Yellow Brick Road: Clean, Green, and Beautiful

YELLOW BRICK ROAD

®

Cle a n , Gr ee n, a nd Be a ut if ul Grant a p p l ic a t io n

Attachment A: Project Narrative A.1 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The City of Richmond’s Yellow Brick Road®: Clean, Green, and Beautiful project addresses three public spaces in Richmond’s underserved “Iron Triangle” neighborhood: two city parks (Elm Playlot and Harbour-8 Park) and the city streets that connect them (via the Yellow Brick Road®, hereafter “YBR”).

Richmond’s Iron Triangle is a historic, one-square mile neighborhood whose residents rank among the most disadvantaged and underserved communities in the state. Residents experience disproportionately high levels of poverty, and 90% are people of color. Many feel trapped inside their homes by gun violence, and they often cite a desire for clean, safe spaces where they can gather outside to form social and cultural connections.

With few trees or flowers and virtually no public green space, Richmond’s Iron Triangle neighborhood suffers from environmental degradation, blight, waste, and debris. Many streets and sidewalks have become sites for illegal dumping; their disrepair only invites more dumping. The Iron Triangle also lies adjacent to the Chevron oil refinery, the largest refinery west of the Mississippi River. According to CalEnviroScreen 3.0, the Iron Triangle ranks among California’s most environmentally disadvantaged communities overall.

Our vision is to bring once-blighted and abandoned public spaces back to life by cleaning and beautifying two parks and the streets that connect them. Yellow Brick Road®: Clean, Green, and Beautiful will transform the community through beautiful new infrastructure, safe and clean streets and parks, new public art, and physical improvements that promote enhanced cultural connection.

The YBR will be accessible to all of the Iron Triangle’s 15,000 residents. In addition to the two parks, YBR will connect several community assets: Richmond’s downtown shopping area and transit connections, three schools, the YMCA, the Kaiser Permanente Richmond Medical Center, Harbour View Senior Apartments, government housing that serves 400 low-income residents, and a historic black church. The YBR route also transects the Richmond Greenway, a 3-mile pedestrian and bicycle trail that connects residents to the BART light rail system, Amtrak, and neighborhoods beyond Richmond.

Yellow Brick Road®: Clean, Green, and Beautiful is the culmination of a deep and proven partnership between the City and the sub-applicant Pogo Park, a community-based nonprofit that has worked in the Iron Triangle for 15 years. Pogo Park’s mission is to transform underused and dispirited city parks and streets into safe, green, and vibrant public spaces for children to play and the community to gather.

Pogo Park uses an urban renewal process that is radically different from most. Pogo Park's unique model 1) directs grant funds into the community to hire, train, and empower residents to do a significant portion of the work themselves, and 2) awards contracts and procures materials locally from Richmond businesses.

Richmond and Pogo Park’s partnership has been so successful that the California Parks Department named it as a model for how cities can deeply and authentically engage the local community in the transformation of their own neighborhood.

Together with our partner Pogo Park, the City proposes the following: DESCRIPTION

LOCATION

PURPOSE

Pedestrian-Scale Lighting

To provide warm, pedestrian-friendly lighting to create "a street that feels different than any Both sides of 8th Street, from Ohio other street in Richmond," and to create a to Pennsylvania sense of place and increase the beauty and accessibility of city streets.

Perimeter of Harbour-8 Park, including four entry gates at Harbour-8 Park

To beautify, clean, maintain and protect public spaces critical to the health of the community from being vandalized, trashed, and torn apart at night.

Public Restroom

Harbour-8 Park

To provide residents with a clean and beautiful public restroom in the heart of what will become one of the most visited parks in Richmond. Opportunity for residents to practice best waste disposal practices in custom waste receptacles.

Pavers

Harbour-8 Park

To provide a beautiful and long-lasting surface; to elevate the quality of the entire park.

Benches

At entrance to Harbour-8 Park on Beautiful hand-crafted benches on YBR route 8th Street made with local hands.

Dog Waste Station

In Elm Playlot and Harbour-8 Park; Litter abatement & waste reduction. along YBR route.

Multi-Stream Waste Receptacles

In Elm Playlot and Harbour-8 Park; Litter abatement & waste reduction. along YBR route

Public Art: Signage

In Elm Playlot and Harbour-8 Park; Educational, wayfinding, community along YBR route placemaking, cultural connection.

Public Art: Yellow Brick Road stencils

On the sidewalks and across roads along the YBR route

Public Art: Murals on four raised intersections

8th St and Chanslor Ave; 8th St & Cultural connection, community placemaking, Bissell Ave; 8th St and and beautification.

Pennsylvania Ave

Architectural Fence & Gates

Cultural connection, community placemaking, and beautification.

Public Art: Entry Markers to 8th St & Ohio Ave; 9th St and Yellow Brick Road Pennsylvania Ave

Cultural connection, community placemaking, and beautification.

Public Art: YBR markers along Yellow Brick Road route

Cultural connection, community placemaking, and beautification.

8th St from Ohio Ave to Pennsylvania Ave; Pennsylvania Ave from 7th St to 9th St

Public Art: Sculptures in two 8th St and Ripley Ave; 8th St and Cultural connection, community placemaking, traffic calming circles Elm Ave and beautification.

A.2 DEMONSTRATED COMMUNITY NEED PROJECT BACKGROUND AND HISTORY (PER ATTACHMENT D) As part of a 2008 summer jobs program, 30 youths from Richmond’s Iron Triangle neighborhood were tasked with developing a solution to some of the biggest challenges that plague their community: high levels of gun violence, poverty, widespread blight, environmental degradation, speeding cars, and a lack of safe, green, and vibrant public spaces. Their solution: the Yellow Brick Road®, a safe, green, and clean biking and walking path through the Iron Triangle that connects community assets, including churches, schools, parks, transportation, shopping, and cultural centers.

Pogo Park picked up the baton in 2009. Since that time, Pogo Park has organized a core team of residents from the Iron Triangle community to bring these youth’s vision to life. Pogo Park and the City have partnered to include YBR in the City’s Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan; secure a $243,000 Caltrans Environmental Justice grant to develop the project’s concepts; lead a robust public engagement process to finalize the YBR elements and route; secure a $6.2 million Caltrans ATP grant to begin construction on YBR’s grayscape; and secure a $4.1 million Natural Resources Agency Urban Greening Program grant to begin construction on YBR’s greenscape.

In addition to this work on the YBR, the City and Pogo Park have partnered to reimagine Elm Playlot and Harbour-8 Park, the two city parks that bookend the YBR route. In addition to the rounds of funding named above, the City and Pogo Park have secured a $1.9 million Prop 84 grant to renovate Elm Playlot and an $8.5 million Prop 68 grant to design and build Harbour-8 Park. Elm Playlot is now one of Richmond’s jewels.

Harbour-8 Park will join it when complete in June 2023.

It took 8 weeks to come up with the idea for the YBR—and it has taken 15 years to actualize it. The YBR project is now entering its final phase, which focuses on the CCLGP’s four goals of beautification, litter abatement, improving public spaces for walking and recreation, and advancing equity for underserved communities. Yellow Brick Road®: Clean, Green, and Beautiful will tie all these projects together to have an exponential impact on the Iron Triangle community.

EXISTING CONDITIONS The YBR route is plagued by waste and debris. Many streets and parks in the Iron Triangle neighborhood are magnets for illegal dumping, and many people simply throw trash on the ground. The present infrastructure is not adequate to the task of keeping these public spaces clean. One resident remarked: “You want to do the right thing, but there’s no trash cans!”

Elm Playlot provides the model for the City and Pogo Park will proceed. This park was once overrun with litter, illegal dumping, and graffiti. Working through Pogo Park, local residents decided to continually clean, tend, and care for the park. Today, it is a clean and beautiful community space that the neighborhood is proud of.

The City and Pogo Park want to extend this model to the surrounding streets for YBR. Yellow Brick Road®: Clean, Green, and Beautiful meets all of four of the CCLGP program’s goals: GOAL 1: REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF WASTE AND DEBRIS The Project will include the placement of multi-stream waste receptacles and dog waste stations along the YBR route. The parks themselves will serve as a model for how to 1) reduce the amount of waste produced, and 2) properly dispose of waste.

Richmond municipal employees and Pogo Park employees will work together to clear debris and litter and manage the waste system. In addition to paid staff, the Project includes volunteer clean-up days, which will have the double benefit of bringing neighbors together and removing waste and debris from the YBR. Finally, cleaning and maintaining the YBR route will be serviced by high school students and individuals performing court-ordered community service.

The Project also includes a targeted education campaign for residents. The Clean, Green, and Beautiful Campaign will be a community engagement effort to convene stakeholders, produce and distribute

informational materials, and demonstrate best practices for litter abatement. Educational block parties will add a ground game to this communications effort, bringing neighbors together to connect with each other and learn how to dispose of waste properly. “Friday Night Lights” Zero Waste Events will take place at Elm Playlot, publicly employing zero-waste practices as a model for local residents. These Zero Waste educational campaigns and events will be staffed by Pogo Park employees with the assistance of community volunteers.

GOAL 2: BEAUTIFY AND IMPROVE PUBLIC SPACE This Project’s beautification improvements will take place alongside existing urban greening efforts. Thanks to an Urban Greening grant, the City and Pogo Park will plant 93 trees and add 11,000 square feet of planting to eight blocks of the YBR. This Project includes additional public art beautification improvements that will function as a force multiplier to bring the entire project site to life: •

ENTRY & ROUTE MARKERS: Six entry markers will be placed at two YBR entries; custom-made pedestal markers with a sculpture on top will be placed along 14 blocks of the YBR route. These markers will be YBR-branded and include depictions of a diverse and inclusive range of YBR users, such as people biking, children walking, and seniors using wheelchairs.

•

ASPHALT ART: Yellow bricks will be stenciled on the sidewalks and streets to designate the YBR as a special route for the community.

•

MURALS: Murals will be placed on the YBR’s four raised intersections and on the fence by the zip line at Harbour-8 Park. All murals will be created by local artists, create a sense of place, and add visual beauty to the public spaces.

•

ROUNDABOUT SCULPTURE: A sculpture will stand in the traffic calming circle to add beauty and a sense of place to the route.

GOAL 3: IMPROVING PUBLIC SPACES FOR WALKING AND RECREATION Every intersection of the YBR has been redesigned and is currently being reconstructed to favor pedestrians and bicyclists rather than cars. Because these improvements connect two city parks and numerous other community assets, they not only promote walking and biking but also help people access clean and green public spaces for recreation.

This project includes the following improvements to public spaces for walking and recreation: •

IMPROVED LIGHTING: 93 human-scale, pedestrian-friendly lights will be installed on 11 blocks of 8th Street between Pennsylvania Avenue and Ohio Avenue. With the support of a Caltrans ATP grant, 41 lights are already being installed at key intersections along this route; the new lights requested in this grant will illuminate the rest of the blocks between intersections.

•

FENCES AND GATES: Architectural fences and gates will be installed around the perimeters of Elm Playlot and Harbour-8 Park. Modeled on Jackson Square in the New Orleans French Quarter and the Tuileries Garden in Paris, these architectural fences and gates will enhance community placemaking by designating Elm Playlot and Harbour-8 Park as special, protected, and valued public spaces. The gates at each park will be open during the day to allow public access and locked at night to prevent homeless encampments, illegal dumping, and vandalism.

•

PAVERS: Harbour-8 Park’s pathways will be set with architectural pavers to elevate the quality of the park space. They will mark the park’s walking areas as more enduring and purpose-built than paths made of mulch, dirt, or gravel. They will also be more accessible to people who use wheelchairs and walkers.

