Nanyang style dusun special

dusun quarterly

2014

e-journal of Asian Arts and Culture

Nanyang ‘Style’?

special issue 1

Dusun Quarterly 3 cover by Tew Nai Tong

Editor Martin A Bradley email martinabradley@gmail.com Dusun TM Published by EverDay Ar

Nany 2

rt Studio and Educare September 2014

yang Southern Seas

Dusun remains an entirely free and non-associated publication concerned with bringing Asian arts and culture to everyone

3

inside....

11

Black lines and flat colour

16

That Japanese connection

18

A subtle beginning

26

Immigrant art

4

2014

30

Nanyang

32

Naively questing the naive

67

Four Chinese men on an island

87

Ergo Nanyang Style

5

dusun quarterly e-journal of Asian Arts and Culture

editor’s note A Dusun Special, especially for you.

For some weeks I had been wrestling with the concept of Nanyang Style.

I had spoken with many sons and daughters of the Nanyang Academy of Fine Art, and read about others.

It just so happened that there were a number of exhibitions around at the time, emphasising the importance of the Nanyang painters on Malaysian and Singaporean modern art, and this further piqued my curiosity. I began to have an idea to write about Nanyang.

I was invited to give a sharing about Nanyang, in Muar, Malaysia round about that time, so the idea grew that I should write an essay based on my findings. Now I know that not everyone will agree with my findings.

But do understand that this is an opinion piece coupled with some history I have dug out. It does not propose to be the definitive history or definative essay on the subject.

Here is my illustrated essay, I do hope that it piques someone else’s interest in the subject.

Now read on................

Martin Bradley Editor.

6

Lim Hak Tai

founder of the Nanyang Academy of Fine Art

7

Exposition Unive Paris 1889

8

erselle

9

Nanyang ‘Style’? an essay by Martin Bradley MA

10

Paul Gauguin Self Portrait 1896

Black Lines and Flat Colour It would, surely, be naïve to proclaim that it all started with that French exhibition - the Exposition Universelle of 1889, set in a curious Paris full of curiosities, and naïve because the West has had a not-so-secret fascination with all things Orientalist Eastern and, perhaps, a little visa versa with a growing occidentalist East.

In the late 1850s, Eugène Henri Paul Gauguin (Paul Gauguin) and his artist mentors (Manet, Pissaro, Degas, Monet and Van Gogh) had already come into contact with Japanese (ukiyo-e) colour prints.

G a ugui n had included Japanese artefacts in his ‘fan’ paintings in 1885.

He had bought those Japanese prints, and carried them with him to Tahiti, for reference. For t h e sake of our story, we will make the claim that without that Paris ‘Exposition’, Paul Gauguin may have had no such interest in making a ‘Primitive’ or ‘Savage’ life in Tahiti. For Gauguin, the Southern Seas would not have held such an exotic allure, and Bali may not have been the destination for four Singaporean artists to generate notions of a new Asian style in painting.

It is, perhaps, as tenuous a thread as that which held the sword of Damocles aloft, as it unites the Singaporean fusion of Nanyang (Mandarin - South Seas), to the utopianism notions of Gauguin,

11

A Borobudur frieze

and Western Orientalism. It is tenuous, but nevertheless tangible and traceable. At that, now infamous, Exposition Universelle, Paris,1889, Gauguin had seen the mock-up of a Javanese village, and marvelled at the Borobudur (Indonesian Buddhist) wall reliefs.

It is there, at that exposition, that Gauguin is reported to have bought at least two photographs of Buddhist friezes from the Temples of Borobudur, in Central Java, allegedly taken by J. van Kinsbergen

usai1831

Katsushika Hok

Utagawa Kuniyoshi 1830

(1872), and a fragment of a reproduction of Cambodian art at the Exposition Coloniale (the ‘Colonial’ section of the exposition).

Images of Tahiti and other islands of French Oceania were also there. Those well thumbed photographs of Borobudur were constantly with Gauguin, along with his Japanese prints, during his travels and, it is suggested, that they were used as reference for more than one of Gauguin’s sketches and paintings.

There is little doubt that the study of other cultures, initially Peruvian (from his childhood in Peru), the Japanese line-work and prints, and the Buddhist works from Cambodia and Borobudur, influenced Gauguin’s painting style enormously. Gauguin’s imagery moved towards flatter planes, brighter colours, with dark lines similar to those seen in Japanese prints. They gave delineation to Gauguin’s figures. He used ‘motifs’ found in Hokusai, and perhaps Kuniyoshi, and began an abstraction which others were to capitalise on, in the future of ‘Modern Art’.

12

Paul Guaguin Still Life with Fan 1889

Paul Gauguin Where Do We Come From?, 1897

13

Paul GauguinTe arii vahine 1896

Gauguin had long been disillusioned with the trappings of the bourgeoise life he had been leading. He had always had an urge to travel, and a romantic yearning for other places and other peoples.

To a large degree Gauguin was a self-taught artist, but was mentored

by Camille Pissarro and had painted with the Impressionists. He gradually emboldened his canvases with more lurid coloration and soft shapes, perhaps gleaned from those Eastern images has was encountering. Gauguin’s wanderlust, no doubt imparted by that early life in Peru, led him to Martinique, Brittany and to spend an enlightening autumn/winter (1888) with Van Gogh in Arles, then, finally, for him to seek his own utopia, a place of exotic naivety, simplicity, away from all that was familiar, conventional and Western bourgeoisie - the South Pacific islands of Tahiti and later to Hiva Oa (in the Marquesas Islands, French Polynesia). In Tahiti, Gauguin had met too many French missionaries.

Gauguin described the Tahiti of 1891 thusly - ‘….civilisation is leaving me little by little'… ‘I have all the pleasures of a free, animal and human life. I escape from the artificial; I enter into nature.’ Tahiti was primitive, and Gauguin was naïve. Maybe fuelled by daydreams of Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Noble Savage, Gauguin believed that he had entered his island paradise, a utopia of simple, carefree, living.

Having grown into a new romanticism, which became known as Symbolism his style of painting, drew away from his erstwhile friends the Impressionists and towards the new style emerging.

Gauguin had been emboldened by the strokes of his good friend Paul Cezanne, and his own researches. In his letter to Henri Cazalis (1864) the French poet Stéphane Mallarmé had explained the need for intuiting the perceived world and “To paint not the thing itself,

14

Paul Gaugui

Grafton Gallery poster 1903

but the effect it produces.” Gauguin had taken note and fused what he saw as ‘Primitive’ styles from Borobudur and Angkor Wat, with striking Japanese line work and distinctive coloration, with his own symbolic elements into a fresh new style of cloisonnism, able to capture the vibrancy he was encountering on his own exotic island ‘paradise’.

in Peace (above), War (below) wood carving 1889.

After Gauguin’s death (of syphilis, 1903), British artist and art critic Roger Fry, when organising an English exhibition of French artists (past the heady days of Impressionism), had looked for a retrospective term. ‘Modern’ was becoming cliché even then. Fry coined the term Post-Impressionist, denoting artists whose styles came after, and differed from, Impressionism. The exhibition (1910) was eventually called ‘Manet and the Post-Impressionists’.

It was held at London’s Grafton Gallery, and included the works of Paul Gauguin.

Grafton Paul Guaguin Three Tahitians 1899

Gallery

catalogu

e 1903

15

That Japanese Connection While artists in the West - Manet, Pierre Bonnard, Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec, Mary Cassat, Degas, Renoir, James McNeill Whistler, Monet, van Gogh, Camille Pissarro, Paul Gauguin, Aubrey Beardsley and Gustave Klimt, had become enamoured with Japanese prints and Eastern styles, Japanese artists were beginning to learn about Western art too.

In 1856 Japan signed a trade treaty with America and, in 1861, a painting division was created at the already established Institute for the Study of Western Documents (Bansho Shirabesho,1856). It was there that a government sponsored study of Western art took place. By late 1880s, the Tokyo School of Art was founded (1887)

by Ernest Fenollosa and Okakura Tenshin. The school of art (now the Tokyo University of the Arts) offered courses on Western styles of art. Japanese painters (adopting Western styles) became known as yōga.

Kuroda Seiki, aided the introduction of the concept of “fine arts” to Japanese society and prospered a revival of Western style painting in Japan from the 1890’s. Kuroda was invited to teach at the Tokyo School of Fine Arts, and later formed the Hakubakai (White Horse Society) for the promotion and exhibition of works influenced by the French academic and Impressionist plein-air painting styles.

Japanese artists began to study abroad, many in Paris, bringing back new art theories and styles, with them.

