Plan-it East Report

1 Street + 3 Blocks + 12 Public Spaces

plan-it forward

plan i eas PUBLIC SPACE PLAN

EAST FRONT STREET

#TCMI

November 1, 2017 by Influence Design Forum LLC (IDF) IDF shall retain all rights to the design and drawings, which are produced in connection with this report. No part of this report may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without the written permission from Influence Design Forum LLC except in the case of brief quotations embodied in articles. All drawings, illustrations, and graphics and copies thereof furnished by IDF are, and shall remain, its property. They are to be used only with respect to this project and are not to be used on any other project. If such designs are executed by a contractor, third party, or Client, the Client agrees to release IDF from any liability for its designs.

Published by IDF, USA, Traverse City Distributed to the City of Traverse City and Rotary Charities of Traverse City Cover photo courtesy of IDF Photographs courtesy of IDF and City of Traverse City

Designed by Nathan G. Elkins, ASLA Printed in the USA

plan-it.

01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08

09 10

11 12

1 Street + 3 Blocks + 12 Public Spaces

acknowledgements acknowledgements Rotary Charities

Little Fleet

We would like to thank Rotary Charities for providing funding

We would like to send a special thanks

to make this project possible.

to Little Fleet for hosting the location for Trivia Night and donating the 1st

Over the past 35 years, Rotary Charities has granted at

Place Prize for Trivia Night.

least $58 million dollars to organizations in Northwest Lower Michigan five-county region. These grants have spurred economic development, enriched arts and culture, preserved the environment, guaranteed access to recreation and increased quality of life.

Downtown Development Authority

Thank you for supporting the project and providing Downtown Traverse City Gift Certificates for Trivia Night.

City of Traverse City The Design Team would like to acknowledge the City of Traverse City’s staff and elected and appointed officials for their support and time committed to the project.

Special thanks to Missy Luick, Planning and Engineering Assistant, for coordinating the project.

plan i eas

acknowledgements

Local Businesses

Steering Committee

We would like to thank all of the East Front Street businesses

The Plan-it East Steering Committee:

who participated in the Facebook Polling, took the time to write on the Public Chalkboard, and came out to Trivia Night!

Jeff Joubran

Traverse City DDA Board

Linda Koebert

Traverse City Planning Commission

We also want to send a special thanks to the following East

Eric Patterson

East Front Business Owner

Front Street businesses for donating prizes for Trivia Night.

Jen Blakeslee

East Front Business Owner

Misha Neidorfler

East Front Business Owner

Gary Jonas

East Front Business & Property Owner

Bob Cornwell

East Front Business & Property Owner

Dean Sparks

East Front Business Owner

Elysha Davila

East Front Business & Property Owner

City Staff Advisory Committee

Missy Luick

Planning and Engineering Assistant

Russ Soyring

Planning Director

Rob Bacigalupi

DDA Executive Director

Tim Lodge

City Engineer

Dave Green

DPS Director

Derek Melville

Parks Superintendent

Barry Smith

Marina

Luke MacLean

Planning Intern

Jake Myers

Planning Intern

01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08

09 10

11 12

1 Street + 3 Blocks + 12 Public Spaces

preface preface Project Background

1 Street + 3 Blocks + 12 Public Spaces

On June 15, 2015, the City Commission took action to

Plan-it East consists of one street, 3 city blocks, and 12 public

authorize execution of a grant agreement with Rotary Charities

spaces. The project area is from Park Street to Grandview

of Traverse City for a $5,000 planning grant for the Traverse

Parkway along East Front Street.

City Public Pier project. The grant had been executed; however, the work never got underway.

1 Street

3 Blocks

East Front Street

Park Street to Grandview Parkway

City Staff then recommended that the City re-focus the grant scope “up river.” Staff proposed conducting a planning

12 Public Spaces

effort consisting of a focused public engagement effort with

• Front St. & Grandview Pkwy. Intersection

property owners, tenants and the general public regarding

• Mini Park

various projects on the east end of East Front Street. The

• Murchie Bridge Reconstruction

project area would consist of East Front Street from Park Street

• Murchie Bridge Underpass

to Grandview Parkway. Over a dozen public projects were

• Wellington Plaza

proposed that were all at different stages of planning. The

• Boardman River Pedestrian Bridge

City had conceptual plans for many of the projects listed - in

• Pump Station Property

some cases a particular project had one, two, sometimes

• 300 Block Mid-Block Crosswalk

three different project concepts. Staff recommended that they

• Park St. Streetscape & Public Restrooms

would like to discuss the concentration of proposed projects

• Park Street Beach Access

within the project area and engage the public in the possible

• Park Street Bridge Reconstruction

future vision of East Front Street’s East End. The re-purposed

• Lot D & Boardman River Boat-Launch

scope of work was discussed with Rotary Charities Staff and they supported the amended grant scope.

A steering committee and staff advisory committee were formed and a project consultant was hired by the City. The Plan-it East brand was then developed and used to bring awareness to the public engagement process and to the East Front Street neighborhood.

plan i eas

preface

Project Goals

Public Engagement

The Plan-it East project is meant to explore what the

Communities are growing, technology and way of life are

possibilities are for the public properties, parks, and spaces

constantly changing, so why should our public input meetings

along East Front Street in Downtown Traverse City between

remain the same? Turning the dreaded municipal public

Park Street and Grandview Parkway. The process, findings,

meeting into an energized, creative and engaging event isn’t

and report are meant to get people talking, and raise the

as hard as you might think.

conversation level around the future. The report also provides an opportunity to begin a community conversation around

The underlying objective of the public input event is always

what uses they would like to see in the future and begin to

to weigh public opinion and provide an opportunity for

compare those uses against different programming ideas

engagement; furthermore, by using a mix of approaches

(activities, events, recreational uses, social gatherings) that

to public engagement it will encourage more community

may take place there.

members to participate, provide different methods and days/ times to provide input, and provide an opportunity for ideas to

The project is also meant to be a catalyst for improving the

marinate and grow organically on their own.

identity of this section of East Front Street within Downtown Traverse City. The street could be reconstructed as soon as

The Plan-it East project utilized different forms of public

2019.

engagement as a means to reach out to downtown users, visitors, and business and property owners. Public input tools that were used include: •

Walking Tour

•

Facebook polling

•

Public chalkboard

•

Social media presence @planiteast on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram

•

Business and property owner outreach

•

Trivia Night at the Little Fleet on August 3, 2017 at 5:30 p.m.

Image: Word Cloud that was generated from the Public Chalkboard

The City of Traverse City Planning Department

GOVERNMENTAL CENTER 400 Boardman Avenue Traverse City MI 49684 (231) 922-4778 (231) 922-4457 fax

July xx, 2017 RE:

East Front Street Planning Project: Plan-it east Trivia Night- August 3, 2017

Dear Property Owner on East Front Street, Plan-it east is a planning project for East Front Street and 13 public spaces in the vicinity of the corridor.

The project area consists of East Front Street from Park Street to Grandview Parkway. One of the project goals is to improve the identity of this section of East Front Street within Downtown Traverse City. The street could be reconstructed as soon as 2019. We need the help of the community and property and business owners to provide input on the future of the streetscape and connected public spaces. The public spaces in the vicinity of the project area that we will be completing a review of and looking to you for future vision include: • Wellington Plaza • Murchie Bridge Underpass • Park Street Bridge Repair • Mini Park • Park Street Beach Access • Pump Station Property • 300 Block Mid-Block Crosswalk • East Front Streetscape • Lot D & Boardman River Boat-Launch • Park St. Streetscape & Public Restrooms • Boardman River Pedestrian Bridge • Front St. & Grandview Pkwy.

Intersection • Murchie Bridge Improvements Please join us. We will also be hosting a Trivia Night at Little Fleet on August 3, 2017 at 5:30 p.m.

We welcome comments regarding the project. Feel free to contact our project consultant at commentplaniteast@gmail.com or myself at mluick@traversecitymi.gov Plan-it east is also on social media. Please “like” @planiteast on facebook, follow on twitter, and instagram to stay connected and up to date! Share with your coworkers, family, and friends.

Sincerely, City of Traverse City

Missy Luick Planning and Engineering Assistant Plan-it east is made possible by a grant from Rotary Charities of Traverse City and contributions by the City of Traverse City and Traverse City Downtown Development Authority.

cate!

(not your normal public meeting)

plan i eas PUBLIC SPACE PLAN

presents

r i v i a n i g h

EAST FRONT STREET

#TCMI

LITTLE FLEET

AUGUST 3, 2017

5:30-7:00pm

Enjoy Craft Brew And Local Food* Brush Up On Your History Of Traverse City Provide Your Ideas For 13 Public Spaces Prizes Including A Downtown Gift Certificate! *Craft brew and food available to purchase from Little Fleet and food trucks

East Front Street (Park Street to Grandview Parkway) is underway to improve its identity in Downtown Traverse City.

The street could be reconstructed as soon as 2019. We need the help of the community and property and business owners to provide input on the future of the streetscape and connected public spaces. Please follow Plan-it East on Facebook, we will be posting polls periodically on Facebook to get your input.

The public spaces that we will be completing a review of and looking to you for future vision include: WELLINGTON PLAZA

MURCHIE BRIDGE UNDERPASS

PARK STREET BRIDGE REPAIR

MINI PARK

PARK STREET BEACH ACCESS

PUMP STATION PROPERTY

300 BLOCK MID-BLOCK CROSSWALK

EAST FRONT STREETSCAPE

LOT D & BOARDMAN RIVER BOAT-LAUNCH

PARK ST. STREETSCAPE & PUBLIC RESTROOMS

BOARDMAN RIVER PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE

FRONT ST. & GRANDVIEW PKWY. INTERSECTION

MURCHIE BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS

Please “like” @planiteast on facebook, follow on twitter, and instagram to stay connected and up to date! Share with your coworkers, family, and friends. commentplaniteast@gmail.com

plan i eas PUBLIC SPACE PLAN

EAST FRONT STREET

#TCMI

01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08

09 10

11 12

1 Street + 3 Blocks + 12 Public Spaces

project extents location map

WEST GRAND TRAVERSE BAY

PARK STREET BEACH ACCESS

GRANDVIEW PARKWAY (US-31)

PARK STREET BRIDGE REPAIR

LOT D & BOARDMAN RIVER BOAT-LAUNCH

BOARDM RIVER PEDESTR BRIDG PUMP STATION PROPERTY 300 BLOCK MID-BLOCK CROSSWALK

EAST FRONT STRE

BOARDMAN AVE.

PARK STREET

PARK ST. STREETSCAPE & PUBLIC RESTROOMS

plan i eas

project extents

MURCHIE BRIDGE UNDERPASS MURCHIE BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS

MAN R RIAN GE

MINI PARK WELLINGTON PLAZA

FRONT ST. & GRANDVIEW PKWY. INTERSECTION

FRANKLIN STREET

WELLINGTON STREET

EETSCAPE

01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 1 Street + 3 Blocks + 12 Public Spaces

table of contents 1 Street East Front Streetscape

12 Public Spaces 01

Front & Grandview Parkway Intersection

02

Mini Park

03

Murchie Bridge Reconstruction

04

Murchie Bridge Underpass

05

Wellington Plaza

06

Boardman River Pedestrian Bridge

07

Pump Station Property

08

300 Block Mid-Block Crosswalk

09

Park St. Streetscape & Public Restrooms

10

Park St. Beach Access

11

Park St. Bridge Reconstruction

12

Lot D & Boardman River Boat Launch

09 10

11 12

01 02 03 04 05 06

07 08 09 10

11 12

1 Street + 3 Blocks + 12 Public Spaces

east front street site assessment Type of Public Space Street

Key Issues •

Limited budget.

•

Improving stormwater.

Project Status East Front Street (Park Street east to Grandview Parkway) has Other Things to Consider

seen an explosion of activity since the arrival of Little Fleet.

Little Fleet, Sparks BBQ, and now the space on the corner of Boardman and East Front that includes Tee See Tee and Coin Slot have all invested in strong outdoor venues that bring people together outside enjoying Traverse City’s dowtown.

East Front Street is also home to 12 public spaces that all interconnect and make this area even more desirable.

Two recent planning efforts both studied East Front including the Boardman River Plan (2013) and Corridors Plan (2013).

The City’s capital improvement plan includes a budget number of $915,000 for the street improvement project in 2018-19.

What We’ve Heard •

19 people weighed in on Facebook Polling.

•

People like that East Front feels different from other areas of downtown.

•

Safety for pedestrians and bicyclists is important.

•

Match the Front Street District streetscape pattern, but provide some uniqueness to the identity.

•

12 public spaces connect to East Front Street.

east front street block 1 HEAD TO THE BEACH

EAST FRONT STREET

RIDE A BIKE

WINDOW SHOP

ENJOY PUBLIC ART

PARK STREET

PARK YOUR CAR

place analysis

Sociability Streets can be the most highly sociable public spaces if the design of the public right-of-way supports the private realm. Zoning and land use policy also is a factor in determining the success of East Front Street.

East Front Street is different from block-to-block, each block with a different level of sociability.

Block 1 only provides sidewalk space for pedestrians to interact with the exception of the newly constructed midblock crosswalk and the landscaped space with public art in front of the Hardy Parking Deck entrance.

Connectivity The Street provides important connectivity to downtown - Block 1 is one-way vehicular traffic and 2 and 3 are two-way. Block 1 also includes a parking deck which gives people direct access to the public right-of-way. All 3 blocks are limited by the Boardman River and providing north-south connections which currently only exist at Park Street and Grandview Parkway - Block 1 is one-way and drivers cannot make a left turn at Grandview which also limits connectivity. Also, bicycle lanes only exist on East Front, no north-south connections are provided.

Activity Almost all of the activity and things to do are provided by private businesses restaurants and a coffee shop with large outdoor spaces and a food truck court.

Even though East Front Street has more connected public spaces than any other neighborhood downtown, the spaces struggle to draw people in because of the lack of programming and things to do in those spaces.

plan i eas

east front street

HIRE A FISHING CHARTER

N RIVER

BOARDMA WATCH BOATS

STROLL ALONG THE STREET

SIP A LATTE NEXT TO THE RIVER GO SHOPPING

DRIVE A CAR

BOARDMAN AVENUE

GO TO A YOGA CLASS

ALLEY

Image East Front Street has struggled with image as it relates to the condition of the public right-of-way, but over the past few years people have looked beyond the condition of The Street and public spaces and have found excitement, fun, and new life along The Street with the opening of new businesses providing creative outdoor spaces. These quasi-public spaces have been responsible for activating The Street and neighborhood and improving the image of the East Front Street neighborhood.

Place Scorecard The Place Scorecard is a rating system used to evaluate each public space. The rating system uses a 1 to 5 point scale, 1 being the lowest or poor and 5 the highest or best. An overall score is calculated with a total of 20 points possible.

Sociability Connectivity Activity Image

OVERALL SCORE

11

east front street block 2

DRIVE A CAR

BOARDMAN AVENUE

RIDE A BIKE

STROLL ALONG THE STREET

place analysis

Sociability Streets can be the most highly sociable public spaces if the design of the public right-of-way supports the private realm. Zoning and land use policy also is a factor in determining the success of East Front Street.

East Front Street is different from block-to-block, each block with a different level of sociability.

Block 1 only provides sidewalk space for pedestrians to interact with the exception of the newly constructed midblock crosswalk and the landscaped space with public art in front of the Hardy Parking Deck entrance.

Connectivity The Street provides important connectivity to downtown - Block 1 is one-way vehicular traffic and 2 and 3 are two-way. Block 1 also includes a parking deck which gives people direct access to the public right-of-way. All 3 blocks are limited by the Boardman River and providing north-south connections which currently only exist at Park Street and Grandview Parkway - Block 1 is one-way and drivers cannot make a left turn at Grandview which also limits connectivity. Also, bicycle lanes only exist on East Front, no north-south connections are provided.

Activity Almost all of the activity and things to do are provided by private businesses restaurants and a coffee shop with large outdoor spaces and a food truck court.

Even though East Front Street has more connected public spaces than any other neighborhood downtown, the spaces struggle to draw people in because of the lack of programming and things to do in those spaces.

plan i eas

east front street WALK TO THE WATERFRONT

ER

N RIV BOARDMA

WATCH BOATS

GO SHOPPING

PARK YOUR CAR

EAST FRONT STREET

WELLINGTON STREET

EAT AT A FOOD TRUCK

ALLEY

Image East Front Street has struggled with image as it relates to the condition of the public right-of-way, but over the past few years people have looked beyond the condition of The Street and public spaces and have found excitement, fun, and new life along The Street with the opening of new businesses providing creative outdoor spaces. These quasi-public spaces have been responsible for activating The Street and neighborhood and improving the image of the East Front Street neighborhood.

Place Scorecard The Place Scorecard is a rating system used to evaluate each public space. The rating system uses a 1 to 5 point scale, 1 being the lowest or poor and 5 the highest or best. An overall score is calculated with a total of 20 points possible.

Sociability Connectivity Activity Image

OVERALL SCORE

11

east front street block 3 RIDE A BIKE

PARK YOUR CAR

DRIVE A CAR

GO TO THE PARK

EAST FRONT STREET

ALLEY place analysis

Sociability Streets can be the most highly sociable public spaces if the design of the public right-of-way supports the private realm. Zoning and land use policy also is a factor in determining the success of East Front Street.

East Front Street is different from block-to-block, each block with a different level of sociability.

Block 1 only provides sidewalk space for pedestrians to interact with the exception of the newly constructed midblock crosswalk and the landscaped space with public art in front of the Hardy Parking Deck entrance.

Connectivity The Street provides important connectivity to downtown - Block 1 is one-way vehicular traffic and 2 and 3 are two-way. Block 1 also includes a parking deck which gives people direct access to the public right-of-way. All 3 blocks are limited by the Boardman River and providing north-south connections which currently only exist at Park Street and Grandview Parkway - Block 1 is one-way and drivers cannot make a left turn at Grandview which also limits connectivity. Also, bicycle lanes only exist on East Front, no north-south connections are provided.

Activity Almost all of the activity and things to do are provided by private businesses restaurants and a coffee shop with large outdoor spaces and a food truck court.

Even though East Front Street has more connected public spaces than any other neighborhood downtown, the spaces struggle to draw people in because of the lack of programming and things to do in those spaces.

plan i eas

east front street

TRAFFIC WATCH

GRANDVIEW PARKWAY (US31)

RA

FRANKLIN STREET

ILR

OA

D

AV E

NU

Image East Front Street has struggled with image as it relates to the condition of the public right-of-way, but over the past few years people have looked beyond the condition of The Street and public spaces and have found excitement, fun, and new life along The Street with the opening of new businesses providing creative outdoor spaces. These quasi-public spaces have been responsible for activating The Street and neighborhood and improving the image of the East Front Street neighborhood.

E

BOARDMAN AVENUE

ACCESS THE TART TRAIL

Place Scorecard The Place Scorecard is a rating system used to evaluate each public space. The rating system uses a 1 to 5 point scale, 1 being the lowest or poor and 5 the highest or best. An overall score is calculated with a total of 20 points possible.

