Issuu

BACKGROUND STUDY

Walking is a basic and common mode of transport in all societies around the world . Road Traffic deaths by the type of road users Road accidents in India India contributes 11% of accident related deaths in the world . 1 Accident A Minute 1Death in 4 Minutes Source :Road accidents report 2018

Global scenario: Pedestrians and motorcyclist account 45% of all road fatalities . Top 10 ranking cities in 2018 in terms of road accidents in India City Chennai Delhi Bangalore

Accidents 7,580 6,515 4,611

Rank 1 2 3

City Jabalpur Mumbai Hyderabad

Accidents 3,419 6,126 2,846

Rank 6 7 8

Bhopal Indore

3,508 3,434

4 5

Jaipur Kolkata

2,781 2,663

9 10

Road accidents in India Repot -2018

Pedestrian deaths in different cities of India 1000

• India ranks 1st in the number of road accidents .

Most of the Pedestrian crashes occur at intersections and mid blocks .

13,894

15,746

2015

2016

2015

600

20,457

22,656

2017

2018

2017

200

2018

0 Chennai

Delhi

Banglore

Mumbai

Hyderabad

The Indian Central Motor Vehicle Rules state that Pedestrians have the right of way at uncontrolled pedestrian crossings .

In India • NHs -30% accidents 35% Deaths . • SHs -25.2% Accidents 26.8% Deaths.

SCALE : Source : Ministry of Road Transport and highways

2016

400

• 1.35 million people die each year due to road accidents .

Deaths

year

800

Notes :

Pedestrian Deaths in India Population

Source :Global status report on road safety by WHO (2018)

Source Ministry of road transport & Highways

PLANNING PROJECT

Kolkata

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

Pedestrian comprises 10% Death .

BACKGROUND STUDY Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

WORKING METHODOLOGY PROBLEM STATEMENT Background study AIM

PLANNING PROJECT

Lack of infrastructure facilities for pedestrians . Rising of the pedestrian accidents day by day. Pedestrian accident Statistics

Literature studies

Behavior & infrastructure for pedestrians.

Desktop studies

Pedestrian safety action plans .

15 days

To prepare an Action Plan for pedestrians at Secunderabad Junction.

3. Study area is selected and delineated based on the identified parameters.

4. To analyze the identified parameters at selected nodes through surveys.

5. Proposals to improve the pedestrian safety and accessibility at selected Nodes .

• Study the NMT policy. • Review the Pedestrian infrastructure. • Study the Pedestrian behavior & flow .

• Pedestrian accident statistics. • Major pedestrian flow areas. • Signalized and unsignalized intersections.

• Pedestrian flow. • Pedestrian accident rate. • Surrounding land use. • Type of junction • Type of road . • Crossing widths.

• Pedestrian & traffic volume . • Land use • LOS of pedestrian. • Parking capacity • Pedestrian opinion survey.

Provide •Pedestrian infrastructure facilities. •Efficient management and monitoring.

Primary data Pedestrian & Traffic volume count LOS of pedestrians at intersections Opinion survey

DATA ANALYSIS PROPOSAL

DATA COLLECTION

Secondary data Accident statistics Land use maps Parking data

Analysis of the data and gap identification. To prepare an Action plan for pedestrians at Secunderabad Junction.

15 days

2. To identify the pedestrian accident and major pedestrian flow areas at distinct nodes.

30 days

1. To review the existing pedestrian policies, infrastructure facilities and their behavior.

7 days

OBJECTIVES

Expected outcome :Provide safe & accessible infrastructure for Scope :Effective management of pedestrian movements. pedestrians .

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

Limitations: The study is limited to different nodes in the Hyderabad city where pedestrian accidents occur frequently and pedestrian flow is heavy. Study justification : Increasing the support for walking will make the transportation system more socially , environmentally and economically sustainable . • Affordable mode of transportation. • Produces no pollution. • Supports healthy lifestyle. • It encourages transit use . SCALE :

METHODOLOGY Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

TIME LINE NMT POLICY)

NUTP POLICY(2006)

National urban transport policy • Safe , affordable , quick , comfortable ,reliable and sustainable urban transport. • Priority to non motorized transport.

UTTIPEC (2009)

Unified Traffic and Transportation Infrastructure {Plg. & Eng..} Centre • Increase in comfort for current walking population. • Prioritization of public transport • Reduced dependency on the car.

Footpaths should be provided on both sides on all categories of street.

INFRASTRUCTURE

IRC Guidelines (2012)

Pedestrian Crosswalks

Footpath zone

Width

Mid block zones

Crossing interval

Residential

1.8m

80-250m

Commercial

2.5m

Residential areas Commercial

80-150m

High intensity commercial area

Pedestalization if possible

Shopping frontage 3.5-4.5m Bus stops

High intensity commercial areas

At-grade Crosswalk Zebra crossing

Themed Crosswalks

Zebra crossings should always be accompanied by a STOP Line . Width -2-4 m.

Refuge islands can provide a safe place for pedestrians to wait for a green signal.

Themed crosswalks can be used on streets that are buzzing with pedestrian activities, like a shopping district. Minimum 3m wide pedestrian crossing should be provided at all crossings .

ITDP (2013)

Road safety manual –WHO (2013)

Indian Road Congress • Pedestrian vehicle conflicts . • Pedestrian safety. • Inclusive planning. • Standard designs.

Smart city AMRUT Green transport scheme

Institute for Transport Development Policy • A guide to creating footpaths that are safe, comfortable, and easy to use.

Raised crosswalks

Raised crosswalk shall have a minimum width of 3m.

PLANNING PROJECT

Segregation of pedestrians and vehicles either in space or it time so that pedestrians and vehicles are not in the same place simultaneously.

Pedestrian Lighting ·Along the sidewalk, ·At street corners, ·At access to atgrade crosswalk. · All subways and foot over bridges should be well lit.

Grade Separated Crosswalk All foot over bridges and subways should be universally accessible. Foot Over Bridges are necessary for streets with high speed transit corridors.

Humped pedestrian crossing

SCALE :

LITERATURE REVIEW Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

(a)One-step (b)Two-step

PLANNING PROJECT

Movement

Oblique crossings perpendicular crossing

BEHAVIOUR

pedestrians:

Pedestrian signals

Stepping , walking or running off footway .

Mixed crossings Source : Pedestrian safety manual –WHO

Source :Pedestrian Road Crossing Behavior Under Mixed Traffic Conditions

Source : Ministry of road transport and Highways

Other factors

• Inadequate enforcement of traffic laws; • Unsafe driving practices. • Driver distraction, including mobile phone use.

FACTORS Speed:

Higher the speed of vehicles higher the risk for pedestrian. – S.J Aston , Road safety

San Francisco MTA Vision Zero Action Plan

Vehicle design: The design of the vehicle exterior can have a significant effect on the severity of injuries. – SJ Aston , Road safety .

Inadequate visibility :Crash Built up & non severity increases as vehicle built up: Most of

speed increases, visibility of the crashes occur in built up area . pedestrian decreases.

Source : Pedestrian safety manual –WHO

Source : Walkable City Rules

INTERSECTIONS

Y – SKEWED SCALE :

CROSS

T –INTERSECTION

OFFSET

CROSS SKEWED ROTATORY INTERJUNCTION

MULTI-INTERSECTION

Source : Intersection safety Federal highway

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

LITERATURE REVIEW Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

LITERATURE REVIEW TITLE

PUBLICATION CONCEPT

INDICATORS/ PARAMETERS

METHOD/ANALYSIS

Pedestrian 1998, Accommodati swless ons at Intersections in US .

