The Executive Connection of North Texas: Spring 2012

SPRING 2012 

CONTENT President’s Remarks

4

Scott Schmidly, FACHE

Welcome New Members and New Fellows

5

Mission Possible:

6

2012 Congress on Healthcare Scholarship Recipients

8

Mentoring Program

8

Will the Affordable Care Act Move Patient-Centeredness to Center Stage?

10

News from National

12

Finding Capital for Stand-Alone Hospitals

northtexas.ache.org

Leverage Your Marketing 13 Success to Shore Up Physician Perception Calendar

14

The ACHE of North Texas e-magazine, The Executive Connection, is published quarterly (Spring, Summer, Fall and Winter) and includes information on the latest regulatory and legislative developments, as well as the quality improvement and leadership trends that are shaping and influencing the healthcare industry. Readers get indepth reporting on the issues and challenges facing hospital and health system leaders today. We make it our job to tell you about the great things the organization and Chapter are doing every day to ensure the health of our community. If you have any news and updates that you want to share with other members, please e-mail your items to info@northtexas.ache.org. Microsoft Word or compatible format is preferable. If you have a graphic or picture that you’d like to include, please send it as a separate file. The following are the types of information that our members shared in past ACHE of North Texas magazines: Advocacy Issues, Legislative Issues, Educational Opportunities, Awards / Achievements, Promotions (Members On the Move), Committee Updates, journal submissions, conference submissions, and workshop participations, sharing mentoring experiences, etc.

ACHE of

North Texas

A Publication of the American College of Healthcare Executives of North Texas Chapter | SPRING 2012

3

2012 Board of Directors Britt R. Berrett, PhD, FACHE Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas Ex-Officio, Regent Beverly Dawson, RN, CCM, FACHE ElderCare Chair, Advancement and Mentoring

Editor-In-Chief

Susan Edwards, FACHE

Managing Directors

Joan Clark, DNP, RN, FACHE Angela CJVincent, MHS

Contributing Editors

Felicia McLaren Lisa Cox Forney Fleming Jania Villarroel Scott Schmidly

Contributing Writers

Anthony J. Taddy Jason Beakas Michael L. Millenson Juliana Macri Ann Maloley, MBA

Production

Kay Daniel

Advertising/ Subscriptions

info@northtexas.ache.org

Questions and Comments:

ACHE of North Texas Editorial Office, c/o Executive Connection 511 John Carpenter Frwy, Suite 600, Irving, Texas 75062 p: 972.812.1154 | f: 972.570.8037 e: info@northtexas.ache.org | w: northtexas.ache.org

J. Eric Evans, FACHE Lake Pointe Medical Center Chair, Education Forney Fleming University of Texas at Dallas Ex-Officio, Faculty Josh Floren, FACHE Parkland Health & Hospital System Co-Chair, Membership and Networking Dresdene Flynn-White JPS Health Network Co-Chair, Communications Jay Fox Baylor Medical Center, Waxahachie Co-Chair, Advancement and Mentoring Jonni Johnson, CPSM RTKL Associates Inc. Chair, Sponsorship Ashley McClellan, FACHE Medical Center of Lewisville Co-Chair, Education Rick Stevens Co-Chair, Sponsorship

2012 Chapter Officers

President Scott Schmidly, FACHE Medical City and Medical City Children’s Hospital Co-Chair, Membership and Networking

President-Elect Caleb F. O’Rear, FACHE Denton Regional Medical Center Co-Chair, Communications Committee

Past President Brad Simmons, FACHE Parkland Health & Hospital System Chair, Nominating Co-Chair, Education

Secretary Winjie Tang Miao Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Alliance Co-Chair, Sponsorship

Treasurer Pam Stoyanoff Methodist Health System

Matt van Leeuwe Parkland Health & Hospital System Ex-Officio, Student Council Jania Villarroel, MHA Candor Healthcare Co-Chair, Communications Demetria Wilhite The University of Texas at Arlington Ex-Officio, Faculty Teresa Baker VA North Texas Health Care System Co-Chair, Advancement and Mentoring Bethany Williams ZirMed Chair, Membership and Networking Chip Zahn, FACHE Las Colinas Medical Center Co-Chair, Sponsorship Lisa Cox The Health Industry Council ACHE Coordinator

A Publication of the American College of Healthcare Executives of North Texas Chapter | SPRING 2012

4

President’s Remarks

Scott Schmidly, FACHE Dear Members, Well, the first three months of 2012 have come and gone.

