Airport centric approach that the design has taken.

The Main institutional and core commercial areas are located in the centre so as to be easily accessible by all

KMS

LAND USE URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

PAGE 75

RESIDENTIAL EAST

URBAN VILLAGE

TOTAL SITE AREA

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS

Land cover and Land use Public / Semi public 2%

Commercial 3% Transit zone 3% Mixed used zones 3%

SPA-M

Urban voids 1% Physical Infrastructur e 1%

Urban villages 4% Fintech SEZ 4%

SPA-M

Residential 18%

Green spaces 17%

Inter modal transit hub 5%

Roads 11%

PAGE 76

Logistics / Industrial 11%

0

01

03

KMS

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

SPA-M

Airport 17%

Residential

Green spaces

Airport

Logistics / Industrial

Roads

Inter modal transit hub

Fintech SEZ

Urban villages

Mixed used zones

Commercial

Transit zone

Public / Semi public

Urban voids

Physical Infrastructure

LAND USE A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

R1 Single family residential 47%

R2 Multi family residential 53%

SPA-M

R1 Single family residential R2 Multi family residential

LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS

Residential Typology

Commercial Typology

SPA-M

C3 Commercial 41%

C1 Commercial 14%

C2 Commercial 45% C1 Commercial

C2 Commercial

C3 Commercial

R1 – PLOTS OF SIZE 12M X 18M 15M X 24M AND 24M X 30M R2 – PLOTS ABOVE 1000SQM C1 – PLOTS NOT EXCEEDING 500 SQM C2 – PLOTS BETWEEN 500 AND 2000 SQM

C1 COMMERCIAL

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

C2 COMMERCIAL

C3 COMMERCIALSPA-M

0

R2 RESIDENTIAL 01

C3 – PLOTS EXCEEDING 2000SQM 02

KMS

RESIDENTIAL AND COMERCIAL TYPOLOGIES

PAGE 77

R1 RESIDENTIAL

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS

SPA-M

SPA-M

SPA-M RESIDENTIAL TYPOLOGY

22

02 03 11 10

05 08

06

09

12

17 14

PAGE 78

0

01

16

30

36 33 35

18

34

KMS

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

Multi Family residential

26

27

Sectors have been created by using Roads and Stream networks as Edge delineators

28

Six sectors are predominantly commercial in nature along the NH 766, while residential sectors also have Mixed use commercial zones.

29

31 32

Fintech SEZ comprises of 5 sectors while institutional areas are located in 2 sectors.

37 SECTORS 02 URBAN VILLAGES SPA-M

03

Single Family residential

Mixed use commercial

15

13

37

19

07

25

21 20

04

24

23

01

SECTOR MAP

Sectors are further subdivided as blocks based on the land use typology within the sector

SECTORS A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

18 X 24 M SITE 12 X 18 M SITE C A SITE 12 X 18 M SITE APARTMENTS

SPA-M

LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS

URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS – RESIDENTIAL BLOCK DESIGN

BIRD EYE VIEW OF RESIDENTIAL SECTOR SPA-M SPA-M PARK

BOULEVARD

SPA-M

PARKLET PLAZA

BIRD EYE VIEW OF RESIDENTIAL SECTOR

COMMERCIAL CENTER

N

SPA-M BIRD EYE VIEW OF RESIDENTIAL SECTOR URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

PAGE 79

BUS STOP

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS

URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS – RESIDENTIAL BLOCK DESIGN

SPA-M

SPA-M

PAGE 80

SPA-M

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

SPA-M PARKLET

PLAZA A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS

SPA-M

SPA-M Identified important gateways and Corridors passing through the Aeropolis.

