LOOK INSIDE: Source Books in Architecture 15, Johnston Marklee

Published by Applied Research and Design Publishing, an imprint of ORO Editions.

Gordon Goff: Publisher www.appliedresearchanddesign.com info@appliedresearchanddesign.com Copyright © 2022 Knowlton School, The Ohio State University.

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including electronic, mechanical, photocopying of microfilming, recording, or otherwise (except that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the US Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press) without written permission from the publisher.

You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer.

Contributors: Sharon Johnston, Mark Lee, Ashley Bigham, Todd Gannon, Benjamin Wilke Book Design: Benjamin Wilke Editor: Benjamin Wilke Project Manager: Jake Anderson 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 First Edition ISBN: 978-1-957183-25-1 Color Separations and Printing: ORO Group Inc. Printed in Hong Kong.

AR+D Publishing makes a continuous effort to minimize the overall carbon footprint of its publications. As part of this goal, AR+D, in association with Global ReLeaf, arranges to plant trees to replace those used in the manufacturing of the paper produced for its books. Global ReLeaf is an international campaign run by American Forests, one of the world’s oldest nonprofit conservation organizations. Global ReLeaf is American Forests’ education and action program that helps individuals, organizations, agencies, and corporations improve the local and global environment by planting and caring for trees.

CONTENTS

7

INTRODUCTION BENJAMIN WILKE

8

SHAPE AND SERIALITY TODD GANNON

20

A DISCUSSION WITH SHARON JOHNSTON AND MARK LEE SHARON JOHNSTON, MARK LEE, ASHLEY BIGHAM, STUDENTS

50 64 74 94 100 106 118 130 142 150

JOHNSTON MARKLEE: SELECTED PROJECTS MENIL DRAWING INSTITUTE UCLA MARGO LEAVIN GRADUATE ART STUDIOS UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO CENTER FOR THE ARTS RICE UNIVERSITY VISUAL & DRAMATIC ARTS MCA CHICAGO CASA DE MONT PORCH HOUSE HUT HOUSE PHILADELPHIA CONTEMPORARY MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT

157

HOME VALUES ASHLEY BIGHAM

160 161 162

PROJECT CREDITS & DATA IMAGE CREDITS BIOGRAPHIES / ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Vault House

Pavilion of Six Views

Poggio Golo Winery

UIC Center for the Arts

Butterfly House

6

INTRODUCTION BENJAMIN WILKE

I found the work of Johnston Marklee odd at first. I couldn’t identify a consistent or recognizable signature. There was some repetition to motifs and forms, but the work felt too flexible and varied to signal a constant disciplinary project. Of course, I was comparing Johnston Marklee to other architects in this publication series, most of whom have a manner of form-making or representation—or some other sine qua non—that marks an identity that has formed, maintained, and shifted. I couldn’t find the constant that provided a path to understanding this particular body of work.

But there was one thing that was consistent: the collages. Every Johnston Marklee project has a collage that provides shorthand representation of that project and that uses strategies of both nothing and everything to do its job. The nothing is the white silhouette that remains among the contextual queues and contexts that define it. A consistent graphic device across all of the collages, this blankness that marks the presence of the project is devoid of resolution or detail except for what the silhouette itself gives away. At the same time, the collages aim to explain everything about each project by distilling a set of ideas into a singular image that acts as a de facto album cover or thesis statement for the project. This strategy produces an identifying profile and a blank slate. It presents agenda and possibility. It is explicit and vague. There is the thing itself and the relationships that make it so. The collages were my way into the work of Johnston Marklee.

Once I was able to get in via an understanding of the collages, the work opened up. As the collages suggest, these aren’t projects that exist as objects without context. These are not opportunities to flex an interoffice or discipline-exclusive dialogue. The projects are the medium between conditions inside and out in very conscious and considerate ways. Forms and devices often remain relatively primitive in their geometric manifestation because complexity, when warranted, arrives by way of repetition or modulation of the thing or of the qualities possessed by that thing. Dimension, scale, color, number of instances, manner of quotation, and order of arrangement are some of the ways that the same form or device can repeat, either within a single project or from one project to

the next. This is one of the calling cards of the work: the use of repetition to create collections of like conditions.

