TOTAL INTERACTIONS AT
29,6
Taps, Views and Votes Cast in Chime
KEY ENGAGEMENT METRICS
AUDIENCE INTERACTIONS
236
125
Attendees Logged-On
1,316
Average Interaction Per Attendee
Live Stream Views
839
Biography Views
TOP CONTENT INTERACTIONS
Schedule
3,479
Networking
2,062
Agenda Views
342 EDPNA Requirements Over Breakfast: Course 2 & Course 3 200 "Get to the Point": Writing a Prehearing Memo that Gets the ALJ's Attention, Presented by Lindsay Osterhout
Session
1,838
Speakers
1,351
160 Representative Roundtables: Exploring a Wide Range of Relevant Topics, Virtually and In-Person 159 Keynote: Slow Your Roll: Mindfulness for Fast Times, presented by Greg Graber
Ask A Question
1,141
Exh
Live Polling
1,
1,116
134 Keynote: The Current State of Disability Representation 117 Ethics: What Would You Do? Presented by Professor Robert Rains Is Success at the Appeals Council 110 Possible? presented by Sarah Bohr and Linda Cosme
Live Stream Unique Vie
117
General S
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF DISABILITY REPRESENTATIVES
FIRST QUARTER 2021
IN THIS ISSUE:
3
A NOTE FROM THE PRESIDENT
4
CONFERENCE WRAP
5
101 WAYS TO BUILD A CONVINCING CASE
6
MEMBER OF THE YEAR
7
GET TO THE POINT
8
ROUNDTABLE BIGGEST TAKEAWAY
10
2022 PR SAVE THE DATE
11
SSA UPDATE
CONTENTS
NADR NEWSLETTER FIRST QUARTER 2021
IN THIS ISSUE 3
4
A NOTE FROM THE PRESIDENT CONFERENCE WRAP
5
101 WAYS TO BUILD A CONVINCING CASE
6
MEMBER OF THE YEAR
7
GET TO THE POINT
8
ROUNDTABLE BIGGEST TAKEAWAY
10
2022 PR SAVE THE DATE
11
SSA UPDATE
A NOTE FROM THE PRESIDENT of my time on the Board, I am also amazed at the challenges that NADR has faced over the past year or so and the strength and resilience of our organization. Despite all of the challenges, the organization did not waiver from our mission. I am proud to conclude that this current Board of Directors (and every other Board that I served on) has met every challenge with honest effort and hopefully transparency. To their credit, we are on solid financial ground and have a very strong leadership group in place. Our administrative staff continues to provide outstanding management and guidance to the Board’s efforts. I challenge each one of you to increase your participation in NADR activities. You owe it to yourself to become involved in the efforts of NADR.
Greetings ColleaguesIt seems that we all do a lot of reflecting back these days. So now, I am reflecting back on our recent hybrid conference. I continue to be elated and amazed over the total experience but disappointed that many of you were not able to share in the in-person experience. From my perspective, the event was mostly flawless, save a couple of technical issues that are bound to occur in any new format. Ultimately, I believe that virtual/hybrid conferences are here to stay. But, the opportunity to have a conversation, dinner, lunch or adult beverage with your colleagues is just beyond invaluable. Paraphrasing a statement from one of our high-profile members: We are the best bunch of misfits in the world…we come from various backgrounds with one mission; to provide our clients the very best representation. Sharing these experiences, making connections and learning about the lives of other members is very rewarding. The focus of our current Board has been (and continues to be) to engage members at every opportunity on every level. Although the administrative staff and social media folks have made outstanding efforts (the cocktail hour/concert was amazing and the trivia night was loads of fun) in this arena, seeing someone in person, takes that engagement to another level. I am not extremely social, but being with the NADR group is a unique and fulfilling experience. So, please make it a goal to attend the next NADR events in person. The St. Petersburg Networking Event and the Puerto Rico Conference will be epic. In the words of our past presidents: “Go NADR” - “Be NADR”!
Although, you’ll probably see one more quarterly message from me…Thanks for the memories. Greg Cates NADR President
Now, as I reflect back on the winding down NADR NEWS
3
FIRST QUARTER 2021
CONFERENCE WRAP EVA SIRMAN Baltimore or online, you may purchase course content from the conference HERE.