Slightly later, in China, Western ideas of art were taking hold. In 1902, Western style drawing and painting was introduced into the Chinese school curriculum, and two teacher’s training colleges opened departments of painting and drawing. Over time, in China, many such courses were taught by Japanese instructors, who encouraged their pupils to go to Japan for further studies. It is reported that by 1909 there were some 461 Japanese teachers in

16

Kang Youwei 1858 – 1927

Shanghai Sketch, was a weekly pictorial magazine published in Shanghai from 21 April 1928 until 7 June 1930

schools and colleges in China.

In 1898, Kang Youwei - Chinese scholar, calligrapher and wide spread traveller, had written; “ Four or five hundred years ago Chinese painting was the best. What a pity that it has not developed since then‌.if we can correct the false painting doctrine of the past five hundred tears then Chinese painting will recover and develop further‌.if we adhere to the old way without change, Chinese painting will become extinct. Now, at this historic moment, it is up to those who are up to the challenge to arise. They must begin a new era by combining Chinese and Western art, (Travels in Eleven European Countries).

Many of the earlier Chinese students and teachers, who studied in Japan, preferred Western classical styles, but the later students, arriving back in the 1920s and 1930s, brought ideas, ideals and concepts of Modern Art back with them. Chinese Western Art aficionados split into two fractions, those for Modern (Western) Art and those against.

Ye Qianyu: Unfortunate Love 1928

17

A Subtle Beginning?

Liu Haisu The Spectacle at Mount Huangshan

When a leading Chinese writer - Lu Xun, returned to China from Japan, in 1918, in a lectured entitled “Methods of Reforming Chinese Painting” he proclaimed that ‘The decline of Chinese painting has reached its nadir. A civilisation should never go backward. But Chinese painting today has gone back fifty paces from twenty years ago, five hundred paces from three hundred years ago… and a thousand from seven hundred years ago’. He believed that the Chinese artist must ‘keep what is good…change what is bad…and adopt what he can from Western painting.’

Shanghai of the 1920s and 1930s was very cosmopolitan. Looking Western was all the rage, Western looks, Western names, even Western plays and an orchestra. Shanghai became the centre for spreading Western art in China. In 1922 the Shanghai College of Fine Arts inaugurated a Department of Western Art. There were many other smaller art schools springing up, but 1926 saw the founding of the Xinhua Academy. Zhu Qizhan, one of the teachers, was an oil painter who was strongly influenced by the Post-Impressionists.

In the late 1920s artists were returning from art schools in France, mainly due to the conclusion of W.W.1 and the lure that France and French artists continued to have over young Chinese art students. The fresh artists were bent on fusing two worlds together - the Chinese world and the Parisian world. In design, distinctive Shanghai book and magazine designs came into being, born out of Art Deco and Shanghai themes. By the middle 1930s young artists, still with links to Japan, were being influenced by avant-garde conceptualisations such as the neo-fauves and the surrealists. It is from this melting pot of cultures and ideas about Eastern and

18

Ye Lingfeng: Untitled 1928

19

Cubist Shanghai Life by Zhang Guangyu

20

Luo Qingzhen Against the Current Woodblock print 1930's

writer - Lu Xun, returned to China from Japan, in 1918, in a lectured entitled “Methods of Reforming Chinese Painting” he proclaimed that ‘The decline of Chinese painting has reached its nadir. A civilisation should never go backward. But Chinese painting today has gone back fifty paces from twenty years ago, five hundred paces from three hundred years ago… and a thousand from seven hundred years ago’. He believed that the Chinese artist must ‘keep what is good…change what is bad…and adopt what he can from Western painting.’

Shanghai of the 1920s and 1930s was very cosmopolitan. Looking Western was all the rage, Western looks, Western names, even Western plays and an orchestra. Shanghai became the centre for spreading Western art in China. In 1922 the Shanghai College of Fine Arts inaugurated a Department of Western Art. There were many other smaller art schools springing up, but 1926 saw the founding of the Xinhua Academy. Zhu Qizhan, one of the teachers, was an oil painter who was strongly influenced by the Post-Impressionists.

In the late 1920s artists were returning from art schools in France, mainly due to the conclusion of W.W.1 and the lure that France and French artists continued to have over young Chinese art students. The fresh artists were bent on fusing two worlds together - the Chinese world and the Parisian world. In design, distinctive Shanghai book and magazine designs came into being, born out of Art Deco and Shanghai themes. By the middle 1930s young artists, still with links to Japan, were being influenced by avantgarde conceptualisations such as the neo-fauves and the surrealists.

It is from this melting pot of cultures and ideas about Eastern and Western art, that many Chinese immigrants to Singapore and Penang, came.

21

China roars Li Hua 1935

22

Woodblock print.Hu Yichuan.1930's

23

Xia Peng fourth class car 1931

24

Xia Peng street sweepers 1931

25

Lim Hak Tai Shipyard 1953

Immigrant Art

Nanyang (South Seas) is a distinctive region, named by Chinese, and exists in what others call South East Asia. The name Nanyang was applied to many businesses in Singapore, and it comes as no surprise that it should be chosen to head up a school of art there too.

For many decades from the 1800s to the 1900s, Singapore had been a magnet for Chinese migration. All manner of trades people, educated and less educated people had washed up on the shores of that small island. It should not be a surprise that many Chinese artists, or those having a liking for the arts, found their ways to Singapore to blend into a culture rapidly becoming multi-racial and multi-cultural diaspora.

It is believed that one of the earliest art training establishments in Singapore, was the Su Bin Ting Art Centre, began in 1906 by photographer Su Binting. Many other art training establishments sprang up, such as the Overseas Chinese Art Academy (Hua Qiao Art Academy), founded by Chen Bingzhen in 1922, followed by Lin Youfei’s Mei Gui Arts Academy in 1929 and the Nan Xing Specialised School for the Arts in 1931. From between 1937 and 1938, there were Lin Junde’s Bai Lu Art Academy, Jiang Xiuhua’s Xi Nan Art Academy, Deng Siyi and Chen Daju’s Xi Hu Art Academy, and Lin Xueda’s Nanyang Specialised School of Art. Following on from previous Singaporean ideas, and literary movements, concerned with "Nan-yang se-ts'ai," (South Seas colour), Lim Hak Tai, along with businessman Tan See Siang, founded the Nanyang Fine Arts College in Singapore, 1938.

Lim Hak Tai was born in Xiamen, Fujian Province, China in May 1893. He had graduated from the Provincial Art Teacher's Training College in Fuzhou, China (1915) and taught at the Siming High

26

Lim Hak Tai

Tongkangs on the Singapore River, c 1930s

School and Jimei Teachers Training College before co-founding the Xiamen Academy of Fine Arts in 1923. In 1936, Lim Hak Tai taught at The Chinese High School, in Singapore, before founding the now famous Nanyang Fine Arts College (later Academy). At first the new Nanyang College of Fine Arts (Nan-yang Yi-shu Yuan) had only fourteen students and three part-time lecturers, they were Kao Fei Tse, Chang Ming Tse and Qiu Ying Kui. By 1940, and the outbreak of war again, the Academy had moved premises and had attracted fifty students, and a staff of twelve. The Japanese occupation of Singapore closed the Academy, from 1942 until 1945, but it was a start.

Nanyang Academy of Fine Art at St Thomas Walk campus in 1949

Lim Hal Tai Inner Beauty (1954)

27

"I do not think we should indis predecessors left behind. Rathe integrating the essence of art of th and taking from the aspects that a (South Seas) region." (from Lim Hak 195

28

scriminately discard all that our er I am all for a flexible way of he masters, Oriental and Western, are most suitable for the Nanyang k Tai, Art of the Young Malaysians, 55).

29

Nanyang Academy at St. Thomas Walk Lim Hak Tai 1949

Nanyang Returning after the Japanese occupation, there were a lesser number of schools of art in Singapore. Some believe that the Nanyang Academy might have been the only surviving school of art postwar. Founder of the Nanyang Fine Art Academy, in Singapore, Lim Hak Tai, eventually put together an unbeatable team of artist/ lecturers which, over time, was to include Tchang Ju Chi, Yong Mun Sen, Chen Wen His, Cheong Soo Pieng, Huang Pao Fang, See Hiang To, Chen Chong Swee, Georgette Li Ying Chen and the Academy’s close associate Liu Kang . Lim Hak Tai died in 1963 (aged 70).

Lim Hak Tai had been trained (in China) in traditional ink brush painting, as well as watercolour, calligraphy and Western oil painting. In his oil painting Lim Hak Tai had been heavily influenced by the Post-Impressionist works (Inner Beauty, 1954) and by Expressionism and Cubism/Futurism as seen in Composition (1953) his 1955 paintings Riot and Construction on Site of a Shipyard at Tanjong Rhu. While the Academy still struggled, during the 1950s there came an event which, according to many art historians, changed the entire nature of how we conceive Singaporean/Malaysian art.