Another identifiable trait of the work is a deliberate restraint on the use of forms or devices. The collages always use a limited and simple series of tools in the service of a unified aesthetic. The projects limit themselves in the number of forms used in order to explore the variables and potentials within that form. It makes sense to hear Sharon Johnston and Mark Lee talk about how they see their work, on some level, as categorizable based on the strategies used to arrange things. Understanding the projects as the result of compaction, hinging, stacking, or spanning implies the manipulation of multiples that are related by being compressed (compaction), adjacent (hinging), above or below (stacking), or extended (spanning). There are architectural mechanisms that, by their very nature, organize or collect different elements and it’s no accident that these show up as prominent tools in the work of Johnston Marklee. Roofs organize a collection of things beneath them. Walls separate a collection of things on either side of them. Frames collect or isolate things within them. These organizing agents allow for the expression of both the individual elements and the collection as a whole to be legible. This is one way in which I now read the work: look for the element that repeats and look for the larger thing or mechanism that collects and organizes.

Of course, this manner of understanding the work doesn’t account for the fact that projects addressed within a studio are the result of a larger team inquiry and that there are various cadences of development along the way. As this publication is merely weeks from being sent to the publisher in the spring of 2022, there has been a recent and very public reckoning with old hierarchies and labor practices that have existed as norms in architecture for too long. It feels a bit prescient for the discussion here (from November 2019) to include the topics of work-life balance and cultivating relationships both within and outside of the office. It is critical to understand that this work is not just disciplinary output framed within the context of architecture and adjacent disciplines, but also an effort by a team to address conditions out in the world with—as Sharon Johnston says here—a sense of generosity.

7

SHAPE AND SERIALITY TODD GANNON

Fig. 1 Installation View, ‘Critial Mass’ at the Tijuana Cultural Center, Nov 10-30, 1996

10 Nov 2006 I board the Pacific Surfliner at Union Station, southbound for San Diego. It’s midafternoon and, though I know I’m going to roast, I slide into a window seat on the righthand side. After about an hour of nondescript warehouses and sleepy OC suburbs we trace a wide arc at Dana Point and I claim the reward for my now sun-seared brow. The Pacific opens alongside in all its horizontal splendor and for the rest of the trip I stare down at the waves that lap at the beach in slow syncopation with the clatter of the train.

I disembark at dusk and hop the tram to San Ysidro, where I walk across the border into Mexico. Fifteen minutes later the taxi deposits me at the Instituto de Cultura de Baja California. I am maybe an hour early for the opening of Critical Mass [Fig. 1], an installation

by Johnston Marklee (JML), the Los Angeles-based architecture firm led by Sharon Johnston and Mark Lee. Inside, eight glass shelves on metal standards line two walls of the gallery. The shelves support several hundred identical glass bottles arranged in neat rows, with a ninth row placed on the floor beneath the lowest shelf. The bottles have been filled to varying levels with apple-colored liquids to suggest attenuated waves across the

8

Fig. 2 Palos Verdes Art Center

array. Gala gives way to Granny Smith as the eye travels bottom to top and left to right. I am informed that the height of the liquid indexes the population of residents living in irregular and planned housing settlements in Tijuana, but this seems less the point of the exhibition than a kind of ruse, extraneous trivia deployed primarily to justify continued staring at the glistening ondas de colores.

So, I stare. Before long, red bottles appear to advance in my field of vision as green ones recede, an effect that renders the ensemble an illusory seascape, islands on a placid sea. Oblique views, especially from the corner of one’s eye, highlight the shimmer of the glass, which makes the waves seem to move. After three hours on the train, the ABBA spacing of the standards against the even staccato of the bottles does not seem the least bit accidental.

