OECD work on Biotechnology: Issue No. 48 (Dec 2025)

BIOTECHNOLOGY UPDATE

Unclassified - Non classifié

2

HIGHLIGHTS OF THIS ISSUE

Report Publication: ‘Synthetic biology, AI and automation: A forwardlooking technology assessment’ The OECD Working Party on Biotechnology, Nanotechnology and Converging Technologies (BNCT) has released a forward-looking assessment on the convergence of synthetic biology with artificial intelligence and automation, providing policymakers with strategic insights to anticipate impacts and guide policy efforts. The report highlights current and future examples of its application (such as advanced biodesign tools and large language models in synthetic biology education) and identifies a series of governance and policy implications (e.g. regulation, biosecurity, data governance, human oversight, regional disparities, etc.).

Find out more on page 20

G20 Policy Brief on Financing Instruments and Policy Levers to Harness Biomanufacturing for Climate, Biodiversity and Growth The global bioeconomy is expanding rapidly, currently valued at USD 4–5 trillion and with the potential to reach USD 30 trillion by 2050. A strong bioeconomy can strengthen supply-chain resilience, advance climate and biodiversity objectives, and support sustainable growth, yet significant investment gaps persist. The OECD Working Party on Biotechnology, Nanotechnology, and Converging Technology (BNCT)’s policy brief highlights how blended finance, de-risking tools, market-based instruments and public–private partnerships can help mobilise private capital, and emphasises the need for coherent governance to scale sustainable biomanufacturing. It serves as a G20 background document on financing instruments and policy levers to harness biomanufacturing for climate, biodiversity and growth.

Find out more on page 25

Policy Brief Upcoming Report: Comparing Innovation and Regulatory Environments of Biotechnology Across the EU and US The OECD Working Party on Biotechnology, Nanotechnology and Converging Technologies (BNCT) has published a policy brief on “Boosting biotechnology innovation through agile regulation and finance instruments”, comparing the investment and regulatory landscapes of the European Union and the United States and highlighting shared challenges and lessons. It aims to support policymakers seeking to boost biotechnology innovation by highlighting a policy mix to make regulatory systems more adaptive and predictable and deploying financial tools to reduce risk and attract private capital.

Find out more on page 21

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

3

OECD-Korea Co-creation Workshop: Good Practices for Responsible Innovation and Anticipatory Governance of Emerging Biotechnologies (25-26 September 2025) The OECD Working Party on Biotechnology, Nanotechnology and Converging Technologies (BNCT) co-organised the OECD-Korea event “Responsible Innovation and Anticipatory Governance of Emerging Biotechnologies” in collaboration with the Korean Society for Biotechnology and Bioengineering (KSBB) and the Asian Federation of Biotechnology (AFOB), supported by Korea’s Ministry of Science and ICT. This event consisted of two main activities: An Open Forum on 25 September and the OECD co-creation workshop “Good practices for anticipatory governance of Emerging Biotechnologies” on 26 September. These activities were as part of the KSBB-AFOB 2025 Conference and gathered policymakers, experts, and practitioners from Member and Partner countries to exchange national experiences and identify good governance practices for emerging biotechnologies.

Find out more on page 22

Multistakeholder Consultation on Responsible Innovation and Anticipatory Governance of Emerging Biotechnologies (9 December 2025) The OECD Working Party on Biotechnology, Nanotechnology and Converging Technologies (BNCT), together with the UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, convened a full-day workshop with a broad variety of stakeholders from government, academia, industry, trade unions and civil society from OECD member and accession countries. The OECD-UK Multi-stakeholder workshop was the final of the three workshops to gather information for the development of the draft OECD Recommendation on responsible innovation in emerging biotechnologies.

Find out more on page 24

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

4

CONTENTS Highlights of This Issue .............................................................................................................................2 About OECD’s Internal Co-Ordination Group for Biotechnology (ICGB) ............................5 Green Growth and Sustainable Development ................................................................................6 Food Systems ................................................................................................................................................8 Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology .................................................... 10 Safety of Novel Foods and Feeds ...................................................................................................... 13 Biotrack Online .......................................................................................................................................... 15 Biodiversity Economics and Policy .................................................................................................... 16 The 13th Expert Group on BioPesticides Seminar 25-26 February 2025.......................... 18 Report Publication – ‘Synthetic biology, AI and automation: A forward-looking technology assessment’......................................................................................................................... 20 Policy Brief and Upcoming Report: Comparing Innovation and Regulatory Environments of Biotechnology Across the EU and US ........................................................... 21 OECD-Korea Co-creation Workshop: Good Practices for Responsible Innovation and Anticipatory Governance of Emerging Biotechnologies (25-26 September 2025) ...... 22 Multistakeholder Consultation on Responsible Innovation and Anticipatory Governance of Emerging Biotechnologies (9 December 2025) ........................................... 24 Policy Brief on Financing Instruments and Policy Levers to Harness Biomanufacturing for Climate, Biodiversity and Growth ............................................................................................... 25 Biotechnology Statistics......................................................................................................................... 26 Bioenergy and Biofuels at Trade and Agriculture Directorate .............................................. 27 Bioenergy at the International Energy Agency (IEA) - Renewable Energy Market Report and Delivering Sustainable Fuels: Pathways to 2035 ................................................. 28 Policies for Agricultural Innovation and Sustainable Productivity Growth ...................... 31 Agricultural Seed and Forest Reproductive Material Certification Schemes .................... 35 Co-operative Research Programme: Sustainable Agricultural and Food Systems ......... 38 Upcoming OECD Events in Biotechnology 2026 ........................................................................ 42 Who’s Who in Biotech at OECD? ....................................................................................................... 43 Endnote: A Brief Guide to the OECD ................................................................................................ 46

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

5

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025 This newsletter provides up-to-date information on activities related to biotechnology or the life sciences more generally at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). It is mainly intended for OECD staff and delegates to OECD meetings who are already familiar with certain aspects of the Organisation’s work. We hope that it is also informative for the wider biotech community.

The contents of this ‘Biotechnology Update’ newsletter have been provided by those members of the OECD Secretariat who are responsible for the various activities. The Secretariat can be contacted via the e-mail address: ehscont@oecd.org. Alternatively, individuals can be contacted via e-mail using the form firstname.lastname@oecd.org (See Who’s Who list at the end of the newsletter).

Visit the OECD website to access the latest news and previous editions.

ABOUT OECD’S INTERNAL CO-ORDINATION GROUP FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY (ICGB) The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and its member countries have been addressing issues related to biotechnology since 1982.

From that time, biotechnology has had an increasing impact on the programmes of different sectors at OECD such as: agriculture and trade; environment; science, technology and innovation. In 1993, the Internal Co-ordination Group for Biotechnology (ICGB) was established to facilitate co-ordination among these sectors.

Jane Richardson, Head of OECD’s Biosafety, Novel Foods/Feeds Safety and Pesticides Programmes is the Executive Secretary of the ICGB, and the editor of the ICGB Newsletter with the contribution of Satoshi Nakano.

Contacts:

Jane Richardson, Satoshi Nakano (ENV/EHS)

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

6

GREEN GROWTH AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Four years ago, at COP26, 145 countries endorsed pledges to halt and reverse deforestation by 2030.

COP30 to be held in Belém, Brazil this year is poised to be the “Nature COP”, with an ambition for scaling up nature finance. Agriculture, forestry and other land-use sectors are critical to efforts to tackle the triple planetary crisis (i.e. climate change, biodiversity loss and pollution). These sectors accounts for at least 23% of global greenhouse gas emissions. At the same time, it is the only sector that can remove carbon dioxide and act as carbon sinks. To remain within the Paris Agreement’s 1.5oC temperature target, GHG emissions from agriculture, forestry and other land use will need to reduce by 42% and 77% in 2030 and 2050 respectively, with the sector quickly becoming a net GHG emissions sink from around 2030 onwards. Avoiding and reversing deforestation is also critical to averting and reversing biodiversity loss and providing critical ecosystems services such as clean water and reducing local air pollution. However, under current trends, GHG emissions from agriculture, forestry and other land use are projected to rise. Biodiversity is similarly declining at an unprecedented rate, driven in part by land-use change. This underscores the need for policy action to reduce emissions from these sectors and leverage their potential for carbon dioxide removal, while preserving and restoring forests for global biodiversity.

Ahead of COP30, this year’s Green Growth and Sustainable Development (GGSD) Forum explored how to harness the potential of forests and agriculture to mitigate to climate change. Over five thematic sessions, the Forum explored how improving forest management practices can enhance carbon sequestration and the protection of natural capital and how the agriculture sector can reduce emissions and contribute to biodiversity, while remaining productive and building resilience to climate impacts and other environmental risks. The Forum also discussed measurement and data challenges in estimating GHG emissions and removals, how to scale up finance to leverage the forests as carbon sinks, as well as the interlinkages between forests and rural development.

Speakers included: •

Eric LAMBIN, Professor, Université Catholique de Louvain,

•

Jessika ROSWALL, Commissioner for Environment, Water Resilience and a Competitive Circular Economy, European Commission (Video Address)

•

Franz TATTENBACH CAPRA, Minister for Environment and Energy, Costa Rica

•

Julie COLLINS, Deputy Director-General Policy and Trade, Ministry for Primary Industries, NZL

•

Hiroyuki ISONO, CEO, Oji Holdings, Japan

•

Jack HURD, Executive Director, Tropical Forest Alliance, World Economic Forum

•

Anja GASSNER, Director Europe, CIFOR-ICRAF

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

7

Rewatch the sessions on the Forum website and read our recent Blog on key takeaways from the discussions and how the OECD is taking these forward in its work on forests.

