Falkirk Center - Spring 2020

A L I B E RT Y U N I V E R S I T Y P U B L I C AT I O N

/// J E R R Y F A L W E L L , J R . & C H A R L I E K I R K

I

n the 1995 movie “Braveheart,” the battle of Falkirk is remembered as the heartbreaking defeat of William Wallace when the freedom fighter realized the treachery of the Scottish establishment. It was indeed a loss for Scotland, but it was also the beginning of the end of King Edward’s ambitions in the nation.

Wallace lost the battle — with many casualties — but ignited the spark of freedom that ultimately won the war.

For the past few decades, conservatives have felt like we’ve been losing the battle. From Hollywood to academia, from corporations to government, from special interest groups to the mainstream media, a growing and strident anti-Christian, anti-American sentiment has long dominated the most powerful institutions in America.

Today, we have an opportunity to embolden a new generation of patriots to fight back with resilience, and like Wallace, hold up the banner for freedom and advance rather than retreat.

Bemoaning the rise of leftism is no longer enough, and turning the other cheek in our personal relationships with our neighbors as Jesus taught while abdicating our responsibilities

on the cultural battlefield is no longer sufficient. There is too much at stake in the battle for the soul of our nation.

Bold, unapologetic action and initiative is needed, which is why together we just launched the Falkirk Center, a think tank dedicated to restoring and defending American ideals and JudeoChristian values in all aspects of life.

The two of us grew up in different generations with vastly different perspectives, but our goal is the same and our vision is clear. The principles of the Falkirk Center transcend generational divides and withstand cultural trends, as we believe they are rooted in compelling, enduring, absolute truths. As the creeds of secularism are proving fragile and unsatisfying to millions of Americans, there has never been a better time to fill this void and amplify these truths.

Earlier this year, a WSJ/NBC poll made national headlines after revealing a drastic 20-point drop in the number of young Americans today versus two decades ago who name patriotism and religion as important values. It came as no surprise to those who have been paying attention to the rampant antiAmerican, secular sentiment that has

plagued our society, starting in our institutions of learning. In recent months alone, an elementary school banned the phrase “God bless America” and a university listed “America” and “American” as offensive words “to avoid.” Even more alarming, the overwhelming majority of America’s elite universities no longer require history majors to take a single course in American history. Students often say they chose Liberty University over public universities because of mandatory speech codes at the publics.

Upcoming generations are falling victim to the teachings of secularism primarily because they’re not learning America’s exceptional ideals. Further, attacks on religious freedom have caused them to abandon their Christian roots in droves.

It’s no coincidence that as young people’s acceptance of traditional values declines, depression and anxiety is reaching record highs. They are hungry for fulfillment and truth like never before, and right now, the only option for them is the siren-song of secularism promoted by the far-left.

Today we have a tremendous opportunity to provide our youth and other Americans an alternative to the left’s unfulfilling and outright dishonest attempt to provide a purposeful

Charlie Kirk

life. We also have an opportunity to provide clarity to a passionate, yet confused generation of believers.

Accomplishing this requires more than adding noise to the echo chamber. It requires an army of bold ambassadors equipped with Judeo-Christian and Constitutional knowledge to speak truth to believers and unbelievers alike in every professional field and public forum. This includes Christian leaders and influencers of all ages and backgrounds defending, explaining, and sharing their beliefs on all platforms and sectors of society. That is the function and the moral mission of the Falkirk Center. We will go on offense in the name of Judeo-Christian principles and in the name of exceptional, God-given American liberties.

Thankfully, we don’t have to render ourselves powerless as the left misguides our youth. Much like Wallace’s struggle for freedom, we need brave, tenacious, passionate fighters to prevail in our war to save the greatest nation on Earth.

The Falkirk Center will be on the frontlines of this war, and we believe, like the passionate freedom fighters that courageously charged into the breach before us, we will eventually see victory.

Jerry Falwell, Jr.

DEFENDING FREEDOM REQUIRES A MORAL F O U N D A T I O N / / / Jenna Ellis

I

n the current battle for our culture, two weapons have damaged the belief in objective moral truth: atheistic political philosophies and the idea that consent is all one needs to justify any behavior.

culture war by jettisoning biblical truth and leading congregants to “find your truth.”

They subjectively apply biblical principles instead of teaching theology, and then seem puzzled when the flock no longer believes in universal moral truth.

So what does that mean, in practical terms, for social issues today?

