Issuu

Faulkner County Transportation Report

JANURARY 2026 INSET: ROUNDABOUT IN CONWAY

PREPARED BY:

Metroplan is a voluntary association of local governments that has operated by interlocal agreement since 1955. Originally formed as the Metropolitan Area Planning Commission of Pulaski County, Metroplan now has members in five counties of the six-county metro area. Metroplan is the designated metropolitan planning organization (MPO) under Title 23 of the United States Code. Metroplan serves as the regional voice on issues affecting Central Arkansas, develops transportation plans required by federal law, convenes stakeholders to deal with common issues, and provides information and staff resources to our member local governments, the business community, and the public.

The Central Arkansas Regional Transportation Study, or CARTS, is the cooperative effort by the participating communities, transportation providers and many other interested parties to develop a long-range transportation plan for the metropolitan area.

Disclaimer

PrepareNotice of Nondiscrimination

This report was funded in part through grants from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The views and opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. Department of Transportation.

Metroplan complies with all civil rights provisions of federal statutes and related authorities that prohibit discrimination in programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance. Therefore, Metroplan does not discriminate on the basis of race, sex, color, age, national origin, religion or disability, in the admission, access to and treatment in Metroplan’s programs and activities, as well as Metroplan’s hiring or employment practices. Complaints of alleged discrimination and inquiries regarding nondiscrimination policies may be directed to Sydney Dozier, ADA/504/Title VI Coordinator, 501 West Markham Street, Suite B, Little Rock, AR 72201, (501) 3723300, or the following e-mail address: sdozier@metroplan.org. (Hearing impaired may dial 711.) This notice is available from the ADA/504/Title VI Coordinator in large print, audiotape or braille..

Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ABSTRACT FAULKNER COUNTY HISTORY TRANSPORTATION CURRENT GROWTH TRENDS FORECASTED DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES REPORT LIMITATIONS TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS SOURCES TABLE OF MAPS MAPS

Executive Summary ABSTRACT:

This report was developed by Metroplan to inform regional development and transportation plans. This report also provides decision makers within Faulkner County jurisdiction (both cities and the county), with information to guide the development of transportation projects.

BRIEF HISTORY: Faulkner County, featured in Image 1, is located in Central Arkansas and as part of the Little Rock, North Little Rock, Conway Metropolitan Statistical Area. Faulkner County has seen its population double since 1990 from 60,000 to over 130,000 today with the majority of the county's population centered in Conway, its county seat and primary urban area.

Image 1: Faulkner County on the map of Arkansas

Faulkner County Population Statistics (See Figure 1)

Figure 1: County Population Forecast to 2050

Population estimate for 2025 is 131,509. Population has grown 6.5% from 2020 to 2024. This is the third largest population net gain and fourth largest population percent growth in the state of Arkansas The median age of 35 contracts to the regions median age of 37.5

GROWTH & DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES Metroplan forecast that Faulkner County will grow to as much as 180,000 residents by 2050. This increase will continue to overwhelm infrastructure within the county. Strategic investments in transportation infrastructure will be necessary to accommodate this growth and continue the highquality of life within the county. The following development challenges were identified and forecasted for Faulkner County if population growth and infrastructure investment continue: Faulkner County’s population growth is not evenly distributed, and the transportation impacts of new growth will primarily be concentrated in higher growth areas. Congestion, travel time reliability, and delay are primarily concerns within Conway and on I-40, Highway, 64, Highway 65, and Highway 25. *Note: This report was generated to be used as a resource for Faulkner County and cities within its jurisdiction.

Faulkner County Transportation Report Abstract This report was developed by Metroplan to inform regional development and transportation plans. This report is intended to provide decision makers within Faulkner County and its cities and towns with information to guide the development of transportation projects. The report provides data associated with safety, congestion, demographics, infrastructure condition, and current transportation projects. The report largely focuses on existing conditions but also examines past trends as well as projected future conditions.

Faulkner County History

Faulkner County has positioned itself as a resilient community that supports development benefiting its cities, residents, and the Central Arkansas. Its county seat, Conway, hosts three of Arkansas’s thirty-eight institutions of higher education with 10,678 students. It is also home to the state’s largest man-made lake managed by the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, Figure 2: Faulkner County Population from 1960-2020

Current Growth Trends

Lake Conway. A total of 46,985 jobs are located in the county. Nestled between the Arkansas River and the Ozark Mountains, Faulkner County continues to attract people due to its diverse employment opportunities, strong public education system, and high quality of life.

Faulkner County is experiencing an uptick in population for more than six decades (19602020), as shown in Figure 2. This growth has continued in recent years too. Between 2020 and 2024, the county added more than 8,000 new residents, a 6.5 percent increase. During this period, Faulkner County recorded the fastest growth rate, and the largest net population gain in Central Arkansas, along with the third-largest net gain and fourth-largest percentage increase statewide. Population projections indicate that Faulkner County is expected to grow as much as 180,000 residents by 2050, as seen in Figure 1.

Image 2: An aerial image of Hendrix Village, one of the first Traditional Neighborhood Developments (TND) in Arkansas Began Construction in 2008

Transportation Faulkner County’s transportation system is built around several key roadways that support both regional and local travel. Interstate 40, Highway 64, and Highway 65 are major corridors that connect the county to the rest of Arkansas while also serving daily travel within the county. Highway 60, Dave Ward Drive, is a critical link within Conway to the broader roadway network. As growth continues, newer corridors are carrying increasing traffic. Highway 25 is emerging as an important alternative to Highway 65, helping relieve congestion and improve mobility and system resilience particularly with the addition of a new interchange on Interstate 40. Highway 107 also plays a key role connecting Faulkner County to Pulaski County and strengthening regional connectivity. Recent transportation priorities for one of the cities in Faulkner County is public transportation. Conway has recently partnered with the Central Arkansas Regional Transit Authority (Rock Region METRO) to offer on-demand public transportation. This partnership expands mobility options, improves access to employment and essential services, and supports a more connected multimodal transportation system. Below are some examples over the past 25 years of strategic transportation investment. These projects include, but are not limited to, the following: Transportation Interstate 40 widening to 6 Lanes Highway 25 - Interchange on I-40 Highway 25 Relocation and Widening Highway 25/285 Intersection (funded) Highway 89 - Relocation & Railroad Overpass Baker-Willis Parkway & Interchange Highway 64 - Bypass, Vilonia Highway 65 Intersections in Greenbrier (funded) Harkrider Ave - Conway Roundabouts & Reconstruction (Hendrix) Conway Airport Relocation Prince Street Reconstruction Connection to Highway 64 - Salem Rd. & Hogan Rd., Conway Salem Rd. Rail Grade Separation Dave Ward Dr. Access Management - Plan & Widening Jump Start - Enhancements to Markham St. and neighborhood north of Downtown, Conway.

Ped/Bike Dave Ward Dr. - Highway 60 pedestrian Overpass Highway 225 Sidewalk Church Street Sidewalk Connect Conway (funded) - trail system of ped/bike connections within the city. Transit Started on Demand Transit Service (Conway)

Forecasted Development Challenges Faulkner County’s population growth and land use patterns are closely tied to the performance and evolution of its transportation system. Future land development and population growth will impact the suitability of county transportation facilities, while the magnitude, direction, and extent of growth will in part be driven by the adequacy of existing and future transportation facilities. Faulkner County’s population growth is not evenly distributed (Map 2), and the transportation impacts of new growth will primarily be concentrated in higher growth areas. Strategic planning for new facilities, increased capacity, and potential multi-modal improvements will concentrate on Conway, Greenbrier, Mayflower, Vilonia and Wooster and the corridors such as I-40, Highway 65, and Highway 64 that connect these areas. At this time congestion, travel time reliability, and delay are primarily concerns within Conway and on limited number of other facilities, including I-40, Highway, 64, Highway 65, and Highway 25. As areas of Faulkner continue to grow, strategic alternatives, such as the Conway Loop, a Highway 64 to 65 connector, and new alternatives and connections in Greenbrier may be needed to help with delay, travel time reliability, and to provide system-wide resilience and reliability. However, as the region’s population and employment centers grow, strategic corridors within lower population areas of the county must also be planned for economic growth. In addition to capacity considerations, safety and facility condition are important considerations in all areas of the county, regardless of growth and development trends.