•

RESTROOM: Nothing elicited more heated emotion during the public engagement process than the need for a clean public restroom at Harbour-8 Park. Residents want a bathroom that gives a sense of

place, with public art on its interior and exterior walls. Pogo Park’s staff will custom-design the bathroom for the space. The facility will additionally have a place to dispose of trash and compost.

•

BENCHES: 8th Street at the entryway to the YBR is a bustling place for parents to drop off and pick up their children. Benches there will make it easier and safer for people to perform this task.

GOAL 4: ADVANCE EQUITY FOR UNDERSERVED COMMUNITIES THE UNDERSERVED COMMUNITY BENEFITED The 15,000 people who live in the Iron Triangle are the community benefited. All the census tracts in the project have been identified as underserved and 100% of the grant funds will benefit the local community.

HOW THE COMMUNITY WAS IDENTIFIED The project underserved community was identified using data from the U.S. Census Bureau, CalEnviroScreen 3.0, and the California Department of Education’s Free or Reduced-Price Meal program. Project census tracts 3750, 3760, 3770 and 3790 have a CalEnviroScreen 3.0 score greater than 39.34 and 94.5% of children attending the elementary school in the census tract 3730 qualify for the Free or Reduced-Price Meal program.

HOW THE PROJECT BENEFITS THE COMMUNITY The Project benefits the community by advancing the CCLGP program’s goals to reduce the amount of waste and debris they experience, beautify and improve their public spaces, and improve their public spaces for walking and recreation. The Project meets a demonstrated community need for cultural connection and placemaking, expressed routinely by residents over a decade of public engagement.

The Project also advances equity by building power for the community to take control of the conditions of their own neighborhood.

A.3 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT LOCAL PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PROCESS The City has partnered with the sub-applicant Pogo Park for over a decade to lead an award-winning public engagement process around how to revitalize two city parks and the streets that connect them. Pogo Park has acted as the City’s agent throughout this process.

This community engagement process was unprecedented in its depth and scale. The State of California Parks Department recognized Pogo Park’s community engagement efforts as an outstanding model in their 2020 SCORP Report.

Pogo Park held hundreds of meetings with residents and key stakeholders. The topics always revolved around one question: "What will it take to bring public spaces in the Iron Triangle to life?”

Highlights from those engagement efforts include: •

2008-9: Pogo Park held multiple meetings to discuss improvements to Elm Playlot and the Yellow Brick Road. Stakeholders included representatives from community groups, churches, schools, local businesses, hundreds of residents, the Iron Triangle Neighborhood Council, and the City of Richmond.

•

2010: Elm Playlot became home to a community-driven pop-up park. Pogo Park staff used this park as a place to try out ideas and engage local residents about what they want the park to become. Pogo Park held 45 community engagement meetings to draw up the initial plans and discuss a potential route for the YBR.

•

2011: Pogo Park took initial plans for the YBR back to the Iron Triangle community’s key stakeholders to continue gathering input.

•

2013: Pogo Park held 14 days of community meetings with community residents to finalize the YBR route. They also conducted weeks of onsite outreach at Harbour-8 Park to imagine how to bring this park to life and make it clean, safe, and accessible.

•

2014: Pogo Park hosted a full-scale model “Living Preview” of a section of the YBR. 384 residents and over 2,000 cars tested it and shared feedback.

•

2015: Harbour-8 Park became the site for a new pop-up park. Like Elm Playlot, this space was used to experiment and gather community input for the permanent park that would eventually be built there.

•

2016: Pogo Park hosted a week-long “Design Tent” to hold meetings about final plans for the YBR. Over 1000 residents and stakeholders attended.

•

2019: Pogo Park engaged 2,592 residents in a series of meetings about accessibility, beauty, and cleaning at Harbour-8 Park. This specific engagement process is reflected in this proposal’s improvements for both Harbour-8 Park and Elm Playlot.

•

2021-22: Pogo Park held community engagement meetings to discuss what should be included in the Caltrans Clean California grant.

HOW THE PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS The YBR project is consistent with the City General Plan 2030 and was adopted as an appendix to the City Pedestrian Plan in 2011.

YBR is also consistent with Richmond’s 2014 Health in All Policies (HiAP) ordinance, which provides a framework for city policy, practices, and partnership based on the idea that physical and social environments should strive to have a positive impact on individual health outcomes. YBR is an important model for HiAP that can be replicated in other neighborhoods across Richmond and California.

HOW THE PROJECT REFLECTS COMMUNITY PRIORITIES All aspects of the Project are driven by community-identified priorities, and all Project planning reflects concerns, suggestions, and ideas that were raised during the decade-long community engagement process.

Throughout a decade of community meetings, residents voiced four major priorities: 1. IMPROVED LIGHTING: The top priority expressed during the community engagement process was the need for streetlights. Community members specified that the lights should be soft, warm, and inviting; they felt that this lighting would bring beauty to the route, provide a sense of place, and make it feel “like a real neighborhood.” The Project addresses this priority by installing human-scale, 2700 Kelvin lights along the YBR route.

2. CLEAN, GREEN, AND BEAUTIFUL PUBLIC SPACES: Residents expressed that the amount of waste and debris in public spaces made the streets unwalkable and the parks unusable. This problem is compounded by the fact that the Iron Triangle is one of the most densely populated neighborhoods in the City—it should be especially pedestrian-friendly. The Project addresses this priority through its litter abatement measures, including park fencing, trash cans, trash sorting, dog litter stations, and educational projects.

3. IMPROVE TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY: Residents expressed that traffic was heavy, fastmoving, and often reckless. Community surveys and city data supported these complaints, showing high levels of both reported and unreported vehicular collisions. Richmond is addressing this priority by renovating the hardscape along the YBR route; that project is supported by a 2015 Caltrans ATP grant.

4. COMMUNITY JOBS, COMMUNITY VOICE: Residents expressed that they wanted to have a voice, a “say-so,” in the decisions that affect their community. Residents felt that too often outside experts merely listened to their input and then implemented the project however they saw fit. This project addresses that priority by working with local residents in the project and, whenever possible, procuring services and materials from local Richmond businesses.

A.4 PROJECT DELIVERABILITY CERTAINTY THE PROJECT WILL BE DELIVERED ON TIME The Project is shovel-ready and will be complete by June 30, 2024.

IDENTIFY ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT AND NOTE ALL NOT APPROVED A building permit (not yet approved) is required for the restroom building.

KNOWN RISKS OR CONCERNS TO OPENING THE PROJECT TO THE PUBLIC AND/OR EXPENDING ALL THE FUNDS There are no known concerns or risks to opening the project to the public and expending all funds by June 30, 2024.

PRE-CONSTRUCTION WORK REQUIRED TO DELIVER THIS PROJECT AND ITS DATE The project will require final refinement of the elements, preparation of plans and specifications for public bid, bid, and award by the Richmond City Council. The anticipated date of completion for this work is Summer 2022.

INVENTORY OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES, ISSUES, AND PROCESSING (PER ATTACHMENT D) YBR is exempt from CEQA. Elm Playlot received a Categorical Exemption in 2012. Harbour-8 Park Expansion Project received a Categorical Exemption on June 28, 2019.

DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/WASTE PROBLEMS (PER ATTACHMENT D) Excavation of the City’s streets has the potential to encounter lead and hydrocarbon contamination. This is typical in public roadways within the City and is generally managed by disposing of the soil at a Class I landfill.

A.5 ADVANCE PAYMENT No advance payment is requested.

A.6 MARKETING PLAN The Project will include the development of marketing materials and resources. It will also be marketed and publicized through a variety of community events.

MATERIALS AND RESOURCES After meetings with all stakeholders, informational flyers and posters about the YBR will be distributed to community residents door to door, through physical mailings, and through email and social media. YBR T-

shirts will also be distributed during the initial publicity phase and at subsequent volunteer events.

The City will work with Pogo Park to craft a press release to distribute to local news outlets, along with press advisories and outreach to reporters covering relevant beats.

COMMUNITY EVENTS The City of Richmond and Pogo Park held a groundbreaking ceremony for YBR in June 2021 which was attended by 350 people. No further opening ceremony is planned for the additional infrastructure improvements that are part of this project.

The City and Pogo Park plan the following community events to market and publicize the Project to community stakeholders. As described in Question 2, Goal 1, there will be two initial events:

•

BLOCK PARTIES: Four block parties will take place down an 8-block stretch of 8th Street, covering two blocks each.

•

“FRIDAY NIGHT LIGHTS” Zero Waste Events: These events at Elm Playlot will model zero-waste practices.

After the initial round of publicity events, the sub-applicant Pogo Park will also host an ongoing series of events dedicated to further outreach, publicity, and community buy-in:

•

LITTER CLEAN-UP EVENTS: Pogo Park routinely receives requests to do volunteer work, and this organization has a well-developed capacity to process and manage a large number of volunteers.

They will leverage this volunteer pool to do consistent cleaning and litter abatement along the YBR route over time.

•

COMMUNITY SERVICE HOURS: Pogo Park is set up to manage certified community service hours.

Local high school students and people satisfying court orders need a place to perform community service hours. These hours would be dedicated to cleaning and litter abatement.

•

PUBLIC ART VOLUNTEER DAYS: Because asphalt art wears and fades over time, there will be regular events to bring volunteers and staff together to stencil and maintain yellow painted bricks along the YBR route and to perform similar maintenance on the YBR’s four murals painted on raised intersections.

A.7 MAINTENACE PLAN ANTICIPATED LIFESPANS OF THE PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS The anticipated lifespans of the project improvements follow: • Lights: 40 years • Metal Fence and Gates: 100 years • Wooden Fence: 20 years • Pavers: 100+ years • Restroom: 50 years • Benches: 30 years • Signs: 20 years • Asphalt Art: 10 years • Sculpture: 50 years HOW THE IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE MAINTAINED The improvements will be maintained throughout their lifespans through the City’s public/private partnership with Pogo Park. For over a decade, Pogo Park has used a staff of community residents and local volunteers to

clean and maintain city property. They clean Elm Playlot regularly and pick up litter and waste from the surrounding sidewalks and streets. City staff then come to remove the waste.

We believe that this partnership is a force multiplier and has the potential to be a model for the rest of Richmond. Elm Playlot and its surroundings are some of the best-maintained spaces in Richmond, and we are excited to expand this partnership to cover the YBR. RESOURCES AND COMMITMENT TO PERFORM MAINTENANCE City staff perform maintenance activities as needed. Pogo Park also raises philanthropic funding for their staff to supplement our work.

The necessary resources are committed to perform maintenance. Richmond and Pogo Park have partnered for 15 years. We are committed to building this partnership and expanding its reach.

The artwork proposed will be as low-maintenance as possible. To the degree that the sculpture and murals require maintenance, Pogo Park will perform it. They currently maintain public art that they have installed on city property; they will care for new sculpture and murals in the same manner. The artist(s) commissioned for this project will also receive a maintenance agreement as part of their compensation.

The yellow bricks and asphalt art will be cared for through Public Art Volunteer Days, as described in Question 6. Pogo Park embraces the maintenance of the YBR’s asphalt art. Continuous cleaning and maintenance has been part of their model since they were founded in 2007.

Non-Infrastructure Cost Proposal Work Plan Estimates Fill in the following items: Date: (1)

1-Feb-22

Implementing Agency Name: (2)

City of Richmond

Project Title: (3)

Yellow Brick Road-Clean Green and Beautiful

Project Description: (4)

The City of Richmond will partner wth the local non-profit Pogo Park to conduct an anti-litter campaign, zero waste block parties and events, create a litter cleanup community service program and implement volunteer public art events.

Enter information in each Task Tab, as it applies (Task A, Task B, Task C, Task D, etc.)