The show was mesmerizing. But it seemed to have less to do with JML’s then-current concerns than with preoccupations I thought they had left behind. At the time, the firm was enjoying the groundswell of attention that erupted upon completion of the Hill House in Pacific Palisades. This justly celebrated work marked a significant swerve for the still-young office, one that appeared to move away from themes of seriality and repetition that drove earlier projects toward a pursuit of arresting singular shapes.

Consider the Palos Verdes Art Center competition entry of 2000, an important early effort and crucial ancestor of Critical Mass.

Here, JML unifies an elegantly rambling collection of low volumes by floating a vast abstracted pergola overhead [Fig. 2]. Fashioned of translucent acrylic in an otherwise basswood model, the canopy is rectilinear in plan, though each of its vertical fins is shaped with gentle curves top and bottom that render the array a single, rippling surface. In some photos the project seems to prefigure the installation in Tijuana, with the horizontal array flattening to the vertical picture plane. In others it calls to mind more distant affiliations including the Shroud of Turin, a ghostly surface that similarly suggests a corporeality that is no longer—or perhaps never was—present.

Though JML’s scheme for Palos Verdes went unrealized, the firm completed a version of its sculpted canopy at the Penner House in Palm Springs in 2000. Not long after, they returned to the undulating overhead plane in the Orchid restaurant in Santa Monica [Fig. 3]. Reversing the approach in Palos Verdes, where they conjure a virtual surface from an abundance of structure, here an actual surface floats above with no indication of support. Yet seriality remains in the unashamedly visible panel joints, which register the ceiling’s reticulation as they trace undulated curves across its luminous topography.

By then, Johnston Marklee had already completed an important early commission in which repetition reappears in a new, stealthier form. The Sale House [Fig. 4] replaces a Venice bungalow on the same property as the 2-4-6-8 House by Morphosis. A key early work by the firm then led by Thom Mayne and Michael Rotondi, 2-4-6-8 comprises a 20-foot square studio volume, clad in asphalt shingles and capped with a pyramidal metal roof, perched atop a two-car garage of colored concrete block [Fig. 5]. On each wall of the studio the architects locate a single foursquare window, each one incrementally larger than its neighbor to the left. Turn in circles at the center of the space and the windows will appear to expand and contract as you spin.

Taking their cues from the earlier structure, JML repeats the square plan of 2-4-6-8’s upper volume twice—first to form the main volume of the new house and again to define the central void of its patio. Each of the four original windows is echoed in the upper part of the new house, though here they align at the head rather than the sill and are displaced to the edge of each facade.1 The displacement of the upper windows occurs in the opposite direction of their increase in size (which itself reverses 2-4-6-8’s clockwise expansion), a move that both reinforces and counters

Fig. 3 Orchid Restaurant

Fig. 4 Sale House and 2-4-6-8 House beyond

Fig. 5 2-4-6-8 House

9

MENIL DRAWING INSTITUTE HOUSTON, TEXAS (2018)

50

The Menil Drawing Institute (MDI) is sited within the 30 acre campus of The Menil Collection. Positioned in the geographic center of the campus, the MDI is adjacent to the Cy Twombly Pavilion and nested among the historic bungalows that make up the fabric of this neighborhood of art. The design of the MDI honors the legacy of intimacy and direct engagement with art that underlies the domestic and institutional character of the Menil campus. Situated in a park-like setting, the new building assumes the scale of both a house and a museum, with a low-lying, elongated profile that blends with the architecture of the historic campus while signaling a new dimension for future growth.

