Loveland Reporter Herald - Election 2018

ELECTION

2018 A guide to issues and candidates on the ballot

A product of the Loveland Reporter­Herald

This is your guide to local and county races and ballot issues, as well as statewide ballot issues. Watch for coverage of statewide races, including the governor’s race, in the daily Loveland Reporter­Herald.

Thompson School District mill levy override ............... 3 Thompson School District bond ....................................... 4 Larimer County Commissioner District 1 .... 5 Larimer County Clerk and Recorder ....................... 6 Larimer County Treasurer .. 7 Larimer County Assessor ... 8 Larimer County Ballot Issue 1A: Mental health .... 9 Larimer County uncontested races .............. 9 Berthoud recreation improvements ................... 10 Berthoud annexation ...... 11 Berthoud Fire District ...... 11 State House District 49 .... 12 State House District 51 .... 13 State Senate District 15 ........................... 14 State Board of Education ....................... 15 CU Board of Regents ... 16­17 Colorado Proposition 109 ................. 18 Colorado Proposition 110 ................. 18 Colorado Proposition 111 ................. 19 Colorado Proposition 112 ................. 19 Colorado Amendments 73, 74, 75 ........................... 20 Colorado Amendments A, V, W, X, Y, Z .............. 20­22 2nd Congressional District ........................... 22­24

JENNY SPARKS / Loveland Reporter­Herald

A voter drops off ballots on Election Day 2014 outside the Larimer County offices in downtown Loveland.

How and where to vote

Election Day is Tuesday, Nov. 6. You must return your mail ballot or be in line at a Voter Service Center by 7 p.m. that day in order for your vote to count. Ballots will be mailed to eligible, registered voters beginning Oct. 15. While voters can register right up to and even on Election Day, the last day to register or change your registration and still receive a ballot in the mail is Oct. 30. If you register or change your registration after that date, you must vote in person. Track your mail ballot by signing up for Ballot Track at ballottrax.net/voter. For more election information, visit larimer.org/clerk/elections/current­ elections/2018.

• Safeway, 1426 E Harmony Road, Fort Collins • King Soopers, 1275 Eagle Drive, Loveland Hours 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Friday, Nov. 2 9 a.m to 1 p.m. Saturday, Nov. 3 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday, Nov. 5 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Tuesday, Election Day, Nov. 6.

Voter service and polling centers

Services include: ballot­drop­off, in­person voting, obtaining a replacement ballot, voter registration and updating registration information, vote using equipment and facilities for people with disabilities. 24­hour ballot drop­off boxes • Larimer County Courthouse, 200 W. Oak, • Larimer County Courthouse, 200 W Oak, 1st Floor, Fort Collins Outside SW entrance, Fort Collins • Loveland Police & Courts Building, 810 E. • Loveland Vehicle Licensing Branch Office, 10th St., Loveland 200 Peridot Ave, Loveland • CSU Lory Center, Lory Student Center, • Estes Park Vehicle Licensing Branch Office, North Ballroom, Fort Collins 1601 Brodie Ave, Estes Park • Council Tree Covenant Church, 4825 S. Days: Open beginning Monday, Oct. 15, Lemay Ave., Fort Collins and close at 7 p.m. Election Day, Nov. 6. • Clearwater Church, 2700 S. Lemay Ave., Additional ballot 1st Floor, Fort Collins • Drake Centre, 802 W. Drake Ave., Fort drop­off locations Collins • King Soopers, 2602 S. Timberline Road, • Elks Lodge, 1424 E. Mulberry Ave., Fort Fort Collins Collins • King Soopers, 1842 N. College Ave., Fort • Estes Park Municipal Building, 170 Collins MacGregor Ave., Estes Park • Safeway, 2160 W. Drake Road, Fort Collins

2 • OCTOBER 14, 2018 • VOTER GUIDE

Hours 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday, Oct. 22­26 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. Saturday, Oct. 27 8 .m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday, Oct. 29 ­ Nov. 2 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. Saturday, Nov. 3 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday, Nov. 5 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Tuesday, Election Day, Nov. 6

Election Day­only voter service and polling centers

7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Services include: ballot­drop­off, in­person voting, obtaining a replacement ballot, voter registration and updating registration information, vote using equipment and facilities for people with disabilities. • Hilton Hotel, Green and Gold Room, 425 W Prospect Road, Fort Collins • King of Glory Lutheran Church, 2919 N. Wilson Ave., Loveland • American Legion, 2124 W. County Road 54G, LaPorte • River of Life Fellowship Church, 3161 E. County Road 62E, Wellington • Red Feather Lakes POA, 58 Firehouse Lane, Red Feather Lakes • The Ranch Events Complex, 5280 Arena Circle, Loveland • Brookside Gardens, 619 E. Highway 56, Berthoud

THOMPSON SCHOOL DISTRICT Issue 5A: Mill levy override

What it asks: “Shall Thompson School District R2-J’s taxes be increased $13.8 million annually by a levy of up to 7.6 mills in the 2018-2019 budget year and by whatever amount is raised by a levy of 7.6 mills in each budget year thereafter by the collection of property taxes for the following educational purposes, to be monitored by a citizens’ oversight committee: • maintaining current class sizes and pupil-teacher ratios; • establishing the district as a competitive employer by increasing compensation to attract and retain high quality employees; • updating textbooks, curriculum, materials, technology resources and instructional programs; and •increasing and upgrading student security in school buildings, including expanding the school resource officer program; with a portion of such taxes to be distributed to the district’s charter schools in accordance with state law; and with such taxes to be in excess of property tax revenues that would be provided by the general fund mill levy permitted under state law without such increase, but in no event shall such tax increase be greater than the amount permitted under section 22-54-108, c.r.s., or any successor statute; and with the district to be authorized to collect, retain and spend all revenues from such taxes, together with revenues from specific ownership taxes attributable thereto,

JENNY SPARKS / Loveland Reporter­Herald

Deb Grafel, first­grade teacher at Truscott Elementary School, leads students through a reading lesson Sept. 27 at the school in Loveland. From left are Isaac Guerra Molinar, Jerry Harmant, Isabel Medina, Desmia Chesser Cobb, and Emiliana Pena­Chavez. and the earnings on such taxes and revenues as a voter approved revenue and spending change under Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution or any other law?” What it means: Voters would approve a tax increase for the Thompson School District to be spent on salary increases, to ensure that class sizes do not increase, to expand the school resource officer program, to pay for increased security measures and to update textbooks, curriculum, technology and other materials and resources for student education. According to numbers from the school

district, the increase in taxes for a $350,000 home would be $185.88 per year. What supporters say: The Thompson School District has been underfunded by the state nearly $14 million per year since 2010, and voters have not approved any additional local revenue for our schools since 2006, according to the campaign committee Vote Yes For Thompson Students. The district is losing good teachers to other districts at a rate of 17 percent, or 159 teachers in the last two school years alone. If 5A passes, every dollar will be spent locally and every school and student will benefit.

The mill levy will: provide a safe and secure environment to learn by expanding the school resource officer program, providing uniformed police officers that offer a visible presence at schools and activities and teach online safety and anti-bullying lessons; update textbooks, curriculum and technology; and maintain small classroom sizes by helping the district compete for good teachers. The bulk of the revenue, $10.5 million, will be spent on salaries to compete with nearby higher-paying districts. If the measure fails, class sizes will increase, safety upgrades will be post-

poned, and the district may be forced to lay off teachers and increase class sizes. For more information: yes4thompson.org. What opponents say: No official opposition group has been formed or opposition points filed with the Larimer County Elections Office. However, general opposition points are that taxes are already too high, particularly for those on fixed incomes, and that the school district should operate within its means. Some have suggested that the district should ask for either a mill levy override or a bond issue, but not both within the same year.

VOTER GUIDE • OCTOBER 14, 2018 • 3

THOMPSON SCHOOL DISTRICT

What it asks: “Shall Thompson School District R2-J’s debt be increased $149.0 million with a repayment cost of $265.4 million or such lesser amount as may be necessary, and shall Thompson School District R2-J’s taxes be increased $15.9 million annually or such lesser amount as may be necessary for the payment of such debt, for the following district-wide capital improvement purposes, to be monitored by a citizens’ oversight committee: • upgrading school building safety and security systems and upgrading fire alarm systems to current code; • extending the useful life of aging school buildings by replacing, repairing, and upgrading heating, ventilation and cooling systems and mechanical controls, plumbing, roofs, windows and doors, making building exterior improvements, removing or abating asbestos and updating obsolete technology in schools; • constructing, furnishing and equipping a new K-8 school, and additions to Berthoud Elementary School and Ivy Stockwell Elementary School; and • improving, constructing, expanding, remodeling, equipping and furnishing schools and district buildings, additions, facilities and grounds; and with such debt to mature, be subject to redemption, with or without premium, and be issued, dated and sold at, above or below par, and at such time or times and in such manner and containing such terms, not incon-

Issue 5B: Bond

measures including new door latches to comply with state fire standards and secured entries at the front of each building. The bond, which will cost $8.36 per month for a $350,000 home, will pay for additional classrooms at Ivy Stockwell and Berthoud Elementary and build a new kindergarten through eighth grade school in the eastern part of the district, together allowing room for an additional 1,200 students. If the bond does not pass, these pressing needs will be postponed, and the district might need to continue to close schools. “SurJENNY SPARKS / Loveland Reporter­Herald rounding school districts Jason Arnold, an HVAC apprentice with the Thompson School District, works on an air compres­ have passed bonds to prosor that works in conjunction with the boiler system behind him Thursday at Carrie Martin Ele­ vide their students a safe and secure learning mentary School in Loveland. space,” according to the sistent herewith, as the of the Colorado constituWhat supporters say: Repair campaign committee. “Our board of education may tion or any other law?” and maintenance challeng- Thompson students deserve the same learning determine; and in connecWhat it means: Voters es across the district will opportunities.” tion therewith (i) to would allow the school dis- “soon compromise the For more information: increase the district’s prop- trict to take out $149 millearning environment for yes4thompson.org. erty taxes when required lion in debt and approve an our students,” and it has What opponents say: No offias stated above in an increased tax to pay that been 13 years since voters cial opposition group has amount sufficient to pay debt specifically to take have passed a bond to been formed or opposition the principal of and interest care of maintenance that address these issues, points filed with the Larimon such debt when due and has been deferred for a according to a campaign er County Elections Office. to fund any reserves for decade including heating committee Vote Yes For However, general opposithe payment thereof, and and cooling systems, roofs, Thompson Students. (ii) to collect and spend the plumbing, windows, doors Across the district, 28 of tion points are that taxes are already too high, parproceeds of such debt and and asbestos abatement the 31 schools are experiticularly for those on fixed the revenues from such and removal. The money encing roof leaks, which incomes, that the school taxes and the specific own- also would pay to build a are damaging foundations district should operate ership taxes attributable new school on the growing and floor tiles. Twenty thereto and any earnings east side of the district, aging boilers need replace- within its means and that the school district should from the investment of where families are moving ment as do leaking pipes, such proceeds and revebut no Thompson schools and with the average age of not build a new school when existing schools are nues as a voter approved exist, and to expand both school buildings at 46 below capacity and two revenue and spending elementary schools in years, most schools have schools will close next change without limitation Berthoud. Money also decaying caulking around by the revenue and spend- would be spent on technol- windows, doors and perim- year, leaving empty buildings. Others have suggesting limits of, and without ogy, safety and security. eters. If this passes, mained that growth should pay affecting the district’s abili- Approval of this issue tenance issues will be ty to collect and spend any would add $100.32 to the addressed at every school for itself instead of asking taxpayers to foot the bill for other revenues or funds annual tax bill for a and the district will under, Article X, Section 20 $350,000 home. upgrade safety and security a new school.