Design features • locations of • Informal that are critical in high pedestrian study. order to provide use. • Review for pedestrian statistics. access at intersections.

Pedestrian 2009 Safety at winter Intersections at US.

Reduce pedestrian fatalities injuries.

• Intersections • Pedestrian and Fatalities statics

PLANNING PROJECT OUTCOME

traffic • Crosswalk improvements; crash • Intersection design. • Intersection operations and signal technology.

• Traffic volumes. • Observations. • Road safety audit.

• • • •

Enhancements. Curb extension. Raised crosswalk. Rectangular Rapid-Flashing Beacon.

• Signalized • Direct observation. • Crosswalk and intersection sites • videography Improvements. • Four arm surveys. intersections • Pedestrian crossing speed. • Pedestrian crossing compliance.

OBSERVATIONS

Notes

Pedestrian accommodations at intersections include both traffic signal and pavement marking improvements.

• The average pedestrian crossing speed is estimated to be 1.36 m/sec for perpendicular movement conditions and as 1.98 m/sec for oblique movement conditions.

Pedestrian safety at intersections requires coordination among authorities, professional engineers, education experts, and vehicle designers.

• Pedestrian crossing behavior is divided into four categories namely “one stage”, “two-stage” “perpendiculaire direction” and “oblique direction”.

Study on 2014 Pedestrian Vedagiri Crossing Behavior at Signalized Intersections in Mumbai.

Increase walkability reduce pedestrian accidents.

Pedestrian 2014 crossing Akash Jain1 , behavior Ankit Gupta analysis at intersections in Roorkee.

Improve • Land use • Direct observation • Crossing Time and pedestrian safety • Width of the methods, Waiting Time. while crossing the road • Video observation • Pedestrian road. • Type of methods Crossing Speeds intersection. • Time Lapse Photography • Pedestrian opinion surveys.

The pedestrian crossing behavior analysis is an important factor for pedestrian safety .

Study on 2019 pedestrian Archana crossing behavior at intersections in Thrissur district.

Understanding • Pedestrian flow. the pedestrian • Pedestrian crossing behavior characteristics. at both controlled and uncontrolled intersections.

To develop pedestrian delay models at controlled and SCALE : uncontrolled intersections.

• video survey.

graphic • Pedestrian Crossing Patterns. • Crossing Speed and Crossing Pattern.

Pedestrian-vehicular interaction were analyzed. Gender , age has a significant impact on crossing speed.

• Pedestrian crossing speed of a male is more than that of a female.

LITERATURE REVIEW Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

PEDESTRIAN PLAN FOR KOZHIKODE CITY

DELHI PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES • Delhi is the capital city of India with a population about 11millions. • Its area is about 159 sq.kms. • Roads in Delhi were primarily designed to increase the speed and ease movement of cars . Delhi has more cars than in other states. • Nearly half of the fatal accidents in Delhi involve PEDESTRIANS. Modal share of Delhi 40% of the total roads do not have sidewalks

44%

23% 33%

Kozhikode is a coastal city in Kerala with a population about 6,13,255.

Issues

• Lack of pedestrian infrastructure facilities . • About 90% of the roads of Kozhikode do not have footpaths. • Rise in the use of private vehicles.

Objectives

Motorized Private Transport Public Transport Non motorised Transport

Goals 1. Ensure preferred pubic transport. 2. Provide safety, comfort and amenities to all users . 3. Provide universal accessibility and civic amenities . Proposals & achievements Pavement zone

Pedestrian only Zone

Kerb height -Continuous 150mm pavement

Auditory signals

• Provide pedestrian infrastructure facilities . • Widening of sidewalks . • Integrate land use pattern & street connectivity . PEDESTRIAN VIBRANCY MAP Priority

Built ups

Catchment area

Score

Up to 400m

HIGH

Transit stations CBD Market , hospital

400m-800m

Above 800m

Up to 400m

400m-800m

Above 800m

Up to 400m

400m-800m

Above 800m

MEDIUM

LOW

Nodes FOB

Accessible bus stops

Tactile paving

School / college High residential area community centers Local bus stop , restaurant

Slope

Trees occupy walking zone

Crossings

Marked cycle lanes-vehicles freely drive and park on these cycle lanes.

Bus stops completely occupy the footpath without accessing pedestrians.

Pedestrian vibrancy map of city

Land use Pedestrian vibrancy map

Failures

Hawkers occupy footpaths

PLANNING PROJECT

Proposals Pedestrian network plan . Safe routes to schools. Rerouting and speed limits. Curb ramps , sidewalks according IRC standards . • Pedestrian only districts . • • • • •

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

Pedestrian activity map SCALE :

DESKTOP STUDY Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

COMPARISION OF DESKTOP STUDIES

PEDESTRIAN SAFETY ACTION PLAN FOR VIRGINIA Virginia, a southeastern U.S state along the coast with a Population of 85.2 lakhs .

SUMMARY OF Virginia pedestrian safety plan

Year

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Pedestrian crashes

1752

1641

1595

1564

1681

Location of Fatal versus Injury Crashes

62%

51%

Mid-Block

12%

19%

Unsignalized Intersection

13%

Source : Virginia Department of Transportation

22%

Signalized Intersection

Objectives • Identify the locations with the highest number of pedestrian crashes . • Consider the relationship between land use and pedestrian safety . • Identify countermeasures that address key pedestrian safety issues. Parameters • Speed limit. • Presence of median or signalized crossing. • Land use context and nearby pedestrian destinations. • Location of crashes relative to crossing types. Counter measures Pedestrian crash Hotspots

High-visibility crosswalk

In-street Yield sign

Curb Extension

raised crosswalks

Increase pedestrian Pedestrian crossing time Countdown signal

Transit stop access improvements.

PLANNING PROJECT

channelized right turn Source :Virginia departm ent of transport ation

• Virginia is a state in U.S with a population about 85.2 lakhs. • Pedestrian crashes were more at un signalized intersections and mid blocks according to the pedestrian crash analysis. • 19 hotspots were identified with high traffic , pedestrian activity. • Counter measures were planned. Source :Virginia department of transportation

SUMMARY OF DELHI PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDE LINESS • Delhi is the capital city of India with a population about 11 million . • Pedestrian design guidelines were prepared as 44% of the population use non motorized transport. • The were no side walkways , inadequate kerb heights , encroached footpaths. • Guidelines were prepared in order to provide safe , accessible and comfort infrastructure for pedestrians. Source : Delhi pedestrian design guidelines

SUMMARY OF KOZHIKODE CITY PEDESTRIAN PLAN.

