Skip to main content

The States of Matter - Fabricademy Final Project 2021/22

Page 1

FABRICADEMY Textile and Technology Academy

STATES OF MATTER

Material research & concept by Petra Garajová Tutoring by 2021 / 2022


STATES OF MATTER

Petra Garajová

2021 / 2022


ABSTRACT

-

-

-

KEYWORDS


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

-

-


CONTENT

Acknowledgments Content

Aims

From Sheep to Wool Wool waste

Chemical processes Keratin Extraction Process


INTRODUCTION

-


THESIS STATEMENT

AIMS


METHODOLOGY


I. FROM SHEEP TO WOOL


FROM SHEEP TO WOOL

1. WOOL

2. HAIR

1.1. SHEEP

2.1. GOAT

2.2. CAMELIDS

2.3. RABBITS

1.1.1. MERINO

2.1.1. CASHMERE

2.2.1. ALPACA

2.3.1. ANGORA

1.1.2. LINCOLN

2.1.2. MOHAIR

2.2.2. CAMELS

1.1.3. DORSET

1.1.3. DORSET

2.2.3. LLAMAS

1.1.4. PYGORA

2.2.4. VICUÑAS

1.1.4. LAMBS WOOL

2.2.5. GUANACOS


BIODEGRADABILITY

ECOLOGY

the environment

recyclable natural resource

TENSILE STRENGHT

COMFORT INDEX

VOLUMINOSITY

FLEXIBILITY

THERMAL INSULATION

FINIISHING

cool in summer

UV PROTECTION

HYDROPHOBICITY

FIRE RESISTANCE

ABSORPTION

properties


WOOL WASTE

-

-


LOCAL FARM

= 1€

=

1 kg

4 kg

= 0,40 €

200 €

80 €

per year

per year

costs

earnings


creatine - α

β

α β


DIAGRAM OF WOOL WASTE RECYCLING

SCOURING

CARDING

SPINNING CHEMICAL DISSOLUION

MORDANTING

DYEING FILTRATION

CENTRIFUGATION WEAVING

KNITTING

DIALYSIS FINISHING

CUTTING

SEWING KERATIN POWDER

GARMENT

BIOPLASTICS

NANOFIBERS

TEXTILE FINISHING

3D PRINTING


CHEMICAL PROCESS

-

-


1.1. REDUCTION

1.1.1 thiol containing chemicals

1. CHEMICAL

1.2.1. Paracetic acid 1.2. OXYDATION

1.2.2. Performic acid

1.3. HYDROLYSIS

1.4. IONIC LQUIDS

a. Stenorophmonas SP 2.1. GRAM NEGATIVE BACTERIA

2. MICROBIAL & ENZYMATIC 2.2. GRAM POSITIVE BACTERIA

2.3. SAPROHYTIC AND PARASITIC FUNGI

3. SUPERCRITICAL WATER & STEAM EXPLOSION

4. MICROWAVE IRADIATION


III. USE OF KERATIN IN THE PRODUCTION OF MATERIALS


CHAPTER II.

a.


b.

c.


2.2. CHEMICAL DISSOLUTION

a.


I. CHEMICAL EXTRACTION - NaOH

b.

c.


d.

-


a.

b.

c.

d.


2.3. FILTRATION AND CENTRIFUGATION

FILTRATION

a.

b.

c.


CENTRIFUGATION

a.

b.


c.

e.

d.

f.


g.


2.4. BIURET REAGENT TEST

-

a. positive result

b. negative result


-

-

a.

b.

c.

c.


2.5. DIALYSIS

-

-

a.

b.


c.

e.

d.

f.


III. USE OF KERATIN IN THE PRODUCTION OF MATERIALS


CHAPTER III.


3.1. BIOPLASTICS

-

a.

b.


3.1. KERATIN AND SODIUM ALGINATE -

a.

b.


3.2. KERATIN AND GELATINE

-

a.

b.

c.

e.

f.


g. without citric acid

h. with citric acid

i.


3.3. KERATIN AND CELLULOSE

a.


3.4. PURE KERATIN

a.

b.

b.


3.2. 3D PRINTING

-


3.2.1. KERATIN, TAPIOCA AND CORNSTARCH

-

-

-

a.

b.

c. result


d.

e. dried prototype


3.2.2. KERATIN AND ALGINATE -

-

a.


3.2.3. KERATIN AND CELLULOSE

-

a.

b.

c.

d.


-

a.

b.


-


3.4. TEXTILE FINISHING AND IMPREGNATION

-


3.4.1.

KERATIN POWDER

3.4.2. KERATIN AND SODIUM ALGINATE -

-


a.

b.

c.

e.

d.

f.


IV. DISCUSSION

-


V.

CONCLUSION

-


BIBLIOGRAPHY

-

-


ONLINE RESOURCES

-

-

-


STATES OF MATTER


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
The States of Matter - Fabricademy Final Project 2021/22 by Petra Garajová - Issuu