مصر و موشک

‫‪ 25‬ژﻭﺋــﻦ ‪2012‬‬

‫ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺪ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻰ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻣﺸــﺘﺮﻙ ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ ـ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ »ﻟﻮﺱ ﻛﺎﺑﻮﺱ«‪ ،‬ﺷــﻠﻴﻚ‬ ‫ﻣﻮﺷــﻚ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻯ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺑﻠﻪ‪ ،‬ﻧﺸﺴــﺖ »ﻟﻮﺱ ﻛﺎﺑﻮﺱ« ﻭ‬ ‫»ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﺴــﻜﻮ« ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺑﻼگ ﻗﺒﻠﻰ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ‪ ،‬ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﺷــﻴﺮﻳﻦ‬ ‫ﺣﻜﻮﻣــﺖ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺑــﻮﺱ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ‪ .‬ﭘﺎﻳــﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ »ﺍﷲ‬ ‫ﺍﻛﺒــﺮ« ﺩﺭ ﻳﻮﺭﻭﻧﻴــﻮﺯ‪ ،‬ﻟﻜﻨﺖ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸــﺖ ﺳــﻔﻴﺮ ﻣﺮﺩﻩ‬ ‫ﺷﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺫﺭﺑﺎﻳﺠﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺯﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺍﺭﺩﻭﻏﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﻭ ‪ ...‬ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ‬ ‫ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻞ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺩﻛﺎﻥ »ﺁﺷﻮﺏ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺼﺮ« ﺷﺎﻫﺪﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻋﺎ‪.‬‬

‫ﺍﺗﺨــﺎﺫ ﻣﻮﺍﺿــﻊ »ﻏﻴﺮﺟﺎﻧﺒﺪﺍﺭﺍﻧﻪ« ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ‪،‬‬ ‫ﺩﺭ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﺳــﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ‪ ،‬ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﺑﺴــﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻥ‬ ‫»ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ« ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﺍﻥ ﺳﻨﺘﻰﺍﺵ‪ ،‬ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ‬ ‫ﻣﻠﻞ ﻭ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﺔ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺍﻧﺴﺪﺍﺩ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻣﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ »ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ‬ ‫ﺍﻧﺴﺪﺍﺩ« ﻣﺤﻔﻞ »ﻛﺎﺭﺗﺮ ـ ﺑﺮژﻳﻨﺴﻜﻰ« ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ‪ .‬ﻣﺤﻔﻠﻰ ﻛﻪ‬ ‫ﺗﻮﺣﺶ ﻭ ﺗﺤﺠﺮ ﺩﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺠﺎﻯ »ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳﻰ«‬ ‫ﻧﺸــﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺑــﻮﺩ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﺭﻭﻳــﺎﻯ »ﻳﻚ ﺩﺳــﺖ« ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ‬ ‫ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻥﻧﺸــﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺮ ﻣﻰﭘﺮﻭﺭﺍﻧــﺪ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳــﺦ ‪ 22‬ژﻭﺋــﻦ‬ ‫ﺳﺎﻟﺠﺎﺭﻯ‪ ،‬ﺷﻠﻴﻚ ﻣﻮﺷﻚ ﺳﻮﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺖ ﺟﻨﮕﻨﺪﺓ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻧﺎﺗﻮ‬ ‫ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﻔﻞ »ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ« ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺃﺱﺷــﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﺔ‬ ‫ﺁﻣﺮﻳــﻜﺎ ﺗﻔﻬﻴﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ »ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﭘــﺮﻭﺍﺯ ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻉ« ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ‬ ‫ﻟﻴﺒﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ‪ ،‬ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻨﺒﺎﺭ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ »ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ« ﺷﺎﻣﻞ‬ ‫ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ!‬ ‫ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ‪ 22‬ژﻭﺋﻦ ‪ ،2012‬ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺝ ﻫﻴﺎﻫﻮﻯ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺏ‬ ‫ﺑﻪ ﭘﺸــﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺯ »ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ« ﺁﺷــﻜﺎﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺧﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺳﻮﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ‬

‫ﺍﺭﺩﻥ ﮔﺮﻳﺨﺘــﻪ ﺑــﻮﺩ‪ ،‬ﻳﻚ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻯ ﻧﻈﺎﻣــﻰ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺍﺯ‬ ‫ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺳــﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻣﻮﺷــﻚ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ‪ ...‬ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ‬ ‫ﻫﺎﺭﺕﻭﭘــﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ؛ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻮﻝ‬ ‫ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ‪» ،‬ﺍﻓــﻼﺱ« ﺍﺭﺩﻭﻏﺎﻥ ﻭ »ﺍﺧﻼﺹ« ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲ ﮔﻞ ﺭﺍ‬ ‫ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ‪ .‬ﺑﻌﺪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﻮﺑﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺑﻴﺮﻛﻞ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ‬ ‫ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺘﺎﻳﺶ »ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦﺩﺍﺭﻯ« ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺑﻨﺸﻴﻨﺪ ﻭ‬ ‫‪ ...‬ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ »ﻏﻠﻂ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ« ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ‬ ‫ﺩﺍﺭﺩ‪ ،‬ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ‪ 23‬ژﻭﺋﻦ ﺳــﺎﻟﺠﺎﺭﻯ‪ ،‬ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﻣﺼﻠﺤﻰ ﺭﺍ‬ ‫ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﭘﺎﺳــﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻛﺒﺮﮔﻨﺠﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻰﺑﻰﺳﻰ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮﻓﺮﺩﺍ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ‬ ‫ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺷﺪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳﺎﻭﺍﻙ ﻣﻼﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ‬ ‫ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ »ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﻰ« ﺭﺍ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺑﺎﻥﺍﺵ ﺩﺭ ﻏﺮﺏ‬ ‫ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻛﻨﺪ! ﻛﻴﻬﺎﻥ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ‪ ،‬ﻣﻮﺭﺥ ‪ 23‬ژﻭﺋﻦ ﺳﺎﻟﺠﺎﺭﻯ‬ ‫ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﻰ ﻣﻰﻧﻮﻳﺴﺪ‪ ،‬ﻏﺮﺑﻰﻫﺎ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ‬ ‫ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ »ﺧﺸﻦ« ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺭﺍ‬ ‫ﺑﻪ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺸــﺮ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ! ﺑﻠﻪ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﺁﻥ‬ ‫ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﺣﺶﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﺤﻤﻞ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ‪،‬‬