• Kozhikode is a small city with 6 lakhs population. • The use of private vehicles has been increased. • Pedestrian vibrancy map has been prepared use index scoring method . • Study area is delineated based on the high activity nodes. • Nodes, slope , land use and high pedestrian activity areas were taken for site selection. • Pedestrian activity map is prepared. Source :comprehensive mobility plan for Kozhikode city

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

SCALE :

DESKTOP STUDIES Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

Urban sprawl of GHMC Area in Hyderabad 1997 2007

Location Telangana

2017

PLANNING PROJECT Key Map

India

Hyderabad

Profile

• Hyderabad is the capital city of Telangana state. • Population is about 6.9 million as per 2011 census. • It is second largest metropolitan region with 7,228 sqkms. • Hyderabad is a great hub for administration ,Industrial , education , medical , cultural activities . • There are 3 National highways and 5 State highways . Population Total registered vehicles (2019)

Vehicles

6000000

Urban Sprawl of GMNC Area from 1997-2017

Pedestrian accidents occur more in the peripheral area of GHMC due to the urban sprawl of the city which is more to wards the west (IT Hub). • lack of pedestrian infrastructure. • 3 National highways and 5 State highways. Total pedestrains involved in accidents 1000

Telangana

Hyderabad

800

40 Million

12.24 million

600

1,25,59,616

55,69,000

Registered vehicles

Jaywalking is one of most common issue on the city roads.

400 200 0 Simple

4000000

Grievous 2016

Fatal 2017

Total 2018

Injured 2019

2000000 0 2015

2016

2017 2018 Year Registered vehicles

2019

Source : Telangana government , RTO

1/4th

Hyderabad accounts of the total vehicles in Telangana state .More than 1000 new vehicles are registered within Hyderabad daily .

Deaths

Pedestrians struggle to cross the roads in the absence of zebra crossing .

3000 2900 2800 2700 2600

2945 2761

Source : Hyderabad , Cyberabad Traffic police

Pedestrian infrastructure facilities in Hyderabad

2834 2846

Accidents Accidents in Hyderabad

Footpaths available

MCH

GHMC

HMA

Footpath

44%

12%

No Footpath

56%

88%

99%

Total length

582km

660km

3674km

Total road length of HMA -17,000KM

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

SCALE :

PROFILE Pedestrians forced to walk on the road as two-wheelers were riding on the footpath.

Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

PARAMETERS FOR SELECTION CRITERIA OF THE NODES

CORE AREA (MCH)

IN PERIPHERAL AREA OF GHMC

1.Pedestrian flow

1.Accident Prone Areas

2.Land use

3.Junctions

4.Type of road

4.Type of Road

PEDESTRIAN ACCIDENTS FROM 2017-2019 Police station 2017 2018 area 47 49 Miyapur 56 51 KPHB 45 36 Madhapur 40 45 Kukatpally 23 43 RC puram 38 Rajendranagar 37 35 50 Medchal Pet 43 35 baheerabad 47 38 Banjara hills 31 Mailardevpally 41 30 25 Saidabad 27 30 Panjagutta 25 39 S.R.Nagar 32 29 Raidurgam 27 40 RGIA 27 Chandanagar 38 29 32 Narsingi 27 32 Bowenpally Osmania 27 27 university 30 22 Saidabad

2019

Total

Average

65 30 46 35 50 40 26

161 137 127 120 116 115 111

54 46 42 40 39 38 37

105

18 29 39 36 29 32 26 26 28 25

103 101 94 93 93 93 93 91 89 84

34 34 31 31 31 31 31 30 30 28

Source: Hyderabad traffic police

High pedestrian accident prone areas in GHMC .

A buffer zone of 750m is considered around the node . PEDESTRIAN FLOW (Persons /day) Area Total Secunderabad 20,580 Mehdipatnam 10,190 Kukatpally 9,900 Paradise 4,618 Tarnaka junction 3,707 ECIL X road 3,494 Balanagar junction 2,940 Fever hospital junction 2,048 Radhika theatre 1,970 Mettuguda junction 1,781

Pedestrian Accident prone areas

PLANNING PROJECT Key Map

LEGEND Source : CTS report 2011

NODES IN GHMC PERIPHERIAL AREA Area Miyapur KPHB

2017 2018 2019 Total Average

Junction

Land use

47 56

49 51

65 30

161 137

54 46

Miyapur Xroads Commercial JNTU junction Institutional

Madhapur 45

127

RC Puram

116

Cyber Towers Junction Beeramguda Jn

Rajendra nagar

115

Office Industrial

Rajendra nagar Residential X roads Source: Hyderabad traffic police

Area Secunderabad (RT +BT+MT) Medhipatnam (Key junction ) Paradise Tarnaka ECIL

NODES IN CORE AREA OF GHMC Pedestrian flow Junction 20,580 10,190 4,618 3,707 3,494

Rathifile Rithu bazar junction Paradise junction Tarnaka X Rd ECIL X Roads

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

Land use Transportation hub Mixed Commercial Commercial Industrial Source : CTS report

Rules pertaining to zebra crossings are been violated by the pedestrians and motorist. SCALE :

1:25,000

SELECTION CRITERIA Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

Land use patterns play a significant role in encouraging walks.

There are about 152 signalized intersections in Hyderabad.

PEDESTRIAN ACCIDENT HOTSPOTS 1 Miyapur

2 JNTU Junction

Intersection :Y type. Landuse: commercial Road type :National Highway . 4 Buffer zone :750m 50 accidents per year.

3 Madhapur

Intersection :T type. Landuse: Institutional Road type : National Highway. Buffer zone :750m High pedestrian accident prone area .

4 RC Puram

Intersection :X Roads. Landuse: Office space Road type :Major arterial Road . Buffer zone :750m IT Hub. Intersection :T type Landuse: Industrial Road type : National Highway. Buffer zone :750m Suburb of the city.

PLANNING PROJECT

6 Secunderabad

Intersection :Y ,Rotatory . Land use: Transportation hub. Road type :Major Arterial Road Buffer zone :750m It connected with Bus ,Rail and Metro terminal .

7 Medhiptnam

Intersection :Y , T type Land use: Mixed Road type :Major Arterial Road . Buffer zone :750m It is a key junction connecting to shamshabad airport and outer parts of the city .

8 Paradise 5

5 Rajendra Nagar

10 Tarnaka

9 ECIL Intersection :X Roads Land use: Residential Road type : State Highway . Buffer zone :750m.

Key Map

Intersection :X type Landuse: Commercial Road type :Major Arterial road Buffer zone :750m

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

Intersection :X road s Land use: commercial Road type :National Highway. Buffer zone :750m It is connected with metro and bus terminal . Intersection :Rotatory Land use: Mixed Road type :Arterial road Buffer zone :750m It is a major bus transportation terminal .

NODE : A node is a meeting point of two or more routes. SCALE :

1:25,000

SELECTION CRITERIA Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

Telangana

STUDY AREA

Hyderabad district

Secunderabad is the twin city of Hyderabad. Secunderabad is one of the oldest and busiest area . It is a major transportation hub . The area surrounding the Secunderabad railway station is mainly a hub for commercial and residential areas, and military and national security forces. • Secunderabad Railway is an oldest and busiest railway station in India which handles 1.8 lakhs passengers per day. Source :Maps of India • Bus terminals in Secunderabad like Rathifile, Chilakalguda, Uppal Secunderabad Junction bus stop, Alpha Hotel (opposite the railway station) and bus stand opposite Gurudwara provide connectivity to various parts of the city . • • • •

Mode of changes at Secunderabad Railway station area • Metro • MMTS • City busses • Autos • Cabs • Private vehicles (4 wheeler & 2 wheeler ) • Pedestrians Pedestrian inter change mode at secunderabad railway station area .

Pedestrian Inter change Modes

% of Pedestrians

54%

22%

Rail-Bus

Rail-Auto

Source : International transport guidelines

Inference :11,500 pedestrians per hour are observed moving between various halts of the city buses and study area.