For Department use only You will not be able to fill in the following items. Items will auto-populate once you've entered all "Task" tabs that apply: Task Summary: Click the links below to navigate to "Task Details" tabs: Task

Task "A" Task "B" Task "C" Task "D" Task "E" Task "F" Task "G" Task "H" Task "I" Task "J" Total for all Tasks

ATP V.11 (04/27/2018)

Enter the Task Name from Each Itemized Task Task Name

Clean, Green and Beautiful Campaign Educational Block Parties "Friday Night Lights" Zero Waste Events Litter Cleanup Volunteer Events Litter Cleanup Community Service Program Public Art Volunteer Events

Total CCLGP $ $117,397 $68,636 $65,911 $33,536 $15,824 $73,272 $0 $0 $0 $0 $374,578

Total Cost $

$117,397 $68,636 $75,911 $33,536 $15,824 $73,272 $0 $0 $0 $0 $384,578

TASK "A" DETAIL ESTIMATE Task Name (5a):

Clean, Green and Beautiful Campaign

Task Summary (5b): Outreach campaign to educate residents of Richmond's Iron Triangle about appropriate litter disposal, recycling and composting.

Task Activities (6a):

Deliverables (6b):

Start Date

End Date

1.

Aug-22

Nov-22

Stakeholder Coordination Meetings

2.

Oct-22

Dec-22

Design and Produce Educational / Informational Materials

3.

Jan-23

Feb-23

Distribute Flyers and Posters (door-to-door)

4.

Jan-23

Jun-23

Mail Flyers (x3)

5.

Jan-23

Jun-23

Design and Implement Email/Social Media Campaign

6.

Mar-23

Jun-23

Develop Litter Abatement Best Practices Demonstration

List of Campaign priorities and materials 8.5 x 11 flyers and tri-fold pamphlets 1500 flyers and pamphlets Email, website and social media updates Best Pratices Community Presentation Staff Costs (7):

Staff Time (Agency) (7a): Party 1 - Program Manager

Staff Hours

Rate Per Hour

CCLGP Total $

12

$65.54

$786.48

Local Cash Match Total $

In-kind Match $

Party 2 $786

$0

$0

Staff Hours

Rate Per Hour

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match Total $

In-kind Match $

Party 1 - Executive Director

67

$225

$15,075

Party 2 - Project Manager

88

$226

$19,888

Party 3 - Communuty Development Team Member

58

$227

$13,166

Party 4 - Communuty Development Team Member

49

$228

$11,172

Party 5 - Communuty Development Team Member

45

$229

$10,305

Party 6 - Communuty Development Team Member

37

$230

$8,510

Party 7 - Communuty Development Team Member

25

$231

$5,775

Party 8 - Communuty Development Team Member

25

$232

$5,800

Party 9 - Graphic Designer

40

$233

$9,320

Subtotal Agency Costs:

Staff Time (Consultant/Subcontractor) (7b):

Subtotal Consultant Costs:

$99,011

$0

$0

Total Staff Costs (Agency & Consultant) (7c):

$99,797

Indirect Costs (8) Approved ICAP/ ICRP (8a)?

FALSE

If Approved ICAP/ ICRP box is checked, provide Rate (8b): Task Notes (9):

Other Costs (10): You will not be able to fill in the following items. The totals for each "Other Costs" category listed below will automatically calculate from information entered in the itemized other costs section:

Total $

To fill out an itemized cost for each "Other Cost", use Tab Task A "OC".

Travel (10a): Equipment (10b): Supplies/Materials (10c):

$0 $17,600

Incentives (10d):

$0

Other Direct Costs (10e):

$0

Additional Other Direct Costs (10f):

ATP V.11 (04.27.2018)

$0

$0

Subtotals:

$17,600

TASK GRAND TOTAL (11):

$117,397

Task "A" Other Costs: Itemized Travel Cost (10a) Please provide an itemized "travel" cost estimate for all travel costs applicable to each task Travel (10a) Type of Travel

Quantity

Units

Cost $

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind $

$0

$0

$0

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

Subtotals:

Total Travel Costs:

$0

Itemized Equipment Cost (10b) Please provide an itemized "equipment" cost estimate for all equipment cost applicable to each task Equipment (10b) Type of Equipment

Quantity

Units

Cost $

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind $

$0

$0

$0

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

Subtotals:

Total Equipment Costs:

$0

Itemized Supplies/Materials Cost (10c) Please provide an itemized "supplies/materials" cost estimate for all supplies/materials cost applicable to each task Supplies/Materials (10c) Type of Supplies/Materials

Quantity

Units

Cost $

CCLGP Total $

250

$8.00

$2,000

$2,000

2. Print brochure

1,000

$5.00

$5,000

$5,000

3. Printing Misc. - stickers, patches etc.

1,000

$3.00

$3,000

$3,000

4. Postage

3,000

$2.00

$6,000

$6,000

5. Meeting supplies (whiteboard, pens, paper etc.)

1

$600

$600

$600

6. Visuals (large maps, photos etc.)

1

$1,000

$1,000

$1,000

1. Print poster

Local Cash Match $

In-kind $

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

Subtotals:

$17,600

$0

Total Supplies/Materials Costs:

ATP V.11 (04.27.2018)

$0 $17,600

Task "A" Other Costs: Itemized Travel Cost (10a) Itemized Incentives Cost (10d) Please provide an itemized "incentives" cost estimate for all incentives costs applicable to each task Incentives (10d) Type of Other Direct Costs

Quantity

Units

Cost $

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind $

$0

$0

$0

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

Subtotals:

$0

Total Itemized Incentives Costs:

Itemized Other Direct Costs (10e) Please provide an itemized "other" cost estimate for all other costs applicable to each task Other Direct Costs (10e) Type of Other Direct Costs

Quantity

Units

Cost $

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind $

$0

$0

$0

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

Subtotals:

$0

Total Other Direct Costs:

If applicable, Additional Itemized Other Direct Costs (10f) Please provide an itemized "other" cost estimate for all other costs applicable to each task Other Direct Costs (10f) Type of Other Direct Costs

Quantity

Units

Cost $

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind $

$0

$0

$0

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

Subtotals:

Total Additional Itemized Other Direct Costs:

ATP V.11 (04.27.2018)

$0

TASK "B" DETAIL ESTIMATE Task Name (5a):

Educational Block Parties

Task Summary (5b): Hold four community block parties to provide anti-litter education for residents on the Yellow Brick Road route on 8th St.

Start Date 1.

End Date

Task Activities (6a):

Apr-23

May-23 Event Planning

2.

Apr-23

May-23 T-Shirt Design

3.

May-23

Jun-23 Event Marketing

4.

Jun-23

Oct-23 Conduct Events (4)

5.

Jun-23

Oct-23 Post-Event Evaluation/Data Collection

Deliverables (6b): Design for Event T-Shirt

Collated attendee data Staff Costs (7):

Staff Time (Agency) (7a): Party 1 - Program Manager

Staff Hours

Rate Per Hour

CCLGP Total $

12

$65.54

$786.48

Local Cash Match Total $

In-kind Match $

Party 2 -

$786

Subtotal Agency Costs:

Staff Hours

Rate Per Hour

CCLGP Total $

Party 1 - Executive Director

10

$225.00

$2,250.00

Party 2 - Project Manager

6

$125.00

$750.00

Party 3 - Communuty Development Team Member

46

$75.00

$3,450.00

Party 4 - Communuty Development Team Member

30

$50.00

$1,500.00

Party 5 - Communuty Development Team Member

30

$50.00

$1,500.00

Party 6 - Communuty Development Team Member

30

$50.00

$1,500.00

Party 7 - Communuty Development Team Member

30

$50.00

$1,500.00

Party 8 - Communuty Development Team Member

30

$50.00

$1,500.00

Party 9 - Graphic Designer

8

$200.00

$1,600.00

Staff Time (Consultant/Subcontractor) (7b):

Subtotal Consultant Costs:

$15,550

$0 Local Cash Match Total $

$0

$0 In-kind Match $

$0

Total Staff Costs (Agency & Consultant) (7c):

$16,336

Indirect Costs (8) Approved ICAP/ ICRP (8a)?

FALSE If Approved ICAP/ ICRP box is checked, provide Rate (8b): Task Notes (9):

Other Costs (10): You will not be able to fill in the following items. The totals for each "Other Costs" category listed below will automatically calculate from information entered in the itemized other costs section:

Total $

To fill out an itemized cost for each "Other Cost", use Tab Task B "OC".

Travel (10a):

$12,600

Supplies/Materials (10c):

$17,700

Incentives (10d):

$20,000

Other Direct Costs (10e):

$2,000

Additional Other Direct Costs (10f):

ATP V.11 (04.27.2018)

$0

Equipment (10b):

$0

Subtotals:

$52,300

TASK GRAND TOTAL (11):

$68,636

Task "B" Other Costs: Itemized Travel Cost (10a) Please provide an itemized "travel" cost estimate for all travel costs applicable to each task Travel (10a) Type of Travel

Quantity

Units

Cost $

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind $

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

$0

Subtotals:

$0

$0 $0

Total Travel Costs:

Itemized Equipment Cost (10b) Please provide an itemized "equipment" cost estimate for all equipment cost applicable to each task Equipment (10b) Type of Equipment 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Quantity

Coleman Outdoor Tents 14 x 14 (purchase for use at all events) Sound System (purchase for use at all events) Tables (purchase for use at all events Metal chairs (purchase for use at all events) Umbrella & weighted stand (purchase for use at all events) Storage Unit for Materials and Supplies

Units

4 1 8 70 6 1

Cost $

$250 $2,500 $100 $40 $250 $4,000

$1,000 $2,500 $800 $2,800 $1,500 $4,000

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind $

$1,000 $2,500 $800 $2,800 $1,500 $4,000

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

Subtotals:

$12,600

$0

Total Equipment Costs:

$0 $12,600

Itemized Supplies/Materials Cost (10c) Please provide an itemized "supplies/materials" cost estimate for all supplies/materials cost applicable to each task Supplies/Materials (10c) Type of Supplies/Materials 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Permit to Block of Street Signage Entertainment - DJ Rental Food and Beverage Decorations Portable Waste Educational Display Station

Quantity

4 1 4 1,000 1 1

Units

$250 $1,000 $800 $8 $500 $4,000

Cost $

$1,000 $1,000 $3,200 $8,000 $500 $4,000

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind $

$1,000 $1,000 $3,200 $8,000 $500 $4,000

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

Subtotals:

$17,700

$0

Total Supplies/Materials Costs:

ATP V.11 (04.27.2018)

$0 $17,700

Task "B" Other Costs: Itemized Travel Cost (10a) Itemized Incentives Cost (10d) Please provide an itemized "incentives" cost estimate for all incentives costs applicable to each task Incentives (10d) Type of Other Direct Costs 1.

2.

T-shirt Counterop green waste bin

Quantity

Units

1,000 1,000

Cost $

$10 $10

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind $

$10,000 $10,000

$10,000 $10,000

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

$20,000

Subtotals:

$0

Total Itemized Incentives Costs:

$0 $20,000

Itemized Other Direct Costs (10e) Please provide an itemized "other" cost estimate for all other costs applicable to each task Other Direct Costs (10e) Type of Other Direct Costs 1.

Quantity

Child Entertainment

Units

4

$500

Cost $

CCLGP Total $

$2,000

Local Cash Match $

In-kind $

$2,000

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

$2,000

Subtotals:

$0

Total Other Direct Costs:

$0 $2,000

If applicable, Additional Itemized Other Direct Costs (10f) Please provide an itemized "other" cost estimate for all other costs applicable to each task Other Direct Costs (10f) Type of Other Direct Costs

Quantity

Units

Cost $

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind $

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

Subtotals:

$0

$0

Total Additional Itemized Other Direct Costs:

ATP V.11 (04.27.2018)

$0 $0

TASK "C" DETAIL ESTIMATE

"FRIDAY NIGHT LIGHTS" ZERO WASTE EVENTS

Task Name (5a): Task Summary (5b):

Hold eight community events at Elm Playlot. Events will provide food and entertainment and will include zero waste demonstations. Attendees will receive a free kitchen waste bin.