The 2026 Green Growth and Sustainable Development Forum (Paris, 1-2 July) will focus on the economics of climate adaptation: to measure and capture the value of resilience and how to integrate it across public and private decision making. This will include discussions of the role of nature for building resilience to climate impacts, and how to better integrate nature and ecosystem services into economic accounting frameworks. Stay tuned on the GGSD network website for updates.

Contact:

Kilian Raiser (ENV)

Website:

https://www.oecd.org/en/networks/green-growth-and-sustainable-developmentforum.html

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

8

FOOD SYSTEMS Background The term “food systems” refers to all the elements and activities that relate to the production, processing, distribution, preparation and consumption of food, and the effects of these activities. The emphasis on “food systems” highlights the importance of potential synergies and trade-offs across different policy domains which have often been treated in silos – e.g. public health and nutrition, the environment, poverty and rural development. Food systems matter not only for food security and nutrition, and for the livelihoods of those involved in them, but also for environmental sustainability.

OECD published a major report on Making Better Policies for Food Systems in 2021.

Recent publications and ongoing work on food systems •

Measuring Carbon Footprints of Agri-Food Products | OECD – This report asks what it would take to achieve widespread and reliable measurement of carbon footprints of agri-food products. Eight building blocks are essential: Reporting standards, science-based methods, farm-level calculation tools, and databases with secondary data are needed to calculate carbon footprints, but these must be complemented with ways to communicate carbon footprint data along the supply chain, ensure the integrity and quality of the data and calculations, scale up carbon footprint calculations while keeping costs low, and to update all these elements as scientific insights and technologies evolve. Although the magnitude of the challenge should not be underestimated, this report shows that many of the building blocks are falling into place and can be improved and aligned through collaboration between researchers, farmers, other supply chain actors, governments, and civil society, both at domestic and international levels.

•

Enabling trust in food labels for improved environmental outcomes | OECD - A new trend in initiatives to communicate the environmental impact of food products is the development of simplified environmental labelling schemes that aim to communicate aggregated environmental outcomes based on an established measurement methodology. They take the form of an easy-to-understand label displayed on food products at the front-of-pack. Such schemes, despite a lack of harmonisation on what environmental outcomes to measure and a lack of impact assessments, could play a role as part of a wider policy package aimed at influencing consumer choices towards more sustainable food products by enabling more informed food choices and creating incentives for producers to shift to more sustainable practices.

•

Beyond food loss and waste reduction targets | OECD - Reducing food loss and waste (FLW) is critical to finding global solutions to the triple challenge of feeding a growing world population, ensuring the livelihoods of households along the agro-food supply chain, and delivering on climate and environmental sustainability commitments. Tracking the progress made in meeting the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) target 12.3 of halving global per capita food waste, however, has been hampered by inconsistent definitions and metrics across countries and differing national policy approaches to FLW reduction.

Reduction targets are often unclear, national policy commitments fragmented, and coordination is limited across government entities. This report provides a comprehensive

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

9

review of the FLW policy environment, drawing on data collected by the OECD from representatives of 42 national ministries and from the European Commission to support crosscountry dialogue and accelerate the implementation of more effective evidence-based and context-specific FLW policies.

•

How do consumers interact with environmental sustainability claims on food? | OECD This paper presents new evidence on how consumers interact with sustainability claims on food products, based on a survey of 37 000 consumers in 40 countries. Respondents are generally most interested in natural, locally produced, eco-friendly and organic claims. Trust and broader attitudes and beliefs regarding the environment play an important role in shaping consumers’ willingness to pay more for products with a sustainability claim. For most claims, willingness to pay is also higher among consumers with higher incomes and education. Even after controlling for these factors, there are significant differences among countries. In some countries, people are generally distrustful of claims, while in others, people have greater trust.

This suggests that consumer trust may be shaped less by the specifics of a claim and more by country-specific factors. This interpretation is consistent with data suggesting that consumers have only a limited understanding of what different claims mean.

•

Practical approaches to develop resilience strategies for food systems | OECD Food systems deliver essential services, but are also vulnerable to a wide range of shocks. A major concern amongst policymakers is therefore how to build more resilient food systems.

This paper asks which processes can be used by policymakers and stakeholders to develop strategies tailored to their specific context to enhance resilience. Such processes should be inclusive, recurring, and involve governments. A good process will have well-designed objectives, assess risks and opportunities, and generate action plans with clear responsibilities.

This paper provides examples taken from several OECD Member countries. Although to date there are few examples of processes that meet all the criteria mentioned above, this paper identifies several initiatives that embody one or more criteria and could serve as a model to policymakers.

In 2025-26, OECD work on food systems will continue to explore the measurement of carbon footprints and of food loss and waste, in addition to work on equal opportunities in food systems and on demand-side policies for sustainable food choices. The Food Chain Analysis Network, the OECD expert group specialised in food systems analysis, is contributing to the ongoing OECD food loss and waste project, with two meetings scheduled in November 2025 and February 2026. The FCAN serves as a platform for practitioners, experts, and stakeholders to exchange information, share practices, and explore common approaches to enhance food loss and waste data comparability. These insights and discussions will also inform the future development of food loss and waste indicators along the value chain, as well as strengthen the evaluation of food loss and waste policy instruments.

Contact:

Céline Giner and Koen Deconinck (TAD/ATM)

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

10

HARMONISATION OF REGULATORY OVERSIGHT IN BIOTECHNOLOGY The OECD’s Working Party on the Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology (WP-HROB) deals with the environmental safety of organisms produced through modern biotechnology (plants, animals, micro-organisms). The work aims to ensure that the types of elements used in biosafety assessment, as well as the methods to collect such information, are as similar as possible amongst countries. This improves mutual understanding and harmonised practice, which in turn, increases the efficiency of the biosafety assessment process, limits duplication of effort, while reducing barriers to trade.

The WP-HROB participants are mainly officials from OECD countries responsible for the environmental risk/safety assessment of products derived from modern biotechnology. Observer delegations and invited experts collaborate actively, given the use of biotech products and breeding activities worldwide. They include candidate countries and other partner countries interested (in recent years: Argentina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Croatia, India, Kenya, Paraguay, Philippines, Romania, Rwanda, Singapore, South Africa, Thailand, Uruguay, Viet Nam); Business at OECD (BIAC); other intergovernmental and expert organisations such as FAO; UNEP; the Convention on Biological Diversity Secretariat; the African Biosafety Network of Expertise (AUDA NEPAD-ABNE) and the Agriculture and Food Systems Institute (AFSI).

The publication of the OECD Series on the Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology remains a major output of the programme. They constitute a set of practical tools for regulators and biosafety assessors dealing with new varieties produced through modern biotechnology, with respect to environmental safety. The 72 documents issued to date address the biology of crops, trees, animals and micro-organisms, selected traits that have been introduced in plants, as well as other key issues in the context of environmental risk assessment. The Series also includes information documents, which compile elements provided by delegations to share up-to-date information on biosafety.

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

11

Collation of the Answers for Questionnaire: Enhanced Information Exchange on New Breeding Techniques, 2025 Results was published in October 2025. This document presents the second set of results from the Enhanced Information Exchange on NBTs project—a joint initiative of the WP-HROB and the Working Party for the Safety of Novel Foods and Feeds (WP-SNFF), led by Japan. The project aims to provide comprehensive and accurate information on regional, national, and local regulations related to NBTs through an annual questionnaire. This edition compiles responses from 20 delegations, offering valuable insights into the regulatory frameworks governing NBT approvals and registrations across various jurisdictions.

Developments in Delegations on Biosafety Issues, March 2024 – March 2025 was published in October 2025. This information document compiles inputs provided by delegations on the occasion of the 39th WP-HROB meeting (24-26 March 2025). It summarises activities related to biosafety issues since the previous meeting (March 2024), drawing on individual contributions from OECD Members, partner countries, and observer organisations involved in the work.

Works under development are as follows: •

Consensus documents: o

Revised maize biology document

o

Biology of Citrus x sinensis (sweet orange)

o

Biology of mosquitoes Anopheles gambiae (publication expected in 2026) and Anopheles albimanus and Anopheles stephensi (in progress) These documents support developers of gene drives where engineered strains are being used to fight insect borne diseases such as malaria

o

Biology and use of photoautotrophic microalgae for biomass production

In common with WP-SNFF: •

Enhanced information exchange on New Breeding Techniques

•

Moving towards “safe(r)-innovation-approach” in the context of modern biotechnology

Upcoming events •

40th Meeting of the Working Party on the Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology, 22-24 April 2026

•

41st Meeting of the Working Party on the Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology, 19-21 April 2027

Recent publications •

Collation of the Answers for Questionnaire: Enhanced Information Exchange on New Breeding Techniques, 2025 Results

•

Developments in Delegations on Biosafety Issues, March 2024 – March 2025

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

12

Website:

BioTrack Online https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/biosafety-novel-food-and-feedsafety.html

Contacts:

Satoshi Nakano, Jane Richardson (ENV/EHS)

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

13

SAFETY OF NOVEL FOODS AND FEEDS The OECD Working Party for the Safety of Novel Foods and Feeds (WP-SNFF) addresses aspects of the risk/safety assessment and regulation of novel foods and feeds, especially products of modern biotechnology. The work aims to ensure that the types of elements used in risk/safety assessment, as well as the methods to collect such information, are as similar as possible amongst countries. The approach is to compare crops produced through modern biotechnology and derived products with similar conventional ones that are already known and considered safe in their use, based on recognised experience. Harmonised methods and practice, as well as share of data are facilitated through the WP-SNFF activities.