‫ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﻳﻚ »ﺗﻤﺪﻥ« ﺍﺳــﺖ! ﻭ ﻋﺠﻴﺐ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﺗﻤﺪﻥ« ﺍﺯ‬ ‫ﻗﻀﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻏﺮﺏ »ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ« ﻣﻰﻭﺭﺯﺩ‪.‬‬ ‫ﻭﻟﻰ ﺷــﺎﻫﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺪﻥ ﻛﺬﺍ‪ ،‬ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ‬ ‫ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻰﺩﺭﻳﻎ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ‪:‬‬ ‫»]‪ [...‬ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ]‪ [...‬ﻣﺎﺩﻭﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻏﺮﺏ‪ ،‬ﻭﺣﺸﻲ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻋﻘﻼﻧﻲ‬ ‫ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺷــﻮﺩ]‪ [...‬ﻏﺮﺑﻲﻫﺎ ]‪ [...‬ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺧﺸﻦ‬ ‫]‪ [...‬ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻏﺮﺏ ]‪ [...‬ﺭﺩ‬ ‫ﺷﻮﺩ ]‪ [...‬ﺑﺎ ﺗﻴﺮﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺭ ﺟﻠﻮﻩ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ]ﻭ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ‬ ‫ﻣﺴﺎﻳﻠﻰ[ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺭﺓ ]‪ [...‬ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ]‪ [...‬ﺳﻌﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﮕﺮﺵ ﺭﺍ‬ ‫ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ‬ ‫]‪ [...‬ﻏﺮﺑﻲﻫﺎ ]‪ [...‬ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ]ﺑﺎ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ[ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ‬ ‫ﻭ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻥ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺸﺮ ]ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ [‬ ‫ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺑﮕﺮ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺰﺩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﺨﺪﻭﺵ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ]‪«[...‬‬ ‫ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ‪ ،‬ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﻰ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻣﻠﺖ‬ ‫ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ‪ ،‬ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﮕﻔﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻰﮔﻮﺋﻴﻢ؛‬ ‫ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺠﺮﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ‬ ‫ﻭ ﻫﺴــﺖ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻰ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﻰ‪ ،‬ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻤﺎﻗﺖ‬ ‫ﻛﺎﻓﻰ‪ ،‬ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻔﻬﻤﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﭘﺘﺔ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ‬ ‫ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺑﺎﻥﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑــﺮ ﺁﺏ ﻣﻰﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﺩ‪ .‬ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺳــﺎﻭﺍﻙﺍﷲ‬ ‫ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ؛ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺍژﻩ ﺑﻴﺶ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﻭﺍژﺓ ﻭﺣﺸﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻤﺪﻥ‬ ‫ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡﮔﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ »ﻭﺣﺸــﻰ« ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﭼﺮﺍ‬ ‫ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻔﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ‪ .‬ﺍﺳــﻼﻡﮔﺮﺍ »ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺪﺍﺭ«‬ ‫ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺑﻠﻪ‪ ،‬ﺍﺯ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﻰ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ! ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﻳﻚ »ﺗﻤﺪﻥ«‬ ‫ﻭ »ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ« ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ! ﮔﻮﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻮﺳــﺎﻟﺔ‬ ‫ﻧﻨﻪﺣﺴــﻦ ﺗﻮﺣﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺪﻥ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ‪ .‬ﺗﻌﺠﺒﻰ‬ ‫ﻫﻢ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ؛ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﻰ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻮ ﺷــﻌﻮﺭ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﺮﺍﻓﺖ‬ ‫ﺍﺧﻼﻗــﻰ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﺑﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣــﺖ ﺍﺑﻠﻪﭘﺮﻭﺭ ﻭ ﭼﺎﻗﻮﻛﺶﻧﻮﺍﺯ‬ ‫ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﻤﻰﮔﺮﻓﺖ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ‬ ‫ﻣﺼﻠﺤﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﺷــﻴﺮﻳﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﻯ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺷــﺪﻩ‪ ،‬ﭘﺲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ‬ ‫ﭼــﻪ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﻰ ﻭ ﻋﺒــﺎﺩﻯ؟! ﻳﻚ ﻧﻮﺑﻞ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ‬ ‫ﺳﺎﻭﺍﻙ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺪﻫﻴﺪ! ﺧﻮﺷﺒﺨﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺮﺵ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﻰ ﺑﻪ‬ ‫ﺳﻨﮕﺮ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﻯ‪ ،‬ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺔ ﻣﻚﻛﺎﺭﺗﻰ ﺗﺪﺍﺑﻴﺮ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻧﺠﺎﺕ »ﺷﺒﻪ‬ ‫ﺍﻭﭘﻮﺯﻳﺴﻴﻮﻥ« ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺗﻰ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻨﮕﻪ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ‪.‬‬

‫ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﭘﺮﺷﻮﺭ ﺭﺿﺎ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻯ ﻭ »ﻣﺮﺩﻡ« ﺍﺯ ﺗﻬﺎﺟﻢ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ‬ ‫ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ‪ ،‬ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﺮﺷﻨﺎﺱ ﻭ ﮔﻤﻨﺎﻡ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ »ﺳﻮﺳﻤﺎﺭﻳﺴﻢ«‬ ‫ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﺮﻳﻌﺘﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺠﺎﻯ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﻧﺸــﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ‪ ،‬ﻭ‬ ‫ﺩﻭ ﺟﺒﻬﺔ ﻛﺎﺫﺏ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺯﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ‬ ‫»ﺍﺳﻼﻡﺳــﺘﻴﺰﺍﻥ« ﻭ »ﺍﺳﻼﻡﭘﺮﺳــﺘﺎﻥ« ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭ »ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺳــﺒﺰ«‬ ‫ﺍﻓﺘﺘﺎﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ! ﺁﺭﻯ‪ ،‬ﻣﻮﻫﺒﺘﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ »ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ« ﻭ »ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ« ﺩﺭ‬ ‫ﺩﺍﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭ‪ .‬ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﻪ »ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ«‬ ‫ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻌﺼﺒﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻫﺎﻯﺷــﺎﻥ ﺩﻭ ﻗﻄﺐ »ﻋﺸﻖ«‬ ‫ﻭ »ﻧﻔﺮﺕ« ﭘﺎﻳﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ‪ .