Sociability Connectivity Activity Image

OVERALL SCORE

11

plan i eas

east front street

public engagement Facebook Polling

Which type of identity would you like East Front Street to develop? (19 respondents)

Other 10.5%

Develop an identity that is unique to Traverse City 36.8%

Yes 52.6%

What would you like to see more of along the street? (16 respondents) 2.8 / 8

3.3 / 8

3.4 / 8

3.4 / 8

4.6 / 8

4.8 / 8

6.6 / 8

7.3 / 8

What kind of street would you like East Front Street to be? (18 respondents)

Other 11.1%

Complete street (bicycle, transit, pedestrian friendly, green infrastructure and traffic calming 88.9%

plan i eas

east front street

Respondent Comments: Please keep with the CHARACTER of Traverse City..not overly bright or modern. People come for the old fashion warmth and charm On my cell phone, I can’t tell whether 1, above, is the thing I most want to see happen. That is how I ranked your ideas. 1 is the best and 8 is the thing I’d least like to see.

As the gateway to our downtown, Front St. sets the tone for what type of town we are. Traverse City is a happy, healthy, strong and vibrant town and our infrastructure should reflect this. It’s time to abandon on-street parking on Front St. and this is where is should start. Wide and comfortable sidewalks and protected bike lanes should just *beg* people to ditch the car and walk/bike our beautiful city.

Just please don’t ruin it like West Front

Make the amenities funky and fun

Should be continuous with the rest of Front Street to create a sense of a larger downtown district. Take advantage of the river’s proximity.

Crosswalk is desperately needed at the intersection near little fleet. In terms of identity, it would be good to have East Front street cohesively linked to the rest of downtown but have a bit of a unique flavor (e.g. red bricks and yellow light poles)

Do something with old boardwalk and empty/wasted space next to pumphouse and next to morsels.

More bike parking is needed in the area as it is often easier to bike to this area than to drive and park.

plan i eas

east front street

what we think The recommendations have been separated into two

term changes could include new amenities such as public art,

categories based on how they relate to future implementation:

landscaping improvements, or moveable seating.

short-term recommendations and long-term actions.

Together, these categories provide recommendations at

Ideas include:

different points of time, at different scales, and in relation to

•

multiple systems.

Support the quasi-public restaurant, coffee house, and bar outdoor spaces - provide amenities including street furniture, litter receptacles, bicycle racks near these areas.

Short-Term Recommendations

•

neighborhood.

Recommendation No. 1

Continue to engage public and community participation

Plan an event or festival in the street that celebrates the

Tasks 1.

Collaborate with local planners, designers and technical experts to develop concept plans and help activate the

Objective

improvements.

Strong brands inspire people to connect with businesses and

2.

Involve the Traverse City DDA, Traverse City Parks

services and with each other.. The “brand” of the Plan-it East

Commission, local organizations, East Front Street

project helped to inspire people to get involved with the

business owners, and other stakeholders.

process. The Plan-it East brand could be used as a tool to

Recommendation No. 3

continue to engage the public.

Complete schematic design plans

Tasks

Objective Schematic design plans should be completed during winter

1.

2.

Continue to develop the Plan-it East brand and marketing

2018-19 to determine the preferred cross-section and identify

efforts using social media.

opportunities along the right-of-way to create public spaces.

Create a website that can be used as a resource for

The schematic design process will also provide a preferred

the community to get updates, leave comments, or get

design that can be estimated for cost.

involved.

Tasks Recommendation No. 2

Implement short-term improvements to activate the public space and test ideas Objective Improving a street and its public spaces does not need to be expensive, and it does not need to take a lot of time.

Regardless of how long it might take to eventually design and fund a full street reconstruction low cost, low risk short-term improvements should be highly considered. By implementing short-term improvements, City Planners will be able to test and evaluate different ideas and impacts of those uses. Short-

1.

Identify funding to pay for schematic design.

2.

Involve the Plan-it East Steering Committee and Advisory Committee to arrive at a preferred design and guide the planning process.

3.

Hold a public meeting with the property owners.

4.

Complete schematic design alternatives.

plan i eas

east front street

Long-Term Actions Recommendation No. 4

Develop a sub-area plan that identifies long-term vision for the street, public spaces, and surrounding neighborhood Objective The value of all the connected public spaces is to high to ignore the potential to plan for a unique district and

3.

Identify grant funding and/or project partners including the Watershed Center of Grand Traverse Bay that could support stormwater improvements.

Recommendation No. 6

Look for opportunities to develop partnerships once a preferred subarea plan is realized and adopted Objective

neighborhood in the downtown.

Many successful streets, parks and public spaces are The sub-area plan should look at long-term vision and zoom

developed and sustained through partnerships, and with the

out and focus on connectivity and bringing the public spaces

support and collaboration between the public and private

together.

sector.

Tasks

Tasks 1.

2.

1.

Identify goals with clear objectives.

Allocate planning dollars from the City’s capital

2.

Identify costs and funding needs.

improvements plan to complete a sub-area plan.

3.

Build relationships and explore partnerships with not-for-

Start to look for funding opportunities including grants

profit groups whose visions and goals align with the goals

that could help pay for developing a plan and/or future improvements to the street and its many connected public

and needs for the intersection.

4.

spaces.

Recommendation No. 5

Implement efforts to protect water quality

Build relationships and explore partnerships with other public agencies and public institutions whose goals align with the goals of the intersection.

5.

Create a fund development plan and identify potential public and private sources of funding for the intersection.

6.

Allocate resources and staff time to manage a team of staff and consultants to see the project through.

Objective

7.

Consider investing in programmatic capacity to build partnerships with businesses and volunteers to help

To begin early on in the planning process to look for creative ways to protect the water quality of the Boardman River and Grand Traverse Bay. Tasks 1.

Complete a review and assessment of the existing property and building to ensure that there currently no threats to water quality.

2.

Support efforts to monitor and address threats to the river and to water quality.

develop and maintain the improvements.

8.

Develop creative programs that can provide opportunities for the community to support through donations, crowdfunding, and volunteerism.

plan i eas

Recommendation No. 7

Develop a life-cycle analysis and eco-balance program for the existing street infrastructure and other assets identified Objective When considering all aspects of sustainability and the life cycle of a building, tree, concrete, asphalt, or other long-term investment it is important to consider the life of that investment from the time of implementation, life-long maintenance to proper use and/or disposal of the materials and waste generated when the asset is removed.

This recommendation addresses the removal of trees, concrete, asphalt, underground utilities and pipes, or raw materials life cycle and identifies strategies to extend the resource after it is removed from the property. The purpose of this recommendation is to develop creative ideas for reusing the materials at the end of their life cycles.

Tasks 1.

Identify potential partnerships with businesses or organizations that specialize in recycling.

2.

When trees are removed, use them for a City project, or offer them to local businesses, including restaurants or art centers, for reuse or reclamation.

3.

Establish criteria and develop guidance materials for purchasing building materials and planting trees and other vegetation on City-owned properties.

east front street

plan i eas

east front street

01 02 03 04 05 06

07 08 09 10

11 12

1 Street + 3 Blocks + 12 Public Spaces

front st & grandview pkwy intersection site assessment Type of Public Space Street

Key Issues •

Poor pedestrian crossing and connections between Boardman Neighborhood and the waterfront.

Project Status

•

Safety for drivers, bicyclists, and pedestrians.

Over the past few years three (3) different options have emerged for the future design of the Front Street and Grandview Parkway Intersection. Different options have come from different planning processes including the Boardman River Plan 2013, The Bayfront Plan 2010, and the Corridors Plan 2013. The Michigan Department of Transportation plans to make improvements to the intersection in 2023.

(3) Existing Design Options: 1. Reconstruct The Intersection in the same configuration 2. Redesign The Intersection into a roundabout (Bayfront Plan) 3. Realign The Intersection to be a T-Intersection (Boardman River Plan)

What We’ve Heard •

Over 300 people have weighed in on Facebook Polling and the community is split on whether they want The Intersection to stay the way it is or be reconstructed as a roundabout. The T-Intersection design is a close third.

•

This intersection needs a crosswalk.

•

Gateway gateway gateway...but not literal. Revamp Mini Park to be the gateway park to downtown.

•

Idea to make 3 lanes.

•

Needs safe crosswalk for pedestrians and trail users.

Other Things to Consider •

Re-routing of the TART Trail.

•

Literal gateway sign or arch may actually help traffic calm and slow drivers as they enter downtown.

GRA

NDV

IEW

01

PAR K

WAY (U

S-31

)

front st & grandview pkwy intersection

DRIVE YOUR

FRONT STREET

WALK, RUN, RID

place analysis

Sociability The sociability of the intersection is poor and non-existent with the exception of the adjacent park and non-motorized trail (TART Trail). The design of the intersection is not welcoming to drivers or pedestrians. The intersection does not support street life or evening use, evoke a sense of community pride, diversity, or stewardship.

Connectivity Traffic data was not analyzed for this project; however, field observation was completed. With the exception of the TART Trail pedestrian crossing on Front Street the intersection does not provide any other pedestrian connections. The intersection is not walkable, convenient, or accessible nor does it boast pedestrian activity. Again, with the exception of the TART Trail mode split observation determined little to no cycling with low to moderate public transportation.

Activity Obviously, intersections are not typically designed for uses and activity other than moving cars, buses, cyclists and people, but in some cases intersections can be celebratory. Intersection design and function can influence land use patterns, property values and retail sales. Consequently, the Front and Grandview intersection is not special in any way, is not fun or active.

plan i eas

front st & grandview pkwy intersection

01

R CAR

RIDE A BUS

GRANDVIEW PARKWAY (US-31)

DE YOUR BICYCLE

Image The unique design of the intersection unfortunately does not improve the image users are left with after passing through the intersection. The lack of walkability, charm, and safety all contribute to a poor image and perception.

Place Scorecard The Place Scorecard is a rating system used to evaluate each public space. The rating system uses a 1 to 5 point scale, 1 being the lowest or poor and 5 the highest or best. An overall score is calculated with a total of 20 points possible.

Sociability Connectivity Activity Image

OVERALL SCORE

5

01

02

EMERGENT WETL WETLAND AREA O

EAST END FISHING PIER SHADE STRUCTURES RAMP ACCESS

G R A N D V I E W P A R K W A Y PROMENADE TART TRAIL OVERLOOKS

Holiday In

BOARD

RI MA N

VER

BAYFR

MURCHIE BRIDGE & FISHING PIER The most significant element of the Murchie Bridge area plan is a public fishing pier that would extend out into Lake Michigan adjacent to the Boardman river outlet. The previous planning studies pier would provide universal access for fishing from the shore. It would also create a significant destination point center Plan view rendering of a roundabout located at the intersection of Grandview Parkway and Front Street at the east end of the shoreline Bayfront Plan, 2010 promenade. Views of the downtown and sunsets to the west would be comparable to those enjoyed by boaters on the bay.

Other recommendations in this area include stair and accessible ramp connections from the TART trail to the

plan i eas

front st & grandview pkwy intersection

LAND AREA OVERLOOK

01

WALK CONNECTION TO FRONT STREET WALK CONNECTION TO SENIOR CENTER

RECONFIGURED WALKWAY RELOCATED STAIRS

NMC Great Lakes Campus

nn

FRONT

RONT/DOWNTOWN GATEWAY Before

Senior Center

01

FRONT STREET

Front Street is the gateway to the heart of Traverse City. The intersection of Front Street and Grandview Parkway is an important entry point for visitors heading to the downtown core of the city. As vehicles turn onto Front Street, downtown is visible in the distance, drawing them into the activity of the commercial center. The city has been considering an alteration to the current traffic pattern at this intersection to create a more pedestrian-friendly environment (City of Traverse City: Corridors Master Plan). Due to its status as a critical entry point to the downtown area, any proposed modifications to this intersection should be sensitive to the area’s character.

previous planning studies left

Rendering showing a gateway arch concept over East Front Street Boardman River Plan, University of Michigan, 2013, page 31

right

Illustration showing a possible T-Intersection alignment at the corner of Front and Grandview Parkway Boardman River Plan, University of Michigan, 2013, page 36

31

plan i eas

front st & grandview pkwy intersection

Front Street

Illustration 7:

FRONT STREET INTERSECTION SITE PLAN NOT TO SCALE

et tre nt S Fro

The realignment of this intersection requires that the intersection of Front Street and Franklin be closed off and creates an opportunity for future development on this site. This “new” real estate will be a valuable asset for the city, strengthening the Front Street corridor over the long term, and acting as an anchor for the commercial district.

Development on this site should respond to Front Street’s character, encouraging similar development on nearby lots and extending the downtown feel.

Pedestrians using the eastern segment of Front Street will benefit from an increase in street trees, which provide shade and create continuity

Grandview Parkway

of experience in an area that currently lacks a unifying element. Stormwater planters bring additional vegetation to the streetscape, and also manage stormwater runoff from the roadway. Situated at the city’s main entry point and in collaboration with nearby raingardens, these stormwater planters showcase Traverse City’s commitment to tackling ecological issues.

Another key opportunity to highlight Traverse City’s interest in sustainable stormwater management practices exists in the small pocket park on Front Street. A re-imagined park highlights the stormwater that flows beneath it, daylighting the water in a series of rain gardens.

Stepping down to the river in tiered planting

01

plan i eas

front st & grandview pkwy intersection

01

public engagement Facebook Polling

The Front Street / Grandview Parkway is the gateway to downtown Traverse City, what would you like people to first see when they enter downtown? (271 respondents)

Other 6.3%

A Statement art piece 17%

A literal gateway over the road 28.8%

A reconstructed park 48%

There are ideas of reconstructing this intersection. Of the following ideas which do you prefer? (263 respondents)

T-Intersection 28.9%

Reconstruct in same configuration 35.2%

Roundabout 35.9%

Would you like to see a crosswalk at this intersection? (270 respondents)

No 21.3%

Yes 78.7%

Respondent Comments: I generally like the idea of roundabouts, but not sure if this is a great spot--the second option actually looks good. Would be helpful to have more information about how traffic would flow.

I like a strong visual as you come into town. Currently this portion of town is ill defined and even misleading for visitors. An identifying welcome arch would solve this. It is extremely precarious on bike, trying to head downtown on Front from Franklin/Railroad. I make this bike commute daily. I cannot read the details of the roundabout presentation (too low res), but I do like the explanation of the T, and can see that being much more safe than the current situation. My fear with a roundabout is that although they slow traffic and increase safety for motorized vehicles, they can present challenging and unsafe situations for pedestrians and cyclists. The T option seems to provide a better space for walk- and bike-ability.

The way the street curves into the T also reduces speeds.

I would love to see this area of town become more walkable!

I would like both a gateway and a nice park. The last thing this town needs in another ugly sculpture. As for the intersection, we really need a solution that helps with the congestion around peak hours.

Loving the idea of a roundabout at this intersection! It’s a great candidate, as well as many other intersections in Traverse City.

I worry that there is too much heavy traffic that moves through the area for a roundabout.

As you plan for this intersection please keep in mind the difficulties surrounding the intersection of Woodmere and 8th Street. Some of the cross streets near here are integral to our traffic patterns and reaching area businesses.

plan i eas

front st & grandview pkwy intersection

01

Respondent Comments: (continued) Adding pedestrians to this area seems dangerous. It’s already scary when people try to cross here. The bridge makes a good underpass and the new proposed pedestrian bridge over the river should be sufficient.

horridly blocked up with people trying to make left hand turns.

Mainly people pulling into McDonald’s and the Holiday Inn.

NO roundabouts!

People in traverse city do not know how to act in a round about. Don’t you dare put one at this busy intersection!!!!!!

That’s actual craziness.

NOT THE ROUNDABOUT, THEY ARE NOT GREAT, WE DON’T NEED MORE One of the few intersections that works consistently.

Please avoid roundabouts. There isn’t enough space for an adequate sized one.

The form doesn’t allow me to deselect one of the above choices or put in my own option. A different configuration.

If there was an over or under the road sidewalk, that would be the only option I see. For the road intersection, a civil engineering project would go way further than 2 options.

For example, if a sidewalk went in with a speed bump (an elevated sidewalk) would ensure that pedestrians at that site would get more right of way. These kinds of options would provide a lot more help for this poll. Round about - there are ways to model which option would slow traffic more. Actual data about these choices would be helpful - without data, it is a biased view of which would be better.

The T would provide a very difficult left turn, and while I love roundabouts, from my time overseas and in Grand Rapids, where I currently live in Williamsburg, everyday I still see people struggle with the roundabout concept. I think either of those could end up being problematic. Love the gate idea though, would be great for pictures, could become a well known TC landmark, and would be gorgeous at holidays.

Possibly a skywalk? roundabouts are generally confusing for americans. If it is done it needs good signage.

Roundabout is clearly the best option, but that assumes that tourists (and locals) know how to effectively use them. Could be a disaster during festival weeks...

I personally like the way the intersection is already. I like how the right lane of traffic heading west doesn’t have to stop which keeps things flowing.

Roundabouts are confusing and cause accidents with impatient drivers Grandview Parkway leading up to this intersection will become

Move the tart trail crossover closer to the bridge underpass.

This interaction works well as is. Better pedestrian crossing and signage would be helpful, but traffic flows well enough through it.

I’d like this intersection to have an underground pedestrian crossing like Cass St. it would be much safer for people since this is such a busy and important intersection. Please do not install a roundabout. MDOT studies show that roundabouts with more than one lane of traffic actually increase accidents.

Roundabouts are only helpful in intersections that experience significant amount of fatal accidents or where there is only one lane of traffic in each direction. I would like the Parkway to have an increased speed limit of 40-45mph. It’s what everyone does anyway. A median should be added for the entire length and all lefts turned into Michigan Lefts I would love to see the Parkway widened to three lanes in each direction.

No more roundabouts! We have too many pedestrians that get hit already on the parkway - a roundabout would mean that traffic never ceases and crossing would be impossible.

No round about in town!

This intersection can be dangerous and tough to navigate for pedestrians and drivers who are unfamiliar with how to get around. Better signage for cars to know ahead of time which lane to be in would be imperative. This section of road gets very busy and backed up. A roundabout would be awful to navigate between the tourists, inexperienced drivers, and those who just don’t care to follow the rules. I would expect many accidents in a roundabout situation. In Williamsburg, the semi trucks can’t even navigate those roundabouts without occupying both lanes. There is not enough room here.

Widen to three lanes at Holiday in so you have two dedicated lanes that veer right onto westbound Grandview Parkway and on the goes straight into downtown.

Traffic needs to flow nicely. I think the T would discourage downtown visitors.

Roundabouts are far more easier to deal with than people think, safer (provided all the drivers understand how they work) traffic continues to move.

plan i eas

Respondent Comments: (continued) Pedestrian access, comfort and safety needs to be prioritized here. The current crossing for the TART trail is very uncomfortable and dangerous, especially when trying to cross with young children or those with slower walking speeds. A well designed roundabout would help slow traffic and level the aging field for people on foot. Also, there should be a better pedestrian connection for people getting to/from the N side of grandview (i.e. Holiday Inn) without having to use the trail.

Bike friendly please.

Please do not change the Parkway/Front Street design as it is currently used!!! Specifically the road set up (the “Y”) It’s absolutely fine. If we just stop allowing left turns into the Holiday Inn, we’d be all set.

Utilize the bike path in whatever you do. It’s one of our area’s best things.