Consensus documents and other documents The main output of SNFF is the set of consensus documents on compositional considerations for new varieties of specific crops. These documents compile a common base of scientific information on the major components of the plants and their derived products: key nutrients; toxicants; antinutrients; and other plant metabolites where relevant. Other publications deal with general aspects to facilitate harmonisation in safety assessment. These documents constitute practical tools for regulators and risk assessors dealing with new varieties produced through modern biotechnology, with respect to human food and animal feed safety. The Series also includes compilations of regulatory updates from delegations. To date, 31 documents have been published on major crops and mushrooms, the animal feedstuffs, and a document on the molecular characterisation of plants derived from modern biotechnology developed in common with the WP-HROB. They are available through the OECD BioTrack website (https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/biosafety-novel-food-and-feed-safety.html ).

Developments in Delegations on the Safety Assessment of Novel Foods and Feeds, March 2024 – March 2025 was published in October 2025. This information document compiles inputs provided by delegations on the occasion of the 32nd WP-SNFF meeting (26-28 March 2025). It summarises activities related to the safety assessment of novel foods and feeds since the previous meeting (March 2024), drawing on individual contributions from OECD Members, partner countries, and observer organisations involved in the work.

Three composition documents, on maize (revision), faba bean (Vicia faba) and banana, are under development. Joint projects conducted with the WP-HROB are the enhanced information exchange on New Breeding Techniques, and the project on moving towards “safe(r)-innovation-approach” in the context of modern biotechnology.

Outreach and Engagement of Non Member Economies Officials from OECD countries and delegates from the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Business at OECD (BIAC), observer organisations such as FAO, UNEP, the African Biosafety Network of Expertise (AUDA NEPAD-ABNE), the Agriculture and Food Systems Institute (AFSI) and the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) participate actively in the novel food and feed safety programme. In addition, the WP-SNFF has increasingly exchanged experience, scientific knowledge and interests with non-member economies, which allows it to address a wider range of food and feed products of global interest. Brazil, South Africa and Thailand, for example, were actively involved in

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

14

the drafting of consensus documents on compositional considerations for cowpea, cassava, papaya as well as other tropical crops. The WP-SNFF benefits also from the expertise from Argentina, Croatia, India, Kenya, Paraguay, Philippines, Singapore, Uruguay and Viet Nam. Upcoming events: •

33rd Meeting of the Working Party for the Safety of Novel Foods & Feeds, 20-22 April 2026

•

34th Meeting of the Working Party for the Safety of Novel Foods & Feeds, 21-23 April 2027

Website:

BioTrack Online https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/biosafety-novel-food-and-feedsafety.html

Contacts:

Satoshi Nakano, Jane Richardson (ENV/EHS)

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

15

BIOTRACK ONLINE

The BioTrack Online information system is a mechanism by which the Working Party on the Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology and the Working Party for the Safety of Novel Foods and Feeds make publicly available the outputs of their work, especially their Consensus/Guidance Documents described in sections above.

BioTrack Online offers also a public access to the “Product Database”. This database allows regulatory officials to easily share basic information on products derived from the use of modern biotechnology (mainly crop plants) and approved for commercial application in terms of food, feed or environmental safety. The database is updated, on a voluntary basis, by authorities of countries participating in the OECD biosafety activities. Products are listed with unique identifiers, and the information includes common/scientific names of the host organism and introduced genes, the events and traits, the regulatory elements and relevant links regarding approvals for release and use in countries.

Information on new or updated entries provided by Argentina, Australia, Canada, Paraguay and Philippines were added to the Product Database in 2025. Currently, the database includes 428 products of genetically engineered crops, trees and flowers, from a total of 27 plant species, these products being approved in one or several of 17 countries and the European Union.

The co-operation continues between the OECD’s Product Database, the CBD Biosafety ClearingHouse and the FAO GM Food Platform, for interoperability between these web-based systems and facilitating the exchange of information on safety assessment of organisms and foods derived from biotechnology. This activity responds to a request from the Codex ad hoc Task Force on Food Derived from Biotechnology, and a Memorandum of Cooperation signed between OECD and the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.

Website:

BioTrack Online https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/biosafety-novel-food-and-feedsafety.html Product Database https://biotrackproductdatabase.oecd.org/

Contacts:

Satoshi Nakano, Jane Richardson (ENV/EHS)

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

16

BIODIVERSITY ECONOMICS AND POLICY

Biodiversity work at the OECD focuses on the economics and policies needed to promote the effective conservation, sustainable use and restoration of biodiversity. It covers areas such as the effective design and implementation of economic instruments and other policy measures, biodiversity mainstreaming and finance. This programme also supports the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). The work is conducted under the oversight of the OECD Working Party on Biodiversity, Water and Ecosystems (WPBWE), a subsidiary body of the Environment Policy Committee (EPOC).

Biodiversity, including forests, wetlands and marine ecosystems, is fundamental to human well-being and the economy. Biodiversity provides critical ecosystem services such as food provisioning, water purification, nutrient cycling, and climate regulation, all of which are essential to support human wellbeing and economic growth. Despite the significant economic, social and cultural benefits provided by biodiversity and ecosystem services, global biodiversity is declining.

Current OECD work on biodiversity is on Good Practices in Mobilising Public and Private Finance for Biodiversity, Tracking Economic Instruments and Finance for Biodiversity (2026 update), and on Tracking Progress towards the USD 200 Billion Biodiversity Finance Target 19 of the CBD’s KunmingMontreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF). The OECD convened an international workshop on Mobilising Public and Private Finance for Biodiversity in May 2025.

A report on Scaling Up Biodiversity-Positive Incentives: Delivering on Target 18 of the Kunming Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework was released in September 2025. Drawing on experiences worldwide, the report highlights key challenges and opportunities for effectively scaling up a suite of incentives to promote biodiversity, conservation, sustainable use and restoration. Incentives covered include taxes, tradable permits, biodiversity offsets, and payments for ecosystem services.

The 2024 update of Tracking Economic Instruments and Finance for Biodiversity was released in October. Drawing on the OECD database on Policy Instruments for the Environment (PINE), the 2024 edition provides the latest data on biodiversity-relevant economic instruments (known as positive incentives under the KMGBF) and the finance they mobilise. The database includes information from over 140 countries on biodiversity-positive taxes and fees, tradable permits, environmentally-motivated subsidies, payments for ecosystem services and biodiversity offsets.

The report “Mainstreaming Biodiversity into Renewable Power Infrastructure” was launched in January 2024 through a Green Talk Live. The report synthesises evidence on biodiversity impacts from renewable power infrastructure. It identifies opportunities for mainstreaming biodiversity into power sector planning and policy to deliver better outcomes for nature and the climate.

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

17

“Assessing nature-related risks in the Hungarian financial system Charting the impact of nature's financial echo” was published in June 2024. The paper assesses nature-related risks within the Hungarian economy and financial system. It draws on the OECD’s Supervisory Framework published in 2023, which provides technical guidance to central banks and financial supervisors on how to prioritise, conceptualise, and assess biodiversity- and nature-related financial risks with respect to their financial system.

Recent publications and working papers: OECD (2025), Scaling Up Biodiversity-Positive Incentives: Delivering on Target 18 of the Global Biodiversity Framework, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/19b859ceen.

•

OECD (2024), Tracking economic instruments and finance for biodiversity – 2024. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/data/insights/dataexplainers/2024/10/tracking-economic-instruments-and-finance-for-biodiversity2024/OECD-Tracking-Economic-Instruments-and-Finance-for-Biodiversity-2024.pdf •

OECD (2024), Mainstreaming Biodiversity into Renewable Power Infrastructure, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/357ac474-en.

•

Boffo, Miller, Gülersoy and Carneiro (2024), “Assessing nature-related risks in the Hungarian financial system: Charting the impact of nature’s financial echo” Environment Working Paper, No. 243, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/24fd70e3-en.

•

OECD (2023), "A supervisory framework for assessing nature-related financial risks: Identifying and navigating biodiversity risks", OECD Business and Finance Policy Papers, No. 33, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/a8e4991f-en.

•

OECD (2023), "Assessing biodiversity-related financial risks: Navigating the landscape of existing approaches", OECD Environment Policy Papers, No. 36, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d52137a5-en.

•

OECD (2022), “Identifying and assessing subsidies and other incentives harmful to biodiversity at national level: A comparative review of existing national level assessments and insights for good practice”, OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 206, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/3e9118d3-en.

•

OECD (2021), “Biodiversity, natural capital and the economy: A policy guide for finance, economic and environment ministers”, OECD Environment Policy Papers, No. 26, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/1a1ae114-en.