Start Date

End Date

Task Activities (6a):

1.

Apr-23

Jun-23

Event Planning

2.

May-23

Jun-23

Event Marketing

3.

Jun-23

Jun-24

Conduct Events (8)

4.

Jun-23

Jun-24

Deliverables (6b):

Collated attendee data Post-Event Evaluation/ Data Collection Staff Costs (7):

Staff Time (Agency) (7a): Party 1 -

Program Manager

Staff Hours

Rate Per Hour

12

$65.54

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind Match $

$786

Party 2 Subtotal Agency Costs:

Staff Hours

Rate Per Hour

33

$225

Party 2 - Project Manager

6

$125

Party 3 - Communuty Development Team Member

62

$75

Party 4 - Communuty Development Team Member

44

$50

Party 5 - Communuty Development Team Member

44

$50

Party 6 - Communuty Development Team Member

44

$50

Party 7 - Communuty Development Team Member

44

$50

Party 8 - Communuty Development Team Member

44

$50

Party 9 - Security

32

$50

Party 10 - Security

32

$50

Party 11 - Security

32

$50

Party 12 - Cook

32

Staff Time (Consultant/Subcontractor) (7b): Party 1 - Executive Director

$50 Subtotal Consultant Costs:

$786 CCLGP Total $

$0 Local Cash Match $

$7,425 $750 $4,650 $2,200 $2,200 $2,200 $2,200 $2,200 $1,600 $1,600 $1,600 $1,600 $30,225

$0

Total Staff Costs (Agency & Consultant) (7c):

$0 In-kind Match $

$0 $31,011

Indirect Costs (8) Approved ICAP/ ICRP (8a)?

If Approved ICAP/ ICRP box is checked, FALSE provide Rate (8b): Task Notes (9):

Other Costs (10): You will not be able to fill in the following items. The totals for each "Other Costs" category listed below will automatically calculate from information entered in the itemized other costs section:

Total $

To fill out an itemized cost for each "Other Cost", use Tab Task C "OC".

Travel (10a): Equipment (10b): Supplies/Materials (10c): Incentives (10d): Other Direct Costs (10e): Additional Other Direct Costs (10f): Subtotals: TASK GRAND TOTAL (11):

ATP V.11 (04.27.2018)

$0 $12,000 $14,900 $10,000 $8,000 $0 $44,900 $75,911

Task "C" Other Costs: Itemized Travel Cost (10a) Please provide an itemized "travel" cost estimate for all travel costs applicable to each task Travel (10a) Type of Travel

Quantity

Units

Cost $

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind $

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

$0

Subtotals:

$0

$0 $0

Total Travel Costs:

Itemized Equipment Cost (10b) Please provide an itemized "equipment" cost estimate for all equipment cost applicable to each task Equipment (10b) Type of Equipment 1.

Quantity

Rental Fees - Lighting, Stage, Sound System - Set up/Take down

Units

8

$1,500

Cost $

$12,000

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind $

$12,000

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

Subtotals:

$12,000

$0

Total Equipment Costs:

$0 $12,000

Itemized Supplies/Materials Cost (10c) Please provide an itemized "supplies/materials" cost estimate for all supplies/materials cost applicable to each task Supplies/Materials (10c) Type of Supplies/Materials 1.

2.

3.

4.

Signage Food and Beverage Decorations Sample Waste Disposal Station

Quantity

1 1,600 1 1

Units

$1,000 $8 $500 $600

Cost $

$1,000 $12,800 $500 $600

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind $

$1,000 $12,800 $500 $600

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

Subtotals:

$14,900

$0

Total Supplies/Materials Costs:

ATP V.11 (04.27.2018)

$0 $14,900

Task "C" Other Costs: Itemized Travel Cost (10a) Itemized Incentives Cost (10d) Please provide an itemized "incentives" cost estimate for all incentives costs applicable to each task Incentives (10d) Type of Other Direct Costs 1.

Countertop green waste bin

Quantity

Units

1,000

Cost $

$10

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

$0

$10,000

In-kind $

$10,000

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

$0

Subtotals:

$0

Total Itemized Incentives Costs:

$10,000 $10,000

Itemized Other Direct Costs (10e) Please provide an itemized "other" cost estimate for all other costs applicable to each task Other Direct Costs (10e) Type of Other Direct Costs 1.

Quantity

Entertainment - Fee for Service

Units

8

$1,000

Cost $

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind $

$8,000

$8,000

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

$8,000

Subtotals:

$0

Total Other Direct Costs:

$0 $8,000

If applicable, Additional Itemized Other Direct Costs (10f) Please provide an itemized "other" cost estimate for all other costs applicable to each task Other Direct Costs (10f) Type of Other Direct Costs

Quantity

Units

Cost $

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind $

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

Subtotals:

$0

$0

Total Additional Itemized Other Direct Costs:

ATP V.11 (04.27.2018)

$0 $0

TASK "D" DETAIL ESTIMATE Task Name (5a):

LITTER CLEANUP VOLUNTEER EVENTS

Task Summary (5b): Three-hour volunteer cleanup events along 8th Street and Pennsylvania Ave.

Start Date 1.

End Date

Task Activities (6a):

Deliverables (6b):

Apr-23

May-23

Event Planning

2.

Apr-23

May-23

Event Marketing

3.

May-23

Jun-23

Design T-Shirt

4.

Jun-23

Jun-24

Conduct Events (6)

5.

Jun-23

Jun-24

Post-Event Evaluation/Data Collection

Design for Event T-Shirt

Collated attendee data Staff Costs (7):

Staff Time (Agency) (7a): Party 1 -

Program Manager

Staff Hours

Rate Per Hour

$12

$66

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind Match $

$786

Party 2 Subtotal Agency Costs:

Staff Hours

Rate Per Hour

Party 1 - Executive Director

$18

$225

Party 2 - Project Manager

$8

$125

Party 3 - Communuty Development Team Member

$46

$75

Party 4 - Communuty Development Team Member

$46

$50

Party 5 - Communuty Development Team Member

$40

$50

Party 6 - Communuty Development Team Member

$38

$50

Party 7 - Communuty Development Team Member

$38

$50

Party 8 - Communuty Development Team Member

$38

$50

Party 9 - Communuty Development Team Member

$38

$50

$8

$200

Staff Time (Consultant/Subcontractor) (7b):

Party 10 - Graphic Designer

Subtotal Consultant Costs:

$786 CCLGP Total $

$0 Local Cash Match $

$4,050 $1,000 $3,450 $2,300 $2,000 $1,900 $1,900 $1,900 $1,900 $1,600 $22,000

$0

Total Staff Costs (Agency & Consultant) (7c):

$0 In-kind Match $

$0 $22,786

Indirect Costs (8) Approved ICAP/ ICRP (8a)?

FALSE

If Approved ICAP/ ICRP box is checked, provide Rate (8b): Task Notes (9):

Other Costs (10): You will not be able to fill in the following items. The totals for each "Other Costs" category listed below will automatically calculate from information entered in the itemized other costs section:

Total $

To fill out an itemized cost for each "Other Cost", use Tab Task D "OC".

Travel (10a): Equipment (10b): Supplies/Materials (10c): Incentives (10d): Other Direct Costs (10e): Additional Other Direct Costs (10f): Subtotals: TASK GRAND TOTAL (11):

ATP V.11 (04.27.2018)

$0 $0 $7,750 $3,000 $0 $0 $10,750 $33,536

Task "D" Other Costs: Itemized Travel Cost (10a) Please provide an itemized "travel" cost estimate for all travel costs applicable to each task Travel (10a) Type of Travel

Quantity

Units

Cost $

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

InKind $

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

$0

SubTotals:

$0

$0 $0

Total Travel Costs:

Itemized Equipment Cost (10b) Please provide an itemized "equipment" cost estimate for all equipment cost applicable to each task Equipment (10b) Type of Equipment

Quantity

Units

Cost $

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

InKind $

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

SubTotals:

$0

$0

$0 $0

Total Equipment Costs:

Itemized Supplies/Materials Cost (10c) Please provide an itemized "supplies/materials" cost estimate for all supplies/materials cost applicable to each task Supplies/Materials (10c) Type of Supplies/Materials 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Signage Trash Pickers 5 Gallon Plastic Tubs for Trash Disposable gloves (box of 100) PPE (safety vests, safety glasses) Food and Beverage

Quantity

Units

1 80 50 10 80 400

$800 $25 $10 $5 $30 $5

Cost $

$800 $2,000 $500 $50 $2,400 $2,000

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

InKind $

$800 $2,000 $500 $50 $2,400 $2,000

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

SubTotals:

$7,750

$0

Total Supplies/Materials Costs:

ATP V.11 (04.27.2018)

$0 $7,750

Task "D" Other Costs: Itemized Travel Cost (10a) Itemized Incentives Cost (10d) Please provide an itemized "incentives" cost estimate for all incentives costs applicable to each task Incentives (10d) Type of Other Direct Costs 1.

Quantity

T-Shirts

Units

300

Cost $

$10

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

InKind $

$3,000

$3,000

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

$3,000

SubTotals:

$0

Total Itemized Incentives Costs:

$0 $3,000

Itemized Other Direct Costs (10e) Please provide an itemized "other" cost estimate for all other costs applicable to each task Other Direct Costs (10e) Type of Other Direct Costs

Quantity

Units

Cost $

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

InKind $

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

$0

SubTotals:

$0

$0 $0

Total Other Direct Costs:

If applicable, Additional Itemized Other Direct Costs (10f) Please provide an itemized "other" cost estimate for all other costs applicable to each task Other Direct Costs (10f) Type of Other Direct Costs

Quantity

Units

Cost $

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

InKind $

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

SubTotals:

$0

$0

Total Additional Itemized Other Direct Costs:

ATP V.11 (04.27.2018)

$0 $0

TASK "E" DETAIL ESTIMATE Task Name (5a):

LITTER CLEANUP COMMUNITY SERVICE PROGRAM

Task Summary (5b): Cleanup program on 8th Street for students and other needing community service hours.

Start Date 1.

End Date

Task Activities (6a):

Deliverables (6b):

Apr-23

May-23

Program Planning

2.

Apr-23

May-23

Program Marketing

3.

May-23

Jun-23

T-Shirt Design

Jun-24

Program Administrative Costs/Data Collection

4.

Jun-23

Staff Costs (7):

Staff Time (Agency) (7a): Party 1 -

Program Manager

Staff Hours

Rate Per Hour

$8

$66

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind Match $

$524

Party 2 Subtotal Agency Costs:

Staff Hours

Rate Per Hour

Party 1 - Executive Director

$14

$225

Party 2 - Project Manager

$16

$125

Party 3 - Communuty Development Team Member

$60

$75

Party 4 - Communuty Development Team Member

$8

$50

Party 5 - Communuty Development Team Member

$8

$50

Party 6 - Communuty Development Team Member

$37

Staff Time (Consultant/Subcontractor) (7b):

$50 Subtotal Consultant Costs:

$524 CCLGP Total $

$0 Local Cash Match $

$3,150 $2,000 $4,500 $400 $400 $1,850 $12,300

$0

Total Staff Costs (Agency & Consultant) (7c): Approved ICAP/ ICRP (8a)?