4 • OCTOBER 14, 2018 • VOTER GUIDE

LARIMER COUNTY COMMISSIONER

District 1: Sean Dougherty Website: SeanForLarimerCounty .com Age: 49 Family: Wife, Mary; son, Donovan. Political party: Republican How long have you lived in Larimer County: 19 years Professional background: 18 years in real estate. Political/com­ munity experi­ ence: Larimer County Planning Commission, 8½ years; Red Feather Lakes Planning Advisory Committee, 3½ years; Fort Collins Board of Realtors, president 2010-11 and director for eight years; Colorado Association of Realtors, director two years, grievance committee chair five years; Fort Collins Chamber of Commerce Local Legislative Affairs Committee, seven years. Education: Associate’s degree in hotel and restaurant management, bachelor’s degree in hospitality management. What would you describe as your top priorities for Larimer County? How would you accomplish these goals, if elected? Larimer County has over $350 million in capital needs over the next five years. A major priority would be to work out the details on how we’re going to fund these improvements, especially the courts building as mandated by state law, the jail, maintenance sheds and more. Another priority would be to continue working on upgrading and repairing our roadways. All major bridges will be structurally sufficient by the end of 2019, as per our Strategic Plan for

2013–2018. Once the bridges are complete, we can move forward on roadways, including paving Owl Canyon Road. A third priority will be to complete the Larimer County Comprehensive Plan, the vision for the future of the county from the residents. Revising the Land Use Code, which implements the comprehensive plan once complete, will be the next step. What is Larimer County’s role in pro­ viding mental health services to the com­ munity? A public/private partnership is an excellent way to achieve many of the needs of the county, where the county builds the facility and a private company runs the facility up to standards set in place by the people of Larimer County. This is on the ballot this fall, and I fully support the issue. There will be transparency and accountability, and if the facility does not achieve the goals set, we can adjust until we are able to achieve, and hopefully exceed, those goals, and help all Larimer County residents. What would you describe as your quali­ fications to serve as Larimer county com­ missioner? My experience with the county and my past roles in leading large organizations. Having served for over eight years on the Larimer County Planning Commission, I have experience both with land use and with working with our county commissioners. This has given me an insight into the roles and responsibilities of the position. This is such a huge advantage for me as I will be able to walk into the job and really be able to work on day one. Additionally, my time on the board of directors for the Fort Collins Board of REALTORS has given me the skills to lead large organization and to be able to help make the tough decisions.

District 1: John Kefalas

Website: kefalasforlarimer.org Age: 63 Family: Beth, wife of 37 years; two sons; two daughters-in-law; four grandchildren Political party: Democratic How long have you lived in Larimer County: 42 years Professional background: Teacher, counselor, nonprofit worker, policy advocate, adjunct faculty. Political/community experience: State senator, 2013 to present; State representative 007-2012; Peace Corps, 1979-1980; extensive community volunteerism and advocacy work. Education: Certificate: State/ Local Government Executives, Harvard Kennedy School of Government (2011); Certificate: Western Legislative Academy, Council of State Government West (2010); master’s degree in secondary science education, Fairleigh Dickinson University (1982); bachelor’s degree in Botany, Colorado State University (1978). What would you describe as your top priorities for Larimer County? How would you accomplish these goals, if elected? • Adequate public infrastructure to support the needs of our community — bring together regional stakeholders (public/ private) to plan for smart/predictable growth that helps preserve our quality of life, both urban and rural; focus on quality jobs, roads, bridges and multi-modal transportation, public health and safety, increased access to broadband, greater emphasis on renewable energy projects. • Access to economic opportunities and quality of life — affordable/quality child care and housing; workforce development; a clean and healthy environment. • Safe, decent, affordable hous-

ing — work with community partners and leverage resources, creativity in rental and homeownership markets; conduct comprehensive review of regulations that inhibit housing affordability; consider innovative approaches that incentivize affordable housing development such as a regional housing investment trust fund, effective-voluntary inclusionary zoning policies, density bonuses, transferable development rights, transitoriented and mixed-income/use multi-family development, land use codes to preserve and build manufactured and modular housing, smaller/more sustainable homes (Minka homes), co-housing and resident-owned communities, community land trusts; build on already-existing programs such as the Larimer County Home Ownership and Home Improvement Programs. • Support future service needs of all Larimer County residents — make needed capital improvements by leveraging public/private partnerships, collaboration and community engagement; make county government more inclusive, open, transparent, accountable with everyone welcome at the table. What is Larimer County’s role in pro­ viding mental health services to the community? Larimer County plays a critical role in facilitating the effective delivery of community-based, coordinated behavioral health services. Referendum 1A merits SEE KEFALAS, PAGE 9

VOTER GUIDE • OCTOBER 14, 2018 • 5

LARIMER COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER Dan Sapienza Angela Myers Website: ElectAngelaMyers.com Age: 56 Political party: Republican Family: Gary Myers How long have you lived in Larimer County? 20 years Professional background: 15 years at Clerk and Recorder’s Office; 28plus years at the side of executives; successful small business owner Political/community experience: Clerk and recorder since May 2013; member of Colorado County Clerks Association Executive Board, Central Region chair, Education Committee chair, motor vehicle legislative co-chair; Host annual fundraiser; RFC Triumph Award Committee; Peace With Christ Church; many local charities Education: Certified election registration administrator — election center; cyber security training & certified election official — Colorado Secretary of State; administrative certificate – Robert Morris College Given that there has been no significant evidence of voter fraud in Colorado elec­ tions, are efforts still needed to increase voter confidence in election security sys­ tems? If yes, how would you attempt to do so? I believe it is important to educate citizens about how elections are conducted. Doing so ensures their confidence in the process. I have enjoyed interacting with citizens on this topic and encourage these discussions whenever possible. I encourage all citizens, especially those concerned about security, to become election judges and see first-hand the very complex, detailed work that goes into ensuring our elections are safe from fraudulent activities. Focus on the integrity of elections is always necessary and knowledgeable vigi-

lance in administering them is what keeps them so secure. Do you believe the clerk and recorder should play a role in the enfranchisement of historically under­registered voting populations? If yes, how? It is important that the clerk and recorder ensure all voters are treated the same, all laws and rules are followed to ensure that only those eligible to vote participate, and all ballots cast by those who are eligible are counted as each voter intended. When clerks focus on specific voting populations, it can be perceived as an effort to influence election outcomes, and great care must be taken to make any efforts applicable to all voters. Name and describe another goal you would work toward as clerk and recorder. As clerk and recorder these past five years, I have consistently focused on quality customer service and operational efficiencies. I am proud to be navigating the Vehicle Licensing office through the new system conversion, and am looking forward to utilizing the full potential of this system to create efficiencies for our citizens. As we have accomplished many unique operational innovations these last five years, I look forward to engaging the staff in a similar manner to upgrade processes and workflow. Larimer will continue to be at the vanguard when it comes to these improvements. In Recording, I am excited about having a system that is comprehensive in the way documents are accessed, and already have efforts underway to ensure all documents are digitally recorded, indexed and accessible. I look forward to completing this effort and to making Larimer one of the first, if not the first, in the state to achieve this goal. Elections activities in the coming years will require much attention and expertise as we successfully navigate five back-to-back elections — beginning with the November 2019 general election and culminating with the November 2020 presidential.

6 • OCTOBER 14, 2018 • VOTER GUIDE

URL: www.dansapienza.com Age: 38 Political party: Democratic Family: Declined to answer How long have you lived in Larimer County? 1993-2006, 2012-present Professional background: Legislative aide in U.S. Congress, policy advocate for local health organization, adjunct professor at Colorado State University, small business owner Political/community experience: Vice president, Fort Collins Municipal Railway Society; former board member, Fort Collins Musicians Association and Northern Colorado AIDS Project. Regular community volunteer and advocate Education: George Mason University School of Law (JD), Colorado State University (BA), Fort Collins High School Given that there has been no signifi­ cant evidence of voter fraud in Colorado elections, are efforts still needed to increase voter confidence in election security systems? If yes, how would you attempt to do so? There has been no significant evidence of voter fraud anywhere in the United States; that doesn’t mean we have figured it all out. Election reform laws passed by the Colorado General Assembly have made our state the national leader in secure elections; that doesn’t mean we can rest on past successes. As clerk, I will work to increase voter confidence through increased transparency in our election process and a proactive communications plan to help citizens understand what we are doing to keep elections safe. Many community members don’t know what the clerk’s office is, much less how important it is to our democracy. Voter confidence will only increase if we actively demonstrate why they should have confidence in the work of the clerk’s office. Do you believe the clerk and recorder should play a role in the enfranchise­

ment of historically under­registered voting populations? If yes, how? The clerk and recorder should be a champion for voting rights in the county and should make increased turnout a priority. Our elections only represent the needs and wants of the community when every voter has a say. I will work within the county and its municipalities to register voters in all offices, not just in those department that are mandated to register voters by law. We should go above and beyond to ensure that ballot drop locations are located in areas where they are needed. Finally, ensuring that the office is competent to work with the diverse population of this large county should begin with staffing the office with employees that are representative of the citizens we serve. Name and describe another goal you would work towards as Clerk and Recorder. As I’ve talked with voters around Larimer County, I get asked again and again, “What does the county actually do?” As the county office that works with almost every citizen annually, the clerk should be at the forefront of promoting citizen engagement. County leadership has simply become too complacent. Maintaining the status quo seems to be their main goal and maintaining the status quo doesn’t require engaging with citizens. As clerk, I will make it a goal to make county government more accessible and more transparent. I will prioritize citizen engagement and citizen awareness of the important work of the clerk and recorder’s office.

LARIMER COUNTY TREASURER Rick Bohn

Website: bohnforlarimer.com Family: Wife, Maggie Bohn Age: 51 How long have you lived in Larimer County? 3 years Professional background: More than two decades working in Illinois government and politics. Responsibilities included managing budgets and salaries and hiring on campaigns and in governmental offices. More specifically, as legislative liaison for the Illinois Department of Insurance, we challenged predatory big insurance companies, pushing forward policies that put people before profits. Political/community experience: Member of The National Society of Leadership and Success. Active politically in many progressive areas but focused on LGBT equality and women’s reproductive rights. Education: Student at Front Range Community College, anticipated associate’s degree January 2019. What would you strive to accomplish if elected Larimer County Treasurer? How would you work toward that goal?

My office would actively reach out to seniors and other vulnerable populations to help them find solutions and programs that work for them regarding their tax burden. This can be achieved through more frequent community meetings, mailings and improved online communications. How important is transparency for the treasurer’s office? What is your plan to achieve this? Transparency is integral to keeping the Treasurer’s Office accountable to constituents. Democracy only works when citizens are informed enough to hold elected officials responsible. As treasurer, I will prioritize transparent communications through newsletter and online platforms such as Facebook and YouTube. I will focus on putting out more information regarding county investments, budgeting processes, and returns. How would you describe the job and responsibilities of the Larimer County Treasurer? The treasurer is responsible for ensuring that the funds collected via taxes flow smoothly to cover Larimer County’s expenses. The treasurer also needs to keep homeowners informed about the tax assessment appeal process, exemptions and abatements by improving online communications and increasing community workshops.

Irene Josey

Website: irenejosey.com Age: 57 Family: Husband, Andy; two children; four grandchildren. How long have you lived in Larimer County? 33 years Professional background: Larimer County treasurer, 2015-current; Larimer county chief deputy treasurer, 1988-2014; clerk in the Larimer County Treasurer’s Office, 1986-1988. Immediate past-president, Colorado County Treasurers’ Association. Previously: clerk, University of Arkansas and Nebraska Labor Department. Political/community experience: Executive board member, The Center for Family Outreach; volunteer, Animal House, a no-kill shelter Education: Colorado Mesa University, Certified Colorado County Treasurer (01/2019); 1,000-plus hours treasurer-specific continuing education; University of SD; University of Nebraska What would you strive to accomplish if elected Larimer County Treasurer? How would you work toward that goal? The continuance of safeguarding public funds for our schools, fire districts, municipalities and county operations is paramount. Customer service is so important: We answer phones when you call; we don’t use voice mail during work hours. Our newest tax collection system allows us to improve service and earned us the County’s Innovation Award. Excellent application of technology allows me to limit employees from the 14 in 1986 to 13 today. Since 2015, I’ve returned over $500,000 in unspent allocated funds. Our service delivery model, technology, and competent staff enable us to provide services at the high level taxpayers expect and deserve. I will continue to safeguard public funds; provide outstanding customer service; enhance operations through technological advances and remain under budget. I will accomplish this by applying my experience and knowledge and through teamwork.