•

Website:

https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/biodiversity.html

Contacts:

Katia Karousakis, Edward Perry (ENV/CBW)

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

18

THE 13TH EXPERT GROUP ON BIOPESTICIDES SEMINAR 25-26 FEBRUARY 2025 Session 1: Regulatory Considerations for Peptides Session 2: Taxonomic changes of Bacillus thuringiensis Session 3: Risk Assessment of Semiochemicals The first session focused on Peptides as Plant Protection Products (PPPs) with presentations from the Netherlands, Spain, Canada, International Biocontrol Manufacturers Association (IBMA), and two companies producing peptide-based PPPs. Peptides are small and stable molecules, are already used in medicine and recently have been found to be specific to target pests. Advances in Artificial Intelligence have enabled the identification and subsequent synthesis of new peptides, including unnatural ones, by applying various technologies. The IBMA has included peptides and proteins in their definition of natural substances, provided they meet certain conditions. Delegates at the seminar requested that the OECD develop a definition for peptides, include them in the scope of biopesticides work, and continue to engage in information sharing and potentially develop associated guidance.

The second session considered Taxonomy and Safety Considerations for Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt)based pesticides with presentations from Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, IBMA, BIAC, and a European Food Safety Authority representative. Bt has been used as a microbial insecticide in OECD countries for decades and is generally considered low risk. However, recent advancements in genomic tools have led to a re-examination of Bt taxonomy. Additionally, there is uncertainty about whether pesticidal Bt strains have been involved in foodborne outbreaks. These issues pose challenges for regulators assessing the safety of Bt. The seminar provided an opportunity for academics and regulators to exchange information. There was a consensus that the classification and naming of Bt strains are complex and should remain a collaborative effort among OECD countries and stakeholders as the science advances and specific markers are developed.

The third session considered semiochemicals, another type of biopesticides with presentations from, Spain, European Commission, and IBMA. The session provided a platform to consolidate ongoing efforts related to semiochemicals and present the progress and findings of an OECD project.

Semiochemicals, which are naturally occurring substances emitted by plants, animals, and other organisms, play a crucial role in intra- and inter-species communication. These substances are recognised for their minimal concerns when used as plant protection products (PPPs) due to their target-specific and non-toxic mode of action. They are effective at very low application rates, often comparable to their natural background levels. During the seminar, a revised calculation method of background levels, confirmed based on reliability criteria, was presented and integrated into the draft updated OECD guidance document, which is now available for comments. Additionally, potential future OECD activities were discussed, focusing on identifying cases where existing risk-assessed semiochemicals could be applied in other regions to facilitate mutual recognition of assessments.

The seminar report is published.

Other relevant EGBP activities A project to develop a guidance document on problem formulation for the assessment of microbial pesticides: pathways to assess the likelihood of not meeting the protection goal (Lead Countries Netherlands and US) was approved by the Working Party Pesticides

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

19

(WPP). This was a follow-up outcome of last year’s EGBP seminar on this topic A consensus documents for Bacillus amyloliquefaciens is under internal review.

Publications: •

OECD (2024), Report of the 12th Expert Group on Biopesticides Seminar on Problem Formulation for the risk assessment of biopesticides, Series on Pesticides and Biocides, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/c78ef74a-en.

•

OECD (2023), Innovating Microbial Pesticide Testing: Conference https://one.oecd.org/document/ENV/CBC/MONO(2023)10/en/pdf.

•

Paege, N., Feustel, S. & Marx-Stoelting, P. Toxicological evaluation of microbial secondary metabolites in the context of European active substance approval for plant protection products. Environ Health 23, 52 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-024-01092-0.

•

Wend, K., Zorrilla, L., Freimoser, F.M. et al. Microbial pesticides – challenges and future perspectives for testing and safety assessment with respect to human health. Environ Health 23, 49 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-024-01090-2.

•

OECD (2023), Guidance Document on Baculoviruses as Plant Protection Products, Series on Pesticides and Biocides, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/8f0dc501-en.

•

Consensus document on Beauvaria bassianna strains as microbial plant protection product https://doi.org/10.1787/cc1d28d9-en

Contacts:

Magda Sachana, Jane Richardson (ENV/EHS)

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

Proceedings,

20

REPORT PUBLICATION – ‘SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY, AI AND AUTOMATION: A FORWARDLOOKING TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT’ The OECD Working Party on Biotechnology, Nanotechnology and Converging Technologies (BNCT) has published a forward-looking technology assessment of the convergence of synthetic biology with artificial intelligence and automation. It aims to meet the demand by policymakers for timely strategic intelligence on these rapidly developing technologies to aid in anticipating impacts and shape policy efforts.

The report identifies a series of examples illustrating the state of play of these converging technologies, locating them in the context where they are being developed and implemented: for example, the use of large language models in synthetic biology education, or new biodesign tools to accelerate the pace and complexity in laboratory research. The implications for governance and policy of these developments are extracted - ranging from biosecurity and biosafety to data, human oversight of automated models, and regional disparities – with suggestions for accompanying policy options. Key issues identified throughout the paper to have high uncertainty or importance for policy are outlined for further analysis and strategic intelligence.

Insights for this work were drawn from several BNCT-organised activities. A workshop in October 2024 titled “Prospecting the governance of AI and SynBio convergence: A forward-looking technology assessment” brought together 40 experts in synthetic biology, artificial intelligence, governance and foresight from academia, industry and policy. The two days of discussions mapped the convergence of synthetic biology and artificial intelligence to date, foresaw potential co-evolutions and the potential governance issues and opportunities, and explored the readiness of the current governance ecosystem as well as the ongoing role of the OECD. A follow-up online webinar with the original attendees plus new experts was held in February 2025 to further flesh out these issues, and was complemented by additional online meetings with experts. The OECD Working Party on Biotechnology, Nanotechnology and Converging Technologies (BNCT) has drafted a report on a forward-looking technology assessment of the convergence of synthetic biology with artificial intelligence and automation. It aims to meet the demand by policymakers for timely strategic intelligence on these rapidly developing technologies to aid in anticipating impacts and shape policy efforts. It is currently undergoing committee approval and will be made publicly available in the coming months.

Contact: Douglas Robinson (STI/STP) douglas.robinson@oecd.org, Daniel Nadal (STI/STP) daniel.nadal@oecd.org

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

21

POLICY BRIEF AND UPCOMING REPORT: COMPARING INNOVATION AND REGULATORY ENVIRONMENTS OF BIOTECHNOLOGY ACROSS THE EU AND US The OECD Working Party on Biotechnology, Nanotechnology and Converging Technologies (BNCT) has published a policy brief ‘Boosting biotechnology innovation through agile regulation and finance instruments’. It explores the investment and regulatory policy landscapes in the European Union and the United States, highlighting shared challenges and lessons that can help accelerate sustainable innovation and strengthen participation in the global bioeconomy.

To do so, the paper leverages quantitative data across both jurisdictions on patent applications and financing levels for startups and greenfield facilities, as well as extracts concrete examples of financing and market creation instruments. It also identifies a series of regulatory barriers for biotechnologies across the EU and the US, ranging from regulatory fragmentation and complexity to approval times and costs. Guidance is then provided for policymakers seeking to boost biotechnology innovation, namely a policy mix to make regulatory systems more adaptive and predictable while at the same time deploying financial tools that reduce risk and attract private capital. It includes the use of strategic intelligence tools like participatory technology assessments to anticipate developments, as well as engaging innovators in regulation via regulatory sandboxes and innovation testbeds, coupled with financial instruments that could support de-risking of investment, build demand, and foster green and results-oriented finance.

The paper leverages expert insights from industry, academia, and public bodies gained via interviews and an online workshop organised by BNCT over the summer months. An upcoming working paper (to be published in early 2026) will provide the evidence base to support the recommendations made in this policy brief.

Contact: Cesar Barraza-Botet (STI/STP) cesar.barraza-botet@oecd.org, David Winickoff (STI/STP) david.winickoff@oecd.org.

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

22

OECD-KOREA CO-CREATION WORKSHOP: GOOD PRACTICES FOR RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION AND ANTICIPATORY GOVERNANCE OF EMERGING BIOTECHNOLOGIES (25-26 SEPTEMBER 2025) The OECD Working Party on Biotechnology, Nanotechnology and Converging Technologies (BNCT) co-organised the OECD-Korea event “Responsible Innovation and Anticipatory Governance of Emerging Biotechnologies” in collaboration with the Korean Society for Biotechnology and Bioengineering (KSBB) and the Asian Federation of Biotechnology (AFOB), supported by Korea’s Ministry of Science and ICT. This event consisted of two main activities: An Open Forum on 25 September and the OECD co-creation workshop “Good practices for anticipatory governance of Emerging Biotechnologies” on 26 September. These activities were as part of the KSBB-AFOB 2025 Conference and gathered policymakers, experts, and practitioners from Member and Partner countries to exchange national experiences and identify good governance practices for emerging biotechnologies.

Currently, there are no international standards explicitly addressing responsible innovation and anticipatory governance of emerging biotechnologies. An OECD Recommendation on responsible innovation of emerging biotechnologies is under development to fill that gap by guiding policymakers, and indirectly other relevant stakeholders and the public in the field around six areas as follows: I. Responsible innovation in emerging biotechnologies to drive economic growth and address societal challenges in line with national priorities.