‬ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﺎ ﺑﺪ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﺔ‬ ‫ﻭﺯﻳﻦ ﭘﺎﺳــﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻛﺒﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻰﺑﻰﺳــﻰ‪ ،‬ﻣــﻮﺭﺥ ‪ 22‬ژﻭﺋﻦ ‪2012‬‬ ‫ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻧﻴﻢﻧﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺑﻴﻨﺪﺍﺯﻳﻢ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺩﺭ ﻫﺰﺍﺭﺓ ﺳــﻮﻡ‪ ،‬ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﭘﺎﺳــﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻛﺒﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺑﻪ »ﻭﺳﻂ‬ ‫ﺍﺭﺳﻄﻮﺋﻰ«‪ ،‬ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﺭﺫﻳﻠﺖ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺷﺪﻩ‪ ،‬ﻭ‬ ‫ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ »ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻝ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳــﻰ« ﺑﺎ »ﺣﻖ ﺭﺃﻯ« ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﺍﺩﻑ‬ ‫ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ! ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺎﺭﻻﺗﺎﻧﻴﺴــﻢ‪ ،‬ﺣﻤﺎﻗﺖﮔﺴــﺘﺮﻯ ﻭ‬ ‫»ﻓﻀﻴﻠــﺖ ﭘﺮﻭﺭﻯ«‪ ،‬ﭘﺎﺳــﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻛﺒﺮ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ »ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ‬ ‫ﺳــﺎﺯﮔﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳﻰ« ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺩﻫﺪ! ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﺒﺎﺭ ﻻﺯﻡ‬ ‫ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳــﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﭘﺎﺳــﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻛﺒﺮ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﭘﺎﻟﻜﻰﻫﺎﻯﺍﺵ‬ ‫»ﺩﻳﻦ ﺳــﻨﺞ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ »ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺖ ﺳﻨﺞ« ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﮔﺸﺖﻫﺎﻯ‬ ‫ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻰﻓﻀﻴﻠﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻧﺪ‪ .‬ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺑﻼگ‬ ‫ﮔﻔﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳــﻰ »ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﻣﺤﻮﺭﻯ«‬ ‫ﺍﺳــﺖ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺑــﺮ ﭘﻴﺶﻓﺮﺽﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻬﻰ ﻭ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﺔ‬ ‫ﺍﺭﺳــﻄﻮ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺳــﺨﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ‪ .‬ﻫﺮ‬ ‫ﭼﻨﺪ ﻧﻮﭼﺔ ﻣﺤﻔﻞ ﺗﻮﺣﺶﮔﺴــﺘﺮ ﺁﻭﺭﺍﻡ ﭼﺎﻣﺴــﻜﻰ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ‬ ‫ﺗﻮﺳــﻞ ﺑﻪ »ﺭﻭﺍﻳــﺖ«‪ ،‬ﺧﺪﺍﻣﺤﻮﺭﻯ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ »ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥﻣﺤﻮﺭﻯ«‬ ‫ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺘﻪ »ﺳﺎﺯﮔﺎﺭ« ﺑﻨﻤﺎﻳﺎﻧﺪ‪ .‬ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﻣﻌﺮﻛﺔ ﺷﻴﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ‬ ‫»ﺷﺒﻪﺭﻭﺷــﻨﻔﻜﺮ« ﺗﺎﺭﻳﻚﺍﻧﺪﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻛــﻪ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ‪ ،‬ﻳﻌﻨﻰ‬ ‫ﭘﻮﻳﺎﺋﻰ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ »ﺯﻣﺎﻥ« ﻭ »ﻣﻜﺎﻥ« ﻣﺸــﺨﺺ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻔﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ‪،‬‬ ‫ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺗﻴﺰﻩ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻴﺴﻢ« ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﻳﻢ!‬ ‫ﺑﻪ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻯ ﭘﺎﺳــﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻛﺒﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺗﻴﺰﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ‪ ،‬ﺩﺭ ﻗﺮﻥ ﺑﻴﺴــﺘﻢ‬ ‫»ﺗﻜﻤﻴــﻞ« ﺷــﺪﻩ! ﺑــﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕــﺮ‪ ،‬ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺗﻴﺰﻩ‬ ‫ﺷــﺪﻥ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺮﻥ ﺑﻴﺴــﺘﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻜﺎﻣﻞ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ‬

‫ﻣﻨﻄﻘــﺎً ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ »ﺳــﻜﻮﻥ« ﻧﻴﺰ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ‪ ،‬ﭘﺲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ‬ ‫ﻫﻴــﭻ »ﺗﺤﻮﻟﻰ« ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷــﺪ! ﺭﻭﺷــﻦﺗﺮ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ‬ ‫»ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻴﺴــﻢ« ﭘﺎﺳﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻛﺒﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﻉ »ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺍﻛﺒﺮﻯ« ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ‬ ‫ﺑﻪ ﺧﺪﺍﻭﻧﺪ »ﻻﻳﺘﻐﻴﺮ« ﺍﺩﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻤﻰ ﻣﻰﻣﺎﻧﺪ‪ .‬ﺍﻳﻦ »ﺧﺪﺍﻭﻧﺪ«‬ ‫ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻧﻜﻪ ﭘﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﺔ ﻛﻼﺳــﻴﻚ‬ ‫ﺑــﻪ ﻋﺎﺭﻳﺖ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻭ ﺍﺑﺪﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ »ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰﺍﺕ«‬ ‫ﻫﻢ ﻧﻤﻰﭘﺬﻳﺮﺩ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﭘﺎﺳــﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻛﺒﺮ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻴﺴﻢ »ﻧﻴﺴﺖ‬ ‫ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ«ﺍﺧﺘــﺮﺍﻉ ﻛــﺮﺩﻩ‪ .‬ﻭﻟــﻰ ﺑﺮﺧــﻼﻑ ﺗﻮﻫﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ‪،‬‬ ‫»ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻴﺴــﻢ« ﻭ »ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺗﻴﺰﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ« ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻰ ﺑﺎ »ﻛﻤﺎﻝ« ﻭ‬ ‫»ﺟﺎﻭﺩﺍﻧﮕﻰ« ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ‪.‬‬ ‫ﻣﻨﺒــﻊ ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻡ ﭘﺎﺳــﺪﺍﺭ ﮔﻨﺠﻰ‪ ،‬ﻫــﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻴﻤﺎً ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ‬ ‫ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨــﺪ‪ ،‬ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗــﻊ ﺗﺮﻫﺎﺕ ﺁﺧﻮﻧــﺪ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ‪ .‬ﻫﻤﺎﻥ‬ ‫ﺩﺳــﺘﺎﺭﺑﻨﺪ ﻭﺣﺸﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﺳﺘﻴﺰﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺍﻫﻰ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺳﺮﺷﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ‬ ‫ﺗﺤﺠﺮ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺣﺶﺍﺵ‪ ،‬ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ‬ ‫ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ‪ .‬ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﻨﮓﺳــﺮﺩ‪ ،‬ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺎ‬ ‫»ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﻣﺤﻮﺭﻯ« ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ‬ ‫ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ‪» ،‬ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻴﺴــﻢ« ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ‬ ‫ﺁﺛﺎﺭﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ »ﭼﻤﺎﻕ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ« ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ‪ .‬ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻰﺑﻰﺳﻰ‬ ‫ﻫﻢ ﻣﻰﭘﻨﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﭼﻤﺎﻕ »ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﺩ ﺷــﻬﻴﺪ« ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩ ﺟﺎﺩﻭﺋﻰ‬ ‫ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ‪ ،‬ﺩﺭ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﺼﻮﺭﺕ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﺰﺧﺮﻓﺎﺗﻰ ﺭﺍ‬ ‫ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﺮﺩ‪:‬‬ ‫»ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻳﻬﻮﺩﻳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺴــﻴﺤﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﻭ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴــﻢ ﺩﺭ‬ ‫ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺷــﻨﺎﺱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ]‪ [...