Massive handout for VW plant is corporate welfare writ large

If you live in St. Thomas, government plans committing up to $14 billion on a new VW battery plant probably seems like a good idea – it will certainly provide jobs and a host of financial benefits. For everyone else, the deal raises some big concerns.

The federal government offered to provide some $13 billion in tax subsidies over 10 years to entice Volkswagen to choose the southern Ontario location as the site of its first electric battery plant in North America. The province is kicking in another $500 million.

Government supports amount to double the $7 billion VW has earmarked to build the massive production facility, which is expected to open in 2027.

The plant will have the capacity to produce a million batteries per year, employing 3,000 workers.

Leaving aside the logistics and environmental considerations of mining and sourcing the materials needed to produce a million automotive batteries – as well as the long-term viability of the technology – the government subsidies wreak of corporate welfare writ large.

While this deal is likely the largest example of support for a single project, Canada is no stranger to corporate handouts.

Getting a handle on such payouts is notoriously difficult, not least of all because of secrecy, but a report released last month by the Fraser Institute estimated all levels of government in the country spent some $352.1 billion on subsidies between 2007 and 2019. The payoff for taxpayers? Not much.

STEVE KANNON

Editor's Point of View and/or job creation. In fact, business subsidies might have a negative impact on economic development as governments’ attempts to pick winners by interfering in the free market ultimately distort private decisions and misallocate resources,” find Tegan Hill and Joel Emes, authors of ‘The Cost of Business Subsidies in Canada.’

The true level of government supports is likely much higher, they note.

The automotive sector is no stranger to handouts, of course, so the VW deal fits the mould. The companies have pocketed the cash and some pandering politicians have helped their cronies and got their pictures taken at ribbon-cuttings, but the rest of us are simply out a whole lot of money.

Advocates of perpetual handouts to businesses –often large and profitable businesses – say such deals create and/or protect jobs. Besides, they’ll say, every other government does the same thing, so we need to dole out cash to even the playing field.

Problem is, companies know this, and end up playing one jurisdiction off of another. Worse still, the benefits touted don’t materialize.

The history of corporate welfare is replete with unpaid loans, bankruptcies, undelivered jobs and shuttered factories despite assurances to the contrary. For a sad example of all of the above, check out Ontario’s steel industry, particularly what happened in Hamilton. The automotive sector, too, has seen plants close and jobs disappear even as governments poured in billions of dollars.

Given that all levels of government and a variety of ministries and departments are involved, it’s hard to get a handle on just how much money is doled out as corporate welfare. It’s made worse by the fact that officials try to hide what they’re doing: what we do know almost always comes through Access to Information requests. Documents redacted as a matter of course, with the transfer of your money to wealthy corporations treated in the same way as military secrets. Any documentable benefits are hard to come by.

In that light, it makes sense to scrap all subsidies to business. That’s not going to happen, however, as such programs are another vote-buying scheme for politicians. Political life is a perpetual election cycle, and the one thing politicians relish is doling out money – grants, loans, subsidies – and the photo ops that accompany such announcements.

Staples throughout the year, they’re especially prevalent during the summer barbecue circuit.

With legislatures on a break, funding announcements are a way for members to keep themselves in the spotlight, reminding constituents they’ve still got representatives at work.

Will the money ever come with airtight guarantees for long-term employment, investment and eventual full return to tax coffers? Not likely. Instead, it will be just another gimme in the never-ending cycle of privatized profits and socialized costs, the real modus operandi of corporatism.

What would make the this and other welfare payments more palatable is a realistic cost-benefit analysis: if an investment makes sense – i.e. pays back every dollar to the taxpayers directly, and then some – then it should be considered. If not, then take a pass. That applies to everything from massive, decades-long support for the likes of Bombardier and Pratt and Whitney to ersatz economic development efforts in Woolwich and the region. In almost every case, the decisions are bad ones, which, as we know, is pretty much business as usual for politicians and bureaucrats.

