Issuu

City of College Park

COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Analysis and 30 Percent Design for Five Street Segments March 2021

City of College Park

COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN: Analysis and 30 Percent Design for Five Street Segments

PREPARED FOR:

Prince George’s County Planning Department 14741 Governor Oden Bowie Drive, Upper Marlboro, MD 20772 Phone: 301-952-3208 | http://pgplanning.org/

Planning and Community Development City of College Park, Maryland 4500 Knox Road, College Park, MD 20740 Phone: 240-487-3538 https://www.collegeparkmd.gov/318/Complete-and-Green-Streets-Implementatio PREPARED BY:

AMT Inc. 4640 Forbes Boulevard, Suite 320, Lanham, MD 20706 Phone: 301-577-7800 | https://amtengineering.com/ Cover photographs: Top and center: City of College Park Bottom: AMT

ABSTRACT DATE: March 2021 TITLE: City of College Park Complete and Green Streets Implementation Plan: 30 Percent Design for Five Street Segments AUTHOR: The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, Prince George’s County Planning Department SUBJECT: Complete and Green Street Reconstruction Projects SOURCE OF COPIES: The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission 14741 Governor Oden Bowie Drive Upper Marlboro, MD 20772 NUMBER OF PAGES: 95 The project was funded through the Planning Assistance to Municipalities and Communities (PAMC) program administered by the Prince George’s County Planning Department. In 2016, the City of College Park adopted a Complete and Green Streets Policy. This policy seeks to provide immediate and long‐term benefits for community residents by incorporating safe multimodal transportation options throughout the city by reconstructing streets to incorporate complete and green principles. These principles include sidewalks, bicycle routes, stormwater best management (low-impact development) practices, and street trees. In 2019, the city applied for and was awarded (by the Prince George’s County Planning Board) planning assistance to implement the city’s 2016 policy using an M-NCPPC-funded consultant. The consultant assessed the feasibility of implementing complete and green streets infrastructure on previously identified priority street segments. The 30 percent designs and cost estimates developed in this project will be used to gather community consensus through outreach, apply for grants, develop final designs, and advance projects to construction. This report describes the process of selecting the prioritized street segments and summarizes the 30 percent designs and cost estimates.

Table of Contents SECTION 1: BACKGROUND AND PROJECT GOALS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................................................................................................6 PROJECT GOALS......................................................................................................................................................................................................................8

SECTION 2: REVIEW OF EXISTING CONDITIONS AND EVALUATION OF STREET SEGMENTS FOR FURTHER ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS................................................................................................................................................................................12 CONNECTIVITY ROUTES AND SIDEWALKS..............................................................................................................................................................12 EXISTING SIDEWALKS.........................................................................................................................................................................................................14 SIDEWALK COVERAGE........................................................................................................................................................................................................16 COMPLETE LIST OF CITY STREETS WITH SIDEWALKS......................................................................................................................................18 PRIOR BASELINE ANALYSIS, STREET SEGMENT RECONSTRUCTION STUDIES AND IMPLEMENTATION EFFORTS............20

SECTION 3: TWELVE STREET SEGMENTS PRIORITIZED FOR RECONSTRUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . 23 PRELIMINARY STREET-SEGMENT PRIORITIZATION MATRIX ..............................................................................................24 TWELVE TARGETED AND PRIORITIZED STREET SEGMENTS.........................................................................................................................28

SECTION 4: SIX HIGHEST-RANKED STREET SEGMENTS AND CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 HIGHEST-RANKED STREET SEGMENTS ................................................................................................................................32 COLLEGE PARK CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION.....................................................................................................................................................40

SECTION 5: FINAL FIVE CITY STREET SEGMENTS FOR 30 PERCENT DESIGN: PLANS, FIVE-YEAR CIP AND UPDATED MATRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 30 PERCENT PLANS AND COST ESTIMATES FOR COMPLETE AND GREEN STREET RECONSTRUCTION...............................................................................................................................44

APPENDICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 APPENDIX A. CITY OF COLLEGE PARK INITIAL COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS MATRIX (AUGUST 2017).........................60 APPENDIX B. COLLEGE PARK STREETS WITHOUT SIDEWALKS....................................................................................................................63 APPENDIX C. MEETING MINUTES.................................................................................................................................................................................67 APPENDIX D. CITY ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS FROM COMPLETE STREETS CONSIDERATION...................................................84 APPENDIX E. FINAL COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS MATRIX (AUGUST 2020)..................................................................................86 APPENDIX F. CITY OF COLLEGE PARK RESOLUTION 16-R-06 COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS POLICY....................................................................................................................................................................................................95

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .C-29

SECTION 1 BACKGROUND AND PROJECT GOALS

INTRODUCTION In 2016, the City of College Park adopted a Complete and Green Streets Policy (See Appendix F.). This policy seeks to provide immediate and long‐term benefits for community residents by incorporating safe multimodal transportation options throughout the city. This can be accomplished by reconstructing streets to incorporate complete and green principles such as sidewalks, bicycle routes, low impact development (LID)stormwater best management practices and street trees. Design and construction of such measures are already underway on Berwyn Road, Osage Trail, 49th Avenue, and the Beechwood Road Bridge. Further improvements are planned for Hollywood and Edmonston Roads. When the reconstructions are complete, residents will start to enjoy the policy’s benefits. The city’s policy compliments the official complete and green streets policy for Prince George’s County, established in 2012 by Council Bill CB-83-2012. This bill requires that all County-financed and approved road projects include accommodations for all modes of transportation. It also included a provision that all Countyfunded projects must meet complete streets standards unless they are found to be cost prohibitive.1 The purpose of this report is to advance the goals and priorities outlined in the 2016 policy by prioritizing further street segments for reconstruction and providing 30 percent plans and cost estimates. Products summarized in this report will be used to gather community consensus through outreach, apply for grants, develop final designs, and advance projects to construction.

Source: 2014 Plan Prince George’s 2035 Approved General Plan, p.148.

ABOUT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Stormwater runoff is generated when precipitation from rain and snow events flows over land or impervious surfaces and does not percolate into the ground. As the runoff flows over these surfaces such as paved streets, parking lots, and building rooftops, it accumulates debris, chemicals, sediment, or other pollutants that harm County streams and waterways if the runoff is not treated. While centralized stormwater retention ponds and detention facilities have been the dominant approach to addressing the quality and quantity of runoff, updates to the County’s stormwater regulations now reflect a more comprehensive and smaller-scale approach to stormwater management practices, referred to commonly as LID. LID relies on small-scale stormwater management practices, nonstructural techniques, and better site planning to mimic natural hydrologic runoff characteristics and minimize the impact of land development on water resources. Examples of LID include rain gardens, landscape ( filter) strips, and conservation landscaping with native plants. —Adapted from the 2014 Plan Prince George’s 2035 Approved General Plan, page 164.

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

City of College Park, Maryland COLLEGE PARK CITY MAP

Buildings City Limits

Ave

Island

Rhode

5 1st P l W ic hi ta Ave 52nd A ve 53rd A ve

l 49th P

l 48th P

imo S

Eutaw Pl

n ¤

Iroq uoi sS t ron St

51st Ave

Greenbelt Station

Apache St

Ave

l 50th P

m to

e Av

aho Nav

tel Dr Rossb oroug h Ln Cam

pus

e le Av Ya Fra t eNo

ge A ve

rwich

Old Town

Lord Calvert Manor Calvert Rd

Fordham Rd

Dartm

Guilfo rd Rd

College Park Estates

Calvert Hills

Colum bia Ave

Colle

n Mawr Rd Bry Chestnut Hill Rd

n ¤

College Park - U of MD Station

Kropps Addition

Radcliffe Dr Baylor A ve Edmo nst on R

48t

Ho us e

Lakeland

outh Ave

L e hig h R d Knox Rd

uebe c St

Pier ce A ve

r n ity

pel L

Cha

ke Pl

Ave

Be rw yn

Roan o

54th

Pontiac St

hA ve

Regents Dr

Union Ln

Alumni Dr

Geron

Berwyn Q

River Rd

Parks

Paint Branch Dr

Baltimore

Terrapin Trl

d Blv ity ive rs Un

Trails

49th A ve

48th A ve

Boteler Ln

Autovill e

Sa int An d Dr rew ak eP l

Bri dg

Purple Line

Championship Ln

E hrensb

MARC Camden Line

Keota Ter

Daniels Park Kenesaw St

Ruata n St Berw yn R d

MARC Station

Lagun a Rd Lacka wanna St

ood R

Fox S

Blackfoo t Rd

t Dr inker Pre

n ¤

Metro Green Line

Fieldhouse D r

Metro Station

e St

Farm Dr

att Mow

us Dr

Edgewood Rd Mineola Rd

Oak Springs

roke

a Os

Camp

Che

Cap Belt Il Niaga So Hw ra Pl y

Hollywood

Hollyw

Erie

Sunnyside

University BranchvilleGreenbelt le Rd Rd Tecum seh St View

Wellne ss W ay Valley Dr

Union Dr

Niagara Rd Nantucket Rd

skogee St Mu

Del awa re

University Blvd

Stadium Dr

er erg

ssa Rd

Branchvil

tial Dr siden Pre

Paducah R d

Ode

l A Hwy

ll R

e rs

R ow

Blv

Cherry Hill

l eP on

Autoville

Duke St

B elt O

In d i a n L n

Crystal Springs

el ph

Kie rna nR d

Lime st

r St ate ew

ter

Baltim ore A ve 47th P l

Park Dr

Cap

College Park Woods Metzero tt Rd

Mar lbr o

y Wa ea Ik

Wofford

ay hW ug

Ike

52n

This map shows the city boundary, the University of Maryland campus boundary, public transportation options, trails, subdivisions (in red), and parkland.

Created by: College Park Engineering Source: College Park GIS, M-NCPPC Created: 10/26/2020

Yarrow Old Calvert R d

Amherst Rd

Albion Rd

University of Maryland

n ¤

1,000 2,000

4,000 Feet

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

PROJECT GOALS Many City of College Park streets are the product of car-centric planning and lack pedestrian and bicycle amenities. This project seeks to: • Assess the feasibility of implementing complete and green street principles. • Create a safe and continuous network of bicycle and pedestrian‐friendly streets. • Provide trees and greener streets in context‐sensitive designs. • Advance neighborhood sidewalk equability. • Implement projects that advance County and state stormwater management goals where possible. • Identify streetscape enhancements at key intersections where community activities may be concentrated and safely account for all users of the public right‐of‐way.

By implementing these objectives, this project aims to improve safety, connect neighborhoods with community attractions, and enhance the public realm. Improvements are suggested based on field observations, data analysis, construction costs, and College Park City Council direction. The project team, including the City of College Park Planning Department, the Prince George’s County Planning Department, College Park City Council, and A. Morton Thomas and Associates, Inc., collaborated to identify specific street segments for conceptual design and inclusion in the city’s Five‐Year Capital Improvement Program. This project will help advance consensus by providing implementation details and forecasting construction costs.

This project builds upon the findings and recommendations from the 2014 Plan Prince George’s 2035 Approved General Plan; the 2017 Prince George’s County Urban Street Design Standards; 2018 City of College Park Department of Engineering maps, and the 2016 City of College Park Complete Streets Policy and Implementation Plan and its corresponding street priority matrix.

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK MARYLAND

Prince George’s County Department of Public Works and Transporation Darrell B. Mobley Director

URBAN

Street Design

STANDARDS

AUGUST 2017

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

COMPLETE STREETS POLICY AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FINAL REPORT MARCH 2016

1 City of College Park | Complete Streets Policy and Implementation Plan

Rushern L. Baker, III County Executive

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

SECTION 2 REVIEW OF EXISTING CONDITIONS AND EVALUATION OF STREET SEGMENTS FOR FURTHER ANALYSIS

EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS The City of College Park Planning Department used geographic information system mapping technology to target street segments for complete and green reconstruction. The maps that follow demonstrate the presence and absence of features such as sidewalks, trails, and other transportation infrastructure. Gaps in non-vehicular transportation options are revealed, allowing pedestrian and bicycle improvements for certain neighborhoods to be prioritized.

CONNECTIVITY ROUTES AND SIDEWALKS (MAP RIGHT) The primary vehicular connector routes for each neighborhood are shown in blue. Trails (green) are present, but mostly in public park areas. Sidewalks (red) are clustered in certain neighborhoods.

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

EXISTING SIDEWALKS (MAP RIGHT)

Existing sidewalks are common in the northern and southern extents of the city. Sidewalks increase walkability, reduce reliance on automobiles, and increase pedestrian safety. Areas without sidewalks miss out on these benefits. The many sidewalks within the University of Maryland campus are not shown as they are not City of College Park sidewalks.

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

SIDEWALK COVERAGE The data shown on the prior pages include the length of each street and sidewalk. By combining these data with College Park’s neighborhood association boundaries, a better understanding is obtained of how walkable a particular part of the city is, and how neighborhoods can be compared in terms of sidewalk coverage. The oldest neighborhoods of Lakeland and Old Town already have greater than 90 percent sidewalk coverage. Both denser residential areas (such as North College Park and Berwyn) and less dense residential areas (such as West College Park, College Park Estates, and Yarrow) that currently have little to no sidewalk coverage are recommended to be prioritized for reconstruction. This prioritization should continue until equitable sidewalk coverage is achieved throughout the city.

SIDEWALK COVERAGE BY SUBDIVISION When the North College Park Citizen’s Association sidewalk coverage is broken down by subdivision, the disparity becomes more apparent than the 45-percent average indicates.

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

SIDEWALK COVERAGE BY NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION This map’s percentages represent the total street length with a sidewalk or trail, broken down by neighborhood association.

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

COMPLETE LIST OF CITY STREETS WITH SIDEWALKS NEIGHBORHOOD SIDEWALK PERCENTAGE COVERAGE The presence of a sidewalk, (and the neighborhood sidewalk percentage) was determined using the maps on the prior pages. Examination of aerial photographs research was also used to verify the presence of sidewalks. Streets that are owned or maintained by MDOT SHA (Maryland Department of Transportation State Highways Administration) or DPW&T (Prince George’s County Department of Public Works and Transportation) are excluded from this study. Examples of state roads within city limits include MD 193 (University Boulevard/ Greenbelt Road) and US 1 (Baltimore Avenue). Examples of County roads within city limits include Cherry Hill Road, Cherrywood Lane, Metzerott Road, Rhode Island Avenue and Campus Drive.

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Neighborhood

Street 48th Avenue 51st Avenue 54th Avenue Lakeland (100%) Lakeland Road Melbourne Place COLLEGE PARK CITY STREETS WITH SIDEWALKS Navahoe Street These streets have a sidewalk on one or both sides Pierce Avenue of the street. This list is not an assessment of the Calvert Road existing condition of sidewalk, nor ADA (Americans College Avenue with Disabilities Act) compliance. Columbia Avenue Dickinson Avenue Hartwick Road Old Town (91%) Hopkins Avenue Howard Lane Knox Road Lehigh Road Princeton Avenue Yale Avenue Amherst Road Calvert Road Calvert Hills (65%) Fordham Lane Guilford Road Harvard Road 51st Avenue (north of Narragansett Parkway) 51st Place 51st Terrace 52nd Avenue (Narragansett Parkway to Mangum Road, Odessa Road to Paducah Road) 52nd Place Caddo Street Catawba Street Cherry Hill Road Edgewood Road Keota Terrace North College Park (45%) Mangum Road Mineola Road Muskogee Street Narragansett Parkway Niagara Place Odessa Road Ontario Road Palco Place Paducah Road Stewart Court Wichita Avenue 54th Avenue Ash Avenue Berwyn District (44%) Berwyn House Road Berwyn Road Navahoe Street West College Park (2%) Acredale Court

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

PRIOR BASELINE ANALYSIS, STREET SEGMENT RECONSTRUCTION STUDIES AND IMPLEMENTATION EFFORTS PRELIMINARY PRIORITY STREETS IDENTIFIED BY CITY STAFF (AUGUST 2017) In 2017, the city analyzed 98 street segments spread across 25 city streets. Each segment was scored by the presence or absence of obstacles and opportunities and then ranked to assess the feasibility and necessity for complete and green reconstruction. The list focused on city-owned neighborhood connector streets that link to US 1 (Baltimore Avenue), Rhode Island Avenue, or other major destinations. See Appendix A for the city’s 2017 matrix that served as a starting point for this project. PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF STREETS WITHOUT SIDEWALKS A preliminary analysis of all city streets that do not have sidewalks was undertaken by A. Morton Thomas and Associates, Inc. (AMT) following the drafting of the city’s initial sidewalk concepts. Streets that were previously identified as candidates for reconstruction in the city’s capital improvement plan (CIP), by the city engineer, or within the city’s draft matrix received additional consideration for this analysis. These streets were also evaluated for connectivity improvements. Streets where a new sidewalk would connect to existing circulation networks were favored (see Appendix B). City planning department staff provided comment on AMT’s initial shortlist of city streets and critique of the city’s draft matrix (see Appendix C). Based on their knowledge of the city, prior resident comment, and the current CIP, the city recommended that certain streets should be either added or removed from the list for further consideration (see Appendix D). CITY DRAFT CONCEPTS FOR STREET SEGMENT SIDEWALK INSTALLATION After completion of the draft matrix, the city studied the potential for new sidewalks on the following street segments: • Hollywood Road: As part of a separate project, the city is currently developing 30 percent sidewalk design plans for Hollywood Road between Rhode Island Avenue and US 1 (Baltimore Avenue). A new sidewalk in this residential area would provide improved walkability to the Hollywood Park playground, North College Park Post Office and the Rhode Island Avenue corridor. The estimated cost for the Hollywood Road sidewalk project is $486,470. • DePauw Place: The city prepared a sketch for this street due to its wide right-of-way and complete lack of sidewalks in the neighborhood. In areas with mature trees, flexible porous pavement is recommended to reduce impacts to roots. A new sidewalk would present the opportunity to connect to other potential future projects, including a sidewalk on St. Andrews Place and a planned M-NCPPC hard-surface trail at the east end of DePauw Place. • St. Andrews Place and Metzerott Road: The city and County are coordinating on the addition of a sidewalk along the north side of Metzerott Road and the east side of city-owned St. Andrews Place (between Metzerott Road and Duke Street). This will provide a safe and accessible route to the bus stops on County-owned Metzerott Road. • Bowdoin Avenue: Many pedestrians currently use the Bowdoin Avenue roadway because there are no sidewalks. The narrow right-of-way, hedgerows, and utility poles are significant challenges, but a new sidewalk in this location would provide a critical north-south pedestrian connection from Erskine Road to the College Park MARC and WMATA stations.

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

lace d

Rh o d e

Island Avenu e

49th P

48th P

o d Ro a 49th A venue

48th A venue

Hollyw o

US 1 (B

altimo re

Avenu e)

47th P

lace

Hollywood Road

DePauw Place

Metze rott

drews

et R o ad

St. An

Duke Stre

Place

St .

Gettys b

An dr ew

urg La ne

DePauw Place

o ad

Bow

R o ad Fordham Road Erskine Road

Rive rR

Guilfo rd

R o ad

enu e

Harv ard

doin Av

Calve r t Ro

Colu mbi a Av

enu e

St. Andrews Place and Metzerott Road

Bowdoin Avenue

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

SECTION 3 TWELVE STREET SEGMENTS PRIORITIZED FOR RECONSTRUCTION

PRELIMINARY STREET-SEGMENT PRIORITIZATION MATRIX Following meetings with city staff, research, and site visits, the city’s 2017 matrix (see Appendix A) was revised in two significant ways: first, A. Morton Thomas and Associates, Inc., expanded the list of streets based on findings shown in Appendices B and D to include additional potential street segments; second, the matrix was expanded to include additional criteria that can be objectively assessed, such as potential impacts to trees, stormwater LID potential and connectivity to existing features ( for example, public parks, facilities, or transportation networks). As with the 2017 matrix, this preliminary matrix consolidates information on each street segment’s right-of-way, topography, parking, vegetation and utilities. Based on the cumulative score relative to the other street segments in the matrix, preliminary recommendations are provided based on the above-referenced criteria. The street segments are ranked high to low by their matrix score.

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Existing Road Section (approx.)

PARALLEL PARKING: Present both sides. Parking is not expected to be significantly impacted by sidewalk designs. OBSTACLES: Utility poles on SW side of street. Steep descent down to Sweetbriar Drive. Utility poles on north side of Wellesley Drive between Bryn Mawr Road and Sweetbriar Drive. VEG/TREES: Mature trees on SW side of street. Mature silver maples at 7511 Wellesley Drive. Recommend a bump out here. Mature trees on north side of Wellesley Drive between Bryn Mawr Road and Sweetbriar Drive. Where trees are present near a potential sidewalk or close to the back of curb, use flexible porous/permeable pavement. POINTS AT RIGHT ARE FOR THE EAST SIDE OF WELLESLEY DRIVE.

PARALLEL PARKING: Present. Parking is not expected to be significantly impacted by sidewalk designs. OBSTACLES: Majority of utility poles are on west side of St. Andrews Place. Fire hydrant on west side. There is a utility pole/guy wire at 9019 St. Andrews Place (east side) that needs to be avoided/relocated. VEG/TREES: Several established trees (including maples, locusts, and others), dense vegetation and planting beds on the east side near 9011, 9013, 9015, 9017, 9117 and 9122 St. Andrews Place. STORM DRAINS: on east side POSSIBLE CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING: ‐Existing crosswalk at Duke Street. North of this crosswalk the utility poles move the east side of St. Andrews Place, but are set pretty far back behind the curb. ‐Connection to College Park Woods is on the east side of St. Andrews Place ‐Existing crosswalk at intersection with De Pauw Place. POINTS AT RIGHT ARE FOR THE EAST SIDE OF ST. ANDREWS PLACE.

Preliminary Notes

ROW BC

Wall

0.5

•1 = not •3 = flat needed •2 = <10% •.5 = short •1 = <20% curb •0 = >20% •0 = needed

Topo

Opportunities for Bump‐ Outs & SWM

LID Potential Scoring .5 pt each for the following

Connectivity Scoring

0.5

1.5

•2 = storm drains present •neighborhood has a sidewalk coverage and bump‐outs are below 50% feasible •connect to park •2 = limited impact •2 = none/minor •1 = storm drains not •connect to public facility •1 = moderate impact •1 = moderate present but bump‐outs •connect to existing sidewalk •0 = severe impact •0 = significant/too many are relatively feasible •connect to a proposed sidewalk/trail •0 = bump‐outs not •connect to City/County bus route and/or feasible WMATA network

Trees Impact/Removals

Obstacles (poles, hydrants, fence, etc.)

Existing Design Constraints Scoring

Priority Street Segment Selection Matrix

PARALLEL PARKING: Present. Possible minor impacts to existing parking by sidewalk designs. OBSTACLES: Between St. Andrews Place and Limestone Place, utility poles on south side of street right behind curb and gutter. South side is flatter slope. North side may require a wall/short curb in some areas. VEG/TREES: Planting bed at 9122 Gettysburg Lane. (2) ~20+ trees outside 3612 DePauw Place. (1) ~20+ tree outside each 9017 Gettysburg Lane, 9018 Gettysburg Lane and 3616 DePauw Place. POINTS AT RIGHT ARE FOR THE NORTH SIDE OF DePAUW PLACE.

Neighborhood

West College Park

College Park Estates

Street Name

St. Andrews Place

De Pauw Place

Wellesley Drive

From (Cross Street 1)

Duke Street

St. Andrews Place

Edmonston Road

To (Cross Street 2)

De Pauw Place

dead end/Gettysburg Lane

Sweetbriar Drive

ROW width

80 feet (raised‐curb landscaped median between Metzerott Road to about 200 feet north of Duke Street) 60 feet (double yellow) 50 feet

50 feet

60 feet

Street Segment Length (approx.)

1670 feet

730 feet

1940 feet

10 foot median/curb and gutter/20 foot travel lane/curb and gutter 24 feet curb to curb (parallel parking each side)

double yellow/12 foot travel lane/6 foot parallel parking/curb and gutter (parallel parking each side)

•2 = >10 feet •1 = >5feet •0 = >5feet

34 feet curb to curb

PROJECT SCORE 11.5

11.5

Due the the width of the street, there is considerable potential for a complete street with SWM bump‐outs, maintaining the parallel parking, protecting mature trees, avoiding utilities, and adding a sidewalk on the NW side (and a connection to a potential sidewalk on Edmonston). If too challenging, could end the new complete street/sidewalks at Bryn Mawr Road.

1. City's concept at Metzerott Road/St. Andrews Place is on the north side of Metzerott Road/east side of St. Andrews Place. Metzerott Road (county road) may receive a future sidewalk but is outside scope of work for this project. Currently there is a "desire path" on the east corner of St. Andrews Place/Metzerott Road. 2. Proposed sidewalk begins on north side of Duke Street. 3. Proposed sidewalk on east side of St. Andrews Place to De Pauw Place corner. This is the same side recommended by the City's initial matrix.

Preliminary Recommendations

YES

RECOMMENDED FOR 30% DESIGN?

Street Name

St. Andrews Cherokee Place Street

Neighborhood

St. Andrews Place

Edmonston 47th PlaceRoad

Narragansett Parkway

De Pauw Place

Wellesley Drive 48th Place

52nd Avenue

College Park Estates North College Park

North College Park

Edmonston Road

West College ParkCollege Park North

West College College Park Park Estates/ Yarrow

From (Cross Street 1)

48th Place

Duke Street

Drive Delaware Street (or Sweetbriar at least Indian Lane or Fox Street)

Huron Street

Old Calvert Road

To (Cross Street 2)

De Pauw Place Rhode Island Avenue

dead end/Gettysburg Lane Bryn Mawr Road

ROW width

80 feet (raised‐curb landscaped median between Metzerott Road to about 200 feet of Duke Street) 50north feet (from 48th Place to Rhode Island 60 feet (double yellow)Avenue) 50 feet

50 feet

80 feet

variable 45‐50 feet (to Fox Street) 60 feet 40 feet (to Delaware Street)

30 feet (Huron to Kenesaw) 50 feet (Kenesaw to Narragansett)

Street Segment Length (approx.) 800 feet 1670 feet 3260 feet 730 feet

Existing Road Section (approx.)

