Professional Training Report Jan2020 - July2020 - Niraj Kamal Karunanidhi by Niraj Kamal

PROFESSIONAL TRAINING REPORT JANUARY 2020 - JULY 2020

Niraj Kamal Karunanidhi B. Arch 4th yr (2016 - 2021)

Department of Architecture and Planning, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, India.

Title: Professional Training Report January 2020 to July 2020. Student: Niraj Kamal Karunanidhi, B. Arch 4th year, Department of Architecture and Planning, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee. nk@ar.iitr.ac.in niraj_kamal.karunanidhi@tu-dresden.de Organization(s): 1) WISSENSARCHITEKTUR - Laboratory of Knowledge Architecture, Technische Universitat Dresden, Dresden, Germany. (Research Internship, Professional Training) January 2020 to July 2020. Supervisor: Prof. Jörg Rainer Noennig 2) Ruairi O’Brien. Architecture. Light. Spatial Design., Dresden, Germany. (Voluntary Part-Time training) May 2020 to July 2020. Architect: Ruairi O’Brien. Supervisor and Guide: Prof. Jörg Rainer Noennig. Funding: DAAD; Technische Universitat Dresden. Programme: ARN 402: Professional Training, Department of Architecture and Planning, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee.

Cover: Karunanidhi, Niraj Kamal - Photo of public installation in Dresden Altstadt city centre.

To my family...

WISSENSARCHITEKTUR Laboratory of Knowledge Architecture

TU Dresden Fakultät Architektur 01062 Dresden

Bearbeiter:

Noennig

Tel / Fax:

0351 463-32210

E-Mail:

joerg.noennig@tu-dresden.de

Erstelldatum:

06.08.2020

INTERNSHIP COMPLETION CERTIFICATE This is to certify that Mr Niraj Kamal Karunanidhi studying Bachelor of Architecture at Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, India has completed his six months Professional Training at WISSENSARCHITEKTUR Laboratory of Knowledge Architecture, TU Dresden, from 13th January 2020 to 25th July 2020. During his Internship, he worked on various projects in Programmable materials, urban spaces, AI and Intelligent Architecture, and Architectural Design. He was exposed to various activities of research, and he learned to work in collaboration with various domains in the field. His association with us was very fruitful, and we are delighted to be a part of his professional career. He took key initiatives, and played an eminent role in research activities related to intelligent and programmable Architecture. We hope the international exposure he got during this Internship will broaden his horizon for his future endeavours.

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jörg Rainer Noennig Director WISSENSARCHITEKTUR Laboratory of Knowledge Architecture Technische Universität Dresden Professorship Digital City Science City Science Lab – A Cooperation with the MIT Media Lab HafenCity University Hamburg

Postadresse (Briefe) Technische Universität Dresden 01062 Dresden

Postadresse (Pakete u.ä.) Technische Universität Dresden Helmholtzstraße 10 01069 Dresden

Besucheradresse Zellescher W eg 17 BZW B EG, 008-012

Internet www.tu-dresden.de/ka

WISSENSARCHITEKTUR Laboratory of Knowledge Architecture

TU Dresden Fakultät Architektur 01062 Dresden

Bearbeiter:

Noennig

Tel / Fax:

0351 463-32210

E-Mail:

joerg.noennig@tu-dresden.de

Erstelldatum:

06.08.2020

TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN I, the undersigned, solemnly declare that this internship report contains the work that has been done by Mr. Niraj Kamal Karunanidhi during the tenure of his professional training/ research internship at WISSENSARCHITEKTUR Laboratory of Knowledge Architecture. All the information, illustrations, drawings and reference to the material provided in this report are true to the best of my knowledge. With kind regards,

Postadresse (Briefe) Technische Universität Dresden 01062 Dresden

Postadresse (Pakete u.ä.) Technische Universität Dresden Helmholtzstraße 10 01069 Dresden

Besucheradresse Zellescher W eg 17 BZW B EG, 008-012

Internet www.tu-dresden.de/ka

CONTENTS

Acknowledgements About Wissensarchitektur Laboratory of Knowledge Architecture. About Ruairi Oâ€™Brien. Architecture. Light. Spatial Design. The Journey Summary of Projects Architecture Projects Urban Design Projects Research Projects Conclusion and Final Reflection. Bibliography

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my Supervisor, Jorg Rainer Noennig. Thanks for introducing me to various incredible fields of digital and knowledge architecture, for teaching me how to handle research projects. Thanks for being supportive of my ambitions and ideas. My research is significantly influenced by collaborators and guides - Jorg Rainer Noennig, Sebastian Wisenhuetter, Martin Sobzyk, Thomas Wallmersperger, Konstantin Doll and Adam Urban. I am grateful for their passion, inspiration, and long talks about programmable and intelligent Architecture. Thank you for listening to my ideas, and collaborating. I am thankful to Ruairi O'Brien, for accepting me as a trainee, giving the opportunity to work on the architectural projects in their firm and introducing me to different architectural topics. I am thankful to Lars Joachim for his guidance, for being an extraordinary mentor in the office and for adjusting with my continually changing university schedules. During my internship at the KA lab, I had a chance to share the workspace with exceptional people. I thank all the members for sharing incredible moments: Jörg Rainer Noennig, Anja Jannack, Sebastian Wiesenhuetter, Konstantin Doll, Anja Beniko Lorenz, David Hick, Adam Urban, Benjamin Stelzle, Michael Kelber, Xiaoping Xie, Olga Kyselova, Malgorzata Flickschu, Isabelle Bartl(esp. for teaching phrases and fowl words in German), Torsten Holmer, Matthias Hauschild, Fabrice Naumann, Florian Saegebrecht, Hong Trang, Linh Vu, Andreas Wilde, Milliena, Vincent Paul Kanig. Thank you for making my life easier at TUD. I thank Nikhil Duggal for virtually collaborating in a project under short notice, for his energetic participation and contribution. Sincere thanks to the TU Dresden International office- Cornelia Hesse, Lieselotte Landgraf-Dietz, and Luise Thalheim, and DAAD, for helping me with the funding and for being very supportive during the pandemic, extending the funding. This wouldn't have been possible without your support. I thank the internship program coordinator, Gaurav Raheja, for supporting, guiding and helping us during the internship, especially during the crisis. I would like to thank professor Smriti Saraswat, Rabi Narayan Mohanty for their incredible support and guidance when I was lost, struggling with visa issues. Thanks to professor Rajasekhar for supporting my crazy ideas and insightful discussions at IITR. I extend my sincere gratitude to all the professors of the architecture department - Avlokita Agrawal, Rita Ahuja, Sonal Atreya, P.S. Chani, Ila Gupta, Saptarshi Kolay, Ram Sateesh Pasupuleti, Tina Pujara, Gaurav Raheja, Rajasekar Elangovan, Uttam Kumar Roy, Subhajit Sadhukhan, Smriti Saraswat, Manavi Suneja, Harshit Sosan Lakra, Pushp Lata, Mahua Mukherjee. , and all the supervisors, faculty. , for tolerating us for four years, imparting invaluable knowledge, guiding us, and for sharing memorable moments during classes, batch trips, and in the department, in IIT Roorkee. I thank the head of department P.S.Chani, Dean International Relations-Arumugam and Director Ajit K Chaturvedi, IITR for their efforts to help me during the crisis. I am very grateful to Manoj(IITRHF) and IITRHF for their sincere efforts to support the internship and during the crisis. I am thankful to my close friend and classmate, Jaswant Parihar for being a good company in Dresden, for introducing me to architect Dirk Friedrich Sehmsdorf, and to his friends with whom I had a wonderful time. I thank Dirk, and his family for the memorable moments during dinners, and insightful discussions. I thank very good friends, Savarna and her family for their support. Sincere thanks to Krishnamoorthy and his family in Delhi, for helping me out. I thank all the amazing friends I met here in Dresden, at Fritz-16, for the dinners, improv trips and wonderful moments. I thank the incredible people I met in IIT Roorkee, seniors and my batchmates for bringing all the vital doses of fun while learning and sharing a ton of knowledge. I am grateful to my mentor, Pal for motivating, encouraging, guiding me through every stage of this journey, and shining his wisdom on me. I am eternally grateful to my amazing family for their unconditional love and their mental support during the long days in ‘home office’, for sharing fun and memorable moments, and staying connected ‘virtually’ during this incredible journey. Thanks to my parents for encouraging me to do whatever I like and helping me with all my crazy ideas. Dresden, August 2020.

The WISSENSARCHITEKTUR Laboratory of Knowledge Architecture is an interdisciplinary think-tank conducting research, design, and consultation at the intersection of design and social sciences. The lab explores the multiple cross-links between environmental structures (spaces, buildings, cities), and knowledge processes (innovation, creativity, co-operation). To investigate knowledge dynamics in space, the lab creates visualisation and modelling tools, and applies them in academic training as well as in professional practice.

LAB UNITS

Participation and Co-creation / Co-design

Innovation and Startup Design

Spatial Robotics and Bionics

Collaborative Workplaces

Digital Future City

Design Planning

PROF. Jörg Rainer NOENNIG LAB DIRECTOR, ARCHITECT

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jörg Rainer NOENNIG is Professor for Digital City Science at the CityScienceLab- A Co-operation with the MIT Media Lab, at Hafencity Universität Hamburg and the Director of the WISSENSARCHITEKTUR Laboratory of Knowledge Architecture at TU Dresden. From 1992 to 1998, he studied architecture at Bauhaus Universität in Weimar- his birthplace, Polytech Krakow and Waseda University Tokyo. Between 1998 and 2001 he practised as an architect in Tokyo, among others at Ishiyama Experimental Underground Architecture Factory, at Arata Isozaki & Associates, and as a freelance architect. From 2001 he was Research Associate at TU Dresden, where he was appointed Junior Professor for Knowledge Architecture (2009-2015). In 2007 he received his doctoral degree from Bauhaus Universität Weimar. He taught at different universities in Japan, USA, China, Italy, Switzerland and Angola, and was a Visiting Professor at Universit Degli Studi dell l´Aquila, ISEN Toulon and Voronezh State Technical University. He has published several books and more than 100 scientific papers and essays. He has won several prizes, scholarships and awards, including the Grand Prize of the European Association for Architecture Education (EAAE).

RuairĂ O'Brien. Architecture. Light. Space art. - The artistic-interdisciplinary architecture firm holistically combines the areas of architecture - building construction, lighting planning, interior design, urban development and open space planning, monument protection and exhibition design. The firm is known for its lighting design, and very cost-effective modular housing buildings. The firm is in the same building as the Erich Kistner Museum in Dresden which they had designed.

Ar. Ruairí O'Brien ARCHITECT

Ruairí O'Brien studied architecture and light at universities in London, Edinburgh and New York and worked for various architecture firms in England, the USA and Germany before he founded his own office in Dresden in 1995 : Ruairí O'Brien. Architecture. Light. Space art. In 2010, he founded the lighting design company Archevolucio Lighting Design Ltd. in London and Dresden. He also worked on a variety of innovative, cost-effective buildings, light and light art projects, sculptures, installations, and projects related to the cultural and historical heritage of the past. In 2003 he founded the light poetry festival «Light and Word» in Dresden. He has a substitutive professorship for architecture and light at the Wismar University of Applied Sciences. He played a key role as coordinator of the international master’s course in Architectural Lighting Design and helped the program to achieve full accreditation in 2005. He regularly teaches at various universities in Germany and abroad, including in the Czech Republic and Russia. In 2014 he founded the «Mobile School of Lighting Design», a project that brings the learning of lighting planning/lighting design to a global public in an innovative and mobile form. He is one of the founding members of the Federation of International Lighting Designers, founded in 2014, and served on the board as Vice President of the professional association until the end of 2018. Since 2017 he is the Associate Professor and Head of Architecture and Visual Design Department at the German University in Cairo - GUC active.

The Journey

I first heard about Prof. Jorg, when he gave a lecture on Digital Architecture during the Bauhaus@100 event in IIT Roorkee. Thanks to Professors Gaurav Raheja, P.S. Chani, and Smriti Saraswat for organising the event. My classmate Jaswant Parihar, kept mentioning about this lecture. I was interested in the technological aspects of Architecture and strategical methods in planning. It's an irony that I draw and design a lot while solving physics problems, and vice-versa - both the activities simulate me a lot. I worked with Prof. Rajasekhar in the NetZed lab-IITR, on exciting and very technical projects in Architecture, which involved a ton of coding and math. Thanks to him for supporting my ideas. I also worked on a project with Ar. Suhasini Ayer during December 2019, on the analytical thermal comfort study of Humanscapes, Auroville. I had a wonderful time, and I realised that I also needed the vital dose of the artistic, and creative aspects in work to keep myself motivated - I needed the balance. This was when I decided to send an email to Jorg. He replied immediately sharing about the labâ€™s projects. I realised that it is a perfect place for me. It was my first time applying for a foreign visa. With the help of Prof. Jorg, Prof. Smriti Saraswat, Prof. Gaurav Raheja, Rabi Mohanty, and TUD international office who guided me with the visa, I was able to reach Germany on time. The lab is interdisciplinary, and it is an academic atmosphere, so I can work on my crazy ideas without risking anything much. The analytical approach to architectural designs was fascinating. I learnt a lot beyond that, to organise everything around my self. I realised on the first day that no one will be assigning tasks for me, or setting any deadlines. I had to either take up initiatives on my own ideas, or be aware of what others are doing, and propose to collaborate with them. I had to keep my own deadlines and meet them. Jorg and the colleagues at the lab were very supportive whenever I got lost, and always opening up on various opportunities to work on projects available from time to time. I learnt a lot working on research projects, especially patterns in both in architectural design and in geometry. I spent a big chunk of time in January in the SLUB maker space, an annex right below the lab, where all the laser cutters and 3D printers were located. When I had finally fixed with my time plan, Germany was hit with the outbreak. Although the home office was not very efficient in my case, the long days gave me time to think, structure my thoughts and write the first draft of a research paper. Prof. Jorg was very supportive and encouraging, guiding me through it. I also had to improvise by finding opportunities to take up architectural projects, since the project we decided in the lab (Kyiv NAUPROSTIR) was delayed due to the crisis. Prof. Jorg supported my decision to take up a voluntary part-time training, and I mailed a few firms in Dresden. Lars Joachim and Ruairi Oâ€™Brien replied, I met them, and I liked their way of work. I also liked the firmâ€™s atmosphere, it is in the same building as the Erich Kastner museum which the firm designed, right above it. The projects were interdisciplinary, I volunteered as a primary trainee. I learnt a host of new software used by the firm. Lars, the project manager, made the problems in sequencing and organising the tasks feel impossibly simple, and agile. It is a small but efficient team with Ruairi, Lars and me, working during the crisis, so I was given diverse tasks to do. I learnt a lot about the history of buildings in Europe, its architecture, and also about the importance of lighting. I met a lot of amazing people in Dresden, had a wonderful time, with all the improv plans and dinners. I am currently continuing the work on my research publications. The architecture of Dresden is merely jaw-dropping. I will never forget the long walks every day from the firm (new city centre) to my room (old city centre), walking through the bridges and castles of Dresden, crossing the Elbe river. Research Intern (KA) Jan

2020

Feb

Mar

Apr Home Office

May

Jun

Jul

Part-time training

SUMMARY OF PROJECTS

My contribution, self evaluation

Architecture Client Meetings

Analysis

Design Concept

CAD Drawings

Modelling

Visualization

Site Visit

Annenhoefe Office Space Hoheneck Prison Museum (concept) Volksolidaritat Trachenberge Kiev NAUPROSTIR**

Urban Design Analysis

Concept

Planning

Drawings

Modelling

Visualization

Neustadt Urban Guidance System Urban Mobility Study - Chemnitz Urban Stage Design Potsdam Berlin War Memorial

Research Conception

Brainstorming

Review

Authoring

Prototypes

Simulations

Visualization

Project ADAM (Programmable Materials)** SCORE Resilience for Coronavirus.

Workshops/ Brainstorming Study on German Standards for Office Spaces AI and Architecture

** Project is being continued/ extended.

Illustration method credits: Divyang Purkayastha

ARCHITECTURE PROJECTS

ANNENHÖFE

HOHENECK PRISON MUSEUM

VOLKSSOLIDARITÄT TRACHENBERGE

KYIV NAUPROSTIR (PROPOSAL)

ANNENHÖFE

A 2000 sq.m office space for a leading international IT Company, in Dresden.

Client: (Undisclosed) A leading International IT Company. Location: Postplatz, Dresden, Saxony Architect: Ruairí O’Brien. Architecture. Light. Spatial Design., TLG Immobilien AG. - Knerer und Lang Architeckten. Plot Area: 7400 Sq.m Status: Under Construction, to be completed in 2021.

Img - 1.1

Brief: This project is a Large Scale 2300 Sq.m office and R&D space for an international IT company (like Intel). The office comprises of working area for 115 employees, R&D laboratories, and leisure, and reception spaces for visitors. The R&D facility and workspace needed special Faraday shielding and had to be highly secluded while having an excellent working atmosphere.

Site: The site is in the heart of Dresden, Postplatz and in close proximity to the Zwinger palace. It is a modern inner-city office space right in the historic old town.

1 2

Challenges: The office planning needs to stick to the German laws. The space needs a spacial protocol program to work even during a pandemic.

Img - 1.2 1

The R&D facility and workspace has to be secluded. The design of toilets and kitchens should be cost effective, and efficiently connected to the plumbing ducts. There needs to be showering facilities for employees who use bicycles.

Img - 1.3 2

The office needs to be balanced with nooks, leisure spaces etc. The reverberation time should not exceed 1.5 seconds.

Img - 1.4

My contribution: I contributed to the design, planning, and modelling of the 2300 Sq.m office space, and R&D facility. The total plot area is 7400Sq.m. I was also involved in the multiple revisions of the design. Room Plan

Spacial Layout

Archicad Model and Visualization

Workflow: RuairĂ O'Brien was responsible for the planning of the tenant's room programme layout, which was coordinated with the developer/landlord (TLG) to define the requirements and standards for the office space.

Img - 1.5 Interior Office Space

Img - 1.6 Interior Teekuche Img - 1.7 View from South West Side

TYPICAL FLOOR

Default Floor Plan, Floor Area - 3500 Sq.m.

ACOUSTICS Internal walls, and wall cladding: Drywall / metal stud wall Knauf W112, Clad - Double planked on both sides, 4cm mineral wool Sound reduction index R'wR = 45 dB Doors: Rw = 32dB to R'w = 27dB

Reverberation time: For private offices, the RT is less than 1 second. For the meeting rooms, the reverberation time is less than 1.5 seconds. For confidential conversations, and in systems laboratory, the reverberation time is below 0.5 seconds.

The stairwells of the building divide the floor plates into zones, and are to be built using firewalls, which compartmentalise the building. This makes the space flexible, thus offering more options and orientations to choose from.

Acoustic Panels for Ceiling:

Acoustic panels were chosen for the ceiling, due to the aesthetics and cost effectiveness. The Reverberation time calculated to be ~1 second. 4 White Noise A gridded speaker plan was chosen mainly for generating white noise and other multimedia purposes

GES

WÄN DE

E12

/Ö

1,36

E11

25 5,41 5

2,95

025

E10

6,20

8,50

6,20

5,4 5 1

Fah

rra

dste

5,41 5

llplä

5,40

tze

8,6

-1.2 Fah 2

F= rrad 54,1 ab U= 29,8 8m² stellra 8m

33,16 5

um -1.2 Fah 3

7,07 5

F= rrad 54 U= ,85m abste 30,1 ² llra 0m um

5,40

5,41 5

31 F

1,0 2,1

ahrr

1,0 1

adst

15,64 5

ellp

lätz

60 Fa

2,50

17,9 25

2,13

1,01

132

2,1 3

dste

5,05

5,40

hrra

tze

10,0 0%

2,52 5

-1.24 Fahr

F= 10 radabs U= 44 0,05m² tellrau m ,68m

130 25

11,58%

2,52 5

5,10

5,40

9,72 %

2,52 5

llplä

3,52 5

5,15

1,01 2,13

1,57 5

= 13

25 25

2,85

F= 50,73m² U= 40,82m

1,01

Au F= fzugss 4,08 ch Ka m² acht 1,10 binen mx2 innen ,10m maß

2,85

2,13

8,75

2,13

8,00

1,01

4 3 2

-1.0 Tre 9

2,525

5,05

3,005

20 35

5,00

18 6,90

2,52

5,40

88,4 45

5,00

2,00

C 19

5,05

20,5 5

5,02 5

5,40

9,595

37 5

6,025

E 1

18 /28

F= ppe U= 23,4 nha 27,6 2m² us 5 6m

Stg.