Aerial of the MDI and Menil campus

MDI model

Massing diagram of interior domestic-scaled museum spaces

51

ROOF

72

FT

01 5

10

40

3

1

4

5

6

2

SECTION A-A’ 1. ENTRY GARDEN 2. ENTRY 3. SOUND STUDIO 4. STUDIO APARTMENT 5. EXTERIOR MEZZANINE 6. SCULPTURE YARD

3

1

1

2

3

SECTION B-B’ 1. CENTER BAY 2. WOOD SHOP 3. STUDIO

1

2

3

4

5

5

5

5

SECTION C-C’ 1. SEMINAR 2. GALLERY 3. ENTRY 4. CENTER 5. STUDIO

1

2

3

4

SECTION D-D’ 1. SCULPTURE YARD 2. WOOD SHOP 3. CERAMICS 4. CERAMICS YARD

73

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO CENTER FOR THE ARTS CHICAGO, ILLINOIS (2019)

74

Aerial view The historic Walter Netsch campus at the University of Illinois at Chicago was conceived as an adaptable architectural network; interconnected communal and social spaces were intended to facilitate learning and sharing and unify buildings across the campus.

The new UIC Center for the Arts advances these original architectural aspirations in a contemporary building, presenting an opportunity to showcase the important role of the arts in the university through an iconic and highly functional building that serves the campus and the city. This building will realize aspects of Netsch’s vision for Project Y, which intended to combine a public concert hall, theater, and cultural spaces to create, in Netsch’s words, “the Lincoln Center of Chicago.”

In the unique setting of Harrison Field and the adjacent expressways—currently experienced as voids in the urban fabric—the new arts building connects the campus to the city through transit and pedestrian routes. Two stepped, geometric towers form a highly visible gateway to the campus and house the theater in the tower to the east and the concert hall to the west. The western tower steps as a traditional ziggurat; the eastern tower grows in size as it ascends, declaring its presence to downtown Chicago. During the day, the towers reflect light and veil interior activity through a layer of curved and perforated metal panels encasing the glass curtain wall. At night, the veil appears to recede with interior illumination that reveals the brightly colored performance halls within.

View of the towers from the expressway

Connecting the towers is a plateau: a sprawling and voluminous space activated by informal performances, rehearsals, arts exhibitions, and campus life where students and the public meet. The plateau establishes a new built horizon that anchors the Center for the Arts to Harrison Field, offering multiple points of entry from paths across the campus and the city. At the cross section of Harrison and Halsted streets, it supports the symmetrical objects of theater and concert hall above like two vases on a table—defining a building in the round without a true front or back. Between these arts spaces is the winter garden.

The structural frame of the winter garden roof spans across the plateau to connect the two large performance halls. With its full glass roof, the winter garden will be a communal hub for students and faculty on the north side of the UIC campus, at the heart of the College of Architecture, Design, and the Arts.

View diagram

75

Model views

76

View of towers from the north

West elevaiton of concert hall

77

Entrance

78

Atrium

Interior street

SITE PLAN

GENERAL STAGE STORAGE

BACKSTAGE ASSEMBLY SOUND

AUDIO& DIMMER

LIGHTING STORAGE

PLATFORM WING SL

KITCHEN

CAFE JAZZ CLUB/ DESIGN STORE

MUSIC REHEARSAL 2 CHORAL

REST ROOMS

STRG GALLERY

STORAGE

COAT

OFFICE

STRG

CONCERT PLATFORM & SEATING SLL

STORAGE

OFFICE

UP

STRG

UP

WINTER GARDEN

UP

UP

TRASH

LOADING DOCK

RECEIVING ROOM SLL PLATFORM WING SR

GREEN ROOM

LOADING DOCK

RECYCLING ROOM

STORAGE

PIANO STORAGE

DRESSING ROOM 1 DRESSING ROOM 2

SLL

PERCUSSION STORAGE DRESSING ROOM 3 DRESSING ROOM 4

DRESSING ROOM CONDUCTOR

MUSIC REHEARSAL 1 INSTRUMENTAL

BOX OFFICE

STRG

OFFICE

STRG

STRG

CTRL

SLL

SLL

COSTUME SHOP

THEATRE REHEARSAL

STRG

SPRAY

FITTING ROOM

PAINT

MACHINE SHOP

SCENE/PAINT/ PROPS SHOP

CRAFT& TOOLS WIG

STORAGE OFFICE OFFICE

LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN UIC CENTER FOR THE ARTS SCALE: 1” = 40’