18%

Bus-Bus Modes

Rail-Private vehicle

Bus-Auto

Source : Planning for multi modal hub at secunderabad Report(2014)

PLANNING PROJECT

Secunderabad Node

Case Area :750sqmts walkability distance.

Study out line Land use observation Pedestrian infrastructure facilities

Pedestrian volume count Traffic volume count

Existing features Road carriage widths

Parking survey

• Total commuters and pedestrian movement is 5.10 lakh per day. • 60% of the commuters travelling are interchanges. • Estimated area for operating the bus terminals is about 3.10 acers.

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

SCALE :

1:2,500

STUDY AREA Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

Secunderabad Railway station

2 Kukatpally Bus Terminal

3 Rathifile Bus Terminal

Rezimental bazar Bus Terminal

PLANNING PROJECT

5 Rezimental St

Secunderabad 6 East Metro

8 1

Secunderabad Exist Terminal

SCALE :

1:2500

BASE MAP Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

11 Secunderabad bus stop

10 Bhoiguda Bus stop

9 ChilkalgudaCircle

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

Uppal bus Terminal

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

LAND USE MAP OF STUDY AREA

Land Use 7%

Residential Commercial

38%

20% 3% 32%

PLANNING PROJECT Land use Legend Residential

Public semi Public Transportation

Commercial Public % Semi Public Transportation & Communication

Roads

Inference : Secunderabad study area has a mixed type of land use with various government offices and commercial spaces such as Monda market , Rezimental bazar. The roads are occupied by street hawker along the footpaths and roads.

Metro line

Source : Primary Survey

TRAFFIC FLOW PATTERN

Traffic Vehicle Composition volume 1% count is 12% 2- Wheeler observed 2% in the 3-Wheeler 35% peak Car/Jeep hours 8- 22% LCV/Tempo 10 , 12-2 , 4-6 and 8Bus 28% 10.

Traffic Flow High Traffic flow Moderate Traffic flow Low traffic flow Public traffic flow

Truck/Lorry

• Bikes are the dominant vehicles followed by 3-wheelers . • 1000 buses originate and terminate in these bus stops . • Around 3 lakh vehicles flow in the study area . Source : Primary Survey ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

SCALE :

1:2,500

LAND USE ,TRAFFIC Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

RATHIFLFE JUNCTION

CHILKALGUDA JUNCTION

Towards Blue sea

PLANNING PROJECT

LEGEND

Towards Sec T2

Towards Mettuguda

Towards Railway station

Towards Oliphanta Bridge

Towards Chilkalguda circle TRAFFIC FLOW AT RATHIFILE JUNCTION AT PEAK HOURS 9AM 12 AM 4 PM

Towards Bhoiguda Towards Sitafalmandi TRAFFIC FLOW AT CHILKALGUDA JUNCTION AT PEAK HOURS 9AM

4 PM

8 PM

TVC Heavy Moderate Low

Radar Legend 8 PM

6 PM

RATHIFILE JUNCTION 4%

3-Wheeler

Car/Jeep

47%

21%

Towards Rathifile 2000 1500 1000 500 0

2-Wheeler

LCV/Tempo Bus

19%

HGV

Towards Other Chilkalaguda Circle

12 PM

10 PM

CHILKALGUDA JN 3%

Towards Blue sea Hotel

2-Wheeler

3-Wheeler 44%

24%

Inference- The radar shows the hourly average vehicular traffic flow through the Rathifile Junction. The traffic flow is mainly dominated 2-wheeler followed by 4-wheelers. The traffic flow is high in towards Chilkalguda and blue sea hotel. Source :Primary Data Survey

6 PM

Car /Jeep LCV /Tempo

20%

Bus

Truck/Lorry

Towards Mettuguda 1500 Towards 1000 Oliphanta 500 Bridge 0 Towards Secunderabad Railway station

10 PM

Towards Sitafalmandi

Towards Bhoiguda

Inference : The radar shows the hourly average traffic flow through Chilkalguda junction. The traffic composition is dominated by 2-wheelers and followed by cars. The traffic flow is high towards Mettuguda , Bhoiguda and Oliphanata Source :Primary Data Survey Bridge

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

SCALE :

1:1000

TVC ANALYSIS Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

NORTH TERMINAL (GURUDWARA) JN

SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

PLANNING PROJECT

Towards Clock Tower

Legend Towards Rathifile

Towards Shankar Mandal Rd TRAFFIC FLOW AT SECUNDERABAD JN AT PEAK HOURS

TRAFFIC FLOW AT GURUDWARA JUNCTION AT PEAK HOURS 9AM

4 PM

9AM

8 PM

12APM

TVC

8 PM

Heavy Moderate Low

Radar Legend

12 PM 0%

32%

21% 28%

TRAFFIC FLOW

1000 0

4 PM

10 PM

6 PM

GURUDWARA JN

18%

6 PM

600 800

SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION Inference : The bar graph 0% 2-Wheeler shows the hourly average 2-Wheeler flow through Towards 3-Wheeler traffic 3-Wheeler monda junction. The 1% 20% Car /Jeep Gurudwara 32% market Car /Jeep Traffic flow is high towards LCV /Tempo clock tower and railway LCV /Tempo Bus 20% station The traffic flow is Truck/Lorry Bus 27% dominated by the 2-wheelers.

500 750

350 600

24 30

2-Wheeler 3-Wheeler Car /JeepLCV /Tempo Towards Clocktower

Truck/Lorry

450 350 Bus

Truck/Lorry

Towards Railway station

Towards Rathifile 600 400 200 0

10 PM

Towards Clock tower

SCALE :

Towards Shankar Mandal

Inference : The Radar shows the hourly average traffic flow that is high towards Clock Tower and Rathifile . The vehicle composition is dominated by 2-wheelers followed by 3Source :Primary Data Survey wheeler ,4-wheeler and Buses.

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

Source :Primary Data Survey

1:1000

TVC ANALYSIS Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

The pedestrian flow at this site area varies with the peak months such as holidays festival s. There is a continuous flow of pedestrians from 5am to 12 am due to the presence of railway station.

PLANNING PROJECT LEDEND : Pedestrian flow /15min

Above 700 500 - 700 300 - 500

100 - 300 50 - 100 0 - 50 SITE AREA ALONG THE ROAD ACROSS THE ROAD

41% 59% RATHIFILE JUNCTION

CHILKALGUDA JUNCTION

ALONG THE ROAD

44% 56%

ALONG THE ROAD

48%

ACROSS THE ROAD

52%

Inference : Pedestrians flow is high along the road towards blue sea hotel due to the presence of bus terminal which connects east part of the city.

ACROSS THE ROAD

Inference : Pedestrians flow across the road and along the road are nearly equal due to the presence of bus stops towards each road at this junction.

GURUDWARA BUS STOP

ALONG THE ROAD

32% 68%

ACROSS THE ROAD

Inference :The pedestrian flow is high along the road than across the road at this junction. Source : Primary Survey

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

43% 57%

ALONG THE ROAD ACROSS THE ROAD

Inference :Pedestrians at this junction mostly consists of railway passengers they walk to the railway station from bus terminals.

Inference : Overall 59 % of the pedestrian flow is along the road .