18 /28

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Stg.

6,025

2,00

10 9

5,40

Sc F= hach 2,35 t m²

OK De RFB ck = UK e d=32-5.0 0 RD = -5 cm m .32 m

m ,50m ²

-1.1 Sc 0 F= hleu U 8,23 se

11,27%

-1.19 Technik

5,15

5,40

1,01 2,13

5,40

5 3,35

5,40

7,44

125 5,22

5,40

60 1,10

2,52

5,00

40 5,00

3,30

2,52

5,40

5 2,52

C 35

5,05

5 3,00

7,09

2,52

J2 F= 4567,61m² U= 674,59m

2,52 25

25 25

2,525

ngF= 7,trauchu TG79m² ngss ch

acht

18 /28

2,525

3,005

2,88

6,97

5,10

10,9 25

-1.0 Tre 7

7,70

7,45

F= ppe U= 23,4 nha 27,6 2m² us 4 6m

65 5,00

60 5,00

Sc ha ch F= 2,35 t m²

15 2,525

2,525

5 2,52

0 35

5 2,52

2,52

2,525

2,52

5 2,52

2,525

5,40

2,525

5 2,52

5,40

1,57

2,20

6,75

Au F= fzug 4,08 ssch Ka m² acht 1,10 binen mx2 innen ,10m maß

1,01 2,13

5,40

OK De RFB ck = UK e d=32-5.0 0 RD = -5 cm m .32 m

= 13

m ,50m ²

-1.0 Sc 8 F= hleu U 8,25 se

18 /28

5,00

50 Stg.

7 5,15

Stg.

5,00

10 8

1,01 2,13

5,15

5,40

2 F1

chu

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

2,85

trau

2,70

2,85

F11

5,40

7,15

6,325

-1.21 Tiefgarage

2,17

6,325

8,60

3,50 6,00

8,10

6,00

2,52

5 2,52

2,52

6,84

0 35

2,525

70 5,00

2,52

5,00

5,05

5,40

2,52

2,525

22,3 5

120

3,52

5,05

6,65

5,05

8,70

2,52 5,40

7,445

2,525

A8`

A9`

A10`

A11`

2,52

350

2,52

5 2,52

2,52

5 2,52

2,52

5 2,52

2,52

5 2,52

2,52

5 2,52

5 3,00

6,97

6,45

7,25

6,45

4,625

1,01 2,13

6,45

-1.1 HA 8

2,52

2,00

UKRD = -5.32 m

,45

0 15,5

3,07

2,13

1,01

5 5,15 5

1,01 2,13

10 Stg. 18/28

20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

2,85

5,10

5,15

2,85

5 3,52

1,38

105

1,01

-1.04 Schleuse F= 8,24m² U= 13,50m

5,15

F= 23,04m² U= 27,66m

2,13

2,52

Schacht F= 2,35m²

-1.03 Treppenhaus 2

F= 8,24m² U= 13,50m

5,10

5 2,87

2,00

5,05

2,00

5,05

2,00

2,85

5,15

5,10

5,05

4,905

2,85

5,15

5,10

5,05

5 4,90

4,90

5,40

72,42

0 15,5

3,01

3,075

Aufzugsschacht F= 4,08m²

UKRD = -5.32 m 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12

110 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

F= 23,42m² U= 35,40m

3,015

2,57

8,75

6 OKRFB = -5.00 m Decke d=32 cm

-1.05 Treppenhaus 3

-1.06 Schleuse

2,00

OKRFB = -5.00 m Decke d=32 cm

10 Stg. 18/28

Aufzugsschacht F= 4,08m² Kabineninnenmaß 1,10mx2,10m

Schacht F= 2,35m²

2,13

8,75

1,01

5 1,57

6,45

2,13

3,52

1,01

Kabineninnenmaß 1,10mx2,10m

2,13

11 Stg. 17,8/28

-1.1 ern 7

F= w U= 65,3 ärm 33,9 8m² e 2m

3,07

1,01

12 Stg. 17,8/28

F= R W U= 25,21m ass 20,7 er ² 2m

25 25

5,155

2,52

3,88

5 2,52

2,525

3,88

115

5,36

2,52

95 2,525

A7`

5,00

A6`

A5`

5,00

2,52

A4`

A10

A11

A12

5,415 8,265

2,85

25 5,415

5,16

5,415

GESAMTMASS

2,13

WÄNDE

39 ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

6,055

D9 G

6,25

-1.14 Technik

6,25

1 5,40

Kabineninn 1,10mx2,10 enmaß m Aufzugs F= 4,08 schacht m²

25 14

25 14 0

1,01

855

6,055

OKRFB Decke = -5.00 m d=32 cm UKRD = -5.32 m

nhaus 6

F= 37,83m² U= 24,62m

-1.25 Ram

2,13

14,60m² 19,21m

us 6

5,415

15,895

-1.12 Treppe

-1.11 Treppe nha

F= 5,26 m² U= 9,40 m

ACHSEN

5,415

-1.13 Schleu se

F= 8,59 m² U= 13,7 6m

1,01 2,13

Schach F= 2,35 t m²

10 Stg.

8 + 10

17,9/28

Stg. 17,9 /28

1,01

15,895

18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 F= 9 U=

2,13

1,01

19 20 121 2 22 3 23 4 24 5 25 6 26 7 27 8 28

WÄNDE

ACHSEN

E4 25

GESAMTMASS

8,12 5

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

64,49 5

F= 22 pe U= 78 7,99m² ,78m

5,37

4,995

4,625

5,05

9,73%

2,525

5,40

3,10

7,70

2,40

3,60

5,40

2,525

7,35

5,40

6,90

2,525

5,05

F= 144,95m² U= 62,78m

5,05

-1.20 Lager / Technik

5,40

2,525

5,40

6,065

4,82

235

5,40

35 5,645

2,75

10,00%

2,75

5,43

10,325

J5 UZ Stahlverbundträger

5,10

2,525

2,775

BODENDURCHBRUCH (BD)

WANDDURCHBRUCH (WD)

OK FFB

OK RD

DECKENDURCHBRUCH (DD)

WANDSCHLITZ (WS)

UK FD

UK RD

SCHRAFFUREN

45,20

2,525

2,85

2,50

STB BESTAND

STB

WU-BETON

FEUERHEMMEND (F30)

MW BESTAND

BETON UNBEW. / ESTRICH

FEUERBESTÄNDIG (F90)

PUTZ BEST.

PUTZ

BT-FERTIGTEIL

BRANDWAND

WERKSTEIN BEST.

WERKSTEIN

HOLZ

UHD

TROCKENBAU BEST.

TROCKENBAU

WÄRMEDÄMMUNG

ABBRUCH

1,85

5,40

7,78

UZ Stahlverbundträger

5,05

= 112,66 m NHN

2,525

8,60

6,30

HÖHENBEZUG ± 0.00:

SYMBOLE

5,40

2,52

5,05

5 2,52

5,05

5 2,52

LEGENDE

5,40

5 2,52

5,05

5 2,52

2,50

5,40

1,98

2,525

UZ Stahlverbundträger

2,525

14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

14 Stg. 17,9/28

2 35

2,13

5,40

2,13

5,40

2,425 1,01

2,13

F= 16,69m² U= 20,46m

PROJEKT

1,01

5,05

1,01

F= 9,07m² U= 13,20m

-1.01 Treppenhaus 1

1,01

MK4 - NEUBAU BÜROGEBÄUDE "ANNENHÖFE"

8,60

FREIBERGER STRAßE/ SCHWERINER STRAßE, 01067 DRESDEN

6,10

5,40

8,60

2,13

BAUHERR

F= 235,29m² U= 81,65m

5,05

6,075

25 14

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

5,10

5,05

6,075

WÄNDE

0 39 0 71

5,40

1,675

5 25 14 58 25

14 25

5,10

0 5 25 14 58 25

5,40

B01 GESAMTMASS

ACHSEN

WÄNDE

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

B02

B03

A03

17,45

100

GESAMTMASS

5,40

5,05

LAGEPLAN / GEBÄUDEÜBERSICHT

ACHSEN

28,70

6,255

TLG IMMOBILIEN AG BUDAPESTER STRAßE 3, 01069 DRESDEN

1,71

5 6,55

14 25

3,70

Schacht F= 2,59m²

-1.15 Technik

5,40

5,05

A04

A01

A02 24,36 35

5,40

4,625

5 1,55

5,00

6,55 14 25

-1.16 Technik

6,325

1,05

F= 41,43m² U= 25,75m

25 14

5 6,32

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

25 14 1,10

WÄNDE

ACHSEN

GESAMTMASS

A14

ACHSEN

GESAMTMASS

WÄNDE

5,40

PLANINHALT

MASSSTAB

GRUNDRISS TG-1

1:400

TYPICAL BASEMENT PLAN

5,40

6,55 14 25

5 6,57

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

-1.02 Schleuse

OKRFB = -5.00 m Decke d=32 cm UKRD = -5.32 m

Kabineninnenmaß 1,10mx2,10m Aufzugsschacht F= 4,08m²

2,425

35 4,95

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Schacht F= 3,18m²

2,425

15 14 Stg. 17,9/28

GES

WÄN DE

E12

/Ö

1,70

58 5

2,10 5,40

3,02

3,93 5

3,53 5

E11

58 5

E10

4,60 5,60

-1.40

111,2

5,4

6 NH

5,40

4,6 0 5,6 0 4,60 5,60

5,40

4,60 5,60

F= rrad 129, ab U= 56,1 51m² stell ra 6m

33,15

5,40

4,60 5,60

72 F ahrr adst ellp lätz e

F= h U= 271, rt TG 95,9 95m 8m ²

5,40 80

4,60 5,60

5,40

0.1 6 Fah

10,2 5

-1.40

10,0

11,58%

41 5

2,75

4,60

5,60 5,11 5

11,27%

5,21

FF 1,35 2,90

m OK 0,8 H: BR

1,35 12 5

FF 1,35 4,80 2,57 5

m OK 0,8 H: BR

12 5 62,6 9

FF 1,35 2,90 2,57 5

0,8 H:

585 1,35

2,90

3,36

12 5

112.04

12 5

2,90

1,35

2,90

1,35 1,35 1,35

112.04

m OK

0,8 H:

1,35

-0.60 m = 112,06 NHN

1,35

2,90

1,35 BR

6,845 2,26

112.04

12 5

H: 0,8 m 1,35 OKFF 2,90

1,35

12 5

BR H: 0,8 m 1,35 OKFF 2,90 2,57 5

1,35

1,2

1,35

111.24

2,90

= 11 m -1.4 0

1,35

3,70 2,05

2,90

1,35

H: 0,8 m 1,35 OKFF 2,90

1,35

m 1,35 OKFF 2,90

1,35 1,35

2,90

1,35

A5`

1,35

125

5,21

1,35

3,70

1,35

A6` 2,575 1,35

125 1,35

2,575 1,35

A7`

125

2,575

1,35

125

2,575

1,35

125

1,35

A8`

45,86 2,575 1,35

125

2,575

1,35

125

A9`

5,215

1,35

2,90

BRH: 0,3 m OKFF

Teeküche F= 12,17m²

Serverraum F= 12,17m²

Büro - 1 AP F= 12,17m²

A10` 2,05

1,35

2,90

1,35

2,95 1,35

A11` 8,345

1,35

3,20

1,35

2,90

1,35

2,90

1,35

2,90

0.03 MIETEINHEIT F= 593,80m² U= 154,06m

5 1,04

1,35 2,90

111.74

112.04

5,40

111.24

1,35

2,90

2,05

1,35

2,96

2,95

A4`

6,10

4,60 5,60

5,40

1,35

BR H: 0,8 m 1,35 OKFF 2,90 13,4 0

1,35

2,90

0,8 BR

4,60 5,60

26,4 8

5,40

1,35

24,60

2,95

m 1,35 OKFF 2,90

1,35

0,8

Sc ha ch F= 2,47 t m²

1,35

WC F= H 6,74 m²

2,90

WC F= H 5,95 m

4,60 5,60

1,07 5 FF

19 5

m OK 0,8

1,35 4,80

BR H:

5,21 5

1,35 0,8 1,35 25

FF m OK 0,8

1,35 3, 2,05 70

-1.4 0m H: 0,8 m 1,35 OKFF 2,90

1,35

5,21

1,35

0.1 Du 1

F= rch U= 15,34mgan 19,3 ² g 4 0m

Sc F= hach 2,35 t m²

111.24

1,35 2,90

Au F= fzug 4,08 ssch Ka m² acht 1,10 binen mx2 innen ,10m maß

43,76

WC F= D 11,5 3m

Sc F= hach 2,47 t m²

5,40

BR H: 0,8 m 1,35 OKFF 2,90 2,57 5 H:

4 1

WC F= D 4,16 m²

6 NH

4,60 5,60

5,40

OK d=28FFB cm = -1.4 OK 0m De RFB UK cke d= = -1.6 RF B = 32 cm8 m -2.0 0m

66 5 3,48

1,35

hau

,7 29,0 3m² 5m

Bü ro F= 12,1 1 AP 7m ²

Pu M F= i 3,12 m

,8/2

1,35 4,80 2,57 5

,8/2 8

m OK

8 -1.4

= 11

1,2

3,10

6 NH

4,60

2 F1

Stg.

17,8 /28

Stg.

0,8

12 11 10

5,40

Stg.

Bü ro F= 12,1 1 AP 7m ²

acht

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 12

En tra F= uc 7,80 hung m² ssch TG

111.24

4,60 5,60 2,85 25 2,05

Lauf

66 5 3,48

1,35

Bü ro F= 12,1 1 AP 7m ²

m OK

5,40

F11

3,88

12 5

4,60 5,60

F= TE U= 298,43 INH 96,9 m EIT 0m ² 4

Ser F= verrau 12,1 m 7m ²

OK d= FFB 28 = cm -1.4 OK 0m De RFB UK cke d= = -1 .6 RF B = 32 cm8 m -2.0 0m

0.1 MIE 2

4,60 5,60

5,40

Bü ro F= 12,1 1 AP 7m ²

0.1 Tre 0 F= pp 24 en

66 5

1,35

Tee F= küch 12,1 e 7m ²

1,35

BR H: 0,8 m 1,35 OKFF 2,90 2,57 5

5,40

89,0 9

20,5 5

WC F= H 11,5 3m

Bü ro F= 12 14 A 7,91 P m² Flu r F= 48,1

uchu

66 5 3,48

2,95

BR H: N = 11

80 80

Pu M F= i 3,12 m²

23,35

1,2

6 NH

Sc F= hach 2,47 t m²

66 5 3,48

1,35 2,90

4 3

0.1 Du 4

4,60 5,60

Lag F= er 7,15 m²

F= rch U= 15,3 gan 19,3 4m² g 4 0m

17 ,8/2 8

5,40

Stg.

BR H:

8 7 6

m²

Stg. 17 ,8/2 17,8 8 /28

Stg.

3,48

m OK

WC F= 5,68

10 9 Lauf

12 11

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

66 5 3,48

3,88

Sc F= hach 2,47 t m²

1,35 2,90

aus

3m ,05m ²

3,88

1,35

2,85 4,60 5,60

5,40

= 29

66 5 3,48

6 NH

4,60

1,2 = 11 -1.4

2,05 80

Sc ha ch F= 2,35 t m²

111.24

Ver F= kaufs 70,2 rau 1m m ²

WC F= H 4,16 m

tra

3,48

OK d= FFB 28 = cm -1.4 OK 0m De RFB UK cke d= = -1 .6 RF B = 32 cm8 m -2.0 0m

Au F= fzug 4,08 ssch Ka m² acht 1,10 binen mx2 innen ,10m maß

0.1 Tre 3 F= pp e U 24,7 nh

66 5

25 80 3,10 5,40

F6 C

4,60 5,60

1,3 5 9

0.1 MIE 5

F= TE U= 84,3 INH 56,4 6m² EIT 3m 5

OK d= FFB 28 = cm -1.4 OK 0m De RFB UK cke d== -1 .6 RF B = 32 cm8 m -2.0 0m

NHN

2,75

9,72 %

18 5

ahrt

111,26

0.17 Tran

= 11 1,2

6 NH

4,60 5,60

-1.4 0

Einf

F= gan U= 61,6 g Ho 36,0 4m² f 0m

5,21 5

5,40

F= 62 sformat oren U= 43 ,20m² ,27m

hrt

5,12 5

5,40

sfa

-0.90 m = 111,76 NHN

WC H F= 11,53m²

WC H F= 6,74m²

WC D F= 11,53m²

WC H F= 4,16m²

Aufzugsschacht F= 4,08m²

0.07 Treppenhaus 3 OKFFB = -1.40 m d=28 cm

15,9

50 5,4,60

F= 24,73m² U= 29,06m

OKRFB = -1.68 m Decke d=32 cm UKRFB = -2.00 m

WC D F= 4,16m²

WC H F= 5,95m²

F= 15,34m² U= 19,30m

Schacht F= 2,47m²

Kreativwerkstatt-AP 38 F= 546,14m² OKFFB = -0.90 m d=28 cm

Flur F= 48,15m²

-0.90 m = 111,76 NHN

2 Stg. 15/45 -0.60 m = 112,06 NHN

OKRFB = -1.18 m Decke d=32 cm UKRFB = -1.50 m

0.06 MIETEINHEIT 2

24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13

F= 308,23m² U= 94,13m

22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12

Büro - 16 AP F= 137,69m²

Kabineninnenmaß 1,10mx2,10m

11 Stg. 17,9/28

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

3. Lauf 12 Stg. 17,8/28

Kabineninnenmaß 1,10mx2,10m

Schacht F= 2,35m²

12 Stg. 17,8/28

1 2

Verkaufsraum F= 432,62m² -1.40 m = 111,26 NHN

12 Stg. 17,8/28

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Aufzugsschacht F= 4,08m²

Schacht F= 2,35m²

0.04 Treppenhaus 2 F= 24,73m² U= 29,05m

OKFFB = -0.90 m d=28 cm OKRFB = -1.18 m Decke d=32 cm UKRFB = -1.50 m

5,50 -1.40 m = 111,26 NHN

5,60 4,50

80 5 58

5,50

4,60 5,60

80 10,385

5,40

4,60

-0.90 m = 111,76 NHN

4,60

5,60

5,10 25

5,40

3,10

2,05

5,40

2,85

4,60

5,10 25

5,40

4,60

5,10 20,55

5,10

5,40

4,60

5,10 25

2,85

2,05

5,40

3,10

4,60

4,80

5,40

4,60

4,80 22,33 5,40

72,755

4,50

3 Stg. 16,7/30

OKRFB = -1.68 m Decke d=32 cm UKRFB = -2.00 m

5,60

5,50

OKFFB = -1.40 m d=28 cm

PuMi F= 3,12m²

3. Lauf 11 Stg. 17,9/28

Schacht F= 2,47m²

F= 15,34m² U= 19,30m

F= 461,22m² U= 141,30m

11 Stg. 17,9/28

0.08 Durchgang 3

Umkleide F= 6,27m²

Schacht F= 2,47m²

0.09 MIETEINHEIT 3

0.05 Durchgang 2

4,60

-1.40 m = 111,26 NHN

Pausenraum F= 7,23m²

A10

A11

A12

5,40

5,40 5,40

4,95

5,40

GESAMTMASS

4,60 4,20

5,40

10,50 25

1,35

1,485

D9 D8 5,40

4,60 1,35

4,20

1,35 Schacht F= 1,47m²

Umkleide F= 4,03m²

1,35 1,35

WC F= 8,15m²

Umkleide F= 5,55m² WC F= 5,76m² 112.64

1,35

112.64 ±0.00 m = 112,66 NHN

1,35

2,195

4,60

125

2,47

4,10

5,33 245

1,35

5,79

4,10

5,25

1,35

1,45

385 1,35

Flur F= 10,60m²

Schacht F= 2,64m ²

0.23 WC

F= 3,92 m² U= 8,30 m

OKFFB = ±0.00 m d=28 cm OKRFB = -0.28 m Decke d=32 cm UKRFB = -0.60 m

4,185

5,40

2,85

eister 0.21 Hausm

112.64

4,20

4,60 35

Küche F= 52,07m²

F= 18,0 1m² U= 18,2 9m

0.22 Lager

F= 16, 01m² U= 22, 61m

11,40

2,86

WÄNDE

Lager F= 19,77m²

Pausenrau m F= 13,60m²

Zugang

F= 66,1 Hof 3m² U= 36,6 7m

Kabineninn 1,10mx2,10 enmaß m Aufzugss F= 4,08m chacht ²

Schacht F= 2,35m ² 112.04

112.04

ACHSEN

6 NHN

5,40

= 112,6

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

0.20 Flur

Schach F= 2,47 t m²

4,20

±0.00 m = 112,66 NHN

F= 5,43 m² U= 9,64 m

0.19 WC

F= 6,4 6m U= 10, ² 19m

±0.00 m

OKFFB d=28 cm= ±0.00 m OKRFB Decke = -0.28 m d=32 cm UKRFB = -0.60 m

17,9/28

8 Stg.

0.18 Trepp en

ha F= 25, 53m² us U= 28, 88m

17,9/28

10 Stg.

4,60

3. Lauf

6,00

11,60

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

1,60

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

1,20

585

4,60

4,20

ACHSEN

2,85

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

E4 25

8,90

1,085

8,10

GESAMTMASS

64,98 5

4,10

1,35

2,84

WC D F= 4,44m²

D4 D3

1,35

5,40

PuMi F= 2,03m²

4,60

WC F= 6,92m²

F= 69,24m² U= 38,05m

1,35

2,85

1,35

4,60

4,20

5,40

STB BESTAND

STB

WU-BETON

FEUERHEMMEND (F30)

MW BESTAND

BETON UNBEW. / ESTRICH

FEUERBESTÄNDIG (F90)

PUTZ BEST.