Consent culture asserts that so long as a person has a desire or feeling — and therefore consents — the government should not intervene.

We see this in “choice” “Self-governance does arguments for many not mean we each get to cultural battlegrounds like abortion, physiciandetermine our own truth assisted suicide, and the a n d r e a l i t y .”

LGBT social agenda.

But consent culture conflicts with the universality of moral truth. If we abandon a standard outside our sheer consent and individual will, then no choice of behavior can be inherently wrong.

It is often said that politics is downstream from culture.

Unfortunately, many Christians have conceded ground in the 3 ///

The progressive agenda asserts that as long as an adult consents, what business does the government have interfering? If there’s no objective standard, then there should be no judgment! We’ve lost the basis of what legitimate government means in a self-governed society.

Remember, our rights don’t come from government or even from ourselves. Our rights come from our Creator, by virtue of being made in His image.

Self-governance does not mean we each get to determine our own truth and reality. It does not mean that a will of a sheer majority can decide what is moral or immoral in society. It makes no difference if one person, 51%, or 100% of people think abortion should be a valid choice— it is still inherently morally wrong because it is a medical intervention to intentionally kill a human being without justification.

Self-governance means we are free to make choices within the context of reality.

We shouldn’t give up on social issues, or the universality of morality. This is the original intent of the Constitution, built upon the Declaration’s recognition that truth is self-evident and our rights come from our Creator.

Generally, Americans are taught that “we the people” are infallible and inherently legitimate as a 51% majority. If the majority agrees on something, it must therefore be right. But the unpopular truth is that democracies—and constitutional republics even—only survive the test of legitimacy when that government system operates according to fundamental, objective moral truth.

We cannot legitimize evil through a political mechanism any more than we can legislate ourselves

out of the Earth’s elliptical orbit.

Humans simply do not have that control. Regardless of how many tyrants a given society has, no human, singular or collective, is unlimited in power. Reality shows us that self-evident truth.

Our Founders began with the premise that the government’s only legitimate role is to protect and preserve our God-given rights. The government does not define our rights. It should not infringe upon our rights, giving and taking them at whim. Nor should it replace God’s measurable standard of moral legitimacy with the moral illegitimacies of one tyrant (or a million tyrants).

Our Founders created this American experiment to preserve freedom and liberty for all because they understood that genuine freedom and liberty cannot be protected for all without a moral foundation.

JENNA ELLIS IS SENIOR LEGAL ADVISOR AND AT T O R N E Y T O PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP AND F E L LO W W I T H T H E FALKIRK CENTER

AMERICA’S GREATEST

free world. It is his duty and responsibility to uphold our nation’s values, protect our democracy, defend the rule of law, and preserve the individual rights endowed to each of us by our creator. …

THREAT

/// NEWT GINGRICH

I

have been studying China and its ruling Chinese Communist Party for the past 60 years. For much of that time, like many American policymakers and experts, I thought that communist-ruled China would evolve into a system that was based on freedom, openness, and the rule of law.

However, as I’ve watched the power and reach of the Chinese Communist Party grow – and its system of control, surveillance, and oppression dramatically expand and strengthen – I’ve come to realize that the vision for a liberated system in China under the rule of the CCP was wrong.

For decades, we fundamentally misunderstood the nature, structure, and objectives of the Chinese Communist Party. Today, the Chinese Communist Party is deploying a worldwide strategy to secure its interests and increase its power and influence.

From the rampant theft of intellectual property, to using American universities to push the Party’s propaganda, to illegal territory

acquisitions in the South China Sea, to the widespread persecution of religious and ethnic groups, the Communist Party’s ambitions directly jeopardize American interests, security, and values. The United States now finds itself in a competition with communist-ruled China that threatens the survival of America and impacts virtually every American and every industry.

President Trump has been boldly standing up to the challenge that the US now faces with China. My latest New York Times bestselling book, Trump vs China: Facing America’s Greatest Threat, describes the competition, how we got to where we are today, and what we as a country need to do to survive. As I describe in Chapter 1: “This book is a report on two strong leaders, two strong countries, two strong visions—and the competition that will decide which vision succeeds and which vision fails.

“As president of the United States, Donald Trump is the leader of the

“But today, the interests, security, and values that our country cherishes, and the free world in which we are accustomed to living, is being challenged by General Secretary Xi Jinping and the Chinese Communist Party.

