Missouri Runner and Triathlete - Fall 2012

Fall 2012

2012 Fall Shoe Review Olympic Wrap www.morunandtri.com

Volume 11, Number 2

Olympic Trials’ 10 Special Moments Cover photo by PhotoRun.net

MEDIA PARTNER www.usatf.org

2

M I S S O UR I R U N NE R A ND T R I AT H L E T E FALL 2012

www.morunandtri.com

TA B L E O F CO NT ENT S 5

Publisher’s Note

By Larry Eder

6

Billikens on the Rise in the A-10

By Mike Meehan

8

GO! St. Louis Still Going Strong

10

Felix Looks Beyond Trials

By Dick Patrick

13

Scars and Streaks: Molly Beckwith

By Jon Gugala

14

Big River Running Company Pre-Season Rankings

By Ben Rosario

15

2012 Fall Shoe Review

By Cregg Weinmann

21

Olympic Trials’ 10 Special Moments

By Dave Hunter

27

St. Louisan Takes on Badwater Course for Greater Good

By Mike Meehan

29

Olympic Wrap

By Elliott Denman

Design Richele Collins RicheleCollins1@verizon.net

Volume 11 Number 2 Fall 2012 Group Editor Christine Johnson christinej.ssm@gmail.com Founding Editor Gina Sokolich ginasok3@charter.net

Managing Editor D. M. Strauss morunner@earthlink.net

Group Publisher Larry Eder, Shooting Star Media, Inc. P.O. Box 67, Fort Atkinson, WI 53538 larry@runningnetwork.com 608.239.3785 Fax: 920.563.7298 Advertising Shooting Star Media, Inc. SSMadvert@gmail.com 608.239.3785

Copyeditor Marg Sumner Red Ink Editorial Services MargSumner@aol.com

Contributors Larry Eder, Cregg Weinmann, Dick Patrick, Ben Rosario, Mike Meehan, Jon Gugala, PhotoRun.net, Elliott Denman Special Projects Adam Johnson Eder

Missouri Runner and Triathlete is produced and published

by Shooting Star Media, Inc., P.O. Box 67, Fort Atkinson, WI 53538. Publisher assumes no liability for matter printed. Publisher assumes no responsibility or liability for content of paid advertising and reserves the right to reject paid advertising. Opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Publisher.

Copyright ©2012 by Shooting Star Media, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without the written permission of the Publisher. www.morunandtri.com

LL C

www.morunandtri.com

FALL 2012

M I S S O U R I R UN N E R A N D T R I A T H L E T E

3

4

L L I W E THIS SHOR LIFE. U O Y N I U R

E L B A T S X A M BLADE-

p nd you will sto a d e s is m e b ed, ill s, birthdays w r run, your spe s u e o m y a to e b ts p ill a w d shioning a Your social life about nothing re rogressive cu a p c s It to t. u u o yo d . e c te being invi ing shoe to be . It will convin n e n d ri ru t a ily a re d g r a u u o u want yo while giving y is everything yo e o h s is h T . g but runnin

M I S S O UR I R U N NE R A ND T R I AT H L E T E FALL 2012

www.morunandtri.com

PUB L I SH ER ’ S NO TE

D a w n H ar p e r Ea r n s L o n g , L o n g O v e rd u e A c c o l a d e s I’m writing today about one of the best 100 meter hurdlers in the world.

If you are a world-class athlete, the 100 meter hurdles, when run correctly, are over with in under 13–14 seconds. Dawn Harper has run 12.37.

Harper is more than world class. In 2008, when LoLo Jones struck the ninth hurdle in the 100 meter Olympic final, Harper kept her own hurdling clean and fast and ran away with the Olympic Gold medal. But in 2009, at the World Champs, Harper experienced her own nightmare, hitting hurdles and finishing 7th.

Harper attended UCLA, where she was an outstanding athlete and a two-time All American. Like world-class athlete Jackie Joyner-Kersee, Harper hails from East St. Louis, Illinois. Another thing they have in common—Harper is coached by Bobby Kersee, husband of JJK. Harper lets her hurdling do the talking. In 2011 in Daegu, South Korea she won the bronze medal at the World Championships and told the media, “I want to win medals in all colors.”

While LoLo Jones was getting most of the publicity in the U.S. in 2012, the 2008 Olympic Gold medalist was an afterthought. Last June on RunBlogRun, I wrote that Harper might be the most underrated Olympic Gold medalist in London.

Harper won the 100m hurdles in the U.S. Olympic Trials, leaving her competitors in the dust. Kellie Wells was 2nd and Jones 3rd.

In London, before 80,000 fans, the hurdlers in the final lined up just as it began to rain.

All three Americans made the final, as did Sally Pearson of Australia. Pearson had been the silver medalist in 2008, and in 2011, she came into her own, winning the World Championships.

In the final, Pearson got out well, as did Harper. Wells and Jones were in the thick of the battle until the fifth hurdle when Pearson and Harper were together, battling over hurdle 6, hurdle 7, hurdle 8 and hurdle 9. Coming off hurdle 10, Pearson and Harper were together.

Neither athlete gave an inch—heck—not a centimeter!

It came down to the final sprint, where Pearson had a tiny lead over Harper, the defending champion. In the final analysis, Pearson of Australia moved up to the Gold, and Harper, whom no one had considered, took the silver, adding to her Olympic Gold from 2008.

Dawn Harper ran 12.37, the second fastest time in the world this year, second only to Sally Pearson’s 12.35. After the Olympics, Pearson called it a season due to some nagging injuries. Harper won three races in a row, having some fun and getting the accolades long overdue.

Harper has already told the media she will be racing in 2013, so look for her at the final next summer in the Moscow World Championships, with few other athletes from the Metro St. Louis area.

Regards,

Larry Eder Publisher, Missouri Runner and Triathlete President, The Running Network, LLC

www.morunandtri.com

FALL 2012

M I S S O U R I R UN N E R A N D T R I A T H L E T E

5

Bi ll i k ens on th e Ri se in th e A-1 0

By Mike Meehan The Saint Louis University cross country program is on the verge of turning the corner in the Atlantic 10 Conference. The men’s team is stocked full of young, raw talent that, although inexperienced and still learning to run at the collegiate level, will not be backing down from its challenging conference foes. On the women’s side, a window of opportunity is opening for a well-balanced squad that could be one of the conference’s top teams in the next few years.

Seven sophomores and three freshmen make up the majority of the Billiken men’s roster. Although lacking experience, the program has recruited well in recent years, attracting quality runners.

Billiken coach Jon Bell sees sophomores Michael Scolarici (O’Fallon, Illinois) and Tim Zellmer (Milwaukee) as two of the up-and-coming runners in the conference. “We have some of the best young runners in the conference on the men’s side, so that is encouraging. A lot of youth, which a lot of coaches get leery of having young guys, but this group is so competitive that I think we’ll do pretty well with them.”

Running their first year for the Billikens are former local high school standouts Jeff Orf (Ballwin) and walk-on Nathan Rubbelke (SLUH).

Orf is the third member of his family to run for the Billikens. His older sister Hilary, who was a senior last year, is the most decorated cross country student-athlete in the history of the program.

As far as competing with the more experienced teams in the conference, Coach Bell likes his team’s grit. “They’ve all been very successful at the high school level. They’re all state champions or [were] All-State-type athletes in high school, so they are used to competing at a high level—I

6

M I S S O U R I R UN N E R A N D T R I A T H L E T E FALL 2012

feel good about them. I’m not worried about them competing hard.