‬ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺍﺭﺳﻄﻮﺋﻰ ]‪[...‬‬ ‫ﻣﻔﻬــﻮﻡ ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺖ ]ﺩﺍﺭﺩ[ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺮﻳﻂ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳــﺎﺕ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ‬ ‫ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺫﻳﻠﺖ ﻣﻰﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﺪ ]‪ [...‬ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﺰﻩ ﺷــﺪﻥ‬ ‫ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺩﺭ ]‪ [...‬ﻏﺮﺏ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻴﻤــﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻗﺮﻥ ﻧﻮﺯﺩﻫﻢ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻭ ﺩﺭ‬ ‫ﻗﺮﻥ ﺑﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻞ ﺷﺪ ]‪ [...‬ﭼﺮﺍ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺣﻖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ‬ ‫ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺳــﺎﺯﮔﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳــﻰ ﻭ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺸﺮ ﺍﺯ‬ ‫ﺩﻳﻦ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﺑﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ]‪ [...‬ﻧﻪ ﺻــﺪﻭﺭ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﻬﺎﺟﻢ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ‬ ‫ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ]‪ [...‬ﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ‪ ،‬ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺟﻨﮓﻃﻠﺒﻰ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ]‪«[...‬‬ ‫ﺑﻠــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻘــﺎﻻﺕ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ »ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﻣﺒﺮﻫﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ‪«...‬‬ ‫ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺧــﻮﺏ ﻭ ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﻰ »ﻭﺟــﻮﺩ« ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺩﺷــﻤﻦ‬

‫»ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ« ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ‪ .‬ﻋﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ‪ ،‬ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺷﻴﺮﻳﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﻯ‬ ‫ﻭ ﺁﺧﻮﻧــﺪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﻰ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ »ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ« ﺩﺧﻴﻞ ﺑﺴــﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ‬ ‫ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ »ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ«‪ ،‬ﻣﺎﺩﻳﺖ‪ ،‬ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥ ﻭﺟــﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ؛‬ ‫ﺣﺘﻰ »ﻣﺴــﻠﻤﺎﻥ« ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﺟﺎﺋﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻥ‬ ‫ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻓﻌﻠﺔ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴــﻢ »ﻫﻴﭻ«ﺭﺍ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﻳﺰ‬ ‫ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ‪ .‬ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ‪» ،‬ﻣﺴــﻠﻤﺎﻥ« ﻛﺴــﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﻦ‬ ‫ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﺭﺍ »ﻗﺒﻮﻝ« ﻛــﺮﺩﻩ! ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺼﻮﺭﺕ »ﻣﺴــﻠﻤﺎﻥ« ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ‬ ‫ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻪ‪ ،‬ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﻦ ﻣﺬﻛﻮﺭ‬ ‫ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻰ ﻭ »ﻏﻴﺮﺟﺎﻧﺒﺪﺍﺭﺍﻧﻪ« ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ‪ .‬ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﺩﻯ‬ ‫ﺑــﺎ »ﺗﻌﺼﺒــﺎﺕ« ﻭ »ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻫﺎﺋﻰ« ﻛﻪ »ﺑﺮﺣﻖ« ﺗﺼــﻮﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ‪ ،‬ﺩﺭ‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻭ »ﺭﺳــﻤﻰﺍﺕ« ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﻣﻰﻛﺸــﺪ‪ .‬ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻏﺮﺏ‬ ‫ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳﻰ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﻴﺤﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻳﻬﻮﺩﻳﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ‬ ‫ﻭ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ‪ ،‬ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳــﻰ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻓﺮﺍﻳﻨﺪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ‬ ‫»ﺭﺳــﻤﻴﺖﺯﺩﺍﺋﻰ« ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ‪ ،‬ﺳــﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺑﺎ‬ ‫ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻏﻴﺮﺭﺳﻤﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺗﻀﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻏﻴﺮﺭﺳﻤﻰ ﺩﻳﻨﺪﺍﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ‪،‬‬ ‫ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳــﺮﻛﻮﺏ »ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ« ﻛﻔﺎﻳﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫــﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ‪ .‬ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ‬ ‫ﺳــﻨﺖ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﺣﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻫﺰﺍﺭﺓ ﺳــﻮﻡ‬ ‫ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ »ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ« ﺩﺭ ﺗﻀﺎﺩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ‪ .‬ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻫﻢ ﺭﻭﺷــﻦ‬ ‫ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺳﻨﺖ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ »ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳﻤﻰﺍﺕ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻨﺎﺳﺪ‪ ،‬ﭼﺮﺍ‬ ‫ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻨﮕﺮ ﺣﻖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ‪ .‬ﭘﺎﺳﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻛﺒﺮ‪،‬‬ ‫ﺧﻮﺷــﺒﺨﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻙ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻜﺘﺔ ﭘﻴﺶﭘﺎﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﻋﺎﺟﺰ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ‪،‬‬ ‫ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜــﻪ »ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺪﺍﺭﻯ«‪ ،‬ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺳــﻴﻨﻪ ﺯﺩﻥ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ »ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻫﺎ«‪،‬‬ ‫ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﺟــﺰ »ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻯﻃﻠﺒــﻰ‪ «.‬ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻯ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ‬ ‫»ﺟﻨﮓﻃﻠﺒــﻰ« ﻧﻴــﺰ ﺍﺯ »ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻯﻃﻠﺒــﻰ« ﺳﺮﭼﺸــﻤﻪ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻟﺐﺗﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭘﺎﺳــﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻛﺒﺮ‪ ،‬ﺑﻰﺧﺒﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ »ﺟﻨﮓ ﻃﻠﺒﻰ«‪،‬‬ ‫ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻜﻮﻫﺶ ﺟﻨﮓﻃﻠﺒﻰ ﭘﺮﻭﻓﺴﻮﺭ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻯ ﮔﺸﻮﺩﻩ!‬ ‫ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺯﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﻣﻬﻮﻉ ﺑﻴﻦ ﭘﺎﺳﺪﺍﺭ ﻭ ﭘﺮﻭﻓﺴﻮﺭ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺪﻑ‬ ‫ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺮﻛﻮﺑﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺑﺎﻥﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ‬ ‫ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ »ﺍﻭﭘﻮﺯﻳﺴﻴﻮﻥ« ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺗﻮﺣﺶ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﺒﺎﺭ ﺁﻧﮕﻠﻮﺳﺎﻛﺴــﻮﻥﻫﺎ ﺳــﺨﺖ ﻛﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ! ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ‬ ‫ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﭼﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﻭ‬