A roundabout and a park with a gateway would be ideal This intersection needs a crosswalk.

No roundabouts they are not the solution for every damn intersection!

I love roundabouts, but I have never seen them work well in this busy of an intersection in the US. So, the way it exists works well, but I’m not sure for how long given potential for growth. What about an underpass into town? With a green walkway into the park over top?

Not sure. Whatever option is chosen, bike/pedestrian crossing/ access has to be primary consideration.

Add pedestrian signals, make the pedestrian crossing/tart trail crossing much better.

Shut down motorized traffic on front. Use state street or the alley for deliveries and parking. It Could easily eliminate the need for the stoplight on state and the parkway Love roundabouts roundabout would be least disturbing for through traffic, with a crosswalk nearby or possibly tunnel?

front st & grandview pkwy intersection

Trivia Night

Question 7 Follow-up Question - Worth 1 Point

The intersecSon of Grandview Parkway & Front St. is the entryway to downtown, what would you like to see when entering Downtown?

A. A literal gateway or arch over the road B. A statement art piece C. A reconstructed park D. All of the above plan i eas

r i v i a n i g h

01

plan i eas

front st & grandview pkwy intersection

01

plan i eas

front st & grandview pkwy intersection

01

what we think The recommendations have been separated into two

Recommendation No. 2

categories based on how they relate to future implementation:

Implement short-term improvements that enhance the intersection

short-term recommendations and long-term actions.

Together, these categories provide recommendations at different points of time, at different scales, and in relation to multiple systems.

Short-Term Recommendations Recommendation No. 1

Decide whether changing the intersection design is worth the investment

Objective Improving a public space does not need to be expensive, and it does not need to take a lot of time. Regardless of whether the design of the intersection is changed, low cost and low risk short-term improvements should be implemented. By implementing short-term improvements, City Planners will be able to test and evaluate uses and impacts. Short-term changes could include new amenities such as public art, landscaping, and improved access.

Objective Three (3) different options for the intersection design have been studied and proposed over the last decade. The Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) will be making improvements to the existing intersection in 2023. A

Ideas include: •

around the intersection.

•

than later in order to allow enough time to work together with

to the south of the intersection.

•

1.

that abuts the intersection.

Tasks

Complete a City Staff review of the three (3) options and a review of the public input and survey results from Plan-it

1.

3.

2.

Involve the Traverse City Arts Commission and encourage

level of investment, and overall estimated costs.

them to complete a review and feasibility study of whether

Allow the Planning Commission and the Downtown

it would be possible to introduce pop-up art / sculpture.

Development Authority to review the options and make a recommendation to the City Commission.

4.

improvements.

Prepare and organize all available information for each option including design opportunities and challenges,

Collaborate with local planners, designers and technical experts to develop concept plans and help activate the

East public engagement process.

2.

As part of Mini Park’s first phase improvement (2018) include some level of improvements to the eastern corner

MDOT to arrive at a preferred design and secure funding.

Tasks

Consider adding a temporary pop-up art/sculpture location along the TART Trail in the greenspace area just

determination of whether or not a change in the intersection design is worth the investment needs to made sooner rather

Secure necessary easements and add landscaping

Allow the City Commission to review to review the findings and recommendations at a public meeting and make a decision for moving forward.

plan i eas

front st & grandview pkwy intersection

01

Recommendation No. 3

Tasks

Continue to engage public and community participation

1.

Objective

2.

Identify goals with clear objectives.

3.

Identify costs and funding needs.

4.

Build relationships and explore partnerships with not-for-

Strong brands inspire people to connect with businesses

Refine the vision for the intersection and surrounding public right-of-way.

and services and with each other.. The “brand� of the Plan-it

profit groups whose visions and goals align with the goals

East project helped to inspire people to get involved with the

and needs for the intersection.

process. The Plan-it East brand should continue to be used as

5.

Build relationships and explore partnerships with other public agencies and public institutions whose goals align

a tool to engage the public.

with the goals of the intersection.

Tasks

6.

1.

7.

Create a fund development plan and identify potential public and private sources of funding for the intersection.

Continue to develop the Plan-it East brand and marketing efforts using social media.

2.

Create a website that can be used as a resource for

Allocate resources and staff time to manage a team of staff and consultants to see the project through.

8.

Consider investing in programmatic capacity to build

the community to get updates, leave comments, or get

partnerships with businesses and volunteers to help

involved.

develop and maintain the improvements.

9.

Long-Term Actions

Develop creative programs that can provide opportunities for the community to support through donations, crowdfunding, and volunteerism.

Recommendation No. 4

Look for opportunities to develop partnerships once a clear vision and preferred option for the intersection has been realized Objective Many successful intersections turned public spaces are developed and sustained through partnerships, and with the support and collaboration between the public and private sector.

The City of Normal, Illinois redeveloped an intersection in their downtown that today has been nationally recognized and provides an important public space.

Learn more www.normal.org

01 02 03 04 05 06

07 08 09 10

11 12

1 Street + 3 Blocks + 12 Public Spaces

mini park site assessment Type of Public Space Urban Park

Key Issues •

The ability to bring together a cohesive park design without holding up a first phase improvement, which

Project Status

includes implementation of a sculpture.

•

Mini Park is the entryway to downtown Traverse City from the

Safety related to The Park’s edges along two very busy streets

east end. It is currently in the first phase of improvements that includes implementation of a sculpture donated by the Other Things to Consider

Coast Guard. The sculpture is representative of Traverse City’s designation as a Coast Guard City. The TART Trail

•

Re-routing of the TART Trail.

runs through Mini Park and connects to the Murchie Bridge

•

Literal gateway sign or arch may actually help traffic calm

Underpass and waterfront. The remaining greenspace in The Park is currently underutilized space most likely due to the noise of heavy traffic surrounding both sides of The Park.

and slow drivers as they enter downtown.

•

Completing a refinement of the Concept Plan at the same time construction documents and plans are prepared for first phase implementation.

A Concept Plan for The Park was completed a few years ago together with the Coast Guard and representatives from the City of Traverse City. The Concept Plan will be used as a starting point for implementing Phase 1 Improvements at The Park, which include the proposed sculpture.

What We’ve Heard •

159 people weighed in on Facebook Polling and 2 to 1 people preferred a park that is redeveloped as a urban park with a mix of uses.

•

Gateway gateway gateway...but not literal. Revamp Mini Park to be the gateway park to downtown.

•

People like the idea of a barrier along the north edge of The Park abutting Grandview Parkway.

02 GRAN

DVIEW

mini park

PARKW AY (US -

31)

CLIMB TREES ACCESS THE BAYFRONT

WALK, RUN, RIDE YOUR BICYCLE

FRONT STREET

place analysis

Sociability The sociability of The Park is low to moderate at times as a result of the non-motorized trail (TART Trail). The current design of The Park limits social interaction due to a lack of places to sit, a lack of interconnected spaces and walkways, and overall a absence of things to do. The Park does not support street life or evening use and struggles to evoke a sense of community pride, diversity, or stewardship.

Connectivity Field observation was completed to evaluate connectivity and how people use The Park.

With the exception of the TART Trail, The Park does not provide any other pedestrian walks, paths, or connections. The existing non-motorized trail and its connection to the waterfront through the Murchie Bridge Underpass provides a extremely valuable connection. A public sidewalk, shared with the TART Trail, connects to the business district. Public transportation does not directly serve The Park.

Activity Activity in The Park is little to none with the exception of special events including seating for festival parades and people using the TART Trail.

plan i eas PUBLIC SPACE PLAN

EAST FRONT STREET

mini park

02

#TCMI

LOOK AT THE GARDEN

HAVE A PICNIC LUNCH CAR WATCH

Image

Place Scorecard

The image of The Park struggles as a result of its location between two streets that see a high volume of vehicle traffic. The high traffic along with the absence of things to do, design, and safety all contribute to a poor image and perception.

The Place Scorecard is a rating system used to evaluate each public space. The rating system uses a 1 to 5 point scale, 1

The name, “Mini Park”, may also be a contributing factor to the poor image and perception.

Activity

being the lowest or poor and 5 the highest or best. An overall score is calculated with a total of 20 points possible.

Sociability Connectivity

Image

OVERALL SCORE

9

02

mini park

mini park concept plan

plan i eas PUBLIC SPACE PLAN

EAST FRONT STREET

mini park

02

#TCMI

Image courtesy of Influence Design Forum

plan i eas

mini park

02

public engagement Facebook Polling

Would you like to see a buffer between the north end of Mini Park and Grandview Parkway? (153 respondents)

Yes 88.2%

No 11.8%

If you would like to see a buffer, what kind would you prefer? (146 respondents)

Fence Wall 4.1% 4.8%

Other 4.8%

Enhance the existing hillside to create a barrier 26.7%

Shrubbery 59.6%

If Mini Park gets a makeover, what type of park would you prefer? (159 respondents)

Implement the Coast Guard sculpture and don’t do anything more 8.8%

Passive park with gardens and Landscaping 34.6%

An urban park with a mix of uses including art, sculpture, a water feature, spaces for gathering, and greenspaces 56.0%

Respondent Comments: Make it friendly and inviting. Encourage people to stop and stay. If possible, a view of the bay with some buffer from the road would be cool. Bike parking will be important.

Maybe some seating for picnics

This would be a great spot for a fix-it station for bikes (if there isn’t already one close by) and also for one of those great drinking fountains with the water bottle filler.

Wouldn’t a barrier block a view of the bay for those in the park?

Use fruit trees for the homeless to eat Seating/ picnic area for families fishing Do people actually spend time here? It feels like a temporary space. I think spending funds to have a mixed use solution would be wasted. It’s too close to traffic. Beautiful, welcoming gardens with a fountain would be nice to see.

My concern about installing a buffer in the park is that it would also block views of the bay. Maybe those views are already blocked, I’m not sure, but I think TC needs to incorporate the bay wherever possible. Not many downtowns have that view!

Find a solution to jaywalkers crossing from the north. Create a pedestrian bridge or cross walk or significantly impede their attempts. I’d be ok with barbed wire. LOL The park design should be complete and not just plop a sculpture in it. That would not be giving the Coast Guard City the honor it deserves.

Don’t add a lot of concrete. Let’s keep our parks green and natural.

The Downtown TC logo on the wooden wall looks awesome!

plan i eas

mini park

02

Trivia Night

Question 10 Worth 2 Points

What kind of sculpture is planned for Mini Park in 2018?

A. B. C. D.

Giant trout Cherry Navy Ship Coast Guard Helicopter

Question 14 Follow-up Question - Worth 1 Point

If there was a fence or physical barrier along the north border of Mini Park and Grandview Parkway would you use the park space more oken?

A. Yes B. No

plan i eas

plan i eas

Question 10

Question 18

Follow-up Question - Worth 1 Point

Worth 2 Points

If Mini Park gets a makeover, what type of park would you prefer?

The Tart Trail was originally designed for horses

r i v i a n i g h

A. Urban park with a mix of uses including sculpture, water feature, spaces for gathering, and greenspace B. Passive park with gardens and landscaping C. Implement the Coast Guard Sculpture and don’t do anything more

r i v i a n i g h

A. True B. False

i eas plan

plan i eas

Question 14

Question 18

r i v i a n i g h

Worth 2 Points

What trail runs through Mini Park?

A. B. C. D.

Vasa Sleeping Bear Heritage Trail TART Trail Glacial Hills Pathway

plan i eas

r i v i a n i g h

r i v i a n i g h

Follow-up Question - Worth 1 Point

The Tart Trail currently shares the public sidewalk along Mini Park, if the trail alignment could be changed what do you think is the best alternaSve? A.

Go through the center of the park B. Move it into the street as a 2way trail that is physically separated from traffic C. Widen the sidewalk that is there now to accommodate all users D. Leave it the way it is plan i eas

r i v i a n i g h

plan i eas

mini park

02

what we think The recommendations have been separated into two categories based on how they relate to future implementation: short-term recommendations and long-term actions.

Together, these categories provide recommendations at

Recommendation No. 2

Continue to engage public and community participation

different points of time, at different scales, and in relation to multiple systems.

Objective Strong brands inspire people to connect with businesses

Short-Term Recommendations

and services and with each other.. The “brand” of the Plan-it East project helped to inspire people to get involved with the

Recommendation No. 1

process. The Plan-it East brand should continue to be used as

Phase 1 implementation should include a holistic approach to future planning for the entire park

a tool to engage the public.

Tasks 1.

Objective

Continue to develop the Plan-it East brand and marketing efforts using social media.

2.

Create a website that can be used as a resource for

The concept plan that currently exists for Mini Park was

the community to get updates, leave comments, or get

created as a result of planning for a location of the United

involved.

States Coast Guard Sculpture. Little to no public engagement

3.

Consider installing the “Public Chalkboard” in the

was completed while developing the plan. Phase 1

Spring 2018 at The park to build awareness for Phase 1

Improvements should include not only time to develop

Improvements and to solicit ideas for future plans.

construction documents and plans for implementation of the sculpture, but also a comprehensive and holistic approach to

Recommendation No. 3

planning for future improvements of The Park.

Implement short-term improvements to activate the public space and test ideas

Tasks 1.

Draft a request for proposal that takes a comprehensive approach to planning and design of The Park’s Phase 1

Objective

Improvements and also future improvements.

2.

Develop a vision for The Park - what does The Park want

Improving a public space does not need to be expensive,

to be? Is it a gateway park to downtown, is it an art park,

and it does not need to take a lot of time. Regardless of how

or is it an urban park with a mix of uses?

long it might take to eventually design and fund a full park

3.

Reach out to TART Trails early on as a stakeholder.

reconstruction low cost, low risk short-term improvements

4.

Consider developing a working group sub-committee to

should be highly considered. By implementing short-term

oversee first phase planning and implementation. The

improvements, City Planners will be able to test and evaluate

committee should include members from the Traverse

uses and impacts. Short-term changes could include new

City Parks Commission, Planning Commission, Downtown

amenities such as additional public art, landscaping, seating,

Development Authority, members of the community, the

and improved access.

local Coast Guard station, and the artist who designed the sculpture.

5.

Closely coordinate future planning efforts with the future design of the Grandview Parkway and Front Street Intersection.

plan i eas

Ideas include: •

Add landscaping.

•

Consider adding a temporary pop-up art/sculpture to experiment with the idea The Park could someday play the role of an urban art park or gateway park.

•

mini park

02

Recommendation No. 5

Host a design competition to come up ideas for creating a buffer between The Park and Grandview Parkway.

Place moveable seating - chairs & tables in The Park Objective

Tasks The Facebook Polling completed as part of Plan-it East’s 1.

2.

Collaborate with local planners, designers and technical

public engagement showed a significant number of people

experts to develop concept plans and help activate the

all agreed that the high volume of traffic and noise from

improvements.

Grandview Parkway creates an environment in The Park that

Involve the Traverse City Arts Commission and other

feels unsafe and unwelcoming. Almost 90% of participants

stakeholders.

agreed that some type of physical barrier would benefit The Park.

Recommendation No. 4

Develop a pilot project to test ideas of how to best separate the TART Trail from the public sidewalk.

Objective Currently, trail users share the section of public sidewalk that runs along the edge of The Park. The Plan-it East public engagement process revealed that recreational trail users, non-motorized commuters, park users, and visitors to downtown will benefit if a solution can be arrived at to separate trail users from the public sidewalk.

Tasks 1.

Develop concepts for a possible pilot project as part of ongoing planning for East Front Street.

2.

Reach out to TART Trails early on as a stakeholder.

3.

Coordinate all planning efforts with overall park planning, Grandview Parkway and Front Street Intersection changes (2023), and East Front Street streetscape plans and improvements targeted for 2018-19.

Installing some type of buffer along Grandview Parkway will not only improve safety for children and reduce road noise, but will allow the remaining park spaces to be improved and utilized at a much higher rate.

Tasks 1.

Encourage the Traverse City Parks Commission to collaborate with the Arts Commission and Downtown Development Authority to commission a design competition.

plan i eas

mini park

02

Long-Term Actions Recommendation No. 6

Recommendation No. 7

Look for opportunities to develop partnerships once a preferred site master plan is realized and adopted

Rename The Park Objective The image of existing park struggles as a result of its location between two streets that see a high volume of vehicle traffic.

The high traffic along with the absence of things to do, design,

Objective

and safety all contribute to a poor image and perception.

Many successful parks and public spaces are developed and

Renaming “Mini Park� would be a catalyst for change.

sustained through partnerships, and with the support and collaboration between the public and private sector.

Tasks

www.designtrust.org is a great example of an organization

1.

easy.

that builds relationships through partnerships with the public sector.

Tasks

Consider holding a naming competition, make it fun and

2.

Review the current park naming policy.

3.

Complete the renaming of The Park in conjuction with developing a Mini Park Site Master Plan and Phase 1 Improvements.

1.

Identify goals with clear objectives.

2.

Identify costs and funding needs.

3.

Build relationships and explore partnerships with not-forprofit groups whose visions and goals align with the goals and needs for the intersection.

4.

Build relationships and explore partnerships with other public agencies and public institutions whose goals align with the goals of the intersection.

5.

Create a fund development plan and identify potential public and private sources of funding for the intersection.

6.

Allocate resources and staff time to manage a team of staff and consultants to see the project through.

7.

Consider investing in programmatic capacity to build partnerships with businesses and volunteers to help develop and maintain the improvements.

8.

Develop creative programs that can provide opportunities for the community to support through donations, crowdfunding, and volunteerism.

plan i eas

mini park

02

01 02 03 04 05 06

07 08 09 10

11 12

1 Street + 3 Blocks + 12 Public Spaces

murchie bridge reconstruction site assessment Type of Public Space State Highway Bridge

Key Issues •

Maintenance and upkeep of the recent improvements especially the sidewalk / non-motorized trail on the north

Project Status

side.

•

Coordination between local and state jurisdictions.

The Murchie Bridge was reconstructed in the spring of 2017.

Improvements included reconstructing the bridge deck, sidewalks, and railings.

Other Things to Consider •

What We’ve Heard •

79 people weighed in on Facebook Polling with almost 80% of respondents satisfied with the improvements.

•

People welcomed the improvements, especially to the sidewalk and railing system, but some wondered why the railings on the south side of The Bridge do not match the design of the north side.

•

Why is there not a sidewalk on the south side?

Specific signage for pedestrians and trail users accessing the waterfront - signage for safety related to bridge crossing and trail user rules.

03

murchie bridge reconstruction

LOOK OUT AT THE WATER

GRANDVIEW PARKWAY (US-31)

place analysis

Sociability Highway bridges are not usually associated with sociability, but the Murchie Bridge is unique in that it is a highway bridge located at the mouth of a world class trout stream and is a significant access link for a non-motorized trail system that connects two peninsulas of land, and provides outstanding views over West Grand Traverse Bay (Lake Michigan).

The Bridge however does little more than provide sidewalk access and misses out on the opportunity to enhance the pedestrian user experience.

Connectivity Bridges connect places and people.

The Murchie Bridge provides a valuable connection over the Boardman River that moves goods and services into and out of downtown Traverse City. The Bridge also provides a valuable pedestrian connection.