Main Passenger and Goods corridor is the NH766, which will be complimented by the development of parallel Light Rail Transit system Two new Freight and passenger corridors have been proposed through the city and on the southern flank to act as Bye passes avoiding the residential core of the city Existing village road axes on the peripheries to be developed into state highways for better movement of people and goods abutting the city

0

01

03

KMS

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

SPA-M

NATIONAL HIGHWAY STATE HIGHWAY BYE PASS ROAD RAILWAY LINE

Main Traffic entries into the city being through the National highway and the Bye passes

GATEWAYS INTO AEROPOLIS MYSORE

GATEWAYS AND CORRIDORS

PAGE 81

Primary gateways into the city are along the national highway while the secondary ones are on the State highways abutting the city.

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS

SPA-M

SPA-M

SPA-M

PAGE 82

SPA-M

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS

SPA-M

SPA-M

SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

PAGE 83

SPA-M

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS

SPA-M

SPA-M

PAGE 84

SPA-M

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

SPA-M

VIEW OF WATER BODY

LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS

URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS

SPA-M VIEW OF WALKWAY

SPA-M

VIEW OF GATHERING SPACE

SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

PAGE 85

SPA-M

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS

SECTION AT A – A’

SECTION AT B – B’ SPA-M Seating area Parking

Gathering area

Foot over bridge connecting at +6.00 m level

Walkway – at road level

B

B’

Pond Cycling track

PAGE 86

Parking

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

SPA-M

Walking track

A’ A

N A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS

SPA-M SPA-M STREET MORPHOLOGY Road Morphology indicates a large percentage of existing roads have been amalgamated into the newer development City geometry here is a consequence of Road geometry and stream and canal networks Street Hierarchy is designed inspired by the V7 system of road seen in Chandigarh, resulting in smaller road widths as one gets closer to home.

0

01

SPA-M

03

KMS

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

48M 45M 30M 30M 24M 18M 15M

NATIONAL HIGHWAY

BY PASS ROAD STATE HIGHWAY CONCENTRIC AXIS ROADS RADIAL AXIS ROADS SECTOR ROADS BLOCK MAIN ROADS

Street geometry designed in such a way to keep out through traffic from residential areas

The national highway passing through the city will be elevated throughout.

STREETS

PAGE 87

STREET HIERARCHY

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS

VEGETATION SERVICE ROAD

VEGETATION CARRIAGE WAY

VEGETATION CARRIAGE WAY

SERVICE ROAD

VEGETATION ROW- 45M

CYCLE TRACK

BY PASS ROAD

FOOTPATH

FOOTPATH CARRIAGE WAY

VEGETATION CYCLE TRACK

SPA-M SPA-M ROW- 30M

ROW- 24M CONCENTRIC AXIS ROAD RADIAL AXIS ROAD

PAGE 88

ROW- 18M

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

48M 45M 30M 30M 24M 18M 15M

NATIONAL HIGHWAY

BY PASS ROAD STATE HIGHWAY CONCENTRIC AXIS ROADS RADIAL AXIS ROADS SECTOR ROADS BLOCK MAIN ROADS

SECTOR ROAD

SPA-M STREET SECTIONS A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

VEGETATION

CYCLE TRACK

VEGETATION CARRIAGE WAY

FOOTPATH

LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS

CYCLE TRACK

FOOTPATH

CARRIAGE WAY

CARRIAGE WAY

SPA-M

SECTOR MAIN ROAD

Buffer

NATIONAL HIGHWAY

Buffer

SECTOR MAIN ROAD

SPA-M

Buffer

Buffer

STATE HIGHWAY

SPA-M

SECTOR MAIN ROAD

Key Plan

STREET SECTIONS URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

PAGE 89

SECTOR MAIN ROAD

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS

URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS - BOULEVARDS

FUNCTIONAL POSITIVES OF BOULEVARDS

AESTHETIC POSITIVES OF B0ULEVARDS

 Sustain to local climate

 Roads can be easily distinguished

 Can sustain stresses of vehicular vibrations and pollution

 Adds character to the precinct

 Serve as natural fencing

 Provides shade for cyclists and pedestrians

 Absorbs and cleans the water that runs off the highways and other roads.