And before it is all said and done, the likely conclusion of the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), perhaps one of the most sweeping reform bills ever passed, will have been decided (even if not made public for several more months). Regardless of your own personal position on the PPACA, the three days over which the Supreme Court heard oral arguments from dissenters and sponsors has certainly stirred a nation and reignited controversial topics – well beyond accessibility to health care or even a more affordable approach to health care – like individual rights and the dividing line of authority between states and the federal government.

A thematic question becomes “what effect will the Court’s decision have on the reformation agenda underway in healthcare?”

Truthfully, it is unclear and still hotly debated what the short-term or long-term effects will be as a result of the Court’s decision. It is apparent, though, that healthcare providers and healthcare policy will continue to be the subject of sizable scrutiny. Those quick to criticize need to realize this stark reality; more than 49 million Americans are without health insurance. Another 60 million are enrolled in Medicaid (our means-testing program for the poor) and another 48 million are enrolled in Medicare (the entitlement program for our elderly and disabled). In toll, more than 157 million of the 313 million Americans are either uninsured or enrolled in a program that, arguably, does not cover the cost for their care. Medicare and Medicaid are critically important social programs. Their creation and existence supports a dignified societal philosophy rooted in ethical, compassionate responsibility. In turn, as an industry, healthcare needs to remain steadfast in its pursuits to deliver exceptional quality and care in a more efficient manner. There are numerous examples of health care organizations across this nation that have taken the lead on trying to resolve a multitude of issues whether its evidence-based medicine, billing reform and transparency, integrated information and technology systems, individual responsibility for personal well being, and a well-defined patient quality improvement agenda. These topics are involved, with few easy, recuperative paths. But more and more there is a true indication that reform is being led, not by government or cynic, but by capable men and women dedicated to leading their organizations positively and resourcefully.

The North Texas Chapter is honored to aid in this pursuit by serving our membership as the foremost professional organization for continuing education and B2B networking. I hope that in that past three months you have made it a point to attend or get involved in our Chapter. If not, I encourage you to take a moment, visit our

web site northtexas. ache.org and find out more about the upcoming events on the calendar.

Also, please stay alert to the weekly e-mail updates provided through info@northtexas.ache. org.

Once again, let me say thank you to our sponsors and volunteers – without you none of this would be possible. Finally, on behalf of our Board, it is a privilege to continue to find ways to serve you better.

Sincerely, Scott Schmidly, FACHE

A Publication of the American College of Healthcare Executives of North Texas Chapter | SPRING 2012

5

Welcome New Members JANUARY Rami Almuhtadi, Fort Worth Brenda Berry, Addison Mary C. Black, Dallas Greg Bryan, Dallas Kelli A. Bural, RN, Garland Julie Butner, Fort Worth Nicholas Carroll, Lutherville Timonium Sanjeev Chhabra, Irving Brian Craft, Plano Abigail R. Edmister, Bedford Kent Ellis, Plano Kathryn A. Flores, Carrollton Kristen M. Georgia, Dallas Qiana M. Johnson, Frisco Shanda Johnson, Wylie Linda Kurland, Fort Worth Mike LaHaie, Dallas Don Mang, Newport Jeff Maxwell, West Linn Judith Messer, Murphy Vishwanath Mysore, Fort Worth Tam Nguyen, Richardson Sonya B. Odell, Dallas Russ E. Peal, Lantana Turabia Sajid, Carrollton Brianna R. San Miguel, Flower Mound

Thomas J. Tierney, Grand Prairie Derek Townsend, Arlington Melanie A. Tsakonas, Lewisville Brian Villegas, Fort Worth Troy Zupancic, Dallas

FEBRUARY William G. Buck, Mckinney Carolyn Carlson, Dallas Allen Dye, Dallas Sally Dyess, Carrollton David Fontenot, Grapevine Bryan Hill, Arlington John F. Holland, Dallas James A. Horton, Weatherford Matthew R. Malinak, Strongsville Stephanie V. Mask, Dallas Michelle Mirkovic, Dallas Syed Nabeel, Plano David W. Nunez, DDS, Dallas Judson Orlando, Dallas Charles Oswalt, Dallas Joseph Palmore, Fort Worth Radhika D. Patel, Dallas SFC Leslie D. Patterson, Grand Prairie Sandra Routly, Fort Worth Pamela Sanders, Grand Prairie Matthew Schneider, Dallas

Michael W. Seiler, Mansfield Prashant Shinde, Fort Worth John P. Taylor, Mckinney Cindy Tucker, Plano Tracy P. Walls, Dallas Stanley Williams, Fort Worth