Activity The Bridge does not provide a place for activity other than users moving along the street and sidewalk.

plan i eas

03

BO AR D

MA NR

IVE R

murchie bridge reconstruction

WALK, RUN, RIDE YOUR BICYCLE DRIVE YOUR CAR

Image The image of the Murchie Bridge has greatly improved since the reconstruction, however, some in the community were left wondering why improvements did not include railing on the south side to match and why the existing bridge’s structural beams were left without a new coat of paint.

Place Scorecard The Place Scorecard is a rating system used to evaluate each public space. The rating system uses a 1 to 5 point scale, 1 being the lowest or poor and 5 the highest or best. An overall score is calculated with a total of 20 points possible.

Sociability Connectivity Activity Image

OVERALL SCORE

9

plan i eas

murchie bridge reconstruction

03

public engagement Facebook Polling

Are you satisfied with the recent renovations of the Murchie Bridge? (79 respondents)

No 8.9%

Other 11.4%

Yes 79.7%

Respondent Comments: Should celebrate the river meeting the bay better than what is there.

Barrier between multiuser trail and motor vehicles should meet standards! Crappy work

Make the other side of the bridge the same style as the other side. The railing is steel tubing vs black gates

It looks great but i was surprised you didn’t go with the rusted look similar to the warehouse district bridge as it seems the painting of the murchie bridge fell by the wayside and there was years of peeling paint. I understand cost was probably a factor and I like the black paint..hope it’s maintenance is kept up or you could get a group to adopt the bridge for up-keep as it is a gateway for tourists. russian sage would look nice along the bridge too! thank you! proud of TC!

Would like to see improvements to the trail beneath the bridge.

Paint the underside I’d like to see a very clearly marked pedestrian crossing under the bridge, very similar to the Cass St crossing. Pedestrians try crossing the road regularly which is dangerous for everyone because this crossing is not well established The old railings on the south side don’t match the new railings on the north. That looks bad. The workmanship is fine but bad attention to design and no understanding of aesthetics. Lame.

Walkway under bridge is part of TART trail and a means to pedestrians to cross Grandview Parkway. Two cyclist in opposite directions barely fit. Then you ad in people who fish under bridge.... maybe restrict fishing to wider areas?

I’m not dissatisfied. Nothing changed too much from the previous design. The trail crossing under the bridge is a bit too narrow and causes a lot of conflict. I like the rail improvements and wider width of the trail over the river. You know, nothing real mind blowing from what was there before.

If Mini Park gets developed, hopefully a sidewalk along the south side of the bridge can be incorporated.

Didn’t increase the width of the underpass, still too narrow. I do appreciate the new railings streetside on top, and the wider bike paths

A better underpass for pedestrians and bikes. A bridge on the other side of the underpass. A bridge underneath for pedestrians to cross the river.

plan i eas PUBLIC SPACE PLAN

EAST FRONT STREET

#TCMI

Trivia Night

Question 22 Worth 2 Points

What year was the Murchie Bridge Built?

A. B. C. D.

1936 1939 1941 1946

plan i eas

r i v i a n i g h

murchie bridge reconstruction

03

01 02 03 04 05 06

07 08 09 10

11 12

1 Street + 3 Blocks + 12 Public Spaces

murchie bridge underpass site assessment Type of Public Space Promenade / Non-motorized Trail

Key Issues •

The navigable river channel is already extremely narrow and limited due to sand drift that deposits along the western abutment which limits the possibility of widening

Project Status

the promenade.

The Murchie Bridge Underpass is a popular spot for fishermen

•

Low overhead clearance

and TART Trail users accessing the waterfront.

•

Multiple user types and limited space (i.e. fishermen,

There have been ideas to widen the sidewalk along The Underpass to improve mobility and access - this plan was

sightseers, trail users) •

included in the Bayfront Plan, 2010 and the Boardman River

Popularity by the homeless population as a place to drink alcohol and sleep.

Plan that was completed by students from the University of Michigan in 2013.

Other Things to Consider What We’ve Heard •

151 people weighed in on Facebook Polling. The majority of responses weigh heavily towards wanting some level of improvements to The Underpass.

•

Lighting, lighting, lighting.

•

Widen the promenade for pedestrians and bicyclists.

•

More or improved wayfinding signage.

•

Health of the Boardman River

•

Certain types of lighting under The Bridge could negatively impact fish passage and other wildlife that move along the river corridor.

04

murchie bridge underpass

RELAX UNDER A T ACCESS THE BAYFRONT

GO FISHING

WALK, RUN, RIDE YOUR BICYCLE

FRONT STREET

place analysis

Sociability The sociability of The Underpass is low to moderate at times as a result of the nonmotorized TART Trail and chance encounters that occur as a result of the high volume of trail users. The current design of The Underpass also contributes to poor social interaction. The Underpass currently attracts the local homeless population and teens looking for a “out-of-site� place to hang out.

Connectivity Field observation was completed to evaluate connectivity and how people use The Underpass. The Underpass not only connects The downtown to the waterfront, but also connects to the Wellington Plaza and to a local hotel. Public transportation does not directly serve The Underpass.

Activity Activity in The Underpass can be extremely busy with multiple activities occurring at once including bicycle commuters using the TART Trail, families with children strolling along the promenade, teens swimming, and anglers fishing the mouth of The River.

plan i eas

murchie bridge underpass

04

LOOK FOR WILDLIFE

TREE

GRA

ND

VIE

WP ARK

WA Y (U

S-3

Image The image of The Underpass struggles as a result of its current condition and outdated site furnishings and public space. The image of The Underpass is also negatively impacted by the homeless population using the space to consume alcohol and sleep and the low lighting levels and low sense of security all contribute to a poor image and perception.

1)

Place Scorecard The Place Scorecard is a rating system used to evaluate each public space. The rating system uses a 1 to 5 point scale, 1 being the lowest or poor and 5 the highest or best. An overall score is calculated with a total of 20 points possible.

Sociability Connectivity Activity Image

OVERALL SCORE

10

04

murchie bridge underpass

aerial view of the murchie bridge underpass

plan i eas PUBLIC SPACE PLAN

EAST FRONT STREET

#TCMI

murchie bridge underpass

04

04 Coastal Park

Figure 25: Areas of Concern. Highlighted below are the large Cottonwood tree (dark green), small patch of Coastal Sand Dune (light green), Sunset Park Beach (tan), and the hotel’s outdoor patio. Great views to the bay are also shown below.

Figure 26: Circulation. The current circulation of this area revolves around the TART Trail, as it loops from under the bridge upwards toward Grandview Parkway. Curious people explore the coastal ecosystem by bushwhacking through it. Potential connections (dashed) are shown linking the hotel beach and patio to other elements.

ANALYSIS The most visually striking element in this area is a large Cottonwood tree. This tree could serve as a landmark for this space, but the surrounding conditions are not optimal for its long-term survival. The TART trail runs around the tree, and its pavement and associated hardscape are constraining the root system. The tree’s roots have broken apart the planter box constructed around its base, exposing them and creating a safety concern.

A re-design of this space should consider the tree’s health, providing more root space for growth while highlighting the character of the tree.

Across the trail from the Cottonwood is a small coastal Lake Michigan sand dune ecosystem, an environment not found elsewhere in the city. This patch of vegetation is relatively new, recently reclaimed from Lake Michigan.

Successional processes will be evident here, as fast growing early colonizers give way to slower growing, long term vegetation. This interesting process offers an opportunity for environmental education, as visitors return time and again to see the changing species composition.

While visitors are interested in exploring this ecosystem, as evidenced by trampled paths crisscrossing the space, there is no formal system for access. A formalized boardwalk or path system would allow curious visitors to enter the space without harming the fragile ecosystem.

Visitors currently pass through this pocket of green space, but have little reason or opportunity to stop and appreciate the scenery. One bench beneath the Cottonwood tree provides a space for resting, but is not well-used. A re-imagined space could provide enhanced opportunities for exploration, resting and the appreciation of views out over the bay.

42

previous planning studies left

Boardman River Plan, University of Michigan, 2013. page 42

right

Boardman River Plan, University of Michigan, 2013. page 43

plan i eas

murchie bridge underpass

04

Coastal Park

Coastal Sand Dune (left). Man made paths found throughout the ecosystem. Exposed Roots (below). Exposed roots will affect the health of the Cottonwood Tree. Circulation (bottom). The heavy focus on circulation in this area leaves little room to sit and enjoy the shade while looking out over the Bay.

Image courtesy of Influence Design Forum

43

04 Coastal Park

DESIGN GOALS t Re-envision this area as a destination t Preserve and protect the small sand dune ecosystem t Educate visitors about the unique ecosystem and the process of ecological succession t Increase the visibility and viability of the iconic Cottonwood tree

SOLUTION The redesigned area surrounding the Cottonwood tree protects the long-term health of the tree itself while maintaining the TART trail’s current route and providing new seating opportunities. To do this, the ground plane is raised slightly and enclosed by a retaining wall that doubles as the edge of the trail. Adding soil to the area near the base of the tree will provide both protection for the root system and structural stability for the roots to take stronger hold. Removing the current hardscape and replacing it with grass will provide a space for bikers, joggers and other visitors to rest and relax, overlooking the adjacent sand dune ecosystem.

COASTAL SAND DUNE PARK SITE PLAN A. RAISED PLANTING BED A retaining wall here will hold back the newly added soil, while providing seating opportunities to users of the TART trail.

This new area will be a comfortable place to sit back and enjoy views of Grand Traverse Bay.

B. WOOD BOARDWALK This boardwalk will allow people to explore the unique ecosystem, all the while keeping them from harming it. The boardwalk connects the TART trail with the beach.

C. TRELLIS ENTRANCE The trellis located at the entrance of the boardwalk at the beach will give the boardwalk an identity. It will attract the

In order to encourage pedestrian access to the coastal sand dune without harming the ecosystem, the Boardman River Plan calls for the construction of a boardwalk traversing the sand dune and connecting to the beach beyond. This will benefit the area in the long term, decreasing disturbance and allowing formalized passage through the space. In addition to protecting this ecosystem, the boardwalk provides opportunities for community education, promoting an understanding of the coastal sand dune and the threats it faces.

44

previous planning studies left

Boardman River Plan, University of Michigan, 2013. page 44

right

Boardman River Plan, University of Michigan, 2013. page 45

attention of beach-goers, prompting them to explore the new attraction.

D. CONNECTION TO FRONT STREET A separate path has been added that will bring people from the TART trail to the beach by way of crossing Grandview Parkway. This link will create a connection from the Front Street commercial corridor to the beach.

E. RAIN GARDENS Rain gardens constructed along Grandview Parkway will help mitigate stormwater runoff issues. These rain gardens will also add interest to an area where turf grass currently exists along the busy roadway.

plan i eas

murchie bridge underpass

Coastal Park

Illustration 11:

COASTAL PARK SITE PLAN NOT TO SCALE

C

B

A D

E

Fro nt Str eet

Grandview Parkway

45

04

plan i eas

murchie bridge underpass

04

public engagement Facebook Polling

Which is more important to you? (150 respondents)

Other 4.7%

Keeping the width of the river as wide as possible 38.7%

Offering a wider riverwalk space 56.7%

Would you like to see a mural along the wall? (151 respondents)

No 23.2%

Yes 76.8%

Do you like the idea of adding a coastal wetland recreational area on the north side of the Murchie Bridge Underpass that could include a boardwalk with interpretive signage? (151 respondents)

No 19.9%

Yes 80.1%

Respondent Comments: Place a sign on the Tart Trail for bicyclists to walk their bikes under the bridge.

Surround the path with a native habitat( keep what is existing that is native). All the beaches, hotels, and the open space are quickly taking up space that native animals need. Keep TC area beautiful in the right ways.

Definitely needs to be wider with an area for fishing. also new railing above along GrandView Pkwy needs to be higher!

I direct a nonprofit called Arts for All of Northern MI, and we engage, empower, and inspire people with disabilities, and their peers, through accessible art and culture opportunities.

We are currently looking for a mural opportunity, and would love to be considered in any mural plans! Thanks!

Lighting, Cleanliness

I like bringing back the idea of a fishing pier.

It is currently not inviting but a bit scary and neglected.

Anything you do to clean it up would be welcome.

I think this is sufficient for pedestrians crossing grandview in this area. No need for additional consideration down by holiday inn.

The space North of the bridge after going under it on the walkway is so under utilized! The flagstones and trees are lovely and I feel as if people overlook this space because of road noise and inaccessibility to the bay itself. My parents would take me to this very spot to watch the air show when I was little, and I grew up thinking it was a picnic area.

Recently, I walked by here on my way to view the fireworks, and I thought it was a shame there isn’t more space available there to relax with reduced road noise. Obviously only so much can be changed here, but food for thought!

plan i eas

murchie bridge underpass

04

Respondent Comments: (continued) Currently a tough place to be on foot - improve for pedestrians too...

The underpass should be set up more like the Cass St underpass for pedestrians. This area should function for the TART trail and as a nice and clearly marked area for hotel stayers to cross in to the down town or into the Mini Park For the safety of boating (given the boat ramp) keep the river as wide as possible. There are many kayakers, SUPs and boaters who use that turn. Narrow it and someone is more than likely bound to be seriously hurt or heaven forbid die.

be difficult and even more so on a blind corner. I think this especially important with the huge increase in paddle traffic on the river and many of them not knowing how to control their craft.

Sidewalk is fine the way it is; narrowing the river restricts boats passing each other which becomes a hazard to navigation.

Widen the sidewalk and need to figure out a way for boats to safely transit under the bridge. Not factoring in the hoards of kayaker’s that block passage of powered boats because they do not have awareness of their surroundings and other boats.

The mural should be hearts. The hearts are nice graffiti.

We use the river area often it is already well designed and accessible. Please do not “fix it” it’s not broken!

I think the plan to encourage bikers to cross Grandview Parkway (D in the illustration above) is dangerous for the bikers and drivers. That is why I selected the option to widen the underpass, so bikers and fishermen can share that space safely.

I would like any changes to the coastal wetland zone to reflect and dedicated to the tribal trading and native history the predates European settlement. The original mouth of the Boardman used to be where the traders set up their encampment. A brass statuette camp depicting life as it may have looked.

Add low-level decorative lighting under the bridge.

Tc Bypass first. Let’s give people a way to get around town before we draw more people in I believe it’s more important to keep the waterway as wide as possible. With a flowing river and increased water traffic, keeping the underpass wider helps boaters of all kinds.

Especially some that may have a difficult time navigating the flowing water way.

I would normally like a mural, but I’m afraid it won’t be maintained, or even kept clean. Better to install only what you can realistically take care of. A wetland educational area will benefit more people in the long run There really needs to be a good way for people to know there is an underpass. The current signage does not lead people to it and they continually are crossing the parkway in an unsafe way.

A wider, more comfortable pathway would be a huge improvement to the trail. Improved lighting under the bridge is sorely needed. Feels very unsafe when dark. Designated fishing spots would also be helpful so fisherman are not obstructing the pathway for trail users.

The wetland area is one of the few in the Bay in town, and a lot of animals and birds live there. While I like the idea of being able to walk through it, I do worry that too much people traffic could damage that tiny but important ecosystem. It would be good to get the advice of an environmental expert on this. Regarding the underpass: I would suggest that an alternative walkway across Grandview connecting to the westbound TART trail would relieve most if not all of the pedestrian and bike traffic that causes safety issues. This is necessary regardless, and should be a consideration here.

Lighting at night.

Better lighting under the bridge. How about something artistic with lighting rather than a mural. Its the 21st century. Lets get creative. Maybe SEEDS or Crooked Tree could figure this out.

Don’t forget about the seasonal boaters who have paid to be in that part of the river for years. The river underneath of that bridge needs to be wide enough to accommodate two boats passing at the same time.

Keep it as wide as possible, please. It is the safest for boaters coming around the corner. You need space to move out of the way of each other and doing so on a flowing river can

plan i eas

murchie bridge underpass

Trivia Night

Question 9 Worth 2 Points

Where was Captain Boardman from?

A. B. C. D.

Beloit, WI Loveland, OH Stevens Point, WI Naperville, IL

Question 16 Worth 2 Points

Boardman River was named aker the first white seHler in TC. What was Captain Boardman’s first name?

A. B. C. D.

William Robert Horace Asa

plan i eas

plan i eas

Question 12

Question 22

Worth 2 Points

Worth 2 Points

What was the name of the club at the mouth of the Boardman River over 120 years ago?

What year was the Murchie Bridge Built?

A. B. C. D.

A. B. C. D.

r i v i a n i g h

Wequetong Club Rotary Club Boardman Clubhouse Wilkwedoong Clubhouse

r i v i a n i g h

1936 1939 1941 1946

plan i eas

plan i eas

Question 12

Question 22

r i v i a n i g h

r i v i a n i g h

Follow-up Question - Worth 1 Point

Follow-up Question - Worth 1 Point

What level of investment for improvements would you like to see in the area of the Murchie Bridge Underpass?

LighSng isn’t that good under the Murchie Bridge Underpass, what type of lighSng would you like to see?

A. ALL IN: improve pedestrian access under bridge, enhance the north side and develop an interpreSve walk through the coastal wetland B. MIDDLE OF THE ROAD: improve pedestrian access under the bridge, fix up the underpass C. BARE MINIMUM: paint railings, patch the holes D. IT PERFECT: don’t do anything plan i eas

r i v i a n i g h

A.

LED lighSng along the sidewalk and railing to guide pedestrians and boaters B. DecoraSve or arSsSc lighSng installaSon C. Basic lighSng on the understory structure of the bridge D. Keep the lighSng the way it is today plan i eas

r i v i a n i g h

04

plan i eas

murchie bridge underpass

04

plan i eas

murchie bridge underpass

04

what we think The recommendations have been separated into two

Recommendation No. 2

categories based on how they relate to future implementation: Together, these categories provide recommendations at

Continue to engage public and community participation

different points of time, at different scales, and in relation to

Objective

short-term recommendations and long-term actions.

multiple systems.

Strong brands inspire people to connect with businesses and services and with each other.. The “brand” of the Plan-it Short-Term Recommendations

East project helped to inspire people to get involved with the

Recommendation No. 1

process. The Plan-it East brand should continue to be used as

Add signage to manage circulation, improve the user experience, and increase safety

a tool to engage the public.

Tasks 1.

Objective

Continue to develop the Plan-it East brand and marketing efforts using social media.

2.

Create a website that can be used as a resource for

Currently, the promenade under the Murchie Bridge is to

the community to get updates, leave comments, or get

narrow to support 2-way trail traffic of bicyclists, walkers,

involved.

runners, strollers and support other uses including fishing and sightseeing. Developing a circulation management

Recommendation No. 3

plan, implementing proper signs, and enforcing the rules will

Implement short-term improvements to activate the public space and test ideas

improve the user experience and increase safety.

Changes to consider: •

Bicyclists must walk there bikes on the promenade section under The Bridge.

•

Warning signs that let trail users know the trail narrows ahead.

•

No fishing, stopping, standing on the promenade section under The Bridge.

Tasks

Objective Improving a public space does not need to be expensive, and it does not need to take a lot of time. Regardless of how long it might take to eventually design and fund a full public space reconstruction low cost, low risk short-term improvements should be highly considered. By implementing short-term improvements, City Planners will be able to test and

1.