Report Limitations Current data, including traffic counts, travel speeds, travel time reliability, and infrastructure condition were taken from available federal, state and regional databased. These databases do not include all public roadways. Local, city and county, databased will be incorporated into future editions of the report.

Transportation Improvements While no specific recommendations are made in this report, this information can assist in the planning of transportation improvements that help make Faulkner County’s transportation system safer, more reliable, and more efficient. Strategic public investment in transportation will position Faulkner County to accommodate future population and economic growth by expanding roadway and intersection capacity, creating new routing options, and increasing travel choices. A well-connected and adaptable transportation system will support continued investment, development, and quality of life for residents and businesses. The Faulkner County Transportation report provides information on population growth and land use to help plan these future infrastructure investments.

Sources This report includes data from a variety of sources. The data used to draft maps is mentioned in the legend of the respective map. Additional information can be found at: 2025-2025 Transportation Improvement Program: https://metroplan.org/wpcontent/uploads/2025/08/TIP-2025-2028-FINAL-Adopted.pdf ARDOT data on crashes, bridges. Speed limits, etc.: https://gis.ardot.gov/portal/home/index.html Central Arkansas Safety Action Plan: https://metroplan.org/central-arkansas-safety-action-plan/ Commuting Data: https://ctppdata.transportation.org/?utm_source=dlvr.it#/index Congestion Management Process (CMP) 2025: https://metroplan.org/congestion-managementprocess-2025-cmp/ Crashes and Safety: https://metroplan.org/central-arkansas-safety-action-plan/ Historical Information on Faulkner County: https://encyclopediaofarkansas.net/entries/faulknercounty-767/ Traffic Counts: https://ardot.gov/divisions/tsmo/traffic-information-systems/maps/ Population Forecasts: https://metroplan.org/research-center/regional-demographics/ Metropolitan Transportation Plan: https://metroplan.org/transportation/long-range-metropolitantransportation-plan-mtp/ Metroplan Congestion Management Process: https://metroplan.org/congestion-managementprocess-2025-cmp/

Table Of Maps Demographics & Development Factors This group of maps highlights how population trends and development patterns have evolved across Faulkner County. Together, they show where people live and work, how growth is expected to change over time, and how land use and physical constraints influence where future development can occur.

Map 1: Population Change 2010 to 2020 Map 2: Population Distribution Map 3: Projected Population Change 2015 to 2050 Map 4: No Vehicle Households Map 5: Employment Map 6: Development Constraints · Map 6a: Development Constraints (Conway) Map 7: Land Use (2023) · Map 7a: Land Use, Conway (2023) Transportation Infrastructure This group of maps provides an overview of Faulkner County’s transportation infrastructure, showing how the roadway network is organized, who maintains it, and how it functions today. Together, the maps highlight existing conditions, and gaps in connectivity that can inform maintenance priorities, and future transportation planning.

Map 8: Roadway Administrative System The map shows who is responsible for the network of roads; State, County, or City

Map 9: Roadway Functional Classification Map 10: Master Street Plans of Cities · Map 10a: Master Street Plan of Conway Map 11: Bridge Condition – Locally Owned · Map 11a: Condition of Locally Owned Bridges in Conway Map 12: Bridge Condition – State Ownership Indicated · Map 12a: Condition of State-Owned Bridges in Conway Map 13: Number of Through Lanes The map highlights the roads according to the number of travel lanes

Map 14: Traffic Control Signals Map 15. Pavement Condition (2021) Map 16: Pedestrian and Bike Facilities The map does not show sidewalks

· Map 16a: Pedestrian and Bike Facilities in Conway

Safety This group of maps highlights where crashes occur in Faulkner County, with a focus on high-injury streets and non-motorized safety. Together, they identify corridors where targeted safety improvements could reduce crash severity and improve outcomes for all users. Please refer to the Central Arkansas Safety Action Plan for further information.

Map 17: Crashes Occurred from 2021-2024 & High Injury Network · Map 17a: Crashes Occurred from 2021-2024 & High Injury Streets in Conway Map 18: Non-Motorized Crashes Occurred from 2020-2024 & High Injury Network · Map 18a: Non-Motorized Crashes Occurred from 2020-2024 & High Injury Streets in Conway Traffic Congestion & Volume This set of maps shows where traffic demand is highest in Faulkner County and where congestion occurs today and in the future. Together, they highlight key corridors and roadway segments where improvements could enhance traffic flow and travel reliability.

Map 19: 2024 Average Daily Traffic · Map 19a: Average Daily Traffic in Conway This map showcases the daily traffic recorded by the traffic counters placed by ARDOT in 2024

Map 20: Five Year Traffic Growth Trend This map reflects the change in traffic count recorded between 2019-2024

Map 21: Traffic Volume 2015/2050 Comparison The map estimates the growth in traffic volume between 2015 and 2050

Map 22: Maximum Volume to Capacity (V/C) Ratio in Morning (AM), 2015 Map 23: Maximum Volume to Capacity (V/C) Ratio in Evening (PM), 2015 These maps show road segments that are nearing or exceeding their traffic capacity, thus causing congestion

Map 24: Estimated Maximum Volume to Capacity (V/C) Ratio in Morning (AM), 2025. Map 25: Estimated Maximum Volume to Capacity (V/C) Ratio in Evening (PM), 2025 These maps predict road segments that will be nearing or exceeding their traffic capacity, thus causing congestion

Map 26: Level of Service This map interprets the flow of traffic on streets

Map 27: Average Peak Hour Speed in Morning (AM) Map 28: Average Peak Hour Speed in Evening (PM) Map 29: Congestion Management Process Lower Speed Arterials Map 30: Congestion Management Process Higher Speed Arterials Map 31: Congestion Management Process Freeways Please refer to the Congestion Management Report for additional information

Map 32: Level of Travel Time Reliability (LOTTR) This map shows how consistently travelers can reach their destinations on time on major roadways

Freight Movement and Access This group of maps highlights how freight moves through Faulkner County and how the region connects to the broader freight and multimodal network. Together, they identify key freight corridors, access to multimodal facilities, and the reliability of truck travel that supports economic activity and regional connectivity.

Map 33: State Freight Plan and Multi-modal Facilities Map 34: Interstate Truck Travel Time Reliability (TTTR) This map shows how consistently trucks can travel on interstate and major roadways without unexpected delays

Map 35: Freight Percentage

Transit This map highlights existing public transit service in Faulkner County

Map 36: Transit Service This map highlights the area which is served by a public transit system

Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) Projects This section of maps highlights planned transportation investments. Together, they show where transit is currently available and how future projects and strategic connections can improve access, mobility, and system connectivity.

Map 37: Transportation Improvement Projects Slated for 2025-2028 Map 38: Strategic Connections Map 39: Future Capacity Concerns

Map 1. Population Change 2010 to 2020

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

Greenbrier 225

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤ 266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower 89

365

Census Tracts Percent Change

Steady 0% to 10% 10% to 25% Greater than 25%

Source: Census 2010 and 2020

Population Change is calculated by subtracting the 2010 Census population from the 2020 Census population. 0