MARCH Joseph Brunson, Arlington Craig M. Drayden, Dallas Patrick S. Finch Jr., Highland Village James R. Garner, Fort Worth Tanima Hoque, mckinney Trevor Jares, Irving Donald E. Katz, Dallas Cheryl P. Koch, Rowlett Gerri J. Lindsay, Plano Andrew Montgomery, Dallas Greg Pipes, Garland Pamela Scott, Dallas Travis Singleton, Irving Babalola Solomi, Arlington Randolph S. Swanson, Frisco Jeffrey L. Tobias II, Dallas

Congratulations to the following members who advanced to Fellow status FEBRUARY John L. Schinske, FACHE, Argyle Patsy L. Youngs, RN, FACHE, Kaufman MARCH Carla J. Degges, FACHE, Carrollton

A Publication of the American College of Healthcare Executives of North Texas Chapter | SPRING 2012

6

Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to find capital to renovate or replace your aging hospital at an affordable cost. As a stand-alone hospital that doesn’t rely on taxes, how hard can it be in 2012?

Let’s find out. Median-ratios reports issued at the end of 2011 for nonprofit hospitals and health systems by the “Big Three” credit rating agenciesStandard & Poor’s, Fitch Ratings and Moody’s Investor Service-indicate how industry and economic pressures are affecting the credit ratings of hospitals. These median ratios, by offering a snapshot of the finances of all rated hospitals in their individual portfolios, help in the comparison of credits across rating categories and are used to predict future sector performance.

What Lies Ahead?

Year-end median reports pointed to an overall improvement in performance for hospitals and health systems, but predicted challenging conditions for 2012. The Big Three warned of the growing pressures on the nonprofit health-care sector with a still weak economy, selective credit markets, health-care reform uncertainties, low patient volumes and the increasing number of uninsured/underinsured patients along with decreased reimbursement rates. These serious external threats continue to apply pressure on a hospital’s bottom line while patients increasingly expect state-of-the-art facilities and services that provide quality and value.

Mission Possible:

Finding Capital for Stand-Alone Hospitals

On the positive side, due to a waning supply of higher rated, investmentgrade debt over the past three years, health-care investors have moved down the credit spectrum in search of higher yields. Health-care investors’ increased risk tolerance is evident by the narrowing spread between BBB and A-rated 30-year bonds as investors search for higher returns.

For example, the spread between Healthcare Baa/BBB and A/A 30-year offerings was 151 basis points in January 2009. However, as of January 2012, that spread has dropped by 53.6% to just 70 basis points. This has created an opportunity for lower rated, stand-alone hospitals to reduce their cost of capital to levels that more closely match their higher rated brethren. This landscape also requires a growing list of alternative capitalfunding options, which low- to noninvestment-grade, stand-alone hospitals can use to revamp their aging plants or refinance existing higher cost debt.

By Anthony J. Taddey and Jason Beakas

Reprinted with permission from The Capital Issue at www.lancasterpollard.com.

Mission Possible for BBB or Below Hospital leaders—particularly those of stand-alone, investment and noninvestment-grade facilities-need to be aware of what financing continued on page 7

A Publication of the American College of Healthcare Executives of North Texas Chapter | SPRING 2012

options are available to them in order to choose the best way to fund construction, renovations and new technologies and caredelivery methods. In addition to obtaining a debt rating, hospitals can consider the following routes to access long-term, fixed-rate capital: Government-Sponsored Options • The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s FHA Sec. 242 Mortgage Insurance offers 100% nonrecourse debt at fixed-interest rates. The maximum term is 25 years after construction completion and loan-to-value is capped at 90%, which in some cases allows the loan to cover the entire actual project cost. Average operating margins must be positive and the average debt-service-coverage ratio must be equal to or greater than 1.25 for the previous three years.

• The U.S. Department of Agriculture offers two programs for rural hospitals – the Business & Industry Program (B&I) for communities of 50,000 or less and the Community and Facilities Program (CF) for communities of 20,000 or less. The B&I program offers a maximum term of 25 years and is best suited for projects of $10 million or less with the size of the loan guarantee varying between 60% 80% depending on the loan size. The CF program provides direct and guaranteed loans (up to 90%) with a maximum term of 40 years. For both programs, the guarantee is generally issued upon construction completion.

• The New Markets Tax Credit Program (NMTCP) through the U.S. Department of the Treasury may be used to finance capital projects for the health-care sector. NMTCP attracts investment capital to eligible low-income communities-rural or urban-by providing investors with a tax credit against their federal income tax return in exchange for making equity payments in Community Development Entities (CDEs). The tax credit, which totals 39% of the original investment amount, is claimed over a period of seven years. The CDE will then make two loans to the borrower at below market rates, which require interest-only payments for the first seven years. Amortization on the loans begins after that initial period. The borrower pays no fees and most banks will treat investor-provided equity as project equity, reducing the amount of equity a non-profit borrower needs to contribute to finance the project. Additionally, many states offer state tax credits in conjunction with the federal program.