II. Robust and agile approaches to biosafety along the development of emerging biotechnologies and their product life cycles, in alignment with existing national regional and international frameworks.

III. Robust and agile approaches to biosecurity along the development of dual-use biotechnologies, in alignment with existing national regional and international frameworks.

IV. Skill development and broad societal participation in decision-making since early developments of emerging biotechnologies.

V. Anticipatory governance mechanisms for decision-making to steer innovations in emerging biotechnologies into delivering benefits and minimising risk.

VI. Interdisciplinary research, cross-sectoral collaboration and international cooperation to bring innovations of emerging biotechnologies from labs to markets.

The co-creation workshop gathered BNCT delegates and experts from academia and industry. The workshop contributed to the operationalisation of the OECD Framework for Anticipatory Governance of Emerging Technologies for the Recommendation, and identified policy actions for governments to develop anticipatory governance capacities on emerging biotechnologies. Participants discussed challenges and barriers previously identified by BNCT delegates and provided examples of good policy practice to address them.

This event is supported by the Republic of Korea and will feed into a policy paper for publication in mid-2026 to celebrate the 30th anniversary of its membership to the OECD.

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

23

Contact:

Cesar Barraza-Botet (STI/STP), cesar.barraza-botet@oecd.org

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

24

MULTISTAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION ON RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION AND ANTICIPATORY GOVERNANCE OF EMERGING BIOTECHNOLOGIES (9 DECEMBER 2025) The OECD Working Party on Biotechnology, Nanotechnology and Converging Technologies (BNCT), together with the UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, convened a full-day workshop with a broad variety of stakeholders. A total of 145 registered participants joined the event from more than 30 countries, including OECD Member and accession countries. International organisations such as the African Union – NEPAD, the Council of Europe, and WHO were present, alongside internal stakeholders including Business at OECD and the OECD Trade Union Advisory Committee. The event also welcomed representatives from academic institutions, civil society organisations, and industry.

The OECD-UK Multi-stakeholder workshop was the final of the three workshops to gather information for the development of the draft OECD Recommendation on responsible innovation in emerging biotechnologies.

This event consulted stakeholder on a series of good practices for responsible innovation and anticipatory governance of emerging biotechnologies in each of the areas of the draft structure of the Recommendation identified in previous information gathering workshops. Stakeholders provided insights on potential gaps, challenges and opportunities for implementation in different countries and sectors. The OECD’s Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy (CSTP) and the Working Party on Biotechnology, Nanotechnology and Converging Technologies (BNCT) will take into consideration the stakeholders’ insights in the proposed Recommendation.

The multi-stakeholder consultation was kindly supported by the United Kingdom as the final of the three workshops to gather relevant information to guide the development of the proposed Recommendation on responsible innovation of emerging biotechnologies.

Contact:

Cesar Barraza-Botet (STI/STP), cesar.barraza-botet@oecd.org

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

25

POLICY BRIEF ON FINANCING INSTRUMENTS AND POLICY LEVERS TO HARNESS BIOMANUFACTURING FOR CLIMATE, BIODIVERSITY AND GROWTH The global bioeconomy is expanding rapidly, currently valued at USD 4–5 trillion and with the potential to reach USD 30 trillion by 2050. A strong bioeconomy can strengthen supply-chain resilience, advance climate and biodiversity objectives, and support sustainable growth, yet significant investment gaps persist. The OECD Working Party on Biotechnology, Nanotechnology, and Converging Technology (BNCT)’s policy brief highlights how blended finance, de-risking tools, market-based instruments and public–private partnerships can help mobilise private capital, and emphasises the need for coherent governance to scale sustainable biomanufacturing. It serves as a G20 background document on financing instruments and policy levers to harness biomanufacturing for climate, biodiversity and growth.

Contact:

Cesar Barraza-Botet (STI/STP), cesar.barraza-botet@oecd.org, Pierre Sarlieve

(STI/STP) pierre.sarlieve@oecd.org

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

26

BIOTECHNOLOGY STATISTICS The OECD Key Biotech Indicators (KBI) and OECD Key Nanotech Indicators (KNI) were updated in October 2025.

The KBI and KNI data are available at: https://www.oecd.org/en/data/datasets/emerging-technology-indicators.html.

Contact: Brigitte van Beuzekom (STI/STP)

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

27

BIOENERGY AND BIOFUELS AT TRADE AND AGRICULTURE DIRECTORATE The subject of bioenergy touches various areas, in particular, scientific developments, environmental effects, energy balances and agricultural market economics. The Trade and Agriculture Directorate (TAD) work on bioenergy focuses on a comprehensive compilation of data and information, the categorisation of the variety of support policies and the quantitative analysis of bioenergy markets and policy measures.

The OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook annual report covers biofuel market and related policy developments. The 2025 Agricultural Outlook (projecting on the 2025-2034 period) is available at http://www.agri-outlook.org/, see ‘Biofuels’ chapter (OECD/FAO, 2025).

TAD participates in the Agricultural Market Information System (AMIS) project (www.amisoutlook.org). One of TAD’s contributions to AMIS is to report each month on newly implemented biofuel policies in the AMIS countries in the Market Monitor Report.

Recent Publication: •

OECD/FAO (2024), OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2024-2033 – “Biofuels” chapter, full document available at: http://www.agri-outlook.org/.

Website: OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook: https://www.agri-outlook.org/commodities/ AMIS Market Monitor Report: http://www.amis-outlook.org/amis-monitoring/monthly-report/en/ Contacts: Marcel Adenauer (TAD/ATM), Annelies Deuss (TAD/ATM), Hubertus Gay (TAD/ATM)

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

28

BIOENERGY AT THE INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY (IEA) - RENEWABLE ENERGY MARKET REPORT AND DELIVERING SUSTAINABLE FUELS: PATHWAYS TO 2035 The activities of the International Energy Agency (IEA) cover bioenergy across the electricity, heat and transport sectors. The following summarises notable activities in 2025.

Renewables Energy Market Report 2025 •

The IEA's Renewable Energy Market Report was released in October. It is the IEA's flagship five-year forecast on renewable energy covering electricity, heat, transport, and biogases.

This year's edition forecasts renewable energy market trends between 2025 and 2030.

•

More specifically, the report covers bioenergy in all sectors with a particular focus on its role in heat, transport, and biogases. o In heating, bioenergy made up 21% of renewable heat in 2024, driven primarily by greater deployment in industrial applications. By 2030 bioenergy is expected to increase by 20% in buildings and a 14% decrease in industry with greater demand for electricity. o In transport, bioenergy made up nearly 4% of renewable energy in transport in 2024, driven primarily by liquid biofuels in road transport. By 2030, renewable energy in transport is expected to grow 50% with 35% of this growth driven by liquid biofuels. o Biogases are expected to grow more than 20% by 2030 with increasing demand across transport, buildings and electricity.

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

29

Delivering Sustainable Fuels: Pathways to 2035 •

Prepared in support of Brazil’s COP30 Presidency, the IEA recently released a sectoral analysis of global pathways for accelerating the deployment of sustainable liquid and gaseous fuels to 2035.

•

Sustainable fuels – including liquid biofuels, biogases, low-emissions hydrogen and hydrogenbased fuels – complement electrification and energy efficiency measures in energy transitions, especially in sectors that continue to be reliant on fuel-based solutions, an also enhance energy security, strengthen environmental sustainability and stimulate economic development, particularly in rural areas.

•

The report outlines that if current and proposed national and international policies are implemented demand for sustainable fuels would quadruple between 2024 and 2035.

•

o

In transport, sustainable fuels would triple from 5 exajoule (EJ) to 15 EJ by 2035, with liquid biofuels making up two-thirds of the sustainable fuel mix.

o

In industry, sustainable fuels would quadruple from 1 EJ to 5 EJ by 2035 with liquid and gaseous biofuels making 40% of the sustainable fuel mix.

o

In buildings, sustainable fuels neqrly quintuple from 0.45 EJ to 2 EJ by 2035 driven almost exclusively from gaseous biofuels.

However, it notes that progress must occur on multiple fronts to increase uptake and foster a large and diverse set of sustainable fuel pathways. This calls for a shared global vision for sustainable fuels, along with targeted policies, innovation to expand production potential, robust and mutually agreed upon carbon accounting methodologies to ensure that sustainability criteria are met, long-term investment in infrastructure, and more accessible financing, especially in emerging and developing economies.

The report was used as the analytically basis for Brazil’s COP 30 Belém 4x Pledge to Quadruple Sustainable Fuel deployment.

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

30

Recent publications: •

•

IEA (2025) Renewables 2025 https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/02b65de2-1939-47ee-8e8a4f62c38c44b0/WorldEnergyOutlook2024.pdf IEA (2025) Delivering Sustainable Fuels: Pathways to 2035 https://www.iea.org/reports/delivering-sustainable-fuels

Contact: Andrew Klain (IEA/EMS/RED - andrew.klain@iea.org )

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

31

POLICIES FOR AGRICULTURAL INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH

The Ministerial Declaration on Transformative Solutions for Sustainable Agriculture and Food Systems The Declaration underlines the key role of developing transformative and innovative policies towards more sustainable and resilient agriculture and food systems. To this end, it calls OECD countries to strengthen the assessment of investments in agricultural innovation systems that offer cost-effective levers to progress towards productive, sustainable, and resilient agriculture and food systems. This will allow countries to address the triple challenge of agriculture: providing adequate, affordable, safe and nutritious food for a growing global population; providing opportunities for livelihoods all along the food value chain; and doing so while increasing the environmental sustainability of the sector.