“As general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party, Xi Jinping presides over the communist totalitarian dictatorship that has been in power since the founding of the People’s Republic of China in October 1949. Using surveillance, control, deception, and cheating as methods for preserving the power of the Chinese Communist Party—examples of which are provided throughout this book— General Secretary Xi Jinping and the Chinese Communist Party are constructing a different kind of world that threatens the survival of our free and sovereign nation. …

“This book is going to introduce you to the greatest threat to a free America that we have faced in our lifetime. It is also going to suggest some urgent steps that we need to take if America is going to survive.

This may sound extreme to some.

However, after a lifetime of studying world conflicts—and recently more than a year focused on studying the

current situation in China—I’m confident in saying that China is the greatest competitor the United States has had to deal with in its 243 yearlong history.

China’s totalitarian system, extraordinary organization, and immense population make this communist nation formidable.”

Addressing this challenge begins with educating ourselves and each other about the seriousness of the current threat. Overcoming the current challenge that we face with the Chinese Communist Party will require the support, ingenuity, and effort of Americans across the nation.

This will take a lot of hard work, new thinking, and new systems.

However, I have no doubt that it is possible for the United States to be successful and to emerge as a stronger country – and a resilient defender and continued example of freedom.

8/// N E W T G I N G R I C H S E R V E D A S 50 T H SPEAKER OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF R E P R E S E N TAT I V E S A N D I S A N A U T H O R O F N U M E R O U S B E S T- S E L L I N G B O O K S , INCLUDING, “TRUMP VS. CHINA: F A C I N G A M E R I C A’ S G R E A T E S T T H R E A T.”

NO, JESUS WAS NOT A SOCIALIST /// D A V E B R A T & L A W R E N C E R E E D

T

he Falkirk Center is working for faith and freedom, two terms that have helped define our country and the Christian Church.

Both are key themes of our beliefs – in Exodus Moses displays faith through his fight for the Israelite’s release from bondage and in Luke 4:18 Jesus proclaims freedom for captives and the oppressed.

Jesus was King but did not coerce, offering freedom as a choice. Yet, within 300 years, Constantine would declare the Roman Empire to be Christian.

The Founders of the United States built the logic of faith and freedom into our Constitution and institutions, declaring that all citizens of the United States should be guaranteed the basic inalienable rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. No coercion.

Rights are God given and the job of the government is to protect these rights, never to deconstruct them.

Today, most institutions of higher education are doing just that – deconstructing rationality and rights while removing faith and freedom from their vocabulary. After decades of this assault on faith and freedom we are now seeing the results; a political party that has removed all God language from its platform and created a near void of freedom of speech on college campuses.

9 ///

Yet, no alternative religion has been offered and perhaps that is the point.

This sanitized environment has created the perfect soil for political elites to plant the seeds of socialism as both the new religion and the long-awaited solution to economic and political imperfections.

It is not surprising that these secular revisionists, including at least one presidential candidate, claim that Jesus Christ was a socialist. Is this bold claim true?

The answer requires a clear understanding of what socialism is and is not. Socialism is not “sharing” things with others and it is not helping the poor. People in free market countries do those things every day—far more than people in socialist countries do, in fact.

Stripped of fuzzy rhetoric and kumbaya spin-doctoring, the hard fact is that Socialism is the concentration of political power for the purposes of 1) redistributing income, 2) controlling people and the economy and/or 3) promoting government ownership of the means of production. Socialism is not voluntary nor is it not simply a list of helpful tips and suggestions. Socialism rests on force that is fueled by envy and class warfare. Socialism is coercion by its very definition and practice.

Even a beginning student of the Gospels will see that Jesus never endorsed Socialism. He was concerned about

far more important matters, namely, personal salvation and character.

Jesus knew that concentrated earthly power was inevitably harmful and corrupting and he spoke out against it throughout his earthly ministry.

who buries his money is reprimanded while the one who invests and generates the largest return is applauded and rewarded. What Jesus praised as productive, socialists decry as greed.

Jesus drove money-changers from the Consider the Eighth Commandment Temple—God’s house—but never from which Jesus said he came to uphold: a bank or a marketplace. Though he “You shall not steal.” It does not read, spoke of it being difficult for a rich “You shall not steal unless the other guy man to enter Heaven, it wasn’t because has more than you do” or “You shall not riches were evil; Jesus was warning us to steal unless you’re not put material absolutely positive things ahead of you can spend it spiritual and “RIGHTS ARE better than the moral priorities.