Our first ever Hybrid Conference is in the books! Thank you to the Conference Committee for helping put forth some great ideas and helping me walk through all the logistics of a half-virtual, half in-person conference during a global pandemic. Thank you to each and every NADR member who participated. I appreciate your patience and your willingness to try something new.
A picture is worth 1,000 words! I’ll leave you with this infographic that summarizes all the highlights of the week. See you in St. Pete!
Through out this issue we are answering the leftover questions from the conference sessions. We hope you’ll find these answers helpful. If you were unable to join us in
Eva Sirman, CAE NADR Association Manager
TOTAL INTERACTIONS AT NADR 2021
29,615
Taps, Views and Votes Cast in Chime Live Event App
KEY ENGAGEMENT METRICS
125
Attendees Logged-On
AUDIENCE INTERACTIONS
236
1,316
Average Interaction Per Attendee
Live Stream Views
839
Biography Views
56
Social Posts
TOP CONTENT INTERACTIONS
Schedule
3,479
Networking
2,062
Agenda Views 342 EDPNA Requirements Over Breakfast: Course 2 & Course 3 200 "Get to the Point": Writing a Prehearing Memo that Gets the ALJ's Attention, Presented by Lindsay Osterhout
NADR NEWS
Session
1,838
Speakers
1,351
160 Representative Roundtables: Exploring a Wide Range of Relevant Topics, Virtually and In-Person 159 Keynote: Slow Your Roll: Mindfulness for Fast Times, presented by Greg Graber
Ask A Question
1,141
Live Polling
1,116
134 Keynote: The Current State of Disability Representation 117 Ethics: What Would You Do? Presented by Professor Robert Rains Is Success at the Appeals Council 110 Possible? presented by Sarah Bohr and Linda Cosme
4
Exhibit Hall
1,054
Live Stream Unique Views
117
General Session
FIRST QUARTER 2021
101 WAYS TO BUILD A CONVINCING CASE
What about claimants who do not use Western medicine? Like a legal permanent resident alien from Peru who is only using medicinal teas and marijuana? Answer to question 1: It is important for claimants to get treatment from acceptable medical sources. You have to have medically determinable severe impairments and diagnoses from acceptable sources. Marijuana is illegal on the federal level and can be problematic depending on the judge and also the impairments alleged (mental impairments in particular because marijuana affects a person’s cognitive functioning). In some states it is a non-issue for judges with the advancement of marijuana legalization/ laws but this varies geographically. However, if they have a medical marijuana card that usually requires a doctor to sign off on so make sure you obtain that documentation in regions that are not yet on board with acceptance to offset the concern and potential hazard to your case. How do you know your judges? Is there a website giving their judicial habits? Answer to question 2: You know your judges by going in front of them on multiple occasions, but when it’s a judge you haven’t had before, ask your NADR friends on the Talklist Forum for feedback. I also always look at the ALJ’s approval and denial statistics which is public information. That can be found at ALJ Disposition Data | Public Data Files (ssa.gov) Does amending the alleged onset date effect the amount of the ongoing monthly benefit that the claimant would get? Answer to question 3: Amending the onset date usually doesn’t affect the monthly benefit amount unless it results in Title II benefits not being available due to an expired DLI and SSI being the only benefit for which the person is eligible. How do you get post-AOD earnings? Answer to question 4: Post AOD earnings are on paystubs or check stubs from STD/LTD companies. Your client should have them, but if not, he/she can request them from the employer or insurance company. You want something that shows that the earnings were for accrued paid time off, sick leave, bonuses or anything else other than actual work performed so you can demonstrate it wasn’t SGA. Keep your eyes on DEQY/NDNH queries within the ERE file. Earnings are checked and updated quarterly typically. A role of many clerks at the OHO level is to pull these reports often. Check these reports and with your client often on returning to work (even if only a little) regularly so you are not blindsided. What to do when you can’t get the MSS/RFC report completed by physician? Answer to question 5: Have your clients take the MSS/RFC to the provider in person. It’s much harder for them to deny a person when they are face-to-face. You can’t force a provider to complete the form, but this increases your chances. Also remember you are an advocate first herein and sometimes calling and/or sending a fax cover letter explaining the importance of such forms can help. Try to speak with a live person like the nurse to clarify the need for forms without ever being pushy or coercive as this compromises your case. Many doctors oppose out of fear given the clamp down on fraudulent medical sources and supporting evidence by the agency. Empathize with them and look for other ways to beef up the file. NADR NEWS
5
FIRST QUARTER 2021
NADR NEWS
6
FIRST QUARTER 2021
GET TO THE POINT...
