21ﺁﻭﺭﻳـــﻞ 2011
ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺟﻨﮓﻃﻠﺒﺎﻧﺔ ﺍﺳــﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥﺍﺵ ﺩﺭ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺗﻀﻌﻴــﻒ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ» ،ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺍﻥ ﺧﻂ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ« ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﺧــﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞﻧﻮﺍﺯﺍﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺷﺪﺕ ﻻﺕﺑﺎﺯﻯﺷــﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﻨﺪ .ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻣﻼﻣﻤــﺪ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ﺑــﺎ ﭼﻤﺎﻗﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥﺍﺵ ﺑــﻪ ﺟﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨــﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ »ﻣﻤﺪ ﻳﻮﻧﺴــﻜﻮ« ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑــﻪ ﺭﻭﻯ ﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺮﺩ؛ ﺑــﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ »ﺻﺪﺍﻯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ« ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺸــﻮﻳﻖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ »ﻣﻮﻓﻖ« ،ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ، ﻋﻠﻰﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﺓ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ، ﺩﺭ ﺳﻪ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﺍﺵ ﺍﺑﻘﺎ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻴﺮﻭﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻰ ،ﭘﺴــﺮﺧﺎﻟﺔ ﭘﺎﺳﺪﺍﺭ ﻋﻠﻰﻛﻮﭼﻴﻜﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻐﺘﻨﻢ ﺷــﻤﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﺎﺭﻭﺍﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﺧﺮﺩﺟﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬــﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺖ .ﻳﻚ »ﺧﺮﺩﺟﺎﻝ« ﺑﻪ ﻋﺮﺑﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﺘــﺮﺍﺽ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻳﻜﻰ ﺑــﻪ ﺑﺤﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ ...ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﺍﻣﻦ ﺯﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺤﺸــﺮﺧﺮ» ،ﻣﻬﺮﻧﻴﻮﺯ« ﻧﻴﺰ »ﺧﺒﺮ ﻣﻮﺛﻖ« ﺳﻮﺯﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺮﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﻌﻜﺲ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﺗﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﺵ ﭘﻴﺮﻭ ﺧﻂ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ »ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺭﻭﺷﻦﺿﻤﻴﺮ« ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ. ﺑﻪ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻯ ﻓﻼﺳــﻔﺔ ﻣﺤﺒﻮﺏ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺳــﻴﺎ» ،ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ« ﺧﺸــﻮﻧﺖﻃﻠﺒﻰ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻃﺒﻞ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺭﻭﺷﻦﺿﻤﻴﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻮﺑﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﺋﻰ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ! ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﭘﺮﻭﭘﺎﮔﺎﻧﺪ ﺗﻮﺣﺶﮔﺴﺘﺮ ،ﻛﻴﻬﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﻘﺾ ﺁﺷــﻜﺎﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﻋﻠﻰﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﻭ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﻭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﺓ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺪﺍﺭ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ .ﭘﺲ ﺗﻌﺠﺒﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﻛــﻪ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﺵ ﺳــﺒﺰ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺪﺍﻓﻌــﺎﻥ »ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰ« ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺷﻴﭙﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﺷﻜﻨﻰ ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﺧﻔﻘﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ »ﺷﻴﺦ« ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻯ »ﺷﺎﻩ« ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻫﺴﺖ. ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺎﻣﻮﺭﺗﻰﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪﻥ »ﺳﺎﻭﺍﻙ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ« ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺳــﺎﻭﺍﻙ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺷــﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ؛ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺎﻭﺍﻙ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ،ﺷﺒﻪﻣﺠﻠﺴــﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻳﺎ »ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺣﺴــﻨﺖ« ﻣﻰﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﻋﺮﺑﺪﻩﺟﻮﺋــﻰ ﻻﺕﺍﷲ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻯ »ﻗﻮﺓ ﻣﻘﻨﻨﻪ« ﻣﻰﻧﺸﺴــﺖ. ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻧﻜــﻪ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻣﺠﻠــﺲ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻧﮕﻬﺒﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ »ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺎﻧﻰ« ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻨﺸﻴﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ »ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺣﺴﻨﺖ« ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ. ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗــﻊ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﺪ؛ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺩﺳﺖﻧﺸــﺎﻧﺪﻩ، ﻫﻤﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯﺍﺵ ﭘﻮﺷــﺎﻟﻰ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸــﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴــﻞ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻟﺸﻜﺮﻛﺸــﻰ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻧــﻰ ﻛﺎﺭﺵ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺭﻓﺖ.