2460 feet (to Indian Lane) feetStreet) 2930 feet1940 (to Fox 3780 feet (to Delaware Street) 1260 feet

double yellow/11 foot travel lane/ 1 foot paved shoulder 10 foot median/curb and gutter/20 foot travel lane/curb and gutter OR 24 feet curb to curb double yellow/12 foot travel lane/9 foot parallel parking 26 feet curb to curb double yellow/12 foot travel lane/6 foot parallel parking/curb and (parallel parking each side) (Typically open section but some asphalt curbs sporadically throughout gutter (parallel parking each side) the road.) 26 feet curb to curb 34 feet curb to curb 28 feet curb to curb

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PARALLEL PARKING: Present. Possible minor impacts to existing parking by sidewalk designs. OBSTACLES: Between Narragansett Parkway and Kenesaw Street, fewer obstructions on west side of 52 Avenue. Bump‐ outs may still be necessary, however. Steep banks between Kenesaw Street and Huron Street, the east side has more potential. VEG/TREES: (1) ~10 inch Zelkova outside 9608 52nd Avenue and (1) ~15 inch maple outside 9604 52nd Avenue. POSSIBLE CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING: existing sidewalks on each side of 52nd Avenue north of Narragansett Parkway. Could tie into either side.

‐Existing crosswalk at Duke Street. North of this crosswalk PARALLEL PARKING: side between the utility poles moveParallel the eastparking side ofwest St. Andrews Place, but Brynset Mawr Road Drive. are pretty far and backWellesley behind the curb.Possible minor impacts to existing parking sidewalk ‐Connection to College Parkby Woods is ondesigns. the east side of St. OBSTACLES: Wall will be needed at 7314 Edmonston Road. Andrews Place "Yarrow"crosswalk entrance at brick walls will need to be preserved ‐Existing intersection with De Pauw Place. at RadcliffeAT Drive intersection. Possibly minor POINTS RIGHT ARE FOR THE EASTaSIDE OFbump‐out ST. ANDREWS needed. PLACE. VEG/TREES: Planting bed at 7302 Edmonston Road. Large trees at 7308‐7314 Edmonston but most impacts can be avoided. Vegetation gets denser north of Wellesley Drive. INTERSECTING STREET: Narrow intersection width at Knoxville Drive by bumping out curb. This will reducePresent. proposed crosswalk length. PARALLEL PARKING: Possible minor impacts to The Marenka House (Historcdesigns. Site 66‐076) at 7300 Radcliffe existing parking by sidewalk Road is protected by the Historic Preservation OBSTACLES: Between St. County Andrews Place and Limestone Ordinance and side is listed on theright National Register Place, utility(Subtitle poles on29) south of street behind curb of Historic Installation a sidewalk and gutter.Places. South side is flatterofslope. Northmay siderequire may coordination with the Prince George's County Historic require a wall/short curb in some areas. PreservationPlanting Commission. VEG/TREES: bed at 9122 Gettysburg Lane. (2) ~20+ POINTS AT RIGHT FOR THE WEST SIDEtree OF outside each trees outside 3612ARE DePauw Place. (1) ~20+ EDMONSTON ROAD. 9017 Gettysburg Lane, 9018 Gettysburg Lane and 3616 DePauw Place. PARALLEL Sidewalk could cause POINTS ATPARKING: RIGHT AREPresent. FOR THE NORTHdesign SIDE OF DePAUW minor impacts. PLACE. OBSTACLES: Appears that a garage is encroaching in the ROW at 4813 Hollywood Road. Will need new mid‐block crosswalks to avoid steep banks, retaining walls and trees in ROW. Needed to simplify PARALLEL PARKING: Present both sides. Parking is not construction and reduce costs. expected to be significantly impacted by sidewalk designs. Steep descent down from 47th Place. OBSTACLES: Utility poles on SW side of street. Steep descent TREES/VEG: Possibly some small trees removed between down to Sweetbriar Drive. Utility poles on north side of 9714 and 9718 48th Place. Could pinch sidewalk down here Wellesley Drive between Bryn Mawr Road and Sweetbriar to 3‐4 feet if needed. Dense vegetation and several mature Drive. deciduous trees south of Indian Lane towards Delaware VEG/TREES: Mature trees on SW side of street. Mature Street. silver maples at 7511 Wellesley Drive. Recommend a bump POSSIBLE CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING: out here. Mature trees on north side of Wellesley Drive Existing sidewalks terminate at 47th Place corner. Good tie‐ between Bryn Mawr Road and Sweetbriar Drive. Where in potential. trees are present near a potential sidewalk or close to the Existing sidewalks terminate at three‐out‐of‐the‐four back of curb, use flexible porous/permeable pavement. corners at 48th Place/Muskogee Street. Tie new sidewalk POINTS AT RIGHT ARE FOR THE EAST SIDE OF WELLESLEY into the existing northwest corner sidewalk. Two existing DRIVE. crosswalks, too. Existing sidewalk east side 48th Place between Muskogee Street and Lackawanna Street. There is a strip of sidewalk on the east side of 48th Place between Hollywood Road and Iroquois Street. Place new sidewalk on this side to tie into existing sidewalks. POINTS AT RIGHT ARE FOR EXTENDING THE PROJECT TO INDIAN LANE.

PARALLEL PARKING: Present. Possible minor impacts to existing parking by sidewalk PARALLEL PARKING: Present.designs. Parking is not expected to be OBSTACLES:impacted Obstructions the entire length; however, they significantly by sidewalk designs. can be worked aroundoftoutility installpoles a sidewalk. OBSTACLES: Majority are on west side of St. VEG/TREES: ~20" Zelkova and outside 4805 Andrews Place. Fire hydrant onshrubs west side. There is a utility Cherokeewire Street. ~18 inch BradfordPlace pear (east outside 9104 pole/guy at 9019 St. Andrews side) thatRhode Island to Avenue. needs be avoided/relocated. POSSIBLE CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING: The Developer plans VEG/TREES: Several established trees (including maples, (for the and Metropolitan at College Park luxury townhomes) locusts, others), dense vegetation and planting beds on show a sidewalk each9013, side of Cherokee the east side nearon9011, 9015, 9017, Street, 9117 and 9122 St. terminating at intersection with 48th Place. Andrews Place. POINTS DRAINS: AT RIGHTon ARE FOR THE NORTH SIDE OF CHEROKEE STORM east side STREET. CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING: POSSIBLE

Preliminary Notes

ROW BC

2 1.5

2 2

1.5

Wall

0.5

1 0.5

0.5

•1 = not •3 = flat needed •2 = <10% •.5 = short •1 = <20% curb •0 = >20% •0 = needed

Topo

Obstacles (poles, hydrants, fence, etc.)

LID Potential Scoring Opportunities for Bump‐ Outs & SWM .5 pt each for the following

Connectivity Scoring

1 1

0.5

2 1

1.5 2

1.5

Trees Impact/Removals

Existing Design Constraints Scoring

Priority Street Segment Selection Matrix

•2 = >10 feet •1 = >5feet •0 = >5feet

26 PROJECT SCORE 8

11.5 9

11.5

1. Sidewalk is feasible on west side 52nd Avenue, as is SWM where bump‐outs are needed. 2. Kenesaw Street to Narragansett Parkway is feasible given wide ROW; however, it only lengthens the existing sidewalk network by 1 block. Other projects could be better served with CIP design/construction funding. 3. South of Kenesaw Street is not cost effective.

1. Strongly recommend a sidewalk on south side of 48ththe Place Place and Muskogee Due thebetween width of47th the street, there is Street. This takes advantage of the existing considerable potential for a complete street with sidewalks and crossings between Street SWM bump‐outs, maintaining theMuskogee parallel parking, and Lackawanna protecting matureStreet. trees, avoiding utilities, and 2. Sidewalk to Indian is feasible and adding a sidewalk on Lane the NW side (and a relatively cost effective. connection to a potential sidewalk on 3. Very challenging and costly south Indian Edmonston). If too challenging, couldofend the Lane. new 4. Connecting to Indian Lane students complete street/sidewalks at benefits Bryn Mawr Road. (bus stops on Indian Lane) and City employees (DPW at south end of Indian Lane).

1. If selected as a project, recommend sidewalk is on west side of road since neighborhood is on west side. 2. Since bus stops are on both sides of road, 1. A proposedcross‐walks hard-surface, recommend andshared-use signage to trail ADA‐is planned linkpads withonthe DePauw Place street accessibletobus east side of Edmonston centerline. (Source: Road. (Currently no PGAtlas) ADA accessible bus pads or shelters.) 2. City's concept proposes a sidewalk on each side. There are "desire paths" on each side of guardrail currently. 3. Recommend sidewalk starting on the north side of the DePauw Place/St. Andrews Place intersection because utility poles are on the south side of DePauw Place. Continue to intersection with Limestone Place. 4. After Limestone Place, major trees will complicate continuing to the dead end. Bumpouts may be needed but will take away parallel parking. If ROW is wide enough, use an "on‐grade" flexible porous/permeable sidewalk section in tree CRZs.

road) may receive a future sidewalk but is outside scope of work for this project. Currently there is a "desire path" on the east corner of St. Andrews Place/Metzerott Road. 2. Proposed sidewalk begins on north side of Duke Street. 3. Proposed sidewalk on east side of St. Andrews Place to De Pauw Place corner. This is the same side recommended by the City's initial matrix.

1. City's Recommend new sidewalkRoad/St. on northAndrews side of 1. conceptaat Metzerott Cherokee that side connects to the sidewalk Place is onStreet the north of Metzerott Road/east already built by the Place. Metropolitan developer. side of St. Andrews Metzerott Road (county

Preliminary Recommendations

YES YES

YES

RECOMMENDED FOR 30% DESIGN?

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Street Name

Neighborhood

West Park North College ParkCollege North College Park

CollegeNorth Park Estates College Park

49th Place St. Andrews Place Bowdoin Avenue

De Pauw Place Iroquois Street Fox Street

Wellesley Drive Road Hollywood

West College Park North College Park Calvert Hills

From (Cross Street 1)

Harvard Road

Duke Street

St. Andrews Place Rhode Island Avenue

Edmonston Road US 1

Muskogee Street

US 1

To (Cross Street 2)

Erskine Road

Hollywood Road De Pauw Place [or at least from Muskogee to

dead end/Gettysburg51st LaneAvenue Davis Field Playground

Sweetbriar RhodeDrive Island Avenue

ROW width

60 feet (from Lackawanna Street to 80 feet (raised‐curb landscaped median between Metzerott Road to Hollywood Road) about 200 feet north of Duke Street) approx. 35‐40 feet 60 feet (double yellow) 35 feet (from north of Lackawanna 50 feet Street to Muskogee)

variable 50 feet 30 feet, 40 feet, 50 feet

30 feet

60 feet 40 feet

Existing Road Section (approx.)

10 foot median/curb and gutter/20 foot travel lane/curb and gutter

Street Segment Length (approx.) 610 feet 1670 feet 1130 feet 2640 feet 730 feet 2050 feet 1940 feet 1720 feet

24 feet curb to curb 24 feet curb to curb double yellow/12 foot travel lane/6 foot parallel parking/curb and gutter (parallel parking each side)

24 feet curb to curb 30 feet curb to curb 24 feet curb to curb parking each side) (parallel parking(parallel each side) 34 feet curb to curb n/a

PARALLEL PARKING: Present both sides. Parking is not expected to be significantly impacted by sidewalk designs. OBSTACLES: Utility poles on SW side of street. Steep descent down to Sweetbriar Drive. Utility poles on north side of 30% design is already underway by the City and a Wellesley Drive between Bryn Mawr Road and Sweetbriar consultant. Further matrix analysis is not needed. Drive. VEG/TREES: Mature trees on SW side of street. Mature silver maples at 7511 Wellesley Drive. Recommend a bump out here. Mature trees on north side of Wellesley Drive between Bryn Mawr Road and Sweetbriar Drive. Where trees are present near a potential sidewalk or close to the back of curb, use flexible porous/permeable pavement. POINTS AT RIGHT ARE FOR THE EAST SIDE OF WELLESLEY DRIVE.

PARALLEL PARKING: Present. Possible minor impacts to existing parking by sidewalk designs. PARALLEL PARKING: Present. Possible minor to OBSTACLES: Very narrow at connection to USimpacts 1. Retaining existing sidewalk designs. wall andparking parkingby area on north side; hydrant and utility poles OBSTACLES: Andrews Place and Limestone on the other.Between MultipleSt. obstructions all the way to 51st Place, utility poles on south side of street right behind curb Avenue. and gutter. South side isvegetation flatter slope. North side VEG/TREES: Abundant throughout themay segment. require a wall/short curb in some areas. VEG/TREES: Planting bed at 9122 Gettysburg Lane. (2) ~20+ trees outside 3612 DePauw Place. (1) ~20+ tree outside each PARALLEL PARKING: Possible minor 9017 Gettysburg Lane,Present. 9018 Gettysburg Lane impacts and 3616to existing parking DePauw Place. by sidewalk designs. OBSTACLES: ManyARE obstructions for the entire length. POINTS AT RIGHT FOR THE NORTH SIDE OF DePAUW VEG/TREES: (2) large oaks near corner with 51st Avenue. (2) PLACE. large cottonwoods near playground. (2) large trees (maple & gum) back of curb by 5022 Iriquois Street.

STORM DRAINS: on east side POSSIBLE CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING: ‐Existing crosswalk at Present. Duke Street. North of this crosswalk PARALLEL PARKING: Possible minor impacts to the utility poles move the east side of St. Andrews Place, but existing parking by sidewalk designs. are set prettyMany far back behind theincurb. OBSTACLES: obstructions ROW, including ‐Connection to College Woods is on eastslopes. side of St. vegetation (see below),Park retaining wall andthe steep Andrews Place VEG/TREES: Several notable areas of vegetation near the ‐Existing at intersection with De Pauw Place. roadway,crosswalk i.e.. vegetable garden, cherry trees at library, POINTS RIGHTtrees ARE FOR THE EAST SIDE OF ST. ANDREWS bamboo,ATmature at corner of 49th Place & Lackawanna PLACE. Street as well as 9607 49th Place.

PARALLEL PARKING: PARKING: Present. Present. Parking Possibleisminor impacts to to be PARALLEL not expected existing parking by sidewalk designs. significantly impacted by sidewalk designs. OBSTACLES: Majority Utility poles and tracks side make OBSTACLES: of utility poles on areeast on west side ofa St. sidewalk Place. there aFire challenge. very near backisofa curb Andrews hydrantFence on west side. There utilityat 4817 Guilford Road, BowdoinPlace Avenue (and stairs), pole/guy wire at 90197201 St. Andrews (east side) that established at 7204 Bowdoin Avenue. Narrow ROW needs to be trees avoided/relocated. and obstaclesSeveral may make this unfeasible. VEG/TREES: established trees (including maples, VEG/TREES: Established shrub beds onand west side, especially locusts, and others), dense vegetation planting beds on at 7004 Too 9015, many 9017, hedgerow and St. the east Bowdoin side nearAvenue. 9011, 9013, 9117trees and 9122 other landscape trees to count. Andrews Place.

Preliminary Notes

ROW BC

Wall

0.5

•1 = not •3 = flat needed •2 = <10% •.5 = short •1 = <20% curb •0 = >20% •0 = needed

Topo

•2 = >10 feet •1 = >5feet •0 = >5feet

Obstacles (poles, hydrants, fence, etc.)

LID Potential Scoring Opportunities for Bump‐ Outs & SWM .5 pt each for the following

Connectivity Scoring

0.5

1.5

0.5

Trees Impact/Removals

Existing Design Constraints Scoring

Priority Street Segment Selection Matrix

PROJECT SCORE 11.5

11.5

6.5

7.5

1. A proposed hard-surface, shared-use trail is planned to link with the DePauw Place street centerline. (Source: PGAtlas) 1. Not cost‐effective. Recommending eliminating 2. City's concept proposes a sidewalk on each side. from consideration. There are "desire paths" on each side of guardrail currently. 3. Recommend sidewalk starting on the north side of the DePauw Place/St. Andrews Place intersection because utility poles are on the south side of DePauw Place. Continue to intersection with Limestone Place. 4. After Limestone Place, major trees will 1. Not cost‐effective. complicate continuing to the dead end. Bumpouts may be needed but will take away parallel parking. If ROW is wide enough, use an "on‐grade" flexible porous/permeable sidewalk section in tree CRZs.

1. Not cost effective. Too expensive to reconstruct the area to provide space for sidewalk. Will involve major coordination with homeowners, who will not be happy with removed trees/shrub beds and 1. City's concept at Metzerott Road/St. Andrews relocated fences/steps. Place is on the north side of Metzerott 2. City's concept includes a sidewalk onRoad/east the east side St. isAndrews Place. Metzerott Roadhowever, (county side.of This more feasible than west side, road) may receive a future sidewalk buthedgerow is outside will involve removal of portions of the scope of work for this project. Currently and avoidance/relocation of utility poles.there is a "desire path" on the east corner of St. Andrews Place/Metzerott Road. 2. Proposed sidewalk begins on north side of Duke Street. 3. Proposed sidewalk on east side of St. Andrews A newtosidewalk neither cost‐effective Place De Pauwwould Placebe corner. This is the same nor pedestrian‐friendly given all initial the back‐and‐forth side recommended by the City's matrix. crossings (both mid‐block and end‐of‐block) that would be required to avoid existing trees, obstructions and other infrastructure.

Preliminary Recommendations

YES

RECOMMENDED FOR 30% DESIGN?

TWELVE TARGETED AND PRIORITIZED STREET SEGMENTS BASED ON THE PRELIMINARY MATRIX When mapped, it can bee seen that the twelve prioritized street segments included in the preliminary matrix are clustered in neighborhoods with the fewest sidewalks, as discussed in Section 2. The six highest-ranked street segments on the preliminary matrix (St. Andrews Place, DePauw Place, Wellesley Drive, Cherokee Street, Edmonston Road and 48th Place) were initially recommended for 30 percent design. These six street segments were presented to the College Park City Council at their February 18, 2020 hearing (see Section 4).

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

SECTION 4 SIX HIGHEST-RANKED STREET SEGMENTS AND CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION

HIGHEST-RANKED STREET SEGMENTS

NOT RATED

Hollywood Road ( from US 1 to Rhode Island Avenue) previous page

5.0 Iroquois Street ( from Rhode Island Avenue to Davis Field Playground) previous page

6.0 Fox Street ( from US 1 to 51st Avenue) previous page

6.5 49th Place ( from Muskogee Street to Hollywood Road) previous page

7.5 Bowdoin Avenue ( from Harvard Road to Erskine Road)

8.0 52nd Avenue ( from Narragansett Parkway to Huron Street) previous page

LOWEST-RANKED STREET SEGMENTS and MATRIX SCORES (see SECTION 3)

On February 18, 2020, city planning department staff and AMT presented the project’s purpose, funding, preliminary findings and scope to the College Park City Council. The goal of the presentation was to reach consensus between the council, mayor and planning department on which street segments to advance to the next project phase. The map below locates the segments, ranked from highest to lowest matrix score. The city planning department staff and AMT recommended that streets ranked 1-5 (or 6 in lieu of 5) advance to the next phase of 30-percent plan drawings, cost estimates, an updated matrix and a draft 5-year capital improvement plan. The following pages summarize the content of the presentation, and the challenges and opportunities associated with each of the six highest-ranked street segments.

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

St. Andrews Place ( from Duke Street to De Pauw Place)

De Pauw Place ( from St. Andrews Place to dead end/Gettysburg Lane)

Wellesley Drive ( from Edmonston Road to Sweetbriar Drive) next page

Cherokee Street ( from 48th Place to Rhode Island Avenue)

Edmonston Road ( from Old Calvert Road to Bryn Mawr Road) next page

48th Place ( from 47th Place to Delaware Street, or at least to Indian Lane or Fox Street, represented by dashed line)

6 9.0

9.0

10.0

11.5

12.0

HIGHEST-RANKED STREET SEGMENTS and MATRIX SCORES (see SECTION 3)

ST. ANDREWS PLACE

PROPOSED SIDEWALK: EAST SIDE, DUKE STREET TO DE PAUW PLACE

St. Andrews Place is constructed as a boulevard with a raised-curb landscaped median from Metzerott Road to approximately 200 feet north of Duke Street. On-street parking is present; however, because of the wide right-of-way, a new sidewalk would not significantly impact its location or availability. Storm drains along the eastern curb line present an opportunity for stormwater management to be integrated into the existing system. In addition, there are several established trees and vegetation on the east side near the 90- and 9100 block of St. Andrews Place. This vegetation will need to be protected to the maximum extent practicable during implementation, including possibly installing on-grade porous flexible pavement in critical root zones, as well as bump-outs into the roadway. Potential challenges to implementation: Overhead electric and telecommunication lines hang from utility poles on the west side of St. Andrews Place. There is also a pole/guy wire outside 9019 St. Andrews Place that should be avoided (or relocated if necessary). A fire hydrant is also located on the west side. Opportunities: A new sidewalk on St. Andrews Place from Duke Street to De Pauw Place could connect to existing crosswalks at these intersections. A new sidewalk on the east side would also provide safe access to the College Park Woods Neighborhood Park, and could connect to a future city or County sidewalk on Metzerott Road and St. Andrews Place running to Duke Street (see the city ‘s draft concept in Section 2).

DE PAUW PLACE

PROPOSED SIDEWALK: NORTH SIDE, FROM ST. ANDREWS PLACE

A new sidewalk would be unlikely to significantly affect the location or availability of on-street parking. There are several established trees outside 3612 and 3616 DePauw Place and 9017 and 9018 Gettysburg Lane. A planting bed is present at 9122 Gettysburg Lane. This vegetation will need to be protected to the maximum extent practicable during implementation, including possibly installing on-grade porous flexible pavement in critical root zones, as well as bumpouts into the roadway. Potential challenges to implementation: Overhead electric and telecommunication lines hang from utility poles on the south side of DePauw Place directly behind the curb and gutter. Although the south side has a shallower slope behind the curb than does the north side, due to the presence of these utilities it is recommended to locate the sidewalk on the north side. The north side may require a short retaining wall or curb in some areas. Opportunities: A new DePauw Place sidewalk could connect to the proposed St. Andrews Place sidewalk project and an M-NCPPC planned hard-surface shared-use trail connecting at the DePauw Place dead end.

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

ST. ANDREWS PLACE (LOOKING NORTH) Source: AMT Inc.

DE PAUW PLACE (LOOKING EAST) Source: AMT Inc.

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

WELLESLEY DRIVE

PROPOSED SIDEWALK: NORTHEAST SIDE, EDMONSTON ROAD TO SWEETBRIAR DRIVE

Due to the wide right-of-way and ample asphalt surface, Wellesley Drive has promising potential for a complete street reconstruction that includes LID bump-outs, maintains parallel parking on each side of the street, protects mature trees, avoids utilities, and adds a sidewalk on at least the northeast side, if not the southwest. Steep slopes north of Bryn Mawr Road may limit the project north of this cross street. Potential challenges to implementation: Wellesley Drive includes several mature trees on the southwest side of the street, notably at 7511 Wellesley Drive where a bump-out is recommended. Mature trees are also present on the north side between Bryn Mawr Road and Sweetbriar Drive. This vegetation will need to be protected to the maximum extent practicable during implementation, including possibly installing on-grade porous flexible pavement in critical root zones, as well as bump-outs into the roadway. Opportunities: A new sidewalk on Wellesley Drive would present opportunities to connect to the proposed sidewalk on Edmonston Road and offers a safe pedestrian connection to bus stops there.

EDMONSTON ROAD

PROPOSED SIDEWALK: WEST SIDE, OLD CALVERT ROAD TO BRYN MAWR ROAD

Edmonston Road is a long, curvilinear street east of the Yarrow and College Park Estates neighborhoods. Parallel parking is present on the west side of Edmonston Road between Bryn Mawr Road and Wellesley Drive. The west side of the road also includes several mature trees ( for example, near 7308-7314 Edmonston Road) and a planting bed (at 7302 Edmonston Road) that would necessitate special construction techniques to protect the vegetation to the maximum extent practicable. At some of the cross streets, such as Knoxville Drive, the wide intersection can be reduced by bumping out the curb, creating a shorter and safer new crosswalk and a more pedestrian-friendly entrance to the neighborhood. Potential challenges to implementation: On the west side, steep slopes near 7314 Edmonston Road could require a retaining wall, and the brick entrance features need to be preserved at the Radcliffe Drive intersection. Bump-outs may be required to do so. The Marenka House (Historic Site 66-076) at 7300 Radcliffe Road is protected by the County Historic Preservation Ordinance (Subtitle 29) and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Installation of a sidewalk may require coordination with the Prince George’s County Historic Preservation Commission. On the east side, utility poles are installed near the roadway. The east side also has a steep bank that will require significant brush clearing, filling, and possibly walls to retain the fill required by a sidewalk. For these reasons, sidewalk installation is recommended for the west side, except between Bryn Mawr Road and Wellesley Drive, where the sidewalk could cross to the east side to avoid impacts to parallel parking. A sidewalk on the west side likely reduces the amount of pedestrian crossings from the neighborhood to the east side of Edmonston Road. Although the posted speed limit is 25 miles per hour, it was observed that vehicles frequently exceed that. Currently, pedestrians typically prefer the west side because the east side slope is less comfortable for walking. Crosswalks and signage are still required on the east side wherever a bus stop is present. The Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission is scheduled to replace the Edmonston Road water main. Contract BT6433A18 began in Spring 2020 and is scheduled to conclude by June 2021. Roadway pavement restoration will occur in Summer 2022. Opportunities: A new sidewalk on Edmonston Road could connect to other non-vehicular circulation systems, including the potential Wellesley Drive sidewalk project, and a new roadway project along Old Calvert Road (stretching from Edmonston Road to Campus Drive). The city council recommended the following condition to (pending) DSP-18047: “Amend the BPIS to eliminate the bus shelter improvement and instead reflect 5.b. (3) of the Preliminary Plan resolution (PGCPB No. 20-09, File No. 4-18027), ‘Construct a sidewalk from the Campus Drive/Riverside Avenue intersection on the west side of Riverside Avenue to Old Calvert Road.’”

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

WELLESLEY DRIVE (LOOKING SOUTHEAST) Source: AMT Inc.

EDMONSTON ROAD (LOOKING SOUTH) Source: AMT Inc.

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

CHEROKEE STREET

PROPOSED SIDEWALK: NORTH SIDE, 48TH PLACE TO RHODE ISLAND AVENUE

Although not a thoroughfare, Cherokee Street provides a critical link between US 1 (Baltimore Avenue)and Rhode Island Avenue. The street will not lend itself to further narrowing, so the sidewalk should be made to fit into the rightof-way without encroaching into the roadway or reducing the on-street parking. Storm drains exist, but new bump-outs or stormwater low-impact development are not practical due to the narrow street width. Cherokee Street includes several established trees and vegetation, including an approximately 20-inch Zelkova (4805 Cherokee Street) and an approximately 18-inch Bradford pear (9104 Rhode Island Avenue). However, there are higher-quality trees on the south side, which should eliminate that side from consideration for sidewalk installation. Potential challenges to implementation: Utility poles carrying electric and telecommunication lines, guardrails, and signage are located on the north side. Signage can be moved, but the proposed sidewalk needs to avoid the utility poles as they would be expensive to relocate. Opportunities: A new sidewalk on Cherokee Street would provide a pedestrian connection to the US 1 (Baltimore Avenue) and Rhode Island Avenue corridors. This project could also connect (via a crosswalk) to a sidewalk that terminates at 48th Place, recently installed as part of the Metropolitan at College Park development (4701-4729 Cherokee Street).