SCALE :

1:2,500

PEDESTRIAN FLOW MAP Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

Towards Blue sea

RATHIFILE JUNCTION

PLANNING PROJECT

Road Cross Sections

RATHIFILE JUNCTION

A’

Towards Railway station

PVC

C’

Heavy Moderate

Low B’ B

A Towards Chilkalguda circle

A’

PEDESTRIAN FLOW AT RATHIFILE JUNCTION AT PEAK HOURS

8:30-9:30AM

12:30-1:30PM

Finding • A sky walk is provided from the metro to the rathifile bus stop. • The way through ROB is unhygienic and congested for the pedestrians to walk.

Source : Primary Survey

5:30-6:30 PM 8:30-9:30 PM • The pedestrian flow is high towards railway station with 4,068 pedestrians per hour in the evening hours . • The pedestrian flow towards Blue sea hotel is about 1,680 persons per hour. Most of the pedestrians move towards railway station and to wards Blue sea hotel. • Most of the pedestrians cross the road at rathifile junction with a maximum count of 1452 per hour.

B’

SCALE :

1:1000

PVC ANALYSIS Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

C’

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 08:00-08:15 08:15-08:30 08:30-08:45 08:45-09:00 09:00-09:15 09:15-09:30 09:30-09:45 09:45-10:00 12:00-12:15 12:15-12:30 12:30-12:45 12:45-01:00 01:00-01:15 01:15-01:30 01:30-01:45 01:15-02:00 04:00-04:15 04:15-04:30 04:30-04:45 04:45-05:00 05:00-05:15 05:15-05:30 05:30-05:45 05:45-06:00 08:00-08:15 08:15-08:30 08:30-08:45 08:45-09:00

ALONG THE ROAD FROM BLUE SEA TO RATHIFILE JN

Time

Towards Railway Station

500 400 200 100 08:00-08:15 08:15-08:30 08:30-08:45 08:45-09:00 09:00-09:15 09:15-09:30 09:30-09:45 09:45-10:00 12:00-12:15 12:15-12:30 12:30-12:45 12:45-01:00 01:00-01:15 01:15-01:30 01:30-01:45 01:15-02:00 04:00-04:15 04:15-04:30 04:30-04:45 04:45-05:00 05:00-05:15 05:15-05:30 05:30-05:45 05:45-06:00 08:00-08:15 08:15-08:30 08:30-08:45 08:45-09:00

ACROSS THE ROAD TOWARDS BLUE SEA HOTEL ACROSS THE ROAD FROM BLUE SEA TO RATHIFILE JN

PLANNING PROJECT

RATHIFILE JUNCTION Pedestrian Flow at at this junction mostly inter change at the Bus terminals and Railway station.

Towards Blue sea

ALONG THE ROAD TOWARDS RAILWAY STATION ALONG THE ROAD FROM RAILWAY STATION

300

ACROSS THE ROAD TOWARDS RAILWAY STATION ACROSS THE ROAD FROM RAILWAY STATION

Inference The Pedestrian flow is extremely high in to and fro direction from Railway station To Rathifile junction. The average Pedestrian Flow along the roads is 400 persons and 200 across the road per 15 minutes.

Towards Chilkalguda circle

Towards ROB (Chilkalguda circle) 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0

ALONG THE ROAD TOWARDS ROB ALONG THE ROAD FROM ROB TO JN

08:00-08:15 08:15-08:30 08:30-08:45 08:45-09:00 09:00-09:15 09:15-09:30 09:30-09:45 09:45-10:00 12:00-12:15 12:15-12:30 12:30-12:45 12:45-01:00 01:00-01:15 01:15-01:30 01:30-01:45 01:15-02:00 04:00-04:15 04:15-04:30 04:30-04:45 04:45-05:00 05:00-05:15 05:15-05:30 05:30-05:45 05:45-06:00 08:00-08:15 08:15-08:30 08:30-08:45 08:45-09:00

Pedestrians

Inference • The average pedestrian flow along the road is about 230 persons per 15 minutes. • The pedestrian flow across the road is about 100 persons per 15minutes. • The pedestrian flow is high in the morning and evening hours. • Most of pedestrians flow towards ROB due to the presence of 5 bus stops.

ALONG THE ROAD TOWARDS BLUE SEA HOTEL

Towards Railway station

Pedestrians

600

Towards Blue sea –From blue sea Pedestrians

Inference • Pedestrian flow is heavy due to the presence of Metro and a 2 bus terminals. • Average pedestrian flow along the road is about 360 pedestrians and across the road is about 300 per 15 minutes. • The pedestrian flow is heavy during the morning and evening hours.

Time

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

ACROSS THE ROAD TOWARDS ROB ACROSS THE ROAD FROM ROB TO JN

Source : Primary Survey

SCALE :

1:1000

PVC ANALYSIS Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

Towards Oliphanta Bridge

CHILKALGUDA JUNCTION

A’

D’

B’ C C’

Towards Mettuguda

Towards Sec T2

PLANNING PROJECT

E’

Towards Bhoiguda

Road Cross Sections

CHILKALGUDA JUNCTION LEGEND

A’

B B’

Towards Sitafalmandi

PEDESTRIAN FLOW AT CHILKALAGUDA JUNCTION AT PEAK HOURS 8:30-9:30AM

12:30-1:30PM PVC C

Heavy

C’

Moderate Low

5:30-6:30 PM • • • • •

D’

8:30-9:30 PM

At this junction the pedestrian flow is high across the roads. There are about 6 bus stops near the junction. Pedestrians interchange from railway station to different bust stops. The pedestrian flow is high towards ROB . The pedestrian flow is observed with the arrival and departure of E trains from the Exist road. Source : Primary Survey ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

SCALE :

1:1000

PVC ANALYSIS Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

E’

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

CHILKALGUDA JN –TOWARDS ROB

Pedestrians

350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0

Time

Towards Oliphanta Bridge

CHILKALGUDA - METTUGUDA

350 250 200

CHILKALGUDA JUNCTION

ALONG THE ROAD TOWARDS METTUGUDA

150 ACROSS THE ROAD TOWARDS METTUGUDA

100 50 0

ACROSS THE ROAD FROM METTUGUDA

The pedestrian flow is high due to the presence of Bus stops where they interchange. The pedestrian crossing pattern is high at this junction. The pedestrians are high along the road towards Mettuguda TOWARDS BHOIGUDA

TOWARDS CKILKALGUDA CIRCLE

Inference: The pedestrian outflow is high than the inflow at the SEC EXIT (T2) road .

200 150 100 50 0 08:00-08:15 08:15-08:30 08:30-08:45 08:45-09:00 09:00-09:15 09:15-09:30 09:30-09:45 09:45-10:00 12:00-12:15 12:15-12:30 12:30-12:45 12:45-01:00 01:00-01:15 01:15-01:30 01:30-01:45 01:15-02:00 04:00-04:15 04:15-04:30 04:30-04:45 04:45-05:00 05:00-05:15 05:15-05:30 05:30-05:45 05:45-06:00 08:00-08:15 08:15-08:30 08:30-08:45 08:45-09:00

Towards Sitafalmandi

SECUNDERABAD T2

TOWARDS SECUNDERABAD

PLANNING PROJECT

ALONG THE ROAD FROM METTUGUDA

Pedestrian Flow

150 100 50 0

300

Towards Sec T2

Towards Mettuguda

Towards Bhoiguda

Inference • The average pedestrian flow along the road towards ROB is ALONG THE ROAD FROM about 190 persons and towards ROB the circle is about 230 persons per 15 minutes. ACROSS THE ROAD TOWARDS ROB • The average pedestrian crossings is about 120persons ACROSS THE ROAD per 15 minutes. FROM ROB • The pedestrian flow is high in the morning and evening peak hours. ALONG THE ROAD TOWARDS ROB

Along the Road

Across the Road

Inference : The pedestrian Flow is high due to the presence of bus stop. The pedestrian Flow is High in the morning and evening hours. The average pedestrian flow is about 120 pedestrians per 15 min.