FHA Sec. 242 in Action Electra Memorial Hospital is a critical access hospital in northwest Texas. Challenged by a tight credit market and rural location Electra and its lender turned to the FHA Sec. 242 program to significantly renovate its 45-year-old facility and build a new wing of private rooms. As a result of the FHA mortgage insurance credit enhancement, Electra is expected to increase patient volume revenues through enhanced patient care and added services at AA-rated equivalent cost of capital.

Commercial Options All nonprofit hospitals and governmentally owned hospitals can

7

issue revenue (or cash-flow supported) bonds, which are generally ratable depending on their underlying credit characteristics.

Additionally, many governmentally owned hospitals can issue general-obligation (or tax-supported) bonds, which also may be rated. These long-term, fixed-rate bonds are underwritten by a broker/dealer in a primary offering. Depending on market conditions and other available financing options, the hospital has the ability to use additional credit enhancement to further reduce its borrowing.

• A floating-rate index note may be a more preferable option than a fixed-rate bond. Basically, the index floater is a variable-rate bond with an initial index-floater mode or period (typically three to seven years) during which the bond pays an interest rate equal to a short-term index plus a fixed-credit spread. The bond can be a public offering or privately placed directly with a bank and is subject to renewal risk at the expiration of its initial term.

• Private placement, a common alternative today, is when taxexempt bonds are privately placed with a bank or multiple banks or with a large bond fund. These bonds are negotiated with a select group of investors and disclosure requirements can sometimes be minimized and covenants made more flexible. If the private placements are deemed “bank qualified,” banks can deduct 80% of their costs and can pass along the savings to borrowers by means of a reduced interest rate. However, only $10 million in tax-exempt bonds can be designated as bank-qualified by a debt issuer in a year.

• The Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) letter-of-credit wrap gives a borrower the means to enhance taxable-debt issuances with a FHLB’s AA+ rating when an FHLB member bank provides the underlying LOC. This means smaller local banks could provide organizations access to investment-grade credit enhancement usually available only from larger banks. Nonprofits should still investigate FHLB LOCs because tax-exempt debt is not providing the cost break it has in the past. Also, taxable bonds require fewer upfront closing costs and fewer restrictions on the use of bond proceeds.

Private Placement in Action Fulton County Health Center, a small hospital in northwest Ohio, has grown to include several specialty units, several medical clinics and a senior-living facility. FCHC, in good financial standing, faced an expiring LOC with a bank. A 5-year variable-rate direct purchase structure was selected. The new issue was a refunding of the earlier bonds plus cost of issuance. The transaction addressed the upcoming LOC expiration and removed the credit renewal risk during the 5-year term.

Despite mixed reviews from the Big Three for the health-care sector in 2012, credit spreads have narrowed and options exist for standalone hospitals, such as Electra Memorial and Fulton County, to continue to finance their growth. A good understanding of all the options will help you obtain the required financing at reasonable terms to complete your mission.

A Publication of the American College of Healthcare Executives of North Texas Chapter | SPRING 2012

8

2012 Congress on Healthcare Scholarship Recipients Every year, the North Texas Chapter for ACHE is proud to offer limited scholarships to the always exciting and innovative Congress on Healthcare event in Chicago. Sponsored by National ACHE, Congress is the place to network, learn and have fun.

See what a few of our local recipients had to say...

“I am grateful for the opportunity the scholarship from the ACHE of North Texas Chapter afforded me in allowing me to attend the 2012 ACHE congress.

My previous experience at ACHE congress was as a student and a new graduate, so this year’s ACHE experience was really meaningful. The sessions were really interesting, informative and provided very useful tools that I can apply at my job.

“I would like to take a moment to thank you for the scholarship that you provided enabling me to attend the 2012 Congress on Healthcare Leadership, in Chicago. I know now that this was the first Congress of many that I will attend. I think the first time I felt a little overwhelmed was when I started the process of deciding which lectures I was going to attend. The topics were incredibly diverse and numerous! It took me a while, but I was able to select a wide variety of topics that were of interest to me on several different levels.

Studer’s session was one that left a very profound impression. He is certainly known in the healthcare industry and his concepts are being embraced by many healthcare organizations as the standards for day to day operations made the session even more significant. The career development and networking opportunities that ACHE presents are immeasurable.

The sessions were very meaningful and provided me the face to face credits I need in obtaining fellow status as I hope to take the exam later this year. Thank you again to ACHE Of North Texas Chapter.”

As I look back on the lectures, events and networking Congress facilitated I am still a little overwhelmed. The information was endless. I especially enjoyed the Hot Topics every morning.