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻔﺎﻯ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﻰ ،ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮﻓﺮﺩﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻨﺎﺭﻩﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻭﻯ »ﺧﺒﺮ« ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺳــﭙﺲ ﺣﻨﺎﺯﺭﭼﻮﺑﻪ ﺍﻋــﻼﻡ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻘــﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈــﻢ ﺍﺛــﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸﻢ ﻧﻤﻰﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻭ ...ﻭ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻫﻤﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ، »ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ« ﺑﺎ ﺟﺎﺑﺠﺎﺋﻰ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻬﻴﺞ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﺗﺎ ﻧﺎﻣــﺔ »ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ« ﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻴﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺷﺪ. ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﻣﻔﻠﻮﻙ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺓ ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻟﺐ ﺗﺮ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻭﺑﺎﺷﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑــﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻔﺘﻀﺢ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ، ﻣﻬﺮﺭﻭﺭﺯﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﺑﻨﻰﺻﺪﺭ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﮔﻮﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﻓﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﻰﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺗﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺧﺎﻣﻨــﻪﺍﻯ ،ﻭ ﭘﺮﺗﺎﺏ ﻭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰﺍﺵ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺳــﻨﮕﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﻭﺩﺳﺘﺔ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻯ ﻭ ﻛﺮﻭﺑﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ! ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﻣﺼﻠﺤــﻰ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺩﻳﮕــﺮ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺟﻤﻜــﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻴﭽﻜﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﻼﻑﺍﺵ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﺩﻭﻫﺎﻯ ﺳــﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﻛﺬﺍ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﻣﻰﮔﻴــﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺳــﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﺯﺩﻩ ،ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻰﺗــﺎﺯﺩ؛ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﮔﺴﺴــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﺯﺩﻩ ،ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺄﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺄﻣﻴﻦ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻣﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ »ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻚ« ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ؛ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻚ ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ ،ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻚ ﻣﺼﻠﺤــﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠــﻰ» ،ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻚ ﻗــﺪﺭﺕ!« ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻚ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻧﻜﻪ ﻃﻰ ﺳﺪﺓ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ،ﺟﻬﺖ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺗﻘــﺪﺱ ﻭ »ﺳــﻨﮕﺮ ﺣﻖ« ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧــﻮﺩ ،ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﺳــﺘﻴﺰ »ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﺷــﻜﻨﻰ«» ،ﺍﺑﻬﺎﻡ« ﻭ »ﺍﺭﻋــﺎﺏ« ﺗﻐﺬﻳﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛــﺮﺩ ،ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﺎ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺑــﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻭﺍﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺮﺩﺟﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺷﺮﻳﻒ ﺳــﺎﻳﺖ »ﻣﻬﺮﻧﻴﻮﺯ«، ﻛﻪ ﺳــﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﺳــﻮﺯﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ،ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ
ﺳــﻮﺯﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺘﺎﺏﻫﺎ ﺑﺨﺸﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ »ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ« ،ﺧﺒﺮ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻮﺛﻖ ﺳــﻮﺯﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻌﻜﺲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ! ﺑﻠﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺮﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﭽــﻮﻥ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ »ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ« ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ، ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺳﻮﺯﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺤﻜﻮﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﻭﺍﻥ ﺧﺮﺩﺟــﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺖ. ﻭﻳﮋﮔــﻰ ﻛﺎﺭﻭﺍﻥ ﺧﺮﺩﺟــﺎﻝ »ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﻛﻠﻤﻪ« ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ »ﺷــﻌﺎﺭ ﭘﻮچ« ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺷــﻌﺎﺭ ﭘﻮچ ،ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ »ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﻼﻝ ،ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ« ﻓﺮﻳﺒﻨــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻰ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠــﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺳــﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺣﺘﻰ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺷــﻮﺕ ﻭﭘﺮﺕﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺴﻴﺞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻭﺍﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺮﺩﺟﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺖ .ﺗﻮﻫﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﺪﺳﺎﺕ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻦ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻭﺍﻥﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﺑﺪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ! ﻣﻬﺮﻧﻴﻮﺯ ،ﻣﻮﺭﺥ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﺭﺩﻳﺒﻬﺸــﺖﻣﺎﻩ ﺳــﺎﻟﺠﺎﺭﻯ ،ﺩﺭ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﻰ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻀﺤﻚ »ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻬﺮ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺩﺍﺩ« ﻣﻰﻧﻮﻳﺴــﺪ، ﻳﻚ ﺷــﻴﺦ ﺑﺤﺮﻳﻨــﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧــﺎﻡ »ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮﺍﻧﻰ« ﺿﻤﻦ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ »ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ« ﺁﺗﺶ ﺯﺩﻥ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ،ﺑﻪ ﻓﺠﺎﻳﻊ »ﺁﻝﺳــﻌﻮﺩ« ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻃﺮﺡ »ﺷﻴﻌﻪﻛﺸــﻰ« ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺧﺒــﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ! ﺑﻠــﻪ ،ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺍﻇﻬــﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮﺍﻧــﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺘﻤﺎً ﺣﺎﻝﻭﺍﺣــﻮﺍﻝﺍﺵ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ »ﺁﻝﺧﻠﻴﻔﻪ« ﺳــﻨﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻫﻤﻪ ﺷﻴﻌﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎً ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭ ﺧﻂ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻴﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻣﻮﺱ ﺷﻴﭙﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺰﺧﺮﻓﺎﺕ ﻣﻼﻳﺎﻥ ،ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺗﺄﺋﻴﺪ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻧﺎﺗﻮ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻦ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﻫﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ »ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ« ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨــﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮ» ،ﺷــﻴﻌﻪ« ﺑــﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﷲ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻰ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻣﻰ ﺟﺎﻧﺸــﻴﻦ ﺩﺟﺎﻝﺍﺵ ،ﻋﻠﻰﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﺴــﺖ! ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺍﻳﻦﻫﺎ »ﭘﻴﺶﻓﺮﺽ« ﻭﺍژﺓ ﺷــﻴﻌﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﻗﺮﺍﺋﺖ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻣﺪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ. ﺍﻣــﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺸــﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﻣﻮﺛﻖ» ،ﻣﻬﺮﻧﻴــﻮﺯ« ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﺑﻠﻬﺎﻧﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻤﺎﺵ ﺷﻴﻌﻪ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻣﻼﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﭘﻴﺸــﺔ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ،ﭘﻔﻴﻮﺯ ﻭ ﭘﺪﺭﺳــﻮﺧﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺷــﺎﺭﻻﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻼﻫﺖ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﺑــﺮﺩﻩ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺳــﻮ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳــﺮ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺁﺗﺶ
ﺯﺩﻥ ﻗــﺮﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺗــﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﻧﺘﺎژ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ، ﺑﺎ ﺗﺮﻫﺎﺕﺍﺵ ﻣﺴــﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ »ﻏﻴﺮﺷــﻴﻌﻪ« ﺭﺍ ﺩﺷــﻤﻦ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﻣﻰﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻧﺪ! ﺑــﻪ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﻣﻬﺮﻧﻴﻮﺯ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮﺍﻧــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻢ ﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺟﻤﻜــﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺰﺧﺮﻓﺎﺗﻰ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ،ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻛﺬﺍ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨــﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺴــﻴﺞ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﺵ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻭ ﺑــﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺧﺮﺩﺟﺎﻝ ﻣﻔﺼﻠﻰ ﺑــﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻧــﺪ .ﻛﺎﺭﻭﺍﻥ ﺧﺮﺩﺟــﺎﻝ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻼﻳﺎﻥ ﺣﻜﻢ »ﻛﺎﺭﻧــﺎﻭﺍﻝ ﺭﻳﻮ« ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺯﻳــﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﻭﺍﻥ ﺧﺮﺩﺟﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﻭ ﺭﻗﺺ ﻭ ﺟﺸــﻦ ﻭ ﺷﺎﺩﻯ ﺧﺒﺮﻯ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ؛ ﻣﺸــﺘﻰ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﺵ ﻣﻮﻧﺚ ﻭ ﻣﺬﻛــﺮ ﺑﺎ ﭼﺎﺩﺭ ﻭ ﺭﻳــﺶ ،ﺟﻬﺖ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻬﻴﻨﻪ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﻋﺮﺑﺪﻩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﺸﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺒﻴﻦ! ﺑﻠﻪ »ﺧﻼﻳﻖ ﺭﺍ ﺳــﻼﻳﻖ ،ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ« ،ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺳﻼﻳﻖ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻤﺎﺵ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻭﺍﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﻣﻰﭘﺴــﻨﺪﻧﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻬﺮﻧﻴــﻮﺯ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ »ﻋﺎﻟﻢ ﺑﺤﺮﻳﻨﻰ« ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺠﺎﻳﻊ »ﺁﻝﺳﻌﻮﺩ« ﻭ ﺩﻳﻜﺘﺎﺗﻮﺭﻯ »ﺁﻝﺧﻠﻴﻔــﻪ« ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻗــﻢ ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ. ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻴــﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺟــﻊ ﻗﻢ ﺑــﺎ ﺩﻳﻜﺘﺎﺗــﻮﺭﻯ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻭ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﻜﺘﺎﺗﻮﺭﻯ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺵﺷــﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺁﻳــﺪ .ﺑﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ،ﺷــﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺮﻳﻦ »ﺍﻣﻨﻴــﺖ« ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧــﺪ! ﻭﻟﻰ ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ »ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ« ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻣــﻮﺱ »ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮﺍﻧــﻰ« ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻰ ﺑــﺎ ﻧﻈﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋــﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ؛ »ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ« ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺑﺮﭘﺎﺋﻰ ﻣﺮﺍﺳــﻢ ﺭﻭﺿﻪ ﻭ ﺯﻭﺯﻩ: »]ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮﺍﻧﻰ[ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺠﺎﻳﻊ ﺁﻝﺳﻌﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻝﺧﻠﻴﻔﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺮﻳﻦ ،ﺍﺯ ﺁﺗﺶ ﺯﺩﻥ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ][...ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺩﺍﺩ ]ﻭ ﮔﻔــﺖ[ ﺁﻝﺧﻠﻴﻔﻪ ] [...ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﻓﺮﺻﺘﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ] [...ﺷﻴﻌﻪﻛﺸــﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﻴﻨﺪﺍﺯﺩ ] [...ﻫﻴﭻ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺤﺮﻳﻦ ] [...ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ][...ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﺓ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻯ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﻧﮕﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ]«[...
ﭼﻘــﺪﺭ ﺑﺤﺮﻳــﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺷــﺒﺎﻫﺖ ﻳﺎﻓﺘــﻪ! ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻪ ﺁﻝﺧﻠﻴﻔﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺁﻝﺳﻌﻮﺩ ،ﻓﻘﻂ ﺁﻝﺍﻭﺑﺎﺵ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ! ﺑﺰﻭﺩﻯ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺩﻳﺪ ،ﺑــﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺷــﺎﻩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖﺍﺵ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻫﻰ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺷﺒﺎﻫﺖ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ؛ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﭘﻮﺷﺎﻟﻰ ﻭ ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﻫﻮﻳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺎﻩ ﻗﺸــﺮﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ،ﺑﻌﻀﻰ ﺍﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﻭ ﻗﺸــﺮﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﻣﻰ ،ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﭘﻴﺸــﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎً ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺮﺍﺩﻋﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﺑﺎ »ﺷﭙﻴﮕﻞ« ﮔﻔﺘﻪ، »ﻗﻮﻣﻰ« ﻫﻢ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷــﺪ .ﺗﺮﺟﻤﺔ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻏﻠﻂﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ» ،ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ؛ ﻧﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺣﻞﺍﺗﻤﻰ« ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻳﺖ »ﭘﻴﻚﻧﺖ« ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ. »ﺷــﭙﻴﮕﻞ« ﺍﺯ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺮﺍﺩﻋﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺎء ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ »ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ« ﺩﺳﺖ ﻧﺸــﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩﺑﺮﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺑــﺎﻥﺍﺵ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻨﮕــﻪ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ! ﭘﺮﻭﭘﺎﮔﺎﻧﺪ »ﺷﭙﻴﮕﻞ« ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﺔ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ »ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ« ﺍﺯ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻳﺸــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﺴــﺖ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﺔ ﺁﻧﮕﻠﻮﺳﺎﻛﺴــﻮﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻬﺎﺟــﻢ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﻭ ﺳــﭙﺲ ﻛﻮﺩﺗــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ! ﺣﺎﻝ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓﺍﻓﺮﻭﺯﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺭﻓﺘــﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﺔ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﻯ ﺳــﺒﺰ ﻫﻴﺰﺍﻛﺴﻠﻨﺴﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﺭﻭﺑﺮﻭ ﺷﺪﻩ» ،ﺷﭙﻴﮕﻞ«، ﺷﻴﭙﻮﺭ ﻣﻌﺘﺒﺮ ﺍﺳﻼﻡﭘﺮﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞﻧﻮﺍﺯ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﻫﺎﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺯﺑــﺎﻥ ﭘــﺎﺩﻭﻯ ﻣﺼــﺮﻯ ﻳﺎﻧﻜﻰﻫﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﺗــﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺗﻮﺣﺶ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ! ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﺔ »ﺷــﭙﻴﮕﻞ« ﺍﺯ ﺯﺑــﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺮﺍﺩﻋﻰ ﻫﻤﺰﻣــﺎﻥ ﭼﻨﺪ ﭘﻴﺎﻡ ﮔﻮﺳــﺎﻟﻪﻓﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺍﺭﺳــﺎﻝ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﻧﺨﺴــﺖ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺰﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ؛ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺩﻳﺪﻩﺍﻳﺪ ﻛﺴﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻴﺮﻩﺧﻮﺍﺭﺵ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻧﻈﺮ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ؟! ﭘﻴﺎﻡ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺷــﭙﻴﮕﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ،ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﭙﺬﻳﺮﻓﺖ ،ﺣﺎﻝ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 2003ﻣﺤﻤــﺪ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﺣﻞ »ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ« ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﺟﺮﺝ ﺑﻮﺵ ﻧﭙﺬﻳﺮﻓﺖ:
»ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 2003ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫــﺎ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻧــﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺟﻮﺭﺝ ﺑﻮﺵ ﻧﻤﻰﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ [...] 2010ﻛﻪ ﭘﺮﺯﻳﺪﻧﺖ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺩﺳــﺘﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺩﺭﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎ ] [...ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺸﺮﺩﻥ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺍﻭ ﻧﺸﺪﻧﺪ]«[... ﺍﺯ ﺗﺮﻫــﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺮﺍﺩﻋﻰ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺑــﺮ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺧﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎﻯ 11ﺳــﭙﺘﺎﻣﺒﺮ ،2001ﺟﻬــﺎﻥ ﻫﻴــﭻ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﻧﻜــﺮﺩﻩ! ﺣﺎﻝ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﺮﻏﻢ ﺧﻔﻘﺎﻥ ﻣﻔﺴــﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺤﻘﻘﺎﻥ ﺳﺮﺷــﻨﺎﺱ ﻏﺮﺏ، ﺗﺨﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﺮﺝﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻴﻮﻳﻮﺭﻙ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﺔ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻩ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺟﺮﺝ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺮ ﺑﻮﺵ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﺨﺸﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ »ﻛﻼﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ« ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ .ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺮﺍﻧﺘﺰ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺷــﺘﺎﺑﺰﺩﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺑﻴﻞ ﻛﻠﻴﻨﺘﻦ ﻭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻯ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﺕ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺗﻰ »ﺍﻝﮔﻮﺭ« ﺑﻴﻨﺪﺍﺯﻳﻢ. ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻛﻠﻴﻨﺘﻦﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻼﻫﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ »ﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻭﺍﺗﺮﺯ« ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷــﺪ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻧﻔﺮ »ﺧﻮﺩﻛﺸﻰ« ﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ،ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻮﻧﻴﻜﺎ ﻟﻮﻳﻨﺴﻜﻰ ،ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻴﻞ ﻛﻠﻴﻨﺘﻦ ﺍﺯ »ﺍﻝﮔﻮﺭ« ﺩﺭ ﺣﻜــﻢ ﺧﻨﺠــﺮ ﺯﺩﻥ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺸــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻛﺸــﻤﻜﺶ »ﺍﻝﮔﻮﺭ« ﻭ ﺟﺮﺝ ﺑﻮﺵ ﺑﺮ ﺳــﺮ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻫﻢ ﻛﺸﺎﻛﺶ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺤﻔﻞ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻰ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ »ﺟﻨﮓ ﺳﺮﺩ«، ﻭ ﺩﻭﻣﻰ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻣﺤﻔﻞ ﺑﻮﺵ ﻣﺪﺍﻓﻊ »ﺟﻨﮓ ﮔﺮﻡ« ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻤﻜﺶ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻛﺬﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺩﻭ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻯ ﻣﺴــﺎﻓﺮﺑﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﺔ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻫﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺳﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﻮﻳﻮﺭﻙ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺣﻤﻠــﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ؛ ﺗﻬﺎﺟﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻴﻮﻳﻮﺭﻙ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺳــﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻯ ﻣﺴــﺎﻓﺮﺑﺮﻯ ﻃﺮﺣﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ؛ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺤﻘﻘﺎﻥ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻳﻚ ﺻﺪﺍ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺧﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎﻯ 11ﺳــﭙﺘﺎﻣﺒﺮ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻏﺎﻓﻠﮕﻴﺮ ﻛﺮﺩ! ﻭﻟﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﺋﻴﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﻌﻀﻰﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻤﻼﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻏﺎﻓﻠﮕﻴﺮ ﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ. ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ 17ژﻭﺋﻴﻪ ،1996ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ 747ﺷﺮﻛﺖ »ﺗﻰ .ﺩﺑﻠﻴﻮ. ﺍﻯ« ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻴﻮﻳﻮﺭﻙ ﻋﺎﺯﻡ ﭘﺎﺭﻳﺲ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺁﺳﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻔﺠﺮ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺏﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻴﻮﻳﻮﺭﻙ ﺳــﻘﻮﻁ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺳﺮﻧﺸــﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﻛﺸــﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻧﺪﺍﺩ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺕ
ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻞ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣــﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﻴــﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ 31 ﺍﻛﺘﺒﺮ 1999ﻳﻚ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ 767ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﺋﻰ ﻣﺼﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺧﺎﺳــﺘﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻓــﺮﻭﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﻧﻴﻮﻳﻮﺭﻙ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﺎﻉ 10ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﺘﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺏ ﺳﻘﻮﻁ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻘﻮﻁ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺧﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﺸﻰ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ! ﺳــﻘﻮﻁ ﻣﺸــﻜﻮﻙ ﺩﻭ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻯ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺧﺎﺳــﺘﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﻧﻴﻮﻳﻮﺭﻙ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻃــﺮﺡ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻤﺎﻧﻌﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻫﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻏﻠﻂ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ. ﺩﺭ ﻫــﺮ ﺣــﺎﻝ ﺭﺧﺪﺍﺩﻫــﺎﻯ 11ﺳــﭙﺘﺎﻣﺒﺮ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻋــﺎﺩﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻏﺎﻓﻠﮕﻴــﺮ ﻛــﺮﺩ ،ﻭ ﻣﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻋﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﭽــﻮﻥ ﺟــﺮﺝ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺮ ﺑﻮﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳــﺎﻥ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴــﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﻊ ﻧﻴﻮﻳــﻮﺭﻙ ﺣﻴﺮﺕ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺣــﺎﻝ ﭘﺮﺍﻧﺘﺰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺑﻨﺪﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻣﻰﮔﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﺔ ﺷــﭙﻴﮕﻞ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺮﺍﺩﻋﻰ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﭘﺮﻭﭘﺎﮔﺎﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﺔ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻗﺪﺭﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺿﺪﻳﺖ ﺩﺭﻭﻏﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﭘﻮﺷﺎﻟﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺏﺍﺵ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻭﺍژﮔﻮﻥﻧﻤﺎﺋﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺷﭙﻴﮕﻞ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﺳﺎﻳﺖ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮﻓﺮﺩﺍ ،ﻣﻮﺭﺥ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﺭﺩﻳﺒﻬﺸﺖﻣﺎﻩ ﺳــﺎﻟﺠﺎﺭﻯ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﻄﻠﺒﻰ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ« ،ﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪﺭﻭ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ! ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺣﻘﻨﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﺮﻫﺎﺗﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ، ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮﻓﺮﺩﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺘﻦ »ﻓﺎﺭﻳﻦ ﭘﺎﻟﻴﺴﻰ« ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﺔ ﻛﺮﻳﻢ ﺳــﺠﺎﺩﭘﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺒﮕﻠﻮ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺑﺮﻭﺗﺮ ﺗﻮﺳــﻜﺎﻧﻮ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻞ ﺷــﺪﻩ» .