PUTZ

BT-FERTIGTEIL

BRANDWAND

WERKSTEIN BEST.

WERKSTEIN

HOLZ

UHD

TROCKENBAU BEST.

TROCKENBAU

WÄRMEDÄMMUNG

ABBRUCH

D2 5,40

MK4 - NEUBAU BÜROGEBÄUDE "ANNENHÖFE" FREIBERGER STRAßE/ SCHWERINER STRAßE, 01067 DRESDEN

1,585

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

1,185

ACHSEN

28,70

BAUHERR

GESAMTMASS

TLG IMMOBILIEN AG C4

BUDAPESTER STRAßE 3, 01069 DRESDEN GESAMTMASS

ACHSEN

LAGEPLAN / GEBÄUDEÜBERSICHT

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

5,40

4,60

OKRFB = -0.88 m Decke d=32 cm UKRFB = -1.20 m

4,80

OKFFB = -0.60 m d=28 cm

B01

5,40

4,80

4,60

8 Fahrradstellplätze

24,50

4,80

5,40

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN 58

5,40

WÄNDE

1,44

ACHSEN

GESAMTMASS

ACHSEN

GESAMTMASS

A14

PLANINHALT

MASSSTAB

GRUNDRISS EG

1:400

5,40

4,60

4,80

1,385

1,785 1,84

4,80

A01

A02

4,60

A04

4,60

B02

B03

A03

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

4,60

4,20

1,285

1,685 4,60

915 515

UK RD

PROJEKT

1,36

±0.00 m = 112,66 NHN

1,515

PuMi F= 3,38m²

4,20

4,60 Schacht F= 2,59m²

1,915

WC D F= 4,43m²

OK RD

UK FD

1,36

Schacht F= 1,05m²

1,35

WC D F= 13,09m²

WC F= 5,65m²

OK FFB

WANDSCHLITZ (WS)

1,35

WC H F= 12,32m²

0.01 Foyer/Durchgang 1

Stg. 15/45

80 80

WC H F= 4,23m²

OKFFB = ±0.00 m d=28 cm OKRFB = -0.28 m Decke d=32 cm UKRFB = -0.60 m

WANDDURCHBRUCH (WD)

DECKENDURCHBRUCH (DD)

1,35

Lager F= 8,10m²

F= 11,01m² U= 14,91m

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Kabineninnenmaß 1,10mx2,10m Aufzugsschacht F= 4,08m²

Schacht F= 3,18m²

BODENDURCHBRUCH (BD)

SCHRAFFUREN

±0.00 m = 112,66 NHN

0.02 Treppenhaus 1 14 Stg. 17,9/28

45,55

WC D F= 8,69m²

4,60

112.64

1,35

14 Stg. 17,9/28

5,40

1,35

Schacht F= 3,16m²

3,49

4,10 112.64

5,40

1,35

4,10

4,20

±0.00 m = 112,66 NHN

1,35

4,10

14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ±0.00 m = 112,66 NHN

1,35

4,20

5,10

1,35

4,10

= 112,66 m NHN

1,35

112.64

3,49

1,35

4,10

1,35

25 1,35

112.64

HÖHENBEZUG ± 0.00:

SYMBOLE

5,15

1,35

4,10

1,34

25 1,35

LEGENDE

OKFFB = ±0.00 m d=28 cm

1,10

28,70

7,28

4,20

4,60

F= 506,21m² U= 152,12m

112.64

OKRFB = -0.28 m Decke d=32 cm UKRFB = -0.60 m

6,75

5,40

1,35 1,35

0.24 MIETEINHEIT 6

F= 240,02m² U= 147,87m

1,35

14 Stg. 17,9/28

Arkadengang

Gastronomie F= 321,84m²

1,35

4,10

14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

±0.00 m = 112,66 NHN 1,35

14 Stg. 17,9/28

7,85

6,75

17,14

F= 22,57m² U= 21,45m

1,35

0.25 Treppenhaus 7 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

4,20

4,60

1,35

4,10

1,35

6,10

GROUND FLOOR PLAN

GES

WÄN DE

E12

/Ö

1,80

E11

1,80

5,45

1,35

2,35

4,10

E10

1,35

0,34

6,65

m 1,35 2,37 BR H: 0,34 m

1,3

5,4 5

1,35 2,35

0,34

1,3 5

0,34

1,3 5 2,3 7

Bü ro - 34 F= AP 34 0,87 m²

m 0,34

5,40

1,3 5

0,34

1,3

2,3 7

1,35

0,34

33,16 5

1,35 2,35

1,35

1,35 2,35

1,35

1,3 2,3 7

5,45

1,35

0,3

1,35

2,37 H: 0,3 4m

1,35

0,34

1,35

5,40

2,35

1,35

H: 0,3

1,35

1,35 2,35

7,55

24,4 5

1,35

1,35 2,35

BRH: 0,34

H: BR

BRH:

0,34m

m 0,34

1,35 2,35

1,35 2,37

1.1 MIE 9

Bü ro F= 40,0 4 AP 4m ²

1,35 BR

0,34

1,35 2,35

1,35

0,34m

F= TE U= 636, INH 144, 23m EIT 40 ² 11 m

1,35

30,8 0 5,40

2,37

m 0,34

1,35

H: 0,3

1,35

12 5

2,35 2,75

H: 0, 1,35 34m

1,67 5

1,35 5,21 H:

25 m 0,34 H:

5,15 0, 1,35 34m 2,35

BR 1,35

25 H: 0, 1,35 34m 2,35

BR 1,35

5,21

m 1,35 2,35

0,34 H: BR

12 5

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

1,35 12 5

BR H: 0, 1,35 34m 2,35 2,57 5

ro -1 AP 12,1 7m ²

WÄNDE

GESAMTMASS

1,35 2,35 2,57 5

0,34 H:

Flu r F= 48,1 5m

1,35

BR H: 0, 1,35 34m 2,35 2,57 5

12 5

1,35

0,34

2,35

1,35 1,35 m

1,35 2,35

0,34 H:

BR 1,35 2,35

0,34 H:

GESAMTMASS WÄNDE

63,0 0

1,35 2,35 2,57 5

0,34

12 5

1,35

-1

12,1 7m

6,845

46 2,15

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

1,35

1,35 2,35 BRH: 0,34m

1,35

2,35 BRH: 0,34m 46

3 4

1,35

acht

17 ,5/2 8

-1

12 5

1 2

2,05

Stg.

Bü

BR H: 0, 1,35 34m 2,35 2,57 5

m H:

0,34

2,35

1,35 1,35 2,85 1,35 1,35

1,35

2,35 2,35

BRH: 0,34m

Büro - 1 AP F= 12,67m²

2,35

BRH: 0,34m

Büro - 1 AP F= 12,67m²

2,35

BRH: 0,34m

Büro - 1 AP F= 12,67m²

2,35

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

2,35

BRH: 0,34m

2,35

BRH: 0,34m

2,35

BRH: 0,34m

Büro - 1 AP F= 12,67m²

BRH: 0,34m

4,885

Büro - 1 AP F= 12,67m²

1,35 2,43

1,35

1,35 5,21 m

1,35

125

1,35

2,575

: 0, 1,35 34m 2,35

2,575

BR H:

WC F= H 11,5 3m

1,35 1,35 1,35

2,575

24,60

125

25 0, 1,35 34m 2,35

Pu M F= i 3,1 2m

1,35

125

BR H 1,35

5,15 m BR H: 1,35

0,34 m

WC F= H 4,1 6m

1,35 2,35

1,35

0,34

Sc F= hach 2,47 t m²

BR H:

1,35 2,35

1,35

Büro - 1 AP F= 11,94m²

0,34 H:

= 19 ,33m ,75m

0,34

H: BR 1,35

1.1 MF 4 F= -G1 /2 U 24

1,01 2,13

Büro - 3 AP F= 33,43m²

125

Au F= fzug 4,08 ssch m² acht

Bü ro - 32 F= AP 30 4,78 m²

12 5

m 0,34 H: BR 1,35

WC F= D 11,5 3m

Sc F= hach 2,47 t m²

12 5

H: 0, 1,35 34m 2,35

1,01 2,13

m²

WC F= D 4,16 m²

1.1 TR 3

F= H V U= 15,11morb 19,6 ² ere ich 0m

1,35 2,35 2,57 5

20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11

1,35 m 0,34

1,35 m

Pu M F= i 3,12

17 ,5/2 8

Ka 1,10 binen mx2 innen ,10m maß

3,25

1,35 2,35

0,34

H: BR

Stg.

2,35

1.1 Tre 2

F= pp U= 25,9 enha 25,1 0m² us 0m 4

3,10 1,35 25

-1

1,35 2,35 1,35

12,1

0,34

1,35 2,35

12,1

0,34 H:

En F= trauc 7,79 hu m² ngss ch

Sc F= hach 2,35 t m²

Bü F=

2,35

1,35

Ser F= verrau 12,1 m 7m ²

RF De B OK ck = +4.5 RF e d= 7 B = 28 m +4 cm OK d=15 .85 FF cm m B= ±5 .00 m

1,35

WC F= H 11,5 3m

Tee F= küch 12,1 e 7m ²

Bü

1,35 2,35

1,35

0,34

BR 1,35 BR

0,34

2,35

1,35 1,35

- 14

8,18

Bü

0,34

1,35 2,35

BRH: 0,3

1,67 5 15

9 10

1,01 2,13

1,35 2,35 1,35

31,9 0

1,35 2,35

0,34m

1,35 2,35 2,60

12 5

1,35 2,35

17 ,5/2 8

0,34

20,5 5

Bü 12

² 1,35

125 2,575

1,35

5,21

1,35 1,35

125

1,35 12 5

A6`

125

5,21

2,575

125

2,575

125

A7` 2,575

125

2,575

A8`

46,20

125

2,575

2,70

125

A9`

5,215

A10`

5,15

A11` 5,215

125

2,575

1,35

3,41

1,35

A5`

5 5,58

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

2,35 BRH: 0,34m

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

2,35 BRH: 0,34m

2,35

2,35 BRH: 0,34m

2,35

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

2,35 BRH: 0,34m

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

2,35 BRH: 0,34m

2,35

2,35 BRH: 0,34m

2,35

2,35 BRH: 0,34m

2,35

2,35 BRH: 0,34m

1,35

1,15

Büro - 2 AP F= 16,79m²

BRH: 0,34m

BR H:

0,34

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

1,10

0, 1,35 34m 2,35

BR H:

1,35

5,15

A4`

1,35

1,35 2,35 BR H: 0,34 m

125

2,35

BR H:

1,35

0,34

BR H

Flu r F= 63,7 6m

1,35

2,575

BR H: 0, 1,35 34m 2,35 2,57 5

BR 1,35 34

Bü ro F= 35,9 4 AP 0m ²

12 5

1,35

0,34

Tee F= küch 12,1 e 7m ²

1,35

BR H: 0, 1,35 34m 2,35

1,35

1,35 2,35 H: 0,34 m

24,8 5

BRH:

1,67 5

44,15

1,35

Stg.

m²

1,35 2,35

0,34m

1,35 2,35 3,05

U= 24,33m/2 19,7 ² 5m

WC F= H 4,16 m²

1.1 MIE 5 F= TE

: 0,

1,35 2,35

BRH:

1,67 5 12 5

1,35

20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 1,01 2,13

1.1 MF 8 F= -G1

U= 15,11morb 19,6 ² ere ich 1m

Pu M F= i 3,12 m²

U= 298, INH 96,3 63m EIT 0m ² 1

1,35 2,35

0,34m

1,35 2,35 2,75

1,35

1.10 MF-G1/2

WC D F= 11,53m²

WC H F= 11,53m²

0,34 m

F= 24,33m² U= 19,75m

Teeküche F= 12,17m²

Serverraum F= 12,17m²

Büro - 1 AP F= 12,17m²

1.06 MF-G1/2

WC D F= 11,53m²

Büro - 2 AP F= 21,10m²

F= 24,33m² U= 19,75m

Büro - 1 AP F= 12,17m²

Archiv

Serverraum F= 12,17m²

F= 14,71m²

0,34

OKRFB = +4.85 m Decke d=28 cm UKRFB = +4.57 m

1,01 2,13

5,40

:0 ,3

1,35

F= 234,34m²

1.04 Treppenhaus 2

OKRFB = +4.85 m Decke d=28 cm UKRFB = +4.57 m

F= 25,91m² U= 25,11m

0,3

1,35

2,35

Büro - 27 AP

OKFFB = ±5.00 m d=15cm

F= 25,91m² U= 25,11m

Flur F= 82,15m²

Schacht F= 2,35m²

Kabineninnenmaß 1,10mx2,10m

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

2,13

1,01

2,13

1,01

F= 308,46m² U= 93,30m

F= 138,01m²

1.05 TRH Vorbereich

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

1.07 MIETEINHEIT 8 Büro - 16 AP

F= 15,11m² U= 19,60m

2,13

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Aufzugsschacht F= 4,08m²

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

2,35

1,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

2,35

1,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35

5,40

1,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35

11,35

5,40

25 5,40

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35 3,10

1,35 2,35 2,05

1,35 25

5,40

1,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35 2,85

1,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35

1,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35

1,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

1,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35

1,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35

1,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35

5,40

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

2,35

20,55 5,40

1,35 2,35 2,85

5,40

17,715

BRH: 0,34m 1,35 25

1,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35 2,05

5,40

1,35 2,35 3,10

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

1,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35

1,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

1,35

2,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

1,35

2,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35

1,35

1,3

2,35

22,35 5,40

5,40

5,40 28,955

26,20

1,35

5,40

1,35 2,35

1,35

1.08 Treppenhaus 3

WC D F= 4,16m²

10 Stg. 17,5/28

5 16,0

2,13

PuMi F= 3,12m²

10 Stg. 17,5/28

5 1,3 5 2,3 0 17,5

F= 475,49m² U= 109,53m

1,35 2,35

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

1,01

OKFFB = ±5.00 m d=15cm

WC H F= 4,16m²

Schacht F= 2,47m²

Flur F= 48,15m²

10 Stg. 17,5/28

1,01

1,35

1.11 MIETEINHEIT 9

F= 15,11m² U= 19,60m

Aufzugsschacht F= 4,08m² Kabineninnenmaß 1,10mx2,10m

2,35

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

Schacht F= 2,35m²

1.09 TRH Vorbereich

1,01

Schacht F= 2,47m²

2,13

1,35

2,35

BRH: 0,34

WC D F= 4,16m²

1,35

5,40

PuMi F= 3,12m²

Serverraum F= 10,51m²

Schacht F= 2,47m²

10 Stg. 17,5/28

1,35

1,35 2,35

BRH:

1,67 5 12 5

1,35

0, 1,35 34m 2,35

1.1 TR 7 F= H V

17 ,5/2 8

26,2 0 5,40

F9 5,40

0 F1 5,40

F11 5,40

2 F1 5,40

3 F1 5,40

4 F1 5,40

5 F1 5,40

6 F1

5,70

H: 0,3

1,35

2,35 3,05

12 5

m H:

Sc F= hach 2,47 t m²

Sc ha ch F= 2,47 t m²

1,67 5 12 5

Büro - 1 AP F= 12 ,74m²

Büro - 1 AP F= 14 ,91m²

0,3

Büro F= 13 1 AP ,59m²

1,35

2,37 3,00

12 5

2,35 2,57 5

Büro F= 15 1 AP ,05m²

12 5

H: 0, 1,35 34m

1,67 5 12 5

0,34

WC F= D 11,5 3m

H: BR

1,35 2,35

2,13

5,40

0,34

m 0,34

H: BR

1,01

2,05

1,35 2,35

25 1,35 2,85

1,35 2,35

Stg.

0,34

1,35 2,35

WC F= D 4,16 m²

0,34

BR 1,35

5,40

Sc F= hach 2,35 t m²

Au F= fzugss 4,08 ch m² acht Ka 1,10 binen mx2 innen ,10m maß

hau

,9 25,1 0m 0m

2,3 7 2,8 0

2,35 2,57 5

H: BR

25 1,35 2,70 3,10

1,35 2,35

0,34

H: BR 2,70

UK RF De B = ck +4 RF e d= .57 B = 28 m +4 cm OK d=15 .85 FF cm m B= ±5 .00 m

1.1 Tre 6 F= pp 25 en

1,3

61 5 0

1,35

Pu M F= i 3,12 m²

Büro F= 13 - 1 AP ,47m ²

0,34

1,35 2,35

Flu r F= 86,6 7m

Tee F= küch 12,1 e 7m ²

1,35

F6 C

Büro F= 14 - 1 AP ,84m ²

Ser F= verrau 12,1 m 7m ²

1,35

5,40

1,35 2,35

1,35

A10

A11

A12

2,95

1,35 2,37 BRH:

5,30

1,35

0,34m

5,45

1,35

2,37

1,35

BRH:

0,34m

5,45

1,35

2,37 BRH:

1,35

0,34m

GESAMTMASS

1,35

2,37 BRH:

1,35

2,37

0,34m

1,35

5,45

ACHSEN

5,45

1,35

2,37

BRH: 0,34m

1,30 WÄNDE

2,37

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

2,37

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

2,37

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN 1,30

BRH: 0,34m

OKFFB d=15cm = ±5.00 m OKRFB = +4.85 Decke d=28 cm m UKRFB = +4.57 m

95 1,35

1.20 Trepp

F= 24, enhaus 06m² U= 24, 88m

17,5/28

17,5/28 10 Stg.