They were informational, motivating and relevant. The entire experience reinforced my desire to deliver superior healthcare to patients in the current role that have at Dallas Methodist Medical Center and other roles I will have in the future.”

Sejal Patel, Director of Operations, Critical Care Services and Trauma Services, Children’s Medical Center Dallas

Kena Johnson, Pathology Technical Coordinator Methodist Dallas Medical Center

Kimberly Anderson, Senior Planning Analyst - Children’s Medical Center of Dallas, and Pranshu Narwal, Grad Student - UNTHSC were also awarded scholarships to the event.

2012 Mentoring Program ACHE of North Texas recently matched 51 mentees and mentors for the 2012 Mentorship Program. The chapter matches experienced healthcare professionals with early careerists that will complete their Master’s program within the year or who have graduated in the last 5 years. Requirements for the program included 16 contact hours within a 6 month period. Mentee’s gain insight into various segments of the health industry including general management; consulting; real estate; finance; IT; and operations.

2011 Mentee Reactions “I found [my mentor] to be an able and enthusiastic listener; our one-on-one meetings were opportunities to talk about the industry, the challenges she has faced, and the ways in which she overcame them. Her wisdom and insight were invaluable, and I will take her lessons with me as I begin my professional career. In retrospect, there was nothing that could have made my experience more enjoyable. Not only did I get a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to explore the far corners of hospital activity, but I also got to exchange war stories with a noted leader in the health care community.“ - Virginia Traweek

continued on page 9

A Publication of the American College of Healthcare Executives of North Texas Chapter | SPRING 2012

9

2011 Mentee Reactions cont.

“The mentor/mentee program provided a bridge from the academic to the administrative world. Mr. William Rathke, director of emergency department operations at Children’s Medical Center, gave professional guidance and understanding to the complex world of modern healthcare. He modeled a genuine interest in helping students, a commitment to his profession through continuing education and personal insight in career development. I spent considerable time learning about the mentor’s organization and professional responsibilities within Children’s Medical Center. The value of this experience provided by ACHE of North Texas exemplifies their long-term commitment to producing leaders in the healthcare industry.”

“I have been in several mentor programs and I have to say never have I learned as much as I have through this program.”

- Kim Hightower “ACHE and the healthcare industry are unique in that there is a community so willing to share with others. I believe in the importance of this effort, and I believe that we have a responsibility to build up those around us through their professional development.”

Mentor - William Rathke, FACHE; Mentee - Chris Surley; Mentor - Pam Stoyanoff

- Paul Aslin

- Justin Smith “I would say that my experience in the mentoring program was not only a good one but a great one. I enjoyed talking with John about topics that were specific to the hospital, as well as, the healthcare industry as a whole. This exposure to a real world setting was invaluable to me. I would recommend the mentoring program to all pursuing a path in Healthcare Management either at the undergraduate or graduate level.”

Baylor University Hosts - Tom Haines, FACHE and JL Radford-Williard; Committee Co-Chair, Jay Fox

- James Scott

Mentor, John O’Neill, FACHE; Mentee, James Scott

Mentor, Vivian Leopold; Committee Co-Chair, Jay Fox

Mentors Ron Coulter and Stephan Moore

Mentee, Leon Nguyen - Mentor, Amy Assenmacher, FACHE

Patty McCoy and Mentee Kim Hightower

A Publication of the American College of Healthcare Executives of North Texas Chapter | SPRING 2012

10

Summary

Will the Affordable Care Act Move Patient-Centeredness to Center Stage?

Timely Analysis of Immediate Health Policy Issues March 2012 Michael L. Millenson and Juliana Macri

Nearly a decade Institute integrated into the “core” instruments, and questions are under clinicaldesignated role for patient-reported Nearly a decade afterafter the the Institute of of Medicine “patient-centeredness” as one of six goals for a 21st century health development for specific areas of policy interest, such as patients’ information, where it begins to be Medicine designated “patientcare system, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) experiences with non-physician providers at medical groups.

The ACA also refers to patient collected inpublic standardized formats to centeredness” as the oneuse of of sixmeasures goals for a quality has mandated of the of care, engagement and shared decisionprovide ongoing 21st reporting, century health care system, the that reflect and performance payments this feedback ambitious about The ACA also refers to patient engagement and shared decisionmaking. Consumer advocacy groups treatment decisions.

These separate Patient and Affordable aim.Protection The law repeatedly refers to patient-centeredness, patient making.

Consumer advocacy groups talk about patient activation. talk about patient patient care, engagement, and However, distinctions among terms and their activation. relationships to one threads are intertwined in the ACA. Caresatisfaction, Act (ACA) has experience mandatedofthe usepatient However, distinctions among terms shared decision-making in its provisions.