They’re not going to be intimidated by running in the A-10.”

Bell anticipates that the men will continue to climb up the standings of the A-10 and improve on last year. “I like to think we’ll have our best program finish [in the A-10]. We can be 8, 9 or 10 [in the conference],” he says.

With balance and experience, the Billiken women’s team is just a small step away from competing at the top of the conference. “I feel really, really good about our women. I’d say we’re very well balanced across the board,” says Bell.

Junior Margo Richardson (Mt. Vernon, Illinois) returns as the women’s top runner and is surrounded by a consistent group of 3, 4 and 5 runners, including Elise Medley (Louisville, Kentucky), Lauren Fyalka (Springfield, Illinois), Natalie Myers (Spring Lake, Michigan) and Jessica Hoefert (Godfrey, Illinois).

“Margo was Freshman of the Year [and] has been All-Conference her freshman and sophomore years. I would kind of expect that she would continue that trend. With Jess, Natalie, Lauren and Elise, I really do feel like we have a complete team for the first time in awhile,” Bell says.

Bell sees the improvement of the Billikens’ 3, 4 and 5 runners as key to the team’s success. “Whereas with the last couple years, Hilary and Margo have been low numbers, but the 3, 4, 5 runners’ [times] have been so high that the team scoring has been up. Whereas now, I feel like we have a low number in Margo, and then we have a 3, 4, 5 that are going to be very low as well.

“Over the next two years, I think we have a window of opportunity where we could be a podium-type team. In the next two years, I really feel like we can be a first, second or third team in the Atlantic 10 Conference.”

SLU’s season began with two local meets in early September. The Billiken women placed 8 out of 17 teams at the Washington University Early Bird meet on Sept. 1, while the men finished 9 out of 15. The following week, the Billikens swept 1st place with the men and women winning the Forest Park Cross Country Festival’s collegiate meet. SLU’s road schedule includes the National Catholic Championships in South Bend, Indiana on Sept. 14, the Greater Louisville Classic on Sept. 29 and the Bradley Classic in Peoria on Oct. 12.

The Atlantic 10 Conference Championships will be held in Philadelphia on Oct. 27. Springfield Missouri will host the NCAA Midwest Regional on Nov. 9. L www.morunandtri.com

It’s Pepper Time...

Saturday, October 13, 2012 U of A Cross Country Course, Fayetteville, AR 10K Open and Fun Mile • 10K Open Run/ RRCA Arkansas State and Southern Regional Cross Country Championships • University of Arkansas Men’s and Women’s Home Meet Men’s 10K • Women’s 6K • 5K Junior and Senior High School Boy’s and Girl’s Divisions

Over 80 college and 120 high school teams from across the nation will be there!

24 years supporting cross-country programs in area schools!

Cool merchandise and delicious tacos ahead!

For more info or to register for the race today!

www.morunandtri.com

chilepepperfestival.org FALL 2012

M I S S O U R I R UN N E R A N D T R I A T H L E T E

7

GO ! St. Lo ui s Still Go ing S tro n g GO! St. Louis president and founder Nancy Lieberman recently spoke with Missouri Runner and Triathlete’s Diana Minardi Strauss to discuss the success of the annual Marathon Weekend and how she and her staff continuously look for new and creative ways to grow the GO! experience.

MR&T: What would you describe as the most significant change to GO! St. Louis [formerly the Spirit of St. Louis Marathon & Family Fitness Weekend] since its debut in 2000?

Nancy Lieberman: The expansion of the mission to include year-round activities and programs for people all age groups and the investment in the programs. The greater vision is to make the St. Louis region healthy and fit, and to improve quality of life. We started with 2,500 participants the first year and now have 25,000 for all events during the marathon weekend.

We’ve always put the participant first and foremost in terms of amenities, safety and overall experience. We have an experienced staff, medical team and volunteers who work hard to maintain a level of excellence at all our events.

MR&T: How has the running landscape changed in metro St. Louis over the last decade? Have you noticed any shift in registrations or popularity of specific events?

NL: GO! St. Louis started as an independent, grassroots, nonprofit organization and added events to involve more people. The weekend has become a prototype for event

organizers across the country, and we were the role model for making [this type of event] more inclusive for all people.

In 2003 we launched the half marathon.

That event has become “the new marathon” and is highly respected. We realize the marathon distance, while a great accomplishment, is not for everyone, so in turn the half marathon has continued to grow. It’s a manageable distance and attainable for many participants. You can run or walk, and it’s not as punishing on your body. The 5K run/walks have become hugely popular here. It’s exciting now to go out and see people running and walking in the streets and incorporating fitness into their lives.

MR&T: Runners, particularly in St. Louis, have a growing number of races to select from.

What is the key point of differentiation between GO! St. Louis and other running/ walking events in the area?

NL: I think people appreciate the GO! St. Louis brand and they know they are getting a quality race in a safe and enjoyable environment [regardless of the specific event]. Our race amenities, including the shirts, medals and race bibs, are also pretty special and unique.

Photo courtesy of GO! St. Louis

8

M I S S O UR I R U N NE R A ND T R I AT H L E T E FALL 2012

Photo courtesy of GO! St. Louis

GO! is more than a race. It is an organization that provides people in the bi-state region with opportunities to engage in a fitness regimen whether it is through the Read, Right & Run, the different distance events, the Halloween 5K or the Mile-by-Mile Marathon, our corporate wellness initiative. We want to get people off their duffs. GO! has become more of a way of life: We inspire 22,500 students as part of our youth programs, 30 charities use our venue to raise money, and we donate funds to schools and universities that assist us throughout the year.

We have only one goal: to get the St. Louis region fit. The only thing we are selling is health and fitness for individuals and families.

We are well organized, have a dedicated staff and dedicated volunteers, and work hard to engage the community. All events are family focused. That’s who we are—just a local nonprofit “selling” fitness to everybody.

MR&T: You’ve started to expand the GO! brand to events such as the annual Halloween run and most recently the All-American 5K. Can we expect to see more branded events in the future?

NL: We are always looking for new and creative opportunities to engage more people as well as help them attain higher fitness levels.

We’ve grown incrementally over the years to make sure participants have a positive and lifechanging experience. We always keep that in mind when we expand and do our homework before adding an event. We did that with the All-American 5K and we had a sellout crowd of 1,500—it’s now one of the largest 5Ks in the metro area. Running in St. Louis continues to grow, and I think we help to lead the charge. www.morunandtri.com

MR&T: Runners love to share their opinions about events. What’s the best feedback you’ve received about GO! St. Louis?

NL: We always welcome constructive feedback and take great pride in offering rewarding and safe events. After races we ask people to complete a survey. Ninety percent of the respondents say they would recommend our race to someone else, and we always receive personal stories from people who achieved their fitness goals. All of that reminds us of why we are involved in this industry.

Constructive criticism generally centers on ways we can realistically improve, and we improve each year as more people share their experiences. The surveys indicate we do a really good job.

MR&T: Registration for the 2013 event opened Sept. 4. How many participants are you expecting?

NL: We are expecting between 25,000–27,000 total participants. The Marathon Relay sold out in February last year at 500 teams. The 5K also is a sellout so we’ve increased registration from 2,500 to 3,000.

The numbers don’t include the extra 15,000 kids who participate in Read, Right & Run. We do their 1.2-mile celebration in May after MAP [Missouri Assessment Program] testing. We put up the finish lines at four different schools and everyone gets medals.

MR&T: Can participants expect anything new in the 2013 event?

