Rogue Landlords

LAYTONS

Rogue Landlords

LAYTONS Our Sectors • • • •

Technology, Communications & Digital Media Construction, Land & Planning Personal Affairs, Private Wealth & Philanthropy Retail & Hospitality

Our Expertise • • • • • • • • • • • •

Banking & Finance Charities Commercial & Corporate Data Protection & Information Disputes Employment & Immigration Family & Matrimonial Insolvency & Restructuring IP & Technology Real Estate Tax Trusts, Estates & Private Client

This information is offered on the basis that it is a general guide only and not a substitute for legal advice.

We cannot accept any responsibility for any liabilities of any kind incurred in reliance on this information.

Rogue Landlords One of the key aims of the controversial Housing and Planning Act 2016 is to crack down on rogue landlords who knowingly rent out unsafe and substandard accommodation. To do so, the Act introduces the concept of a ‘banning order offence’ and a database of rogue landlords.

While this is a worthy goal, the Act itself provides little certainty as to exactly what constitutes a rogue landlord and instead simply grants the Secretary of State wide powers to create and impose secondary legislation which will include those details which are lacking in the Act

Luke Arnold Solicitor | Disputes luke.arnold@laytons.com +44 (0)1483 407 000

Simon Foster Partner | Disputes simon.foster@laytons.com +44 (0)1483 407 000

Rogue Landlords | March 2017

What is the Act missing?

The starting point is that a rogue landlord is not defined in the Act. Unsurprisingly, this absence led to some criticism but we expect that a rogue landlord will simply be defined as anyone who is found to be guilty of a banning order offence.

Unhelpfully once again, a banning order offence is not

•

a serious criminal offence | specifically those relating

defined. Instead, the Secretary of State now has the power to

to fraud, drugs, violence or sexual offences which took

make regulations as to what sort of actions are to be caught

place at residential premises by someone involved in

by this Act. Looking at the Government’s recent consultation,

management of those premises (such as a landlord

it seems likely a banning order offence will include:

threatening his tenants); and

•

a relevant housing offence | this may include illegal

•

Other criminal offences | in instances where the

eviction and harassment of tenants as well as a wide

offender has been sentenced in the Crown Court and

variety of offences under the Housing Act 2004

the offence was committed against, or in conjunction

(such as failure to comply with an overcrowding or

with, a person residing at the property.

improvement notice) This consultation finished on 10 February 2017 and we •

4

an immigration offence | most likely being letting

will be monitoring the outcome in future articles as well as

property to someone who does not have the right

hopefully giving a potential timeframe for these changes to

to rent property in the UK

be implemented.

Rogue Landlords | March 2017

What do we know so far?

While the definition of a rogue landlord and a banning order offence is yet to actually be confirmed, the Act does set out the punishment for anyone who is convicted of such an offence.

When implemented, a local authority will be able to apply for

rogue landlords. While the exact mechanism of placing such

a banning order from the First Tier Tribunal against anyone

an entry and what information will actually be included is not

who has been convicted of a banning order offence.

yet certain, this does suggest a simple but effective way of identifying and ostracising rogue landlords.

The effect of a banning offence is that the person is prevented from letting property in England or engaging in letting agency

Finally, renters who have been affected by rogue landlords

or property management work relating to housing in England

now have greater recourse against their landlords. Tenants

for at least 12 months.

are able to apply for a rent repayment order against landlords who have committed certain offences (including breach of a

If the banning order is breached, that person is liable

banning order) whereby the Tribunal can order that the guilty

for imprisonment for up to 51 weeks or a fine. However,

landlord repays rent paid up to 12 months preceding that

interestingly the Act provides that the local authority is able to

offence.

impose the financial penalty itself as opposed to prosecution.

This fine is capped at ÂŁ30,000 for every six months where the

The lack of details in the Act has led to criticism and it is

individual is in breach and the local authority is able to keep

difficult to predict how it will be implemented in practice

this penalty fine. Presumably therefore this option will be

until we see the severity of the secondary legislation. That

taken up far more often than imprisonment.

being said, the overall goal of protecting tenants and

There is also a new provision whereby local authorities will

stopping abusive landlords is unequivocal and ought to be

be required to include details of anyone subject to a banning

commended.

order or guilty of a banning order offence on a database of

5

Sectors

Expertise Construction, Land & Planning

Disputes

Real Estate

London

Manchester

Guildford

2 More London Riverside London SE1 2AP +44 (0)20 7842 8000 london@laytons.com

22 St. John Street Manchester M3 4EB +44 (0)161 214 1600 manchester@laytons.com

Ranger House, Walnut Tree Close Guildford GU1 4UL +44 (0)1483 407 000 guildford@laytons.com

laytons.com

Š Laytons Solicitors LLP which is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Nº 566807). A list of members is available for inspection at the above offices.