20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11

22,20

1,35 2,37

BRH: 0,34m

10 Stg.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

5,45

1,35

0,34m

2,37 BRH:

WÄNDE

1,35

0,34m

ACHSEN

1,35 2,37 BRH:

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

8,15

GESAMTMASS

65,55

1,35

1,01

1,35

2,35

1,35 1,35 1,35

BRH: 0,34m

2,35

5,40

1,35

19,30

2,35

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

1,35 2,35

1,35

1,675

2,35

Büro - 2 AP F= 19,97m²

1,35

2,35

1,35 1,35

2,35

1,35

Büro - 1 AP F= 12,98m²

BRH: 0,34m

125 2,515

BRH: 0,34m

3,865

4,90

3,00

2,35

125

5,40

1,35 2,30

1,35

125

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

3,45

2,35

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,675

BRH: 0,34m

Schacht F= 1,47m²

0,34m

1,35

1,60

BRH: 1,675

2,35

Serverraum F= 9,13m²

WC H F= 8,26m²

0,34m

1,35 5,80

1,01

2,575

1,35

125 1,35

2,875

1,35

2,35

BRH: 0,34m

WC F= 7,47m²

WC F= 4,31m²

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

2,35 BRH: 0,34m

1.01 Treppenhaus 1

10 Stg. 17,5/28

Büro - 1 AP F= 12,37m²

Büro - 1 AP F= 12,63m²

Teeküche F= 15,77m²

1.02 TRH Vorbereich

45,55

OK RD

UK FD

UK RD

STB BESTAND

STB

WU-BETON

FEUERHEMMEND (F30)

MW BESTAND

BETON UNBEW. / ESTRICH

FEUERBESTÄNDIG (F90)

PUTZ BEST.

PUTZ

BT-FERTIGTEIL

BRANDWAND

WERKSTEIN BEST.

WERKSTEIN

HOLZ

UHD

TROCKENBAU BEST.

TROCKENBAU

WÄRMEDÄMMUNG

ABBRUCH

2,35

1,35

OK FFB

WANDSCHLITZ (WS)

MK4 - NEUBAU BÜROGEBÄUDE "ANNENHÖFE" D1

2,35

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

WANDDURCHBRUCH (WD)

DECKENDURCHBRUCH (DD)

PROJEKT

FREIBERGER STRAßE/ SCHWERINER STRAßE, 01067 DRESDEN

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35

1,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35

1,35

1,30

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

27,50

70 5,40

2,81

BAUHERR

2,35

5,40

WÄNDE

1,30

ACHSEN GESAMTMASS

TLG IMMOBILIEN AG

GESAMTMASS

ACHSEN

LAGEPLAN / GEBÄUDEÜBERSICHT

WÄNDE

5,40

125

2,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35

5,40

2,35

1,35 1,35

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

24,60

1,35

2,35

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

A04

A01

19,64

2,35

1,35 BRH: 0,34m

B02

B03

5,40

A02

PLANINHALT

MASSSTAB

GRUNDRISS 1.OG

1:400

5,40

2,35

B1 1,50 70

2,25

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN 70

WÄNDE

5 1,55

ACHSEN

GESAMTMASS

ACHSEN

WÄNDE

GESAMTMASS

A14

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35

5,40

2,35

5,40

1,35

2,35

1,35

1,35 1,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35

5,40

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

1,35

2,35

1,35 70

BRH: 0,34m

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35

B01

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

1,45

BRH: 0,34m

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35

BUDAPESTER STRAßE 3, 01069 DRESDEN

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

F= 575,79m² U= 136,56m

1,35

A03

1,35

1.03 MIETEINHEIT 7

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

28,70

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

5,40

2,35

BRH: 0,34m

Teeküche F= 17,92m²

1,35 2,35

125

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35

2,20

1,35

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

1,10

WC H F= 5,29m²

PuMi F= 3,57m²

WC D F= 4,73m²

1,40

2,05

Schacht F= 2,59m²

WC H F= 6,95m²

5,40

BRH: 0,34m

F= 246,37m²

Schacht F= 1,05m²

WC D F= 8,99m²

1,35

Büro - 28 AP

F= 16,91m² U= 16,58m

F= 409,86m² U= 95,40m

2,35

2,13

1,01

2,13

1,01

Flur F= 53,10m²

BRH: 0,34m

1.27 MIETEINHEIT 13

2,13

1,35

1,01

WC F= 4,90m²

5,40

7,85

2,35 16,80

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

OKRFB = +4.85 m Decke d=28 cm UKRFB = +4.57 m

Kabineninnenmaß 1,10mx2,10m Aufzugsschacht F= 4,08m²

Schacht F= 3,18m²

Serverraum F= 20,67m²

OKFFB = ±5.00 m d=15cm

5,40

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

10 Stg. 17,5/28

BODENDURCHBRUCH (BD)

SCHRAFFUREN

1,35

F= 13,13m² U= 15,58m

2,35

2,13

PuMi F= 3,28m²

335 90

2,35

125

1,35

2,575

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

125

= 112,66 m NHN

5,40

1,35

2,575

2,35

1,35

125

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

3,60

2,515

HÖHENBEZUG ± 0.00:

SYMBOLE

1,01

Schacht F= 3,16m²

1,10 25 1,35

LEGENDE

25 1,35

28,70 7,28 6,75

1,35

OKRFB = +4.85 m Decke d=28 cm UKRFB = +4.57 m

1,35

2,13

OKFFB = ±5.00 m d=15cm

2,35

F= 9,99m² U= 12,70m

1,01

2,35

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

1.24 Treppenhaus 7

2,35

BRH: 0,34m

1,35 1,35

F= 48,30m² U= 28,91m

BRH: 0,34m

1.26 MF-G1/2

F= 31,21m² U= 23,65m

5,40

1.25 TRH Vorbereich

1,35

20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11

10 Stg. 17,5/28

7,845

6,75

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

17,40

BRH: 0,34m

255

1,35

2,13

BRH:

1,675

2,35

0,34m

1,35 25

BRH:

1,675

Büro - 2 AP F= 22,82m²

Teeküche F= 11,29m²

WC D F= 8,57m²

0,34m

1,35 2,35

Flur F= 51,44m²

WC H F= 4,24m²

1,35

PuMi F= 2,42m²

Schach F= 2,64 t m²

1.22 MF-G1/2 BRH:

1,67 5

5,40

BRH: 0,34m

1,01

2,13

Schach F= 2,47 t m²

F= 24,7 3m² U= 21,4 1m

F= 393,08m² U= 101,81m

WC D F= 4,10m²

WC F= 5,1 3m²

WC H F= 4,4 8m² WC H F= 13, 93m²

1.23 MIETEINHEIT 12

BRH: 0,34m

Büro - 24 AP F= 227,52m²

6,12 5

1,35

Schach F= 2,35 t m²

Kabineninn 1,10mx2,10 enmaß m Aufzugs F= 4,08 schacht m²

1.21 TRH Vor

bereich F= 16,3 2m² U= 20,0 8m

2,13

1,01

2,13

FIRST FLOOR PLAN

GES

WÄN DE

E12

/Ö

1,80

E11

70 70

1,80

5,45

6,63

1,35

2,35

4,10

6,65

8,29

1,35 2,37

12 5 1,3

5,4

0,34

1,3 BR H:

0,34

1,35 2,35

E10

1,35

0,34

Bes F= prech 55,3 u 1m ngsr au ² m

2,3 7

5,1 5 5

1,3 5

0,34

2,3

1,35

12 5

1,3

5,40

1,3

0,34

m 0,34

12 5

1,35 m 0,34

1,35 2,35

7,55

Bür o4 F= 34,6 AP 8m ²

Büro F= 34 - 4 AP ,36m ²

Büro - 4 AP F= 34 ,37m²

Bür o4 F= 36,2 AP 3m ²

Büro F= 14 - 1 AP ,84m ²

Büro F= 29 2 AP ,15m² H:

0,3

1,35

H: 0,3

1,35

12 5

2,35 2,75

H: 0, 1,35 34m

1,67 5

12 5

2,35 2,57 5

2,37 3,00

1,67 5

H: 0,3

12 5

1,35

12 5

BRH:

1,67 5

0,34m

1,35

12 5

1,35

2,35 3,05

2,35 2,75

2,35 3,05

= 19 ,33m ,75m

0,34 H:

1,01 2,13

1,35

9 10

1,35

17 ,5/2 8

5,15 0, 1,35 34m 2,35

H: BR

1,35 25 H: 0, 1,35 34m 2,35

1,35 5,21

m 1,35 2,35

0,34 H: BR 1,35

12 5

BR H: 0, 1,35 34m 2,35 2,57 5 1,35 m

WÄNDE

BR 1,35

5 5,27

m H:

1,35 2,35

63,0 0

2,35

1,35 BRH: 0,34m

1,35

2,35

3,25

1,35

5 5,27

2,35

1,35

1,35 125

2,35

1,35 1,35

5,13

2,35

BRH: 0,34m

2,35

BRH: 0,34m

1,35 1,35

125

BRH: 0,34m

1,35 5,21 m 1,35 2,35

0,34 H: BR BR 1,35

F= 575,96m² U= 135,86m

5,15 m

1,35 1,35

2,35

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

2,35

5,275

Büro - 2 AP F= 25,95m²

BRH: 0,34m

24,60

1,35 2,35

0,34 H: BR 1,35 H: 0, 1,35 34m 2,35

125

5,21

1,35

1,35 2,35

BR H:

1,35

125

2,575

125

2,575

5,275

125

1,35

2,35 BRH: 0,34m

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

2,35 BRH: 0,34m

2,35

2,35 BRH: 0,34m

2,35

1,35

A10`

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

5,15

1,35

2,35 BRH: 0,34m

A11` 5,215

125

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

2,35 BRH: 0,34m

2,35

2,35 BRH: 0,34m

2,35

2,35 BRH: 0,34m

2,35

2,35 BRH: 0,34m

1,35

2,575

2,35

1,35

Büro - 2 AP F= 16,79m²

1,15

BRH: 0,34m

0,34

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

A9`

5,215

125

A8`

46,20

125

A7` 2,575

2,35

2,575

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

A6`

125

5,21

3,41 1,35

1,10

BR H

1,35

A5`

5 5,58

: 0, 1,35 34m 2,35

5,15

BRH: 0,34m

BR 1,35

12 5

2,35

H: 0, 1,35 34m

A4`

1,35

5,275

H: 0, 1,35 34m

12 5

1,35

m 34 : 0,

Flu r F= 63,7 6m

Büro - 2 AP F= 25,95m²

2,35 2,57 5

1,35 2,35 BR H: 0,34 m

0,34

BR 1,35

Tee F= küch 12,1 e 7m ²

Bü ro F= 34,8 4 AP 6m ²

1,35

0,34 m

WC F= H 11,5 3m

m²

2.03 MIETEINHE

Büro - 2 AP F= 25,22m²

1,35 H: 0, 1,35 34m 2,35

BR 1,35 m

1,35

WC F= H 4,16 m² Pu M F= i 3,12

BRH: 0,34m

1,35 2,35

4,885

0,34 H: BR

Büro - 3 AP F= 33,43m²

12 5

H: 0, 1,35 34m 2,35

= 19 ,33m ,75m

0,34

1,35 2,35

1,35 BRH: 0,34m

WC F= D 11,5 3m

Sc F= hach 2,47 t m²

2.1 MF 4 F= -G1 /2 U 24

0,34 m

31,9 0

1,35 2,35

2,15

1,01 2,13

,1 rb 19,6 1m² ere ich 0m

1,35

6,845

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

3 1,01 2,13

1,35 2,35

WÄNDE

12 5 0

H: 0, 1,35 34m 2,35

1 2

25 1,35 2,05

20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11

m²

BR H:

5,40

4 5,40

1,35 2,35

0,34

H: BR 1,35 0,34

1,35 m

Pu M F= i 3,12 WC F= D 4,16 m²

0,34

acht

17 ,5/2 8

GESAMTMASS

0,34

1,35 m 0,34 H:

2,35

1,35

2,85

Bü ro F= 24,9 2 AP 2m ²

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

12 5 0

H: 0, 1,35 34m 2,35

1,35

GESAMTMASS

1,35 2,35 2,57 5

0,34 BR

Bü ro F= 24,9 2 AP 2m ²

12 5

² Flu r F= 48,1 5m

H: BR

1,35 H:

0,34

2,35

1,35 5 5,27 1,35 H: m

2,35

0,34 H:

0,34

1,35 2,35

1,35

5,27

Tee F= küch 12,1 e 7m ²

Bü ro F= 34,8 4 AP 2m ²

1,35

0,34

1,35 2,35

WC F= H 11,5 3m

BR 1,35

2.1 MIE 5

2.1 TR 3 F= H V 15 o

2,35

3,10 1,35 25 1,35 m

1,35 2,35

0,34

5,21 2,35

1,35

ro 34,5 4 AP 0m ²

1,35

0,34

1,35 2,35

2 4

Stg.

Sc ha F= ch 2,47 t m²

En F= trauc 7,79 hu m² ngss ch

Stg.

BR H

1,35 2,35

BRH:

1,67 5 15

44,15

F= TE U= 298, INH 95,9 73m EIT 5m ² 17

Sc F= hach 2,47 t m²

Bü ro F= 34,8 4 AP 6m ²

34 m

0,34m

1,35 2,35 2,60

5,21

1,35 17 ,5/2 8

BRH:

1,67 5 12 5

20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 1,01 2,13

2.1 MF 8 F= -G1 /2 U 24

U= 15,11morb 19,6 ² ere ich 1m

Ser F= verrau 12,1 m 7m ²

Bü ro F= 35,9 4 AP 0m ²

: 0,

0,34m

1,35

12 5

0, 1,35 34m 2,35

2.1 TR 7 F= H V

Sc F= hach 2,35 t m²

Bü ro F= 34,8 4 AP 7m ²

1,35

5,40

BRH:

1,67 5

1,35 2,35

Büro - 1 AP F= 12 ,74m²

H: 0, 1,35 34m

2,35 2,57 5

1,67 5 12 5

Büro - 2 AP F= 29 ,13m²

12 5

61 5 0

m 0

1,35

0,34

WC F= D 11,5 3m

Sc F= hach 2,47 t m²

WC F= H 4,16 m

17 ,5/2 8

Ka 1,10 binen mx2 innen ,10m maß

BR H

1,35 2,35

Büro F= 34 4 AP ,37m²

12 5

1,35 m

1,35 2,35

0,34

2,13

m 0,34

H: BR

1,01

Pu M F= i 3,12 m²

Au F= fzug 4,08 ssch m² acht

5,40

3 F1

Stg.

UK RF De B =

Bü

F1 5,40

5 F1 5,40

1,35

0,34m

BR 1,35 BR

0,34

1,35 2,35 12 5

1,35

1,35 0,34

H: BR 1,35 2,70 2,05

1,35 2,35

25 1,35 2,85

BR 1,35 BR

4,81 5

1,35 m

1,35 2,35

1,3 5

2,3 7 2,8 0

1,35 2,35

3,10

2,70

1,35

0,34

1,35 2,35

WC F= D 4,16 m

0,34

1,35 2,35

Stg.

1,35

0,34m

2,37

0,34

1,35 2,35

5,30

1,35 2,37

1,35 2,35

0,34

Ser F= verrau 15,9 m 8m ²

Flu r F= 86,6 7m

Sc F= hach 2,35 t m²

1,35 m

1,35 2,35

0,34

5,40

F11 5,40

2 F1

2.1 Tre 2

F= pp U= 25,9 enha 25,1 0m² us 0m 4

1,35

12 5 0

1,35

H: m 0,34

Büro - 4 AP F= 34,90m²

F= 475,67m² U= 108,83m

OKFFB = +8.50 m d=15 cm

Büro - 4 AP F= 34,49m²

OKRFB = +8.35 m Decke d=30 cm UKRFB = +8.07 m

1,35

5 16,0

2.08 Treppenhaus 3 F= 25,91m² U= 25,11m

2.06 MF-G1/2

Büro - 2 AP F= 24,92m²

Büro - 4 AP F= 31,76m²

Büro - 4 AP F= 34,82m²

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Büro - 4 AP F= 31,76m²

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

1,01 2,13

Archiv F= 14,71m²

Aufzugsschacht F= 4,08m²

Flur F= 82,11m²

Schacht F= 2,35m²

OKFFB = +8.50 m d=15 cm

2.04 Treppenhaus 2

Büro - 4 AP F= 34,50m²

OKRFB = +8.35 m Decke d=30 cm UKRFB = +8.07 m

Büro - 4 AP F= 34,86m²

Büro - 2 AP F= 20,58m²

F= 25,91m² U= 25,11m

5,40

1,35

Serverraum F= 12,17m²

2,13

1,01

2.05 TRH Vorbereich

1,01

2,13

F= 308,57m² U= 92,90m

Büro - 1 AP F= 12,17m²

Schacht F= 2,47m²

2,13

WC D F= 4,16m²

2.07 MIETEINHEIT 15

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Büro - 2 AP F= 21,10m²

F= 24,33m² U= 19,75m

PuMi F= 3,12m²

Schacht F= 2,47m²

Kabineninnenmaß 1,10mx2,10m

2,13

Büro - 2 AP F= 24,93m²

F= 15,11m² U= 19,60m

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

1,01

Serverraum F= 12,17m²

Flur F= 48,15m²

10 Stg. 17,5/28

5 1,3 5 2,3 0 17,5

:0 ,3

2,35

0,3

1,35

2,35

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35 1,35 5912

5,40

1,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35 5,27

1,35 2,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35 5 12

5,40

1,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35 5,21

1,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35 25

5,40

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35 3,10

1,35 2,35 2,05

1,35 25

5,40

1,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35 2,85

1,35 2,35 25

BRH: 0,34m 1,35 5 4,81

5,40

1,35 2,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35 5 12

1,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35 5,27

5,40

2,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35 5 12

1,35 2,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35 5 5,27

5,40

17,715

1,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35 12

1,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

2,35 4,81

5,40

1,35 2,35 2,85

BRH: 0,34m 1,35 25

1,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35 2,05

5,40

1,35 2,35 3,10

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

1,35 2,35

5,40

BRH: 0,34m 1,35 5 5,21

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

2,35 12

5,40

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35 5,27

1,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

1,35

2,35 5 3,11

2,35

5,40

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

1,35 5 120

1,3

2,35

5,40 28,955

26,20

1,35

2.11 MIETEINHEIT 16

WC H F= 4,16m²

10 Stg. 17,5/28

1,01

1,35

Kabineninnenmaß 1,10mx2,10m

2,35

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

Aufzugsschacht F= 4,08m²

2.09 TRH Vorbereich

2,13

1,01

WC D F= 4,16m²

Schacht F= 2,35m²

Teeküche F= 12,17m² Schacht F= 2,47m²

10 Stg. 17,5/28

1,35 m

1,35

BRH: 0,34

2,35

PuMi F= 3,12m²

Serverraum F= 10,51m²

Besprechungsraum F= 54,24m²

WC D F= 11,53m²

F= 24,33m² U= 19,75m

F= 15,11m² U= 19,60m

m 0,34

2.10 MF-G1/2

Schacht F= 2,47m²

1,35

5,40

WC H F= 11,53m²

10 Stg. 17,5/28

WC D F= 11,53m²

Bü ro F= 31,9 4 AP 8m ²

1,35 2,35

1,35

5,70

BR H:

3,30

1,35 2,35

5,40

2,35

BRH:

12 5

1,35

1,35 m 0,34

1,35 2,35

2.1 MIE 9 T

Pu M F= i 3,12 m²

Bü ro F= 34,8 4 AP 2m ²

1,01 2,13

1,35

BRH:

F= E U= 636, INH 143, 41m EIT 70 ² 18 m

Au F= fzugss 4,08 ch m² acht Ka 1,10 binen mx2 innen ,10m maß

hau

,9 25,1 0m 0m

Bü ro F= 31,7 4 AP 6m ²

0,34

1,35

2,37 H: 0,3 4m

Tee F= küch 12,1 e 7m ²

Bü ro F= 22,2 2 AP 6m ²

OK cke +8.0 RF B = d=30 7 m +8 cm OK d=15 .35 FF cm m B= +8 .50 m

5,30

H: 0,3

Bü ro F= 34,5 4 AP 0m ²

0,34

2,35

5,21 5

5,40

F5 F6 5,40 25

F7 5,40 12 5

F8 26,2 0 5,40 12 5 1,35

F9 5,40 12 5 1,35

5,45

1,35

0,3

Bü ro F= 34,9 4 AP 1m ²

Bü ro F= 34,8 4 AP 6m ²

UK RF De B = ck +8 RF e d= .07 B = 30 m d= +8 cm OK 15 .35 FF cm m B= +8 .50 m

2.1 Tre 6 F= pp 25 en

4,81

12 5

1,35

2,35

1,35

0,34

5,27 5

F3 30,8 0 5,40

5,27 5

F4 E

5,30

1,3 2,3 BR

1,35 2,35

A10

A11

A12

1,35

5,45

1,35 1,35

0,34m BRH:

5,24

1,35

2,37

us 6

5,425

2,37

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

1,30 WÄNDE

125

2,37

1,35

5,85

2,37

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

2,37

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN 1,30

BRH: 0,34m

95 1,35 2,35

1,35 1,35

8,145

BRH: 0,34m

2,35 125

1,35

5,40

2,97

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

2,35

125

1,35 1,35

1,675

2,35

Büro - 2 AP F= 13,00m²

Büro - 2 AP F= 15,48m²

5,40

1,35 1,35

2,35

BRH: 0,34m

2,35

BRH: 0,34m

3,865 1,35 125

1,35 1,35

2,515

Büro - 4 AP F= 32,50m²

2,35

Büro - 2 AP F= 20,00m²

4,90

125

3,00

2,35

125

5,275

1,35 2,30

1,35

125

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

3,45

BRH: 0,34m

BRH: 0,34m 1,675

2,35

1,35

0,34m

1,35

1,60

1,675

2,35 2,515

PuMi F= 2,42m² BRH:

1,35

Büro - 2 AP F= 18,29m² Flur F= 51,43m²

BRH: 0,34m

Serverraum F= 9,17m² WC H F= 8,26m²

2,35

Schacht F= 1,47m²

Büro - 2 AP F= 22,82m²

Teeküche F= 11,29m²

WC H F= 4,24m²

0,34m

2,35

Besprechungsraum F= 49,78m²

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

5,40

BRH: 0,34m

2,35

Büro - 4 AP F= 34,37m²

Büro - 4 AP F= 34,01m² 2,13

1,01

Schach F= 2,35 t m²

WC D F= 8,57m² BRH:

1,675

2,35

5,80

1,01

2,35

BRH: 0,34m

Büro - 4 AP F= 32,18m²

WC F= 4,31m²

10 Stg. 17,5/28

2.01 Treppenhaus 1

1,35

Serverraum F= 20,69m² Büro - 2 AP F= 17,52m²

OKRFB = +8.35 m Decke d=30 cm UKRFB = +8.07 m

5,40

45,55 7,85

2,35

1,35 2,35

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

D1 1,40

5,215

125

BRH: 0,34m 1,35 125

5,40

1,35 2,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

1,35 2,35

5,275

BRH: 0,34m 1,35 125

5,40

1,35

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35

2,35 5,04

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

1,35 125

5,40

1,35 2,35

6,175

1,35

1,30

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

WÄNDE

2,35

5,40

1,30

UHD

TROCKENBAU BEST.