The OECD Agro-food Productivity Sustainability Resilience policy framework Innovation in agriculture is a key driver to improve the productivity and environmental sustainability of the sector. Innovative technologies and practices allow food systems to produce more food for a growing world population, using less resources and reducing the pressures on the environment.

Innovation can make food systems more resilient to systemic shocks exacerbated by climate change, including sudden outbreaks like COVID-19 pandemic. The Agro-food Productivity-SustainabilityResilience policy framework responds to a demand from the G20 in 2012 and to the Communiques from the OECD Agricultural Ministerial meeting in 2016. It is currently a ready-to-use instrument to analyse the performance of agricultural policies from a holistic perspective and their contribution to enhance innovative outcomes.

Agriculture Innovation Systems are relevant for achieving sustainable productivity growth OECD Trade and Agriculture Directorate (TAD) has been analysing the potential role of agricultural innovation systems and innovation policies for addressing the triple challenge.

After three pilot country reviews published in 2015 (Australia, Brazil, and Canada), the framework was used in country reviews including: the Netherlands (2015), Türkiye and the United States (2016), P.R. China, Estonia, Korea and Sweden (2018), Japan, Latvia, and Argentina (2019), Norway (2021) and Viet Nam (2022). The main findings and policy recommendations from the country reviews were published in 2019 (OECD, 2019).

A booklet containing an overview of the main findings and a policy brief were made available at an OECD seminar organised on 11 May 2019 before the G20 Meeting of Agricultural Ministers in Niigata, Japan. In 2023, three additional reviews were released for the Netherlands, Spain, and the European Union. They contain updated information and a detailed

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

32

assessment of agricultural innovation systems and how they can work for achieving environmental sustainability. Journalists, policy makers, and researchers have expressed great interest in them. Agricultural policies reviews for Switzerland and Egypt are currently under development.

Fostering Sustainable Productivity Growth Sustainable Productivity Growth (SPG) will be key to overcome the triple challenge. Productivity growth makes it possible to produce more with less resources through innovations that allow a more efficient use of land, fertilisers and other inputs, opening an opportunity to increase incomes and reduce the pressure on natural resources, such as water and soils. SPG seeks to ensure that this is done sustainably contributing to food production and to viable livelihoods, limiting negative impacts on the environment.

TAD is making substantial progress towards defining, understanding and measuring SPG. The most recent developments are a conference on “Sustainable Agricultural Productivity to Address Food Systems Challenges: Measurement, Data, Drivers and Policies”, and the OECD Global Forum on Agriculture on “Steering Policies towards Sustainable Agricultural Productivity”, both taking place on October 2024, and the flagship publication Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2024 with a focus on “Sustainable Productivity Growth” (OECD, 2024). An environmentally sustainable productivity index (ESPI) was developed to examine sustainable productivity performance considering three environmental externalities: greenhouse gas emissions, and nitrogen and phosphorus surpluses; for 28 countries over three decades (Cobourn et al., 2024). The Proceedings of the Conference on Sustainable Agricultural Productivity to Address Food Systems Challenges Measurement, Data, Drivers and Policies were published in 2025. Additionally, recent work has addressed social issues in agriculture in rural areas that are key for social sustainability (Asai and Antón, 2024).

Digital agriculture can help advance both environmental and social sustainability Digitalisation offers the potential to help address the productivity, sustainability and resilience challenges facing agriculture. A literature review (McFadden et al., 2022) and an “issues note” on trust (McFadden, Casalini and Antón, 2022) address the barriers of adoption of digital agriculture in OECD countries. A recent work analyses how digital technologies affect labour, skills and farmers’ wellbeing (Campi et al., 2024). The focus on these relations is relevant because digital technologies can improve working conditions in agriculture, by reducing the need for menial tasks and physical labour, allowing for more flexible work schedules and reducing health risks, and generate new entrepreneurship opportunities in rural areas, for example, allowing for certain on-farm diversification activities, such as tourism. All these effects can make the sector increasingly attractive to younger people and for attracting new entrants into agriculture.

OECD networks for advancing sustainable productivity growth and inducing innovation Innovation provides an opportunity to increase productivity while better managing natural resources.

Public and private agricultural stakeholders have roles to play in fostering productivity and

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

33

environmental sustainability. Private firms can produce improved inputs, farmers can adopt practices and invest in the latest technologies, and can governments provide resources, institutions and incentives for all stakeholders. With the right policies, governments can create an enabling environment to optimise resource use from an economic, environmental and social perspective. To broaden the understanding of innovation, sustainability, the role of different stakeholders, and the multiple interlinkages, TAD has established networks of experts from research and governments.

The Farm-Level Analysis Network (FLAN) undertakes studies and exchange of experience on the use of micro level data for policy analysis. A series of reports investigating the determinants of farm productivity and sustainability performance and dynamics, including innovation and agricultural policies have been discussed in the Network and published in the OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Paper series. Next FLAN meeting in June 2025 includes sessions on: income and social issues in agriculture; the role of farm advisory in achieving farm sustainability; entrepreneurship, inclusiveness and generational renewal; and innovation for sustainable productivity growth.

The Network on Agricultural Total Factor Productivity and the Environment (TFPN) is an OECD expert group sharing experiences and best practices for cross-country agricultural total factor productivity comparisons and for the measurement of sustainable productivity growth in agriculture. Thus, it is a platform to discuss challenges and opportunities of measuring the sustainable productivity growth through indicators that combine Productivity and environmental sustainability. Since 2015, the TFPN organises meetings of experts to share knowledge on the topic with participants that include researchers from the academy, and country experts and delegates. The 10th Meeting of the TFPN, took place on 28-29 April 2025 discussed advancements in the measurement of SPG in agriculture and understand its drivers.

Recent publications: •

OECD (2025), Sustainable Agricultural Productivity to Address Food Systems Challenges: Measurement, Data, Drivers and Policies, Proceedings from the OECD Conference, 28 October 2024, OECD Publishing, Paris.

•

OECD (2024), Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2024: Innovation for Sustainable Productivity Growth, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/74da57ed-en.

•

Cobourn, K. et al. (2024), "An Index Theory Based Approach to Measuring the Environmentally Sustainable Productivity Performance of Agriculture", OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, No. 213, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/bf68fb78-en.

•

Asai, M. and J. Antón (2024), "Social issues in agriculture in rural areas", OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, No. 212, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/fec15b38-en.

•

Campi, M., et al. (2024), "The evolving profile of new entrants in agriculture and the role of digital technologies", OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, No. 209, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d15ea067-en.

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

34

•

OECD (2023), Policies for the Future of Farming and Food in the European Union, OECD Agriculture and Food Policy Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/32810cf6-en.

•

OECD (2023), Policies for the Future of Farming and Food in Spain, OECD Agriculture and Food Policy Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/a93d26be-en.

•

OECD (2023), Policies for the Future of Farming and Food in the Netherlands, OECD Agriculture and Food Policy Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/bb16dea4-en.

•

Asai, M., et al. (2023), "Fostering agricultural and rural policy dialogue", OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, No. 197, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d36fcbad-en.

•

Sauer, J. and J. Antón (2023), “Characterising farming resilience capacities: An example of crop farms in the United Kingdom", OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, No. 195, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/1e26883b-en.

•

Bureau, J. and J. Antón (2022), "Agricultural Total Factor Productivity and the environment: A guide to emerging best practices in measurement", OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, No. 177, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/6fe2f9e0-en.

•

McFadden, J., et al. (2022), "The digitalisation of agriculture: A literature review and emerging policy issues", OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, No. 176, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/285cc27d-en.

•

McFadden, J., F. Casalini and J. Antón (2022), "Policies to bolster trust in agricultural digitalisation: Issues note", OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, No. 175, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5a89a749-en.

•

OECD (2022), “Insights Into the Measurement of Agricultural Total Factor Productivity and the Environment”, https://www.oecd.org/agriculture/topics/network-agriculturalproductivity-and-environment.

•

OECD (2021), “Policies for the Future of Farming and Food: How to improve productivity, sustainability and resilience?” (Booklet on PSR Policy Framework), https://issuu.com/oecd.publishing/docs/policies_for_the_future_of_farming_and_food.

Website:

http://www.oecd.org/agriculture/topics/agricultural-productivity-and-innovation/

Contact:

Jesús Antón (TAD/ARP) and Mercedes Campi (TAD/ARP)

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

35

AGRICULTURAL SEED AND FOREST REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL CERTIFICATION SCHEMES The following three criteria; distinctness, uniformity and stability are used for defining crop varieties and form the basis for agricultural seed development and trade. Identification and minimum purity criteria are important components of sustainability, especially in the case of hybridisation and genetic modifications. For forest reproductive material reliability depends on several factors including identification of origin (region or provenance), selection and breeding.