GOD GIVEN AND guy who earned it” or “You shall Jesus advised us THE JOB OF THE not steal, but it’s to be of generous G O V E R N M E N T alright to hire spirit, to care for IS TO PROTECT a politician to one’s family, to do it for you.” help the poor, T H E S E R I G H T S .” to assist widows In Luke 12, Jesus and orphans, to was confronted exhibit kindness with a redistribution request. A man and to maintain the highest character. He with a grievance approached him and never recommended we turn these duties demanded, “Master, tell my brother to over to the government, but challenged divide the inheritance with me.” Jesus believers to love God and others, replied, “Man, who made me a judge promising that it would bring us freedom. or divider over you?” and rebuked the man for his envy. Socialists routinely Please help us at the Falkirk Center encourage envy and posture as judges as we share this Godly wisdom of and dividers over the rest of society. faith and freedom with the world.

In Jesus’s Good Samaritan story, a traveler comes upon a man at the side of a road. The man had been beaten, robbed and left half-dead. What did the traveler do? He helped the man himself, on the spot, with his own resources. The Samaritan using his own resources to care for someone in need made him “good.”

The tenets of socialism reclaim personal resources and redistribute their use…and often not to those who need them most.

Consider Jesus’ Parable of the Talents.

Of several men in the story, the one

D AV E B RAT I S THE DEAN OF T H E L I B E RTY U N I V E R S I TY S C H O O L OF BUSINESS AND CHAMPION WITH THE FALKIRK CENTER FOR FAITH AND L I B E RTY

LA W R E N C E R E E D IS PRESIDENT OF T H E F O U N D AT I O N FOR ECONOMIC E D U CAT I O N

YES, WOMEN OF FAITH C A R R Y G U N S / / / Antonia Okafor Cover

B

efore I was saved, I clung to a false version of female empowerment. My whole life has been one long quest to regain what I lost when I was a child. In Nigeria, my innocence was taken from me at the young age of 5 years old.

And from that day forward, my sole mission to get that power back consumed me. I know what it means to be completely vulnerable and defenseless. But Christ uses everything, even the most tragic events of this world, to bring glory to his name. And eventually, he led me to the Truth.

For the most part, my political beliefs mirrored my mother’s.

She’s a die-hard Democrat through and through but still continues to hold onto her strict Roman Catholic beliefs.

Fortunately, my mom thought the pro-life issue was a no brainer.

A belief, for most of my young adulthood, I did not share.

I grew up in a broken home.

Shortly after my traumatic trip to Nigeria, my dad went to prison for 20 years for drug trafficking crimes. My single African immigrant mother was left with my three younger siblings and me.

Because of my mother’s nursing profession and by the grace of God she was able to keep us in the same home and neighborhood after my father left. Fortunately, that meant decent schooling in a relatively safe, lowermiddle-class neighborhood.

In 2010, through the faithfulness of a former college roommate, I gave my life to Christ. That alone changed everything about my point of view. I couldn’t reconcile my modern feminist, prochoice, anti-gun beliefs with the woman I had just become: Born again. God gave me a desire and conviction to protect the most vulnerable and defenseless among us: the unborn and the women without access to self-defense.

11 ///

By college, I was the quintessential feminist. I prided myself in my regular involvement with a feminist group that taught feminism and public policy to students in the inner-city charter schools.

In 2011, my quest for equality and my anti-gun beliefs finally came to a head. I came to the realization that there was something missing in the feminist movement. I wasn’t able to reconcile why a movement that claimed to want equality between men and women didn’t advocate for those same independent women to embrace their God-given right to selfprotection. It was finally obvious that self-defense rights are women’s rights. I decided that I had to be a part of the movement that believed the same way I did.

were adamantly pro-life led the women’s suffrage movement.

Women like Susan B. Anthony.

Wyoming, still one of the most progun states in America was also the birthplace of true gender equality.

This year Wyoming celebrates 150 years of granting women the right to vote and hold public office.

I founded a female student gun rights organization in 2017 called emPOWERed 2A, that has brought the concept of female empowerment and the Second Amendment together with the goal of preventing sexual assault on college “But Christ uses campuses. I wanted a safe place for pro-gun everything, even the women to gather, educate most tragic events of and train one another.

t h i s w o r l d .”