How important is transparency for the treasurer’s office? What is your plan to achieve this? Larimer County government belongs to the people of Larimer County. Nearly everything we have and do is posted at larimer.org. Transparency is so valued by Larimer County that an entire section of our website is dedicated to transparency, including: the annual budget and audit; capital improvement plan; monthly checks written; audited investments; property tax searching; property tax payments by credit card, e-check or via local bank listed; ordering certificates of taxes due; tax lien sales; senior and veteran information; manufactured home tips; personal property and mortgage company information; monthly distributions to the taxing authorities; electronic property tax statements; frequently asked questions, online chat option, and more. The Treasurer’s Office is as transparent as logic and good sense allows without placing your financial information at risk. How would you describe the job and responsibilities of the Larimer County Trea­ surer? The treasurer is a non-policy making, administrative position, ensuring that Colorado statutes are followed correctly and accurately; responsible to all residents of Larimer County. Primary duties include accepting the tax roll from the assessor; mailing nearly 155,000 tax statements; and the collection, investment and distribution of property taxes. By law, the county treasurer is also responsible for all of the monies that come to the county and ensuring all county financial obligations are met.

VOTER GUIDE • OCTOBER 14, 2018 • 7

LARIMER COUNTY ASSESSOR

Bob Overbeck

Website: www.BobOverbeck.com Age: 55 How long have you lived in Larimer County? 17 years Family: Blessed to share life with the love of my life, four kids 9 to 20, one Labrador and four cats. Work experience: Have been a Commodity Trading Advisor (CTA) and a member of the National Futures Association since 1983. I have spent my career ensuring accuracy and advocating for fairness, transparency and accountability in government. Started education on the trading floor as a runner in the Chicago Mercantile exchange, completed a degree in business administration, then moved on to be a floor broker and trader on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Board of Trade and Minneapolis Grain Exchange. I understand the value of our dollars. Community involvement: Current Fort Collins City Council member. Is there anything voters should know about the Assessor position and how you would approach it? It is the responsibility of the

county assessors to accurately evaluate property for the purpose of assessing and collecting property taxes. I am running for county assessor to ensure that property valuations are done right the first time, no one pays more than their fair share in taxes, and the office of the assessor upholds the level of transparency, accuracy and accountability that taxpayers deserve.

What impact do you think Amend­ ment 73 would have on county home­ owners and revenues? According to the amendment language, Amendment 73 would lower and freeze residential and commercial property tax assessments for the K-12 education portion of your property taxes. The Colorado legislative council has said that this will have no impact for the county or other special districts. This is a question that is left up to the voters to decide, because it is their role to tell us where and how they want their dollars to be spent. In my role as assessor, I will ensure that property valuations are done right the first time, no one pays more than their fair share in taxes, and the office of the assessor upholds the level of transparency, accuracy and accountability that taxpayers deserve. The process must improve and that’s my singular focus.

8 • OCTOBER 14, 2018 • VOTER GUIDE

Alexis Smith

Website: www.alexisforassessor .com Age: 46 Family: Married since 1996 to Robb D Smith, Retired 1SG - US Army, two combat tours (Desert Storm and Iraqi Freedom). Two sons: Andrew Smith (28) and Ryan (26). One daughter, Rebecca Smith (15), is a sophomore at Loveland High School. Work experience: I worked in a commercial real estate firm until Robb and I moved to Loveland in 1997. Then I worked for local real estate developer and water rights broker prior to being hired by the Larimer County Assessor’s office in 2001. Community involvement: Families Readiness president, Deployed Soldiers, 2002-2004; American Legion Auxiliary unit treasurer, past president & member, 2005 – present; breast cancer research advocate, various roles, 1995 to present; active member at Zion Lutheran of Loveland. Bachelor of arts in public relations, Southern Utah University (1996); real estate courses completed for real estate broker’s license 2001; real estate appraisal courses required for certified general appraiser’s license, 2005. Is there anything voters should know about the assessor position and how you would approach it? I am running to be your Larimer County assessor because I realize that this office plays a vital role in this community. The assessor’s role is administrative but also impacts every person that lives, or even visits, Larimer County. I have the experience and knowledge that comes from working in the office for 17 years. I am proud of the work our office does, much of which is invisible to most voters. Having an assessor that understands the complexities of Colorado property tax laws is essential to assure the success of this county. Statutory mandates must always be first priority. Deadlines

and guidelines are set at the state level. Because 2019 is a reappraisal year, new values on over 150,000 accounts must be determined, analyzed, and mailed to all property owners on or before May 1. My focus would also be on continuous improvement both in how effectively and efficiently this office meets all mandated duties, and the ease of which property owners can access and review property records. Are there any issues relevant to this position you think are particularly important? How would you approach them? I believe it is important to encourage all property owners to review the property valuations themselves. In many Colorado counties, protests are filed by mostly real estate professionals, tax agents, or large corporations. The typical homeowner in those counties sees it as an intimidating process that is intentionally presented as adversarial. However, in Larimer County we have been on the leading edge of providing online sales information and making our protest processes as fast and easy as possible. What impact do you think Amend­ ment 73 would have on county home­ owners and revenues? Amendment 73 is a very complex proposal to change both the Colorado income tax structure and property tax assessment rates. It would most likely increase the tax liability for homeowners in Larimer County. It will increase the revenues to school districts in our county but may also have the unintended result of lowering revenues for many other districts in the county including fire districts, library districts and others. I encourage all voters to really research this issue.

LARIMER COUNTY

Ballot Issue 1A: Mental health

What it says: “Shall Larimer County taxes be increased $19,000,000 dollars annually (estimated first fiscal year dollar increase in 2019), and by whatever additional amount as may be raised annually thereafter, for a period of 20 years by the imposition of a .25 percent (25 cents on 100 dollars) sales and use tax, with all revenue from such tax to be used in accordance with the Board of County Commissioners resolution No. 07242018R013 for the following mental/behavioral health care purposes: • Provide preventative, early identification, intervention, support, and treatment services for youth, adults, families, and senior citizens, either directly or indirectly, who are residents of Larimer County including Berthoud, Estes Park, Fort Collins, Johnstown, Loveland, Timnath, Wellington, Windsor and rural communities of Larimer County, through in-person and other delivery methods which may include tele-services, community based services and other ser-

KEFALAS from page 5

vice options; and • Acquire, construct, improve, maintain, lease, remodel, staff, equip, and operate new and/or existing mental/behavioral health facilities; And shall the county be authorized to collect, retain and spend all proceeds of such tax without limitation by Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution, and further provided that an annual report shall be published and provided to the Board of County Commissioners on the designation or use of the revenues from the tax increase in the preceding calendar year consistent with its approved purposes?” What it means: Do you support a sales and use tax increase of 25 cents on every $100 spent in Larimer County for the next 20 years to be spent on the development of a mental and behavioral health care facility in the county and to provide various kinds of care services in-person and digitally to the county’s communities?

• Participation in legislative committees including: Health/ Human Services (effective servoter support because its passage vice delivery — child care, child and implementation will enhance well-being, self-sufficiency, workcurrent practices by building a force, aging, health); Local Govcomprehensive facility that ernment (county/municipal/speincludes a detox center and crecial districts); Capital ates opportunities for collaboraDevelopment (capital improvetion with community partners ment master plan); Business, throughout the county to ensure Labor & Technology (public/priproper implementation. vate partnerships, economic What would you describe as your qual­ development); Finance and ifications to serve as Larimer County Appropriations (budget/fiscal). Commissioner? •Larimer County home (42 years): extensive community, pro• State legislator (House and Senate): 12 years experience with fessional and volunteer experience working with various secrelevant skills and relationships tors — private, public, business, that translate directly to county nonprofit, faith, preschool-12 eduand regional approaches for colcation and higher education. laborative problem solving.

Uncontested candidates

Below is a list of the uncontested candidates who will be on the Nov. 6 ballot.

JENI ARNDT: STATE REPRESENTATIVE, DISTRICT 53

has graduated the FBI National Academy, the National Sheriffs Institute and the FBI Law Enforcement Executive Development Seminar.

CHAD R. WASHBURN: Jeni Arndt will run uncontested SURVEYOR as a Democrat repreSurveyor Chad Washburn, a senting DisRepublican, trict 53 of has served as Colorado. Larimer That district County’s surenvelops Fort veyor since Collins southApril 2009. east of HorseHe has been tooth Resera professional voir. Arndt surveyor for grew up in more than 19 Fort Collins and has been a longyears and is time resident. She also serves as licensed in the chair of the House of Agricul- Colorado, Wyoming and Idaho. ture, Livestock and Natural JAMES A. WILKERSON, IV: Resources Committee for the CORONER 71st Colorado General Assembly, County Coroner and Medical and is a member of the House of Examiner Business Affairs Committee and James Wilkthe Statutory Revision Commiserson, a sion. Republican, JUSTIN SMITH: LARIMER will run COUNTY SHERIFF uncontested Sheriff Justin Smith will run for the posiuncontested tion of Larimas a Republier County can sheriff for Coroner. Larimer Wilkerson County. was elected Smith has to the office in 2014, and has been the more than 25 years’ experience county sheriff practicing pathology. He managsince January es the Larimer County Coro2011 and has ner’s Office and Medical Exambeen a mem- iner’s Office, which contains ber of the eight investigators and a fullSheriff’s Office since 1991. He time secretary.

VOTER GUIDE • OCTOBER 14, 2018 • 9

BERTHOUD

Ballot Issues 3I, 3J, 3K: Recreation improvements

WHAT THEY ASK: Ballot Issue 3I: Town of Berthoud Issue regarding authorization of new 1% sales tax to finance recreation improvements. “Shall the town of Berthoud taxes be increased $1,400,000 (first full fiscal year dollar increase) annually for the purpose of funding parks and recreation needs within the town; such tax to consist of a rate increase in the town sales and use tax of 1.0% (which represents a one cent increase on each dollar) commending January 1, 2019; shall all revenues generated from the tax, net of the costs of collection, be deposited into a separate park and recreation fund and restricted as to use solely for parks and recreation purposes, including but not limited to: • Expanding and improving the existing town trail system; • Renovating or replacing existing aquatic facilities; • Developing, constructing and equipping a recreation center and related facilities; and • Developing, constructing and equipping athletic fields; And, to the extent funds are available, for the purpose of constructing, acquiring, equipping and operating park and recreation improvements; and shall the tax revenues deposited in the town park and recreation fund and all earnings thereon (regardless of amount) constitute a voter approved revenue change and an exception to the revenue and spending limits of Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution?” Ballot Issue 3J: Town of Berthoud issue regarding authorization for bond issuance to finance recreation improvements. “Shall the Town of Berthoud debt be increased $30,000,000, with a maximum repayment cost of up to $59,000,000, such debt to

and building new athletic fields? And, do you support the town issuing $30,000,000 in bonds, to be repaid with sales and use tax revenue, for those parks and recreation improvements? And, do you support the town changing the allowable uses for funds from a tax increase approved by voters in 1997 to allow those funds to be put toward the town’s planned parks and recreation improvements along with funds from the new sales tax increase?