‫ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﻼﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ »ﺗﻨﻬﺎ« ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ!‬ ‫ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻘﻮﻁ ﺟﻨﮕﻨﺪﺓ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﻭﺩﺍﺭ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ‬ ‫ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺸــﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻓﺴﺮ ﺳﻮﺭﻯ‪ ،‬ﺩﺭ‬ ‫ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﻼﺭﻯ ﻛﻠﻴﻨﺘــﻦ‪ ،‬ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﺧﺎﺭﺟــﺔ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺮ‬ ‫ﻃﺒﻞ ﻣﺴــﻠﺢ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺑﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺪ ﻣﻰﻛﻮﻓﺖ‪ ،‬ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ‬ ‫ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺳــﺮﻋﺖ ﺩﻧﺪﻩﻋﻘﺐ »ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ« ﮔﺮﻓــﺖ‪ .‬ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻫﻢ‬ ‫ﺍﻳﻨﻜــﻪ ﻫﻴﻼﺭﻯ ﻛﻠﻴﻨﺘﻦ‪ ،‬ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻯ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ‬ ‫ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺮﻙ ﮔﻮﻳﺪ‪ ،‬ﻭ‬ ‫ﺑــﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺗﺎﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺗــﺎﺯ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ‪ .‬ﺗﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﻭ‬ ‫ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﺍﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﺛﺮﻯ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ »ﺑﻌﻀﻰﻫﺎ«‬ ‫ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻰ ﺟﻨﺎﻳﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺪﺍﺯﻧﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ‬ ‫»ﻫﻴﻼﺭﻯ ﻏﺎﻳﺐ!«‬ ‫ﺑﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺗﻴﺮﻣﺎﻩ ﺳــﺎﻟﺠﺎﺭﻯ‪ ،‬ﺑﻪ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺳﺎﻳﺖ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮﻓﺮﺩﺍ‪،‬‬ ‫ﻣﻮﺭﺥ ﺟﻤﻌــﻪ ‪ 22‬ژﻭﺋﻦ ‪» ،2012‬ﻟﺌﻮﻥ ﭘﺎﻧﻪﺗﺎ« ﺑﻪ »ﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺁﺭﺍﻡ«‬ ‫ﺩﺭ ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﻧﻜﻨﻴﻢ‪ ،‬ﺍﻳﻦ »ﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺁﺭﺍﻡ«‬ ‫ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺳــﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺑﻠﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ‬ ‫ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻓﺘﻮﻯ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ‪» ،‬ﺑﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ!« ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮﻓﺮﺩﺍ ﻫﻢ‬ ‫ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥﻛﺎﺭﻯ »ﻓﺘﻮﻯ« ﭘﺎﻧﻪﺗﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﻌﻜﺲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻰﻧﻮﻳﺴﺪ‪،‬‬ ‫ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻃﺎﻋﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺘﻮﻯ‪ ،‬ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺳــﻮﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ‬ ‫ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ‪:‬‬ ‫»]‪ [...‬ﻟﺌــﻮﻥ ﭘﺎﻧﻪﺗﺎ ﺭﻭﺯ ﭘﻨﺞﺷــﻨﺒﻪ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺩﺍﺭﻯ‬ ‫ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺳــﺎﻝ ﺗﺴــﻠﻴﺤﺎﺕ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ‬ ‫ﮔﻔﺖ ]‪ [...‬ﺁﻥﭼﻪ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻯ ﮔﺬﺍﺭ‬ ‫ﺁﺭﺍﻡ ﻭ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﺗﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ]‪ [...‬ﭘﺎﻧﻪﺗﺎ‬ ‫ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺣﻞ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺗﻴﻚ‪ ،‬ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ‬ ‫ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ]‪«[...‬‬ ‫ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﺎ ﺷﻠﻴﻚ ﻣﻮﺷﻚ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻯ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﻧﺎﺗﻮ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ‪،‬‬ ‫ﺑﻪ ﮔﺰﺍﻓﻪﮔﻮﺋﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻧﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ‬ ‫ﻛﻞ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ »ﭘﺎﺳــﺨﻰ« ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﺩﺍﺩ‪» .‬ﭘﺎﺳﺦ« ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ‬

‫ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺑﺸﺎﺭﺍﺳــﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻴﻄﺔ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺳــﻮﺭﻳﻪ‬ ‫ﺍﺳــﺖ‪ .‬ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﻭ ﺑﻪ‬ ‫ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ‪ ،‬ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻤﺐ ﻭ ﮔﻠﻮﻟﻪ!‬ ‫ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ»ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻣﺎ« ﺍﺯ ﺭﺧﺪﺍﺩ ‪ 22‬ژﻭﺋﻦ ﺳﺎﻟﺠﺎﺭﻯ!‬ ‫ﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﻤﻴــﺖ ﺭﻭﺯ ‪ 22‬ژﻭﺋﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻣﻌﺎﺻــﺮ‪ ،‬ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ﻛﻢ‬ ‫ﮔﻔﺘﻪﺍﻳــﻢ! ﺑﺎ ﻧﻴﻢ ﻧﮕﺎﻫــﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺧﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎﻯ ‪ 22‬ژﻭﺋــﻦ‪ ،‬ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ‬ ‫ﻫﻴﺘﻠﺮ »ﺭﻭﺷــﻦﺿﻤﻴﺮ« ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖﺳﺎﺯ »ﺑﺎﺩ« ﭘﻰ‬ ‫ﻣﻰﺑﺮﻳــﻢ؛ »ﺑﺎﺩ« ﺭﺍ ﺩﺳــﺘﻜﻢ ﻧﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ! ﭼــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻰ ﻭ‬ ‫ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻣﺠﺎﺯﻯ‪ ،‬ﻭﺯﺵ »ﺑﺎﺩ«‪ ،‬ﻳﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ‬ ‫ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺗــﻰ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ‪ .