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

Source : Primary Survey

SCALE :

1:1000

PVC ANALYSIS Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

NORTH TERMINAL (GURUDWARA) JUNCTION

Towards Clock tower

Road Cross Sections

PLANNING PROJECT

GURUDWARA JUNCTION

A’ A

LEGEND D D’

B’

Towards Rezimental Bazar

C’

Towards Railway station

A’

Towards Monda Market

Towards Railway station

PVC Heavy

PEDESTRIAN FLOW AT GURUDWARA JUNCTION AT PEAK HOURS 8:30-9:30AM

Moderate

12:30-1:30PM

Towards Clock tower

C’

Towards Market Rd

5:30-6:30 PM

8:30-9:30 PM

B’

D’

Towards CT

• The pedestrian flow is high towards the clock tower with maximum count of 2121 persons per hour along the road. • The pedestrians across the road are about 1109 per hour.

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

Low

Source : Primary Survey

SCALE :

1:1000

PVC ANALYSIS Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

PLANNING PROJECT

Towards Clock Tower Pedestrian Flow

500

GURUDWARA JUNCTION

400

300 200 Along the Road Across the Road

100 0

Time

Inference • The average pedestrian flow along the road is about 320 persons per 15 minutes. • The pedestrian crossings are about 150 per 15 minutes. • The pedestrian flow is maximum in the evening hours • The pedestrian flow is high due to the presence of informal sector , church, temple and a city bus stop. • The footpaths are occupied by two wheelers .

400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0

Time

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

08:45-09:00

08:30-08:45

08:15-08:30

08:00-08:15

05:45-06:00

05:30-05:45

05:15-05:30

05:00-05:15

04:45-05:00

04:30-04:45

04:15-04:30

04:00-04:15

01:15-02:00

01:30-01:45

01:15-01:30

01:00-01:15

12:45-01:00

12:30-12:45

12:15-12:30

12:00-12:15

09:45-10:00

09:30-09:45

09:15-09:30

09:00-09:15

08:45-09:00

08:30-08:45

08:15-08:30

Source : Primary Survey

08:00-08:15

Pedestrian Flow

Inference • The pedestrian flow is high in the morning peak hours. • The average pedestrian flow is 280 persons per 15 minutes. • Most of the pedestrians are the railway passengers . • The presence of monda market is one of the reason for high Towards Railway Station pedestrian flow .

Along the Road Across the Road

SCALE :

1:1000

PVC ANALYSIS Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

Towards Clock Tower

PLANNING PROJECT

Road Cross Section

SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION A

A C

C’

A’

Towards Rathifile Bus Stop

Towards Rathifile

Towards Monda market

B’

LEGEND

B’

Towards Shankar Mandal Road

A’

Towards Monda Market

C’

Towards Shankar Mandal Rd D

PEDESTRIAN FLOW AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION AT PEAK HOURS 8:30-9:30AM

12:30-1:30PM

Towards Clock tower

D’

• There is a continuous flow of pedestrians at this junction. • The pedestrian flow is heavy during the arrival and departure of the trains. • The roads are blocked by the Street hawkers causing inconvenience to the pedestrians. • Pedestrian in and out count is about 7,216 and 5,264 per hour. • Railway passengers are the major pedestrians at this junction.

PVC Heavy Moderate Low Source : Primary Survey

SCALE :

1:1000

PVC ANALYSIS 5:30-6:30 PM

8:30-9:30 PM

Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

8 AM

10 AM

PLANNING PROJECT

12 AM

SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

420

432

6 PM

4 PM

438

510

464

8 PM

410

Average Pedestrian flow for 15 minutes at Secunderabad junction . • Secunderabad Junction is a major intercity railway station and a commuter rail hub in the Hyderabad urban area. In the city center, the station is in the South Central Railway zone of Indian Railways. • Built in 1874 by the Nizam of Hyderabad during the British era. • Pedestrian flow in and out count is about 7,216 and 5,264 per hour. • Due to the presence of Railway station , bus stops and metro stations generate huge pedestrians at this junction. • Monda market is the informal street fully occupied by street vendors and pedestrians.

Source : Primary Survey

SCALE :

1:1000

PVC ANALYSIS Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

PLANNING PROJECT

4 9

OFF-STREET PARKING

ON STREET PARKING

Legend

5 8

Visitors parking area in Secunderabad railway station is about 12,500 sqm.

7 1

Off-street Parking

On-street parking

• Vehicles are being parked on the footpath. • There are 6 parking lots • There are no proper bus terminal s for the buses to • Four 2-wheeler ,Two 4-wheeler be parked . • Parking Area Capacity of 2-wheeler vehicles -2,300 two • Buses are parked on the roads. wheelers. • Dominated on street vehicles are the 3-wheelers. • Parking Demand – 11,300 vehicles • On street parking decreases the capacity of the • The parking lots are occupied at their capacity . existing roadway. • The parking charges are very high compared with the railway tickets. Source : Planning for multi modal hub at Secunderabad Report Source : Primary Survey ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

SCALE :

1:2,500

PARKING ANALYSIS Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

LOS A –Pedestrian Space >4.9 m2 Flow rate ≤ 12 p/m/m At LOS A walkways, pedestrians move in the path choose by them without shifting their movement in response with other pedestrians.

LOS B- Pedestrian Space >3.3-4.9 m2 Flow rate ≤ 12-15 p/m/m Pedestrians can choose their own walking speed because there is sufficient area for pedestrians to move freely and to bypass other pedestrians. >1.9-3.3m2

Vp=

Legend Rail way line Roads LOS A LOS B

V15 = peak 15 min flow rate(p /15-min ) LOS C

LOS D -Pedestrian Space >1.3-1.9m2 Flow rate ≤ 21-27 p/m/m The freedom to select the individual walking speed and to Bypass other pedestrians is restricted .Crossing or reverse flow moments face a high probability of conflict.

LOS D

LOS F Pedestrian Space ≤ 0.6m2 Flow rate varies All walking speeds are severely restricted and forward movement of pedestrians is only done by shuffling. Normal walking speed is very poor and reverse flow movement is highly impossible.

V15 -------------15* WE

PLANNING PROJECT

V p = pedestrian unit flow rate (p/min/m)

LOS B

LOS C- Pedestrian Space Flow rate ≤ 15-21p/m/m The space is sufficient for normal walking speeds and for bypassing other pedestrian in primarily unidirectional streams.

LOS E- Pedestrian Space >0.6-1.3m2 Flow rate ≤ 27-45 p/m/m All the pedestrians restrict their normal walking speed .Frequently adjusted. Forward movement of pedestrians is only possible by shuffling. Cross flow moments are only possible with difficulties .

LOS Unit flow rate

LOS A

LOS C LOS D

WE = effective walkway width (m)

LOS E LOS F

WE = Effective walkway width (m). WT =

Total walkway width (m).