48TH PLACE

PROPOSED SIDEWALK: 47TH PLACE TO DELAWARE STREET (OR AT LEAST TO INDIAN LANE OR FOX STREET)

This segment of 48th Place is hilly and residential in character. Between 47th Place and Muskogee Street, a sidewalk is recommended for installation on the south side. This would take advantage of the existing sidewalks and crosswalks between Muskogee and Lackawanna Streets. Care should be taken to ensure that changes to the location or reduction in the amount of on-street parking are minimized. Unless the sidewalk width is reduced to three or four feet, several small trees between 9714 and 9718 48th Place may need to be removed. There are mature trees between Indian Lane and Delaware Street, complicating the potential for a sidewalk at this location. Potential challenges to implementation: A garage at 4813 Hollywood Road may encroach into the right-of-way, and there are steep slopes near 47th Place. South of Indian Lane, this project may prove not as cost-effective as other options because of the need for mid-block crossings and short retaining walls. However, between 47th Place and Indian Lane, this project is feasible and relatively cost-effective. Opportunities: A new sidewalk on 48th Place would connect fragments of existing sidewalks (at the corner of 47th and 48th Places; at the corner of 48th Place and Muskogee Street; at 48th Place between Hollywood Road and Iroquois Street, and at 48th Place between Muskogee and Lackawanna Streets) with a continuous pedestrian route that connects them to existing crosswalks. If the sidewalk is extended to Indian Lane, an improved pedestrian route would be provided to the Indian Lane bus stops and the City of College Park Department of Public Works (located at the south end of Indian lane at 9217 51st Avenue).

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

CHEROKEE STREET (LOOKING WEST) Source: AMT Inc.

48TH PLACE (LOOKING SOUTH) Source: AMT Inc.

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

COLLEGE PARK CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION SELECTION OF FINAL FIVE STREET SEGMENTS FOR 30 PERCENT DESIGN City of College Park Planning Department staff and A. Morton Thomas and Associates, Inc., (AMT) presented their recommended street segments to the mayor and city council on February 18, 2020. The mayor and council directed AMT and staff to proceed with developing 30 percent plans with corresponding matrix updates, cost estimates and CIP recommendations for the following street segments: St. Andrews Place, Cherokee Street, Edmonston Road, 52nd Avenue, and Bowdoin Avenue. (See Appendix C for complete meeting minutes.)

PRESENTATION TO CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR A recording of the presentation (including video/audio and meeting minutes) is available at https://www.collegeparkmd.gov/councilmeetings. Image source: City of College Park

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

GENERAL COMMENTS • Existing traffic volumes should factor into the decision-making process for street selection • Include a safety score of each street (either current safety or potential safety improvements) • Break down North College Park into neighborhoods [subdivisions] • Prioritize streets near Metro stations and commercial districts • Present these recommendations to nearby residents for their comments • Consider how future development will impact certain streets • After development of 30 percent plans, city staff will begin community outreach to obtain consensus

STREET-SEGMENT SPECIFIC COMMENTS Edmonston Road: Based on prior community comments, the new sidewalk should be located on the east side of the road, not the west side. City planning staff and AMT advocated for the new sidewalk to be on the west side for several reasons, including but not limited to: proximity to residences (the College Park Estates and Yarrow neighborhoods are west of Edmonston Road); that it is safer (pedestrians do not need to cross Edmonston Road to access the sidewalk); and the presence of a steep slope on east side of Edmonston Road. These factors would make a future sidewalk on the west side better-used, and a better capital investment. However, the east side was selected for 30 percent design due to the potential loss of parallel parking and prior resident comments. Wellesley Drive: Located near Edmonston Road, Wellesley Drive was recommended for reconstruction due to its wide right-of-way (vehicles are prioritized over pedestrians) and its potential to be transformed into a complete street. However, councilmembers noted other city streets would be better served by a new sidewalk ( for example, Bowdoin Avenue). DePauw Place: Despite the potential for connection to a planned M-NCPPC trail at the end of DePauw Place, and a connection to the recommended sidewalk on St. Andrews Place, a nearby resident previously advocated against adding a sidewalk because of the existing trees that might have to be removed. Bowdoin Avenue: Although narrow, it is a major pedestrian link to WMATA and heavily used; therefore, it should be included.

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

SECTION 5 FINAL FIVE CITY STREET SEGMENTS FOR 30 PERCENT DESIGN: PLANS, FIVE-YEAR CIP AND UPDATED MATRIX

30 PERCENT PLANS AND COST ESTIMATES FOR COMPLETE AND GREEN STREET RECONSTRUCTION Section 5 shows a portion of each 30-percent-design street segment with its corresponding matrix row and CIP cost estimate. The matrix was finalized based on action by the mayor and city council of College Park: • Points awarded for a potential ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) connection to public transportation (such as WMATA station, MARC station, or city/county bus stop) were separated into their own column. The amount for a connection to such public transit network was increased from .5 to 1 point. • Streets with any connection to a commercial area received 1 point. • Sidewalks on streets that pedestrians perceived to be safe are more likely to be used. A column was added for an assessment of perceived safety. This subjective scoring of 0, .5, or 1 point is based on site lines, posted speed limits versus typical driving speeds, roadway width (vehicles travel slowly on narrow roads, faster on wider ones) and the presence of parallel parking (parked cars provide a buffer between pedestrians and moving vehicles). Additional notes from the February 18, 2020 City Council hearing: • Traffic counting is outside the scope of this project, but could be undertaken during future funding, planning or design phases. However, the addition of the aforementioned safety column is similar to the scoring that would be achieved by adding a traffic-counting column. • Neighborhoods for each of the twelve street segments are listed in the matrix. • City of College Park Planning Department staff will undertake community and stakeholder outreach after this project is completed. • The impact of future development was taken into consideration on St. Andrews Place, DePauw Place, and Cherokee Street. The additional criteria did not significantly change the scoring of the highest-ranked street segments; however, with the heightened emphasis on connections to public transit options, Bowdoin Avenue now outranks 48th Place. Although only the five street segments agreed upon at the city council hearing are advanced to the 30 percent design level, it is recommended that the city planning department continue to refer to the final matrix for future complete street reconstruction efforts and planning considerations. The complete set of 30 percent Plans is available by contacting the City of College Park Planning Department; the complete final matrix is included in Appendix E. The full 30 percent construction plan set includes a project cover sheet with standard notes, demolition plans, proposed site plans, standard details and typical sections. The 30 percent drawings also include information on sidewalks, tree planting, crosswalks, ADA-compliant ramps, curbs and gutters, driveway crossings, bump-outs, stormwater management (where appropriate), header curbs, short retaining walls, and planting areas. The plans also indicate preliminary tree protection measures and existing vegetation to be preserved, relocated or removed.

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

30% DRAWINGS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

ATION OF N SHOWN N. EORGE'S UNLESS

GES; THE NCE. UCTION. CTOR BY

CES (MD AND/OR

PLACING

PROVED

ED, ETC.) AY OF AN

OVERLAY

MENT OF

T RADII. IS PLAN.

OF THE STREET

WIDTH OF RTY LINE. STREET LL BE IN

PROVIDE

ON (NOT QC AND

ONNAGE

ITE BY A

ISTANCE

LEAST 5 CTOR NO

HEY ARE ENTIFIED,

S, IN ONE WILL NOT

VICINITY MAP - COVER SHEET C100 The vicinity map of the 30 percent plans highlights the five street segments selected by the city council. The final street selection demonstrates a balance between providing new improvements in neighborhoods with low sidewalk coverage, and offering improvements in a variety of neighborhoods throughout the city.

ERIALS

ONE DAY

LEMS, IF

RIOR TO

ENTS ON E DESIGN DIVISION

IGNS ON

GENERAL NOTES: 1.

GENERAL NOTES ARE FOR TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND MAY INCLUDE INFORMATION NOT APPLICABLE TO THE SCOPE OF WORK.

CALL 'MISS UTILITY' (202-265-7177 OR 811) PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION SO THAT EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY CAN BE FIELD-MARKED. COMPLY WITH MISS UTILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR UTILITY LOCATION.

ALL PROPOSED WORK TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INVITATION FOR BID MANUAL, AND THE LATEST EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING: MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAYS AND INCIDENTAL STRUCTURES; MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIALS; CITY OF COLLEGE PARK, STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS; PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTATION. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL WORK TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 2011 STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL.

SKETCHES TO THE ENGINEER SHOWING THE RECOMMENDATION REVISING THE DESIGN INVERT AND TOP ELEVATIONS AS REQUIRED TO AVOID ANY CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING UTILITY LINES AND OTHER FEATURES. 12.

OMISSION AND/OR ADDITIONS OF UTILITIES FOUND DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE AT THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR ENGAGED IN EXCAVATION AT THE SITE. THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF ANY AND ALL UTILITY INFORMATION, OMISSIONS AND ADDITIONS FOUND BY ANY CONTRACTOR. DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE FIXED IMMEDIATELY AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.

3. 4. 5.

13.

REFER TO THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL PROJECT REQUIREMENTS.

14.

CODES AND STANDARDS INCLUDED ON THE PLANS ARE FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE MOST CURRENT OR COMPLETE STANDARDS REQUIRED TO INSTALL THE WORK. REFER TO APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS AT ALL TIMES.

15.

MAKE FIELD ADJUSTMENTS AS NECESSARY TO MEET EXISTING CONDITIONS WHEN 45 AUTHORIZED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.

16.

MAINTAIN A WORKING COPY OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS HAND-MARKED IN RED WITH ALL

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

8. 9.

LOD

9119 ST. ANDREWS PL.

x x

x x x

x x

LOD

x x x x x

x x x

x x x x x

x x

x x x

x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

LOD

ROW BC

LOD

ADJUST EX. WALKWAY TO MATCH SIDEWALK GRADE

x x

x x x x

x x x

x x x x x x x x x x x x

x x x x x x x x x x

9200 ST. ANDREWS PL.

N 2

x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

x x x x x x x x x

x x x x

LOD

INE -

LOD

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN SCALE: 1"=20'

Subjective Safety Scoring

Perceived Pedestrian 10' 20' 40' Safety

x x

0.5

•0 = lower sense of pedestrian safety •.5 = average sense of pedestrian safety •1 = higher sense of pedestrian safety

•connect to City/ County bus route •connect to WMATA network/metro station •connect to commercial district

1 pt each for the 0 following

1.5

.5 pt each for the following

Connectivity Scoring

LOD

Opportunities for Bump‐ Outs & SWM

LOD

9119 ST. ANDREWS PL.

SECTION A

LOD

Obstacles (poles, hydrants, fence, etc.)

LOD

LID Potential Scoring

LOD

Trees Impact/Removals

SECTION H

LOD

Wall

PROPOSED Existing Design ConstraintsPLAN Scoring SCALE: 1"=20'

LOD

•2 = storm drains present •neighborhood has SW and bump‐outs are coverage below 50% •3 = flat feasible •1 = not needed •2 = limited impact •2 = none/minor •connect to park •2 = <10% •1 = storm drains not •.5 = short curb •1 = moderate impact •1 = moderate •connect to public facility •1 = <20% present but bump‐outs •0 = needed •0 = severe impact •0 = significant/too many •connect to ex. sidewalk •0 = >20% are relatively feasible •connect to a proposed •0 = bump‐outs not sidewalk/trail feasible

Topo

COORDINATE WITH HOMEOWNER TO TRANSPLANT PLANTING BED

9122 ST. ANDREWS PL.

PARALLEL PARKING: Present. Parking is not expected to be significantly impacted by sidewalk designs. OBSTACLES: Majority of utility poles are on west side of St. Andrews Place. Fire hydrant on west side. There is a utility pole/guy wire at 9019 St.Andrews Place (east side) that needs to be avoided/relocated. VEG/TREES: Several established trees (including maples, locusts, and others), dense vegetation and planting beds on the east side near 9011, 9013, 9015, 9017, 9117 and 9122 St. Andrews Place. Avoid impacts to this vegetation. STORM DRAINS: east side POSSIBLE CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING: ‐Existing crosswalk at Duke Street. North of this crosswalk the utility poles move the east side of St. Andrews Place, but are set pretty far back behind the curb. ‐Connection to College Park Woods is on the east side of St. Andrews Place ‐Existing crosswalk at intersection with De Pauw Place. POINTS ARE FOR THE EAST SIDE OF ST. ANDREWS PLACE.

LOD

9120 ST. ANDREWS PL.

30% Notes

9117 ST. ANDREWS PL.

SECTION B

LOD

ST. ANDREWS PL.

LOD

9118 ST. ANDREWS PL.

LOD

9116 ST. ANDREWS PL.

LOD

9114 ST. ANDREWS PL.

9115 ST. ANDREWS PL.

LOD

SECTION B

LOD

DEMOLITION PLAN

LOD

SCALE: 1"=20'

LOD

CH L

MAT

LOD

9112 ST. ANDREWS PL.

LOD

9 . AN 112 DR PL. EWS

LOD

VICINITY MAP

RELOCATE EX. SIGN RELOCATE EX. MESSAGE BOARD

EX. MAILBOX TO REMAIN

EX. PET WASTE STATION TO REMAIN

EX. CROSSWALK TO REMAIN

EX. UTILITY POLE TO REMAIN

EX. SIGN TO REMAIN

DESCRIPTION

DEMOLITION SCHEDULE ST. ANDREWS PLACE SYMBOL

ESTIMATED CRITICAL ROOT ZONE

ROOT PRUNING

LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE

REMOVE VEGETATION (CLEAR AND GRUB WITHIN ENTIRE LOD)

DEMO EX. CURB AND GUTTER

DEMO EX. PAVEMENT

DESCRIPTION

SYMBOL

DESCRIPTION

EX. MAILBOX TO REMAIN

$25,218

DESCRIPTION

002 EXISTING PROPOSEDCONDITIONS RETAINING WALL

SYMBOL

$5,000 $250,577

1. City's concept at Metzerott Road/St. Andrews Place is on the north side of Metzerott Road/east side of St. Andrews Place. Metzerott Road (county road) may receive a future sidewalk but is outside scope of work for this project. Currently there is a "desire path" on the east corner of St. Andrews 12.5 Place/Metzerott Road. 2. Proposed sidewalk begins on north side of Duke Street. 3. Proposed sidewalk on east side of St. Andrews Place to De Pauw Place corner. This is the same side recommended by the City's initial matrix.

30% Recommendations

PROPOSED UNDERSTORY TREE

PROPOSED OVERSTORY TREE

TURF SEED MIX & 2" TOPSOIL TOTAL COST (INCLUDING $361,231 MOBILIZATION, STAKEOUT, BUMP-OUT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SOIL MEDIA, HERBACEOUS GENERAL PERENNIALS, LOW SHRUBS AND STONE (AT INLET CONTINGENCY, & OUTLET) CONDITIONS, AND BOND)

SUBTOTAL

PROPOSED DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE PER DPWT DETAILS 300.07 & 300.08

034 TRANSPORTATION

PAVEMENT

032 EXTERIOR $174,159 PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER PER DPWT DETAIL 300.01 IMPROVEMENTS 033 UTILITIES PROPOSED FLEXI-PAVE OR APPROVED$20,000 EQUAL POROUS

300.06

031 EARTHWORK $25,200 PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER DPWT DETAILS 300.05 &

001 GENERAL

PROPOSED CROSSWALK

ESTIMATED COST $1,000 RELOCATE EX. MESSAGE BOARD

8 RELOCATE EX. SIGN CONSTRUCTION DIVISION

30% CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE 5 EX. PET WASTE STATION TO COST REMAIN

EX. CROSSWALK TO REMAIN

1 EX. SIGN TO REMAIN 30% CONSTRUCTION PLANS, COST 2 EX. UTILITY POLE TO REMAIN ESTIMATES AND FINAL MATRIX EXCERPT

ST. ANDREWS PLACE

PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE ST. ANDREWS PLACE

LOD

SYMBOL

PRESERVE EX. CONCRETE

DESCRIPTION

SYMBOL

REMOVE EX. TREE

ST. ANDREWS PLACE - SHEET C104 (PROPOSED) A PROPOSED variable width sidewalk ( five-foot minimum) is offset three feet from the curb where possible and adjacent to the curb where space is lacking. A stormwater bump-out is provided at the park entrance.

LOD

9115 ST. ANDREWS PL.

9117 ST. ANDREWS PL.

LOD

ST. ANDREWS PL.

CH L

MAT

LOD

Street Name

Neighborhood

St. Andrews Place

West College Park

LOD

46 x

T C1

SHEE

E-S EE

From (Cross Street 1)

Duke Street

ROW width

To (Cross Street 2)

De Pauw Place

Street Segment Length (approx.)

1670 feet

PL.

80 feet (raised‐curb landscaped median between Metzerott Road to about 200 feet north of Duke Street); 60 feet (double yellow); 50 feet

AUW

RECOMMENDATION TO PLANNING DEPARTMENT & CITY COUNCIL?

DE P

YES (EAST SIDE)

CITY COUNCIL SELECTON @ FEBRUARY 18, 2020 MEETING?

UW P

YES (EAST SIDE)

A DE P

Existing Road Section (approx.)

1) 10 foot median/curb and gutter/20 foot travel lane/curb and gutter 2) double yellow/12 foot travel lane/6 foot parallel parking/curb and gutter

SIT E

•2 = >10 feet •1 = >5feet •0 = >5feet

STREET SCORE

x x x x x

DATE

SHEET

DE PR

SHEET TITLE

CHECKED BY:

DRAWN BY:

SCALE:

PROJECT NO:

MARK

3 NOT

COLL

COLL GREEN

$119,372

$5,000

$20,000

$64,612

$10,150

PARALLEL PARKING: Present. Possible minor impacts to existing parking by sidewalk designs. OBSTACLES: Obstructions the entire length; however, they can be worked around to install a sidewalk. VEG/TREES: ~20 inch Zelkova and shrubs outside 4805 Cherokee. ~18 inch Bradford pear outside 9104 Rhode Island Avenue. POSSIBLE CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING: The Developer plans (for the Metropolitan at College Park luxury townhomes) show a sidewalk on each side of Cherokee Street, terminating at intersection with 48th Place. POINTS ARE FOR THE NORTH SIDE OF CHEROKEE STREET.

4805 CHEROKEE ST.

LOD

4809 CHEROKEE ST.

8 2

LOD

Wall

Trees Impact/Removals

LOD

SECTION A

LOD

4811 CHEROKEE ST.

LOD

1.5

•2 = storm drains present •neighborhood has SW and bump‐outs are coverage below 50% feasible •connect to park •1 = storm drains not •connect to public facility present but bump‐outs •connect to ex. sidewalk are relatively feasible •connect to a proposed •0 = bump‐outs not sidewalk/trail feasible

Opportunities for Bump‐ Outs & SWM

LO D

•connect to City/ County bus route •connect to WMATA network/metro station •connect to commercial district

1 pt each for the following

Connectivity Scoring .5 pt each for the following

PROPOSED PLAN SCALE: 1"=20'

4811 CHEROKEE ST.

LOD

SECTION B

4810 CHEROKEE ST.

ADJUST EX. WALKWAY TO MATCH SIDEWALK GRADE

LID Potential Scoring

4809 CHEROKEE ST.

ADJUST EX. WALKWAY TO MATCH SIDEWALK GRADE

Obstacles (poles, hydrants, fence, etc.)

Existing Design Constraints Scoring

4807 CHEROKEE ST.

PROPOSED FUTURE ROUNDABOUT BY VIKA MARYLAND, LLC.

LOD

SCALE: 1"=20'

DEMOLITION PLAN

4808 CHEROKEE ST.

•3 = flat •1 = not needed •2 = limited impact •2 = none/minor •2 = <10% •.5 = short curb •1 = moderate impact •1 = moderate •1 = <20% •0 = needed •0 = severe impact •0 = significant/too many •0 = >20%

Topo

LOD

SECTION A

4806 CHEROKEE ST.

4807 CHEROKEE ST.

CHEROKEE ST.

ADJUST EXISTING WALKWAY TO MATCH SIDEWALK GRADE

ROW BC

PROPOSED FUTURE SIDEWALK BY VIKA MARYLAND, LLC.

30% Notes

TOTAL COST (INCLUDING $259,753 MOBILIZATION, STAKEOUT, CONTINGENCY, GENERAL CONDITIONS, AND BOND)

SUBTOTAL

034 TRANSPORTATION

032 EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS 033 UTILITIES

031 EARTHWORK

002 EXISTING CONDITIONS $18,610

CONSTRUCTION DIVISION ESTIMATED COST 001 GENERAL $1,000

4804 CHEROKEE ST.

30% CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE

LOD

4805 CHEROKEE ST.

LOD

30% CONSTRUCTION PLANS, COST ESTIMATES AND FINAL MATRIX EXCERPT

LOD

CHEROKEE STREET

PROPOSED FUTURE ROUNDABOUT BY VIKA MARYLAND, LLC.

CHEROKEE ST.

LOD

ROW width

LOD

To (Cross Street 2)

LOD

Rhode Island Avenue

LOD

50 feet (from 48th to Rhode Island)

D LO

48TH PLACE

4 2

•0 = lower sense of pedestrian safety •.5 = average sense of pedestrian safety •1 = higher sense of pedestrian safety

Perceived Pedestrian Safety

0.5

4 2

LOD

1. Recommend a new sidewalk on north side of Cherokee Street that connects to the sidewalk already built by the Metropolitan developer.

30% Recommendations

4901 CHEROKEE ST.

4903 CHEROKEE ST.

D LO

8 EX. H MATC ADJUST AY TO WALKW K GRADE AL SIDEW

D LO

. KEE ST CHERO

ADJUST EX. WALKWAY TO MATCH SIDEWALK GRADE

LOD

SECTION B

4900 CHEROKEE ST.

4901 CHEROKEE ST.

PROPOSED FUTURE ROUNDABOUT BY VIKA MARYLAND, LLC.

D LO

Subjective Safety Scoring

CHEROKEE STREET - SHEET C201 (PROPOSED) A five-foot sidewalk and crosswalks are proposed. The sidewalk is either directly behind the back of curb or offset two to four feet, depending on available space.

PROPOSED FUTURE SIDEWALK BY VIKA MARYLAND, LLC.

D LO 1

LOD

Street Name

LOD

Neighborhood

LOD

North College Park

LOD

From (Cross Street 1)

LOD

48th Place

LOD

Cherokee Street

LOD

Street Segment Length (approx.)

LOD

4903 CHEROKEE ST.

RECOMMENDATION TO PLANNING DEPARTMENT & CITY COUNCIL? YES (NORTH SIDE)

LOD

CITY COUNCIL SELECTON @ FEBRUARY 18, 2020 MEETING?

LOD

LO D

800 feet

SE 2

Existing Road Section (approx.)

EC20 YES (NORTH SIDE)

LOD

LIN

26 feet curb to curb

CH MAT

HE ES

•2 = >10 feet •1 = >5feet •0 = >5feet

LOD

LO LO

49TH AVE.

C20

STREET SCORE

- SE ET D LO

LOD

HL INE HE ES

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

DEMO

SYMBOL

PROPO

LOD

SYMBOL

LOD

From (Cross Street 1)

Old Calvert Road

Street Name

Neighborhood

College Park Estates/ Yarrow

LOD

7330 EDMONSTON RD.

LOD

ON B

SECTI

LOD

LOD LOD

EDMONSTON RD.

LOD

PROPOSED MAILBOX

LOD

30% Notes

TRENCH DRAIN

LOD

ROW BC

LOD

LO D

LOD

Wall

Obstacles (poles, hydrants, fence, etc.)

SECTION A

LOD

Opportunities for Bump‐ Outs & SWM

LID Potential Scoring

LOD

7402 EDMONSTON RD.

LOD

.5 pt each for the following

1 pt each for the following

Connectivity Scoring

LOD

7404 EDMONSTON RD.

0.5

•2 = storm drains present •neighborhood has SW •connect to City/ and bump‐outs are coverage below 50% County bus route SCALE: 1"=20' •3 = flat feasible •1 = not needed •2 = limited impact •2 = none/minor •connect to park •connect to WMATA •2 = <10% •1 = storm drains not •.5 = short curb •1 = moderate impact •1 = moderate •connect to public facility network/metro •1 = <20% present but bump‐outs 0 10' 20' 40' •0 = needed •0 = severe impact •0 = significant/too many •connect to ex. sidewalk station •0 = >20% are relatively feasible 1"=20' •connect to a proposed SCALE:•connect to •0 = bump‐outs not sidewalk/trail commercial district feasible

Trees Impact/Removals

Existing Design Constraints Scoring

LOD

EDMONSTON RD.

PROPOSED PLAN

Topo

LOD

DECORATIVE STONE EROSION CONTROL

SECTION A

5408 KNOXVILLE DR.

SCALE: 1"=20'

DEMOLITION PLAN

LOD

•0 = lower sense of pedestrian safety •.5 = average sense of pedestrian safety •1 = higher sense of pedestrian safety

Perceived Pedestrian Safety

Subjective Safety Scoring

VICINITY MAP

EX. UTILITY POLE TO REMAIN RELOCATE EX. SIGN

2 8

ROOT PRUNING

LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE

REMOVE VEGETATION (CLEAR AND GRUB WITHIN ENTIRE LOD)

DEMO EX. CURB AND GUTTER

DEMO EX. PAVEMENT

DESCRIPTION

PRESERVE EX. CONCRETE

DESCRIPTION

DEMO EX. RETAINING WALL

REMOVE EX. BENCH

REMOVE EX. TRASH CAN

9.5

RELOCATE EX. SIGN PROPOSED STRIPING

$60,800

$5,000

$20,000

1. If selected as a project, recommend sidewalk is on west side of road since neighborhood is on west side. West side is a safer option and more likely to be used than the east side. 2. Since bus stops are on both sides of road, recommend cross‐walks and signage to ADA‐ accessible bus pads on east side of Edmonston Road. (Currently no ADA accessible bus pads or shelters.)