TROCKENBAU

WÄRMEDÄMMUNG

ABBRUCH

MK4 - NEUBAU BÜROGEBÄUDE "ANNENHÖFE" BAUHERR

TLG IMMOBILIEN AG BUDAPESTER STRAßE 3, 01069 DRESDEN

GESAMTMASS

HOLZ

LAGEPLAN / GEBÄUDEÜBERSICHT

WERKSTEIN

ACHSEN GESAMTMASS

ACHSEN

2,81

BRANDWAND

WERKSTEIN BEST.

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

5,40

125

2,35

125

1,35 1,35 1,35

2,35

BT-FERTIGTEIL

5,40

5,275 2,35

1,35

24,60

125 4,79

5,40

125 6,625

PLANINHALT

MASSSTAB

GRUNDRISS 2.OG

1:400

1,35

A01

2,35

BRH: 0,34m

1,35 1,35

2,35

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

A04

A02

2,35

1,35

B02

B03

5,40

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

5,275

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

1,35

2,25

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

2,35

5 8,35

WÄNDE

5 1,55

5,40

ACHSEN

GESAMTMASS

A14

ACHSEN

GESAMTMASS

WÄNDE

2,35

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

1,35

1,50

1,45

BRH: 0,34m

Besprechungsraum F= 55,23m²

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

FEUERBESTÄNDIG (F90)

PUTZ

A03

1,35

Büro - 4 AP F= 30,75m²

2,35

PUTZ BEST.

B01

1,35

Büro - 4 AP F= 33,85m²

125

1,35

28,70

2,35 2,575

BRH: 0,34m BRH: 0,34m

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

Büro - 2 AP F= 16,52m²

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

MW BESTAND

2,35

1,35

5,40

2,35

FEUERHEMMEND (F30)

BETON UNBEW. / ESTRICH

2,35

BRH: 0,34m

Teeküche F= 17,95m²

1,35

WÄNDE

BRH: 0,34m 1,35

2,35

2,20

725

1,35

WU-BETON

FREIBERGER STRAßE/ SCHWERINER STRAßE, 01067 DRESDEN

70 BRH: 0,34m 1,10

STB

PROJEKT

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

PuMi F= 3,57m²

WC H F= 5,29m²

UK RD

WC D F= 4,73m²

OK RD

UK FD

2,35

Büro - 4 AP F= 32,88m²

1,35

Büro - 4 AP F= 34,43m²

BRH: 0,34m

Büro - 4 AP F= 34,02m²

WC H F= 6,95m²

2,05

WC D F= 8,99m²

OK FFB

WANDSCHLITZ (WS)

8,45 1,35

Schacht F= 1,05m²

Schacht F= 2,59m²

WANDDURCHBRUCH (WD)

DECKENDURCHBRUCH (DD)

5,40

F= 16,91m² U= 16,58m WC F= 4,90m²

Besprechungsraum F= 52,19m²

2,35

Flur F= 53,10m²

F= 409,97m² U= 94,95m

2.02 TRH Vorbereich

1,35

2,13

1,01

2,13

1,01

BRH: 0,34m

2.27 MIETEINHEIT 20

2,13

BODENDURCHBRUCH (BD)

STB BESTAND

125

1,01

= 112,66 m NHN

SCHRAFFUREN

1,35

Aufzugsschacht F= 4,08m²

1,35

Büro - 2 AP F= 25,90m²

BRH: 0,34m

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Büro - 2 AP F= 25,62m²

OKFFB = +8.50 m d=15 cm

Kabineninnenmaß 1,10mx2,10m Schacht F= 3,18m²

Teeküche F= 15,78m²

F= 13,13m² U= 15,58m

10 Stg. 17,5/28

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

2,13

WC F= 7,47m²

2,35 BRH: 0,34m

5,40

2,35 BRH: 0,34m

1,35

2,35 BRH: 0,34m

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

2,35 BRH: 0,34m

PuMi F= 3,28m²

335 90

5,215

2,875

1,35

2,35

1,35

125 1,35

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

125

5,275 1,35

2,35

1,35

2,86

125 1,35

HÖHENBEZUG ± 0.00:

SYMBOLE

5,40

1,35

25 1,35

LEGENDE

1,01

Schacht F= 3,16m²

1,10 1,35

3,60

5,215

25 1,35

28,70 7,28 6,75

2,35

1,35 BRH: 0,34m

OKRFB = +8.35 m Decke d=30 cm UKRFB = +8.07 m

1,35

2,13

OKFFB = +8.50 m d=15 cm

2,35

F= 9,99m² U= 12,70m

1,01

2,35

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

2.24 Treppenhaus 7

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

F= 48,34m² U= 28,90m

F= 31,21m² U= 23,65m

5,40

2.26 MF-G1/2

2.25 TRH Vorbereich

1,35

10 Stg. 17,5/28

20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11

10 Stg. 17,5/28

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

7,85

6,75

17,40

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

2,13

EIT 14

1,35

F= 393,19m² U= 101,32m

WC D F= 4,10m²

Schach F= 2,64 t m²

2.22 MF-G1/2

F= 24,7 3m² U= 21,4 1m

0,34m

1,35 25

1,35 2,37

OKFFB d=15 cm= +8.50 m OKRFB = +8.35 Decke d=30 cm m UKRFB = +8.07 m

2.20 Treppe nha

Kabineninn 1,10mx2,10 enmaß m Aufzugs F= 4,08 schacht m²

2.21 TRH Vor

bereich F= 16,3 2m² U= 20,0 8m

1,01

2,13

Schach F= 2,47 t m²

WC H F= 13, 93m²

BRH:

1,675

ACHSEN

5,45

1,35

2.23 MIETEINHEIT 19

0,34m

1,35

5,45

125

1,35 2,37

1,01

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

2,35

GESAMTMASS 5,30

1,35 2,37

0,34m

BRH: 0,34m

F= 24,0 6m² U= 24,8 8m

17,5/28

10 Stg.

17,5/28

Büro - 4 AP F= 32 ,02m²

WC F= 5,1 3m²

1,35

2,37

BRH: 0,34m

20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11

2,13

WC H F= 4,4 8m²

125

1,35

0,34m

BRH:

5,45

2,37

0,34m

BRH:

1,67 5

5,30

1,35

Büro - 4 AP F= 35,11m²

BRH:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

5,45

1,35 2,37

1,35

0,34m

WÄNDE

2,95

2,37 BRH:

6,12 5

1,35

BRH: 0,34m

1,35

0,34m

ACHSEN

1,35 2,37 BRH:

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

8,15

4,85

GESAMTMASS

65,55

12 5

1,35

TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN

E12

1,69

E11

5,40 5

F At tika

3,41

+23. 00

E10 5,4 5 0

5,40

5,40 5

E8 5,40 5

5,40

30,6 95

5,40

5,40 5

LT05

- Bür

o/G

ewer

E 7.50

0 kg

5,40

+23. 00

5,40

F At

tika

ca.

5,40

+22. +22. 60 40 OKF OK Sc RD hach

tko

44,61 5

5,40

43,94

sve

tore

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

500

ca.

n tore

500 ca.

ntila

ung

ntila

sve

63,0 25

55 64,2

tra

ca.

uch

5.5 0

ung

tra En

GESAMTMASS 7,095

WÄNDE

6,63

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

+23.00 OKF Attika

ebe

nrä

LT1

uchu

WÄNDE

ca.

n tore ntila

sve ung uch tra

uch

En tra

LT1

5,40

F11

GESAMTMASS

500

LT0

5,40

Bü

erb

26,7 15

5,40

88,6 55

ca.

7.5 0

5,40

LT0

5,40

+25.31 OKF Attika

+22. +22. 60 40 OKF OK Sc RD hach

tko

5,40

24,14

LT0 3

-B üro

erb

5,40

ca.

7.5 0

24,60

g 0k

5.5 0

Kü LT1 5-

31,2 45

ca .

che

nan

lag

5,40

A5`

A6`

A7`

A8`

A9`

A4`

A10`

A11`

47,025

5,39

tika

+23.00 OKF Attika

ca.

5.0 0

46,21

+23.

OK F At

6.1 Dachfläche F= 3726,24m² U= 590,13m

ca. 5.500 kg

KT00 - Puffer

ca. 2.000 kg ca. 2.000 kg KT00 - Verteiler

erk 1 ühlw ück k -R

KT00 - Puffer

LT02 - Büro / Gewerbe

+22.60 OKF Schachtkopf +22.40 OKRD

ca. 7.500 kg

LT01 - Büro / Gewerbe

+22.60 OKF Schachtkopf +22.40 OKRD

ca. 7.500 kg

1.25 2.25

ca. 2.500 kg KT00 - Kältemaschine

LT08 - WC / Nebenräume

17,715 5 1,11

5,40

26,20

5,40

28,84

5,40

72,755

1 16,2

KT00 - Kältezentrale 1

A10

A11

A12

E6 65,25 5

WÄNDE

ACHSEN

5,405

GESAMTMASS ACHSEN

5,405

5,41

1,185

WÄNDE ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

Kältezent

rale 1

ca. 5.500 kg

5,40

12,65

KT00 -

46 96

rale 2

KT00 -

Kältezent

1.25 2.25

KT00 -

5,40

Verteile KT00 -

+22.60 OKF Scha +22.40 chtkopf OKRD

ca. 5.000 kg

kg ca. 2.000 kg

+23.00 OKF Attika

Kältem ca. 2.500 aschine kg

Puffer

ca. 2.000

KT00 -

Kältem ca. 2.500 aschine kg

Puffer

KT00 -

5,40

LEGENDE D4

LT06 - Büro / Gewerbe

45,495

18,25

17,38

ca. 7.500 kg

5,40

LT13 - Küchenanlage

KT00 - Rückkühlwerk 2

+23.00 OKF Attika

HÖHENBEZUG ± 0.00:

13,405 13,405

1,35

ca. 5.500 kg

+23.00 OKF Attika

15Stg. 0,20 / 0,28

OK FFB

OK RD

WANDSCHLITZ (WS)

UK FD

UK RD

1,01 2,13

ca. 7.500 kg

WU-BETON

FEUERHEMMEND (F30)

MW BESTAND

BETON UNBEW. / ESTRICH

FEUERBESTÄNDIG (F90)

PUTZ BEST.

PUTZ

BT-FERTIGTEIL

BRANDWAND

WERKSTEIN BEST.

WERKSTEIN

HOLZ

UHD

TROCKENBAU BEST.

TROCKENBAU

WÄRMEDÄMMUNG

ABBRUCH

5,40

13,55

LT07 - Büro / Gewerbe

STB

STB BESTAND

5,40

LT10 - WC / Nebenräume

OKRFB = +22.35 m Decke d=28 cm OKRFB = +22.17 m

PROJEKT

ca. 5.500 kg

MK4 - NEUBAU BÜROGEBÄUDE "ANNENHÖFE" FREIBERGER STRAßE/ SCHWERINER STRAßE, 01067 DRESDEN

ca. 5.500 kg

585

+23.00 OKF Attika

585

+23.00 OKF Attika

675

LT11 - WC / Nebenräume

515

5,40

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN 28,70 5,40

WÄNDE

5,40

1,185

5,40

28,70

GESAMTMASS

BUDAPESTER STRAßE 3, 01069 DRESDEN GESAMTMASS

ACHSEN

WÄNDE

LAGEPLAN / GEBÄUDEÜBERSICHT

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

6,075

BAUHERR

ACHSEN

TLG IMMOBILIEN AG

10,465

LT14 - Küchenanlage

5,40

B01

24,45

B02

B03

A03

A01

5,40

A04

13,40

A02

PLANINHALT

MASSSTAB

DACHAUFSICHT

1:400

5,40 80 585

585

+23.00 OKF Attika

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN WÄNDE 5,40

1,44

ACHSEN

GESAMTMASS

A14

ACHSEN

GESAMTMASS

WÄNDE

Schacht F= 3,18m²

Kabineninnenmaß 1,10mx2,10m Aufzugsschacht F= 4,08m²

OKFFB = +22.50 m d=15 cm 4,33

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

WANDDURCHBRUCH (WD)

DECKENDURCHBRUCH (DD) SCHRAFFUREN

+25.31 OKF Attika

BODENDURCHBRUCH (BD) 46 5,40

7,28

= 112,66 m NHN

SYMBOLE

28,70 8,20

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

5,405

GESAMTMASS

64,13 5

ROHBAU / ÖFFNUNGEN

8,11

ROOF PLAN

A10

A11

50 3,03

2,71

32 47

50 32 47 2,71

3,35

32 47 3,50 2,71

3,65

3,50 2,71

32 47 2,71

3,50

32 47

32 47 3,50 2,71

47 53 2,50

2,50

3,35

3,50

47 53 3,50 2,50

32 47 2,71

3,50

32 47 2,71

3,50

32 47

+5,00

Abhangdecke 53 cm (wie im Grundriss 2.O

+8,50

3,50

1.OBERGESCHOSS

+12,00

2,71

+8,50

Abhangdecke max. 32 cm in Bereiche mit Fenster

±0,00

-0,90 60

-1,40

4,40

E11

E12

3.OBERGESCHOSS

+12,00

2.OBERGESCHOSS

+8,50

1.OBERGESCHOSS

+5,00

34 30

3,55

3,20

2,71

34 30

+19,00

34 30

3,50

3,20

2,71

34 30

3,50

3,20

2,71

+15,50

3,20

3,55

4.OBERGESCHOSS

2,71

+23,00

+19,00

3,80 35

3,60

E10

+23,00

5.OBERGESCHOSS

3,25

35 3,60

3,25

3,60

-8,60

-5,00

3,25

UNTERGESCHOSS -2

3,50

3,60 -5,00

UNTERGESCHOSS -1

3,00

NORD SCHWERINER STRAßE

4,10

- 1,40 = 111,26 NHN

5,60

±0,00

ERDGESCHOSS

5,13

5,90 4,73

5,93

6,40

+5,00 47

2.OBERGESCHOSS

32 47

+12,00

2,71

3.OBERGESCHOSS

+15,50

2,71

+15,50

4.OBERGESCHOSS

+19,00

+19,00 32 47

5.OBERGESCHOSS

2,71

3,03

32 47

+23,00

15 30

34 30

3,50

3,20

2,71

34 30

3,50

3,20

2,71

+15,50

15 30

34 30

3,50

3,20

2,71

34 30

3,50

3,20

2,71

+12,00

15 30

34 30

3,50

3,20

2,71

34 30

3,50

3,20

2,71

+8,50

15 30

4.OBERGESCHOSS

3.OBERGESCHOSS

2.OBERGESCHOSS

1.OBERGESCHOSS

6,40

18 5,95

5,77

30 6,40

18 5,95

5,77

+5,00

5.OBERGESCHOSS

ERDGESCHOSS ± 0,00 = 112,66 NHN SÜD FREIBERGER STRAßE

ERDGESCHOSS

-1,40 32

- 1,40 = 111,26 NHN

-8,60

3,60

3,28

UNTERGESCHOSS -1

3,60

3,28

3,60

UNTERGESCHOSS -2

-5,00

3,28

-5,00 32

UNTERGESCHOSS -1

3,28

3,60

NORD SCHWERINER STRAßE

-8,60

UNTERGESCHOSS -2

A12

A13

A14

C6 LEGENDE

HÖHENBEZUG ± 0.00:

= 112,66 m NHN

SYMBOLE

32 47

+23,00

BODENDURCHBRUCH (BD)

WANDDURCHBRUCH (WD)

OK FFB

DECKENDURCHBRUCH (DD)

WANDSCHLITZ (WS)

UK FD

UK RD

STB

WU-BETON

FEUERHEMMEND (F30)

MW BESTAND

BETON UNBEW. / ESTRICH

FEUERBESTÄNDIG (F90)

PUTZ BEST.

PUTZ

BT-FERTIGTEIL

BRANDWAND

WERKSTEIN BEST.

WERKSTEIN

HOLZ

UHD

TROCKENBAU BEST.

TROCKENBAU

WÄRMEDÄMMUNG

2,86

STB BESTAND 3,07

OK RD

SCHRAFFUREN

+19,00

5.OBERGESCHOSS

ABBRUCH

2,71

3,50

30 49

+19,00

PROJEKT +15,50

4.OBERGESCHOSS

30 34

+15,50

MK4 - NEUBAU BÜROGEBÄUDE "ANNENHÖFE" FREIBERGER STRAßE/ SCHWERINER STRAßE, 01067 DRESDEN

3,50

BAUHERR 2,71

TLG IMMOBILIEN AG

+12,00

3.OBERGESCHOSS

BUDAPESTER STRAßE 3, 01069 DRESDEN

30 15

LAGEPLAN / GEBÄUDEÜBERSICHT

MAL

ERG

Abhangdecke max. 32 cm in Bereiche mit Fenster

FREIBERGER STRASSE

RA SS E ST ER

SSE

B02

TRA

2.OBERGESCHOSS

30 15

HW ER

+8,50

B03

NE AN

+8,50

A03

3,50

ÄSS CHE N

B01 3,05

m nur im beidseitig begrenzten Flurbereich möglich OG)

A04

A01

ASS

-STR

3,05

3,50

A02

NER

-LIND

THA

HER

HERTHA-LINDNER-STRASSE

+5,00

1.OBERGESCHOSS

PLANINHALT

MASSSTAB

SCHNITT AA

1:100

+5,00

5,00

4,55

:Planverfasser

ERDGESCHOSS ±0,00

±0,00

± 0,00 = 112,66 NHN

SECTION AA

-0,60

5,00

4,40

SÜD FREIBERGER STRAßE

-5,00

UNTERGESCHOSS -1

-8,60

UNTERGESCHOSS -2

3,60 -8,60

LEGENDE

HÖHENBEZUG ± 0.00:

= 112,66 m NHN

SYMBOLE BODENDURCHBRUCH (BD)

WANDDURCHBRUCH (WD)

OK FFB

DECKENDURCHBRUCH (DD)

WANDSCHLITZ (WS)

UK FD

OK RD UK RD

SCHRAFFUREN STB

WU-BETON

FEUERHEMMEND (F30)

MW BESTAND

BETON UNBEW. / ESTRICH

FEUERBESTÄNDIG (F90)

PUTZ BEST.