‬ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒــﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ »ﺑﺎﺩ«‪ ،‬ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ‬ ‫ﭘﻴﺎﻣــﺪ ﻧﺒــﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ؛ ﺣﺘــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻰﺑﻰﮔﻮﺯﻙﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺩﻳﺎﻥ‬ ‫ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻤــﻰ‪ ،‬ﺑﮕﺬﺭﻳــﻢ! ﺑــﺎﺩ‪ ،‬ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ‪ 4‬ﻋﻨﺼــﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ‬ ‫ﺧﺪﺍﻭﻧــﺪ »ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺘﻪ« ﺍﺳــﺖ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﻭﺑﻼگﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﻛــﻪ ﺑﻪ »ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺘﻪ«‬ ‫ﺍﺧﺘﺼــﺎﺹ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ‪ ،‬ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﻤــﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﭘﺲ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ‬ ‫ﻣﻜﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﻧﻜﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻭﻳﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﺭﺧﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺯ ‪ 22‬ژﻭﺋﻦ!‬ ‫ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ‪ 22‬ژﻭﺋﻦ ﺳــﺎﻝ ‪ 1941‬ﻣﻴﻼﺩﻯ‪ ،‬ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﺯﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ‬ ‫ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺯ ‪ 16‬ﺳﭙﺘﺎﻣﺒﺮ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﻝ‪ ،‬ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ‬ ‫ﺍﺯ ‪ 3‬ﻣــﺎﻩ ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻬﺎﺟﻢ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻫﻴﺘﻠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻯ‪ ،‬ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻯ ﺍﻭﻝ‬ ‫ﻛﻪ »ﻳﻚ ﺗﻨﻪ« ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ ﻗﺪﺭﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﻳﺴــﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﻭ‬ ‫ﺍﺯ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺝ ﻣﺴﺘﺸــﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺧــﻮﺩﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ‪» ،‬ﺟﺎﻡ‬ ‫ﺯﻫﺮ« ﺭﺍ ﺳــﺮ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖ »ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻔﺎ« ﺩﺍﺩ‪ ،‬ﭼﺮﺍ؟ ﭼﻮﻥ‬ ‫ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ‪ ،‬ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ‪ 22‬ﺑﻬﻤﻦ ‪ 1357‬ﻫﻢ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ‬ ‫ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ‪ ،‬ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ »ﻭﻟﻴﻨﻌﻤﺖ« ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﻤﻰﺍﻳﺴــﺘﺪ! ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ‬ ‫ﻫﻴﺘﻠﺮ‪ ،‬ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻛﻤﻰ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩﺗﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ‪ ،‬ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ‬ ‫ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﺭﻭﺋﻰ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﺑﺎ‬ ‫ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ‪ ،‬ﺍﺭﺗﺶ »ﺷﺎﻫﻨﺸــﺎﻫﻰ« ﺯﻳﺮ ﭘﺎﻯ‬ ‫ﺍﻋﻠﻴﺤﻀﺮﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﺸــﻴﺪ‪ ،‬ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﻣﻰﺷــﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺍﺷــﻐﺎﻟﮕﺮ‬ ‫ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺠﻨﮕﺪ! ﺁﻧﻮﻗﺖ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎً ﺧﻨﺪﻩﺩﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ؛ ﭘﺲ‬ ‫»ﺍﻋﻠﻴﺤﻀﺮﺕ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺩﻧــﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻰﺧﻨﺪﻳﻢ‪،‬‬ ‫ﺍﺯ ﺷﺪﺕ ﺧﻨﺪﻩ ﺭﻭﺩﻩﺑﺮ ﻧﺸﻮﻳﻢ!‬

‫ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﻯ ‪ 22‬ﺑﻬﻤﻦ ‪ ،1357‬ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺯﺩﻭﺑﻨﺪ ﺗﺎﻭﺍﺭﻳﺶﻫﺎ‬ ‫ﺑﺎ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺷــﻨﮕﺘﻦ‪ ،‬ﻫﻴﭻ ﺧﻄﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻣﺴــﻜﻮ‪ ،‬ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ‬ ‫ﺁﻧﮕﻠﻮﺳﺎﻛﺴــﻮﻥﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﺮﺩ‪ .‬ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ‬ ‫ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺷــﻨﮕﺘﻦ‪ ،‬ﻭﺣﺸﻰﮔﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻔﺮﻳﺢ‬ ‫ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺮ »ﻣﺮﺯ ﭘﺮﮔﻬﺮ«‬ ‫ﺭﺍ ﻏــﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ‪ ،‬ﺑﻌﺪﺍ ً ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑــﺎ »ﺍﷲﺍﻛﺒﺮ« ﺑﻪ‬ ‫ﻣﺮﺍﺗﺐ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ »ﻣﺮﺯ ﭘﺮﮔﻬﺮ« ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﺭﺍﺝ ﻛﺮﺩ‪ .‬ﭘﺲ ﺩﺳﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ‬ ‫ﺳــﺮﻭﮔﻮﺵ »ﻣﺼﺪﻕ« ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺱ‬ ‫ﻣﺨﺘﻠــﻂ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﺗــﺮﻭﺭ »ﺭﺯﻡ ﺁﺭﺍ« ﭘﺎﻯ »ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺳــﻴﻮﻡ « ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ‬ ‫ﺑــﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ‪ .‬ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﻫﻢ »ﺷــﻴﺦﻣﻬﺪﻯ« ﻭ »ﺣــﺎﺝ ﺭﻭﺡﺍﷲ« ﺭﺍ‬ ‫ﺑﺮﺍﻯﺷــﺎﻥ »ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ« ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ »ﺷﻴﺦﻭﺷﺎﻩ«‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻧﺒــﺪﺍﺭ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ‪ .‬ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻨﮕﺮ‬ ‫»ﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﻣﻈﻠﻮﻡ« ﻧﺸﺴــﺖ‪ .‬ﻧﻘــﺶ ﻧﺨﺴــﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ »ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻰ« ﻭ‬ ‫»ﻣﻈﻠﻮﻡ« ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﮔﻮﺳﺎﻟﻪﻓﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﻮﺩ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺏ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻭﻇﺎﺋﻒ‬ ‫ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮ ﺍﺣﺴــﻦ‪» ،‬ﻧﺨﺴــﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ« ﺩﺭ ﺳﻨﮕﺮ »ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﻈﻠﻮﻡ« ﻳﺎ‬ ‫»ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ« ﺑﻨﺸﻴﻨﺪ‪ .‬ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﻮﺩ »ﺧﺎﺩﻡ ﻭﻓﺎﺩﺍﺭ« ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻭﺭ »ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭ«‬ ‫ﺷــﻮﺩ‪ ،‬ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﺍﻫﻰ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ »ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻨﺪﺭﻭﻯ«‪ ،‬ﻳﺎ‬ ‫ﺗﺤﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩﺳــﺮ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻩ »ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎ« ﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻨﮕﺮ‬ ‫ﺣﻖ ﻳــﺎ »ﺣﻤﺎﻗﺖ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻫــﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻰ« ﻟﻨﮕﺮ ﺍﻧــﺪﺍﺯﺩ‪ .‬ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭﻯ‬ ‫ﻣﺼﺪﻕ‪ ،‬ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻔﺎﻯ ﺷــﻴﺦﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﻓــﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻨﻰﺻﺪﺭ‪ ،‬ﻭ‬ ‫»ﻋﺰﻟﺖﻧﺸــﻴﻨﻰ« ﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼــﻮﺏ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ‬ ‫ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺖ‪.‬‬ ‫ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ‪ ،1388‬ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﮕﻠﻮﺳﺎﻛﺴﻮﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ‬ ‫ﺷﺪﻧﺪ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﺔ ﺭﺟﺎﻟﻪﭘﺮﻭﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ »ﺑﺎﺯﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﺯﺑﺎﻟﻪ« ﻭ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ‬ ‫ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻯ ﺑﻪ »ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ« ﻣﺤﺒﻮﺏ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻰ ﺷﻜﺴــﺖ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ‪ .‬ﺑﻪ‬ ‫ﻫﻤﻴــﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻀﺮﺍﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺳــﻨﺎﺭﻳﻮﻯ »ﺍﺷــﻐﺎﻝ‬ ‫ﺳــﻔﺎﺭﺕ« ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ »ﻣﺮﺩﻡ« ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ‬ ‫ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﻧــﺎﻛﺎﻡ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ‪ ...‬ﻭ ﻋﻠﻴﺮﻏﻢ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ‪،‬‬