30% Recommendations

PROPOSED OVERSTORY TREE

NATIVE PLANTING AREA (NON-BMP)

TURF SEED MIX & 2" TOPSOIL

TOTAL COST (INCLUDING $1,248,080 PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER PER DPWT DETAIL 300.01 MOBILIZATION, STAKEOUT, CONTINGENCY, GENERAL PROPOSED DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE PER DPWT DETAILS AND 300.07 &BOND) 300.08 CONDITIONS,

300.06

PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK$865,760 PER DPWT DETAILS 300.05 & SUBTOTAL

PROPOSED RETAINING WALL 034 TRANSPORTATION

PROPOSED BENCH 032 EXTERIOR 32 RELOCATE MAILBOX IMPROVEMENTS SYMBOL DESCRIPTION 033 UTILITIES 27

$708,389

$70,571 25

031 EARTHWORK PROPOSED TRASH CAN

ESTIMATED COST $1,000 002 EXISTING CONDITIONS 14 PROPOSED CROSSWALK

001 GENERAL

EX. UTILITY POLE TO REMAIN

EX. SIGN TO REMAIN

CONSTRUCTION DIVISION

SYMBOL

DESCRIPTION 30% CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE

PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE EDMONSTON RD.

ESTIMATED CRITICAL ROOT ZONE

30% CONSTRUCTION PLANS, COST ESTIMATES AND FINAL MATRIX EXCERPT

EDMONSTON ROAD

LOD

SYMBOL

12 REMOVE EX. STRIPING

EX. SIGN TO REMAIN

DESCRIPTION

DEMOLITION SCHEDULE EDMONSTON RD. SYMBOL

EDMONSTON ROAD - SHEET C505 (PROPOSED) A proposed five-foot sidewalk is offset typically four feet from the back of curb when space permits. The existing roadway includes large curb radii, which create an unnecessarily wide P intersection. The 30 percent design reduces the curb radii, which slows vehicle traffic, offers clearance for an ADA sidewalk and creates space for native plant areas.

LOD

PARALLEL PARKING: Parallel parking west side between Bryn Mawr Road and Wellesley Drive. Possible minor impacts to existing parking by sidewalk designs. OBSTACLES: Wall will be needed at 7314 Edmonston Road. "Yarrow" entrance brick walls will need to be preserved at Radcliffe Drive intersection. Possibly a minor bump‐out needed. Utility poles primarily on east side. VEG/TREES: Planting bed at 7302 Edmonston Road. Large trees at 7308‐7314 Edmonston Road but most impacts can be avoided. Vegetation gets denser north of Wellesley Drive. INTERSECTING STREET: Narrow intersection width at Knoxville Drive by bumping out curb. This will reduce proposed crosswalk length. The Marenka House (Historc Site 66‐076) at 7300 Radcliffe Road is protected by the County Historic Preservation Ordinance (Subtitle 29) and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Installation of a sidewalk may require coordination with the Prince George's County Historic Preservation Commission. POINTS ARE FOR THE WEST SIDE OF EDMONSTON ROAD.

Bryn Mawr Road

LOD

To (Cross Street 2)

ROW width

80 feet

LOD

Street Segment Length (approx.)

3260 feet

LOD

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Edmonston Road

Existing Road Section (approx.)

1) double yellow/11 foot travel lane/1 foot paved shoulder 2) double yellow/12 foot travel lane/9 foot parallel parking Typically open section but some asphalt curbs sporadically throughout the road.

6 MATCH LI

6 SHEET C50 NE - SEE

STREET SCORE

LOD

T C5 •2 = >10 feet •1 = >5feet •0 = >5feet

HEE

LOD

ES - SE

LOD

INE

LOD

CH L LOD

LOD

T C5 MATCH LI

LOD

SHEET C50 NE - SEE

LOD

MAT LOD

LO LOD

LOD

DR.

LOD

LO LOD

LOD

HEE

KNOXVILLE

TIO

LOD

INE

ES - SE LOD

LOD

D LOD

48 LOD

CH L LOD

LOD

MAT LOD

LO LOD

RECOMMENDATION TO PLANNING DEPARTMENT & CITY COUNCIL?

LOD

YES (WEST SIDE)

LOD

DR. LOD

CITY COUNCIL SELECTON @ FEBRUARY 18, 2020 MEETING?

LOD

D SECTION T

YES (EAST SIDE)

LOD

SHEET

CHECK

DRAW

DESIG

SCALE:

PROJE

MARK

$266,537

$5,000

TOTAL COST (INCLUDING $384,240 MOBILIZATION, STAKEOUT, CONTINGENCY, GENERAL CONDITIONS, AND BOND)

SUBTOTAL

034 TRANSPORTATION

x x

MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET C302

LOD

14 8

LOD

PARALLEL PARKING: Present. Possible minor impacts to existing parking by sidewalk designs. OBSTACLES: Between Narragansett Parkway and Kenesaw Street, fewer obstructions on west side of 52nd Avenue. Bump‐ outs may still be necessary, however. Between Kenesaw Street and Huron Street, the west side has steep embankments, stairs and retaining walls; the east side has steep banks, chain link fences, signage, and utility poles. VEG/TREES: (1) ~10 inch Zelkova outside 9608 52nd Avenue and (1) ~15 inch maple outside 9604 52nd Avenue. POSSIBLE CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING: existing sidewalks on each side of 52nd Avenue north of Narragansett Parkway. Could tie into either side. POINTS ARE FOR THE WEST SIDE OF 52ND BETWEEN NARRAGANSETT AND KENESAW.

30% Notes

ROW LINE

LOD

$20,000

$171,162

$13,000

002 EXISTING CONDITIONS $56,375

Street Segment Length (approx.)

CONSTRUCTION DIVISION ESTIMATED COST 001 GENERAL $1,000

30% CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE

LOD

30% CONSTRUCTION PLANS, COST ESTIMATES AND FINAL MATRIX EXCERPT

Street Name

D x

Neighborhood

LO x

LOD

LOD x LOD

9603 52ND AVE.

ROW BC

LOD

9607 52ND AVE.

LOD x x

x LOD

9609 52ND AVE.

LOD

x LOD

Obstacles (poles, hydrants, fence, etc.)

LOD

Opportunities for Bump‐ Outs & SWM

x x

0.5

LOD x

•connect to City/ County bus route •connect to WMATA network/metro station •connect to commercial district

1 pt each for the following

Connectivity Scoring .5 pt each for the following

9607 52ND AVE.

x LOD

LOD

9609 52ND AVE.

0.5

•0 = lower sense of pedestrian safety •.5 = average sense of pedestrian safety •1 = higher sense of pedestrian safety

Perceived Pedestrian Safety

8.5

9611 52ND AVE.

LOD

9611 52ND AVE.

10'

LOD

20'

LOD

SECTION B

LO SCALE: 1"=20'

52ND AVE.

30% Recommendations

52ND AVE.

D 1. Between Narragansett Parkway and Kenesaw Street, a sidewalk is feasible on west side 52nd Avenue, as are SWM bump‐outs where needed/appropriate. This section of the street was one of the highest rated streets in the City's 2017 matrix. 2. Kenesaw Street to Narrangansett Parkway is feasible given wide ROW; however, it only lengthens the existing sidewalk network by 1 block. 3. South of Kenesaw Street is not cost effective, for several reasons, including: the obstacles listed at left and the narrow right of way that is essentially at the back of existing curb. Adding a sidewalk likely requires a combination of 1) removing roadway width and parallel parking, 2) expanding the right‐of‐way and taking private property, 3) retaining walls and short curbs to comport to topographical challenges, 4) relocations of fences, signage, etc.) and rebulding of driveways and front walkways. Both the east and west sides of 52nd Avenue (between Kenesaw Street and Huron Street) were poorly rated in terms of their potential for a "complete streets treatment" in the City's 2017 matrix. Other street segments are better served with CIP design/construction funding.

ADJUST EX. WALKWAY TO MATCH SIDEWALK GRADE

Subjective Safety Scoring

9608 52ND AVE.

LOD

ADJUST EX. WALKWAY TO MATCH SIDEWALK GRADE

9605 52ND AVE.

LID Potential Scoring

9603 52ND AVE.

SECTION B

9606 52ND AVE.

•2 = storm drains present •neighborhood has SW and bump‐outs are coverage below 50% •3 = flat feasible •1 = not needed •2 = limited impact •2 = none/minor •connect to park •2 = <10% •1 = storm drains not PLAN PROPOSED •.5 = short curb •1 = moderate impact •1 = moderate •connect to public facility 1"=20' •1 = <20% presentSCALE: but bump‐outs •0 = needed •0 = severe impact •0 = significant/too many •connect to ex. sidewalk •0 = >20% are relatively feasible •connect to a proposed •0 = bump‐outs not sidewalk/trail feasible

Trees Impact/Removals

ADJUST EX. WALKWAY TO MATCH SIDEWALK GRADE

LOD

9604 52ND AVE.

5200 KENESAW ST.

Wall

Existing Design Constraints Scoring

ADJUST EX. WALKWAY TO MATCH SIDEWALK GRADE

9602 52ND AVE.

DEMOLITION PLAN SCALE: 1"=20'

9605 52ND AVE.

LOD

1.5

LOD

Topo

5120 KENESAW ST.

5200 KENESAW ST.

North College Park

LOD x

From (Cross Street 1)

x x

52nd Avenue

Narragansett Parkway

ST.

1260 feet

ROW width

AW x

To (Cross Street 2)

ES KEN

Huron Street

032 EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS 033 UTILITIES

D x

30 feet (Huron to Kenesaw) 50 feet (Kenesaw to Narrangansett)

LOD

Existing Road Section (approx.)

LOD

x x

28 feet curb to curb

LOD

x x

LOD

x x

LOD

x x

LOD

x x

LOD

ER.

•2 = >10 feet •1 = >5feet •0 = >5feet

LOD

031 EARTHWORK

52nd AVENUE

LO 33

LOD x

52ND AVENUE - SHEET C303 (PROPOSED) A proposed five-foot sidewalk is offset two feet from the back of curb. New crosswalks provide safe pedestrian access across Kenesaw Street, 52nd Avenue and Kennebunk Terrace.

LOD

D x x

LOD

LO x x

KEN KT

RECOMMENDATION TO PLANNING DEPARTMENT & CITY COUNCIL?

LOD

MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET C304 40'

MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET C304

LOD

ST. x

UN NEB

CITY COUNCIL SELECTON @ FEBRUARY 18, 2020 MEETING?

STREET SCORE

YES

D LO

LOD

W x

LOD

ER. x

LOD

KT N

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

DEMOLI

SYMBOL

PROPO

LOD

SYMBOL

INE RSK

LOD

x x

LOD

BOWDOIN AVE

LOD

x x

LOD

Topo

x x

LOD

Wall

Trees Impact/Removals

LOD

Opportunities for Bump‐ Outs & SWM

LID Potential Scoring

LOD

SECTION A

LOD

Obstacles (poles, hydrants, fence, etc.)

Existing Design Constraints Scoring

LOD

BOWDOIN AVE

LOD

0.5

•connect to City/ County bus route •connect to WMATA network/metro station •connect to commercial district

LOD

0.5

•0 = lower sense of pedestrian safety •.5 = average sense of pedestrian safety •1 = higher sense of pedestrian safety

Perceived Pedestrian Safety

Subjective Safety Scoring

LOD

1 pt each for the following

Connectivity Scoring

LOD

.5 pt each for the following

LOD

•2 = storm drains present •neighborhood has SW and bump‐outs are coverage below 50% •3 = flat feasible •1 = not needed •2 = limited impact •2 = none/minor •connect to park •2 = <10% •1 = storm drains not •.5 = short curb •1 = moderate impact •1 = moderate •connect to public facility •1 = <20% present but bump‐outs PROPOSED•0PLAN •0 = needed •0 = severe impact = significant/too many •connect to ex. sidewalk SCALE: 1"=20' •0 = >20% are relatively feasible •connect to a proposed •0 = bump‐outs not sidewalk/trail feasible

LOD

ROW BC

SCALE: 1"=20'

DEMOLITION PLAN

BOWDOIN AVENUE - SHEET C401 (PROPOSED) The proposed five-foot sidewalk provides access to Calvert Park and WMATA/MARC trains. Where space is limited by utility poles, the curb is bumped out into the roadway to avoid costly relocations.

LOD

PARALLEL PARKING: Present. Possible minor impacts to existing parking by sidewalk designs. OBSTACLES: Utility poles and tracks on east side make a sidewalk there a challenge without bumping out the curb line. Fence very near back of curb at 4817 Guilford Road, 7201 Bowdoin Avenue (and stairs), established trees at 7204 Bowdoin Avenue. Narrow ROW and obstacles may make this unfeasible. VEG/TREES: Established shrub beds on west side, especially at 7004 Bowdoin Avenue. Low quality hedgerow trees are present on the east side. POINTS ARE FOR THE EAST SIDE OF BOWDOIN AVENUE.

30% Notes

Neighborhood

Calvert Hills

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Street Name

From (Cross Street 1)

Harvard Road

ROW width

To (Cross Street 2)

Bowdoin Avenue

LOD

ROA

Erskine Road

M RD

approximately 35‐40 feet

FORDHA

Street Segment Length (approx.)

610 feet

Existing Road Section (approx.)

GUILFORD RD

24 feet curb to curb

TIE INTO EX. PARK ENTRANCE

x x

•2 = >10 feet •1 = >5feet •0 = >5feet

x x

9.5

STREET SCORE

50 x

ESTIMATED CRITICAL ROOT

ROOT PRUNING

LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE

REMOVE VEGETATION (CLE

DEMO EX. CURB AND GUTTE

DEMO EX. PAVEMENT

$5,000 $187,247 $269,936

034 TRANSPORTATION SUBTOTAL TOTAL COST (INCLUDING MOBILIZATION, STAKEOUT, CONTINGENCY, GENERAL CONDITIONS, AND BOND)

1. Not cost effective. Too expensive to reconstruct the area to provide space for sidewalk. Will involve major coordination with homeowners, who will not be happy with removed trees/shrub beds and relocated fences/steps. 2. City's concept includes a sidewalk on the east side. This is more feasible than west side, however, the east side will involve removal of portions of the hedgerow and avoidance/relocation of utility poles. Bumping out the curb to narrow an already narrow street is likely needed.

30% Recommendations

$20,000

$102,212

032 EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS 033 UTILITIES

TURF SEED MIX & 2" TOPSOI

PROPOSED DETECTABLE W DETAILS 300.07 & 300.08

PROPOSED CURB & GUTTE

PROPOSED CONCRETE SID 300.06

PROPOSED RETAINING WAL

DESCRIPTION

PROPOSED CROSSWALK

$13,350 SYMBOL

RELOCATE EX. SIGN

031 EARTHWORK

$45,685 14

002 EXISTING CONDITIONS

001 GENERAL

ESTIMATED 1 EX. SIGN TO REMAIN COST 2 EX. UTILITY POLE TO REMAI $1,000

CONSTRUCTION DIVISION

30% CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE SYMBOL DESCRIPTION

PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS S

30% CONSTRUCTION PLANS, COST ESTIMATES AND FINAL MATRIX EXCERPT

BOWDOIN AVENUE

RELOCATE EX. SIGN

DESCRIPTION

EX. UTILITY POLE TO REMAI

SYMBOL

EX. SIGN TO REMAIN

DESCRIPTION

DEMOLITION SCHEDULE BOW SYMBOL

RECOMMENDATION TO PLANNING DEPARTMENT & CITY COUNCIL?

MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET C402

CITY COUNCIL SELECTON @ FEBRUARY 18, 2020 MEETING?

CH LINE - SEE SHEET C402 YES (EAST SIDE)

D N

FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSAL FOR EACH OF THE FIVE STREET SEGMENTS

Construction cost estimates were prepared for the five priority street segment selections to be included as part of the city’s five-year CIP. As shown on the previous pages, the cost estimates comprised six construction divisions, including: General, Existing Conditions, Earthwork, Exterior Improvements, Utilities, and Transportation. The five-year CIP includes fiscal year projections from FY 2022–FY 2026. The funding sources shown are similar to those in the City of College Park’s Adopted Operating Budgets and CIP For Fiscal Year 2020. These funding sources were selected based upon their relevance to the five priority street-segment projects. A. Morton Thomas and Associates, Inc., recommends funding to be applied for include Safe Routes To School (SRTS) and Community Development Block Grant (CDBG). SRTS is a federally-funded reimbursement program administered by the Maryland Department of Transportation State Highways Administration (MDOT SHA) that supports infrastructure and non-infrastructure activities and encourages children in grades K-8 to walk or bike to school. The CDBG is administered by the Prince George’s County Department of Housing and Community Development, which receives approximately $4.5 million annually from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to benefit low- to moderate-income families.

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

ST. ANDREWS PLACE

COMPLETE AND GREEN STREET RECONSTRUCTION FROM DUKE STREET TO DEPAUW PLACE Project Description: ST. ANDREWS PLACE This is a discrete project that was preliminarily developed during a comprehensive effort to provide complete and green streets COMPLETE AND GREEN STREET RECONSTRUCTION FROM throughout College Park. The project includes crosswalks, curb ramps, curb and gutter, sidewalks (concrete and porous), tree planting DUKE STREET TO DEPAUW PLACE and stormwater management low impact development (LID) bumpouts. The project also includes other associated complete street/roadway/infrastructural improvements. Project Description: This is a discrete project that was preliminarily developed during a comprehensive effort to provide complete and greenCumulative streets throughout College Park. The project includes crosswalks, curb ramps, curb and gutter, sidewalks (concrete and porous), Project tree planting Inception to FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 complete and stormwater management low impact development (LID) bumpouts. The project also includes other associated End/FY26 street/roadway/infrastructural improvements. Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Cumulative Project Funding Sources: Inception to FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 $108,369 $108,369 Professional Services (Design Fee) End/FY26 $361,231 Projected Projected $361,231 Projected Projected Projected Projected General Fund Funding Sources: $108,369

Professional Services (Design Fee)

$108,369

General Fund Sources Total Funding

$108,369

$361,231

$361,231 $469,600

Total Funding Sources Capital/Project Expenditures:

$108,369

$361,231

$469,600

Improvements (Sidewalk, Curb/Gutter, Trees)

$361,231

Capital/Project Expenditures: Total Capital/Project Expenditures

$361,231

Improvements (Sidewalk, Curb/Gutter, Trees)

$361,231

Total Capital/Project Expenditures

$361,231

College Park Complete and Green Streets Implementation Plan St. Andrews Place

A. Morton Thomas Associates, Inc.

College Park Complete and Green Streets Implementation Plan St. Andrews Place

A. Morton Thomas Associates, Inc.

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

COMPLETE AND GREEN STREET RECONSTRUCTION FROM 48TH PLACE TO RHODE ISLAND AVENUE Project Description: CHEROKEE STREET This is a discrete project that was preliminarily developed during a comprehensive effort to provide complete and green streets COMPLETE AND GREEN STREET RECONSTRUCTION FROM throughout College Park. The project includes crosswalks, curb ramps, curb and gutter, concrete sidewalks and tree planting. The 48TH PLACE TO RHODE ISLAND AVENUE project also includes other associated complete street/roadway/infrastructural improvements. Project Description: Cumulative This is a discrete project that was preliminarily developed during a comprehensive effort to provide complete and green streets Project throughout College Park. The project includes crosswalks, curb ramps, curb and gutter, concrete sidewalks and tree planting. The Inception to FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 project also includes other associated complete street/roadway/infrastructural improvements. End/FY26 Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Cumulative Funding Sources: Project Inception to FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 $77,926 $77,926 Professional Services (Design Fee) End/FY26 $259,753 $259,753 General Fund Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Funding Sources: $259,753 $259,753

$77,926 $337,679 $259,753

$259,753 $259,753

$337,679 $259,753

Total Capital/Project Expenditures Capital/Project Expenditures:

$259,753

Improvements (Sidewalk, Curb/Gutter, Trees)

$259,753

Total Capital/Project Expenditures

$259,753

Professional Services (Design Fee) Total Funding General Fund Sources

$77,926 $77,926

Capital/Project Expenditures: Total Funding Sources Improvements (Sidewalk, Curb/Gutter, Trees)

$77,926

College Park Complete and Green Streets Implementation Plan Cherokee Street

A. Morton Thomas Associates, Inc.

College Park Complete and Green Streets Implementation Plan Cherokee Street

A. Morton Thomas Associates, Inc.

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

52ND AVENUE

COMPLETE AND GREEN STREET RECONSTRUCTION FROM HURON STREET TO NARRANGANSETT PARKWAY Project Description: 52ND AVENUE This is a discrete project that was preliminarily developed during a comprehensive effort toFROM provide complete and green streets COMPLETE AND GREEN STREET RECONSTRUCTION throughout College Park. The project includes crosswalks, curb ramps, curb and gutter, concrete sidewalks and tree planting. The HURON STREET TO NARRANGANSETT PARKWAY project also includes other associated complete street/roadway/infrastructural improvements. Project Description: Cumulative This is a discrete project that was preliminarily developed during a comprehensive effort to provide complete and green streets Project throughout College Park. The project includes crosswalks, curb ramps, curb and gutter, concrete sidewalks and tree planting. The Inception to FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 project also includes other associated complete street/roadway/infrastructural improvements. End/FY26 Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Cumulative Funding Sources: Professional Services (Design Fee)

FY2022 $115,272

FY2023

FY2024

FY2025

FY2026

General Fund

Projected $384,240 Projected Projected Projected Projected

Project Inception to $115,272 End/FY26 $384,240 Projected

Funding Sources: $115,272

Professional Services (Design Fee)

$115,272

Total Funding General Fund Sources

$115,272

$384,240 $384,240

$499,512 $384,240

Capital/Project Expenditures: Total Funding Sources

$115,272

$384,240

$499,512

Improvements (Sidewalk, Curb/Gutter, Trees)

$384,240

Total Capital/Project Expenditures Capital/Project Expenditures:

$384,240

Improvements (Sidewalk, Curb/Gutter, Trees)

$384,240

Total Capital/Project Expenditures

$384,240

College Park Complete and Green Streets Implementation Plan

52nd Avenue

A. Morton Thomas Associates, Inc.

College Park Complete and Green Streets Implementation Plan

52nd Avenue

A. Morton Thomas Associates, Inc.

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

BOWDOIN AVENUE

COMPLETE AND GREEN STREET RECONSTRUCTION FROM ERSKINE ROAD TO HARVARD ROAD Project Description: BOWDOIN AVENUE This is a discrete project that was preliminarily during a comprehensive effortFROM to provide complete and green streets COMPLETEdeveloped AND GREEN STREET RECONSTRUCTION throughout College Park. The project includes crosswalks, curb ramps, curb and gutter and concrete sidewalks. The project also ERSKINE ROAD TO HARVARD ROAD includes other associated complete street/roadway/infrastructural improvements. Project Description: This is a discrete project that was preliminarily developed during a comprehensive effort to provide complete and green Cumulative streets throughout College Park. The project includes crosswalks, curb ramps, curb and gutter and concrete sidewalks. The projectProject also Inception to FY2022 improvements. FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 includes other associated complete street/roadway/infrastructural End/FY26 Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Cumulative Funding Sources:

FY2022

Professional Services (Design Fee)

FY2023

FY2024 $80,981

FY2025

FY2026

$50,000 Projected $50,000 Projected $61,962 Projected Projected Projected $107,974

Community Development Block Grant GeneralSources: Fund Funding

$107,974 $80,981

$80,981

Professional Services (Design Fee)

Project Inception$80,981 to End/FY26 $161,962 Projected

$161,962

Community Development Block Grant

$50,000

$61,962

Total Funding General Fund Sources

$50,000

$130,981 $107,974 $169,936

$350,917 $107,974

Capital/Project Expenditures: Total Funding Sources

$50,000

$130,981

$169,936

$350,917

Improvements (Sidewalk, Curb/Gutter, Trees)

$50,000

$169,936

$269,936

Total Capital/Project Expenditures Capital/Project Expenditures:

$50,000

$169,936

$269,936

Improvements (Sidewalk, Curb/Gutter, Trees)

$50,000

$169,936

$269,936

Total Capital/Project Expenditures

$50,000

$169,936

$269,936

College Park Complete and Green Streets Implementation Plan Bowdoin Avenue

A. Morton Thomas Associates, Inc.

College Park Complete and Green Streets Implementation Plan Bowdoin Avenue

A. Morton Thomas Associates, Inc.

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

COMPLETE AND GREEN STREET RECONSTRUCTION FROM OLD CALVERT ROAD TO BRYN MAWR ROAD Project Description: EDMONSTON ROAD This is a discrete project that was preliminarily developed during a comprehensive effort to provide complete and green streets COMPLETE AND GREEN STREET RECONSTRUCTION FROM throughout College Park. The project includes crosswalks, curb ramps, curb and gutter, concrete sidewalks, bus stop improvements, OLD CALVERT ROAD TO BRYN MAWR ROAD tree planting, native planting, and bumpouts. The project also includes other associated complete street/roadway/infrastructural improvements. Project Description: Cumulative This is a discrete project that was preliminarily developed during a comprehensive effort to provide complete and green streets Project throughout College Park. The project includes crosswalks, curb ramps, curb and gutter, concrete sidewalks, bus stop improvements, Inception to FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 tree planting, native planting, and bumpouts. The project also includes other associated complete street/roadway/infrastructural End/FY25 improvements. Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Cumulative Funding Sources: Project Inception to FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 $374,424 $374,424 Professional Services (Design Fee) End/FY25 $1,248,080 $1,248,080 General Fund Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Funding Sources: Professional Services (Design Fee) Total Funding General Fund Sources

$374,424 $374,424 $1,248,080 $1,248,080

$374,424 $1,622,504 $1,248,080

Capital/Project Expenditures: Total Funding Sources Improvements (Sidewalk, Curb/Gutter, Trees)

$374,424 $1,248,080 $1,248,080

$1,622,504 $1,248,080

Total Capital/Project Expenditures Capital/Project Expenditures:

$1,248,080

Improvements (Sidewalk, Curb/Gutter, Trees)

$1,248,080

Total Capital/Project Expenditures

$1,248,080

College Park Complete and Green Streets Implementation Plan Edmonston Road

A. Morton Thomas Associates, Inc.

College Park Complete and Green Streets Implementation Plan Edmonston Road

A. Morton Thomas Associates, Inc.

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

APPENDICES

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

1 Crystal Springs 2 Crystal Springs 3 Daniels Park (E) 4 Daniels Park (E) 5 Daniels Park (E) 6 Daniels Park (E) 7 Calvert Hills 8 Calvert Hills 9 Calvert Hills 10 Calvert Hills 11 Lakeland 12 Lakeland 13 Berwyn 14 Berwyn 15 Berwyn 16 Berwyn 17 Berwyn 18 Berwyn 19 Berwyn 20 Berwyn 21 Berwyn 22 Berwyn 23 Oak Springs (E) 24 Oak Springs (E) 25 Old Town 26 Old Town 27 Old Town 28 Old Town 29 Old Town 30 Old Town 31 Oak Springs (W) 32 Oak Springs (W) 33 Oak Springs (W) 34 Oak Springs (W) 35 Old Town 36 Old Town 37 Woods 38 Woods