² 2

Miles

Map 2. Population Distribution

! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! Damascus ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! Quitman 124 !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! 25 ! ! ! ! ! ! !! 65 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! !! ! !! ! !! !! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! !!! ! ! ! Guy ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 310 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! 124 ! !!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! 107 ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! Twin Groves ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! 25 ! ! ! !! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! !!! !!! ! !! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !285 ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !!!!!!!! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!! 285 ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 36 ! ! !! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! 225 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!!!!!! ! !!! !! ! ! ! !!! ! ! !! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!!! ! ! ! !! !!! !! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! !!! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! !! !! !!!! 107 ! ! !! !!! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! !!!!! !!! !!! !!! !!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !!! ! ! !!! !!!!!!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!!!!! ! ! !! !!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! !! ! !! !! ! 225 ! !! ! !!!! !! !!!!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! !! !! ! ! ! !!! !! Greenbrier ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! ! !! ! !!! ! ! ! !! ! !!!! !! !! ! !! ! !! !!! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !!! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! !!! ! !! !! !! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! !!!! ! !! Mount ! !! ! !!! ! !!!!!!! ! !!!! !!!!!!! ! ! !!! ! !! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 25 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! !!! !!! !! !!! ! ! Vernon !! ! !!!!!! !! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! !! ! !!!! ! ! ! !!!! !! !!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! !! ! !! !! 310 !! !!!!! !! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! !! ! ! !!!!! ! ! !! ! ! !!! !!! ! ! !! ! !! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! !! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! !! !! !! ! ! !! !!! ! !! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! Enola ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !Wooster ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! !! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!! !!! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! !!! !! !! ! !!!! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! !!!! ! !! !!! ! ! !! !! !!! !!!!!! ! ! ! !! ! !!! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! !! !!!! !! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 287 ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! !!!! ! !! !!! 65 ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! !! !!! ! !! ! !! ! !! !!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 36 ! ! ! ! !! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!!! !!!! !! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! !Holland ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! 25 ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! !! ! !! ! !!! !! ! ! !! !!!!!!!! !! !! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!!! ! !! !!!! ! ! !! !! ! !! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! !! !!!!!! ! !! !! ! !! ! ! ! !! !! !! ! !! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! !! !! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!!! ! ! !! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! !!!! ! !! ! ! ! !! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! !!! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! !!! ! ! !! ! !!! ! ! !!! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 36 !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! !! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! !! ! !!64 ! !! ! ! !! 65 ! ! !! !!!! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!! ! ! !! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! !! !! !!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! !!!!!! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !!!! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! !!! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! !!! !!!!!!! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !! !!!! !! ! !! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! !!! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! !! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !!! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 266 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! ! ! !! !!! ! !!!! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! !!! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! !! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !!! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!!! !!! ! ! !! !! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! !! ! !!! ! ! !! !! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! !!! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! !! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! !! !! ! ! ! !! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! ! !! ! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! ! !!! ! !! ! !! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! !!!! ! !! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! !!! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!!! !! !! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!! ! !! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Vilonia !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! !! ! !! !! !! ! !! !!! !! !!!!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!! !! !! ! !!!! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! !! ! ! !!! ! !!! ! !!!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! 64 ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! !!! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! !! ! !!!! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !! !! !! ! ! !!!!!! ! !!!!!! ! ! !!!!! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!! !! !! ! ! ! ! !!!! !!! !! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! 6!4B ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!!!!!!! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !!! !! ! ! !!!! !! ! !! ! ! !!! ! !! !!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! !! ! !!! !!! ! ! ! ! !! !! !! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! !! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! 65B! !! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! !! ! !!! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! !! !! ! !! !!!! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!! !! !! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! !! !!!! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! !! !!!!! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!! !! ! ! !! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! !!!!!! !! ! ! ! 64 ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! !!! !! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 60 ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! !!! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! !! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! !!! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! !! !! ! ! ! ! !!! !! ! !! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! 64 ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 319 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! !!!! ! ! ! !! !! !! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!!! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! !! !!! !! ! !! ! !! !! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! ! !! ! !!!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 286 ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! !!! ! ! ! !! !!!! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! !! ! ! !! !! ! !! !! ! !! ! !! !!!! !!! ! ! !! ! ! !! !! ! !! !!! !! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! !! ! !!! ! ! ! !! Conway !! ! ! !! !! !!! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! !! !! !! !! ! ! ! !! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!!! !! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!! ! !!! ! !!!!! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! !! ! ! !!!!! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!! !! !! !! ! ! !!! ! !!! !!! !!! ! ! ! !!! !!107 ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! !!! ! !! ! !! ! !!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! !!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! !! !!! ! !! ! !! ! !!!! ! !! ! ! !!!!!! ! !!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! !!!40 !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!! ! !!!! !! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! !! !!!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!! !!!!! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! !!! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! Mayflower !!!! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!89 ! ! ! ! !!! !! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! !! ! !! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! !! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! !!!! !!!! ! !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !!!!! ! !!! ! !! !! !! ! ! 89 !! ! ! ! !!! ! ! !!! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! !! !!! !! !! !! ! ! ! !! !! !!!! ! !!!!!!! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!!! !! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! 365 ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!! ! !

£ ¤

§ ¦ ¨

! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! !

Population Distribution Population Density

One Dot = 10 People

! !! ! !

Source: 2020 Decennial Census

Population Density is derived from the 2020 Census Tract Level Data and is modified to exclude undevelopable areas such as Lake Conway.

² 2

Miles

Map 3. Projected Population Change 2015 to 2050

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

Greenbrier

225

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤ 266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower 89

365

Population Change Projected Population Change 2015 to 2050 Loss

Steady

+100 - +499 +500 - +999

+1,000 - +2,975 Source: Metroplan Projections

Population Change is based on population projection datasets produced by Metroplan. The 2050 population is an estimate. 0

² 2

Miles

Map 4. No Vehicle Households

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

Greenbrier 225

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤ 266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower 89

365

Census Tracts Percent of Households with 0 Vehicles 0% to 1% 1% to 3% 3% to 5% 5% to 10% Greater Than 10%

Source: US Census American Community Survey 2023 - 5 Year Average

Zero Vehicle Household are a sample based dataset produced by the US Census Bureau that is collected by survey. The American Community Survey uses a 5-year average to produce the dataset.

² 2

Miles

Map 5. Employment

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

Greenbrier

225

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤ 266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower 89

365

Employment Total Employment by TAZ

0 - 49 50 - 99 100 - 249 250 - 499 500 - 999 1,000 - 3,600

The employment data is derived from a data set produced by the US Census bureau called Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD). Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ) are the geography used for display.

Source: LEHD 2022 LODES Data

² 2

Miles

Map 6. Development Constraints

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

Greenbrier

225

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤ 266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower 89

365

Development Constraints Cemetery Slope > 15% Lake \ River Wetlands 100 Year Flood Plain Park or Protected Open Space

The map of development constraints is a combination of various data layers produced by Metroplan and other publicly available datasets.

Developed or Reserved Land

² 2

Miles

Sta te

y2 5

Map 6a. Development Constraints (Conway Inset) Acklin Gap Rd

65 £ ¤

65B

£ ¤

Dave Ward Dr

ey C r

ss R d

286

Development Constraints Slope > 15% Wetlands

100 Year Flood Plain

Sturgis R

Cemetery

Lake \ River

Park or Protected Open Space

Clint on R

Conway

Wasson Rd

Stanley R u

Can

Amity Rd

eek

Saltillo Rd

Donaghey Av

Salem Rd

64 £ ¤

Rooster Rd

Elm

College Av

Oak St E German Ln

Caldwell St

Harkrider St

Prince St

McNutt Rd

Padgett Rd 60

Prince St

Siebenmorgen Rd

266

t nt S Fro

Hogan Ln

W Tyler St

Lower Ridge Rd

Skunk Hollow Rd

Av Washington

Tyler St

N Museum Rd

£ ¤

Pickles Gap Rd

Developed or Reserved Land

Source:Metroplan

The map of development constraints is a combination of various data layers produced by Metroplan and other publicly available datasets.

Lake Conway 0

§ ¦ ¨

0.5

² 1

Miles

1.5

Map 7. Land Use (2023)

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

Greenbrier

225

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤ 266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower 89

365

Existing Land Use Land Use

Rural Residential Residential Multi-Family Commercial Industrial Institutional Other Park/Open Space

Source: Metroplan (2023)

The Land Use dataset was developed by Metroplan using imagery and county parcel data for general land use classifications.

² 2

Miles

Sta te

y2 5

Map 7a. Land Use (2023)

Acklin Gap Rd

65 £ ¤

65B

£ ¤

Dave Ward Dr

ey C r

ss R d

286

Existing Land Use Land Use

Rural Residential

Residential

Multi-Family

Sturgis R

Commercial Industrial

Institutional Other

Clint on R

Conway

Wasson Rd

Stanley R u

Can

Amity Rd

eek

Saltillo Rd

Donaghey Av

Salem Rd

64 £ ¤

Rooster Rd

Elm

College Av

Oak St E German Ln

Caldwell St

Harkrider St

Prince St

McNutt Rd

Padgett Rd 60

Prince St

Siebenmorgen Rd

266

t nt S Fro

Hogan Ln

W Tyler St

Lower Ridge Rd

Skunk Hollow Rd

Av Washington

Tyler St

N Museum Rd

£ ¤

Pickles Gap Rd

Source: Metroplan (2023)

Lake Conway

The Land Use dataset was developed by Metroplan using imagery and county parcel data for general land use classifications.