Lim Hak Tai, Riot 1955

30

Flowers Lim Hak Tai 1935

Bamboo Rock Lim Hak Tai 1950

Composition Lim Hak Tai 1955

31

Naively Questing the Naive From 1912 onwards there was a lot of ‘artistic’ interest in the island of Bali, Indonesia. Western photographers such as Dr Gregor Krause and Arthur de Carvalho were flocking to Java, and especially Bali, to capture, perhaps, the last paradise with half-dressed women.

Avant-garde artists such as German Walter Spies had settled in Bali since 1927, when he was reputed to say “I shall move into my little bamboo hut here in the lovely, lonely Ubud, and soon be lost to the world”.

The Dutchman Rudolf Bonnet had already discovered the rare beauties of Bali, in 1929, while Belgium painter and photographer Adrien Jean Le Mayeur de Merpres had followed Gauguin’s route to French Polynesia, and to Tahiti, but finding it in decline, visited India and Cambodia. Finally he landed in Bali, 1933, and exhibited his paintings of Bali in Singapore in the same year, again in 1937 and 1941. In 1951, the Belgium’s house and museum on Bali were featured in the National Geographic magazine.

In the early 1930s Dutch painter A.E.Herrmann was active in Bali, painting local women, and in 1931 José Miguel Covarrubias Duclaud, the Mexican painter arrived in Bali. And returned in 1933, later (1937) he produced the book Island of Bali featuring his own sketches and his wife Rosa’s photographs. While in 1933, a travel book by Eva Yates (Bali: Enchanted Isle) describes Bali thus; ‘“A modest woman has nothing to hide” is the theory of Bali. The first few days you are on the island, your eyes nearly pop out at the sight of so many “Eves” - but after a few days of seeing these bronzed natives, busy about their living, entirely unconscious of their bared beautiful breasts, you no longer notice them. Their dark skin seems like a garment.’ Also in 1933 there was the Edouard de Keyser novel: L'île des seins Nus (The Island of Bare breasts).

32

Rosa Covarrubias with two Balinese girls by Miguel Covarrubias

Walter Spies with Balinese by Rosa Covarrubias

33

Island of Bali, by Miguel and Rose Covarrubias, 1938

34

1936 cover, titled “Bali Beauty,”

by Miguel Covarrubias

35

Bali and Lombok written and illustrated by W. O. J. Nieuwenkamp 1910

Nieuwenkamp "played a critical role in creating the myth of Bali, most importantly through his support of the German doctor and amateur photographer, Gregor Krauser. Together they held the first exhibition of Balinese Art in Amsterdam in 1918, with Krauser's photos and Nieuwenkamp's drawings.

It is Krauser's later book which brought many later artists to Bali source wikipedia

36

37

Sumatra Java Bali K T Satake 1935

Ben Lenhoff’s Bal Bali resuarant, Chicago, USA, early 1950s Bali Folk Country Dance Festivals temple Gregor Krause 1918-1945

Club Bali opened in 1943, Washinton USA

38

Bali Enchanted Isle Helen Eve Yates 1933

Legong Dance of the Virgins, Dutch version, Paramount Film, 1935

39

See Bali. 1938. Designed by E. Korver

40

1930s Netherland Indian State Railway poster promoting travel to Java and Bali.

Legong by Milestone Films, USA, 1935

Life Magazine January 1940

Honeymoon in Bali, 1939

41

1952

42

43

Walter Spies

Iseh in the morning light Walter Spies 1938

44

Jungle scene Walter Spies

45

River landscape Walter Spies

46

The ladscape and her children Walter Spies

47

Rudolf Bonnet

48

Ni najas by R.Bonnet 1950

Ni Radji by R.Bonnet 1954

"Wanita Bali menabur bunga"

by R.Bonnet 1952

Rudolf Bonnet, undated

49

R Bonnet 1933

R Bonnet 1941

50

Ploughing with Water Buffalo R Bonnet, undated

51

Adrien Jean Le Mayeur de Merpres

Balinese Woman at her Window Le Mayeur

Le Mayuer painting

52

Two Balinese Women Le Mayuer

53

54

Two women at the balcony Le Mayuer

55

56

Ladies with Parasol Le Mayuer

57

Theo Meier

Reclining Nude Theo Meier 1933

58

Girl by Theo Meier

59

Romantic Reed Theo Meier

60

Young Dancer Theo Maier 1970

Balinese girls with offerings Theo Meier

A Balinese beauty Theo Meier 1953

Balinese Legong Dancing Theo Meier

In 1936, the Swiss painter Theo Meier, who had studied under Otto Dix in Germany, also sampled the delights of Tahiti by following the Gauguin trail, and eventually landed in Bali then wrote; “When I arrived in Tahiti, I was very disappointed that the culture I had dreamed about no longer existed there, but I did observe the components that Gauguin had used to build up his beautiful paintings. He showed me tropical Nature, and this influenced me so enormously that I began looking for a place where perhaps more culture had survived, but in the same natural setting. That place was Bali. There I was shaped, and became what I am today.” And in 1940 Willem Gerard Hofker and his wife settled in Ubud, where he painted numerous romanticised and exoticised images of local women.

While the film South Pacific, and the song Bali Ha’i (Rogers and Hammerstein), were not to be made until 1958, during the 1950s Bali was beginning to be as tourist friendly as the Tahiti Gauguin had complained about. According to Singapore’s The Straits Times (6th June, 1952) Bob Hope and Bing Crosby’s all singing, all dancing romanticised American comedy film; Road to Bali (Paramount,1952) was being seen in cinemas across the world. It was a continuance of the ‘Road’ series of films sometimes featuring Dorothy Lamour, sometimes not, but this one was the only film in the series in Technicolor. Previously (1939), Fred MacMurray had seduced Madeleine Carroll in another American film - Honeymoon in Bali. The romantically orientalist inclined Westerners had ‘discovered’ Bali, overlaid that simple society with their own romantic notions of ‘Paradise’ and ‘Eden’. Then it was time for four Singaporean Chinese immigrants to do the very same.

Offering to The Sea God Theo Meier

61

Willem Gerard Hofker

W G Hofker 1943

62

Dressing for the Feast WG Hofker

63

Balinese Lady W G Hofker

64

Gusti Kampyang dalam Pesta Pura W G Hofker

65

That Trip to

Bali

66

Liu Kang

Four Chinese men on an island In 1952, perhaps fuelled by some of the above, romantically exotic/ erotic notions of a final paradise, four Chinese male artists from Singapore - three teachers from the Nanyang Academy and one associate, made the now art historical three week trip to Bali. There is little doubt that those four artists, Liu Kang (President of the Society of Chinese Artists of Singapore), Chen Chong Swee, Chen Wen Hsi and Cheong Soo Pieng had expected a gentile utopia.

Chen Chong Swee

Many years later (1979) art historians Redza Piyadasa and T.K. Sabapathy coined the term ‘Nanyang Style’ and intimated that it had developed because of that notable trip to Bali. According to T.K.Sabapathy (1986) “The choice of Bali is significant. As if in response to Lim Hak Tai’s suggestions, these artists sought the one context in Southeast Asia in which art and life appeared to be inextricably meshed and which also promised the extension of pictorial motifs and subject matter.”

Chen Wen Hsi

Cheong Soo Pieng

It must be noted, however, that Singapore’s jungle clad sister Malaya, was enduring a civil strife at the time, named by British colonisers as ‘The Emergency’, after a series of murders of British plantation managers in 1948, and the assassination of the High Commissioner Henry Gurney in 1951. The Emergency effectively lasted until 1960. Whereas Singapore had just recovered from its own (1950) (Maria Hertogh) religious riot. The siren call of a painter’s paradise must have been very strong in Singapore, in 1952.

Those four Chinese artist friends, three from the Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, and one their friend and supporter quested for a ‘Modernist’ style to incorporate their Eastern heritage, Western painting methods and ideas about painting and the equatorial lands they all had migrated to. They were…..

67

“I went to Bali on a sketching trip, scenery and by the Balinese women are the ideal subject for me, and I m modern in feeling and to my own lik sel

68

, and there I was fascinated by the n. I discovered that Balinese women made a good number of paintings, king many of which I do not wish to ll�.

