Table of contents 1. Team Summary 1 .1 1 .2 1 .3 1 .4 1 .5 1 .6 1 .7 1 .8
01
T ea m N a me I n stitu tion N am e Div ision A pp r oa ch Backg r ou n d F acu lty Lea d & f acul ty Advi sors T h e T eam I n du str y P a r tners
2. Project Summary
04
2 .1 I n tr odu ction 2 .2 P r oject P a r tners 2 .3 Descr iption of the proj ect 2 .4 E stimated total bui l t area 2 .5 T a r g et E n er g y Perf ormance Index 2 .6 P r elimin a r y E st i m ate of on- si t e renew abl e en er g y poten tia l 2 .7 P r elimin a r y constructi on bud get 2 .8 Sp ecial r equi rements of t he proj ect
3. Goals 4. Appendix A 5. Appendix B
06 07 12
List of tables & figures List of Tables
Tabl e Tabl e Tabl e Tabl e Tabl e Tabl e Tabl e Tabl e Tabl e Tabl e
1 : 2 : 3 : 4 : 5 : 6 : 7 : 8 : 9 : 10
Members of t h e t e a m Samarpan N e t - Z e r o G o a l s a n d St r a t e gi e s Wal l assembl i e s Roof assembl i e s Wi ndow ass e m bl i e s Case Stu di e s Maximum Plot Coverage, FAR and road widths Water consumption calculation Water consumption calculation : Water consumption calculation
01 07 08 08 08 11 12 13 13 13
List of Figures F igure 1 : Fac tors i n a Co st - Effe ct i v e De s i gn F igure 2 : E xpl oded I somet r i c v i e w o f wa l l a ss e m by o pt i o n s F igure 3 : E xpl oded I somet r i c v i e w o f r o o f a ss e m by o pt i o n s F igure 4 : I sometri c di agr a m s h o wi n g F A R, P l o t - co v e r a ge an d Road w i dth Opti on 1 F igure 5 : I sometri c di agr a m s h o wi n g F A R, P l o t - co v e r a ge an d Road w i dth Opti on 2 F igure 6 : I sometri c di agr a m s h o wi n g F A R, P l o t - co v e r a ge an d Road w i dth Opti on 3 F igure 7 : Graph showi ng wa t e r co n su m pt i o n F igure 8 : Graph showi ng H o u r l y Dr y Bu l b T e m pe r a t u r e F igure 9 : Graph showi ng H o u r l y W e t Bu l b T e m pe r a t u r e F igure 10 : Graph show i n g H o u r l y W e t Bu l b De pr e ss i o n F igure 11 : Graph show i n g Re l a t i v e H u m i di t y F igure 12 : Psy c hometri c C h a r t F igure 13 : Psy c hometri c C h a r t s t r a t e gi e s (4 0 1 5 h r s .) F igure 14 : Psy c hometri c C h a r t s t r a t e gi e s (8 7 6 0 h r s .) F igure 15 : Graph show i n g H o u r l y A v e r a ge Dr y Bu l b T em peratu re (Monthw i se ) F igure 16 : Ori entati on A n a l ysi s 1 :1 .3 F igure 17 : Ori entati on A n a l ysi s 1 :1 .5 F igure 18 : Ori entati on A n a l ysi s 1 :1 .2
07 08 08 12 12 12 13 16 16 16 16 17 17 17 18 18 18
1 .
E X E C U T I V E
S U M M A R Y
Team Shunyam from NITTE school of Architecture dedicated towards Net Zero Energy Water Design has been working on an Educational Insititute to metamorphosize it into a environmentally consious space. Our goal is to maintain thermal and visual comfort of the students The new campus is proposed to be developed on 125 acres, to be phased over about 15 years in roughly 5 phases of development. The project site is located at Belma village, Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India. When fully built, it is envisaged that about 25,000 students will occupy the facilities of this campus with a rough built-up area of about 65,000 m2 of academic space for higher education. The location falls under the warm-humid climate zone (As per ECBC 2017). This envisaged institute is an architecture college with a projected capacity of 400 students, 40 teaching staff and 20 supporting staff. The estimated built-up area is 4,650 m2. . The project will consist of design studios, faculty area, a conference room, an administrative section, a workshop, a library, a computer lab and an exhibition area. Also, ancillary faciliities like a recreational area, a food court and a stationery store will be provid¬ed. Further, in light of recent pandemic, a sanitizing station will be provided. The project will incorporate xeriscaping, water harvesting, solar panels, solar water heaters, underground cabling, centralized airconditioning and passive cooling systems. The campus is being planned keeping the environment in mind, giving utmost importance to water and energy conservation. We aim to build our structure where all materials in the built environment are regenerative and have no negative impact on human and ecosystem health. It should also be easily constructable, and be economical. Locally sourced materials are being put into use to reduce operational expenses.