During grad school, I took a leadership role in the so-called “campus carry” fight in Texas.

After helping to successfully advocate for and implement concealed carry bill in college campuses in Texas in 2016, I decided it was time to start my own movement. Feminism, female empowerment, and gun rights are not mutually exclusive. And conservative values and feminism are not as well.

Prominent women of God who

Modern feminism tells us young women that Jesus Christ, conservative values and true female empowerment don’t belong together. My mission is to change that perception one young woman at a time.

ANTONIA OKAFOR C OV E R I S N AT I O N A L SPOKESPERSON F O R G U N OW N E R’S OF AMERICA AND F E L LO W W I T H T H E FALKIRK CENTER

THE CHRISTIAN CALL TO VOTE /// RYAN HELFENBEIN

“T

he only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”

Edmund Burke knew that action was indispensable to the survival of liberty. Today, freedom is more fragile than ever. With the growth of federal power and the ever-widening moral and religious gap, Christians in America face the greatest tests of any previous generation. There’s work to do.

Many resources are devoted to Christian living, but few deal in concrete and meaningful terms for participation in civic life. The 2016 presidential election demonstrated this when up-and-coming, evangelical figureheads recklessly urged young people towards political dereliction.

The point was overly simplistic, abandon the ballot box, write-in a candidate, or risk having your faith and integrity publicly excoriated.

Thankfully evangelicals in record number ignored the counsel of the pseudo intelligentsia and disaster was diverted. Many lessons were learned in the 2016 race, but not everyone learned them. The urgency to address the younger generation is greater than ever.

The Apostle Paul wrote, “The kingdom of God is not a matter of talk but power” (1 Cor 4:20). Just as in Paul’s day, there’s no shortage of religious teachers puffed up with theological conceit, promoting an idyllic picture of life without entanglements or dilemmas.

They believe piety is to be praised over action or involvement.

Christians should not be confused about what political engagement means or requires. It does not mean surrendering the Gospel in the name of a lesser ruler or authority. It’s not the conflation of the church with a political party. Voting does require genuine biblical reflection and wisdom about God’s working in the world.

Dietrich Bonhoeffer knew opposing the Nazi regime meant leaving the safety of the academy and facing certain death. William Wilberforce knew that abolishing slavery required more than lofty ideals, it meant persistent engagement and keen interest in British law.

Tragically, young people today only get half-baked ideas with halftruths, which leads to a half-hearted interest in the political process.

Who can blame them? They haven’t yet raised a family, participated in the economy, or paid the lion’s share of taxes. They are standing in the gap of a critical disconnect with history.

repeal the fetal heartbeat bill – a bill that was popular among Kentucky voters and lawmakers. Elections have consequences. Voting always matters.

At no other time in history of the world The younger generation is taught that have people had as much freedom and the moral majority of the 1980s was responsibility as in the United States. politically idolatrous. Virtually no No country has ever delegated as one speaks to the historic and cultural much authority to its citizenry. When context of its formation or the effort Paul wrote Romans 13 concerning to unite conservatives in support of governing authorities, Caesar was just candidates that would confront injustice a person. In America’s representative or preserve widely held cultural values. government, Caesar is a voting people.

By contrast, Steward it wisely. the new crop of evangelical J e s u s “ T H E O N LY T H I N G leaders are commanded NECESSARY FOR preoccupied us to love our with posturing neighbor. It is THE TRIUMPH for fear of impossible to OF EVIL IS FOR being labelled think that we a backwards can love our GOOD MEN TO DO fundamentalist. neighbor in the N O T H I N G .” least, without So how should voting on Christians vote? Every Christian is candidates and policies that have direct aware of the moral tests of abortion, impact on their lives. While voting sexuality, marriage, poverty, falls short of doing all that is necessary immigration and a host of other to defend life, liberty and freedom, issues. None are trivial, but there is a no good endeavor in the public arena priority. More than ever, Christians will be accomplished without it. While need an ethical triage of priority. For we must vote our conscience, our example, the imago Dei remains the conscience must first be bound to vote. greatest of all ethical concerns in political life – it confronts the very dignity of every man, woman and child – born and unborn. Clearly, the unborn are the most vulnerable.

Young people should never think they are free from this duty, because candidates interpret every election outcome as a mandate to implement policy.