2.

Complete a review and site investigation to determine

evaluate different ideas and impacts of those uses. Short-

which options are the most viable, cost effective, and

term changes could include new amenities such as additional

safe.

public art, landscaping, lighting, seating, and improved

Create a circulation management plan that identifies

access.

improvements, short and long-term improvements, 3.

phasing, and costs.

Ideas include:

Coordinate future changes with TART Trails.

•

Add landscaping.

•

Consider adding a temporary pop-up seating area to the plaza space on the north side of The Bridge - seating could be designed as functional art, be dynamic and have movement.

plan i eas

murchie bridge underpass

04

Long-Term Actions • •

Install temporary / seasonal artistic or interactive light

Recommendation No. 5

feature under The Bridge.

Develop a site master plan focused on strengthening the identity of The Underpass

Install temporary pop-up “art in the landscape” in and along the coastal wetland and mouth of the Boardman River to bring attention and awareness to its importance and function.

Tasks

Objective The existing infrastructure is aging or nonexistent. Sooner rather than later major infrastructure upgrades or a complete

1.

2.

Collaborate with local planners, designers and technical

overall will need to be completed to the Murchie Bridge

experts to develop concept plans and help activate the

Underpass and connected spaces. The development of

improvements.

a comprehensive plan that can be a shared vision of the

Involve the Traverse City Arts Commission, local

community will benefit the public space’s future.

organizations, East Front Street business owners, and other stakeholders.

The plan should consider promenade improvements, railings, lighting, navigable river channel, stormwater and river health,

Recommendation No. 4

trail and sidewalk egress points to The Underpass, the plaza

Host a design competition to come up with a wall mural design for under the Murchie Bridge

space on the north side of The Bridge, and the coastal

Objective

1.

wetland area at the mouth of the Boardman River.

Tasks Plan ahead now and consider adding the Murchie Bridge Underpass to the City’s Park and Recreation Master Plan

Almost 80% of the 150 participants who answered the Plan-it East Facebook Poll for Murchie Bridge Underpass agreed

project list.

2.

they would like to see a mural installed on the wall that is along

through the City’s capital improvements planning

the promenade under The Bridge. A design competition would provide an opportunity to bring the community together and also an opportunity to have more than one design option.

Tasks 1.

Encourage the Traverse City Parks Commission to collaborate with the Arts Commission and local arts organization to commission a design competition.

2.

Consider not using paint and instead more modern materials including large-scale vinyl so the design can be changed or removed more easily.

Request money for developing the site master plan process.

3.

Start to look for funding opportunities including grants that could help pay for developing a plan and/or future improvements to the public space.

plan i eas

murchie bridge underpass

04

Long-Term Actions Recommendation No. 6

Recommendation No. 8

Improve awareness of the coastal wetland

Look for opportunities to develop partnerships once a preferred site master plan is realized and adopted

Objective The coastal wetland that exists today at the mouth of the Boardman River has potential to bring awareness to the importance of the watershed that connects to Grand Traverse Bay. Tasks

Objective Many successful parks and public spaces are developed and sustained through partnerships, and with the support and collaboration between the public and private sector.

1.

Reach out to the Watershed Center Grand Traverse Bay and other organizations that have a strong background and understanding of watersheds and coastal wetlands.

2.

Consider implementing short-term improvements to build awareness.

Tasks 1.

Identify goals with clear objectives.

2.

Identify costs and funding needs.

3.

Build relationships and explore partnerships with not-forprofit groups whose visions and goals align with the goals and needs for the intersection.

Recommendation No. 7

Implement efforts to protect water quality and manage vegetation

4.

Objective

5.

Protecting water quality of the Boardman River is important

6.

Build relationships and explore partnerships with other public agencies and public institutions whose goals align with the goals of the intersection.

Create a fund development plan and identify potential public and private sources of funding for the intersection. staff and consultants to see the project through.

to the community of Traverse City. The River and Grand Traverse Bay support the economy; therefore, protections

Allocate resources and staff time to manage a team of

7.

Consider investing in programmatic capacity to build

should be in place to protect them against invasive species,

partnerships with businesses and volunteers to help

stormwater runoff, and non-point source pollution.

develop and maintain the improvements.

8.

Tasks

Develop creative programs that can provide opportunities for the community to support through donations, crowdfunding, and volunteerism.

1.

Support efforts to monitor and address threats to the river mouth and to water quality.

2.

Consider training volunteers and/or staff, or partnering with other groups who specialize in conservation, landscaping or gardening efforts, to conduct field assessments and monitor the health of trees and plants.

3.

Develop a maintenance and pruning cycle for vegetation.

4.

Complete an invasive species assessment and management plan.

5.

Develop and implement a tree management plan.

plan i eas

murchie bridge underpass

04

01 02 03 04 05 06

07 08 09 10

11 12

1 Street + 3 Blocks + 12 Public Spaces

wellington plaza site assessment Type of Public Space Plaza

Key Issues •

Riverbank erosion is undermining The Plaza and a new seawall needs to be constructed.

Project Status

•

Significant change in grade from street level to the river limits accessibility.

Wellington Plaza is an underutilized public space located along the Boardman River with river access. Currently, the Other Things to Consider

space is used mostly by anglers or as pedestrian access to the Murchie Bridge Underpass. The Boardman River Plan,

•

Health of the Boardman River.

completed by University of Michigan Students in 2013, came

•

Currently, transient boaters can tie up along the

up with an idea to convert The Plaza to a stormwater park with a series of ramping and gardens engineered to filter stormwater from Front Street before it enters the Boardman River.

What We’ve Heard •

170 people weighed in on Facebook Polling.

•

Revamp The Plaza with similar design programming to what is there now including tiered seating options and places for small events or entertainment.

•

Add the ability to access the Boardman River.

•

Seating is important.

boardwalk.

05

wellington plaza

place analysis

Sociability The sociability of The Plaza is latent with potential, but currently it struggles because of the lack of comfortable seating, things to do, disconnect from both the Boardman River and street life, and ability to provide activities or programming for day or night use.

Connectivity Field observation was completed to evaluate connectivity and how people use the public space. Wellington Plaza is landlocked between the Boardman River, private buildings on both sides, and East Front Street; however, a short section of promenade with a public easement connects to the Murchie Bridge Underpass and out to the waterfront and non-motorized trail (TART Trail). The promenade access is only 1 of 2 entrances to The Plaza and is the only accessible entrance. The second entrance is directly off of East Front Street.

Activity Activity in The Plaza is low other than people using it as a short-cut to connect to the Murchie Bridge Underpass, TART Trail, and anglers using the pile supported deck to fish from. Currently, no programming exists to support the public space.

plan i eas

wellington plaza

05

BOARDMAN RIVER GO FISHING

ACCESS THE BAYFRONT

LOOK FOR WILDLIFE

BOAT WATCH

RELAX ON A BENCH

VISIT A MEMORIAL

Image The poor image of The Plaza is a reflection of the low awareness of its existence by the people in the community - when asked, many survey participants had never heard of Wellington Plaza.

Place Scorecard The Place Scorecard is a rating system used to evaluate each public space. The rating system uses a 1 to 5 point scale, 1 being the lowest or poor and 5 the highest or best. An overall score is calculated with a total of 20 points possible.

Sociability Connectivity Activity Image

OVERALL SCORE

7

05

wellington plaza

aerial view of wellington plaza

plan i eas PUBLIC SPACE PLAN

EAST FRONT STREET

#TCMI

wellington plaza

05

05

previous planning studies center Illustration showing the concept of a stormwater park at the Wellington Plaza location.

Boardman River Plan, University of Michigan, 2013. page 37

plan i eas

wellington plaza

05

05 Front Street

beds, these gardens promote stormwater infiltration, retain sediment, and reduce the water’s velocity. A series of ramps running over the tiered gardens allows pedestrians to experience the journey of a single raindrop and highlights innovative solutions to environmental problems.

The renovation of this park also speaks to the importance of public open space in an urban environment. Dr. James Whitney Hall is recognized for his commitment to the fight for increased open space in the Traverse City region.

His life is celebrated in this park but in its current configuration the space is not accessible to all.

A re-imagined park is accessed via ramps, which connect the site to the TART system and allow all potential users to experience the rain gardens and the river beyond.

STORMWATER PARK SITE PLAN NOT TO SCALE

Illustration 9: Accessibility is important especially when looking at a public outdoor space that is meant for everyone to enjoy. A low sloping ramp has been designed to get people from the sidewalk along Front Street down to the trail system that follows the Boardman River.

38

previous planning studies left

A plan view Illustration of a stormwater park concept Boardman River Plan, University of Michigan, 2013. page 38

right

A section view illustration of a stormwater park concept Boardman River Plan, University of Michigan, 2013. page 39

plan i eas

wellington plaza

Front Street

Illustration 10: Stormwater Park Terraces. To slow stormwater entering the Boardman River, a series of terraced rain gardens have been designed.

Stormwater steps down from one terrace to the other, depositing sediment as it goes, eventually entering the river at a slower speed.

39

05

plan i eas

wellington plaza

05

public engagement Facebook Polling

Is adequate seating in this area important to you? (141 respondents)

No 33.3%

Yes 66.7%

If Wellington Plaza was improved how would you like to see this space utilized? (170 respondents)

A 10.9%

C 13%

Other 14.3%

D 14.3%

B 15.1%

B and C 15.5%

A and D 16.8%

A. A space that provides access to the river for kayakers and temporary parking for boaters who want to access downtown B. A space that provides a relaxing atmosphere with different outdoor seating options for eating outside on the river, watching boaters, and relaxing C. A space that is primarily designed and used for treating stormwater but at the same time would provide the opportunity to walk through it and learn about the benefits of green infrastructure and watershed protection D. A space that can be used for events and entertainment with tiered seating and access to the rivers edge B. and C. only A. and D. only

Respondent Comments: Or leave it alone and just make it look nicer Keep it simple A place to sit down and enjoy yourself, meet friends, access the river, is needed.

Also, the area under the bridge is dirty. needs to be swept, cleaned and painted and regularly maintained Maybe it seems like a lot to choose all four, but I feel this could be very versatile. I don’t like the idea of temporary boat parking right at the Plaza, but if the boardwalk extended down a ways in a manner conducive to metered boat parking, that would be unobtrusive and convenient. I think extra seating is always a plus in DT TC due to the ever growing tourist population. This would be the most aesthetically appealing option. Storm water treatment and education are very important to the area, and I feel this is the biggest thing to

stress from the options. If there were a way to provide the treatment and education with a slight tiered seating slope that provides both eating space and possible event space in a versatile manner with a small kayak/canoe area and an extended boardwalk for boater parking, you could do all of these things. This space already has a natural slops, a width that allows for multiple seating areas, and ample riverfront space.

Lots of steering of ideas in this poll... not objective. A & B might work, but not a necessary change. Great dock and bench area in that block already

plan i eas

Respondent Comments: (continued) A little bit of A, B & C would be nice. Controlling storm water runoff while making the water’s edge accessible seems to fit the original purpose for the park. I’m not sure if it has to be a ramp, since it looks like there is access just a few hundred feet to the east. There could be a few benches or picnic tables installed for people who want to enjoy their lunch break there, but it doesn’t need to be an entire patio. And then boater tieups (a “shopper’s dock” might encourage people to spend their money downtown. If the dock could include space to launch kayaks and SUPs, great, but I’m not sure how people would get their gear down there easily. Maybe they need to access the site from the parkland to the east.

If the plan was to treat storm water that should remain the primary goal.

Please make sure it is handicapped accessible.

Any seating in that area will be taken over by the “homeless” like it is now. The police cannot monitor it. So your better off not putting it in.

No wayer restrictions Still have access to fish in river, as not everyone owns a boat You could easily do a combination of all of these. It would be easy to do the stormwater gardens and seating with a kayak launch/parking. The seating and tables would provide a nice overflow seating from Little Fleet.

There is plenty of seating at nearby outdoor restaurants. The open space provides nice outdoor space for events, but D is still a cool idea. I love the idea of a kayak launch area - most people launch from the wetlands, which can’t be good for the habitat. A green park is also always nice.

Since this an urban environment, I wouldn’t mind seeing it designed with that context in mind. I really like the plaza between Pangea’s and Kilwin’s: developed to fit the context of its location while providing a great open area for a respite.

Something similar to this with rain gardens for landscaping and storm water management would be wonderful.

wellington plaza

05

plan i eas

wellington plaza

Trivia Night

Question 9 Worth 2 Points

Where was Captain Boardman from?

Question 11 Follow-up Question - Worth 1 Point

If Wellington Plaza was changed how would you like to see the space to be uSlized?

A.

A. B. C. D.

Beloit, WI Loveland, OH Stevens Point, WI Naperville, IL

B.

C. D.

A space that provides access to the river for kayakers and temporary parking for boaters A space that provides a relaxing atmosphere with different outdoor seaSng opSons for eaSng outside on the river, watching boaters, and relaxing A space designed for cleaning stormwater A space that can be used for events and entertainment

plan i eas

plan i eas

Question 9

Question 17

Follow-up Question - Worth 1 Point

Follow-up Question - Worth 1 Point

r i v i a n i g h

Where would you most like to see live music and events along the Boardman River?

A. Wellington Plaza B. The Pump StaSon property C. I don’t want to see live music along the Boardman

plan i eas

r i v i a n i g h

Question 11 Worth 2 Points

Wellington Plaza is now used mostly for A. B. C. D. E.

Fishing EaSng Swimming Biking I have no idea where Wellington Plaza is

plan i eas

r i v i a n i g h

r i v i a n i g h

Would you like to see more boat parking (transient)on the south side of river with access to businesses like LiHle Fleet?

A. Yes B. No

plan i eas

r i v i a n i g h

05

plan i eas

wellington plaza

05

plan i eas

wellington plaza

05

what we think The recommendations have been separated into two categories based on how they relate to future implementation: short-term recommendations and long-term actions.

Together, these categories provide recommendations at

Recommendation No. 2

Continue to engage public and community participation

different points of time, at different scales, and in relation to multiple systems.

Objective Strong brands inspire people to connect with businesses

Short-Term Recommendations Recommendation No. 1

Design and construct a sea wall to prevent further stream bank erosion Objective

and services and with each other.. The “brand” of the Plan-it East project helped to inspire people to get involved with the process. The Plan-it East brand should continue to be used as a tool to engage the public.

Tasks 1.

Continue to develop the Plan-it East brand and marketing efforts using social media.

Wellington Plaza is constructed of a series of decks with pile

2.

the community to get updates, leave comments, or get

supported boardwalk along the river’s edge. A considerable

involved.

amount of erosion caused by scouring has occurred under the pile supported boardwalk against the riverbank. A sea wall will provide long-term stability, prevent damage or possible

Create a website that can be used as a resource for

Recommendation No. 3

Tasks

Implement short-term improvements to activate the public space and test ideas

1.

Objective

collapse of boardwalk and decks, and mitigate possible damage to adjacent buildings.

Complete a review and site investigation to determine what type of sea wall is the best application. Many

2.

3.

different options exist including curved, stepped, vertical

Improving a public space does not need to be expensive,

or even gabion baskets.

and it does not need to take a lot of time. Regardless of how

Develop construction plans that addresses how the wall

how long it might take to eventually design and fund a full

will be constructed and what existing infrastructure,

public space reconstruction low cost, low risk short-term

including decking, will be impacted and need to be

improvements should be highly considered. By implementing

removed.

short-term improvements, City Planners will be able to test and

Consider early-on possible changes to The Plaza that

evaluate different ideas and impacts of those uses. Short-

could occur together with the construction of the new wall.

term changes could include new amenities such as public art, landscaping improvements, or moveable seating.

Ideas include: •

Add landscaping.

•

Consider adding a temporary pop-up seating area along The River - seating could include a grouping of hammocks for visitors to relax in.

plan i eas

•

Consider adding colorful and welcoming signage along

wellington plaza

05

Tasks

the pile supported boardwalk to encourage visitors arriving by boat to tie up and visit downtown shops and

1.

restaurants.

•

interest.

Install temporary pop-up art or sculpture that celebrates

2.

Develop a request for proposals.

the Boardman River, Grand Traverse Bay, and the

3.

Advertise and build awareness for the sponsorship

surrounding watershed.

Tasks 1.

Reach out to East Front Street business owners to gauge

program.

4.

Collaborate with the Traverse City Downtown Development Authority and Merchant Association to hold events and activities.

Collaborate with local planners, designers and technical experts to develop concept plans and help activate the improvements.

2.

Long-Term Actions

Involve the Traverse City Arts Commission, local organizations, East Front Street business owners, and other stakeholders.

Recommendation No. 4

Create an annual sponsorship program that activates The Plaza and supports programming and events

Recommendation No. 5

Develop a site master plan that identifies long-term improvements and reflects the community’s vision Objective The existing infrastructure is aging - custom wood benches are in disrepair, wood decking is failing, the landscaping

Objective

is obsolete, more than 50% of The Plaza is not accessible,

The most successful public spaces and parks have

and the entry gateway is outdated. The development of

programming that supports activities and events. The creation

a comprehensive plan that can be a shared vision of the

of an annual sponsorship program for Wellington Plaza

community will benefit the public space’s future.

would provide opportunity for improved visibility for a public space that is currently undervalued. Building a program of

The plan should consider promenade improvements and

events and activities on the property will facilitate and support

connection to the Murchie Bridge Underpass, railings,

placemaking efforts and bring people to the East Front

lighting, navigable river channel, stormwater and health of the

neighborhood to spend time recreating, shopping, and dining

Boardman River, and egress.

out.

Tasks Ideas include: •

Summer concert series

•

Dining on The River

•

River safety rescue demonstration

•

Fishing charter boat parking

1.

Confirm that Wellington Plaza is listed in the DDA Plan and is eligible for funding from Tax Increment Financing.

2.

Add The Plaza to the Parks and Recreation 5-Year Master Plan as a priority project.

3.

Request money for developing the site master plan in the City’s Capital Improvements Plan.

4.

Start to look for funding opportunities including grants that could help pay for developing a plan and/or future improvements to the public space.

plan i eas

wellington plaza

05

Long-Term Actions Recommendation No. 6

Implement efforts to protect water quality Objective Currently, Wellington Plaza serves as a collection point for underground stormwater infrastructure and is the location of a

Tasks 1.

Identify goals with clear objectives.

2.

Identify costs and funding needs.

3.

Build relationships and explore partnerships with not-forprofit groups whose visions and goals align with the goals and needs for the intersection.

4.

public agencies and public institutions whose goals align

culvert the empties into the Boardman River. The stormwater infrastructure the exists is not currently treating or removing contaminants from the water.

Consider taking advantage of upcoming erosion control repairs or future plaza improvements to look for ways to treat stormwater before it enters the Boardman River and Grand

with the goals of the intersection.

5.

Create a fund development plan and identify potential public and private sources of funding for the intersection.

6.

Allocate resources and staff time to manage a team of staff and consultants to see the project through.

7.

Consider investing in programmatic capacity to build partnerships with businesses and volunteers to help

Traverse Bay. Tasks

Build relationships and explore partnerships with other

develop and maintain the improvements.

8.

Develop creative programs that can provide opportunities for the community to support through donations,

1.