Area Neighborhood

34th Ave 34th Ave 52nd Ave 52nd Ave 52nd Ave 52nd Ave Amherst Rd Amherst Rd Amherst Rd Amherst Rd Berwyn House Rd Berwyn House Rd Berwyn Rd Berwyn Rd Berwyn Rd Berwyn Rd Berwyn Rd Berwyn Rd Berwyn Rd Berwyn Rd Berwyn Rd Berwyn Rd Blackfoot Pl Blackfoot Pl Calvert Rd Calvert Rd Calvert Rd Calvert Rd Calvert Rd Calvert Rd Cherokee St Cherokee St Cherokee St Cherokee St College Ave College Ave DePauw Pl DePauw Pl

Name

End End Huron St Huron St Kenesaw St Kenesaw St Rt 1 Rt 1 RI Ave RI Ave End End Rt 1 Rt 1 48th Ave 48th Ave RI Ave RI Ave 51st Ave 51st Ave Potomac Ave Potomac Ave End End Rt 1 Rt 1 Princeton Ave Princeton Ave RI Ave RI Ave Rt 1 Rt 1 48th Pl 48th Pl End End End End

Street From

End End Kenesaw St Kenesaw St Narragansett Pkwy Narragansett Pkwy RI Ave RI Ave End End End End 48th Ave 48th Ave RI Ave RI Ave 51st Ave 51st Ave Potomac Ave Potomac Ave RR Tracks RR Tracks End End Princeton Ave Princeton Ave RI Ave RI Ave Bowdoin Ave Bowdoin Ave 48th Pl 48th Pl RI Ave RI Ave End End End End

odd even

even odd

even odd even odd even odd

even odd even odd even odd west east west east south north south north south north north south north south north south north south north south north south south north south north south north south north south north south north

Side

1378 1378 694 694 444 444 1089 1089 390 390 1671 1671 491 491 1081 1081 671 671 273 273 294 294 713 713 568 568 926 926 1094 1094 953 953 1048 1048 2642 2642 715 715

50 50 30 30 50 50 70 70 70 70 50 50 40 40 30 30 55 55 30 30 50 50 45 45 45 45 40 40 45 45 50 50 50 50 60 60 50 50

0 = > 20% grade

0 = < 5ft

3 3 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 1 3 3 3 2 2

1 = < 20% grade

1 = > 5ft

2 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

2 = < 10% grade

3 = Flat 2 = No fence

3 = No trees

4 = No UP/Hy

Landscape

1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1

0 = Needed

0 2 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 4 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 2

0 = Obstacle(s)

1 = Not needed1 = No plants

Potential Obstacles Topo Wall

2 = > 10ft

Length Total ROW ROW BC

College Park Complete and Green Streets Worksheet Draft 8‐2017

0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1

0 = Sidewalk

1 = No SW 0 = Unknown

1 = Yes

Opportunities No SW Green Op

6 8 5 2 11 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 9 4 4 6 8 8 5 10 6 6 9 5 5 5 5 5 5 8 7 6 7 6 6 5 8

Score Notes

UP, T T

T UP T, UP UP UP, SW possible at curb Utility support poles only

F, T T, UP, SW possible at curb UP UP

UP UP

T T UP, developer UP

T, UP

UP T Hy H, T UP

UP = Utility Pole

T = Tree(s)

H = Hydrant

F= Fence

APPENDIX A. CITY OF COLLEGE PARK INITIAL COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS MATRIX (AUGUST 2017)

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

24 Oak Springs (E) 25 Old Town 26 Old Town 27 Old Town Area 28 Old Town ID 29 Old Neighborhood Town 30 Old Town 31 Oak Springs (W) 32 Oak Springs (W) 33 Oak Springs (W) 34 Oak Springs (W) 1 Crystal Springs 35 Old Town 2 Crystal Springs 36 Old Town 3 Daniels 37 Woods Park (E) 4 Daniels 38 Woods Park (E) 5 Daniels Park(W) (E) 39 Hollywood 6 Daniels Park(W) (E) 40 Hollywood 7 Calvert Hills(W) 41 Hollywood 8 Calvert Hills(W) 42 Hollywood 9 Calvert Hills(E) 43 Hollywood 10 Hills(E) 44 Calvert Hollywood 11 45 Lakeland Hollywood (E) 12 46 Lakeland Hollywood (E) 13 47 Berwyn Hollywood (E) 14 48 Berwyn Hollywood (E) 15 49 Berwyn Estates/Yarrow 16 50 Berwyn Estates/Yarrow 17 51 Berwyn Daniels Park (W) 18 Daniels Berwyn Park (W) 52 19 53 Berwyn Daniels Park (W) 20 54 Berwyn Daniels Park (W) 21 55 Berwyn Daniels Park (W) 22 56 Berwyn Daniels Park (W) 23 Springs 57 Oak Daniels Park(E) (E) 24 Springs 58 Oak Daniels Park(E) (E) 25 Town 59 Old Calvert Manor 26 Town 60 Old Calvert Manor 27 Town 61 Old Calvert Manor 28 Town 62 Old Calvert Manor 29 Town 63 Old Calvert Manor 30 Town 64 Old Calvert Manor 31 Springs 65 Oak Calvert Hills (W) 32 Springs 66 Oak Calvert Hills (W) 33 Springs 67 Oak Calvert Hills (W) 34 Springs 68 Oak Calvert Hills (W) 35 Town 69 Old Daniels Park (W) 36 Town 70 Old Daniels Park (W) 37 71 Woods Daniels Park (E) 38 72 Woods Daniels Park (E) 73 Daniels Park (E) 74 Daniels Park (E) 75 Daniels Park (E) 76 Daniels Park (E) 77 Oak Spring (E) 78 Oak Spring (E) 79 Oak Spring (E) 80 Oak Spring (E) 81 Calvert Manor 82 Calvert Manor 83 Calvert Manor 84 Calvert Manor 85 Old Town

Blackfoot Pl Calvert Rd Calvert Rd Calvert Rd Calvert Rd CalvertName Rd Calvert Rd Cherokee St Cherokee St Cherokee St Cherokee St 34th AveAve College 34th AveAve College 52nd AvePl DePauw 52nd AvePl DePauw 52nd Ave Rd Edgewood 52nd Ave Rd Edgewood Amherst RdRd Edgewood Amherst RdRd Edgewood Amherst RdRd Edgewood Amherst RdRd Edgewood Berwyn House Edgewood Rd Rd Berwyn House Edgewood Rd Rd Berwyn Rd Rd Edgewood Berwyn Rd Rd Edgewood Berwyn Rd Rd Edmonston Berwyn Rd Rd Edmonston Berwyn Fox St Rd Berwyn Fox St Rd Berwyn Fox St Rd Berwyn Fox St Rd Berwyn Fox St Rd Berwyn Fox St Rd Blackfoot Pl Fox St Blackfoot Pl Fox St Calvert GuilfordRd Dr Calvert GuilfordRd Dr Calvert GuilfordRd Dr Calvert GuilfordRd Dr Calvert GuilfordRd Dr Calvert GuilfordRd Dr Cherokee St Guilford Rd Cherokee St Guilford Rd Cherokee St Guilford Rd Cherokee St Guilford Rd College AveRd Hollywood College AveRd Hollywood DePauw Pl Rd Hollywood DePauw Pl Rd Hollywood Hollywood Rd Hollywood Rd Huron St Huron St Indian Ln Indian Ln Indian Ln Indian Ln Knox Rd Knox Rd Knox Rd Knox Rd Knox Rd

End End odd south 713 45 1 3 1 3 Rt 1 Princeton Ave south 568 45 1 3 1 0 Rt 1 Princeton Ave north 568 45 1 3 1 0 College and Green Streets 8‐2017 1 Princeton Ave ParkRIComplete Ave southWorksheet 926 Draft40 3 1 0 Street Potential Obstacles Princeton Ave RI Ave north 926 40 1 3 1 0 To Side Length Topo Wall Landscape RI Ave From Bowdoin Ave south 1094 Total45ROW ROW 1 BC 3 1 0 4 = No UP/Hy RI Ave Bowdoin Ave north 1094 45 1 3 1 0 3 = Flat 1 3 = No trees Rt 1 48th Pl south 953 50 2 0 4 2 = > 10ft 2 = < 10% 2 = No fence Rt 1 48th Pl north 953 50 2 3grade 1 0 1 = > 5ft 1 = < 20% 48th Pl RI Ave odd south 1048 50 2 1grade 1 = Not0needed1 = No plants 2 0 = < 5ft 0 = > 20% 0 = Obstacle(s) 48th Pl RI Ave even north 1048 50 2 3grade 0 = Needed 1 0 End End even 1378 50 2 3 1 0 south 2642 60 End End odd 1378 50 2 3 1 2 north 2642 60 0 Huron Kenesaw St even west 694 30 0 0 0 4 End St End odd 715 50 2 2 0 Huron Kenesaw St odd east 694 30 0 0 1 0 End St End even 715 50 2 2 2 Kenesaw St Narragansett Pkwy odd even west 444 50 Rt 1 47th Pl south 266 60 2 3 1 4 Kenesaw St Narragansett Pkwy even odd east 444 50 2 3 1 0 Rt 1 47th Pl north 266 60 Rt 1 Pl 1089 70 47th RI Ave odd south 1438 80 2 3 1 0 Rt 1 Pl 1089 70 47th RI Ave even north 1438 80 2 3 1 0 End south 390 70 2 3 1 0 RI Ave 51st Ave odd 1066 80 End north 390 70 2 3 1 0 RI Ave 51st Ave even 1066 80 End Ave End south 1671 50 2 3 1 0 51st 52nd Ave odd 714 60 End Ave End north 1671 50 2 3 1 0 51st 52nd Ave even 714 60 Rt 1 Ave 48th Ave north 491 40 1 3 1 0 52nd 53rd odd south 741 4 Rt 1 Ave 48th Ave south 491 52nd 53rd even north 741 40 1 3 1 4 48th Ave RI Ave even north 1081 30 End End east 3942 80 20 03 01 0 48th Ave RI Ave odd south 1081 30 0 3 1 End End west 3942 80 2 2 0 0 RI Ave 51st Ave even north 671 55 Rt 1 48th Ave odd south 359 30 02 23 01 0 RI Ave 51st Ave odd south 671 55 2 2 Rt 1 48th Ave even north 359 30 0 3 1 4 51st Ave Potomac even north 273 30 0 3 1 4 48th Ave 49th Ave Ave odd south 840 40 1 1 0 1 51st Ave Potomac odd south 273 30 0 3 1 0 48th Ave 49th Ave Ave even north 840 40 1 Potomac RRAve Tracks north 294 4 49th Ave Ave RI odd south 540 50 2 3 1 1 Potomac RRAve Tracks south 294 50 2 3 1 0 49th Ave Ave RI even north 540 End End even north 713 45 1 32 1 0 RI Ave 51st Ave odd south 783 40 End End odd south 713 45 1 31 10 30 RI Ave 51st Ave even north 783 40 Rt 1 Princeton Ave south 568 45 1 3 1 0 Cornell Av Hartwick Rd 688 110 2 Rt 1 Princeton Ave north 568 45 1 3 1 0 Cornell Av Hartwick Rd 681 110 2 Princeton Ave RI Ave Dr south 926 40 1 3 1 0 Hartwick Rd Rowalt 1107 100 2 Princeton Ave RI Ave Dr north 926 40 1 3 1 0 Hartwick Rd Rowalt 1145 100 2 RI Ave Dr Bowdoin Ave south 1094 45 1 3 1 0 Rowalt Rt 1 432 80 2 RI Ave Dr Bowdoin Ave north 1094 45 1 3 1 0 Rowalt Rt 1 382 80 2 Rt 1 48th south 953 50 2 1 0 4 RI AvePl 1301 60 3 1 0 Rt 1 48th north 953 50 2 3 1 0 RI AvePl 1301 60 48th RI Ave Ave odd south 1048 50 2 1 0 2 RI AvePl Bowdoin even north 1061 30 0 0 48th RI Ave Ave even north 1048 50 2 3 1 0 RI AvePl Bowdoin odd south 1061 30 0 End End south 2642 60 2 3 1 0 Rt 1 RI Ave odd 1695 40 1 2 0 1 End End north 2642 60 21 30 10 0 Rt 1 RI Ave even 1695 40 End End odd 715 50 2 2 0 0 RI Ave 51st Pl south 1129 40 1 3 1 1 End End even 715 50 2 2 1 2 RI Ave 51st Pl north 1129 40 1 0 0 0 51st Pl Narragansett Pkwy south 428 50 2 3 1 0 51st Pl Narragansett Pkwy north 428 50 2 0 0 0 51st Ave 52nd Ave even north 555 50 2 1 0 0 51st Ave 52nd Ave odd south 555 50 2 3 1 4 RI Ave Eutaw Pl even north 473 30 0 2 0 0 RI Ave Eutaw Pl odd south 473 30 0 2 0 0 Eutaw Pl 51st Ave north 367 40 1 0 0 0 Eutaw Pl 51st Ave south 367 40 1 0 0 0 Guilford Dr (Fmr Rossburg Dr) south 654 60 2 3 1 0 Guilford Dr (Fmr Rossburg Dr) north 654 60 2 3 1 0 (Fmr Rossburg Dr) Rt 1 south 1101 45 1 3 1 0 (Fmr Rossburg Dr) Rt 1 north 1101 45 1 3 1 0 Rt 1 Dartmouth Ave south 2072 40 1 3 1 0

1 0 0 0 Opportunities 0 No0SW Green Op 0 1 1 1 = No1SW 1 = Yes 0 = Sidewalk 0 = Unknown 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 10 0 1 10 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 01 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

9 5 5 5 Score 5 5 5 8 7 6 7 6 8 6 5 2 8 11 10 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 9 9 10 4 3 4 5 36 8 9 8 4 5 6 10 8 6 7 64 92 5 6 5 6 5 6 5 6 5 6 56 8 6 7 6 62 7 5 6 5 62 5 7 8 2 6 3 4 11 3 3 2 2 6 6 5 5 5 F, plants reataining wall UP UP UP, SW ends at RI Ave T, UP T, UP T, UP

TT, UP UP T T, UP UP UP, SW possible at curb Utility support poles only UP UP, T T T UP UP

F, UPT T, UP, SW possiblewall at curb existing retaining UP T UP T

T, UP UP TUP UP TUP TUP UP, developer UP UP, screen planting UP UP UP UP just shrubs at 4821

UP UP, T T Hy H, T UP

T Notes UP F= T, Fence UP H = Hydrant UP TUP, = Tree(s) SW possible at curb UP = Utility Pole Utility support poles only

T, UP, SW possible at curb UP UP

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

60 Calvert Manor 61 Calvert Manor 62 Calvert Manor 63 Calvert Manor Area Manor 64 Calvert ID 65 Calvert Neighborhood Hills 66 Calvert Hills 67 Calvert Hills 68 Calvert Hills 69 Daniels Park (W) 70 Daniels Park (W) 1 Crystal 71 DanielsSprings Park (E) 2 Crystal 72 DanielsSprings Park (E) 3 Daniels Park (E) 73 4 Daniels Park (E) 74 5 Daniels Park (E) 75 6 Daniels Park (E) 76 7 Calvert Hills(E) 77 Oak Spring 8 Calvert Hills(E) 78 Oak Spring 9 Calvert Hills(E) 79 Oak Spring 10 Hills(E) 80 Calvert Oak Spring 11 81 Lakeland Calvert Manor 12 82 Lakeland Calvert Manor 13 83 Berwyn Calvert Manor 14 84 Berwyn Calvert Manor 15 85 Berwyn Old Town 16 Old Berwyn 86 Town 17 Yarrow Berwyn 87 18 Yarrow Berwyn 88 19 Lakeland Berwyn 89 20 Lakeland Berwyn 90 21 Woods Berwyn 91 22 Woods Berwyn 92 23 Woods Oak Springs (E) 93 24 Woods Oak Springs (E) 94 25 Woods Old Town 95 26 Woods Old Town 96 27 Estates Old Town 97 28 Estates Old Town 98 29 Old Town 30 Old Town 31 Oak Springs (W) 32 Oak Springs (W) 33 Oak Springs (W) 34 Oak Springs (W) 35 Old Town 36 Old Town 37 Woods 38 Woods

Guilford Dr Guilford Dr Guilford Dr Guilford Dr Guilford Dr GuilfordName Rd Guilford Rd Guilford Rd Guilford Rd Hollywood Rd Hollywood Rd 34th Ave Rd Hollywood 34th Ave Rd Hollywood 52nd Ave Rd Hollywood 52nd Ave Rd Hollywood 52nd HuronAve St 52nd HuronAve St Amherst Indian LnRd Amherst Indian LnRd Amherst Indian LnRd Amherst Indian LnRd Berwyn Knox RdHouse Rd Berwyn Knox RdHouse Rd Berwyn Knox RdRd Berwyn Knox RdRd Berwyn Knox RdRd Berwyn Knox RdRd Berwyn Rd Knoxville Dr Berwyn Rd Knoxville Dr Berwyn Rd Lakeland Rd Berwyn Rd Lakeland Rd Berwyn Rd Pl St Andrews Berwyn Rd Pl St Andrews Blackfoot PlPl St Andrews Blackfoot PlPl St Andrews Calvert Rd Pl St Andrews Calvert Rd Pl St Andrews Calvert RdDr Wellesley Calvert RdDr Wellesley Calvert Rd Calvert Rd Cherokee St Cherokee St Cherokee St Cherokee St College Ave College Ave DePauw Pl DePauw Pl

Cornell Av Hartwick Rd north 681 110 2 3 1 0 Hartwick Rd Rowalt Dr south 1107 100 2 3 1 0 Hartwick Rd Rowalt Dr north 1145 100 2 3 1 0 ParkRtComplete and Green Streets 8‐2017 2 RowaltCollege Dr 1 southWorksheet 432 Draft80 3 1 0 Street Potential Obstacles Rowalt Dr Rt 1 north 382 80 2 3 1 0 Side Length Topo Wall Landscape Rt 1 From RI Ave To south 1301 Total60ROW ROW 2 BC 3 1 0 4 = No UP/Hy Rt 1 RI Ave north 1301 60 2 3 1 0 3 = Flat 1 3 = No trees RI Ave Bowdoin Ave even north 1061 30 0 0 0 2 = > 10ft 2 = < 10%3grade 2 = No fence RI Ave Bowdoin Ave odd south 1061 30 0 1 0 1 = > 5ft 1 = < 20%2grade 1 = Not0needed1 = No plants Rt 1 RI Ave odd south 1695 40 1 1 0 = < 5ft 0 = > 20%0grade 0 = Needed 0 = Obstacle(s) Rt 1 RI Ave even north 1695 40 1 0 0 End End even 1378 50 21 3 1 01 RI Ave 51st Pl odd south 1129 40 End End odd 1378 50 21 30 10 20 RI Ave 51st Pl even north 1129 40 Huron Kenesaw St Pkwy even west 694 30 02 03 01 40 51st Pl St Narragansett south 428 50 Huron Kenesaw St Pkwy odd east 694 30 02 0 10 0 51st Pl St Narragansett north 428 50 Kenesaw Narragansett Pkwy even west 444 50 2 31 10 40 51st Ave St 52nd Ave north 555 Kenesaw Narragansett Pkwy odd east 444 50 2 3 1 04 51st Ave St 52nd Ave south 555 Rt 1 RI Ave Pl south 1089 70 20 32 10 0 RI Ave Eutaw even north 473 30 Rt 1 RI Ave Pl north 1089 70 20 32 10 0 RI Ave Eutaw odd south 473 30 RI Ave Pl End south 390 70 21 30 10 0 Eutaw 51st Ave north 367 40 RI Ave Pl End north 390 70 21 30 10 0 Eutaw 51st Ave south 367 40 End End south 1671 50 2 3 1 0 Guilford Dr (Fmr Rossburg Dr) 654 60 End End north 1671 50 2 3 1 0 Guilford Dr (Fmr Rossburg Dr) 654 60 Rt 1 Rossburg Dr) 48th north 491 40 1 3 1 0 (Fmr Rt 1 Ave south 1101 45 Rt 1 Rossburg Dr) 48th south 491 40 1 3 1 40 (Fmr Rt 1 Ave north 1101 45 48th RI Ave even north 1081 30 0 3 1 0 Rt 1 Ave Dartmouth Ave south 2072 40 1 48th RI Ave odd south 1081 30 0 Rt 1 Ave Dartmouth Ave north 2072 40 1 3 1 0 RI Ave 51st Ave even 671 55 End End north 629 50 2 3 1 0 RI Ave 51st Ave odd 671 55 End End south 629 50 2 3 1 42 51st Ave Potomac Ave 273 30 End End even north 2792 50 20 3 1 04 51st Ave Potomac Ave odd south 273 30 3 1 0 End End 2792 50 20 Potomac Ave RR Tracks north 294 50 Metzerott Rd Duke St odd 251 80 2 3 1 4 Potomac Ave RR Tracks south 294 50 Metzerott Rd Duke St even 251 80 2 3 1 0 End St End even north 713 45 1 3 0 Duke Marlborough Way odd 2284 60 2 2 1 3 End St End odd south 713 45 1 3 1 3 Duke Marlborough Way even 2284 60 2 1 0 Rt 1 Princeton Ave south 568 45 1 3 Marlborogh Way End odd 2050 50 2 2 1 0 Rt 1 Princeton Ave north 568 45 1 3 Marlborogh Way End even 2050 50 2 2 1 0 Princeton Ave RI Ave south 926 40 1 3 1 0 End End even 2366 60 2 Princeton Ave RI Ave 926 40 End End odd north 2366 60 21 3 1 20 RI Ave Bowdoin Ave south 1094 45 1 3 1 0 RI Ave Bowdoin Ave north 1094 45 1 3 1 0 Rt 1 48th Pl south 953 50 2 1 0 4 Rt 1 48th Pl north 953 50 2 3 1 0 48th Pl RI Ave odd south 1048 50 2 1 0 2 48th Pl RI Ave even north 1048 50 2 3 1 0 End End south 2642 60 2 3 1 0 End End north 2642 60 2 3 1 0 End End odd 715 50 2 2 0 0 End End even 715 50 2 2 1 2

0 0 0 0 Opportunities 0 No0SW Green Op 0 1 1 1 = No1SW 1 = Yes 0 = Sidewalk 0 = Unknown 1 01 01 10 1 1 1 01 01 01 01 0 0 10 0 0 0 10 10 0 01 10 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 10 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1

6 6 6 6 Score 6 6 6 2 5 5 2 67 82 56 23 11 4 7 11 63 63 62 62 6 6 65 95 4 5 4 5 76 8 11 68 65 10 11 6 7 6 9 9 5 5 6 5 6 5 7 95 5 5 8 7 6 7 6 6 5 8 Notes

UP, T T

T UP T, UP UP UP, SW possible at curb Utility support poles only

F, T T, UP, SW possible at curb UP UP

T UP

UP UP H

T, UP F, plants reataining wall TUP UP TUP, SW ends at RI Ave TT, UP UP, T, UPdeveloper UP T, UP

T UP TUP Hy H, T UP

UP T = Utility Pole

TUP = Tree(s)

H = Hydrant

F= Fence

T, UP T

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

North College Park (45%)

Calvert Hills (65%)

Old Town (91%)

Neighborhood

minor sidewalk coverage minor sidewalk coverage minor sidewalk coverage sidewalks only east of Rhode Island Avenue

Albion Road Beechwood Road

Bowdoin Avenue

Clemson Road Dartmouth Avenue Drexel Road Erskine Road Fordham Road

NO Sidewalk only between Muskogee Street and Lackawanna Street NO NO NO NO NO sidewalks north of Hollywood Road only; sidewalks stop at Narragansett Parkway has sidewalks north of Lackawanna Street; no sidewalks north of Kenesaw Street NO NO

48th Avenue

48th Place

49th Avenue 49th Place 50th Avenue 50th Place

51st Avenue

51st Place

52nd Avenue

53rd Avenue

Apache Street Austin Court

47th Place

47th Avenue

partial sidewalk coverage north of Fordham Road only NO sidewalks stop at Muskogee Street; no sidewalks south of Lackawanna Street

sidewalks only west of Dartmouth Avenue

NO minor sidewalk coverage

Norwich Road

Wake Forest Drive

NO minor sidealk coverage

Girard Avenue

Street Name

Does the street currently have sidewalks?

YES (from Huron Street to Branchville Road). New dogpark, lots of kids, near the metro

YES (CIP FY2020) From Calvert Road to Erskine Road

Project is already completed

City needs a review/recommendation from AMT

Further study recommended between Narragansett Parkway and Huron Street.

(Also previously included on the matrix.)

Highly-rated street previously listed on 2017 Matrix that should Additional streets still be included in the recommended by City Engineer preliminary recommendations, per City's 12/11 CIP Budget update document

Does the street currently NOT have a sidewalk AND was it identified by City as needing improvements? See CIP Budget Updates in Appendix D.

This could connect to the new sidewalk recommended by the city on Huron Street (51st Avenue to 52nd Avenue) and another potential new sidewalk on Iroquois Street (see below).

Provides access to the Boys and Girls Club as well as Public Works Department.

Add new sidewalk, at least between Muskogee Street and Lackawanna Street. Enhances access to public library.

Adding a new sidewalk between 47th Place/48th Place intersection southward to Delaware Street provides a much needed north-south walkability improvement in North College Park. Also provides access to Hollywood Playground. If needed, this proposed segment could be shortened to extend from the existing sidewalk at Lackawanna Street southward to Indian Lane or Fox Street.

This would help. There is already a sidewalk on Bowdoin Avenue between Harvard Road and Calvert Road.

Missing gap in the Old Town sidewalk infrastructure. Several obstacles. Will be a challenge. But would "close the loop" and also provide access to Old Town Playground.

Is the street in a neighborhood with low percentage of sidewalk coverage? Is the street a "missing link" in the existing sidewalk network?