N

0

50

100

20

PROJECT CREDITS & DATA

Menil Drawing Institute (2012-2018)

Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago (2015-2017)

Client: The Menil Collection

Client: Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago

Location: Houston, Texas

Location: Chicago, Illinois

Status: Completed

Status: Completed

Architecture Team: Sharon Johnston, Mark Lee, Nicholas Hofstede,

Architecture Team: Sharon Johnston, Mark Lee, Nicholas Hofstede,

Andri Luescher, Anton Schneider, Rodolfo Reis Dias, Jeff Mikolajewski,

Lindsay Erickson, Jeff Mikolajewski, Juan Salazar, Nathan Kiebler, Ellen

Maria Letizia Garzoli, Douglas Harsevoort, Elizabeth Jones, Maximilian

Marsh

Kocademirci, David Gray, Mehr Kanpour, Mike Todd, Toni-Maria Anschuetz

Collaborators: Harley Ellis Devereaux (AOR), Simpson Gumpertz &

Collaborators: Gilbane (contractor), MVVA (landscape), Guy Nordenson

Heger (structure), Environmental Systems Design (MEP), George Sexton

and Associates (structure), Cardno Haynes Whaley (associate structure),

Associates (lighting), Cerami (AV/IT), Kirkegaard (acoustics), Lerch Bates

Stantec (MEP), Lockwood Andrews Newnam (civil), Simpson Gumpertz

(vertical transport), Places Studio (visualization), 1825 (visualization)

& Heger (building enclosure), George Sexton Associates (lighting), Tillett (landscape lighting), AECOM (cost estimating), Arup (acoustic & AV/

Casa de Mont (2014-2020)

IT), Architect’s Security Group (security), ACI (code), Terracon (geotech),

Location: Pacific Palisades, Los Angeles, California

Olsson (soils), WC3 (irrigation)

Status: Completed Architecture Team: Sharon Johnston, Mark Lee, Rodolfo Reis Dias, Anton

UCLA Margo Leavin Graduate Art Studios (2016-2019)

Schneider, Mary Casper, Jeff Mikolajewski, Fiona Cuypersstanienda,

Client: University of California Los Angeles

Nathan Kiebler, David Himelman

Location: Culver City, CA, USA

Collaborators: RJC Builders (contractor), William Koh & Associates

Status: Completed

(structure), Meline Engineering (MEP), C.W. Howe (civil), Loisos

Architecture Team: Sharon Johnston, Mark Lee, Nicholas Hofstede, Lindsay

Ubbelohde (lighting), Pamela Burton & Company (landscape), Studio

Erickson, Tori McKenna, David Gray, Ryan Hernandez

Shamshiri (interiors)

Collaborators: UCLA Capital Programs (project management), Abbott Construction (contractor), Simpson Gumpertz & Heger (structure &

Porch House (2011-2013)

building envelope), Pamela Burton & Company (landscape), KPFF (civil),

Location: Los Angeles, CA

ME Engineers (MEP), Horton Lees Brogden (lighting), Veneklasen

Status: Completed

(acoustics & AV/IT), Jensen Hughes (code & accessibility), Van Duesen

Architecture Team: Sharon Johnston, Mark Lee, Anton Schneider, Katrin

Associates (vertical transportation), C Plus C Consulting (specifications),

Terstegen, Lindsay Erickson, Gary Ku, Ian Thomas, Mie Benson, Philipp

Mollet Geiser & Co (environmental graphics), Capital Projects Group (cost

Breuer

estimating), GAIA (LEED), Places Studio (visualizations)

Collaborators: Simpson Gumpertz & Heger (structure), Antieri & Haloossim Consulting Engineers (MEP & FPE), Greenlee & Associates