PUTZ

BT-FERTIGTEIL

BRANDWAND

WERKSTEIN BEST.

WERKSTEIN

HOLZ

UHD

TROCKENBAU BEST.

TROCKENBAU

WÄRMEDÄMMUNG

ABBRUCH

STB BESTAND

PROJEKT

MK4 - NEUBAU BÜROGEBÄUDE "ANNENHÖFE" FREIBERGER STRAßE/ SCHWERINER STRAßE, 01067 DRESDEN BAUHERR

TLG IMMOBILIEN AG BUDAPESTER STRAßE 3, 01069 DRESDEN LAGEPLAN / GEBÄUDEÜBERSICHT

MAL

ERG

ÄSS

CHE

SS RA

SSE

TRA

B02

FREIBERGER STRASSE

B01

B03

A03

SC HW

3,25

-5,00

A04 A01 A02 E

ASS

-STR

NER

-LIND

HERTHA-LINDNER-STRASSE

THA

HER

PLANINHALT

MASSSTAB

SCHNITT BB

1:400

SECTION BB

A14

A13

A12

A10

A11

+15,50

3.OBERGESCHOSS

+12,00

2.OBERGESCHOSS

+8,50

1.OBERGESCHOSS

+5,00

3,07

3,22

4.OBERGESCHOSS

2,71

3,53 +19,00

36 28

5.OBERGESCHOSS

36 28

+23,00

3,05

3,50

3,22 28

36 28

2,71

+17,25

3,50 2,71

3,50

36 28

3,22

+13,75

3,50 2,71

3,50

36 28

3,22

+10,25

3,50

3,50 2,71 38

3,22

+6,75

5,00

4,47

5,60

4,75

+2,50

ERDGESCHOSS ±0,00

± 0,00 = 112,66 NHN

UNTERGESCHOSS -2

-8,60

1,20 3,80

4,40

5,00

4,40 -5,00

- 0,60 = 112,06 NHN

3,60

3,28

UNTERGESCHOSS -1

4,40

±0,00

3,43

±0,00

± 0,00 = 112,66 NHN SÜD FREIBERGER STRAßE

F16

F15

F14

3,03

+23,00

5.OBERGESCHOSS

+19,00

4.OBERGESCHOSS

+15,50

3.OBERGESCHOSS

+12,00

2.OBERGESCHOSS

+8,50

1.OBERGESCHOSS

+5,00

3,50

+17,25

3,50

+13,75

3,50

+10,25

3,50

+6,75

5,90

+3,03

+1,06

±0,00

±0,00 ±0,00

ERDGESCHOSS -0,90

- 0,90 = 111,76 NHN

- 0,90 = 111,76 NHN 1,15

WEST HERTHA-LINDNER STRAßE

2,95

4,10

-3,05

UNTERGESCHOSS -1

-5,00

3,60

-6,81

UNTERGESCHOSS -2

-8,60

F13

F12

F11

F10

LEGENDE

HÖHENBEZUG ± 0.00:

= 112,66 m NHN

SYMBOLE BODENDURCHBRUCH (BD)

WANDDURCHBRUCH (WD)

OK FFB

DECKENDURCHBRUCH (DD)

WANDSCHLITZ (WS)

UK FD

OK RD UK RD

SCHRAFFUREN

5.OBERGESCHOSS

36 28

3,53

3,22 28

3,50

SICHTBETON

BETON UNBEW. / ESTRICH

FEUERBESTÄNDIG (F90)

PUTZ

BT-FERTIGTEIL

BRANDWAND

WERKSTEIN

HOLZ

UHD

TROCKENBAU

WÄRMEDÄMMUNG

ABBRUCH

BAUHERR

2,71

3,22

FEUERHEMMEND (F30)

FREIBERGER STRAßE/ SCHWERINER STRAßE, 01067 DRESDEN

TLG IMMOBILIEN AG

4.OBERGESCHOSS

+15,50

BUDAPESTER STRAßE 3, 01069 DRESDEN

36 28

WU-BETON

MK4 - NEUBAU BÜROGEBÄUDE "ANNENHÖFE" +17,25

3,50

STB

PROJEKT

+19,00

3,07

KLINKER

2,71

3,07

3,35

+23,00

LAGEPLAN / GEBÄUDEÜBERSICHT

ERG ÄSS

CHE

B01

ST ER IN SC

SSE

36 28

TRA

B02

B03

A03

3.OBERGESCHOSS

+12,00

FREIBERGER STRASSE

3,50

3,22

MAL

2,71

3,07

3,50

+13,75

3,50

3,22

A04

A01

A02

2,71

3,07

3,50

+10,25

ASS

-STR

NER

2.OBERGESCHOSS

-LIND

THA

HER

HERTHA-LINDNER-STRASSE

36 28

+8,50

3,50

3,22

2,71

3,07

3,50

+6,75

1.OBERGESCHOSS

28 6,40

1:100

5,97

6,25

6,40

+2,87

5,97

MASSSTAB

SCHNITT CC

SECTION CC

+5,00

PLANINHALT

+0,73 ±0,00 ±0,00

±0,00

ERDGESCHOSS

- 0,90 = 111,76 NHN

-1,40

- 1,40 = 111,26 NHN

NORD SCHWERINER STRAßE

3,60

3,00

3,56

2,95

3,60

-3,20

UNTERGESCHOSS -1

-5,00

3,60

3,28

3,60

-6,81

UNTERGESCHOSS -2

-8,60

LEGENDE

HÖHENBEZUG ± 0.00:

= 112,66 m NHN

SYMBOLE

WANDDURCHBRUCH (WD)

OK FFB

DECKENDURCHBRUCH (DD)

WANDSCHLITZ (WS)

UK FD

OK RD UK RD

KLINKER

STB

WU-BETON

FEUERHEMMEND (F30)

SICHTBETON

BETON UNBEW. / ESTRICH

FEUERBESTÄNDIG (F90)

PUTZ

BT-FERTIGTEIL

BRANDWAND

WERKSTEIN

HOLZ

UHD

36 28

SCHRAFFUREN

TROCKENBAU

WÄRMEDÄMMUNG

ABBRUCH

PROJEKT

3,03

3,22

2,71

3,53

+23,00

5.OBERGESCHOSS

FREIBERGER STRAßE/ SCHWERINER STRAßE, 01067 DRESDEN

TLG IMMOBILIEN AG

3,50

28 3,22

MK4 - NEUBAU BÜROGEBÄUDE "ANNENHÖFE" BAUHERR

BUDAPESTER STRAßE 3, 01069 DRESDEN

2,71

3,50

36 28

+19,00

4.OBERGESCHOSS

LAGEPLAN / GEBÄUDEÜBERSICHT

ER IN ER

SS E

3,50

SC HW

3,50

A04 A01

36 28

B02

A02

3,50

3,22

HERTHA-LINDNER-STRASSE

2.OBERGESCHOSS

3,50

6,40

1:400

SECTION DD

28 5,97

6,25

MASSSTAB

SCHNITT DD

1.OBERGESCHOSS

+5,00

±0,00

ERDGESCHOSS -1,40

3,60

- 1,40 = 111,26 NHN

2,95

PLANINHALT

2,71

3,22

36 28 15

+8,50

UNTERGESCHOSS -1

3,60

-5,00

3,28

ASS

-STR

NER

-LIND

THA

HER

2,71

3,50

-8,60

SSE

3.OBERGESCHOSS

+12,00

FREIBERGER STRASSE

TRA

CHE

36 28

ÄSS

B01

B03

3,22

DMALERG

A03

2,71

+15,50

3,50

6,40

3,60

BODENDURCHBRUCH (BD)

UNTERGESCHOSS -2

Scale - 1:200

XXX

**The exact planning of the offices cannot be disclosed. For this purpose, the plans have been cropped/ distorted and jumbled.

Img - 1.8

**The exact planning of the offices cannot be disclosed. For this purpose, the plans have been cropped/ distorted and jumbled.

Informal Meeting Area Folding walls

Scale - 1:200

XXX

**The exact planning of the offices cannot be disclosed. For this purpose, the plans have been cropped/ distorted and jumbled.

Img - 1.9

**The exact planning of the offices cannot be disclosed. For this purpose, the plans have been cropped/ distorted and jumbled.

Scale - 1:200

XXX

**The exact planning of the offices cannot be disclosed. For this purpose, the plans have been cropped/ distorted and jumbled.

What I learned? Internal planning guidelines, German laws and things which are generally expected. The standards for arranging offices, planning the placement of workstations, projectors, and its implications on the wiring conduits. The general strategies followed during preliminary stage, and during construction. Possibilities of Planning of Toilets, Kitchens and Server rooms. The most feasible way depending on the placement of ducts. The stages of planning of a large scale building project, and how all the firmsconstruction, landlord, client, planning, architecture - collaborate. I spent a majority of the time at the part-time training, doing this project. The plans could easily undergo 3 revisions in a day. I learned how to communicate fast, through drawings. Of course, Lars and Ruairi were guiding me through this. I had a chance to apply the principles of acoustics. I learned about the standard drywalls available in the market. I had a chance to be fully involved during the internal planning phase. I learned and used Archicad for our plans and model, which was a vital tool for our spacial study.

Img - 1.10

The external building envelope, and structure were already designed by TLG Immobilien, when I joined the firm, in which, I was involved in making minor corrections, changes in ducts for toilets and teekuche, fire partitions, etc. References: Annenhoefe Building Images, Plans and External Visualizations- TLG Immobilien. Photos, Fig-1.1, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.10 by TLG . Copyright by TLG Immobilien, Source: www.annenhoefe.de Room program office space: RuairĂ Oâ€™Brien.

HOHENECK PRISON MUSEUM A Museum, Depicting the Atrocities to political prisoners in the Hoheneck Castle

Client: City of Stollberg Location: Inside Hoheneck Castle, Stollberg, Saxony Architect: Ruairi Oâ€™Brien.Archecture.Light.Spacial Design. (Museum Planning Concept inside Hoheneck). The Hoheneck Castle was first mentioned in history in 1244 AD. It was rebuilt in 1815. Status: Proposal Stage.

Img - 1.1

Brief: To plan a museum inside the hoheneck castle, and its campus, which depicts the atrocities to the political prisoners in it throughout history.

History:

Site: The Site is located in Areal Stalburc/Hoheneck castle, in Stollberg, Germany. It is surrounded by field lands, and thus can be easily distinguished. The interiors of the castle speak for themselves about its grim past.

1244 The castle is mentioned for the first time in connection with Hugo von Straleburc. Until 18th Century Castle used by Medieval Kings. It was rebuilt in 1815, and served as a rent and justice office. 1862 The Castle is converted into Prison 1933 - 1945 Prison used by the Nazi government, for political prisoners. 1950 - 1990 Prison used by the Soviet Union. It became most notable as a detention facility for female political prisoners in East Germany. The prison was designed to hold up to 600 inmates, however, as many as 1,600 were detained there. 1990 - 2001 The detention centre is being partially modernized and is used to detain criminal men. It was closed in April 2001. The short film Broken: The Womenâ€™s Prison at Hoheneck examines forced labour in Hoheneck prison: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/27/opinion/broken-the-womens-prison-at-hoheneck.html

My contribution: I contributed to the design of the panel elements of the museum ( conceptual), their internal plan ,modelling and rendering. Interior Design

Concept

Visualization

Img - 1.4

Concept: The prison cells are 2m*4m in size. Prisoners sometimes spent as long as 10 days without any human contact in these dark cells. Some of these cells were modified into cold water punishment areas for disciplining the prisoners.

The concept is to â€œmake the walls of the cell unfold and speak the storyâ€?. The walls were first taken and unfolded, preserving the dimensions, and its configurations were studied.

The West wing consists of Administrative blocks for employees, with larger rooms, This is where the museum is hosted.

The Prison Cells are located in the South Wing of the Castle. Cell Dimensions are 2m*4m.

Pre-concept of the memorial information Centre, by beyer+wellach Projekte, taken from competition basic materials of GedenkstĂ¤tte Frauenzuchthaus Hoheneck.

1.270

1.101

0.903

1.101

0.875

1.129

0.875

1.129

0.875

1.129

0.875

1.101

0.931

25.595

1.129 0.762 1.129

0.903

1.129

1.101

8.579

0.875

0.903

13.771

1.129

0.875

1.129

0.875

1.101

0.903

1.129

0.875

1.129

0.818

1.129

0.903

1.129

0.875

16.085

1.129

0.875

1.129

0.903

1.101

0.903

1.101

1.242

1.665 0.705 1.693 15.661 0.705 1.693 0.762 1.580

15.831

15.972

0.875

45.601

3.612 3.245

4.261

4.317 4.402

Preliminary room programme of the west wing.

Scale - 1:200

PRESENT SPACIAL CONCEPT (SITE)

My Learnings: I learnt about the strategies on designing the elements of museum, surrounding a single concept. I learnt some details of the medieval castle architecture.

References: Pre-concept of the memorial information Centre, by beyer+wellach Projekte, taken from competition basic materials of GedenkstĂ¤tte Frauenzuchthaus Hoheneck. Design Study of Hoheneck Museum - Ruairi Oâ€™ Brien. Images of Hoheneck, and its history, Retrieved from : https://www.areal-hoheneck.de/kulturstaetten_aktuelles_gedenkstaette.php

VOLKSSOLIDARITÄT TRACHENBERGE Task on drawing plans of the building.

Client: Volkssolidarität Trachenberge (People’s solidarity association building in Trachenberge) Organization(s): Kistner and Partner Architekten, Wissensarchitektur Laboratory of Knowledge Architecture. Location: Trachenberge, Dresden, Saxony. Team members/ Collaborators: Markus Kistner(Kistener and Partner), Konstantin Doll (KA Lab, Kistner and Partner), Niraj Kamal (KA Lab) Status: -

Brief: To make Renovation and Fire Planning for the Peopleâ€™s Solidarity Association building in Trachenberge. I was involved in the stage of making the architectural drawings from the old building data. My colleague Konstantin Doll was so kind to give me the opportunity, so that I could get to know about the architectural details of the buildings in Saxony better. This was one of the warmup tasks in the lab. People's Solidarity is an organisation for elderly people in the new states of Germany, founded 1945. It was one of many important non-parliamentary mass organisations in the former socialist country, East Germany.

My contribution: I was involved in making the building drawings especially the section in AutoCAD. Only the renovated building plans and sections are shown in this report. I was not involved during the fire planning stage, so those plans are not shown in this report. Architectural Drawings

My Learnings I learnt the architectural details of Saxon houses, and their roof design.

The site: The house was opened in 1998 and is centrally located in the Trachenberge district. In addition to the North Outpatient Services, they also offer day care and senior living on site.

2,25 1,00 2,25

Parken P2 P3

4,36 1

35,60

1,10

6,34 2

2,25

21,10

20,25 8

+- 0,0 = OFF Eingang

4,36 1 4,10 1

3,78 4,35 1

21,04

Fu Feuerwehrzufahrt

0,420 x 0,297 = 0,12 m²

Kistner & Partner Architekten PartGmbB Weißbachstraße 6 Weißbachstraße 6, 01069 Dresden 0351 30 9000 82 mail@kister-partner.de http://www.kistner-partner.de

BAUHERR Volkssolidarität Dresden Altgorbitzer Ring 58 01169 Dresden 0000-00000-1

7, 00 ca. 3

7,67 5 4,50

ußweg

PLAN Lageplan

PROJEKT Volkssolidarität Trachenberge

Maßstab: Datum: Gezeichnet:

Trachenberger Str. 6 01129 Dresden

1 : 200 26.03.2020 KD

6, 37 1,18 3

88 5 2,00 5

1,90 3

80 60

1,62

2,12 8

1,91

3, 8 0 3

1,32

Chemie/ Getränkelager

88 5 2,00 5

14,48 m²

4,32

2,74

1,01

22 9 257 4

16 5

88 5

1,18 60

2,96

1,29 5

7, 12

2,00 2

Aufzugsraum/ Technik

3,83 m²

Aufzug

1,50

2,96 m²

1,84 42 5 28 5

86 80 60 1,46 8

88 5

Waschraum

25 16

6,32 m²

1,27 2,05

2,36

2,65

2710 2

54 3 17 5

17 5

1,31

88 5 2,00 5

5 8 46 17 13

1,31

Umkleide Damen/ Herren

5 2,36 7,70 m²

1,38

1,25

36 12

76 5

63 5 2,00 5

1,18 60 1, 49

44 5

1,18 3

1,08

1,62

12 3 63 5 2,00 5

2,24 5

1,08

5,48

63 5 2,00 5

1,42 42 5

5, 48

28 8 54

80 60 71 3

88 5 2,00 5

1,62 54

1,74

4, 64

64 1,33 42 5

20,25

88 5

3,01

3, 01

9x17/29

1,54 64

0,420 x 0,297 = 0,12 m²

Kistner & Partner Architekten PartGmbB Weißbachstraße 6 Weißbachstraße 6, 01069 Dresden 0351 30 9000 82 mail@kister-partner.de http://www.kistner-partner.de

1,18 60 2, 20

1,00 12

1,18 60 1, 94

BAUHERR Volkssolidarität Dresden Altgorbitzer Ring 58 01169 Dresden 0000-00000-1

58 27

15,76 42

2, 47

2, 13

4,605

42 60

80 60

64 2,05

80 60

2, 25

80 10 8 2,20

1,34 3

3, 62

25 3 42

2,98

80 2,20

1,07 8

3,62

80 14 5 42 2,20

1, 65

1,36 2,78 3 , 7 35

1,98

10 54 75 2, 0 7

5, 8 3

24 81 5

2,22

1,58

1,56 5

1,18 60 2,19

1,02 27

1,18 60 1, 51

45 14

1,18 60

1,00 3, 43

1,18 60

50 25

1,18 60

97 5, 83

1,18 60

1,28 63

21,06

PLAN Kellergeschoss

PROJEKT Volkssolidarität Trachenberge

Maßstab: Datum: Gezeichnet:

Trachenberger Str. 6 01129 Dresden

1 : 100 26.03.2020 KD

6, 10

4, 95

1,90 60

1,32

Archiv

46,30 m²

88 5 2,00 5

1,01

2,00 5

1,07

54 27

1, 0 1 2,00 5

20,25

96 1,90 60 55 5 80 60

1,62

42 8 88 5 10 54 2,00 5

Archiv

3,52 m² 1,78 1,31

60 8 15 57

76 2,00 5

36 5

8, 88

1,01 2,00 5 1,10 1,01 2,00 5

88 5 2,00 5 1,07 8 88 5 2,00 5

4,13 m²

1,74

42 5 5

1,60

2,00 5

3,81 m²

13,66 m²

36 5 44 3

1,84

2,00 5

1,90 60

Lager Tagespflege

1,27

1210 1,32

85 5 2,05

6,85 5

31 5 25

80 60

Hausmeister

12,93 m²

62 7 59 22 2 80 60

1,66 1,13 1,01 2,00 5

1,42 6

85 5 2,05

11 5 48 9

2,00 5

60 5

1,50

84 2,05

35 5 36 5

2,28 5

3,93 3

2,00 5

11 5

1,52 5

1,99

4,45 m²

1,80

Mieterkeller

4,42 2,62 8

1,18 1,89

80 1,89

2,39

1Sa/DD 20x50 1Sa/DD Ø 160

1,62

Sa/DD 20x20

3,04

He/DD 20x10

Beratung

16,13 m²

22 56

5,53 3

11 x 17/30 25 1,55

68 8

10Sa/DD 20x50

He/DD 20/10

1,41 6

WC WC

2,91 5

1,62 m²

1,80 1,65

2,91 5

7,19 3

20,25

1,21

9 x 17/29

8 x 16/28

WC Vorraum

2,36 3

2,33 m²

5,19 m²

12 2,00 5

1,34 4

98 5

80 1,89 78 3

66 8

98 5 12 42 5

1,01 2,00 5

5,30 m²

4, 71

PRELIMINARY IDEAS

1,28 5

25 20 1

1,01 2,00 5

12Sa/DD Ø 160

1,63 5 2,13 5

3,01

2,11

Flur

13,91 m²

+-0,00

3, 01

1,20 3

Aufzug

68 8

3,20 5

2,96 m²

56 8

1,96 3

62 6

2,18 2

7, 12

4,81 4

1,18 1,89

3,91 7

2,11

10 8

2, 1 5

1, 0 1 2,00 5

5,19 8

Ve Be

1,18 1,89

5,11 5

5, 41

2,11 5

101

1,54 56

0,420 x 0,297 = 0,12 m²

Kistner & Partner Architekten PartGmbB Weißbachstraße 6 Weißbachstraße 6, 01069 Dresden 0351 30 9000 82 mail@kister-partner.de http://www.kistner-partner.de