Complete a review and assessment of the stormwater

crowdfunding, and volunteerism.

district that connects to the culvert at Wellington Plaza.

2.

Support efforts to monitor and address threats to The River mouth and to water quality.

3.

Identify grant funding and/or project partners including the Watershed Center of Grand Traverse Bay that could support stormwater improvements.

Recommendation No. 7

Look for opportunities to develop partnerships once a preferred site master plan is realized and adopted

Recommendation No. 8

Develop a life-cycle analysis and eco-balance program for the existing wood decks, trees, and other assets identified on the property Objective When considering all aspects of sustainability and the life cycle of a building, tree, or other long-term investment it is important to consider the life of that investment from the time

Objective

of implementation, life-long maintenance to proper use and/or disposal of the materials and waste generated when the asset

Many successful parks and public spaces are developed and sustained through partnerships, and with the support and collaboration between the public and private sector.

is removed.

plan i eas

This recommendation addresses the end of a building or raw materials life cycle and identifies strategies to extend the resource after it is removed from the property. The purpose of this recommendation is to develop creative ideas for reusing the materials at the end of their life cycles.

Tasks 1.

Identify potential partnerships with businesses or organizations that specialize in recycling.

2.

When trees are removed, use them for a City project, or offer them to local businesses, including restaurants or art centers, for reuse or reclamation.

3.

Establish criteria and develop guidance materials for purchasing building materials and planting trees and other vegetation on City-owned properties.

wellington plaza

05

01 02 03 04 05 06

07 08 09 10

11 12

1 Street + 3 Blocks + 12 Public Spaces

boardman river pedestrian bridge site assessment Type of Public Space Pedestrian Bridge

Key Issues •

Location and siting a bridge is challenging because of limited space on the north side of the Boardman River

Project Status

and steep grades.

•

There are currently no plans to build a new pedestrian bridge

Cost, in 2015 the estimated cost was at $1 Million + (Public Pier Study, JJR. 2015).

along the Boardman River or is the project being proposed, but it has come up as an idea in the past, most recently in the Public Pier Study which was completed in 2015. Currently, three other pedestrian bridges exist in the downtown business district.

The idea was to build a pedestrian bridge next to the Sewer Pump Station on East Front and connect to the north side of the Boardman River - a new pedestrian connection would then be made along the north river bank east and west connecting Murchie Bridge and Lot D and the boat launch respectively.

What We’ve Heard •

84 people weighed in on Facebook Polling and respondents were in favor of a new bridge at this location.

•

A bridge would be an opportunity to build character along the East Front Street neighborhood.

Other Things to Consider •

Health of the Boardman River.

•

Bridge deck and beam clearance over The River.

•

If a pedestrian connection along The Boardman River to the Murchie Bridge is not made then a bridge would be limited in improving connectivity.

06

boardman river pedestrian bridge CONCEPTUAL LOCATION

place analysis

Sociability

Connectivity

Project is currently not under proposal or are there plans to design and construct a bridge.

Project is currently not under proposal or are there plans to design and construct a bridge

Activity Project is currently not under proposal or are there plans to design and construct a bridge

*(The Boardman River Bridge does not currently exist and therefore a place analysis was not completed)

plan i eas

boardman river pedestrian bridge

06

BOARDMAN RIVER

FRONT STREET

Image Project is currently not under proposal or are there plans to design and construct a bridge

Place Scorecard The Place Scorecard is a rating system used to evaluate each public space. The rating system uses a 1 to 5 point scale, 1 being the lowest or poor and 5 the highest or best. An overall score is calculated with a total of 20 points possible. *(The Boardman River Bridge does not currently exist and therefore a place analysis rating was not completed)

Sociability Connectivity Activity Image

OVERALL SCORE

06

Refining the Design: Project Bu 1. Public Pier • • •

Coastal Zone Management Grants Great Lakes Fishery Trust National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF)

1. Public Pier 2. Beach Improvements 3. Boardman River + Downtown 4. East Connections 5. Clinch Marina Connection

2. Beach Improvements •

Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund (MNRTF)

3. Connections • •

MNRTF Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)

Traverse City Public Pier previous planning studies center Planning exhibit showing the location of several public space improvements assoicated with the Public Pier Study.

Traverse City Public Pier Study, JJR, 2015. Powerpoint Slide

Grand Total

plan i eas

boardman river pedestrian bridge

udget $5,360,000 $660,000 $1,150,000 $630,000 $910,000 $8,710,000

22

06

plan i eas

boardman river pedestrian bridge

06

public engagement Facebook Polling

Do you like the idea of a pedestrian bridge located along the Boardman River in this area? (83 respondents)

No 15.7%

Yes 84.3%

How would you like to see this bridge used? (78 respondents)

Other 6.4%

Just add benches For pedestrians only As a public space with for seating 14.1% places to sit, eat, fish 10.3% 19.2%

All of the above 50.0%

Respondent Comments: covered seating and a large space for sitting and eating, should be close to the food trucks so people can eat there when it is too crowded Why have a bridge when there’s a runner 40 feet away. Waste of tax dollars.

Restrooms Build a bridge over the Parkway too.

Sit and fish but not places to eat. Allow bicyclists to walk their bikes across if they can ride elsewhere on the trail. Not sure of bridge placement location.

As a business/ property owner directly across the street from this property (the last remaining green space on this end of town) I think this would be a real loss for the city and the local businesses. Frankly, I don’t see that very much is gained by adding such a bridge, and certainly not enough to justify what would be lost. The proposed bridge seems like a half-baked idea in search of a problem - there is really no need to get to the other side of the river at this location, only to be hemmed in by the parkway and unable to easily access the beach (except by the already existing walkway under the parkway just a short distance to the east). Please don’t do this; work instead to preserve and cultivate the existing green space and improve fish habitat along the river at this location.

One is needed for cyclists between State and 6th.

Keep enough clearance for stand up paddle boarders Traverse City is going to regret not developing a dynamic river walk along the Boardman with seasonal food and drink kiosks, outdoor seating, and fishing areas.

It would need to not interfere with boats going up or down the river.

Maybe I’m not understanding the purpose of this “bridge” but we already have the TART trail going under the highway and over the river there so I would rather see the city spending money to add more safe crossings over/under Grandview to decrease the number of people trying to cross in the middle of traffic or at those pedestrian crosswalks that most drivers ignore or are going to fast to stop at.

What’s the point of it?? Does the city have bunch of extra money??... how about free parking lots for downtown employees? For those that move tourism with good service every day in exchange of ... 0 consideration. Thanks!!

I don’t see the need. There are proper crossings very close to this location. It would be something else to maintain for very little gain. there is not enough parking to accommodate this or the fishing pier. Stop wasting $$$ on studies and plans!

Waiting for you plan on how to get people from West Bay Beach Hotel to the underpass. Instead of them running across the parkway.

plan i eas

boardman river pedestrian bridge

Trivia Night

Question 20 Follow-up Question - Worth 1 Point

If the City decided to move forward with a pedestrian bridge what type of bridge would you like to see?

A. Simple bridge just for crossing the river B. Bridge with Architectural character & strong idenSty C. Put this project on the shelf and don’t move forward plan i eas

r i v i a n i g h

Question 20 Worth 2 Points

What kind of bridge over the Boardman River was proposed in the Public Pier Planning Study?

A. B. C. D.

Pedestrian Car Animal Bicycle

plan i eas

r i v i a n i g h

06

plan i eas

boardman river pedestrian bridge

06

what we think The recommendations have been separated into two

refine overall project costs will be beneficial for making a final

categories based on how they relate to future implementation:

determination of whether the project is viable.

short-term recommendations and long-term actions.

Together, these categories provide recommendations at

Tasks

different points of time, at different scales, and in relation to

1.

Complete a review and site investigation.

multiple systems.

2.

Consider hiring a outside consultant to complete the study.

Short-Term Recommendations Recommendation No. 1

Continue to engage public and community participation Objective Strong brands inspire people to connect with businesses and services and with each other.. The “brand� of the Plan-it East project helped to inspire people to get involved with the process. The Plan-it East brand could be used as a tool to continue to engage the public.

Tasks 1.

Continue to develop the Plan-it East brand and marketing efforts using social media.

2.

Create a website that can be used as a resource for the community to get updates, leave comments, or get involved.

Recommendation No. 2

Complete a study to determine the feasibility of a pedestrian bridge at this location Objective Utilize the past planning studies as a starting point to complete a feasibility study to determine if a pedestrian bridge will work in the proposed location. Over 80% of respondents from the Plan-it East Facebook polling are encouraged that a bridge at this location would benefit the East Front Street neighborhood - completing a study to determine if existing elevations of the riverbanks and connectivity will work and to

3.

Present the findings to the public.

plan i eas

boardman river pedestrian bridge

06

01 02 03 04 05 06

07 08 09 10

11 12

1 Street + 3 Blocks + 12 Public Spaces

pump station property site assessment Type of Public Space Public Property

Key Issues •

Unpleasant odor coming from underground tanks that are part of the Pump Station Building.

Project Status

•

Estimated cost of furnishing labor and materials to repair masonry on the building $26,000.

The Pump Station Property is located on East Front Street on the north side of street between Boardman Avenue and Other Things to Consider

Wellington Street in downtown Traverse City. The building is starting to show signs of deterioration and The Property

•

Adding historical context of the building architecture

around the building is currently not used for anything with

and/or what the building is there for would provide an

the exception of a small area on the east end is leased to an

opportunity for educational and interpretive experience.

adjacent restaurant and is used for outdoor seating. There are ideas to revamp the area into a more inviting public space.

What We’ve Heard •

86 people weighed in on Facebook Polling.

•

People really like the building architecture.

•

Great location to develop river access.

•

Greenspace / lawn area is frequented by dogs visiting the groomer located a few doors down.

07

pump station property LOOK FOR WILDLIFE

SIT IN THE GRASS

WALK YOUR DOG

place analysis

Sociability The property around the Pump Station is currently not designated as official public space or as parkland - overtime, The Property has organically become a space passerbyers use. The unplanned spaces around the building provide opportunity for chance encounters between people and a place to let your dog do its business.

Connectivity Field observation was completed to evaluate connectivity and how people use The Property.

Currently, The Property does not increase or decrease connectivity along East Front Street, but more importantly provides an opportunity to develop a public space connected to the public right-of-way.

Activity Activity on The Property is limited to unplanned activity including people providing their dogs a bathroom break or a shopper taking a break on the bench located near the front door of the Pump Station. More recently, a portion of The Property to the east of the building has been privately leased by restaurant tenants in the neighboring building.

The pop-up cafe space has provided a burst of activity and vibrance around the Pump Station.

plan i eas

pump station property

07

BOARDMAN RIVER

DINE AT AN OUTDOOR CAFE

RELAX ON A BENCH

LOOK AT ARCHITECTURE

Image The image of The Property and building are negatively effected because of the sanitary sewer operations and occasional unwanted smell. Most people probably are not aware the adjacent outdoor cafe is on the public property, but the choice by the City to lease a portion of The Property is seen by some as an improvement to what was there and improves the overall perceived image.

Place Scorecard The Place Scorecard is a rating system used to evaluate each public space. The rating system uses a 1 to 5 point scale, 1 being the lowest or poor and 5 the highest or best. An overall score is calculated with a total of 20 points possible.

Sociability Connectivity Activity Image

OVERALL SCORE

7

07

pump station property

aerial view of the pump house property

plan i eas PUBLIC SPACE PLAN

EAST FRONT STREET

#TCMI

pump station property

07

plan i eas

pump station property

07

public engagement Facebook Polling

The pump station building (even though its primary job is to pump sewage) has strong architectural character and is a unique building, what, if any improvements would you like to see? (84 respondents)

More Other outdoor 6.0% seating in front of building 4.8%

Improve maintenance on the exterior of the building 7.1%

Look into potential to improve the smell and air quality surrounding the building 9.5%

Add landscaping All of the above to complement the 59.5% building architecture 13.1%

Should there be river access on the pump station property? (81 respondents)

No 34.6%

Yes 65.4%

Is it important to you to try to reduce the odor and air quality around the building? (82 respondents)

No 26.8%

Yes 73.2%

The pump station building sits on a larger public property along the Boardman River, if The Property was improved what would you like to see? (83 respondents)

A 7.2%

C 9.6%

D 9.6%

B 34.9%

A and B only 38.6%

A. Selectively remove tree branches to enhance the view of the river and Grand Traverse Bay (Lake Michigan) B. Design and build a small park space that can be used for seating, eating lunch or watching boaters on the river C. Activate the outdoor space by leasing it annually to a business or organization (Currently Sparks BBQ leases a small area on the east end of the property for outdoor seating) D. Do nothing at all A. and B. only

Many years ago there was a boardwalk located between where Morsels and the Pump Station Property are now (see image above). Would you like to see this installed again? (84 respondents)

No 16.7%

Yes 83.3%

plan i eas

pump station property

07

Respondent Comments: Would be super nice for the local boaters to be able to “pull up” there and access the area businesses.

Put in a dock and allow public to tie up boats.

It’s so stinky that I’m afraid I would have no interest eating or sitting near by, unless it improved immensely.

Get rid of it re-route the piping How about focusing on improving the 8th st. corridor from Boardman to Garfield? WAY overlooked! But not to look like the “over kill” of lights and crosswalks by the west end by Burritts... can we just have spaces that aren’t turned into theme-park seating?

The river needs areas where trees are providing shade to cool the water. The loss of trees is increasing water temp. and growth of aquatic plants that are choking out the rivers other inhabitants.

Leave it alone It’s been doing just fine, leave it in a natural state This is a great building and certainly should be given some new life. We should be careful with development to ensure that any potentially improved access does not encourage erosion and that shade and vegetation along the river bank is protected and hopefully improved. trim up the trees so we can see the river and hopefully the bay! also see above maintain ALL river front pathways. They are overgrown with bushes. Other cities take pride in these areas, tc does next to nothing to maintain their properties. All they want to do is build, then do nothing later.

A primary concern is the smell on the property. If the smell was reduced, this parcel would be a great location of a public park with river access. It would be a shame if this location were to be developed. The boardwalk would be a nice touch, and could be improved from the previous version. A shallower grade could make the park seem larger than it is. It would be lovely to have a boardwalk connecting Murchie Bridge to Morsels and beyond.

Eliminate on-street parking directly in front of the pump station so the architecture and landscaping can be better appreciated.

I really like the facade of the building and would feel sad if it ever went away. It seems like there is plenty of opportunities to improve the public space surrounding it, making it more inviting, activating for more passive use, and a connection to a future boardwalk would be excellent. And to be honest, I’ve never really noticed the smell before.

Continue the lease to Sparks (or whatever restaurant is there next) but make it more permanent and harmonious with whatever else is done in that area. For example, have it flow into a more park like setting with better views of the river.

I think this place could be activated as a mini park. With the covered bike parking, and access ramp from the street, more people will come here. Let’s install a water station, a bike pump, and landscape it to be a nice little gathering place.

Narrow Front St there so that the river bank can be widened.

Remove invasive species, and plant native species

plan i eas

pump station property

Trivia Night

Question 13 Worth 2 Points

How many gallons of raw sewage does the Pump StaSon pump every day?

A. B. C. D.

2.5 million 150 542,000 5490

Question 15 Follow-up Question - Worth 1 Point

Would you like to see the trees trimmed around the Pump StaSon to offer more views of the river and bay?

A. Yes B. No

plan i eas

plan i eas

Question 13

Question 16

Follow-up Question - Worth 1 Point

Follow-up Question - Worth 1 Point

Do you like the idea of having a small defined doggy area on the Pump StaSon property, offering a staSon with a drinking fountain for people and their pets?

Would you like to see a boardwalk along the Boardman River between the Pump StaSon and Morsels?

A. Yes I love dogs B. Nope, we already have a dog park

A. Yes B. No

r i v i a n i g h

r i v i a n i g h

plan i eas

plan i eas

Question 15

Question 17

r i v i a n i g h

Worth 2 Points

Why was the small brick building on the Boardman River just west of Sparks BBQ built?

A. B. C. D.

Clubhouse Boathouse Storage Pump sewage

plan i eas

r i v i a n i g h

r i v i a n i g h

Follow-up Question - Worth 1 Point

Would you like to see more boat parking (transient)on the south side of river with access to businesses like LiHle Fleet?

A. Yes B. No

plan i eas

r i v i a n i g h

07

plan i eas

pump station property

07

plan i eas

pump station property

07

what we think The recommendations have been separated into two

landscaping improvements, or moveable seating.

categories based on how they relate to future implementation: short-term recommendations and long-term actions.

Ideas include:

Together, these categories provide recommendations at

•

different points of time, at different scales, and in relation to multiple systems.

Add landscaping and selectively remove tree branches to enhance views of the Boardman River.

•

Consider adding a temporary pop-up park.

•

Continue to lease property to the adjacent restaurant and consider expanded the leased area and/or additional

Short-Term Recommendations Recommendation No. 1

Continue to engage public and community participation

leases for other areas of The Property.

Tasks 1.

Collaborate with local planners, designers and technical experts to develop concept plans and help activate the improvements.

Objective 2.

Involve the Traverse City Parks Commission, local

Strong brands inspire people to connect with businesses

organizations, East Front Street business owners, and

and services and with each other.. The “brand” of the Plan-it

other stakeholders.

East project helped to inspire people to get involved with the process. The Plan-it East brand could be used as a tool to continue to engage the public.

Recommendation No. 3

Tasks

Move forward with building maintenance improvements

1.

Objective

Continue to develop the Plan-it East brand and marketing efforts using social media.

2.

Create a website that can be used as a resource for

The Pump Station has a strong architectural character and

the community to get updates, leave comments, or get

is a critical link in the City’s underground sanitary sewer

involved.

infrastructure. The pumps move on average over 2.5 million gallons of raw sewage everyday. Completing necessary

Recommendation No. 2

building maintenance improvements will demonstrate

Implement short-term improvements to activate the public property and test ideas

the importance of the role the Pump Station plays in our

Objective

•

Masonry / mortar joint repair

•

Consider adding landscaping

•

Lighting upgrades to highlight the Pump Station’s strong

Improving a public space does not need to be expensive,

community.

Ideas include:

architectural character

and it does not need to take a lot of time. Regardless of how how long it might take to eventually design and fund a full

•

Investigate options for smell mitigation

public space reconstruction low cost, low risk short-term

•

Freshen up the existing seating area

improvements should be highly considered. By implementing short-term improvements, City Planners will be able to test and evaluate different ideas and impacts of those uses. Shortterm changes could include new amenities such as public art,

plan i eas

Tasks 1.

Use the bid the City already received as a basis for budgeting repairs.

2.

Include the repairs in the 2018-19 capital improvement plan and pay for with money from the Sewer and Water Fund.

pump station property

07

Recommendation No. 5

Consider permanently protecting The Property by officially adding it to the City’s parkland Objective Currently, the Pump Station and surrounding property are not

Long-Term Actions

an official park or public space - adding The Property to the City’s parkland would permanently protect it. The City owned

Recommendation No. 4

property is extremely valuable and will provide a valuable

Develop a site master plan that identifies long-term vision for the Pump Station and surrounding property

public space that is directly connected to the public right-ofway of East Front Street and to the Boardman River.

Tasks 1.

Review all available history and records to ensure there are no deed restrictions in place that would prevent The Property from becoming parkland.

Objective 2.

The value of The Property is to high to ignore its potential as a

consideration, and recommendation to the City

successful public space. Its location in the middle of the East Front Street Downtown Business District, the connection it has

Place on the Parks Commission agenda for review, Commission.

3.

Consider adding the Pump Station to the City’s list of

to the public right-of-way of the street, and its frontage on the

historic buildings and recognized by the Historic Districts

Boardman River all combine to give The Property high value.

Commission.

The master planning process should not only look at the potential to create a public space or small park, but investigate the feasibility of developing a riverwalk that connects the length of the district and a pedestrian bridge connection to the north side of the Boardman River.

Tasks 1.

Allocate planning dollars from the City’s capital improvements plan to complete a site master plan.

2.

Start to look for funding opportunities including grants that could help pay for developing a plan and/or future improvements to The Property.

plan i eas

pump station property

public and private sources of funding for the intersection.

Recommendation No. 6

Implement efforts to protect water quality

07

6.

Allocate resources and staff time to manage a team of staff and consultants to see the project through.

7.

Consider investing in programmatic capacity to build partnerships with businesses and volunteers to help

Objective

develop and maintain the improvements.

To begin early on in the planning process to look for creative

8.

Develop creative programs that can provide opportunities

ways to protect the water quality of the Boardman River and

for the community to support through donations,

Grand Traverse Bay.

crowdfunding, and volunteerism.

Tasks 1.

Complete a review and assessment of the existing property and building to ensure that there currently no threats to water quality.

2.

Support efforts to monitor and address threats to the Boardman River and to water quality.

3.

Recommendation No. 8

Develop a life-cycle analysis and eco-balance program for the existing wood decks, trees, and other assets identified on the property

Identify grant funding and/or project partners including the Watershed Center of Grand Traverse Bay that could

Objective

support stormwater improvements.

When considering all aspects of sustainability and the life Recommendation No. 7

cycle of a building, tree, or other long-term investment it is

Look for opportunities to develop partnerships once a preferred site master plan is realized and adopted

important to consider the life of that investment from the time

Objective Many successful parks and public spaces are developed and sustained through partnerships, and with the support and collaboration between the public and private sector.

Tasks 1.

Identify goals with clear objectives.

2.

Identify costs and funding needs.

3.

Build relationships and explore partnerships with not-forprofit groups whose visions and goals align with the goals

of implementation, life-long maintenance to proper use and/or disposal of the materials and waste generated when the asset is removed.

This recommendation addresses the removal of trees, the end of a building or raw materials life cycle and identifies strategies to extend the resource after it is removed from the property. The purpose of this recommendation is to develop creative ideas for reusing the materials at the end of their life cycles.

Tasks 1.

organizations that specialize in recycling.

2.

Build relationships and explore partnerships with other public agencies and public institutions whose goals align with the goals of the intersection.

5.

Create a fund development plan and identify potential

When trees are removed, use them for a City project, or offer them to local businesses, including restaurants or art

and needs for the intersection.

4.

Identify potential partnerships with businesses or

centers, for reuse or reclamation.

3.

Establish criteria and develop guidance materials for purchasing building materials and planting trees and other vegetation on City-owned properties.

plan i eas

pump station property

07

01 02 03 04 05 06

07 08 09 10

11 12

1 Street + 3 Blocks + 12 Public Spaces

300 block mid-block crosswalk site assessment Type of Public Space Pedestrian Crosswalk - Bumpout

Key Issues •

Proper signage to ensure pedestrian and vehicle safety.

•

Clear vision of pedestrians waiting to cross.

Project Status The 300 Block Mid-Block Crosswalk was completed in the Spring of 2017. The Crosswalk is similar to the crosswalks on the 100 and 200 Blocks of Front Street. The Crosswalk provides additional public space on the sidewalks and a shorter crossing distance giving pedestrians the right-of-way.

What We’ve Heard •

34 people weighed in on Facebook Polling.

•

People would rather see the additional public space created from the bumpout to be used for seating and landscaping and not storage of bicycles and litter receptacles.

Other Things to Consider •

Installing a crosswalk banner arm sign over the street to maintain consistency with other mid-block crosswalks in Downtown.

08

300 block mid-block crosswalk CROSS-SHOP

FRONT STREET

ACCESS THE PARKING DECK

place analysis

Sociability Pedestrian crosswalks and the public space that surrounds them have high potential for social interaction, running into a friend, or chance encounters if they are designed properly. The newly constructed pedestrian mid-block crosswalk on East Front Street missed out on an opportunity to provide a space large enough to support strong sociability.

Connectivity Field observation was completed to evaluate connectivity and how people use The Crosswalk. The Crosswalk was a success in regard to adding an important connection that was under-served. The adjacent public parking deck is now better served and provides pedestrians with direct access to cross the street without having to walk to the corner.

Activity Activity in the public spaces the bumpout creates are little to none due to the lack of seating or designed spaces for people; however, The Crosswalk itself has created more pedestrian activity in the street and created more awareness of the pedestrian along the 300 block of Front Street.

plan i eas

300 block mid-block crosswalk

08

BOARDMAN RIVER

CROSS-SHOP

Image The mid-block crosswalks in Downtown Traverse City’s 100 and 200 blocks are huge contributors to the image of the Downtown shopping district - they provide places for people to relax and take a break while shopping, they include planters with seasonal displays, and shade from the hot sun. The Crosswalk on East Front was not constructed with the same design standard and subsequently smaller making it difficult to provide adequate space for pedestrians.

Place Scorecard The Place Scorecard is a rating system used to evaluate each public space. The rating system uses a 1 to 5 point scale, 1 being the lowest or poor and 5 the highest or best. An overall score is calculated with a total of 20 points possible.

Sociability Connectivity Activity Image

OVERALL SCORE

9

plan i eas

300 block mid-block crosswalk

08

public engagement Facebook Polling

What do you think is the best use of the extra sidewalk space that is created by the mid-block crosswalk? (33 respondents)

Landscaping Places for 12.1% people to sit and rest 12.1%

Storage for bicycles and litter receptacles 33.3%

A and B only 42.4%

Do you think the traffic signs alerting drivers of the mid-block crosswalk and pedestrians are adequate? (34 respondents)

No 38.2%

Yes 61.8%

Respondent Comments: I do not like the bump outs I think the biggest issue at that section is a lot of people go on wrong side of the road for the parking deck and are backing up into traffic when they are trying to correct themselves. I don’t think the signage is simplified and clear when it comes to addressing this issue. I also think there are issues with the parking deck itself though too. The design makes it difficult to turn this problem extend on multiple levels of the deck especially if using a larger size vehicle An overhead sign would bring it in line with the other downtown mid-block crosswalks Similar crosswalks arrangements to the crosswalks further west on Front Street would encourage people to slow down and spend more time on this part of Front.

Rain garden!!! And please, NO hideous giant crosswalk sign like those on West Front!

Push button lights/warnings help with inattentive drivers, so helpful at west front crossing at Elmwood.

It was very needed!

The decorative barriers that were put in at similar areas in the 100 and 200 blocks actually make it really difficult to see pedestrians and know whether they are coming out into the crosswalk or whether they are just using the area to gather.

I think they’re fantastic in aiding pedestrian crossings and calming traffic. Friends visiting from other cities are quick to complement them and appreciate their effectiveness.

For the extra space I would’ve like to vote for option A and C. A bench with bike storage would be good just shut down the whole street to traffic for 2 months, have restaurants have outdoor seating so there isn’t 2 hour waits at every restaurant

plan i eas

300 block mid-block crosswalk

08

plan i eas

300 block mid-block crosswalk

08

Long-Term Actions

what we think The recommendations have been separated into two categories based on how they relate to future implementation: short-term recommendations and long-term actions.

Recommendation No. 2

Together, these categories provide recommendations at

Develop a pattern design for all future crosswalks

different points of time, at different scales, and in relation to multiple systems.

Objective Short-Term Recommendations Recommendation No. 1

Maximize the additional public space that is created by the midblock crosswalk and bumpout

Crosswalk designs including signage, dimensions, curb radius, and pavement markings are all slightly different depending on what city you are in; moreover, creating consistency in each city is important to maintaining safety.

Developing a pattern design that can be used for crosswalks and mid-block crosswalks will improve driver awareness and expectations of the pedestrian and improve overall walkability.

Objective Tasks The mid-block crosswalk should be about pedestrians and improving the pedestrian experience downtown. The

1.

Develop a pattern book for crosswalk design - crosswalks

mid-block crosswalk is there to improve walkablity, cross-

in residential neighborhoods, crosswalks adjacent

shopping, traffic calming, and most importantly create

to schools and safe routes to school, crosswalks at

additional public space within the public right-of-way. The

intersections with stop signs versus intersections without,

space created should be used for seating and landscaping,

crosswalks in downtown, and mid-block crosswalks.

not for storing bicycles and litter receptacles.

Tasks 1.

Collaborate with local planners, designers and technical experts to develop a street furniture layout and help activate the improvements. Consider using the design pattern that was recently created for the 100 and 200 blocks of Front Street.

2.

Before installing any improvements ensure that a maintenance and management plan has been developed and approved by the Downtown Development Authority and corresponding City of Traverse City departments.

plan i eas

300 block mid-block crosswalk

08

01 02 03 04 05 06

07 08 09 10

11 12

1 Street + 3 Blocks + 12 Public Spaces

park st. streetscape & public restrooms site assessment Type of Public Space Street and Public Restrooms

Key Issues •

Providing adequate signage for people to wayfind the restrooms from Front and State Streets.

Project Status Renovations have just been completed for Park Street

Other Things to Consider

Streetscape and construction is still underway for the Public Restrooms, but will be completed by spring 2018.

•

Add wayfinding signage on Park Street.

•

Consider adding a vending machine at the Park Street Public Restrooms.

What We’ve Heard •

26 people weighed in on Facebook Polling.

•

Would like to have seen bicycle lanes.

•

People are excited about incorporating public art as part of the public restrooms.

09

LOOK AT PUBL

park st. streetscape & public restrooms DRINK A CIDER IN AN OUTDOOR CAFE

PARK STREET

FRONT STREET

PLAY A PUBLIC PIANO

FRONT STREET

place analysis

Sociability Its still to early to gauge the sociability potential of the newly constructed Park Street and Public Restrooms, but early signs show that the public space that will be associated with the restrooms has potential - it will include a rendition of the graffiti “heart wall” that was recently removed from an adjacent building facade that was removed. The street design itself is not unique to downtown, but does provide some improvement to what was there including additional sidewalk space near an existing restaurant.

Connectivity Field observation was completed to evaluate connectivity and how people use Park Street.

The Street sees heavy pedestrian traffic moving between State and Front Streets - it provides an important north-south connection between downtown’s main streets and a direct connection to the waterfront and Boardman River. Unfortunately, the new street did not provide facilities for bicycle lanes or a dedicated location for a transit stop.

Activity Activity along Park Street has seen an increase over the past couple of years with success of two newer restaurants attracting people, the addition of large-scale public art located on building facades, and a public piano that brings an impromptu activity to the street environment.

plan i eas

park st. streetscape & public restrooms

09

LIC ART

USE THE RESTROOM

PARK YOUR CAR

PARK STREET

STATE STREET

ENJOY DINNER OUTSIDE

Image The perceived image of The Street will take time as the community begins to use the recently completed street and public restrooms, but it should not have a problem gaining traction as a quality public space since it will have public restrooms everybody loves public restrooms.

Place Scorecard The Place Scorecard is a rating system used to evaluate each public space. The rating system uses a 1 to 5 point scale, 1 being the lowest or poor and 5 the highest or best. An overall score is calculated with a total of 20 points possible.

Sociability Connectivity Activity Image

OVERALL SCORE

13

09

park st. streetscape & public restrooms

park street construction drawing

plan i eas

park st. streetsacpe & public restrooms

09

Image courtesy of Influence Design Forum

plan i eas

park st. streetsacpe & public restrooms

09

public engagement Facebook Polling

Are you satisfied with how the improvements turned out? (25 respondents)

No 12.0%

Yes 64.0%

Other 24.0%

Would you have like to seen bike lanes along Park Street? (25 respondents)

Yes 72.0%

No 28.0%

Is there a need for more signage to inform people of where the public restrooms are located? (25 respondents)

No 8.0%

Yes 92.0%

Would you like to see an art element incorporated where the public restrooms will be? (25 respondents)

No 12.0%

Yes 88.0%

Respondent Comments: I would like him to keep the theme of old town brick style, that already flows throughout Traverse city. I’m not a huge fan of the modern buildings that are being implemented throughout the city. I think the open space buildings and restroom area is one of the biggest failures in design for the downtown area. Simply because it seems disconnected from the rest of downtown.

More tree coverage would be a good addition. The street is bare. vending machines would be helpful Bike lanes should be everywhere. Encouraging bike and pedestrian traffic downtown should be priority, such limited space for parking, only makes sense.

It’s too late now but the city should have preserved the mature trees on this block.

I work downtown and walk by this daily and had no idea bathrooms were added. So signage is probably a priority I feel like Park St turned out mediocre; a missed opportunity to create a unique streetscape that was interesting, that had the effect of inviting people down it out of curiosity. And I’m one one of those that really wanted to see the pavers incorporated

plan i eas

what we think The recommendations have been separated into two categories based on how they relate to future implementation: short-term recommendations and long-term actions.

Together, these categories provide recommendations at different points of time, at different scales, and in relation to multiple systems.

Short-Term Recommendations Recommendation No. 1

Activate the newly constructed street & advertise the public restrooms Objective The street reconstruction was recently completed (SpringSummer 2017), but now there is the opportunity to activate the newly constructed street and bring awareness to the public restrooms.

Prior to the reconstruction, Park Street had seen new vibrancy including two new successful restaurants, the renovation of the “Chase Bank� building, and pop-up art including a public piano and large format prints attached to building facades.

Tasks 1.

Collaborate with local planners, designers and technical experts to develop ideas and help activate the public space along Park Street.

2.

Involve the Traverse City Parks Commission, Arts Commission, local organizations, Park Street business owners, and other stakeholders.

park st. streetsacpe & public restrooms

09

01 02 03 04 05 06

07 08 09 10

11 12

1 Street + 3 Blocks + 12 Public Spaces

park street beach access site assessment Type of Public Space Beach

Key Issues •

Change in grade and extent of earthwork and grading required.

Project Status

•

Removal of mature landscaping.

Currently, there is no beach access at the end of Park Street Other Things to Consider

- a retaining wall and landscaping make it difficult to access the beach. No sidewalk or pathway exists either. There are

•

ideas to replicate the recently reconstructed Slabtown Beach access along the west end. The Slabtown access not only

Consider replicating the design from the Slabtown Beach Access.

•

Take advantage of the strong siteline or viewshed down

provided an at-grade mid-block pedestrian crossing, but also

Park Street to the bayfront that could be enhanced by the

a small viewing platform and ramped access to the beach

addition of a beach access - plaza could include public

and a stormwater treatment structure that separates pollutants

art or sculpture.

from street runoff into Grand Traverse Bay.

What We’ve Heard •

28 people weighed in on Facebook Polling.

•

People like the idea of developing an accessible access plaza at the end of Park Street.

10

park street beach access

BOARDM

AN RIVER

PARK STREET

place analysis

Sociability Beaches and waterfronts are highly desirable public spaces, especially when the weather is sunny and warm. The Park Street Beach Access, if constructed, would open a much needed connection to the waterfront that has high sociability and activity.

Connectivity Field observation was completed to evaluate connectivity and many people are jumping the beach wall to access the beach. Others who are coming from downtown along Park Street who cannot navigate the wall have to travel several hundred feet to Clinch Park to access the beach.

Activity Activity in the vicinity of where Park Street meets the waterfront is very high and the upper lawn and beach area offer many opportunities for people even without a designed public space. The constraining obstacle is the beach wall which is not accessible.

plan i eas

park street beach access

10

CLIMB A TREE

PEOPLE WATCH

WAY (US3 1)

WATCH THE SUNSET

IEW PARK

LAY IN A HAMMOCK

GRANDV

GET A TAN

HAVE A PICNIC CONCEPTUAL LOCATION

BUILD A SAND CASTLE

GO FOR A RUN, WALK , OR BIKE RIDE GO FOR A SWIM

Image In order to complete an analysis of the Park Street Beach Access it would need to be constructed; however, the recently completed Slabtown Beach Access can be used as a litmus test. The Beach Access has been received with high marks and the neighborhood has taken ownership of the public space and beach area.

Place Scorecard The Place Scorecard is a rating system used to evaluate each public space. The rating system uses a 1 to 5 point scale, 1 being the lowest or poor and 5 the highest or best. An overall score is calculated with a total of 20 points possible. *(The Park Street Beach Access does not currently exist and therefore a place analysis rating was not completed)

Sociability Connectivity Activity Image

OVERALL SCORE

10

previous planning studies center Illustration showing the Slabtown Beach Access City of Traverse City

plan i eas

park street beach access

10

plan i eas

park street beach access

10

public engagement Facebook Polling

Would you like this space to replicate Slabtown Beach? (28 respondents)

Yes 57.1%

No 42.9%

How would you like to access the beach? (28 respondents)

Other 7.1%

Steps 10.7%

Sand 17.9%

Concrete 17.9%

Boardwalk 46.4%

Respondent Comments: Improved crossing at the intersection of Park/Grandview is needed. Marked and signaled crossings on BOTH sides the east and west sides of Park St. would be a considerable improvement. Bulb-outs at the intersection with neckdowns on Grandview would help to calm traffic and improve safety/ comfort for people crossing.

Make it well marked that pedestrians will cross here.

Pedestrian bridge over traffic on parkway. Off grid lights like West End Beach.

Do what’s best for the environment, storm water runoff, etc., but yes, provide access As a driver who almost got rear-ended at the Slabtown crosswalk for obeying the rules, I don’t think there should be a crosswalk at Park St. until drivers are better trained. A pedestrian bridge isn’t really an option until a bypass is built

around the city to reroute large vehicles. The safest way to cross Grandview Parkway is via the tunnel one block away. have a covered shelter as well with a boardwalk and small deck with seating, there are few or no covered picnic areas on the water

plan i eas

park street beach access

10

plan i eas

park street beach access

10

what we think The recommendations have been separated into two

Ideas include:

categories based on how they relate to future implementation:

•

Add landscaping.

short-term recommendations and long-term actions.

•

Construct a temporary staircase

Together, these categories provide recommendations at

•

Add a section of new sidewalk with access to the top of

different points of time, at different scales, and in relation to multiple systems.

the wall •

Install bicycle racks

Tasks Short-Term Recommendations

1.

Recommendation No. 1

Continue to engage public and community participation

Collaborate with local planners, designers and technical experts to develop concept plans and help activate the improvements.

2.

Involve the Traverse City Parks Commission, local organizations, and other stakeholders.

Objective Strong brands inspire people to connect with businesses and

Recommendation No. 3

project helped to inspire people to get involved with the

Complete a post-evaluation survey of the Slabtown Beach Access

process. The Plan-it East brand could be used as a tool to

Objective

services and with each other.. The “brand” of the Plan-it East

continue to engage the public.

Completing a post-evaluation survey will provide insight into Tasks

what worked and what did not. The survey will determine whether the design met expectations for users and can be

1.

Continue to develop the Plan-it East brand and marketing

used to guide the design the Pine Street Beach Access.

efforts using social media.

2.

Create a website that can be used as a resource for

Tasks

the community to get updates, leave comments, or get involved.

1.

Develop a post-evaluation survey.

2.

Distribute the survey to neighborhood presidents including Slabtown Neighborhood.

Recommendation No. 2

Implement short-term improvements to activate the public space and test ideas Objective Improving a public space does not need to be expensive, and it does not need to take a lot of time. Regardless of how long it might take to eventually design and fund a full public space reconstruction low cost, low risk short-term improvements should be highly considered. By implementing short-term improvements, City Planners will be able to test and evaluate different ideas and impacts of those uses.

3.

Review and publicly post the results.

plan i eas

park street beach access

10

Long-Term Actions Recommendation No. 4

Develop a site master plan that can be used to build public support and funding

5.

public and private sources of funding for the intersection.

6.

Allocate resources and staff time to manage a team of staff and consultants to see the project through.

7.

Consider investing in programmatic capacity to build partnerships with businesses and volunteers to help

Objective A site master plan should be developed after a post-

Create a fund development plan and identify potential

develop and maintain the improvements.

8.

Develop creative programs that can provide opportunities

evaluation survey is completed for the Slabtown Beach

for the community to support through donations,

Access Project. The site plan can be used to build support for

crowdfunding, and volunteerism.

the project, funding, and prioritization.

Tasks 1.

Allocate planning dollars from the City’s Capital Improvements Plan to complete a site master plan.

2.

Review the Bayfront Plan 2010.

3.

Start to look for funding opportunities including grants that could help pay for developing a plan and/or future improvements to the public space.

Recommendation No. 5

Look for opportunities to develop partnerships once a preferred site master plan is realized and adopted Objective Many successful parks and public spaces are developed and sustained through partnerships, and with the support and collaboration between the public and private sector.

Tasks 1.

Identify goals with clear objectives.

2.

Identify costs and funding needs.

3.

Build relationships and explore partnerships with not-forprofit groups whose visions and goals align with the goals and needs for the intersection.

4.

Build relationships and explore partnerships with other public agencies and public institutions whose goals align with the goals of the intersection.

01 02 03 04 05 06

07 08 09 10

11 12

1 Street + 3 Blocks + 12 Public Spaces

park street bridge reconstruction site assessment Type of Public Space Bridge

Key Issues •

State and Federal funding for The Bridge limits design creativity.

Project Status Other Things to Consider

The Park Street Bridge is going to be reconstructed in 2018-19, construction documents and plans are now being prepared by the Traverse City Engineering Department. The design of the bridge involves highway bridge standard requirements as a result of the state and federal funding.

What We’ve Heard •

46 people weighed in on Facebook Polling.

•

Can the bridge design or elements of the bridge design be incorporated into a design competition.

•

Incorporate some type of art element.

•

Bike lanes or some type of designated bicycle connection from the non-motorized trail (TART) across the Park Street Bridge to Downtown.

•

Bridge design offers the opportunity to build strong public space character.

11

park street bridge reconstruction WALK ACROSS THE BRIDGE

PARK STREET

WALK ON THE BOARDWALK

GO FISHING

BOARDM

AN RIVER

KAYAK WATCH

place analysis

Sociability The existing Pine Street Bridge acts as a gateway and provides a connection to adjacent public spaces, but does little on its own to enhance or provide for social interaction.

Connectivity Bridges are designed and built to connect, much like the Pine Street Bridge which provides an important connection from Downtown to the waterfront over the Boardman River. The existing Park Street Bridge also acts as a gateway to the City’s system of boardwalks along the Boardman River.

Activity Little to no activity occurs on the existing bridge with the exception of vehicular and pedestrian traffic. The Bridge does not provide any public space, no attraction that would draw you to it in the evening, or strong architectural or historical character.

plan i eas

11

GRANDV

IEW PARK

WAY (US3 1)

park street bridge reconstruction

Image The existing Park Street Bridge’s image is low and its infrastructure and concrete and steel railing has not been maintained which has diluted the overall image and community perception.

Place Scorecard The Place Scorecard is a rating system used to evaluate each public space. The rating system uses a 1 to 5 point scale, 1 being the lowest or poor and 5 the highest or best. An overall score is calculated with a total of 20 points possible.

Sociability Connectivity Activity Image

OVERALL SCORE

3

11

W

U/E

U/E

U/E

W

U/E

U/E

U/E

U/E

U/E

U/E

U/E

U/E

U/E

U/E

U/E

SAN

U/E

W

PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE RAILING PER BRIDGE RAILING, 4 TUBE MDOT PLAN B-26-D (TYP.) BLACK FINISH

W

U/E

U/E

W

W

U/E

U/F

U/E

SAN

W

W

U/E

U/E

9.5' SIDEWALK

U/F

SAN

W

W

W

W

SAN

W

W

W

W

U/E

W

11.0' LANE

W

W

SAN

W

W

W

W

SAN

W

W

W

60.0'

W

W

REFERENCE POINT "B"

1 + 00

W

W

W

SAN

W

W

CONSTRUCTION CENTERLINE

W

REFERENCE POINT "A"

1 + 50

SAN

11.0' LANE

G

SAN

W

SAN

W

G

W

W

G

W

G

W

W

SAN

SAN

W

W

G

W

W

SAN

SAN

W

W

G

W

W

12.0' LANE

ST

1.7' (TYP.)

ST

W

G

W

8.0' O.C. (TYP.)

ST

W

W

SAN

SAN

W

9.5' SIDEWALK

W

PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE RAILING PER BRIDGE RAILING, 4 TUBE MDOT PLAN B-26-D (TYP.) BLACK FINISH

SAN

SAN

W

ST U/E

W

U/E

G

W

U/E

BOARDMAN RIVER ELEV. = 580.48 (NAVD 88) (7-13-2016) 100 YR. ELEV. = 583.63 (NAVD 88)

PLAN SCALE: 1" = 5'

PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE RAILING PER previous planning studies BRIDGE RAILING, 4 TUBE MDOT PLAN B-26-D (TYP.) BLACK FINISH

60'-0"

center Proposed construction drawings for the new Pine Street Bridge TS&L submittal, City of Traverse City Engineering Department, December 2016 C/L RDWY. 590.0

U.C.L. 586.5

PROPOSED BACKWALL AND INTEGRAL DECK

55'-6"

EXISTING W30 x 108 BEAMS TO REMAIN

BR SEAT EL. 586.47

W

SAN

W

W

CONSTRUCTION CENTERLINE

W

REFERENCE POINT "A"

W

G

G

W

plan i eas

SAN

W

G

W

W

SAN

SAN

W

W

G

W

W

SAN

SAN

W

W

G

W

12.0' LANE

W

11

SAN

W

W

G

park street bridge reconstruction

ST

1.7' (TYP.)

ST

W

G

W

8.0' O.C. (TYP.)

ST

W

W

SAN

SAN

W

9.5' SIDEWALK

W

PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE RAILING PER BRIDGE RAILING, 4 TUBE MDOT PLAN B-26-D (TYP.) BLACK FINISH

SAN

SAN

W

ST U/E

W

U/E

G

W

U/E

BOARDMAN RIVER ELEV. = 580.48 (NAVD 88) (7-13-2016) 100 YR. ELEV. = 583.63 (NAVD 88)

PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE RAILING PER BRIDGE RAILING, 4 TUBE MDOT PLAN B-26-D (TYP.) BLACK FINISH

PLAN SCALE: 1" = 5'

60'-0"

C/L RDWY. 590.0

U.C.L. 586.5

BR SEAT EL. 586.47

55'-6"

PROPOSED BACKWALL AND INTEGRAL DECK

EXISTING W30 x 108 BEAMS TO REMAIN

W.S. EL. 580.02

C.O.EL. 578.0

C.O.EL. 572.5

567.0

567.0

ELEVATION 1" = 5'

plan i eas

park street bridge reconstruction

11

public engagement Facebook Polling

What kind of character would you like to see this bridge having? (46 respondents)

Other 8.7%

Keep the simple concrete style it is now 21.7%

Replicate the other bridges in downtown 32.6%

Develop it’s own character unlike any of the other bridges downtown 37.0%

How would you like the width of the road / sidewalk? (46 respondents)

Other Keep road and sidewalk width 4.3% how it is 23.9%

Widen the sidewalk and narrow out the road 28.3%

Keep sidewalk the same width but add bike lanes 43.5%

Is it important to you to keep the left and right hand turn lane? (45 respondents)

No 24.4%

Yes 75.6%

Respondent Comments: Keep it traditional Stairways down to the river walk This should be open to a design competition.

Has anyone studied a) how many people turn left onto Grandview Pkwy from Park St and b) how many accidents occur because of people attempting to turn left? If it’s more dangerous than turning with the traffic lights at Cass and Union, there might be a case for eliminating the left turn lane, but then also post No Left Turn signs so traffic doesn’t back up on Park St. Make safe crossing of parkway for bikes separate from pedestrians.

I am a cyclist and without bike lanes on Grandview pkwy there is no point in having them here. The crosswalk at the light could be improved for pedestrian traffic. Please maintain the light so that protected left turn can be made onto the pkwy.

Whenever possible segregate car, bike and foot traffic. More pedestrian bridges. i really like the new bridge near warehouse district. would love to see you replicate the rust look on that one!

Bike lanes, bike lanes!

If something could be done about crossing from tart to park and vice versa while riding a bike that would be great.

The traffic light at Park seems like the longest one in TC. Seems like you could only eliminate the right turn lane if something could be done about the timing of the light.

Given its visibility from the river and lake, the architecture could and should make a bold statement - perhaps even a cable stayed structure resembling a sailboat like the Manitou.

Make Park a one way, going south?

Lighting Please! Both above and under the bridge.

plan i eas

park street bridge reconstruction

Trivia Night

Question 8 Worth 2 Points

What year was the Park St. Bridge Built?

A. B. C. D.

1956 1949 1929 1935

plan i eas

r i v i a n i g h

Question 8 Follow-up Question - Worth 1 Point

What design element would you like to see on the new Park St. Bridge?

A. B. C. D.

Widened sidewalks DecoraSve lighSng Bike Lanes All of the above

plan i eas

r i v i a n i g h

11

plan i eas

park street bridge reconstruction

11

what we think The recommendations have been separated into two

Tasks

categories based on how they relate to future implementation: short-term recommendations and long-term actions.

1.

Engage the public through a series of open houses.

Together, these categories provide recommendations at

2.

Be careful to accept state and federal dollars with design

different points of time, at different scales, and in relation to

stipulations that limits creativity and does not consider

multiple systems.

context-sensitive design.

3.

Collaborate with local planners, designers and technical experts to develop concept plans and help activate the

Short-Term Recommendations Recommendation No. 1

improvements.

4.

Involve the Traverse City Downtown Development Authority, Parks Commission, Historic Districts

Continue to engage public and community participation

Commission, AIA local chapter, local organizations, and other stakeholders.

Objective Recommendation No. 3 Strong brands inspire people to connect with businesses and services and with each other.. The “brand� of the Plan-it East project helped to inspire people to get involved with the process. The Plan-it East brand could be used as a tool to

Make the bridge about people and the pedestrian experience, not cars Objective

continue to engage the public.

Tasks 1.

Continue to develop the Plan-it East brand and marketing efforts using social media.

2.

Create a website that can be used as a resource for the community to get updates, leave comments, or get

All four bridges in Downtown Traverse City including the Park Street Bridge span and overlook the Boardman River.

Obviously, the bridges need to be able to move cars, goods, and services, but more importantly the bridges should be about people and the experiences they offer.

Design Guidelines to Consider

involved.

Recommendation No. 2

Include the community in the planning and design of Traverse City’s bridges Objective Bridges, like most public infrastructure, only get replaced once in a persons lifetime which underlines the importance of including the public in the planning and design conversation.

Bridges can be iconic and can be great placemakers - over the next 5 years Traverse City will be reconstructing or completely replacing 4 downtown bridges which provides an opportunity to design a family of bridges worth remembering.

1.

Limit vehicle lanes to the minimum allowed.

2.

Pedestrians and bicyclists should be provided with adequate space and dedicated sidewalks and lanes.

3.

Provide additional niche spaces for pedestrians to view the river, photo opportunities, and seating.

4.

Incorporate some type of architectural design or artistic element into the bridge.

plan i eas

park street bridge reconstruction

11

Long-Term Actions Recommendation No. 4

Recommendation No. 5

Develop a life-cycle analysis and eco-balance program for the existing bridges, trees, and other assets identified adjacent to the bridge

Implement efforts to protect water quality Objective To begin early on in the planning process to look for creative ways to protect the water quality of the Boardman River and

Objective

Grand Traverse Bay.

When considering all aspects of sustainability and the life

Tasks

cycle of a building, bridge, tree, or other long-term investment it is important to consider the life of that investment from the

1.

and ensure that there currently no threats to water quality.

time of implementation, life-long maintenance to proper use and/or disposal of the materials and waste generated when

Complete a review and assessment of the existing bridge

2.

Support efforts to monitor and address threats to the river and to water quality.

the asset is removed.

3.

Identify grant funding and/or project partners including

This recommendation addresses the removal of the bridge

the Watershed Center of Grand Traverse Bay that could

structures, trees, and any other materials that will be

support stormwater improvements or creative solutions for

removed and identifies strategies to extend the resource

filtering stormwater runoff from the bridge and connected

after it is removed from the property. The purpose of this

streets.

recommendation is to develop creative ideas for reusing the materials at the end of their life-cycles.

Tasks 1.

Identify potential partnerships with businesses or organizations that specialize in recycling.

2.

When trees are removed, use them for a City project, or offer them to local businesses, including restaurants or art centers, for reuse or reclamation.

3.

Establish criteria and develop guidance materials for purchasing building materials and planting trees and other vegetation on City-owned properties.

01 02 03 04 05 06

07 08 09 10

11 12

1 Street + 3 Blocks + 12 Public Spaces

lot d & boardman river boat launch site assessment Type of Public Space Boat Launch and Public Parking

Key Issues •

Several different user groups and watercraft wanting to access the launch and use the Boardman River.

Project Status

•

Adequate lighting and signage to ensure safety.

Renovations to Lot D and the Boardman River Boat Launch Other Things to Consider

were completed in the Spring of 2017. The improvements included new trailer parking for boaters, a new boat launch, a kayak launch, stormwater improvements, and outdoor seating.

What We’ve Heard •

26 people weighed in on Facebook Polling.

•

The community likes the way the renovation turned out, but would like to see more “boat launch rules”.

•

Over 80% of respondents would like to see a pedestrian connection along the north side of the Boardman River to the Murchie Bridge.

•

Navigable width of the Boardman River.

12

lot d & boardman river boat launch

PARK STREET

KAYAK WATCH WALK ON THE BOARDWALK

place analysis

Sociability Public parking - Lot D is located along the Boardman River and provides access to The River’s only downtown launch site.

The Parking Lot provides direct access to the City’s pile supported boardwalk which is moderately used by mostly anglers or people accessing there boat slips along the Boardman River. Without the boardwalk this highly valuable land would be extremely underutilitzed, have no opportunity for social interaction, and a poor use of public property.

Connectivity Lot D and the Boardman River Boat Launch provide important connectivity related to water - the launch provides access to Grand Traverse Bay (Lake Michigan) and the Boardman River, and the boardwalk located along the parking lot provides pedestrian access to the Boardman River.

Activity Public parking - Lot D sees high use all year long along with the launch site in the warmer months of spring, summer, and fall.

The boardwalk along the Boardman River only sees moderate use by the public which may be a result of the aging condition of the boardwalk, lack of interesting elements, seating, or things to do along the Boardman River, and/or the lack of interesting night time activity and evening use because of the lack of lighting.

plan i eas

lot d & boardman river boatlaunch

12

GRANDVIEW PARKWAY (US31)

PARK YOUR CAR

LAUNCH YOUR BOAT

GO FISHING

N RIVER

BOARDMA

Image Lot D and the Public Parking Lot and Boat Launch have obviously improved the image of this area; however, areas connected and adjacent to the parking area including the boardwalk along the Boardman River are aging and need to be replaced or better maintained.

Place Scorecard The Place Scorecard is a rating system used to evaluate each public space. The rating system uses a 1 to 5 point scale, 1 being the lowest or poor and 5 the highest or best. An overall score is calculated with a total of 20 points possible.

Sociability Connectivity Activity Image

OVERALL SCORE

11

plan i eas

lot d & boardman river boat launch

12

public engagement Facebook Polling

Now that there is a lot more different types of river users (power boaters, kayakers, stand-up paddle boarders, divers, and personal water craft users) do you think establishing rules of the river with signage would be beneficial? (26 respondents)

Yes 73.1%

No 26.9%

Do you like how the renovation turned out? (22 respondents)

No 9.1%

Yes 72.7%

Other 18.2%

Would you like to see the boardwalk continue passed the boat launch toward the Murchie Bridge? (26 respondents)

No 15.4%

Yes 84.6%

Respondent Comments: The focus should be on carry down users.

I didn’t realize there is a kayak launch there now. Previous polls asked about kayak launches on the opposite side of the river. With a launch at Lot D I don’t think it’s necessary to also offer them at the public parks across the river.

more allowance needs to be made for the ecological function of the river, and that will likely tend to have the corollary effect of beautifying the river as well.

There should be bathrooms.

Light up the underpass of the bridge!

Seasonal public restrooms.

The redesign of the parking lot stinks.

It’s not very easy for fishing boat to back up and turn around in the space provided in this parking lot/ boat launch. I also think it’s not very convenient for disabled people having to utilize the pay stations, especially if they have trouble with mobility and have to go to the pay station. I also think you guys are overcharging those trying to utilize the waterways with the price of parking. Those that are boating shouldn’t have to pay as much.

plan i eas

lot d & boardman river boat launch

12

what we think The recommendations have been separated into two

2.

Add signage to manage circulation, improve the user

categories based on how they relate to future implementation:

experience, increase safety, and expectations of different

short-term recommendations and long-term actions.

user groups using the launch facilities and river.

Together, these categories provide recommendations at different points of time, at different scales, and in relation to multiple systems.

Short-Term Recommendations Recommendation No. 1

Complete a post-evaluation survey Objective Completing a post-evaluation survey will provide insight into what worked and what did not. The survey will determine whether the design met expectations for users and can be used as a guide for future public space design.

Tasks 1.

Develop a post-evaluation survey.

2.

Distribute the survey to neighborhood presidents including Slabtown Neighborhood.

3.

Review and publicly post the results.

Recommendation No. 2

Consider evaluating the feasibility of other ideas that have been suggested Objective It is important to evaluate, in the short-term, the feasibility of other ideas that have been proposed for Lot D and the Boat Launch even though improvements are completed.

Other Improvements to Consider: 1.

Look at the feasibility of constructing a walkway along the north bank of the Boardman River from the launch site to the Murchie Bridge Underpass. This connection would also possibly serve a new pedestrian bridge connecting to the Pump Station Property on the south side of the river.