Even when the law only another are often unclear in common usage.

Translating them into implementable of measures of the quality of care, and their relationships to one another uses the more general term “quality measures, ” patient-centered change is a critical challenge public reporting, and performance assessments are being required when these provisions are turned Although there are worries growthinofcommon patient-centered are about oftenthe unclear usage. providers face in meeting ACA payments that reflect this ambitious into regulations for specific programs. measurement and its costs as a result of the ACA, the law explicitly mandates. aim. The law repeatedly refers to seeks integration and alignment of measures other programs.

Although there arewith worries about the patient-centeredness, patientasking patients about emotional Although questionnaires In addition, there is growing evidence pointing to clinical and growth of patient-centered In patient satisfaction surveys, support, patient communication, and of “maintenance of [a hospital] cost benefits from these measures, including greater satisfaction, experience measurement and its costs aspatient a result patients rate care. go and backshared at least to the late 1950s, the In patient adherence to medical advice, fewer complaints and grievances, care,patient’s patientself-esteem” engagement, of the ACA, the law explicitly seeks experience of care surveys, on the context has changed The ACA requirements and similar fewer and less serious malpractice claims, and improvement in decision-making in itsradically. provisions. integration and alignment of measures hold in the private sector represent an unsung patient health and functional status outcomes.

Equally important, patients report what they Evenefforts whentaking the law only uses the more other hand, with other programs.

In addition, there transformation in the patient’s role based on three separate observed ideas. patients’ satisfaction objectively about their care with their care is a valuable outcome in and general term “quality measures,” is growing evidence pointing to of the itself.influence in an attempt to obviate patient-centered assessments The first is ethical, building onare thebeing concept of patient autonomy clinical and cost benefits from these of beneficence. prior expectations that are a required when these provisions are physician as a human right that supersedes The The ACA requires a “consensus-based entity” to provide input measures, including greater patient function of age, socioeconomic status second is the economic one of health care as a marketplace to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on the turned intoidea regulations for specific adherence to medical advice, fewer other of to surveys filled with consumers and providers weighingorcosts andfactors. benefits.The family measures be used, and the National Quality Forum has created programs. complaints and grievances, fewer and known as the Consumer Assessment The third idea is for an explicit clinical role for patient-reported a special Measure Applications Partnership to do so. This privateless serious claims, and information, where it begins in standardized public 366 malpractice possible measures for HHS of Healthcare Providers and partnership Systems has proposed Although questionnaires askingto be collected improvement in patient health and formats to provide feedback about ongoing treatment its 2012 rulemaking.

(CAHPS)decisions. has emergedtoasusea in common patients about emotional support, These separate threads are intertwined in the ACA. Translating functional status outcomes. Equally thread connecting disparate parts of communication, and “maintenance of them into implementable change is a critical challenge providers Timely Analysis of Immediate Health Policy Issues 2 important, patients’ satisfaction with the health care system Despite and will play a [a hospital] patient’s go face in meeting ACAself-esteem” mandates. government-led standardization, private firms continue their care is a valuable outcome in and critical role in assessing back at least to the late 1950s, the to the offerpatient surveys and consulting services. At the same time, webof itself. experience of care. CAHPS context has changed radically.

In patient satisfaction surveys,The patients rate care. In patient based entrepreneurs are bypassing traditional methods of of careand surveys, on efforts the other hand, patients report data requires and coulda one day exert a instruments are dividedcollecting into patient experience ACAexperience requirements similar The ACA “consensus-based what they objectively observed about their care in an attempt to powerful influence on consumers’ choice of providers. ambulatory surveys (including health taking hold in the private sector entity” to provide input to the obviate the influence of prior expectations that are a function of plans) and facilities surveys (for represent an unsung transformation in Department of Health and Human age, socioeconomic status or other factors. The family of surveys The increased emphasis on a patient-centered care system institutions such as hospitals). the patient’s role based on three Services (HHS) on the measures known as the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and resonates on many levels.

For example, a new definition to of be items, related to professionalism specific used, separate ideas.

Systems (CAHPS) has emerged as a commonSupplemental thread connecting physician proposed the American Board of and thebyNational Quality Forum conditions or role aspects of care, Medicine can be included disparate parts of the health care system and will play a critical Internal patient autonomy as one of three has created a special Measure The infirst is ethical, building on the assessing the patient experience of care. integrated CAHPS instruments fundamental principles.

There is also increasing into the “core” instruments, Applications Partnership acceptance to do so. concept of patient autonomysurveys as a (including are divided into ambulatory health plans) and of development previously foreign business concepts such as value-based and questions are under This private-public partnership has human rightsurveys that supersedes physician facilities (for institutions such as hospitals).