Cheong Soo Pieng

69

2004 Singapore Post released a set of 20 stamps featuring artworks from Liu Kang

Liu Kang Liu Kang was born in 1911, Yongchun county,Fujian, China, and followed his father to Muar, in Malaya, at the age of six. He later studied at the Shanghai College of Fine Arts, Shanghai, from 1926 to 1928 and from 1928 to 1933 in Paris, where he favoured works

by Degas, Cezanne, Matisse, Gauguin and van Gogh. In Paris Lui Kang painted Farmer’s House (1930) a study with van Gogh stylisation, then Breakfast (1932), seemingly a study after van Gogh. After Paris, Liu Kang taught in the Xin Hua Arts Academy for five years in the Western Art Department, the war with Japan forced him to return to Muar in 1937, until he settled in Singapore, in 1942. During the war years Liu Kang was not still, he spent his time sketching and, in 1944, produced a volume of his works called Chop Suey cataloguing atrocities by the Japanese in Malaya. In the 1949 he used pastels to render a portrait of a Muslim man with a white beard. It was masterful, but bore little relationship to the works he was to complete. His later ‘utopian’ (1950s) works are a stark contrast to the Chop Suey sketches, appearing influenced by both Renoir and Gauguin. 1952, using black outlines for his figures, Liu Kang presented After the Fire, the aftermath of one of the many fires in Singapore at that time. In a 1953, post Bali trip, there is an image of a Balinese dancer, outlined in black , she is stylised and clothed. Balinese Girl in Sarong, was painted in the same year. By 1954, Liu Kang had stylised his work even more, with even more distinctive outlines in a Gauguin fashion, with flatter, more vibrant colours.

Offerings Liu Kang 1957

70

Souri Liu Kang 1953

71

Siesta In Bali (Liu Kang 1957

Siesta in Bali sketch Liu Kang 1952

72

Artist and Model Liu Kang 1954

Adjusting the Waistband Liu Kang 1997

73

Balinese Woman Chen Chong Swee 1952

74

Market Chen Chong Swee

Fruit Market Chen Chong Swee 1986

Chen Chong Swee Chen Chong Swee was born in Chenghai County, Guangdong Province, China in 1910. 1929 he studied fine art in the Union High School in Shantou (Swatow). In 1931 he studied in Xinhua Arts Academy in Shanghai. 1932, Chen Chong Swee migrated to Penang, teaching art in Chinese schools in Malacca and Penang. In 1934 he moved to Singapore. In 1951 Chen Chong Swee became the head of Chinese Painting Department at the Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, and taught there until 1975.

Specialising in watercolour and ink brush painting,Chen Chong Swee was one of the first of local artists to capture local (Singaporean/Malaysian) scenery and figures, with ink brush painting techniques. It is believed that the 1952 painting Dancing Lesson (in his familiar line and wash technique) was painted during the Bali trip. The artist captured the vividness of the dancers’ costumes while washing out the background. Chen Chong Swee’s works include Offering, Market, Fishermen and Satay Stall, many of which are undated. Coffee Shop is dated 1953, and Drying Fish,1961. Kashmiri was painted in 1971. 1971 Chen Chong Swee produced the frieze Pounding Rice, which is a stunning example of Chinese ink brush painting adapted to equatorial subject matter, and giving an impressive representation of local life, and River Bank, an examples of the painter’s plein-air watercolour realism.

We will come to the different approaches to a Nanyang style later.

The final, last but not least, of the four artists engaging on that fateful Bali trip was .......Chen Wen Hsi.

75

Pounding Rice Chen Chong Swee.Year 1971

76

77

Gibbons Chen Wen Hsi between 1980 and 1989

Chen Wen Hsi Chen Wen Hsi was born in Baigong Village, Guangdong, China, in 1906. He graduated from the Xinhua Academy of Fine Arts, in Shanghai, and it was there that he had befriended Chen Chong Swee and Liu Kang. Chen Wen Hsi lectured in the South China College, Shantou, China, between 1946 to 1947 and, later (1948) settled in Singapore to teach at the Nanyang Academy (1951 to 1959) Chen Wen Hsi has the privilege to have painted one of the largest artworks that Sotheby’s in Hong Kong has had the pleasure of auctioning, and that is Pasar (Market) painted somewhere in the 1950s. It stretches to 130 by 104.5 centimetres, and is very evocative, densely coloured, tropical abstract in a Cubist/Modernist style. Chen Wen His was adept in oils, pastels and in (Chinese) ink brush painting. His image Two Gibbons Amidst Vines (ink on paper, 1970s) was chosen to be on the rear of the Singaporean S$50 banknote.

He continued to experiment with an early Cubist style, perhaps inspired more by the lengthy angular lines of Picasso’s Les Demoiselles d’Avignon (1907), than his later Cubist works.

In 1990, Chen Wen Hsi returned to his ‘angular cubism’ with a stunningly original work entitled Herons, all the more unusual as it was painted with Chinese ink on paper, different from his oil paintings Still Life (1960) and Grazing (1965).

Gibbons looking for fish Chen Wen Hsi

78

The Couple Chen Wen Hsi 1950s

Bali Sketch 1 Chen Wen Hsi

Bali Sketch 2 Chen Wen Hsi

79

Balinese Dancers Chen Wen Hsi 1960s

80

Indian Children Chen Wen Hsi 1950s

81

Malay Life Cheong Soo Pieng 1981

82

Balinese Girl Cheong Soo Pieng 1952

Balinese Girls with Offerings Cheong Soo Pieng 1957

Cheong Soo Pieng Cheong Soo Pieng was born in China, 1917 and had taught at the Nanyang Academy from 1947 to 1961. He had been trained at the Xiamen Academy of Fine Art, in Shanghai between 1933 and 1935, and then the Sin Hwa Fine Art Academy (Shanghai), which was destroyed in 1938.

During the 1950s as he was formulating his style, Cheong’s paintings wavered between different approaches to Post-impressionism, from the more emotive near abstract of Seaside (1951), which to some might seem influenced by Dali, with a towel hanging like a like watch, to Iban Girls (1953) which reflects a distinctive van Gogh and Gauguin influence, both in style and in coloration of his two seated subjects, one green one red. Brook (1953) could almost have been painted by Lim Hak Tai, and has that near Cubist feel. Indian Temple (1956) had all the energy of a van Gogh or Gauguin, but with more subdued coloration; mixed cool blues throwing forward a range of warm colours. The following year (1957) his palette is almost entirely warm, emotive, colours in his Balinese Girls with Offerings. It is believed that Cheong Soo Pieng had created over 300 sketches during the Bali trip.

Two women with baskets on their heads Chen Soo Pieng 1976

Weaver Cheong Soo Pieng 1981

83

In the Village Cheong Soo Pieng 1980

84

Two Sisters Cheong Soo Pieng 1980

85

Four Chinese men go for a three week plus trip, to an island famed for women, pastorale landscapes and a culture both slowed by time but also highly advertised, written about and publicised through films, paintings, photographs and books. Perhaps there was more to the ‘gaze’ of those artists than knowing how to sketch.

The fact that the four artists stayed over in the Belgium painter Adrien Jean Le Mayeur de Merpres’ house, met Le Mayeur whose style of paintings were heavily featuring the female bounty of the island at that time, including that of his wife, the Balinese dancer Ni Pollok, surely had some influence over the four men’s style and subject matter.

86

Ergo, Nanyang Style Tan Tee Chie (Senior Lecturer of Nanyang Academy of Fine Art), in 1985 wrote; Chong Cheng San

“…the aesthetic concern of the Nanyang Style was to represent the essence of the Nanyang spirit in both its ideological and physical manifestations. The art served as a bridge between tradition and ethnicity, as well as between local customs and the natural environment.”

However, writing in 1991, Founding Principal of the Malaysian Institute of Art, Chong Cheng Sun intimated that; “The Nanyang Style in its Western art form was characterised by the representation of local subject matter in the manner of School of Paris, with the infusion of the Balinese figurative form. The Nanyang Style in its ink painting form, on the other hand, was characterised by the representation of local subject matter in the manner of the Shanghai School with plein-air drawing and calligraphic elements, and sometimes incorporating Western compositional elements.”

Dr Chean Tien Soong

There is much debate over what is, what was, and what should be a Nanyang Style. The significance of that 1952 Bali trip, in regard to the creation, or continuance of what has been termed the Nanyang Style only muddies the water. Western and Eastern styles were brought from China and from Paris, either via China or directly

by Chinese immigrants into Singapore. Artists before and after the Second World War had incorporated elements of local scenery, objects people etc into their works. Therefore were Redza Piyadasa and T.K. Sabapathy correct in nominating that 1952 Bali trip as the catalyst for a proposed Nanyang Style, or is it simply, like Roger Fry coming up with the term Post-Impressionism, a handy peg to put a hat on, and little more than that. I have no intention of answering these questions.

87

Lai foong moi indian curry 1959

Self Portrait Georgette Chen 1936

The Nanyang Academy of Fine Art has changed since the days of the first artist immigrants into Singapore and Malaya. Art has moved on in most quarters. Whether ‘Nanyang Style’ referred to those early artist settlers, their artworks, or the region they were creating in, is all a matter of history and sublime conjecture.