1,18 1,89

1,00

1,18 1,89

BAUHERR Volkssolidarität Dresden Altgorbitzer Ring 58 01169 Dresden 0000-00000-1

1,18 1,89

20,69 5

1,80 1,65

80 1,89

4,01 7

37 3

80 1,89

2,19

56 45 56

1,43

1,93

1,01

2,49

83 6

25 79 3 12

He/DD 20x10

2Sa/DD 20x50

D 0

2,55 m²

12,76 m²

Kreativ Raum

42 2 25

19 80 1,89

1,01 2,00 5

1,35 5

Flur

9,31 m²

5, 0 6 5

42 8 12

3,89

12,49 m²

2,07 8

Treppenhaus

21,07 m²

+1 , 2 8

+1 , 0 3

5, 1 6 5 He/DD 20/10

78 3

3,46 7

1218 5

1,42 3

4Sa/DD 20x50

Terrasse

8,1 6

2,30 1,65

5,11 5

eranstaltungsraum/ egegnungsstätte

42 5

3,85 5

1, 0 1 2,00 5

19 , 6 0

1,84

4, 2 2 2

5, 1 6 5

5,11 5

10 80 35 5 1,89

7, 1 5 7

Küche

19,88 m²

42 5 1,42 3

1,01 2,00 5

Flur

37,75 m²

2,30 1,65

Lü/DD Ø 150

1,96

1,71 m²

1,18 1,89

1,00

1,18 1,89

50 19,94

1,15 1,89

1,00

1,18 1,89

1,15 1,89

1,00

1,15 1,89

1,31 56

21,06

PLAN Hochparterre

PROJEKT Volkssolidarität Trachenberge

Maßstab: Datum: Gezeichnet:

Trachenberger Str. 6 01129 Dresden

1 : 100 26.03.2020 KD

20,25

88 5 2,00 5

2,55 6

16,68 m²

3,16 9

Kantine/Café

+1,28

2,62 5

1,09

1,00 8

12 1,05 6

9 13 3 257 9 63 5 712 2,00 5

62 7

1,03

59 22 2 80 1,89

1,01 2,00 5

25 52

49 5 25

98 5

12,38 m²

Büro

1,18 1,89

3,21 6

Büro

3,06

2,57

1,45 5

42 5

6, 76 1,18 1,89

2,39

80 1,89

42 5

1Sa/DD 20x50 1Sa/DD Ø 160 He/DD 20x10

1,22

2,64 8

Sa/DD 20x20

1,18 1,89

Personal

20,90 m²

25 76 2,00 5

29 5

84 2,00 5

4, 0 9 5

Asr

1,20 m² 1.5

1.3

Server

Aufzug

6,23 m²

1,18 1,89

2,86

88 5 2,00 5

1.4

1,12

3,16

1.6

1.2

Flur

3,32 m²

6,82 m²

42 5 56

7,31 8

1,06 3

14, 84

42 5

12Sa/DD Ø 160

88 5 2,00 5

10Sa/DD 20x50

1.23 1,15 6

1,02

28 18 5

2,36 m²

1.21

2,35 m² 2,43

1,01 2,00 5

1.20

Flur

10,12 m² 12

2, 1 4

42 5

12 17 63 5 16 15 9 5 2,00

1,01 2,00 5

5,33 m²

96 4

1,74 4

42 58 3 80 20 344 5 1,89

2,18 9 96 5 12

Trepp

22,49 m

He/DD 20/10

1.22

36 5

2,55 3

1,97

1,21

1,59

1.18

1,01 2,00 5

2,89 m²

1216 5 63 5 2,00 5

1,69 1,18 1,89

15,07 m²

76 5

1,01 2,00 5

1,52

8,86 m²

1,44 5

1,69

Bad

42 5

1.17

2,74

1,01 2,00 5

5, 25

5, 41

1.19

Pflegebad

1,73 42 5

Kistner & Partner Architekten PartGmbB 0,297 x 0,420 = 0,12 m²

25 14

99 5

425

1.1

+3,26

74 6

20,25

10 x 17/38

11 x 17/30

1,06 3

3,01

11 x 17/30

Weißbachstraße 6 Weißbachstraße 6, 01069 Dresden 0351 30 9000 82 mail@kister-partner.de http://www.kistner-partner.de

1,18 1,89 2,91 8

1,00

1,15 1,89

BAUHERR Volkssolidarität Dresden Altgorbitzer Ring 58 01169 Dresden 0000-00000-1

50 3, 30

1,18 1,89

50 25

4, 93 5

1,18 1,89

1,36

2Sa/DD 20x50

1,00 5

42 5 68 5 42 5

1,43

1,97

1,11

2,39

42 5 5

He/DD 20x10

D 0

1.8

1.11

Behandlung

Büro

8,63 m²

3,26

11,27 m²

31 27

12,46 m²

93 1,89

88 5 2,00 5

3,88

93 1,89

1,01 2,00 5

1,34

1,01 2,00 5

3012 72

62 6

3Sa/DD 20x50

4,32

penhaus

93 1,89

3,48

3,04 6

+5,10

93 1,89

3,65 2

He/DD 20/10

81 6

4Sa/DD 20x50

1,04 5

7,19 6

m²

1.13

Lü/DD Ø 150

88 5 23 80 2,00 5 1,89

1.10

Flur/ Eingangsbereich

Aufenthaltsbereich

34,28 m²

1,06

2,49 2

1,01 2,00 5

1,75

1, 0 1 2,00 5

3, 3 4 5

1.15

1,56

2,12

2,03

1,01 2,00 5

Schlafraum

1.14

1,18 1,89 5, 25

Ruheraum

1,01 2,00 5

7Sa/DD 20x50

Gemeinschaftsraum

32,03 m²

42 5

2,12

2,03 5

11,54 m²

1,18 1,89 2, 22

1,00

1,18 1,89

5, 062

1,18 1,89

50 12

1,18 1,89

1,00

1,18 1,89

6, 10

83 5

42 5

1.16

6, 10

26,58 m²

5,25

4, 9 9 42 5

25 42 5

7, 3 9 7

42 510 80 1,89 425

1,54 5

54 5

2,90

1,01 2,00 5

39,21 m²

20,25

2,01 6

12 48 6

3,24 8

22 8

6,54 m²

1,34

Flur

7,54 7

88 5 2,00 5

1.9

7, 30

39 5

1,72 4

1,15

88 5 2,00 5

22 8

65 5

1,65 9

1,43 9

1.12

Empfangs-/ Warteraum

3, 32

64 5

1,10

4,94 9

13,04 m²

3,26

1.7

Behandlung

88 5 2,00 5 3,26

Notleiter mit Rückenschutz

3, 53

2,05

42 5

3,22

1,66 5

2, 48

80 8 5 88 5 1,89 2,00 5

70 5

2,36

6,87 5

42 5

2, 69

1,27 5

15, 76

42 5 425

21,06

PLAN 1. Obergeschoss

PROJEKT Volkssolidarität Trachenberge

Maßstab: Datum: Gezeichnet:

Trachenberger Str. 6 01129 Dresden

1 : 100 26.03.2020 KD

42 5

3,46 3

2,64 8

1,18 1,89

3,04 7

2,35

425

1Sa/DD 20x50 1Sa/DD Ø 160

1,64

He/DD 20x10

Sa/DD 20x20

1,80

5,01 m²

1,71

88 5 2,00 5

4,00

Aufzug

Aufzugsflur

2,34

2,86

2,13 1,18 1,89

Flur

6,52 m²

25 17 8

16,42 m²

1,89

88 5 2,00 5

Büro

6, 27

29 8

1,18 1,89

2,64

7,12

80 1,89

2,99 m²

5,31 m²

98 5

1,21 3

10 x 17/30

88 5 2,00 5 59 5

+6,83

21,98 m

10Sa/DD 20x50

He/DD 20/10

88 5 21 5 80 1,89 2,00 5

42 5

Bad

4,84 m²

Büro

2,43 3

1,42

11,52 m²

1224 5

88 5 2,00 5

1,13 5

62 5

3,59 5

4,71

Trepp

1,36

10 x 17/30

1,06 3

3,01

10 x 17/28

20,25

1,36

4,18 5

1,06 3

42 5

12Sa/DD Ø 160

425

80 1,89

Flur

5,40 m²

88 5 2,00 5

32 8 12

5 88 5 1212 2,00 5

1,18 1,89

Büro

16,61 m²

15,57 m²

42 5

2,11 5

5, 25

5,41

2,11

2,88

1,35 3 42 5

0,420 x 0,297 = 0,12 m²

Kistner & Partner Architekten PartGmbB Weißbachstraße 6 Weißbachstraße 6, 01069 Dresden 0351 30 9000 82 mail@kister-partner.de http://www.kistner-partner.de

1,18 1,89 2,71 8

1,12 12

1,15 1,89

BAUHERR Volkssolidarität Dresden Altgorbitzer Ring 58 01169 Dresden 0000-00000-1

52 3,50

1,18 1,89

64 12

20,69 5 2, 59

72 5

80 12 5 88 5 1,89 2,00 5

73 5

5, 06 80 1,89

425

1,98

1,18 1,89

1,48

2Sa/DD 20x50

1,00 5

42 5 68 5 42 5

1,43

1,97

1,11

2,39

42 5 5

42 5

He/DD 20x10

Büro

88 5 14 5 2,00 5

2,67 6

Bad

3Sa/DD 20x50

5,02 m²

3,53

2,10 5

penhaus

2,30 1,65

+8,47

84 5 1,01 2,00 5

1,82

42 5

79 5 20

1,70 3

88 5 2,00 5

39 5

17 5 33 1

1,59 6

88 5 2,00 5

13,18 m²

3,32

Büro

6,37 m²

2,30 1,65

Flur

20 512

64 5

88 5 2,00 5

1,62 4

1,16 4

16,44 m²

42 5

1,12

Büro

12,00 m²

88 5 2,00 5

3,34 5

3,10 5

88 5 2,00 5

2,89 5

88 5 2,00 5

49 25

3,28

2,10

4,72 9

44 5 25

34 5 38 8 25

2,68

1,70

D 0

1,50 3

63 5 2,00 5 3

1224 5

88 5 2,00 5

Flur

6,11 m²

4,19 m²

3,69

Bad

6,10

30,26 m²

5, 25

Büro

12,81 m²

8,97 m²

42 5

2,46

6,00 m²

1,18 1,89 1,93

80 5 5

1,18 1,89

49 2 3,07 2

1,18 1,89

1,08 25

1,18 1,89 2, 01

44 12

1,18 1,89

1,13 6, 11 5

1,18 1,89

42 5 42 5

21,06

PLAN 2. Obergeschoss

PROJEKT Volkssolidarität Trachenberge

Maßstab: Datum: Gezeichnet:

Trachenberger Str. 6 01129 Dresden

1 : 100 26.03.2020 KD

20,25

7,30

80 1,89 10 4, 9 3 5

1,18 1,89

2,00 5

12 2,00 5

88 5 2,00 5

7Sa/DD 80 20x50

88 5

3,11

2,46

2,15 2

5 88 5 1412 2,00 5

88 5 14 5 2,00 5

88 5 14 5 42 5 31 5 2,00 5

1,51 6

88 5 2,00 5 14 5 1,03 5

6,87 5

54 5

2,12 5 88 5 2,00 5

3,47 2

425

1,50

12 41

1,97

34,52 m²

Lü/DD Ø 150

69 3

2,74

25,54 m²

He/DD 20/10

Büro

4,50 m²

2,25 4

Flur

4Sa/DD 20x50

88 5 24 5 80 1,89 2,00 5

1,30 7

5,55 5

m²

42 5

3,71 3

25 1,18 1,89

2,59 8

2,38

80 1,89

42 5

1Sa/DD 20x50 1Sa/DD Ø 160 He/DD 20x10

1,20

42 5

2,79 7

Sa/DD 20x20

2,50

Bad

1,18 1,89

6,18 m²

88 5 2,00 5

Zimmer

1,51

24,86 m² 2,24 2

88 5 2,00 5

Aufzug

2,43 5

1,18 1,89

2,35 8

79 5

36 5

2,07

6 , 4 45

7,12

6,76

2,79 m²

75 5

1,06 5

12Sa/DD Ø 160

1,36

1,06 3

7,21 8

88 5 2,00 5

10Sa/DD 20x50

1,37

10,51 m²

85 5

1,66

88 5 2,00 5

Flur

1,49

8,38 m²

2,25 3

2,37

88 5 14 525 2,00 5

Zimmer

18,85 m²

42 5

1,06 5

2,11 5

2,80

1,93

1,18 1,89

5,41

Zimmer

11,67 m²

5,42 5

88 5 2,00 5

2,11 5

2,37 5

1,54 5

1,54

2,45 8

1,91 5

2,00

Bad

4,40 m²

5 88 5 1412 2,00 5

Zimmer

1,80 1,65

3, 77

4,71

21,72 m²

20,25

+10,18 He/DD 20/10

Trepp

1,36

10x 17/30

1,06 3

3, 01

3,01

10x 17/30

1,39 8 42 5

0,420 x 0,297 = 0,12 m²

Kistner & Partner Architekten PartGmbB Weißbachstraße 6 Weißbachstraße 6, 01069 Dresden 0351 30 9000 82 mail@kister-partner.de http://www.kistner-partner.de

80 20 1,89

1,42 6,11 3

80 1,89

BAUHERR Volkssolidarität Dresden Altgorbitzer Ring 58 01169 Dresden 0000-00000-1

80 1,89

55 25

20,69 5 2,59

1,80 1,65

1,98

84 0 80

1,99

2,82 5

42 5

1,18 1,89

1,00 5

1,51

2Sa/DD 20x50

1,43

42 5 68 5 42 5

1,97

1,11

2,39

42 5 5

42 5

Zimmer

7,55 m²

3, 53

9,30 m²

9,87 m²

1,18 1,89

Bad

3,81

Zimmer

3,28

2,76

Notleiter mit Rückenschutz

3,10 5

1,47

He/DD 20x10

D 0

61 5

2,45

Zimmer

1,95

75 5

14,86 m²

1,66

42 5

4,07

88 5 2,00 5

1,61 2

1212 5

88 5 2,00 5

1,11

2,39

88 5 2,00 5

Bad

3,10 5

1,04 5

2,38

54 5 12

2,85 3,77

10 80 1,89

25 88 5 2,00 5

5,35 m²

425

2,91

74 5

Zimmer

3,79 5

22,42 m²

42 5

2,53 5

1,40

80 1,89

1,28 7

80 1,89 5, 96 2

80 1,89

1,39 5 12

80 1,89

60 5 3,10 5

80 1,89

82 12

80 1,89

18 80 18 1,89 4,51 5

1,13 5

1,44 5 42 5

21,03 5

PLAN Mansardgeschoss

PROJEKT Volkssolidarität Trachenberge

Maßstab: Datum: Gezeichnet:

Trachenberger Str. 6 01129 Dresden

1 : 100 26.03.2020 KD

6, 10

Zimmer

16,84 m²

1,18 1,89

Zimmer

23,68 m²

5, 25

7Sa/DD 20x50

20,25

1,18 1,89

Zimmer

19,49 m²

1,51 6

2,52 2

1,18 1,89

4,21

Lü/DD Ø 150

3,77

Flur

He/DD 20/10

88 5 2,00 5

3,77

5,36 m²

Bad

8,62 m²

2,67 5

7, 30

4Sa/DD 20x50

13,47 m²

1,64 5

Küche

1,47

88 5 2,00 5

84 5

24 5

1,17 5

88 5 2,00 5

1,18

25 24 5

65 3

1,17 5

88 5 4 5 2,00 5 39 88 5 2,00 5

Flur

11,91 m²

80 5

1,00 5

3, 32

1,18 1,89

9,19 m²

+11,85

penhaus

1,36

25 78 5 88 5 2,00 5

88 5 2,00 5

87 5

3,32 5

Flur

88 5 2,00 5

52 5 25

Ausstiegspodest

2,82 5

42 5

2,89 5

1,98

88 5 2,00 5

2,59

1216 5

25 2,00 5

26 2,06

+14,85

+11,85

2,35 +8,47

10x17/30

2,36

+5,10

2,25

3,21

11x17/28

Kellergeschoss

-1,57

1,54 2,68 1,76

2,00 6

9x17/19

-1,57

Kistner & Partner Architekten PartGmbB 0,420 x 0,297 = 0,12 m²

+1,28

8x16/28

70 17

+0,00

2,45

2,87

Erdgeschoss

2,33

11x17/30

Weißbachstraße 6 Weißbachstraße 6, 01069 Dresden 0351 30 9000 82 mail@kister-partner.de http://www.kistner-partner.de

BAUHERR Volkssolidarität Dresden Altgorbitzer Ring 58 01169 Dresden 0000-00000-1

3,40

3,44

3,40

+3,26

1,33

3,07

10x17/28

2,96

2,33

+6,83

1. Obergeschoss

2,99

2. Obergeschoss

1,47

10x17/30

3,01

+10,20

10x17/30

2,13

+11,85

Mansardgeschoss

2,82

2,13

3,17

+15,02

Dachaufbau Bieberschwanz-Kronendeckung 15,5/36,5 Dachlatten Konterlatten Unterspannbahn Sparren Dämmung - 14cm Mineralwollefilz Dampfsperre sd > 100mm

1,65 8

2,82 93

2,13

Deckenaufbau 1 Fußboden im Dachgeschoss 50mm Estrich (Anhydritestrich oder Zementestrich mit Randdämmstreifen Trennschicht PE-Folie 90mm Wärmedämmung 30mm Trittschalldämmung

+11,85

OFF

1,80

3,12

1,90

Deckenaufbau 2 45mm Zementestrich und 5mm Belag 30mm Trittschalldämmelement 180mm Stahlbeton

+8,51

1,82

1,90

3,05

OFF

2,13

1,23

2x10mm Promatec

2,00 Terrasse

+1,32

50 70 30 40 17

1,37

2,60

2,00 5

+1,28

16 48

15 38

OFF

2,13

3,38

2,10

+5,14

Kellerfußboden Raum 0.30 u. 0.13 Ungedämmter einschichtiger Fußboden Imprägnierung nach DIN 19353 auf Epoxidharzbasis 100mm Geton B25 Tragschicht PE Folie vorh. Sandboden als kapillar Schicht Raum 0.1 u. 0.6 Ungedämmter zweischichtiger Fußboden 3,5mm homogener Kautschukbelag 45mm Zement- o. Anhydritestrich 0,5mm Abdichtung n. DIN 18195 T.4 100mm Beton B25 PE Folie vorh. Sandboden

PLAN Schnitt Treppenhaus

PROJEKT Volkssolidarität Trachenberge

Maßstab: Datum: Gezeichnet:

Trachenberger Str. 6 01129 Dresden

1 : 100 26.03.2020 KD

4 Client: National Aviation University, Kyiv, Ukraine. Organization: TU Dresden - Wissensarchitektur Laboratory of Knowledge Architecture. Location: Kiev, Ukraine. Team members/ Collaborators: Niraj Kamal Karunanidhi, Joerg Rainer Noennig, Olga Kyeslova, David Hick, Adam Urban, Nikhil Duggal. Status: Proposal Stage

KEIV NAUPROSTIR Science and Art space inside a university in KIEV

Brief: To design a space which will act as a focal point for creative projects and enterprises at the university. The wind tunnel has a very good heritage which needs to be preserved, and it is suited very well as a gallery/ exhibition space. Additionally, in later stages of the project, a vertical wind tunnel will be built to facilitate indoor sky diving. A new block should be planned to host the incubator spaces for start-ups and student groups. The old building (green) is more suited for machine workshops and labs. There is an existing aerospace faculty building(blue) which is the only building currently in use in the site.