What are your thoughts on a post-hearing brief/memo? Do you only submit one when there are issues w/ VE testimony or a related problem that arose in the hearing? Answer to Question 1: I only submit a post hearing memo when an issue has arisen at the hearing or I have a 50+ claimant where a post vocational report can be helpful. Resubmitting your prehearing argument post hearing seems duplicative. I recently learned that in my area arguing a listing often results in the appointment of a medical expert to review the file...I of course learned this the hard way. Anyone else experience this? Answer to Question 2: I may need more info on your specific situation on that case. If you submitted a Listing argument close to the hearing, they generally cannot find an ME that quick. Was it via interrogatories? I could see this happening if the Listing argument is submitted early before a hearing is scheduled as an OTR. Technically the ALJ has the authority to make the medically meets listing finding, a ME is only needed for a medically equals finding. What are some specific phrases to avoid that you’ve seen used frequently? Answer to Question 3: No specific phrase comes to mind. Do you still put the 5-step process in the memo? Answer to Question 4: I do not explicitly put the 5-step process in the memo. The information in the memo implicitly addresses the 5 steps.
NADR NEWS
7
FIRST QUARTER 2021
REPRESENTATIVE ROUNDTABLE BIGGEST TAKEAWAYS Greg Cates: “That it worked!” He commented that the number of rules, restrictions and guidelines we needed to navigate to make an in-person conference happen was astronomical and the fact that Eva and NADR pulled it off is truly nothing short of unbelievable. He went on to make (to me) a profound statement that social interaction is not 2D, we give and receive information on all levels in person as humans, and that was why it was important to push forward with the hybrid format. Another comment was that made was appreciation for the Keynote Speaker, Greg Graber. A comment was made that on a base level we (SSD reps) are givers, and there was value in being reminded to take care of oneself and be mindful. Unanswered Questions: Our group missed the opportunity to discuss small business issues, like getting real feedback and input on things like phone systems and case management software, etc. We also missed the sessions about marketing, but that was discussed later in this breakout session. Microsoft Teams: Everyone agreed the training went fine but no one had used it in real life yet. It was agreed that the platform, or something similar is likely to stay because of the savings in real estate, so we’ll have to figure it out. Carletta Griffin said she’s used it in other settings (she’s an educator) and did not have any complaints. I told her we would all call her with questions once things were really rolling! Electronic Access – good/bad: Bad Signature/DocuSign: Mostly Good – varies by region/geography, so definitely some bad out there too (mostly FOs still requiring wet signatures in conjunction with the digital signature) Telephone Hearings/Scheduling: Again, varies by region/geography. Mostly they schedule what they want, when they want and you deal with it however it works in your area. Payment Issues: This was another issue that seemed to have wildly different answers depending on location. Payments have been few and far between and it’s been difficult to follow up. Some people only have success with the Attorney Rep Line, others never do. We compared notes about Payment Center vs Atty Rep # and the only consensus was that Birmingham was awful, until we met with the whole group and Sandy Fambrough said she didn’t have a problem with them. VE Cross: This was a good discussion with Sarah Bohr, Greg Cates, Chris Mazzulli and others chiming in. Some key points were: • Break down RFCs by individual limitation instead of just lumping everything together; mild mental limitation precludes skilled work, sometimes semi-skilled work NADR NEWS
8
FORTH QUARTER 2020
REPRESENTATIVE ROUNDTABLE BIGGEST TAKEAWAYS (CONTINUED) • Ask how jobs are actually performed – everything is a composite job, make the VE prove it. Fill in the chip on your shoulder and use the expert to your advantage. • Be aware of SGA level and composite jobs - make sure the ALJ defines it, make sure it’s SGA not an Unsuccessful Work Attempt (not SGA), or that the skill level was actually achieved • Ask, “which of these limitations are work preclusive?” • BLS is reporting that there are fewer and fewer unskilled jobs – this will be very interesting if/when its published. It is believed the site has been pulled b/c they are not showing the “expected” information and numbers • Don’t ask questions you don’t know the answer to FDC Set Up: Having a good VE cross CM Software: Prevail; Needles; homemade Access databases Intake/Case Theory: These are the same – interview a person and build a case theory in the 1st phone call. You have 3 options: 1. Listing 2. GRIDS 3. Step 5 Free/Inexpensive Marketing Tips: I want to say that our group’s creativity is NOT solely limited to musical prowess. There were some hysterical, effective and creative ideas to market: Shay Guess uses his personal FB page to post situations that appeal to (primarily) his healthcare provider friends/family; he said he will get a handful of IM messages, half of which produce leads each post. The man is a wordsmith! If you are not good