01 1. Executive Summary
2 .
T E A M
I N T R O D U C T I O N
1.1 Team Name: Shunyam. 1.2 Institution Name: Nitte Institute of Architecture, Deralakatte 1.3 Division: Educational building 1.4 Background NITTE (Deemed to be University) is an institute of higher education established in 2008 with the motto of quality education-an abiding commitment. The NITTE education trust has established 31 institutions spread in three different campuses of NITTE in Mangalore and Bangalore. The institution has been accredited with ‘A’ grade by the National Assessment & Accreditation Council (NAAC). 1.5 Faculty Lead and Faculty Advisors Name: Naga Venkata Sai Kumar Manapragada (Assistant Professor, NIA) Bio: Naga holds Bachelor’s in Architecture and M.S by Research in IT in Building Science. He possesses expertise in building energy efficiency and climate change domains 1.6 The Team Shunyam is a group of 13 interdisciplinary team members from the NITTE University Mangalore. These students from architecture, engineering, management, and microbiology domains have teamed up to design a high-performance building. The roles of our team members have been outlined in Table 1. Table 1 : Members of the team Name
Qualification
Role
Namratha Gopan
Under graduation in Architecture
Team Leader
Hala Khaleel
Under graduation in Architecture
Interior Design
Harikiran V Alva
Under graduation in Architecture
Energy Analysis
Lakshit S Salian
Under graduation in Architecture
Indoor Air Quality & Ventilation
Partha R Rai
Under graduation in Architecture
Electric & Daylight simulation
Pritish Nazareth
Under graduation in Architecture
Water & Carbon management
Sinchana Shetty
Under graduation in Architecture
Constructability
Shruthadev B
Under graduation in Architecture
Architectural Design
Post graduation in Microbiology
Environmental Analysis
Tejaswi Kumar
Post graduation in Business Administration
Financial Analyst
Gouri Keshav Balse
Post graduation in Business Administration
Industry Partnership
Post graduation in Energy Systems Engineering
MEP Design
Under graduation in Computer Engineering
Innovation
Sreya Saikrishnan MP
Ashwini Udupi Sanath R Pai
1.7 Industry Partners
02 2. Team Introduction
3 .
P R O J E C T
I N T R O D U C T I O N
2.1 Justification for the name and project - Samarpan 2.2 Project Partners Nitte Institute of Architecture (NIA) is part of Nitte (Deemed to be University), Deralakatte. It was established in 2015. The institution firmly believes in hands-on learning. Sustainability has been one of the main tenets in architectural education. The curriculum is framed to teach and encourage sustainable practices. The institution also shows it’s dedication towards sustainable designs through a LEED lab program. This facilitates the students to gain a deeper understanding of sustainability through a practical and immersive approach. One of the major mode to ascertain in NIA is through experiential learning. By following a sustainable lifestyle, the students get to witness it firsthand. Key Individuals - Prof.Vinod Aranha - Director, Nitte Institute of Architecture Dr.Ken Yeang - Chief Architect 2.3 Project Description The new campus is proposed to be developed on 125 acres, to be phased over about 15 years in roughly 5 phases of development. The project site is located at Belma village, Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India. When fully built, it is envisaged that about 25,000 students will occupy the facilities of this campus with a rough built-up area of about 65,000 m 2 of academic space for higher education. For this competition, we are considering the architecture college building as a part of Phase-1 of the project. Phase-1 is expected to start by December 2021. The location falls under the warm-humid climate zone (As per ECBC 2017). This envisaged institute is an architecture college with a projected capacity of 400 students, 40 teaching staff and 20 supporting staff. The estimated built-up area is 4,650 m 2 . The users primarily comprise of undergraduate students, faculty and researchers. The typical working hours of the program will be 8 am - 4:30 pm on weekdays and 8 am - 1pm on Saturdays. The project will consist of design studios, faculty area, a conference room, an administrative section, a workshop, a library, a computer lab and an exhibition area. Also, ancillary facilities like a recreational area, a food court and a stationery store will be provided. Further, in light of recent pandemic, a sanitizing station will be provided. The project will incorporate xeriscaping, water harvesting, solar panels, solar water heaters, underground cabling, centralized airconditioning and passive cooling systems. 2.8 Market Research Highlights 1. Total number of Engineering colleges in India – 4000 (across specialization) 2. Total Number of B. Arch Colleges in India – 860 (NATA and Private) 504 – Private 356 – NATA 3. Average B.Arch. intake for Indian Architecture Colleges Through NATA – 58 (21000/356) Target Intake – 60(Gross) 350 via JEE Mains and JEE paper 2 (15 institutes for 945 seats) 4. 21000 seats for NATA 5. 45 in Karnataka & 3 institutes in Mangalore 2.9 Special Requirements of the project • • •
Achieving net-zero, and if possible be net positive in terms of energy. Maintaining and preserving various flora and fauna keeping the existing biodiversity intact as much as possible. The campus should be planned keeping the environment in mind and importance should be given for water and energy conservation.