My contribution: I had a chance to be involved in this project in the early stages of analysis. The plan was to visit Kyiv and conduct a design workshop with the students before preliminary design phase, but due to the pandemic, we had to improvise. Thus, I got a chance to be in charge of the current phase of the project. I learnt how client meetings, their expectations, things to do/not to do during proposal stage, and how building registration stages work by interacting with the stakeholders. I also learnt importance of Student Activity Centres and the various stakeholders involved. Project Incharge/ Representative Preliminary Design Analysis Meetings with Client/ Stakeholders

The site: The site is inside the National Aviation University of Kyiv. It is an Air tube, used by the soviets but later decommissioned after the fall of the soviet union.

The wind tunnel is the centrepiece of the site. It is for a long time in unworkable state and from both technical and economic points of view to restore it makes no sense. The main part of the structure, which is not used at all, is a huge metal pipe with a total length of 170m and a cross section of 10 by 4 m. There is also an empty machinery building of 3 floors, each of 450 sq. m, with high ceilings, around - open space. The open space around the wind tunnel is abandoned and partially cluttered with building materials.

References: Photos of the site - NAUPROSTIR Collaboration dashboard- NAU, Kiev. Source: https://protw.github.io/nauprostir/ (This is the projectâ€™s official collaboration handle. Please visit for more information.)

REQUIREMENTS - ANALYSIS

Plans: The plans are quite old (around the early 1960s) and of very poor quality.

Reference: Plan photos - NAUPROSTIR Collaboration dashboard- NAU, Kiev. Source: https://protw.github.io/nauprostir/

PRELIMINARY IDEAS

URBAN DESIGN PROJECTS

NEUSTADT GUIDANCE SYSTEM

URBAN MOBILITY STUDY IN CHEMNITZ

“THE CLOUD” URBAN INSTALLATION

NEUSTADT GUIDANCE SYSTEM Urban City Elements (Guidance for Destinations/ Paths/ Routes)

Client: City of Neustadt in Saxony. Location: City of Neustadt, Saxony Architect: Ruairí O’Brien. Architecture. Light. Spatial Design., City Area: 83.05 Sq. Km Status: Design and Urban Planning Stage.

Brief: To design urban city elements (e.g. Posts, parking Signs, Notice boards, Way Signs, etc.) as a guidance system for Destinations, paths and routes, for the city of Neustadt in Saxony.

The City: Neustadt in Saxony lies between the ridges of the Hohwald and Ungerberg mountains, embedded in the NeustĂ¤dter valley, on the border between the Lusatian highlands and the Elbe Sandstone Mountains. It is situated near the border with the Czech Republic, 35 km east of Dresden, and 23 km southwest of Bautzen.

Previous Works The Office has previously worked on city elements for guidance systems in Dresden, Freiberg, Dresden University hospital etc. My contribution: I contributed in the preliminary, design of the elements, and their details.

Model Preliminary design

References: About Neustadt City, Photos of Neustadt, Retrieved from: https://www.entdecke-sachsen.de/ziel/neustadt-in-sachsen.html Photo of Dresden Guidance System https://www.entdecke-sachsen.de

0.080 1.600

0.800

2.340

1.250 2.100

GSEducationalVersion

0.950

0.080

1.250

1.600

0.080

2.100

1.250

0.800

GSEducationalVersion

URBAN MOBILITY STUDY IN CHEMNITZ Urban mobility study on bicycle paths in Chemnitz

Topic: Urban Study of Chemnitz for new urban mobility awareness. Location: Chemnitz, Saxony. Organization: WISSENSARCHITEKTUR Laboratory of Knowledge Architecture, NUMIC Team mates: Sebastian Wisenhuetter Anja Jannak Jรถrg Rainer Noennig City Area: 220.8 Sq.Km Status: Urban Analysis Stage.

Brief: Data-driven analysis of the urban mobility, topology and morphology of the city of Chemnitz for the study of new possible modes of mobility, especially bike routes. Although initially data-driven, this project follows a participatory approach, involving academicians, citizens for voting the suggested routes, and city planners.

My contribution: I contributed in the initial stages of the study, to the workflow for urban analysis in grasshopper, especially bike(bicycle) scores for detecting the most feasible bike(bicycle) routes. Analysis

Workflow

The City: Chemnitz was first mentioned in 1143 and was founded between 1171 and 1174 as an imperial city. With the time of the Industrial Revolution around 1800 a great upswing and associated growth of the city began. Population growth rapidly from 1000 around 1800 to 360,000 in 1930 (previously the largest population) With the bombing on March 5, 1945, the centre was almost completely destroyed. The town hall and the Red Tower are among the few architectural monuments that could be saved

Chemnitz has a good 246,000 inhabitants as of July 2016. It is encouraging that the migration balance has been slightly positive for some years, so that the population decline has been stopped. Although, due to very less population, most of the activities are confined towards the city centre

FIGURE-GROUND PLAN

STREET NETWORK

BIKE PATHS

GREEN PATHS AND AGRICULTURE

Bike Score (normalized) Culture & Entertainment

Bike Score (normalized) Social & Government Service

Bike Score (normalized) Grocery

Bike Score (normalized) Errands

Bike Score (normalized) Shopping

Bike Score (normalized) Public

Bike Score (normalized) Mobility

Bike Score (normalized) Industries

Bike Score (normalized) Dining

Bike Score (normalized) Drinking

Bike Score (normalized) Average all Categories

ROUTE A SHORT LISTED BIKE ROUTES FOR VOTING

ROUTE B

References: The short-listing and analysis of individual routes were done by Sebastian Wisenhuetter at a later stage. Retrieved from: NUMIC Analysis by Sebastian Wisenhuetter, Wissensarchitektur Laboratory of Knowledge Architecture.

City Data retrieved from : https://m.chemnitz.de/chemnitz/de/unsere-stadt/stadtportrait/index.html https://m.chemnitz.de/chemnitz/de/unsere-stadt/stadtportrait/zahlen-und-fakten/bevoelkerung.ht ml

ROUTE C

Bike Score (normalized) Average all Categories

“THE CLOUD” URBAN INSTALLATION An Urban Installation in the City of Potsdam (for Potsdam Unterwegs im Licht 2021)

Client: City of Potsdam, Saxony. Location: City of Neustadt, Saxony Architect: Ruairí O’Brien. Architecture. Light. Spatial Design. Status: Proposal Stage

Brief: To design urban city element which could be used for spontaneous stage arts especially during a festival in Potsdam.

My contribution: I contributed in the preliminary, design of the elements, and their details.

The Concept: To make a stage, in the market square, in which artists can perform spontaneously. The stage has a primary urban installation - The cloud, which is suspended acts as a main focal point, and it reflects the light at night. One of the design proposals was to paint the cloud with invisible radiative UV paints and illuminate it with UV light at night

Model Preliminary design

Potsdam Unterwegs im Licht is a festival which is conducted every year. The photos of the festival in 2020 are on the left, designed by Ruairi Oâ€™ Brien. This is a proposal for an installation for this festival next year.

References: Photos of Potsdam Unterwegs, Retrieved from Ruairi O â€™Brien LIGHT ART: http://www.ruairiobrien-lightart.com/ablauf/

10.8 7.042

10.8

12.767

Scale - 1:100

RESEARCH PROJECTS

PROJECT ADAM

SCORE - RESILIENCE FOR CORONAVIRUS.

AI AND ARCHITECTURE WORKSHOP

STUDY ON GERMAN OFFICE DESIGN STANDARDS

Research

Workshops / Studies

8 Research topic: Insitu Programmable surfaces with auxetic materials, for Architecture. Organization: TU Dresden - Wissensarchitektur Laboratory of Knowledge Architecture. Team members/ Collaborators: Niraj Kamal Karunanidhi, Joerg Rainer Noennig, Thomas Wallmersperger, Martin Sobcyk, Sebastian Wisenheutter, Konstantin Doll, Adam Urban. Status: Completion stage, research publication.

PROJECT ADAM Adaptive and Programmable Architecture and Material Structures: Insitu Programmable materials for Architecture.

Goal: The overall goal of project ADAM(alias for graduate school) is to set up a graduate school focussed on programmable architecture and geometry, generative design, programmable use cases etc. My project focusses on the programmable materials, to generate programmable geometries, which are either preprogrammed (predetermined during fabrication) or in-situ programmable (programmed in real-time to any desired geometry). The main challenge was to find a way to change the 3-dimensional curvatures of surfaces (Gaussian Curvature). To achieve this, the material has to expand and contract, and/or shear. Thus auxetic tessellation systems were used for this purpose. My contribution: I am currently authoring the paper, under the guidance of Prof. Joerg, and with the collaboration of the team mates/ co-authors. The topic of the paper is â€œInsitu Programmable surfaces with Auxetic tessellation Systems, for Architectureâ€?, under the umbrella of ADAM. All the content shown in the report relates to the themes/content of the research paper. Research Project In-charge Authoring Conception Experimentation Reviewing papers Drawings/ Modelling Simulation/ Calculations

Previous works by the lab: Sebastian Wisenheutter and Adam Urban from the lab have already experimented with Ron-Resch's patterns and had made prototypes of moving building envelopes, using algorithms and research of Tachi.

Motivation: The lab has worked on projects related to spacial robotics, parametric architecture, and Intelligent Architecture. The models of a previous origami project caught my attention, and we decided to take this up as a warmup project to be finished by March. This was my very first research project - I had the chance to take up an initiative and work on the ideas from â€˜phase-0â€™. However, later the project got extended due to the lockdown, as it remained dormant for a few months. The project again gained momentum, and now is in the final stage as a publication.

Origami: The Ron-Resch's Origami patterns were constrained in curvature due to the behaviour of their base hinges. These patterns were extensively studied by Ron Resch, and other researchers. The bases were studied and its crease patterns were modified to induce flexibility. .

Normal Base

Normal Ron-Resch Tessellation

Surface plate Mountain fold Valley fold

Normal Rigid Tessellation (Not flexible, forces do not spread during deformation, breaks easily when deformed)

Flexible Structure (Flexible, forces are spread across the surface, acts like a fabric)

Structural System: Preliminary prototypes of structural system for programmable surfaces.

Auxetic Structures: Auxetic Tessellations can theoretically assume any shape within a specific scaling factor [Konakovic 2018]. This proved to be a promising solution for programmable structures.

Structural System: In order to have multiple degrees of freedom, the actuators in the surface is gridded in different patterns, Also, multiple layers of surfaces and actuators were added to control the scaling factor(expansion/contraction) and Gaussian curvature separately.

Multi-layered surface

Preprogrammed surface

Prototypes @ Home - office

Insitu Programmable geometries using Auxetic Kirigami:

Img - Possible Rapid Actuation:

Retrieved from: Zheng Yan, Fan Zhang, Jiehen Wang, Fei Liu, Xuelin Guo, Kewang Nan, Qing Lin, Mingye Gao, Dongquing Xiao, Yan Shi, Yitao Qiu, Haiwen Luan, Jung Hwan Kim, Yiqi Wang, Hongying Luo, Mengdi Han, Yonggang Huang, Yihui Zhang, John A Rogers: Controlled Mechanical buckling for Origami Inspired Construction of 3D Microstructures in Advanced Materials. Advanced Functional Materials. Volume 26, Issue 16 (2016)

GLOSSARY:

SCORE

Smart Co-Creating Resilience in Public Health Emergency Horizon 2020 Call: H2020-SC1-PHE-CORONAVIRUS-2020 (Advancing knowledge for the Clinical and public health response to the 2019-nCoV epidemic)

Topic: SC1-PHE-CORONAVIRUS-2020 Organization: WISSENSARCHITEKTUR Laboratory of Knowledge Architecture, Horizon 2020. Headed by: Xiaoping Xie

Context and Short Brief: It was early February, and Wuhan was the worst hit hotspot of 2019 nCoV (Later named as CoVID-19) The disease was still an epidemic, and many terms and strategies were not clear as they are now. Countries were still assessing the risks. This proposal lays down important and key strategies to handle the situation, and to increase the level of preparedness. The team collaborated with hospitals and organizations in Europe and China. Important principles of Knowledge Architecture like citizen participation were applied to make the process as agile as possible. (The proposal is of 130 pages)

Image by CDC

My Contribution: I participated in the proposal, in brainstorming, and created a lot of conceptual diagrams for the proposal. Conceptual Diagrams Brainstorming

What I learned: - I had a chance to revise and learn epidemiology while brainstorming and doing background work. - I got an insight on how proposals are made and submitted in research laboratories, and about funding organizations. - I got an insight on various agile strategies which could be used in an architectural and city perspective during an outbreak. - I learnt to represent key concepts and work-flows through conceptual diagrams.

AI AND ARCHITECTURE A workshop implementing basic present computer vision techniques on architectural applications

Topic: Workshop on AI and Architecture Organization: WISSENSARCHITEKTUR Laboratory of Knowledge Architecture, NUMIC Team mates: Niraj Kamal Karunanidhi, Adam Urban, David Hick.

What we did: Implemented basic image processing algorithms in urban spaces using python. We visualised the data using QGIS. We brainstormed about emerging technologies related to AI and Architecture,

Implementation on sample models Brainstorming

Analysis of movements of people in an Urban Square in Copenhagen

3-model Generation GAN network stack (Source:Nvidia)

STUDY ON GERMAN OFFICE DESIGN STANDARDS Analysis and study on German Standards especially in the context of the pandemic.

Topic: Analysis of German Standards for office design. Organization: Ruairi Oâ€™Brien. Architecture. Light. Spatial Design.

What we did: Made a model office as a demonstrator for current German standards, analysed the details and measurements. Made toilet details later for Annenhoefe office space. Studied the standards in the context of Coronavirus.

Analysis Brainstorming Detailing

FLOOR SPACE FOR WORKING AREAS: At-least 8m^2 for one workspace Plus at-least 6m^2 for each additional workspace Standard Values: Cellular Offices (1-6 people) – 8-10m^2 per workstation Group Offices (up-to 25 people) – 10-12m^2 per workstation Open-Plan Offices (from 400m^2) – 12-15m^2 per workstation

Toilet Details of Annenhoefe Space

GUIDELINES DURING PANDEMIC FOR OFFICE SPACES (MAY 2020)

Lunch After U-CODE Press Conference (KA lab)

Colleagues at Ruairi Oâ€™Brien

Home Office

Colleagues(KA Lab) trying to eat the food I cooked :P

KA Lab during April

Getty Images - iStockphoto

Dresden Castle

TU Dresden

Slub Library

TU Dresden

Conclusion I had a very good time in Dresden. I was exposed to a sea of various fields and domains in Architecture. Looking back, this journey has been beyond my expectations, full of turning points. I had a perfect time reflecting upon my interests during the lockdown and while slowly walking from my office back to my room via Elbe and Dresden Castle. I am grateful for this beautiful journey. I had the chance to meet a lot of people, share ideas, knowledge and know their perspective of the world. That helped me see things differently with an open mind and to understand myself better. I learnt a tiny bit of German through conversations, and I have already given the exam for elementary German. I have envisioned myself to be involved in work related to smart systems and knowledge architecture. I have currently extended my stay to complete the research publication. I had the time to mature my vision for my future ambitions. This journey has definitely broadened my horizons, and I hope I could take this learning forward with my future endeavours.

Bibliography Grima, J.N., Manicaro, E., Attard, D.: Auxetic behaviour from connected different-sized squares and rectangles. Proc. R. Soc. A. 467(2121), 439–458 (2011) Gómez Lizcano D. E. (2013): An expandable pendentive dome and polyhedral mechanisms using angulated scissors with sliding elements. New Proposals for Transformable Architecture, Engineering and Design in the Honor of E. P. P. Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura, Sevilla 53-58 Gu and Yau [2008] – conformal mapping Hoberman, C.: Reversibly expandable structures having polygon links. U.S. Patent number 6,082,056 (2000) Konaković, M., Crane, K., Deng, B., Bouaziz, S., Piker, D., Pauly, M. (2016) Beyond developable: computational design and fabrication with auxetic materials. SIGGRAPH Technical Paper, July 24–28 (2016) Friedrich, J., Pfeiffer, S., Gengnagel, C.: Locally Varied Auxetic Structures for Doubly-Curved Shapes (2018) Jungwook Kim1, James A. Hanna2, Myunghwan Byun1, Christian D. Santangelo2,*, Ryan C. Hayward1,*: Designing Responsive Buckled Surfaces by Halftone Gel Lithography. Science. Vol 335, Issue 6073 .09 March 2012. Konaković, M., Konaković, P., Pauly, M. : Computational Design of Deployable Auxetic Shells. Advances in Architec-tural Geometry (2018). Konaković, M., Panetta, J., Crane, K., Pauly, M.: Rapid Design of Curved Surfaces via Programmable Auxetics. ACM Trans. Graph., Vol. 37, No. 4, Article 106. Publication date: August 2018. Roberto Naboni, Stefano Sartori Pezzi, Embedding auxetic properties in designing active-bending gridshells, XX Con-greso de la Sociedad Iberoamericana de Gráfica Digital, Blucher Design Proceedings, Volume 3, 2016, Pages 720-726, ISSN 2318-6968, Raviv, D., Zhao, W., McKnelly, C. et al. Active Printed Materials for Complex Self-Evolving Deformations. Sci Rep 4, 7422 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07422 Resch, R.D. (1973) The topological design of sculptural and architectural systems. In: Proceedings of the June 4–8, 1973, National Computer Conference and Exposition, AFIPS’73, pp. 643–650 (1973) * [Resch1973] - resch patterns Russel W Mailen, Catherine H Wagner, Rachel S Bang, Mohammed Zikry, Michael D Dickery, Jan, G.: Thermo-mechanical transformation of shape memory polymers from initially flat discs to bowls and saddles. Smart Materials and Structures, Volume 28, N0. 4. IOP Publishing ltd (March 2019). Saxena, K., Das, R., Emilio, P.: Three decades of Auxetics Research - Materials with Negative Poisson’s Ratio: A Review. Advanced Engineering Materials (2016), 18, No. 11. Springborn, B., Schröder, P., Pinkall, U.: Conformal equivalence of triangle (2008)

meshes. ACM Trans. Graph. 27(3)

Sawhney and Crane [2017] Tachi[2010] Tachi, T. (2007) “Origamizing 3d surface by symmetry constraints, Tachi T. (2011): Rigid-Foldable Thick Origami. Fifth international Meeting of Origami Science, Mathematics, and Educa-tion. 253-263 Tachi T. (2013): Freeform Origami Tessellations by Generalizing Resch’s Patterns. ASME International Design Engineer-ing Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. [Tachi 2013b] Teunisvan Manen, Shahram Janbaz Amir, A.Zadpoor. Programming the shape-shifting of flat soft matter. Materials Today. Volume 21, Issue 2, (March 2018). *Review paper*. Zheng Yan, Fan Zhang, Jiehen Wang, Fei Liu, Xuelin Guo, Kewang Nan, Qing Lin, Mingye Gao, Dongquing Xiao, Yan Shi, Yitao Qiu, Haiwen Luan, Jung Hwan Kim, Yiqi Wang, Hongying Luo, Mengdi Han, Yonggang Huang, Yihui Zhang, John A Rogers: Controlled Mechanical buckling for Origami Inspired Construction of 3D Microstructures in Advanced Materials. Advanced Functional Materials. Volume 26, Issue 16 (2016) Yigil Cho, Joong-Ho Shin, Avelino Costa, Tae Ann Kim, Valentin Kunin, Ju Li, Su Yeon Lee, Shu Yang, Heung Nam Han, In-Suk Choi, and David J. Srolovitz. Engineering the shape and structure of materials by fractal cut (2014). Amanda Ghassaei - Origami Simulator - http://apps.amandaghassaei.com/OrigamiSimulator/ Bergermeyer Research, Gentsler Research - Strategies to be followed during a pandemic in office spaces.