For example, just weeks after 0.4% victory in the Kentucky gubernatorial election, Governorelect Andy Beshear promised to

14 / / /

R YA N H E L F E N B E I N IS THE EXECUTIVE D I R E CTO R O F THE FALKIRK CENTER FOR FAITH A N D L I B E R TY

HOW GOD SHAPED MY S T O R Y, L O N G BEFORE MY POLITICS /// David Harris, Jr.

N

ot too long ago, I wasn’t very political. I had my own personal beliefs and convictions that anchored my faith, but I didn’t share my feelings too openly. They were personal.

I was born in a small town in Northern California called Redding. It was a predominantly Caucasian area and I’m pretty sure that of the black population in Redding, half of them were my family, and there was the other half. My beautiful mother was white, of Irish descent, and my dad was a large black man. I used to tell my friends that hadn’t met him yet that he looked like two Mr. T’s combined into one man.

I grew up in a loving Christian home; we went to church every Sunday. I’m told that when I was about six or seven years old, I had a Bible verse

15 ///

memorized for every letter of the alphabet. I was a happy kid.

At age nine, I was getting out of school just like any normal day but, instead of walking home, my dad met me at the school entrance in his big GMC van. He said, “Hop in, son.” I did and we left town.

I didn’t see my mother again for several months. When I did, it was in court. My parents were getting a divorce. I’ll never forget the judge inviting me into his chambers to ask me, “Son, who would you rather live with, your father or your mother…?”

I can’t remember thinking about the color of my skin before that day, but at that moment, that young boy felt that since his dad was dark and that he was a man, that he would rather live with him. And, oh how that decision impacted the next 30 years of my life.

We didn’t go to church anymore after that although my convictions and belief in God were still deeply rooted inside of me. I never questioned if God existed.

I just knew that to be true. I never questioned whether life began in the womb. I always felt that a baby inside of the womb was just as much a real life baby as one outside of the womb.

And this was the crux which launched me onto the media/

political scene in 2016. After the third presidential debate between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, I got on Facebook to share my pro-life feelings and what I felt was at stake for our country.

woman with no father in the picture, she felt that she would be inadequate to raise a child alone.

While her mother was at the abortion clinic waiting for the doctor to enter the room, her Hillary firmly believes in abortion mother had a change of heart. She - as most Democrats do. While felt life was precious and that it was worth giving this child a chance. And I’m so glad “ I n e v e r q u e s t i o n e d i f that she did. I would not the man I am today, had G o d e x i s t e d . I j u s t k n e w be it not been for Jeanette t h a t t o b e t r u e .” choosing to give life to that little baby girl she named Jennifer. We have there is a lot about the Democrat two beautiful daughters, Corbin platform that doesn’t align with who is 23, and Skyler, who is 21. my values, the issue of abortion Our lives have been filled with ups is very personal to me. I hopped and downs, but one thing that has on Facebook to share my thoughts remained has been my faith in how as a Christian, a husband, a good God is. It is his goodness, father and as a member of the grace, and unconditional love for black community. I shared how all people that drives me in every important I believed it was to aspect of my life. Whether it’s support Donald Trump, if, speaking at an event, doing a media for no other reason, that he interview, on my daily show, or supports life. That video grew in the books that I write… I must to over 400,000 views and the champion the fact that God is good. response from people all over the country was overwhelming.

When my bride’s mother was fighting for her life - battling cancer - my bride discovered for the first time in her 24 years on earth that her mother had chosen to have her aborted. Her mother was at the abortion clinic, not because of rape or incest, but because as a low-income, single-

DAV I D H A R R I S, J R. IS THE HOST OF “T H E DAV I D H A R R I S, J R S H O W ”, B E S TSELLING AUTHOR A N D F E L LO W W I T H THE FALKIRK CENTER FOR FAITH A N D L I B E RTY

The Only Ideas That Will Win the Future “If you love America and support this president, if you want to explain to your snowflake friends what is happening in politics today, and if you want to defend President Donald Trump—this book is a MUST-READ!”

— D onal d J. Tr um p, J r .

“A must-read by the laser-focused Charlie Kirk, who more than anyone has gotten empowered young people to support making America great.”

—Ju d ge Je an i n e Pi r r o “The MAGA Doctrine will inspire the next generation to Make America Great Again.”

— Sar ah Hu ck ab e e San de r s

“I am often astonished at how few in Washington understand the MAGA base.

This is the book to read to understand the ideas that motivate President Trump and the rest of us!”

— Cong re s s m an Mat t Gae t z