UIC Center for the Arts (2018-2019)

(landscape), Luminesce Design Inc. (lighting), C.W. Howe Partners

Client: University of Illinois at Chicago

Inc. (civil), Geosystems, Inc. (geotechnical), Loisos + Ubbelohde

Location: Harrison Field, Chicago, Illinois

(sustainability), Rob Southern (interior design), Bulthaup (kitchen design),

Status: Competition

Pacific Crest Consultants (expeditor), Becker & Miyamoto (surveyor); RJC

Architecture Team: Sharon Johnston, Mark Lee, Nicholas Hofstede, Anton

Builders, Inc.(contractor)

Schneider, Justin Kim, Miaojie Ted Zhang, Elena Hasbun, Alicia Chen, Isabel Strauss, Seunghyun Kang Collaborators: UrbanWorks (AOR), LERA (structure), BuroHappold (MEP), Reed Hilderbrand (landscape), Schuler Shook (theatre), Threshold (acoustics & AV/IT), TERRA (civil), Thirst (environmental graphics), CCS (cost estimating), 1825 (visualization)

160

IMAGE CREDITS

Hut House (2010-2014)

All reasonable efforts have been made to trace the copyright holders of the

Client: Chan Luu

visual material reproduced in this book. The publisher and the Knowlton

Location: Kauai, Hawaii

School apologize to anyone who has not been reached. Errors and

Status: Completed

omissions should be brought to our attention and will be corrected in future

Architecture Team: Sharon Johnston, Mark Lee, Nicholas Hofstede, Andri

editions. All images and drawings courtesy of Johnston Marklee, except as

Luescher, Lindsay Erickson, Anton Schneider, Allessandro Carrea, Karl

follows:

Wruck, David Gray Collaborators: Roy K. Yamamoto & Associates (AOR), Project Design Inc

Courtesy of Johnston Marklee. Visualization by 1825: 15 (top and bottom),

(structure), Esaki Engineers (civil), KMT II (geotech), Luniesce Design

35, 75 (top and middle), 77 (both), 78, 79 (both), 93 (both), 142 (all)

(lighting), GSLA Studio (landscape), Aqua Engineers (septic), 360 Site (survey), Island Solar (solar)

Photos by Eric Staudenmaier: 8 (left), 9 (top), 10 (top), 12 (bottom), 13 (all), 14 (all), 21, 25, 29, 30, 109 (both), 119 (bottom), 124 (both), 125 (top

Philadelphia Contemporary (2018-2019)

left), 126 (top right), 129 (bottom), 134 (both), 137 (top), 140, 141 (top),

Client: Philadelphia Contemporary

157 (both)

Location: Philadelphia, PA, US Status: Concept Design

Photo by Gustavo Frittegotto: 10 (bottom)

Architecture Team: Sharon Johnston, Mark Lee, Andri Luescher, Lindsay Erickson, Seunghyun Kang, Ryan Hernandez, Toshiki Nimi, Miaojie Ted

Photos by Carlos Domenech: 15 (middle), 151 (bottom right), 153, 156

Zhang

(top right)

Collaborators: MGA (AOR), LERA Consulting Engineers (structure), Vanderweil (MEP), Meliora (civil), Andropogon (landscape), Transsolar

Photos by Louis Heilbronn: 16 (both), 44, 45

(climate engineering), Mollet Geiser & Co (environmental graphics), Tillotson (lighting), Directional Logic (cost estimating), 1825 (visualization)

Courtesy of Johnston Marklee. Visualization by Places Studio: 17 (top), 94 (top and bottom right), 95 (bottom), 97 (top)

Miami Design District (2012-2017) Client: Dacra

Courtesy of the Menil Collection. Photos by Richard Barnes: 17 (bottom),

Location: Miami, FL, US

18, 19 (both), 42 (bottom), 52 (top and bottom left), 53 (bottom right), 57

Status: Completed

(both), 59 (bottom), 61 (top left), 63 (top)