FALSE

$0 In-kind Match $

$0 $12,824

If Approved ICAP/ ICRP box is checked, provide Rate (8b): Task Notes (9):

#VALUE!

Other Costs (10): You will not be able to fill in the following items. The totals for each "Other Costs" category listed below will automatically calculate from information entered in the itemized other costs section:

Total $

To fill out an itemized cost for each "Other Cost", use Tab Task E "OC".

Travel (10a): Equipment (10b): Supplies/Materials (10c): Incentives (10d): Other Direct Costs (10e): Additional Other Direct Costs (10f): Subtotals: TASK GRAND TOTAL (11):

ATP V.11 (04.27.2018)

$0 $0 $0 $3,000 $0 $0 $3,000 $15,824

Task "E" Other Costs: Itemized Travel Cost (10a) Please provide an itemized "travel" cost estimate for all travel costs applicable to each task Travel (10a) Type of Travel

Quantity

Units

Cost $

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind $

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

$0

Subtotals:

$0

$0 $0

Total Travel Costs:

Itemized Equipment Cost (10b) Please provide an itemized "equipment" cost estimate for all equipment cost applicable to each task Equipment (10b) Type of Equipment

Quantity

Units

Cost $

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind $

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

Subtotals:

$0

$0

$0 $0

Total Equipment Costs:

Itemized Supplies/Materials Cost (10c) Please provide an itemized "supplies/materials" cost estimate for all supplies/materials cost applicable to each task Supplies/Materials (10c) Type of Supplies/Materials

Quantity

Units

Cost $

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind $

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

Subtotals:

$0

$0

Total Supplies/Materials Costs:

ATP V.11 (04.27.2018)

$0 $0

Task "E" Other Costs: Itemized Travel Cost (10a) Itemized Incentives Cost (10d) Please provide an itemized "incentives" cost estimate for all incentives costs applicable to each task Incentives (10d) Type of Other Direct Costs 1.

Quantity

T-Shirts

Units

300

Cost $

$10

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind $

$3,000

$3,000

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

$3,000

Subtotals:

$0

Total Itemized Incentives Costs:

$0 $3,000

Itemized Other Direct Costs (10e) Please provide an itemized "other" cost estimate for all other costs applicable to each task Other Direct Costs (10e) Type of Other Direct Costs

Quantity

Units

Cost $

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind $

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

$0

Subtotals:

$0

$0 $0

Total Other Direct Costs:

If applicable, Additional Itemized Other Direct Costs (10f) Please provide an itemized "other" cost estimate for all other costs applicable to each task Other Direct Costs (10f) Type of Other Direct Costs

Quantity

Units

Cost $

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind $

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

Subtotals:

$0

$0

Total Additional Itemized Other Direct Costs:

ATP V.11 (04.27.2018)

$0 $0

TASK "F" DETAIL ESTIMATE Task Name (5a):

PUBLIC ART VOLUNTEER EVENTS

Task Summary (5b): Volunteer community events to install public art (sideawalk and pavement painting, murals) on project site.

Start Date

End Date

Task Activities (6a):

1.

Jan-23

Feb-23

2.

Nov-22

Feb-23

3.

Nov-22

Feb-23

4.

Nov-22

Feb-23

T-Shirt Design

5.

Mar-23

Jun-23

Conduct Events (6)

6.

Mar-22

Jun-23

Deliverables (6b):

Event Planning Intersection and Fence Mural Designs (5) Yellow Brick Stencil Design

Post-Event Evaluation/Data Collection Staff Costs (7):

Staff Time (Agency) (7a): Party 1 -

Program Manager

Staff Hours

Rate Per Hour

40

$66

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind Match $

$2,622

Party 2 Subtotal Agency Costs:

Staff Hours

Rate Per Hour

Party 1 - Executive Director

46

$225

Party 2 - Project Manager

30

$125

Party 3 - Communuty Development Team Member

50

$75

Party 4 - Communuty Development Team Member

32

$50

Party 5 - Communuty Development Team Member

32

$50

Party 6 - Communuty Development Team Member

32

$50

Party 7 - Communuty Development Team Member

32

$50

Party 8 - Mural Artist

40

$200

Staff Time (Consultant/Subcontractor) (7b):

Party 9 - Designer 1

80

$250

Party 10 - Designer 2

4

$175

Party 11 - Graphic Designer

6

$175 Subtotal Consultant Costs:

$2,622 CCLGP Total $

$0 Local Cash Match $

$10,350 $3,750 $3,750 $1,600 $1,600 $1,600 $1,600 $8,000 $20,000 $700 $1,050 $54,000

$0

Total Staff Costs (Agency & Consultant) (7c):

$0 In-kind Match $

$0 $56,622

Indirect Costs (8) Approved ICAP/ ICRP (8a)?

FALSE

If Approved ICAP/ ICRP box is checked, provide Rate (8b): Task Notes (9):

Other Costs (10): You will not be able to fill in the following items. The totals for each "Other Costs" category listed below will automatically calculate from information entered in the itemized other costs section:

Total $

To fill out an itemized cost for each "Other Cost", use Tab Task F "OC".

Travel (10a): Equipment (10b): Supplies/Materials (10c): Incentives (10d): Other Direct Costs (10e): Additional Other Direct Costs (10f): Subtotals: TASK GRAND TOTAL (11):

ATP V.11 (04.27.2018)

$0 $0 $15,650 $1,000 $0 $0 $16,650 $73,272

Task "F" Other Costs: Itemized Travel Cost (10a) Please provide an itemized "travel" cost estimate for all travel costs applicable to each task Travel (10a) Type of Travel

Quantity

Units

Cost $

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind $

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

$0

Subtotals:

$0

$0 $0

Total Travel Costs:

Itemized Equipment Cost (10b) Please provide an itemized "equipment" cost estimate for all equipment cost applicable to each task Equipment (10b) Type of Equipment

Quantity

Units

Cost $

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind $

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

Subtotals:

$0

$0

$0 $0

Total Equipment Costs:

Itemized Supplies/Materials Cost (10c) Please provide an itemized "supplies/materials" cost estimate for all supplies/materials cost applicable to each task Supplies/Materials (10c) Type of Supplies/Materials 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

Permit to close city street to paint mural on raised intersection Street Paint (gallons) Brick Stencils Mural Stencils Paint Brushes/Rollers Paint Trays and Buckets Disposable gloves (box of 100) Drop tarps Traffic control signs and cones

Quantity

Units

4 100 8 8 80 80 10 20 60

$500 $60 $250 $250 $10 $10 $5 $10 $30

Cost $

$2,000 $6,000 $2,000 $2,000 $800 $800 $50 $200 $1,800

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind $

$2,000 $6,000 $2,000 $2,000 $800 $800 $50 $200 $1,800

10.

11.

12.

Subtotals:

$15,650

$0

Total Supplies/Materials Costs:

ATP V.11 (04.27.2018)

$0 $15,650

Task "F" Other Costs: Itemized Travel Cost (10a) Itemized Incentives Cost (10d) Please provide an itemized "incentives" cost estimate for all incentives costs applicable to each task Incentives (10d) Type of Other Direct Costs 1.

Quantity

T-Shirts

Units

200

Cost $

$10

CCLGP Total $

$2,000

Local Cash Match $

In-kind $

$1,000

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

$1,000

Subtotals:

$0

Total Itemized Incentives Costs:

$0 $1,000

Itemized Other Direct Costs (10e) Please provide an itemized "other" cost estimate for all other costs applicable to each task Other Direct Costs (10e) Type of Other Direct Costs

Quantity

Units

Cost $

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind $

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

$0

Subtotals:

$0

$0 $0

Total Other Direct Costs:

If applicable, Additional Itemized Other Direct Costs (10f) Please provide an itemized "other" cost estimate for all other costs applicable to each task Other Direct Costs (10f) Type of Other Direct Costs

Quantity

Units

Cost $

CCLGP Total $

Local Cash Match $

In-kind $

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

Subtotals:

$0

$0

Total Additional Itemized Other Direct Costs:

ATP V.11 (04.27.2018)

$0 $0

Attachment D: Checklist for Agencies Considering their Application as a PSR Equivalent This checklist is for PSR quivalent

do not have an existing PSR or the State Highway System. Projects

should complete this form, and consult their District Contact listed on the CCLGP website about PSRs as soon as possible.

See the section on Attachment D in the Application Instructions for more details.

Applicants who can use this checklist may consider their completed application with all required attachments as a PSR quivalent, if the topics listed below are thoroughly addressed in other parts of the application package. Check the box next to each of the below items that have been addressed in the application package.

✓

Project background and history (discussed in Section A.2, “Demonstrated Community Need”, of the Project Narrative).

✓

Inventory of environmental resources, identification of potential environmental issues, and the anticipated environmental processing type. In addition, describe potential mitigation requirements and associated costs. (Discussed in Section A.4, “Project Deliverability”, of the Project Narrative.)

✓

Description of potentially hazardous materials/waste problems, potential mitigation or avoidance measures, and potential costs. (Discussed in Section A.4, “Project Deliverability”, of the Project Narrative.)

✓

Identification of other funding sources, if applicable. (Listed these in Section 1.3, “Summary Budget Information”, in the main application form.)

After all the boxes are checked, save and attach this completed form to your application in the “Attachment D: For Infrastructure Projects, Project Study Report or Equivalent with Engineer's Stamp” field.

CIVIL ENGINEER: ROBERT STEVENS LICENSE # C58660

PROJECT LOCATION MAP YELLOW BRICK ROAD: Clean, Green and Beautiful

Public Housing

Lincoln

8th

Peres Elementary School

Lucas Park

Pennsylvania

Richmond Parkway

Elm Playlot POGO PARK #1

Chevron

Elm YELLOW BRICK ROAD®

Ripley Stuart Playlot

BNSF Rail Line Public Housing

Public Housing

Public Housing

Nevin Park

Public Housing

Kaiser

8th

Hospital

BART Transportation Hub

YMCA

Downtown Business District

Atchison Village Park Leadership and Greenway High Schools Lincoln Elementary School

8th

Harbour-8 Park POGO PARK #2

Richmond Greenway Ohio

Clean California Local Grant Program Fact Sheet Project Title: Yellow Brick Road: Clean, Green and Beautiful Project Sponsor: City of Richmond Primary Contact: Name Title Organization Email Public Works Director

Joe Leach

Project Location(s) Assembly Senate District District 15

09

City of Richmond

Congressional Caltrans District District 11

04

Phone

joe_leach@ci.richmond.ca.us

510-610-5478

County/Counties City/Cities Contra Costa

Route(s)

Richmond

N/A

Project Scope Briefly describe the project. Provide basic details about project type, purpose and need, etc.

Limit to words.

The Project will install human-scale street lighting, litter abatement facilities, wayfinding and placemaking signage, and public art elements on 8th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue in Richmond.

The Project also proposes decorative fencing at the two parks that bookend the YBR route (Elm Playlot and Harbour-8 Park) as well as a litter abatement and public art maintenance campaign to complete the community's vision to create clean, green and safe public spaces.

Project Cost Total Project Cost:

$4,999,955

Total CCLGP Request:

Project Schedule Project Start Date

6/1/2022

Project End Date

$4,999,955

6/15/2024

Project Benefits Briefly describe the project outcomes/outputs, including any benefits to underserved communities. Limit to words.

The Project benefits the community by reducing the amount of waste and debris in the community, beautifying and improving public spaces, and improving public spaces for walking and recreation. The Project meets a demonstrated community need for cultural connection and placemaking, expressed by residents over a decade of public engagement. The Project advances equity by building power for the community to take control of the conditions of their own neighborhood.

hoose a definition by which to define the community surrounding the project as underserved See the section Underserved Communities of these guidelines for more information. If the community surrounding the project is considered underserved based on multiple options, choose the option that best supports the community’s status as underserved. Per Option 5, Tribal Communities require zero local match, and thus none of these calculations.