WHAT PROPONENTS SAY: Funding a new Berthoud recreation center would improve Berthoud residents’ quality of life by giving them local access to a An artist’s rendition of proposed Berthoud parks and recreation improvements high-quality aquatics center, a gymnasium, a climbing wall and by consulting landscape architect Wenk Associates, Inc. studio space. The new spaces could be used by local students in consist of sales and use tax reverado Constitution?” a partnership with Thompson nue bonds to be payable from all Ballot Issue 3K: Town of Berthoud School District. The current or a portion of the town’s sales and Question Regarding Reallocation of Exist­ Berthoud pool facility does not use tax and issued solely for parks ing Sales Tax raise enough revenue to offset the and recreation purposes, including “Shall Town of Berthoud ordicosts of running it and therefore but not limited to: nances be amended without any costs the city a net $100,000 per • Expanding and improving the increase in taxes to be assessed or year to have, but a new facility existing town trail system; tax revenues to be generated such with more varied offerings would • Renovating or replacing exist- that revenues from the tax better pull its weight by being ing aquatic facilities; increase approved on November 4, more attractive for memberships. • Developing, constructing and 1997, by the qualified electors of equipping a recreation center and the Town of Berthoud may be utiWHAT OPPONENTS SAY: related facilities; and Parks and recreation improvelized exclusively for uses presently • Developing, constructing and allowed and for the construction, ments are “wants,” not “needs,” in equipping athletic fields; operation, and maintenance of cap- the town of Berthoud, and do not Such bonds to be dated and sold ital improvements to parks, open merit the risk the town will take on at such time, and at such prices by issuing bonds for this project. If spaces, recreation facilities and (at, above or below par) and conthe town defaults on its bonds, it trails?” taining such terms, not inconsiswill quite negatively and seriously WHAT IT MEANS: tent herewith, as the board of impact the town’s finances and Do you support a permanent 1 trustees may determine; and shall credit ratings, and potentially put the earnings on the investment of percent sales and use tax increase citizens on the hook to repay the within the town of Berthoud to the proceeds of such bonds debt. Furthermore, a tax increase fund parks and recreation needs (regardless of amount) and the impacts everyone, including those funds used for the payment of the within the town, including expand- who may wish never to use the bonds constitute a voter-approved ing and improving the town’s trail facility, and it will impact the poorrevenue change and an exception system, improving the aquatic est consumers most significantly to the revenue and spending limits facilities, building a new recreation as they struggle to make ends of Article X, Section 20 of the Colo- center in one of the town parks, meet.

10 • OCTOBER 14, 2018 • VOTER GUIDE

BERTHOUD

Ballot Issue 3L: Annexation

What it asks: “Shall the Town of Berthoud be authorized to annex parcel of property consisting of approximately 6.259 acres, more particularly described as: Case Annexation: That portion of the Northeast Quarter of Section 4, Township 4 North, Range 69 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, County of Larimer, State of Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Parcel 2A, Amended Duffy Exemption, recorded at Reception No. 97052403, Larimer County Clerk and Recorder, more particularly described as follows: Considering the North line of the Northeast corner of Section 4 as bearing South 89 degrees 59’ 58’’ West and with all bearings contained herein relative thereto: Commencing at the North Quarter corner of Section 4; thence South 00 degrees 13’ 44’’ West, 50.15 feet to a point on the North line of Heron Lakes Lake Club Annexation To The Town of Berthoud; thence along the West and South lines of Heron Lakes Lake Club Annexation the following 2 courses and distances: South 00 degrees 25’ 45’’ West, 1337.29 feet; thence, North 77 degrees 18’ 05’’ East, 447.46 feet to the Southwest corner of Parcel 2A, Amended Duffy Exemption, said point being the Point of Beginning; thence along said Parcel 2A the following 10 courses and distances: North 07 degrees 03’49’’ West, 396.85 feet; thence, North 04 degrees 08’54’’ West, 128.40 feet; thence, North 02 degrees 15’ 08’’ West, 205.22 feet; thence, North 79 degrees 55’50’’ East, 337.02 feet; thence, South 28 degrees 00’27’’ East, 280.84 feet; thence, South 41 degrees 52’38’’ East, 164.83 feet; thence, South 51 degrees 31’52’’ West,

107.08 feet; thence, South 54 degrees 47’05’’ West, 61.59 feet; thence South 65 degrees 29’05’’ West, 71.05 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 272,633 square feet or 6.259 acres more or less. Provided that the board of trustees, after considering the annexation application and holding a public hearing, as required by law, determines that such annexation is in the best interests of the town?” What it means: Do you support the town of Berthoud annexing an approximately 6.259-acre property known as Parcel 2A, outside the 2012 growth management area of the town at the Heron Lakes Marina Club annexation site? What proponents say: This property, owned by Heron Lakes Investments, is connected to the Heron Lakes Marina Club Annexation, which has already been approved by voters in April and by the Town Board. The Case annexation will allow the town to incorporate that entire property. Per Berthoud Ordinance No. 1180, all new annexation west of County Road 19 must go before the Town Board, so this is merely an administrative matter. Business and development brought to town by the Heron Lakes golf course will be good for Berthoud. What opponents say: Berthoud is growing too fast already, and adding the TPC Colorado at Heron Lakes PGA Tour golf course will only exacerbate that. The course is expected to inspire the building of more than 1,000 homes in the next 10 years, not to mention the many tourists and golfers it will bring to town. The new building could impact the town’s charm.

Berthoud Fire Protection District Ballot Issue 7B: Tax revenue

What it asks: “In order to sustain adequate fire, rescue, and emergency medical services, and only if the residential assessment rate is reduced below the current rate established pursuant to Section 3 of Article X of the Colorado Constitution, shall the Berthoud Fire Protection District (district) be permitted to adjust its property tax mill levy to offset any decrease in revenue caused by the reduction of the residential assessment rate, and shall such tax proceeds be collected and spent by the district as voter approved revenue and spending changes in each year, without regard to any constitutional or statutory spending or revenue limitations contained in Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution and Section 29-1-301 of the Colorado Revised Statutes?” What it means: Ballot Issue 7B would allow the fire district to collect property taxes at the current rate for the foreseeable future, unaffected by the Gallagher Amendment, which has

consistently lowered the taxable rate on homes since 1983. What proponents say: The fire district collects 89 percent of its budget from local property taxes, but the taxable value of Berthoud homes — and revenue — has dropped in recent years as the housing market has grown. Issue 7B would give Berthoud Fire the ability to collect property taxes at the assessment rate of 7.2 percent. This number would not change in years to come, though the projected 2020 assessment rates for homes is 6.11 percent. This would allow the department a guaranteed and steady revenue stream to fund the department, which is necessary since the volume of calls continues to grow as the number of homes continues to increase. Berthoud Fire has experienced a 94 percent increase in call volume since 2012. What opponents say: There is no organized opposition to this ballot issue.

VOTER GUIDE • OCTOBER 14, 2018 • 11

HOUSE DISTRICT 49

Perry L. Buck

Website: PerryforColorado.com Age: 56 Family: Married to Ken Buck, two stepchildren Cody (married to Lindsey) and Kaitlin (married to Matt Schwartz), with one grandchild How long have you lived in House Dis­ trict 49? I have lived in Windsor since May of 2011, but I am a third generation of Weld County. Professional background: Legislator for House District 49; formerly business development representative for Northeast Colorado for Gov. Owens, banker, life insurance and small business owner, currently president of Northern Colorado Event Planning. Political/community experience: Elected Weld County Council, atlarge; Weld County Chair, state GOP secretary and state GOP vice chair; president of the Colorado Federation of Republican Women. Partners Mentoring Youth, chair of United Way Campaign, board member of United Way, Greeley Chamber of Commerce/Northern Colorado Legislative Alliance, Greeley Rotary, Greeley Philharmonic Symphony, P.E.O., Board of Schaffer Enterprise, Habitat for Humanity Advisory Board, Board of Senior Resource Services Education: Graduate of Pepperdine University with a degree in English. Attended additional classes at Fort Lewis College for upper division accounting classes Political party: Republican What, if anything, needs to change about the way Colorado funds its public education system? Colorado funds our education system with 65 percent from the state, mostly general funds, and

35 percent from local communities, mostly property taxes. Total spending has risen from $3.5 billion in 2010-11 to $5.5 billion in 2017-18. That is a 57 percent increase and a 32 percent increase taking inflation and population growth into account. Current plans call for increasing education funding by 3 percent, resulting in an average of $13,000 per student in Colorado, which would rank us in the top 15 states in per pupil spending. I do not believe education funding in Colorado is inadequate. I believe classroom funding is deficient. We divert too much funding away from the classroom to satisfy unfunded federal mandates, compete for federal education grants and meet low priority expectations. We must stop using our schools as social laboratories and focus on educating our children in core subjects that are relevant to the emerging economy. Which state transportation problem should be the Legislature’s highest pri­ ority? What solution would you suggest? There are many transportation needs throughout the state of Colorado. In 1999 we bonded our sales and use tax for 28 projects. Those bonds retired in 2016. I support the same opportunity with Proposition 109, which will prioritize general fund dollars for transportation. For too many years we have done nothing to fund our transportation needs. Name another issue critical to you, and explain how you would approach this issue as the representative for House District 49. Mental Health is a critical issue. I serve on the Opioid Interim Committee, and many of the issues overlap. We have passed several pieces of legislation, and I am looking forward to seeing what more we can do in the next session. It would be an honor to complete my last term and focus more time on mental health issues in Colorado.

12 • OCTOBER 14, 2018 • VOTER GUIDE

Conor Duffy

Website: www.conorforcolorado .com Age: 39 Family: Married and the father of a 4-year-old son and 2-year-old twins How long have you lived in House Dis­ trict 49? 2 years Professional background: 20-plus years in the energy industry Political/community experience: 10plus years of community engagement, including Peace Corp service, Mali, West Africa Education: Bachelor’s of science, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz.; master’s business administration, energy finance, Rice University, Houston Political party: Democratic What, if anything, needs to change about the way Colorado funds its public education system? Education can no longer be constrained by TABOR limits. The solution is to vote YES on Amendment 73 to properly fund our schools. Which state transportation problem should be the Legislature’s highest prior­ ity? What solution would you suggest? I-25 is the greatest concern for House District 49, especially rural

area interchanges and overpasses. The solution is to fully fund our transportation expenditures. Thankfully, Proposition 110 addresses the funding of transportation projects for the next 20 years. I support Proposition 110. Vote yes on Proposition 110. I do not support Proposition 109 because it leaves a hole in the state budget and we will have to cut other programs to fund the road expenditures. Vote no on proposition 109 Name another issue critical to you, and explain how you would approach this issue as the rep­ resentative for House District 49. I will work with Republicans to reintroduce HB17 1187. HB 1187 adjusts the TABOR calculation and will free up about $150 million to $200 million. I support adding the money to the general fund to provide services to all our residents.

HOUSE DISTRICT 51

Hugh McKean

Website: mckeanforstatehouse .com Age: 50 Family: Wife, Kristin; children, Hanna and Aiden How long have you lived in House District 51? 21 years Professional background: Aviation, general contractor Political/community experience: Current state representative for House District 51; Loveland City Council Education: Bachelor’s degree, Colorado State University Political party: Republican Does some­ thing need to change about the way Colora­ do funds its public education system? Yes. It’s a common conversation about priorities, that the tax revenue isn’t keeping up. Staff at the Capitol have been looking into a plan to equalize mill levy revenue and also what fixes might be possible for Gallagher. When we really look at what we are required to spend and how we prioritize any additional dollars, we know we need to get creative with our solutions. No matter what, the additional $600 million from last year should give school boards some room to prioritize on a local level. Which Colorado transportation prob­ lem should be the Legislature’s highest priority? What solution would you sug­

gest? Concrete and asphalt. I really don’t know another way of saying it. Transportation, and for the next 10 to 15 years I really mean roads and bridges, absolutely must be a consistent priority. But we know that the funding sources there aren’t keeping up, in the same way that other functions of government are struggling to be fully funded. I would suggest that the priority is actually working with CDOT to have dollars appropriated by the duly elected representatives of the state helping fund the over $9 billion backlog of construction and repairs. Name another issue critical to you, and explain how you would approach this issue as the representative for House District 51. Care for our aging population. It has become increasingly apparent to me that we have to find innovative solutions to caring for our oldest constituents. I have worked in the past two years on finding ways to help seniors stay in their homes, around their neighbors and their familiar environs. The single best way to help reduce the costs associated with our aging population is to make sure that simple things do not force them into care facilities. Things like providing grant programs to modify their homes (HB 18-1267) are part of that solution as well as helping local organizations connect with seniors to assist in maintaining their properties so they can stay home longer.