Should we, for instance, include all those Western artists, living on Bali, as Nanyang Style artists, or is that a privilege only for those Chinese immigrants. And what of successive generations of students leaving the Nanyang Academy of Fine Art. Are each of them creating in the Nanyang Style, and who gets to say?

There is little doubt that the name Nanyang style has been convenient, for some, as perhaps a branding of Singaporean/ Malaysia art, without which galleries, auction houses and writers would have to be a little more creative in their descriptions and notions about art and artists in this (the Nanyang) region. Perhaps, like a brand, ‘Nanyang Style’ has developed as a benchmark, setting the bar, as it were, for other artworks and artists to attain. Or, perhaps, it means nothing at all, just like Fry’s - Post-Modernism, or Guillaume Apollinaire’s term - Surrealism, coined on 18th May, 1917, in a programme note for the French ballet ‘Parade’.

Stylistically, Gauguin got there first. Was what followed in Singapore/Malaya simply a reenactment of Gauguin’s mixing of Eastern and Western styles in an exotic locale, and was the trip to Bali akin to Gauguin’s move to the South Pacific. Was a Nanyang Style fuelled by the same naiveté, the same desperation for paradise that urged Gauguin to leave bourgeoise society questing another Eden. Or were there other, less exotic and more erotic motives, such as those levelled at Gauguin, for that famous Bali trip. That Malaysian/Singaporean art developed in exciting directions after the Second World War, cannot be denied. So dear reader, it’s up to you to decide.

88

Koeh Sia Yong, Balineses Girl, 2006

Aw Tee Hong balinese festival 2006

Lau Moa Seng 2006

Ceremony in Bali Tew Nai Tong

89

The Nanyang genes continue, bringing new mixes of Eastern Western and Equatorial visual art before us.

Togetherness Lim Kim Hai 2003

Teachers, who were once students of the Nanyang Academy, pass their knowledge on to fresh students, and in turn they too become teachers and pass their skills on. It seems a never ending process, yet each generation is further divorced from the excitement and wonder of those first few immigrants, landing in Malaya and Singapore, their mouths agape and eyes wide open.

Fresh artists working in Malaysia and Singapore have to re-capture that wonder, that innocent gaze and those intial feelings of wonderment of seeing these tropical lands, its flora and fauna,that had captured those first artists and, in turn, create fresh wonders for succeeding generations.

River Crossing, Khoo Sui Hoe 2010

90

Angkor Yeo Eng Hin 2013

Loo Foh Sang 2013

91

Further Reading for those interested Direct Sources Chen, Georgette. Letter dated March 9, 1954, Collection of Singapore Art Museum.

Chen, Georgette. Letter dated March 19, 1954. Collection of Singapore Art Museum.

Chen, Georgette. Letter dated April 12, 1954. Collection of Singapore Art Museum.

Chen, Georgette. Letter dated December 8, 1956. Collection of Singapore Art Museum.

Chen, Georgette. Letter dated February 19, 1963. Collection of Singapore Art Museum.

Chen, Georgette. “Some thoughts on Nanyang, Art, and the Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts”. In Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts Class of 1957, unpaginated. [Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts]. Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, 1957.

Chen, Georgette. “A Chat with the Class of 1962”. In Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, unpaginated. [Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts]. Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, 1962.

Chen, Georgette. “A Few Parting Words to the Class of 1971”. In Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts 31st Souvenir Magazine, unpaginated. [Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts]. Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, 1971.

Chen, Georgette. “Special Project (visual arts)”. Oral interview, reel no. 2. Singapore: Singapore National Archives/ Oral Heritage Center.

Chen, Zhuang, “Nanyang meizhuan wushi niandai zuopinzhan” (Nanyang Academy of Fine Art Exhibitions in the fifties), Sin Chew Jit Poh, 3 Jan, 1982.

Chow, Ee-Tan. “Different Strokes”, New Straits Times, Thursday, 17 August, 1995, p. 3.

Chuah, Ai Mee. “Learning to be an artist”, The Straits Times, 8 April, 1982, Collection of NAFA Library.

Lin Xueda. “Yishu yu shenghuo” (Art and Life). In Nanyang meishu zhuanke xuexiao fuxiao sanzhounian disanzhou biye jiniankan (Third Commemorative Magazine for the Restoration of the Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts), pp. 21-22.

[Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts], Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, 1948.

Lin Xueda. “Zhanhou nanyang meishu de wojian” (My opinion of post-war Nanyang Art). In Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts: Special Issue of Art Exhibition, unpaginated. [Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts]. Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, 1954.

Lin Xueda. “Kanshouyu” (Foreword). In The Art of Young Malayans, p. 1. Edited by [Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts].

Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, 1955.

Min, Xing. “Wanjiu nanyang meizhuan” (Saving the Academy), Nanyang Siang Pau, Thursday, 31 August, 1978.

[Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts]. Nanyang meishu zhuanke xuexiao fuban niankan (Commemorative Magazine for the Restoration of the Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts). Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, 1946.

[Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts]. Nanyang meishu zhuanke xuexiao fuxiao sanzhounian disanzhou biye jiniankan (Third Commemorative Magazine for the Restoration of the Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts). Singapore: Nanyang

92

dusun nurture yourself with

asian arts and culture emagazine Dusun is an Asian Arts and Culture e-magazine, bringing you the very best of Arts and Culture from the Asian region and by Asian writers, Poets and Artists. Dusun aims to inform and educate in the broadest sense of the term.

Dusun is entirely FREE and owes no alligences to country, party, poltitics, gallery, race, relgion or gender. If you are a ceative, then Dusun belongs to you.

93

Academy of Fine Arts, 1948.

[Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts]. First Painting Collections of The Nanyang Fine Art Academy by the Sixth Gradutes.

Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, 1951.

[Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts]. Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts: Special Issue of Art Exhibition. Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, 1954.

[Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts]. The Art of Young Malayans. Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, 1955.

[Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts]. Nanyang meishu zhuanke xuexiao biye banji niankan (Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts Graduation Catalogue). Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, 1962.

[Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts]. Nanyang meishu zhuanke xuexiao biye banji niankan (Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts Graduation Catalogue). Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, 1965.

[Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts]. Nanyang meishu zhuanke xuexiao biye banji niankan (Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts Graduation Catalogue). Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, 1976.

[Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts]. Nanyang meishu zhuanke xuexiao biye banji niankan (Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts Graduation Catalogue). Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, 1977.

[Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts]. Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts: 40th Anniversary Souvenir Magazine. Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, 1977.

[Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts]. Nanyang meishu zhuanke xuexiao biye banji niankan (Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts Graduation Catalogue). Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, 1979.

[Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts]. Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts 41st Graduation. Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, 1981.

[Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts]. Directory of NAFA Alumni. Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, 1998.

[Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts]. Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts: 60th Anniversary. Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, 1998.

[Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts]. Soaring to New Borders. Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, 2003.

[Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts Alumni Association]. Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts Alumni Association Opening Ceremony Exhibition. Collection of NAFA Library.

[Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts Alumni Association]. Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts Alumni Exhibition 80. Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts Alumni Association, 1980.

[Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts Alumni Association]. Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts Alumni Exhibition 81. Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts Alumni Association, 1981.

[Nanyang Siang Pau]. “Meishujia duoren zhushemeishu xuexiao: jingpin Gao Peize deng wei jiaoshou” (A number of artists have formed an art school, and are now hiring Gao Peize as professor.), Nanyang Siang Pau, Thursday, 10 Feb,

94

(morning edition), 1938, p. 8.

[Nanyang Siang Pau]. “Nanyang meishu zhuanke xuexiao zhaokao nannusheng guanggao” (Advertisement for student admission into the Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts), Nanyang Siang Pau, Saturday, 26 Feb, (morning edition), 1938, p.

16.

[Nanyang Siang Pau]. “Dangdi meishuie renshi chuangban nanyang meishu zhuanke xuexiao – xiaozhi shefang yalonglu yiliuchi hao” (Establishment of an art academy by local artists – school address is located at No. 167 Geylang Rd), Nanyang Siang Pau, Wednesday, 2 Mar, (evening edition), 1938, p. 16.

[Nanyang Siang Pau]. “Nanyang meishu zhuanmen xuexiao juxing shouzhou biyeli” Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts organizes its first graduation ceremony), Nanyang Siang Pau, Friday, (morning edition), 21 June, 1940, p. 7.

[Nanyang Siang Pau]. “Meizhuan xuexiao: benqi jiaozhiyan” (Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts: List of Teachers), Nanyang Siang Pau, Wednesday, (morning edition), 31 July, 1940, p. 8.

[Nanyang Siang Pau]. “Nanyang meishu zhuanke xuexiao biyedianli zhisheng” (Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts Graduation Ceremony), Nanyang Siang Pau, (morning edition), 17 Dec, 1940, p. 7.