03 3. Project Introduction
3 .
G O A L S EPI target is set at 50 kWh/m 2/annum whilst maintaining thermal and visual comfort of the occupants.
EPI Target
Thermal Comfort
ROI of at least 50% higher as compared to the prevailing banking interest rates. Cost
Water
• Universally accessible design • Climate responsive • Climate change resilient Design Goals
Indoor Air Quality
St ru c t u re
To meet the WHO (World Health Organization) standards related to PM 2.5 and PM10. To meet ventilation requirements as per ASHRAE 62.1
To maintain unmet hours less than 150 per annum for all the zones. To maintain the indoor air temperature range as prescribed by NBC
To meet zero waste water discharge by grey and black water treatment on site.
All materials in the built environment are regenerative with no negative impact on human and ecosystem health. Easily constructable, and economical. To reduce tCO2e values by reducing on operational and embodied energy by 2/3rd.
Carbon
Table 2 : Samarpan Net-zero goals and strategies Goal
Strategies
EPI Target
• Optimising the building envelope to reduce the heat gain and loss. • Using the outdoor comfort temperature and passive strategies to reduce the reliance on active cooling.
Thermal Comfort
• Using the comfortable outdoor air as and when possible, provide passive strategies and then air conditioning to meet the adaptive comfort setpoints as suggested by IMAC.
Cost
• Locally sourced materials • Reducing operational expenses even though the first cost increases by 10-15% • Using renewable energy to its full potential
Water
• • • •
Design goals
• To achieve thermally comfortable building by designing appropriate wall and roof assemblies and shading. • To provide a interactive spaces which promotes learning by introducing various design components like gazebo or sitout space.
Structure
• To use pre-fabricated structures for quick installation and replication.
Indoor Air quality
• To provide the spaces with MERV8 filters. • Providing trees like neem and indian redwood to improve the air quality on site.
Carbon
• To use the material available from 500 Km radius of the site.
Providing greywater and blackwater treatment plants. Collection and storage of rainwater. Using low flow fixtures in building. Use of xeriscaping.
04 3. Goals
5 4
3
3
Table 3 : Wall Assemblies
4
2
2
Option A
U-value achieved (w/m 2-k)
A.
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Cement plaster - 10mm Fly-ash brick - 100mm Extruded Polystyrene XPS - 10mm Fly-ash brick - 100mm Cement Plaster - 10mm
0.85
B.
1. 2. 3. 4.
Cement plaster - 10mm Aerated Autoclaved Concrete - 150mm Cellular Concrete - 30mm POP board - 10mm
0.85
1
1
Material with thickness (mm) outside to inside
Option
Option B
Figure 2: Exploded Isometric vew of wall assembly options
1
Table 4 : Roof Assemblies
1
Material with thickness (mm) outside to inside
Option 2
A.
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Fibre Reinforced Plastic - 15mm Cellular Concrete - 50mm Reinforced Cement Concrete - 150mm Mineral Wool - 60mm Cement Plaster - 10mm
0.85
B.
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Cement plaster - 15mm Reinforced Cement Concrete - 150mm Expanded Polystyrene Sheets - 40mm Cellular Concrete - 100mm Gypsum Board
0.85
2
3
3
4
4
U-value achieved (w/m 2-k)
5
5
Option A
Option B
Figure 3: Exploded Isometric vew of roof assembly options Table 5 : Window Assemblies - Sisecam Isicam Window systems
Option
Daylight (EN410)
Configuration
4+12+4
A.