at FB shaming your friends/ colleagues into referring leads, you can post informational topics, offer resources. You can convert potential leads by offering information, for example a printed list of free clinics in the area. Medical records make a case! I think it was Kelly Blad (I could be wrong) who said hospitals and places indigent claimants go can be great referral sources. Offer education to the workers so they learn what questions and issues you can help with. Ask if you can put out biz cards, brochures, a flyer, whatever, host an educational seminar, etc. Carletta Griffin has a decal on her truck and she drives through specific neighborhoods on a regular basis, slowly. She also parks in the SSA parking lot to “bring her husband lunch” so people will see her truck decal. Shay Guess will occasionally make loud, although perhaps not 100% authentic phone calls, in the FO office so people will know what he does and reports usually a few people will follow him out of the office to get his name/card. Synopsis Provided by Shirley Jenks, NADR Talklist Moderator and In-Person Conference Attendee NADR NEWS
9
FIRST QUARTER 2021s
FEDERAL COURT PRACTICE
Disability Law Is All We Do! • NATIONWIDE APPEALS • FEDERAL COURT • APPEALS COUNCIL • LONG-TERM DISABILITY
CHECK US OUT ON THE WEB OR CALL US TODAY 1-888-WIN-SSDI | WWW.WINDISABILITY.COM 250 S CLINTON ST. STE 210 SYRACUSE, NY 13202
NADR NEWS
10
FIRST QUARTER 2021
SSA UPDATE
Follow-up Questions & Answers 1. Should the majority of cases be heard within our regional OHO? Out of the last 50 hearings, I estimate that we have had only 8-10 in our local OHO. We can hear cases remotely using telephone or video technology; therefore, we are able to balance workloads to ensure claimants have their case heard timely regardless of location. If a home hearing office has the capacity to hear a case, we will assign the case to that office. If, however, the home hearing office has a large number of receipts and/or large number of cases awaiting a hearing, we can transfer the case to another office with more hearing capacity to provide claimants with a more expedient hearing and optimal customer service. 2. Will there still be phone hearings and online hearings when in-person hearings resume? Yes, we expect to maintain these options for the foreseeable future. Online video hearings and telephone hearings are safe and convenient options that allow for social distancing, provide greater scheduling flexibility, and allows us to serve claimants and representatives where they are. 3. You noted that a representative should talk to the chief judge if an ALJ is putting time limits on hearings. What if the chief judge is the one doing this? You should contact the Regional Chief ALJ if the Hearing Office Chief ALJ is the subject of a complaint. 4. What can be done to accommodate claimants who have limited access to computers for video hearings? One example is a claimant who has no voice box and is unable to speak via telephone. For individuals with limited access to the equipment needed to participate in an online video hearing, at this time we offer the option to appear at the hearing by telephone. A represented claimant or other party may also appear at the representative’s office for an online video hearing, using the representative’s equipment. If neither telephone nor online video is an option, we will wait to schedule the hearing, or postpone it if already scheduled, until our offices reopen. For individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing, the individual may connect to a telephone hearing via Video Relay Services, which allows the individual to communicate with an American Sign Language (ASL) interpreter using video conferencing equipment while the interpreter communicates what is signed by telephone. If speech-to-text is preferred, the individual can join the hearing by Telecommunications Relay Services (TRS). We can schedule ASL interpreters to appear at an online video hearing using Microsoft Teams. NADR NEWS
11
FIRST QUARTER 2021
SSA UPDATE (CONTINUED)
As for the example you provided, we will consider the specific challenges of each case. For instance, if a claimant who has no voice box is scheduled to appear at a hearing by telephone, the ALJ assigned to the case could allow the claimant to submit a written statement in lieu of oral testimony. We also note that the representative may consider filing a request for a decision on-the-record, if the claimant meets a listing, e.g., 2.09 Loss of Speech. 5. Can the 10 attempts to log into an ERE folder be removed so we are not locked out of our account? Once we are locked out, you have to wait two weeks to get back in. A representative’s account is suspended when they have attempted to access 10 SSNs in a 24hour period for which they are not the representative of record (i.e., cases where their 1696 has not been processed). This security function cannot be disabled. Representatives may call the Social Security Administration at 1-866-691-3061 to verify their identity and have their account access immediately restored. A waiting period is not required. 6. Is there a focus in reducing OAO wait times as well? Yes. In FY18, the Appeals Council’s (AC’s) average processing time (APT) was 256 days. In FY19, APT decreased to 246 days. Although APT increased to 264 days in FY20, the AC’s current APT is 163 days and it continues to work toward a goal processing time of 150 days or less.