Supplemental competition based on customer needs. for specific areas of policy interest, proposed 366 possible measures for items, related specificidea conditions can be beneficence.

Thetosecond is the or aspects on page 12 suchofascare, patients’ experiences with HHS to use in its 2012continued rulemaking. economic one of health care as a non-physician providers at medical

A Publication of the American College of Healthcare Executives of North Texas Chapter | SPRING 2012

More broadly, chronic disease cannot be treated effectively without patient participation and cooperation. In a 2011 survey of nearly 800 hospitals, improving patient experience and patient satisfaction was picked as the second-highest priority (behind quality and safety) for the next year and the highest priority in the two years after that.

A serious and sustained effort to build a patient-centered health care system is starting to gain momentum. Still, while the ACA may signal a turning point, national health reform is an opportunity, not a guarantee. Rhetoric will need to be matched with funding for data collection, consensus building on measure use, and the integration, alignment, and harmonization of measures in different programs. And, of course, declarations of cultural change in hotel meeting rooms will have to be reflected in real changes in hospital and exam rooms.

The journey from aspirational to operational for patient-derived measures will not be a smooth road, but it is one that promises unique clinical, economic, and ethical gains. The rallying cry of the disability rights movement, “Nothing about us without us,” can be the model for a new paradigm of care delivery and continuous improvement. Though the process is still unfolding, providers and others are finally beginning to understand the profound impact of seeing health care “through the patient’s eyes.”

Timely Analysis of Immediate Health Policy Issues 3 The views expressed are those of the author and should not be attributed to any campaign or to the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, or the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.

About the Author and Acknowledgements Michael L. Millenson is the president of Health Quality Advisors LLC, the Mervin Shalowitz, MD, Visiting Scholar at Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management, and a senior policy consultant to the Urban Institute. Juliana Macri is a research assistant at the Urban Institute. The authors thank colleagues Robert Berenson, Kelly Devers, and Ellen Kurtzman at the Urban Institute and peer reviewers Susan Edgman-Levitan of the John D. Stoeckle Center for Primary Care Innovation, and Thomas Valuck of the National Quality Forum, for their many helpful comments and suggestions. This research was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

About the Urban Institute The Urban Institute is a nonprofit, nonpartisan policy research, and educational organization that examines the social, economic, and governance problems facing the nation.

About the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation focuses on the pressing health and health care issues facing our country. As the nation’s largest philanthropy devoted exclusively to health and health care, the Foundation works with a diverse group of organizations and individuals to identify solutions and achieve comprehensive, measurable and timely change. For 40 years the Foundation has brought experience, commitment and a rigorous, balanced approach to the problems that affect the health and health care of those it serves. When it comes to helping Americans lead healthier lives and get the care they need, the Foundation expects to make a difference in your lifetime. For more information, visit www.rwjf.org.

Reproduced with permission of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, NJ.

11

A Publication of the American College of Healthcare Executives of North Texas Chapter | SPRING 2012

12

NEWS FROM NATIONAL

2012 Fund for Innovation in Healthcare Leadership Education Programs

Foreign Hospital Partnership Directory Launched

The Fund’s 2012 ethics program, “The Ethics of Mission and Margin,” will be led by Richard A. Culbertson, PhD, professor of global health systems and development and of family medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, and offered on May 23 in conjunction with ACHE’s San Antonio Cluster. The half-day session will address the universal ethical and political challenges of balancing mission and margin, focusing on the interests of patients benefiting from services potentially detrimental to the organization’s fiscal performance; impact on the organization delivering primary and preventive care versus more lucrative specialty services; financial concerns of employers; and welfare of the community.

In development is the 2012 innovation program to be offered on Oct. 12 at ACHE’s Atlanta Cluster. Full details will be available soon at ache.org/Innovation.

Created as the result of a 2011 joint study by ACHE and the American Hospital Association, the Directory of U.S. Hospital Partnerships With Foreign Hospitals is composed of U.S. hospitals nationwide with a foreign hospital partnership. The purpose is to provide a key resource for U.S. hospitals seeking to initiate partnerships with foreign hospitals; hospitals listed in the directory have agreed to be contacted by those seeking more information about their partnership. Hospitals that have a foreign partnership and are not currently listed in the directory are encouraged to submit their partnership information on the page to be considered for inclusion.

The directory can be viewed under ACHE Resources on the homepage ofache.org.

Both programs qualify for ACHE Face-to-Face Education credits.