NL: Yes, they can. Our theme will be St. Louis Originals, originals meaning the people, the cultural institutions, the food and the course itself. It’s a great tour of St. Louis’ neighborhoods and food. We are celebrating who we are and the city we live in. For example, we’re going to have St. Louis foods at the finish line.

Instead of hiding the hills, we are embracing them this year, specifically the hill between miles 6 and 8 on Olive Street from Tucker to Grand at

www.morunandtri.com

St. Francis Xavier College Church. We had a Name the Hill contest and the winner was Holy Hill. It can have a religious aspect with a clergyman on the course with “holy” water or someone saying “Holy Cow! What a Hill!” The contest winner got a gift certificate to Dominic’s Restaurant located in the historic Italian neighborhood known as “The Hill.” We’ll have chip mats at the bottom and top of the hill with age division winners for that part of the race. The winners will be awarded a big chocolate crown from Crown Candy Kitchen. We’re also getting businesses on Delmar involved to make it fun for people as they make their way through The Loop and University City.

There is a substantial increase in prize money for a total of $45,000, so the top half marathon winners will get $10,000. We’re also adding an elite athlete program to bring in some of America’s best to the race.

We want to make it fun for St. Louisans and share what a great city we have with all of the people coming from out of town.

MR&T: The April event is the largest of its kind in Missouri. What challenges do you foresee in continuing its success?

NL: I think GO! St. Louis stays pretty well within its core mission, although every 2–3 years we reevaluate things to make sure we continue to provide the experience people expect. Our success is attributed to the trust we’ve earned over the years, our consistency and that what we say is what we do by providing high-quality customer service and operations. The challenge is to stay relevant and continue to meet the needs of people year round who want to maintain a healthy and active lifestyle. There are a lot of runs that have mass appeal, but they are only here for the moment and affiliated with national groups. Relevancy within the community is the challenge. People value the quality and experience GO! offers and they value our mission. It’s not about making money or selling something, it’s about respecting fitness for everybody. L

FALL 2012

M I S S O U R I R UN N E R A N D T R I A T H L E T E

9

Pers everance P ays Of f fo r Felix at T rials

By Dick Patrick EUGENE, Oregon – If there were a Miss Congeniality Award in track & field, Allyson Felix would surely be in contention.

She smiles more often than it rains at the U.S. Olympic Track & Field Trials. She’s normally as cheerful and friendly as an elementary school teacher, which is a possible future profession.

But there was a different look to Felix Saturday at the Trials.

There was no smile, no wave as she was introduced in Lane 6 before the women’s 200 meter final. Just a steely stare, determination etched on her face. The woman, 26, who made her first Olympic team at 18 and has two silver medals in the 200, was trying to earn a berth in an individual event.

She was coming off an emotional week. On June 23, she and training partner Jeneba Tarmoh tied for 3rd in the 100.

Though both runners were put on the team as possible 4x100 relay runners, the tie-breaking procedure to determine the final entrant in the 100 was left to a Saturday night meeting of the runners, their coach, Bob Kersee, and Benita Fitzgerald Brown, the chief of high performance sport for USA Track & Field.

A week ago, after the 100 when it appeared Felix was 4th instead of tied for 3rd, she was devastated, bent over in disappointment. She was sheer power Saturday when the gun fired.

Not known for getting out of the blocks well, she had one of the best starts of her career.

She had a clear lead in hitting the straightaway against a stellar

10

M I S S O U R I R U N NE R A ND T R I A T H L E T E FALL 2012

PhotoRun.net

www.morunandtri.com

PhotoRun.net

field that included the five fastest women in the world in the event this year. “It’s very rare for me to be coming off any curve in the lead,” Felix said.

The lead expanded. Felix finished in 21.69, the #6 time ever and the fastest in the last 14 years.

Carmelita Jeter, who won the Trials 100 and was 2nd in the 200 at the ’11 World Championships, took 2nd (22.11), and Trials 400 champ Sanya Richards-Ross 3rd (22.22). Those not earning a 200 berth included 4th-place Kimberlyn Duncan (22.34), the NCAA champ from LSU, and 5th-place Tarmoh (22.35).

Felix turned an expected showdown into a runaway victory. “I guess it was all about fighting to make the team,” she said of her aggressive race. “It definitely has been an emotional entire time at Trials. It’s emotional trying to make this team. You train so hard. I was thinking of the hours on the track and just those grueling days. You don’t do it just for nothing. Thinking about all that, I wanted to leave it all on the track today.”

The time was a breakthrough for Felix, whose previous best was 21.81, set while winning the 2007 World Championships.

“Fantastic,” said Kersee. “I thought she’d run 21.80 or better. I knew both her and Jeneba were ready to run. Jeneba was not used to this as much as Allyson. I think she got tired at the end.”

The only women to have run faster than Felix are world recordholder Florence Griffith-Joyner (21.34, 1988), Marion Jones (21.62 at altitude, 1998) and Merlene Ottey (21.64, 1991).

“I don’t think it’s quite sunk in yet,” Felix said. “For so long, I’ve looked at those times. I had just been kind of inching along, hoping to be up there on the list. It’s extremely special. As time goes on it will sink in even more, but the job is not done. It’s all about London and getting it done there.”

There’s another matter, the method of settling the dead heat with Tarmoh after both finished in 11.068 seconds. Even before the scheduled Saturday night meeting, Kersee said after the 200 that a runoff Sunday would not occur.

“Why would you subject these athletes to severe injury?”

Kersee said. “It’s hard enough as it is. They’ve had wet weather all Trials. Their muscles have been warmed up, warmed down,

12

M I S S O U R I R U N NE R A ND T R I A T H L E T E FALL 2012

warmed up, whatever. Their bodies are definitely going to be sore for 48–72 hours.”

Felix and Tarmoh, 22, in her first year as a professional, have shared a lot of sore muscles as training partners, forging a bond.

“Whatever Bobby Kersee throws at us, we’re dying together out there,” Felix said. “Just the grueling training environment. It’s a lot about pushing each other, helping each other reach your goal.

When you see someone every day and see their progress, it’s a special relationship.”

Both Tarmoh and Felix said they did not discuss the tiebreaking procedure during the week. “I think my coach, Bobby Kersee, did an amazing job not letting it get to us,” Felix said. “He kept telling us to stay focused [on the 200] and get it done.

Kersee doesn’t think there should be a rush to decide when to either have a run-off or flip a coin, the two choices USATF has proposed if one of the athletes does not turn down the 100 berth.

USATF wants its team chosen by the end of the meet Sunday, though the roster doesn’t have to be submitted to the International Olympic Committee until July 8.

“It’s what is in the best interests of the athletes is what it should come down to,” Kersee said. “The 21.69 should be the story [today].”

Felix’s competition in London is likely to come from the Jamaicans, including Veronica Campbell-Brown, who beat Felix at the ’04 and ’08 Games as well as the ’11 World Championships.

Felix won world titles in the 200 at the ’05, ’07 and ’09 World Championships.

Kersee, who has coached some of the best athletes in history including Griffith-Joyner, doesn’t think the 21.69 represents Felix’s ultimate peak: “I’ve said it before—I still think she could run under 10.60 [in the 100] and 21.50. She’s that good of an athlete.

“She’s still getting stronger. She’s learning the sport more.

