a Vision

Iiia.aeii a.ie i

iiiii

ii iiiiiiiii iiii iiiiiifIi.i

iiiiii

i.it iii

ii

I T.f.ie

fiftffifig.it It

g

In Geek speak onemaysay Discovery in Science is not necessarily

about forming new

ideological

butrather thefacilitation of idealogical neuroplasticity About the building and tearing down at bridges Disprove a theorem

Break a Law etc

Connect two disparate Concepts

Predict a

Synapses

deunification phenomenonetc

ff

iifii.fi ifE ID

up

Unification

e.g Electromagnetism Wh ai Darwin Mendelian

genetics etc

you can even have interesting situations like

to Prove

prove

ff I

IfÉ

Or a Mathematician's A

ftp.iiiin

fhessio.itHardy

Gambit

proof

by Contradiction

1Tiparethischiftythnontsianethifff

I.IDispanIffffathfiisforthiffan

Unpopular Opinion Crafted pieces should be but Wang quality

the literature

allowed in Not

only the Saying every

W as in

t

m

e

g

it is a Mo

literature

hn

g

Math feastafyjf.fi

f

So who cares it

JT etc it'simaginarythen

waysworthwhiletotakeold disproven ideas

and continue to propagate them forone

miiii

themselves t.i.is

kiiE.name

e.fiiiiiiti

Atf g for another we may be able to treat it as a Cosmological

if we understand the particular

f y

boundary conditions

e.g ty.int i

E ii

removable discontinuity

in which it fails

t.it

x i

if 1 eÉIÉEif_ but

A

but

model has aflaw

ITEM

yahoo.aguuy.a.am

FThatDriveIs

me insane Butonlybecause I LOVELEARNING

been approximating onthesame converging is really nodifferentI've deepdreamy fundamentalobjectthiswholetime I realized Schoolmade easy waspartof theproblem LaGrangian off is TheWholeEducationalSystem I don'treallybuyanyof it anymore Ican'ttrustthe thereferenceof this or thenormalityto that Thisishowthingsarenormallydone Yeahwellthat'sweirdusually

III

Neils science journal

Yeah well

the thing is Broken

Normal

and

got us here Normal won't fix it

the

That's why fundamental Stochasticity Emerges the way

P to stochastic

macrospective

shhh variances in speciation of

Evolutionary Biology

It's clear there's

supposed to be a continuous spectrum of structure thus function You can't discretize a style

or command a particular interpretation We'remeanttoDiversify

q to think We

of reallyanyart scienceincluded as a or even perhaps in a Penrose'ian sense of infinitely non repeating tiling of a plane the sense that subjectto

In

mathematical complexity it's

computationally irreducible

There's probably no way to tell beforehand whether

something might or mightn't be optimizable

throw

m

aÉ yyf

pgynyyyyyyyyyy.gg qq.gg yyyyyyyyyya

mu

theylike

Axioms Tobe Commanded

Allpossiblestyles Imagine allthepossible vectors

of

communication

ff f ded

fffxf.IE sfff

Maybe we one day submit Grandtheorem.suin form of Drawings Songs Poetry

As

Fine

till

Irregardless of theinitialffonditions

of style Aren't

it Iif

EEI.inaffmaticians

once did

we ought to embrace that the science is not independent of the scientist To hug

Maybe

truth yes but maybe too in embracing each unique spoil of an interpretory fingerprint

Maybe

if instead of centralized journals

Dare I say Springer Elsevier

What it every Academician just own

tasteful interpretations

etc

ran their

No rules No Guidelines m

Neilsicieniejournal

pqianasscience Ehsteinssg.mg.gg

Thomas science journal

sciencejournal

Maybe you could even

watch their thoughts

like

novel Maybe some of them figure out ways to represent work maybe a podcast of a Lab a

livestream

a fluorescence Art Gallery etc

I think Scientifin Writing has fallen in the times It has not grown in potential over time in fact most may argue that it has shrunk

IÉ

III

É

i If

so

discretizing

Neil into a

giant connectomies map of my thoughts using each piece as a

giant knot

a

basis neuron may produce

There is an interesting stat

about Wikipedia As of Jan6 2024 there is only 1 dead end article

Meaning that you can traverse the entirety of

Wikipedia

by way of only hyperlink

Ultimately it's

a

knot topology question

Can one's brain be Unraveled in the same 26082

Nfhs

are there

Continuous

way

isolated ideas

Discontinuous

Do interesting loops form

Any themes emerge

As Feynman suggests

Perhaps such

a

perspective may be

helpful not only to Nature But too of the thinkers who study her