NADR NEWS
12
FIRST QUARTER 2021
NADR NEWS
13
FORTH QUARTER 2020
Sarah Bohr’s Pocket Guide TE to Social Security Disability Law - 6th Edition
Sarah Bohr’s Pocket Guide to Key Social Security Rulings - 12th Edition
ONLY
105
$
DOWNLOADABLE VERSION
NEW 2020 EDITION!
• Provides an overview of key provisions of Social Security disability law, including the 2017 regulations abolishing the treating physician rule & expanding acceptable medical sources • Includes a discussion of the key Rulings through SSR 20-01p, including SSR 19-2p regarding obesity, SSR 19-4p regarding headaches, and SSR 20-01p regarding education • NEW sections on "Headaches" and "Fraud and Similar Fault Redeterminations" and updated sections on education, obesity and administrative procedural issues • Includes a detailed discussion of the "Lifetime Commitment to a Field of Work" exception to the Grids
T HAPPEALS CI R CUI WINNING I T Y CA COUNCILCUR ARGUMENTS 9TH016 EDITION UP D A
• Annotates 88 key Social Security Rulings used in Social Security disability cases through new SSR 20-01p addressing education • Provides a synopsis of key rulings dating back to 1968 • Includes, for the first time, a brief summary of all active Acquiescence Rulings by circuit • Includes helpful charts: Chart of Rulings by Subject Area, Chart of Acquiescence Rulings by Circuit and Child's SSI Charts by Domains • Highlights which rulings were repealed and date of repeal • A handy guide to take to hearings and use when writing arguments
ONLY ELEVENTH CIRCUIT L E VE NT H CI R CUI T SOCI AL $ E
ONLY
SOCIALSE SECURITY CUR I T Y CASES CASE S 2020 UPDATE 2016 UP D E
DOWNLOADABLE VERSION
2019 UPDATE!
• NEW section containing Appeals Council and federal court remand charts by topic, Agency Memoranda, Appeals Council Writing Tips, and more! • Includes over 200 PAGES of updated pattern arguments by topic • Addresses recent regulatory changes, key rulings & updates HALLEX cites • Updates AC letter briefs and adds 20 new AC memoranda or briefs. • Helpful tips in writing arguments to the AC as well as to ALJs and federal courts.
105
DOWNLOADABLE VERSION
NEW 2020 EDITION!
150
$
$
ONLY
210
DOWNLOADABLE VERSION
NEW 2020 EDITION!