Obviously her conditioning in the [400] is there as well. She’s a class act. She’s a hard-working athlete. The ability is there. I’ve been blessed to coach some of the best athletes in the world in the sprints and what have you. I kind of think I know talent just a little bit. She’s very talented.” L www.morunandtri.com

SCAR S AND STRE AKS:

Mo l ly B eck with

By Jon Gugala MONACO – It’s Saturday morning. Molly Beckwith, 24, crosses her legs, left over right, and the long, vertical scar on her knee is white, surrounded by tanned skin.

Today marks just under a month since the 2012 Olympic team trials in Eugene, Oregon, where Beckwith, arguably one of the form runners through the rounds, did not make her first Olympic team. After holding a strong second place coming into the last 100 meters of the women’s 800 meter final, she began tying up. Ahead, Alysia Montaño won. On Beckwith’s outside, Geena Gall passed for 2nd. And on her inside in the last 5 meters, Alice Schmidt snuck into the 3rd spot. Beckwith would finish 4th in 1:59.68, only 0.12 seconds off a trip to London.

“I had confidence going into the rounds—I had to have that confidence going in. But I never had in my mind ‘I’m going to make the team’ because I knew the quality of the U.S. girls. I was the dark horse, I felt like,” Beckwith says. “I stepped on the line and I said, ‘This is going to be good?’” There’s a strange question in her voice as she says this.

She goes on: “I made a move—a very risky move—at 550, 600 [meters]. What happened was the worst possible scenario: tying up at the end and getting passed.”

Beckwith’s hotel is less than 800 meters from the Monte Carlo Casino, and it seems fitting since in the Trials final she bet the farm and lost.

Now she’s back at the tables, because her story did not end at the Trials. It moved back to her hometown of Worthington, Ohio, where she gave herself “48 hours to pout” and to scar over.

A verbal butt-kicking over the phone by coach Ron Helmer, who developed her at Indiana University and continues to guide her post-collegiately, also helped her move on. “You didn’t do all this work and get ready to run this fast to just sit at home this summer,” he said.

“I didn’t put myself through a momentous amount of pain in these workouts to shut my season down,” Beckwith says. “I haven’t even peaked yet, I don’t think. I still have that really big one in me right now.”

So she went to Europe, and in Madrid ran 2:00.35. Then came the London Diamond League, and in chilly conditions she battled to the line with 2008 Olympic silver medalist Janeth Jepkosgei, where the big one, at least in terms of achievement, came. With the margin to the thousandth of a second, Beckwith won in 2:00.68.

But she’s not happy with it.

“At this point, I would much rather take last place running a PR than winning a race running slow like London,” Beckwith says. “For me right now, I’m looking for that time, that consistently-running-under-2-minutes, because I have so much room to grow. Next year, when I’m consistently running 1:59 and it’s www.morunandtri.com

PhotoRun.net

feeling like just another day, that 1:57 is going to come at the right time and I’m going to be ahead of where I ever thought I would be.”

Beckwith, with her 1:59.37 fourth-place finish in Monaco, has gone sub-2 minutes four times this year—the most of any American. You could argue that she’s already achieved that 1:59 regularity. And with her results, she’s also sitting in 4th place in Diamond League overall standings, which will only increase her chances of getting into the remainder of the season when it resumes on Aug. 23 in Lausanne, [France]. Those races will let Beckwith gamble again for the big one.

“I was talking to Nick Symmonds after the [Monaco] race, telling him that at 550 meters, I had the decision whether to go with the top three or stay behind the 4th-place girl, and I decided to stay,” she says. “And he interrupted me right as I said that, and he said, ‘When you’re thinking about whether or not to go, always decide to go.’ He said, ‘There’s been 0.1% of the races I’ve ever ran in where making that decision was not the right choice.

Always go when you’re unsure.’”

Smart gamblers know that if you’re in the game long enough, that chance comes again. And when it comes, you bet the farm.

For Beckwith, you bet it again.

Because 4 years will go fast. Rio 2016 will need three more Americans for the women’s 800 meters. Asking Beckwith if she plans to be there for it, she doesn’t hesitate: “Yeah, there’s definitely no question.” L

FALL 2012

M IS S O U RI RU N NE R A N D T RI A T H L E T E

13

B ig Rive r R unnin g C ompa ny Pr e -Se aso n R anki ngs

By Ben Rosario For those of you who have followed our rankings over the past few years, you know that these are just for fun and hopefully they give the athletes a little extra motivation as the season rolls along. Big River will come out with rankings every few weeks. For those of you who are new and checking out the rankings for the first time, we hope you enjoy them. If you know anyone or any team that we missed, let us know by emailing Kyle Cameron at kyle@bigriverrunning.com TEAM RANKINGS

them to compete for wins every time out.

TOP 10 GIRLS’ TEAMS #1) Lee’s Summit West We called 2011 “somewhat of a rebuilding year” for the Titans. Of course, they did a whole lot more than that, winning their fifth straight State title in dominating fashion. This year they return all seven from that championship squad and are the clear favorites once again.

#8) Lafayette The Lady Lancers were 6th in Class 4 in 2011 and return six of their top seven. Their claim to fame a year ago was their low spread, which was just 26 seconds at State. With those kinds of numbers you will always be good, and if all of those girls can improve even a little bit, which we expect they will, they could be looking at a trophy in November.

#2) St. Teresa’s Academy On paper there are two teams that could give LSW a serious run for their money, and these girls are one of those squads. Coming off a 4x800 title on the track, STA is led by Lane Maguire and Courtney Coppinger as well as returning All-Stater Ann Campbell. Putting three in the top 25 at State, which is certainly possible, would be a good start if they want to take home the big prize.

#9) Branson Having a good #1 runner is one of the factors we take into consideration when doing the rankings, and Branson has a great one in last year’s 3rd-placer Brigette Caruthers. They also return five of their top seven from a squad that was 9th at State but showed flashes of brilliance throughout the season, including a 4th-place finish at the Forest Park Cross Country Festival.

#3) Francis Howell This group returns five from last year’s 3rdplace squad, including individual 11th-placer Kristen Adams and perhaps the most versatile athlete in the whole state, Whitney Adams.

The second Adams (no relation to the first) was 5th in the 100, 4th in the 200, 1st in the 400 and anchored Francis Howell to victory in the 4x4 at the State Track Meet. Last fall she was 20th in cross country showing almost unheard-of range. Throw in Valeska Halamicek, the State 800 champ, and this team has some serious talent. #4) Eureka Eureka is one of the premier girls’ programs in the state and has been for a long time. After just missing out last year, they may return to the podium in 2012, led by the state’s top returner in Hannah Long and with the resurgence of senior Angie Sumner who had a great track season highlighted by a 5:10 1600 PR. #5) Kearney The defending Class 3 champs were nothing short of awesome at last year’s State Meet where they scored just 53 points and were the second-best team, regardless of class, of the day. They lost individual runner-up Jasmine Edwards, but return State champ Olivia Franklin. Having a low stick up front always helps, and the rest of their group has a pretty tight spread. #6) Rock Bridge At first glance, on paper last year’s Class 4 runners-up lost a lot, returning only three of their top seven. That’s on paper though. The reality is that sophomore Kayla Funkenbusch is one of the best runners in the state, Megan Schulte isn’t far behind and they’ve added first-time cross country runner Sam Farmer who ran well on the track last spring as a freshman. #7) Lee’s Summit North This pick may surprise some people, but these girls are really good. First of all they return five of their top seven, which is always a positive. Remember, too, that at times last year they looked as good as anyone in the state and even beat mighty LSW early on. Their State performance was not really indicative of what they were capable of and now, a year older and wiser, we expect

14

M I S S O U R I R U N NE R A ND T R I A T H L E T E FALL 2012

#10) Nerinx Hall The Markers were a staple in the rankings a year ago and they look like they could be again. They lost two runners to graduation and one more who is not running cross country this year.

