Wiltshire Council v Cooper Estates

Wiltshire Council v Cooper Estates Strategic Land Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 840

Our Sectors • • • •

Technology, Communications & Digital Media Construction, Land & Planning Personal Affairs, Private Wealth & Philanthropy Retail & Hospitality

Our Expertise • • • • • • • • • • • • •

Arbitration Banking & Finance Charities Commercial & Corporate Data Protection & Information Disputes Employment & Immigration Family & Matrimonial Insolvency & Restructuring IP & Technology Real Estate Tax Trusts, Estates & Private Client

Wiltshire Council v Cooper Estates Strategic Land Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 840 In May 2019, the Court of Appeal upheld the 2018 High Court decision to quash a local authority’s registration of land as a town or village green. The Court of Appeal held that the adopted core strategy policies of the local authority gave rise to a trigger event that precluded the local authority from registering the land as a town or village green. This is an important ruling on trigger events, for the purposes of town and village green registrations and will be welcome news to landowners and developers.

Sara Hampson Partner sara.hampson@laytons.com +44 (0)1483 407 014

laytons.com | 3

Wiltshire Council v Cooper Estates Strategic Land Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 840

If an area of open space has been used (and continues to be used as of right) for an unbroken period of at least 20 years by a significant number of the inhabitants of the locality for lawful sports and pastimes, then an application may be made to the local authority to register the land as a town or village green. Once registered, the land is protected from further development.

In the first decade of the 21st Century, there were a number of examples of the Courts interpreting the meaning of a town or village green very broadly. This resulted in various areas of land such as car parks, golf courses and scrubland, being registered as town or village greens. The Government was concerned that the primary objective of many applications for registration had been to prevent development that might otherwise have been permitted through the planning system.

The Government’s view was that a decision on whether or not to protect a piece of recreational land (with identified development potential) should be decided through the planning system and not the separate process for registering town or village greens. Following a consultation of this matter, Parliament passed the Growth and Infrastructure Act 2013 which, amongst other things, inserted a new s15C into the Commons Act 2006.

Section 15(C) of the Commons Act 2006 prevents the registration of a town or village green if one or more trigger events occur.

Trigger events include, where a development

plan document is adopted by the local authority, that identifies the land for “potential development”.

In the case of Wiltshire Council v Cooper Estates Strategic Land Ltd , the County Council had registered a triangular area of amenity space, in an establishing area of housing, as a town or village green. The High Court quashed the local authority’s decision. The High Court held that the County Council had erred in law in validating and processing the application and in registering the town and village green, because there had been a trigger event. The Court of Appeal, in this instance, upheld the High Court’s decision to quash the registration of the town or village green.

The key issue on appeal was whether the land had been identified in a development plan for potential development.

What does it take in a development plan document to identify land for potential development?

4 | laytons.com

Wiltshire Council v Cooper Estates Strategic Land Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 840

The Wiltshire Core Strategy was adopted in 2015. Its key

“Potential” fell a very long way short of "suitable for" and

policies included a:

“development” included within its scope developments which did not include any new construction, such as a change of

• Settlement strategy identifying settlements where

use. “On this footing, the notion, for example, that a site in

sustainable development would take place. The

a conservation area might have the potential for a change

settlement of Royal Wootton Bassett, which was

of use is not so far fetched as to cause one to understand

where this amenity space was located, was one such

that the settlement boundary does not identify such sites for

settlement.

potential development”.

• Delivery strategy containing a presumption in favour of

The very imprecise nature of “potential development” made

sustainable development within defined boundaries of

it imperative to interpret these words in accordance with the

specific settlements.

policy underlying the change in the law made by Parliament brought about by the addition of s15C into the Commons

The Court of Appeal found that it was not a requirement of a

Act 2006. In this case, the Court of Appeal concluded that

trigger event that the parcel of land be specifically identified

to allow a registration of a town or village green within the

for potential development in the core strategy; it could

settlement boundary, would frustrate the broad objectives

be included as part of a larger area identified for potential

of the approved development plan. This was precisely the

development. In this instance, the Court of Appeal found

reason why Parliament decided that, in circumstances like the

that the land had been identified by the Wiltshire Core

present, a town or village green should not be registered; but

Strategy, as having potential for development.

instead the question of development should be left to the planning system.

The Court of Appeal held that the inclusion of the land within the settlement boundary alone was not in itself sufficient for a trigger to have occurred. Suspension of the right to register a town or village green depended on the consequences, as set out in the core strategy itself, of the land being within the settlement boundary. The policies set out the Wiltshire Core Strategy clearly identified the land in question as having potential for development.

As noted by the High Court, "potential", “is a very broad concept, and is not to be qualified, and is not to be equated with likelihood or probability” of development.

Floyd LJ said that he would not exclude the possibility that other policies might trump the presumption in favour of development of sites within the settlement boundary, and thus compel a conclusion that the land was not identified for development. He commented however that the words "potential" and "development" were very wide terms.

laytons.com | 5

Wiltshire Council v Cooper Estates Strategic Land Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 840

Real Estate | Land Development We specialise in providing legal services in connection with residential development. We deal with all the legal aspects that arise between the time when a developer first identifies a potential development site and agrees heads of terms with the landowner, through to the stage where the development is completed, the units are sold and any ground rents or common parts are sold to an investor or management company.

Our Team Neil Bucknell

Partner neil.bucknell@laytons.com +44 (0)1483 407 016

Ian Cook

Simon Foster

Partner ian.cook@laytons.com +44 (0)1483 407 004

Partner simon.foster@laytons.com +44 (0)1483 407 028

Sara Hampson

Liz Hutton

Sue Irons

Andrew Li

Sharon Mays

David McClenaghan

Partner sara.hampson@laytons.com +44 (0)1483 407 014

Partner andrew.li@laytons.com +44 (0)1483 407 005

Andrew Melvill

Partner andrew.melvill@laytons.com +44 (0)20 7842 8038

6 | laytons.com

Solicitor liz.hutton@laytons.com +44 (0)1483 407 056 Solicitor sharon.mays@laytons.com +44 (0)1483 407 017

Mark Reis

Partner mark.reis@laytons.com +44 (0)20 7842 8034

Consultant sue.irons@laytons.com +44 (0)1483 407 011

Associate Partner david.mcclenaghan@laytons.com +44 (0)1483 407 008

Natalie Tinson

Legal Assistant natalie.tinson@laytons.com +44 (0)1483 407 015

This information is offered on the basis that it is a general guide only and not a substitute for legal advice.

We cannot accept any responsibility for any liabilities of any kind incurred in reliance on this information.

London

Manchester

Guildford

2 More London Riverside London SE1 2AP +44 (0)20 7842 8000 london@laytons.com

22 St. John Street Manchester M3 4EB +44 (0)161 214 1600 manchester@laytons.com

Ranger House, Walnut Tree Close Guildford GU1 4UL +44 (0)1483 407 000 guildford@laytons.com

ID: LaytonsLLP

www.laytons.com

Š Laytons LLP which is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Nº 566807). A list of members is available for inspection at the above offices.