Step

Ste

Determine the SOD of the community surrounding the project

Table 1. SOD of Community Surrounding the Project Site(s) List the Option Used to Determine SOD: Census Data (For definitions of each of the 5 options, see the section ”.)

Metric Score of Census Tract Census Tract Location Relative to Census Tract using the Population Number Project Site(s) chosen option listed above.

(4) (3) (2) (1) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Project Site A Within a ¼ mile radius.

Within a ¼ mile radius.

Within a ¼ mile radius.

Project Site B Within a ¼ mile radius.

Within a ¼ mile radius.

Within a ¼ mile radius.

SOD of Tract (3) x (4) (5)

3,760.00

6,245.00

51,250.00

320,056,250.00

3,770.00

7,323.00

39,232.00

287,295,936.00

3,790.00

7,003.00

46,382.00

324,813,146.00

3,750.00

4,897.00

61,196.00

299,676,812.00

3,760.00

6,245.00

51,250.00

320,056,250.00

3,750.00

4,897.00

61,196.00

299,676,812.00

3,730.00

4,468.00

54,049.00

241,490,932.00 0.00

TOTALS SOD of Community Surrounding the Project

3,312,527,406.00

68,972.00 =

Total of Column 5 Total of Column 3

=

48,027.13

Table 1. SOD of Community Surrounding the Project Site(s) Metric Score of Census Tract using the chosen option listed above.

(4)

SOD of Tract (3) x (4)

Location Relative to Project Site(s)

Census Tract Number

Census Tract Population

(1)

(2)

(3)

3,760.00

6,245.00

51,250.00

320,056,250.00

3,770.00

7,323.00

39,232.00

287,295,936.00

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Project Site Within a ¼ mile radius.

Within a ¼ mile radius.

Within a ¼ mile radius.

Project Site Within a ¼ mile radius.

Within a ¼ mile radius.

Within a ¼ mile radius.

(5)

0.00

0.00 3,790.00

7,003.00

46,382.00

324,813,146.00

3,770.00

7,323.00

39,232.00

287,295,936.00

0.00 0.00

Step 3. Use Table 2 below to determine the Required Local Match based off the SOD of Community Surrounding the Project.

Table 2. Severity of Disadvantage and Corresponding Local Match Requirement SOD Criteria

Ranges for SOD of Community Surrounding the Project

Required Local Match %

Option 1: Area Median Income (AMI) compared to Statewide Median Income (SMI)* Data: Census Tract Level Data from the 2019 American Community Survey 5-year (ACS5) Estimates > $60,188 50 If the AMI SOD of the $56,426 to $60,188 37.5 Then local surrounding $52,665 to $56,425 25 match is… community is… $48,903 to $52,664 12.5 < $48,903 0 Option 2: CalEnviroScreen 3.0 Percentile Score Data: SB 535 List of Disadvantaged Communities or SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities Map < 39 50 If the CalEnviroScreen 39 to 42 37.5 Then local 3.0 SOD of the 43 to 46 25 match is… surrounding 47 to 50 12.5 community is… > 50 0 Option 3: Percentage of Students that Receive Free or Reduced Lunches** Data: California Department of Education website < 75 75 to 79 If the Free Lunch SOD Then local 80 to 84 of the surrounding match is … community is…

85 to 89 > 90 Option 4: Healthy Places Index (HPI) Score (use overall HPI score only) Data: California Healthy Places Index website > 25 If the HPI SOD of the 21 to 25 Then local surrounding 16 to 20 match is… community is…

10 to 15 < 10 Option 5: Tribal Communities Data: List of Federally Recognized Tribal Governments in California If the project applicant or sub-applicant is a Federally Recognized Tribal Government or the project area is located within (or partially within) Federally Recognized Tribal Lands (typically within the boundaries of a Reservation or Then the local Rancheria), lands owned by or held in trust for an Indian tribe, match is… allotted lands, and/or sensitive tribal areas (which might include areas in which a Native American Tribe has a significant interest such as traditional cultural properties and sacred sites).

50 37.5 25 12.5 0

50 37.5 25 12.5 0

0

*Communities with a population less than 15,000 may use data at the Census Block Group level. Unincorporated communities may use data at the Census Place level. **During the development of these guidelines, the National School Lunch Program started offering free lunches to all students. Thus, if an applicant still wants to use this option, it is recommended that pre-pandemic data be used.

0.0

orms for Calculating Population Benefit (PB) (Overall) and Relative PB (Underserved Community) Step 1. If your project has no infrastructure work, skip to Step 3.

Step 2. If your project has infrastructure work, complete Tables 1 through 5 below. Information from tables 1 through 3 will be used to calculate the Infrastructure Work PB for both the overall and underserved community in Tables 4 and 5, respectively.

Table 1. Infrastructure Work – Direct PB (Overall and Underserved Community) On line 1, list the census tract in which the project is located.

On subsequent lines, list all census tracts within a ¼ mile radius of your project.

If your project is large or long, use a ¼ mile from the outer edges. If your project has multiple locations, list the census tracts for each location. Add more rows on the last page if necessary.

For each census tract listed, provide the information requested. For columns 4 and 5, consult the CCLGP guidelines on how to define an undeserved community. If you choose “other” as your option, you must submit Attachment J with a justification of your methodology.

Total column 3 and column 5.

(1) 1 2 3 4

Within a ¼ mile radius.

Within a ¼ mile radius.

Within a ¼ mile radius.

5 6 7 8

Within a ¼ mile radius.

Within a ¼ mile radius.

Within a ¼ mile radius.

Population Totals

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

3,760

6,245

ACS5

6,245

3,770

7,323

ACS5

7,323

3,790

7,003

ACS5

7,003

3,750

4,897

ACS5

4897

3,760

6,245

ACS5

6,245

3,750

4,897

ACS5

4,897

3,730

4,468

CDEdu

4,468

(Overall) =

68,972

(Underserved) =

68,972

Table 2. Infrastructure Work – Indirect PB List all transits routes with at least one transit stop within a ½ mile radius of your project. If you project is large or long, use a ½ mile from the outer edges. Add more rows on the last page if necessary.

Total all ridership numbers.

(1) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

BART- Richmond Line AC Transit Bus Line 71 AC Transit Bus Line 72M AC Transit Bus Line 74 AC Transit Bus Line 76 AC Transit Bus Line 376 AC Transit Bus Line 667 Total of the Average Daily Ridership of Qualifying Routes

(2)

124,180 2,961 7,611 3,153 5,417 552 204 145,776

Table 3. Infrastructure Work – Dose Determine the “dose” factor for the infrastructure work, which are the hours the site will be accessible to the public under the improved conditions.

List all sites and the hours for each site. Add more rows on the last page if necessary.

Calculate the average number of hours of all sites.

(1) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

YBR Site A (8th St.- Pennsylvania Ave. to Ohio Ave) YBR Site B (Pennsylvania Ave. - 7th St. to 9th St.) YBR Site C (7th St. - Pennsylvania to Ripley) YBR Site D - Elm Playlot YBR Site E - Harbour-8 Park

Average of Hours if Project Contains Multiple Sites

(2)

24 24 24 10 10

18.40

Table 4. Infrastructure Work PB (Overall) Use information from Tables 1-3 to complete Table 4.

(Table 1, Column 3)

(1)

68,972

+

+

(Table 2, Column 2)

(2)

145,776

×

×

(Table 3, Column 2)

(3)

18.40

= (4) =

3,951,363

Table 5. Infrastructure Work PB (Underserved Community) Use information from Tables 1-3 to complete Table 5.

(Table 1, Column 5)

+

(1)

68,972

(Table 2, Column 2)

×

(2)

+

145,776

(Table 3, Column 2)

=

(3)

×

18.40

(4) =

3,951,363

Step 3: If your application proposes educational campaigns or events about litter abatement, proper waste disposal, or how to do sanctioned artwork (as opposed to vandalism), use Table 6 to calculate PB of each non-infrastructure activity and total. If your application does not propose these activities, skip to Step 4.

Table 6. Non-Infrastructure Work PB = Number of people reached at least once by an educational campaign or eligible event. = Number of times the campaign will run, or the event will be held.

x (1) 1 2 3 4

YBR Clean Green and Beautiful Educational Block Parties Zero Waste Events Litter Cleanup Volunteer Events

5,000 250 150 67

=

(3)

(2) x x x x

3 4 8 6

= = = =

15,000 1,000 1,200 400 18,000

Total NI Work PB

Step 4. Calculate the Project’s Population Benefit (Overall). This score will be graded by the Department on a curve relative to all applications submitted. The number of points the applicant will be awarded for Scoring Component 2, Project Population Benefit, will be granted accordingly. The maximum number of points is 20.

Table 7. Project’s PB (Overall)

(From Table 4, Column 4)

+

=

(2)

(1)

3,951,363

(From Table 6, Column 3)

+

18,000

(3) =

3,969,363

Step 5. Calculate the Project’s Population Benefit (Underserved Community).

Table 8. Project’s PB (Underserved Community)

+

=

(From Table 5, Column 4)

(From Table 6, Column 3)

(1)

3,951,363

(3)

(2)

+

=

18,000

3,969,363

Step 6. Calculate the Project’s Relative Population Benefit to the underserved community.

=

÷ (From Table 7, column 3)

(From Table 8, column 3)

(2)

(1)

3,969,363

÷

(3) =

3,969,363

1.000

Step 7. Calculate the number of points you, the applicant, will be awarded for Scoring Component 3, Project’s Relative Population Benefit to the Underserved Community. The maximum number of points is 35.

Table 10. Applicant’s Points for Scoring Component 3, Project’s Relative PB (Underserved Community)

(From Table 9, column 3)

×

(1)

1.000

= (2)

×

35

(3) =

35.000

Examples of completed calculation forms based on a fictitious project can be found in Appendix A.4.

Additional rows for Tables 1 and .

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

2,760

6,245

ACS5

6,245

10

2,770

7,323

ACS5

7,323

13

2,790

7,003

ACS5

7,003

2,770

7,323

ACS5

7,323

(1) 9 Within a ¼ mile radius.

Within a ¼ mile 11 radius.

Within a ¼ mile 12 radius.

Within a ¼ mile radius.

Within a ¼ mile 15 radius.

Within a ¼ mile 16 radius.

14

(1) 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

AC Transit Bus Line 675 AC Transit Bus Line 681 AC Transit Bus Line 800 AC Transit Bus Line 864

(2)

527 152 726 293

(2)

(1) 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

(1) 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Liiter Cleanup Community Service Public Art Volunteer Events

Reset Form

1 50

x x x x x x x x x x x x x

(2)

100 6

= = = = = = = = = = = = =

(3)

100 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

A

1. Demonstrated Need Assessment Form:

existing site . Within each section choose a maximum of two (2) questions to answer

City of Richmond

Table 1: Demonstrated Community Need Assessment Form

Describe the evidence there is a recurring litter or land misuse in the project area under existing

-

Range 0 – 5 pts.

No evidence = 0 pts

Use box below

Use box below

collection data or other empirical data.

The Yellow Brick Road-Clean Green and Beautiful project streets and adjacent parks regularly experience residential,commercial and construction litter dumping by residents and non-residents. Local residents regularly report trash dumping to the City of Richmond. 40-50 tons of trash is dumped in the surrounding neighborhood each month.

-2

-

-4

5

5

Under existing conditions, does the project site have adequate signage and amenities for proper waste disposal or prevention?

Under existing conditions, does the site have physical features to discourage inappropriate waste disposal or dumping?