Joan Shaffer

Website: JoanShafferHD51.com Age: 60 Family: Formerly married and the youngest of five siblings How long have you lived in House Dis­ trict 51? 13 years Professional background: Small-business owner since 2006; previously a nonprofit financial and business manager Political/community experience: • Loveland City Council member, Ward II (November 2009 November 2017) • Founder, Front Range on Track • Campaign leader, 2007 Loveland citizen initiative bringing campaign finance reform to council elections Education: High school graduate with college course work and professional certifications Political party: Democratic Does something need to change about the way Colorado funds its public educa­ tion system? Yes. K-12 through higher education is inadequately funded. Primary-education teachers and instructors are not paid livable wages commensurate with the level of education and responsibility required of the profession. Costs for higher education, including community and technical colleges, are too often prohibitive for students and their families, resulting in debt that hinders future success. Facilities are operating with nowcostly deferred maintenance (causing some neighborhood school closures), adding to overcrowding, while not meeting the technology needs of today’s classrooms. I will work to ensure that our funds are used wisely. I support ballot initiatives 5A and 5B because our current mill levy is the second lowest in Northern Colorado, resulting in the highest rate of teacher turnover in the region. I also support Amendment 93 as a fiscally sound and innovative solution to restructure our future statewide school revenue and appropri-

ately fund our schools and teachers. Which Colorado transportation problem should be the Legislature’s highest priori­ ty? What solution would you suggest? Adequate funding is the highest priority. We need to expand North I-25 not just by the one managed lane in the works, but inclusive of another general-purpose lane that is required by 2035 to lessen congestion, improve safety and maintain high air-quality standards. We simply can’t pave our way out. I will work to fund 21st century solutions including multimodal transportation. Services such as the FLEX bus system serving Fort Collins and Loveland through to Longmont and Boulder and Bustang providing express service to Denver are in high demand and should be expanded. Statewide commuter/passenger rail and regional bike and pedestrian systems are also vital to traffic reduction and meeting our needs. Name another issue critical to you and explain how you would approach this issue as the representative for House Dis­ trict 51. The development of affordable/ workforce housing is one of my top priorities. We must get serious about the fact that Loveland now has higher rental rates than Fort Collins. Our first responders, teachers, those who serve us, families and seniors can’t afford to live here, ultimately creating more traffic as they must “drive to qualify.” Yet, such options are drying up in Northern Colorado. I will look for opportunities to work with residential developers to build single — and multifamily housing for rent and purchase that will help to keep our neighbors.

VOTER GUIDE • OCTOBER 14, 2018 • 13

STATE SENATE DISTRICT 15

Rebecca Cranston Rob Woodward

Website: rebeccacranstonfor colorado.com Age: 33 Family: Foster parent How long have you lived in Senate District 15? 3 years Professional background: Health care nonprofit director Political/community experience: I served as a director for the Colorado Health Network, where I was responsible for administering health care services for eight counties in Northern Colorado. I regularly appeared in the local media and traveled to Denver to advocate for health care reform at the state and county levels. Education: Georgetown MBA, B.A. in Economics from Fort Lewis College Political party: Democratic Does something need to change about the way Colorado funds its public educa­ tion system? As an economist, I understand that our budgets are our moral documents, and our funding for public education is a gauge for our priorities as a state. As evermore school districts switch to four-day weeks, and Larimer County weathers a teacher retention crisis, it is critical that we fund public schools adequately to ensure all students have a fair starting point for success in life.

With limited resources, I oppose any voucher proposal that takes funds away from our public schools. Which Colorado transportation prob­ lem should be the Legislature’s highest priority? What solutions would you sug­ gest? While I do not oppose public transit, I believe we should keep our priorities realistic and focus on funding highway maintenance and construction before deferred maintenance makes the problem any worse. Any solution for transportation funding must include rural Colorado’s needs and address congestion on Interstate 25 to Loveland and Fort Collins. I support Proposed Initiative 153 to fund our transportation needs with a balanced budget. I also support reforming the procedure for cities and counties to provide municipal broadband if they choose to do so, as a way of reducing the number of cars on the road. Name another issue critical to you, and explain how you would approach this issue as the representative for SD­ 15. As a nonprofit director, health care policy has always been my passion. As Congress fails us, Colorado must take leadership here at home to halt the rising cost of premiums, increase the availability of care in remote parts of the state, and reduce barriers to coverage for lower-income people so that deferred care does not turn into higher costs in the emergency room later.

14 • OCTOBER 14, 2018 • VOTER GUIDE

Website: www.WoodwardFor Colorado.com Age: 49 Family: Wife, Paula, 27 Years; children Andrew, Allie and Kate How long have you lived in Senate Dis­ trict 15? 20-plus years Professional background: Entrepreneur, small business owner with over 450 employees in region Political/community experience: Actively serve the community — volunteering in public schools, leadership roles at church, involved with Colorado Special Olympics, served on the Loveland Planning Commission, facilitator at The Legacy Project, coach and play soccer Education: Bachelor of Science in Finance from Colorado State University, MBA with concentration in finance from DePaul University Political party: Republican Does something need to change about the way Colorado funds its public educa­ tion system? As a father of three, a business owner, and a candidate for state Senate, improving education is one of my passions and will be a priority as a legislator. Yes, absolutely something needs to change. We can do better. Simply put, more money needs to reach the classroom. We must provide resources to our students, not the growing bureaucracy. Colorado spends more on administrative costs than the U.S. average, and only 53 percent of total expenditures go to instruction. Consider, from 2011-12 to 2017-18: • students increased by 6 percent (853,407 to 906,829) • teachers increased by 8 percent (49,773 to 53,785) • administrators increased by over 34 percent (1,770 to 2,382). We should pay our teachers. Teachers are some of the hardest working professionals in Colorado. We should pay them accordingly. From 1992 to 2014, overall education spending increased 15 percent, but teacher pay

decreased 11 percent. Meanwhile, between 2011 and 2017, the number of K-12 “administrators” skyrocketed 34 percent. Which Colorado transportation prob­ lem should be the Legislature’s highest priority? What solutions would you sug­ gest? The need to focus on trip reliability and address congestion is at the top of the list. Funding immediate transportation and infrastructure needs should be the Legislature’s highest priority. For years the Legislature has failed to provide any real funding from the general fund budget. As a result, Coloradans are frustrated because we are driving on dangerous, congested and aging roads that cost us time, money and lives. The solution is to prioritize our spending. We do this by dedicating a portion of the budget directly to roads, bridges and infrastructure early on instead of treating it as an afterthought. Along with that, I plan to take a strong position with the Colorado Department of Transportation on prioritization of pending projects. Name another issue critical to you, and explain how you would approach this issue as the representative for SD­ 15. The rising cost of health care is an issue that affects many people. A recent study suggests that health care costs in Colorado are 17 percent above average compared to other states in the same study. The main factor that must to be addressed is: why health care in Colorado is so expensive? This is an issue that effects businesses and families alike. I look forward to working with qualified stakeholders to address this important issue once elected.

STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION: 2ND CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Johnny Barrett

Website: cd2johnny.org Age: 59 Family: Wife of 33 years, three kids How long have you lived in the district? 23 years in Niwot; grew up in Boulder Professional background: High tech sales, marketing, business development Political/com­ munity experi­ ence: More than 30 years leadership in multiple youth organizations Education: Bachelor’s degree in technical management, master’s degree in business administration, various executive training programs Party: Republican Should the state board change how much weight is given to factors in rating schools and districts, putting more weight on achievement versus growth?

With the current Colorado Measures of Academic Success (CMAS) testing showing that over half of the students did not pass proficiency in English language arts and math, we need to be focused on student achievement. Results matter. What do you see as the state board’s role in working with school districts? The State Board of Education must direct the Colorado Department of Education to become a clearing house for best practices on student achievement and become more of a support versus compliance organization for school districts. What’s the biggest issue before the state board in the coming year and how would you address it? More than half the students that take the Colorado Measures of Academic Success (CMAS) tests are not proficient, and it must be a priority for both the state board and Colorado Department of Education to address this issue that has been going on for more than 10 years. Results matter.

Angelika Schroeder

Website: schroederforstateboard .com Age: Over 60 Family: Husband of 50 years, Wayne Schroeder; two married daughters; three young grandchildren How long have you lived in the dis­ trict? 51 years in Boulder Professional background: Retired tax CPA and college professor of accounting Political/community experience: Nine-plus years on the State Board of Education, longtime BVSD schools volunteer, eight years on the BVSD school board; numerous district, state and national boards, councils and committees Education: Bachelor’s in math, MBA, Ph.D. in accounting, all from CU Party: Democratic Should the state board change how much weight is given to factors in rating schools and districts, putting more weight on achievement versus growth? Yes, it is time to reconsider the weights. Our school and district accountability measures now are academic achievement, academic growth and postsecondary workforce readiness. The cut scores for these measures are reviewed by law annually, and we will do that again this fall. In addition, as part of rule setting for a new law just passed, a fourth measure, “growth to standard,” (roughly, how much growth is necessary for the student to become proficient) will be defined and added to the frameworks, requiring a recalibration of the weights of each of the factors. What do you see as the state board’s role in working with school districts?

It should be a partnership, but with districts driving the bus. Colorado is a local control state, so school districts have control of education. The State Board of Education has a constitutional responsibility to ensure that state and federal laws are implemented. But there are many opportunities for the Department of Education and the board to assist the districts, both in the implementation of rules and laws when a more centralized process is practical and is requested by districts. Resources are scarce in our state, so any opportunity to provide services, especially to our more than 100 very small districts, can provide needed student support. What’s the biggest issue before the state board in the coming year and how would you address it? The continuing achievement gap for students in Colorado. On national assessments, Colorado students perform reasonably well compared to other states, in the top 20 percent, but we have one of the highest gaps between subgroups such as poverty, race, English language learners and special education. Our challenging financial environment is a factor. Closing these gaps requires all of us, including the board and CDE, to focus on very specific efforts: Bringing all third graders to read proficiently; working with districts that are on academic turnaround to make significant improvements in leadership, curriculum and school culture; and addressing the needs of our high school students by offering more options before graduation.

VOTER GUIDE • OCTOBER 14, 2018 • 15

CU BOARD OF REGENTS AT­LARGE Ken Montera

Campaign website: MonteraForCU Regent.com Age: 61 Family: Partner, Theresa; six children and stepchildren How long have you lived in Colorado Springs? Four years; born and raised in Pueblo Professional background: Worked in four Fortune 200 companies, including as executive vice president of retail operations for L Brands with direct responsibility for 40,000 associates and multibillion dollar operating budget Political/com­ munity experi­ ence: Served on numerous nonprofit boards; part of Leeds MBA mentoring program; established endowments for qualified Colorado students in need. Education: B.S. in business, University of Colorado; graduate-level programs through PepsiCo and L Brands Party: Republican

ities. Our search has to be broad in approach so as not to eliminate highly qualified candidates based on preconceived opinions or historical mindsets. What specific strategies can the Board of Regents employ to help make CU more affordable and accessible? There are a number of fundamental areas that we need to focus on in helping make tuition more affordable. Continue building relationships with the state Legislature to ensure we are maximizing state funding. Clearly provide our fundraising communities and research partners with the visible achievements of the university to drive even greater donation levels and research opportunities. Less than 50 percent of our students graduate in four years — we have to understand and improve on this number to significantly reduce the cost of a CU education. As with any large organization, there is always budget creep. Creating a consistent focus on cost-benefit analysis, reducing bureaucracy and driving a high degree of fiscal accountability across all areas will enable us to reduce redundancy and waste and improve productivWhat qualities and/or experiences ity, which in turn frees up funds would you prioritize in candidates vying for student impact. to become the next president of the Uni­ What are your top priorities and how versity of Colorado? will you address them? This individual must have prov• Ensure that the cost of a CU en, demonstrated success leading education is affordable for Coloralarge, multi-faceted, decentralized do families, as our state’s flagship organizations, including strategy, institution. It is a fundamental budget oversight, capital expendi- responsibility for the Board of ture, culture and diversity leader- Regents. ship; a demonstrated track record • Foster and nurture an enviin fundraising; and, most imporronment of free speech where crittantly, the ability to partner with ical thinking skills can be develdiverse groups to establish strong, oped through vigorous debate. overarching objectives that lead to • Create an inclusive environthe health and success of our stu- ment on the board where our dents, faculty and staff. They must overarching objectives will be have significant experience in driven by the success of our stuproblem solving, creative soludents and faculty, not individual tions and a high degree of curiosi- objectives. ty. This individual could come • Provide degree programs that from academia, government or enable our students to be competithe private sector, as long as they tive and successful in the open clearly demonstrate these capabil- market once they leave CU. 16 • OCTOBER 14, 2018 • VOTER GUIDE