§ ¦ ¨

0.5

Park/Open Space

² 1

Miles

1.5

Map 8. Administrative System

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

Greenbrier

225

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤ 266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower 89

365

Administrative System Administrative System State - Interstate State - US Highway State - State Highway State-Other County City

The Administrative System dataset is maintained by Metroplan and developed from data from ARDOT and Metroplan. This map represents ownership and maintenance responsibility for roadways.

² 2

Miles

Map 9. Roadway Functional Classification

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

225

Greenbrier 25

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤ 266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower 89

365

Functional Classification Interstate

Other Freeway

Other Principal Arterial Minor Arterial

Future Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Local Road

Adjusted Urban Area

Functional Classification dataset shows which roadways are eligible for federal funding. The functional classification map is updated after every decennial census in conjunction with the urbanized area designation. The functional classification map is developed in collaboration with ARDOT and FHWA.

Conway

² 2

Miles

Map 10. Master Street Plans of Cities

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

Greenbrier

225

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤ 266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower 89

365

Master Street Plans aa Roadway Classifications INTERSTATE

MAJOR ARTERIAL

PROPOSED MAJOR ARTERIAL MINOR ARTERIAL

PROPOSED MINOR ARTERIAL COLLECTOR

PROPOSED COLLECTOR

RESIDENTIAL COLLECTOR

The map of Master Street Plans in Faulkner County is a compilation of the individual Master Street Plans for each municipality. The master street plans are developed along with land use plans to guide development within each community.

Source:Metroplan, Conway, Mayflower, Vilonia, Wooster and Greenbrier

² 2

Miles

Sta te

y2 5

Map 10a. Master Street Plans

Acklin Gap Rd

65 £ ¤

65B

£ ¤

Dave Ward Dr

ey C r

ss R d

286

Master Street Plans aa Roadway Classifications INTERSTATE

MAJOR ARTERIAL

PROPOSED MAJOR ARTERIAL

Sturgis R

MINOR ARTERIAL

PROPOSED MINOR ARTERIAL COLLECTOR

Clint on R

Conway

Wasson Rd

Stanley R u

Can

Amity Rd

eek

Saltillo Rd

Donaghey Av

Salem Rd

64 £ ¤

Rooster Rd

Elm

College Av

Oak St E German Ln

Caldwell St

Harkrider St

Prince St

McNutt Rd

Padgett Rd 60

Prince St

Siebenmorgen Rd

266

t nt S Fro

Hogan Ln

W Tyler St

Lower Ridge Rd

Skunk Hollow Rd

Av Washington

Tyler St

N Museum Rd

£ ¤

Pickles Gap Rd

PROPOSED COLLECTOR

RESIDENTIAL COLLECTOR

Source:Metroplan and Conway

Lake Conway 0

§ ¦ ¨

0.5

² 1

Miles

1.5

Map 11. Bridge Condition - Locally Owned

Damascus

65 £ ¤ # *

# * 124

# *

# * 107

# *

124

# * # *

# *

310

# *

# # * *

285

Quitman

# Guy *

Twin Groves

# *

# * 285

# *

107

#Greenbrier *

225

#Wooster * 65 £ ¤

#* * #

# *

# * # *

# *

225

# *

287

310

Enola

#* * #

Mount Vernon

# *

Holland

# *

# * # *

# *

266

#* * #* # 64 £ ¤ # * # #* * £ ¤

#* #* # £ ¤ * 6 4B

286

Conway

# # * *

Vilonia

# * # *

# *

65B

#* * # # *

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤ # * # * # * # * #* * # * # * # # * * # # *

# * # * # *

64 £ ¤

# *

319

# *

# * 107

# *

# * § ¦ ¨

# *

#64 # * * £ ¤ # *

# *

# * 89

# * # * # *

Mayflower

# *

# * # *

365

Bridges Rural Faulkner Conway Enola Greenbrier Guy Vilonia Wooster Total

Good Fair Poor Total 39 28 0 67 9 10 0 19 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 4 1 0 0 1 56 39 0 95

The bridge condition map shows all bridges that are maintained either by the county or cities. These bridges are part of a larger dataset that is maintained by ARDOT and updated annually.

Bridges Bridge Condition

# * Poor # * Fair # * Good

Source: ARDOT 2025

² 2

Miles

# *

Sta te

y2 5

Map 11a. Bridge Condition - Locally Owned

Acklin Gap Rd

65 £ ¤

# * # *

# *

Elm

Oak St

# * * #

# * 65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

# *

Dave Ward Dr

# *

Stanley R u

eek

Amity Rd

# *

ey C r

# *

Can

McNutt Rd

# *

Saltillo Rd

# * # *

Caldwell St

# *

Rooster Rd

# *

# * # *

Donaghey Av

College Av

Prince St

Salem Rd

Padgett Rd

# * # *

Prince St

266

t nt S Fro

Hogan Ln

# *

Siebenmorgen Rd

Skunk Hollow Rd

W Tyler St

Harkrider St

Tyler St

Lower Ridge Rd

E German Ln

Av Washington

# *

N Museum Rd

£ ¤

Pickles Gap Rd

ss R d

286

Bridges

# *

Bridge Condition d

# * Poor # * Fair # * Good

Sturgis R

# #* *

# *

Clint on R

Conway

Wasson Rd

# *

Source: ARDOT 2025

# *

The bridge condition map shows all bridges that are maintained either by the county or cities. These bridges are part of a larger dataset that is maintained by ARDOT and updated annually.

# *

Lake Conway 0

§ ¦ ¨

0.5

² 1

Miles

1.5

Map 12. Bridge Condition - State Owned

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤ # * 124

124

Guy 310

# * Twin Groves

# * 107

# *

# * # *

# *

# * # * # *

285

# *

285

225

# * # *

# *

225

# * Greenbrier

# *

Mount

Enola

Wooster

# *

# * # *

# # * *

65 £ ¤ # * # *

# * # * # * 25

287

# *

# * # *

#* # *

# *

#64 * * #* 65 #* ¤ £ ¤ # £ # * # * # # * * #* * # * # £ 64 ¤ # # * * ¤ # £ * # # * * #* # * #* * # #* * #

# Vernon *

310

* # # * # * # *

Holland

# * # *

# *

266

107

# *

64 £ ¤

Conway

# * # *

6 4B

£ ¤

# #* #* *

65B

286

# *

Vilonia

# *

# * 64 £ # * ¤ * # # * # * # * #* # * 319

# * # *

# *

# * # #* * # * #* * # § ¦ ¨

107

# * Mayflower * # # * * # # #* *

# *

# * # * 365

Bridges Bridge Condition

# * Poor # * Fair # * Good

Source: ARDOT 2025

The bridge condition map shows all bridges that are maintained by ARDOT. These bridges are part of a larger dataset that is maintained by ARDOT and updated annually.

² 2

Miles

# * Sta te

y2 5

Map 12a. Bridge Condition - State Owned

Acklin Gap Rd

# * # * # *

Padgett Rd

Prince St

Caldwell St

Elm

# Siebenmorgen Rd * #* # * Oak St

# *

#* * #

# *

64 £ ¤

# *

65B

£ ¤

# * # # * *

# #* *

# *

# # * # * *

# *

ss R d

# *

ey C r

286

Bridges

## * *

Bridge Condition d

# * Poor # * Fair # * Good

# * # * #* * #

# * # * # *

Clint on R

The bridge condition map shows all bridges that are maintained by ARDOT. These bridges are part of a larger dataset that is maintained by ARDOT and updated annually.