They return individual 5th-placer Sophia Racette, though, and that will help a lot. Rumor has it they have some good freshmen coming in as well.

TOP 10 BOYS’ TEAMS #1) Blue Springs The boys’ pre-season team rankings are always really tough as teams are often senior-laden at the varsity level. This year was especially tough, but when all the calculations were done, Blue Springs came out on top for two reasons. One is that they have arguably the best 1-2 punch in the state with Simon Belete and Stephen Mugeche, both of whom are ranked in the top 10 overall individuals. They also return five from last year’s State Meet, which is not something many top teams can claim. #2) Rock Bridge The sign of a truly great program is the ability to reload, not rebuild. The defending Class 4 State champs lost individual winner Caleb Wilfong and State 800 champ Jordan Cook, but they’re replaced by Nathan Keown, who often ran step-for-step with the aforementioned stars a year ago, as well as All-Stater Evan Schulte.

Junior Zach Cook should also contribute in a big way, and a slew of last year’s top Junior Varsity runners are chomping at the bit to join them. #3) SLUH The Junior Billikens were 5th in Class 4 in 2011, the first time they did not take home a trophy since finishing 8th in 2004.

Look for them to be back on the podium this time around as they return four runners who were all at 17:30 or better at the State Meet as well as 4:21 1600 John Esswein.

Continued on Page 24 www.morunandtri.com

/ $) $# ) ! . # 2 3 ' $'" # 2 + 3 *)' !2+ look across the landscape of running shoes for Fall 2012 reveals more product diversity than in any season of the past decade.

The potential for confusion points to the need for education, and we cannot stress this message enough: Runners need to know what their feet are like and get the shoes that meet those needs. This knowledge is not static. Rather, it’s a constantly changing equation where factors such as fitness, injuries, aging, and weight gain/loss, among other things, affect where you are on the running continuum.

And you must monitor the role your shoes play in that equation.

A

Two trends continue, both related to shoe weight. First, 20% of the shoes in this Review are new shoes—all of them in the Performance category—so we know that lightweight shoes are readily available.

Second, more than 85% of the updated shoes are both lighter and a bit more expensive than the shoes they replaced. The maxim of the lightweight trend is apparently true: Less is more. That is, less weight costs more. The up-side is that the efforts to lighten these shoes have not compromised performance.

Some of the new shoes follow the path of lower-profile geometry, allowing even more running footwear choices. It has never been more important to know the characteristics of your feet and what footwear choices will work for your current fitness level and your biomechanics.

It’s our hope that this Review will help you make great choices! —Cregg Weinmann, Running Network Footwear Reviewer

www.morunandtri.com

FALL 2012

M IS S O U RI RU N NE R A N D T RI A T H L E T E

15

! $" )$ ) *## # ),$' 0( 7567 !! $ + ,

While History Never Repeats was a hit song for the New Zealand band Split Enz in 1981, that’s not exactly true in the saga of performance footwear. In fact, as Cregg Weinmann has shown in his reviews for you over the past 17 years, running footwear theories rise and fall in cycles of popularity.

In 2005, I visited the University of Cologne in Germany to see some of the research on the Nike Free. It was fascinating to learn about the science and research that were going into shoes designed to mimic running barefoot. And though this barefoot or minimalist running focus has become increasingly prominent over the last decade, this thinking has been around before. In fact, I remember my coach, Steve Pensinger, having us do 300-meter repeats, circa 1975, in bare feet on the grass oval at DeAnza Community College, specifically to build and strengthen our feet. And Cregg recently reminded me of Herb Elliott’s training with coach Percy Cerutty, who espoused natural form and running barefoot. In fact, Elliott was pictured running barefoot on the cover of Sports Illustrated in late 1958 and again in May 1960.

Lightweight or minimalist running shoes are here to stay. The innovations made in materials have enabled manufacturers to lighten shoes, even as their support and performance have been improved. It’s worth repeating that you must always factor your own fitness level and biomechanics into the process of choosing shoes. The lightest weight shoes aren’t necessarily the best for you. Consider your needs as you read the reviews put together by Cregg Weinmann and the weartesters who diligently put new shoes through their paces. Our reviews are the starting point of your search for your perfect shoe.

Enjoy your running!

Larry Eder President, Running Network LLC

BEST SHOE

BEST SHOE

BEST SHOE

BEST SHOE

Neutral

Motion Stabilizing

Performance

Performance

F A LL 2 012

F A LL 2 012

F A LL 2 012

F A LL 2 012

'$$ ( !- ' # 65

( *% '#$+ &* # :

1 , (( , ! )

* $#- '$ '

#+ ' 8

BEST NEW SHOE

BEST VALUE

BEST RENOVATION

FALL 2012

FALL 2012

FALL 2012

!1 -) 88

*" ( 8:5

*# ' ! ? 9

American Track & Field www.american-trackandfield.com Athletes Only www.atf-athlete.com Athletics (Canada) www.athleticsontario.ca Austin Fit www.austinfitmagazine.com California Track & Running News www.caltrack.com Club Running www.rrca.org/publications/club-running Coaching Athletics Quarterly www.coachingathleticsq.com Colorado Runner www.coloradorunnermag.com Get Active! www.healthclubs.com Greater Long Island Running Club’s Footnotes www.glirc.org Latinos Corriendo www.latinoscorriendo.com Marathon Guide www.marathonguide.com Michigan Runner www.michiganrunner.net Missouri Runner & Triathlete www.morunandtri.com Running Journal & Racing South www.running.net RunMinnesota www.runmdra.org RUNOHIO www.runohio.com Track & Field News www.trackandfieldnews.com USATF’s Fast Forward www.usatf.org USATF–New England’s Exchange Zone www.usatfne.org The Winged Foot www.nyac.org The Winged M www.themac.com Youth Runner www.youthrunner.com

Reviewer: Cregg Weinmann Project Coordinator/Editor: Christine Johnson Designer: Kristen Cerer Proofreader: Marg Sumner, Red Ink Editorial Services Shoe Photography: Daniel SaldaĂąa, Cregg Weinmann Advertising Sales: Running Network LLC, Larry Eder, President, 608.239.3785, larry@runningnetwork.com Publisher: Larry Eder, 608.239.3785 Website: www.runningnetwork.com For a Media Kit, please visit our website.

This 2012 Fall Shoe Review is produced independently by Running Network LLC for its partner publications. All shoes reviewed were tested by experienced, competitive runners who were matched to the biomechanical purpose of each shoe model.

Copyright Š 2012 by Running Network LLC. All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be stored, copied, or reprinted without prior written permission of Running Network LLC. Running Network LLC and its partner publications suggest that, as with all fitness activities, you meet with a healthcare professional before beginning or changing your fitness regimen.

16

M I S S O U R I R U N NE R A ND T R I A T H L E T E FALL 2012

www.morunandtri.com

( *% '#$+ &* # :2466: BEST SHOE Motion Stabilizing F A LL 2 012

Round 5 of the Supernova Sequence features a few changes to a franchise shoe. The upper is breathable with soft, welded microsuede overlays, and synthetic leather at heel and toe. The lacing features a saddle-like design integrated with the logo stripes, but it’s decoupled near the bottom of the lace throat for better forefoot flexion. Adjustments to the last afford a better fit for a wider range of foot shapes. The midsole is the familiar, though reconfigured, adiPrene+, which provides a responsive feel to the forefoot. A slightly larger ForMotion unit in the heel provides a smoother ride, thanks to the heel bevel’s new sculpting.