Christopher Otwell

Website: facebook.com/otwellc4 CURegent Age: 45 Family: One daughter; fiancé How long have you lived in Aurora? Colorado Springs, 1991- 2011, 2013-2015; Aurora, 2011- 2013, 2015-present Professional background: Computer systems engineer and adjunct cyber security professor, Aurora; platform architect of GPS OCX (GPS III — third generation) Satellite Ground Control Station, Schriever Air Force Base Political/community experience: Volunteered in Cheyenne Mountain VFW Post 3917 activities; no prior political experience; full resume: scribd.com/document/371836914/OTWELL-Resume-v31-Long-Version Education: Bachelors and master’s in computer science, Colorado Technical University; adjunct professor of cyber security at CTU in Aurora since 2016 Party: Unity What qualities and/or experiences would you prioritize in candidates vying to become the next president of the University of Colorado? For too long, the only voices in politics are those of administrators and/or lawyers. We need a voice of unity at the table that also provides a centrist set of opinions. Solving difficult problems is mandatory going forward. Engineers solve problems by finding common ground. Education is a major problem — cost and availability — for the people of Colorado. To improve our state’s future, we need the best educated and most diverse population working to solve problems, starting with college youth. What specific strategies can the Board of Regents employ to help make CU more affordable and accessible? • Stabilize costs: Require the university to inform new students up-front exactly how much each year will cost, and ensure

that the cost does not change for the next six years. • Student government-specific budget: Rebuild the student government with its own dedicated budget approved by the CU Regents, starting at the same level as in 2015. • Availability: Ensure that everyone who wants an education has the means to obtain one. • Increased income, reduced costs: Increase private sector ventures helping to off-set a CU school system modernization effort. Reduce yearly student costs by utilizing tools such as tablet-based electronic textbooks for all classes. With the technology needs of Colorado’s future, we must modernize the curriculum to include cyber security, space engineering and computer cloud concepts. • Diversity: Work with the CU NEXT organization to increase enrollment and diversity by finding a way to bring in deserving students and improve ethnic diversity. All Colorado residents should have equal access to CU, as well as diversity training and acceptance training. All students must be allowed to express themselves freely and without discrimination, regardless of topic, political beliefs, racial spectrums, culture, background, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, socio-economic status, age, physical abilities, religious beliefs, and/or other ideologies. The stronger we are in diversification of thought and acceptance of others, the stronger as a State we can become. What are your top priorities and how will you address them? See above.

CU BOARD OF REGENTS AT­LARGE Lesley Smith

Campaign website: lesleyforcu.org Age: 61 Family: Husband, Michael, of 28 years; daughter, Jocelyn (23); and son, Anton (22) How long have you lived in Boulder?: 29 years Professional background: 29-year CU aquatic scientist and educator Political/community experience: Eight years on the Boulder Valley School Board (2005-2013); current chair of Boulder’s Water Resources Advisory Board; Foothills United Way Community Impact Committee Education: Bachelor’s in aquatic biology, UC Santa Barbara; Ph.D. in marine environmental and estuarine sciences, University of Maryland, College Park 2 Party: Democratic What qualities and/or experiences would you prioritize in candidates vying to become the next president of the University of Colorado? In the coming year, the board will have the critical job of hiring a new president for the first time in a decade. I want to see the board hire a visionary leader who can collaborate with the university’s diverse stakeholders and be an effective advocate for public and private funding for CU. Ideally this individual would have significant leadership experience within systems of higher education and have spent at least several years in Colorado in order to understand the unique funding challenges CU faces. What specific strategies can the Board of Regents employ to help make CU more affordable and accessible?

With resident tuition and fees quadrupling since 2000, this must be the top priority for the board. CU Boulder recently dropped class fees and implemented guaranteed tuition, in which tuition stays constant during a student’s college career. I would like to see these changes implemented at the other three campuses. I also think it’s a positive step for CU to offer alternative models of delivering an education, such as online learning. However, the board’s ability to drive down tuition is limited by state funding for the CU system, which has declined significantly since 2000 on a per-student basis. I would advocate for the Legislature to reverse this trend and to restore higher education funding to pre-recession levels. Regarding accessibility, the board can help smooth the transfer process so that community college students can easily matriculate to CU and get credit for completed coursework without jumping through unnecessary hoops. The board should also continue to establish partnerships with non-CU institutions, like the 2 & 2 engineering program at Colorado Mesa University, in which engineering students stay in Grand Junction but are taught in part by resident CU professors. What are your top priorities and how will you address them? First, hire a new president who can collaborate with the university’s diverse stakeholders, including faculty, students and parents, and be an effective advocate for public and private funding for the university. Second, in spite of cuts to CU’s funding by the Legislature, we must improve affordability for Colorado residents. I would start by investigating what it would take to bring guaranteed tuition to all four CU campuses.

James Treibert

Website: @TreibertJames on Twitter Age: 47 Family: Married; no children How long you lived in Colorado? Since 1997 Professional background: Library and sales Political/community experience: Did not answer Education: B.A. in history, Minnesota State University; master’s certificate in international management, University of Maryland, University College Party: Libertarian What qualities and/or experiences would you prioritize in candidates vying to become the next president of the University of Colorado? The next president of CU should be creative in dealing with the university budget and priorities. These priorities are the following: Reduce dependence on federal student loans. The president (should) encourage more private investments regarding lowering any costs for the university. Having a balanced budget is important. What specific strategies can the Board of Regents employ to help make CU more affordable and accessible? The Board of Regents must be

able to be active in the community — having good student workstudy and internship programs. What are your top priorities and how will you address them? My priorities include offering more summer classes and nontraditional classes to students. I would address this because it would make tuition more affordable. Make learning more interesting and possibly reduce stress on the students to take large amounts of loans out. I feel that CU should be more open to different views and support student academic freedom. I want the university to offer more English and foreign language programs to students campus-wide. The costs of tuition at CU increased because of the dependence on the federal student loan program. I would be creative in how students can fund their school, and possibly have state or local government offer more student aid programs.

VOTER GUIDE • OCTOBER 14, 2018 • 17

COLORADO BALLOT ISSUES

Proposition 109 What it asks: “Shall state debt be increased $3,500,000,000, with a maximum repayment cost of $5,200,000,000, without raising taxes or fees, by a change to the Colorado revised statutes requiring the issuance of transportation revenue anticipation notes, and, in connection therewith, note proceeds shall be retained as a voter-approved revenue change and used exclusively to fund specified road and bridge expansion, construction, maintenance, and repair projects throughout the state?” What it means: Dubbed “Fix Our Damn Roads,” the proposition would require the state to borrow up to $3.5 billion in 2019 to fund up to 66 specific highway projects and direct the state to find a source of funds to repay the borrowed amount without raising taxes or fees. It also would limit total repayment amount, including principal and interest, to $5.2 billion over 20 years. What supporters say: Jon Caldara, president of libertarian think tank, the Independence Institute, drafted the ballot language, saying the measure is needed because the Legislature can’t prioritize highway maintenance.

Proponents say it will accelerate construction of essential highway projects without raising taxes or fees. They argue that building and maintaining a highway system is a core functions of state government and that Colorado has failed to invest sufficient funds to maintain and expand the highway system. The measure, they state, would improve quality of life in Colorado by forcing state government to prioritize highway projects and in turn decrease traffic congestion, which creates higher costs of doing business in the state while decreasing driver and passenger safety on Colorado roads. What opponents say: The proposition commits up to $5.2 billion to repay the debt without creating a source of to do so. They argue debt repayment would divert money from other programs, such as education, health care, and routine transportation maintenance. They further state that the measure would not address all of the state’s transportation needs, nor does it address necessary ongoing maintenance. Other concern stem from the expense of the debt, which opponents state would cost $1.7 billion for interest payments alone.

18 • OCTOBER 14, 2018 • VOTER GUIDE

Proposition 110

What it asks: “Shall state taxes be increased $766,700,000 annually for a twenty-year period, and state debt shall be increased $6,000,000,000 with a maximum repayment cost of $9,400,000,000, to pay for state and local transportation projects, and, in connection therewith, changing the Colorado revised statutes to: 1) increase the state sales and use tax rate by 0.62% beginning January 1, 2019; requiring 45% of the new revenue to fund state transportation safety, maintenance, and congestion related projects, 40% to fund municipal and county transportation projects, and 15% to fund multimodal transportation projects, including bike, pedestrian, and transit infrastructure; 2) authorize the issuance of additional transportation revenue anticipation notes to fund priority state transportation maintenance and construction projects, including multimodal capital projects; and 3) provide that all revenue resulting from the tax rate increase and proceeds from issuance of revenue anticipation notes are voter-approved revenue changes exempt from any state or local revenue, spending, or other limitations in law?” What it means: Proposition 110, dubbed “Let’s Go Colorado,” would increase the state sales and use tax rate from 2.9 percent to 3.52 percent for 20 years. The new tax revenue would go toward state (45 percent), local (40 percent) and multimodal (15 percent) transportation projects. The measure also would allow Colorado to borrow up to $6 billion for transportation projects, with total repayment, including principal and interest, to $9.4 billion over 20 years. What supporters say: The state’s highways are deteriorating while the cost of improvements contin-

ues to increase. Colorado has an immediate need for infrastructure investment but cannot afford to expand and modernize the transportation system, including road, bus, bike, pedestrian, and rail options to address a growing population. Prop 110, they argue creates a flexible statewide transportation solution, and it lets local communities identify their own transportation projects and prioritize their most urgent needs. Supporters further state the measure creates a sustainable source of funding for transportation needs in a time when highway costs outpace collections from the state gas tax, while not diverting money from funding for education, health programs, and public safety. What opponents say: The proposition taxes for a fundamental government service that should be fully funded through the state budget. Any shortfall in transportation funding, they argue, is a result of prioritizing state spending in other areas of government. Colorado, they state, can fund roads with the money it collects in taxes, rather than resorting to expensive borrowing. Opponents contend the measure devotes too much revenue to multimodal transportation, money that should be used exclusively for road repair and improvement. They further argue that state sales taxes are already high and provide a poor method of funding transportation. With sales tax rates exceeding 10 percent in some areas of Colorado, they contend that raising the state sales tax disproportionately affects low-income individuals, who would have to spend a larger share of their budget buying taxable necessities.