# *

Sturgis R

Conway

Wasson Rd

Stanley R u

Can

Amity Rd

eek

McNutt Rd

Dave Ward Dr

Donaghey Av

Salem Rd

College Av

# *

266

t nt S Fro

Hogan Ln

W Tyler St

Harkrider St

Tyler St

# *

Saltillo Rd

Av Washington

# *

Lower Ridge Rd

N Museum Rd

# * # *

Rooster Rd

£ ¤

65 £ ¤

* #

Pickles Gap Rd

Skunk Hollow Rd

# *

E German Ln

# *

Source: ARDOT 2025

Lake Conway 0

§ ¦ ¨

0.35

² 0.7

Miles

1.05

1.4

Map 13. Number of Through Lanes

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

Greenbrier

225

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤ 266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower 89

365

Through Lanes Number of Travel Lanes 1 Thru Lanes 2 Thru Lanes 3 Thru Lanes 4 Thru Lanes 5 Thru Lanes

6 Thru Lanes (total lanes for freeways) State Highway; US Highway

Source: Metroplan GIS

The Through Lanes dataset is maintained and updated by Metroplan. Through Lanes are main travel lanes that do not include turning lanes on the roadway facilities.

² 2

Miles

Map 14. Traffic Control Signals

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

Greenbrier

è é é è é è

225

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

é è

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

é è é è 65 è é é é é éè èè éè è é è é è 266 é è é è é è é è éè éè éè éè éè éè éè é éè è é è é éè é è è é è éè è é é è é è é è é è éè è é 6è é5B é è è é è é è é è é è é éè é é è éè è 64 £ ¤

é è é è éè è é 60

é è

£ ¤

é è

64 £ ¤

Vilonia

é è

é è è é

£ ¤

é è

6 4B

é è

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

é è

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower

é è é è

365

Traffic Signals é Traffic Control Signals è

Source: Metroplan (2025)

The traffic control signals map is maintained and updated by Metroplan. The Signals shown on the map are for traffic control only. Examples of types of signals that are not included on the map: pedestrian beacons, fire station signals, and school zone flashers.

² 2

Miles

Sta te

y2 5

Map 14a. Traffic Control Signals

Acklin Gap Rd

é è

Prince St

é è

College Av

Donaghey Av

é èè é é è

Dave Ward Dr

é è

é è éè èè é é è éè é

é è

é è é è

64 £ ¤

65B é è £ ¤

é è é è

é è

è è é éè é é éè è

é è

ey C r

ss R d

286

Traffic Signals

Sturgis R

Traffic Control Signals

é è Clint on R

Conway

Wasson Rd

Stanley R u

Can

Amity Rd

eek

McNutt Rd

é è

Elm

Oak St

èè éé è é

é è

é é è éè éè èè éé è

Caldwell St

Saltillo Rd

é è è é

Prince St

Salem Rd

Padgett Rd

é è

Siebenmorgen Rd

266

t nt S Fro

è é é è

é è

E German Ln

é è

Hogan Ln

W Tyler St

Lower Ridge Rd

Rooster Rd

Av Washington

é è

Tyler St

N Museum Rd

é è

é éè éè è

Harkrider St

£ ¤

65 £ ¤

è é é è

Skunk Hollow Rd

é è

Pickles Gap Rd

Source:Metroplan (2025)

Lake Conway 0

§ ¦ ¨

0.35

² 0.7

Miles

1.05

1.4

Map 15. Pavement Condition (2021)

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

Greenbrier 225

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤ 266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower 89

365

Pavement Condition Pavement Condition Index (PCI)

Total Federal PCI

Lane Miles Non-Interstate NHS Interstate

Good 68.67 73.51

Fair 108.26 24.3

Good Fair Poor

Poor 9.2 0 Source: ARDOT

Pavement Condition is a dataset collected by ARDOT for FHWA performance measures. The pavement data shown is only for the Interstate and National Highway System (NHS).

² 2

Miles

Map 16. Existing and Planned Pedestrian and Bike Facilities

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

Greenbrier

225

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤ 266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower 89

365

Pedestrian and Bike Facilities Proposed Facilities

Proposed Seperated Path Proposed Bike Lane

Proposed Bike Route

Existing Facilities

Seperated Path Bike Lane

Signed Bike Route

Regional Greenway Conway Connect

Source: Metroplan

The pedestrian and bike facility dataset is maintained and updated by Metroplan. This dataset is a compilation of regional plans and local plans and does not include sidewalks.

² 2

Miles

Sta te

y2 5

Map 16a. Existing and Planned Pedestrian and Bike Facilities Conway Inset Acklin Gap Rd

65 £ ¤

65B

£ ¤

Dave Ward Dr

ey C r

ss R d

286

Pedestrian and Bike Facilities Proposed Facilities

Proposed Seperated Path Proposed Bike Lane

Proposed Bike Route

Existing Facilities

Sturgis R

Seperated Path Bike Lane

Signed Bike Route Regional Greenway Conway Connect

Clint on R

Conway

Wasson Rd

Stanley R u

Can

Amity Rd

eek

Saltillo Rd

Donaghey Av

Salem Rd

64 £ ¤

Rooster Rd

Elm

College Av

Oak St E German Ln

Caldwell St

Harkrider St

Prince St

McNutt Rd

Padgett Rd 60

Prince St

Siebenmorgen Rd

266

t nt S Fro

Hogan Ln

W Tyler St

Lower Ridge Rd

Skunk Hollow Rd

Av Washington

Tyler St

N Museum Rd

£ ¤

Pickles Gap Rd

Park / Open Space

Source: Metroplan

The pedestrian and bike facility dataset is maintained and updated by Metroplan. This dataset is a compilation of regional plans and local plans and does not include sidewalks.

Lake Conway 0

§ ¦ ¨

0.35

² 0.7

Miles

1.05

1.4

Map 17. Crashes 2021-2024 and High Injury Network (HIN)

# Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤ #

Guy

# #

124

Twin Groves

285

310

#D #

107

D # # # # D # #

# Wooster

#285

# # # D # 65 # £ ¤ # # #

107

D #

# #

D 287

# 36

Holland

Mount Vernon

310

Enola

225

# ## # # Greenbrier # # D # # # #

225

# #

124

# D

D # #

D # # D

# #

# # # ## 36 ## # # ## # 65 # D # 64 # £ #£ ¤ # # D ¤ # # # # # # # D # # # # # # # # D D DD # # # # # #266# # # D D D # # # D # # # # ## # # # # # # ## ####D ### ### # # ## ###£ D 64 # # # # D ## # # # ¤ ## # # D # # ## D# D ## # # # ## ## # # # # # # D # # # D # # 65B D # ## # # ##£ ¤ # # # # 60 # # # # # # D D #DD# # ###### ### # D# # # D # #D D # ## # # #D # 286D #D # # D # # # Conway #D D ## D # D # D # D ## # ## # # # # 40 # § ¦ ¨ # # # # D # # # # # # ## # # Mayflower # # # # 89 # # # # D 89 D

# #

# # #

Vilonia

6 4B D DD £ ¤

64 £ ¤

# #

# D

319

# # # # D 107

# ## # #

365

Crashes and HIN Crash Severity

D Fatal

# Serious Injury

Other Crashes

High Injury Network - Safety Action Plan Source: Arkansas State Police/ARDOT/Metroplan

Crash data is maintained and updated in a cooperative effort between ARDOT and Arkansas State Police. The high injury network (HIN) was developed from the crashdata as part of Metroplan's SS4A Safety Action Plan.

² 2

Miles

D # D

Map 17a. Crashes 2021-2024 and High Injury Network (HIN) Conway Inset # y2 5

Sta te

# Acklin Gap Rd

# D #

# #

D # #

D Prince St

# #

College Av

# #

D # #

Dave Ward Dr McNutt Rd

D 60

## # # #

£ ¤

## # #

# ##

# ## ##

# #

64 £ ¤ D# #

# D

## #

Amity Rd

ss R d

# #

## D # # # #

286

# D

D #

Can

Stanley R u

Wasson Rd

# #

# D #

Crashes and HIN Crash Severity

D Fatal

Sturgis R

# #

# 65B

# #

# # # # ##

Conway

# # ## # # ### #

# #

Oak St

Rd DD Siebenmorgen ## # #

# #

# D

# #

S#t Elm

# Donaghey Av

Caldwell St

Salem Rd

Padgett Rd

Prince St

t nt S Fro

Harkrider St

D Hogan Ln

W Tyler St

# # # 266

Lower Ridge Rd

Serious Injury

Other Crashes

D # D D #

Source: Arkansas State Police/ARDOT/Metroplan

# # # ##

High Injury Network - Safety Action Plan

Av Washington

Tyler St

Saltillo Rd

# # ###

## ## ##D D

Clint on R

D £ ¤ ##D #

Rooster Rd

D #

Pickles Gap Rd

# # 65

Skunk Hollow Rd

£ ¤

# #

eek

# #

ey C r

# #

E German Ln

N Museum Rd

Lake Conway #

40 #

§ ¦ ¨ #

0.35

² 0.7

Miles

# 1.05

1.4

Map 18. Non-Motorized Crashes 2020-2024 and High Injury Network (HIN)

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

# Greenbrier

225

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

# 64 £ ¤

D 266

## #

# ## # D

D## # 6#5B

£ ¤

65 £ ¤

# # # # 64

£ ¤

# D

6 4B

£ ¤

# #

286

# ##

Conway

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

319

107

## 40

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower

365

Non Motorized Crashes and HIN Crash Severity

D Fatal

Serious Injury

Other Crashes

High Injury Network - Safety Action Plan

The non-Motorized Crash data is subset of crash data that is maintained and updated in a cooperative effort between ARDOT and Arkansas State Police. The high injury network (HIN) was developed from the crashdata as part of Metroplan's SS4A Safety Action Plan. The crashes represented are between motorized vehicles and pedestrians or cyclists.