The OECD Seed Schemes are a set of international standards for field inspection and certification of the most important agricultural and vegetable species. The Schemes aim to harmonise seed certification; thereby facilitating and promoting international seed trade. The eight Seed Schemes establish rules and standards for varietal inspection and certification of seeds from OECD listed varieties. Sixty-one countries are currently a member of at least one of the Schemes.

The List of Varieties Eligible for OECD Certification covers 204 species – including all major crops – and more than 73 000 varieties. OECD statistics indicate that the total weight of OECD certified seeds traded corresponded to 506 million kg in 2022/23. The electronic database provides an online search facility for OECD listed varieties and is available from the official website (see below).

In order to assess the current and future needs of international certification, the OECD Seed Schemes have established a number of Ad-Hoc Working Groups and holds regular discussions with their Technical Working Group to examine issues, explore new opportunities and develop new procedures.

One of the key issues for the OECD Seed Schemes is the emerging role of biochemical and molecular techniques (BMT) in describing and identifying varieties. These issues are discussed at the Advisory Group on Biochemical and Molecular Techniques. The group plays a key role in the registration of new BMTs under the OECD Seed Schemes. The 2025 Annual Meeting held on 9-13 June 2025

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

36

approved new BMTs which are in use at least by one of the participating countries in the Seed Schemes. The Group also started discussions on how modern molecular techniques can be used for varietal purity tests. Currently the registered BMTs are only allowed for varietal identity tests but only as supplementary methods to phenotyping techniques.

International organisations such as OECD, International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV) and International Seed testing Association (ISTA) need to pursue these new techniques carefully in order to maintain the integrity of the seed sectors international regulatory framework.

These organisations work in close cooperation to harmonise their work on BMTs as much as possible.

Both OECD and UPOV have established their list of BMTS applied in breeding, variety testing and registration or seed certification. The organisations harmonised their approach during the formation of the lists. A joint OECD/UPOV/ISTA Workshop on the application of Biochemical and Molecular Techniques was organised in Beijing on 28 April – 1 May 2025, back-to-back with the UPOV Technical Working Party on Testing Methods and Techniques. The Workshop suggested to harmonizing the terms and definitions used by the different organisations related to BMTs, to set up a joint OECD/UPOV/ISTA list of BMTs and to explore the feasibility to agree on common set of DNA markers for respective agricultural species. The 2025 Annual Meeting agreed with these proposals and the OECD Seed Schemes will work on these issues from now on.

The OECD Forest Seed and Plant Scheme encourages the production and use of forest reproductive material that has been collected, processed and marketed in a manner that ensures their trueness to name. It is currently implemented in 30 countries. The Scheme's rules were recently completed by including the "Tested" category and new types of basic materials, such as clones, clonal mixture and parents of families. Moreover, the Scheme is now adapted to deal with multifunctional forest trees.

The Scheme is exploring possible ways to adapt to and mitigate climate change. The scheme is collaborating with organisations such as Kew Gardens or EUFORGEN, to better understand and communicate the importance of the origin of forest reproductive material in afforestation reforestation and in forest tree plantations. The certification of origin is becoming more and more important as it provides information to foresters on the adaptation potential of the forest reproductive material. Some countries have introduced DNA based control systems to check the true origin (region of provenance) of the imported forest tree seeds, parts of plants or plants.

The OECD Forest Seed and Plant Scheme is currently exploring the possibility of using biochemical and molecular techniques, particularly DNA based techniques in registration of basic material of forestry species under the OECD as well as the certification of origin and population of forest reproductive material.

The OECD Forest Scheme discuss the adaptation of the Rules and Regulations of the programme to certification of forest reproductive materials derived from somatic embryogenesis. This technology is used particularly for different conifers to create clones or increase the number available reproductive material.

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

37

Upcoming events: Agricultural Seed Schemes: •

Technical Working Group Meeting 28-29 January 2026, Paris, France, OECD Headquarters.

•

Annual Meeting of the OECD Seed Schemes: 15-19 June 2026, Paris, France, OECD Headquarters,

Forest Seed and Plant Scheme: •

Technical Working Group Meeting: 28-29 April 2026, Location TBC

•

Annual Meeting of the National designated Authorities: 6-7 October 2026, Paris, France, OECD Headquarters

Recent publications: •

OECD Seed Schemes: Rules and regulations; 2025 edition Systèmes des semences de l’OCDE : Règles et directives ; édition 2025 (fr)

•

List of Varieties Eligible for Seed Certification; July 2025

•

OECD Forest Seed and Plant Scheme “2024” (Rules and Regulations) Système de l’OCDE pour les semences et plants forestiers “2024” (Règles et Directives)

Web sites:

https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/seeds.html https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/forest-seed-and-plant.html Promotional video on the OECD Forest Scheme: https://youtu.be/nqGXYz5Sln4 Promotional video on the OECD Seed Schemes: https://youtu.be/o36HW3xd9wk?si=pypSPpivLvCzQZQY

Contact:

Csaba Gaspar (TAD/COD)

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

38

CO-OPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAMME: SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SYSTEMS The OECD Co-operative Research Programme: Sustainable Agricultural and Food Systems (CRP), which gathers 30 OECD countries, is based on the observation that multi-disciplinary agri-food research is needed to address the gaps in knowledge, deepen understanding and enhance the scientific base of policy. The objectives of the CRP are the following: to provide a sound scientific knowledge base to agricultural policy-making; to contribute to an informed public debate on current and emerging agro-food issues and help resolve conflicting views; and to promote scientific understanding and standards between major regions of OECD. A food systems approach to policy analysis to tackle the “triple challenge” of providing food security and nutrition, and ensuring livelihoods while using natural resources sustainably is in line with the declaration adopted by Agriculture Ministers in 2016 and in 2022 and the work of the Committee for Agriculture. It is also fully aligned with OECD strategic objectives in relation to the need for integrated interdisciplinary approaches in obtaining sustainable solutions. Whilst not specifically mentioned in the title of the Programme, the CRP’s mandate also includes fisheries and forestry research.

Operational features of the Programme involve supporting and promoting international cooperation and networking in the field of basic and applied research. It awards fellowships to scientists from a CRP participating country to conduct research projects in another CRP participating country, and supports financially workshops to address agro-food issues that are high on the science/policy agenda of Members. The CRP strategy emphasises the need to engage a range of scientific disciplines including the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities in an interactive dialogue. The CRP has three pillars, or research themes, as depicted in the below schema which reflects the CRP conceptual framework in force until 31 December 2025:

To maintain the CRP’s relevance, the CRP Governing Body updated the CRP priority areas of research based on a revised conceptual framework. This new framework seeks to break down silos and enable more multi-disciplinary research, reflecting also the key messages in the Declaration on Transformative Solutions for Sustainable Agriculture and Food Systems adopted at the meeting of

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

39

the Committee for Agriculture at Ministerial level in November 2022. The new conceptual framework and related revised schema will be in place as of 1st January 2026 with the 2026-2030 mandate.

The Co-operative Research Programme’s Call for applications for Event and Fellowship funding in 2026 was launched on 28 April 2025 and closed on 10 September 2025 COB Paris time. The outcome of the selection will be communicated to the applicants in January 2026 at the latest.

By funding events and individual fellowships, the Co-operative Research Programme aims to strengthen scientific knowledge and provide scientific information to feed future policy decisions related to the sustainable use of natural resources, in food, agriculture, forests and fisheries.

CRP (Co-)Sponsored Events (Conferences and Workshops) selected for funding in 2025: •

Bridging Innovation Policy and Practice for Sustainable Agricultural Productivity Growth, Arlington, Virginia, USA on 17-18 April 2025

•

Nematodes on the move: Building resilience and sustainability through international collaboration and better policies, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada on 13-16 July 2025

•

Symposium on the agronomic, environmental and societal benefits and risks of using organic soil amendments in agricultural production systems (Symposium on the Use of Organic Soil Amendments), Coolangatta, Queensland, Australia, on 16-18 September 2025

•

Strategic Collaboration for Sustainable Wheat Production: Addressing Global Challenges in the OECD, Valencia and Córdoba, Spain, on 1-3 October 2025

•

Second International Forum on Agroecosystem Living Labs (IF-ALL): 2025, special session on Living labs experimenting with public policies for our food systems, Bordeaux, France on 15-17 October 2025

•

First International Congress on Innovative Technologies for Small and Medium-Sized Rural Agro-Industries: Enhancing Territorial Competitiveness and Resilient Market Access, Medellin, Colombia on 27-29 October 2025

•

Advancing Sustainability in Agriculture: Enabling Precision Application of Crop Protection Products by Inclusion in Regulatory Approaches (Processes), Melbourne, Australia, 19-20 February 2026

Information about these are posted on the CRP website.