[Nanyang Siang Pau]. “You nanyang meizhuan de kunnan suoqi” (Speaking of the woes of the Academy), Nanyang Siang Pau, Friday, 25 August, 1978.

[Nanyang Siang Pau]. “Jianpai zhongsiaoxue meishu jiaoshi dao nanyang meizhuan jingxiu meishu” (School teachers go to the Academy to learn about art), Nanyang Siang Pau, 30 November, 1980.

[New Nation]. “Art teachers go back to school”, New Nation, Wednesday, 15 July, 1981.

[New Straits Times]. “School that’s commercial at art...”. New Straits Times, 18 June, 1981.

[Sin Chew Jit Poh]. “Huaren meishu yanjiuhui mingri huanying zhengke – jue zhukai ban meizhuan xuexiao qi caoweiyuan hui” (The Society of Chinese Artists holds a welcome session tomorrow with the decision to start a committee for the formation of an art school), Sin Chew Jit Poh, Thursday, 23 December, (morning edition), 1937, p. 7.

[Sin Chew Jit Poh]. “Huaren meishu yanjiuhui xinjiao huiyan minjiao huiyan mingri lianhuan: meizhuan xuexiao zhengzai jihua zhong” (The Society of Chinese Artists will be holding a meeting tomorrow for new members; the planning for an art school is currently underway), Sin Chew Jit Poh, Thursday, (evening edition), 13 January, 1938, p. 3.

[Sin Chew Jit Poh]. “Meishu xuexiao xiaozhi zhuding” (Confirmation of the art school’s address), Sin Chew Jit Poh, Thursday, 10 February, (morning edition), 1938, p. 10.

[Sin Chew Jit Poh]. “Education Section”, Sin Chew Jit Poh, Tuesday, 17 June, (morning edition), 1941, p. 11.

[Sin Chew Jit Poh]. “Sishi ming zhongxue meishu jiaoshi zhai nanyang meizhuan shangke”(Forty art teachers attend classes at the Academy), Sin Chew Jit Poh, Wednesday, 15 July.

[Straits Times]. “Academy plans to offer two new subjects”, Straits Times, 28 February, 1981.

[The Singapore Artist]. “Singapore Art Society News”, The Singapore Artist 1(December 1954): 2, 40.

95

[The Singapore Artist]. “ Singapore Wakes up”, The Singapore Artist 1(March 1955): 2, 50.

Wu, Zhongda. “Meizhuan shenghuo de yixie huiyi” (Some memories of Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts). In Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts: 60th Anniversary, pp. 107- 109. [Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts]. Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, 1998.

Zhuang, Zi. “Nanyang meishu zhifu Lin Xueda” (Father of Nanyang Art: Lin Xueda). In Nanayng meishu zhifu Lin Xueda, unpaginated. [MIA, NAFA, KLCA, NAFA Alumni, and Nanyang Siang Pau]. Singapore & Kuala Lumpur: MIA, NAFA, KLCA, NAFA Alumni, and Nanyang Siang Pau, 1991.

Indirect Sources........

Andrews, Julian F. Andrews. “A Century in Crisis: Tradition and Modernity in the Art of Twentieth-Century China”. In A Century in Crisis: Modernity and Tradition in the Art of Twentieth-century China, pp. 2-9. Edited by Julia F. Andrews & Shen Kuiyi. New York: The Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation, 1998.

Andrews, Julia F. & Shen Kuiyi. A Century in Crisis: Modernity and Tradition in the Art of Twentieth-century China.

New York: The Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation, 1998.

[Art Corridor]. “‘Pearls’ of the Orient: Art Development in Penang and its’ Pioneers”, Art Corridor 3(2001): 6-13.

[Art Corridor]. “The Nanyang Inspiration”, Art Corridor 1(2001): 12-15.

[ASEAN Committee on Culture and Information]. Visual Arts in ASEAN: Continuity & Change. Kuala Lumpur: ASEAN Committee on Culture & Information, 2001.

Au Yeung, Hing Yee. Beihong zhai xingzhou (Beihong in Singapore). Singapore: Yishu Studio, 1999.

[Art Department of the Culture Ministry of the People’s Republic of China & Chinese Oil Painting Society]. Chinese Oil Painting in the 20th Century. vol. I – 1. Beijing: Beijing Publishing House, 1999.

Beamish, Tony. The Arts of Malaya. Singapore: Donald Moore, 1954.

Chang, Tsong-Zung. “Art of the Progressive Intellectual”. In Quotation Marks: Chinese Contemporary Painting, pp. 1217. [Singapore Art Museum]. Singapore: Singapore Art Museum, 1997.

Chen Jiazi. “Xu Beihong in Nanyang”. In Sojourn in Nanyang: Works by Xu Beihong, pp. 17-19. [Asian Civilisations Museum]. Singapore: National Heritage Board & Asian Civilisations Museum, 1998.

Chen, Jiazi. “Realism and the Guohua Revolution”. In 20th Century Chinese Paintings in Singapore Collections, pp.

12-19. [Singapore Art Museum]. Singapore: Singapore Art Museum, 2003.

Chen, Shenggui. “Lin Xueda fuzi dui woguo meishu shiye de gongxian” (Their contribution to our country’s art scene – Lin Xueda and his son), Singapore Arts 7(1977): 6-7.

Chen, Zhen Xia. “You huaqiao de senghuo shuodao nanyang meizhuan de fuban” (Discussing the life of an Overseas

96

Chinese and the restoration of the Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts). In Nanyang meishu zhuanke xuexiao fuban niankan (Commemorative Magazine for the Restoration of the Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts), unpaginated. [Nayang Academy of Fine Arts]. Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, 1946.

Cheng, Siok Hwa. “Economic change and industrialization”. In A History of Singapore, pp. 182 – 215. Edited by Ernest C. T. Chew and Edwin Lee. Singapore, Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.

Cheo, Chai-Hiang. “Current Issues’ in Singaporean Art”, Artlink 13(nos. 3 & 4): 123- 125.

Chi, Ching I. “Nanyang Artists in Paris, 1925 – 1970”. In Pont des Arts: Nanyang Artists in Paris 1925 – 1970, pp. 14-15.

[Singapore Art Museum]. Singapore: Singapore Art Museum, 1994.

Chi, Ching I. “A Brief History of NAFA”. In Nanyang yishu xueyuan liushi zhounianji (Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts: 60th Anniversary), pp. 19 – 34. [Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts]. Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, 1998.

Chia, Jane. Georgette Chen. Singapore: National Heritage Board & Singapore Art Museum, 1997.

Chia, Jane. “Georgette Chen (1906-1993): A pioneer artist”, Feminist Studies, 25(Fall 1999), p. 671.

Chu, Christina, “The Lingnan School and its Followers: Radical Innovation in Southern China”. In A Century in Crisis: Modernity and Tradition in the Art of Twentieth-century China, pp. 64-79. Edited by Julia F. Andrews & Shen Kuiyi.

New York: The Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation. 1998.

Chua, Ek Kay. The emergence of the Nanyang Style and its role in the regionalism of ASEAN countries. Nepean: University of Western Sydney, 1995.

Chung, Chen Sun. “Towards the research on Nanyang Art”. In Paintings of Chung Chen Sun, pp. 271-275. Edited by Chung Yi. Kuala Lumpur: Chung Chen Sun, 1995.

Chung, Yi. Paintings of Chung Chen Sun. Kuala Lumpur: Chung Chen Sun, 1995.

Clunas, Craig. Art in China. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.

Drysdale, John. Singapore: Struggle for Excellence. Singapore & Kuala Lumpur: Times Books International, 1984.

[Empress Place Museum & Beurs/World Trade Cener]. Modern Art travels East-West. Singapore & Rotterdam: Empress Place Museum & Beurs/World Trade Cener, 1990.

Fan, Laura. “Controversy and Change: Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Century Landscape Paintings in Indonesia and Malaysia”. In Visions & Enchantments: Southeast Asian Paintings, pp. 22-27. [Singapore Art Museum & Christie’s Singapore]. Singapore: Singapore Art Museum & Christie’s Singapore, 2000.

Fong, We C. Between Two Cultures: Late Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Chinese Paintings from the Robert H. Ellsworth Collection in The Metropolitan Museum of Art 2001 Forman, L. L. “The illustrations to William Hunter’s ‘Plants of Prince of Wales Island”, Kew Bulletin 44(March 1989):151-161.

Gao Minglu. “Toward a Transnational Modernity: An Overview of Inside Out: New Chinese Art”. In Inside Out: New

97

Chinese Art, pp. 15-40. Edited by Gao Minglu. New York: San Francisco Museum of Modern Art and Asia Society Galleries, 1999.

Gowans, Alan. “Art Schools Abroad”, Art Journal, 1969: 209-210.

Gumpert, Lynn. “A Global City for the Arts?”, Art in America, 85, 12(December 1997): 41-47.

Hsu, Marco. Nanyang zhi mei (The Beauty of Nanyang). (1st ed.). Singapore: Nanyang Press Publishing, 1950.

Hsu, Marco. “Malaiya huapai yu chuangzhao” (The School of Malayan Art and its formation). In The Art of Young Malayans, p. 7. [Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts]. Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, 1955.

Hsu, Marco. Nanyang zhi mei (The Beauty of Nanyang). (2nd ed.). Singapore: Qing Nian Publishing, 1959.

Hsu, Marco. A Brief History of Malayan Art. Singapore: Millennium Books, 1999.

Huang Baofang. “Dui nanyang meizhuan ji Lin Xueda de yixie huiyi” (Reminiscences of the Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts and Line Xueda). In Nanyang meishu zhi fu Lin Xueda (Father of Nanyang Art: Lin Xueda), unpaginated. [MIA, NAFA, KLCA, NAFA Alumni and Nanyang Siang Pau], Malaysia: Malaysia Institute of the Arts Eastern Arts Research Centre, 1991.

Huang Congxi. “Nanyang meizhuan yu meishu fengge” (The Academy and art style). In Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts Alumni Exhibition 81, unpaginated. [Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts]. Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, 1981.

Huang, Huoruo. “Sojourn in Nanyang: Works by Xu Beihong”. In Sojourn in Nanyang: Works by Xu Beihong. [National Heritage Board & Asian Civilisations Museum], pp. 11-13. Singapore: National Heritage Board & Asian Civilisations Museum, 1998.

Huang, Shulin. “Sishi nianlai meizhuan” (Forty years of the Academy), Singapore Arts 7(1977): 8-9.

“Jimei xuexiao”. In Encyclopedia of Chinese Overseas: Volume of Education, Science & Technology. Beijing: Chinese Overseas Publishing House, 1999, pp. 117 – 118.

Kao, Mayching. “Reforms in Education and the Beginning of the Western-Style Painting Movement in China”. Kenley, David L. New Culture in a New World: The May Fourth Movement and the Chinese Diaspora in China. New York & London: Routledge.

Koay, Susie. “Singapore: Multi-cultural Crossroads”. In Visual Arts in ASEAN: Continuity & Change, pp. 161-200.

[ASEAN Committee on Culture and Information]. Kuala Lumpur: ASEAN Committee on Culture & Information, 2001.

Koh, Wee Khian. “Penang Art Society – A Historical Report”. In Penang Art Society: 50th Anniversary, pp. 18-25.

[Penang Art Society]. Penang: Penang Art Society, 2003.

Ku Xingseng. “Yinyu yitan sishinian de Chen Zongrui xiansheng” (Forty years of art – Chen Zongrui), Singapore Arts, 10(1978): 12-16.

98

Kwok, Kian Chow. “Notes on Nanyang Style/Regionalism for Discussion”. Singapore: Collection of the Singapore Art Museum, 30th August, 1994.

Kwok, Kian Chow and Chua Ek Kay. “A Perspective on the Development of Ink Painting in Singapore”. In Journey of Ink, p. 18. [National Museum Art Gallery], Singapore: National Museum Art Gallery, 1993.

La Plante, John D. Asian Art. Massachusetts: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1992.

Li, Chu-Tsing. Trends in Modern Chinese Painting. Zurich: Artibus Asiae, 1979.

Lim, Karen. “Serenity, Calmness and a place of solitude...Insights to the artist Lai Foong Moi”. In Imprints on Singapore Art: works of 40 artists, pp. 21-27. [Singapore Art Museum]. Singapore: Singapore Art Museum, 1998.

Lim, Yew Kuan. NUS-Errata Exhibition & Workshop Series. Lecture transcript, 7 March, 2005.

Lin, Xiang Xiong. Liu Haisu in Singapore. Singapore: Wei Hua Publishing, 1987.

Lin, Yucong. “Meizhuan sannian – wo zhui nanwang de yiduan shiguang” (Three years at the Academy – My unforgettable experience), Singapore Arts, 9(1977): 21- 22.

[Liu Hai Su Art Museum]. A Drop in the Ocean – Art Life of Liu Haisu. Shanghai: Shanghai Shiji Publishing & Shanghai Education Publishing, 2005.

Liu Kang, and Ho Ho Ying. Re-connecting: selected writings on Singapore art and art criticism. Edited by T. K. Sabapathy and Cheo Chai-Hiang. Singapore: Institute of Contemporary Arts Singapore & LaSalle-SIA, 2005.

Long, Thien-Shih. “Nanyang Style and the French Influence”. In Pont des Arts: Nanyang Artists in Paris 1925 – 1970, pp. 30-37. [Singapore Art Museum]. Singapore: Singapore Art Museum, 1994.

Long, Thien-Shih. “Youguan nanyang fengge wenti de tantao” (Concerning Nanyang Style). In Pont des Arts: Nanyang Artists in Paris 1925 – 1970, pp. 38-43. [Singapore Art Museum]. Singapore: Singapore Art Museum, 1994.

McNally, Joseph. Proposals for the Malaysian School of Fine Arts based on a Study of demographic and cultural factors.

New York: Columbia University, 1972.

[MIA, NAFA, KLCA, NAFA Alumni and Nanyang Siang Pau], Nanyang meishu zhi fu Lin Xueda (Father of Nanyang Art: Lin Xueda). Malaysia: Malaysia Institute of the Arts Eastern Arts Research Centre, 1991.

Miksic, John N. “Evolving Archaeological Perspectives on Southeast Asia, 1970 – 95”, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 26(March 1995): 46-47.

Mu, Ping. Lun yishu de sehui jiazhi (Discussing the value of Art to Society). Singapore: Wenyi Publishing, 1960.

[Muzium Seni Negara Malaysia]. Pameran retrospektif pelukis-pelukis Nanyang. Kuala Lumpur: Muzium Seni Negara Malaysia, 1979.

[National Heritage Board & Asian Civilisations Museum]. Sojourn in Nanyang: Works by Xu Beihong. Singapore: National Heritage Board & Asian Civilisations Museum, 1998.

[National Museum]. Singapore Festival of Arts 1988: the second decade/Masterpieces from private collections.

99

Singapore: Singapore National Museum, 1988.

[National Museum Art Gallery]. Journey of Ink. Singapore: National Museum Art Gallery, 1993.

[NUS Museum]. Crossroads: The Making of New Identities. Singapore: NUS Museum, 2004.

Ooi, Kok Chuen. A Comprehensive History of Malaysian Art. Penang: The Art Gallery, 2002.

[Penang Art Society]. Penang Art Society: 50th Anniversary. Penang: Penang Art Society, 2003.

Pevsner, Nikolaus. Pioneers of Modern Design. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd, 1949.

Piyadasa, Redza. “Art and role of the industrial designer”, The Sunday Times, January, 1974.

Piyadasa, Redza. “The Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts”. In Pameran retrospektif pewkis-pelukis Nanyang, pp. 24-35.

[Muzium Seni Negara Malaysia]. Kuala Lumpur: Muzium Seni Negara Malaysia, 1979.

Piyadasa, Redza. “The China ‘connection’ in the story of Modern Malaysian Art”, Art Corridor, 2(2001): 6-11.

Qiu, Xin Min. Zhihua dashi Wu Zaiyan (Master Artist Wu Zaiyan). Singapore: -, 1995.

Rawanchaikul Toshiko. “Nanyang 1950 – 62: Passage to Singaporean Art”. In Nanyang 1950 – 65: Passage to Singaporean Art, pp. 34 - 36. [Fukuoka Asian Art Museum]. Fukuoka: Fukouka Asian Art Museum, 2002.

Ronte, Dieter. “China – Contemporary Painting”, in Quotation Marks: Chinese Contemporary Paintings, pp. 18-34.

[Singapore Art Museum]. Singapore: Singapore Art Museum, 1997.

Sabapathy, T. K., “The Nanyang artists: some general remarks”. In Pameran retrospektif pewkis-pelukis Nanyang, pp.

43-48. [Muzium Seni Negara Malaysia]. Kuala Lumpur: Muzium Seni Negara Malaysia, 1979.

Sabapathy, T. K. “Pictorial Vocabulary: The Nanyang Artists - II”, The Straits Times, Monday, October 6, 1980, pp. 8-9.

Sabapathy, T. K. “Traditions and modernity: The Nanyang Artists - I”, The Straits Times, Saturday, October 4, 1980, Leisure 1.

Sabapathy, T. K. “Hak Tai points the way”, The Straits Times, Saturday, February 28, 1981, Leisure 2.