4+16+4 4+12+4
B.
4+16+4 4+12+4
C.
4+16+4
Solar Energy (EN 410)
Transmittance %
Reflectance Outdoor %
Solar Factor %
Shading Co-efficient
80
14
75
0.86
79
12
56
0.64
71
10
44
0.51
Building Standards to be followed are as follows • • • • •
ASHRAE 62.1 ASHRAE 55 NBC - IMAC Model BEE 2017 Living Building Challenge
05 3. Goals
• • • • •
Well Standard GRIHA Council of Architecture CGWB Authority Mangaluru Zonal Regulations
Thermal Conductivity (U) W/m 2K (EN 673 Dry Air
Argon
2.9
2.7
2.7
2.6
1.6
1.3
1.3
1.1
1.6
1.3
1.3
1.1
Photographs of the site visit
Screenshot of the team meeting using Google Meet
06 3. Goals
5.2 Evolution of the design Developing the form with Informed design decisions
The ideal orientation is analysed to minimize radiation on the surfaces. The tool used here is Ladybug.
07 3. Goals
The form is then generated to minimize the radiation falling on the surface. The following generated below minimizes radiation by self shading
08 3. Goals
5.2 Conceptual drawings
Entrance and lecture podium
Desks
Figure showing Ideal configuration of a studio
The base shape is circular starting with the studio with the following shape. The studios arranged side by side forms a circular shape. Thus , the form of the building is influenced by the function of the studio
Ref: Time saver standards for building types - Joseph Chiara
09 3. Goals
5.2 Conceptual drawings
10 3. Goals
5.2 Conceptual drawings
11 3. Goals
5.2 Conceptual drawings
12 3. Goals
5.4 Analysis - Facade & Fenestration Systems
STUDIO
CLASSROOM
(12M X10M)
(10M X 6M)
12m
10m
60sqm
120sqm
19.2sqm
4m
6m
10m
16sqm
4m
16sqm
4m
12m
10m
Total Area= 12m X 10m = 120sqm Aspect Ratio = 6:5 Wall Area = 48sqm 40% of WWR = 19.2sqm
Total Area= 12m X 10m = 120sqm Aspect Ratio = 6:5 Wall Area = 40sqm 40% of WWR = 16sqm
4m
9.6sqm 6m
10m Total Area= 10m X 6m = 60sqm Aspect Ratio = 5:3 Wall Area = 40sqm 40% of WWR = 16sqm
Total Area= 10m X 6m = 60sqm Aspect Ratio = 5:3 Wall Area = 24sqm 40% of WWR = 9.6sqm
LAB/WORKSHOP/COMPUTER LAB
ART COURT
(10M X 4M) AND (12M X 5M)
(10M X10M)
12m
15m 60sqm
60sqm
4m
24sqm
4m
4m
10m
5m 100sqm
6.4sqm
19.2sqm
4m
15m
12m
Total Area= 15m X 4m = 60sqm Aspect Ratio =15:4 Wall Area = 60sqm 40% of WWR = 24sqm
Total Area= 15m X 4m = 60sqm Aspect Ratio =15:4 Wall Area = 16sqm 40% of WWR = 6.4sqm
4m
8sqm
4m
AUDITORIUM
16sqm 10m
5m
Total Area= 15m X 4m = 60sqm Aspect Ratio =12:5 Wall Area = 48sqm 40% of WWR = 19.2sqm
Total Area= 15m X 4m = 60sqm Aspect Ratio =12:5 Wall Area = 20sqm 40% of WWR = 8sqm
Total Area= 10m X 10m = 100sqm Aspect Ratio =1:1 Wall Area = 40sqm 40% of WWR = 16sqm
LIBRARY
(20M X20M)
(15M X10M)
20m
15m
10m 20m
4m
16sqm 10m
4m
Total Area= 20m X 20m = 400sqm Aspect Ratio =1:1 Wall Area = 80sqm 40% of WWR = 32sqm
3. Goals
16sqm 15m
32sqm
20m
13
4m
Total Area= 10m X 15m = 150sqm Aspect Ratio =1.5:1 Wall Area = 40sqm 40% of WWR = 16sqm
10m
Total Area= 10m X 10m = 150sqm Aspect Ratio =1.5:1 Wall Area = 60sqm 40% of WWR = 24sqm
5.4 Analysis - Facade & Fenestration Systems
14 3. Goals
5.5 HVAC, Plumbing and Electrical
15 3. Goals
1800 CFM Workshop (double height Ceiling)
1800 CFM
700 CFM
Do wn
1800 CFM
Up
Down
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
1900 CFM
1900 CFM
1900 CFM
Material Library CFM-1400 Multipurpose hall
Visitors waiting/Gallery space CFM-1400 Front office