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

40

CRP Fellowships selected for funding in 2025: Theme 1 on Managing natural capital • • • • • •

Biochar as a tool for the mitigation of microplastics from soil to the food chain Ecological resilience in future farming landscapes; an assessment of spatial priorities, tradeoffs, and implications for management and policy Ecotoxicological modelling of honeybee mortality in the neotropics: parameterising an individual-based model for environmental risk assessment Harnessing plant-microbe interactions for sustainable nitrogen cycling and climate-smart agriculture Jointly resolving the spatiotemporal dynamics of recharge and plant water use through a deep root zone The effects of forest fire on soil bacterial, fungal and nematode communities and their interactions

Theme 2 on Strengthening resilience in the face of multiple risks in a connected world • • • • • • • •

Assessment of climate crisis effects on spreading strategy of insect-borne yellow dwarf virus disease on cereals Designing sustainable and climate-resilient lentils (Lens culinaris) applying machine learning, deep learning, and artificial intelligence Development of novel resilience indicators using lactation curves and machine learning Enhancing citrus crop resilience through plant defense induction and conservation biological control Optimising resilience in Western US Corn Belt to climate variability/change Physiologically-based toxicokinetic modelling of the transfer of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) to growing lambs Phytosanitary risk science to support global trade: a collaborative approach To quantify changing climatic requirements to develop policy decisions for identifying and expanding citrus production regions

Theme 3 on Transformational technologies and innovation • • • •

Biologically informed deep learning for identifying genetic mutations key to agronomy Enhancing conceptual and theoretical foundations for multi-stakeholder innovations in complex sociotechnical systems Utilization of B-type gelatin of salmon/cod scales by mixing A-type Tilapia gelatin Water observatory: Heterogeneous data integration towards enhancing sustainable water ecosystem

Brief descriptions of these fellowships are posted on the CRP website.

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

41

Recent publications and papers: De la Fuente L. et al. (2023), Phytopathology, Vol. 113, N°6, “Two Xylella fastidiosa subsp. multiplex strains isolated from almond in Spain differ in plasmid content and virulence traits”, APS; https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-06-22-0234-R •

De la Fuente L. et al. (2023), Phytopathology, Vol. 113, N°6, “Complete circularized genome resources of seven strains of Xylella fastidiosa subsp. fastidiosa using hybrid assembly reveals unknown plasmids”, APS; https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-10-22-0396-A •

Gedeon C. et al. (2023), Applied Soil Ecology, Vol. 188, 104878, “Predicting microbial responses to changes in soil physical and chemical properties under different land management”, Elsevier; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.104878 •

Kelling I., M. Carrigan and A. F. Johnson (2023), Food Security, “Transforming the seafood supply system: challenges and strategies for resilience”, Springer; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-023-01400-5 •

Reyes F., A. Sofo et al. (2023), Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 23, 4078–4090, “Plant growth and root morphology are affected by earthworm-driven (Eisenia sp.) Changes in soil chemico-physical properties: a mesocosm experiment with broccoli and faba bean”, Springer Link; https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-023-01325-0 •

Rossignaud, L., D. Kelly, E. B. Spurr, D. J. Flaspohler, R. B. Allen and E. G. Brockerhoff (2022), Avian Conservation and Ecology, 17(2):4 “Trends in bird counts 1978–2020 in a New Zealand Nothofagus forest with variable control of mammalian predators”, The Resilience Alliance; https://doi.org/10.5751/ACE-02176-170204 •

Note: The call for the submission of applications for 2026 research fellowship awards and event sponsorship is closed. The CRP received a record number of applications: 53 for a fellowship and 36 for an event award. The CRP Governing Body decided on the funding at its meeting held on 2-3 December 2025 and hosted by the Slovak Republic. The outcome will be communicated to the applicants in January 2026 at the latest.

All relevant information and application forms will be available on the CRP website, through the link: oe.cd/agriculture-crp (former URL: www.oecd.org/agriculture/crp).

Website:

oe.cd/agriculture-crp

Contacts:

Marie Russel (TAD/PROG), Hubertus Gay (TAD/ATM)

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

42

UPCOMING OECD EVENTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY 2026

20-22 April 2026

33rd Meeting of the Working Party for the Safety of Novel Foods & Feeds, The Hague, the Netherlands (Contact: S. Nakano, ENV/EHS)

22-24 April 2026

40th Meeting of the Working Party on the Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology, The Hague, the Netherlands (Contact: S. Nakano, ENV/EHS)

15-19 June 2026

OECD Agricultural Seed Schemes: Annual Meeting, OECD, Paris (Contact: C. Gaspar, TAD/COD)

1-2 July 2026

OECD Green Growth and Sustainable Development Forum, OECD, Paris (Contact: K. Raiser, ENV)

6-7 October 2026

OECD Forest Seed and Plant Scheme: Annual Meeting of the National Designated Authorities, OECD, Paris (Contact: C. Gaspar, TAD/COD)

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

43

WHO’S WHO IN BIOTECH AT OECD?

Jane RICHARDSON (ENV/EHS) Executive Secretary to the ICGB; Head of Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology (Biosafety) and Novel Food & Feed Safety and Pesticides programmes jane.richardson@oecd.org _____________________________ Marcel ADENÄUER (TAD/ATM) Agricultural Policy Analyst marcel.adenauer@oecd.org Jesús ANTÓN (TAD/ARP) Senior Agricultural Policy Analyst jesus.anton@oecd.org Cesar BARRAZA-BOTET (STI/STP) Economist/Policy Analyst cesar.barraza-botet@oecd.org Enrico BOTTA (ENV) Economist enrico.botta@oecd.org Mercedes CAMPI (TAD/ARP) Agricultural Policy Analyst mercedes.campi@oecd.org Ester CARREGAL ROMERO (ENV/EHS) Junior Policy Analyst ester.carregalromero@oecd.org Koen DECONINCK (TAD/ATM) Agricultural Policy Analyst koen.deconinck@oecd.org Annelies DEUSS (TAD/ATM) Senior Agricultural Policy Analyst annelies.deuss@oecd.org Csaba GASPAR (TAD/COD) OECD Forest Seed and Plant Scheme, OECD Seed Schemes csaba.gaspar@oecd.org

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

44

Hubertus GAY (TAD/ATM) Senior Agricultural Policy Analyst hubertus.gay@oecd.org Céline GINER (TAD/ATM) Agricultural Policy Analyst celine.giner@oecd.org Guillaume GRUÈRE (TAD/ARP) Acting Head of Agricultural and Resource Policies Division guillaume.gruere@oecd.org Ben HENDERSON (ENV) Senior Policy Analyst and Team Lead, Horizontal Initiatives ben.henderson@oecd.org Katia KAROUSAKIS (ENV/CBW) Biodiversity Economics and Policy katia.karousakis@oecd.org Kumi KITAMORI (ENV) Deputy Director of Environment kumi.kitamori@oecd.org Laura KREILING (STI/STP) Economist/Policy Analyst laura.kreiling@oecd.org Giulio MAZZONE (ENV/CBW) Economist giulio.mazzone@oecd.org Jeremy MOORHOUSE (IEA/EMS/RED) Energy Analyst - Renewable Energy & Bioenergy Markets jeremy.moorhouse@iea.org Daniel NADAL (STI/STP) Junior Economist/Policy Analyst daniel.nadal@oecd.org Satoshi NAKANO (ENV/EHS) Policy analyst, Biosafety and Biotechnology satoshi.nakano@oecd.org Edward PERRY (ENV/CBW) Biodiversity, Land Use and Ecosystems edward.perry@oecd.org

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

45

Kilian RAISER (ENV) Green Growth and GGKP kilian.raiser@oecd.org Douglas ROBINSON (STI/STP) Policy Advisor, Bio, Nano, and Converging Technologies douglas.robinson@oecd.org Marie RUSSEL (TAD/PROG) Cooperative Research Programme: Sustainable Agricultural and Food Systems marie.russel@oecd.org Magda SACHANA (ENV/EHS) Policy Analyst, Pesticides, Hazard Assessment magdalini.sachana@oecd.org Brigitte VAN BEUZEKOM (STI/STP) Biotechnology Statistics, Nanotechnology Statistics brigitte.vanbeuzekom@oecd.org Martin VON LAMPE (TAD/ARP) Agricultural Policies (incl. bioenergy) martin.vonlampe@oecd.org David WINICKOFF (STI/STP) Senior Policy Analyst - Secretariat WP Biotechnology, Nanotechnology and Converging Technologies david.winickoff@oecd.org

Visit the OECD BioTrack website to access the latest news and previous editions.

You can also sign up to the OECD Biotechnology Update newsletter to receive future editions directly to your inbox.

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

46

ENDNOTE: A BRIEF GUIDE TO THE OECD The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) is an intergovernmental organisation with 38 member countries1. The mission of the OECD is to promote policies that will improve the economic and social well-being of people around the world. OECD brings together the governments of countries committed to democracy and the market economy to support economic growth, boost employment, raise living standards, maintain financial stability, assist other countries’ economic development, and contribute to growth in world trade.

The Organisation provides a setting where governments compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, and identify better policies for better lives. An increasing number of nonmember economies participate in a wide range of activities, including some of those related to biotechnology.

The Council of OECD is the highest decision-making body of the Organisation. Its members are the Ambassadors of the Member countries to the OECD. It is chaired by OECD’s Secretary-General. Once a year, it also meets at the level of Ministers from member countries. The Council decides on the annual budget of the Organisation as well as the content of the programme of work.

In addition to the Council, there are more than 300 committees, experts and working groups, which undertake the Organisation’s programme of work. The governments of the Member countries nominate the participants to all these groups.

1

OECD Member countries are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Czechia,

Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Republic of Türkiye, the United Kingdom and the United States. The European Commission also takes part in the work of the OECD.

ICGB Newsletter No. 48, December 2025

Unclassified - Non classifié