Sabapathy, T. K. “Chong Swee’s art”, The Straits Times, Friday, July 24, 1981, Leisure 2.

Sabapathy, T. K. “Modern Art in Singapore: Pioneers and Premises”. In Sources of Modern Art. [Ministry of Education].

Singapore: Ministry of Education, 1984.

Sabapathy, T. K. “Forty Years and After: The Nanyang Artists. Remarks on Art and History”. In New Directions 1980 – 1987: Modern Paintings in Singapore, unpaginated. Edited by Thang Kiang How, et al. Singapore: Horizon Publishing, 1987.

Sabapathy, T. K. Chia Wai Hon - Bits and Pieces: Writings on Art. Singapore: Contemporary Asian Arts Centre, 2002.

San, Wu. “Tan nanyang feng” (Speaking on Nanyang Style). In The Art of Young Malayans, p. 2. Edited by [Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts]. Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, 1955.

Sheares, Constance. “Modern Singaporean Painting: An Introduction”. In Modern Art travels East-West, pp. 18-21.

[Empress Place Museum & Beurs/World Trade Cener]. Singapore & Rotterdam: Empress Place Museum & Beurs/

100

World Trade Cener, 1990.

Shen Kuiyi. “The Lure of the West”. In A Century in Crisis: Modernity and Tradition in the Art of Twentieth-century China, pp. 172-180. Edited by Julia F. Andrews & Shen Kuiyi. New York: The Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation, 1998 Shi Xiang Tuo. “Wo zhai meishuan sanshiyi nian” (My 31 years at the art academy). In Xiang Tuo Cong Gao, pp. 228230. Edited by Shi Xiang Tuo. Singapore: Wan Li Book Publishing, 1989.

[Singapore Art Museum]. Pont des Arts: Nanyang Artists in Paris 1925 – 1970. Singapore: Singapore Art Museum, 1994.

[Singapore Art Museum]. One year after graduation. Singapore: Singapore Art Museum, 1994.

[Singapore Art Museum]. Shi Xiangtuo’s World of Art. Singapore: Singapore Art Museum, 1997.

[Singapore Art Museum]. Quotation Marks: Chinese Contemporary Paintings. Singapore: Singapore Art Museum, 1997.

[Singapore Art Museum]. Imprints on Singapore Art: Works of 40 NAFA Artists 29 August – 11 October 1998. Singapore: Singapore Art Museum, 1998.

[Singapore Art Museum]. 20th Century Chinese Paintings in Singapore Collections. Singapore: Singapore Art Museum, 2003.

[Singapore Art Museum]. A Heroic Decade: Singapore Art 1955 – 1965. Singapore: Singapore Art Museum, 2005.

[Singapore Art Museum & Christie’s Singapore]. Visions and Enchantment: Southeast Asian Paintings. Singapore: Singapore Art Museum & Christie’s Singapore, 2000.

Sullivan, Frank. “The Art of Chen Wen Hsi”. In Chen Wen Hsi: Exhibition of Paintings. Singapore: Singapore Art Society, 1956.

Sullivan, Michael. Chinese Art in the Twentieth Century. London: Faber and Faber, 1959.

Suryadinata , Leo. Southeast Asian Personalities of Chinese Descent: A Biographical Dictionary ...

Tan, Bridget Tracy. “Style and Imagination – Art in the Nanyang Academy”. In Style and Imagination – Art in the Nanyang Academy, pp. 2-11. [Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts]. Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, 2005.

Tan, Chee Khuan. Pelukis-Pelukis Perintis Malaysia (Pioneer Artists of Malaysia). Penang: The Art Gallery, 1992.

Tan, Chee Chuan. Treasury of Malaysian and International Art. Penang: The Art Gallery, 1999.

Tan, Tee Chie. “Historic sketch of the Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts”. In Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts: 40th Anniversary Souvenir Magazine, pp. 19-21. [Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts]. Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, 1977.

Tan, Tee Chie. “Nanyang meishu zhuanke xueyuan kecheng fazhan shi” (History of curriculum development at the Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts), Xueda 2(1988): 19- 28.

Tan, Tee Chie. “Sixty Years of The Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts”. In Imprints on Singapore Art: Works of 40 NAFA

101

Artists 29 August – 11 October 1998, pp. 13-16. [Singapore Art Museum], Singapore: Singapore Art Museum, 1998.

Taylor, Karen. “The Farquhar Collection: Natural History Drawings of Malacca”, Arts of Asia 23(Sept-Oct 1993): pp.

123-125.

Thang, Kiang How, et al. New Directions 1980 – 1987: Modern Paintings in Singapore. Singapore: Horizon Publishing, 1987.

[The Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall]. Contemporary Malaysian-Chinese Painting: A Catalogue & Directory. Kuala Lumpur: The Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall, 1987.

[The Singapore Art and Crafts Education Society & the Ministry of Education]. National Art Education Seminar 1977: Reports. Singapore: [The Singapore Art and Crafts Education Society & The Ministry of Education], 1977.

[The Society of Chinese Artists]. 65th Anniversary Exhibition Art Works of the Society of Chinese Artists. Singapore: The Society of Chinese Artists, 2000.

Toh, Lam Huat. “The Love of Ink and Brush – A Hundred Years of Chinese Painting”. In 20th Century Chinese Paintings in Singapore Collections, pp. 24-27. [Singapore Art Museum]. Singapore: Singapore Art Museum, 2003.

VWen, Lipeng. “Review of One Hundred Years”. In Chinese Oil Painting in the 20th Century, vol. I – 1, pp. 18-43. [Art Department of the Culture Ministry of the People’s Republic of China & Chinese Oil Painting Society]. Beijing: Beijing Publishing House, 1999.

Weston, Victoria. “The Japan Art Institute”. In The Rise of modern Japanese Art, pp. 7-15. Edited by Victoria Weston and Ikuo Hirayama. Greenwich, Connecticut: Shorewood Fine Art Books, 1999.

Wolters, O. W. History, Culture, and Region in Southeast Asian Perspectives. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 1982.

Wright, Noni. “East and West meet in a Malayan Style of Painting”. In First Painting Collections of The Nanyang Fine Art Academy, pp. 33-34. [Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts]. Singapore: Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts, 1951.

Wu, Lawrence. “Kang Youwei and the Westernization of Modern Chinese Art”, Orientations, 21(March 1990): 46-53.

Xia, Shuoqi. “Nanyang Spirit: Chinese Migration and The Development of Southeast Asian Art”. In Visions and Enchantment: Southeast Asian Paintings, pp. 18-21. [Singapore Art Museum]. Singapore: Singapore Art Museum & Christie’s Singapore, 2000.

Xiao Ji. “Liuxia xuanli lishi de chidao” (The History of the Equator Arts Society), Redai xuebao (2001): 43-44.

Yan Zhi. “Duifang nanyang meizhuan xiaoyouhui ying ruhe fuqi xinyidai ‘yishu jiebanren’ renwu de yi dian qianjian” (Some comments on how the Academy Alumni is able to raise a new generation of artists), Singapore Arts. 4(1976): 6-7.

Yang, Bangyi. “Tantan Nanyang Meizhuan de cangsang” (Discussing the formation of the Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts). In Nanyang meishu zhi fu Lin Xueda, unpaginated. [MIA, NAFA, KLCA, NAFA Alumni and Nanyang Business News]. Malaysia: Malaysia Institute of the Arts Eastern Arts Research Centre, 1991.

102

Ye, Zhongling. “Xinjiapo huaqiao meishu xueyuan chuangbanshi” (The Founding History of the Overseas Chinese Art Academy), Zhongjiao xuebao 22(1996): 96-101.

Yeo, Hoe Koon. “The Nanyang Academy and l’Ecole Nationale Superieure des Beaux Arts”. In Pont des Arts: Nanyang Artists in Paris 1925 – 1970, pp. 6-7. [Singapore Art Museum]. Singapore: Singapore Art Museum, 1994.

Yeo, Mang Thong. Xinjiapo zhanqian huaren meishushi lunji (Essays on the history of Pre-war Chinese painting in Singapore). Singapore: Singapore Society of Asian Studies, 1992.

Zhong, Jinggou. “Malaixiyayishu de fazhan yu yanbian” (The Development and Change of the Malaysian arts). In Contemporary Malaysian-Chinese Painting: A Catalogue & Directory, unpaginated. [The Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall]. Kuala Lumpur: The Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall, 1987.

Zhong, Yu. Malaixiya huaren meishu shi (1900 – 1965)[The History of Malayan Chinese Art (1900 – 1965)]. Kuala Lumpur: Chung Chen Sun Art & Design Group Sdn. Bhd., 1999.

103

dusun quarterly e-journal of Asian Arts and Culture

this has been

Nanyang ‘Style’? by martin bradley

104