Board of Governors Exam Fee Waiver Promotion 2012 ACHE is pleased to offer once again the Board of Governors Exam fee waiver promotion to ACHE Members who apply for the FACHE® credential between March 1 and June 30. Members must submit their completed Fellow application and $250 application fee during the promotion period. Pending application approval, ACHE will waive the $200 Board of Governors Exam fee. All followup materials (i.e., references) must be submitted by Aug. 31, 2012, to receive the waiver. For more information on the promotion, go to ache.org/FACHE.

C

M

Y

CM

MY

CY

CMY

K

A Publication of the American College of Healthcare Executives of North Texas Chapter | SPRING 2012

13

According to a 2010 industry study conducted by HealthLeaders, nearly 47% of physicians rated marketing within their organization as “very strong” or “slightly strong.” No question that your physicians are in tune to your marketing efforts, especially as it relates to the competitors’ marketing activity.

While there are always physicians that have their own ideas of advertising headlines or suggestions for your logo, strategically, what the physicians really want is for their hospital partner to have a strong brand and effectively compete for share-of-voice in the market. I hope you’re finding physician support for your organization’s marketing efforts today.

I believe that to gain this support physicians first have to believe in what you’re doing; and fundamentally they have to perceive that your efforts are indeed building a stronger, more competitive brand.

So, how can you trigger that positive perception? Consider looking at your marketing activities through their eyes and leveraging the good work you’re already doing: First, define the brand for them. What does the logo signify? And the color theme? What’s the strategic rationale behind the tag line or service line messages? If they understand the back story to the marketing approach the perception can grow from a solid strategic base.

Leverage Your Marketing Success To Shore Up Physician Perception

By Ann Maloley, MBA, Lead Consultant Barlow/McCarthy A consulting firm specializing in hospital-physician relationship strategy

She can be reached at 402-301-3023 or amaloley@barlowmccarthy.com

No different than your Board members or employees, physicians like to see their hospital partner in the news, for good things. If your marketing department is dealing with budget constraints, likely they’re pushing for – and hopefully landing more – “earned” media opportunities. Physicians will applaud any print or broadcast story you get. Be sure they know about it. Show them clips.

Participating in high profile community events that support important causes brings great exposure to your facility. Internal stakeholders view it as an important contribution to the community as well as the hospital’s obligation. Be sure your physicians know about the event sponsorships, food drives, community events, etc. that your organization supports. And invite them to join in.

Physicians love a good patient story! One of the best things you can do for a physician is ensure that their patients have a positive experience, and then talk about it. Share positive patient satisfaction scores and heartwarming letters sent by patients with your physicians.

The same goes for clinical outcomes. Physicians want to know that they’re associated with a facility that matches their level of clinical expertise.

Be sure you don’t overlook physicians when you’re promoting good outcomes and other clinical data.

The work we put into reinforcing physicians’ positive perceptions of our organization is a good start to the process of earning more referrals.

Aligning with the ‘right’ organization is important to them.

One final thought to consider, look for opportunities to remind them of the residual benefits they gain from the hospital’s marketing efforts. Talk in terms of how your efforts to market the hospital can raise awareness and drive business to their practices as well. Having this conversation will make it easier for you next time you ask them to participate in a media interview or participate in a physician educational event.

When they’re involved and experience the positive impact directly they’ll feel a sense of ownership of the brand.

2012 CALENDAR

Wednesday, May 9th Breakfast with the CEO Time: 7:30 - 9:00am Location: Parkland Host: Tom Royer Thursday, May 24th Spring General Membership Meeting and Education Panel: Building the Hospital of Tomorrow Time: 5:30 - 8:00pm Location: NYLO Hotel | Irving Panelists: Kevin Stevenson,

Grand Prairie Healthcare Center

Winjie Tang Miao,

Texas Health Alliance

Walter Jones, Parkland

J. Exley Hill, AHFD Wednesday, June13th Breakfast with the CEO Time: 7:30 - 9:00 AM Thursday, June 21st Education: Using the Baldrige Criteria to Improve Your Organizations Performance and Quality Time: 5:30 - 7:30pm Location: Texas Health Fort Worth Thursday, July 19th Education: Patient Centered Medical Home Time:

5:30 - 9:00pm

Location:

Children’s Medical Center

Panelists:

Lister Robinson, MCNT

Peter Roberts, Children’s

Cheryl Camin, Winstead

Nora Esther Gimpel,

UT Southwestern

We are currently working on new educational and networking opportunities for 2012.

For the latest updates please check our website or watch your inbox for the event guide.

ACHE of North Texas thanks the following Corporate Sponsors for assisting the organization’s mission. By sponsoring various events throughout the year, these sponsors are provided local and national exposure with an opportunity to showcase their organization, brand, career opportunities, products and services to the ACHE membership and its affiliates.