Source: Arkansas State Police/ARDOT/Metroplan

² 2

Miles

Sta te

y2 5

Map 18a. Non Motorized Crashes 2021-2024 and High Injury Network (HIN) Conway Inset

£ ¤

# #

Oak St

# # D

# #

# 65B £ ¤

# #

64 £ ¤

D D

Saltillo Rd

Donaghey Av

# ##

Rooster Rd

Elm Salem Rd

Dave Ward Dr

Skunk Hollow Rd

Caldwell St

Harkrider St

Prince St

College Av

286

# #

# Non Motorized Crashes and HIN Crash Severity

Fatal

# Serious Injury

Other Crashes

High Injury Network - Safety Action Plan

Clint on R

ss R d

Sturgis R

Conway

Wasson Rd

Stanley R u

Can

ey C r

Amity Rd

eek

McNutt Rd

Padgett Rd

Prince St

Siebenmorgen Rd

266

t nt S Fro

Hogan Ln

Lower Ridge Rd

E German Ln

Av Washington

Tyler St

N Museum Rd

Pickles Gap Rd

65 £ ¤

W Tyler St

Acklin Gap Rd

Source: Arkansas State Police/ARDOT/Metroplan

Lake Conway 0

§ ¦ ¨

0.35

² 0.7

Miles

1.05

1.4

! (

Map 19. 2024 Average!( Daily Traffic !(

! (

! ( ! ( ! ( 12000 ! (

! (

( (! ! (!

! (

! ( ! (

! (

! ( ! ( ! (

! (

630

1400

7100

1100

! (

370

700

820

5900

! (

4700

! (

190

! (

810 670

Twin Groves

! (

Quitman

Guy

! (

3000 ! (! (

! (

5600

! (

Damascus

! (

! ( ! ( ! (

210

! (

370

! (

960

! ( ! (

! (

20000

! (

! ( ( 22000 !

1100

! (

2200

! ( ! (

3800

! (

1800

1300

! ( ! (

1500

Greenbrier

! (

7300

! (

2900

! (

950

! (

! ( ! (

! (

31000

! (

9000

280

Enola

! (

(! (! !! ( (( ! (!

! (

790

! (

910

28000

! (

270

1800

! (

Holland

! (

110

770

27000

600

! (

Mount Vernon

! ( ! (

1000

220

! ( 3000 ! (

2800

920 1600

580

! (

210

1200

4700 28000

! (

Wooster

! (

910

1500

240

2400

2900

! (

See Inset

6400

Vilonia

! (

1100

1500

! (

2200

! (

8500

! (

15000

4700

! (

Conway

7200

! (

7600

! (

2800

! ( ! (

760

! (

250

4900

920

! (

74000

780

450

! (

! (! ( 1200

Mayflower

2400 6300

! ( ! (! ! ! (! (( 500 ( 2900 ! ( 3400 ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( 280! ( ! (( 250 ! 74000

! (

5200

1800

! (

3100

! (

520

! ( ! ( ! (

! (

! ( ! (

! (

3800

! ( ! (

Average Daily Traffic ! (

! (

! ! ( ( ! ( ( ( ! ! (! ! (

! (

! ( ! ( ! (

( ! (!

! ( 2024 Average Daily Traffic

! ( ! (

! (

! ( ! (

! (

( !! ( ( ! (!

! ( ! (

( ! (!

! (

! (! ( ! ( ! ( ! ! (! ( ( ! ( ! ( ( ! ( ! ! ( Source: ARDOT (! ! (! ! (! ( (! ! ( ! ( ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ! (! ( ! ! ( ( ! ( ! ( ( ! (! ! ( ! ! ( ( ( ! ( ! ! ! ( ( (! (! ( ! ( ! (! ! ( ! ( ! (( ! ( ! ( ! Traffic Count data is collected and maintained ! ARDOT. (! ! ( ! ! (! ( ! ! ( ( ( ! (by ( ! (! (! ! ( ! (! ! ( ( ! (! ( ! ( ( ! (! ! ( ( ( ( ! (! (! ( ! ( ! ( ! The traffic counts represent the most current ! (! (the locations. ( data for ! ! ( (! ! ( ! (! ! ! ( (! (! ! ( ( ! ( ! ! ( ( ! ( ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ! (! ( (! ! ( ! ! ( ( ( (! 0 1 2 4 ! ( ! ( ! ! ( ( ! ( 3 ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ! ! ( ( ! (! ( ! Miles ! ! ( ( ( ( ! ( ! (! ! ! ( ! (! ( ! ( ( ! ( (! ! ! ( ( ! ! ( ( ( ( ! ( ( ! ! ((! ! (! ! ((! ! ( ! ( ! ! ( ! ( ! (! ! ( ! ! ( ( ( ! ( ! ! ( ( ! ( ! ( ( ! ! ! ( ! ( ( ! ( (! ! ( ! ! ! ( ( ( (! ! ( ! ! ( ! ( ! ( ( ! (! ( ! ( (! ! ( ( (! ! (! ( ! ! (! ( ! ! (! (( ! ! ( ( (! ! ( ! ( ! ( ( ! ( ( ( ! ! ( ( ! ! ( ! ! (

! (

! ( ! (

! !( (

Traffic Count

! (! (

! ( ( !! ( ! ( ( ! (!

! ( ( ! ( ! ! (! ( ! (

! ( ( ! (! ( ! ( ! ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( (! ( ( ! !! ! (! ! ((( ! ( ! ( (! ! ( ! ( ( ! ! ( ! (! ( ! ( ( ( ! ( ! (! ! (! ! (( ! ( ! ( !

! (

! ( (! ( !! (

! (

Sta te

y2 5

Map 19a. 2024 Average Daily Traffic

! ( 1300

! ( 11000

2300

Acklin Gap Rd

! (

38000

! (

310

! (

( 64!

£ ¤

3600

! (

32000 2800 2500 ! ( 11000 ! ( ! ( ! (! ( ( ! ( 47000! ! ( 8400 11000 ! ( 2300 19000 ! ( 23000 ! ( ! ( 11000 7400 ! (! (