COLORADO BALLOT ISSUES

Proposition 111

What it asks: “Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado Revised Statutes concerning limitations on payday lenders, and, in connection therewith, reducing allowable charges on payday loans to an annual percentage rate of no more than thirty-six percent?” What it means: Proposition 111 would amend state statutes to reduce the total cost for a payday loan to a 36 percent annual percentage rate; and would expand the definition for unfair or deceptive trade practices for payday lending. What supporters say: State residents pay too much to borrow from payday lenders, who can charge an annual percentage rate of more than 180 percent. They further argue payday loans lead to a cycle of debt for some borrowers, who borrow money to pay off other payday loans. The reduction in APR, they state, will reduce the cost of payday loans

and allow borrowers to be better able to repay them. What opponents say: The measure could eliminate the payday lending business in Colorado. They argue payday loans provide options for consumers who may not qualify for other types of credit and that limited or no access to such loans, consumers could pay higher costs to other creditors for late payments, bounced checks, overdrafts or utility disconnect fees. Their further concern is if access to payday loans is limited, those in need of financial assistance could turn to unregulated lenders for higher-cost loans. Opponents say the measure in unnecessary, pointing to reforms passed by the legislature in 2010 that led to reduced loan costs and resulted in fewer defaults while ensuring a well-regulated source of short-term credit remained available to state consumers. This measure is unnecessary

Proposition 112

What it asks: “Shall there be a change to the Colorado Revised Statutes concerning a statewide minimum distance requirement for new oil and gas development, and, in connection therewith, changing existing distance requirements to require that any new oil and gas development be located at least 2,500 feet from any structure intended for human occupancy and any other area designated by the measure, the state, or a local government and authorizing the state or a local government to increase the minimum distance requirement?” What it means: Proposition 112 would require that new oil and natural gas development be located at least 2,500 feet from occupied structures, water sources, and areas designated as vulnerable. What supporters say: Oil and natural gas operations may adversely impact public health, safety, and the environment. Some people living near oil and gas operations have reported negative health effects to the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, such as sinus and respiratory conditions, headaches and nausea. They also argue oil and gas operations increases noise, traffic, dust, light, and odors. Requiring operations be farther away from homes, schools, businesses, and other occupied buildings, as well as from water sources and recreation areas, will reduce nuisance impacts and potential exposure to air pollutants. With the Front Range seeing an increase in development and natural gas activity, the measure, supporters state, will provide property owners with greater certainty about the location of new oil and natural gas develop-

ment. Placing oil and natural gas development farther away from occupied structures reduces resident exposure to industrial activity and the potential hazards related to such activity, and also could improve quality of life for nearby residents, the argue. What opponents say: Proposition 112 would eliminate new oil and natural gas activity on most nonfederal land in Colorado; according to the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, about 85 percent of Colorado’s non-federal land would be excluded from development with the required 2,500-foot setback. They state that oil and natural gas development is important to the state economy, generating an estimated $10.9 billion in production value in 2017 and supporting many other industries and jobs. Passage of 112 would result in the loss of jobs, lower payments to mineral owners, and reduced tax revenue that is used for local schools and other governmental services and programs, they argue. They further contend the measure is unnecessary because existing setback requirements provide a balanced approach to protecting public health, safety, and the environment, adding existing setback requirements were developed through a collaborative rule-making process and guided by technical expertise; and that when those setback rules were adopted, the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission considered the concerns of mineral owners, residents, schools, businesses, and others. Opponents also point to current law granting the commission authority to modify setback requirements if necessary.

VOTER GUIDE • OCTOBER 14, 2018 • 19

COLORADO BALLOT ISSUES

Amendment 73

What it asks: “Shall state taxes be increased $1,600,000,000 annually by an amendment to the Colorado constitution and a change to the Colorado revised statutes concerning funding relating to preschool through high school public education, and, in connection therewith, creating an exception to the single rate state income tax for revenue that is dedicated to the funding of public schools; increasing income tax rates incrementally for individuals, trusts, and estates using four tax brackets starting at .37% for income above $150,000 and increasing to 3.62% for income above $500,000; increasing the corporate income tax rate by 1.37%; for purposes of school district property taxes, reducing the current residential assessment rate of 7.2% to 7.0% and the current nonresidential assessment rate of 29%to 24%; requiring the revenue from the income tax increases to be deposited in a dedicated public education fund and allowing the revenue collected to be retained and spent as voter-approved revenue changes; requiring the legislature to annually appropriate money from the fund to school districts to support early childhood through high school public educational programs on an equitable basis throughout the state without decreasing general fund appropriations; directing the legislature to enact, regularly review, and revise when necessary, a new public school finance law that meets specified criteria; until the legislature has enacted a new public school finance law, requir-

ing the money in the fund to be annually appropriated for specified education programs and purposes; requiring the money in the fund to be used to support only public schools; requiring general fund appropriations for public education to increase by inflation, up to 5%, annually; and requiring the department of education to commission a study of the use of the money in the fund within five years?” What it means: The Colorado Constitution would be amended to raise about $1.6 billion in taxes per year that would be used for pre-K to 12th grade public education. It wouldn’t raise taxes on about 92 percent of Coloradans, but would raise corporate taxes and taxes on people making more than $150,000 a year. It would also reduce property taxes, and won’t affect other locally approved taxes. What supporters say: Addresses chronic underfunding of schools at a time when the state economy is strong, and students and schools will benefit through increases to base funding, full day Kindergarten, at-risk children, English Language Learner programs, special needs and gifted students. What opponents say: Will reduce amount of money households have to spend and places an additional tax burden on taxpayers with no guarantee of increased academic achievement. Will decrease productivity because the more a person earns, the more taxes he or she will have to pay. Will drive wealth out of the state.

20 • OCTOBER 14, 2018 • VOTER GUIDE

Amendment 74

What it says: “Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado constitution requiring the government to award just compensation to owners of private property when a government law or regulation reduces the fair market value of the property?” What it means: It would allow Coloradans to make a financial claim on property that’s devalued because of government action.

What supporters say: The proposed amendment, which is backed by the oil and gas industry, will protect private property owners. What opponents say: The proposed amendment is opposed by the Colorado Municipal League, which says it could chill future regulatory efforts by local governments. The Boulder County Board of Commissioners also has opposed the amendment.

Amendment 75

What it says: “Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado constitution providing that if any candidate in a primary or general election for state office directs more than one million dollars in support of his or her own election, then every candidate for that office in the same election may accept five times the amount of campaign contributions normally allowed?” What it means: The amendment would allow political candidates seeking state office to accept up

to $5,750 per person per election cycle, up from $1,500, if another candidate spends $1 million or more of his or her own money on a candidate. The idea is to even the playing field between wealthy candidates and those with less money. What supporters say: The amendment will prevent people from being able to buy their way into elected office. What opponents say: The amendment could possibly pump even more money into elections.

Amendment V

What it asks: “Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado constitution concerning a reduction in the age qualification for a member of the general assembly from twenty-five years to twentyone years?” What it means: If approved, the minimum age for an individual to serve in the state Legislature would be lowered to 21. What supporters say: Excluding 21- to 24-year-olds from seeking election to the state Legislature is an unnecessary restriction. A 21-year-old is considered an adult under the law. Voters can judge whether a candidate possesses the maturity, ability, and

competence to hold political office. In addition, allowing younger candidates to run for office encourages the civic engagement of young people. What opponents say: The current age requirement strikes an appropriate balance between youth and experience. Younger candidates might lack the maturity and expertise to be effective legislators. The policy decisions and political pressures legislators face are best handled by people with more life experience. Lack of experience could hinder a young legislator’s ability to effectively represent constituents.

COLORADO BALLOT ISSUES

Amendment A

What it asks: “Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado constitution that prohibits slavery and involuntary servitude as punishment for a crime and thereby prohibits slavery and involuntary servitude in all circumstances?” What it means: If approved, language that allows slavery and involuntary servitude to be used

as punishment for the conviction of a crime would be removed from the state Constitution. What supporters say: The measure eliminates slavery and involuntary servitude in all circumstances. What opponents say: The amendment would make a change to the Colorado constitution that is redundant.

Amendment W

What it says: “Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado constitution concerning a change in the format of the election ballot for judicial retention elections?” What it means: If approved, ballots would no longer be required to include a retention question for each justice and judge. What it supporters say: The amendment will make ballots more concise and reader-friendly and a shorter ballot will allow voters to complete it more efficiently, which could encourage voter participation. A more con-

cise ballot also could save counties printing and mailing costs, particularly in more populous counties that elect multiple justices or judges and counties that are required to print ballots in both English and Spanish. What opponents say: The amendment runs the risk of confusing voters who might know if they are casting ballots in a multi-candidate election or for each individual justice or judge. The potential confusion could increase the likelihood that voters will skip judicial retention questions.

Amendment X

What it asks: “Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado constitution concerning changing the industrial hemp definition from a constitutional definition to a statutory definition?” What it means: The amendment would remove the definition of “industrial hemp” from the state Constitution and, instead, use the definition in federal law or state statute. What supporters say: Colorado is the leading producer of industrial

hemp in the country and the only state with a definition of industrial hemp in its constitution. Striking the definition will allow the state’s hemp industry to remain competitive with other states as the regulatory landscape evolves for the crop. What opponents say: State voters added the definition of industrial hemp to the Constitution through the initiative process and the measure could deviate from the voters’ original intent.

Amendment Y

What it asks: “Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado constitution concerning a change to the way that congressional districts are drawn, and, in connection therewith, taking the duty to draw congressional districts away from the state legislature and giving it to an independent commission, composed of twelve citizens who possess specified qualifications; prohibiting any one political party’s control of the commission by requiring that one-third of commissioners will not be affiliated with any political party, onethird of the commissioners will be affiliated with the state’s largest political party, and one-third of the commissioners will be affiliated with the state’s second largest political party; prohibiting certain persons, including professional lobbyists, federal campaign committee employees, and federal, state, and local elected officials, from serving on the commission; limiting judicial review of a map to a determination by the supreme court of whether the commission or its nonpartisan staff committed an abuse of discretion; requiring the commission to draw districts with a focus on communities of interest and political subdivisions, such as cities and counties, and then to maximize the number of competitive congressional seats to the extent possible; and prohibiting maps from being drawn to dilute the electoral influence of any racial or ethnic group or to protect any incumbent, any political candidate, or any political party?” What it means: The amendment would create the Independent Congressional Redistricting Commission, which would be made up of an equal number of members from each of the state’s two largest political parties and unaffiliated voters, to amend and approve congressional district maps drawn by nonpartisan legislative staff. It also would establish a pro-

cess for selecting commissioners, new requirements for transparency and ethics, and a procedure for judicial review of commission maps; as well as establish and prioritize the criteria the commission must use for adopting the state’s congressional district map. What supporters say: The measure limits the role of partisan politics in the redistricting process by transferring the Legislature’s role to an independent commission and creates a system of checks and balances to ensure that no one political party controls the commission. It makes the process more transparent and provides greater opportunity for public participation since redistricting would be conducted by an independent commission in public meetings, with safeguards against undue influence in the preparation and adoption of maps. It brings structure to the redistricting process by using clear, ordered and fair criteria in the drawing of districts. and prioritizes factors such as communities of interest, city and county lines and political competitiveness. What opponents say: The amendment takes accountability out of the process. Unlike state legislators who are subject to election and campaign finance requirements, unelected commissioners are not accountable to voters. The commissioner selection process outlined in the measure is complex, and half of the members are determined by random chance. The complicated and random selection process could prevent individuals with important experience and knowledge from becoming commissioners. While the goal of the random selection may be to remove politics from redistricting, unaffiliated commissioners with partisan views could still be selected, and the selection process might not result in a commission that can be impartial and promote consensus.

VOTER GUIDE • OCTOBER 14, 2018 • 21

COLORADO

Amendment Z

What it asks: “Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado constitution concerning a change to the manner in which state senate and state house of representatives districts are drawn, and, in connection therewith, reforming the existing legislative reapportionment commission by expanding the commission to twelve members and authorizing the appointment of members who possess specified qualifications; prohibiting any one political party’s control of the commission by requiring that one-third of commissioners will not be affiliated with any political party, one-third of the commissioners will be affiliated with the state’s largest political party, and one-third of the commissioners will be affiliated with the state’s second largest political party; prohibiting certain persons, including professional lobbyists, federal campaign committee employees, and federal, state, and local elected officials, from serving on the commission; limiting judicial review of a map to a determination by the supreme court of whether the commission or its nonpartisan staff committed an abuse of discretion; requiring the commission to draw state legislative districts using communities of interest as well as political subdivisions, such as cities and counties, and then to maximize the number of competitive state legislative seats to the extent possible; and prohibiting maps from being drawn to dilute the electoral influence of any racial or ethnic group or to protect any incumbent, any political candidate, or any political party?” What it means: The amendment would replace the Colorado Reapportionment Commission with the Independent Legislative Redistricting Commission, consisting of an equal number of members from each of the state’s two largest political parties and unaffiliated voters, to amend and

approve state legislative district maps drawn by nonpartisan legislative staff. It would establish a process for selecting commissioners, new requirements for transparency and ethics, and a procedure for judicial review of commission maps; and expand and prioritize the criteria the commission must use for adopting legislative district maps. What supporters say: The measure limits the role of partisan politics in the legislative redistricting process. Through the commissioner selection process, checks and balances are in place to ensure no single political party controls the commission. Applicants must be qualified to serve on the commission and, unlike the current reapportionment commission, lobbyists and politicians are prohibited from serving. The selection process limits the appointment power of party leaders by relying on retired judges and random selection. Republicans, Democrats, and unaffiliated voters must be appointed to the commission in equal numbers. Additionally, nonpartisan legislative staff draw the district maps, and each map’s approval requires a supermajority vote of the commission, including at least two unaffiliated commissioners. What opponents say: The measure reduces accountability in redistricting because the selection process it proposes will result in a group of commissioners who are not elected and are not accountable to elected officials. This process relies on unelected retired judges to screen applicants and select half of the commissioners. Further, the commission is staffed by government employees who are not accountable to the voters who might end up drawing the final maps if the commission cannot agree. Legislative staff could have a vested interest in the outcome of elections that could bias their work drawing district maps.

