Skip to main content

LMD October 23

Page 1

Riding Herd Saying things that need to be said. October 15, 2023 • www.aaalivestock.com

Volume 65 • No. 10

by LEE PITTS

While The Canary Still Sings The Least LEE PITTS

Y

ou’ve no doubt heard the metaphor about the canary in a coal mine. The phrase refers to the canaries that miners used to take with them into the coal mining tunnels as an early warning system against noxious fumes. It’s hard to know for sure but the phrase supposedly began being used after a deadly explosion in a Welsh coal mine in 1896. Afterwards an engineer named John Haldane invented a type of bird cage that allowed the miners to carry canaries deep into the tunnels of British coal mines. U s u a l l y, the tiny happy canaries spread joy wherever they went but because they’re much more sensitive than humans to the deadly carbon monoxide gas that was often found between coal seams, the small birds became the first carbon monoxide testers, not unlike the ones found in homes now days, except you don’t have to clean the cages of the newer models. Canaries are no longer needed in the mines but cattlemen sure could use a dependable canary in their coal mine. Some would argue that the proverbial canary in the coal mine for cattlemen is the sheep industry. Cattlemen had better hope not. The sheep industry isn’t dead yet in this country and the canary hasn’t died either, but it is in critical condition with a raspy and deadly smoker’s cough.

Mortgage Lifters

NEWSPAPER PRIORITY HANDLING

The

relationship

between

cattlemen and sheepherders in this country has been a rocky one. A century and a half ago cattlemen claimed that sheep overgrazed the lower-elevations in the West making the land unsuitable for cattle, while at the same time the sheepmen accused cattlemen of using up all the water and being the first to fence the western range. The sheepmen may have had a good case in court but the only pleading they did was too often at the end of a cattleman’s noose. For 150 years sheepmen called their sheep “mortgage lifters” and claimed they were far more profitable than the

reproductive efficiency, earlier puberty, a shorter gestation period, and more often had multiple births. Sheep are efficient foragers and can produce wool, milk and quality USDA inspected carcasses all on pasture alone but the one thing that sheep cannot do is create the demand for lamb that beef enjoys. And what demand the sheepmen do create is most often filled by foreign lamb, so even when they win, they lose.

Deader Than Disco

We’re not the only ones who think that sheep are beef’s canary in the coal mine. At the time I was writing this story Bill Bullard, The quickest way to the CEO of R-CALF USA, double your money is to came out with a timely essay fold it over and put it on the same subject. So, are back in your pocket. we to expect an R-LAMB splinter group in the future? cattle they shared the range No, that was not the purpose with. The sheep had greater of Bill’s column. It’s just that he too believes that sheep are the

canary in the coal mine for cattlemen and he backed it up with statistics that ranchers should find sobering.

■■ According

to Bullard, “The U.S. sheep industry, an industry representing the economic cornerstones of rural communities across America, has been decimated. Today 74 percent of the lamb meat in the domestic market comes from foreign countries. In just the past few decades the sheep industry in America lost 62 percent of its sheep, 60 percent of its full-time sheep producers, and the packing plants that manufacture lamb are operating at an estimated one-third to one-half capacity.”

■■ During the same time pe-

riod we were losing six out of every ten sheep producers Bullard said, “Imports of lamb and mutton into the United States from Australia and New Zealand increased 2,363 percent in dollar value and continued on page 2

USDA: Forests Converting to Carbon Emitters

The Green Drive to Reorganize Human Society

BY NICK SMITH, HEALTHY FORESTS, HEALTH COMMUNITIES

BY TOM DEWEESE / AMERICAN POLICY CENTER

A

report from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) finds American forests may convert from being carbon absorbers to significant carbon emitters. Researchers say the shift is due to the increasing destruction from natural disasters and the aging of forests, which is reducing their carbon-absorbing capabilities. Our forests currently absorb 11 percent of U.S carbon emissions, or 150 million metric tons of carbon a year, equivalent to the combined emissions from 40 coal power plants. However, starting in 2025, their ability to hold carbon may start plummeting and could emit up to 100 million metric tons of carbon a year as their emissions from decaying trees exceed their carbon absorption. Without action, forests could become a “substantial carbon source” by 2070, the USDA report says. Already, several states in the Western U.S. have incrementally emitted more carbon than they removed from the atmosphere each year, including those in Colorado, Idaho, Montana, New Mexico, Utah, Arizona, Nevada, South Dakota and Wyoming – states with large amounts of federally-owned forests. Untreated insect epidemics and disease are resulting in significant tree mortality, which directly contributes to massive carbon-emitting wildfires. In Colorado, for excontinued on page 3

I

t’s getting crazy out there. More and more of the policy proposals put out by the Green activists reveal their movement is more about forcing radical changes to our lifestyles and not about climate science or the environment. It’s like a religion where infidels must conform to their rites and rituals and heretics must be silenced. Each day they are pushing harder and faster to implement it all. They are moving to eliminate cheap, reliable energy and gain control over our food supply, ability to travel, housing choices, available jobs, and our personal lifestyle choices. How do they expect to accomplish all of that? Let me give you just a few of the most outrageous policies the radical Greens are promoting right now!

■■ Banning gas stoves: Yep, California is al-

ready leading on this one. The excuse – “NATURAL” gas is a danger to the NATURAL environment. So homeowners, restaurants, hotels, and anyone trying to cook their food will have to surrender their gas stoves to government regulations. Pizza just might be forced into the history books!

■■ Restrictions on Ice Cubes: You see, it takes

energy to make ice cubes…so the drive is on to end our unsustainable use of ice cubes. Scientific American magazine says it takes a lot of water and energy to make continued on page 4

Feast

I

n my neck of the woods every Saturday and Sunday from January through March is reserved for someone’s branding. So when it came time to brand my calves every available day was already spoken for. And no one dared jump on another rancher’s day for fear of being excommunicated. This meant that someone either had to die or quit ranching in order to claim their day. So for the first five years my wife and I had to brand our own calves which meant we worked them on a calf table. But please don’t tell anyone because this is a sin worse than jumping on someone’s branding day. We finally rose to number one on the waiting list and when a rancher sold out and moved to Nebraska we grabbed his day. This despite a hotly contested debate about whether the day actually belongs to a person or did it belong to the ranch? Lucky for us the new owner of the ranch wanted to raise yaks, buffalo and ostriches, which I don’t think require branding. So we got our own branding day although it was not a very desirable one, the last Sunday in March. This meant that a rustler would have three extra months to steal our “slick” calves and by the end of March even our poorly calves would be pushing 400 pounds and no one wants to wrestle those monsters. There has always been an informal competition amongst ranchers as to who could provide the best meal after all the calves were branded. This could get very expensive by the time the rancher filled his truck at COSTCO with beer, beans, beef and bread. There are two schools of thought, but the multi-generation ranchers believe you should spend the price of one calf on your branding dinner, while the more recent and richer ranchers say you should spend the price of two calves! There were only two exceptions: my friend Pete cheapened back by serving chicken, and myself, who believes you should spend the price of one leppy lamb. For our first branding I took the whole crew down to the Dairy Freeze and told them they could have any-

continued on page 3


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
LMD October 23 by Livestock Publishers - Issuu