CFM-700
PA Cabin/ Waiting
Do wn
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION Up
Workshop (double height Ceiling)
Director cabin/ Meeting
Down
Stationary
Cafetaria
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
CFM-980 CFM-1400
Up
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
1800 CFM
HOD cabin 700 CFM
1800 CFM
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
1800 CFM
Up
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
5.5 HVAC, Plumbing and Electrical
16 3. Goals
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
CFM-3100
Studio 02
ClassRoom 01 Auditorium
CFM-7000
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
Open Lecture area
CFM-3500
CFM-3200
Studio 05
CFM-3500 CFM-3100
Studio 06
ClassRoom 02
17 3. Goals
Studio 03
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
CFM-3200
Open Lecture area 02
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
Studio 01
CFM-3300
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
CFM-3300
Studio 07
CFM-3500 CFM-3100
Studio 08
Computer Lab & Materials Lab
ClassRoom 03
Do wn
CFM-4100
Up
Up
Down
Open Lecture area 02
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
Computer Lab & Materials Lab
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
CFM-3500
CFM-1500
18 3. Goals
19 3. Goals
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
5.4 Materials Analysis
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
10
Column size= 300 x 300 mm Beam size= 200 x 400 mm Slab thickness= 130mm Height= 3m Foundation= 1500 x 1500 x 300
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
Considering a room of size 10 x 10 m
10
A comparative study of affordability between RCC construction and FRP+GFRG
Quantity of concrete
Quantity of steel
Quantity of Fibre Reinforced Plastic (FRP)
Quantity of Glass Fibre Reinforced Gypsum (GFRG)
1. Foundation 9 numbers Total Quantity= 9(1.5 x 1.5 x 0.3)= 6.075 m3 Rate/ m3 = Rs 900 Total cost= 900 x 6.075= Rs 54,675
1. Foundation Quantity/ m3 = 80 kg/ m3 Total Quantity= 80 x 6.075= 486kg Rate/ kg= Rs 70 Total cost= 70 x 486= Rs 34,020
I section Beam- 10kg/m For 10meters-5+5=10 numbers are used For 3meters-9 numbers
Dimensions Length= 12.02m Height= 3.05m Thickness= 0.124m Room size= 10 x 10 x 3 Area= 100sqm
2. Column 9 numbers Total Quantity= 9(0.3 x 0.3 x 3)= 2.43 m3 Rate/ m3 = Rs 1200 Total cost= 2.43 x 1200= Rs. 29,160
2. Column Quantity/ m3 = 200 kg/ m3 Total Quantity= 200 x 2.43= 486kg Rate/ kg= Rs 70 Total cost= 70 x 486= Rs. 34,020
Horizontal beams (10 numbers) 1meter= 10kg 10meters=10 x 10= 100kg Total Quantity= 100 x 10= 1000kg
Rate/ m2= Rs1000 Total cost= 220 x 1000= Rs. 2,20,000
3. Beam 12 numbers Total Quantity= 24(0.2 x 0.4 x 5)= 9.6m3 Rate/ m3 = Rs 11,000 Total cost= 9.6 x 11000= Rs. 1,05,600
3. Beam Quantity/ m3 = 150 kg/ m3 Total Quantity= 150 x 9.6= 1440kg Rate/ kg= Rs 70 Total cost= 70 x 1440= Rs. 1,00,800
Vertical column bars (9 numbers) 1meter= 10kg 3meters=10 x 3= 30kg Total Quantity= 30 x 9= 270kg
4. Slab 4 numbers Total Quantity= 4(5 x 5 x 0.13)= 13m3 Rate/ m3 = Rs 12,000 Total cost= 13 x 1200= Rs.1,56,000
4. Slab Quantity/ m3 = 100 kg/ m3 Total Quantity= 100 x 13= 1300kg Rate/ kg= Rs 70 Total cost= 70 x 1300= Rs. 91,000
Total Quantity= (10 x 3)4 + (10 x 10)= 120+100= 220 sqm
