1 minute read
SETTLEMENT
(Continued from Page 6) subsequently filed a counterclaim.
Amid the feuding, there was also a charge that one of the parties had “previously discharged their chlorinated pool water into the Rancocas Creek” and that a “pool deck violated the Pinelands setbacks.”
Advertisement
The township’s settlement resolution summarizes the litigation by stating it “involves disputes between the Parkers and the Friedmans as it relates to alleged impermissible activities each party claims the other causes to occur on their respective properties” and “in response to certain claims brought forth by the Parkers against the Friedmans, the Friedmans, in turn, brought forth claims against the township alleging that the township was responsible for the wrongdoings alleged by the Parkers.”
It then notes that “court-mandated mediation” between the parties occurred on May 16 of this year and “as a result of such mediation, the parties were able to negotiate