Additional streets that would benefit from connectivity improvements identified by A. Morton Thomas and Associates (AMT)

Preliminary Recommendations for Priority Streets

College Park City Streets without Sidewalks

APPENDIX B. COLLEGE PARK STREETS WITHOUT SIDEWALKS

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN NO NO very minor sidewalk coverage very minor sidewalk coverage NO

Cheyenne Place Cree Lane Delaware Street Erie Street Eutaw Place

has sidewalks east of Rhode Island Avenue; no sidewalks west of Rhode Island Avenue has sidewalks east of Rhode Island Avenue; partial sidewalks west of Rhode Island Avenue

has sidewalks east of Rhode Island Avenue; partial sidewalks west of Rhode Island Avenue

Laguna Road

Nantucket Road

Niagara Road NO

has sidewalks east of Rhode Island Avenue; no sidewalks west of Rhode Island Avenue

Lackawanna Street

Park Drive

very minor sidewalk coverage NO NO NO

Indian Lane Iroquois Street Kenesaw Street Kennebunk Terrace

very minor sidewalk coverage

Cherokee Street

Branchville Road

Geronimo Street

Fox Street

partial sidewalk coverage

Blackfoot Place

Does the street currently have sidewalks?

Autoville Drive

Street Name

North College Park (45%) Huron Street

Neighborhood

YES (from US 1 to Rhode Island Avenue) FY2023-24

City needs a review/recommendation from AMT

Further study recommended between 51st Avenue and 52nd Avenue.

Further study recommended between 48th Avenue and Rhode Island Avenue; investigate to link with developer commitment.

Further study recommended between 51st Avenue and Rhode Island Avenue.

(Also previously included on the matrix.)

Does the street currently NOT have a sidewalk AND was it identified by City as needing improvements? See CIP Budget Updates in Appendix D.

Adding a new sidewalk(s) from US 1 (Baltimore Avenue) east to Rhode Island Avenue. This would enhance access to public library.

Add a new sidewalk from Iroquois Street/Rhode Island Avenue east to Davis Field Playground.

This segment is on the north end of Public Works Department, doesn't seem to be a high priority. However, it could tie into recommended segments on 51st Avenue and 52nd Avenue.

City recommends a new Fox Street sidewalk between US 1 and Rhode Island Avenue, as well as a new 51st Avenue sidewalk. Recommend extending the proposed Fox Street sidewalk to 51st Avenue.

Add a sidewalk in front of the new townhouses (if the developer isn't already required to add this). Extend sidewalk from US 1 (Baltimore Avenue) intersection westward to Rhode Island Avenue/Duvall Field.

Recommend extending sidewalk from existing sidewalk termination northward to Erie Street. However, community previously resisted a sidewalk extension.

Is the street in a neighborhood with low percentage of sidewalk coverage? Is the street a "missing link" in the existing sidewalk network?

Additional streets that would benefit from connectivity improvements identified by A. Morton Thomas and Associates (AMT)

Preliminary Recommendations for Priority Streets

College Park City Streets without Sidewalks

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

West College Park (2%)

Berwyn District (44%)

Neighborhood

NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

NO NO NO NO NO NO

34th Avenue

35th Avenue

36th Avenue 37th Avenue 38th Avenue Bridgewater Street Crystal Springs Road Davidson Street Davidson Street

DePauw Place

Dewberry Lane Drake Place Duke Street Gettysburg Lane

Limestone Place

Marlbrough Court

NO NO very minor sidewalk coverage NO NO minor sidewalk coverage minor sidewalk coverage minor sidewalk coverage minor sidealk coverage NO NO NO NO

minor sidewalk coverage minor sidewalk coverage; sidewalk between Ruatan Street and Berwyn Road

49th Avenue

50th Place 51st Avenue Branchville Road Mohegan Place Osage Street Patuxent Avenue Pontiac Street Potomac Avenue Quebec Street Roanoke Place Ruatan Street Seminole Street Tecumseh Street

sidewalks only between Ruatan Street and Berywn Road

48th Place

Does the street currently have sidewalks?

48th Avenue

Street Name

YES (CIP). Sidewalk (south side) concept and estimate prepared. From intersection with St. Andrews Place east to dead end. Will connect to planned M-NCPPC hard-surface trail.

City needs a review/recommendation from AMT

Does the street currently NOT have a sidewalk AND was it identified by City as needing improvements? See CIP Budget Updates in Appendix D.

The DePauw Place sidewalk could tie into a new sidewalk at Limestone Place. The Limestone Place sidewalk extend snorthward to the Limestone Place/Marlbrough Way intersection.

Agree with this project.

Is the street in a neighborhood with low percentage of sidewalk coverage? Is the street a "missing link" in the existing sidewalk network?

Additional streets that would benefit from connectivity improvements identified by A. Morton Thomas and Associates (AMT)

Preliminary Recommendations for Priority Streets

College Park City Streets without Sidewalks

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN NO NO NO NO NO NO

College Park Estates Edmonston Road & Yarrow (0%)

Knoxville Drive Radcliffe Drive Sweetbriar Drive Vassar Drive

Wellesley Drive

YES (CIP) Sidewalk (soliciting proposals from consultants and coordinating with WSSC)

YES (CIP FY2020). From Metzerott Road to the first intersection at Duke Street. Final design with construction pending for 2020.

City needs a review/recommendation from AMT

From the Limestone Place/Marlbrough Way intersection, continue new sidewalk southward to St. Andrews Place.

Is the street in a neighborhood with low percentage of sidewalk coverage? Is the street a "missing link" in the existing sidewalk network?

Additional streets that would benefit from connectivity improvements identified by A. Morton Thomas and Associates (AMT)

Included on the matrix.

Adding a sidewalk would provide improved access from the proposed CIP sidewalk on Edmonston Road to the trail system at Lake Artemisia Park.

Adding a sidewalk between Radcliffe Drive and Edmonston Road will provide a safe and much quicker route between the two streets. Continue sidewalk from Sweetbriar Drive. Extend sidewalk to proposed CIP sidewalk on Edmonston Road. Continue sidewalk from Vassar Drive. Extend sidewalk to Radcliffe Drive. Continue new sidewalk from Bryn Mawr Road. Provide connectin to Lake Artemesia Park. Extend sidewalk to Sweetbriar Drive.

AMT to review the design fee proposals. City to explain which design the bidders were bidding on.

Add new sidewalk that ties into proposed CIP sidewalk on Edmonston Road and extends to Vassar Drive.

The city's online "Construction & Projects Interactive Map" only shows the proposed CIP project between Metzerott Road and the first intersection with Duke Street. AMT recommends that the proposed sidewalk extend from Metzerott Road/St Andrews Place to St. Andrews Place/DePauw Place, where it (Also previously included on the will connect to the proposed CIP sidewalk at DePauw Place. This enhances intra-neighborhood connectivity but also walkability to College Park Woods matrix, from Metzerott Road, to Duke Neighborhood Park. Street and to DePauw Place.) From Marlbrough Way/St. Andrews Place, extend the new sidewalk eastward to St Andrews Place/DePauw Place. This would complete a sidewalk loop for residents who desire a "walking circuit" in their neighborhood.

Percentages (%) listed with Neighbhorhood Association are taken from College Park Sidewalk Coverage Map, dated 10/28/2019. Rhode Island Avenue is currently a County road that will later be transferred to the city. Design plans are already underway. For this reason, it is excluded from analysis. The local Rhode Island Avenue is also excluded Hollywood Road is currently funded for design but not construction. For this reason, it is excluded from this analysis. The table listed above only includes city streets. It does not include streets owned or maintained by County DPWT or SHA.

NO NO NO NO NO NO

Wofford Lane Baylor Avenue Bryn Mawr Road Chestnut Hill Road Citadel Drive Creighton Drive

Does the street currently have sidewalks?

Marlbrough Way

Street Name

St. Andrews Place

West College Park (2%)

Neighborhood

Does the street currently NOT have a sidewalk AND was it identified by City as needing improvements? See CIP Budget Updates in Appendix D.

Preliminary Recommendations for Priority Streets

College Park City Streets without Sidewalks

APPENDIX C. MEETING MINUTES

September 19, 2019

Kickoff Meeting Minutes Project:

City of College Park Complete and Green Streets Project

AMT File No.

114-849.007

Meeting Date:

September 5, 2019

Meeting Location:

4500 Know Road, College Park, MD

Meeting Attendees:

  

City: Terry Schum (Director - Planning), Steve Halpern (City Engineer), Brenda Alexander (DPW Asst. Director), Katie Hart (Planner) M-NCPPC: Adam Dodgshon (Project Manager), Christina Hartsfield (Area Planner) AMT: Jack Goode (Project Manager), Matt Weir (Landscape Architect)

AMT met with the City of College Park (City) and M-NCPPC staff for introductions/roles and to discuss administrative items, project goals, project scope, stakeholders, and next steps. Following the meeting, attendees walked a couple blocks around City Hall to discuss common streetscape issues throughout the city. 



Communication Protocol o Adam D. will be the main point-of-contact for M-NCPPC. Keep him in the loop about any scope changes, schedule, starting a new task, major milestones, billing, etc. o AMT to coordinate with City on “day-to-day” technical items. Final deliverables o Report: InDesign and PDF o Drawings: .DWG and GIS shapefiles Billing format o Also show % complete for each task. o Refer to “MNCPPC Contractual Billing Procedures for Consultants” for more information. Matrix o Prepared by City Staff, including Terry, Steve and Brenda. o The list focuses on neighborhood connector streets linking to Route 1, Rhode Island Avenue, or other major destinations. o City will share with AMT the City’s Existing Conditions and Connectivity Routes map, dated 10/9/2018, which was the genesis of the matrix. Katie Hart emailed a pdf version on 9/5/19. Project Scope o AMT to study destinations and connection points and walkability to/from. o AMT to study available plans (links included in SOW).  County also just produced The Transportation Action Guide for Urban Communities – “Implementation Strategies Playbook” (March 2019).  AMT to also research programs and strategies in Takoma Park that have been successful.

A. MORTON THOMAS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

4601 Presidents Drive, Suite 365  Lanham, Maryland 20706 Phone: (301) 577-7800  Fax: (301) 881-0814  www.amtengineering.com

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

KICKOFF MEETING MINUTES Complete and Green Streets Project College Park, MD

September 19, 2019 AMT File No. 114-849.007 Page 2



City’s goal, and final product of this contract, should provide fair and equal treatment to all neighborhoods.  At the meeting, Steve summarized each College Park neighborhood and their existing sidewalk status. Some neighborhoods have 100% coverage (downtown area); others have 0% (east and west sides of City).  AMT requests that the City provides a quick markup of the city map outlining this information. o Cost estimating is critical for City’s planning and long term (5-year) funding efforts. o This project is focused on neighborhood streets with narrow ROWs.  Typical street in C.P. may be 26’ face-of-curb to face-of-curb with a 30’ ROW. ROW varies from 30-80 feet from block to block.  Doesn’t leave much space for improvements.  Try to work within the ROW, but if easements are needed in order to complete a project, AMT should make that recommendation. ROW takings are not off the table. o AMT to research Prince George’s Co. DPWT CIP online for projects already funded.  AMT should avoid analyzing these streets and focus on potential new projects.  City will provide a list of streets that they are already working on so we don’t duplicate effort.  City will send list of any streets that residents have specifically raised concerns about regarding walkability. Calvert Trails neighborhood is one area with a big demand for more sidewalks. o AMT recommended projects should prioritize connectivity. o Citizen participation during planning and design process is critical for project buy-in. o Projects should be complete streets – not just sidewalks, but furnishings, striping, on-street parking, tree planting, etc.  City is rapidly losing tree canopy coverage. Protect existing trees. o The SOW identifies that AMT should assume that the City “would have available $200,000 per year for design and construction (assuming no grant funding)”  AMT identified that this will not go very far. However, should design to this amount to maximum extent practicable.  AMT to identify potential grant sources. o County and City to provide available GIS data for City limits, including topography, property/ROW, and aerial photography.  Please note that GIS-level data, especially for ROW and property lines, is notoriously inaccurate. Stakeholders o UMD – only if necessary o County DPWT – for projects intersecting with county roads o MDOT SHA District 3 – projects intersecting state roads Ongoing initiatives o Vision Zero adopted by County. o Complete Streets Policy is adopted by City Council and Mayor. o City is starting new bike (pedal and electric) and e-scooter program called VeoRide.

Page 2

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

KICKOFF MEETING MINUTES Complete and Green Streets Project College Park, MD o

o o 

September 19, 2019 AMT File No. 114-849.007 Page 3

Rhode Island Avenue (approx. 160’ ROW) – currently travel lanes are County-owned and maintained; service roads are City-owned and maintained. City is negotiating with County for full maintenance of the roadway within City limits.  (RI Avenue is not within the scope of work for this project but this is valuable information to know). Knox Road, west of US 1 has non-standard 40-foot ROW. City is requesting an additional 10 feet but are getting push back from UMD. AMT to study each of these and coordinate with final product.

Schedule o 1-year schedule for this project. o City will notify AMT of any dates that need to be set for Community Meetings so AMT can adjust schedule (Task 2) accordingly. o AMT to produce a work plan and schedule before 9/23.

Submitted By: Jack A. Goode, II, P.E., PTOE Attachment: Kickoff Meeting Sign-in Sheet – 9/5/19

Page 3

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

September 24, 2019 Ms. Terry Schum, AICP Planning Director Planning, Community & Economic Development City of College Park, Maryland 4500 Knox Road, College Park, MD 20740 Via email: tschum@collegeparkmd.gov Re:

Tasks 1 & 2 – Matrix Critique, Selection Strategies & Stakeholder Outreach Strategies City of College Park Complete and Green Streets Policy AMT File No. 114-849.007

Dear Ms. Schum: Please see below for a discussion and analysis of several upcoming tasks for the College Park Complete and Green Streets Project. MATRIX CRITIQUE The (Draft) College Park Complete Streets Prioritization Matrix was prepared by City staff and wisely focuses on connector streets that link to Route 1, Rhode Island Avenue, and other major destinations. This matrix itemizes sections of various City streets – varying in length from 251 feet to 3,942 feet – and assigns a “Priority Score” based on potential obstacles (i.e., distance between the right-of-way line and back of curb, topography/slope, and existing vegetation) as well as potential opportunities (i.e., the lack of an existing sidewalk, the potential for green stormwater infrastructure). The streets range from a low score of 2 to a high score of 11. Based on the draft matrix, an initial inventory of the highest-rated priority streets (scored 9 and above) reveals the following observations: • 52nd Avenue between Kenesaw Huron Street and Narragansett Pkwy: minor residential street, on-street parking; wide ROW, flat topography, no sidewalks currently, utility poles and fire hydrants are present • Berwyn Road between Route 1 and 48th Avenue: mixed-use/commercial connection at Route 1, walls required on north side, utility poles, residences and sidewalk present on south side, sharrows on each side of street • Berwyn Road between Potomac Avenue and Railroad Tracks: sidewalk on each side, sharrows on each side of street, on street parking on one side, connection to pedestrian bridge over railroad, wide ROW, flat topography, utilities and power poles present • Blackfoot Place between Rhode Island Ave and 51st Avenue: major intersection with New Hampshire Avenue, no connection to existing asphalt trail at New Hampshire Avenue, no sidewalks, community park, major trees, narrow ROW, utility poles, flat topography • Edgewood Road between Route 1 and 47th Place: three lanes, sidewalks one side, wide ROW, utility poles • Edgewood Road between 52nd Avenue and 53rd Avenue: narrow ROW, sidewalk and residential on one side, forest/mature trees on opposite side, very narrow ROW, flat topography • Huron Street between 51st Avenue and 52nd Avenue: no sidewalks, wide ROW, utility poles/fire hydrant, mature trees • Knoxville Drive between Radcliffe Drive and Edmonston Road: narrow street, utility poles, fire hydrant, no sidewalk A. MORTON THOMAS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers

800 King Farm Boulevard, 4th Floor  Rockville, Maryland 20750 Phone: (301) 881-2545  Fax: (301) 881-0814  www.amtengineering.com

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Tasks 1 & 2 Matrix Critique, Selection Strategies & Stakeholder Outreach Strategies City of College Park • • •

September 24, 2019 AMT File No. 114-849.007 Page 2

St Andrews Place between Metzerott Road and Duke Street: four lane boulevard, no sidewalks, wide, utility poles, residential St Andrews Place between Duke Street and Marlborough WayDePauw: on street parking, sloping topography, utility poles, no sidewalks, no connection to park, residential Wellesley Drive between Sweetbriar Drive and Edmonston Rd: wide roadway, on street parking, no sidewalks, utility poles, residential

The City’s draft matrix unquestionably provides valuable insight into the scope of this project. However, the matrix currently lacks rankings for several other important components needed for the proper evaluation and concept design of the City’s streetscapes. This includes scores for the following objective items: • Storm drain infrastructure: Although not necessary for the implementation of potential low-impact development SWM measures, the presence of a public storm drain system increases the potential for stormwater improvements in the right-of-way. • On-street parking: Residents will object to any removal of parking in order to implement the streetscape improvements. • Existing above-ground utilities such as utility poles, guy wires, fire hydrants: Such utilities are often in conflict with proposed streetscape improvements. Moving these utilities is expensive and significantly reduces project budgets for the actual proposed improvements. • ADA compliance: Streets may or may not comply with ADA requirements. (i.e., curb cuts/ramps, detectable warning surfaces, acceptable cross slopes, acceptable clearances, crosswalks). • Environmental features: When present, well-established canopy trees (and their roots), wetlands, streams and bridges pose a challenge to implementation in a manner that is thoughtful and respectful of existing features that must be protected. Updating the matrix as described above will require a significant effort. Additional field reconnaissance may be necessary. Fortunately, AMT’s offices are within a 30-minute drive of the City. The City staff’s local knowledge and understanding of existing conditions is invaluable as the matrix is updated. REVIEW OF EXISTING PLANS AND REPORTS The several existing plans and reports listed in the RFP reinforce the intent and scope of this project. For example, The Prince George’s County Approved Countywide Master Plan of Transportation (2009) highlights the important of bikeways, pedestrian mobility and complete streets as a means of providing transit-oriented development, reduced congestion, reduced vehicle miles travelled, improved access to the WMATA Purple Line. These improvements ultimately lead to economic development, urban density and obviously a diversity of transit options. The City’s recently approved Complete Streets Policy provides perhaps the greatest framework for this project. Notably, the policy states that “because the local roads are under the direct jurisdiction of the City, they provide the greatest flexibility when it comes to implementing Complete Street principles and policies” (20). This project aligns perfectly with that sentiment. Other items of note: • The highest gaps in the sidewalk connectivity network include the area between Berwyn House Road and Navahoe Street, northward to the beltway; Acredale, and; Vassar Drive/Bryn Mawr Road southward to Radcliffe Drive on the west side of Kenilworth Avenue. • Existing typical sections are shown, showing ROWs as narrow as 25’, which does not allow for significant roadway improvements without easements on private property. • Like other reports, it identifies project principles that are well-aligned with the goals of this project. • Identifies missing vehicular and non-vehicular connections between dead-end streets. Page 2

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Tasks 1 & 2 Matrix Critique, Selection Strategies & Stakeholder Outreach Strategies City of College Park •

September 24, 2019 AMT File No. 114-849.007 Page 3

Diagrams traffic-calming methods (i.e., restriping, chicanes, modified intersections, mid-block yields, raised intersections, mini-roundabouts, bumpouts, speed humps, crosswalk refuges, cycle tracks, sharrows, multiuse paths, buffered bike lanes) that are improvements likely to be included within this project. Many of these strategies are further designed and analyzed in NACTO’s Design Guides.

SELECTION STRATGIES Improving and revising the project matrix will offer a data-driven method for comparing the City’s streets in an applesto-apples manner. Following the matrix update, the City and AMT will collaborate on selecting five streets for further study. AMT will require additional information from the City. This includes: • Map showing each of the City’s neighborhoods and an approximately percentage of streets with sidewalks currently. This was quickly discussed at the kick-off meeting; however, we will benefit from having this information in mapped form. Understanding walkability from a neighborhood scale will help to ensure equity in the allocation of design and construction funds. • GIS information, including right-of-way lines, property lines, topography, and other planimetric information. Please note that GIS ROW/property lines are notoriously inaccurate. As specified in the RFP, detailed property survey is excluded from the scope of work. If needed, AMT can provide property/boundary/right-of-way surveys for selected streets as an additional service. Whereas the matrix provides objective measurement, AMT will also rely upon the City to provide more subjective input during the selection process. This includes: • Expression of public desire: I.E., has the community specifically requested improvements made on certain streets? • Identification of critical connections, other transit options or destinations within a 0.5-mile radius: projects that have the potential to connect to existing “hubs” or points of interest should be prioritized as they offer the greatest return on investment from a “complete green street” perspective. • If a street section already has an ADA-compliant sidewalk, it should be removed from the matrix. This will help to ensure that the City’s design/construction funds are distributed in a fair and equitable manner. Lastly, we must consider existing projects that are either already funded or already in the midst of design or construction. The selection of the five streets must exclude any such projects. • The Prince George’s County CIP does not list any projects that could overlap with the scope of this project. • The City is already underway on some streetscape improvements. The City needs to provide a list of any such projects to AMT. After considering the revised matrix, GIS data, public sentiment, previous studies, and current projects, AMT and the City will finally have the information needed in order to begin coordination with project stakeholders. STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH STRATEGIES Project stakeholders include: • Prince George’s County Department of Public Works and Transportation (DPWT) – for projects that intersect/connect to county roads • MDOT SHA District 3 – for projects that intersect/connect to state roads • University of Maryland (UMD) – for projects that intersect/connect to University property • City of College Park staff Page 3

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Tasks 1 & 2 Matrix Critique, Selection Strategies & Stakeholder Outreach Strategies City of College Park • •

September 24, 2019 AMT File No. 114-849.007 Page 4

M-NCPPC Community Planning Division City of College Park residents

At the stakeholder meetings, we will focus on the updated matrix and the street selection process as described previously. The purpose of the meeting is to solicit input from various diverse perspectives, identify any critical items that may have been previously missed, coordinate amongst the various parties, clarify design and construction funding, and discussion the general intent of the proposed designs. AMT’s role at the stakeholder meeting is to lead the presentation and discussion. A presentation will be used to convey our selection strategies and process; handouts, graphics and maps will further explain the project’s intent and scope. The City and M-NCPPC are responsible for arranging, advertising, facilitating and hosting all meetings. It should be noted that inherent to the selection process is an exhaustive ranking of the potential streets. Therefore, if the stakeholders eliminate one of the five selected streets from consideration, the next highest rated street will be added in the place of the eliminated street.

Page 4

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

December 12, 2019

Priority Streets Selection Meeting Project:

City of College Park Complete and Green Streets Project

AMT File No.

114-849.007

Meeting Date:

December 12, 2019

Meeting Location:

8400 Baltimore Avenue, Suite 340, College Park, MD

Meeting Attendees:

• •

City: Terry Schum (Director - Planning), Katie Hart (Planner), Aaron (for Steve Halpern) AMT: Jack Goode (Project Manager), Matt Weir (Landscape Architect)

As the project moves towards contract Tasks 3 & 4, the City of College Park and AMT met to discuss priority streets for further design concepting and cost estimating, the project schedule and next steps. 



AMT summarized work completed over the last couple weeks. o Used GIS mapping (sources included City of College Park shapefiles and publicly available Prince George’s County shapefiles) to study existing conditions and gain familiarity with City.  The information most helpful to moving forward onto Task 3 & 4 was the sidewalk analysis map and the % sidewalk coverage by neighborhood association map. o AMT created a spreadsheet listing all the City’s approximately 150 street names and eliminated any streets that currently have sidewalks from consideration for priority streets.  AMT recommends prioritizing neighborhoods with currently low sidewalk coverage first for an equitable treatment of the City’s different neighborhoods.  Streets that are lacking sidewalk connectivity are recommended for further study. Streets near public facilities (i.e., parks, libraries, metro stations, etc.) are also prioritized. City reviewed the “CIP Budget Update” document o This document lists streets funded for design and construction. These streets will be subject to further review/study by AMT. o The document also lists several streets recommended by the City engineer. o Many of the streets on AMT’s spreadsheet and the City’s CIP update document overlapped. After reviewing the documents, City and AMT agreed to move forward with several streets. 1. St. Andrew’s Place: from Duke St. to De Pauw Place 2. DePauw Place: St. Andrew’s Place to dead end/Gettysburg Lane a. Refine concept, provide cost estimate, one or both sides b. MNCPPC is developing a trail which ties into the north side of DePauw 3. Bowdoin Avenue: from Harvard to Erskine 4. Edmonston: from Old Calvert to Bryn Mawr 5. Fox St: from US 1 to 51st Ave 6. Hollywood: from Rhode Island to US1 a. City has 30% plans and shared them with AMT. AMT to review cost estimate only.

A. MORTON THOMAS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

4601 Presidents Drive, Suite 365  Lanham, Maryland 20706 Phone: (301) 577-7800  Fax: (301) 881-0814  www.amtengineering.com

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

MEETING MINUTES Complete and Green Streets Project College Park, MD

December 12, 2019 AMT File No. 114-849.007 Page 2



If the above streets prove to not be feasible for this project, City and AMT agreed to study the following “backups”: o Wellesley Drive: from Edmonston to Sweetbriar o 48th Place: from 47th to Delaware (or at least to Indian Lane or Fox) o 49th Place: from Muskogee to Hollywood o 52nd Avenue: from Narragansett Parkway to Huron Street o Iroquois Street: from Rhode Island eastward to Davis Field Playground o Cherokee Street: from 48th Place to Rhode Island Avenue  City will send developer plans



Study by AMT not needed: o Beechwood o Old Calvert Road  Developer is studying. o Autoville Road o Muskogee o 49th between Patuxent and Pontiac



Other Notes: o Edmonston Road – major WSSC project will be coming through o City to send consultant proposals for Edmonston construction



Schedule: o Stakeholder Meeting: January 22, 2020  Include attendees present at Kick-off meeting.  AMT will provide greater analysis of the streets listed above to solicit opinions from stakeholders and agree upon the 5 selected streets for this projects’ 30% plans.

Submitted By: Jack A. Goode, II, P.E., PTOE Attachment: AMT Spreadsheet of City Streets.

Page 2

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

January 28, 2020 Revised February 6, 2020

Priority Streets Selection Meeting Project:

City of College Park Complete and Green Streets Project

AMT File No.

114‐849.007

Meeting Date:

January 22, 2020

Meeting Location:

8400 Baltimore Avenue, Suite 375, College Park, MD

Meeting Attendees:

 

City: Terry Schum (Director ‐ Planning), Katie Hart (Planner), Brenda Alexander (DPW Asst. Director) AMT: Jack Goode (Project Manager), Matt Weir (Landscape Architect)

As the project moves towards contract Task 4, the City of College Park (City) and AMT met to discuss the twelve (12) priority streets and select the top (5) for further concept designing and cost estimating. 



