2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program Full Report

Capital Improvement Program GREATER LATROBE SCHOOL DISTRICT Recommendations and Analysis Fiscal Years 2020-2025 DISTRIBUTED APRIL 2021

ISSUED BY Department of Facilities, Operations & Planning REPRESENTATIVE Kurt R Thomas, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP BD+C Director of Facilities, Operations & Planning

Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2020-2025

BOARD OF SCHOOL DIRECTORS Eric Hauser, President Paul McCommons, Vice-President Heidi Kozar Steve LoCascio Susan Mains Merle Musick William Palmer Cathy Sarraf Michael Zorch, M.D. SCHOOL AUTHORITY Carl Baumeister Gene Leonard, Ed. D. Keith Visconti Barry Banker Chuck Gray SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Georgia Teppert, Ed.D. ADMINISTRATION Michael Porembka - Assistant Superintendent Daniel Watson - Business Administrator Becki Pellis - Director of Curriculum, Instruction, and Technology Laurie Golobish - Director of Pupil Services Eugene Joe - Student Support Services Coordinator Mark Mears - Director of Athletics Jillian Meloy - Director of Food Services Jessica Golden - Director of Development and Center of Student Creativity

1

Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2020-2025

Contents Introduction & Background

3

Capital Improvement Planning Process

4

Identification and Prioritization Identification Prioritization

4 5 5

Capital Resources

9

Project Design, Bidding & Construction Project Design Bidding/Contractor Selection Construction Process

11 11 12 12

Existing Facilities Summary Elementary Education Secondary Education Non-Educational Facilities Building Age and Renovation History

13 13 14 15 15

Evaluation of Existing Facilities Feasibility Studies

16 16

Supporting Documents Facility Condition Assessment Facility Needs Summary Capital Improvement Plan

17 17 17 18

Summary of Findings & Recommendations Maintenance Recommendation Short Term Recommendation Long Term Recommendation Facilities Master Plan

19 19 19 19 20

References

21

Related Resources

22

2

Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2020-2025

Introduction & Background The Greater Latrobe School District School Board of Directors is responsible for ensuring adequate educational and operational facilities for the students, staff, and community of Greater Latrobe. To fulfill this obligation, the School Board adopts a Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The CIP provides the Board with a comprehensive program of capital improvements that are being considered to maintain, acquire or construct necessary improvements over the next five-year period.

In collaboration with district administrators, the School Board regularly engages in a comprehensive review of capital needs and assesses projects to meet the following goals: 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Minimize facility deterioration and avoid deferred maintenance Maintain an optimal learning environment for existing, expanding and new academic programs Annually audit and assess facility conditions for health, safety and energy efficiencies Plan for short-term capital maintenance and improvements Plan for long-term capital new construction, renovation and/or alterations

The CIP is a thorough, good-faith document intended to convey the Greater Latrobe School District’s planned and future investments in its infrastructure. The CIP is assessed annually and is subject to modification based on changes in enrollments; updated standards for education, health, and safety; budgetary matters and other economic factors that influence priorities and alter the plan.

School facilities have a significant role in the success of students. The CIP defines characteristics of buildings, rooms and outdoor facilities necessary to provide quality learning environments that are flexible, durable and efficient.

Furthermore, the CIP exemplifies the strong emphasis that the Board has historically placed on providing high-quality education in academics, athletics and arts programs, building strong foundations for student learning.

3

Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2020-2025

Capital Improvement Planning Process This CIP Process is an integrated and comprehensive undertaking to anticipate and develop well-researched plans for new construction, replacement of aging infrastructure, facility renovations or alterations, and the incorporation of long-term preventative maintenance of existing facilities. Under the direction of the School Board of Directors and the oversight of the Superintendent, the CIP Process integrates the staff functions of not only Facilities but also, Finance, Transportation, Food Service, and Custodial Services.

The CIP Process has three main components: 1.

2.

3.

Identification and prioritization of capital facility needs Obtaining, managing and accounting for capital funding Project design, bid, and construction of capital improvements

Identification and Prioritization The projects contained in the CIP include periodic equipment replacement, major maintenance-type projects that are incurred on a recurring basis, as well as one-time expenditures of funds for such items as new construction, expansion or major renovation of facilities, acquisition of land or site improvements, utility and energy efficiency upgrades, vehicle fleet replacement and other infrastructure projects.

Lesser know requirements include: 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

Access control and door security Auditorium upgrades for fire curtain, sound, acoustics seating, and rigging Bleacher and grandstand upgrades Floor coverings and other interior finishes Roof re-roofing and re-covers Building system upgrades, ie. fire alarm, lighting, electrical, data, HVAC and plumbing systems Furniture and equipment Site asphalt parking, roadways, and playgrounds

4

Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2020-2025

Identification The list of potential projects is a direct result of the information gathered and assessed by the planning process. There are a number of factors to consider when evaluating potential projects, including: 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Public health, safety and welfare concerns Legal regulations mandated by local, state or federal government Repair, renovation or replacement of obsolete building systems that are at or near the end of serviceable life Specific needs for improved operational service, timeliness or cost savings Investment return or ability to leverage other monetary fund resources Project risk and feasibility pertaining to cost, time frames and capacity

The ability to accurately assess capital improvement projects in existing buildings is a detailed, accurate and continuous assessment of the District’s facilities. The District has developed a Facility Condition Assessment that provides a “point-in-time” overview of every facility in the District. This Assessment is established by the Facilities Department and is reviewed on an annual basis with major corrections or alterations noted.

The current Facility Condition Assessment is an appendix to this document and should be reviewed in conjunction.

Prioritization To facilitate a proper prioritization or ranking assignment of possible capital projects, the Capital Improvement Program incorporates a listing of a criterion and subsequent ratings for a criterion into a logic matrix.

Projects will be populated from the Facility Needs Assessment in which criteria will be considered for each project and assign a rating on how well it meets the criterion. Criteria are preassigned with a set weight that represents a degree of need or importance factor.

Ratings are then set or determined by their impact in regards to either Safety, Educational Impact, Operational Impact, Age and Service Life.

5

Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2020-2025

Criterion Index Table Criterion

Weight

1. Public Health, Safety and Welfare (HSW)

10

2. Legal / Code Mandates

9

3. Educational Development / Impact

8

4. Service Life Expectancy / Age

7

5. Operational / Deferred Maintenance Impacts

6

6. Technology Changes

5

7. Rebranding, Aesthetic or Social Value

4

8. New Learning Trend

3

Criterion defined: 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

Public Health, Safety, and Welfare: Items that relate to the well-being of the body or mind of the occupant; must be free from the risk of danger, damage or injury resulting from the physical environment; and one that properly accommodates the human activity.

Legal / Code Mandates: Items related to federal, state or local jurisdiction that regulate the physical environment.

Educational Development / Impact: Items that have a direct correlation to the development of the educational process or affect the learning environment.

Service Life Expectancy / Age: The age of and forecast life expectancy of products based on operational experience and real-world results.

Operational / Deferred Maintenance Impacts: Items whose postponement from routine upkeep can cause building and equipment neglect and consequently enabling minor repair work to develop into a more serious condition.

Technology Changes: New ideas or advancements of the latest technology that have a direct effect on the learning environment.

Rebranding, Aesthetic or Social Value: Items that pertain to the physical space in that gives form to the values, history, and traditions of the District and provides the setting for the student experience.

New Learning Trend: Items pertaining to the evolving learning process that can affect the built environment.

6

Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2020-2025

Rating Per Criterion Table Factors per Rating per Criterion

Rating

Unsafe; Needs Immediate Attention; Critical-School Closure; over 20yrs Age; Less than 5yrs of Service Life

7

Not Unsafe But Needs Immediate Attention; Serious-School Disruption; 10-20yrs Age; 5-10yrs of Service Life

6

Needs Prompt Attention; Moderate Disruption; Poor Condition; 5-10yrs Age; 10-15yrs of Service Life

5

Safe; But Needs Addressed; Slight Disruption; Needs Improved; 3-5yrs Age; less than 15-20yrs of Service Life

4

Safe; But Should Be Budgeted; Minor Disruption; Fair Condition; 1-3 years Age; 20-30yrs of Service Life

3

Safe; But Will Need Work In Future; Minor Disruption; Fair Condition

2

No Safety Hazard; Preventative Work Only; No Disruption; Good Condition

1

No Safety Hazard; No Work; No Disruption; New Condition

0

Rating per Criterion. The list of potential projects is populated from the Capital Needs List. Recommendations have been assigned a priority index which represents the degree of need. The priority rating index rankings from 0 to 7, with 7 representing the highest degree of need.

Factors affecting priority ratings include items such as the following: built-in redundancies; criticality of components in relation to the overall facility function; the educational impact of deterioration, deficiency, or existing condition identified during Facility Condition Assessment.

The following page includes the Logic Matrix for Assigning Project Score (Priority)

7

Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2020-2025

8

Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2020-2025

Capital Resources The Capital Improvement Program utilizes multiple mechanisms for funding and allocating cost to each identified need addressed in the Facility Needs Assessment and subsequent capital projects. This section further identifies available and potential funding sources to meet the capital needs of the District.

These potential resources include the following: 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

General Fund (Annual Operating Budget) Capital Fund (Reserve Fund) Debt Fund (General Obligation Bonds) State K-12 Funding (PlanCon) Other Sources ( ie. Grants, Donations, Savings associated with new assets)

General Fund. The General Fund consists of budget accounts that comprise the district’s annual operating budget. Approximately three percent of revenues from real estate taxes are allocated in the category of Plant Operations. Within that category the district budgets for expenditures that pertain to the maintenance and replacement of service systems and other built-in equipment; and improvement to sites.

Proper and adequate annual budgeting allows financial flexibility to address small capital projects.

These projects can prolong life expectancy and reduce costly future replacements that would require more substantial expenses and usage of reserve funding.

Capital Fund. The vast majority of funding for capital projects is sourced through this Reserve Fund. Districts have the option of establishing a fund that is a depository for earmarked capital projects. Subsequent annual transfers from the Fund Balance allow larger “pay-as-you-go” capital projects to occur without debt financing and thus allowing more monies to be allocated to the capital need.

The Capital Fund is a critical component to the district’s facility planning to meet those capital needs identified as larger in scope or that need to be funded over several years and allocations may be carried forward over multiple years until completion. Per state rule, monies within the Capital Fund are kept segregated from the annual budget accounts and must be used for capital projects and not other purposes such as salaries or instructional

9

Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2020-2025

supplies. At the end of every budget year, the District makes prudent financial strategies to move monies from the General Fund into the Capital Fund to support future projects.

Debt Fund. A general obligation bonding process is utilized when the district borrows money or issues debt when the Reserve Fund is not large enough to generate sufficient funding to pay for the acquisition of property, new construction, renovations, and major alterations to capital facilities. The monies received can only be used for a specific project as indicated in the bond issue and is used to payout as Work is performed by contractors.

The district’s business office is responsible for examining the current debt service structure as outstanding debt is “serviced” each year by allocations in the annual budget.

These monies are segregated from any General or Capital Fund and all bond authorizations and payments are approved by the School Authority.

State K-12 Funding. Sometimes the Commonwealth will share the cost of certain large capital projects which is a process known as PlanCon. PlanCon is a set of forms and procedures used to apply for reimbursement from the Commonwealth. The Division of School Facilities in the Department of Education reviews proposed school building projects, building utilization, and building conditions. Furthermore, the Division calculates the state reimbursement rate for qualified school construction projects.

It should be noted that the Department has continued the implementation of a moratorium on all new submissions for the current fiscal year.

Other Sources. Utilization of grants, donations or savings from energy management capital improvements can be sources of funding for capital projects, while these are typically smaller in size and scale, they are a feasible approach to improvements.

It is important to note that the capital needs identified dramatically outweigh the current local and statewide resources available. The ability of the District to perform each and all of the projects identified is dependent on the availability of local resources and state K-12 facilities funding. Capital financing should be viewed as a long-term commitment that will require ongoing and continual support by the Commonwealth and the local community.

Cost estimates, financing methods and recommended time schedules for the improvements are included in the CIP and are referenced by individual projects.

10

Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2020-2025

Project Design, Bidding & Construction Once a capital project has been authorized by the Board, the full scope of the project is defined and established. In this process, the size, specified requirements and an estimated budget are achieved.

Project Design.

The design of capital projects typically will be completed within the Districts Facilities Department. However, building alterations, renovations, new construction, or special projects will require the hiring of professional design services or design-build services.

Advertising a request for a proposal for a valued-based selection process will be orchestrated for such services, including the selection of Architects, Engineers, Construction Agents, and/or other specialty consultants. In planning to contract for professional services the Department shall evaluate the statements of qualifications and proposal fees for the project. The selection of such professional services will be recommended to the Board of School Directors for approval before agreements and contracts are established.

The Facilities Department will initiate an Owner’s Project Requirements (OPR) for projects to ensure their successful delivery. This OPR will guide the selection of building materials; building systems, such as mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and technology (MEPT); and construction methods and delivery are to be utilized as a guideline during pre-design, design, construction, acceptance, and operational decisions.

Building alterations, renovations or new construction projects should include the creation of Educational Specifications. This document represents a compilation of the District’s mission, vision, goals, policies, procedures, program delivery methodologies, space organizational concepts that bring innovation to the learning environment.

Following the completion of Educational Specifications, the District and design professionals will work together to develop the program of requirements. Once the POR is approved the design phases begin: Schematic Design Phase (SD): Spaces are drawn to scale indicating relative sizes as developed in the POR. These spaces are organized in groupings and oriented around

11

Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2020-2025

building circulation and service systems. Building systems schematics, energy modeling and consumption information, if applicable, should occur.

Design Development Phase (DD): The drawings indicated greater levels of detail. In addition to room and building size, mechanical building systems, and materials are expressed in the documents. Preliminary specifications for all components are prepared and are used along with the drawings in preparation for the construction estimate of the cost.

Construction Documents Phase (CD): In the conclusion of the DD Phase, all decisions regarding the project design shall be resolved and documented. The CD Phase is to prepare the documentation that will accurately and precisely convey the design that will be utilized for bidding and construction. These documents are used as the basis of the final estimate of construction cost necessary for the District to approve prior to entering the Bidding Phase.

Bidding/Contractor Selection.

Construction bidding and contractor selection will be in accordance with all Federal, State and School Code Regulations. Contractor/Vendor selection for capital projects that fall under the monetary thresholds for bidding will follow a similar process as professional services. Requests for proposals will be reviewed and a value-based selection conducted.

Capital Projects that require a public bidding process will be bid, bidders are evaluated, and contracts are executed per School Code and other Regulations. Established District manufacturers or preferred material vendors will be utilized for all self-performed work.

Self-performed work consists of minor building alterations, equipment replacements or similar capital projects where it is cost-effective to be managed by the District.

Construction Process.

District personnel are typically used to oversee the construction of small capital projects.

These projects are typically designed in-house, are on small-scale budgets and/or scope extent.

Larger contracts for construction will require professional construction supervision and management. The selection process for such professional expertise will follow a similar process as the selection for professional services. This process will typically be reserved where the capital project is of substantial size and the type or the specialty of work scope requires specialized expertise and oversight.

12

Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2020-2025

Existing Facilities Summary The following includes important information regarding the Greater Latrobe School District (GLSD) existing facilities. Basic statistical data such as the address, age, site size, building square footage, number of parking spaces, number of classrooms. Additional detailed information can be found in the Facilities Condition Assessment (FCA).

Elementary Education Primary and Intermediate education for GLSD is geographically divided amongst three elementary school buildings that house grade levels Kindergarten through Sixth Grade.

Baggaley Elementary. 4080 Route 982 Latrobe, PA 15650 Original Construction: 1951 Addition: 1974 |Renovation: 1998 Site Area: 23.3 acres | Building Area: 98,730 sf Parking Spaces: 91 Standard, 2 Accessible As-Built Classrooms: 28 Grade 1-6, 4 Kindergarten, 3 Special Ed., 5 Encore Latrobe Elementary. 20 Cedar Street Latrobe, PA 15650 Original Construction: 2018 Site Area: 6 acres | Building Area: 124,124 sf Parking Spaces: As-Built Classrooms: 35 Grade 1-6, 6 Kindergarten, 3 Special Ed., 6 Encore Mt View Elementary. 1010 Mountain View Greensburg, PA 15601 Original Construction: 1952 Addition/s: 1960, 1974 | Renovation: 1999 Site Area: 19.2 acres | Building Area: 99,031 sf Parking Spaces: 115 Standard, 5 Accessible As-Built Classrooms: 29 Grade 1-6, 4 Kindergarten, 5 Special Ed., 5 Encore

13

Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2020-2025

Secondary Education Secondary education for GLSD follows the model of locating a junior and high school adjacent to one another. The proximity of co-located schools provides multiple benefits, the least of which is a six-year continuity of secondary education for students 7th through 12th grades, as well as for parents, teachers, and administration. The District’s existing co-located sites share facilities such as an auditorium, athletic fields, and parking but are still able to maintain their own identity.

Greater Latrobe Junior High School. 130 High School Road - Latrobe, PA 15650 Original Construction: 1974 Addition: 2001 |Renovation: 1998, 2014 Site Area: 94.7 acres (combined) | Building Area: 162,500 sf Parking Spaces: 110 Standard, 2 Accessible As-Built Classrooms: 43 General Studies, 6 Special Ed, 8 Sciences, 4 Encore, 2 Tech

Greater Latrobe Senior High School. 131 High School Road - Latrobe, PA 15650 Original Construction: 1966 | Addition: 2001 | Renovation: 2003, 2014 Site Area: 94.7 acres |Building Area: 305,950 sf Parking Spaces: 463 Standard, 13 Accessible CSC: 17 Standard, Student Lot ‘B’: 47 Standard; Teacher Lot: 96 Standard, 2 Accessible Visitor/Admin Lot: 46 Standard, 8 Accessible; Student Lot ‘A’: 174 Standard Student Lot ‘C’: 83 Standard, 4 Accessible As-Built Classrooms: 40 General Studies, 8 Special Ed, 10 Sciences, 11 Encore, 3 Tech

14

Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2020-2025

Non-Educational Facilities Additional buildings within the District consist of a community stadium with numerous outbuildings, an Athletic Complex (Field House and Pressbox) at the Senior High School, a Central District Office, and multiple natural turf and synthetic playing fields.

Memorial Stadium. 131 Irving Avenue - Latrobe, PA 15650 Original Construction: 1951 | Addition & Renovation: 2001 Site Area: 15.7 acres | Building Area: 27,650 sf Parking Spaces: 285 Standard, 6 Accessible Athletic Complex. 130 High School Road - Latrobe, PA 15650 Original Construction: 2014 Site Area: Included into Senior High Acreage | Building/s Area: 24,235 sf Parking Spaces: 8 Standard, 2 Accessible (additional into Senior High parking) Central Administration. 1816 Lincoln Avenue - Latrobe, PA 15650 Original Construction: 1960 | Renovation: 2011 (purchased date) Site Area: 0.6 acres | Building Area: 9,851 sf Parking Spaces: 22 Standard, 1 Accessible Rotary Park. 130 High School Road - Latrobe, PA 15650 Original Construction: N/A Site Area: 13 acres (included into Senior High Acreage) |Building/s Area: 3,200 sf Parking Spaces: N/A

Building Age and Renovation History As indicated above the average age of the District’s educational buildings is nearly 50-years, not including the completion of the new Latrobe Elementary School. The most recent major renovation projects are approaching 20-years of age. The historical age of the Districts’ main school buildings is above the national average of 44-years old and nearly 8-years beyond the national average for a major renovation being 12-years.

15

Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2020-2025

Evaluation of Existing Facilities The District continues to evaluate the needs of the District and strives to provide a safe and positive learning environment for its students. In 2014, the District built a new Athletic Complex Facility, that included a 2000 seat bleacher Pressbox and Field House with two synthetic turf fields. Also completed this past year was a new elementary school, Latrobe Elementary School, the first new school built in over 40-years, that replaces the original 1914 Latrobe High School building.

The Junior High School underwent a small renovation to the main corridor and entrance spaces but has not had significant alterations since the late-1990’s renovation. The Senior High School is currently undergoing a systematic roof replacement process, but it has not had any significant alterations since 2001. Of the remaining schools, Baggaley and Mountain View, none have had major renovations since the late-1990’s. Only minor security, technology, and HVAC upgrades over the last 20-years have occurred.

Feasibility Studies The District typically initiated feasibility studies prior to major construction projects, the earliest traced to 1989 then again in 1991 and followed by 1996. Each study commonly had the same findings and recommendations. All of the buildings were in good-to-fair condition and with the proper maintenance, can continue in use for the next twenty years.

However, problems exist within all the building’s HVAC systems, electrical systems and other major building shell components, such as roofing and windows. This is further substantiated by the latest feasibility study, conducted in 2009, in which the study recommended the replacement of building systems that are life-cycle dependent; these include flooring, boilers and roofing membranes within five to ten years.

The replacement of Latrobe Elementary school was the only major construction project that followed the 2009 study. Other facilities strictly followed a standard level of spending for general maintenance and repair. While particularly important as the building’s age, this practice falls short of the required replacement of building systems as they have extended well beyond their useful service life. The continuation of this plan will lead to an increase in deferred maintenance cost, an increase in energy usage, and inflated expenditures for major maintenance and/or capital renewal projects.

16

Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2020-2025

Supporting Documents The following supporting documents are an appendix to this document and shall be reviewed in conjunction with the CIP. 1.

2.

3.

Facility Condition Assessment (FCA) Facility Needs Summary Capital Improvement Plan (forecast 2020-2025)

Facility Condition Assessment The Facility Condition Assessment provides a “point-in-time” overview of every facility in the District. This Assessment is established by the Facilities Department and is reviewed on an annual basis with major corrections or alterations noted. The primary goals of this assessment include: 1. To determine the overall building conditions and the conditions of the primary systems 2. Identify and prioritize building systems based on need, observed deficiencies, remaining useful/service life, and determine a recommended timeframe for when systems should be replaced or upgraded 3. Recommend actions for the deficiencies and recommendations to address deferred maintenance 4. Provide cost estimates for the required actions Facility Needs Summary The Facility Needs Summary provides the following lists as defined from the Facility Condition Assessment document.

1. A complete listing of all facility deficiencies and potential projects 2. A sorted listing of all facility deficiencies by the assigned priority index 3. A complete listing of capital needs per building One of the most powerful types of data that can be derived from the Facility Needs Summary is the Facility Condition Index (FCI). The FCI offers a relative scale on which to compare facilities. It describes the physical condition of a building and its component

17

Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2020-2025

systems against a cost model for a similar newly constructed building as they were at the beginning of the service life. The total cost of all deficiencies is divided by the current Replacement Value resulting in the FCI. The FCI percentage ranges can be interpreted into the following recommended actions Less than 15% 15 to 25% 25 to 45% 45 to 60% Greater than 60%

Minimal Improvement Needed Refurbish/Maintain Systems Replace Systems Building should be considered for a major renovation Building should be considered for replacement

Items are categorized by building group elements and type of deficiency/improvement category. These categories are the following: Capital Renewal. Projects pertaining to the building’s systems (roofs, building exteriors, elevators, HVAC, electrical, lighting, fire protection systems, equipment or interior finishes) are at the end of their useful life and need to be replaced.

Deferred Maintenance. Projects pertaining to the building failing systems that are operating beyond their useful life.

Functional Deficiency. Projects pertaining to the building systems that do not adequately meet the current need nor the expansion requirements for future building system growth.

New Construction. Proposed projects pertaining to the construction of new elements.

Educational Adequacy. Projects pertaining to elements designed to improve the adequacy of the built environment for achieving educational program goals.

In addition to the building summaries, a list of potential projects is populated from the Capital Needs List. Recommendations have been assigned a priority index which represents the degree of need. These prioritized needs are then to establish budgetary requirements for the deferred maintenance backlogs, capital renewal, and functional and educational programmatic improvements to establish the proposed Capital Improvement Plan.

Capital Improvement Plan The Capital Improvement provides a listing of capital needs as defined from the Facility Condition Assessment document. The priorities have been established using a logic matrix and anticipated estimated budget cost.

18

Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2020-2025

Summary of Findings & Recommendations As identified by the Capital Improvement Plan, additional funding must be obtained in order for the District to begin the process of component replacements and minor renovation projects such as roofs, boilers, HVAC, windows, lighting, etc. Each District building’s Facility Condition Index presents a ratio percentage that can be considered a “critical” condition category. This FCI ratio is a direct response to aging buildings with building systems well beyond their service life.

Maintenance Recommendation Percentage increases of 4-5% should be upheld yearly into the annual operating fund as allocated to the building maintenance as the District will need to address ongoing component replacement and minor repairs to systems not slated for immediate replacement or modernization.

Ideally, addressing either short or long-term capital improvements requires the proper allocating of adequate funds for ongoing maintenance and set-asides capital funding for high-dollar system repairs and replacements for appropriate intervals. To accomplish this, no revisions should be made to the current filtering of District funds into the Capital Improvement Fund.

Short Term Recommendation District to review items that comprise the capital improvement plan and first address those affecting life/safety issues, those having the greatest potential for future damage to other building components, those that are code compliance issues, critical mechanical and electrical issues, and educational components.

Long Term Recommendation If no further capital improvements are achieved, the FCI ratio will only increase over the next five years to ten years. The District will need to address how to meet the financial shortfalls to best address the needs through a combination of repairs, replacement and strategic renovations to address program change and facility condition simultaneously.

19

Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2020-2025

When all the variables are analyzed, it is evident that further analysis into either a path of short-term capital improvement projects or long-term modernization of all educational facilities through building replacement or renovations is required. The latter option would require the execution of a more detailed and comprehensive Facilities Master Plan.

Facilities Master Plan This plan would further brainstorm the future educational delivery of the District with a framework developed to examine items such as pre-kindergarten programming, grade configurations, optimum class size, student enrollments, and other programs and services.

Being that all District school buildings are in need of full modernization or reconstruction the Facilities Master Plan will also establish an order of implementation.

Ideally, this plan would incorporate a community engagement component. A process by gathering input from focus groups by pulling together a community advisory team composed of key stakeholders. Community engagement events would occur to share options and feedback for refining the community values, parameters, and preferences as it pertains to the District’s facilities.

Lastly, the Facilities Master Plan should determine the order in which buildings will be replaced or fully modernized will improve the investment strategy of the capital improvement program. For example, if a building needs a new roof, and the building is scheduled for renovation within a few years, the investment in the roof should not be made. However, if the building is scheduled for renovation in the later years, a short-term fix may be in order.

Modifications may be required due to factors such as changes in funding from state or local sources, demographic changes that affect enrollment projects and future education program needs. By assessing current facilities, gaining input from the community and incorporating assistance from professionals, Greater Latrobe Schools facilities will set the standard for education.

Ultimately, the goal of the District is to create school environments that are conducive to efficient and effective learning, teaching and community activities. It is with this in mind that the Greater Latrobe School District embarks on a process to redefine and modernize its educational facilities.

20

Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2020-2025

References 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

Bahr, S., and Sparks, D. (2016). Changes in America’s Public School Facilities: From School Year 1998–99 to School Year 2012–13. U.S. Department of Education.

Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Collaborative for High-Performance Schools. (2016). 2014 US-CHPS Criteria: New Construction and Renovation. Sacramento, CA: Collaborative for High-Performance Schools.

Filardo, Mary. (2016) State of Our Schools: America’s K-12 Facilities 2016.

Washington, D.C.: 21st Century School Fund.

Foothills Architecture + Consulting. (2009) Feasibility Study for the Greater Latrobe School District, prepared by Charles E. Rogers, R.A. HHSDR Architects & Engineers. (1996) Greater Latrobe School District Feasibility Study, prepared by Charles E. Rogers, R.A. National Forum on Education Statistics. (2018). Forum Guide to Facility Information Management: A Resource for State and Local Education Agencies. (NFES 2018-156).

U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, National Forum on Education Statistics. (2003) Planning Guide for Maintaining School Facilities, NCES 2003-347, prepared by T. Szuba, R. Young, and the School Facilities Maintenance Task Force. Washington, DC. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Fast Response Survey System (2013) Condition of Public School Facilities: 2012–13, FRSS 105, (Table 217.10) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2009). Indoor Air Quality for Schools Reference Guide. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2016). Schools: An Overview of Energy Use and Energy Efficiency Opportunities. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.

21

Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2020-2025

Related Resources APPA: Leadership in Educational Facilities The gathering place for those of us engaged in the field of educational facilities management and dedication to the ongoing evolution of its professionals into influential leaders in education. www.appa.org ASHRAE ASHRAE, founded in 1894, is a global society advancing human well-being through sustainable technology for the built environment. The Society and its members focus on building systems, energy efficiency, indoor air quality and sustainability within the industry. Through research, standards writing, publishing and continuing education, ASHRAE shapes tomorrow’s built environment today. www.ashrae.org Association for Learning Environments The Association for Learning Environments was first established in 1921 as the National Council on Schoolhouse Construction (NCSC) then becoming Council of Education Facility Planners International (CEFPI) in 1971. It took its current name in 2015. The Association for Learning Environments is a professional 501 (c)(3) non-profit association whose sole mission is improving the places where children learn. www.a4le.org CHPS: Collaborative for High-Performance Schools The mission of the Collaborative for High-Performance Schools is to nationally foster well-designed, operated, and maintained K-12 educational facilities that enhance student performance; positively impact student, teacher, and staff health and wellness; make education more enjoyable and rewarding; and promote positive environmental stewardship. www.chps.net National Council on School Facilities The mission of the National Council on School Facilities is to support states in their varied roles and responsibilities and to advocate for support mechanisms and processes that equitably deliver safe, healthy, and educationally appropriate public school facilities that are sustainable and fiscally sound. www.facilitiescouncil.org

22

Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2020-2025

National Center for Education Statistics The National Center for Education Statistics, the National Forum on Education Statistics, and the Association of School Business Officials International (ASBO) are pleased to provide this Planning Guide to education administrators, facilities staff, community members, and other individuals who are interested in the responsible management of our nation's school facilities. www.nces.ed.gov PA Department of Education School Construction and Facilities (PlanCon) The Division of School Facilities in the Department of Education reviews proposed school building projects calculates state reimbursement for qualified school construction projects, and reviews and approves the financing for reimbursable projects. www.education.pa.gov The 21st-Century School Fund The 21st Century School Fund (21CSF) was founded in 1994 on the premise that communities are responsible for creating healthy, safe, and educationally appropriate learning environments. www.21csf.org The Center for Green Schools (at the U.S. Green Building Council) USGBC launched the National Green Schools Campaign committing to a vision of green schools for every child. USGBC founded the Center for Green Schools in 2010. www.centerforgreenschools.org U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Guidance and Tools for Healthy Schools Healthy school environments can affect the attendance, concentration and performance of both students and educators. The EPA presents information about establishing and enhancing healthy school environments. www.epa.gov/schools U.S. Green Building Council The U.S. Green Building Council is committed to a sustainable, prosperous future through LEED, the leading program for green buildings and communities worldwide. Their mission is to transform the way buildings and communities are designed, built and operated, enabling an environmentally and socially responsible, healthy, and prosperous environment that improves the quality of life. www.usgbc.org

23

Facility Condition Assessment GREATER LATROBE SCHOOL DISTRICT Completed 2019-2020 DISTRIBUTED APRIL 2021

ISSUED BY Department of Facilities, Operations & Planning REPRESENTATIVE Kurt R Thomas, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP BD+C Director of Facilities, Operations & Planning

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

BOARD OF SCHOOL DIRECTORS Eric Hauser, President Paul McCommons, Vice-President Heidi Kozar Steve LoCascio Susan Mains Merle Musick William Palmer Cathy Sarraf Michael Zorch, M.D. SCHOOL AUTHORITY Carl Baumeister Gene Leonard, Ed. D. Keith Visconti Barry Banker Chuck Gray SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Georgia Teppert, Ed.D. ADMINISTRATION Michael Porembka - Assistant Superintendent Daniel Watson - Business Administrator Becki Pellis - Director of Curriculum, Instruction, and Technology Laurie Golobish - Director of Pupil Services Eugene Joe - Student Support Services Coordinator Mark Mears - Director of Athletics Jillian Meloy - Director of Food Services Jessica Golden - Director of Development and Center of Student Creativity

1

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Introduction & Background As part of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), the Facilities Department implemented a comprehensive Facility Condition Assessment (FCA) that provides a “point-in-time” overview of the District’s portfolio of all educational facilities. The FCA This Assessment is established by the Facilities Department and is reviewed on an annual basis with major corrections or alterations noted.

In collaboration with district administrators, the objective of the FCA for the District is to meet the following goals: 1.

2.

3.

4.

To determine the overall building conditions and the conditions of the primary systems Identify and prioritize building systems based on need, observed deficiencies, remaining useful/service life, and determine a recommended timeframe for when systems should be replaced or upgraded Recommend actions for the deficiencies and recommendations to address deferred maintenance Provide cost estimates for the required actions to develop into the Capital Improvement Plan

The findings in this report are based on recognized facility condition assessment approaches, methods, and best practices used to evaluate and assess the physical condition of educational facilities. buildings, site and ground features.

Included in these assessments were educational

Items and issues identified in the FCA could have the potential to impact current operations and future capabilities of capital improvements. The result of the FCA survey provides a baseline assessment of current deferred maintenance and capital replacement funding needs that should be utilized in planning decisions and consideration of future reinvestments into District facilities.

2

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Facility Assessment Process Beginning in 2019, the Facilities Department invested hundred of labor hours performing comprehensive assessments of the Districts facilities and athletic fields, totaling nearly 900,000 square-feet over 162-acres.

The FCA process includes a review of building drawings and other facility operational specifications. Interviews were conducted with the maintenance and custodial staff to document non-visible and ongoing building component problems. Site visits were conducted to verify data already gathered as well as to record additional information found during the inspection. Based on visual observations and on-site discussions with staff members provided the assessor with a thorough understanding of the conditions of the building and site components. Therefore allowing the development of a written description of each facility including an overview of the construction, building systems, and general overall conditions.

Publications used as references for the anticipated service life of the building systems include the Building Owners and Managers Association International (BOMA) “Building Systems Useful Life” and the American Society of Heating Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Applications Handbook” as a reference for the service life of systems and equipment. In many instances, actual experience may indicate a longer service life for a particular system, but these are the best available recognized standards for the anticipated service life of capital assets typically found in educational and support facilities.

The results of the field studies within the FCA include a listing of deficiencies with suggested recommendations and benefits of improvement along with an associated budget cost. The budget estimates were developed utilizing industry cost information.

These estimations of cost attempt to describe all costs reasonably associated with performing the prescribed benefit work. However, other costs for project financing, downtime of systems, operational inefficiencies are not included. In some cases, these estimates may exceed the replacement value for the respective system as a whole. It is critical to note that the intent is to provide estimated costs as approximations for budgeting purposes. As a result, not all budgets will match future contractor’s or vendor’s proposals.

3

BAGGALEY ELEMENTARY

building summary FACILITY ASSESSMENT Original Construction: 1951

Addition: 1974

Renovation: 1998

Site Area: 23.3 acres | Building Area: 98,730 sf

FACILITY ASSESSMENT Cost Set: 2020

Rating: = 1 Satisfactory = 2 Needs Repair = 3 Needs Replacement Description:

Rating:

Dollar Assessment:

A

SITE CONDITION

2

$ 493,650

B

EXTERIOR WALLS AND FOUNDATION

2

$ 250,000

C

ROOFING

2

$ 2,570,500

D

EXTERIOR DOORS & WINDOWS

3

*$ 200,000

E

INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION-STAIRS-FINISHES

3

$ 1,727,000

F

LIFE SAFETY & FIRE PROTECTION

3

$ 370,237

G

ACCESSIBILITY

2

**$ 300,000

H

PLUMBING

3

$ 987,300

I

HVAC

(HEATING, VENTILATION, AND AIR-CONDITIONING)

3

$ 2,673,000

J

ELECTRICAL, LIGHTING, EMERGENCY SYSTEM

3

$ 2,468,250

TOTAL

$ 12,039,937

* Assessment is an estimate, square-footage of window and door systems is required ** Assessment is an estimate, detailed accessibility work scope is required

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

BAGGALEY ELEMENTARY

sitework SITE CONDITION Installed: 1951, 1974, 1998

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The site for this facility is irregular in shape and is located in a rural residential area. The elevation of the site ranges from 1,064’ to an elevation of 1,135’ at the high point.

The site for this facility consists of approximately 23.3 acres located in Unity Township Municipality.

The western half of the property is the site for the Senior High. The building site is fairly level. The southern and western portions of the site are wooded while the building site has a moderate sparse tree landscaping. Significant grading and site drainage deficiencies along the front drives were noted. Lack of curbing has caused excessive rutting thus causing improper paths to site drainage.

The building is served by two entrance drives off of Route 982 which enter from the north of the building. This arrangement allows for a separation of bus and vehicular traffic, however, morning arrival and afternoon dismissals require District personnel to facilitate traffic. Vehicular traffic congestion can be significant to a point that back up occurs to the main road, therefore, parking lot lanes must be used which can cause safety issues. Bus traffic must also travel through parking lot lanes causing issues with turning radiuses.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Each roadway is marked for two-way traffic with the eastern roadway then shifting to one-way traffic upon entering the parking lot area. The site has two asphalt parking lots in fair-to-poor condition and they contain adequate parking for day-to-day operations. Two separate drives access site playgrounds and a building operations loading dock.