 Public spaces can be part of buffer- as linear parks

 Can be durable and also long lived

PAGE 90

SPA-M

SPA-M CONCENTRIC ROAD

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

RADIAL AXIS ROAD A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS

SPA-M SPA-M MIXED USE COMMERCIAL ZONES WALKABILITY MAPPING Primarily two types on Commercial areas in the city, The core commercial located along the NH 766 and the Mixed use commercial zones located within residential sectors.

MIXED USE COMMERCIAL CENTERS 0

01

SPA-M

03

KMS

CENTRAL CORE COMMERCIAL CENTERS

Mixed use commercial zones have been placed in land parcels delineated by roads and streams and are blocks in essence catering to other residential blocks around them and located such that no zone is farther than 500m from any residence in the city.

URBAN & COMMERCIAL CENTERS URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

PAGE 91

Core commercial areas are further divided into three categories based on plot sizes and will cater to the whole city, while Mixed use commercial zones will cater to the commercial need within the sectors.

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS

SPA-M

SPA-M

PAGE 92

SPA-M

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

The central park in Aeropolis Mysore is inspired it’s namesake in New York

SPA-M

LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS

SPA-M

Typology based on location of dedicated green spaces,

1.

2.

3.

Central park – located in the heart of the city to act as a physical and social buffer between the Airport and the residences Stream buffer – To provide green and open spaces along stream network to up to 30m meters on either side and to act as green spaces within sectors Road buffer – 9m to 12m ranging green buffers along important roads and corridors helping create green boulevards and softening the impact of heavy traffic on the city folk Road edge green buffers 18%

CENTRAL PARK

0

01

SPA-M

03

KMS

Central park 36%

ROADSIDE GREEN BUFFERS

TYPOLOGY OF GREEN SPACES

GREEN SPACES URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

PAGE 93

STREAM SIDE GREEN BUFFERS

Stream green buffers 46%

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS

GREEN BUFFER Concentric central / Arterial Bypass

9m

SPA-M

Concentric Ring road

15m

SPA-M

Railway Line 10m- West 30m- East

Abutting Streams

20m

PAGE 94

INTERSECTION BETWEEN ROADS AND GREEN SPACES

0

01

03

KMS

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

SPA-M GREEN SPACES A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS

SPA-M

SPA-M

SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

PAGE 95

SPA-M

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS

SPA-M

SPA-M

PAGE 96

SPA-M

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS

SPA-M

SPA-M

SPA-M URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

PAGE 97

SPA-M

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS

AIRPORT

SPA-M IMTH

RAILWAY LINE

NH 766

The Inter modal transit Hub is located at the junction of three different modes of transit, Air, rail and Road.

SPA-M

Important Transit routes for passenger movement out of city are the National highway and the Railway line.

Local public transit within the city runs mostly on the concentric roads connecting all sectors with all bus stops being located only on the concentric roads which are 30m wide.

IMTH

SPA-M

PAGE 98

NATIONAL HIGHWAY

0

01

SPA-M

03

KMS

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

STATE HIGHWAY LOCAL TRANSIT ROUTE BUS STOPS

TRANSIT MODES AND ROUTES

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

LAYERS AND URBAN DESIGN MOMENTS

SPA-M

SPA-M PEDESTRIAN GREEN CORRIDOR

SPA-M

DEDICATED BICYCLE NETWORK

0

01

SPA-M

03

KMS

URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, SEM III

AEROPOLIS MYSORE

BIKE SHARING CENTERS LOCATED IN CORE COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE COMMERCIAL CENTERS

ALTERNATIVE MOBILITY MODES AND ROUTES

PAGE 99

ROADS WITH DEDICATED BIKE LANES

A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S

SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE, UNIVERSITY OF MYSORE MASTERS INSPA-M URBAN DESIGN

A

SHWETHASHREE

|

PRIYANKA

V

KHADI

|

SHASHANK

P

S

2019-2021

SPA-M A SHWETHASHREE PRIYANKA KHADI SHASHANK P S