ﻣﺴﺘﺮ« ﺳﺠﺎﺩﭘﻮﺭ ،ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺱ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻰ »ﻛﺎﺭﻧﮕﻰ« ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ؛ ﻣﺴﺘﺮ ﺗﻮﺳﻜﺎﻧﻮ ،ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺭﺥ ﻭ »ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰﺩﺍﻥ« ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻭ ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺒﮕﻠﻮ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﺎﻥ »ﻣﻤﺪ ﻳﻮﻧﺴــﻜﻮﻯ« ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺒﮕﻠﻮ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﻫﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﺳﻔﻨﺪﻳﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ »ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﻓﺎﺕ« ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﻰ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪ ﺍژﻩﺍﻯ ﻫﻨﺮﻧﻤﺎﺋﻰﻫﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯﺷــﺎﻥ ﻛﻒ ﺯﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮﻓﺮﺩﺍ ﻣﻰﻧﻮﻳﺴﺪ:
»ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺒﮕﻠﻮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﺮﺷــﻨﺎﺱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺮﻭﺟﺎﻥ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ]ﺍﺳﺖ[« ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮ ﺳﺮﺷــﻨﺎﺱ ﻭ ﻣﺮﻭﺝ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ،ﺗﻈﺎﻫﺮﺍﺕ ﺩﺍﺭﻭﺩﺳــﺘﺔ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﺎﻳﻌﺔ ﺗﻘﻠﺐ ،ﻭ ﺗﺠﻤﻊ ﻣﺮﺩﻣــﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳــﺶ ﻣﻬﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ »ﺑﺎﻭﺭ« ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺷــﻌﺎﺭ »ﻣﺮگ ﺑﺮ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ« ﺑﻪ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻢ ﺁﻣﻴﺨﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺻﻠﺢ ﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ »ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺳــﺒﺰ« ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪ: »ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ﻃﻠﺐ ﻫﻴﭽﮕﺎﻩ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥﻫﺎ ﻣﻌﺘﺮﺽ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩ]«[... ﻋﺠﺐ! ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺘﺪﻻﻻﺕ »ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻰ« ﺣﺘﻤﺎً ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﷲ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖﻃﻠﺐ ﻧﻤﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﺷﻮﺩ! ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺎﻣﺪﻧﺪ! ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﭘﺎﺳﺦﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺮﺩﻣﻨﺪﺍﻧﺔ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺒﮕﻠــﻮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻗﺖ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺩﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺑﻠﻪ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺷــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍژﮔﻮﻥﻧﻤﺎﺋﻰ ﻣﺸــﻐﻮﻝﺍﻧﺪ .ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺒﮕﻠــﻮ »ﺍﺟﻤﺎﻉ« ،ﻳﻌﻨــﻰ ﻧﻔﻰ ﻓﺮﺩﻯﺍﺕ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺮﻫﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ:
»ﺗﺎﺭﻳــﺦ ﻳﻚ ﺩﺭﺱ ﻣﻬــﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻰﺩﻫــﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ] [...ﻛﻪ ﭘﺮﻫﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺸــﻮﻧﺖ ] [...ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻑ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺑﺴﻴﺞ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺳــﺎﺩﻩﺗﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ] [...ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺷﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺠﺰﻳﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ]«[... ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺒﮕﻠﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺳــﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍژﮔﺎﻥ ﭘﻮچ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺰﺧﺮﻓﺎﺕ ﺭﻭﺡﺍﷲ ﺧﻤﻴﻨــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ »ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﻛﻠﻤــﻪ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻠﻪ، ﮔﻠﻪﭘﺮﻭﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺟﻤﻊﭘﺮﺳﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﺑﺸﺮ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻣﺼﺪﺍﻕ ﺧﺸــﻮﻧﺖ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ،ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻑ ﺩﻟﺨﺴﺘﺔ »ﺳﺒﺰ« ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔــﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺸــﻮﻧﺖ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳــﺪ ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﺷــﻮﺩ! ﮔﻮﻳﺎ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺒﮕﻠــﻮ »ﺗﺎﺭﻳــﺦ« ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻜﺘﺐ ﺑﻴﺸــﺮﻣﻰ ﺭﻫﺒــﺮ ﻓﺮﺯﺍﻧﻪ ﺁﻣﻮﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﻯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺔ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺻﺎﺣﺐﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﻮﺭﺧﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ »ﺩﺭﺳﺖ« ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻦ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﺑــﻮﺩ؛ ﮔﻮﻳﺎ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺒﮕﻠﻮ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﺍ »ﺩﺭﺳﺖ« ﻣﻰﺷﻨﺎﺳﺪ!