The ProModerator+ component has been dialed in to effectively support the sidewall. The outersole retains the proven ContinentalŽ rubber with blown rubber in the forefoot. Its combination of stability, cushioning, and size range earned the Supernova Sequence 5 honors as our Best Shoe in the Motion Stabilizing category. “The fit was surprising. The foam molds comfortably around the ankle and the heel. The under-foot bounce also cushioned the impact well.

I felt very pleased with the shoe’s performance.�

Updates the Supernova Sequence 4 • Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with mild to moderate overpronation • Sizes: Men 6.5–15,16,17,18,19,20; Women 5–14 • Weight: Men 12.6 oz. (size 11); Women 10.1 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobel board

.*#$ + ! "- 672466:

, ! # 67;5 +72469:

The Alchemy 12 continues to trade on Mizuno’s implied philosophy: Keep what works and make only incremental changes. One change that runners can celebrate here is a weight reduction of nearly 5%, a small move in the right direction. Round 12 continues with the same midsole and outersole, one of the most effective platforms from any company for runners looking for a stable, well-cushioned ride with good durability. The upper features a similar mesh that’s wide open, and the familiar saddle-like midfoot support has been pared back. The hinged top eyelet has been eliminated in favor of the mid-lace articulation seen in other Mizuno shoes, which flexes better with the foot and firmly holds the midfoot over the midsole. The roomy forefoot fit, gender specificity, and effective motion stabilizing performance will continue to please Alchemy wearers, both old and new.

The 1260 v2 updates the 1260 by visually blending the older design with the new and sprinking in some new technologies. The upper is a similar open mesh with repositioned overlays, but now features a welded saddle. The substantial heel counter secures the rearfoot, and the plush interior is lined with effective, moisture-wicking polyester and a soft layer of memory foam in the ankle collar. The midsole features the rubbery Stabilicore configuration, here reshaped for more effective stability, extending from the middle of the heel along the medial sidewall. A new crashpad layer of Abzorb foam and the N2 cushioning element introduced in the 1080 v2 are now used here to good effect, while substantially lightening the shoe. The durable outersole is blown rubber in the forefoot and Ndurance carbon compound in the heel, with effective forefoot flexibility.

The overall ride, plush textures, and outstanding stability make the 1260 v2 worthy of your consideration.

“Good, solid shoe. Excellent fit, but a bit firm in the heel.

Very stable, no concerns about the balance or support.�

Updates the Wave Alchemy 11 • Recommended for: low- to medium-arched feet with moderate overpronation • Sizes: Men 7–13,14,15,16; Women 6–12 • Weight: Men 13.0 oz. (size 11); Women 10.1 oz. (size 8) • Shape: semi-curved • Construction: Strobel slip-lasted

, ! # =<5 +724665 The completely redesigned 870 v2 is a great improvement. The upper is a breathable, closed mesh with both welded and traditional overlays for a secure fit. The lacing has been separated at each of the lower eyelets, improving flexibility. The textured polyester interior handles moisture, and the foam ankle collar provides a comfortable fit. The redesigned RevLite midsole and an EVA Strobel board give the shoe a springy lightness thanks, in part, to a crashpad layer sandwiched between the midsole proper and the foam layer on the lateral heel. Medial side support via the â&#x20AC;&#x153;fannedâ&#x20AC;? medial post provides stability without feeling like a wall, noticeably improving heel-to-toe transition. The outersole adopts the blown rubber forefoot and Ndurance carbon heel of the 890, here expertly accomplished. The result is a stable, lightweight shoe with good cushioning to handle training miles and up-tempo running.

â&#x20AC;&#x153;Great fit, like a gentle hug. Version 2 seems just as cushioned and even more stable than last year. My runs were great in the shoe!â&#x20AC;?

Updates the 1260 â&#x20AC;˘ Recommended for: low- to mediumarched feet with moderate to maximum overpronation â&#x20AC;˘ Sizes: Men 7â&#x20AC;&#x201C;12,13,14,15,16 (B,D,2E,4E); Women 6â&#x20AC;&#x201C;12,13 (B,D) â&#x20AC;˘ Weight: Men 12.6 oz. (size 11); Women 10.8 oz. (size 8) â&#x20AC;˘ Shape: semi-curved â&#x20AC;˘ Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, PU Strobel board

â&#x20AC;&#x153;Good cushion around the entire foot. Traction was good, and the wear was typical for a New Balance shoe.

Light shoes, these felt good as far as weight is concerned.â&#x20AC;?

Updates the 870 â&#x20AC;˘ Recommended for: low- to mediumarched feet with mild to moderate overpronation â&#x20AC;˘ Sizes: Men 7â&#x20AC;&#x201C;13,14,15 (D,2E); Women 5â&#x20AC;&#x201C;12,13 (B,D) â&#x20AC;˘ Weight: Men 11.2 oz. (size 11); Women 9.9 oz. (size 8) â&#x20AC;˘ Shape: semicurved â&#x20AC;˘ Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobel board

* $#- '$ ' "# 6624675 The Omni 11 features its most significant changes ever. The upper has a similar open mesh, and a nicely padded tongue and ankle collar. The overlays have been reduced, but the full rand supports well and the medial side is shored up by the ArchLock anchor strapping device, which connects the lacing to the midfoot. The outersole continues with the carbon rubber heel/blown rubber forefoot, but the shank has been eliminated in favor of a more stable, full-contact bottom. It retains many characteristics the Omni is known for, but the reshaping of the midsole geometry pushes things in a different direction and is responsible for the improved ride and stability. The full-contact bottom design also reduces the heel-to-toe drop from 12mm to 8. The Omni 11 may require a period of adjustment, though the improvement in transition and the shoeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s stability are worth it. â&#x20AC;&#x153;The fit was perfect and they were good to go out of the box. They felt lighter than last yearâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s, but just as stable.â&#x20AC;?

Updates the ProGrid Omni 10 â&#x20AC;˘ Recommended for: low- to medium-arched feet with mild to moderate overpronation â&#x20AC;˘ Sizes: Men 7â&#x20AC;&#x201C;13,14,15 (M,W); Women 5â&#x20AC;&#x201C;12 (N,M,W) â&#x20AC;˘ Weight: Men 11.5 oz. (size 11); Women 9.3 oz. (size 8) â&#x20AC;˘ Shape: semi-curved â&#x20AC;˘ Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobel board

www.morunandtri.com

FALL 2012

M IS S O U RI RU N NE R A N D T RI A T H L E T E

17

( *' $) $#24665 Part of the new adiPure series of minimal shoes, the lightweight adiPure Motion has near-traditional geometry that serves its purpose: transitioning to even less shoe. The upper is a stretchy booty with a rubbery grid printed on for a bit of support and a minimal midfoot saddle. The lightweight saddle of stiffer materials (synthetic suede overlays and mesh) covers the sides of the booty and welded logo stripes secure it to the midsole. Thereâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s not much protective material under the laces, so donâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t overtighten them. The low-profile midsole has a stack height of 24mm and a heel-to-toe drop of 10mm which, with the reduced structure of the shoe, strengthen the foot while protecting it from the shock of impact. The multi-piece carbon rubber outersole is fairly low to the ground, flexes well with the foot, and keeps the weight down. In a nutshell, the adiPure Motion is a shoe for improving running efficiency and moving fast while doing it. â&#x20AC;&#x153;Snug fit, though the thin upper makes it a little tricky to tighten the laces just right. The weight, flexibility, [and] low profile [let you] go fast without trying! They are great for speedwork and faster runs.â&#x20AC;?