Architecture Team: Sharon Johnston, Mark Lee Lindsay Erickson, Rodolfo Reis Dias, Thibaut Pierron, Austin Kaa

Courtesy of the Menil Collection. Photo by Paul Hester: 59 (top)

Collaborators: SB Architects (associate architect), Duany Plater-Zyberk (master plan architects), CHM Engineering (structural), TLC Engineering

Courtesy of Johnston Marklee. Visualization by Igor Brozyna: 39 (bottom),

(MEP), Island Planning Corporation (landscape), Spiers & Major (lighting)

69 (top) Photo by Phil Arnold: 49 Photos by Iwan Baan: 69 (bottom), 71 (both) Courtesy of MCA Chicago. Photos by Kendal McCaughtery + Hall & Merrick: 102 (top left and top right) Photo by Livia Corona Benjamin: 159

161

BIOGRAPHIES

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

BENJAMIN WILKE is the editor of the Source Books in Architecture series. He teaches design studios and other courses in architecture at the Knowlton School at The Ohio State Univeristy.

He has edited publications on the work of Stan Allen, Preston Scott Cohen, Neil Denari, Ryue Nishizawa / SANAA, and Rem Koolhaas / OMA AMO.

I would like to extend a big thank you to all of those who helped make this publication possible. I am especially grateful to Sharon Johnston and Mark Lee for their generosity. Thanks to everyone at Johnston Marklee. Nichole Valliere deserves a special thanks, as her communication and effort with all things related to this publication was essential at every step.

SHARON JOHNSTON is Professor in Practice at the Harvard Graduate School of Design; she has taught at Princeton University and the University of California, Los Angeles and has held the Cullinan Chair at Rice University and the Frank Gehry International Chair at the University of Toronto. In 2019, Sharon Johnston was named Architectural Record’s Women in Architecture: New Generation Leader.

Thank you to Ashley Bigham and Todd Gannon, whose contributions to the content included here provide original perspectives on the work of Johnston Marklee. At the Knowlton School, Dorothee Imbert and Todd Gannon have been and continue to be incredibly generous in their support of the Source Books in Architecture series. Thank you to Jaimie Mollison, Carla Sharon, and the whole of the Knowlton School administrative team for their assistance with this and every publication.

MARK LEE is the Chair of the Department of Architecture at the Harvard Graduate School of Design. He has also taught at Princeton University, the University of California, Los Angeles, the Technical University of Berlin, and ETH Zurich. He has held the Cullinan Chair at Rice University and the Frank Gehry International Chair at the University of Toronto.

ASHLEY BIGHAM is co-director of Outpost Office and an Assistant Professor at the Knowlton School at The Ohio State University.

She has been a Fulbright Fellow in Ukraine, a MacDowell Fellow, and a Walter B. Sanders Fellow at the University of Michigan’s Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning. Her writing and work has appeared in publications such as MAS Context, Metropolis, Mark, CLOG, and Surface. The design work of Outpost Office has been exhibited at the Chicago Architecture Biennial, the Milwaukee Art Museum, the Tallinn Architecture Biennale, Roca London Gallery, Wedge Gallery, and The Cooper Union.

TODD GANNON is a professor of architecture at the Knowlton School at The Ohio State University. His books include Reyner Banham and the Paradoxes of High Tech, The Light Construction Reader, Et in Suburbia Ego: José Oubrerie’s Miller House, A Confederacy of Heretics (with Ewan Branda), and monographs on the work of Morphosis, Bernard Tschumi, UN Studio, Steven Holl, Mack Scogin Merrill Elam Architects, Peter Eisenman, and Eric Owen Moss.

162

A continued thanks to Gordon Goff and Jake Anderson at ORO/ AR+D for their guidance, expertise, and patience.

Finally, Brittney Wilson’s assistance has been critical to the success of this project. Her constant attention to detail has been invaluable. Thank you.