Wo = Sum of the walkway widths and sky

Source : IRC Guidelines 1032012 HCM 2000,2010

distances from obstructions on the walkway (m).

PEDESTRIAN LEVEL OF SERVICE

LOS E

LOS F

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

SCALE :

1:2,500

LEVEL OF SERVICE Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

LOS A -At LOS A walkways, pedestrians move in the path choose by them without shifting their movement in response with other pedestrians.

LOS B- Pedestrians can choose their own walking speed because there is sufficient area for pedestrians to move freely and to bypass other pedestrians.

LOS C- The space is sufficient for normal walking speeds and for bypassing other pedestrian in primarily unidirectional streams.

LOS D -The freedom to walking speed and pedestrians is restricted flow moments face a conflict.

LOS E- All the pedestrians restrict their normal walking speed .Frequently adjusted. Forward movement of pedestrians is only possible by shuffling. Cross flow moments are only possible with difficulties .

LOS F- All walking speeds are severely restricted and forward movement of pedestrians is only done by shuffling. Normal walking speed is very poor and reverse flow movement is highly impossible.

select the individual to Bypass other .Crossing or reverse high probability of

RATHIFILE JN

RATHIFILE JUNCTION Total Effectiv IRC Road width e width LOS 1

Road

From blue sea

1.2

0.7

Towards clock tower

Towards ROB

0.75

From ROB Towards R S From R S

1 1 3

0.5 1 1

F E E

Towards R S

Towards 31B.S

Towards Mettuguda From Mettuguda Towards Sitafalmandi From Sitafalmandi

2 1 1 1

FLOW RATE

0.5 1 0.5

Towards Bhoiguda

0.5

From Bhoiguda

1.5

Towards Sec T2

From Sec T2

1 1.5

A A

A C

LOS B

>3.3-4.9 m2

LOS C

>1.9-3.3m2

A A

LOS E LOS F

SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

LOS B

≤ 12-15 p/m/m

LOS C

≤ 15- 21 p/m/m

LOS D

≤ 21-27 p/m/m

Sec IN

LOS E

≤ 27-49 p/m/m

LOS F

Varies

Sec OUT

Towards Monda market

Towards shankar mandal

PEDESTRIAN SPACE >4.9 m2

LOS D

≤ 12 p/m/m

CHILKALGUDA JN LOS A

LOS A LOS B

LOS A

SECUNDERABAD JN

Roads

Total Effectiv IRC width e width LOS

Rail way line

LOS C

Towards Blue sea

Road

Legend

GURUDWARA JN

GURUDWARA JUNCTION

CHILKALGUDA JUNCTION

PLANNING PROJECT

Road

Total Effectiv IRC width e width LOS

LOS D

>1.3-1.9m2

Towards Rathile

LOS E

>0.6-1.3m2

From rathifile

LOS F

≤ 0.6m2

Towards CT

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

SCALE :

1:2,500

LEVEL OF SERVICE Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

Legend Rail way line

LOS B

LOS C LOS D

LOS C

LOS D

LOS E

LOS F

CHILKALGUDA JUNCTION

LOS F

SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

LOS A LOS B

LOS C- Pedestrian Space >1.9-3.3m2 Flow rate ≤ 15-21p/m/m The space is sufficient for normal walking speeds and for bypassing other pedestrian in primarily unidirectional streams.

Roads

RATHIFILE JUNCTION

PLANNING PROJECT

LOS A

GURUDWARA JUNCTION

LOS A –Pedestrian Space >4.9 m2 Flow rate ≤ 12 p/m/m At LOS A walkways, pedestrians move in the path choose by them without shifting their movement in response with other pedestrians.

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

SCALE :

1:2,500

LOS Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

ISSUES • •

PEDESTRIANS

• •

FOOTPATHS

•

ROADS

• • •

TRAFFIC

• •

•

SIGNAGE

• •

PARKING

•

RATHIFILE JN CHILKALGUDA JN GURUDWARA JN Pedestrians walk on the • Haphazard crossing of • Haphazard road erupting the traffic. roads . movement of Vehicles Occupy the • Intersection is operated pedestrians. Crosswalks. manually. • Pedestrians walk on Jay walking . • No pedestrian signal. the road erupting the Nearly 800 pedestrians traffic. cross the road. • Absence of footpath barrier. Illegally Occupied by • Insufficient footpaths • Illegally vehicles commercial shops . • Vehicles are parked on Occupy Footpaths Encroachment of the footpaths. • Absence of footpath footpaths. • Absence of footpaths barrier Vehicles are parked on in both the direction. • Occupied by street the footpaths. • Contain electric poles. vendors. Inadequate footpath • Contain electric poles widths. . Lack of Authorized Bus • Lack of Authorized Bus • Roads are occupied Stops. Stops with3-wheelers . Congested roads. • Improper design of the junction. Nearly 187 buses take U- • Five busy roads • U-Turn of the buses Turn at the junction converge. due to the bus stops which interrupts the • Manual Operation of interrupts the traffic traffic flow . Intersections flow . Wrong direction driving. • Heavy traffic flow in • 3-wheelrs park on the Lining up of Buses . peak hours. road & obstruct traffic • Buses stop at flow. intersection. Lack of signs and zebra • Lack of signs • Lack of signs and crossings • Manual operation of zebra crossings. Manual Operation of heavy traffic . • Manual Operation of Intersections. Intersections. 3-wheelers block the • On street parking is • Buses are parked on road . observed . road . Insufficient of bus bay • 3-wheelers are parked • Insufficient of bus bay area for parking of on street. area for parking of buses. buses. ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

• •

•

• • •

SECUNDERABAD JN Irregular flow of pedestrians erupting traffic. Haphazard crossing of roads. Nearly 1200 pedestrians flow per 15 min at peak hours. Illegally Occupied by street hawkers. Encroachment of footpaths by commercials. Poor construction materials are used.

PLANNING PROJECT

Street vendors occupying Footpath

• 3-wheelers park on the roads causing congestion. • Manual Operation of Intersections. • Lining up of Buses . • U-Turn of the buses(218) due to the bus stops interrupts the traffic flow . • Lack of signs and zebra crossings. SCALE :

• Insufficient of bus bay area for parking of buses

ISSUES Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

PLANNING PROJECT

ISSUES Footpath

Pedestrian

ENCROACHMENT OF FOOTPATHS & ROADS

HAPAZARD MOVEMENT OF PEDESTRIANS 6

Signage 3

Parking Infrastructure

17 2 7

7 11 5

Traffic

9 10 16

14 19 8 18

15 9

ONSTREET PARKING 10

CONGESTED ROADS

HEAVY TRAFFIC 19

SCALE :

1:2,500

PRIORITASION OF ISSUES Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

IMPROPER FOOTPATHS

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

The pedestrian flow 80% of the is about 1.6 lack Footpaths in per day. the study area are completely occupied by the hawkers .

Pedestrians Nearly 500 buses take a U occupy 2/3rd turn causing traffic of the roads congestion. due heavy pedestrian activity in the study area.

Commuters and pedestrians face a hardship due to the presence of 3-4 liquor shops in the site area.

PLANNING PROJECT

St. Johns road is congested due to heavy traffic and narrow roads of 10m of carriage width.

Total commuters and pedestrians per day are about 5 lakhs in the study area.

Parking demand is about 11,000 vehicles per as the supply is only about 8,000 vehicles per day.

