Underpay Disabled Workers

It’s Legal to Underpay Disabled Workers By, Chau Auh Nguyen

America, the land of opportunity, has undoubtedly While seemingly well-intended at first, as the years exploited millions of citizens—from minorities to continued over time, the interpretation of “substandard” low-income citizens—in its journey to becoming one of became blurred, and many employers have actually atthe wealthiest countries in the world. While racial minori- tempted to weaponize this loophole in some of the most ties and women are often discussed when the subject of horrid ways imaginable. For example, employers would marginalized groups comes up, one group that is often sys- commonly argue that because Southern workers suppostematically abused and overlooked is the disabled. So, with edly “tended to be slower of movement and less oriented October being Disability Employment Awareness month, toward production,” they should therefore be paid as it is about time that the U.S. reexamines how citizens born substandard workers. This loophole would even be utilized without able-bodied privilege are treated in its society. in racist ways, with many seeing this as an opportunity to

Staggering unemployment rates significantly affect the sions by claiming that black employees are “inherently” disabled more than other minorities, and the disabled substandard workers. employment-population ratio is only a mere 19.8 percent in 2018 compared to the 65.9 percent ratio among those Thankfully, these arguments were considered controwithout a disability. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor, versial—even for their time period—in the end, and while “. . . [Across] all age groups, people with a disability were future progressive actions remedied the racist and/or overmuch less likely to be employed than those with no dis- all worker abusive practices, disabled people, however, are ability.” still one of the few groups to be given subminimum wages

The few that are hired face another problem: subminimum wages. Today, employers who exploit this loophole tend to

According to a 2019 Forbes report, out of the 420,000 training and jobs for those who [would] otherwise never disabled people employed, the vast majority of them re- find one.” ceive only a meager average of $2.15 per hour as payment for their labor, and this is an obviously low number, espe- These jobs referenced are often a part of “community cially when considering that the U.S. national minimum rehabilitation programs,” otherwise known as “sheltered wage is $7.25 per hour. In many cases, individuals with workshops.” A mix of both nonprofits and private firms, disabilities were even paid as little as 4 cents per hour. these programs usually utilize disabled labor due to their

While this transaction is morally wrong, it is unfor- est when subminimum wages are discussed. And while tunately legal due to a loophole in the 1938 Fair Labors sheltered workshops often claim to purpose themselves Standards Act, which allowed employers to administer around disabled individuals’ best interests, too frequently payments based on productivity or ability—even payments have many gone against this statement. under the federal minimum wage. The idea was initially discriminate against black workers, justifying their decitoday. claim that they’re providing these workers with “vocational structures, therefore making them a high subject of interintroduced in the legislative hearings that followed Presi- Rock River Valley Self Help Enterprises is perhaps one dent Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s suggestion to implement of the most horrific and well-known examples to illustrate a national minimum wage, during which Labor Secretary this. While Self Help Enterprises prides itself on “recycling, Frances Perkins advocated for reduced wages for “substan- packaging, and pallet [manufacturing],” an investigation dard workers,” meaning “persons who by reason of illness by the U.S. Department of Labor found that the nonprofit or age or something else are not up to normal production.” organization was guilty of exploiting nearly 250 disabled

This incident alone highlights one of the massive issues with the 1938 FLSA loophole. While the disabled individuals of the Self Help Enterprises were aware that federal law permitted them to be underpaid, they were not aware that it was still illegal for their employers to pay them in gift cards. This confusion around subminimum wages allowed for Self Help Enterprises to escape the consequences of their misconducts for a long time, and on the longer scale, inherently allowed for the exploitation of the vulnerable disabled. Many disabled individuals are not aware of the extent of the loophole’s leeway, and as a result, sheltered workshops can freely abuse their employees with disabilities without much worry.

So . . . why don’t we just close this clause, especially since many inhumane outcomes resulted from this loophole?

The fight against subminimum wages has been going on for a long time, dating as far back as the 1960s and began when Senator Wayne Morse first publicly attacked it. In his criticism, he proposed to gradually transition the “moderately disabled” to a full-minimum wage over a three-year period and argued that the “more severely disabled” be paid at least half of the federal minimum wage.

Those against him were, unsurprisingly, employers of the disabled, who often claimed that the Morse Proposal was “unrealistic” and “a drain on the economy.” They commonly emphasized that it’ll “deprive disabled people of employment opportunities in the future.”

Nevertheless, the push against the 1938 Fair Labors Act loophole continued, and The National Federation of the Blind pushed for the Morse Proposal to be implemented, urging that disabled workers be given “the same protection of federal law now available to millions of other workers.” In the end, however, legislative powers only modified the Morse Proposal to apply to agricultural employment, permitting disabled labor abuse to continue in other fields.

Attempts to close this loophole continued throughout the years, but none were successful. Opponents often pointed to government benefits—including social security support— that disabled people received as justification to keep the loophole in the FLSA.

While legislation addressing other disabled issues passed in that time period (such as the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act), the subminimum wages issue has largely been ignored up until recently.

Successful growing calls against subminimum wages began to rise in the 21st century, and the first state to abolish subminimum wages was Vermont in 2002. In addition to that decision, the state also ceased funding sheltered workshops (described earlier), and instead “sends directly to disabled clients for services of their choosing, such as job coaching and transportation.” Nowadays, Vermont is considered the model state for workplace inclusion. Disabled residents in this state are twice as likely to find jobs in this state compared to other states, with nearly 40 percent of disabled workers even working alongside able-bodied people (compared to the 13 percent in the state of Minnesota).

Other states soon followed in momentum, including— but not limited to—Alaska, Texas, Oregon, and Maine. However, some states (such as New Hampshire) still allow exceptions or just set limitations to subminimum wages in their legislation.

This emerging movement has also been supported by multiple prominent politicians, including former presidential candidates Pete Buttigieg and Bernie Sanders. Finally, subminimum wages also have the chance to be abolished on a federal level, with current Democratic presidential nominee, Joe Biden, proposing to phase out the subminimum wage in one of his campaign promises.

OCTOBER 2020

Thank you for reading the first issue of this year’s MCHS Deadline!

If you have any questions, comments or concerns please DM us on our Instagram page: @mchsdeadline. We would love to hear feedback from you. While you are reading our digital copy, we have a website available for you to check out.

We will continue to accept your song recommendations for MCHS mixtape all year round along with applications to take part in Freshman Interviews! So you may be apart of the next issue! The links for both of those forums can be fond in the linktree on our instagram page.

The Deadline team will continue to work hard and come up with new ideas! We hope you will come along with us on this journey! Until the next issue, stay fiery Dragons!

TEAM MEMBERSadfa

Senior Editor: Chau-Anh Nguyen

Senior Editor/Social Media: Hieu Ho

Graphic Designer/Writer: Aashna Singh

Graphic Designer/Writer: Nora Taing

Graphic Designer: Charlene Nguyen

Senior Writer: Arlene Hickman

Senior Writer: Danielle Tuazon

Senior Writer: Jaskaran Bajwa

Junior Writer: Mekhi Randle

Junior Writer: Elizabeth Rocili