AMT summarized work completed since December 2019 project meeting. o Used GIS mapping of the City to illustrate the twelve (12) priority streets subdivided by the six (6) highest rated streets and the six (6) “second tier” streets as determined at the December 12th meeting.  Highest rated streets: 1. St. Andrews Place (from Duke Street to De Pauw Place) 2. De Pauw Place (from St. Andrews Place to dead end/Gettysburg Lane) 3. Wellesley Drive (from Edmonston Road to Sweetbriar Drive) 4. Cherokee Street (from 48th Place to Rhode Island Avenue) 5. Edmonston Road (from Old Calvert Road to Bryn Mawr Road) 6. 48th Place (from 47th Place to Delaware Street) [or at least to Indian Lane or Fox Street]  Lowest rated streets: 7. 52nd Avenue (from Narragansett Parkway to Huron Street) 8. Bowdoin Avenue (from Harvard Road to Erskine Road) 9. 49th Place (from Muskogee Street to Hollywood Road) 10. Fox Street (from US Route 1 to 51st Avenue) 11. Iroquois Street (from Rhode Island Avenue to Davis Field Playground) 12. Hollywood Road (from US Route 1 to Rhode Island Avenue) o AMT refined the Priority Street Selection Matrix to add two (2) more rating criteria including LID Potential (opportunities for bump‐outs and SWM) and Connectivity Score (neighborhood sidewalk coverage and connections to parks, public facilities, existing sidewalks, proposed sidewalks/trails, and bus routes). Discussion points: o Concept plans for the Old Calvert Road connection from Edmonston Road to Campus Drive need to be developed. Looking to tie into Edmonston Road project.

A. MORTON THOMAS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

4640 Forbes Boulevard, Suite 320  Lanham, Maryland 20706 Phone: (301) 577‐7800  Fax: (301) 881‐0814  www.amtengineering.com

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

MEETING MINUTES Complete and Green Streets Project College Park, MD

January 28, 2020/Revised February 6, 2020 AMT File No. 114‐849.007 Page 2



Steve Halpern will provide an update on the sidewalk connection along Metzerott Road to the east of St. Andrews Place. o Flexi‐pave was recently installed along Quebec Street around some trees. It is initially costly but effective rather than tree grates. o Cherokee Street – can replace the 18” bradford pears. ROW width is 50 feet from 48th Place to Rhode Island Avenue. o Edmonston Road – find out if Steve H. has the plans; people park between Knoxville Road and Bryn Mawr Road; need to avoid impacting the on‐street parking; adding curb and gutter will have an effect on drainage and SWM; Councilmember lives in this area and wants this project. o Sites #1‐#4 from the highest rated streets are very good candidates. o 49th Place – ROW width from Lackawanna Street to Hollywood Road is 60 feet and north of Lackawanna Street to Muskogee Street is 35 feet. Instead of limits from Muskogee Street to Hollywood Road, maybe from Muskogee Street to Laguna Road. o Indian Lane – from Rhode Island Avenue to 51st Avenue (near DPW); this section of roadway is a possible priority street candidate; there are bus stops for students but they have to stand in the roadway; wide ROW; parking on both sides; overhead on north side; City is in discussions with Prince George’s County DPWT to take over Rhode Island Avenue. o AMT will develop 30% cost estimate for Hollywood Road. o City noted to look for RFP for Hollywood Road design project. Next Project Steps: o Request Steve H. to review the twelve (12) priority streets and confirm the “top five” highest rated streets. o City has asked AMT to present the current matrix to the City Council on Tuesday, February 18th, 2020 at 7:30pm at DPW. It will be a 30‐minute presentation. o Presentation should include:  Process used to arrive at this point.  Existing sidewalks.  Connectivity.  Information from prior reports.  Process of elimination.  “Top 5”.  Next steps. o City needs to upload presentation to website for Council review by Friday, February 14th. AMT to provide a draft presentation for City review by Monday, February 10th.

Submitted By: Jack A. Goode, II, P.E., PTOE

Page 2

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

*RRGH -DFN )URP 6HQW 7R &F 6XEMHFW $WWDFKPHQWV

.DWLH +DUW NKDUW#FROOHJHSDUNPG JRY! 7XHVGD\ -DQXDU\ 30 *RRGH -DFN 7HUU\ 6FKXP %UHQGD $OH[DQGHU 6WHYH +DOSHUQ :HLU 0DWWKHZ 'RGJVKRQ $GDP +DUWVILHOG &KULVWLQD 5( 3ULRULW\ 6WUHHWV 0HHWLQJ 0LQXWHV (GPRQVWRQ5GB6LGHZDONBY SGI

)ROORZ 8S )ODJ )ODJ 6WDWXV

)ROORZ XS &RPSOHWHG

'ŽŽĚ ĨƚĞƌŶŽŽŶ͕ dŚĂŶŬ ǇŽƵ ĨŽƌ ƐĞŶĚŝŶŐ ƚŚĞ ŵŝŶƵƚĞƐ͘ ,ĞƌĞ ĂƌĞ ƐŽŵĞ ĨŽůůŽǁͲƵƉ ŝƚĞŵƐ ŽŶ ƚŚĞ ŵŝŶƵƚĞƐ͗ WĂŐĞ Ϯ ϭ͘ ^ƚĞǀĞ ,ĂůƉĞƌŶ ǁŝůů ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ ĂŶ ƵƉĚĂƚĞ ŽŶ ƚŚĞ ƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬ ĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŽŶ ĂůŽŶŐ DĞƚǌĞƌŽƚƚ ZŽĂĚ ƚŽ ƚŚĞ ĞĂƐƚ ŽĨ ^ƚ͘ ŶĚƌĞǁƐ WůĂĐĞ͘ tĞ ŚĂǀĞ ŶŽƚ ƌĞĂĐŚĞĚ ŽƵƚ ƚŽ ƚŚĞ ŽƵŶƚǇ ǇĞƚ ĨŽƌ ƉĞƌŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ ƚŽ ŝŶƐƚĂůů ƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬ ŽŶ ƚŚĞŝƌ ZKt͘ ^ƚĞǀĞ ǁŝůů ƌĞĂĐŚ ŽƵƚ͘ Noted. Ϯ͘ ŚĞƌŽŬĞĞ ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ʹ sĞƌŝĨǇ ƚŚĞ ϱϬͲĨŽŽƚ ZKt͘ ZKt ŝƐ ϱϬ Ĩƚ ĨƌŽŵ ϰϴƚŚ WůĂĐĞ ƚŽ ZŚŽĚĞ /ƐůĂŶĚ ǀĞ͘ Minutes revised. ϯ͘ ϰϵƚŚ WůĂĐĞ ʹ ĐŽŶĨŝƌŵ ǁŝƚŚ ^ƚĞǀĞ ,͘ ŽŶ ZKt ǁŝĚƚŚ͖ &ƌŽŵ >ĂĐŬĂǁĂŶŶĂ ^ƚ͘ ƚŽ ,ŽůůǇǁŽŽĚ ZKt ŝƐ ϲϬ Ĩƚ͘ ZKt ŶŽƌƚŚ ŽĨ >ĂĐŬĂǁĂŶŶĂ ƚŽ DƵƐŬŽŐĞĞ ^ƚ ŝƐ ϯϱ Ĩƚ͘ Minutes revised. ϰ͘ ĚŵŽŶƐƚŽŶ ZŽĂĚ ʹ ĐŽŶĐĞƉƚ ƉůĂŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬ ŽŶ ƚŚĞ ĞĂƐƚ ƐŝĚĞ ĂƌĞ ĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚ͘ ZĞƋƵĞƐƚ Dd ƚŽ ŝŶǀĞƐƚŝŐĂƚĞ ĐŽŶĐĞƉƚ ƉůĂŶƐ ĨŽƌ ƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬ ŽŶ ƚŚĞ ǁĞƐƚ ƐŝĚĞ͘ t^^ ǁŝůů ďĞ ƐƚĂƌƚŝŶŐ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ ŝŶ ŵŝĚͲƐƉƌŝŶŐ ϮϬϮϬ ĨŽƌ ƚǁŽ ǇĞĂƌƐ ƚŽ ƌĞƉůĂĐĞ ƚŚĞ ǁĂƚĞƌ ůŝŶĞ͘ Noted. ϱ͘ /ŶĚŝĂŶ >ĂŶĞ ʹ ŝƚǇ ŝƐ ŝŶ ĚŝƐĐƵƐƐŝŽŶƐ ǁŝƚŚ WƌŝŶĐĞ 'ĞŽƌŐĞ͛Ɛ ŽƵŶƚǇ Wtd ƚŽ ƚĂŬĞ ŽǀĞƌ ZŚŽĚĞ /ƐůĂŶĚ ǀĞŶƵĞ ;ĐŽƌƌĞĐƚŝŽŶͿ͘ Minutes revised. 51st Avenue was discussed at the December meeting but we collectively decided not to pursue. Reason being that the sidewalk would need a curb bumpout due to power poles, fences, and trees at the back of the existing curb. Existing road may not be wide enough to include a curb bumpout. dŚĞ ŝƚǇ Ɛƚ x tĂƐ ϱϭ ĂǀĞŶƵĞ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ƌĂŶŬŝŶŐ ůŝƐƚ͍ dŚĞƌĞ ŝƐ ŝŶƚĞƌĞƐƚ ŝŶ Ă ƐĞŐŵĞŶƚ ŽĨ ƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬ ĨƌŽŵ ,ƵƌŽŶ ^ƚ ƚŽ ƌĂŶĐŚǀŝůůĞ ZŽĂĚ͘ x tĞ ĂŐƌĞĞ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚĞ ŚŝŐŚĞƐƚ ƌĂƚĞĚ ƐƚƌĞĞƚƐ ŽŶ ƚŚĞ WƌŝŽƌŝƚǇ ƐƚƌĞĞƚ ƐĞůĞĐƚŝŽŶ ŵĂƚƌŝǆ ĂƌĞ ^ƚ͘ ŶĚƌĞǁƐ WůĂĐĞ͕ Ğ WĂƵǁ WůĂĐĞ͕ tĞůůĞƐůĞǇ ƌŝǀĞ͕ ŚĞƌŽŬĞĞ ^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕ ĂŶĚ ĚŵŽŶƐƚŽŶ ZŽĂĚ͘ Noted. AMT will move forward with developing concept plans for the 5 streets under Task 4. dŚĂŶŬ ǇŽƵ͕ <ĂƚŝĞ &ƌŽŵ͗ 'ŽŽĚĞ͕ :ĂĐŬ ф:ŐŽŽĚĞΛĂŵƚĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ͘ĐŽŵх ^ĞŶƚ͗ DŽŶĚĂǇ͕ :ĂŶƵĂƌǇ Ϯϳ͕ ϮϬϮϬ ϴ͗ϯϯ WD dŽ͗ dĞƌƌǇ ^ĐŚƵŵ фƚƐĐŚƵŵΛĐŽůůĞŐĞƉĂƌŬŵĚ͘ŐŽǀх͖ <ĂƚŝĞ ,Ăƌƚ фŬŚĂƌƚΛĐŽůůĞŐĞƉĂƌŬŵĚ͘ŐŽǀх͖ ƌĞŶĚĂ ůĞǆĂŶĚĞƌ ф ĂůĞǆĂŶĚĞƌΛĐŽůůĞŐĞƉĂƌŬŵĚ͘ŐŽǀх͖ ^ƚĞǀĞ ,ĂůƉĞƌŶ фƐŚĂůƉĞƌŶΛĐŽůůĞŐĞƉĂƌŬŵĚ͘ŐŽǀх Đ͗ tĞŝƌ͕ DĂƚƚŚĞǁ фŵǁĞŝƌΛĂŵƚĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ͘ĐŽŵх͖ ŽĚŐƐŚŽŶ͕ ĚĂŵ ф ĚĂŵ͘ ŽĚŐƐŚŽŶΛƉƉĚ͘ŵŶĐƉƉĐ͘ŽƌŐх͖ ,ĂƌƚƐĨŝĞůĚ͕ ŚƌŝƐƚŝŶĂ ф ŚƌŝƐƚŝŶĂ͘,ĂƌƚƐĨŝĞůĚΛƉƉĚ͘ŵŶĐƉƉĐ͘ŽƌŐх ^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗ WƌŝŽƌŝƚǇ ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐ DĞĞƚŝŶŐ DŝŶƵƚĞƐ 'ƌĞĞƚŝŶŐƐ͗ WůĞĂƐĞ ĨŝŶĚ ĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚ ƚŚĞ ŵŝŶƵƚĞƐ ĨƌŽŵ ŽƵƌ WƌŝŽƌŝƚǇ ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐ ^ĞůĞĐƚŝŽŶ ŵĞĞƚŝŶŐ ŽŶ :ĂŶƵĂƌǇ ϮϮ͕ ϮϬϮϬ͘ dŚĂŶŬ ǇŽƵ͘

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

February 20, 2020

Priority Streets Selection Meeting Project:

City of College Park Complete and Green Streets Project

AMT File No.

114-849.007

Meeting Date:

February 18, 2020

Meeting Location:

College Park Department of Public Works

Meeting Attendees:

• •

City: City Mayor and City Council, City Clerk, Manager, Counsel & student liaisons, City Planning Department AMT: Jack Goode (Project Manager), Matt Weir (Landscape Architect)

The City Planning Department and AMT presented a project update, focusing on the process used to update the City’s 2017 Matrix as well as AMT’s recommend list of streets for 30% design. 

 



Terry Schum introduced the project, summarizing progress since the 2017 matrix. She explained the scope of work and intent for this project, as well as M-NCPPC’s funding role and other “sidewalk/streetscape” projects that are not a part of this project. AMT presented the Powerpoint presentation followed by a question and answer session. Questions/Comments regarding Process: o Matrix should include a column for a SAFETY score of each street – either current safety or potential safety improvements. This safety score may include information or data on traffic counts. Questions/Comments regarding AMT’s Recommended Streets o Edmonston Drive – based on prior community feedback, the new sidewalk should be on the east side of the road, not the west side (which is the residential side).  Planning Department and AMT initially recommended the sidewalk on the west side (residential side) because it is easier to access (avoids the need for pedestrians to cross Edmonston) and thus likely to be used more frequently than a sidewalk on the east side.  Councilmember expressed that a sidewalk on the west side will be heavily objected to because of portions of the road where parallel parking is present. AMT acknowledge that in select areas of the west side, retaining walls would be needed. o Wellelsey Drive – currently very wide and offers plenty of space for pedestrians to walk in the roadway. Other streets may be better served by a new sidewalk – i.e., Bowdoin Drive rather than Wellesley. o DePauw Place – resident previously expressed that a sidewalk should not be added here.  AMT explained the potential connection to a new trail by MNCPPC at the DePauw Place dead-end, as well as the potential to connect to a new sidewalk on St. Andrews.  Councilmember expressed that a resident is especially concerned with the preservation of the large trees near the end of the block.  AMT expressed that approximately 90% of DePauw sidewalk is away from trees, and that where trees are present, the sidewalk could be bumped out to avoid them.

A. MORTON THOMAS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

4601 Presidents Drive, Suite 365  Lanham, Maryland 20706 Phone: (301) 577-7800  Fax: (301) 881-0814  www.amtengineering.com

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

MEETING MINUTES Complete and Green Streets Project College Park, MD



February 18, 2019 AMT File No. 114-849.007 Page 2

o Bowdoin Avenue – although narrow, it is a major pedestrian link to WMATA and heavily used. o Final Alignment of First Tier Streets o St. Andrews Place o Bowdoin Avenue o Cherokee Street o Edmonston Road o 52nd Avenue

Submitted By: Jack A. Goode, II, P.E., PTOE

Page 2

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

July 27, 2020

30% Concept Design Comment‐Responses Project:

City of College Park Complete and Green Streets Project

AMT File No.

114‐849.007

Comment Date:

May 26, 2020

GENERAL COMMENTS:

1. Provide house numbers on plans for referencing. AMT RESPONSE: Added. 2. A typical street section for each segment would be nice. AMT RESPONSE: Street sections have been added. 3. It doesn’t look like opportunities for street tree plantings and micro‐bioretention were addressed. AMT RESPONSE: Trees and micro‐bioretention are added where appropriate. Trees added: St. Andrews, Cherokee, 52nd Micro‐bio bump‐outs added: St. Andrews, Edmonston There is not adequate space for either on Bowdoin. Bowdoin also has overhead lines that make tree planting not realistic. 4. What about curb bump‐outs where appropriate where there is on‐street parking? AMT RESPONSE: See above. 5. For the final report, a short narrative summary would also be helpful to describe the limits of work, what side of the street, unusual constraints and rationale for particular decisions. AMT RESPONSE: Narrative has been provided.

SPEC IFIC COMMENTS:

St Andrews Pl sheets C101 thru C104  Looks good with bump‐out and wall. AMT RESPONSE: Acknowledged.  Sheet C102 – Can replacement tree be planted behind the curb? AMT RESPONSE: Due to a steep bank in front of the house, the proposed 5’ sidewalk is only 3’ off the back of curb. A 5’ offset is not feasible as this increases disturbance and the amount of grading needed. We do not recommend planting a street tree in that limited 3’ space. Cherokee Street sheet s C201 thru C202  C201 – confirming the plan shows a curb extension from 48th Pl to 4808 Cherokee St. and provide striped crosswalks AMT RESPONSE: Yes, correct about the curb extension. Striped crosswalks added.

A. MORTON THOMAS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

4601 Presidents Drive, Suite 365  Lanham, Maryland 20706 Phone: (301) 577‐7800  Fax: (301) 881‐0814  www.amtengineering.com

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

30% Concept Design Comment‐Responses Complete and Green Streets Project College Park, MD

   

July 27, 2020 AMT File No. 114‐849.007 Page 2

C202 – plan does not show existing guardrail on the side of 4920 Cherokee St. and provide striped crosswalks AMT RESPONSE: Guardrail added to the plans. Striped crosswalks added. Good tree conservation. AMT RESPONSE: Acknowledged. Please explain reasons for choosing the north side of the street. AMT RESPONSE: South side was avoided due to several high‐quality trees between 48th place and 49th Ave and beyond. The north side is a safer option for navigating around the triangle between 49th Ave and 49th Place.

52nd Ave: Sheets C301 thru C302  Sheets showing sidewalk from Huron St to Kenesaw St are missing. AMT RESPONSE: As indicated in the matrix, building a sidewalk south of Kenesaw is not cost effective. o The west side of 52nd south of Kenesaw has a very steep bank at the road edge, as well as several stairs and a retaining wall at the road edge. o The east side of 52nd south of Kenesaw has multiple chain link fences that are at or near the back of the curb. A sidewalk here would require removing and replacing those fences and it dd not seem cost effective to do so. There are also utility poles and slight bank on the east side.  Steve likes the sidewalk location. AMT RESPONSE: Acknowledged.  C301 ‐ provide striped crosswalks AMT RESPONSE: Striped crosswalks added.  C302 – provide striped crosswalks AMT RESPONSE: Striped crosswalks added.  Please explain reasons for choosing the west side of the street. AMT RESPONSE: There are fewer obstacles (trees and utility poles) on the west side. Private fence lines align well with the ROW line, reducing the need to relocate residents’ private fences. Bowdoin Ave: Sheets C401 thru C402  Like the narrowing of the street from Erskine to Harvard. AMT RESPONSE: Acknowledged.  Discuss the option of narrowing the street north of Harvard. AMT RESPONSE: Plans are revised. Edmonston Rd: sheets C501 thru C508  C501 – like the sidewalk orientation AMT RESPONSE: Acknowledged.  C505 – like the sidewalk orientation AMT RESPONSE: Acknowledged.  C508 ‐ like the sidewalk orientation

Page 2

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

30% Concept Design Comment‐Responses Complete and Green Streets Project College Park, MD

  

July 27, 2020 AMT File No. 114‐849.007 Page 3

AMT RESPONSE: Acknowledged. Sidewalk is missing from Bryn Mawr Rd to city Line. AMT RESPONSE: The matrix and prior map only showed sidewalk between Bryn Mawr and Old Calvert. However, we extended the sidewalk further to the city line. Should note that much more attention will be required for the slope adjacent to the sidewalk. AMT RESPONSE: Agree. It will be a more expensive sidewalk to build because of the existing grade. I’m concerned about the amount of clearing required and changing sides of the street. Wouldn’t the west side be less disruptive and cheaper? I understand this was a political decision but maybe the consultants can include some editorial comments in case this decision is revisited. AMT RESPONSE: Our recommendation, for multiple reasons, was the west side of the street. However, a councilmember was adamant that his constituents opposed the west side option. Based on feedback at the Council meeting, we opted for the east side.

Submitted By: Jack A. Goode, II, P.E., PTOE

Page 3

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Metzerott Road Calvert Road

St. Andrews Place Old Calvert Road

Huron Street

Rhode Island Avenue Rhode Island Avenue

St. Andrews Place

Bowdoin Avenue

DePauw Place

Beechwood Road

Edmonston Road

51st Avenue

Fox Street

Hollywood Road

STREET

Baltimore Avenue / US 1

Branchville Road

Town of Berwyn Heights Boundary

Dead end

Erskine Road

Duke Street

FROM

FY 2023–FY 2024

FY 2021–FY 2022

FY 2020

FUNDING YEAR

30% design complete with a Safe Routes to School grant for 100% design. 100% design expected to be completed around June 2021. Provide cost estimate based on 30% design.

City received two cost proposals for design but neither design nor construction is under contract. Interest based on new dog park, family neighborhood and metro access. Not initiated. Not initiated.

Final design with construction pending for 2020. Concept sidewalk design on the east side; but no cost estimate for final design or construction. Constructibility may be an issue. Sidewalk along west side of Bowdoin in front of U.S. Post Office to be completed in FY 20. Concept design and estimate for sidewalk on the south side. Complete

NOTE

The following street segments are funded for design and construction in the FY 2020–2024 CIP. Their current status and years funded are noted. Although funding is already secured, analysis of these street segments is still required. The city requested that A. Morton Thomas and Associates, Inc., (AMT) study the concept designs of these street segments and provide a recommendation for each.

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN BUDGET UPDATE

APPENDIX D. CITY ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS FROM COMPLETE STREETS CONSIDERATION

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

51st Avenue Narragansett Parkway Huron Street 48th Avenue

Branchville Road

52nd Avenue

Cherokee Street

Investigate sidewalk potential.

NOTE

Potomac Avenue Rhode Island Avenue US 1 (Baltimore Avenue) 47th Place 52nd Avenue Metzerott Road

Berwyn Road

Blackfoot Place

Edgewood Road

St. Andrews Place

Design completed, remove from consideration.

Can be completed with future development projects.

Can be completed with Duvall Field Project

Completed.

REASON

FEEDBACK FROM CITY ON THE REVIEW OF THE CITY’S ORIGINAL MATRIX AND AMT’S LIST OF POTENTIAL STREETS City planning department staff commented on AMT’s initial shortlist of city streets and AMT’s critique of the city’s draft matrix (see Appendix C). Regarding specific streets, city comment is summarized at left. Based on their knowledge of the city, comments previously received, and the current CIP, the city recommended that certain streets should be either added or removed from the matrix for further consideration as a complete street reconstruction candidate.

Duke Street

53rd Avenue

51st Avenue

Railroad Tracks

US 1 (Baltimore Avenue) 48th Avenue

Berwyn Road

FROM

STREET

Some highly-rated street segments included in the city’s original matrix are excluded from further consideration. Reasons for exclusion include the potential for these street segments to be paired with other construction projects or the fact that they have already been completed.

CITY ENGINEER REMOVALS FROM FURTHER INVESTIGATION

Rhode Island Avenue Investigate connection to developercommitted sidewalk.

Investigate sidewalk potential.

Rhode Island Avenue Investigate sidewalk potential.

52nd Avenue

51st Avenue

Huron Street

FROM

STREET

CITY ENGINEER REQUESTS FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION

Neighborhood

College Park Estates

Street Name

De Pauw Place

West College Park

North College Park

PARALLEL PARKING: Present both sides. Parking is not expected to be significantly impacted by sidewalk designs. OBSTACLES: Utility poles on SW side of street. Steep descent down to Sweetbriar Drive. Utility poles on north side of Wellesley Drive between Bryn Mawr Road and Sweetbriar Drive. VEG/TREES: Mature trees on SW side of street. Mature silver maples at 7511 Wellesley Drive. Recommend a bump out here. Mature trees on north side of Wellesley Drive between Bryn Mawr Road and Sweetbriar Drive. Where trees are present near a potential sidewalk or close to the back of curb, use flexible porous/permeable pavement. POINTS AT RIGHT ARE FOR THE EAST SIDE OF WELLESLEY DRIVE.

30% Notes

ROW BC

PARALLEL PARKING: Present. Parking is not expected to be significantly impacted by sidewalk designs. OBSTACLES: Majority of utility poles are on west side of St. Andrews Place. Fire hydrant on west side. There is a utility pole/guy wire at 9019 St.Andrews Place (east side) that needs to be avoided/relocated. VEG/TREES: Several established trees (including maples, locusts, and others), dense vegetation and planting beds on the east side near 9011, 9013, 9015, 9017, 9117 and 9122 St. Andrews Place. Avoid impacts to this vegetation. STORM DRAINS: east side POSSIBLE CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING: ‐Existing crosswalk at Duke Street. North of this crosswalk the utility poles move the east side of St. Andrews Place, but are set pretty far back behind the curb. ‐Connection to College Park Woods is on the east side of St. Andrews Place ‐Existing crosswalk at intersection with De Pauw Place. POINTS ARE FOR THE EAST SIDE OF ST. ANDREWS PLACE.

Wall

Trees Impact/Removals Opportunities for Bump‐ Outs & SWM

LID Potential Scoring .5 pt each for the following

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2

0.5

1.5

•connect to City/ County bus route •connect to WMATA network/metro station •connect to commercial district

1 pt each for the following

Connectivity Scoring

Topo

Obstacles (poles, hydrants, fence, etc.)

Existing Design Constraints Scoring

0.5

•0 = lower sense of pedestrian safety •.5 = average sense of pedestrian safety •1 = higher sense of pedestrian safety

Perceived Pedestrian Safety

Subjective Safety Scoring

1. Recommend a new sidewalk on north side of Cherokee Street that connects to the sidewalk already built by the Metropolitan developer.

Due the the width of the street, there is considerable potential for a complete street with SWM bump‐outs, maintaining the parallel parking, protecting mature trees, avoiding utilities, and adding a sidewalk on the NE side (and a connection to a potential sidewalk on Edmonston). If too challenging, could end the new complete street/sidewalks at Bryn Mawr Road.