Emergency access drives are limited to only portions of the site. Event parking is limited.

The site and parking lot drainage system consists of sheet drainage to open grade areas and a few catch basins. No indications of the site or parking lot ponding have been observed. Asphalt paving is a mixture of heavy-duty and light-duty depths which are showing signs commonly experienced with its age, ie. potholes, rutting, edge cracks, fatigue cracks and alligatoring. However, the hardscape play area to the west has structurally failed. Damage is noted in not only the asphalt paving but also the subsurface.

This appears to be caused by bus traffic on a light-duty asphalt depth paving.

Concrete curbs are in fair condition but have sections of deterioration. Concrete paving sidewalks are generally properly sloped, are located to provide a logical flow of pedestrian traffic, are in fair condition for their age and only have small sections of deterioration or heaving. An exterior ramp is located at a secondary entrance and stair access to the kitchen entry both are in fair condition.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Deficiencies: 1. Areas of concrete deterioration will continue to break down the integrity of the paving 2. Existing sealants within control joints and expansion joints are beyond their life and are crumbling to failure.

3. Areas of asphalt deterioration will continue to break down the integrity of the asphalt paving 4. Roadway deterioration that causing site drainage erosion 5. Lack of proper vehicular and bus traffic separation for the site Recommendations: 1. Remove and replace deteriorated concrete paving sections 2. Recaulk existing control joints, expansion joints, and dissimilar materials as required.

3. Structurally review asphalt paving and either plan for full-depth replacement or mill and overlay.

4. Redesign existing traffic flow to allow for a separate bus and vehicular traffic without interaction into parking lots Benefits: 1. Prolong performance and life paving systems 2. Deter any future cracking, shifting, spalling or movement in exterior paving 3. Provide sustainable and quality materials Cost: $493,650 or $5.00/sf (building) 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

Heavy Duty Asphalt: $31.00 sy (remove/replace) Light Duty Asphalt: $29.00 sy (remove/replace) Asphalt Paving / New Wearing Course: $20.00 sy (minor crack repair) New Asphalt Paving: $26.00 sy (light duty) $28.00 sy (heavy duty) Concrete Curb: $26.00 lf (remove/replace) Concrete Sidewalk: $8.00 sf (remove/replace) Stabilize soil erosion: $2.50 sf (stripping and re-grading)

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

BAGGALEY ELEMENTARY

building shell EXTERIOR WALLS AND FOUNDATION Installed: 1951, 1974, 1998

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The Original Building (20,000sqft) was constructed in 1951 and makes up what is the existing administration area and the 5th and 6th-grade wing. In 1974 a much larger addition was constructed and remains the general building footprint today (98,730 sqft).

The overall facility is equipped with concrete masonry unit foundation walls on concrete footings, which displayed no locations of significant differential settlement, cracking or leaking, and are considered in good condition. No significant issues related to foundation cracking or spalling were encountered. No grading or site drainage deficiencies were noted around the perimeter of the structure that are contributing or could contribute to the foundation/wall structural deterioration.

There are signs of leaking below the open grate boiler room access panel causing moisture/water intrusion into the basement section of the boiler room.

The original 1951 building has a brick veneer on load-bearing masonry wall systems, that display some locations of deterioration (appox. 780 lf).

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The 1974 building has a brick veneer on load-bearing masonry wall systems (approx.

2,130 lf) with a mezzanine level consisting of vertical metal wall panels on steel truss stud wall systems (approx. 635 lf). There are large canopies over entrances and are steel construction with exterior soffit and are in fair condition.

Either in renovations or during the 1974 addition, portions of the exterior window system were infilled with an EIFS (exterior-insulated-and-finish-system) which is in good-to-fair condition with only signs of a needed clean.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The exterior masonry does not appear to have appropriately spaced or adequately caulked control joints, which are in fair-to-poor condition. Control joints are not provided at all lintel locations, doors and windows, building corners, and/or wall offsets. Exterior walls in the overall building appear to be adequately insulated but would not meet today’s energy and building codes. Brick veneer masonry walls are cavity walls but lack proper spacing or quantity of weeps to allow water moisture to exit the cavity. Lack of proper air space and moisture in the cavity wall has caused the premature rusting of exterior steel lintels, failure of joints and spalling of brick.

The original chimney is in good-to-fair condition. The exterior masonry has not been cleaned or sealed in recent years and has locations of efflorescence.

Window sills are of stone in the original building and are angled brick in the 1974 addition, with the majority in good condition.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Deficiencies: 1. Areas of mortar and masonry veneer deterioration will continue to break down the integrity of the exterior enclosure.

2. Sub wall and foundation weatherproofing have failed.

3. Existing sealants within control joints and expansion joints are beyond their life and are crumbling to failure.

4. Exterior steel lintels are sagging and rusting.

5. Exterior metal panel wall sections are problematic, are in need of replacement and reconfigured, or minimally require resealing and repainting.

6. Sections of EIFS areas are damaged and have sections of painting failing.

7. Exterior wall R-Values do not meet current energy codes and standards.

8. Minimal daylighting or exterior viewing windows in 1974 addition.

Recommendations: 1. Provide tuckpointing in all areas of mortar deterioration as required through the overall building.

2. Replace damaged and deteriorated lintels.

3. Provide masonry cleaning, sealing, and weep holes as required.

4. Recaulk existing control joints, expansion joints, and dissimilar materials as required.

5. Prep and paint all existing EIFS paneling sections.

Benefits: 1. Prolong performance and life of exterior finishes 2. Deter any future cracking, shifting, spalling or movement in exterior fenestration 3. Provide sustainable and quality materials and finishes Cost: $250,000 or $2.50/sf (does not include metal wall panel work) 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

Tuckpointing: $7.50 sf (wall surface) Masonry Cleaning/Sealing: $2.50 sf (wall surface) Exterior Caulking: $7.50 lf (remove/replace) Lintel Replacement: $250.00 lf (total removal/replacement) Remove and Replace Metal Wall Panels: $28.00 sf Scope of work can be further broken down into manageable pieces A possible candidate for a renovation project

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

BAGGALEY ELEMENTARY

building shell ROOFING Installed: 1999

Size: 98,864/SF

Warranty: 20 YEAR(2019)

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: Approximately 90,234sf of roof cover for the overall facility is a built-up modified bitumen system by The Garland Company, Streesply E with an original warranty of 20-years. Roof areas are generally in fair condition with approximately 2-4 years of service life remaining.

Sections of roof areas associated with the HVAC roof-top-equipment are in poor-failed condition and have multiple leaking issues. Additionally, there are signs of past leaking.

Access to the roof is by exterior doors from the balcony level which are in fair condition and exterior steel ladders to upper roof areas. Parapet walls are traversed by wooden ship ladders as built by the maintenance department. Proper safety rails are not present, fall safety protection cages are not required, and are not provided.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

No observations of standing water on the roof. Many areas indicated a history of leaking around roof-top-units and parapet copings. Roof drainage areas show a history of standing water, drainage is directed through a system of internal roof drains and exterior downspouts in fair condition. The roof is not equipped with overflow roof drains.

Silver-FlashⓇ counter flashings show wear splits in seams, blisters and “alligatoring” which is caused by the drying out of the exposed asphalt surfacing by the sun.

Deficiencies: 1. Existing caulking above counter flashings is splitting and deteriorating.

2. Small tears at base flashings.

3. No overflow roof drains.

4. Active leak around HVAC mechanical units.

Recommendations: 1. Plan for full replacement at end of warranty.

2. Continue bi-annual inspections and increase budgetary amounts for repairs.

Benefits: 1. Optimize Energy Performance 2. Replace End-of-Life (EOF) System Cost: $2,570,500 OR $26.00/sf 1. Possible candidate for a ten-year restoration system.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

BAGGALEY ELEMENTARY

building shell EXTERIOR DOORS & WINDOWS Installed: 1951, 1974, 1998

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The building is equipped with aluminum-clad wood windows with dual glazed-type window systems. The window system features operable windows throughout the building, operable windows are equipped with opening limiters and integral blinds.

Overall windows are in fair-to-poor condition and are beyond their expected life expectancy. Thermally broken aluminum windows with dual glazed-type window systems were installed within the cafeteria area.

The 1974 Addition features small acrylic sheet skylights in the main corridors.

The exterior doors are a mixture of hollow-metal systems with single-glazing vision lites and aluminum storefront with dual glazing transom and sidelites. The hollow-metal door panels paint is faded and worn.

Door thresholds, weatherstripping and hardware are in need of replacement or repair.

Few exterior doors contain security access control features. Controls are limited to main entrance doors and feature card access, door monitoring and egress controls.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Deficiencies: 1.

2.

3.

4.

Hollow metal door systems have failed panel systems Existing sealants are beyond their life and are crumbling to failure Window hardware in many cases is failing Not all exterior doors have access controls or door monitoring

Recommendations: 1.

2.

3.

4.

Replace hollow-metal door systems with aluminum frames with FRP doors Replace all exterior door weatherstripping, astragals and thresholds Recaulk existing joints and dissimilar materials as required Replace all exterior windows with aluminum type

Benefits: 1. Prolong performance and life of exterior windows and doors 2. Deter any pests or outdoor air infiltration Cost: To be determined.

1.

2.

3.

4.

Insulated Glass/Panels: $70.00sf (includes blinds) Curtain Wall/Storefront System: $80.00sf (remove and replace) Skylights: $125.00 sf (remove and replace) Door Weatherstripping: $300.00 ea (demo and replace)

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

BAGGALEY ELEMENTARY

interiors INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION-STAIRS-FINISHES Installed: 1951, 1974, 1998

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The building features conventionally partitioned classrooms, corridors, and stairs with sheet carpet flooring with resilient base; varying styles of acoustical tile ceilings; wall finishes include painted concrete masonry, gypsum board, and plaster. Interior elements vary in conditions but are generally in fair-to-poor condition.

The typical classroom contains laminate casework and counters and is provided with chalkboards, tackboards, and tack strips that are in good condition. The facility is equipped with louvered and non-louvered interior doors that are both flush-mounted and recessed, mostly with proper ADA hardware and clearances, and are in good condition, however, the classroom locks lack security intruder functions.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The Gymnasium space has athletic wood-type flooring, an open ceiling, as well as painted CMU walls with acoustical wall treatments. The maple flooring is at its median stage of product life and will accommodate future resurfacings.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The Library has sheet carpet flooring, acoustical tile ceilings, as well as painted gypsum board type finishes that are in good condition. The Cafeteria has linoleum sheet flooring that has completely failed and is deteriorating from the subfloor, the acoustical tile ceilings are in fair-to-poor condition. The acoustical wall panels are not of sufficient depth for proper sound absorption, as well as painted CMU, and are in fair condition.

Restroom flooring and walls are ceramic tiles that are in good condition with steel toilet partitions that are in fair-to-poor condition.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Deficiencies: 1. All sheet carpet flooring is beyond its expected life span and is in need of replacement. Sheet carpet flooring is not a preferred flooring finish for classrooms, corridors, and stairs as it harbors dirt, dust, and dander.

2. Cafeteria linoleum flooring has completely failed and is in need of immediate replacement.

3. Interior paint finishes have been deferred maintenance for too long and need to be addressed.

4. Acoustical Ceiling Tiles (ACT) are beyond their life and are showing signs of sagging, water damage and do not meet proper acoustical properties.

5. Chalkboards are not a preferred writing surface for visual display surfaces.

6. Gymnasium and Cafeteria acoustical wall panels do not meet current NTC sound coefficients.

7. Classroom and Corridor casework, shelving, and equipment do not meet the educational needs in quantity, quality, or locations.

8. The steel toilet partitions within the restrooms are showing signs of rust, warping and hardware failure.

9. Portions of the original construction plaster partitions have deteriorated beyond repair and other areas continue to deteriorate causing ongoing maintenance issues.

10. Classroom locksets lack proper security intruder functions.

Recommendations: 1. Plan for interior finish upgrades that include capital renewal of flooring and ceiling finishes. Address deferred maintenance painting items, and include redesign color palette of interior wall finishes. Replace baked enamel steel over paper core toilet partitions with solid plastic (HDPE) that have a higher resistance to abuse, scratches, and the growth of mold and mildew.

Benefits: 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Replace End-of-Life (EOF) System Improve Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) Performance Prolong performance and life of interior finishes Improve acoustical performance and sound control Provide sustainable and quality materials and finishes A rebranded color scheme that is impactful, attractive and vibrant

Cost: $1,727,000 or $17.50/sf (Complete Replacement of Finishes and Casework) 1. Scope of work can be further broken down into manageable pieces 2. A possible candidate for a renovation project

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

BAGGALEY ELEMENTARY

services LIFE SAFETY & FIRE PROTECTION Installed: 1951, 1974, 1998

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The overall facility is equipped with an addressable Simplex 4020 fire alarm system installed in 1999 and is in poor condition. The system consists of an obsolete main control panel, 1 remote LCD annunciators panels located in the main office.

Building subpanels are Simplex 4009 NAC Power Extenders with battery backup. There are only 27 manual pull stations; 32 audio-visuals indicating devices and 85 visuals; 193 smoke detectors, including, 17 duct detectors and 4 heat detectors.

The system is automatic and is monitored by a third-party ATC. The system is not equipped with sufficient audible horns, strobe indicating devices, smoke detectors and heat sensors.

The system is not equipped with any flow switches or tamper switches thus it will not support any future fire suppression systems. The system is not adequately provided throughout and does not have additional zone capabilities.

The system is not fully compliant with the International Fire Code (IFC) or the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA).

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The facility is not equipped with an automatic fire suppression system. A flow test would be required to determine if the existing water supply system would provide adequate support for a future system. The kitchen hood is equipped with an Ansul system that is in fair-to-poor condition and is proper for current cooking requirements.

Fire Extinguishers are provided throughout the building.

Deficiencies: 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Main Alarm Control Panel is obsolete, unable to make future repairs Two of the three annunciator panels are non-functional Fire alarm system end devices have met their lifespan Energy performance of all fixtures and systems is poor Visual and audible alarm devices do not meet ADA and NFPA requirements

Recommendations: 1. Replace non-addressable and obsolete fire alarm control equipment 2. Upgrade occupant notification to meet ADA and NFPA requirements for visual and audible coverage 3. All exit signs are to meet code for size and location 4. Emergency lighting must meet code for illumination levels and locations, upgrade fixtures to LED Benefits: 1. Upgrade to compliant IFC and NFPA System 2. Resolve emergency notification failures 3. Replace End-of-Life (EOF) System Cost: $370,237 or $3.75/sf

(Fire Alarm $2.25, Lighting $1.50)

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

BAGGALEY ELEMENTARY

legal/code ACCESSIBILITY Installed: 1951, 1974, 1998

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: This site lacks public sidewalks from the public right-of-way, there is an accessible route provided from the accessible parking areas. Passenger loading zones at both the bus and vehicle drop-off lack an accessible route to the main entrance of the school. There is an accessible route connecting all or most areas of the site. The exterior entrances are mostly accessible and access from the parking/drop-off area to the building entries is not compromised by steps or steep ramps. An adequate number of accessible parking spaces are provided, including one van-accessible space, and are properly marked.

Exterior doors meet minimum clear width, maneuvering clearances and proper hardware.

The main entrance lacks the convenience of an ADA automatic/power assist door. The addition of a secure entry vestibule is not compliant and requires travel to the non-secure lobby for access to office administration.

There is an accessible route through the building that connects all accessible spaces and elements. Generally does not include protruding objects. Objects such as fire extinguishers, drinking fountains, signs cannot protrude more than 4-inches along the accessible route. In some instances, the building’s drinking fountains do impede upon the accessible route.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Elevation changes within the overall facility are facilitated by compliant stairwells, a ramp, a passenger elevator and a vertical platform lift. The passenger elevator is isolated within the Library/Media Center on the ground floor The raised platform (stage) within the Gymnasium is in non-compliance. An accessible route must connect the platform (stage) directly to seating areas where they are directly connected. If temporary stairs are added for performances a temporary ramp should as well, otherwise access requires an individual to leave the Gymnasium and enter from a back hallway ramp.

Interior signage meets requirements for raised and contrasting text/characters, raised Braille, however not all signs are located on the proper side (latch side) of doors.

Generally, all public interior doors are equipped with hardware that is ADA-compliant that is operable with one hand does not require tight grasping, pinching, or twisting of the wrist, nor more than 5-pounds of force to operate. There are a few exceptions, as a few doors that provide access to utility or mechanical-type spaces are not compliant.

Group Restroom layouts meet the requirements for clearances and compliant accessories are adequately provided and mounted properly. Single user toilet rooms serve dual functions as both staff and public accessible toilet rooms within the restroom.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

With last renovations occurring prior to 2012, clearances around the water closet are permitted and the lavatory may overlap that clearance if the door to the room does not swing into the clearances at the fixtures and that the edge of the lavatory is at least 18-inches front of the centerline of the water closet. The International Building Code or IBC makes reference to the ICC/ANSI A117.1 that specifies a vertical grab bar that is not present in this facility. The toilet room within the upper mezzanine classroom is not ADA-compliant as it pertains to clearances, mounting heights for fixtures and accessories.

Most Classroom, Breakrooms and/or Corridor sinks allow for a forward approach which is preferred at sinks and work surfaces to increase maneuvering clearance.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Deficiencies: 1. Lack of accessible route from passenger loading/unloading at bus and vehicle drives 2. Lack of power assist door openers at the main entry 3. Lack of direct access to performance platform (stage) and spectator accessible seating 4. Improper clearances for individual toilet rooms and mounting heights for accessories 5. Front access usability of work surfaces and sinks Recommendations: 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Install power assist door opener at the main entrance Enlarge and reconfigure individual toilet rooms to be accessible Reconfigure group restrooms to have an accessible fixture Remount and add additional toilet accessories to meet regulatory requirements Evaluate and replace casework with ADA-compliant sink base

Priorities for Accessibility: 1.

2.

3.

4.

Accessible approach and entrances Access to goods and services Access to public toilet rooms Access to other items such as water fountains

Safe Harbor Provision: 1. Any facility’s elements built or altered before 2012, and that comply with the 1991 Standards do not need to be changed to satisfy the 2010 Standards. This provision does not apply to elements in existing facilities that were not included in the 1991 Standards but are now regulated by the 2010 Standards. These elements must satisfy the 2010 Standards to the extent readily achievable.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

BAGGALEY ELEMENTARY

services PLUMBING Installed: 1951, 1974, 1998

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The building is serviced by the local municipal water authority (Youngstown/Latrobe). The 6-inch service line runs along Route 982. A 4-inch line serves the original building and then branches off to serve the 1974 Addition. The line is equipped with a reduced pressure backflow preventer and is in fair condition. A water treatment system is not present. No pressure-related issues have been reported and the utility meter is satisfactory. The domestic water supply piping is copper and most of the piping system is in fair condition. Piping insulation is fiberglass with known hazardous materials being removed in past renovations. Parts of the distribution system piping are original and have been suffering from pipe erosion and subsequent pinhole leaks. As the piping has failed, it has been replaced.

The sanitary waste piping is cast iron and is in good-to-fair condition as dependent on the age and/or if sections were replaced during building renovations.

There have been no ongoing signs of clogging or backups noted. Parts of the sanitary waste system are original to the building and would be at the end of their life.

There is a grease interceptor outside the kitchen area which has been maintained but is extended beyond its life expectancy.

The rainwater drainage piping consists of cast iron piping and is in good-to-fair condition. No visible indications of issues, however, multiple locations are original and are at the end of their life expectancy. Roof drainage is handled by internal roof drains, all of which are in good-to-fair condition. Some locations show signs of failing or removed fiberglass insulation. Original flange bowls and rings may be wrapped with hazardous materials.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

A 4-inch natural gas line services the original building which feeds from a 6-inch mainline around Route 982. The 1974 addition gas service is provided via another 4-inch gas line running south along the property line and enters near the kitchen side of the addition.

The facility has two gas-fired domestic water heaters. Within the original building is a 40gal Rheem model that is beyond its serviceable life and is in need of replacement. The expansion tank has met its serviceable life and is recommended to be replaced with any work associated with this unit. Within the upper mechanical room of the 1974 addition is a 125gal PVI model, This water heater was replaced with the last 10-years and is in good-to-fair condition. The domestic water heaters are equipped with master mixing valves that have been rebuilt from renovations and are in fair-to-poor condition and should be further evaluated for repair upgrades and/or replacement.

The majority of the facility’s plumbing fixtures and trim were replaced in the renovations, however, original fixtures do remain and are beyond their life expectancy.

These fixtures are also not low flow, while fixtures replaced are. Lavatories are china with either electronic-metering or two-handle manual faucets. Water Closets are a mixture of battery-operated sensor operation and manual while the urinals are all manual.

Classroom and other learning area countertop sinks are typical of stainless steel basins with manual faucets. Artrooms sinks have under-counter clay/sediment traps. Floor mounted, three-station fixtures are in the group restrooms. Service Sinks and exterior hose bibs are located and spaced properly throughout the building and are in fair-to-poor condition.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Electric water coolers are of sufficient numbers and are spaced throughout the facility and are generally in good-to-fair condition. Maintenance has been upgrading replacements to bottle filler-type units.

Deficiencies: 1.

2.

3.

4.

Existing copper piping corrosion and pinhole leaks Many portions of the plumbing system are beyond its life expectancy Not all fixtures meet the current building codes pertaining to flow consumption The water heater unit requires significant upgrades to continue its service and proper planning for replacement 5. The energy performance of all heating units are very poor 6. Not all fixtures meet ADA requirements per current building codes and regulations Recommendations: 1. Investigate water treatment fluids and flush out the entire piping system 2. Evaluate existing copper piping to determine the cause of pipe corrosion and pinhole leaks 3. Replace domestic water heater and storage tank located in the original building 4. Replace original sections of domestic water piping and sanitary water piping 5. Replace and upgrade the plumbing fixtures with low-flow models 6. Replace flush valves with either sensor or electronic metering to meet current building codes 7. Replace older model electric water coolers that haven’t been replaced 8. Reinsulate domestic piping. Remediate any hazardous materials from existing piping 9. Upgrade non-compliant fixtures to current ADA requirements and regulations 10. Further pipe inspection via camera photography to better determine the condition of sanitary and storm drainage Benefits: 1. Optimize Energy Performance 2. Replace End-of-Life (EOF) System 3. Improve Water Efficiency Cost: $987,300 or $10/sf

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

BAGGALEY ELEMENTARY

services HVAC (HEATING, VENTILATION, AND AIR-CONDITIONING) Installed: 1951, 1974, 1992, 1998

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The overall facility is equipped with a ducted packaged roof-top HVAC unit-type forced air conditioning system, which is in fair-to-poor condition. The existing 1951 and 1974 addition is equipped with rooftop units that condition the space with forced air.

Classroom spaces are tempered with VAV air terminals. Gymnasium and Cafeteria utilize the roof-top units to condition the space with forced air. The ventilation system in the overall facility consists of floor-mounted, horizontal unit ventilators and rooftop units, installed in 1998 and are in fair-to-poor condition, providing fresh air to classrooms and adjacent spaces.

Relief air venting is provided by louvered interior doors, unit ventilators, and ducted packaged roof-top units. The art program is equipped with a kiln and the existing ventilation is inadequate and in poor condition. General building exhaust systems for Restrooms and Storage Rooms are adequately placed and are in fair-to-poor condition.

The existing heating system is a gas-fired heating hot water system, installed in 1974, and is in fair-to-poor condition. The heating and chilled water system in the overall facility is a 2-pipe system, without a capacity for simultaneous heating and cooling operation. The two gas-fired boilers, manufactured by HB Smith were installed in 1992 with upgrades to converted from steam to hot water during the 1998 renovation. Heating water is distributed to terminal units consisting of cabinet heaters, unit heaters, and air handlers.

The majority of the terminal equipment was installed in 1998 and is in fair condition.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The system does feature individual temperature controls. However, the DDC type system was also installed in 1998 and is in poor condition, controls are intermittently failing and are considered obsolete by the manufacturer. A pneumatic control system using air to control various valves and damper in the original building sections. Overall the heating system is evaluated as being safe but inefficient working order and long-term life expectancy of the existing system is not anticipated.

Deficiencies: 1. All HVAC units and components have reached their useful serviceable life 2. Ventilation fails to meet the current building codes 3. The energy performance of all units are very poor Recommendations: 1. Plan for HVAC upgrades that include replacement of VAV air-terminals, Roof-top-units and unit ventilators. Replace general building exhaust systems.

2. Replace antiquated DDC-Controls.

3. Replace and upgrade the existing kiln exhaust system.

4. Repair or upgrade existing boilers burner heads, boiler combustion chamber, and valves.

5. Investigate chemical treatment fluids and flush-out the entire piping system and equipment coils.

Benefits: 1. Optimize Energy Performance 2. Replace End-of-Life (EOF) System 3. Improve Indoor Environmental Quality (IAQ) Cost: $2,673,000 or $27/sf

(demo, reconfigure new system, piping, new controls)

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

BAGGALEY ELEMENTARY

services ELECTRICAL, LIGHTING, EMERGENCY SYSTEM Installed: 1951, 1974, 1998

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The electrical system provided to the overall facility is a 277/480-volt, 3-phase, 4-wire, underground feed from the transformer to the main switchboard. Power is furnished by the utility company to a utility-owned pad-mounted transformer, located in the courtyard, and is in fair condition. The main switchboard is a Square D fusible board with two main switches, a 1200 amp and 1600 amp. 227/480-volt power is feed to another transformer located in an electrical room where power is converted to 120/208-volt which is distributed to the 1951-era wing.

The 480-volt system handles large loads such as air-conditioning, ventilation systems, motors, and some lighting. It is further extended to multiple 120/208-volt step-down transformers through the 1974 addition and the 120-volt panels serve remaining items such as receptacles and miscellaneous power. The existing main service entrance is in fair condition, although at capacity, it can continue to serve the building with proper service and upgrades.

The majority of classroom or learning areas are equipped with adequate electrical outlets, while the corridors provide sufficient coverage for service. However, adequate coverage of GFI-protected exterior outlets is not provided around the perimeter of the building.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The facility emergency power system consists of two emergency generators. A 1974-era Onan 30kW model within the electrical panel room that is in fair condition.

The 1998 renovation scope included a new Kohler 35kW model which is in good condition.

Both generators are 277/480-volt, 3-phase, 4-wire, natural gas models that feed an automatic transfer switch and associated emergency panelboards. The emergency panelboards feed means of egress illumination, lighting of exit and directional signage, fire detection/alarm system, and other miscellaneous system control panels.

Lighting protection safeguards are not present in the facility.

The existing lighting system in the overall facility is typically equipped with T-8, lay-in, 2-by-4 direct fluorescent fixtures with electronic ballast. Fixtures are in fair condition and generally provide the recommended illumination levels of 50 footcandles for classrooms and 20 footcandles for corridors.

Lobby entrances are equipped with lay-in, 2-by-2 direct compact fluorescent fixtures with electronic ballast. Manual toggle dual-level switching is utilized in classrooms while other spaces utilize single-level keyed switching.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The Gymnasium space is equipped with pendant metal halide type lighting, in poor condition, providing illumination below the recommended levels. Student Dining, Kitchen and Service areas are equipped with T-8, lay-in, 2-by-4 direct fluorescent fixtures with single level switching and are in fair condition providing illumination levels below recommendations.

The exterior site lighting system is equipped with high-intensity discharge (HID) building-mounted light fixtures and pole-mounted parking site fixtures are equipped with low-pressure sodium (LPS) lamps.

These fixtures are in poor condition and are inadequate in illumination levels due to insufficient fixture capacity and parse placement of fixtures.

Deficiencies: 1. Main switchboard and fusible switch distribution and panels as they have reached their useful serviceable life, 30-40 years 2. Lighting systems fail to meet the current energy conservation codes 3. Verify if site, security and egress lighting meet current code requirements 4. Energy performance of all fixtures and systems is poor 5. Lack of automatic lighting controls Recommendations: 1. Plan for electrical upgrades that include replacement of all equipment and associated feeders 2. Full replacement of all interior and exterior lighting fixtures LED 3. Upgrade or replace 1974-era emergency generator 4. Provide automatic lighting controls for all spaces Benefits: 1. Optimize Energy Performance 2. Replace End-of-Life (EOF) System 3. Improve Indoor Environmental Quality (IAQ) Cost: $2,468,250 or $25/sf

(Electrical $16.50, Lighting $6.50, Site/Emergency $2) Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEMENTARY

building summary FACILITY ASSESSMENT Original Construction: 1952

Addition: 1960, 1974

Renovation: 1999

Site Area: 19.2 acres | Building Area: 99,031 sf

FACILITY ASSESSMENT Cost Set: 2020

Rating: = 1 Satisfactory = 2 Needs Repair = 3 Needs Replacement Description:

Rating:

Dollar Assessment:

A

SITE CONDITION

2

$ 321,550

B

EXTERIOR WALLS AND FOUNDATION

2

$ 250,000

C

ROOFING

2

$ 2,440,000

D

EXTERIOR DOORS & WINDOWS

3

*$ 200,000

E

INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION-STAIRS-FINISHES

3

$ 1,733,042

F

LIFE SAFETY & FIRE PROTECTION

3

$ 371,400

G

ACCESSIBILITY

2

**$ 300,000

H

PLUMBING

3

$ 990,310

I

HVAC

(HEATING, VENTILATION, AND AIR-CONDITIONING)

3

$ 2,673,000

J

ELECTRICAL, LIGHTING, EMERGENCY SYSTEM

3

$ 2,475,775

TOTAL

$ 11,775,077

* Assessment is an estimate, square-footage of window and door systems is required ** Assessment is an estimate, detailed accessibility work scope is required

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEMENTARY

sitework SITE CONDITION Installed: 1952, 1960, 1974, 1999

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The site for this facility is irregular in shape and is located in a residential area. The elevation of the site ranges from 1,437’ to an elevation of 1,454’ at the high point.

The site for this facility consists of approximately 19.2 acres located in Unity Township Municipality. The southeastern portions of the site are wooded while the building site has a moderate sparse tree landscaping. No grading or site drainage deficiencies were noted. However, minor settling has occurred in the main bus/entry drive that causes ponding during storm events.

These events are also causing premature erosion at the south portion of the site adjacent to the wooded playground.

The building is served by multiple drives, three off of Unity Road #844 which enter from the north and west of the building. This arrangement allows for a separation of bus and vehicular traffic, however, morning arrival and afternoon dismissals require District personnel to facilitate traffic. An additional entry drive is located to the south and a residential road. Bus traffic must also travel through parking lot lanes causing issues with turning radiuses.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Each roadway is marked for two-way traffic with the northern roadway then shifting to one-way traffic upon entering the parking lot area. The site has two asphalt parking lots in fair-to-poor condition and they contain adequate parking for day-to-day operations. A separate drive access site playgrounds. Emergency access drives are limited to only portions of the site. Event parking is limited.

The site and parking lot drainage system consists of sheet drainage to open grade areas and a few catch basins. No indications of the major site or parking lot ponding have been observed, except as noted above.

Asphalt paving is a mixture of heavy-duty and light-duty depths which are showing signs commonly experienced with its age, ie. potholes, rutting, edge cracks, fatigue cracks and alligatoring.

Concrete curbs are in fair condition but have sections of deterioration. Concrete paving sidewalks are generally properly sloped, are located to provide a logical flow of pedestrian traffic, are in fair condition for their age and only have small sections of deterioration or heaving.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Deficiencies: 1. Areas of concrete deterioration will continue to break down the integrity of the paving 2. Existing sealants within control joints and expansion joints are beyond their life and are crumbling to failure.

3. Areas of asphalt deterioration will continue to break down the integrity of the asphalt paving 4. Roadway deterioration that causing site drainage erosion 5. Lack of proper vehicular and bus traffic separation for the site Recommendations: 1. Remove and replace deteriorated concrete paving sections 2. Recaulk existing control joints, expansion joints, and dissimilar materials as required.

3. Structurally review asphalt paving and either plan for full-depth replacement or mill and overlay.

4. Redesign existing traffic flow to allow for a separate bus and vehicular traffic without interaction into parking lots Benefits: 1. Prolong performance and life paving systems 2. Deter any future cracking, shifting, spalling or movement in exterior paving 3. Provide sustainable and quality materials Cost: $321,550 or $3.25/sf (building) 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

Heavy Duty Asphalt: $31.00 sy (remove/replace) Light Duty Asphalt: $29.00 sy (remove/replace) Asphalt Paving / New Wearing Course: $20.00 sy (minor crack repair) New Asphalt Paving: $26.00 sy (light duty) $28.00 sy (heavy duty) Concrete Curb: $26.00 lf (remove/replace) Concrete Sidewalk: $8.00 sf (remove/replace) Stabilize soil erosion: $2.50 sf (stripping and re-grading)

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEMENTARY

building shell EXTERIOR WALLS AND FOUNDATION Installed: 1952, 1960, 1974, 1999

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The original building (11,000sqft) was constructed in 1952 and makes up what is the existing administration area and portions of the 6th-grade wing. An addition (19,000sqft) in 1960 extended the classroom wing along the site. In 1974 a much larger addition was constructed and remains the general building footprint today (99,730sqft).

The overall facility is designed with concrete masonry unit foundation walls on concrete footings, which generally showed no locations of significant differential settlement, cracking or leaking, and are considered in good condition. Only minor issues related to foundation cracking or spalling were encountered. Generally, no grading or site drainage deficiencies were noted around the perimeter of the structure that are contributing or could contribute to the foundation/wall structural deterioration.

However, there are significant signs of leaking below the open grate boiler room access panel causing moisture/water intrusion into the basement section of the boiler room.

The original 1952 and 1960 buildings have a brick veneer on load-bearing masonry wall systems, that display only minor locations of deterioration (approx. 1,075 lf).

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The 1974 building has a brick veneer on load-bearing masonry wall systems (approx.

1,407 lf) with a mezzanine level consisting of vertical metal wall panels on steel truss stud wall systems (approx. 635 lf). There are large canopies over entrances and are steel construction with exterior soffit and are in fair condition.

Either in renovations or during the 1974 addition, portions of the exterior window system were infilled with an EIFS (exterior-insulated-and-finish-system) which is in good-to-fair condition with only signs of a needed clean.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The exterior masonry does not appear to have appropriately spaced or adequately caulked control joints, which are in fair-to-poor condition. Control joints are not provided at all lintel locations, doors and windows, building corners, and/or wall offsets. Exterior walls in the overall building appear to be adequately insulated but would not meet today’s energy and building codes. Brick veneer masonry walls are cavity walls but lack proper spacing or quantity of weeps to allow water moisture to exit the cavity. Lack of proper air space and moisture in the cavity wall has caused the premature rusting of exterior steel lintels, failure of joints and spalling of brick.

The original chimney is in good-to-fair condition. The exterior masonry has not been cleaned or sealed in recent years and has locations of efflorescence.

Window sills are of stone in the two older buildings and are angled brick in the 1974 addition, all are in good condition.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Deficiencies: 1. Areas of mortar and masonry veneer deterioration will continue to break down the integrity of the exterior enclosure.

2. Sub wall and foundation weatherproofing have failed.

3. Existing sealants within control joints and expansion joints are beyond their life and are crumbling to failure.

4. Exterior steel lintels are sagging and rusting.

5. Exterior metal panel wall sections are problematic, are in need of replacement and reconfigured, or minimally require resealing and repainting.

6. Sections of EIFS areas are damaged and have sections of painting failing.

7. Exterior wall R-Values do not meet current energy codes and standards.

8. Minimal daylighting or exterior viewing windows in 1974 addition.

Recommendations: 1. Provide tuckpointing in all areas of mortar deterioration as required through the overall building.

2. Replace damaged and deteriorated lintels.

3. Provide masonry cleaning, sealing, and weep holes as required.

4. Recaulk existing control joints, expansion joints, and dissimilar materials as required.

5. Excavate and waterproof/parge existing foundation at boiler room.

6. Prep and paint all existing EIFS paneling sections.

Benefits: 1. Prolong performance and life of exterior finishes 2. Deter any future cracking, shifting, spalling or movement in exterior fenestration 3. Provide sustainable and quality materials and finishes Cost: $250,000 or $2.50/sf (does not include metal wall panel work) 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

Tuckpointing: $7.50 sf (wall surface) Masonry Cleaning/Sealing: $2.50 sf (wall surface) Exterior Caulking: $7.50 lf (remove/replace) Lintel Replacement: $250.00 lf (total removal/replacement) Remove and Replace Metal Wall Panels: $28.00 sf Scope of work can be further broken down into manageable pieces A possible candidate for a renovation project

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEMENTARY

building shell ROOFING Installed: 2000

Size: 98,864/SF

Warranty: 20 YEAR(2020)

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: Approximately 93,864sf of roof cover for the overall facility is a built-up modified bitumen system by The Garland Company, Streesply E with an original warranty of 20-years. Roof areas are generally in fair condition with approximately 2-4 years of service life remaining.

Sections of roof areas associated with the HVAC roof-top-equipment are in poor-failed condition and have had severe leaking issues. Additionally, there are signs of past leaking.

Access to the roof is by exterior doors from the balcony level which are in fair condition and exterior steel ladders to upper roof areas. Parapet walls are traversed by wooden ship ladders as built by the maintenance department. Proper safety rails are not present, fall safety protection cages are not required, and are not provided.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

No observations of standing water on the roof. Many areas indicated a history of leaking around roof-top-units with areas being fully replaced. Roof drainage areas show a history of standing water, drainage is directed through a system of internal roof drains and are in fair condition. The roof is not equipped with overflow roof drains.

Silver-FlashⓇ counter flashings show wear splits in seams, blisters and “alligatoring” which is caused by the drying out of the exposed asphalt surfacing by the sun.

Deficiencies: 1. Existing caulking above counter flashings is splitting and deteriorating.

2. Small tears at base flashings.

3. No overflow roof drains.

4. Active leak around HVAC mechanical units.

Recommendations: 1. Plan for full replacement at end of warranty.

2. Continue bi-annual inspections and increase budgetary amounts for repairs.

Benefits: 1. Optimize Energy Performance 2. Replace End-of-Life (EOF) System Cost: $2,440,000 OR $26.00/sf 1. Possible candidate for a ten-year restoration system.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEMENTARY

building shell EXTERIOR DOORS & WINDOWS Installed: 1952, 1960, 1974, 1999

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The building is equipped with aluminum-clad wood windows with dual glazed-type window systems. The window system features operable windows throughout the building, operable windows are equipped with opening limiters and integral blinds.

Overall windows are in fair-to-poor condition and are beyond their expected life expectancy. Thermally broken aluminum windows with dual glazed-type window systems were installed within the cafeteria area.

The 1974 Addition features small acrylic sheet skylights in the main corridors.

The exterior doors are a mixture of hollow-metal systems with single-glazing vision lites and aluminum storefront with dual glazing transom and sidelites. The hollow-metal door panels paint is faded and worn.

Door thresholds, weatherstripping and hardware are in need of replacement or repair.

Few exterior doors contain security access control features. Controls are limited to main entrance doors and feature card access, door monitoring and egress controls.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Deficiencies: 1.

2.

3.

4.

Hollow metal door systems have failed panel systems Existing sealants are beyond their life and are crumbling to failure Window hardware in many cases is failing Not all exterior doors have access controls or door monitoring

Recommendations: 1.

2.

3.

4.

Replace hollow-metal door systems with aluminum frames with FRP doors Replace all exterior door weatherstripping, astragals and thresholds Recaulk existing joints and dissimilar materials as required Replace all exterior windows with aluminum type

Benefits: 1. Prolong performance and life of exterior windows and doors 2. Deter any pests or outdoor air infiltration Cost: To be determined.

1.

2.

3.

4.

Insulated Glass/Panels: $70.00sf (includes blinds) Curtain Wall/Storefront System: $80.00sf (remove and replace) Skylights: $125.00 sf (remove and replace) Door Weatherstripping: $300.00 ea (demo and replace)

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEMENTARY

interiors INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION-STAIRS-FINISHES Installed: 1952, 1960, 1974, 1999

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The building features conventionally partitioned classrooms, corridors, and stairs with mostly sheet carpet flooring with resilient base (some corridors contain terrazzo tile); varying styles of acoustical tile ceilings; wall finishes include painted concrete masonry, gypsum board, and plaster. Interior elements vary in conditions but are generally in fair-to-poor conditions.

The typical classroom contains laminate casework and counters and is provided with chalkboards, tackboards, and tack strips that are in good condition. The facility is equipped with louvered and non-louvered interior doors that are both flush-mounted and

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

recessed, mostly with proper ADA hardware and clearances, and are in good condition, however, the classroom locks lack security intruder functions.

The Gymnasium space has athletic wood-type flooring, an open ceiling, as well as painted CMU walls with acoustical wall treatments. The maple flooring is at its median stage of product life and will accommodate future resurfacings.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The Library has sheet carpet flooring that is in fair-to-poor condition, acoustical tile ceilings, as well as painted gypsum board type finishes that are in good condition. The Cafeteria has terrazzo flooring with a resilient base that is in good condition, the acoustical tile ceilings are in fair-to-poor condition. The acoustical wall panels are in not of sufficient depth for proper sound absorption, as well as painted CMU, and is in fair condition.

Restroom flooring and walls are ceramic tiles that are in good condition with steel toilet partitions that are in fair-to poor condition.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Deficiencies: 1. All sheet carpet flooring is beyond its expected life span and are in need of replacement. Sheet carpet flooring is not a preferred flooring finish for classrooms, corridors, and stairs as it harbors dirt, dust, and dander.

2. Interior paint finishes have been deferred maintenance for too long and need to be addressed.

3. Acoustical Ceiling Tiles (ACT) are beyond their life and are showing signs of sagging, water damage and do not meet proper acoustical properties.

4. Chalkboards are not a preferred writing surface for visual display surfaces.

5. Gymnasium and Cafeteria acoustical wall panels do not meet current NTC sound coefficients.

6. Classroom and Corridor casework, shelving and equipment do not meet the educational needs in quantity, quality or locations.

7. The steel toilet partitions within the restrooms are showing signs of rust, warping and hardware failure.

8. Portions of the original construction plaster partitions are deteriorated beyond repair and other areas continue to deteriorate causing on-going maintenance issues.

9. Classroom locksets lack proper security intruder functions.

Recommendations: 1. Plan for interior finish upgrades that include capital renewal of flooring and ceiling finishes. Address deferred maintenance painting items, and include redesign color palette of interior wall finishes. Replace baked enamel steel over paper core toilet partitions with solid plastic (HDPE) that have a higher resistance to abuse, scratches, and the growth of mold and mildew.

Benefits: 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Replace End-of-Life (EOF) System Improve Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) Performance Prolong performance and life of interior finishes Improve acoustical performance and sound control Provide sustainable and quality materials and finishes Rebranded color scheme that is impactful, attractive and vibrant

Cost: $1,733,042 or $17.50/sf (Complete Replacement of Finishes and Casework) 1. Scope of work can be further broken down into manageable pieces 2. A possible candidate for a renovation project

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEMENTARY

services LIFE SAFETY & FIRE PROTECTION Installed: 1952, 1960, 1974, 1999

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The overall facility is equipped with an addressable Simplex 4020 fire alarm system installed in 1999 and is in poor condition. The system consists of an obsolete main control panel, 1 remote LCD annunciators panels located in the main office.

Building subpanels are Simplex 4009 and a Radionics NAC Power Extenders with battery backup. There are only 25manual pull stations; 27audio-visuals indicating devices and 67 visuals; 214 smoke detectors, including, 13duct detectors and 1 heat detector.

The system is automatic and is monitored by a third-party ATC. The system is not equipped with sufficient audible horns, strobe indicating devices, smoke detectors and heat sensors.

The system is not equipped with any flow switches or tamper switches thus it will not support any future fire suppression systems. The system is not adequately provided throughout and does not have additional zone capabilities.

The system is not fully compliant with the International Fire Code (IFC) or the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA).

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The facility is not equipped with an automatic fire suppression system. A flow test would be required to determine if the existing water supply system would provide adequate support for a future system. The kitchen hood is equipped with an Ansul system that is in fair-to-poor condition and is proper for current cooking requirements.

Fire Extinguishers are provided throughout the building.

Deficiencies: 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Main Alarm Control Panel is obsolete, unable to make future repairs Two of the three annunciator panels are non-functional Fire alarm system end devices have met their lifespan Energy performance of all fixtures and systems is poor Visual and audible alarm devices do not meet ADA and NFPA requirements

Recommendations: 1. Replace non-addressable and obsolete fire alarm control equipment 2. Upgrade occupant notification to meet ADA and NFPA requirements for visual and audible coverage 3. All exit signs are to meet code for size and location 4. Emergency lighting must meet code for illumination levels and locations, upgrade fixtures to LED Benefits: 1. Upgrade to compliant IFC and NFPA System 2. Resolve emergency notification failures 3. Replace End-of-Life (EOF) System Cost: $371,400 or $3.75/sf

(Fire Alarm $2.25, Lighting $1.50)

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEMENTARY

legal/code ACCESSIBILITY Installed: 1952, 1960, 1974, 1999

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: This site lacks public sidewalks from the public right-of-way, there is an accessible route provided from the accessible parking areas. Passenger loading zones at both the bus and vehicle drop-off lack an accessible route to the main entrance of the school. There is an accessible route connecting all or most areas of the site. The exterior entrances are mostly accessible and access from the parking/drop-off area to the building entries is not compromised by steps or steep ramps. An adequate number of accessible parking spaces are provided, including one van-accessible space, and are properly marked.

Exterior doors meet minimum clear width, maneuvering clearances and proper hardware.

The main entrance lacks the convenience of an ADA automatic/power assist door. The addition of a secure entry vestibule is not compliant and requires travel to the non-secure lobby for access to office administration.

There is an accessible route through the building that connects all accessible spaces and elements. Generally does not include protruding objects. Objects such as fire extinguishers, drinking fountains, signs cannot protrude more than 4-inches along the accessible route. In some instances, the building’s drinking fountains do impede upon the accessible route.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Elevation changes within the overall facility are facilitated by compliant stairwells, a ramp, a passenger elevator and a vertical platform lift. The passenger elevator is isolated within the Library/Media Center on the ground floor The raised platform (stage) within the Gymnasium is in non-compliance. An accessible route must connect the platform (stage) directly to seating areas where they are directly connected. If temporary stairs are added for performances a temporary ramp should as well, otherwise access requires an individual to leave the Gymnasium and enter from a back hallway ramp.

Interior signage meets requirements for raised and contrasting text/characters, raised Braille, however not all signs are located on the proper side (latch side) of doors.

Generally, all public interior doors are equipped with hardware that is ADA-compliant that is operable with one hand does not require tight grasping, pinching, or twisting of the wrist, nor more than 5-pounds of force to operate. There are a few exceptions, as a few doors that provide access to utility or mechanical-type spaces are not compliant.

Group Restroom layouts meet the requirements for clearances and compliant accessories are adequately provided and mounted properly. Single user toilet rooms serve dual functions as both staff and public accessible toilet rooms within the restroom.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

With last renovations occurring prior to 2012, clearances around the water closet are permitted and the lavatory may overlap that clearance if the door to the room does not swing into the clearances at the fixtures and that the edge of the lavatory is at least 18-inches front of the centerline of the water closet. The International Building Code or IBC makes reference to the ICC/ANSI A117.1 that specifies a vertical grab bar that is not present in this facility. The toilet room within the upper mezzanine classroom is not ADA-compliant as it pertains to clearances, mounting heights for fixtures and accessories.

Classroom, Breakrooms and/or Corridor sinks require a side approach for access. For better usability, a forward approach is preferred at sinks and work surfaces to increase maneuvering clearance.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Deficiencies: 1. Lack of accessible route from passenger loading/unloading at bus and vehicle drives 2. Lack of power assist door openers at the main entry 3. Lack of direct access to performance platform (stage) and spectator accessible seating 4. Improper clearances for individual toilet rooms and mounting heights for accessories 5. Front access usability of work surfaces and sinks Recommendations: 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

TheInstall power assist door opener at the main entrance Enlarge and reconfigure individual toilet rooms to be accessible Reconfigure group restrooms to have an accessible fixture Remount and add additional toilet accessories to meet regulatory requirements Replace casework with ADA-compliant sink base

Priorities for Accessibility: 1.

2.

3.

4.

Accessible approach and entrances Access to goods and services Access to public toilet rooms Access to other items such as water fountains

Safe Harbor Provision: 1. Any facility’s elements built or altered before 2012, and that comply with the 1991 Standards do not need to be changed to satisfy the 2010 Standards. This provision does not apply to elements in existing facilities that were not included in the 1991 Standards but are now regulated by the 2010 Standards. These elements must satisfy the 2010 Standards to the extent readily achievable.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEMENTARY

services PLUMBING

Installed: 1952, 1960, 1974, 1999

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The building is serviced by the local municipal water authority (Westmoreland Co). The 8-inch service line runs along Mountain View Drive. A 4-inch line serves the 1974 Addition and a 3-inch line serves the original building. The line is equipped with a reduced pressure backflow preventer and is in good condition. A water treatment system is not present. No pressure-related issues have been reported and the utility meter is satisfactory. The domestic water supply piping is copper and most of the piping system is in fair condition. Piping insulation is fiberglass with known hazardous materials being removed in past renovations. Parts of the distribution system piping are original and have been suffering from pipe erosion and subsequent pinhole leaks. As the piping has failed, it has been replaced.

The sanitary waste piping is cast iron and is in good-to-fair condition as dependent on the age and/or if sections were replaced during building renovations.

There have been no ongoing signs of clogging or backups noted. Parts of the sanitary waste system are original to the building and would be at the end of their life.

There is a grease interceptor outside the kitchen area which has been maintained but is extended beyond its life expectancy.

The rainwater drainage piping consists of cast iron piping and is in good-to-fair condition. No visible indications of issues, however, multiple locations are original and are at the end of their life expectancy. Roof drainage is handled by internal roof drains, all of which are in good-to-fair condition. Some locations show signs of failing or removed fiberglass insulation. Original flange bowls and rings may be wrapped with hazardous materials.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

A 4-inch natural gas line services the original building which feeds from the gas house at the north corner of the property. The 1974 addition gas service is provided via another 4-inch gas line running south along the property line and enters near the kitchen side of the addition.

The facility has two gas-fired domestic water heaters. Within the original building is a 125gal PVI model installed in 1999, is beyond its serviceable life and is in need of replacement. The expansion tank has met its serviceable life and is recommended to be replaced with any work associated with this unit. Within the upper mechanical room of the 1974 addition is a 99gal high-efficiency condensing water heater manufactured by Bock with an additional storage tank. This water heater was replaced with the last 10-years and is in good-to-fair condition. The domestic water heater is equipped with master mixing valves that have been rebuilt from renovations and are in fair-to-poor condition and should be further evaluated for repair upgrades and/or replacement.

The majority of the facility’s plumbing fixtures and trim were replaced in the renovations, however, original fixtures do remain and are beyond their life expectancy.

These fixtures are also not low flow, while fixtures replaced are. Lavatories are china with either electronic-metering or two-handle manual faucets. Water Closets are a mixture of battery-operated sensor operation and manual while the urinals are all manual.

Classroom and other learning area countertop sinks are typical of stainless steel basins with manual faucets. Artrooms sinks have under-counter clay/sediment traps. Floor mounted, three-station fixtures are in the group restrooms.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Service Sinks and exterior hose bibs are located and spaced properly throughout the building and are in fair-to-poor condition.

Electric water coolers are of sufficient numbers and are spaced throughout the facility and are generally in good-to-fair condition. Maintenance has been upgrading replacements to bottle filler-type units.

Deficiencies: 1.

2.

3.

4.

Existing copper piping corrosion and pinhole leaks Many portions of the plumbing system are beyond its life expectancy Not all fixtures meet the current building codes pertaining to flow consumption The water heater unit requires significant upgrades to continue its service and proper planning for replacement 5. The domestic water storage tank is at the end of its serviceable life 6. The energy performance of all heating units are very poor 7. Not all fixtures meet ADA requirements per current building codes and regulations Recommendations: 1. Investigate water treatment fluids and flush out the entire piping system 2. Evaluate existing copper piping to determine the cause of pipe corrosion and pinhole leaks 3. Replace domestic water heater and storage tank located in the original building 4. Replace original sections of domestic water piping and sanitary water piping 5. Replace and upgrade the plumbing fixtures with low-flow models 6. Replace flush valves with either sensor or electronic metering to meet current building codes 7. Replace older model electric water coolers that haven’t been replaced 8. Reinsulate domestic piping. Remediate any hazardous materials from existing piping 9. Upgrade non-compliant fixtures to current ADA requirements and regulations 10. Further pipe inspection via camera photography to better determine the condition of sanitary and storm drainage Benefits: 1. Optimize Energy Performance 2. Replace End-of-Life (EOF) System 3. Improve Water Efficiency Cost: $990,310 or $10/sf

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEMENTARY

services HVAC (HEATING, VENTILATION, AND AIR-CONDITIONING) Installed: 1974, 1992, 1999

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The overall facility is equipped with chilled water and a DX forced air conditioning system, which is in fair-to-poor condition. The existing 1952 classroom wing and 1960 addition utilize a chiller to provide chilled water for the building and pumps deliver the chilled water to the terminal units. The existing 1974 addition is equipped with a ducted packaged roof-top HVAC unit-type forced air conditioning system, which is in fair-to-poor condition. Classroom spaces are tempered with VAV air terminals. Gymnasium and Cafeteria utilize the roof-top units to condition the space with forced air. The ventilation system in the overall facility consists of floor-mounted, horizontal unit ventilators and rooftop units, installed in 1999 and are in fair-to-poor condition, providing fresh air to classrooms and adjacent spaces.

Relief air venting is provided by louvered interior doors, unit ventilators, and ducted packaged roof-top units. The Art program is equipped with a kiln and the existing ventilation is inadequate and in poor condition. General building exhaust systems for Restrooms and Storage Rooms are adequately placed and are in poor condition with some being replaced in 2018.

The existing heating system is a gas-fired heating hot water system, installed in 1974, and is in fair-to-poor condition. The heating and chilled water system in the overall facility is a 2-pipe system, without a capacity for simultaneous heating and cooling operation. The two gas-fired boilers, manufactured by HB Smith were installed in 1992 with upgrades to converted from steam to hot water during the 1999 renovation. Heating water is

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

distributed to terminal units consisting of unit ventilators, cabinet heaters, unit heaters, and air handlers. The majority of the terminal equipment was installed in 1999 and is in fair condition.

The

system

does

feature

individual

temperature controls. However, the DDC type system was also installed in 1999 and is in poor condition, controls are intermittently failing and are considered obsolete by the manufacturer. A pneumatic control system using air to control various valves and damper as well as the unit ventilators is present in the original building sections.

Overall the heating system is evaluated as being safe but inefficient working order and long-term life expectancy of the existing system is not anticipated.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Deficiencies: 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

All HVAC units and components have reached their useful serviceable life Active humidity control is difficult with the existing unit ventilator system Ventilation fails to meet the current building codes The energy performance of all units are very poor Air-cooled chiller contains screw-driven compression which is excessively loud

Recommendations: 1. Plan for HVAC upgrades that include replacement of chiller, VAV air-terminals, Roof-top-units and unit ventilators. Replace general building exhaust systems.

2. Convert the 1950-era wings to a ducted system.

3. Replace antiquated DDC-Controls.

4. Replace and upgrade the existing kiln exhaust system.

5. Repair or upgrade existing boilers burner heads, boiler combustion chamber, and valves.

6. Investigate chemical treatment fluids and flush out the entire piping system and equipment coils.

Benefits: 1. Optimize Energy Performance 2. Replace End-of-Life (EOF) System 3. Improve Indoor Environmental Quality (IAQ) Cost: $2,673,000 or $27/sf

(demo, reconfigure new system, piping, new controls)

1. Conversion of the 1950-era to a ducted system is anticipated to be an additional $8-10 per square foot.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEMENTARY

services ELECTRICAL, LIGHTING, EMERGENCY SYSTEM Installed: 1952, 1960, 1974, 1999

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The electrical system provided to the overall facility is a 277/480-volt, 3-phase, 4-wire, underground feed from the transformer to the main switchboard. Power is furnished by the utility company to a utility-owned pad-mounted transformer, located in the courtyard, and is in fair condition. The main switchboard is a Square D fusible board with two main switches, a 1200 amp and 1600 amp. 227/480-volt power is feed to another transformer located in an electrical room where power is converted to 120/208-volt which is distributed to the 1950-era wing.

The 480-volt system handles large loads such as air-conditioning, ventilation systems, motors, and some lighting. It is further extended to multiple 120/208-volt step-down transformers through the 1974 addition and the 120-volt panels serve remaining items such as receptacles and miscellaneous power. The existing main service entrance is in fair condition, although at capacity, it can continue to serve the building with proper service and upgrades.

The majority of classroom or learning areas are equipped with adequate electrical outlets, while the corridors provide sufficient coverage for service. However, adequate coverage of GFI-protected exterior outlets is not provided around the perimeter of the building.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The facility emergency power system consists of two emergency generators. A 1974-era Onan 30kW model within the electrical panel room that is in fair condition.

The 1998 renovation scope included a new Kohler 35kW model which is in good condition.

Both generators are 277/480-volt, 3-phase, 4-wire, natural gas models that feed an automatic transfer switch and associated emergency panelboards. The emergency panelboards feed means of egress illumination, lighting of exit and directional signage, fire detection/alarm system, and other miscellaneous system control panels.

Lighting protection safeguards are not present in the facility.

The existing lighting system in the overall facility is typically equipped with T-8, lay-in, 2-by-4 direct fluorescent fixtures with electronic ballast. Fixtures are in fair condition and generally provide the recommended illumination levels of 50 footcandles for classrooms and 20 footcandles for corridors.

Lobby entrances are equipped with lay-in, 2-by-2 direct compact fluorescent fixtures with electronic ballast. Manual toggle dual-level switching is utilized in classrooms while other spaces utilize single-level keyed switching.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The Gymnasium space is equipped with pendant metal halide type lighting, in poor condition, providing illumination below the recommended levels. Student Dining, Kitchen and Service areas are equipped with T-8, lay-in, 2-by-4 direct fluorescent fixtures with single level switching and are in fair condition providing illumination levels below recommendations.

The exterior site lighting system is equipped with building-mounted light fixtures and pole-mounted parking site fixtures are equipped with high-intensity discharge (HID) lamps. These fixtures are in poor condition and are inadequate in illumination levels due to insufficient fixture capacity and parse placement of fixtures.

Deficiencies: 1. Main switchboard and fusible switch distribution and panels as they have reached their useful serviceable life, 30-40 years 2. Lighting systems fail to meet the current energy conservation codes 3. Verify if site, security and egress lighting meet current code requirements 4. Energy performance of all fixtures and systems is poor 5. Lack of automatic lighting controls Recommendations: 1. Plan for electrical upgrades that include replacement of all equipment and associated feeders 2. Full replacement of all interior and exterior lighting fixtures LED 3. Upgrade or replace 1974-era emergency generator 4. Provide automatic lighting controls for all spaces Benefits: 1. Optimize Energy Performance 2. Replace End-of-Life (EOF) System 3. Improve Indoor Environmental Quality (IAQ) Cost: $2,475,775 or $25/sf

(Electrical $16.50, Lighting $6.50, Site/Emergency $2) Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

GREATER LATROBE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

building summary FACILITY ASSESSMENT Original Construction: 1974

Addition: 2001

Renovation: 1998, 2014

Site Area: 94.7 acres | Building Area: 162,500 sf

FACILITY ASSESSMENT Cost Set: 2020

Rating: = 1 Satisfactory = 2 Needs Repair = 3 Needs Replacement Description:

Rating:

Dollar Assessment:

A

SITE CONDITION

2

$ 528,125

B

EXTERIOR WALLS AND FOUNDATION

2

$ 406,250

C

ROOFING

2

$ 3,580,000

D

EXTERIOR DOORS & WINDOWS

3

*$ 300,000

E

INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION-STAIRS-FINISHES

3

$ 3,006,250

F

LIFE SAFETY & FIRE PROTECTION

3

$ 609,375

G

ACCESSIBILITY

2

**$ 300,000

H

PLUMBING

3

$ 1,625,000

I

HVAC

(HEATING, VENTILATION, AND AIR-CONDITIONING)

3

$ 4,387,176

J

ELECTRICAL, LIGHTING, EMERGENCY SYSTEM

3

$ 4,062,200

TOTAL

$ 18,204,376

* Assessment is an estimate, square-footage of window and door systems is required ** Assessment is an estimate, detailed accessibility work scope is required

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

GREATER LATROBE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

sitework SITE CONDITION

Installed: 1974, 1998, 2001, 2014

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The site for this facility is irregular in shape and is located in a rural residential area. The elevation of the site ranges from 1,010’ to an elevation of 1,140’ at the high point.

The site for this facility is shared with the Senior High School consisting of approximately 94.7 acres located in Unity Township Municipality.

The western half of the property is the site for the Senior High. The building site is fairly level.

The northern and eastern portions of the site are wooded while the building site has a moderate sparse tree landscaping. Only minor grading and site drainage deficiencies along the front drive were noted.

Only one true entrance exists for the Junior High (Arnold Palmer Drive) which is from the south. All other access is a pass through the Senior High site. This arrangement creates a lack of proper separation of bus and vehicular traffic; morning arrival and afternoon dismissals require District personnel to facilitate.

The main roadway is marked for two-way traffic and then shifts to one-way traffic upon entering the parking lot area. The site has two asphalt parking lots in good-to-fair condition and they contain adequate parking for day-to-day operations. A singular drive Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

circles the building that allows access for emergency, student and athletic activities. Event parking is limited during concurrent events, which is quite often.

The site and parking lot drainage system consists of sheet drainage to two open rocked swales that provide adequate drainage during stormwater runoff. Minor signs of the improper minimum slope of the parking lot ponding have been observed. Asphalt paving is a mixture of heavy-duty and light-duty depths which are showing signs commonly experienced with its age, ie. potholes, rutting, edge cracks, fatigue cracks and alligatoring.

Concrete curbs are in poor condition, have sections of inappropriate heights but are appropriately placed for pedestrian paving locations. Concrete paving sidewalks are generally properly sloped, are located to provide a logical flow of pedestrian traffic, are in fair condition for their age and only have small sections of deterioration or heaving.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Deficiencies: 1. Areas of concrete deterioration will continue to break down the integrity of the paving 2. Existing sealants within control joints and expansion joints are beyond their life and are crumbling to failure.

3. Areas of asphalt deterioration will continue to break down the integrity of the asphalt paving 4. Sections of concrete curbing inadequate for the protection of pedestrians from vehicular traffic Recommendations: 1. Remove and replace deteriorated concrete paving sections 2. Recaulk existing control joints, expansion joints, and dissimilar materials as required.

3. Structurally review asphalt paving and either plan for full-depth replacement or mill and overlay.

Benefits: 1. Prolong performance and life paving systems 2. Deter any future cracking, shifting, spalling or movement in exterior paving 3. Provide sustainable and quality materials Cost: $528,125 or $3.25/sf (building) 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Heavy Duty Asphalt: $31.00 sy (remove/replace) Light Duty Asphalt: $29.00 sy (remove/replace) Asphalt Paving / New Wearing Course: $20.00 sy (minor crack repair) Concrete Curb: $26.00 lf (remove/replace) Concrete Sidewalk: $8.00 sf (remove/replace)

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

GREATER LATROBE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

building shell EXTERIOR WALLS AND FOUNDATION Installed: 1974, 1998, 2001, 2014

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The original Building (155,000 sqft) was constructed in 1974 and makes up the majority of the exterior fenestrations. In 2001, small additions (7,500 sqft.) were constructed and together remain the general building footprint today.

The overall facility is designed with concrete masonry unit foundation walls on concrete footings, which displayed a few locations of differential settlement, shifting, cracking, and are considered in fair condition. The Interior column structure sits on concrete pads. No significant issues related to column foundations or foundation cracking or spalling were encountered. No grading or site drainage deficiencies were noted around the perimeter of the structure that is contributing or could contribute to the foundation/wall structural deterioration.

Concerns of pyrite damage within the connecting corridor were unfounded during previous construction projects in which concrete slabs and exterior footings were replaced and/ or repaired. Inadequate stone base and proper depth were determined to be the cause for excessive cracking and slab failure.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The original 1974 building (approx. 1,470 lf) has a brick veneer on a steel truss stud wall system that displays some locations of deterioration. Brick damage and deterioration have occurred around the architectural ornate open downspout and cistern system. The upper floor level consists of vertical metal wall panels on steel truss stud wall systems

(approx. 1,360 lf). The upper fenestration is beyond its lifespan and has had significant areas of failure and leaking at the base and top of wall conditions. Furthermore, the connecting panel seals and paint finish has deteriorated. The 2014 renovations included large canopies over entrances of steel with brick construction and are in good condition.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The exterior masonry does not appear to have appropriately spaced or adequately caulked control joints, which are in fair-to-poor condition. Control joints are not provided at all lintel locations, doors and windows, building corners, and/or wall offsets. Exterior walls in the overall building appear to be adequately insulated but would not meet today’s energy and building codes. Brick veneer masonry walls are cavity walls but lack proper spacing or quantity of weeps to allow water moisture to exit the cavity. Lack of proper air space and moisture in the cavity wall has caused the premature rusting of exterior steel lintels, failure of joints and spalling of brick.

The exterior masonry has not been cleaned or sealed in recent years and has locations of efflorescence.

Window sills are angled soldier set brick in the original building, with the majority in poor condition.

Renovations to the connecting corridor sills were revised to the preferred aluminum window extender sill.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Deficiencies: 1. Areas of mortar and masonry veneer deterioration will continue to break down the integrity of the exterior enclosure.

2. Existing sealants within control joints and expansion joints are beyond their life and are crumbling to failure.

3. Exterior steel lintels are sagging and rusting.

4. Exterior metal panel wall sections are problematic, are in need of replacement and reconfigured, or minimally require resealing and repainting.

5. Exterior wall R-Values do not meet current energy codes and standards.

6. Minimal daylighting or exterior viewing windows in the majority of the building.

Non-existent on the upper level.

Recommendations: 1. Provide tuckpointing in all areas of mortar deterioration as required through the overall building.

2. Replace damaged and deteriorated lintels.

3. Provide masonry cleaning, sealing, and weep holes as required.

4. Recaulk existing control joints, expansion joints, and dissimilar materials as required.

5. Replace/reconfigure all exterior metal wall panels and exterior sheathing at the upper level.

Benefits: 1. Prolong performance and life of exterior finishes 2. Deter any future cracking, shifting, spalling or movement in exterior fenestration 3. Provide sustainable and quality materials and finishes Cost: $406,250 or $2.50/sf (does not include metal wall panel work) 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

Tuckpointing: $7.50 sf (wall surface) Masonry Cleaning/Sealing: $2.50 sf (wall surface) Exterior Caulking: $7.50 lf (remove/replace) Lintel Replacement: $250.00 lf (total removal/replacement) Remove and Replace Metal Wall Panels: $28.00 sf Scope of work can be further broken down into manageable pieces A possible candidate for renovation project OR replacement

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

building shell ROOFING Installed: 1999

Size: 137,693/SF

Warranty: 20 YEAR(2019)

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: Approximately 137,693sf of roof cover for the overall facility is a built-up modified bitumen system by The Garland Company, Streesply E with an original warranty of 20-years. Roof areas are generally in fair condition with approximately 2-4 years of service life remaining. Sections of roof areas associated with drainage paths to exterior wall are in poor-failed condition and have had severe leaking issues. Additionally, there are signs of past leaking around the upper mezzanine to the lower roof wall transition flashings.

Access to the roof is by exterior doors from the mezzanine level which are in fair condition and exterior steel ladders and stairs to the upper roof area. Proper safety rails are not present, fall safety protection cages are not required, and are not provided.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Observations of standing water on the roof and around parapet scuppers. Many areas indicated a history of leaking around drainage paths to exterior wall and roof-top-units with multiple areas of wet insulation shown.

The upper mezzanine roof drainage areas show a history of standing water, drainage is directed through a system of exterior wall scuppers into open downspouts to the lower roof.

The lower roof has minimal slope to the exterior walls, scuppers to an architectural ornate open downspout into cisterns.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Roof scuppers are in poor condition and require annual maintenance patches to remain in serviceable condition. The roof is not equipped with overflow roof drains.

Silver-FlashⓇ counter flashings show wear splits in seams, blisters and “alligatoring” which is caused by the drying out of the exposed asphalt surfacing by the sun.

Deficiencies: 1. Existing caulking above counter flashings is splitting and deteriorating.

2. Small tears at base flashings.

3. No overflow roof drains.

4. Active leak around HVAC mechanical units.

5. Minimal drainage slope and poor drainage design.

6. Improper flashing height clearances at base and top of wall detailing.

Recommendations: 1. Plan for full replacement at end of warranty.

2. Continue bi-annual inspections and increase budgetary amounts for repairs.

Benefits: 1. Optimize Energy Performance 2. Replace End-of-Life (EOF) System Cost: $3,580,000 OR $26.00/sf 1. A possible candidate for a ten-year restoration system.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

GREATER LATROBE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

building shell EXTERIOR DOORS & WINDOWS Installed: 1974, 1998, 2001, 2014

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The original building is equipped with thermally broken hollow-metal windows with dual glazed-type window systems. The window system features operable windows throughout the building, operable windows are equipped without opening limiters. Overall windows are in poor condition as their seals have failed and their hardware is in need of repair.

There is one large central skylight that is in fair condition.

The 2014 renovation included the replacement of some window units with thermally broken aluminum windows with dual glazing.

The majority of the exterior doors are hollow-metal systems with dual-glazing.

Door thresholds, weatherstripping and hardware are in need of replacement or repair. The 2014 renovation replaced some hollow metal doors with fiberglass-reinforced polymer (FRP) doors that contain insulated dual-glazing lites.

Few exterior doors contain security access control features. Controls are limited to main entrance doors and feature card access, door monitoring and egress controls.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Deficiencies: 1.

2.

3.

4.

Hollow metal door systems have failed glazing system seals Existing sealants are beyond their life and are crumbling to failure Window hardware in many cases is failing Not all exterior doors have access controls or door monitoring

Recommendations: 1.

2.

3.

4.

Replace hollow-metal door systems with aluminum storefront Replace all exterior door weatherstripping, astragals and thresholds Recaulk existing joints and dissimilar materials as required Replace all exterior windows with aluminum type

Benefits: 1. Prolong performance and life of exterior windows and doors 2. Deter any pests or outdoor air infiltration Cost: To be determined.

1.

2.

3.

4.

Insulated Glass/Panels: $70.00 sf (includes blinds) Curtain Wall/Storefront System: $80.00 sf (remove and replace) Skylights: $125.00 sf (remove and replace) Door Weatherstripping: $300.00 ea (demo and replace)

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

GREATER LATROBE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

interiors INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION-STAIRS-FINISHES Installed: 1974, 1998, 2014

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The building features non-conventionally partitioned classrooms, corridors, and stairs are typically sheet carpet flooring with a resilient base. However, some spaces are consist of luxury vinyl tile (LVT), vinyl composition tile (VCT), or sealed concrete; varying styles of acoustical tile ceilings; wall finishes include painted concrete masonry, gypsum board, and plaster. Interior elements vary in conditions but are generally in fair-to-poor condition.

The typical classroom contains laminate casework and counters and is provided with chalkboards, tackboards, and tack strips that are in fair condition. The facility is equipped with louvered and non-louvered interior doors that are both flush-mounted and recessed,

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

mostly with proper ADA hardware and clearances, and are in good condition, however, the classroom locks lack security intruder functions.

The Gymnasium space has athletic wood-type flooring, an open ceiling, as well as painted CMU walls with acoustical wall treatments. The maple flooring is at its median stage of product life and will accommodate future resurfacings.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The Library has sheet carpet flooring, acoustical tile ceilings, as well as painted gypsum board type finishes that are in fair condition. The Cafeteria has linoleum sheet flooring that has completely failed and is deteriorating from the subfloor; the acoustical tile ceilings are in fair-to-poor condition. The lack of acoustical wall panels adds to poor sound acoustics in this space.

Restroom flooring and walls are ceramic tiles that are in fair condition with steel toilet partitions that are in poor condition.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Deficiencies: 1. All sheet carpet flooring is beyond its expected life span and requires replacement.

Sheet carpet flooring is not a preferred flooring finish for classrooms, corridors, and stairs as it harbors dirt, dust, and dander.

2. Cafeteria linoleum flooring has completely failed and requires immediate replacement.

3. Interior paint finishes have been deferred maintenance for too long and need to be addressed.

4. Acoustical Ceiling Tiles (ACT) are beyond their life and are showing signs of sagging, water damage, and do not meet proper acoustical properties.

5. Chalkboards are not a preferred writing surface for visual display surfaces.

6. Gymnasium and Cafeteria acoustical wall panels do not meet current NTC sound coefficients.

7. Classroom and Corridor casework, shelving and equipment do not meet the educational needs in quantity, quality, or locations.

8. The steel toilet partitions within the restrooms are showing signs of rust, warping, and hardware failure.

9. Portions of the original construction plaster partitions have deteriorated beyond repair and other areas continue to deteriorate causing ongoing maintenance issues.

10. Classroom locksets lack proper security intruder functions.

Recommendations: 1. Plan for interior finish upgrades that include capital renewal of flooring and ceiling finishes. Address deferred maintenance painting items, and include redesign color palette of interior wall finishes. Replace baked enamel steel over paper core toilet partitions with solid plastic (HDPE) that have a higher resistance to abuse, scratches, and the growth of mold and mildew. Install security intruder locksets.

Remove sections of locker banks for educational usage.

Benefits: 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Replace End-of-Life (EOF) System Improve Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) Performance Prolong performance and life of interior finishes Improve acoustical performance and sound control Provide sustainable and quality materials and finishes A rebranded color scheme that is impactful, attractive and vibrant

Cost: $3,006,250 or $18.50/sf

(Complete Replacement of Finishes and Casework)

1. Scope of work can be further broken down into manageable pieces 2. A possible candidate for a renovation project

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

GREATER LATROBE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

services LIFE SAFETY & FIRE PROTECTION Installed: 1974, 1998, 2001, 2014

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The overall facility is equipped with an addressable Simplex 4020 fire alarm system installed in 2001 and is in poor condition. The system consists of an obsolete main control panel, 1 remote LCD annunciators panels located in the main office.

Building subpanels are Simplex 4009 NAC Power Extenders with battery backup. There are only 44 manual pull stations; 33 audio-visuals indicating devices and 126 visuals; 349 smoke detectors, including, 20 duct detectors and 9 heat detectors.

The system is automatic and is monitored by a third-party ATC. The system is not equipped with sufficient audible horns, strobe indicating devices, smoke detectors and heat sensors. The system is not equipped with any flow switches or tamper switches thus it will not support any additions to the small fire suppression system that is present. The system is not adequately provided throughout and does not have additional zone capabilities. Strobes are required for every classroom The system is not fully compliant with the International Fire Code (IFC) or the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA).

Sections of the facility are equipped with an automatic fire suppression system. These include the connecting corridor, portions of the main corridor and stair. A flow test would Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

be required to determine if the existing water supply system would provide adequate support for a future system. The kitchen hood is equipped with an Ansul system that is in fair-to-poor condition and is proper for current cooking requirements.

Fire Extinguishers are provided throughout the building.

Deficiencies: 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Main Alarm Control Panel is obsolete, unable to make future repairs Two of the three annunciator panels are non-functional Fire alarm system end devices have met their lifespan Energy performance of all fixtures and systems is poor Visual and audible alarm devices do not meet ADA and NFPA requirements

Recommendations: 1. Replace non-addressable and obsolete fire alarm control equipment 2. Upgrade occupant notification to meet ADA and NFPA requirements for visual and audible coverage 3. All exit signs are to meet code for size and location 4. Emergency lighting must meet code for illumination levels and locations, upgrade fixtures to LED Benefits: 1. Upgrade to compliant IFC and NFPA System 2. Resolve emergency notification failures 3. Replace End-of-Life (EOF) System Cost: $609,375 or $3.75/sf

(Fire Alarm $2.25, Lighting $1.50)

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

GREATER LATROBE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

legal/code ACCESSIBILITY

Installed: 1974, 1998, 2001, 2014

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: This site lacks public sidewalks from the public right-of-way, there is an accessible route provided from the accessible parking areas. Passenger loading zones at both the bus and vehicle drop-off have an accessible route to the main entrance of the school. There is an accessible route connecting all or most areas of the site. Only main exterior entrances are accessible and access from the parking/drop-off area to the building entries is not compromised by steps or steep ramps. An inadequate number of accessible parking spaces are provided, one van-accessible space is properly marked.

Main exterior doors meet minimum clear width, maneuvering clearances and proper hardware. The main entrance lacks the convenience of an ADA automatic/power assist door. Secondary exterior doors, while marked as accessible, fail to meet the proper threshold requirements.

There is an accessible route through the building that connects all accessible spaces and elements. Generally does not include protruding objects. Objects such as fire extinguishers, drinking fountains, signs cannot protrude more than 4-inches along the accessible route. In some instances, the building’s drinking fountains do impede upon the accessible route.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Elevation changes within the overall facility are facilitated by compliant stairwells, ramps, and two passenger elevators.

Interior signage meets requirements for raised and contrasting text/characters, raised Braille, however not all signs are located on the proper side (latch side) of doors.

Generally, all public interior doors are equipped with hardware that is ADA-compliant that is operable with one hand, does not require tight grasping, pinching, or twisting of the wrist, nor more than 5-pounds of force to operate.

Group Restroom layouts meet the requirements for clearances and compliant accessories are adequately provided and mounted properly.

Single user toilet rooms serve dual functions as both staff and public accessible toilet rooms within the restroom. With last renovations occurring prior to 2012, clearances around the water closet are permitted and the lavatory may overlap that clearance if the door to the room does not swing into the clearances at the fixtures and that the edge of the lavatory is at least 18-inches front of the centerline of the water closet.

The International Building Code or IBC makes reference to the ICC/ANSI A117.1 that specifies a vertical grab bar that is not present in this facility.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Most Classroom, Breakrooms and/or Corridor sinks allow for a forward approach which is preferred at sinks and work surfaces to increase maneuvering clearance.

Assembly areas, Gymnasium, has an adequate number of wheelchair spaces within the telescopic bleachers dispersed to allow location choices and view angles equivalent to other seating. The Cafeteria seating has an accessible route to seating that is useable by people with disabilities. Locker/dressing rooms lack ADA-compliant bench seating.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Deficiencies: 1. Lack of accessible route from passenger loading/unloading at bus and vehicle drives 2. Lack of minimum number of accessible parking spaces 3. Lack of power assist door openers at the main entry 4. Improper clearances for individual toilet rooms and mounting heights for accessories 5. Front access usability of work surfaces and sinks Recommendations: 1. Install power assist door opener at the main entrance 2. Reconfigure and restripe parking lot stalls to account for the proper number of accessible parking 3. Enlarge and reconfigure individual toilet rooms to be accessible 4. Reconfigure group restrooms to have an accessible fixture 5. Remount and add additional toilet accessories to meet regulatory requirements 6. Evaluate and replace casework with ADA-compliant sink base Priorities for Accessibility: 1.

2.

3.

4.

Accessible approach and entrances Access to goods and services Access to public toilet rooms Access to other items such as water fountains

Safe Harbor Provision: 1. Any facility’s elements built or altered before 2012, and that comply with the 1991 Standards do not need to be changed to satisfy the 2010 Standards. This provision does not apply to elements in existing facilities that were not included in the 1991 Standards but are now regulated by the 2010 Standards. These elements must satisfy the 2010 Standards to the extent readily achievable.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

GREATER LATROBE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

services PLUMBING

Installed: 1974, 1998, 2001

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The building is serviced by the local municipal water authority (Youngstown/Latrobe). The 6-inch service line is equipped with a reduced pressure backflow preventer and is in good condition. A water treatment system is not present. No pressure-related issues have been reported and the utility meter is satisfactory. The domestic water supply piping is copper and most of the piping system is in fair condition. Piping insulation is fiberglass with known hazardous materials being removed in past renovations. Parts of the distribution system piping are original and have been suffering from pipe erosion and subsequent pinhole leaks. As the piping has failed, it has been replaced.

The sanitary waste piping is cast iron and is in good-to-fair condition as dependent on the age and/or if sections were replaced during building renovations. There have been no ongoing signs of clogging or backups noted.

Parts of the sanitary waste system are original to the building and would be at the end of their life.

There is a grease interceptor outside the kitchen area which has been maintained but is extended beyond its life expectancy.

The rainwater drainage piping consists of exterior architectural downspouts into cisterns which tie into 8-inch lines that circle the bullying increasing in size till they meet the main storm line to the north of the site.

A 6-inch natural gas line services the building which feeds from the Senior High School and enters the building at the southeast corner.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The facility has a gas-fired Bryan domestic water heater with a separate original steel-lined storage tank located in the main mechanical room. The water heater and storage tank are in fair condition but beyond their expected life expectancy. The expansion tank has met its serviceable life and is recommended to be replaced with any work associated with the domestic heaters or storage tanks. The domestic water heater is equipped with a master mixing valve that has and is in fair-to-poor condition and is to be evaluated for repair upgrades and/or replacement.

The majority of the facility’s plumbing fixtures and trim were replaced in the renovations, however, original fixtures do remain and are beyond their life expectancy.

These fixtures are also not low flow, while fixtures replaced are. Lavatories are china with either electronic-metering or two-handle manual faucets. Water Closets are a mixture of battery-operated sensor operation and manual while the urinals are all manual.

Classroom and other learning area countertop sinks are typical of stainless steel basins or epoxy resin with manual faucets. Floor mounted, three-station fixtures are in art or project lab-type spaces. Artrooms sinks have under-counter clay/sediment traps. The Athletic Locker spaces feature multiple sufficient shower stalls but lack low-flow shower controls. Service Sinks and exterior hose bibs are located and spaced properly throughout the building and are in fair-to-poor condition.

Electric water coolers are of sufficient numbers and are spaced throughout the facility and are generally in good-to-fair condition. Maintenance has been upgrading replacements to bottle filler-type units.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Deficiencies: 1.

2.

3.

4.

Existing copper piping corrosion and pinhole leaks Many portions of the plumbing system are beyond its life expectancy Not all fixtures meet the current building codes pertaining to flow consumption The water heater unit requires significant upgrades to continue its service and proper planning for replacement 5. The domestic water storage tank is at the end of its serviceable life 6. The energy performance of all heating units are very poor 7. Not all fixtures meet ADA requirements per current building codes and regulations Recommendations: 1. Investigate water treatment fluids and flush out the entire piping system 2. Evaluate existing copper piping to determine the cause of pipe corrosion and pinhole leaks 3. Replace original sections of domestic water piping and sanitary water piping 4. Replace and upgrade the plumbing fixtures with low-flow models 5. Replace flush valves with either sensor or electronic metering to meet current building codes 6. Replace older model electric water coolers that haven’t been replaced 7. Reinsulate domestic piping. Remediate any hazardous materials from existing piping 8. Upgrade non-compliant fixtures to current ADA requirements and regulations 9. Further pipe inspection via camera photography to better determine the condition of sanitary and storm drainage Benefits: 1. Optimize Energy Performance 2. Replace End-of-Life (EOF) System 3. Improve Water Efficiency Cost: $1,625,000 or $10/sf

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

GREATER LATROBE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

services HVAC (HEATING, VENTILATION, AND AIR-CONDITIONING) Installed: 1974, 1998, 2001

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The overall facility is equipped with a ducted packaged roof-top HVAC unit-type forced air conditioning system, which is in fair-to-poor condition. The building is equipped with eleven rooftop units that condition the space with forced air. The units are gas-fired for heating and contain refrigeration compressors for cooling.

General classroom, laboratories and office spaces are tempered with VAV air terminals. The Gymnasium, Library and Cafeteria spaces utilize the roof-top units to condition the space with forced air. However, the gymnasiums lack cooling capabilities. Music Classrooms are serviced by individual unit ventilators. The ventilation system in the overall facility consists of floor-mounted, horizontal unit ventilators and rooftop units, installed in 1998 and are in fair-to-poor condition, providing fresh air to classrooms and adjacent spaces.

Relief air venting is provided by louvered interior doors, unit ventilators, and ducted packaged roof-top units. The art program is equipped with a kiln and the existing ventilation is inadequate and in fair-to-poor condition. General building exhaust systems for Restrooms, Storage Areas, Workrooms, Locker Rooms, Project & Science Laboratories are inadequately placed and are in poor condition. A dust collection system is present and is in fair condition.

The heating water system is feed from the adjoining Senior High 2-pipe system. Heating water is distributed to terminal units consisting of cabinet heaters, unit heaters, and air handlers. The majority of the terminal equipment was installed in 1998 and is in fair Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

condition. The majority of the system does feature individual temperature controls for space, however, some thermostats control multiple spaces. The DDC type system was also installed in 1998 and is in poor condition, controls are intermittently failing and are considered obsolete by the manufacturer. A pneumatic control system using air to control various valves and damper as well as the unit ventilators in some building sections.

Overall the heating system is evaluated as being safe but inefficient working order and long-term life expectancy of the existing system is not anticipated.

Deficiencies: 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

All HVAC units and components have reached their useful serviceable life Lack of air-conditioning within the Gymnasium and adjacent Locker Rooms Ventilation fails to meet the current building codes DDC-Controls are obsolete and fail to meet today’s standards The energy performance of all units are very poor Lack of simultaneous heating and cooling in order to control humidity

Recommendations: 1. Plan for HVAC upgrades that include replacement of VAV air-terminals, Roof-top-units and unit ventilators. Replace general building exhaust systems.

2. Replace antiquated DDC-Controls.

3. Replace and upgrade the existing kiln exhaust system.

4. Investigate chemical treatment fluids and flush-out the entire piping system and equipment coils.

1. Plan for upgrades to allow for humidity control through reheat operations.

Benefits: 1. Optimize Energy Performance 2. Replace End-of-Life (EOF) System 3. Improve Indoor Environmental Quality (IAQ) Cost: $4,387,176 or $27/sf

(demo, reconfigure new system, piping, new controls)

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

GREATER LATROBE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

services ELECTRICAL, LIGHTING, EMERGENCY SYSTEM Installed: 1974, 1998, 2001, 2014

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The electrical system provided to the overall facility is a 277/480-volt, 3-phase, 4-wire, underground feed from the transformer to the main switchboard. Power is furnished by the utility company to a utility-owned pad-mounted transformer, located in the courtyard, and is in fair condition. The main switchboard is a General Electric fusible board with a 2,500 amp main switch.

The 480-volt system handles large loads such as air-conditioning, ventilation systems, motors, and some lighting. The 480 volt is extended to multiple 120/208-volt step-down transformers through the 1974 building and the 120-volt panels serve remaining items such as receptacles and miscellaneous power. The existing main service entrance is in fair condition, although at capacity, it can continue to serve the building with proper service and upgrades.

The majority of classrooms or learning areas are not equipped with adequate electrical outlets as staff relies on multiple extension cords to meet demand. Corridors provide sufficient coverage for service. However, adequate coverage of GFI-protected exterior outlets is not provided around the perimeter of the building.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The facility emergency power system consists of a 2001-era Kohler 35kW model within the electrical panel room that is in fair condition. The 277/480-volt, 3-phase, 4-wire, natural gas model feeds an automatic transfer switch and associated emergency panelboards. The emergency panelboards feed means of egress illumination, lighting of exit and directional signage, fire detection/alarm system, and other miscellaneous system control panels.

Lighting protection safeguards are not present in the facility.

The existing lighting system in the overall facility is typically equipped with T-8, lay-in, 2-by-4 direct fluorescent fixtures with electronic ballast. Fixtures are in fair condition and generally provide the recommended illumination levels of 50 footcandles for classrooms and 20 footcandles for corridors. Student Dining, Kitchen and Service areas are equipped with T-8, lay-in, 2-by-2 direct fluorescent lighting and recessed can light’s in soffit areas.

The renovated main lobby entrance and corridor are equipped with lay-in, 2-by-2 LED fixtures, LED striplighting, and LED spotlighting with lighting control and keypad switching.

Manual toggle dual-level switching is utilized in classrooms while other spaces utilize single-level keyed switching.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The Gymnasium spaces are equipped with pendant metal halide type lighting, in poor condition, providing illumination below the recommended levels.

The exterior site lighting system is equipped with building-mounted light fixtures and pole-mounted parking site fixtures are equipped with high-intensity discharge (HID) lamps. These fixtures are in fair-to-poor condition. Evaluation of illumination levels, fixture capacities and locations should be further evaluated. The renovated main entry canopies are equipped with LED fixtures that are in good condition.

Deficiencies: 1. Main switchboard and fusible switch distribution and panels as they have reached their useful serviceable life, 30-40 years 2. Building amperage is on the low-side for square footage, calculates to 3,200 min.

3. Lighting systems fail to meet the current energy conservation codes 4. Verify if site, security and egress lighting meet current code requirements 5. Energy performance of all fixtures and systems is poor 6. Lack of automatic lighting controls Recommendations: 1. Plan for electrical upgrades that include replacement of all equipment and associated feeders 2. Full replacement of all interior and exterior lighting fixtures to LED 3. Upgrade or replace 1999-era emergency generator 4. Provide automatic lighting controls for all spaces Benefits: 1. Optimize Energy Performance 2. Replace End-of-Life (EOF) System 3. Improve Indoor Environmental Quality (IAQ) Cost: $4,062,200 or $25/sf

(Electrical $16.50, Lighting $6.50, Site/Emergency $2)

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

GREATER LATROBE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

building summary FACILITY ASSESSMENT Original Construction: 1966

Addition: 2001

Renovation: 2003, 2014

Site Area: 94.7 acres | Building Area: 305,950 sf

FACILITY ASSESSMENT Cost Set: 2020

Rating: = 1 Satisfactory = 2 Needs Repair = 3 Needs Replacement Description:

Rating:

Dollar Assessment:

A

SITE CONDITION

2

$ 994,337

B

EXTERIOR WALLS AND FOUNDATION

2

$ 841,750

C

ROOFING

2

$ 890,000

D

EXTERIOR DOORS & WINDOWS

3

*$ 600,000

E

INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION-STAIRS-FINISHES

3

$ 6,119,000

F

LIFE SAFETY & FIRE PROTECTION

3

$ 1,147,312

G

ACCESSIBILITY

2

**$ 300,000

H

PLUMBING

3

$ 3,059,500

I

HVAC

(HEATING, VENTILATION, AND AIR-CONDITIONING)

3

$ 8,260,650

J

ELECTRICAL, LIGHTING, EMERGENCY SYSTEM

3

$ 7,648,750

TOTAL

$ 28,961,299

* Assessment is an estimate, square-footage of window and door systems is required ** Assessment is an estimate, detailed accessibility work scope is required

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

GREATER LATROBE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

sitework SITE CONDITION

Installed: 1966, 2001, 2003, 2014

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The site for this facility is irregular in shape and is located in a rural residential area. The elevation of the site ranges from 1,040’ to an elevation of 1,150’ at the high point.

The site for this facility is shared with the Junior High School consisting of approximately 94.7 acres located in Unity Township Municipality. The building site is fairly level with the exception of the north and south portions which are quite steep.

The northern and western portions of the site are wooded while the building site has a moderate sparse tree and shrub landscaping. No grading or site drainage deficiencies were noted.

Multiple access entrances exist, proper separation of bus and other vehicular traffic requires District personnel to facilitate. All roadways are marked for two-way traffic, one-way traffic is again orchestrated by District personnel. The site has multiple asphalt parking lots in good-to-fair condition and contains adequate parking for day-to-day operations. Event parking is limited during concurrent events, which is quite often. The building has access drives around its entire perimeter for emergency vehicles.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The site and parking lot drainage system consists of sheet drainage to catch basins providing adequate drainage during stormwater runoff. No indications of the site or parking lot ponding have been observed. Asphalt paving is a mixture of heavy-duty and light-duty depths which are showing signs commonly experienced with its age, ie. potholes, rutting, edge cracks, fatigue cracks and alligatoring.

Concrete curbs are in poor condition, have sections of inappropriate heights but are appropriately placed for pedestrian paving locations. Concrete paving sidewalks are generally properly sloped, are located to provide a logical flow of pedestrian traffic, are in fair condition for their age and only have small sections of deterioration or heaving. Exterior stairs in addition to proper ramps are located at two secondary event entrances and both are in good condition.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Deficiencies: 1. Areas of concrete deterioration will continue to break down the integrity of the paving 2. Existing sealants within control joints and expansion joints are beyond their life and are crumbling to failure.

3. Areas of asphalt deterioration will continue to break down the integrity of the asphalt paving 4. Sections of concrete curbing inadequate for the protection of pedestrians from vehicular traffic Recommendations: 1. Remove and replace deteriorated concrete paving sections 2. Recaulk existing control joints, expansion joints, and dissimilar materials as required.

3. Structurally review asphalt paving and either plan for full-depth replacement or mill and overlay.

Benefits: 1. Prolong performance and life paving systems 2. Deter any future cracking, shifting, spalling or movement in exterior paving 3. Provide sustainable and quality materials Cost: $994,337 or $3.25/sf (building) 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Heavy Duty Asphalt: $31.00 sy (remove/replace) Light Duty Asphalt: $29.00 sy (remove/replace) Asphalt Paving / New Wearing Course: $20.00 sy (minor crack repair) Concrete Curb: $26.00 lf (remove/replace) Concrete Sidewalk: $8.00 sf (remove/replace)

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

GREATER LATROBE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

building shell EXTERIOR WALLS AND FOUNDATION Installed: 1966, 2001, 2003

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The original Building (248,700 sqft.) was constructed in 1966 and makes up the majority of the exterior fenestration. In 2001, gymnasium, commons, and fine art additions (57,250 sqft.) were constructed and unitedly these two construction periods are the building footprint today.

The overall facility is designed with poured concrete foundation walls on concrete footings, which displayed no locations of significant differential settlement, cracking or leaking, and are considered in fair condition. The interior column structure sits on concrete pads. No significant issues related to column foundations or foundation cracking or spalling were encountered.

No grading or site drainage deficiencies were noted around the perimeter of the structure that are contributing or could contribute to the foundation/wall structural deterioration. However, interior courtyard grade shows signs of settlement which has caused interior water intrusion and moisture issues.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The original 1966 building has a brick veneer on a steel truss stud wall system infill between concrete columns that displays some locations of deterioration. Generally, for the age of the building, it is in good condition. The larger volumes have a brick veneer on load-bearing masonry wall systems and display minor locations of deterioration.

The wing stairwells and hallway exterior wall cladding material is an architectural precast concrete that appears to have had anchorage points added for support during a renovation. Large canopies over entrances are a mixture of steel and concrete construction and are in fair condition.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The exterior masonry does not appear to have appropriately spaced or adequately caulked control joints, which are in fair-to-poor condition. Control joints are not provided at all lintel locations, doors and windows, building corners, and/or wall offsets. Exterior walls in the overall building appear to be adequately insulated but would not meet today’s energy and building codes. Brick veneer masonry walls are cavity walls but lack proper spacing or quantity of weeps to allow water moisture to exit the cavity. Lack of proper air space and moisture in the cavity wall has caused the premature rusting of exterior steel lintels, failure of joints and spalling of brick.

The exterior masonry has not been cleaned or sealed in recent years and has locations of efflorescence.

Window sills are angled soldier set brick in the original building, with aluminum window extender sills installed in the 2001 renovation.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Deficiencies: 1. Areas of mortar and masonry veneer deterioration will continue to break down the integrity of the exterior enclosure.

2. Existing sealants within control joints and expansion joints are beyond their life and are crumbling to failure.

3. Exterior steel lintels are sagging and rusting.

4. Exterior wall R-Values do not meet current energy codes and standards.

Recommendations: 1. Provide tuckpointing in all areas of mortar deterioration as required through the overall building.

2. Replace damaged and deteriorated lintels.

3. Provide masonry cleaning, sealing, and weep holes as required.

4. Recaulk existing control joints, expansion joints, and dissimilar materials as required.

5. Structurally review concrete columns and architectural concrete cladding anchorage.

Benefits: 1. Prolong performance and life of exterior finishes 2. Deter any future cracking, shifting, spalling or movement in exterior fenestration 3. Provide sustainable and quality materials and finishes Cost: $841,750 or $2.50/sf (does not include architectural concrete column/panel work) 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Tuckpointing: $7.50 sf (wall surface) Masonry Cleaning/Sealing: $2.50 sf (wall surface) Exterior Caulking: $7.50 lf (remove/replace) Lintel Replacement: $250.00 lf (total removal/replacement) Scope of work can be further broken down into manageable pieces A possible candidate for renovation project OR replacement

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

building shell ROOFING Installed: Varies Area 1: 2018-19 Area 2: 2019 Area 3: 2004

Size: 119,830/SF Size: 48,805/SF Size: 34,274/SF

Warranty: 30 YEAR Warranty: 30 YEAR Warranty: 20 YEAR(2024)

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: Approximately 203,000sf of roof cover for the overall facility is a built-up modified bitumen system by The Garland Company, Streesply E with an original warranty of 20-years. Roof area ages and installed construction vary as multiple generations of roofing replacements have occurred. The oldest sections of the roof are generally in average condition with approximately 4-6 years of service life remaining. Sections of roof have been replaced in 2018, areas are indicated in white in the below photo - reference 2018 capital improvement roofing project. The Upper gym roof was replaced in 2019 as indicated in orange.

Area 1: Classroom wings, Administrative Area, and Fine Arts Wing (white) Area 2: Upper Gym Roof, H-Wing (orange) Area 3: Auditorium, Shop, Commons, Rotunda (blue)

Access to the lower roof sections is limited to only two roof hatches, upper roof sections lack permanent access. Proper safety rails are not present, fall safety protection cages are not required, and are not provided.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

No observations of standing water on the roof. Areas were replaced in 2018 and 2019 that had a history of leaking around roof-top-units and metal screen walls. Sections of oof drainage areas show a history of standing water, drainage is directed through a system of internal roof drains and is in fair condition. The roof is not equipped with overflow roof drains. (construction photos 2018) The upper auditorium roof and lower sections around the auditorium drainage areas show a history of standing water and have sections of wet insulation. One active leak has been determined to be an issue above the stage scene shop.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Silver-FlashⓇ counter flashings show wear splits in seams, blisters and “alligatoring” which is caused by the drying out of the exposed asphalt surfacing by the sun.

Deficiencies: 1. Existing caulking above counter flashings is splitting and deteriorating.

2. Small tears at base flashings.

3. No overflow roof drains.

4. Active leak around HVAC mechanical units and screen walls.

5. Minimal drainage slope and poor drainage design.

6. Improper flashing height clearances at base and top of wall detailing.

Recommendations: 1. Plan for full replacement at end of warranty.

2. Continue bi-annual inspections.

Benefits: 1. Optimize Energy Performance 2. Replace End-of-Life (EOF) System Cost: $890,000 OR $26.00/sf 1. Pertains to Area 3 only

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

GREATER LATROBE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

building shell EXTERIOR DOORS & WINDOWS Installed: 1966, 2001, 2003

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The original building is equipped with thermally broken aluminum windows with dual glazed-type window systems. The window system features operable windows throughout the building, operable windows are equipped with opening limiters and integral blinds.

Overall windows are in good-to-fair condition as they were replaced in the latest renovations. The window system seals and screens are in fair condition, however operable blind hardware is in need of repair.

There are large glass block daylighting panels within the physical education wing of the original building as well as the auxiliary gymnasium of the 2001 addition. This system is in poor condition with many cracked or fractured glass blocks.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The majority of the exterior doors are aluminum storefront systems with dual-glazing.

Door thresholds, weatherstripping and concealed vertical rods are in need of replacement or repair. The courtyard and stairwell exterior doors are the hollow-metal type with dual-glazing with the majority of the glazing seals failing to cause fogging or condensation in the unit. Door thresholds and weatherstripping are in need of replacement or repair.

The building does contain one section of curtainwall which features a dual-glazed window system and is in good condition. There is also a greenhouse associated with the Science department.

Few exterior doors contain security access control features. Controls are limited to main entrance doors and feature card access, door monitoring and egress controls.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Deficiencies: 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Hollow metal door systems have failed glazing system seals Existing sealants are beyond their life and are crumbling to failure Window hardware in many cases is failing Improper door hardware at courtyard doors Not all exterior doors have access controls or door monitoring

Recommendations: 1.

2.

3.

4.

Replace hollow-metal door systems with aluminum storefront Replace all exterior door weatherstripping, astragals and thresholds Recaulk existing joints and dissimilar materials as required Structurally review glass block system to further determine the extent of damage; glass block system should be replaced with windows or translucent wall panels

Benefits: 1. Prolong performance and life of exterior windows and doors 2. Deter any pests or outdoor air infiltration Cost: To be determined.

1.

2.

3.

4.

Insulated Glass/Panels: $70.00 sf (includes blinds) Curtain Wall/Storefront System: $80.00 sf (remove and replace) Greenhouse Replacement: $85.00 sf (demo and replace, based on floor area) Door Weatherstripping: $300.00 ea (demo and replace)

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

GREATER LATROBE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

interiors INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION-STAIRS-FINISHES Installed: 1966, 2001, 2003

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The building features conventionally partitioned classrooms separated into curriculum wings, corridors, and stairs with varying styles of flooring; terrazzo, vinyl-composite-tile, concrete, and sheet carpet flooring with resilient base; ceilings are a mixture of hard surface plaster as well as acoustical tile ceilings; wall finishes include painted concrete masonry, ceramic wall tile, gypsum board, and plaster. Interior elements vary in conditions but are generally in good-to fair condition.

The typical classroom contains laminate casework and counters and is provided with chalkboards, tackboards, and tack strips that are in good condition. The facility is equipped with louvered and non-louvered interior doors that are both flush-mounted and

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

recessed, mostly with proper ADA hardware and clearances, and are in good condition, however, the classroom locks lack security intruder functions.

Encore spaces that include the creative and performing arts meet current curriculum needs but are showing age.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The Gymnasium spaces have athletic wood-type flooring, an open ceiling, as well as painted CMU walls with acoustical wall treatments. The maple flooring is at its median stage of product life and will accommodate future resurfacings. The Natatorium spaces have a ceramic wall and floor tile, an open ceiling, as well as acoustical wall treatments.

The glazed structural block wall system contains numerous fractures, weak mortar joints and causes extreme glaring issues for the spaces.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The Library has sheet carpet flooring, acoustical tile ceilings, as well as painted gypsum board type finishes that are in good condition. The Cafeteria has terrazzo flooring, the acoustical surfaced hard plaster ceiling, as well as the acoustical tile ceilings, are in fair-to-poor condition. The wall construction of brick and ceramic tile surfaces is in fair condition.

Restroom flooring and walls are ceramic tiles that are in fair condition with a mixture of HDPE toilet partitions and steel toilet partitions that vary from fair-to-poor condition.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Deficiencies: 1. All vinyl-composite tile flooring is beyond its expected life span and is in need of replacement.

2. Areas of sheet carpet flooring are beyond their expected life span and are in need of replacement.

3. Interior paint finishes have been deferred maintenance for too long and need to be addressed. Areas of wallpaper covering are deteriorating and the adhesive is failing.

4. Areas of hard surface plaster ceiling and Acoustical Ceiling Tiles (ACT) are beyond their life and are showing signs of sagging, water damage and do not meet proper acoustical properties.

5. Chalkboards are not a preferred writing surface for visual display surfaces.

6. Some classroom casework, shelving, and equipment do not meet the educational needs in quantity, quality or locations. Sink area casework shows signs of water damage.

7. The steel toilet partitions within the restrooms are showing signs of rust, warping and hardware failure.

8. Portions of the original construction plaster partitions have deteriorated beyond repair and other areas continue to deteriorate causing ongoing maintenance issues.

9. Classroom locksets lack proper security intruder functions.

10. Locker banks and their excessive amount of locker storage accommodate a significant amount of square footage.

Recommendations: 1. Plan for interior finish upgrades that include a capital renewal of wall, flooring and ceiling finishes. Address deferred maintenance painting items, and include redesign color palette of interior wall finishes. Replace baked enamel steel over paper core toilet partitions with solid plastic (HDPE) that have a higher resistance to abuse, scratches, and the growth of mold and mildew. Install security intruder locksets. Remove sections of locker banks for educational usage.

Benefits: 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Replace End-of-Life (EOF) System Improve Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) Performance Prolong performance and life of interior finishes Improve acoustical performance and sound control Provide sustainable and quality materials and finishes A rebranded color scheme that is impactful, attractive and vibrant

Cost: $6,119,000 or $20/sf

(Complete Replacement of Finishes and Casework)

1. Scope of work can be further broken down into manageable pieces 2. A possible candidate for a renovation project Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

GREATER LATROBE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

services LIFE SAFETY & FIRE PROTECTION Installed: 1966, 2001

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The overall facility is equipped with an addressable Simplex 4020 fire alarm system installed in 2001 and is in poor condition and includes the Athletic Complex Field House and Pressbox system (Mfg. EST, Model i064). The system consists of an obsolete main control panel, 3 remote LCD annunciators panels located at main entries (Administration, Physical Education, Auditorium).

Building subpanels are Simplex 4009 NAC Power Extenders with battery backup. There are 104 manual pull stations; 147 audio-visuals indicating devices and 238 visuals; 140 smoke detectors, including, 37 duct detectors and 15 heat detectors.

The system is automatic and is monitored by a third-party ATC. The system is not equipped with sufficient audible horns, strobe indicating devices, smoke detectors and heat sensors. The system is not equipped with any flow switches or tamper switches thus it will not support any future fire suppression systems. The system is not adequately provided throughout and does not have additional zone capabilities.

The system is not fully compliant with the International Fire Code (IFC) or the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA).

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The facility is not equipped with an automatic fire suppression system. A flow test would be required to determine if the existing water supply system would provide adequate support for a future system. The kitchen hood is equipped with an Ansul system that is in fair-to-poor condition and is proper for current cooking requirements.

Fire Extinguishers are provided throughout the building.

Deficiencies: 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Main Alarm Control Panel is obsolete, unable to make future repairs Two of the three annunciator panels are non-functional Fire alarm system end devices have met their lifespan Energy performance of all fixtures and systems is poor Visual and audible alarm devices do not meet ADA and NFPA requirements

Recommendations: 1. Replace non-addressable and obsolete fire alarm control equipment 2. Upgrade occupant notification to meet ADA and NFPA requirements for visual and audible coverage 3. All exit signs are to meet code for size and location 4. Emergency lighting must meet code for illumination levels and locations, upgrade fixtures to LED Benefits: 1. Upgrade to compliant IFC and NFPA System 2. Resolve emergency notification failures 3. Replace End-of-Life (EOF) System Cost: $1,147,312 or $3.75/sf

(Fire Alarm $2.25, Lighting $1.50)

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

GREATER LATROBE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

legal/code ACCESSIBILITY Installed: 1966, 2001

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: This site lacks public sidewalks from the public right-of-way, there is an accessible route provided from the accessible parking areas. Passenger loading zones at both the bus and vehicle drop-off have an accessible route to the main and secondary event entrances of the school. There is an accessible route connecting all or most areas of the site. The exterior entrances are mostly accessible and access from the parking/drop-off area to the building entries is not compromised by steps or steep ramps. An adequate number of accessible parking spaces are provided, van-accessible spaces are properly marked.

Main exterior doors meet minimum clear width, maneuvering clearances and proper hardware. The main entrance has an ADA automatic/power assist door, yet it is not utilized as it does not allow for properly securing the main vestibule.

There is an accessible route through the building that connects all accessible spaces and elements. Generally does not include protruding objects. Objects such as fire extinguishers, drinking fountains, signs cannot protrude more than 4-inches along the accessible route. In some instances, the building’s drinking fountains do impede upon the accessible route.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Elevation changes within the overall facility are facilitated by compliant stairwells with the exception of the Auditorium balcony. Other locations contain a vertical platform lift, two passenger elevators, and one service elevator. The natatorium provides an accessible transfer pool lift as means of entry.

Interior signage meets requirements for raised and contrasting text/characters, raised Braille, however not all signs are located on the proper side (latch side) of doors.

Generally, all public interior doors are equipped with hardware that is ADA-compliant that is operable with one hand, does not require tight grasping, pinching, or twisting of the wrist, nor more than 5-pounds of force to operate.

Group Restroom layouts meet the requirements for clearances and compliant accessories are adequately provided and mounted properly.

With last renovations occurring prior to 2012, clearances around the water closet are permitted and the lavatory may overlap that clearance if the door to the room does not swing into the clearances at the fixtures and that the edge of the lavatory is at least 18-inches front of the centerline of the water closet.

The International Building Code or IBC makes reference to the ICC/ANSI A117.1 that specifies a vertical grab bar that is not present in this facility.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Most Classroom, Breakrooms and/or Corridor sinks allow for a forward approach which is preferred at sinks and work surfaces to increase maneuvering clearance.

Assembly areas, Gymnasium, has an adequate number of wheelchair spaces within the telescopic bleachers dispersed to allow location choices and view angles equivalent to other seating. The Auditorium has an adequate number of wheelchair spaces within the fixed seating with a proper clear line of sight over and between fellow spectators. The wheelchair spaces adjoin and not overlap accessible routes. There is direct access to the stage from the spectator seating as well. The Cafeteria seating has an accessible route to seating that is useable by people with disabilities. Locker/dressing rooms lack ADA-compliant bench seating.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Deficiencies: 1. Non-compliant stairwell to Auditorium balcony.

2. Exterior accessible route to the Creative Student for Creativity (CSC) has uneven paving and brick pavers 3. Lack of secure power assist door openers at the main entry 4. Improper clearances for individual toilet rooms and mounting heights for accessories 5. Front access usability of work surfaces and sinks Recommendations: 1.

2.

3.

4.

Provide secure power assist door opener at the main entrance Remove and replace brick pavers from the exterior accessible route at the CSC Remount and add additional toilet accessories to meet regulatory requirements Evaluate and replace casework with ADA-compliant sink base

Priorities for Accessibility: 1.

2.

3.

4.

Accessible approach and entrances Access to goods and services Access to public toilet rooms Access to other items such as water fountains

Safe Harbor Provision: 1. Any facility’s elements built or altered before 2012, and that comply with the 1991 Standards do not need to be changed to satisfy the 2010 Standards. This provision does not apply to elements in existing facilities that were not included in the 1991 Standards but are now regulated by the 2010 Standards. These elements must satisfy the 2010 Standards to the extent readily achievable.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

GREATER LATROBE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

services PLUMBING

Installed: 1966, 2001

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The building is serviced by the local municipal water authority (Youngstown/Latrobe). The 6-inch service line is equipped with a reduced pressure backflow preventer and is in good condition. A water treatment system is not present. No pressure-related issues have been reported and the utility meter is satisfactory. The domestic water supply piping is copper and most of the piping system is in fair condition. Piping insulation is fiberglass with known hazardous materials being removed in past renovations. Parts of the distribution system piping are original to the building and have been suffering from pipe erosion and subsequent pinhole leaks. As the piping has failed, it has been replaced.

The sanitary waste piping is cast iron and is in good-to-fair condition as dependent on the age and/or if sections were replaced during building renovations. There have been no ongoing signs of clogging or backups noted.

Parts of the sanitary waste system are original to the building and would be at the end of their life.

There is a grease interceptor outside the kitchen area which has been maintained but is extended beyond its life expectancy. There is an acid neutralizer tank outside the science wing that is also beyond its life expectancy and requires further evaluation to determine its condition.

The rainwater drainage piping consists of cast iron piping and is in good-to-fair condition.

No visible indications of issues, however, multiple locations are original and are at the end of their life expectancy. Roof drainage is handled by internal roof drains, all of which are in good-to-fair condition. Some locations show signs of failing or removed fiberglass insulation. Original flange bowls and rings may be wrapped with hazardous materials.

An 8-inch natural gas line services the building.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The facility has two gas-fired A.O. Smith domestic water heaters with separate Cemline cement-lined storage tanks; one located in the main boiler room and one located in the pool mechanical room. The water heaters are in good-to-fair condition, however, the storage tanks are original and are showing signs of failure in the internal linings.

Expansion Tanks and backflow preventers have met their serviceable life and are recommended to be replaced with any work associated with the domestic heaters or storage tanks. Each domestic water heater is equipped with master mixing valves that have been rebuilt from renovations and are in fair-to-poor condition and should be further evaluated for repair upgrades and/or replacement.

The majority of the facility’s plumbing fixtures and trim were replaced in the renovations, however, original fixtures do remain and are beyond their life expectancy.

These fixtures are also not low flow, while fixtures replaced are. Lavatories are china with either electronic-metering or two-handle manual faucets. Water Closets are a mixture of battery-operated sensor operation and manual while the urinals are all manual. Classroom and other learning area countertop sinks are typical of stainless steel basins or epoxy resin with manual faucets. Floor mounted, three-station fixtures are in art or project lab-type spaces.

Athletic and Community Locker spaces feature multiple sufficient shower stalls but lack low-flow shower controls. Service Sinks and exterior hose bibs are located and spaced properly throughout the building and are in fair-to-poor condition.

Electric water coolers are of sufficient numbers and are spaced throughout the facility and are generally in good-to-fair condition. Maintenance has been upgrading replacements to bottle filler-type units.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Deficiencies: 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

Existing copper piping corrosion and pinhole leaks Many portions of the plumbing system are beyond its life expectancy Not all fixtures meet the current building codes pertaining to flow consumption The water heater units require significant upgrades to continue their service and proper planning for replacement Domestic water storage tanks are at the end of their serviceable life The energy performance of all heating units are very poor Acid Neutralizer Tank unknown conditions Not all fixtures meet ADA requirements per current building codes and regulations

Recommendations: 1. Investigate water treatment fluids and flush out the entire piping system 2. Evaluate existing copper piping to determine the cause of pipe corrosion and pinhole leaks 3. Replace original sections of domestic water piping and sanitary water piping 4. Replace and upgrade the plumbing fixtures with low-flow models 5. Replace flush valves with either sensor or electronic metering to meet current building codes 6. Replace older model electric water coolers that haven’t been replaced 7. Reinsulate rainwater and domestic piping. Remediate any hazardous materials from existing piping 8. Upgrade non-compliant fixtures to current ADA requirements and regulations 9. Further pipe inspection via camera photography to better determine the condition of sanitary and storm drainage Benefits: 1. Optimize Energy Performance 2. Replace End-of-Life (EOF) System 3. Improve Water Efficiency Cost: $3,059,500 or $10/sf

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

GREATER LATROBE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

services HVAC (HEATING, VENTILATION, AND AIR-CONDITIONING) Installed: 1966, 2001

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The majority of the building is serviced by a central heating and cooling plant that is in good-to-fair condition. Installed in 2001, two chillers by Trane provide chilled water for the building, and distribution is comprised of multiple primary and secondary pumps that deliver the chilled water to the terminal units. There is bypass piping to provide some redundancy in distribution. Two cooling towers provide heat rejection for the chillers.

The Administrative wing is equipped with a ducted packaged roof-top HVAC unit-type forced air conditioning system and is tempered with VAV air terminals, which are in fair-to-poor condition.

The Music, Band and LGI Classrooms are serviced by individual floor-to-ceiling vertical air-handling units with some spaces requiring multiple units.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Generally, the Classrooms with outside wall exposure are serviced with floor-mounted unit ventilators, while Project and Science Laboratories have horizontal ceiling-mounted units. These Trane units provide the required outside air and are in good-to-fair condition.

The Auditorium, the Student Dining and both Gymnasiums are served by multiple air-handler units to condition the space with forced air. These units are equipped with variable speed drive supply fans to deliver the proper amount of supply air to heat or cool and the required outside air. These units were installed in 2001 and are considered to be in good-to-fair condition.

The Art program is equipped with two kilns and the existing ventilation is adequate but in fair-to-poor condition.

General building exhaust systems for Restrooms, Storage Areas, Workrooms, Locker Rooms, Project & Science Laboratories are inadequately placed and are in poor condition. A dust collection system is present in the stage scene shop area and is in fair condition.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The Natatorium is serviced by two dehumidifying roof-top units as manufactured by PoolPak and installed in 2001. These units are in poor condition, have surpassed their serviceable life and should be further investigated for replacement as the harsh chlorine environment has deteriorated interior components.

The existing heating system is a gas-fired hot water system, installed in 1966, and is in good-to-fair condition. The heating water distribution system is a 2-pipe system, without a capacity for simultaneous heating and cooling operations. Heating water is distributed by redundant base-mounted pumps located in the boiler room and includes a three-way bypass piping connections to provide some energy consumption benefits.

The three gas-fired boilers, manufactured by HB Smith were installed in 1966 with upgrades converting from steam to hot water. These cast iron boilers, while original, appear to be in overall good condition. No leaks were noticed at the gaskets of the cast iron sections. Some sealing material and insulation are missing and would need further work. Each boiler refractory front wall was modified in 1998 to properly accept new Industrial Burners and all are in good working condition. Further assessment of interior combustion chambers system expansion tanks, check valves and isolation valves is recommended.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The majority of the terminal equipment was installed in 2001 and is in fair condition. The system does feature individual temperature controls for space. The DDC type system was also installed in 2001 and is in poor condition, controls are intermittently failing and are considered obsolete by the manufacturer. A pneumatic control system using air to control various valves and damper as well as the unit ventilators in some building sections.

Overall the heating system is evaluated as being safe but inefficient working order and long-term life expectancy of the existing system is not anticipated.

Deficiencies: 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

All HVAC units and components have reached their useful serviceable life The boiler units require significant upgrades to continue their service Ventilation fails to meet the current building codes DDC-Controls are obsolete and fail to meet today’s standards The energy performance of all units are very poor Lack of simultaneous heating and cooling in order to control humidity

Recommendations: 1. Plan for HVAC upgrades that include replacement of VAV air-terminals, Roof-top-units and unit ventilators. Replace general building exhaust systems.

2. Replace antiquated DDC-Controls.

3. Replace and upgrade the existing kiln exhaust system.

4. Investigate chemical treatment fluids and flush-out the entire piping system and equipment coils.

5. Plan for upgrades to allow for humidity control through reheat operations.

Benefits: 1. Optimize Energy Performance 2. Replace End-of-Life (EOF) System 3. Improve Indoor Environmental Quality (IAQ) Cost: $8,260,650 or $27/sf

(demo, reconfigure new system, piping, new controls)

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

GREATER LATROBE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

services ELECTRICAL, LIGHTING, EMERGENCY SYSTEM Installed: 1966, 2001

Warranty: N/A

FEATURES & ELEMENTS Description: The electrical system provided to the overall facility is a 277/480-volt, 3-phase, 4-wire, underground feed from the transformer to the main switchboard. Power is furnished by the utility company to a utility-owned pad-mounted transformer, located in the courtyard by the boiler room, and is in fair condition. The main switchboard is a FPE fusible board with four main switches, a 1200 amp, 800 amp, 600 amp and 400 amp. 227-480-volt power is feed throughout the building electrical rooms to 120/208-volt transformers that convert the 480-volt power to 120/208 volts.

The 480-volt system handles large loads such as air-conditioning, ventilation systems, motors, and some lighting. The 480-volts is extended to multiple 120/208-volt step-down transformers throughout the building and the 120-volt panels serve remaining items such as receptacles and miscellaneous power. The existing main service entrance is in good condition and can continue to serve the building with proper service and upgrades.

Classrooms are not equipped with adequate electrical outlets as they are not in convenient locations. Renovation work added data and electrical wire-molding.

Corridors provide sufficient coverage for service. Coverage of GFI-protected exterior outlets is not provided around the perimeter of the building.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The facility emergency power system consists of a 2001-era Kohler 200kW model within the generator room that is in fair condition.

The 277/480-volt, 3-phase, 4-wire, 4-cycle diesel model feeds multiple automatic transfer switches and associated emergency panelboards. The emergency panelboards feed means of egress illumination, lighting of exit and directional signage, fire detection/alarm system, and other miscellaneous system control panels.

Lighting protection safeguards are not present in the facility.

The existing lighting system in the overall facility is typically equipped with T-8, lay-in, 2-by-4 direct fluorescent fixtures with electronic ballast. Fixtures are in fair condition and generally provide the recommended illumination levels of 50 footcandles for classrooms and 20 footcandles for corridors. Student Dining, Kitchen and Service areas are equipped with T-8, lay-in, 2-by-2 direct fluorescent lighting and recessed can light’s in soffit areas.

Upgraded areas in the Cafeteria are equipped with lay-in, 2-by-2 LED fixtures and the Corridor Artwork is equipped with LED spotlighting with lighting control and keypad switching.

Manual toggle dual-level switching is utilized in classrooms while other spaces utilize single-level keyed switching.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The Gymnasium spaces are equipped with pendant metal halide type lighting, in poor condition, providing illumination below the recommended levels.

The Auditorium has an obsolete and antiquated lighting console that controls the dimming equipment. The dimming equipment, border lighting and lighting instruments were replaced in renovations but have since met their serviceable life. The Stage lighting system is the original equipment and is considered obsolete as well as the other theatrical down lighting. The Natatorium space is equipped with pendant uplighting with 1000w metal halide lamps and incandescent can lights that are in fair-to-poor condition.

The Center for Student Creativity (CSC) is equipped with T-8, lay-in, 2-by-2 direct fluorescent fixtures with electronic ballast and parabolic louvers. Theatrical stage architectural lighting is present in the “performing” side of the CSC and is in fair condition.

The theatrical lighting system control console is non-functional, obsolete and requires replacement.

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

The exterior site lighting system is equipped with building-mounted light fixtures, pole-mounted parking site fixtures and architectural pendant arm pedestrian site fixures are equipped with high-intensity discharge (HID) metal-halide lamps. These fixtures are in fair-to-poor condition. Evaluation of illumination levels, fixture capacities and locations should be further evaluated. The upgraded main entry canopies are equipped with LED fixtures that are in good condition.

Deficiencies: 1. Main switchboard and fusible switch distribution and panels as they have reached their useful serviceable life, 30-40 years 2. Lighting systems fail to meet the current energy conservation codes 3. Verify if site, security and egress lighting meet current code requirements 4. Energy performance of all fixtures and systems is poor 5. Lack of automatic lighting controls Recommendations: 1. Plan for electrical upgrades that include replacement of all equipment and associated feeders 2. Full replacement of all interior and exterior lighting fixtures to LED 3. Upgrade or replace 2001-emergency generator 4. Provide automatic lighting controls for all spaces Benefits: 1. Optimize Energy Performance 2. Replace End-of-Life (EOF) System 3. Improve Indoor Environmental Quality (IAQ) Cost: $7,648,750 or $25/sf

(Electrical $16.50, Lighting $6.50, Site/Emergency $2)

Facility Condition Assessment 2019-2020

Facility Needs Summary GREATER LATROBE SCHOOL DISTRICT Updated 2020-21 DISTRIBUTED APRIL 2021

ISSUED BY Department of Facilities, Operations & Planning REPRESENTATIVE Kurt R Thomas, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP BD+C Director of Facilities, Operations & Planning

Facility Needs Summary 2020-2021

BOARD OF SCHOOL DIRECTORS Eric Hauser, President Paul McCommons, Vice-President Heidi Kozar Steve LoCascio Susan Mains Merle Musick William Palmer Cathy Sarraf Michael Zorch, M.D. SCHOOL AUTHORITY Carl Baumeister Gene Leonard, Ed. D. Keith Visconti Barry Banker Chuck Gray SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Georgia Teppert, Ed.D. ADMINISTRATION Michael Porembka - Assistant Superintendent Daniel Watson - Business Administrator Becki Pellis - Director of Curriculum, Instruction, and Technology Laurie Golobish - Director of Pupil Services Eugene Joe - Student Support Services Coordinator Mark Mears - Director of Athletics Jillian Meloy - Director of Food Services Jessica Golden - Director of Development and Center of Student Creativity

Facility Needs Summary 2020-2021

DISTRICT-WIDE FACILITIES DEFICIENCY LISTING AND IMPROVEMENT PLAN Complete Project/ Deficiency Listing

A

B

C

22

21

20

19

18

17

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

9

8

7

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

6 Bldg BES

4 5

Full replacement stairs with rubber tread system

Wood framed windows full replacement with insulated glass and integral blinds (apx. $70.00/sf) Exterior Hollow Metal Doors full replacement (apx. $2,500/per leaf) Full roof removal and re-roof replacement

Description Deteriorated masonry joints repaired, repointing and preservation (apx. $7.50/sf @ 28,000sf) assume 30% replacement factor Total removal and replacing of masonry control, corner joints (apx. $7.50/lf @ 1,985lf)

C20 Stairs

B30 Roofing

B20 Exterior Enclosure

B20 Exterior Enclosure

B20 Exterior Enclosure

Category B20 Exterior Enclosure

F

IDF Room AC Upgrades

Boiler (2) Replacement

Kitchen sink faucet replacement

Plumbing Fixture Replacement

Interior Acoustical Ceiling Replacement

Gym Floor(s) Resurfacing (apx 6,000sf)

Carpet Replacement - Corridors (apx. 20,000sf)

Replace existing damaged, inefficient, non-ada compliant fixtures with new (apx. $1,500/ea) assume 75% replacement factor Replace existing 2.5gpm faucets with 1.4gpm faucets at prep sink and 0.5gpm hand sinks Replace both boilers with high efficiency HVACR equipment that offer cost effective energy savings (boiler, venting, pumps and accessories) (apx. $150,000/ea) Install AC units to IDF rooms (apx. 4,500/ea)

New drop-in acoustical ceiling tile, replace with proper acoustical tile (NRC 0.70) per District POR ($4.50/sf)

Gym floors are in need to be sanded and refinished to prolong life and performance (apx. $3.50/sf)

D30 HVAC

D30 HVAC

D20 Plumbing

D20 Plumbing

C30 Interior Finishes

C30 Interior Finishes

Full replacement hallways with rubber, lvt or vet flooring C30 Interior Finishes ($1.50/sf removal)

Patch, Repair and Redesign color palatte for interior wall C30 Interior Finishes finishes ($2.00/sf) C30 Interior Finishes Cafeteria Floor (apx. 3850sf) Replace worn/damaged linoleum flooring ($1.50/sf removal) Carpet Replacement - Classrooms Full replacement/removal of all carpet in classrooms with C30 Interior Finishes (apx 45,000sf) (apx.

45 000sf) rubber lvt or vet flooring ($1 rubber, ($1.50/sf 50/sf removal)

Interior Painting

Carpet Replacement - Stairs

Roof Replacement (2023)

Exterior Door Replacement

Window Replacement

Exterior Caulking Replacement

/ Project Name Masonry Restoration

Greater Latrobe School District Facilities Deficiency Listing and Improvement Plan 3 Capital Renewal, Deferred Maintenance, and Educational Adequacy Needs

1 2

Prolong Performance and Life of Network Systems

Optimize Energy Performance, Replace Endof-Life (EOF) System

Indoor Water Use Reduction

Optimize Energy Performance, Replace Endof-Life (EOF) System, ADA compliance

Life-cycle of ceiling has surpassed expectancy of 20-25yrs

Optimize Energy Performance, Replace Endof-Life (EOF) System Optimize Energy Performance, Replace Endof-Life (EOF) System ($5,000/ea) Optimize Energy Performance, Replace Endof-Life (EOF) System Life-cycle of flooring finish has surpassed expectancy of 8-10yrs Life-cycle of painting finish has surpassed expectancy of 10-15yrs Life-cycle of flooring finish has surpassed expectancy of 15-20yrs ($11.00-rubber) Life-cycle of flooring finish has surpassed expectancy of 8 8-10yrs 10yrs ($11 ($11.00-rubber; 00 rubber; $6 $6.0000 lvt; $5.50-vet; $4.00-cpt; $3.00-cpt) Life-cycle of flooring finish has surpassed expectancy of 8-10yrs ($11.00-rubber; $6.00lvt; $5.50-vet; $4.00-cpt; $3.00-cpt) Prolong Performance and Life

Restore, stabilize and structurally preserve the integrity of the exterior envelope

Restore, stabilize and structurally preserve the integrity of the exterior masonry

Benefits

K

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

9,000

300,000

3,000

99,000

441,000

22,750

250,000

562,500

48,125

196,000

10,000

2,346,084

60,000

150,500

15,000

63,000

Estimated Cost

L

Page 1 of 14

$45,510

Actual / Completed Costs

M

Project / Deficiency Listing 2019-2020

40

39

38

37

36

35

34

33

32

31

30

29

28

27

26

25

24

23

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

6 Bldg BES

A

Description Replace VAV and double-duct boxes (apx. $1,400.00/ea) est. 82 units

C

Category D30 HVAC

D30 HVAC

Retrofit existing T8 fluorescents, CFL and Metal Halide D50 Electrical with LED lighting with occupancy sensors (apx. $6.50/sf)

HVAC Testing, Balancing and Retro Commisioning (apx. D30 HVAC $.80/sf) Duct Cleaning Required (apx. $.20/sf) D30 HVAC

Replace existing obsolete BAS controls (apx. $3.25/sf)

F

Replacement of all non-compliant toilet accessories full analysis required ($1000/ea) toilet room

E10 Equipment

Entry / Bus Drives (apx. 1,350sycar lane; 1,700sy-bus lane)

Library reconfiguration

Classroom Corridor Reconfiguration

Remove built-in bookbag arrangements, reconfigure layout to accommodate revisions to curriculum (ELA) (apx. $16.00/sf) est. 5000sf Remove built-in seating, reconfigure layout to accommodate revisions to curriculum (STEM) (apx. $16.00/sf) est. 3500sf Asphalt Paving, heavy duty wearing course and berm reconfiguration ($29.00/sy-light duty; $31.00/sy-heavy duty)

G20 Site Improvements

F20 Selective Building Demolition

F20 Selective Building Demolition

Classroom Furniture Replacement Replacement of all classroom furnishings, student desk, E20 Furnishings tables and chairs - full analysis required , ($6.50/sf) whole building Overhang at Parent Drop-off Extruded Aluminum Entry/walway canopy for students at F10 Special Construction parent drop off (apx. $50.00/sf @ 350sf)

ADA Toilet Accessories

Install security cameras to common areas as current D50 Electrical setup is inadequately provided throughout (apx. $.55/sf or $1,200/camera) Unified Communication Speakers, Install unified communications speakers, clocks as D50 Electrical Clocks Upgrade current setup is inadequately provided throughout (apx. $1.50/sf) Unified Communication Tele Full replacement of existing phone system to IP phones D60 Technology Upgrade I t Interactive ti Display Di l P Panell B Boards d R l Replacement t off smartboards tb d with ith IInteractive t ti di display l D60 T Technology h l panels (apx. $3.50/sf; $6,500/ea) Kitchen Equipment - Warming Total Warming Kitchen Replacement - full analysis with E10 Equipment Kitchen Replacement Food Service Director required (112.50/sf) est. 2,200sf

Security Cameras

Interior Lighting

HVAC Testing, Balancing and Retro Commisioning HVAC Duct Cleaning

Upgrade BAS Controls

HVAC Upgrades - Roof-Top-Unit Replace (9) Rooftop Units (apx. $13.00/sf; $143,000/ea) D30 HVAC (RTU) HVAC Upgrades - Unit Ventilators Replace Unit/Cabinet Ventilators (apx. $2,500/ea) est. D30 HVAC 10 units

/ Project Name HVAC Upgrades - VAV Air terminals

B

Repair and Replace existing asphalt paving

Implement and reconfigure learning areas to align with district learning models

Implement and reconfigure learning areas to align with district learning models

Walkways do not have shelter from weather conditions

Provide for replacement of outdated or inadequate furnishings

ADA Compliance

Provide P id ffor replacement l t off outdated td t d or inadequate technology Replace End-of-Life (EOF) Equipment

Replace End-of-Life (EOF) Equipment

Increase security to monitor common areas, visitor monitoring, and deter vandilism, theft and crime Provide for replacement of outdated or inadequate technology

Optimize Energy Performance & Improve Indoor Environmental Quality (IAQ)

Improve Indoor Environmental Quality (IAQ)

Optimize Energy Performance, Improve Indoor Environmental Quality (IAQ), Replace End-of-Life (EOF) System Optimize Energy Performance & Improve Indoor Environmental Quality (IAQ) Optimize Energy Performance, Improve Indoor Environmental Quality (IAQ), Replace End-of-Life (EOF) System Optimize Energy Performance, Replace Endof-Life (EOF) System Optimize Energy Performance

K Benefits

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

95,000

56,000

80,000

17,500

642,200

20,000

247,500

325,000

25,500

148,000

54,000

642,616

19,775

80,000

321,308

37,500

1,285,232

114,800

Estimated Cost

L

Page 2 of 14

$25,500

M Actual / Completed Costs

Project / Deficiency Listing 2019-2020

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

59

58

57

56

55

54

BES

BES

BES

BES

BES

52 53 BES BES

51

50

49

48

47

46

45

44

43

42

6 Bldg BES 41 BES

A

C

ADA Parking Stalls

Lobby ADA Ramp

Security Reception Waiting Area

Security Access Doors Exterior/Interior

Security Access Doors - Main

Fire Suppression System Classroom Door Hardware

Fi Alarm Fire Al S System t

Fire Doors

Exterior/Safety Lighting

Ballfield Bleachers

Playfield Equipment Upgrades

Playground Repairs (North & South) Playfield Upgrades

O10 Lif Life S Safety f t

O10 Life Safety

G30 Site Utilities

G20 Site Improvements

G20 Site Improvements

G20 Site Improvements

G20 Site Improvements

G20 Site Improvements

G20 Site Improvements

G20 Site Improvements

G20 Site Improvements

Category G20 Site Improvements

F

O10 Life Safety

O10 Life Safety

O10 Life Safety

Lobby ADA Ramp in non-compliance with ADA O20 ADA guard/handrails Insufficient amount of ADA parking stall, non-compliance O20 ADA with ADA

Reconfiguration of secure entry vestibule and reception office waiting area

Secure exterior entry doors additional exterior locations and interior (apx. $5,000/ea)

Secure exterior main entry door(s)

Install fire suppression system ($3.20/sf) O10 Life Safety Retrofit existing classroom doors with classroom intruder O10 Life Safety (able to lock from inside) locksets (apx. $800/ea)

Installation of playground edging system, regrade perimeter drainage, install playground mulch Fencing repairs, regrade perimeter drainage, install playfield dirt (apx. $15/sy @ 980sy) Replacement of basketball and other site playground equipment (apx. $.50/sf) Non-compliance with ICC 300; open spaces at seatboards required guards (apx. $8,000/ea) Retrofit existing metal halide and wall pack fixtures with LED fixtures (apx. $1.00/sf) Retrofit existing fire doors with electronic hold opens tied into fire alarm system (apx. $1000/ea) U Upgrade d Fi Fire Al Alarm System S t ($1.75/sf) ($1 75/ f)

Asphalt Paving, wearing course front parking lot ($20.00sy) Concrete Sidewalk Repair / replace damage concrete sidewalk (apx.

8.00/sf) est. 10k onsite w/ 50% replacement factor Entry Trees, Field Perimeter Tress Tree structure evaluation, structural supports, pruning, and Other Site Trees tree removal

Front Parking Lot (apx 1,400sy)

/ Project Name Description Entry / Bus Drives 982 Turn Lane Asphalt Paving, heavy duty wearing course and 982 North entry reconfiguration South Parking Lot (apx. 1,200sy) Asphalt Paving, subgrade repair, new subbase and heavy duty wearing course at south parking kitchen lot ($29.00/sy-light duty; $31.00/sy-heavy duty)

B

$

$

$

$ Remove, restore, and stabilize site trees prolonging the life and structrually preserving $ their life and property safety Restore and preserve playground fall zones $ Restore and preserve competition useage of $ athletic fields Restore and preserve elementary $ playground equipment Property Safety and Liability $ Optimize Energy Performance, Increase $ Lighting Levels and Safety Upgrade to fully compliant IBC and NFPA $ requirements U Upgrade d tto ffully ll compliant li t IBC and d NFPA $ requirements $ HSW, existing system is minimal Staff can use their key on the inside of the room without having to go into the hallway and expose themselves to potential harm.

This prevents students from locking the door from the inside with a turn or pushbutton. $ Increase security to monitor common areas, visitor monitoring, and deter vandilism, theft $ and crime Increase security to monitor common areas, visitor monitoring, and deter vandilism, theft $ and crime Increase security to monitor common areas, visitor monitoring, and deter vandilism, theft $ and crime ADA Compliance $ ADA Compliance $

Rplace existing concrete walk areas

Repair and Replace existing asphalt paving

Turning lane adds safety and improves vehicle traffic at site from SR road Repair and Replace existing asphalt paving

K Benefits

5,000

4,000

10,000

80,000

5,887

35,200

175,000 315,000

22,000

98,000

16,000

49,000

14,700

15,000

10,000

40,000

28,000

40,000

65,000

Estimated Cost

L

Page 3 of 14

$5,887

$12,541

$6,840

M Actual / Completed Costs

Project / Deficiency Listing 2019-2020

78

77

76

75

74

73

72

71

70

69

68

67

66

65

64

63

62

61

60

JHS

JHS

JHS

JHS

JHS

JHS

JHS

JHS

JHS

JHS

JHS

JHS

JHS

JHS

JHS

JHS

JHS

JHS

6 Bldg JHS

A

Replace (6) existing hollow metal doors with aluminum FRP (apx. $2,500/per leaf) Replace (3) existing hollow metal doors systems with aluminum storefront (apx. $70/sf @ 360sf) Remove and replace existing damaged threseholds, weatherstripping, seals, hardware, etc (apx. $150/per leaf @ 115leafs) Full roof removal and re-roof replacement

Wood framed windows full replacement with insulated glass and integral blinds (apx. $70.00/sf) Total removal and replacing of masonry control, corner joints (apx. $7.50/lf @ 1,780lf)

Description Deteriorated masonry joints repaired, repointing and preservation (apx. $7.50/sf @ 24,920sf) assume 30% replacement factor Remove and replace of problematic metal wall panels (apx. $28/sf @ 1360lf by 14'-8"H, 19,950sf)

C

B30 Roofing

B20 Exterior Enclosure

B20 Exterior Enclosure

B20 Exterior Enclosure

B20 Exterior Enclosure

B20 Exterior Enclosure

B20 Exterior Enclosure

Category B20 Exterior Enclosure

F

Domestic Supply Piping Corrosiviness

Plumbing Fixture Replacement

Carpet/VCT Replacement Classrooms, Lockers, Sm. Corridors (apx. 79,000sf) Carpet Replacement - Entry walkoff matting (apx. 1,500sf) Kitchen sink faucet replacement

Aux Gym Floor(s) Resurfacing (apx. 6,000sf)

Aux Gym Floor(s) Resurfacing (apx. 7,600sf)

Main Gym Floor(s) Resurfacing (apx. 8,800sf)

C f t i Fl Cafeteria Floor (apx. ( 6,000sf) 6 000 f)

C30 Interior Finishes

C30 Interior Finishes

C30 Interior Finishes

C30 Interior I t i Finishes Fi i h

Full replacement in Admin and Gym Entries (apx. $7.00/sf) Replace existing 2.5gpm faucets with 1.4gpm faucets at prep sink and 0.5gpm hand sinks Replace existing damaged or non-ada compliant fixtures with new (apx. $1,500/ea) assume 75% replacement factor Water treatment to neutralize the corrosiviness of the existing pluming lines causing pin hole leaks

D20 Plumbing

D20 Plumbing

D20 Plumbing

C30 Interior Finishes

Full replacement/removal of all carpet in classrooms with C30 Interior Finishes rubber, lvt or vet flooring (apx. $1.50/sf removal)

Gym floors are in need to be sanded and refinished to prolong life and performance (apx. $3.50/sf)

Gym floors are in need to be sanded and refinished to prolong life and performance (apx. $3.50/sf)

Gym floors are in need to be sanded and refinished to prolong life and performance (apx. $3.50/sf)

Replace R l worn/damaged /d d lilinoleum l flflooring i ($1 ($1.50/sf 50/ f removal)

Patch, Repair and Redesign color palatte for interior wall C30 Interior Finishes finishes ($2.00/sf) Cafeteria Interior Finish Upgrades Upgrade cafeteria wall and ceiling finishes, branding, C30 Interior Finishes (apx. 6,000sf) acoustical treatment (apx. $4.50/sf @ 6,000sf)

Interior Painting

Roof Replacement (2022)

Exterior Door Replacement HollowMetal Exterior Door Replacement Aluminum Exterior Door Repairs

Exterior Caulking Replacement

Window Replacement

Exterior Metal Wall Panels Replacement

/ Project Name Masonry Restoration

B

$

$

$

$ Life-cycle of flooring finish has surpassed expectancy of 8-10yrs ($11.00-rubber; $6.00lvt; $5.50-vet; $4.00-cpt; $3.00-cpt) $ Life-cycle of flooring finish has surpassed $ expectancy of 8-10yrs Indoor Water Use Reduction $ Optimize Energy Performance, Replace Endof-Life (EOF) System, ADA compliance $ Prolong Performance and Life of Domestic $ Supply Piping

Prolong Performance and Life

Prolong Performance and Life

$ Optimize Energy Performance, Replace End$ of-Life (EOF) System Restore, stabilize and structurally preserve the integrity of the exterior envelope $ Optimize Energy Performance, Replace End$ of-Life (EOF) System Optimize Energy Performance, Replace End$ of-Life (EOF) System Restore, stabilize and structurally preserve the integrity of the exterior envelope $ Optimize Energy and Building Envelope $ Performance, obtain new 30yr warranty Life-cycle of painting finish has surpassed $ expectancy of 10-15yrs Implement and reconfigure café areas to align with district learning models $ (lunch&learn) build aesthic value Lif Life-cycle l off flooring fl i finish fi i h has h surpassed d expectancy of 15-20yrs ($11.00-rubber; $ $6.00-lvt) Prolong Performance and Life

Restore, stabilize and structurally preserve the integrity of the exterior envelope

Restore, stabilize and structurally preserve the integrity of the exterior masonry

K Benefits

35,000

157,500

3,000

10,500

987,500

21,000

26,600

30,800

45,000

27,000

324,976

3,580,018

17,250

25,200

30,000

13,350

215,250

558,600

56,070

Estimated Cost

L

Page 4 of 14

$33,150

M Actual / Completed Costs

Project / Deficiency Listing 2019-2020

98

97

96

95

94

93

92

91

90

89

88

87

86

85

JHS

JHS

JHS

JHS

JHS

JHS

JHS

JHS

JHS

JHS

JHS

JHS

JHS

6 Bldg JHS 79 JHS 80 JHS 81 JHS 82 JHS 83 JHS 84 JHS

A

Existing backstop electronic operations is failing and obsolete (apx. $6,500/ea @ 8 units) Total Warming Kitchen Replacement - full analysis with Food Service Director required (190.00/sf) est. 2,200sf

E10 Equipment

E10 Equipment

Front & Side Parking Lot (apx.

7,500sy)

Locker Corridor Reconfiguration

Library reconfiguration

Commons Furniture and Seating

Remove built-in locker arrangements, reconfigure layout F20 Selective Building to accommodate revisions to curriculum (ELA) (apx.

Demolition $16.00/sf @ 3,000sf) Asphalt crack fill, sealcoat, stripe (apx. $4.50/sy) G20 Site Improvements

Addition of flexible furnishing in commons area to E20 Furnishings accommodate revisions to secondary education learning environment ($5.00/sf) commons/corridors (apx.

20,000sf) Reconfigure layout to accommodate revisions to F20 Selective Building curriculum (STEM) (apx. $16.00/sf) est. 8,000sf Demolition

Classroom Furniture Replacement Replacement of all classroom furnishings, student desk, E20 Furnishings tables and chairs - full analysis required, ($6.50/sf) whole building Cafeteria Table/Furnishing Replace existing cafeteria tables (apx. $2,600/ea @ 32 E20 Furnishings Replacements OR café tables and chairs (apx. $8.50/sf @ 6,000)

Main Gym Basketball Backstop Upgrades Kitchen Equipment - Total Kitchen Replacement

E10 Equipment

E10 Equipment

D60 Technology

D60 Technology

D50 Electrical

Retrofit existing T8 fluorescents, CFL and Metal Halide D50 Electrical with LED lighting with occupancy sensors (apx. $6.50/sf)

Interior Lighting

Unified Communication Speakers, Install unified communications speakers, clocks as Clocks Upgrade current setup is inadequately provided throughout (apx. $1.50/sf) Unified Communication Tele Full replacement of existing phone system to IP phones Upgrade Interactive Display Panel Boards Replacement of smartboards with Interactive display panels (apx. $6,500/ea) Telescoping Stands Replacement Spectator Gym: Replace entire telescoping bleachers (apx. $150/per seat @ 370/seats) Art Kiln(s) Replacement Replace obsolete (1) kilns (apx. $5,200/ea)

HVAC Testing, Balancing and Retro Commisioning (apx. D30 HVAC $.85/sf) Duct Cleaning Required (apx. $.20/sf) D30 HVAC

F

HVAC Testing, Balancing and Retro Commisioning HVAC Duct Cleaning

D30 HVAC

D30 HVAC

Description Category Installation of AC unit for Wood Shop (apx. $13.00/sf @ D30 HVAC 3,000sf) Install AC units to IDF rooms (apx. 6,000/ea) D30 HVAC

C

HVAC Upgrades - (11) Roof-Top- Replace Rooftop Units (apx. $13.00/sf; $140,000/ea) Unit (RTU) (4) New Upgrade BAS Controls Replace existing obsolete BAS controls (apx. $3.25/sf)

/ Project Name HVACR Upgrades to Shop Classroom HVAC IDF Room (4 Rooms)

B

Repair and Replace existing asphalt paving

Implement and reconfigure learning areas to align with district learning models

Implement and reconfigure learning areas to align with district learning models

Provide for replacement of outdated or inadequate furnishings

Provide for replacement of outdated or inadequate furnishings

Provide for replacement of outdated or inadequate furnishings

Replace End-of-Life (EOF) Equipment

Replace End-of-Life (EOF) Equipment

Provide for replacement of outdated or inadequate technology Replace End-of-Life (EOF) Equipment, NonADA Compliant Replace End-of-Life (EOF) Equipment

Replace End-of-Life (EOF) Equipment

Provide for replacement of outdated or inadequate technology

Optimize Energy Performance, Replace Endof-Life (EOF) System

Improve Indoor Environmental Quality (IAQ)

Optimize Energy Performance & Improve Indoor Environmental Quality (IAQ) Prolong Performance and Life of Network Systems Optimize Energy Performance, Replace Endof-Life (EOF) System Optimize Energy Performance, Replace Endof-Life (EOF) System Optimize Energy Performance

K Benefits

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

33,750

48,000

128,000

100,000

83,200

1,056,250

247,500

52,000

5 5,200 200

55,500

455,000

47,000

243,750

1,056,250

32,500

130,000

528,125

2,112,500

24,000

$ $

39,000

$

Estimated Cost

L

Page 5 of 14

$47,000

M Actual / Completed Costs

Project / Deficiency Listing 2019-2020

JHS

JHS

117

116

115

114

113

112

111

110

109

108

107

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

JHS

105 106 JHS JHS

104

103

6 Bldg JHS 99 JHS 100 JHS 101 JHS 102 JHS

A

G20 Site Improvements

Repair / replace damage concrete sidewalk (apx.