• Annotates over 150 new cases since the last Update! • NEW sections on EAJA fees and 406b fees • NEW! Includes key Supreme Court cases addressing Social Security and attorney fee issues • Annotates published & unpublished 11th Circuit cases and published district court cases over the past 30 years through 9-15-20 • Widely used by members of the federal judiciary in the Eleventh Circuit
NADR DISCOUNT: $10 off each book for online orders only: Use coupon code: NADR2021
Sarah Bohr’s
Pocket Gu
ide to Social Secu ty Disability Lri aw 6th Edition
’s
de to
Key So Security Rcuial lin 12TH EDIT
ION
by Sarah H. Bo hr
2337 SEMINOLE ROAD • ATLA TELEPHONE NTIC BEACH 904 246-7603 FL 32233 FACSIMILE
www.SarahBohrPub licati
Sarah Bohr
Pocket Gui
904 246-8884
ons.com
gs
WINNING AP PEALS COUNCIL AR GUMENTS 9T H EDIT IO N
ELEVENTH CI RCUIT SOCIAL SECU RITY CASES 2020 UPDATE
by Sarah H. Bohr
by Sarah H. Bohr
by Sarah H. Bo hr
2337 SEMINOL E ROAD • ATLANTIC TELEPHON E 904 246-7
603
BEACH FL
FACSIMILE
www.SarahBohrP ubli
32233
2337 SEMINOLE ROAD • ATLAN TELEPHONE TIC BEACH FL 904 246-7603 32233 FACSIM
904 239-3222
cations.com
ILE 904 239-322 2
www.SarahBohrP ublications.com
2337 SEMINOLE ROAD • ATLAN TELEPHONE TIC BEACH FL 904 246-7603 32233 FACSIM
www.SarahBohrP
ILE 904 239-322 2
ublications.com
www.SarahBohrPublications.com NADR NEWS
14
FIRST QUARTER 2021
nADr MentorInG GUIDe Automated Intake
(For Mento r
s and Ment
Contact & Matter Management
ees)
SSA Merge Forms Included Automatic SMS/Text Messaging Manage Tasks & Appointments Web-Based Intake Questionnaires New and Improved Calendar Options Integrates with Outlook Includes the SSD Claim Process
Board of Director s 2014-2015
Track Time, Fees, & Costs
President Robert McDowell Elizabethtown, KY
Medical Records Management
Vice President Steve Skinner Redding, CA
Multiple Law Types Included
Mentor Guide Sub-Committee, Earline
Secretary Philip Litteral Ashland, KY
QuickBooks Integration
Marchand, and the following folks on her
Treasurer Michael Wener Memphis, TN
Committee for their hard work on the production of the NADR Mentoring Guide.
Directors-at-Large Karen Starr Grand Rapids, MI Greg Cates Memphis, TN
Please consider signing uptio as a Mentor or a NADR Na
Patty Sexton Wauna, WA
Mentee after
Barbara Manna Pittsburgh, PA
Administrators Eva Sirman 202-822-2155 eva@nadr.org Julie Phelps 202-822-2155 admin@nadr.or g
NADR
NADR NEWS
nal Office PO Box 96503 #3 0550 Washithrough reading the guidelines. ngton, DC 2009 0-6503
We are hopeful that this will be another
NADR National Offi ce
Robin Ventura (866) 367-7919 | rventura@prevail.net
NADR would like to thank the chair of the
PO Box 96503 Washington, DC 20090-6503 Phone: (202) 822 -2155 Fax (972) 245-67 01 Web Site: www.n adr.org
16
invalualbe NADR member benefit. Mentor Guide Sub-Committee Earline D. Marchand Carol Balderee Sherrell Rodgers Steven Gragg Brandy Bowdry Dedra Wood FIRST QUARTER 2021
Ta
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
KEY ENGAGEMENT METRICS
125
AUDIENCE INTERACTIONS
2020 - 2021
236
Attendees Logged-On
1,316
Average Interaction Per Attendee
Live Stream Views
TOP CONTENT INTERACTIONS
Schedule
President 3,479 C. Greg Cates, EdD., ADR Agenda Memphis, TN Views
Session
Networking
Vice President 1,838 2,062 Michael Wener, ADR Memphis, TN
342 EDPNA Requirements Over Breakfast: Course 2 & Course 3 200 "Get to the Point": Writing a Prehearing Memo that Gets the ALJ's Attention, Presented by Lindsay Osterhout
Speakers
Ask A Question
Secretary 1,141 1,351 Clifford Berkley, ADR Fullerton, CA
160 Representative Roundtables: Exploring a Wide Range of Relevant Topics, Virtually and In-Person 159 Keynote: Slow Your Roll: Mindfulness for Fast Times, presented by Greg Graber
134 Keynote: The Current State of Disability Representation 117 Ethics: What Would You Do? Presented by Professor Robert R Is Success at the Appeals Coun 110 Possible? presented by Sarah B and Linda Cosme
Treasurer Christopher Mazzulli, ADR Baltimore, MD
Director At Large Kelly Blad, ADR Cook, MN
Director At Large Melissa Smith, ADR St. Louis, MO
Director At Large Meredith Marcus
Director At Large Sherrell Rodgers
Director At Large Carl Groves
NADR News is published by NADR and is the property of the National Association of Disability Representatives. Copyright 2016, NADR. The articles appearing in the NADR News do not necessarily reflect the opinions of NADR. The accuracy and content of each article is the responsibility of the individual writer.
NADR NEWS
17
FIRST QUARTER 2021