! (

6900

Av Washington

! (

11000

810

! (

3100

E German Ln

Donaghey Av

£ ¤

Amity Rd

1800

! (

2800

! (

1900

! (

250

! (

800

! (

4900

180

! (

286

Average Daily Traffic

5400

Conway

! (

Wasson Rd

250

2024 Average Daily Traffic

! ( d

! (

1900

! (

! ( 5400

! (

1100

ss R d

2300

! (

Can

Stanley R u

20000

23000

440

1300

! (

! ( 4900

! (

1400

Traffic Count Location ! (

540

! (

Clint on R

! (

740

Sturgis R

2000

740

eek

5300

! (

ey C r

2800

! (

3900

! (

Skunk Hollow Rd

4000

60 ! (

Salem Rd

! (

460

! (

McNutt Rd

5500

! (

2200

! (

Harkrider St

1300

Hogan Ln

Padgett Rd

! (

2800

Lower Ridge Rd

t nt S Fro

5900

65 £ ¤

Tyler St 10000 ! ( ! (2000 ! ( 9900 ! ( ! ( 66000 8400 ! ( 3600 ( Siebenmorgen Rd W Tyler St 610 ! ( 266 ! 12000 ! ( ! ! ( ( ! ( 25000 10000 ! ( 6400 5200 12000 ! 2200 ! ( 530 ! ( 600 2400 ! ( ( 3400 6100 150 ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ! ( ( 26000 9800 Prince St 13000 Prince St 15000 ! ( ( 7500 32000 2200 ! 27000! ( 9000 ! ( Oak St ! ( 9400 ( 8700 ! ( ! ( ! ! ! ( ( ! ! ! ( ( ( 14000 ( ! ( ! ( 6400 ! ( Caldwell! St 2100 ! ( ! ( 22000 25000 ! 21000 ( ! ( 64 ! ( ! ! ( ( 920 ! ( ( 15000 ! 5200 13000 ! ! ! ( ( 2800! 12000 ( 11000 ( 2200 9800 6200 8000 20000 ! ! ( ( t ! ( ( 10000 600 ! ( lm S! ! ( 5100 ! ( 12000 15000 2100 6400 E College Av ! 7700 ! ( ! ( ! ! ( ( 12000 ! ! ( ( 13000 ( 14000 16000 13000 5300 9300 ! ( 5100 3800 ! ! ( ( 6900 6700 ! ( ! ! (! ( 13000! ! ! ( ( ( 1800 ! ( ( 1100 ! 1800 ( 3400 5500 2600 64000 ! ( ! ( ! ! ( 65B ( 3200 ! ( 4600 ! ( 14000 ! ! ( 820 ( 6600 9000 2400 ! ( 15000 ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( 30000 ! ( 2500 Dave Ward Dr ! 4000 ( ! ( 16000 ! ( ! ( 3700 ! ( 11000 ! ( 35000 ! ( 4900 ! ( 520 6000 ! ( ( ! ! ( ( ! 10000 ! ( ! ( ( ! ! ( ! ( ! ( 37000 ! ( 8800 840 3800 ! ( 480 ! ( 5100 ! 9600! ( ( 9100 ! 840 ( ! ( ! ( ! 1500 ( 300 ! ( ! ( 7800

! (

! ( 940

! (

Pickles Gap Rd

Rooster Rd

560

! (

! ( 2800 380 ! (

11000

5300

430

! (

( !! 1800 ! ( ( 6500( 23000 ! 12000 ! ( 9100

10000

! (

N Museum Rd

! (

Saltillo Rd

4100 18000 ( ! (! 2000 ! ( ! ( 1800

38000

3600

32000

620

1000

! (

Source: Arkansas State Police/ARDOT/Metroplan

Traffic Count data is collected and maintained by ARDOT. The traffic counts represent the most current data for the locations.

870 ! (

2600

! (

870

! 5000 ( 2500 ! ( 360 40

! (

§ ¦ ¨

Lake Conway 0

0.35

² 0.7

Miles

1.05

1.4

Map 20. Five Year Traffic Growth Trend

22.4%

24.4%

Damascus

40%

-22%

65 £ ¤

Quitman

124

25 35.7%

Guy

25%

310

124

29.6%

50%

25.5% 107

Twin Groves 23.5%

285

37.3%

35.2%

28.6%

22.2%

64.2%

90.9%

28.6% 285

225

20%

107

22.2% 25%

225

Greenbrier

35.7%

45%

22.2%

21.8%

21.7%

Wooster

310

Enola

24.2%

125%

287

65 £ ¤

26.8%

Mount Vernon

22.2%

20%

42.9% 26.4%

25%

20%

Holland 28.2%

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤ 266

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

22.2%

Vilonia

22.6%

25%

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

31%

22.5% 107

§ ¦ ¨

-42.7%

Mayflower 30.8%

-35.9% -37.5%

24%

-24.2%

365

ADT Growth Trend Five Year Growth % (2019 - 2024)

20% - 125% 10% - 19.9% 0% - 9.9% -9.9% - - 0.1% -70% - -10%

Source: ARDOT

Traffic Count data is collected and maintained by ARDOT. The traffic counts represent the percentage change in Average Daily Traffic (ADT) between 2019 and 2024. 0

² 2

Miles

30%

Sta te

y2 5

Map 20a. Five Year Traffic Growth Trend

22.2%

Acklin Gap Rd 29.2%

-25%

£ ¤

27.3%

76.3%

-20%

64 £ ¤

94%

65B

£ ¤

Dave Ward Dr

-21.6% 30%

25% Rd

61.5%

ss R d

-25%

286

ADT Growth Trend Five Year Growth% (2019 - 2024)

20% - 125%

10% - 19.9% 27.3%

0% - 9.9% -9.9% - - 0.1% -70% - -10%

Clint on R

Stanley R u

Sturgis R

Conway

Wasson Rd

21.7%

Can

Amity Rd

eek

87.5%

ey C r

37.7%

Saltillo Rd

Elm

Oak St

Rooster Rd

27.9%

Siebenmorgen Rd

266

Skunk Hollow Rd

Caldwell St

Lower Ridge Rd

E German Ln

Salem Rd

College Av

-32.6%

Prince St

Donaghey Av

36.8%

McNutt Rd

Padgett Rd

Prince St

-31%

t nt S Fro

Hogan Ln

W Tyler St

Harkrider St

Tyler St

Av Washington

27.8%

N Museum Rd

23.5%

38.7%

65 £ ¤

Pickles Gap Rd

Source:ARDOT

Traffic Count data is collected and maintained by ARDOT. The traffic counts represent the percentage change in Average Daily Traffic (ADT) between 2019 and 2024.

24.3%

Lake Conway 0

§ ¦ ¨

0.35

² 0.7

Miles

1.05

1.4

Map 21. Traffic Volume 2015 / 2050 Comparison

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

Greenbrier

225

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤ 266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower 89

365

2015 / 2050 Traffic Volume DailyTraffic Volume

Tot_Flow

1, 00 2, 0 50 5, 0 0 10 00 ,0 25 00 ,0 50 00 ,0 75 00 10 , 00 0, 0 00 0

2015 Volume

Proportional bandwidths with current over future bandwitdh

Tot_Flow

Traffic volumes are presented with bandwidths shown proportional to the 24-hour traffic volume. 2015 volumes in gray are shown over modeled 2050 traffic volumes in red. The amount of red shown is proportional to traffic growth over the period. Volumes are derived from the CARTS Travel Demand Model.

1, 00 2, 0 50 5, 0 0 10 00 ,0 25 00 ,0 50 00 ,0 75 00 10 , 00 0, 0 00 0

2050 Volume

Source: CARTS Travel Demand Model

Map 22. Maximum AM Volume / Capacity Ratio 2015

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

Greenbrier

225

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤ 266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower 89

365

V/C Ratio AM 2015 Maximum AM V/C 2015 0.00 - 0.59 0.60 - 0.69

Some congestion

0.70 - 0.79 0.80 - 0.89 0.90 - 0.99

Severe congestion

1.00 - 1.05

Source: CARTS TDM

Volume to capacity ratio correlates strongly with traffic congestion. Volume to capacity ratios were obtained from the CARTS Travel Demand Model.

² 2

Miles

Map 23. Maximum PM Volume / Capacity Ratio 2015

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

Greenbrier

225

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤ 266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower 89

365

V/C Ratio PM 2015 Maximum PM V/C 2015 0.00 - 0.59 0.60 - 0.69

Some congestion

0.70 - 0.79 0.80 - 0.89 0.90 - 0.99

Severe congestion

1.00 - 1.05

Volume to capacity ratio correlates strongly with traffic congestion. Volume to capacity ratios were obtained from the CARTS Travel Demand Model.

Source: CARTS TDM

² 2

Miles

Map 24. Maximum AM Volume / Capacity Ratio 2050

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

Greenbrier

225

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤ 266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower 89

365

V/C Ratio AM 2050 Maximum AM V/C 2050 0.00 - 0.59 0.60 - 0.69

Some congestion

0.70 - 0.79 0.80 - 0.89 0.90 - 0.99

Severe congestion

1.00 - 1.05

Source: CARTS TDM

Volume to capacity ratio correlates strongly with traffic congestion. Volume to capacity ratios were obtained from the CARTS Travel Demand Model

² 2

Miles

Map 25. Maximum PM Volume / Capacity Ratio 2050

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

Greenbrier

225

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤ 266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower 89

365

V/C Ratio PM 2050 Maximum PM V/C 2050 0.00 - 0.59 0.60 - 0.69

Some congestion

0.70 - 0.79 0.80 - 0.89 0.90 - 0.99

Severe congestion

1.00 - 1.05

Source: CARTS TDM

Volume to capacity ratio correlates strongly with traffic congestion. Volume to capacity ratios were obtained from the CARTS Travel Demand Model.

² 2

Miles

Map 26. Level of Service

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

Greenbrier

225

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤ 266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower 89

365

Level of Service 2025 Level of Service A (free flow)

B (reasonably free flow) C (stable flow)

D (approaching unstable flow) E (unstable flow)

F (forced or breakdown flow)

Source: ARDOT

Roadway level of service is a measure used to represent roadway operating conditions. Level of Service A represents free-flow traffic. Level of Service F is representative of a high level of congestion with breakdowns in traffic flow. Level of service estimates are from ARDOT.

² 2

Miles

Map 27. AM Peak Hour Speed

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

Greenbrier

225

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤ 266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower 89

365

AM Peak Hour Average Speed AM Peak Hour Speed Weekdays 0 - 9.9 MPH 10 - 19.9 MPH 20 - 29.9 MPH 30 - 39.9 MPH 40 - 49.9 MPH 50 - 59.9 MPH 60+ MPH

Source: NPMRDS: September 2025 M-TH 7:00AM-7:59AM

Segments identified correspond to NPMRDS Traffic Management Channels. Speeds may vary significantly along a TMC. Map reflects slower direction of travel.

² 2

Miles

Map 28. PM Peak Hour Speed

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

Greenbrier

225

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤

266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

40 40

§ ¦ ¨ 89

Mayflower 89

365

PM Peak Hour Average Speed AM Peak Hour Speed Weekdays 0 - 9.9 MPH 10 - 19.9 MPH 20 - 29.9 MPH 30 - 39.9 MPH 40 - 49.9 MPH 50 - 59.9 MPH 60+ MPH

Source: NPMRDS: September 2025 M-TH 7:00AM-7:59AM

Segments identified correspond to NPMRDS Traffic Management Channels. Speeds may vary significantly along a TMC. Map reflects slower direction of travel.

² 2

Miles

Map 29. Congestion Management Process Lower Speed Arterials

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

Greenbrier 225

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤ 266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower 89

365

Lower Speed Arterials Average per Day below 25 MPH

Source: NPMRDS

The data represented was developed from the Congested Management Process (CMP) that was authored by Metroplan. The CMP shows roadways and delay by time below set thresholds. More detailed information is available in the CMP document.

0 to 15 Minutes 15 to 30 Minutes 30 to 60 Minutes 60 to 90 Minutes 90 to 120 Minutes Over 120 Minutes

October 2024 Weekdays, 6:00 AM to 8:00 PM

² 2

Miles

Map 30. Congestion Management Process Higher Speed Arterials

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

Greenbrier 225

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤ 266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower 89

365

Higher Speed Arterials Average per Day below 35 MPH

Source: NPMRDS

0 to 15 Minutes 15 to 30 Minutes 30 to 60 Minutes 60 to 90 Minutes 90 to 120 Minutes Over 120 Minutes

October 2024 Weekdays, 6:00 AM to 8:00 PM

² 2

Miles

Map 31. Congestion Management Process Freeways

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

Greenbrier 225

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤ 266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower 89

365

Freeways

Average per Day below 45 MPH

Source: NPMRDS

0 to 15 Minutes 15 to 30 Minutes 30 to 60 Minutes 60 to 90 Minutes 90 to 120 Minutes Over 120 Minutes

October 2024 Weekdays, 6:00 AM to 8:00 PM

² 2

Miles

Map 32. Level of Travel Time Reliability (LOTTR)

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

Greenbrier 225

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤ 266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower 89

365

Travel Time Reliability LOTTR

Reliable Potentially Unreliable Unreliable

Source: NPMRDS 2024

The data represented was developed from the National Performance Measures Reliability Data Set (NPMRDS). The information represents Travel Time and how reliable it is for the roadway facilities.

² 2

Miles

Map 33. State Freight Plan and Multimodal Facilities

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

Greenbrier

225

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤ 266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower 89

365

Multimodal Facilities State freight tiers and Multi-modal facilities Freight Tier 1 Freight Tier 2 Freight Tier 3 Freight Tier 4 Rail

Airport

McClellan-Kerr Navigation System

The multi-modal data shown is from ARDOT and the State freight plan. ARDOT maintains this dataset.

² 2

Miles

Map 34. Interstate Truck Travel Time Reliability (TTTR)

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

Greenbrier 225

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤ 266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower 89

365

Freight Reliability Reliable Potentially Unreliable Unreliable

Source: NPMRDS 2024

The data represented was developed from the National Performance Measures Reliability Data Set (NPMRDS). The information represents Travel Time and how reliable it is for the roadway facilities and freight.

² 2

Miles

Map 35. Freight Percentage

12% Damascus

Quitman

10%

124

65 £ ¤

14%

124

Guy 8%

310

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

Greenbrier

225

Wooster

310

Enola

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

5% 8%

20%

27%

64 £ ¤

29%

18%

266

65 £ ¤ 6%

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

Vilonia

17%

10%

17%

6 4B

£ ¤ 9%

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

9% 107

§ ¦ ¨ 15%

Mayflower 5%

15%

365

Freight Percentage Truck Percentage

20%+

10% - 19.9% 5% -9% 2%-4% 1%

Source: ARDOT 2025

The freight percentage is part of the ADT dataset. ARDOT collects and maintains this as part of the traffic count data.

² 2

Miles

Map 36. Transit Service

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

225

Greenbrier 25

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

64 £ ¤ 266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower 89

365

Transit Service Micro-Transi Service Areat Interstate / Freeway

State Highway; US Highway

Arterial not otherwise classed

Federal Aid not otherwise classed Local Road

Conway Metro Connect Zone

Transit Service in Faulkner County is provided by Rock Region Metro. It is an on demand service with no fixed routes.

² 2

Miles

Map 37. Transportation Improvement Projects 2025-2028

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

Greenbrier

! ( ( ! ( !

225

310

Enola

( ! Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤ 266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

( ! £ ¤

(! ! (! (

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower 89

365

") ")

Projects Bridge Replacement \ Preservation Interchange \ Ramp Improvements

( Intersection !

Capacity \ Widening Pavement Preservation Rehabilitation

Source: Metroplan 2025

The Transportation Implementation Plan (TIP) projects are scheduled near term projects. The TIP represents the current transportation investment guided by Metroplan in Faulkner County.

² 2

Miles

Map 38. Strategic Connections

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

225

Greenbrier 25

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

64 £ ¤ 266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower 89

365

Strategic Connections Potential Strategic Connections Strategic Connection Interstate / Freeway

State Highway; US Highway

Arterial not otherwise classed

Federal Aid not otherwise classed Local Road

The strategic connections represent potential projects in Faulkner County that are not currently under development/construction but are seen as opportunities to minimize congestion, increase connectivity, and improve travel time reliability. Additional connections, that are not shown on the map will also be necessary to provide new development opportunities in growing areas of Faulkner County.

² 2

Miles

Map 39. Future Capacity Concerns

Damascus

Quitman

65 £ ¤

124

Guy 310

124

107

Twin Groves

285 285

225 107

Greenbrier

225

310

Enola

Wooster

Mount Vernon

287

65 £ ¤

Holland 25

65 £ ¤

64 £ ¤ 266

Vilonia

64 £ ¤

6 4B

£ ¤

65B

£ ¤

64 £ ¤

319

286

Conway

107

§ ¦ ¨

Mayflower 89

365

Future Capacity Concerns Roadways with Potential Capacity Concerns Potential Future Capacity Needs

Source: CARTS TDM, ARDOT ADT

The capacity needs identified represent roadways where existing capacity may be inadequate to serve future traffic volumes as indicated by the CARTS Travel Demand Model.

² 2

Miles