New Shoe â&#x20AC;˘ Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics, for faster-paced running and transitioning to minimal shoes â&#x20AC;˘ Sizes: Men 6.5â&#x20AC;&#x201C;13,14,15; Women 5â&#x20AC;&#x201C;14 â&#x20AC;˘ Weight: Men 7.5 oz. (size 11); Women 6.4 oz. (size 8) â&#x20AC;˘ Shape: semi-curved â&#x20AC;˘ Construction: Strobel slip-lasted

( '$ "%$ :24665 This time out, the adiZero Tempo sports changes to its geometry that have made it lighter and a bit faster than before. The upper is a thin layer of mesh with welded film overlays. Minimal synthetic suede and synthetic leather supports give it both a flexible and breathable character. The midsole is low-profile adiPrene, with adiPrene+ in the forefoot. In the heel, the former ForMotion cassette has been replaced with a wedge of LightStrike EVA, which serves the same purpose: smooth the touchdown and curb overpronation.

Medially, Round 5 now uses the ProModerator support to add stability to the foot in lining up over the midsole.

The outersole has open areas and thin rubber pads just in the highest-wear areas to save weight. The condensed version of the story: a trim-the-fat, go-fast shoe with enough protection to keep you on the roads. â&#x20AC;&#x153;A great, lightweight shoe for shorter, faster runs, especially in hot weather. Breathes well, feels good, nicely cushioned for a light shoe. Pretty good in support and stability. I love them.â&#x20AC;?

Updates the adiZero Tempo 4 â&#x20AC;˘ Recommended for: mediumto high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics â&#x20AC;˘ Sizes: Men 7â&#x20AC;&#x201C;13,14,15 (D,2E); Women 5â&#x20AC;&#x201C;11,12 (B,D) â&#x20AC;˘ Weight: Men 7.4 oz. (size 11); Women 7.9 oz. (size 8) â&#x20AC;˘ Shape: semicurved â&#x20AC;˘ Construction: Strobel slip-lasted

1 , (( , - ! ) 2468: BEST NEW SHOE FALL 2012

!1 -) 8824655 The Gel-Lyte 33 harkens back, if only philosophically, to one of the most popular models in ASICSâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; history, the Gel-Lyte. The thin, synthetic mesh upper is supported by welded overlays that provide just enough structure to keep the foot positioned properly. While spare, it doesnâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t feel skimpy under the tongue or in the ankle collar. The resilient, single density Solyte midsole flexes well and cushions without hindering motion. The new sidewall sculpting aids in the flexibility. The narrow waist (where the midfoot narrows into the arch) provides lateral support to the fifth metatarsal bone, noticeable but not uncomfortable. The outersole is carbon rubber, but only where needed for durability (nearly half the sole goes without). Its light weight, sleek design, and excellent cushioning were responsible for the Gel-Lyte 33 receiving our award for Best New Shoe. â&#x20AC;&#x153;They fit very well. Iâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;m happy they have reduced pressure points with a smooth interior that feels great on my feet. They have better cushioning than expected. The best thing is they are really light and really fast!â&#x20AC;?

The new Kwicky Blade Light N is the neutral version of the Kwicky Blade Light. Theyâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;re equals in every way but one: Here the midsole is a single density. The ride is a good blend of cushioning and responsiveness, thanks to the EVA Strobel board, GuideGlide, and midsole foam. The upper is an open stretch mesh for a flexible, seamless feel. A full-welded saddle secures the foot and thereâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s extra support from the thermoplastic device on the medial half of the saddle. The interior is cushy at the ankle collar, and the Ion Mask treatment keeps the shoe from absorbing extra moisture in all conditions. The outersole is carbon and blown rubber placed effectively only in the high-wear areas, providing durability without compromising flexibility. The mix of lightness, responsiveness, and performance earned the Kwicky Blade Light N a tie as our Best Performance Shoe. â&#x20AC;&#x153;This is an extremely well-balanced shoe. My feet feel well-cushioned and even pampered, the shoe seemed to actually adjust to my foot while running. The fit and performance have been about as good as I have triedâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;and I have been running for quite a few years.â&#x20AC;?

New Shoe â&#x20AC;˘ Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics, for faster-paced running or daily training â&#x20AC;˘ Sizes: Men 6.5â&#x20AC;&#x201C;13,14,15; Women 5â&#x20AC;&#x201C;11,12 â&#x20AC;˘ Weight: Men 10.1 oz. (size 11); Women 7.9 oz. (size 8) â&#x20AC;˘ Shape: semi-curved â&#x20AC;˘ Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobel board

BEST SHOE Performance F A LL 2 012

New Shoe â&#x20AC;˘ Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics for faster-paced running â&#x20AC;˘ Sizes: Men 7â&#x20AC;&#x201C;13,14,15 (D); Women 5â&#x20AC;&#x201C;11,12 (B) â&#x20AC;˘ Weight: Men 9.8 oz. (size 11); Women 7.9 oz. (size 8) â&#x20AC;˘ Shape: semi-curved â&#x20AC;˘ Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobel board

.*#$ + ' ( $# 6824665 It will come as good news to fans of the Precision that Round 13 is their lucky number. The midsole is the same AP+ blend that Mizuno has so effectively dialed in, and last seasonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Wave plate remains. The effective outersole is unchangedâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;X-10 rubber in the heel and blown rubber up frontâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;and the well-thought-out element of concentric rings positioned under the cuboid bone continues to accommodate the midfoot strikers. Most of the changes are in the upper where the welded support strapping has been replaced by synthetic leather and the hinged first eyelet has been eliminated. Instead, repositioned lace eyelets allow for some customization, and the lace throat separates in the middle for better articulation with the foot. Runners unfamiliar with the Precision are missing out on great cushioning and a light feel, as well as good durability from a real performer. â&#x20AC;&#x153;Overall, a good balance of the different aspects of shoes. They are lightweight, but durable enough for day-in and day-out training. I like them. Good protection, good durability, and good ventilation.â&#x20AC;?

Updates the Wave Precision 12 â&#x20AC;˘ Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics â&#x20AC;˘ Sizes: Men 7â&#x20AC;&#x201C;13,14; Women 6â&#x20AC;&#x201C;11 â&#x20AC;˘ Weight: Men 10.6 oz. (size 11); Women 7.8 oz. (size 8) â&#x20AC;˘ Shape: semi-curved â&#x20AC;˘ Construction: Strobel slip-lasted

18

M I S S O U R I R U N NE R A ND T R I A T H L E T E FALL 2012

www.morunandtri.com

*# ' ! ? 924665 BEST RENOVATION FALL 2012

The LunarGlide series has been a welcome blend of straightforward stability and innovative solutions. Version 4 overhauls both the upper and the chassis, lightening up the shoe in the process. The upper is an engineered meshâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;smooth on the interior and designed to maximize evaporationâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;while providing support where needed. The new lacing system extends the promise of Flywire more effectively, with new Dynamic Flywire strands that wrap the midfoot securely and gather in groups of three at the eyestay, providing continuous adjustment based on foot movement. In the midsole, the carrier foam has been pared down on the lateral sidewall to allow the Lunarlon to absorb shock more effectively, and the bottom of the carrier has been opened for better flexion. The cushioning, light weight, and variable fit earned the LunarGlide+ 4 our Best Renovation award. â&#x20AC;&#x153;The shoe fits snugly and feels comfortable, and the interior is very smooth. The laces adjusted well to my foot. The cushioning was the best, a bit surprising because the shoe is very light.â&#x20AC;?