‫ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﻣﻼﻗــﺎﺕ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ »ﻭﻳﻠﻴــﺎﻡ ﻫﻴﮓ ـ‬ ‫ﺻﺎﻟﺤــﻰ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﻻﺕﺑــﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺭﻭﺿﻪ ﻭ ﺯﻭﺯﻩ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ‬ ‫ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻴﻮﺓ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻟﺸﻜﺮﻛﺸﻰ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﺩ‪ .‬ﻫﺮ‬ ‫ﭼﻨﺪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺭﺍﺫﻝ ﻭ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺕ‬ ‫ﺧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻰ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ‪ .‬ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻣﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺟﻬﺖ‬ ‫»ﺑﺎﺩ«‪ ،‬ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ‪ 22‬ژﻭﺋﻦ ‪ 2012‬ﻧﺎﺷﻰ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ!‬ ‫ﺍﻳﻦ »ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ« ﻫﻢ ﺩﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﷲﺍﻛﺒﺮ »ﻳﻮﺭﻭﻧﻴﻮﺯ« ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻞ‬ ‫ﻛﺮﺩ‪ ،‬ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻻﺕﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﺼﺮ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ‪ ...‬ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ‬ ‫ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮ‪ ،‬ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺁﺩﻣﺨﻮﺍﺭ ﻧﺎﺗﻮ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻯ ﺷــﻴﺮﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﮓﺍﻓﺮﻭﺯﻯ‬ ‫ﻣﻴــﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﺩﻥ ﻭ ﺳــﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ! ﭘﻴــﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ«‪،‬‬ ‫ﺑﻮﻕﻫﺎﻯ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺔ ﻣﻚﻛﺎﺭﺗﻰ ﺩﺭﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻋﻄﺎﻯ ﭘﻨﺎﻫﻨﺪﮔﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ‬ ‫ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺭﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺧﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﺳــﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﻣﻌﺮﻛﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ؛‬ ‫ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺪ »ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻰ« ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻋﻤﻠﻰ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺍﻋﻄــﺎﻯ ﭘﻨﺎﻫﻨﺪﮔﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﺷــﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ‬ ‫ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺷــﻮﺭﺵ ﻣﺴــﻠﺤﺎﻧﻪ‪ ،‬ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ‪ ،‬ﺑﻪ‬ ‫ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﻧﺸﺴﺘﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻨﮕﺮ ﺷﻮﺭﺷﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻋﻼﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻋﻠﻨﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ »ﺯﭘﺮﺗﻰ« ﺍﺭﺩﻥ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎ ﺍﻋﻄﺎﻯ ﭘﻨﺎﻫﻨﺪﮔﻰ ﺑﻪ‬ ‫ﺧﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺳــﻮﺭﻯ‪ ،‬ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﻋﻼﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ‬ ‫ﺑﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺳــﺘﺎﻧﺔ ﻣﺴــﺎﻓﺮﺕ ﻗﺮﻳﺐﺍﻟﻮﻗــﻮﻉ ﻭﻻﺩﻳﻤﻴﺮ ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ‬ ‫ﺍﺳــﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ‪ ،‬ﺍﺭﺩﻥ ﻭ ﻓﻠﺴــﻄﻴﻦ‪» ،‬ﭘﻴﺎﻡ« ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺭﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ‬ ‫ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﻔﺴــﻴﺮ ﺑﻰﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺍﺳــﺖ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺣــﺎﻝ »ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺭﺩﻥ«‪،‬‬ ‫ﻣﺎﻧﻨــﺪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻯ »ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻞ« ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﺘﺮﺳــﻚ‬ ‫ﻳﺎﻧﻜﻰﻫﺎﺳــﺖ‪ .‬ﺍﮔــﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻣﻠﺖﺍﺵ »ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ«‬ ‫ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺷــﺖ‪ ،‬ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺣﻤﺎﻗﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺮﺝ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ‬ ‫ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻘﺾ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﺮﺩ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﭘﻬﻠــﻮﻯ ﺩﻭﻡ‪ ،‬ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺳــﺮﺩ‪ ،‬ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ‬ ‫ﺧﻠﺒﺎﻧــﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻯ ﻫﻮﺍﺋﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺖ ﺟﻨﮕﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻯ‬ ‫ﮔﺮﻳﺨﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎﻯ ﭘﻨﺎﻫﻨﺪﮔﻰ ﻛﺮﺩ‪ .‬ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ‬ ‫ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺤﻮﻳــﻞ ﺩﺍﺩ‪ .‬ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻋﻄﺎﻯ ﭘﻨﺎﻫﻨﺪﮔﻰ ﺑﻪ‬

‫ﺧﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺷﺎﻫﻨﺸﺎﻫﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﺍﻋﻼﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ‬ ‫ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳــﻰ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ‬ ‫ﺑــﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺍﻟﺒﺘــﻪ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ »ﻣﺘﺤﺪ« ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺒــﻮﺩﻩ‪ .‬ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻗﺎﺟﺎﺭ‬ ‫ﻧﻤﻰﮔﻮﺋﻴــﻢ‪ ،‬ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻯ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻭ ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﻯ ‪ 28‬ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ‬ ‫‪ 1332‬ﻣﻰﮔﻮﺋﻴــﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺷﺎﻫﻨﺸــﺎﻫﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ‬ ‫ﻣﺘﺤــﺪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎء ﺩﺭﺟﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧــﺪ! ﻭﻟﻰ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ‬ ‫»ﻣﺘﺤﺪ«‪ ،‬ﻃﻰ ‪ 37‬ﺳﺎﻝ ﺗﺤﺖ »ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ« ﻏﺮﺏ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ! ﺑﻠﻪ‪،‬‬ ‫ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺫﻭﺏﺁﻫﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ؛ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺄﺳﻴﺲ‬ ‫ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ »ﻣﺎﺷﻴﻦﺳﺎﺯﻯ«‪» ،‬ﺗﺮﺍﻛﺘﻮﺭﺳﺎﺯﻯ« ﻭ ‪ ...