Buses are parked on the roads due to insufficient bus terminal area.

Oliphanta bridge was constructed in 1874 .

Uneven pavement surfaces are present . All the footpaths space is encroached by trees and electric poles at Chilkalguda junction.

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

SCALE :

1:2,500

QUANTIFICATION OF PROBLEM Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

RATHIFILE JUNCTION

LAND USE

DESIGN ELEMENTS

PLANNING PROJECT

KEY MAP

SCALE :

LEGENG

COMMERCIAL PUBLIC-SEMI PUBLIC

TRANSPORTATION

FOOTPATH

BUS STOP

STREET LIGHTS

MEDIAN

SIGNAL

TREES

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

1:1000

PROPOSALS Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

PLANNING PROJECT

Towards Railway station BB’

Towards Blue Sea AA’

RATHIFILE JUNCTION

FOOTPATH MEDIAN

BUS STOP SIGNAL

STREET LIGHTS TREES

COMMERCIAL

Towards Oliphanta Bridge CC’

LEGEND

Footpaths should have uniform height (150mm) and continuous.

PSP -1

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

Curb ramps are provided for people using wheel chairs at the junction.

SCALE :

1:1000

PROPOSALS Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

PLANNING PROJECT

CHILKALGUDA JUNCTION

LAND USE

LEGENG RESIDENTIAL

TRANSPORTATION

CHILKALGUDA JUNCTION

PUBLIC-SEMI PUBLIC

Public and semi public is the dominant land use present at this junction.

Bus stop is proposed to provide safe & A bus stop is comfortable waiting proposed at space . Gurudwara temple.

ON STREET PARKING

Vertical clearance of 2.4m is maintained .

Parallel parking is provided at the junction.

On street parking is provided at a distance of 25 m away from the Junction.

LEGEND FOOTPATH

BUS STOP SCALE :

MEDIAN

SIGNAL

STREET LIGHTS

METRO

1:1000

PROPOSALS Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008

TREES

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

PLANNING PROJECT

CHILKALGUDA JUNCTION

LEGEND FOOTPATH

MEDIAN METRO

SIGNAL STREET LIGHTS

Krishnadevaraya Rd AA’

TREES RESIDENTIAL PSP -1

Design speed of the rotatory junction is about 30kmhr

Towards Sitafalmandi BB’

SCALE :

1:1000

PROPOSALS Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

Towards ROB EE’

Towards SEC Exit DD’

Towards Bhoiguda CC’’

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

GURUDWARA JUNCTION

LAND USE

PLANNING PROJECT LEGENG

RESEDENTIAL

TRANSPORTATION

PUBLIC-SEMI PUBLICL

COMMERCIAL

GURUDWARA JUNCTION

SIGNAGE Sign boards are installed at the junction with 2.4m of vertical clearance.

DESIGN ELEMENTS

STREET LIGHTING Single light is proposed for the streets less than 12m. LEGENG

SCALE :

FOOTPATH

BUS STOP

STREET LIGHTS

MEDIAN

SIGNAGE

PLANTATION

FOB & METRO

1:1000

PROPOSALS Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

Towards Clock Tower

Towards Railway station AA’

GURUDWARA JUNCTION

PLANNING PROJECT

GURUDWARA JUNCTION FOOTPATH

GURUDWARA JUNCTION

MEDIAN BUS STOP SIGNAL STREET LIGHTS

Towards Clock tower BB’

TREES RESIDENTIAL PSP -5 COMMERCIAL

Towards Railway Station

STREET LIGHTS Towards Monda market CC’ A bus stop is proposed at gurudwara temple

Towards CT DD’ SCALE :

1:1000

PROPOSALS LED street lights with a height of 12 m are proposed with 30m of interval distance. ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

LAND USE

PLANNING PROJECT

LAND USE

SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

LEGENG COMMERCIAL

TRANSPORTATION

PUBLIC-SEMI PUBLIC

BURIAL GROUND

1m of MUZ is provides to accommodate vendors the

footpaths

on the

Secunderabad junction.

DESIGN ELEMENTS Universal accessibility is provide for all , including differently disabled by providing Kerb ramps at crossings. A FOB connecting the sky way is proposed at the sec railway station in gate to provide accessibility to the pedestrians.

SCALE :

LEGEND FOOTPATH MEDIAN

BUS STOP FOB

STREET LIGHTS TREES

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

1:1000

PROPOSALS Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

Shankar Mandal Rd DD’

PLANNING PROJECT

SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION LEDENG

SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

FOOTPATH MEDIAN BUS STOP SIGNAL STREET LIGHTS

Monda Market Rd CC’

TREES RAILWAY STATION

PSP -5 COMMERCIAL

Towards Rathifile AA’

Towards Clock Tower BB’

SCALE :

1:1000

PROPOSALS Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008

ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

PLANNING PROJECT

SKY WALK

• The skywalk will help in the improvement of the flow of passengers and vehicles in and around the junction , reduction in traffic congestion resulting in smooth and safe flow of pedestrians. • The walkway width is about 4.5m on Snt Mary Rd and it is about 6 m at Secunderabad west metro. • FOBs and escalators are place at gurudwara temple and at the In gate of Secunderabad railway station Structure of Sky walk at Metro.

The structure of the skywalk is based on the simple geometry of a tetrahedron/ space.

Integration of a sky walk to the existing metro track at gurudwara junction.

Structure of sky walk on St Mary Rd. The total length of sky walk is about 650mts.

Material Pile foundation Steel

Quantity M 40 500 MT

Truss Slab(Polycarbo nate sheet) Staircase Steel FOB Escalator

6069Kg 2600sqmts

Amount .Rs 50lakhs 200 lakhs 4 lakhs 13 lakhs

Steel (200 tones) 0.5lakhs 2 20lakhs 4 400lakhs

Total cost

Rs.700 lakhs

COST ESTIMATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS SL.NO

ELEMENT

PER UNIT COST

1 2 3 4 5

FOOTPATH ROAD MARKINGS BUS STOP STREET LIGHTS SIGNAL

6 7 8 9 10

SIGNAGE KERB KERB RAMP SKY WALK MISCELLANEOUS

Rs100/sqmts Rs300/sqmts Rs1lakh/unit Led Rs 2000/unit LED traffic signal -10,000/Unit Pedestrian signal Rs3000/Unit Rs 200/unit Rs60 /m (500mm*120mm*150mm) Rs3600/unit

TOTAL QUANTITY

TOTAL COST

11,500sqmts 270sqmts 3 units 150 units 5 units 10units 25units 3000mts 20units 1unit

Rs.11,50,000 Rs.1,00,000 Rs.3,00,000 Rs.3,00,000 Rs.50,000 Rs.30,000 Rs.50,000 Rs.1,80,000 Rs.72,000 Rs 7,00,00,000 Rs.1,00,000 Rs8,00,00,000(8 crores)

TOTAL COST ACTION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIANS AT SECUNDERABAD JUNCTION

Steel columns are provided around the metro columns.

SCALE :

1:2,500

PROPOSALS Department of Urban & Regional Planning School of Planning & Architecture JNAFAU

B.MOUNIKA 16011BA008 Thesis Guide

E. Sandhya Reddy G. Sai Krishna Kumar

B.Tech Planning IV Year VIII Semester

Sheet No

Action Plan For Pedestrians at Secunderabad Junction