Total Quantity=1000 + 270= 1270kg Rate/kg= Rs135 Total cost= 135 x 1270= Rs. 1,71,450
Cost of RCC Construction for 10mx10m room
Cost of FRP+GFRG Construction for 10mx10m room
Total cost of concrete= 29160+105600+ 156000+ 54675= Rs. 3,45,375
Total cost= 135 x 1270 = Rs. 1,71,450
Total cost of steel= 34020+ 100500+ 91000+ 34020 = Rs. 2,59,840
Total cost= 220 x 1000= Rs. 2,20,000
Total Project cost= 345375 + 259840 = Rs. 6,05215
Total Project cost= 171450+ 220000 = Rs. 4,00,000
20 3. Goals
5.4 Materials Analysis A quantitative comparision between concrete and FRP
Character
Units
FRP
Concrete
Resources
g/cm3
2
2.4
https://global.ctbuh.org/resources/papers/download/2519-fiber-reinforced-polymer-frp-a-new-materialused-in-facades-of-tall-buildings.pdf
Tensile strength
MPa
340
250
Thermal Transmittance
W/m²K
0.07
1.63
Young’s Modulus
GPa
37–784
30- 50
Shear strength
GPa
21
1.3 to 5.1
MJ/m2
183-286
Density
Embodied energy
3,180
https://global.ctbuh.org/resources/papers/download/2519-fiber-reinforced-polymer-frp-a-new-materialused-in-facades-of-tall-buildings.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.023 https://www.wgtn.ac.nz/architecture/centres/cbpr/ resources/pdfs/ee-coefficients.pdf
Comparision between concrete and FRP summarized
Quality Strength Resistant Flexibility Ability to carry loads Cost Installation rate Weight Durabilty
21 3. Goals
FRP
Concrete
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
Low
High
Low
Min. 28days
Lightweight 75years
heavier 15-20years
Design Methodology Informed Design Decision
Site Analysis To p o g r a p h y
Cl i m a t e A n a l y s i s W a t e r S h e d d i n g An aly s is Ecology Market Potential
Pre-Design
Asp ect Ratio
Form
Orientation
Bas e d O n
Radiation parameter
Architecture Design
Perfomance achieved
Z o n in g A c ti ve Se m i - A cti ve Pas s i ve Ci rc ul a ti on
SAMARPAN
Da yligh t E l e c t r i c L igh t in g T h e rm al E n e rgy
Perfomance not achieved
B u ilt F o r m
D e ta i l i ng B a s ed o n
C l i mat e & re qu ir emen t
Structur a l D es i gn
Simul ati on
Desi gn Sol ut i ons
B as e d o n
Pa s s i ve, Hy b r i d M ode A cti ve St rat e gie s
Figure 4: Flow chart showing the design methodology of the team
22 6. Project Completion Plan
A .
A P P E N D I X
-
A
A.1 Detailed Building Area Program
Sl. No. Room 1 Workshop 2 Faculty Room 3 H.O.D Cabin 4 5 6 7
Guest and visiting faculty lounge Amphitheatre Material Library Multipurpose Hall
8 9
Visitors Lounge/ Gallery space Front Office
Area (in m2)
Directors Cabin/ 10 Meeting Room 11 Stationary 12 Cafeteria P.A. Cabin/ Waiting Room Studio 1 Studio 2 Classrooms Open Lecture Area Auditorium Computer Lab Roof Top Dining Kitchen Washroom 1 Washroom 2 Corridor Ground 24 Floor 25 Corridor First Floor Corridor 26 2nd/3rd/4th Floor 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Total Area
23 Appendix - A
Number of Total Area rooms (in m2) 202 1 202 19 9 171 38 1 38 26 173 54 45
1 1 1 1
26 173 54 45
50 45
1 1
50 45
38 23 61
1 1 1
38 23 61
26 106 131 97 109 225 189 643 111 82 74
1 6 2 3 3 1 1 1 1 6 6
26 636 262 291 327 225 189 643 111 492 444
268 485
1 1
268 485
312
3
936 6261
D .
A P P E N D I X
-
D
D.1 Confirmation letter of Industry Partner
24 Appendix - D
NITTE INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTURE