Evaluation findings

Below, the three main evaluation questions will be examined; Has the promise of a high and meaningful youth participation and influence in S+50 been fulfilled? Was it an inclusive process, and were the right prerequisites in place?

In the following sections, findings based on interviewees’ and respondents’ accounts will be assessed against each of the layers of the evaluation model.

Enabling factors and challenges will be identified and discussed, and suggestions on possible improvements for future processes will be provided.

In order to navigate the model, and to sum up the findings for each layer, the evaluator has also set a roughly estimated score. This is only a summary of the evaluation report, bringing together main findings and recommendations. The reader is invited to consult the main report, whenever more detail or background is needed.4

3 The Major Group for Children and Youth (MGCY) is the UN General Assembly-mandated and self-organised mechanism for young people to meaningfully engage in certain UN processes.

4 Evaluation report Youth Inclusion Stockholm +50 https://issuu.com/lsu_sverigesungdomsorganisationer/docs/ astockholm_50youthinclusionstrategy