Under existing conditions, does the proposed community or project site lack educational programs or events about litter abatement or proper waste disposal?

5

No

No = 5 pts. pts.

Yes = 0 pts.

No = 5 pts. pts.

Yes = 0 pts.

Yes = pts. = 2 pts.

No or N/A = 0 pts.

5

2-

2-2

2-

2-4

5

5

5

5

Under existing conditions what percentage of the project site needs beautification?

Under existing conditions, what percentage of the project site is not functional and/or accessible for Based on the hours the project site is open, approximately what percentage of time is it What percentage of the project site is negatively affected by graffiti or other vandalism?

0-20% -40% = 2 pts.

-60% -80% = 4 pts. >80% = 5 pts.

0-20% -40% = 2 pts.

-60% -80% = 4 pts. >80% = 5 pts.

0-20% -40% = 2 pts.

-60% -80% = 4 pts. >80% = 5 pts.

0-20% -40% = 2 pts.

-60% -80% = 4 pts. >80% = 5 pts.

85%

5

0%

85%

0%

5

-

-2

-

-4

5

Yes Yes = 5 pts.

5

5

5

5

pts No = 0 pts.

Yes = 5 pts.

5

-5

-6

Does the project area currently prevent a critical connection to daily life destinations such as school, medical care, jobs, or groceries via walking, biking, Is the public space a barrier or

pts route?

Is the existing public recreation space unusable for its intended purposes?

Under existing conditions, are there adequate/sufficient recreation places in the community?

Under existing conditions, are there enough places to sit at Does the existing project site lack features or elements that connect it to the culture or history of the surrounding community?

No = 0 pts.

Yes = 5 pts. pts No = 0 pts.

No = 5 pts. = pts Yes = 0 pts.

No = 2 pts Yes = 0 pts.

Yes = 5 pts. = pts No = 0 pts.

Yes

5

4-

4-2

5

How does the percentage of usable public space in the underserved community compare to the region's Is the project area an

Yes = 5 pts. = pts.

No or N/A = 0 pts.

Yes

Is the project site an

Yes = 5pts.

Yes

5

4-

5

4-4

5

Below Avg. = 5pts.

Avg. = pts Above Avg. = 0 pts.

= pts.

No or N/A = 0 pts.

Does the space function for people with disabilities or special needs?

No = 5pts. = pts.

Yes or N/A = 0 pts.

5 5

5

Under existing conditions what percentage of the space scaped?

5-2

5

Under existing conditions, what percentage of landscape lacks native or low-water plants?

5-

5

5-

5-4

5

What percentage of the space is unusable due to lack of

What percentage of the project site is unusable due to excessive heat at midday?

0-20% = 5 pts.

-40% = 4 pts.

-60% = pts.

-80% = 2 pts. % = pts.

0-20% = pt.

-40% = pts.

-60% = pts.

-80% = pts. % = pts.

-20% = pts.

-40% = 2 pts.

-60% = pts.

-80% = 4 pts. % = 5 pts.

0-20% = pts.

-40% = 2 pts.

-60% = pts.

-80% = 4 pts. % = 5 pts.

19%

5

85%

5

0%

0%

50

A

. Project’s Outcomes Assessment Form:

Within each section, choose a maximum of two questions to answer, for a total of 10 questions.

Table 2: Project’s Outcomes Assessment For

-

4

-2

-

-4

-5

4

By what percentage will the waste and debris within the project site be reduced.

By what percentage will the signage and amenities for proper waste disposal or prevention increase at the project site?

What is the estimated reduction of waste or debris at the project site because of new physical features to discourage inappropriate waste disposal or dumping?

What is the percent increase in the number of educational programs or events about litter abatement and proper waste What is the percent increase in the number of litter pickup and waste disposal events?

0-25% = 26-50% = 2 pts.

-75% pts.

76=4

77%

4

0-66% = 2 pts.

67pts.

0-25% = 26-50% = 2 pts.

-75% pts.

76=4

0%

77%

0-66% = 2 pts.

67pts.

0%

0-66% = 2 pts.

67pts.

0%

4

2-

2-2

4

By what percentage will the project site be beautified or improved?

026-50% = 2 pts. pts.

76-

0%

4

By what percentage do the improvements increase the number and/or diversity of viable uses in the project site?

026-50% = 2 pts. pts.

76-

0%

05

By what percentage do the improvements increase access to the project site?

2-4

4

By what percentage will the quantity of human scale, energy conserving lighting be increased?

2-5

4

What percentage of project site will be improved with anti-graffiti/antivandalism solutions?

2-6

4

Will visual art pieces be added to the project site?

4

What is the percentage increase in educational programs informing the community how to do sanctioned public artwork (as opposed to vandalism/graffiti)?

2-

2-7

-40% = 2 pts.

-80% = 4 pts.

026-50% = 2 pts. pts.

76026-50% = 2 pts. pts.

762 or more = 4 pts.

0%

99%

0%

46 026-50% = 2 pts. pts.

76-

4

0%

4

-

4

-2

4

Will the project create or enable a critical connection to daily life destinations such as school, medical care, jobs, or groceries via walking, biking, or Will the project improve a walking or biking route?

Will the project improve or rehabilitate an existing public recreation space?

Will the project add new recreation space to the community?

-

4

-4

4

-5

4

By what percentage will the project site(s) be improved for walking or recreation?

4

Will the improved project site incorporate features or elements that connect it to the culture or history of the surrounding community?

-6

Yes = 4 pts. pts.

No or N/A = 0 pts.

Yes = 4 pts. pts.

No or N/A = 0 pts.

Yes = 4 pts. pts.

No or NA = 0 pts.

Yes = 4 pts. pts.

No or NA = 0 pts.

026-50% = 2 pts. pts.

76Definitely = 4 pts.

Not at all = 0 pts.

Yes

4

Yes

4

0%

4-

4-2

4-

4-4

4

4

What percentage of census tracts project site qualify as underserved?

= 4 pts.

40-50% = pts.

20= 2 pts. pts.

99%

4

What percentage of transit

= 4 pts.

40-50% = pts.

20= 2 pts. pts.

99%

4

project site reach an underserved community?

4

Will the project create or improve access to a key connection across a major physical barrier in an underserved community?

4

Will the improved project site function for people with disabilities or special needs?

Yes = 4 pts. pts.

No or N/A = 0 pts.

Yes = 4 pts.

2 pts.

No or N/A = 0 pts.

5-

4

5-2

4

5-

4

5-4

4

026-50% = 2 pts. pts.

760What will be the percent 26-50% = 2 pts. increase in native, drought pts. tolerant plantings?

760What is the anticipated percent 26-50% = 2 pts. increase of shade measured at pts. the noon hour?

760What is the anticipated increase 26-50% = 2 pts. of greening or tree canopy? pts.

76What is the anticipated decrease in impervious surfaces at the project site?

0%

77%

4

0%

99%

4

40

PEDESTAL MARKERS YELLOW BRICK ROAD

SPECIAL STREET SIGNS YELLOW BRICK ROAD

ARCHITECTURAL FENCE AND GATE HARBOUR-8 PARK

ARCHITECTURAL PAVERS HARBOUR-8 PARK

EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOW THE NEED FOR PROJECT: YELLOW BRICK ROAD – Clean, Green, and Beautiful

S U R V E Y - H A R B O U R - 8 PA R K AGE:

RACE:

DESIGN TENT - SURVEY RESULTS

Residents' Requests

Adult Senior with Senior with child child

Youth

Adult

Total

%

108

132

91

57

19

407

12.02%

Police / Security

97

106

93

28

14

338

9.98%

Park / Playground

75

79

60

15

10

239

7.06%

Trees (+ Fruit Trees)

71

69

55

16

15

226

6.67%

Flowers

64

56

45

23

18

206

6.08%

Plants

75

46

27

11

1

160

4.73%

Maintenance

43

40

30

15

6

134

3.96%

Art

56

28

25

14

5

128

3.78%

Garden (Food + flower gardens)

16

48

32

22

3

121

3.57%

Water Fountain

36

33

29

7

5

110

3.25%

Restrooms

29

29

31

11

6

106

3.13%

Benches

33

26

26

12

7

104

3.07%

Event Stage

30

31

17

9

14

101

2.98%

Grass

31

39

20

8

0

98

2.89%

Bike/Walking Path

12

34

20

15

7

88

2.60%

Trash cans

20

20

28

4

2

74

2.19%

Basketball

19

28

12

9

3

71

2.10%

Recreational Activities - things to do

21

23

19

5

1

69

2.04%

Farmers' Market

16

15

14

15

7

67

1.98%

BBQ

15

25

17

4

2

63

1.86%

Community Hub

12

28

13

7

2

62

1.83%

Soccer Field

19

21

19

3

0

62

1.83%

9

22

20

8

2

61

1.80%

Vendors

14

16

14

11

4

59

1.74%

Music

20

9

11

14

3

57

1.68%

Security Cameras

22

14

14

4

2

56

1.65%

6

13

15

6

7

47

1.39%

18

10

9

4

6

47

1.39%

Animal Park (dog park + animal pettin

9

15

8

5

6

43

1.27%

Volunteers

6

18

12

3

2

41

1.21%

13

15

10

0

1

39

1.15%

Roller Skating Rink

6

13

9

5

0

33

0.97%

Gym (fitness equipment)

4

8

11

4

3

30

0.89%

13

9

1

5

1

29

0.86%

Doggy Pot

5

4

2

4

3

18

0.53%

Pond with Fish / Creek

8

5

4

0

1

18

0.53%

Lights

Tables

Signs Skateboard Park

Swimming Pool

Fences / Gate

DESIGN TENT - SURVEY RESULTS

Residents' Requests

Adult Senior with Senior with child child

Youth

Adult

Total

%

Bird Houses

9

3

4

1

0

17

0.50%

Tennis court

8

5

4

0

0

17

0.50%

After-School Programs / Outdoor class

1

5

6

1

2

15

0.44%

Calling Phones

1

3

5

0

2

11

0.32%

Football

4

4

1

0

2

11

0.32%

Bike shop

5

2

2

1

0

10

0.30%

Gazebo

0

5

4

0

1

10

0.30%

Softball Field

3

3

3

0

0

9

0.27%

Track and Field

3

2

2

2

0

9

0.27%

Mini Mall

3

3

1

1

0

8

0.24%

Waterfall

3

2

2

1

8

0.24%

Medical Stand

3

1

3

0

0

7

0.21%

Horses

2

4

0

0

0

6

0.18%

Volleyball

2

2

2

0

0

6

0.18%

Tool Shed

1

1

3

0

0

5

0.15%

Day Care Center

0

1

1

1

1

4

0.12%

Pizza Oven

0

1

1

1

1

4

0.12%

Boxing

1

1

1

0

0

3

0.09%

Curfew

1

1

1

0

0

3

0.09%

Go Cart Track

2

0

1

0

0

3

0.09%

Bike Racks

0

2

0

0

0

2

0.06%

Hot tub

1

1

0

0

0

2

0.06%

Jump Rope

2

0

0

0

0

2

0.06%

Photography - workshop

1

0

0

1

0

2

0.06%

Solar Power (lights)

0

2

0

0

0

2

0.06%

Area for Disabled children

1

0

0

0

0

1

0.03%

Donations

1

0

0

0

0

1

0.03%

Healthy Cooking Area

0

0

0

1

0

1

0.03%

Power Outlet

0

1

0

0

0

1

0.03%

Senior Area

0

1

0

0

0

1

0.03%

1,001

1,051

819

337

178

3,386

100.00%

Totals

Comments - General ENGLISH

SPANISH

Anything to make it safer for our children to walk is good for everyone. I like this plan.

I hope you make it beautiful and plant lots of trees.