8.00/sf) est. 8k onsite w/ 50% replacement factor (2) Monumental signage added to entries off Cat Curve and Arnold Palmer Drive Install masonry screen wall for trash and recycling bins

O10 Life Safety O10 Life Safety

O10 Life Safety

G30 Site Utilities

Full replacement stairs with rubber tread system

Wood framed windows full replacement with insulated glass and integral blinds (apx. $70.00/sf) Exterior Hollow Metal Doors full replacement (apx. $2,500/per leaf) Full roof removal and re-roof replacement

Deteriorated D t i t d masonry jjoints i t repaired, i d repointing i ti and d preservation (apx. $7.50/sf @ 32,000sf) assume 30% replacement factor Total removal and replacing of masonry control, corner joints (apx. $7.50/lf @ 2,160lf)

C20 Stairs

B30 Roofing

B20 Exterior Enclosure

B20 Exterior Enclosure

B20 Exterior Enclosure

B20 E Exterior t i E Enclosure l

Retrofit existing classroom doors with classroom intruder O10 Life Safety (able to lock from inside) locksets (apx. $800/ea)

Install fire suppression system ($3.20/sf) Secure exterior entry doors additional exterior locations and interior (apx. $5,000/ea)

Retrofit existing metal halide and wall pack fixtures with LED fixtures (apx. $1.00/sf) Upgrade Fire Alarm System ($1.75/sf)

Carpet Replacement - Corridors (apx. 20,000sf)

Full replacement hallways with rubber, lvt or vet flooring C30 Interior Finishes ($1.50/sf removal)

Optimize Energy Performance, Replace Endof-Life (EOF) System Optimize Energy Performance, Replace Endof-Life (EOF) System ($5,000/ea) Optimize Energy Performance, Replace Endof-Life (EOF) System Life-cycle of flooring finish has surpassed expectancy of 8-10yrs Life-cycle of painting finish has surpassed expectancy of 10-15yrs Life-cycle of flooring finish has surpassed expectancy of 8-10yrs ($11.00-rubber; $6.00lvt; $5.50-vet; $4.00-cpt; $3.00-cpt) Life-cycle of flooring finish has surpassed expectancy of 8-10yrs ($11.00-rubber; $6.00lvt; $5.50-vet; $4.00-cpt; $3.00-cpt)

Restore, stabilize and structurally preserve the integrity of the exterior envelope

Restore, R t stabilize t bili and d structurally t t ll preserve the integrity of the exterior masonry

Remove, restore, and stabilize site trees prolonging the life and structrually preserving their life and property safety Optimize Energy Performance, Increase Lighting Levels and Safety Upgrade to fully compliant IBC and NFPA requirements HSW, existing system is minimal Increase security to monitor common areas, visitor monitoring, and deter vandilism, theft and crime Staff can use their key on the inside of the room without having to go into the hallway and expose themselves to potential harm.

This prevents students from locking the door from the inside with a turn or pushbutton.

G20 Site Improvements

Patch, Repair and Redesign color palatte for interior wall C30 Interior Finishes finishes ($2.00/sf) Carpet Replacement - Classrooms Full replacement/removal of all carpet in classrooms with C30 Interior Finishes (apx. 45,000sf) rubber, lvt or vet flooring ($1.50/sf removal)

Interior Painting

Carpet Replacement - Stairs

Roof Replacement (2023)

Exterior Door Replacement

Window Replacement

Exterior Caulking Replacement

M Masonry R Restoration t ti

Classroom Door Hardware

Fire Suppression System Security Access Doors Exterior/Interior

Fire Alarm System

Exterior/Safety Lighting

Site and Grounds Beautification

Site and Grounds Beautification

Rplace existing concrete walk areas

Repair and Replace existing asphalt paving

K Benefits

G20 Site Improvements

G20 Site Improvements

Category G20 Site Improvements

F

Description Asphalt crack fill, sealcoat, stripe (apx. $4.50/sy)

C

Trash and Recylcling Bin Screen Enclosure Entry Trees, Field Perimeter Tress Tree structure evaluation, structural supports, pruning, and Other Site Trees tree removal

Entry Monumental Signage

/ Project Name Rear Parking Lot and Drive (apx.6,210sy) Concrete Sidewalk

B

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

250,000

562,500

398,000

10,000

2,440,464

60,000

150,500

16,200

72,000

62,400

150,000

$

$

284,375 520,000

162,500

4,000

30,000

30,000

32,000

27,945

$ $

$

$

$

$

$

$

Estimated Cost

L

Page 6 of 14

$2,950

M Actual / Completed Costs

Project / Deficiency Listing 2019-2020

136

135

134

133

132

131

130

129

128

127

126

125

124

123

122

121

120

119

118

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

6 Bldg MES

A

Replace existing damaged or non-ada compliant fixtures with new (apx. $1,500/ea) assume 75% replacement factor Replace existing 2.5gpm faucets with 1.4gpm faucets at prep sink and 0.5gpm hand sinks Replace existing Domestic Hot Water Heater & Expansion Tank in Main Mechanical Room Replace both boilers with high efficiency HVACR equipment that offer cost effective energy savings (boiler, venting, pumps and accessories) (apx. $150,000/ea) Install AC units to IDF rooms (apx. 4,500/ea)

New drop-in acoustical ceiling tile, replace with proper acoustical tile (NRC 0.70) per District POR ($4.50/sf)

Description Gym floors are in need to be sanded and refinished to prolong life and performance (apx. $3.00/sf)

C

D30 HVAC

Retrofit existing T8 fluorescents, CFL and Metal Halide D50 Electrical with LED lighting with occupancy sensors (apx. $6.50/sf)

HVAC Testing, Balancing and Retro Commisioning (apx. D30 HVAC $.80/sf) Duct Cleaning Required (apx. $.20/sf) D30 HVAC

Replace existing obsolete BAS controls (apx. $3.25/sf)

D30 HVAC

D30 HVAC

D30 HVAC

D30 HVAC

D30 HVAC

D30 HVAC

D30 HVAC

D20 Plumbing

D20 Plumbing

D20 Plumbing

C30 Interior Finishes

Category C30 Interior Finishes

F

Install security cameras to common areas as current D50 Electrical setup is inadequately provided throughout (apx. $.55/sf or 1,200/camera) Unified Communication Speakers, Install unified communications speakers, clocks as D50 Electrical Clocks Upgrade current setup is inadequately provided throughout (apx. $1.50/sf) Unified Communication Tele Full replacement of existing phone system to IP phones D60 Technology Upgrade

Security Cameras

Interior Lighting

HVAC Testing, Balancing and Retro Commisioning HVAC Duct Cleaning

Upgrade BAS Controls

HVAC U Upgrades d I t ll dehumidification Install d h idifi ti system t tto crawll space Dehumidification Crawl Space HVAC Upgrades - (7) Roof-Top- Replace Rooftop Units (apx. $13.00/sf; $143,000/ea) Unit (RTU) HVAC Upgrades - Unit Ventilators Replace Unit Ventilators (apx. $2,500/ea) est/ 18 units

HVAC Upgrades - Chiller Replace Chiller Condenser Units (apx. $1500/per ton) Condenser Units Replacment (30 Ton) Replace VAV and double-duct boxes (apx.

HVAC Upgrades - VAV Air terminals $1,400.00/ea) est. 71 units

IDF Room AC Upgrades

Domestic Hot Water Heater & Expansion Tank Boiler (2) Replacement / Refurbishment

Kitchen sink faucet replacement

Plumbing Fixture Replacement

Interior Acoustical Ceiling Replacement

/ Project Name Gym Floor(s) Resurfacing (apx 6,000sf)

B

$

$

$

Replace End-of-Life (EOF) Equipment

Increase security to monitor common areas, visitor monitoring, and deter vandilism, theft and crime Provide for replacement of outdated or inadequate technology

Optimize Energy Performance & Improve Indoor Environmental Quality (IAQ)

Improve Indoor Environmental Quality (IAQ)

Prolong Performance and Life of Network Systems Optimize Energy Performance, Improve Indoor Environmental Quality (IAQ), Replace End-of-Life (EOF) System Optimize Energy Performance, Improve Indoor Environmental Quality (IAQ), Replace End-of-Life (EOF) System O ti i E Optimize Energy P Performance f & Improve I Indoor Environmental Quality (IAQ) Optimize Energy Performance & Improve Indoor Environmental Quality (IAQ) Optimize Energy Performance, Improve Indoor Environmental Quality (IAQ), Replace End-of-Life (EOF) System Optimize Energy Performance, Replace Endof-Life (EOF) System Optimize Energy Performance

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$ Optimize Energy Performance, Replace End$ of-Life (EOF) System Optimize Energy Performance, Replace Endof-Life (EOF) System

Indoor Water Use Reduction

Optimize Energy Performance, Replace Endof-Life (EOF) System, ADA compliance

Life-cycle of ceiling has surpassed expectancy of 20-25yrs

Prolong Performance and Life

K Benefits

26,000

148,500

55,000

643,500

19,800

79,200

321,750

45,000

1,001,000

35,000

99,400

45,000

9,000

300,000

50,000

3,000

99,000

245,000

35,000

Estimated Cost

L

Page 7 of 14

$26,000

$40,625

M Actual / Completed Costs

Project / Deficiency Listing 2019-2020

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

MES

155 156 MES

154

153

152

151

150

149

148

147

146

145

144

143

142

141

140

139

138

6 Bldg MES 137 MES

A

Replacement of all non-compliant toilet accessories full analysis required ($1000/ea) toilet room

Description Replacement of smartboards with Interactive display panels (apx. $3.50/sf; $6,500/ea) Total Warming Kitchen Replacement - full analysis with Food Service Director required (112.50/sf) est. 2,200sf

C

E10 Equipment

E10 Equipment

Category D60 Technology

F

Fire Suppression System

Fire Alarm System

Fire Doors

Exterior/Safety Lighting

Ballfield Bleachers

Playfield Equipment Upgrades

Playfield Upgrades

Playground Trees, Entry Trees, Field Perimeter Tress and Other Site Trees Playground Repairs

G20 Site Improvements

G20 Site Improvements

G20 Site Improvements

G20 Site Improvements

G20 Site Improvements

G20 Site Improvements

G20 Sit Site IImprovements t

G20 Site Improvements

G20 Site Improvements

F20 Selective Building Demolition

F20 Selective Building Demolition

Install fire suppression system ($3.20/sf)

O10 Life Safety

Retrofit existing metal halide and wall pack fixtures with G30 Site Utilities LED fixtures (apx. $1.00/sf) Retrofit existing fire doors with electronic hold opens tied O10 Life Safety into fire alarm system (apx. $1000/ea) Upgrade Fire Alarm System ($1.75/sf) O10 Life Safety

Installation of playground edging system, regrade perimeter drainage, install playground mulch Repairs, regrade perimeter drainage, install playfield dirt (apx. $15/sy @ 980sy) Replacement of basketball and other site playground equipment (apx. $.50/sf) Install New ICC compliant bleachers (apx. $8,000/ea)

Tree structure evaluation, structural supports, pruning, tree removal

Remove built-in bookbag arrangements, reconfigure layout to accommodate revisions to curriculum (ELA) (apx. $16.00/sf) est. 5000sf Library reconfiguration Remove built-in seating, reconfigure layout to accommodate revisions to curriculum (STEM) (apx. $16.00/sf) est. 3500sf Entry / Bus Drives (apx. 920sy-car Asphalt Paving, heavy duty wearing course and berm lane; 3,000sy-bus lane) reconfiguration ($29.00/sy-light duty; $31.00/sy-heavy duty) Deerborn Parking Lot (apx.

Asphalt Paving, wearing course front parking lot 2,950sy) ($20.00sy) F t Parking Front P ki Lot L t (apx ( 2,400sy) 2 400 ) A h lt P Asphalt Paving, i wearing i course ffrontt parking ki llott ($20.00sy) Concrete Sidewalk Repair / replace damage concrete sidewalk (apx.

8.00/sf) est. 17,800 onsite w/ 50% replacement factor

Classroom Corridor Reconfiguration

Classroom Furniture Replacement Replacement of all classroom furnishings, student desk, E20 Furnishings tables and chairs - full analysis required , ($6.50/sf) whole building Overhang at Parent Drop-off Extruded Aluminum Entry/Walkway canopy for students F10 Special Construction Dearborn at parent drop off Dearborn (apx. $50.00/sf @ 350sf)

ADA Toilet Accessories

Kitchen Equipment - Warming Kitchen Replacement

/ Project Name Interactive Display Panel Boards

B

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$ Remove, restore, and stabilize site trees prolonging the life and structrually preserving $ their life and property safety Restore and preserve playground fall zones $ Restore and preserve competition useage of $ athletic fields Restore and preserve elementary $ playground equipment Property Safety and Liability $ Optimize Energy Performance, Increase $ Lighting Levels and Safety Upgrade to fully compliant IBC and NFPA $ requirements Upgrade to fully compliant IBC and NFPA $ requirements $ HSW, existing system is minimal

Replace existing concrete walk areas

R Repair i and dR Replace l existing i ti asphalt h lt paving i

Repair and Replace existing asphalt paving

Repair and Replace existing asphalt paving

Implement and reconfigure learning areas to align with district learning models

Implement and reconfigure learning areas to align with district learning models

Walkways do not have shelter from weather conditions

Provide for replacement of outdated or inadequate furnishings

ADA Compliance

Provide for replacement of outdated or inadequate technology Replace End-of-Life (EOF) Equipment

K Benefits

173,250 316,800

22,000

99,000

16,000

40,000

14,700

35,000

8,000

71,200

48,000

59,000

119,000

56,000

79,500

17,500

643,500

20,000

247,500

325,000

Estimated Cost

L

Page 8 of 14

$12,735

$5,700

M Actual / Completed Costs

Project / Deficiency Listing 2019-2020

172

171

170

169

168

167

166

165

164

163

162

161

160

159

158

157

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

MES

MES

MES

6 Bldg MES

A

Replace Auditorium Wallpaper

O10 Life Safety

O10 Life Safety

O10 Life Safety

Exterior E t i H Hollow ll M Metal t lD Doors ffullll replacement l t ((apx. $2,500/per leaf) Remove and replace existing damaged threseholds, weatherstripping, seals, hardware, etc (apx. $200/per leaf @ 115leafs) Full roof removal and re-roof replacement

Replace existing wallpaper finish and redesign color palette for auditorium wall finishes (apx. $2.50/sf)

C30 Interior Finishes

C30 Interior Finishes

Patch, Repair and Redesign color palatte for interior wall C30 Interior Finishes finishes ($2.00/sf) Redesign of Athletic Locker, corridors and Gym Entries C30 Interior Finishes (apx. $16.00/sf @ 3,000sf)

B30 Roofing

B30 Roofing

B30 Roofing

B20 Exterior Enclosure

B20 E Exterior t i E Enclosure l

Deteriorated masonry joints repaired, repointing and B20 Exterior Enclosure preservation (apx. $7.50/sf @ 120,000sf) assume 30% replacement factor Replace existing glazed block portion of the P-Wing is B20 Exterior Enclosure that failing with windows or translucent wall panels, develop system to remove/reduce glare (apx. $140/sf @ 5,000sf) Total removal and replacing of masonry control, corner B20 Exterior Enclosure joints (apx. $7.50/lf @5,050lf)

Reconfiguration of secure entry vestibule and reception office waiting area

Secure exterior entry doors additional exterior locations and interior (apx. $5,000/ea)

Secure exterior main entry door(s)

Cafeteria Interior Finish Upgrades Upgrade cafeteria wall and ceiling finishes, lighting, (apx. 6,500sf) branding (apx. $8.50/sf @ 6,500sf), Café Tables & Chairs (apx. $45,000)

Athletic Hall of Distinction

Interior Painting

F

Description Category Retrofit existing classroom doors with classroom intruder O10 Life Safety (able to lock from inside) locksets (apx. $800/ea)

C

Roof Replacement Area 1a (2020) Full roof removal and re-roof replacement - Upper Gym Roof Roof Replacement Area 2 (2029) Full roof removal and re-roof replacement

Roof Replacement Area 1 (2019)

Exterior Door Repairs

E t i D Exterior Door R Replacement l t

Exterior Caulking Replacement

P-Wing Glazed Block Retrofit

Masonry Restoration

Security Reception Waiting Area

Security Access Doors Exterior/Interior

Security Access Doors - Main

/ Project Name Classroom Door Hardware

B

$

$

$

$

$

$

$ Optimize O ti i E Energy P Performance, f Replace R l E Endd $ of-Life (EOF) System ($5,000/ea) Restore, stabilize and structurally preserve the integrity of the exterior envelope $ Optimize Energy and Building Envelope $ Performance, obtain new 30yr warranty Optimize Energy and Building Envelope $ Performance, obtain new 30yr warranty Optimize Energy and Building Envelope $ Performance, obtain new 30yr warranty Life-cycle of painting finish has surpassed $ expectancy of 10-15yrs Rebranding, build aesthic value that reflects the positive values and winning tradition of $ District Athletics Implement and reconfigure café areas to align with district learning models (lunch&learn) build aesthic value, provide for replacement of outdated or inadquate $ furnishings Life-cycle of wallpaper has surpassed expectancy of 10-15yrs ($2.50/sf) $

Restore, stabilize and structurally preserve the integrity of the exterior envelope

Restore, stabilize and structurally preserve the integrity of the exterior envelope

Increase security to monitor common areas, visitor monitoring, and deter vandilism, theft and crime Increase security to monitor common areas, visitor monitoring, and deter vandilism, theft and crime Increase security to monitor common areas, visitor monitoring, and deter vandilism, theft and crime Restore, stabilize and structurally preserve the integrity of the exterior masonry

Staff can use their key on the inside of the room without having to go into the hallway and expose themselves to potential harm.

This prevents students from locking the door from the inside with a turn or pushbutton.

K Benefits

15,000

55,250

48,000

320,000

1,828,000

1,100,000

2,500,000

23,000

80,000

37,875

700,000

270,000

10,000

75,000

6,200

40,000

Estimated Cost

L

Page 9 of 14

$1,079,818

$2,601,896

$6,200

M Actual / Completed Costs

Project / Deficiency Listing 2019-2020

188

187

186

185

184

183

182

181

180

179

178

177

176

175

174

173

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

6 Bldg SHS

A

HVAC Upgrades - Variable Frequency Drives (VFD) Add to Chiller HVAC Upgrades - Centrifugal Chiller Renewal

HVACR Upgrades to Shop Classroom HVAC IDF Room (4 Rooms)

Boiler(3) System Retrofit / Replacement

Boiler(3) System Repair

Domestic Supply Piping Corrosiviness Domestic Hot Water Storage Tanks

Kitchen sink faucet replacement

VCT Replacement - Classrooms, Lockers, Sm. Corridors (apx.

136,000sf) Terrazzo Floor Restoration (apx.

80,000sf) assume 5% heavy repair factor

Main Gym Floor(s) Resurfacing (apx. 11,800sf) Aux Gym Floor(s) Resurfacing (apx. 7,600sf) Carpet Replacement - Entry walkoff matting (apx. 5,500sf) Stage Floor Resurfacing (apx.

3,200sf)

/ Project Name CSC Wood Floor (apx. 4,400sf unknown scope, carryover from previous Director)

B

D30 HVAC

D20 Plumbing

D20 Plumbing

D20 Plumbing

C30 Interior Finishes

C30 Interior Finishes

C30 Interior Finishes

C30 Interior Finishes

C30 Interior Finishes

C30 Interior Finishes

D30 HVAC

Install variable frequency drives and submeter to existing D30 HVAC cooling tower Replace worn materials, restore compressor performance, update components w/ 5YR Warranty

F

Category C30 Interior Finishes

Replace all three boilers with up to five high efficiency D30 HVAC HVACR equipment that offer cost effective energy savings (boiler, venting, pumps and accessories) (apx. $150,000/ea) Installation of AC unit for Wood Shop (apx. $13.00/sf @ D30 HVAC 3,000sf) Install AC units to IDF rooms (apx. 4,500/ea) D30 HVAC

Repairs and replacement for critical components with Boilers (3-units) Combustion Chambers. Replacement of deteriorating and falling out of refractor chamber wall bricks. Burner head replacement, as well as the abatement of asbestos insulation.

To prolong the life of the existing terrazzo floor, full restoration to repair chips, pitting and cracks needs to be addressed (apx. $25.00/sf @ 4,000sf; $4.00/sf @ 76,000sf) Replace existing 2.5gpm faucets with 1.4gpm faucets at prep sink and 0.5gpm hand sinks Water treatment to neutralize the corrosiviness of the existing pluming lines causing pin hole leaks Replace existing Domestic Hot Water Storage Tank (Lower P Wing); Asbestos wrapped tank increase cost

Description Wood floor is in need to be sanded and refinished to prolong life and peformance (apx. $3.50/sf) existing floor shows signs of moiture related cupping not aware of source, cause, or existing construction Gym floors are in need to be sanded and refinished to prolong life and performance (apx. $3.50/sf) Gym floors are in need to be sanded and refinished to prolong life and performance (apx. $3.50/sf) Full replacement in Auditorium, Admin, and Gym Entries (apx. $7.00/sf) Wood floor is in need to be sanded and refinished to prolong life and peformance (apx. $3.00/sf) existing floor shows signs of excessive wear and damage from set work Full replacement/removal of all carpet in classrooms with rubber, lvt or vet flooring ($1.50/sf removal)

C

$

$

$

$

$

Optimize Energy Performance, Replace Endof-Life (EOF) System

Optimize Energy Performance & Improve Indoor Environmental Quality (IAQ) Prolong Performance and Life of Network Systems Optimize Energy Performance & Improve Indoor Environmental Quality (IAQ)

Optimize Energy Performance, Replace Endof-Life (EOF) System

$

$

$

$

$

$

$ Prolong Performance and Life of Domestic $ Supply Piping Optimize Energy Performance, Replace Endof-Life (EOF) System $ Optimize Energy Performance, Replace Endof-Life (EOF) System

Indoor Water Use Reduction

$ Life-cycle of flooring finish has surpassed expectancy of 8-10yrs ($11.00-rubber; $6.00$ lvt; $5.50-vet; $4.00-cpt; $3.00-cpt) Prolong Performance and Life

Life-cycle of flooring finish has surpassed expectancy of 8-10yrs Prolong Performance and Life

Prolong Performance and Life

Prolong Performance and Life

Prolong Performance and Life

K Benefits

128,000

60,000

18,000

39,000

750,000

65,000

84,000

20,000

3,000

200,000

1,700,000

9,600

38,500

26,600

35,400

15,400

Estimated Cost

L

Page 10 of 14

$124,000

$67,588

$78,587

$8,700

$32,230

M Actual / Completed Costs

Project / Deficiency Listing 2019-2020

208

207

206

205

204

203

202

201

200

199

198

197

196

195

194

193

192

191

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

6 Bldg SHS 189 SHS 190 SHS

A

Spectator Gym: Replace bleacher seating components and install additional safety items to ensure safety and proper operation (apx. $50/per seat @ 1155/seats)

Auxilary Gym Telescoping Stands Auxilary Gym: Replace bleacher seating components Replacement/Retrofit and install additional safety items to ensure safety and proper operation (apx. $50/per seat @ 1155/seats)

Spectator Gym Telescoping Stands Replacement/Retrofit

F

E10 Equipment

E10 Equipment

E10 Equipment

D60 Technology

D60 Technology

D50 Electrical

D50 Electrical

D50 Electrical

D50 Electrical

D50 Electrical

D50 Electrical

D50 Electrical Replacement of HID and Tungsten system with LED house light system (apx. $6.50/sf) Retrofit existing T8 fluorescents, CFL and Metal Halide D50 Electrical with LED lighting with occupancy sensors (apx. $5.00/sf)

HVAC Testing, Balancing and Retro Commisioning (apx. D30 HVAC $.45/sf) Duct Cleaning Required (apx. $.10/sf) D30 HVAC

D30 HVAC

D30 HVAC

D30 HVAC

Repace PoolPak Rooftop Units (apx. $130,000/ea)

Replace Kitchen Refrigeration Condenseor Units (apx.$4,200/ea) Replace existing obsolete BAS controls (apx. $3.25/sf)

D30 HVAC

Category D30 HVAC

Description Replace worn materials, restore Condensor performance, update components Replace Rooftop Units (apx. $13.00/sf; $143,000/ea)

C

Auditorium On-Stage 7-Color LED Replace border lighting with efficient LED down light Down Wash Lighting fixture package Auditorium Stage Front of House 7- Install theatrical lighting package Color LED Ellipsoidal Art Work Security System Unknown U Upgrade d Unified Communication Speakers, Install unified communications speakers, clocks as Clocks Upgrade current setup is inadequately provided throughout (apx. $3.50/sf) Auditorium Sound Upgrades Installation of replacement speakers, processing unit and digitial sound mixer console Natatorium/Gym Sound Upgrades Installation of replacement speakers, processing unit and digitial sound mixer console Unified Communication Tele Full replacement of existing phone system to IP phones Upgrade Interactive Display Panel Boards Replacement of smartboards with Interactive display panels (apx. $3.50/sf; $6,500/ea) Spectator Gym Telescoping Spectator Gym: Replace entire telescoping bleachers Stands Replacement (apx. $150/per seat @ 1155/seats, 75/seats portable)

Interior Lighting

Auditorium House Lighting

HVAC Testing, Balancing and Retro Commisioning HVAC Duct Cleaning

/ Project Name HVAC Upgrades - Cooling Tower Condenser Pumps Rebuild HVAC Upgrades - (2) Roof-TopUnit (RTU) HVAC Upgrades - (2) Pool Pak Rooftop Dehumidication Units (PAHU) HVAC Upgrades - (7) Refrigeration Condensor Units Upgrade BAS Controls

B

Replace End-of-Life (EOF) Equipment

Replace End-of-Life (EOF) Equipment

Provide for replacement of outdated or inadequate technology Replace End-of-Life (EOF) Equipment

Replace End-of-Life (EOF) Equipment

Replace End-of-Life (EOF) Equipment

Replace End-of-Life (EOF) Equipment

Provide for replacement of outdated or inadequate technology

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

Optimize Energy Performance, Replace End$ of-Life (EOF) System Optimize Energy Performance, Replace End$ of-Life (EOF) System Optimize Energy Performance, Replace Endof-Life (EOF) System $ Optimize Energy Performance, Replace End$ of-Life (EOF) System Optimize Energy Performance, Replace End$ of-Life (EOF) System Optimize Energy Performance $ Improve Indoor Environmental Quality (IAQ) $ Optimize Energy Performance, Replace End$ of-Life (EOF) System Optimize Energy Performance, Replace Endof-Life (EOF) System $ Optimize Energy Performance, Replace End$ of-Life (EOF) System Optimize Energy Performance, Replace End$ of-Life (EOF) System Replace End-of-Life (EOF) Equipment

K Benefits

19,300

57,750

173,250

552,500

58,000

35,000

32,000

1,120,000

12,000

178,000

1,600,000

52,000

32,000

144,000

994,338

30,000

260,000

286,000

45,000

Estimated Cost

L

Page 11 of 14

$20,000

$0

$184,450

$58,000

$34,255

$36,195

$22,558

$30,000

M Actual / Completed Costs

Project / Deficiency Listing 2019-2020

228

227

226

225

224

223

222

221

220

219

218

217

216

215

214

213

212

211

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

SHS

6 Bldg SHS 209 SHS 210 SHS

A

Reconfigure layout to accommodate revisions to curriculum (STEM) (apx. $16.00/sf @ 7,000sf)

Remove built-in locker arrangements, reconfigure layout to accommodate revisions to curriculum (ELA) (apx. $93.50/sf @ 1,000sf) Entry / Bus Drives (apx. 10,650sy) Asphalt Paving, heavy duty wearing course ($29.00/sylight duty; $31.00/sy-heavy duty) Student Parking Lot (apx. 6,800sy Asphalt Paving, wearing course student parking lot Center; 4,555sy Tennis; 2,150sy ($29.00/sy-light duty; $31.00/sy-heavy duty) CSC) Teacher Parking Lot (apx.

Asphalt Paving, wearing course Teacher parking lot 3,500sy) ($29.00/sy-light duty; $31.00/sy-heavy duty) CSC Exterior Pavers (apx.

Subgrade and Subbase Repaired/Replaced (apx.

1300sfy) $4.50/sf) Concrete Sidewalk Repair / replace damage concrete sidewalk (apx.

8.00/sf) est. 32k onsite w/ 50% replacement factor

Locker Corridor Reconfiguration

Library reconfiguration

G20 Site Improvements

G20 Site Improvements

G20 Site Improvements

G20 Site Improvements

G20 Site Improvements

F20 Selective Building Demolition

F20 Selective Building Demolition

F10 Special Construction

E20 F Furnishings i hi

E20 Furnishings

E20 Furnishings

E10 Equipment

E10 Equipment

Repair and Replace existing brick paver system Rplace existing concrete walk areas

Repair and Replace existing asphalt paving

Repair and Replace existing asphalt paving

Repair and Replace existing asphalt paving

Implement and reconfigure learning areas to align with district learning models

Implement and reconfigure learning areas to align with district learning models

Walkways do not have shelter from weather conditions

Provide for replacement of outdated or inadequate furnishings P id ffor replacement Provide l t off outdated td t d or inadequate furnishings

Provide for replacement of outdated or inadequate furnishings

Replace End-of-Life (EOF) Equipment

Replace End-of-Life (EOF) Equipment

Replace End-of-Life (EOF) Equipment

Replace End-of-Life (EOF) Equipment

Prolong Performance and Life

Replace End-of-Life (EOF) Equipment

Replace End-of-Life (EOF) Equipment

E10 Equipment

E10 Equipment

Replace End-of-Life (EOF) Equipment

Replace End-of-Life (EOF) Equipment

K Benefits

E10 Equipment

Category E10 Equipment

F

Replace three traveler tracks as inspected by Pittsburgh E10 Equipment Stage Replacement of Choral sound shells as requested by E10 Equipment SHS Music Department (apx. $3,800/ea @ 16 units) Replacement of Choral Risers as requested by SHS E10 Equipment Music Department (apx. $2,500/ea @ 9 units)

Replacement of Follow Spot Lights as requested by SHS Music Department Stage Rigging System Upgrades Existing counterweight rigging system is need of replacement, repairs and updating Classroom Furniture Replacement Replacement of all classroom furnishings, student desk, tables and chairs - full analysis required, ($6.50/sf) whole building (apx. 128,000 sf) Cafeteria Table/Furnishing Replace existing cafeteria tables, café booths, café Replacements tables and chairs (apx. $11.00/sf @ 6,500) C Commons F Furniture it and dS Seating ti Additi off flexible Addition fl ibl furnishing f i hi in i commons area to t accommodate revisions to secondary education learning environment ($8.00/sf) commons/corridors (apx.

20,000sf) Overhang at P-Wing |Gym Extruded Aluminum Entry/walway canopy for students at Entrance parent drop off (apx. $45.00/sf @ 1,250sf)

Auditorium Follow Spot Lights

Auditorium Stage Choral Risers

Auditorium Stage ACD Traveler Track Auditorium Stage Sound Shells

Replace obsolete Site/Lawn Equipment

Existing backstop electronic operations is failing and obsolete (apx. $6,500/ea @ 8 units) Total Warming Kitchen Replacement - full analysis with Food Service Director required (190.00/sf) est. 2,200sf

Main Gym Basketball Backstop Upgrades Kitchen Equipment - Total Kitchen Replacement

Tractor / Mower / Plow

Description Replace obsolete (2) kilns (apx. $5,200/ea)

C

/ Project Name Art Kiln(s) Replacement

B

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

128,000

5,850

101,500

390,000

330,150

93,500

112,000

56,250

160,000

71,500

1,982,500

14,000

3,626

24,300

60,800

26,000

15,000

247,500

52,000

10,400

Estimated Cost

L

Page 12 of 14

$3,626

$10,203

M Actual / Completed Costs

Project / Deficiency Listing 2019-2020

SHS

SHS

SHS

247

246

245

244

243

242

241

240

239

238

237

MEM

MEM

MEM

ROT

ROT

SWC

SWC

SHS

SHS

SHS

235 236 SHS SHS

234

233

232

6 Bldg SHS 229 SHS 230 SHS 231 SHS

A

Description (2) Monumental signage added to entries off Cat Curve and Arnold Palmer Drive Remove and regrade site along parking lots

C

Grandstand Lighting Painting

Pressbox Upgrades

Synthetic Track Replacement

Playfield Upgrades-Practice

Playfield Upgrades-Competition

Synthetic Turf Replacement Graham-Sobota Field

Synthetic Turf Replacement Rossi Field

ADA Accessible Route

Classroom Door Hardware

Secure Entry Pedestrian Walks

Fire Suppression System Security Access Doors Exterior/Interior

Fire Alarm System

Exterior Visitor Parking Lot Lighting Exterior/Safety Lighting

O10 Life Safety

O10 Life Safety O10 Life Safety

O10 Life Safety

G30 Site Utilities

Repairs, regrade perimeter drainage, install playfield dirt (apx. $15/sy @ 1110sy) Repairs, regrade perimeter drainage, install playfield dirt (apx. $15/sy @ 1000sy) Full Replacement, asphalt overlay track slope, install new polyurethane track surface, and surrounding fencing Repairs, retrofits and upgrades to existing stadium pressbox, including interior and exterior materials, electrical, lighting, hvac and technology Repair and repaint existing lighting mast

Full replacement of existing synthetic turf fields from 2014 installation (apx. $70.00/sy @ 15,000sy)

Full replacement of existing synthetic turf fields from 2014 installation (apx. $70.00/sy @ 11,000sy)

Install ADA accessible route from upper parking lot to Rossi Field (apx. $14.00/sf @ 375sf plus ADA curbs)

G30 Site Utilities

G20 Site Improvements

G20 Site Improvements

G20 Site Improvements

G20 Site Improvements

G20 Site Improvements

G20 Site Improvements

O20 ADA

$

$

$

Resstore and preserve steel framing of lighting mast

Restore and preserve use of pressbox for District events

$

$

$

30,000

180,000

600,000

15,000

16,650

1,050,000

770,000

16,450

68,000

25,000

350,000

$

$

560,000 1,024,000

320,000

8,000

10,000

35,000

5,000

32,000

Estimated Cost

L

$ $

$

$

$

$

$

$

$ Restore and preserve competition useage of $ athletic fields Restore and preserve competition useage of $ athletic fields Replace End-of-Life (EOF) Material

Replace End-of-Life (EOF) Material

Replace End-of-Life (EOF) Material

ADA Compliance

Staff can use their key on the inside of the room without having to go into the hallway and expose themselves to potential harm.

Thi prevents This t students t d t from f locking l ki the th d door from the inside with a turn or pushbutton.

Remove, restore, and stabilize site trees prolonging the life and structrually preserving their life and property safety Optimize Energy Performance, Increase Lighting Levels and Safety Optimize Energy Performance, Increase Lighting Levels and Safety Upgrade to fully compliant IBC and NFPA requirements HSW, existing system is minimal Increase security to monitor common areas, visitor monitoring, and deter vandilism, theft and crime Increase building safety and security and deter crime

G20 Site Improvements

G30 Site Utilities

Site and Grounds Beautification

Site and Grounds Beautification

Site and Grounds Beautification

K Benefits

G20 Site Improvements

G20 Site Improvements

Category G20 Site Improvements

F

Retrofit existing classroom doors with classroom intruder O10 Life Safety (able to lock from inside) locksets (apx. $800/ea)

Installation of security measures to entry pedestrian walks to protect main entries from security threats

Install fire suppression system ($3.20/sf) Secure exterior entry doors additional exterior locations and interior (apx. $5,000/ea)

Install additional lighting heads to existing light poles in center visitor parking lot (apx. 2,500/ea) Retrofit existing metal halide and wall pack fixtures with LED fixtures (apx. $1.00/sf) Upgrade Fire Alarm System ($1.75/sf)

Trash and Recylcling Bin Screen Install masonry screen wall for trash and recycling bins Enclosure Entry Trees, Field Perimeter Tress Tree structure evaluation, structural supports, pruning, and Other Site Trees tree removal

Regrade of Parking Lot Stone

/ Project Name Entry Monumental Signage

B

Page 13 of 14

$12,692

$8,000

$8,160

$2,200

M Actual / Completed Costs

Project / Deficiency Listing 2019-2020

255

6 Bldg MEM 248 249 250 251 252 253 254

A

/ Project Name Tractor Mower

B

F

Description Category Replacement of grounds mower whose motor has failed. E10 Equipment

C

9,000

$9,000

M Actual / Completed Costs

$ 17,514,822 $ 4,086,792 $ 21,601,613

Page 14 of 14

$ 58,382,739 $ 4,702,796

$

Estimated Cost

L

Total Project Cost (Excluding Financing) $ 79,984,352

Subtotal Soft Cost (Professional Fees & Contingencies) A/E Fees, Permits, Contingencies (30%) Design Contingency (7%) Total Soft Cost

Replace End-of-Life (EOF) Equipment

K Benefits

Project / Deficiency Listing 2019-2020

Facility Needs Summary 2020-2021

DISTRICT-WIDE FACILITIES DEFICIENCY LISTING AND IMPROVEMENT PLAN Project Priority Index Listing

49

26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48

25

21 22 23 24

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

G

H

I

J

K

WEIGHT 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3

Additional projects may be added by using the copy function to add rows. Rows must also be added to the Improvement Plan tab.

SHS Exterior Visitor Parking Lot Lighting MES Domestic Hot Water Heater & Expansion Tank SHS Roof Replacement Area 1 (2019) SHS Roof Replacement Area 1a (2020) SHS HVAC Upgrades - (7) Refrigeration Condensor Units BES Unified Communication Tele Upgrade JHS Unified Communication Tele Upgrade MES Unified Communication Tele Upgrade SHS Unified Communication Tele Upgrade MEM Synthetic Track Replacement SHS Domestic Hot Water Storage Tanks BES Fire Alarm System JHS Fire Alarm System MES Fire Alarm System SHS Fire Alarm System BES HVAC Upgrades - Roof-Top-Unit (RTU) BES HVAC Upgrades - Unit Ventilators JHS HVAC Upgrades - (11) Roof-Top-Unit (RTU) MES HVAC Upgrades - Chiller Units Replacment (30 Ton) MES HVAC Upgrades - (7) Roof-Top-Unit (RTU) MES HVAC Upgrades - Unit Ventilators SHS HVAC Upgrades - (2) Roof-Top-Unit (RTU) HVAC Upgrades - (2) Pool Pak Rooftop SHS Dehumidication Units (PAHU)

BLDG / PROJECT NAME

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

S

Educational Development / Impact

Public Health, Safety and Welfare (HSW)

Service Life Expectency / Age

Operational / Deferred Maint Impacts

CRITERION 4 CRITERION 5

Technology / Energy Changes

CRITERION 6

Rebranding, Aesthetic or Social Value

New Learning Trend

CRITERION 7 CRITERION 8

6

10

0

9

6

8

7

7

7

6

7

5

0

4

0

3

Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight 7 10 2 9 3 8 7 7 7 6 7 5 5 4 0 3 8 10 0 9 6 8 7 7 7 6 7 5 0 4 0 3 7 10 5 9 6 8 7 7 7 6 0 5 0 4 0 3 7 10 5 9 6 8 7 7 7 6 0 5 0 4 0 3 7 10 0 9 7 8 7 7 7 6 7 5 0 4 0 3 7 10 2 9 4 8 7 7 7 6 7 5 0 4 0 3 7 10 2 9 4 8 7 7 7 6 7 5 0 4 0 3 7 10 2 9 4 8 7 7 7 6 7 5 0 4 0 3 7 10 2 9 4 8 7 7 7 6 7 5 0 4 0 3 6 10 3 9 5 8 7 7 5 6 1 5 8 4 0 3 4 10 6 9 7 8 7 7 7 6 0 5 0 4 0 3 7 10 7 9 7 8 7 7 0 6 0 5 0 4 0 3 7 10 7 9 7 8 7 7 0 6 0 5 0 4 0 3 7 10 7 9 7 8 7 7 0 6 0 5 0 4 0 3 7 10 7 9 7 8 7 7 0 6 0 5 0 4 0 3 6 10 0 9 6 8 7 7 7 6 7 5 0 4 0 3 6 10 0 9 6 8 7 7 7 6 7 5 0 4 0 3 6 10 0 9 6 8 7 7 7 6 7 5 0 4 0 3 6 10 0 9 6 8 7 7 7 6 7 5 0 4 0 3 6 10 0 9 6 8 7 7 7 6 7 5 0 4 0 3 6 10 0 9 6 8 7 7 7 6 7 5 0 4 0 3 6 10 0 9 6 8 7 7 7 6 7 5 0 4 0 3

Legal / Code Mandates

CRITERION 3

CRITERION 1 CRITERION 2

T

Step 4: Set Project Score needed for inclusion in Capital Improvement Plan:

RATING per Criterion (Safety; Educational Impact; Operational Impact; Age; Service Life) Unsafe; Needs Immediate Attention; Critical-School Closure; Over 20yrs Age, Less than 5yrs of Service Life Not Unsafe But Needs Immediate Attention; Serious-School Disruption; 10-20yrs Age, 5-10yrs of Service Life Needs Prompt Attention, Moderate Disruption, Poor Condition, 5-10yrs Age, 10-15yrs of Service Life Safe, But Needs Addressed; Slight Disruption, Needs Improved, 3-5yrs Age, 15-20yrs of Service Life Safe, But Should Be Budgeted, Minor Disruption, Fair Condition, 1-3 years Age, 20-30yrs of Service Life Safe, But Will Need Work In Future, Minor Disruption, Fair Condition No Safety Hazard, Preventative Work Only, No Disruption, Good Condition No Safety Hazard, No Work, No Disruption, New Condition

Step 3: Projects will be populated from Capital Needs list. Consider each criterion for each project and assign a rating from 17 on how well it meets that criterion. Add project lines as needed.

CRITERION Public Health, Safety and Welfare (HSW) Legal / Code Mandates Educational Development / Impact Service Life Expectency / Age Operational / Deferred Maint Impacts Technology / Energy Changes Rebranding, Aesthetic or Social Value New Learning Trend

Step 2: Assign a weight to each criterion on a scale of 3 - 10, with 10 being the most important.

F

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

E

Step 1: List the criteria (e.g., cost, need) you will use to evaluate the project or acquisition. You may add criteria as needed.

D

5

2 Facilities Deficiency Listing and Improvement Plan 3 Needs Assessment 4

A B C 1 Greater Latrobe School District

Page 1 of 6

234

PROJECT SCORE 258 254 254 254 252 246 246 246 246 243 241 238 238 238 238 234 234 234 234 234 234 234

200

RATING 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

U

Project Priority Index Listing 2019-2020

SHS

SHS BES MES SHS SHS BES JHS BES BES JHS MES SHS JHS JHS BES BES BES BES JHS JHS JHS MES MES MES MES SHS SHS SHS SHS BES BES BES

JHS

JHS MES MES MES SHS

SHS SHS SHS SHS

53

54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85

86

87 88 89 90 91

92 93 94 95

C

D

Auxilary Gym Telescoping Stands Replacement/Retrofit Boiler (2) Replacement Boiler (2) Replacement / Refurbishment Boiler(3) System Repair Boiler(3) System Retrofit / Replacement Cafeteria Floor (apx. 3850sf) Cafeteria Floor (apx. 6,000sf) Library reconfiguration Ballfield Bleachers Library reconfiguration Library reconfiguration Library reconfiguration Exterior Metal Wall Panels Replacement Window Replacement Fire Suppression System Classroom Door Hardware Security Access Doors - Main Security Access Doors - Exterior/Interior Fire Suppression System Security Access Doors - Exterior/Interior Classroom Door Hardware Fire Suppression System Classroom Door Hardware Security Access Doors - Main Security Access Doors - Exterior/Interior Fire Suppression System Security Access Doors - Exterior/Interior Classroom Door Hardware Auditorium House Lighting Carpet Replacement - Stairs Carpet Replacement - Classrooms (apx. 45,000sf) Carpet Replacement - Corridors (apx. 20,000sf) Carpet/VCT Replacement - Classrooms, Lockers, Sm. Corridors (apx. 79,000sf) Carpet Replacement - Entry walkoff matting (apx.

1,500sf) Carpet Replacement - Stairs Carpet Replacement - Classrooms (apx. 45000sf) Carpet Replacement - Corridors (apx. 20,000sf) Main Gym Floor(s) Resurfacing (apx. 11,800sf) Carpet Replacement - Entry walkoff matting (apx.

5,500sf) Stage Floor Resurfacing (apx. 3,200sf) Main Gym Basketball Backstop Upgrades Regrade of Parking Lot Stone

Additional projects may be added by using the copy function to add rows. Rows must also be added to the Improvement Plan tab.

Auditorium Sound Upgrades Natatorium/Gym Sound Upgrades Spectator Gym Telescoping Stands Replacement Spectator Gym Telescoping Stands Replacement/Retrofit

B BLDG / PROJECT NAME

SHS SHS SHS

A

26 50 51 52

25

24 Educational Development / Impact

Public Health, Safety and Welfare (HSW)

Service Life Expectency / Age

Operational / Deferred Maint Impacts

K L M N CRITERION 4 CRITERION 5 Technology / Energy Changes

O P CRITERION 6 Rebranding, Aesthetic or Social Value

New Learning Trend

Q R S T CRITERION 7 CRITERION 8

6 6 6 6

6 6 6 6 6

6

8 3 3 3 3 7 6 4 4 4 4 4 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 6 6

8

10 10 10 10

10 10 10 10 10

10

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

10

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0

0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 0 0 0

0

9 9 9 9

9 9 9 9 9

9

9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

9

5 5 5 5

5 5 5 5 5

5

4 7 7 7 7 5 7 4 4 4 4 4 7 7 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 5 5 5

4

8 8 8 8

8 8 8 8 8

8

8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

8

7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7

7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7

7

7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7

7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7

7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7

7

7 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 7 6 6 6 7 7 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 7 7 7 7

7

6 6 6 6

6 6 6 6 6

6

6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

6

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0

0 7 7 7 7 0 0 4 0 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0

0

5 5 5 5

5 5 5 5 5

5

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

5

7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7

7

7 0 0 0 0 7 7 7 0 7 7 7 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 7

7

4 4 4 4

4 4 4 4 4

4

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

4

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0

3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3

3

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

3

Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight 6 10 0 9 4 8 7 7 7 6 7 5 4 4 0 3 6 10 0 9 4 8 7 7 7 6 7 5 4 4 0 3 8 10 0 9 4 8 7 7 7 6 0 5 7 4 0 3

Legal / Code Mandates

I J CRITERION 3

E F G H CRITERION 1 CRITERION 2

Page 2 of 6

219 219 219 219

219 219 219 219 219

219

231 230 230 230 230 229 229 226 226 226 226 226 223 223 221 221 221 221 221 221 221 221 221 221 221 221 221 221 220 219 219 219

231

PROJECT SCORE 234 234 231

U

Project Priority Index Listing 2019-2020

SHS BES BES BES JHS JHS JHS MES MES MES SHS SHS SHS BES JHS MES SHS JHS SHS BES MES

SHS SHS SHS BES MES BES BES JHS JHS JHS JHS MES MES

MES SHS SHS BES JHS MES SHS BES MES MES

100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120

121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133

134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143

C

D

Additional projects may be added by using the copy function to add rows. Rows must also be added to the Improvement Plan tab.

Fire Doors Fire Doors Tractor / Mower / Plow HVAC Upgrades - Centrifugal Chiller Renewal HVAC Upgrades - Cooling Tower Condenser Pumps Rebuild IDF Room AC Upgrades Interior Lighting Unified Communication Speakers, Clocks Upgrade HVAC IDF Room (4 Rooms) Interior Lighting Unified Communication Speakers, Clocks Upgrade IDF Room AC Upgrades Interior Lighting Unified Communication Speakers, Clocks Upgrade HVAC IDF Room (4 Rooms) Interior Lighting Unified Communication Speakers, Clocks Upgrade Interactive Display Panel Boards Interactive Display Panel Boards Interactive Display Panel Boards Interactive Display Panel Boards Cafeteria Table/Furnishing Replacements Cafeteria Table/Furnishing Replacements Plumbing Fixture Replacement Plumbing Fixture Replacement CSC Wood Floor (apx. 4,400sf unknown scope, carryover from previous Director) Auditorium Stage ACD Traveler Track Stage Rigging System Upgrades Security Cameras Security Cameras Exterior Door Replacement Roof Replacement (2023) Exterior Door Replacement - HollowMetal Exterior Door Replacement - Aluminum Exterior Door Repairs Roof Replacement (2022) Exterior Door Replacement Roof Replacement (2023) Playground Trees, Entry Trees, Field Perimeter Tress and Other Site Trees Exterior Door Replacement Exterior Door Repairs Exterior/Safety Lighting Exterior/Safety Lighting Exterior/Safety Lighting Exterior/Safety Lighting Playfield Upgrades HVAC Upgrades - Dehumidification Crawl Space Playfield Upgrades

B BLDG / PROJECT NAME

BES MES SHS SHS

A

26 96 97 98 99

25

24 Educational Development / Impact

Public Health, Safety and Welfare (HSW)

Service Life Expectency / Age

Operational / Deferred Maint Impacts

K L M N CRITERION 4 CRITERION 5 Technology / Energy Changes

O P CRITERION 6 Rebranding, Aesthetic or Social Value

New Learning Trend

Q R S T CRITERION 7 CRITERION 8

7 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 6 5

5 4 4 7 7 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 5

7 5 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 4 3 3 3 3 5 5 4 4

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 2 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5

9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 4

5 5 5 3 3 4 6 4 4 4 6 4 6

7 5 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 4 6 6 6 6 4 4 4 4

8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

5 7 7 5 5 5 5 4 5 4

7 7 7 5 5 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 4 4 4 4 7 7 5 5

6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

0 2 2 7 7 7 7 0 5 0

0 4 4 7 7 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 0

0 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 0 0 0 0

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

0 4 4 5 5 5 5 7 0 7

7 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 4 4 0 4 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 7 7 4 4

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 7 7 4 4 0 0

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight 5 10 7 9 4 8 7 7 4 6 0 5 0 4 0 3 5 10 7 9 4 8 7 7 4 6 0 5 0 4 0 3 6 10 0 9 4 8 7 7 7 6 7 5 0 4 0 3 7 10 0 9 7 8 7 7 7 6 0 5 0 4 0 3

Legal / Code Mandates

I J CRITERION 3

E F G H CRITERION 1 CRITERION 2

Page 3 of 6

207 207 207 206 206 206 206 204 204 204

209 209 209 208 208 207 207 207 207 207 207 207 207

217 216 216 216 216 216 216 216 216 216 216 216 216 215 215 215 215 213 213 212 212

PROJECT SCORE 218 218 218 217

U

Project Priority Index Listing 2019-2020

170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191

145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169

144

26

25

24

A

D

Auditorium On-Stage 7-Color LED Down Wash Lighting Auditorium Stage Front of House 7-Color LED SHS Ellipsoidal ROT Playfield Upgrades-Competition ROT Playfield Upgrades-Practice JHS Cafeteria Interior Finish Upgrades (apx. 6,000sf) SHS Cafeteria Interior Finish Upgrades (apx. 6,500sf) SHS Auditorium Stage Sound Shells SHS Auditorium Stage Choral Risers SHS Auditorium Follow Spot Lights BES ADA Toilet Accessories MES ADA Toilet Accessories SHS P-Wing Glazed Block Retrofit BES Upgrade BAS Controls JHS Upgrade BAS Controls MES Upgrade BAS Controls SHS Roof Replacement Area 2 (2029) SHS Upgrade BAS Controls MEM Grandstand Lighting Painting BES Interior Painting BES Gym Floor(s) Resurfacing (apx 6,000sf) BES Interior Acoustical Ceiling Replacement JHS Interior Painting JHS Main Gym Floor(s) Resurfacing (apx. 8,800sf) JHS Aux Gym Floor(s) Resurfacing (apx. 7,600sf) JHS Aux Gym Floor(s) Resurfacing (apx. 6,000sf) MES Interior Painting Gym Floor(s) Resurfacing MES (apx 6,000sf) MES Interior Acoustical Ceiling Replacement SHS Interior Painting SHS Aux Gym Floor(s) Resurfacing (apx. 7,600sf) SHS Terrazzo Floor Restoration (apx. 80,000sf) assume 5% heavy repa BES HVAC Testing, Balancing and Retro Commisioning JHS HVAC Testing, Balancing and Retro Commisioning MES HVAC Testing, Balancing and Retro Commisioning SHS HVAC Testing, Balancing and Retro Commisioning JHS Locker Corridor Reconfiguration SHS Locker Corridor Reconfiguration BES Playground Repairs (North & South) BES Playfield Equipment Upgrades JHS Commons Furniture and Seating MES Playground Repairs MES Playfield Equipment Upgrades SHS Commons Furniture and Seating BES Classroom Furniture Replacement JHS Telescoping Stands Replacement JHS Classroom Furniture Replacement MES Classroom Furniture Replacement SHS Classroom Furniture Replacement

SHS

C

Additional projects may be added by using the copy function to add rows. Rows must also be added to the Improvement Plan tab.

B BLDG / PROJECT NAME Educational Development / Impact

Public Health, Safety and Welfare (HSW)

Service Life Expectency / Age

Operational / Deferred Maint Impacts

K L M N CRITERION 4 CRITERION 5 Technology / Energy Changes

O P CRITERION 6 Rebranding, Aesthetic or Social Value

New Learning Trend

Q R S T CRITERION 7 CRITERION 8

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 5 5 3 5 5 3 1 4 1 1 1

10

6 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 6 4 4 4 5 4 7 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

6

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 0 3 0 0 0

3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3

9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

9

5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

2 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 2 2 4 2 2 2 6 2 1 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

2

8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

8

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 7 6 6 6

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 7 7 7 7 7

7 4 4 6 6 7 7 7 4 4 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7

6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

6

0 0 0 0 0 7 7 7 7 4 4 0 0 2 0 0 2 3 0 3 3 3

2 0 0 2 2 4 4 4 0 0 0 7 7 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

5

7 7 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 7 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 7 0 7 7 7

0 7 7 7 7 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

0

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

4

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 0 7 7 7

0 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

3

Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight

Legal / Code Mandates

I J CRITERION 3

E F G H CRITERION 1 CRITERION 2

Page 4 of 6

199 199 199 199 199 198 198 198 198 196 196 194 194 194 194 194 194 190 190 190 190 190

204 204 204 203 203 203 203 203 202 202 201 200 200 200 200 200 200 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199

204

PROJECT SCORE

U

Project Priority Index Listing 2019-2020

233 234 235 236 237 238

226 227 228 229 230 231 232

208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225

201 202 203 204 205 206 207

26 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200

25

24

A

C

D

Additional projects may be added by using the copy function to add rows. Rows must also be added to the Improvement Plan tab.

BES Window Replacement MES Window Replacement BES Overhang at Parent Drop-off BES Security Reception Waiting Area MES Overhang at Parent Drop-off Dearborn MES Security Reception Waiting Area SHS Overhang at P-Wing |Gym Entrance BES HVAC Upgrades - VAV Air terminals MES HVAC Upgrades - VAV Air terminals HVAC Upgrades - Variable Frequency Drives (VFD) SHS Add to Chiller SHS Athletic Hall of Distinction JHS HVACR Upgrades to Shop Classroom JHS Main Gym Basketball Backstop Upgrades SHS HVACR Upgrades to Shop Classroom SHS ADA Accessible Route BES Classroom Corridor Reconfiguration Entry / Bus Drives (apx. 1,350sy-car lane; 1,700sy-bus BES lane) BES Entry / Bus Drives 982 Turn Lane MES Classroom Corridor Reconfiguration SHS Secure Entry Pedestrian Walks BES HVAC Duct Cleaning BES Kitchen Equipment - Warming Kitchen Replacement JHS HVAC Duct Cleaning JHS Kitchen Equipment - Total Kitchen Replacement JHS Trash and Recylcling Bin Screen Enclosure MES HVAC Duct Cleaning MES Kitchen Equipment - Warming Kitchen Replacement SHS HVAC Duct Cleaning SHS Kitchen Equipment - Total Kitchen Replacement SHS Trash and Recylcling Bin Screen Enclosure JHS Art Kiln(s) Replacement SHS Art Kiln(s) Replacement JHS Domestic Supply Piping Corrosiviness SHS Domestic Supply Piping Corrosiviness VCT Replacement - Classrooms, Lockers, Sm. SHS Corridors (apx. 136,000sf) BES Kitchen sink faucet replacement JHS Kitchen sink faucet replacement MES Kitchen sink faucet replacement MES Deerborn Parking Lot (apx. 2,950sy) MES Front Parking Lot (apx 2,400sy) SHS Kitchen sink faucet replacement Student Parking Lot (apx. 6,800sy Center; 4,555sy SHS Tennis; 2,150sy CSC) SHS Teacher Parking Lot (apx. 3,500sy) SWC Synthetic Turf Replacement - Rossi Field SWC Synthetic Turf Replacement - Graham-Sobota Field MEM Tractor Mower BES Lobby ADA Ramp

B BLDG / PROJECT NAME Educational Development / Impact

Public Health, Safety and Welfare (HSW)

Service Life Expectency / Age

Operational / Deferred Maint Impacts

K L M N CRITERION 4 CRITERION 5 Technology / Energy Changes

O P CRITERION 6 Rebranding, Aesthetic or Social Value

New Learning Trend

Q R S T CRITERION 7 CRITERION 8

4 4 4 4 4 5

3 4 4 4 4 4 4

7 7 3 7 5 3 5 3 4 5 3 5 3 4 4 4 4 4

4 5 3 3 5 5 3

10 10 10 10 10 10

10 10 10 10 10 10 10

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

10 10 10 10 10 10 10

0 0 2 2 2 7

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 2 0 0 2 0

9 9 9 9 9 9

9 9 9 9 9 9 9

9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

9 9 9 9 9 9 9

3 3 2 2 2 3

5 2 2 2 3 3 2

4 4 6 7 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4

5 4 5 4 5 4 6

8 8 8 8 8 8

8 8 8 8 8 8 8

8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

8 8 8 8 8 8 8

7 7 7 7 7 2

7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 6

7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 3 3 3 0

7 5 5 5 7 7 5

4 4 3 0 7 7 7 7 4 7 7 7 7 4 7 7 7 7

5 4 4 7 7 3 3

6 6 6 6 6 6

6 6 6 6 6 6 6

6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

6 6 6 6 6 6 6

0 0 0 0 0 0

0 4 4 4 0 0 4

0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0

5 0 0 0 0 0 0

5 5 5 5 5 5

5 5 5 5 5 5 5

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

5 5 5 5 5 5 5

0 0 3 3 3 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 7 3 3 0 0

0 7 5 7 0 3 4

4 4 4 4 4 4

4 4 4 4 4 4 4

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

4 4 4 4 4 4 4

0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 7

3 3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight 4 10 0 9 4 8 7 7 7 6 2 5 4 4 0 3 4 10 0 9 4 8 7 7 7 6 2 5 4 4 0 3 5 10 0 9 5 8 7 7 3 6 0 5 7 4 0 3 7 10 0 9 5 8 5 7 0 6 4 5 5 4 0 3 5 10 0 9 5 8 7 7 3 6 0 5 7 4 0 3 7 10 0 9 5 8 5 7 0 6 4 5 5 4 0 3 5 10 0 9 5 8 7 7 3 6 0 5 7 4 0 3 4 10 0 9 5 8 7 7 5 6 5 5 0 4 0 3 4 10 0 9 5 8 7 7 5 6 5 5 0 4 0 3

Legal / Code Mandates

I J CRITERION 3

E F G H CRITERION 1 CRITERION 2

Page 5 of 6

155 155 153 153 153 151

161 155 155 155 155 155 155

175 175 175 175 173 173 173 173 173 173 173 173 173 173 167 167 163 163

184 183 181 181 181 179 175

PROJECT SCORE 189 189 185 185 185 185 185 184 184

U

Project Priority Index Listing 2019-2020

MES MES SHS SHS SHS SHS

BES JHS

JHS SHS

SHS BES JHS MES SHS JHS JHS BES BES JHS MES SHS JHS SHS

244 245 246 247 248 249

250 251

252 253

254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267

C

D

Additional projects may be added by using the copy function to add rows. Rows must also be added to the Improvement Plan tab.

Ballfield Bleachers South Parking Lot (apx. 1,200sy) Front Parking Lot (apx 1,400sy) Concrete Sidewalk Concrete Sidewalk Entry / Bus Drives (apx. 920sy-car lane; 3,000sy-bus lane) Concrete Sidewalk Replace Auditorium Wallpaper Entry / Bus Drives (apx. 10,650sy) CSC Exterior Pavers (apx. 1300sfy) Concrete Sidewalk Entry Trees, Field Perimeter Tress and Other Site Trees Entry Monumental Signage Entry Trees, Field Perimeter Tress and Other Site Trees Entry Monumental Signage Entry Trees, Field Perimeter Tress and Other Site Trees Exterior Caulking Replacement Exterior Caulking Replacement Exterior Caulking Replacement Exterior Caulking Replacement Front & Side Parking Lot (apx. 7,500sy) Rear Parking Lot and Drive (apx.6,210sy) Masonry Restoration ADA Parking Stalls Masonry Restoration Masonry Restoration Masonry Restoration Art Work Security System Upgrade Art Work Security System Upgrade

B BLDG / PROJECT NAME

MES BES BES BES JHS

A

26 239 240 241 242 243

25

24 Educational Development / Impact

Public Health, Safety and Welfare (HSW)

Service Life Expectency / Age

Operational / Deferred Maint Impacts

K L M N CRITERION 4 CRITERION 5 Technology / Energy Changes

O P CRITERION 6 Rebranding, Aesthetic or Social Value

New Learning Trend

Q R S T CRITERION 7 CRITERION 8

4 4 4 4 4 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 3 3

4 2

4 2

4 4 5 4 4 4

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

10 10

10 10

10 10 10 10 10 10

0 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0

9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

9 9

9 9

9 9 9 9 9 9

3 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 3

3 2

3 2

4 4 2 4 4 4

8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

8 8

8 8

8 8 8 8 8 8

7 7 7 7 7 6 6 3 3 3 3 3 5 5

7 7

7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 7

7 7

7 7 7 7 7 7

5 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 0 0

5 5

5 5

4 4 3 4 4 4

6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

6 6

6 6

6 6 6 6 6 6

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

5 5

5 5

5 5 5 5 5 5

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4

0 7

0 7

0 0 3 0 0 0

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

4 4

4 4

4 4 4 4 4 4

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

3 3

3 3

3 3 3 3 3 3

Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight Rating Weight 0 10 2 9 5 8 7 7 7 6 0 5 0 4 0 3 4 10 0 9 4 8 7 7 4 6 0 5 0 4 0 3 4 10 0 9 4 8 7 7 4 6 0 5 0 4 0 3 4 10 0 9 4 8 7 7 4 6 0 5 0 4 0 3 4 10 0 9 4 8 7 7 4 6 0 5 0 4 0 3

Legal / Code Mandates

I J CRITERION 3

E F G H CRITERION 1 CRITERION 2

Page 6 of 6

143 131 131 131 131 118 118 113 113 113 113 113 105 105

143 143

143 143

145 145 145 145 145 145

PROJECT SCORE 149 145 145 145 145

U

Project Priority Index Listing 2019-2020

Facility Needs Summary 2020-2021

DISTRICT-WIDE FACILITIES DEFICIENCY LISTING AND IMPROVEMENT PLAN Building Breakout Summaries

Building Breakout Summary 2019-2020 A 1 BES 2

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70

Bldg BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES BES

B

F

J

L

Baggaley Elementary

/ Project Name Masonry Restoration Exterior Caulking Replacement Window Replacement Exterior Door Replacement Roof Replacement (2023) Carpet Replacement - Stairs Interior Painting Cafeteria Floor (apx. 3850sf) Carpet Replacement - Classrooms (apx. 45,000sf) Carpet Replacement - Corridors (apx. 20,000sf) Gym Floor(s) Resurfacing (apx 6,000sf) Interior Acoustical Ceiling Replacement Plumbing Fixture Replacement Kitchen sink faucet replacement Boiler (2) Replacement IDF Room AC Upgrades HVAC Upgrades - VAV Air terminals HVAC Upgrades - Roof-Top-Unit (RTU) HVAC Upgrades - Unit Ventilators Upgrade BAS Controls HVAC Testing, Balancing and Retro Commisioning HVAC Duct Cleaning Interior Lighting Security Cameras Unified Communication Speakers, Clocks Upgrade Unified Communication Tele Upgrade Interactive Display Panel Boards Kitchen Equipment - Warming Kitchen Replacement ADA Toilet Accessories Classroom Furniture Replacement Overhang at Parent Drop-off Classroom Corridor Reconfiguration Library reconfiguration Entry / Bus Drives (apx. 1,350sy-car lane; 1,700sy-bus lane) Entry / Bus Drives 982 Turn Lane South Parking Lot (apx. 1,200sy) Front Parking Lot (apx 1,400sy) Concrete Sidewalk Entry Trees, Field Perimeter Tress and Other Site Trees Playground Repairs (North & South) Playfield Upgrades Playfield Equipment Upgrades Ballfield Bleachers Exterior/Safety Lighting Fire Doors Fire Alarm System Fire Suppression System Classroom Door Hardware Security Access Doors - Main Security Access Doors - Exterior/Interior Security Reception Waiting Area Lobby ADA Ramp ADA Parking Stalls

Deficiency / Improvement Category $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

Estimated Cost 63,000.00 15,000.00 150,500.00 60,000.00 2,346,084.00 10,000.00 196,000.00 48,125.00 562,500.00 250,000.00 22,750.00 441,000.00 99,000.00 3,000.00 300,000.00 9,000.00 114,800.00 1,285,232.00 37,500.00 321,308.00 80,000.00 19,775.00 642,616.00 54,000.00 148,000.00 25,500.00 325,000.00 247,500.00 20,000.00 642,200.00 17,500.00 80,000.00 56,000.00 95,000.00 65,000.00 40,000.00 28,000.00 40,000.00 10,000.00 15,000.00 14,700.00 49,000.00 16,000.00 98,000.00 22,000.00 175,000.00 315,000.00 35,200.00 5,887.00 80,000.00 10,000.00 4,000.00 5,000.00

$

9,752,677.00

$ $ $ $

2,925,803.10 682,687.39 3,608,490.49 13,361,167.49

Renovation @ $200/sf plus Soft Cost (Excluding Financing) $ Replacement @ $250/sf plus Soft Cost (Excluding Financing) $ Total Capital Improvements as % of Renovation Cost

27,052,020.00 33,815,025.00 49.39%

*Note: Per Utilization Rates, Bldg SF Reduction to 88,000/650 $ Students for Replacement Option

30,140,000.00 44.33%

Category B20 Exterior Enclosure B20 Exterior Enclosure B20 Exterior Enclosure B20 Exterior Enclosure B30 Roofing C20 Stairs C30 Interior Finishes C30 Interior Finishes C30 Interior Finishes C30 Interior Finishes C30 Interior Finishes C30 Interior Finishes D20 Plumbing D20 Plumbing D30 HVAC D30 HVAC D30 HVAC D30 HVAC D30 HVAC D30 HVAC D30 HVAC D30 HVAC D50 Electrical D50 Electrical D50 Electrical D60 Technology D60 Technology E10 Equipment E10 Equipment E20 Furnishings F10 Special Construction F20 Selective Building Demolition F20 Selective Building Demolition G20 Site Improvements G20 Site Improvements G20 Site Improvements G20 Site Improvements G20 Site Improvements G20 Site Improvements G20 Site Improvements G20 Site Improvements G20 Site Improvements G20 Site Improvements G30 Site Utilities O10 Life Safety O10 Life Safety O10 Life Safety O10 Life Safety O10 Life Safety O10 Life Safety O10 Life Safety O20 ADA O20 ADA

Capital Renewal Deferred Maintenance Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Deferred Maintenance Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Deferred Maintenance Deferred Maintenance Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Functional Deficiency Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Deferred Maintenance Deferred Maintenance Functional Deficiency Functional Deficiency Functional Deficiency Capital Renewal Educational Adequacy Functional Deficiency Functional Deficiency Educational Adequacy Educational Adequacy Educational Adequacy Educational Adequacy Capital Renewal New Construction Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Deferred Maintenance Deferred Maintenance Educational Adequacy Educational Adequacy Functional Deficiency Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal New Construction Capital Renewal Functional Deficiency Functional Deficiency Functional Deficiency Functional Deficiency Functional Deficiency

Subtotal Soft Cost (Professional Fees & Contingencies) A/E Fees, Permits, Contingencies (30%) Design Contingency (7%) Total Soft Cost Total Capital Improvement Cost (Excluding Financing)

Building Breakout Summary 2019-2020 A 1 MES 2

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69

Bldg MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES MES

B

F

J

L

Mountain View Elementary

/ Project Name Masonry Restoration Exterior Caulking Replacement Window Replacement Exterior Door Replacement Roof Replacement (2023) Carpet Replacement - Stairs Interior Painting Carpet Replacement - Classrooms (apx. 45,000sf) Carpet Replacement - Corridors (apx. 20,000sf) Gym Floor(s) Resurfacing (apx 6,000sf) Interior Acoustical Ceiling Replacement Plumbing Fixture Replacement Kitchen sink faucet replacement Domestic Hot Water Heater & Expansion Tank Boiler (2) Replacement / Refurbishment IDF Room AC Upgrades HVAC Upgrades - Chiller Condenser Units Replacment (30 Ton) HVAC Upgrades - VAV Air terminals HVAC Upgrades - Dehumidification Crawl Space HVAC Upgrades - (7) Roof-Top-Unit (RTU) HVAC Upgrades - Unit Ventilators Upgrade BAS Controls HVAC Testing, Balancing and Retro Commisioning HVAC Duct Cleaning Interior Lighting Security Cameras Unified Communication Speakers, Clocks Upgrade Unified Communication Tele Upgrade Interactive Display Panel Boards Kitchen Equipment - Warming Kitchen Replacement ADA Toilet Accessories Classroom Furniture Replacement Overhang at Parent Drop-off Dearborn Classroom Corridor Reconfiguration Library reconfiguration Entry / Bus Drives (apx. 920sy-car lane; 3,000sy-bus lane) Deerborn Parking Lot (apx. 2,950sy) Front Parking Lot (apx 2,400sy) Concrete Sidewalk Playground Trees, Entry Trees, Field Perimeter Tress and Other Site Trees Playground Repairs Playfield Upgrades Playfield Equipment Upgrades Ballfield Bleachers Exterior/Safety Lighting Fire Doors Fire Alarm System Fire Suppression System Classroom Door Hardware Security Access Doors - Main Security Access Doors - Exterior/Interior Security Reception Waiting Area

Category B20 Exterior Enclosure B20 Exterior Enclosure B20 Exterior Enclosure B20 Exterior Enclosure B30 Roofing C20 Stairs C30 Interior Finishes C30 Interior Finishes C30 Interior Finishes C30 Interior Finishes C30 Interior Finishes D20 Plumbing D20 Plumbing D20 Plumbing D30 HVAC D30 HVAC D30 HVAC D30 HVAC D30 HVAC D30 HVAC D30 HVAC D30 HVAC D30 HVAC D30 HVAC D50 Electrical D50 Electrical D50 Electrical D60 Technology D60 Technology E10 Equipment E10 Equipment E20 Furnishings F10 Special Construction F20 Selective Building Demolition F20 Selective Building Demolition G20 Site Improvements G20 Site Improvements G20 Site Improvements G20 Site Improvements G20 Site Improvements G20 Site Improvements G20 Site Improvements G20 Site Improvements G20 Site Improvements G30 Site Utilities O10 Life Safety O10 Life Safety O10 Life Safety O10 Life Safety O10 Life Safety O10 Life Safety O10 Life Safety

Deficiency / Improvement Category Capital Renewal Deferred Maintenance Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Deferred Maintenance Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Deferred Maintenance Deferred Maintenance Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Functional Deficiency Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Deferred Maintenance Deferred Maintenance Functional Deficiency Functional Deficiency Functional Deficiency Capital Renewal Educational Adequacy Functional Deficiency Functional Deficiency Educational Adequacy Educational Adequacy Educational Adequacy Educational Adequacy Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Deferred Maintenance Deferred Maintenance Educational Adequacy Educational Adequacy Functional Deficiency Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal New Construction Capital Renewal Functional Deficiency Functional Deficiency Functional Deficiency

Subtotal Soft Cost (Professional Fees & Contingencies) A/E Fees, Permits, Contingencies (30%) Design Contingency (7%) Total Soft Cost Total Capital Improvement Cost (Excluding Financing)

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

Estimated Cost 72,000.00 16,200.00 150,500.00 60,000.00 2,440,464.00 10,000.00 398,000.00 562,500.00 250,000.00 35,000.00 245,000.00 99,000.00 3,000.00 50,000.00 300,000.00 9,000.00 45,000.00 99,400.00 35,000.00 1,001,000.00 45,000.00 321,750.00 79,200.00 19,800.00 643,500.00 55,000.00 148,500.00 26,000.00 325,000.00 247,500.00 20,000.00 643,500.00 17,500.00 79,500.00 56,000.00 119,000.00 59,000.00 48,000.00 71,200.00 8,000.00 35,000.00 14,700.00 40,000.00 16,000.00 99,000.00 22,000.00 173,250.00 316,800.00 40,000.00 6,200.00 75,000.00 10,000.00

$

9,761,964.00

$ $ $ $

2,928,589.20 683,337.48 3,611,926.68 13,373,890.68

Renovation @ $200/sf plus Soft Cost (Excluding Financing) $ Replacement @ $250/sf plus Soft Cost (Excluding Financing) $ Total Capital Improvements as % of Renovation Cost

27,134,494.00 33,918,117.50 49.29%

*Note: Per Utilization Rates, Bldg SF Reduction to 88,000/650 $ Students for Replacement Option

30,140,000.00 44.37%

Building Breakout Summary 2019-2020 A 1 JHS 2

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67

Bldg JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS JHS

B

F

J

L

Junior High School

/ Project Name Category Masonry Restoration B20 Exterior Enclosure Exterior Metal Wall Panels Replacement B20 Exterior Enclosure Window Replacement B20 Exterior Enclosure Exterior Caulking Replacement B20 Exterior Enclosure Exterior Door Replacement - HollowMetal B20 Exterior Enclosure Exterior Door Replacement - Aluminum B20 Exterior Enclosure Exterior Door Repairs B20 Exterior Enclosure Roof Replacement (2022) B30 Roofing Interior Painting C30 Interior Finishes Cafeteria Interior Finish Upgrades (apx. 6,000sf) C30 Interior Finishes Cafeteria Floor (apx. 6,000sf) C30 Interior Finishes Main Gym Floor(s) Resurfacing (apx. 8,800sf) C30 Interior Finishes Aux Gym Floor(s) Resurfacing (apx. 7,600sf) C30 Interior Finishes Aux Gym Floor(s) Resurfacing (apx. 6,000sf) C30 Interior Finishes Carpet/VCT Replacement - Classrooms, Lockers, Sm. Corridors (apx. 79,000sf)C30 Interior Finishes Carpet Replacement - Entry walkoff matting (apx. 1,500sf) C30 Interior Finishes Kitchen sink faucet replacement D20 Plumbing Plumbing Fixture Replacement D20 Plumbing Domestic Supply Piping Corrosiviness D20 Plumbing HVACR Upgrades to Shop Classroom D30 HVAC HVAC IDF Room (4 Rooms) D30 HVAC HVAC Upgrades - (11) Roof-Top-Unit (RTU) (4) New D30 HVAC Upgrade BAS Controls D30 HVAC HVAC Testing, Balancing and Retro Commisioning D30 HVAC HVAC Duct Cleaning D30 HVAC Interior Lighting D50 Electrical Unified Communication Speakers, Clocks Upgrade D50 Electrical Unified Communication Tele Upgrade D60 Technology Interactive Display Panel Boards D60 Technology Telescoping Stands Replacement E10 Equipment Art Kiln(s) Replacement E10 Equipment Main Gym Basketball Backstop Upgrades E10 Equipment Kitchen Equipment - Total Kitchen Replacement E10 Equipment Classroom Furniture Replacement E20 Furnishings Cafeteria Table/Furnishing Replacements E20 Furnishings Commons Furniture and Seating E20 Furnishings Library reconfiguration F20 Selective Building Demolition Locker Corridor Reconfiguration F20 Selective Building Demolition Front & Side Parking Lot (apx. 7,500sy) G20 Site Improvements Rear Parking Lot and Drive (apx.6,210sy) G20 Site Improvements Concrete Sidewalk G20 Site Improvements Entry Monumental Signage G20 Site Improvements Trash and Recylcling Bin Screen Enclosure G20 Site Improvements Entry Trees, Field Perimeter Tress and Other Site Trees G20 Site Improvements Exterior/Safety Lighting G30 Site Utilities Fire Alarm System O10 Life Safety Fire Suppression System O10 Life Safety Security Access Doors - Exterior/Interior O10 Life Safety Classroom Door Hardware O10 Life Safety

Deficiency / Improvement Category Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Deferred Maintenance Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Deferred Maintenance Capital Renewal Deferred Maintenance Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Deferred Maintenance Functional Deficiency Functional Deficiency Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Deferred Maintenance Deferred Maintenance Capital Renewal Functional Deficiency Capital Renewal Educational Adequacy Capital Renewal Educational Adequacy Capital Renewal Functional Deficiency Educational Adequacy Educational Adequacy Educational Adequacy Educational Adequacy Educational Adequacy Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal New Construction New Construction Deferred Maintenance Capital Renewal Capital Renewal New Construction Functional Deficiency Capital Renewal

Subtotal Soft Cost (Professional Fees & Contingencies) A/E Fees, Permits, Contingencies (30%) Design Contingency (7%) Total Soft Cost Total Capital Improvement Cost (Excluding Financing)

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

Estimated Cost 56,070.00 558,600.00 215,250.00 13,350.00 30,000.00 25,200.00 17,250.00 3,580,018.00 324,976.00 27,000.00 45,000.00 30,800.00 26,600.00 21,000.00 987,500.00 10,500.00 3,000.00 157,500.00 35,000.00 39,000.00 24,000.00 2,112,500.00 528,125.00 130,000.00 32,500.00 1,056,250.00 243,750.00 47,000.00 455,000.00 55,500.00 5,200.00 52,000.00 247,500.00 1,056,250.00 83,200.00 100,000.00 128,000.00 48,000.00 33,750.00 27,945.00 32,000.00 30,000.00 30,000.00 4,000.00 162,500.00 284,375.00 520,000.00 150,000.00 62,400.00

$

13,945,359.00

$ $ $ $

4,183,607.70 976,175.13 5,159,782.83 19,105,141.83

Renovation @ $200/sf plus Soft Cost (Excluding Financing) $ Replacement @ $250/sf plus Soft Cost (Excluding Financing) $ Total Capital Improvements as % of Renovation Cost

44,525,000.00 55,656,250.00 42.91%

*Note: Per Utilization Rates, Bldg SF Reduction to 99,000/700 $ Students for Replacement Option

33,907,500.00 56.34%

Building Breakout Summary 2019-2020 A 1 SHS 2

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73

Bldg SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS

B

F

J

L

Senior High School

/ Project Name Category Masonry Restoration B20 Exterior Enclosure P-Wing Glazed Block Retrofit B20 Exterior Enclosure Exterior Caulking Replacement B20 Exterior Enclosure Exterior Door Replacement B20 Exterior Enclosure Exterior Door Repairs B20 Exterior Enclosure Roof Replacement Area 1 (2019) B30 Roofing Roof Replacement Area 1a (2020) B30 Roofing Roof Replacement Area 2 (2029) B30 Roofing Interior Painting C30 Interior Finishes Athletic Hall of Distinction C30 Interior Finishes Cafeteria Interior Finish Upgrades (apx. 6,500sf) C30 Interior Finishes Replace Auditorium Wallpaper C30 Interior Finishes CSC Wood Floor (apx. 4,400sf unknown scope, carryover from previous Director) C30 Interior Finishes Main Gym Floor(s) Resurfacing (apx. 11,800sf) C30 Interior Finishes Aux Gym Floor(s) Resurfacing (apx. 7,600sf) C30 Interior Finishes Carpet Replacement - Entry walkoff matting (apx. 5,500sf) C30 Interior Finishes Stage Floor Resurfacing (apx. 3,200sf) C30 Interior Finishes VCT Replacement - Classrooms, Lockers, Sm. Corridors (apx. 136,000sf) C30 Interior Finishes Terrazzo Floor Restoration (apx. 80,000sf) assume 5% heavy repair factor C30 Interior Finishes Kitchen sink faucet replacement D20 Plumbing Domestic Supply Piping Corrosiviness D20 Plumbing Domestic Hot Water Storage Tanks D20 Plumbing Boiler(3) System Retrofit / Replacement D30 HVAC HVACR Upgrades to Shop Classroom D30 HVAC HVAC IDF Room (4 Rooms) D30 HVAC HVAC Upgrades - Variable Frequency Drives (VFD) Add to Chiller D30 HVAC HVAC Upgrades - Centrifugal Chiller Renewal D30 HVAC HVAC Upgrades - Cooling Tower Condenser Pumps Rebuild D30 HVAC HVAC Upgrades - (2) Roof-Top-Unit (RTU) D30 HVAC HVAC Upgrades - (2) Pool Pak Rooftop Dehumidication Units (PAHU) D30 HVAC HVAC Upgrades - (7) Refrigeration Condensor Units D30 HVAC Upgrade BAS Controls D30 HVAC HVAC Testing, Balancing and Retro Commisioning D30 HVAC HVAC Duct Cleaning D30 HVAC Auditorium House Lighting D50 Electrical Interior Lighting D50 Electrical Auditorium On-Stage 7-Color LED Down Wash Lighting D50 Electrical Auditorium Stage Front of House 7-Color LED Ellipsoidal D50 Electrical Art Work Security System Upgrade D50 Electrical Unified Communication Speakers, Clocks Upgrade D50 Electrical Auditorium Sound Upgrades D50 Electrical Natatorium/Gym Sound Upgrades D50 Electrical Unified Communication Tele Upgrade D60 Technology Interactive Display Panel Boards D60 Technology Spectator Gym Telescoping Stands Replacement E10 Equipment Spectator Gym Telescoping Stands Replacement/Retrofit E10 Equipment Auxilary Gym Telescoping Stands Replacement/Retrofit E10 Equipment Art Kiln(s) Replacement E10 Equipment Main Gym Basketball Backstop Upgrades E10 Equipment Kitchen Equipment - Total Kitchen Replacement E10 Equipment Tractor / Mower / Plow E10 Equipment Auditorium Stage ACD Traveler Track E10 Equipment Auditorium Stage Sound Shells E10 Equipment Auditorium Stage Choral Risers E10 Equipment Auditorium Follow Spot Lights E10 Equipment Stage Rigging System Upgrades E10 Equipment Classroom Furniture Replacement E20 Furnishings Cafeteria Table/Furnishing Replacements E20 Furnishings Commons Furniture and Seating E20 Furnishings Overhang at P-Wing |Gym Entrance F10 Special Construction Library reconfiguration F20 Selective Building Demolition Locker Corridor Reconfiguration F20 Selective Building Demolition Entry / Bus Drives (apx. 10,650sy) G20 Site Improvements Student Parking Lot (apx. 6,800sy Center; 4,555sy Tennis; 2,150sy CSC) G20 Site Improvements Teacher Parking Lot (apx. 3,500sy) G20 Site Improvements CSC Exterior Pavers (apx. 1300sfy) G20 Site Improvements Concrete Sidewalk G20 Site Improvements Entry Monumental Signage G20 Site Improvements Regrade of Parking Lot Stone G20 Site Improvements Trash and Recylcling Bin Screen Enclosure G20 Site Improvements

Deficiency / Improvement Category Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Deferred Maintenance Capital Renewal Deferred Maintenance Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Deferred Maintenance Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Deferred Maintenance Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Functional Deficiency Functional Deficiency Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Deferred Maintenance Deferred Maintenance Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Functional Deficiency Functional Deficiency Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Educational Adequacy Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Educational Adequacy Capital Renewal Functional Deficiency Functional Deficiency Deferred Maintenance Educational Adequacy Educational Adequacy Functional Deficiency Functional Deficiency Educational Adequacy Educational Adequacy Educational Adequacy Educational Adequacy Educational Adequacy Educational Adequacy Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Capital Renewal Functional Deficiency Capital Renewal Functional Deficiency Functional Deficiency New Construction

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

Estimated Cost 270,000.00 700,000.00 37,875.00 80,000.00 23,000.00 2,500,000.00 1,100,000.00 1,828,000.00 320,000.00 48,000.00 55,250.00 15,000.00 15,400.00 35,400.00 26,600.00 38,500.00 9,600.00 1,700,000.00 200,000.00 3,000.00 20,000.00 84,000.00 750,000.00 39,000.00 18,000.00 60,000.00 128,000.00 45,000.00 286,000.00 260,000.00 30,000.00 994,337.50 144,000.00 32,000.00 52,000.00 1,600,000.00 178,000.00 12,000.00 1,120,000.00 32,000.00 35,000.00 58,000.00 552,500.00 173,250.00 57,750.00 19,300.00 10,400.00 52,000.00 247,500.00 15,000.00 26,000.00 60,800.00 24,300.00 3,626.00 14,000.00 1,982,500.00 71,500.00 160,000.00 56,250.00 112,000.00 93,500.00 330,150.00 390,000.00 101,500.00 5,850.00 128,000.00 32,000.00 5,000.00 35,000.00

Building Breakout Summary 2019-2020

74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98

A SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS

B Entry Trees, Field Perimeter Tress and Other Site Trees Exterior Visitor Parking Lot Lighting Exterior/Safety Lighting Fire Alarm System Fire Suppression System Security Access Doors - Exterior/Interior Secure Entry Pedestrian Walks Classroom Door Hardware ADA Accessible Route

F G20 Site Improvements G30 Site Utilities G30 Site Utilities O10 Life Safety O10 Life Safety O10 Life Safety O10 Life Safety O10 Life Safety O20 ADA

J Deferred Maintenance Functional Deficiency Capital Renewal Capital Renewal New Construction Functional Deficiency New Construction Capital Renewal Functional Deficiency

Subtotal Soft Cost (Professional Fees & Contingencies) A/E Fees, Permits, Contingencies (30%) Design Contingency (7%) Total Soft Cost Total Capital Improvement Cost (Excluding Financing)

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

L 10,000.00 8,000.00 320,000.00 560,000.00 1,024,000.00 350,000.00 25,000.00 68,000.00 16,450.00

$

22,124,088.50

$ $ $ $

6,637,226.55 1,548,686.20 8,185,912.75 30,310,001.25

Renovation @ $200/sf plus Soft Cost (Excluding Financing) $ 83,830,300.00 Replacement @ $250/sf plus Soft Cost (Excluding Financing) $ 104,787,875.00 Total Capital Improvements as % of Renovation Cost 36.16% *Note: Per Utilization Rates, Bldg SF Reduction to $ 244,000/1500 Students for Replacement Option

83,570,000.00 36.27%

Capital Improvement Plan GREATER LATROBE SCHOOL DISTRICT Recommendations and Analysis Fiscal Years 2020-2025 DISTRIBUTED APRIL 2021

ISSUED BY Department of Facilities, Operations & Planning REPRESENTATIVE Kurt R Thomas, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP BD+C Director of Facilities, Operations & Planning

Capital Improvement Plan Fiscal Years 2020-2025

BOARD OF SCHOOL DIRECTORS Eric Hauser, President Paul McCommons, Vice-President Heidi Kozar Steve LoCascio Susan Mains Merle Musick William Palmer Cathy Sarraf Michael Zorch, M.D. SCHOOL AUTHORITY Carl Baumeister Gene Leonard, Ed. D. Keith Visconti Barry Banker Chuck Gray SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Georgia Teppert, Ed.D. ADMINISTRATION Michael Porembka - Assistant Superintendent Daniel Watson - Business Administrator Becki Pellis - Director of Curriculum, Instruction, and Technology Laurie Golobish - Director of Pupil Services Eugene Joe - Student Support Services Coordinator Mark Mears - Director of Athletics Jillian Meloy - Director of Food Services Jessica Golden - Director of Development and Center of Student Creativity

i

C

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55

254 254 254 252 246 246 246 246 241 238 238 238 238 234 234 234 234 234 234 234 234 231 231 230 230 230 229 229 226 226 226 226 226 223 223 221 221 221 221 221 221 221 221 221 221 221 221 220

SHS SHS MES SHS BES JHS MES SHS SHS BES JHS MES SHS BES BES JHS MES MES MES SHS SHS SHS SHS BES MES SHS JHS BES BES BES JHS MES SHS JHS JHS BES BES BES JHS JHS JHS MES MES MES SHS SHS SHS SHS

E

F

$ $ $ $

$

G

$ $

45,510.00 2,200.00

$ 67,588.00 $ 33,150.00

$ 184,450.00 $ 20,000.00

$ 31,667.00

$ 28,277.00

Curent Year Previous Years 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 1,195,389.08 $ 1,406,507.39 $ 1,079,818.00 $ 40,625.00 $ 22,558.00 25,500.00 47,000.00 26,000.00 58,000.00 $ 78,587.00

(anticipate 4-percent construction inflation factor)

D

Project Name Total Cost Roof Replacement Area 1 (2019) $ 2,601,896.47 Roof Replacement Area 1a (2020) $ 1,079,818.00 Domestic Hot Water Heater & Expansion Tank $ 40,625.00 HVAC Upgrades - (6) Refrigeration Condensor Un $ 22,558.00 Unified Communication Tele Upgrade $ 25,500.00 Unified Communication Tele Upgrade $ 47,000.00 Unified Communication Tele Upgrade $ 26,000.00 Unified Communication Tele Upgrade $ 58,000.00 Domestic Hot Water Storage Tanks $78,587 Fire Alarm System (Phased) $ 175,000.00 Fire Alarm System (Phased) $ 284,287.00 Fire Alarm System (Phased) $ 175,000.00 Fire Alarm System (Phased) $ 560,000.00 HVAC Upgrades - Roof-Top-Unit (RTU) $ 1,285,232.00 HVAC Upgrades - Unit Ventilators $ 37,500.00 HVAC Upgrades - (11) Roof-Top-Unit (RTU) $ 2,112,500.00 45,000.00 HVAC Upgrades - Chiller Units Replacment (30 To $ HVAC Upgrades - (7) Roof-Top-Unit (RTU) $ 1,001,000.00 HVAC Upgrades - Unit Ventilators $ 45,000.00 HVAC Upgrades - (2) Roof-Top-Unit (RTU) $ 286,000.00 HVAC Upgrades - (2) Pool Pak Rooftop Units (PAH$ 286,000.00 Spectator Gym $ 184,450.00 p y Telescoping p g Stands Replacement p Auxilary Gym Telescoping Stands Retrofit $ 20,000.00 Boiler (2) Replacement $ 300,000.00 Boiler (2) Replacement $ 300,000.00 Boiler (3) System Repair $ 65,000.00 Cafeteria Floor (apx. 6000sf) $ 33,150.00 Cafeteria Floor (apx. 3500sf) $ 45,510.00 Library reconfiguration $ 56,000.00 Ballfield Bleachers $ 16,000.00 Library reconfiguration $ 128,000.00 Library reconfiguration $ 56,000.00 Library reconfiguration $ 112,000.00 Exterior Metal Wall Panels Replacement $ 558,600.00 Window Replacement $ 215,250.00 Fire Suppression System $ 315,000.00 Classroom Door Hardware $ 35,200.00 Security Access Doors - Exterior/Interior $ 80,000.00 Fire Suppression System $ 520,000.00 Security Access Doors - Exterior/Interior $ 150,000.00 Classroom Door Hardware $ 62,400.00 Fire Suppression System $ 316,800.00 Classroom Door Hardware $ 40,000.00 Security Access Doors - Exterior/Interior $ 75,000.00 Fire Suppression System $ 1,024,000.00 Security Access Doors - Exterior/Interior $ 350,000.00 Classroom Door Hardware $ 68,000.00 Auditorium House Lighting $ 52,000.00

2 Facilities Deficiency Listing and Improvement Plan 3 5YR Capital Improvement Plan by Priority Ranking 4 5 Project Project 6 Score Building

A B 1 Greater Latrobe School District

***scheduled***

***scheduled***

***scheduled***

***scheduled***

2021-22

H

J

Future Plan Years 2022-23 2023-24

I

2024-25

K

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

$ $

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

Page 1 of 3

Balance $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 175,000.00 256,010.00 175,000.00 528,333.00 1,285,232.00 37,500.00 2,112,500.00 45,000.00 1,001,000.00 45,000.00 286,000.00 286,000.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 300,000.00 300,000.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 53,800.00 16,000.00 128,000.00 56,000.00 112,000.00 558,600.00 215,250.00 315,000.00 35,200.00 80,000.00 520,000.00 150,000.00 62,400.00 316,800.00 40,000.00 75,000.00 1,024,000.00 350,000.00 68,000.00 52,000.00

L

Capital Improvement Plan Fiscal Years 2020-2025

A

B

Project Project 6 Score Building 7 56 219 BES 57 219 BES 58 219 BES 59 219 JHS 60 219 JHS 61 219 MES 62 219 MES 63 219 MES 64 219 SHS 65 219 SHS 66 219 SHS 67 219 SHS 68 218 BES 69 218 MES 70 218 SHS 71 217 SHS 72 216 BES 73 216 BES 74 216 BES 75 216 JHS 76 216 JHS 77 216 JHS 78 216 MES 79 216 MES 80 216 MES 81 216 SHS 82 216 SHS 83 216 SHS 84 215 BES 85 215 JHS 86 215 MES 87 215 SHS 88 213 JHS 89 213 SHS 90 212 BES 91 212 MES 92 209 SHS 93 209 SHS 94 209 SHS 95 208 BES 96 208 MES 97 207 BES 98 207 BES 99 207 JHS 100 207 JHS 101 207 JHS 102 207 JHS 103 207 JHS 104 207 MES 105 207 MES 106 207 MES 107 207 SHS

5

D

Project Name Total Cost Carpet Replacement - Stairs $ 10,000.00 Carpet Replacement - Classrooms (apx. 45,000sf) $ 562,500.00 Carpet Replacement - Corridors (apx. 20,000sf) $ 250,000.00 Carpet/VCT Replacement - Classrooms, Lockers, $ 987,500.00 Carpet Replacement - Entry walkoff matting (apx. 1 $ 10,500.00 Carpet Replacement - Stairs $ 10,000.00 Carpet Replacement - Classrooms (apx. 45000sf) $ 562,500.00 Carpet Replacement - Corridors (apx. 20,000sf) $ 250,000.00 Main Gym Floor(s) Resurfacing (apx. 11,800sf) $ 32,230.00 Carpet Replacement - Entry walkoff matting (apx. 5 $ 38,500.00 Stage Floor Resurfacing (apx. 3,200sf) $ 8,700.00 Main Gym Basketball Backstop Upgrades $ 52,000.00 Fire Doors $ 22,000.00 Fire Doors $ 22,000.00 Tractor / Mower / Plow $ 9,000.00 HVAC Upgrades - Cooling Tower Condenser Pum $ 3,000.00 IDF Room AC Upgrades $ 9,000.00 Interior Lighting $ 642,616.00 Unified Communication Speakers, Clocks Upgrade $ 148,000.00 HVAC IDF Room (4 Rooms) $ 24,000.00 Interior Lighting $ 1,056,250.00 Unified Communication Speakers, Clocks Upgrade $ 243,750.00 IDF Room AC Upgrades $ 9,000.00 Interior Lighting $ 643,500.00 Unified Communication Speakers, Clocks Upgrade $ 148,500.00 HVAC IDF Room (4 Rooms) $ 18,000.00 1 600 000 00 Interior Lighting $ 1,600,000.00 Unified Communication Speakers, Clocks Upgrade $ 1,120,000.00 Interactive Display Panel Boards $ 325,000.00 Interactive Display Panel Boards $ 455,000.00 Interactive Display Panel Boards $ 325,000.00 Interactive Display Panel Boards $ 552,500.00 Cafeteria Table/Furnishing Replacements $ 83,200.00 Cafeteria Table/Furnishing Replacements $ 71,500.00 Plumbing Fixture Replacement $ 99,000.00 Plumbing Fixture Replacement $ 99,000.00 CSC Wood Floor (apx. 4,400sf unknown scope, ca $ 15,400.00 Auditorium Stage ACD Traveler Track $ 26,000.00 Stage Rigging System Upgrades $ 14,000.00 Security Cameras $ 54,000.00 Security Cameras $ 55,000.00 Exterior Door Replacement $ 60,000.00 Roof Replacement (2023) $ 2,346,084.00 Exterior Door Replacement - HollowMetal $ 30,000.00 Exterior Door Replacement - Aluminum $ 25,200.00 Exterior Door Repairs $ 17,250.00 Roof Replacement (2022) $ 3,580,018.00 Cafeteria Floor (apx. 6,600sf) $ 33,150.00 Exterior Door Replacement $ 60,000.00 Roof Replacement (2023) $ 2,440,464.00 Playground Trees, Entry Trees, Field Perimeter Tr $ 5,700.00 Exterior Door Replacement $ 80,000.00

C

F

32,230.00 8,700.00

9,000.00 30,000.00

$ $

$ $

2020-21

Curent Year

G

$

5,700.00

$ 33,150.00

$ 16,773.00

***LED LED Upgrade Program*** Program

***LED Upgrade Program***

***LED Upgrade Program***

***LED Upgrade Program***

Previous Years 2018-19 2019-20

E

***scheduled*** ***scheduled***

***scheduled***

***scheduled***

***scheduled***

2021-22

H

J

Future Plan Years 2022-23 2023-24

I

2024-25

K

$

$ $

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

$ $ $

$

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

Page 2 of 3

Balance 10,000.00 562,500.00 250,000.00 987,500.00 10,500.00 10,000.00 562,500.00 250,000.00 $ 0.00 38,500.00 $ 0.00 52,000.00 22,000.00 22,000.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 9,000.00 642,616.00 148,000.00 24,000.00 1,056,250.00 243,750.00 9,000.00 643,500.00 148,500.00 18,000.00 1 600 000 00 1,600,000.00 1,120,000.00 325,000.00 455,000.00 325,000.00 552,500.00 83,200.00 54,727.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 15,400.00 26,000.00 14,000.00 54,000.00 55,000.00 60,000.00 2,346,084.00 30,000.00 25,200.00 17,250.00 3,580,018.00 $ 0.00 60,000.00 2,440,464.00 $ 0.00 80,000.00

L

Capital Improvement Plan Fiscal Years 2020-2025

A

B

Project Project 6 Score Building 7 108 207 SHS 109 206 BES 110 206 JHS 111 206 MES 112 206 SHS 113 204 BES 114 204 MES 115 204 SHS 116 204 SHS 117 203 JHS 118 203 SHS 119 203 SHS 120 203 SHS 121 203 SHS 122 202 BES 123 202 MES 124 201 BES 125 201 JHS 126 201 MES 127 201 SHS 128 201 SHS 129 200 BES 130 200 JHS 131 200 MES 132 200 SHS 133 200 SHS 134 0 135 136

5

TOTAL PROJECT COSTS

Project Name Exterior Door Repairs Exterior/Safety Lighting Exterior/Safety Lighting Exterior/Safety Lighting Exterior/Safety Lighting Playfield Upgrades Playfield Upgrades Auditorium On-Stage 7-Color LED Down Wash Lig Auditorium Stage Front of House 7-Color LED Ellip Cafeteria Interior Finish Upgrades (apx. 6,000sf) Cafeteria Interior Finish Upgrades (apx. 6,500sf) Auditorium Stage Sound Shells Auditorium Stage Choral Risers Auditorium Follow Spot Lights ADA Toilet Accessories ADA Toilet Accessories Classroom Furniture Replacement Classroom Furniture Replacement Classroom Furniture Replacement P-Wing Glazed Block Retrofit Classroom Furniture Replacement Upgrade BAS Controls Upgrade BAS Controls Upgrade BAS Controls Roof Replacement Area 2 (2029) Upgrade BAS Controls

C

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

Total Cost 23,000.00 98,000.00 162,500.00 99,000.00 320,000.00 12,541.00 12,735.00 178,000.00 12,000.00 27,000.00 55,250.00 60,800.00 24,300.00 3,626.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 642,200.00 1,056,250.00 643,500.00 700,000.00 640,000.00 321,308.00 528,125.00 321,750.00 1,828,000.00 994,337.50 43,600,597.97

D

$

F

1,431,819.08

3,626.00

$

$ 2,562,937.39

12,541.00 12,735.00

$ $

Previous Years 2018-19 2019-20

E

$ 562,525.00

2020-21

Curent Year

G

J

-

Future Plan Years 2022-23 2023-24

I

$ $ $ $ 2,174,850 Tentatively Scheduled

***scheduled*** ***scheduled***

2021-22

H

$

-

2024-25

K

Balance 23,000.00 98,000.00 162,500.00 99,000.00 320,000.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 178,000.00 12,000.00 27,000.00 55,250.00 60,800.00 24,300.00 $ 0.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 642,200.00 1,056,250.00 643,500.00 700,000.00 640,000.00 321,308.00 528,125.00 321,750.00 1,828,000.00 994,337.50

Page 3 of 3

$ 39,072,904.50

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

$ $ $ $ $ $

$ $ $ $ $

L

Capital Improvement Plan Fiscal Years 2020-2025

Enrollment Summary GREATER LATROBE SCHOOL DISTRICT Updated 2020-21 DISTRIBUTED APRIL 2021

ISSUED BY Department of Facilities, Operations & Planning REPRESENTATIVE Kurt R Thomas, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP BD+C Director of Facilities, Operations & Planning

Enrollment Projection Summary 2020-2021

BOARD OF SCHOOL DIRECTORS Eric Hauser, President Paul McCommons, Vice-President Heidi Kozar Steve LoCascio Susan Mains Merle Musick William Palmer Cathy Sarraf Michael Zorch, M.D. SCHOOL AUTHORITY Carl Baumeister Gene Leonard, Ed. D. Keith Visconti Barry Banker Chuck Gray SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Georgia Teppert, Ed.D. ADMINISTRATION Michael Porembka - Assistant Superintendent Daniel Watson - Business Administrator Becki Pellis - Director of Curriculum, Instruction, and Technology Laurie Golobish - Director of Pupil Services Eugene Joe - Student Support Services Coordinator Mark Mears - Director of Athletics Jillian Meloy - Director of Food Services Jessica Golden - Director of Development and Center of Student Creativity

1

Enrollment Projection Summary 2020-2021

Introduction The Facilities Department has conducted a preliminary enrollment projection summary that includes historical and current grade-level enrollment, capacity analysis and future projections. The main purpose of this preliminary study is to provide a tool to help the District decision-making in addressing the long-term facility needs of the District.

Variables that Influence Future Enrollments The typical six sources of current and projected school district enrollment are: 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Live births within the school district and their eventual enrollment (PK-K) in the district New household population with children who move to the district New population that move to the district who are at child-bearing age and plan to begin a family Enrollment of students from non-public schools or from homeschooling settings District program and academic intervention changes that may increase the success of the school district in keeping enrollment to stay till graduation Adjacent districts whose programs or academics may cause tuition students to attend Greater Latrobe School District

Building Capacity and Utilization The capacity of a school building is not a fixed number. Depending on the number of rooms, the occupants (number of students per classroom), and scheduling factors will cause the capacity to vary.

Typical capacity and/or class size per total enrollments similar to Greater Latrobe School District are the following: Grade Level Student per Classroom Grade

Desirable Capacity Students Per Classroom

Max Capacity Calculation Students Per Classroom

K-3

20

25

4-6

22

25

7-9

24

30

10 -12

28

30

2

Enrollment Projection Summary 2020-2021

It is important to note that classroom sizes are not the same as the building or fire code occupant loads. These loads should not be misunderstood to determine the proper student per classroom capacities.

Building Capacities In addition to calculating capacity based on existing classroom spaces, additional analysis of specialized classrooms (art, music, and physical education) and intervention spaces (Special Edu, EL, Title 1) need to be identified and will not necessarily fall within these typical class sizes.

Current Enrollment Day three enrollments for the 2020-2021 school year: K

1

2

3

4

5

6

BES

70

60

75

73

58

80

89

LES

82

90

98

99

68

90

104

MES

67

74

78

75

93

91

90

Subtotal

219

224

251

247

219

261

283

JHS

7

8

271

309

SHS

1704 Total K-6

9

10

11

12

280

310

292

325

580 JHS

1207 SHS

3491 Total Students Total Student Populations for the Elementary Schools are as follows: Population

Design Capacity

Capacity Max

(k-3: 20/per, 4-6: 24/per)

(25/per)

Baggaley Elem (BES)

505

720

800

Latrobe Elementary (LES)

631

900

1025

Mountain View Elem (MES)

568

744

825

3

Enrollment Projection Summary 2020-2021

Total Student Populations for the Secondary Schools are as follows: Population

Design Capacity

Capacity Max

(7-9: 24/per, 10-12: 28/per)

(30/per)

Junior High School*

580

1032

1290

Senior High School

1207

1120

1200

Note: Junior High School was configured as a 7-9 grade level building when designed; the Senior High a 10-12. A majority of ninth-grade students take courses at Junior High School.

Utilization Rate The utilization rate for each school site was determined by dividing enrollment by capacity. The preferred utilization rate, expressed as a percentage, falls between 80-percent and 95-percent.

Utilization by building for 2020-21 is summarized below. Acceptable utilization is marked in green; unacceptable utilization is marked in red. As portrayed, the District buildings do not currently fall into acceptable ranges.

Design Capacity Calculation

Max Capacity Calculation

Baggaley Elem (BES)

70%

63%

Latrobe Elementary (LES)

70%

62%

Mountain View Elem (MES)

76%

69%

Junior High School

56%

45%

Senior High School

107%

100%

This table presents that the capacities and utilization for each of the Elementary Schools can be considered outside the acceptable ranges. These buildings can increase population by approximately 10-to-25-percent to be within desired design capacities. Further, it can be determined that the Senior High School building footprint is not capable of a self-sustaining 9-12 configuration without significant increases in Classroom spaces.

4

Enrollment Projection Summary 2020-2021

Historical Enrollment The enrollment data included in Chart 1 is for the Grade Band or level attendance for the years 2008-09 thru 2019-20. Chart 2 is Enrollment by Building for the same years.

5

Enrollment Projection Summary 2020-2021

An examination of the historical District-Wide Enrollment at the grade-band level reveals that enrollment has been relatively stagnant over the last 10-years. The slight increase has been led by enrollment at the K-6 grades at Baggaley and Latrobe Elementary.

The Pennsylvania Department of Education The Pennsylvania Department of Education provides annual enrollment projections to assist School Districts to identify and proactively address issues related to anticipated enrollments. Projections are based on recent historic trends in births and trends in the progression of students from one grade to the next.

When using enrollment projections for planning purposes, it is important to be aware that the projection model uses only actual enrollments, births, and retention rates to formulate projections. Other factors which may exist in a particular school district, such as a significant change in new home building, may need to be considered in conjunction with the projections to most accurately estimate future enrollments.

The Chart above provides information on historical and projected enrollments on a statewide basis and by the Greater Latrobe School District. PDE reports are available on the following pages.

6

257

230

231

257

231

233

234

256

233

231

229

227

225

223

220

2015 - 2016

2016 - 2017

2017 - 2018

2018 - 2019

2019 - 2020

2020 - 2021

2021 - 2022

2022 - 2023

2023 - 2024

2024 - 2025

2025 - 2026

2026 - 2027

2027 - 2028

2028 - 2029

2029 - 2030

107653102

Greater Latrobe SD

K

YEAR

225

227

229

232

234

236

259

237

236

238

260

242

234

254

282

1

228

230

233

235

237

260

238

237

239

261

248

232

251

287

266

2

230

233

235

237

260

238

237

239

261

248

224

259

284

271

302

3

Enrollment Projections

233

235

237

260

238

237

239

261

248

224

262

281

269

305

285

4

236

238

261

239

238

240

262

249

225

263

284

266

312

283

309

5

240

263

241

240

242

264

251

227

265

286

278

307

282

310

295

6

7

282

303

312

353

323

8

266

244

243

245

267

254

230

268

289

281

244

243

245

267

254

230

268

289

281

311

Projection

311

281

304

311

352

Actual

Greater Latrobe SD 107653102

(717) 787-2644

Prepared by the Pennsylvania Department of Education

246

248

270

257

232

271

292

284

314

285

313

310

354

327

312

9

250

272

259

234

273

294

286

317

287

316

313

358

328

321

343

10

3131

3133

3168

3221

3265

3337

3379

3446

3486

3594

3671

3719

3796

3949

3995

Total

Tuesday, September 8, 2020

249

225

262

283

275

304

276

303

300

344

317

313

323

354

310

12

Department of Education, Data Quality Office

264

252

228

265

286

278

308

279

307

304

348

310

312

343

359

11

1202

1136

2024 - 2025

2029 - 2030

1.17352

1.05

1.03459

1.07021

2011

2017-18 to 2018-19

2018-19 to 2019-20

Average Rate

Retention Rate Used

2010

218

Year

Births

107653102

Greater Latrobe SD

0.92771

2016-17 to 2017-18

233

0.98712

Birth to K

2015-16 to 2016-17

Sources:

1372

1442

1509

K-5

1612

1706

1787

K-6

1878

1960

2098

K-7

2122

2190

2380

K-8

2368

2461

2693

K-9

3131

3337

3671

K-12

986

988

1155

5-8

750

748

871

6-8

510

484

593

7-8

996

1019

1184

6-9

756

755

906

7-9

249

2012

1.08213

1.08213

1.18721

0.97189

1.00429

1.16514

Birth to 1

219

2013

1.00554

1.00554

1.02479

0.99145

0.98819

1.01773

1 to 2

220

2014

1.00143

1.00143

0.96552

1.03187

0.98955

1.0188

2 to 3

218

2015

1.00089

1.00089

1.01158

0.98944

0.99262

1.00993

3 to 4

219

2016

239

2017

1.00386

1.00386

1.01068

0.98885

1.02295

0.99298

4 to 5

218

2018

1.0072

1.0072

1.04511

0.98397

0.99647

1.00324

5 to 6

Retention Rate by Grade by Year

214

2020

1.00158

1.00158

1.00356

0.99671

1.00322

1.00284

7 to 8

212

2021

1.01045

1.01045

1.033

0.99359

1.00283

1.01238

8 to 9

1519

1631

1884

7-12

9 to 10

1009

1147

1291

9-12

210

2022

1.00801

1.01322

1.00968

1.0113

1.00306

1.02885

1253

1377

1573

8-12

208

2023

0.97229

0.97229

0.97207

0.94512

0.97196

1

10 to 11

763

876

978

10-12

206

2024

0.98839

0.98839

1.02258

1.00321

0.94169

0.98607

11 to 12

Department of Education, Data Quality Office

Tuesday, September 8, 2020

| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Projected Births - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |

216

2019

1.01109

1.01109

1.01303

0.99645

0.98065

1.05424

6 to 7

1. Excludes students in full-time out-of-district special education, comprehensive AVTSs, charter schools, state-owned schools, consortium-operated alternative high schools, and juvenile correctional institutions.

2. Enrollment projections beyond five years are subject to errors in the lower grades resulting from inconsistencies between actual and projected live births and should be reviewed closely.

3. Four year old kindergarten students, if any, added to K enrollments.

4. Elementary and secondary ungraded students were distributed among the grades. Therefore, enrollments by grade may differ from those reported by the local education agencies.

1. Pennsylvania Information Management System (PIMS) 2. Resident Live Birth file supplied by the Division of Health Statistics, Pennsylvania Department of Health.

The Department of Health specifically disclaims responsibility for any analyses, interpretations or conclusions.

1225

2019 - 2020

Notes:

K-4

YEAR

Various Grade Groupings of the Enrollment Projections