22 • OCTOBER 14, 2018 • VOTER GUIDE

2ND CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Kevin Alumbaugh Website: Greaterbouldergreen party.org Age: 60 Family: Married, no children How long have you lived in Colora­ do? 28 years Professional background: A professional musician and music teacher since 1976. I opened a private music school in Evergreen in 2000, currently employing 12 teachers. Political/community experience: I have been active in the Green Party of Colorado since 2006. GPCO online state council facilitator from 2006-2013, and cochair of the Greater Boulder Green Party local chapter for four years. Education: Two years of college. Longview Community College, Lee’s Summit, Mo., 197677, and UMKC Conser vator y of Music, Kansas City, Mo., 197778. Party: Green Should oil and gas activity in the 2nd Congressional District be primari­ ly subject to local control, state con­ trol, or do you favor fewer restrictions on the industry? Oil and gas activity in CD2 should be entirely under local control. I support Ballot Initiative 97. I support the Colorado Community Rights Amendment and the Colorado Community Rights Network. I propose to double the severance taxes on the oil and gas industr y (Colorado currently has one of the lowest severance tax rates), eliminate “ad valorem” deductions and “stripper well” severance tax exemptions, and use the resulting revenues to subsidize private investment in solar power and electric cars. The time is now to take bold steps to initiate the transition from fossil fuels to clean renewable energy and the transition of fossil fuelrelated jobs to jobs in the

emerging green energy industr y. Oil and gas extraction on the Front Range is not only poisoning the air 3 million people breathe with average ozone levels higher than what is considered safe by federal health standards, it is contributing to the current climate catastrophe which is threatening life as we know it globally. What is your stance on whether stricter gun controls are needed; if they are needed, what is the best path forward? I support the banning of assault weapons and a buyback program to reduce the number of assault weapons that currently exist, stricter background checks, and an end to gun show loopholes. I propose a tax on gun sales that would go to support a program to replace public mental health facilities eliminated by the Reagan administration. Do you support President Donald Trump’s call to fund a wall on our southern border to slow immigration? No. The concept of a continuous wall along the southern U.S. border is ludicrous and impossible at any cost. The best way to curb immigration is to require that all trade agreements with Mexico and all countries be predicated on the stipulation that citizens in countries we do trade with are paid a fair wage. The current immigration hysteria is ridiculous and based on racism. Immigrants should be screened for criminal backgrounds and then offered work visas and a quick path to citizenship for them and their families.

2ND CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Roger Barris

Website: barris4congress.com Age: 59 Family: Legally separated with three adult children (Athena, Artus and Oscar); long-term girlfriend How long have you lived in Ever­ green? Since November 2017 Professional background: I was an investor and entrepreneur for over 25 years, including cofounding a $2 billion fund management business. I invested more than $20 billion without loss. Political/com­ munity experi­ ence: I am on the Board of the LP of Colorado. I am an active donor to libertarian causes and my high school. Education: I am a summa cum laude graduate (BA Economics) from Bowdoin College. I am a Highest Distinction graduate (MBA Finance) from the University of Michigan. Party: Libertarian Should oil and gas activity in the 2nd Congressional District be primarily sub­ ject to local control, state control, or do you favor fewer restrictions on the industry? Your question is a false opposition. The decisions about this industry should be made at the state and local level. It would be wise for these decisions not to be restrictive, but this is not a feder-

al matter to decide. In general, I believe that the fracking industry is safe, provides high-paying jobs and sizable tax revenues, keeps energy prices low, and enhances our national security by freeing us from foreign sources of energy. It has also allowed the U.S. to greatly reduce CO2 and other emissions as we transition to alternative energies, which are not yet economically feasible due to problems of intermittency and storage. What is your stance on whether stricter gun controls are needed; if they are needed, what is the best path for­ ward? Again, this is not a federal matter. I am a strong supporter of the right of self-defense and the federal government’s role here should be to intervene if states or localities interfere with 2nd Amendment rights. In the House, I will never vote to approve of federal gun control measures. Do you support President Donald Trump’s call to fund a wall on our southern border to slow immigration? No. This is a dumb idea. The best way to avoid illegal immigration is to make legal immigration - for both skilled workers (H1B visas) and unskilled “guest workers” (in, for example, agriculture, construction and food processing - where we have labor shortages) - easier and broader. These immigrants are enormously beneficial to our communities and economy. A path to citizenship for the Dreamers should be created.

Joe Neguse

Website: joeneguseforcongress .com Age: 34 Family: Wife, Andrea Neguse; and daughter Natalie Neguse (1-month old) How long have you lived in Colorado? 28 years Professional background: Attorney Political/community experience: CU Regent for 2nd Congressional District (2009-2015); state cabinet member & executive director of Colorado’s consumer protection agency (Department of Regulatory Affairs) (2015-2017); Co-founder & former board chair of New Era Colorado; Former commissioner on Boulder Housing Authority. Education: University of Colorado, B.A., economics & political science (summa cum laude); University of Colorado School of Law, J.D. Party: Democratic Should oil and gas activity in the 2nd Congressional District be primarily sub­ ject to local control, state control, or do you favor fewer restrictions on the industry? Oil and gas activity and development should be subject to local control, so that communities can regulate or outright ban oil and gas development in their communities. I also believe the state must codify the Martinez decision so that protection of public health, safety, and the environment is prioritized, and believe we need decisive action at the local, state and federal level to protect the public and the environment, including the Keep It In The Ground Act (which would

ban fracking on all federal public lands). What is your stance on whether stricter gun controls are needed; if they are needed, what is the best path for­ ward? I will be a strong champion for sensible gun-control measures, including universal background checks and closing the federal “gun show loophole,” supporting an assault-weapons ban, encouraging states to pass “Red Flag” laws, which prevent people at risk to themselves or others from having access to firearms, and opposing concealedcarry “reciprocity” legislation. I’m proud to be the only candidate in this race endorsed by Gabby Gifford’s “Courage to End Gun Violence” organization and to be a Moms Demand Action “gun sense candidate.” Do you support President Donald Trump’s call to fund a wall on our southern border to slow immigration? As the son of refugees, I do not support President Trump’s call for a border wall, and am appalled by this administration’s treatment of immigrants. I support an immediate halt to the continued separation of families at the border and a reunion of all separated children with their families, as well as a clean DREAM Act, and comprehensive immigration reform.

VOTER GUIDE • OCTOBER 14, 2018 • 23

2ND CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT

Nick Thomas Website: NickThomasfor Congress.com Age: 34 Family: Nephew Sami, 3; niece Emma, 2. How long have you lived in Boulder? 34 years Professional background: Experienced generalist: start-ups, tech, aviation, international education, foreign policy and diplomacy, sports marketing and business management. Political/com­ munity experi­ ence: Eagle Scout. Intern/ Aide ’07/’08 to Boulder State Sen. Ron Tupa; U.S. Congressional Youth Ambassador to South Korea, 2009; American Shafik Gabr Fellow to Egypt, 2015; personal assistant to Coretta Scott King, 2004 and 15-year volunteer at the MLK Center (each January 2004-2018), USGLC member, Rotarian Education: BA in political science, CSU; MA in international diplomacy, DU’s Korbel School; MBA, Hult International Business School (Shanghai, Dubai, London, Davos) Party: Independent Should oil and gas activity in the 2nd Congressional District be primarily sub­ ject to local control, state control, or do you favor fewer restrictions on the industry? As the only Congressional candidate state-wide to endorse Ballot Initiative 112, I am fighting to put environmental stewardship and the health and will of the citizens of CD2 ahead of corporate money and party politics. Both local and state control are critical: local populations should generally be able to vote for/against what’s in their best interest while at the same time we must take serious active measures at the

state level on issues that impact the greater good and affect the commons. Fracking is detrimental to the health of our newborns and citizens, impacting our air quality with its chemicals (Boulder now has an “F” due to this and other factors), and poisoning the water ways which in itself is a red herring issue given we don’t have enough of the resource to start with. This affects health, quality of life, tourism, and the long-term economy all which are being given a back-seat for short term gains. Enough. What is your stance on whether strict­ er gun controls are needed; if they are needed, what is the best path forward? R response: “thoughts and prayers.” D response: “ban ‘assault weapons’ and it will all go away.” Honest answer: Yes, some stricter gun controls are common sense in a functional modern-day society. Ban high capacity magazines, close the gun-show loophole, pass legislation that puts responsibility for weapons on the owners so if someone borrows my shotgun and shoots up a theater I could go to jail. Beyond that though, we must deal with the trauma in our society and realize that when bullying is treated as “kids being kids,” rape faults the victim, and our children grow up in a state of perpetual war, people will use whatever means necessary whether guns knives bombs cars etc. to take their anger and pain out on a world that has stripped them of their innocence and self worth. As a hunter, I’m happy to take responsibility of safe storage and use of my guns. As an American, I take responsibility that we are failing the younger generations, and we must do more to mitigate our constant dose of violence and salaciousness in media, culture, and war. Do you support President Donald Trump’s call to fund a wall on our south­ ern border to slow immigration? No.

24 • OCTOBER 14, 2018 • VOTER GUIDE

Peter Yu

Website: peteryuforcongress .com Age: 46 Family: Single How long have you lived in Colorado?: 46 years Professional background: Director/ manager of sales and marketing for companies such as HSBC Bank, Wyndham Worldwide and Ecomark Solar Political/community experience: First time running for public office. Education: Bachelor of arts degree in business, Fort Lewis College. Political party: Republican Should oil and gas activity in the 2nd Congressional District be primarily sub­ ject to local control, state control, or do you favor fewer restrictions on the industry? I am comfortable with the regulations that the COGCC has put in place for oil and gas development, as they have the health and safety of our neighbors — making our state the most stringent in the nation. I am all for local control on almost everything that doesn’t violate our state or federal Constitution. Currently our Colorado oil and gas regulations fall in state statute, with oversight by the COGCC. This would have to be a change at the state Legislature to divert certain aspects of these regulation to the local levels. Issue question 2: What is your stance on whether stricter gun controls are needed; if they are needed, what is the best path forward? If a criminal wants to commit a crime, they don’t follow the law — thus the definition of a criminal. I am a strong supporter of our Second Amendment. I believe that law-abiding citizens have the God-given and Constitu-

tional right to protect themselves, their family and their property. What we are not discussing is the consistent factor that is pervasive among all those who commit these gun crimes — mental health. Non-constitutional gun control is simply a Band-Aid to the true issue, which is the early detection of possible metal health issues, proper reporting and investigative techniques, and of course the availability of mental health services. Do you sup­ port President Donald Trump’s call to fund a wall on our southern border to slow immigra­ tion? As a son of a family that came to America in 1969, immigration is dear to my heart. I want all people around the world to have the same opportunities my family had when we applied and were approved to come this great nation. However, we are still a nation of laws and there is a legal process that needs to be followed for people who want to come to America. Your question should not be to “slow immigration,” it should be to “slow illegal immigration.” We need to ensure the health and safety of every American citizens (just like with our oil and gas laws), and this means stopping human trafficking, stopping the flow of dangerous illegal drugs and stopping violent criminals. Existing structures have proven to deter drugs and human trafficking, so I do support new structures along the border.