‬ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ‬ ‫ﻓﻬﺮﺳﺖ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ »ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ« ﻓﺮﺿﻰ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ‬ ‫ﺷﺎﻫﻨﺸﺎﻫﻰ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﭘﻰ ﻣﻰﺑﺮﻳﻢ‪.‬‬ ‫ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﻳﻚ‬ ‫»ﺁﭼﺎﺭ« ﻧﺎﻗﺎﺑﻞ »ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻰ« ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ‪ .‬ﺳــﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ »ﻣﺎﺷﻴﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻯ« ﻭ‬ ‫ﺩﻳﮕﺮ »ﺳــﺎﺯﻯﻫﺎ« ﺭﺍ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﻭﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﻭﺧﺖ! ﻏﺮﺑﻰﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ‬ ‫ﻫﻤــﺎﻥ ﻻﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﻯﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ »ﺫﻭﺏ ﺁﻫــﻦ« ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻪ‬ ‫ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ! ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﻮﻕﻫﺎﻯ ﺳــﺎﻭﺍﻙ‬ ‫ﺧﻔﻘﺎﻥ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﺑﻪ »ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ« ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠــﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺫﻫﺎﻥ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﻴﺮ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺎﻩ‬ ‫ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ‪ ،‬ﺣﺎﻝ‬ ‫ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ!‬ ‫ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻘﺶ »ﻋﺎﺷــﻖ ﺑﻴﻌﺎﺭ« ﻏــﺮﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﻔﺎ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ‪،‬‬ ‫ﺗﺎ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻭﭘﻮﺯﻳﺴــﻴﻮﻥ »ﻏﺮﺏﺳــﺘﻴﺰ« ﺭﺍ‬ ‫ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰﻫﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻫــﻢ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ‬ ‫ﺍﻣــﺮ »ﻣﻮﻓﻖ« ﺷــﺪ‪ .‬ﺣﺎﺝ ﺭﻭﺡﺍﷲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻋﺮﺑــﺪﺓ »ﻣﺮگ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ«‬ ‫ﻭ »ﻣﺮگ ﺑﺮ ﺷــﺎﻩ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺋﻰ« ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﻣﺸــﺘﻰ ﺧﻮﺩﻓﺮﻭﺧﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺑﻠﻪ‬ ‫ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺰﺩﻭﺭﻯ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺷــﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﺳــﺘﺎﺩﻧﺪ‪ .‬ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ‬ ‫ﻛﻪ ﺣﻀــﺮﺕ ﺭﺿﺎ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺳــﺮﻧﮕﻮﻥ ﻛــﺮﺩﻥ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ‬ ‫ﺩﺳﺖﻧﺸــﺎﻧﺪﺓ ﻳﺎﻧﻜﻰﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻬﺎﺟﻢ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ‬ ‫ﺳــﻮﻯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺁﻣﺮﻳــﻜﺎ ﺩﺭﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ »ﻣﺮﺩﻡ« ﺍﺯ‬ ‫ﺍﺷﻐﺎﻟﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻠﻮﻛﺎﻧﻪ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ‪.‬‬

‫ﭘﺲ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﺔ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ‪ ،‬ﺣﻘﻮﻕ‬ ‫ﺑﺸــﺮ ﻭ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳــﻰ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﺭﺿﺎ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑــﻪ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺩﻭﻡ‬ ‫ﺗﺒﺪﻳــﻞ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﺯﺩﺓ ﺗﺮﻛﻴــﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ‬ ‫ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ! ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ‬ ‫ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ »ﻧﻴﻜﻮﻻﺱ ﻛﺮﻳﺴﺘﻒ« ﺩﺭ ﻧﻴﻮﻳﻮﺭﻙ ﺗﺎﻳﻤﺰ »ﭘﻴﺶﮔﻮﺋﻰ«‬ ‫ﻛﺮﺩﻩ! ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﮕﺮﻳﺴﺘﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻡ ﺑﻠﻮﺭﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻒ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ‬ ‫ﻛﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﺣﺴــﻴﻦ »ﺩﺷﻤﻦ«‬ ‫ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ! ﻭ ﭘﺴــﺮ ﺟﺮﺝ ﺑﻮﺵ ﺑﺎ ﺳــﺮﻧﮕﻮﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ‬ ‫ﻃﺎﻟﺒــﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ‬ ‫ﻛﺮﺩﻩ‪ .‬ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﺮﻳﺴﺘﻒ ﻣﻰﭘﻨﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺎ »ﺍﺣﻤﻖ« ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺟﻨﮓ‬ ‫ﺯﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻼﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺪﻯ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ! ﻭﻟﻰ ﺳﺮ‬ ‫ﻫﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ‬ ‫ﺍﺯ ﺣﻤﺎﻗﺖ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻧﻴﻮﻳﻮﺭﻙﺗﺎﻳﻤﺰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ!‬ ‫ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻬﻨﻪ ﻓﺮﻭﺵﻫﺎﻯ‬ ‫ﻧﻴﻮﻳﻮﺭﻙ ﻫﻴــﭻ ﻛﻢ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ‪ .‬ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﻮﻧــﻪ‪» ،‬ﻣﺘﻮﻟﻰﺯﺍﺩﻩ«‪،‬‬ ‫ﻗﺎﺋﻢ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﻕ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ‪ ،‬ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ‬ ‫ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺍﺯ »ﻧﻌﻤﺖ ﺑﺮﻕ« ﺑﻰﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ‪ ،‬ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭ‬ ‫ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪﺓ ﺑﺮﻕ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺭ‬ ‫ﺯﻣﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺮژﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺻﺪﺳﺎﻝ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ‪:‬‬ ‫»]‪ [...‬ﺑــﺎ ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ‪ ،‬ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ‬ ‫ﺑﺮﻕ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ]‪ [...‬ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ‬ ‫ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺮژﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺭﺷــﻴﺪﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﺳــﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ‬ ‫ﺑﺎﻻﻳﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ]‪ [...‬ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺳــﻴﺎﺏﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺎﺩﻯ‬ ‫ﺧﻮﺍﻑ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﭼﻨﺪﺻﺪ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ]‪«[...‬‬ ‫ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ »ﻣﻔﺮﺡ« ﺭﺍ ﺳﺎﻳﺖ ﻧﻮﻭﺳﺘﻰ‪ ،‬ﻣﻮﺭﺥ ‪ 2‬ﺗﻴﺮﻣﺎﻩ ‪1391‬‬ ‫ﻣﻨﺘﺸــﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ‪ .‬ﺷــﺎﻧﺲ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻧﺪ »ﺑﺎﺩ« ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭ ﺑــﺮﺍﺩﺭ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﻰﺯﺍﺩﻩ‬ ‫ﺑــﻪ ﺟﻨﮕﻨﺪﺓ ﻧﺎﺗﻮ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴــﻪ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺖ‪ ،‬ﻭﮔﺮﻧﻪ ﻻﺷــﻪﺍﺵ ﻃﻌﻤﺔ‬ ‫ﺁﺳﻴﺎﺏﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺎﺩﻯ »ﺧﻮﺍﻑ« ﻣﻰﺷﺪ!‬