30% Recommendations

1. City's concept at Metzerott Road/St. Andrews Place is on the north side of Metzerott Road/east side of St. Andrews Place. Metzerott Road (county road) may receive a future sidewalk but is outside scope of work for this project. Currently there is a "desire path" on the east corner of St. Andrews 12.5 Place/Metzerott Road. 2. Proposed sidewalk begins on north side of Duke Street. 3. Proposed sidewalk on east side of St. Andrews Place to De Pauw Place corner. This is the same side recommended by the City's initial matrix.

STREET SCORE

APPENDIX E. FINAL COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS MATRIX (AUGUST 2020)

Duke Street

St. Andrews Place

48th Place

West College Park

From (Cross Street 1)

De Pauw Place

dead end/Gettysburg Lane

Rhode Island Avenue

Edmonston Road

50 feet

50 feet (from 48th to Rhode Island)

Wellesley Drive

To (Cross Street 2)

730 feet

800 feet

Cherokee Street

St. Andrews Place

ROW width

60 feet

24 feet curb to curb (parallel parking each side)

Sweetbriar Drive

Street Segment Length (approx.)

1940 feet

1670 feet

80 feet (raised‐curb landscaped median between Metzerott Road to about 200 feet north of Duke Street); 60 feet (double yellow); 50 feet

Existing Road Section (approx.)

34 feet curb to curb

1) 10 foot median/curb and gutter/20 foot travel lane/curb and gutter 2) double yellow/12 foot travel lane/6 foot parallel parking/curb and gutter

•2 = >10 feet •1 = >5feet •0 = >5feet

26 feet curb to curb

RECOMMENDATION TO PLANNING DEPARTMENT & CITY COUNCIL? YES (EAST SIDE) YES (NORTH SIDE) YES (NORTH SIDE)

YES (NORTHEAST SIDE)

CITY COUNCIL SELECTON @ FEBRUARY 18, 2020 MEETING? NO YES (EAST SIDE) NO YES (NORTH SIDE)

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Neighborhood

College ParkCollege Estates/ Yarrow Park Estates

Street Name

North College Park West College Park

North College Park

Calvert WestHills College Park

From (Cross Street 1)

Old Calvert Road Edmonston Road

Edmonston Road Drive Wellesley

Harvard Duke Road Street

48th Place De Pauw Place

Bowdoin Avenue Place St. Andrews

47th PlaceSt. Andrews Place

48th Place

Cherokee Street

To (Cross Street 2)

Bryn Mawr Road Sweetbriar Drive

ROW width

60 feet

80 feet

45‐50 feet (to Fox Street) 50 feet 40 feet (to Delaware Street)

ErskineDe Road Pauw Place

Delaware Street (or at leastdead Indian Lane or Fox Street) Rhode Island Avenue end/Gettysburg Lane

Street Segment Length (approx.)

3260 feet 1940 feet

50 feet (from 48th to Rhode Island)

80 feet (raised‐curb landscaped median between Metzerott approximately 35‐40 Road to about 200 feet north offeet Duke Street); 60 feet (double yellow); 50 feet

800 feet

610 feet 1670 feet

2460 feet (to Indian Lane) 2930 feet (to Fox Street) 730 feet 3780 feet (to DelawareStreet)

Existing Road Section (approx.)

30% Notes

Present parking both sides. is not PARALLEL PARKING: Parallel westParking side between expected toRoad be significantly impacted sidewalk designs. Bryn Mawr and Wellesley Drive. by Possible minor OBSTACLES: Utility parking poles onbySW side of designs. street. Steep impacts to existing sidewalk descent downWall to Sweetbriar Drive. poles on north OBSTACLES: will be needed at Utility 7314 Edmonston side of"Yarrow" Wellesleyentrance Drive between Brynwill Mawr Road and Road. brick walls need to be SweetbriaratDrive. preserved Radcliffe Drive intersection. Possibly a minor VEG/TREES: MatureUtility trees poles on SWprimarily side of street. bump‐out needed. on eastMature side. silver maplesPlanting at 7511 bed Wellesley Drive. Recommend VEG/TREES: at 7302 Edmonston Road.aLarge bumpat out here. Mature trees onRoad north side of Wellesley trees 7308‐7314 Edmonston but most impacts Drivebebetween Mawr Road Sweetbriar can avoided.Bryn Vegetation gets and denser north of Drive. Where trees are present near a potential sidewalk or Wellesley Drive. close to the back of curb, use flexible porous/permeable INTERSECTING STREET: pavement. Narrow intersection width at Knoxville Drive by bumping POINTS RIGHT ARE FOR THE EAST SIDE OF length. WELLESLEY out curb.AT This will reduce proposed crosswalk DRIVE. The Marenka House (Historc Site 66‐076) at 7300 Radcliffe Road is protected by the County Historic Preservation Ordinance (Subtitle 29) and is listed on the PARALLEL PARKING: Present. Parking is not expected to National Register of Historic Places. Installation be significantly impacted by sidewalk designs. of a sidewalk mayMajority require coordination Prince OBSTACLES: of utility poleswith are the on west side of George's County Historic Preservation Commission. St. Andrews Place. Fire hydrant on west side. There is a POINTS ARE FORwire THEatWEST OF EDMONSTON utility pole/guy 9019 SIDE St.Andrews Place (eastROAD. side) that needs to be avoided/relocated. PARALLEL PARKING: Present. Possible minor impacts to VEG/TREES: Several established trees (including maples, existing parking by sidewalk designs. locusts, and others), dense vegetation and planting beds OBSTACLES: Utility poles and tracks on east side make on the east side near 9011, 9013, 9015, 9017, 9117 anda sidewalk there a challenge without bumping the curb 9122 St. Andrews Place. Avoid impacts to thisout vegetation. line. Fence very near STORM DRAINS: eastback side of curb at 4817 Guilford Road, 7201 Bowdoin Avenue (and established trees at POSSIBLE CONNECTIONS TOstairs), EXISTING: 7204 Bowdoin Avenue. Narrow ROW andof obstacles may ‐Existing crosswalk at Duke Street. North this crosswalk make this poles unfeasible. the utility move the east side of St. Andrews Place, VEG/TREES: Established shrub beds oncurb. west side, but are set pretty far back behind the especially at to 7004 Bowdoin quality ‐Connection College ParkAvenue. Woods isLow on the east side of hedgerow trees are present on the east side. St. Andrews Place POINTS FOR THE EAST SIDE OF BOWDOIN ‐ExistingARE crosswalk at intersection with De PauwAVENUE. Place.

tie‐in potential. Existing sidewalks terminate at three‐out‐of‐the‐four corners at 48th Place/Muskogee Street. Tie new sidewalk PARALLEL PARKING: Present. Possible minorTwo impacts to into the existing northwest corner sidewalk. existing existing parking crosswalks, too. by sidewalk designs. OBSTACLES: Obstructions however, Existing sidewalk east sidethe 48thentire Placelength; between Muskogee they can beLackawanna worked around to install a sidewalk. Street and Street. VEG/TREES: ~20ofinch Zelkova andeast shrubs There is a strip sidewalk on the sideoutside of 48th4805 Place Cherokee.Hollywood ~18 inch Bradford outside 9104Place Rhode between Road andpear Iroquois Street. new Island Avenue. sidewalk on this side to tie into existing sidewalks. POSSIBLE CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING: The Developer POINTS ARE FOR EXTENDING THE PROJECT TO INDIAN plans (for the Metropolitan at College Park luxury LANE. townhomes) show a sidewalk on each side of Cherokee Street, terminating at intersection with 48th Place. POINTS ARE FOR THE NORTH SIDE OF CHEROKEE STREET.

POINTS ARE FOR THE EAST SIDE OF ST. ANDREWS PLACE. PARALLEL PARKING: Present. Sidewalk design could cause minor impacts. OBSTACLES: Appears that a garage is encroaching in the ROW at 4813 PARALLEL PARKING: Present. Possible minor impacts to Hollywood Road. existing parking by sidewalk designs.to avoid steep banks, Will need new mid‐block crosswalks OBSTACLES: Between St. in Andrews Place and Limestone retaining walls and trees ROW. Needed to simplify Place, utility poles on south side of street right behind construction and reduce costs. curb and gutter. South side is Steep descent down from 47thflatter Place.slope. North side may require Possibly a wall/short curb in some areas. between TREES/VEG: some small trees removed VEG/TREES: Planting bed atCould 9122pinch Gettysburg Lane. (2) 9714 and 9718 48th Place. sidewalk down ~20+ to trees 3612 DePauw (1) ~20+ here 3‐4 outside feet if needed. Dense Place. vegetation and tree several outside deciduous each 9017 trees Gettysburg 9018 Gettysburg mature south Lane, of Indian Lane towards Lane and 3616 DePauw Delaware Street. Place. POINTS ATCONNECTIONS RIGHT ARE FOR NORTH SIDE OF POSSIBLE TOTHE EXISTING: DePAUW PLACE. terminate at 47th Place corner. Good Existing sidewalks

1) doubleand yellow/11 foot travel lane/1 foot paved shoulder 1) 10 foot median/curb and gutter/20 foot travel lane/curb 2) double yellow/12 foot travel lane/9 foot parallel parking gutter 24 feet curb to curb 34 feet curb to curb Typically open section but some asphalt curbs sporadically 2) double yellow/12 foot travel lane/6 foot parallel parking/curb throughout the road. and gutter

24 feet curb to curb 26 feet curb to curb (parallel parking each side)

26 feet curb to curb

ROW BC

1.5

2 3

Wall

Trees Impact/Removals

Obstacles (poles, hydrants, fence, etc.)

0.5

Topo

•2 = >10 feet •1 = >5feet •0 = >5feet

Existing Design Constraints Scoring .5 pt each for the following

1.5

0.5

1.5

•connect to City/ County bus route •connect to WMATA network/metro station •connect to commercial district

1 pt each for the following

Connectivity Scoring

Opportunities for Bump‐ Outs & SWM

LID Potential Scoring

0.5

•0 = lower sense of pedestrian safety •.5 = average sense of pedestrian safety •1 = higher sense of pedestrian safety

Perceived Pedestrian Safety

Subjective Safety Scoring STREET SCORE 11

1. Recommend a new sidewalk on north side of Cherokee Street that connects to the sidewalk already built by the Metropolitan developer.

south end of Indian Lane).

1. A proposed hard-surface, shared-use trail is planned to link with the DePauw Place street centerline. (Source: PGAtlas) 2. City's concept proposes a sidewalk on each side. There are "desire paths" on each side of guardrail currently. 3. Strongly Recommend sidewalkastarting onon the north side 1. recommend sidewalk south side of of thePlace DePauw Place47th St. Andrews Place 11.5 48th between Place and Muskogee intersection because utility poles on the south Street. This takes advantage of theare existing side of DePauw Place. Continue intersection sidewalks and crossings betweentoMuskogee Street withLackawanna Limestone Place. and Street. 4. Sidewalk After Limestone Place, treesand will relatively 2. to Indian Lanemajor is feasible 9 complicate continuing to the dead end. Bumpouts cost effective. may be challenging needed butand will costly take away parking. 3. Very southparallel of Indian Lane. If ROW is wideto enough, use an "on‐grade" flexible 4. Connecting Indian Lane benefits students (bus porous/permeable sidewalk section in tree(DPW CRZs.at stops on Indian Lane) and City employees

1. City's concept at Metzerott Road/St. Andrews Place is on the north side of Metzerott Road/east side of St. Andrews Place. Metzerott Road (county 1. Notmay costreceive effective. Too expensive road) a future sidewalk to butreconstruct is outside the area provide space for sidewalk. involve scope of to work for this project. CurrentlyWill there is a major who will "desirecoordination path" on thewith easthomeowners, corner of St. Andrews 12.5 not be happy with removed trees/shrub beds and Place/Metzerott Road. relocated fences/steps. 2. Proposed sidewalk begins on north side of Duke City's concept includes a sidewalk on the east 9.5 2. Street. side. This is more feasible thanside west however, 3. Proposed sidewalk on east of side, St. Andrews the east sidePauw will involve removal of is portions of Place to De Place corner. This the same the and avoidance/relocation of utility sidehedgerow recommended by the City's initial matrix. poles. Bumping out the curb to narrow an already narrow street is likely needed.

9.5

Due the the width of the street, there is considerable potential for a complete street with SWM bump‐outs, maintaining the parallel parking, 1. If selected as a project, recommend sidewalk is protecting mature trees, avoiding utilities, and on west side of road since neighborhood is on adding a sidewalk on the NE side (and a connection west side. West side is a safer option and more to a potential sidewalk on Edmonston). If too likely to be used than the east side. challenging, could end the new complete 2. Since bus stops are on both sides of road, street/sidewalks at Bryn Mawr Road. recommend cross‐walks and signage to ADA‐ accessible bus pads on east side of Edmonston Road. (Currently no ADA accessible bus pads or shelters.)

30% Recommendations

RECOMMENDATION TO PLANNING DEPARTMENT & CITY COUNCIL? YES (WEST SIDE) YES (NORTHEAST SIDE) YESYES (NORTH SIDE) YES (NORTH SIDE)

NO (EAST SIDE) YES

CITY COUNCIL SELECTON @ FEBRUARY 18, 2020 MEETING? YES (EAST SIDE) NO YES (EAST SIDE) SIDE) YES (EAST NO NO YES (NORTH SIDE)

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Hollywood Road

From (Cross Street 1)

Narragansett Parkway Edmonston Road

Muskogee Street Duke Street

US 1

Rhode Island Avenue Place St. Andrews

US 1

48th Place

Street Name

52nd AvenueWellesley Drive

Neighborhood

North CollegeCollege Park Park Estates

North College ParkCollege Park North CollegeNorth Park College Park West CollegeNorth Park College Park North CollegeWest Park Iroquois 49th Place DeStreet Pauw Place Fox Street St. Andrews Place

Hollywood Road Cherokee Street

To (Cross Street 2)

Sweetbriar Drive

Huron Street

De Pauw Place

Davis Field 51st Avenue dead end/Gettysburg Lane Playground

Rhode Island Avenue Rhode Island Avenue

ROW width

40 feet 50 feet (from 48th to Rhode Island)

feet(raised‐curb (Lackawanna to 8060feet landscaped median between Metzerott 30 feet (Huron to Kenesaw) 30 feet 50 feet 30 feet, 40 feet, 50 feet Road to about 60 feet Hollywood) 200 feet north of Duke Street); 60 feet (double 50 feet (Kenesaw to Narrangansett) 35 feet (north of yellow); 50 feet

Street Segment Length (approx.)

1940 feet

1260 feet

1670 feet

1130 feet

2640 feet

‐

2050 feet730 feet

1720 feet

800 feet

30% designPARKING: is alreadyPresent. underway by theminor City and a PARALLEL Possible impacts to consultant. Further matrix analysis existing parking by sidewalk designs.is not needed. OBSTACLES: Obstructions the entire length; however, they can be worked around to install a sidewalk. VEG/TREES: ~20 inch Zelkova and shrubs outside 4805 Cherokee. ~18 inch Bradford pear outside 9104 Rhode Island Avenue. POSSIBLE CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING: The Developer plans (for the Metropolitan at College Park luxury townhomes) show a sidewalk on each side of Cherokee Street, terminating at intersection with 48th Place. POINTS ARE FOR THE NORTH SIDE OF CHEROKEE STREET.

VEG/TREES: Several established trees (including maples, locusts, and others), dense vegetation and planting beds on the east side near 9011, 9013, 9015, 9017, 9117 and 9122 St. Andrews Place. Avoid impacts to this vegetation. STORM DRAINS: east side PARALLEL PARKING: Present. Possible minor impacts to POSSIBLE CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING: existing by sidewalk designs. ‐Existingparking crosswalk at Duke Street. North of this crosswalk OBSTACLES: Many obstructions in ROW, the utility poles move the east side of St. including Andrews Place, vegetation below), retaining and steep slopes. but are set (see pretty far back behindwall the curb. VEG/TREES: notable areas ofisvegetation ‐Connection Several to College Park Woods on the eastnear sidethe of roadway, i.e.. vegetable garden, cherry trees at library, St. Andrews Place bamboo, mature trees at corner ofwith 49thDe Place & Place. ‐Existing crosswalk at intersection Pauw Lackawanna asEAST well as 9607 Place. POINTS ARE Street, FOR THE SIDE OF49th ST. ANDREWS PLACE. PARALLEL PARKING: Present. Possible minor impacts to existing parking by sidewalk designs. OBSTACLES: Very narrow at connection to US 1. Retaining wall and parking areaPresent. on northPossible side; hydrant utility PARALLEL PARKING: minor and impacts to poles onparking the other. Multiple designs. obstructions all the way to existing by sidewalk 51st Avenue.Between St. Andrews Place and Limestone OBSTACLES: VEG/TREES: vegetation Place, utility Abundant poles on south side ofthroughout street rightthe behind segment. curb and gutter. South side is flatter slope. North side may require a wall/short curb in some areas. PARALLEL PARKING: Present. Possible minor impacts to VEG/TREES: Planting bed at 9122 Gettysburg Lane. (2) existing parking by sidewalk designs. ~20+ trees outside 3612 DePauw Place. (1) ~20+ tree OBSTACLES: Many obstructions for the entire length. outside each 9017 Gettysburg Lane, 9018 Gettysburg Lane VEG/TREES: (2) large oaks near corner with 51st Avenue. and 3616 DePauw Place. (2) large cottonwoods near playground. (2) large trees POINTS AT RIGHT ARE FOR THE NORTH SIDE OF (maple & gum) back of curb by 5022 Iriquois Street. DePAUW PLACE.

PARALLEL PARKING: Present both sides. Parking is not expected to be significantly impacted by sidewalk designs. OBSTACLES: Utility poles on SW side of street. Steep descent down to Sweetbriar Drive. Utility poles on north PARALLEL PARKING: Present. Possible minorRoad impacts side of Wellesley Drive between Bryn Mawr andto existing parking Sweetbriar Drive.by sidewalk designs. OBSTACLES: VEG/TREES: Mature trees on SW side of street. Mature Between Narragansett Parkway Drive. and Kenesaw Street,a silver maples at 7511 Wellesley Recommend fewer on west side 52ndside Avenue. Bump‐ bump obstructions out here. Mature trees onof north of Wellesley outs still beBryn necessary, however. Drivemay between Mawr Road and Sweetbriar Drive. Between Kenesaw Streetnear and Huron Street, the west Where trees are present a potential sidewalk or side has embankments, and retaining walls; the closesteep to the back of curb, stairs use flexible porous/permeable east side has steep banks, chain link fences, signage, and pavement. utility poles. POINTS AT RIGHT ARE FOR THE EAST SIDE OF WELLESLEY VEG/TREES: (1) ~10 inch Zelkova outside 9608 52nd DRIVE. Avenue and (1) ~15 inch maple outside 9604 52nd Avenue. PARALLEL PARKING: Present. Parking is not expected to POSSIBLE CONNECTIONS TOsidewalk EXISTING: existing sidewalks be significantly impacted by designs. on each side Majority of 52nd Avenue Narragansett OBSTACLES: of utilitynorth polesofare on west side of Parkway. Could tie Fire into hydrant either side. St. Andrews Place. on west side. There is a POINTS ARE FOR THEatWEST OF 52ND BETWEEN utility pole/guy wire 9019 SIDE St.Andrews Place (east side) NARRAGANSETT AND KENESAW. that needs to be avoided/relocated.

30% Notes

ROW BC

3 2

2 0

1.5

Wall

Trees Impact/Removals

Obstacles (poles, hydrants, fence, etc.) Opportunities for Bump‐ Outs & SWM

LID Potential Scoring .5 pt each for the following

0.5

1.5

•connect to City/ County bus route •connect to WMATA network/metro station •connect to commercial district

1 pt each for the following

Connectivity Scoring

Topo

•2 = >10 feet •1 = >5feet •0 = >5feet

Existing Design Constraints Scoring

0.5

•0 = lower sense of pedestrian safety •.5 = average sense of pedestrian safety •1 = higher sense of pedestrian safety

Perceived Pedestrian Safety

Subjective Safety Scoring STREET SCORE 11

1. Recommend a new sidewalk on north side of Cherokee Street that connects to the sidewalk already built by the Metropolitan developer.

1. A proposed hard-surface, shared-use trail is planned to link with the DePauw Place street Not cost‐effective. Recommending eliminating centerline. (Source: PGAtlas) from consideration. 2. City's concept proposes a sidewalk on each side. There are "desire paths" on each side of guardrail currently. 3. Recommend sidewalk starting on the north side 11.5 of the DePauw Place St. Andrews Place intersection because utility poles are on the south side of DePauw Place. Continue to intersection 5 1. Not cost‐effective. with Limestone Place. 4. After Limestone Place, major trees will complicate continuing to the dead end. Bumpouts may be needed but will take away parallel parking. If ROW is wide enough, use an "on‐grade" flexible porous/permeable sidewalk section in tree CRZs.

essentially at the back of existing curb. Adding a sidewalk likely requires a combination of 1) removing roadway width and parallel parking, 2) expanding the right‐of‐way and taking private property, 3) retaining walls and short curbs to comport to topographical challenges, 4) relocations of fences, signage, etc.) and rebulding of driveways and front walkways. Both the east 1. City's Metzerott Andrews and westconcept sides ofat52nd AvenueRoad/St. (between Kenesaw Place isand on Huron the north sidewere of Metzerott Road/east Street Street) poorly rated in side ofofSt.their Andrews Place. Road (county terms potential forMetzerott a "complete streets road) may receive a future sidewalk is outside treatment" in the City's 2017 matrix.but Other street scope of work for this project. Currently there is a segments are better served with CIP "desire path" on the east corner of St. Andrews 12.5 design/construction funding. Place/Metzerott Road. 2. Proposed sidewalk begins on north side of Duke Street. A sidewalk wouldon beeast neither 3. new Proposed sidewalk sidecost‐effective of St. Andrews nor pedestrian‐friendly allThis the isback‐and‐forth Place to De Pauw Place given corner. the same (both mid‐block and end‐of‐block) that 7.5 crossings side recommended by the City's initial matrix. would be required to avoid existing trees, obstructions and other infrastructure. 8.5

1. Between Narragansett Parkway and Kenesaw Street, a sidewalk is feasible on west side 52nd Avenue, as are SWM bump‐outs where needed/appropriate. This section of the street was Due of thethe thehighest width of thestreets street, in there one rated the is City's 2017 considerable potential for a complete street with matrix. SWM bump‐outs, the parallel parking, 2. Kenesaw Street maintaining to Narrangansett Parkway is protecting mature utilities, feasible given widetrees, ROW;avoiding however, it only and adding a sidewalk on the NE side (and a connection lengthens the existing sidewalk network by 1 block. to a potential sidewalk on Edmonston). If too 3. South of Kenesaw Street is not cost effective, challenging, could end the newthe complete for several reasons, including: obstacles listed street/sidewalks at Bryn Mawr Road. at left and the narrow right of way that is

30% Recommendations

Existing Road Section (approx.)

1) 10 foot median/curb and gutter/20 foot travel lane/curb and 30 feet curb to curb 24 feet curb to curb gutter 24 feet curb to curb 24 feet curb to curb 28 feet curb to curb (parallel parking 34 feet curb to curb (parallel parking each side) 2) double yellow/12 foot travel lane/6 foot parallel parking/curb each side) and gutter

26 feet curb to curb

RECOMMENDATION TO PLANNING DEPARTMENT & CITY COUNCIL? NO YES (NORTHEAST SIDE) YES (EAST SIDE) NO(NORTH SIDE) NO YES YES (NORTH SIDE) NO

CITY COUNCIL SELECTON @ FEBRUARY 18, 2020 MEETING? NO YES YES (EAST SIDE) NO NO NO YES (NORTH SIDE) NO

APPENDIX F. CITY OF COLLEGE PARK RESOLUTION 16-R-06 COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE I AND GREEN STREETS POLICY I I I

l 6-R-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE PARK, MARYLAND TO ADOPT A COMPLETE & GREEN STREETS POLICY 11

WHEREAS, safe, convenient, and accessible transportation for all users is a priority of the City of College Park; and WHEREAS, "Complete Streets" describe a comprehensive, integrated transpo1iation and land use network where the right-of-way (ROW) is designed and operated to allow safe and convenient travel along and across all streets for all users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, persons with disabilities, seniors, children, and motorists; and WHEREAS, "Green Streets" describe roadways that incorporate plantings or other vegetative practices along the ROW that are designed to reduce the amount of pollutants in storm water runoff; and WHEREAS, Complete Streets improve public health and safety by reducing the risk of injuries and fatalities for users of all modes of transportation; and WHEREAS, Complete Streets are designed with the safety and convenience of pedestrians and bicyclists in mind while aiming to increase the number of people walking and bicycling; and WHEREAS, Complete Streets represent a balanced transportation and land use system that inherently encourage people to walk and bicycle to everyday destinations, such as schools, shops, restaurants, businesses, parks, transit, and jobs, which in turn enhances the City's economic vitality and livability; and WHEREAS, encouraging people to walk, bicycle, and use public transit saves resources, reduces air pollution, and reduces emissions that contribute to global warming; and WHEREAS, Complete Streets encourages an active lifestyle by creating opportunities to integrate exercise into daily activities, thereby helping to reduce the risk of obesity and its associated health problems; and WHEREAS, Green Streets improve the environment by reducing the impact that impervious surfaces have on our waterways by slowing down and pre filtering storm water runoff from our roads, helping to alleviate drainage issues; and

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project was funded and managed by the Planning Assistance to Municipalities and Communities (PAMC) program, Prince George’s County Planning Department.

Planning Department Andree Green Checkley, Esq., Planning Director Kipling Reynolds, Chief, Community Planning Division Adam Dodgshon, Supervisor, Community Planning Division (Project Manager August 2019-April 2020) Frederick Stachura, Supervisor, Community Planning Division Wendy Irminger, Planner Coordinator, Community Planning Division, PAMC Program Manager Daniel Sams, Planner Coordinator, Community Planning Division (Project Manager April 2020-March 2021) Robert Getz, Publications Specialist, Management Services Division

Consultants

Jack Goode II, PE, PTOE, A. Morton Thomas and Associates, Inc. Matthew Weir, PLA, A. Morton Thomas and Associates, Inc.

City of College Park

The Honorable Patrick L. Wojahn, Mayor City Council The Honorable S.M. Fazlul Kabir, District 1 The Honorable Kate Kennedy, District 1 The Honorable Monroe S. Dennis, District 2 The Honorable Robert W. Day, Sr., District 3 The Honorable John Rigg, District 3 The Honorable Denise C. Mitchell, District 4 The Honorable Maria E. Mackie, District 4 Staff Terry Schum, Planning Director Steve Halpern, City Engineer Brenda Alexander, Assistant Director, Department of Public Works Katie Hart, Planner

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK COMPLETE AND GREEN STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN