What Should Career-Long SEND Training Really Look Like? Alan Gardner Alan Gardner is an Account Manager in Education, working with schools, Multi-Academy Trusts, Local Authorities, and Virtual Schools across the North East and North West to help them access the training and support they need to improve outcomes for children and young people. With a particular passion for Attachment & Trauma, Relationships, Behaviour, SEND, and wellbeing, Alan works closely with education leaders to understand their challenges and connect them with practical solutions that make a meaningful difference.
The Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) provision continues to sit at the centre of national conversation in education. Rising demand, increasing complexity of need and growing expectations on schools have renewed focus on how effectively the system supports learners. For many years, SEND training has varied significantly in both quality and consistency. Almost half of primary and secondary teachers report that additional training would help build their confidence in supporting pupils with SEND. The Government’s white paper, “Every Child Achieving and Thriving”, released earlier this year, marked a positive step forward, recognising that workforce development must play a central role in improving outcomes. Supporting pupils with additional needs is no longer viewed as the responsibility of specialists, but as a core part of inclusive practice, school improvement and everyday classroom teaching. The question is no longer whether more training is needed, but what that training must deliver in practice.
Rising Demand and Classroom Realities There are now over 1.8 million pupils in England identified with special educational needs, an increase of 91,400 pupils since 2025. The proportion of pupils with an education, health and care (EHC) plan has risen to 6.0%, up from 5.3% in 2025, while the proportion receiving SEN support has increased to 14.8%, up from 14.2%. For teachers and support staff, this demand is felt most acutely in the classroom. Many are supporting pupils with overlapping needs within the same lesson, while balancing curriculum expectations, behaviour, attendance and wellbeing. In practice, staff are making frequent, highstakes decisions throughout the day. They are adapting tasks, responding to behaviour and supporting pupils whose needs may not be immediately clear. These situations rarely follow a set process, and there is often no single correct response. What matters is the quality and consistency of adult responses in the moment.
Continues on page 2