Skip to main content

DR-TB Model of Care in Cambodia

Page 1

Myanmar DR TB Symposium Yangon, August 22, 2013

MSF TB Project in Cambodia

Dr. Jean Phillippe DOUSSET Medical Coordinator Cambodia


Cambodia

MSF

MSF


Kompong Cham Province, Operational Districts

MSF

MSF


TB / DR-TB epidemiology in Cambodia Second TB Prevalence Survey 2011: decrease of 38% of Smear + cases in 10 years BUT Cambodia

Thailand

Vietnam

Myanmar

Rwanda

14

70

89

48

11

Notification rate (/100k)

270

95

111

283

61

Estimated prevalence /100k)

817

161

323

506

117

Estimated incidence (/100k)

424

124

199

381

94

Population (millions)

2007 Drug Resistance Survey: Prevalence of MDR-TB Previously treated patients is 11%, 8 times higher than in new patients (1.4%). Combined prevalence is 2%.


Historical Description of NTP and MSF DR-TB care 2006: First MDR cases diagnosed among PLHAs Taken in charge by Cambodian Health Committee and MSF in Phnom Penh and Kompong Cham (KC)

2009: NTP received funds from Global Fund Round 7 MSF HIV/AIDS Project at KC  DR-TB project

2010: NTP initiated the DR-TB TWG MSF: DR-TB project  Comprehensive TB project with a DR-TB component, in the KC Provincial Hospital and in 2 Operational Districts.


Historical Description of NTP and MSF DR-TB care Collaboration with NTP through Technical Working Groups (DR-TB and Laboratory):  Programmatic Management of Drug resistant TB Plan (2010)  National DR-TB guideline (2010-2012)  Guideline for the screening of DR-TB suspects: Standard of Procedures for referral / criteria for Genexpert testing (2012) In 2013, MSF supports the NTP by providing 2nd line drugs (+ monitoring) to DR TB patients from Phnom Penh and Kandal province in collaboration CHC.


KC PH TB Department: Chest Clinic


KC PH TB Department: Chest Clinic reception


KC PH TB Department: Screening Area


KC PH TB Department: TB Paediatric rooms


KC PH TB Laboratory: Microscopy


KC PH TB Laboratory: Culture and Genexpert


Case Finding (common criteria for NTP and MSF): Criteria for presumptive DR-TB cases (request for Genexpert, culture plus DST):  All

retreatment cases (relapse, failure, return after default)

 All

non converters at month 2 (+/-) and 3

 All

HIV+ /(or suspect HIV) regardless of previous TB treatment history

 Contact

of DR-TB cases, TB Health Care Workers and prisoners.


MSF Treatment Approach 

Most of Patients are detected by Genexpert

Start ETR: E / PZA / Km / Lfx / Eto / Cs (PAS if HIV+) MSF: add PAS

IT according to DST results

DST 2nd line: Km, Cm, Lfx, requested at  Day 1 by MSF  If no culture conversion at M4 by NTP


MSF Treatment Approach 

Before starting ETR:  Medical

and laboratory assessment  1 nurse/drug educator and 1 counsellor deliver 5 sessions to patient and family (around 1 week):  HIV VCCT  Assessment of the emotional and social status  Education on disease, drug, side effects, infection control 

DR-TB committee (Medical/nurse/counseling team): Collegial decision to start DR-TB treatment. Mutual Contract.


MSF Treatment Approach 

ETR Initiation in Hospital:  Week 1: Individual treatment adherence counseling, education on drugs DOT and Home Based Care process  Week 2: DR TB Support Group for experience sharing, depression evaluation (PHQ9)  Follow up of the adherence, side effects

Before Discharge (smear conversion, clinical and psycho social status) to set up the Home Based Care process:  Identification and training of HBC nurse (health centre) for DOT and injection  Home assessment, infection control, shelter  Hotline


MSF Treatment Approach 

After Discharge:  Monthly medical consultation and peer support group at Chest Clinic 

Monthly (or required home) visit to assess PS status, adherence, HBC nurse performance, nutritional status, infection control, family support

Transportation fee support, Gift within the treatment course, Food basket


DOTs training for DRTB patients


Nurse Home visit DRTB patients


Lessons Learned: Case finding 

Case notification: at HC level, no retreatment cases: patients refused to be hospitalised during the injection period, thus they are registered as New Cases  No Cat2 and no Streptomycine: all previously treated patients referred for Genexpert, culture

Retreatment cases limited to smear-positives, if smear negative or EPTB reported as new cases or others  May expand to include smear-negatives (as resources and capacity become available)


Lessons Learned: Case Finding 

Non Converter at M2-M3: poor quality of the samples sent (saliva, contamination)  To refer patients to the PH (Infection Control, acceptability, workload and capacity at PH)

Difficulty in advancing money from central to periphery to refer patient or sample:  During more than 1 year, we did not get any referrals from OD or the 5 provinces of the catchment area


Lessons Learned: Case Finding In the 2 ODs where MSF runs TB activities:  Clinical

assessment and smear control of TB patients at M2 and M6

 Facilitation

of the Referral of patients or samples to

PH  Searching

for retreatment cases at HC level.


Lessons learned: case management DR TB cohort Outcomes :

2010

2011

2012

2013

Number

%

Number

%

Number

%

Number

%

Cured

0

0%

6

50%

3

17%

0

0%

Treatment completed

1

25%

1

8%

0

0%

0

0%

Failure

0

0%

0

0%

0

0%

0

0%

Defaulters

1

25%

3

25%

0

0%

2

20%

Deaths

2

50%

1

8%

2

11%

1

10%

Transfer out

0

0%

0

0%

0

0%

0

0%

Still on treatment

0

0%

1

8%

13

72%

7

70%

Total

4

12

18

10

Culture conversion at M6

na

4/4

3/3

10/11

HIV Co infection

0

17%

28%

20%


Lessons learned: case management 

High rates of defaulters, mostly due to drug adverse effect (PAS) and psychological troubles (depression)  2011: upgrade initial assessment  decrease of defaulters since 2012

Non supportive environment: discouraging patient to continue the treatment  Strengthen education, information and support to relatives

Nutritional status: death or rehospitalisation due to weight loss and poor feeding  Nutritional support, anticipate important weight loss and degrading clinical status by hospitalising on time.


Lessons learned: case management 

Psychological status: depression  Assessment of the psychological status at pre-treatment phase.  Importance

of the follow up at home and good communication within DR TB team. Patient care meeting  Importance of the pre initiation phase for patients and relatives


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
DR-TB Model of Care in Cambodia by Médecins Sans Frontières (Doctors Without Borders) - Issuu