Let's see if we will be able to go out more.

A ver si asi podemos salir mas

Cannot happen soon enough.

I put neon Caltrans vests on my children when we walk to school because I am so afraid that they might get hit by a car. The Yellow Brick Road is a great improvement to the safety and quality of our streets – especially for our children. We are so happy this project is finally happening. It's been a long time. We like everything you are all doing to improve our community. God bless you.

It's good for the community

Es bueno para la comunidad

No one respects the streets

Nadie respetan las calles

The Yellow Brick Road is going to be one of the best things happening in our community. I can't wait for it to be built.

I think the city should make sure they ticket cars that are parked in the wrong place.

We really like this plan. We are for it.

The streets will be prettier

Van hacer mas bonitas las calles

Very good!!!

Que bien!!!

With all the upcoming developments projects like Pogo Park and Yellow Brick Road, I can see the beautification of the city returning.

Richmond is becoming a place of Pride of Purpose again. - J. It's a good thing for the kids and the handicapped. The handicapped will be able to ride their wheelchairs down the streets, because some of the streets are broken or they do not have a sidewalk ramp - Rita I like the idea.

Me gusta la idea

There are lots of cars parked in illegal places – will they be towed?

Im scared for my kids to cross the streets here. -Dominique Williams, local resident As long as it helpsthe children and elderly I support it! -Michael Allen, local resident I need a place to park my vehicles please don't take the parking away. -Carlos M, local resident Something like this was needed.

I think that's why there are a lot of cars...because the people don't feel safe enough to walk through the street.s -A It's great.

Great idea...safety It's great for the children.

Great project can't wait to see how it turns out.

Great.

Good things for the kids.

The people don't respect the pedestrians.

Richmond needed a change. -Norma It's going to be something safe and good for the families

Ya se ocupaba algo asi Creo que por eso tambien hay muchos carros porque la gente no se sienten seguros de andar en pie por estas calles -A Es estupendo Es muy bueno para los niños.

La gente no respetan a los peatones Ya ocupaba un cambio Richmond -Norma Va a ser algo seguro y bueno para familias

This will help bring the community together. -Destiny Cook, Triangle Court resident This will make it safer for my kids to walk to school. -Rachel Hawthorne, Triangle Court resident It's going to look pretty once it's done.

Se va a ver bonito ya acabado

FINALLY!!! Somebody is doing something to improve Richmond! Kevin Smith, local resident I look forward to seeing this when you're done with it

Espero ver esto ya cuando lo acaben

Thanks for all the good things you guys do in the neighborhood!!

You have my family's full support. -Billy Smith, local resident Can you do anything about all the cars causing blinds spots at the corners? -Joshua MCcain, local resident Good work Pogo park!! Where do i sign up to show I approve of your plan? -Raven Richardson, local resident I like the idea because it makes the streets safer and it's going to give a very pretty view and well that will produce more employment for our people within the city. - Felipe Coronado I like the project. It helps have safe streets for a lot of people who walk. Good decision from the people that are making this project possible. -Mirna Martinez Excellent

Me gusta la idea porque hace las calles mas seguras y les va a dar muy bonita vista y pues eso producira mas empleos para nuestra gente de la cuidad. Felipe Coronado Mirna Martinez - Me gusta el proyecto ayuda a tener calles segura para muchas personas que caminan.

Buena decision de las personas que esta haciendo este proyecto posible."

Excelente

These drawings are easy to understand and a tremendous improvement over what we are usually shown.

Great plans for generations to come. Keep up the good work! We love Pogo Park!

We need this all over Richmond.

Good project.

Buen proyecto

Good project.

Buen proyecto

It's marvelous.

Es maravilloso

This is really good.. I am so happy with this project.

Accessible corner ramps throughout the neighborhood residential areas.

Really awesome - looks great Excellent

Excelente

Excellent

Excelente

Excellent

Excelente

Excellent

Excelente

Excellent

Excelente

Excellent

Excelente

More trees please.

Just make it nice.

All for 4 way stop.

I support y'all.

It's going to look nice.

Se va a ver muy bonito

I want to support this project. Where can I sign to acknowledge it?

Richmond should have better streets. This is a start.

Excellent for the protection of the kids.

Excelente para proteccion de los niños

It's excellent because there are a lot of accidents.

Esta excelente porque hay mucho accidentes

Excellent

Excelente

Excellent

Excelente

Put crossing lights.

Que pongan luces para crusar

Excellent

Excelente

No Yellow Paint in front of my house!

I love what you all are doing for us - we love you so much.

Amazing! Can't wait to see it all!!

We value Pogo Park - it's a great and safe place for our children and helps to build the community Great ideas I like the concept It's really good what you guys are going to make Excellent Excellent Excellent Looks good!

Thank you so much for everything and for our community Very good idea. The project is very beautiful.

Put weapon detectors so that the streets can be safer. -Maricela Granajo My complaint is with the US Gov. + the State. If the Gov. + the State have something that belong to me who do I go to for help in getting what belongs to me back?. My name is Thelma Myers 728 5th St. (510) 974-9489 [? - One of the numbers were illegible]

Esta muy bueno lo que van hacer Excelente

Muchas gracias por todo y por nuestra comunidad Muy buena idea. Esta muy bonito el proyecto.

Maricela Granajo - Pongan detectores de armas para que las calles sean mas seguras.

This project will help make Richmond a better place. -Cheryl Maier I'm really excited! I think this will be a huge contribution to the neighborhood Love the project keep up the good work! -Aerayna WIlliams Great work.

Residents gave us their support.

Comments - 8th & Barrett ENGLISH We love the raised intersections; we would like to see a protected intersection at Barrett - like a light

SPANISH

I was about to go to the city to propose putting in a stop light here.

We most definitely need a light!

8th Barrett - The Yellow Brick Road for me is really great that it's fixing the streets. For everyone's security more for the kids and one who walks.. Should put stops, cameras, and bumps.

8th Barrett - Yellow Brick Road seems like a great solution to ending most of the traffic problems in the area. It benefits pedestrians and bikers very well. I love the effort being put into help[ing] our community. -Rosa

8th Barrett - El Amarillo Brickroad para mi esta muy bien que arreglen las calles. Por la seguridad de todos mas de los niños y que uno camina... Que pongan stop, camaras, y topes

8th & Barrett - I love what Pogo Park is doing to slow down the traffic where [I] live because the drivers on the corner of 8th Barrett Drive very fast and it "extremely" dangerous for pedestrians and cyclist[s] to cross the intersection... Thanks again for your help.

Concerned pedestrian A resident mentioned about creating some sort of petition to create a safe intersection at the corner of 8th & Barrett - A couple of residents wanted the same thing and recommended a traffic signal.

A resident/Pogo Park visitor passed by Station at 8th + Barrett complaining about Elm Playlot (but was okay with the YBR plans): -Why does Elm playlot have the bbq pits if they aren't being used?

-Why have the mounds of mulch been at the Zumba spot for a while?

-Upset that Zumba isn't at the park anymore, especially since no one gave anyone any explanations; she has diabetes; they paid money to amplify the zumba area -Should have built a bump where the totem pole is located.

Can you please do something to help the pedestrians on 8th & Barrett sign a petition and or help in any way I can to improve the safety of crossing that intersection? -Makeda Gordan 700 barrett Ave. People come down Barrett just as fast as they were when they were driving down Richmond Parkway, they think that they're still on there going 60mph. You need a red traffic light to stop the traffic.

-Hilario It's great that you're bettering the intersections because there are a lot of kids and students that walk through here and the drivers simply don't care for their safety on 8th & Barrett -Diamond Butler 439 c Nevin Love The idea!! The drivers on 8th are Crazy PLEASE HELP!! Angel Wilson Barrett apt Resident Excellent Excellent

Excelente Excelente

My children are scared to ride their bikes on Barrett due to how fast these drivers are going. I think we need a light at this intersection (8th and Barrett) -Lamar Stringer Barrett, apt Resident I love the idea - anything I can do to help sign me up -Daniel Benton, Barrett Apt resident We do need a better intersection on Barrett. It's very dangerous.

Si se ocupa una interseccion mejor en la Barrett. Es muy peligroso.

Can you add a traffic light on 8th & Barrett the speeding is ridiculous. -Eliza Hamilton, Barret Apt resident Please add a stop light on 8th & Barrett. It's impossible to cross the street. -John Marshall, Barrett Apt resident

Comments - Pennsylvania ENGLISH 7th + Penn. - They should put a ridge in the middle of the street to put more plants because it's better for the environment and it looks beautiful. [There should be a] program to plant trees outside of houses and it should be a part of the house to park one's car.

SPANISH 7th + Penn. - Que pusierán un camellón en medio de la calle para poner más plantas porque es mejor para el ambiente y se ve más bonito. [Deberia de ver un ] programa para plantar arboles afuera de las casas y que fuera la parte de la casa. Al lado de la casa para estacionar el carro de uno.

Its scary to cross on Pennsylvania! The drivers drive very fast and are very aggressive towards pedestrians. Anything you can do to slow the cars down is welcome, There is way to many blind spots on Pennsylvania due to all the over crowding of parked cars People drive here like its the freeway on Pennsylvania! They have no respect for anyone.

Add more stop lights the drivers don't honor the stop signs on Pennsylvania 7th + Pennsylvania - Protection is needed.

7th + Pennsylvania - Se necesita mas proteccion

Pennsylvania - There are always car crashes.

Pennsylvania - Siempre hay choques de carros

7th + Pennsylvania - They don't respect the stop sign.

7th + Pennsylvania - No respetan el estop

7th + Pensylvania - They run the stop light.

7th + Pennsylvania - Se pasan la luz Pennsylvania - Los niños caminan y los que manejan no les importan

Pennsylvania - The children walk and the drivers don't care.

Comments - 8th & Elm/Ripley ENGLISH

SPANISH

No on the 4 way stop sign by Ripley Ave. 8th Can you please fix that crash site on 6th & Ripley -Carmen Lee DON'T REMOVE MY PARKING SPOT!!! -Trudy Elm - You should've built a bump at the totem pole.

Elm Playlot - Pogo Park - Great futuristic plans!

Comments - 8th & Ohio ENGLISH I don't like the splitter island. I like the old plan better - the one where the sidewalk gets pushed out into the street to make more room to plant things. That's my vote. -Fernando Cazales, local resident I do not like how the street is split in two like they did on 6th Street. Cars don't slow down when the street is split - they just speed through. Mario, local resident There are so many accidents on 8th and Ohio. You have to do whatever it takes to slow these cars down. It's dangerous for people!

Since this is the entry to Yellow Brick Road, I think it needs an archway over it that says something like "Welcome to the Iron Triangle neighborhood." That would make people feel pride in their neighborhood. -Pam Saucer, local resident Cars turn fast onto 8th from Ohio – I think the curb needs to pushed way out onto the street to slow cars down. -Timothy McDaniels, local resident Thirty of us have worked on this project for 10 years now and we all would rather see the curb extension/bulbout installed rather than the "splitter island" that is shown in the new plans. -Pogo Park Community Resident Team You need crosswalks across Ohio to make it safe for pedestrians.

Cars just drive crazy!

SPANISH

Comments - Other Locations ENGLISH Where am I supposed to park my cars? -Anthony F, local resident 7th st I like the upgrade e[s]pecially for 9th Street because [it's] like a freeway. Me and my family love it.

7th + Barrett - Why "No Parking at Any Time" signs on Barrett? but on 10th + 7th.

7th + Acadia - This plan takes away PARKING from people who have lived here all their life. (Note: the Parking issue is huge) 8th + Bissell - Cars speed on Bissell-East to West Blow through stop sign 8th + Bissell - Can you put in a traffic calming circle?

SPANISH