“It was an NDP leader, David Lewis, who coined the term corporate welfare bums in 1972. Unfortunately, in the past 30 years, too many corporations have been drawn into this trap by the available plethora of government loans, grants, and subsidies.”

Those words came not from Lewis’ successors or free-enterprisers of the Frontier Centre mould, but from then-opposition leader Stephen Harper in a 2004 speech to the Toronto Board of Trade, part of a pledge to tackle corporate welfare. We know how that’s played out in the past decade.

Political gain and an eagerness to channel public money into private hands aside – and that’s a big cultural change to reverse, as milking taxpayers is the norm – ending corporate welfare wouldn’t be that difficult. As it stands, reports show most of the country’s largest companies don’t take financial assistance.

Broader research tells us that any benefits of corporate welfare are, at best, fleeting and rarely successful in attracting highskilled, high-paying jobs. The money disappears down a sinkhole, with little lasting effect. But as long as politicians are allowed to control the money, they’ll

“A significant body of research finds little evidence that business subsidies generate widespread economic growth →KANNON 10

Find Us: 20B Arthur Street North, Elmira, Ontario, N3B 1Z9

Contact Us:

JOE MERLIHAN Publisher 519-669-5790 x107

DONNA RUDY Sales Manager 519-669-5790 x104

LEAH GERBER Reporter 519-669-5790 x101

PATRICK MERLIHAN Digital Strategist 519-669-5790 x105

STEVE KANNON Editor 519-669-5790 x103

CASSANDRA MERLIHAN Production Manager 519-669-5790 x109

BILL ATWOOD Reporter 519-669-5790 x102

Phone: 519-669-5790

Toll Free: 1-888-966-5942

Fax: 519-669-5753

Email: info@woolwichobserver.com newsroom@woolwichobserver.com Web: https://observerxtra.com

Professional Associations:

• Ontario Community Newspaper Association (OCNA)

• News Media Canada

• The Greater KW Chamber of Commerce

About Us: Independent, locally-owned and the only weekly community newspaper serving the residents of Woolwich and Wellesley Townships. Real news, real reporting concentrating on the close-tohome issues in our communities. When it comes to reaching our residents, The Observer is unsurpassed.

Press Oversight: The Observer is a member of the National Newsmedia Council - an independent organization established to deal with acceptable journalistic practises and ethical behaviour. If you have concerns about editorial content, contact: 519-669-5790 ext 103 or editor@woolwichobserver.com.

If you are not satisfied with the response and wish to file a complaint, visit mediacouncil.ca or call 1-844-877-1163 for more information.

Subscriptions:

Annual subscriptions to The Observer mailed within Canada/U.S. are available by contacting the office or by visiting us online: observerxtra.com/subscribe.

The annual fee is $39.55 (Tax included)

Delivery Concerns:

Issues with local delivery can be directed to The Record by calling 519-894-3000.

Letters to the Editor:

Letters must be exclusive to this publication on a topic of relevance to the community. It must contain the author's name, address, contact info and be no more than 300 words. Letters may be edited for length and clarity. The Observer declines announcements, poetry, thank-you and unsigned letters. Deliver to: editor@woolwichobserver. com or online: observerxtra.com/letters

Store: www.newsmart.ca

Arbor Day in Ontario is celebrated on the last Friday in April.

Canada’s first Arbor Day was celebrated on April 26, 1886 organized by the horticultural society in Bellefontaine.

Arbor Day is celebrated worldwide on the same day and the combined effort adds millions of new trees being planted.

ↆ LAST WEEK:

True – Milwaukee has only one the NBA championship one other time in 1971 when the team was lead by Kareem Abdul-Jabbar and Oscar Robertson.

True – The Play-In Tournament was started in the 2019-2020 season as a one-time measure due to the unique circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic. It was seen to add more excitement at the end of the season and provide more opportunities for teams to make the playoffs. It is now permanent.

Lie - The shot clock remains at 24 seconds.