Updates the LunarGlide+ 3 â&#x20AC;˘ Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics to mild overpronation â&#x20AC;˘ Sizes: Men 6â&#x20AC;&#x201C;13,14,15; Women 5â&#x20AC;&#x201C;12 â&#x20AC;˘ Weight: Men 10.5 oz. (size 11); Women 8.1 oz. (size 8) â&#x20AC;˘ Shape: semi-curved â&#x20AC;˘ Construction: Strobel sliplasted, EVA Strobel board

*" ( 8:524=:

* $#- '$ ' #+ ' 824655

The Faas 350 is the latest of the Faas shoes, and one of the most versatile. The upper is a closed, though breathable, mesh, and soft sueded overlays help the upper hold its shape but provide little more structure than that. The molding in the sole allows the foot to flex efficiently. Described as a racing shoe, it actually has more oomph to it. We say, with its light and highly flexible feel, itâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s suitable for tempo runs or some shorter training runs. The midsole is Faas Foam, a very resilient and flexible EVA formulation. The ride is responsive with a good deal of proprioceptive feedback, and it features Pumaâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s lowest heel-to-toe drop: 6mm. The low-profile design makes it stable. The outersole is carbon rubber in the high-wear areas, and toughened and textured foam over the rest of the sole.

The combination of lightness, fit, and especially the economical price earned the Faas 350 honors as our Best Value Shoe.

For such a low-profile shoe, the ProGrid Kinvara emerges in Round 3 with a highprofile reputation. The upper is a semi-open mesh supported with Flex-Film welded overlays and a synthetic leather toecap. The textured polyester interior and the foam lobes beneath the ankle have been retained as they effectively reduce weight and improve fit.

The midsole features the same heel-to-toe drop (4mm) thatâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s been responsible for its success. Resculpting has improved the lateral releaseâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;the ability of the shoeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s heel to flex to the outside so the foot is discouraged from overpronatingâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;and softened the ride a touch. The outersole is still carbon rubber on the heel and selected forefoot lugs, but itâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s been redesigned to feel lightweight while providing a better touchdown. The outstanding ride, fit, and innovative use of new materials earned the ProGrid Kinvara 3 a tie as our Best Performance Shoe.

â&#x20AC;&#x153;Wrap the foot well and have a great low-profile feeling. They are light and tougher than they first appear. Great for faster running and even racing.â&#x20AC;?

New Shoe â&#x20AC;˘ Recommended for: medium-to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics, for fasterpaced, mid-distance running â&#x20AC;˘ Sizes: Men 6.5â&#x20AC;&#x201C;12,13,14; Women 6â&#x20AC;&#x201C;11 â&#x20AC;˘ Weight: Men 8.7 oz. (size 11); Women 6.9 oz. (size 8) â&#x20AC;˘ Shape: semi-curved â&#x20AC;˘ Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobel board

â&#x20AC;&#x153;The Kinvara has been great for me. The new upper is better because it is so thin and light. The cushion is improved and it feels even lighter!â&#x20AC;?

BEST VALUE FALL 2012

Updates the ProGrid Kinvara 2 â&#x20AC;˘ Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics â&#x20AC;˘ Sizes: Men 7â&#x20AC;&#x201C;13,14,15; Women 5â&#x20AC;&#x201C;12 â&#x20AC;˘ Weight: Men 8.4 oz. (size 11); Women 7.2 oz. (size 8) â&#x20AC;˘ Shape: semi-curved â&#x20AC;˘ Construction: Strobel slip-lasted

BEST SHOE Performance F A LL 2 012

!1 *"*!*( 6924665 The Cumulus has been upgraded in a number of areas. The upper features an open stretch mesh that conforms to and moves with the foot. The Discrete Eyelets from Round 13 are now two series of two pairs, with the top pair separate so the lacing both secures the foot and flexes well as the foot moves. The midsole is Solyte, here with wavy, articulated pods to absorb the shock and allow good flexibility. The outersole has been upgraded to AHAR+ rubber in the heel and blown rubber in the forefoot. The Guidance Line has been extended the full length of the outersole for better flexibility. Version 13 was a good shoe, adequate in some areas, good in others, and very good in some. Version 14 steps up to good in all areas, very good in comfort, and excellent in protection, making the shoe a better value despite its price increase. â&#x20AC;&#x153;Felt light and fit very well. Impressed by the cushion, but more by the responsive feel. These should last well, even with my long runs.â&#x20AC;?

Updates the Gel-Cumulus 13 â&#x20AC;˘ Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics â&#x20AC;˘ Sizes: Men 6â&#x20AC;&#x201C;13,14,15 (D), 7â&#x20AC;&#x201C;13,14,15 (2E,4E); Women 5â&#x20AC;&#x201C;13 (2A,B), 6â&#x20AC;&#x201C;13 (D) â&#x20AC;˘ Weight: Men 11.7 oz. (size 11); Women 9.8 oz. (size 8) â&#x20AC;˘ Shape: semi-curved â&#x20AC;˘ Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, Solyte Strobel board (heel)

!1 " *( 6924695 The Nimbus has consistently showcased ASICSâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; best cushioning technologies in their best executions, and Round 14 epitomizes that trend. In fact, the upper alone features so much technology that it almost deserves its own review. The interior is a luxurious blend of mesh and foam that cradles the foot. Though it looks a bit busy, the upperâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s combination of stretch mesh and synthetic overlays both support and flex with the foot as each component has been dialed-in over the past several seasons. The Nimbus now employs the ASICSâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; 33 Seriesâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Heel Clutching System to reduce unneeded material, making for a lightweight framework that improves support. The midsole is a firm formulation of Solyte that we found to be protective and resilient. The usual minor adjustments extend to the Guidance Line and reshaped Trusstic midfoot support, while maintaining the plush, but responsive ride expected of the Nimbus series. The outersole continues with the same effective rubber compound. â&#x20AC;&#x153;Was surprised by the weight of the shoe. They feel much lighter than they look. The ride is very smooth, great cushion, flexes well. This is a very good shoe.â&#x20AC;?

Updates the Gel-Nimbus 13 â&#x20AC;˘ Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics â&#x20AC;˘ Sizes: Men 6â&#x20AC;&#x201C;14,15,16 (D), 7â&#x20AC;&#x201C;14,15,16 (2E,4E); Women 5â&#x20AC;&#x201C;13 (B), 6â&#x20AC;&#x201C;13 (2A,D) â&#x20AC;˘ Weight: Men 11.8 oz. (size 11); Women 9.9 oz. (size 8) â&#x20AC;˘ Shape: semi-curved â&#x20AC;˘ Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, Solyte Strobel board (heel) www.morunandtri.com

FALL 2012

M IS S O U RI RU N NE R A N D T RI A T H L E T E

19

'$$ ( - <24665 The Dyad 7 is the latest round of a shoe for neutral-gaited runners who need a substantial foundation. Itâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s a bit heavy because it supplies both a stable base and ample cushioning. This time out, the upper is a new design, not merely cosmetic changes.

The lacing is better articulated to fit well and move with the foot. The open mesh, though a bit different, still offers cooling ventilation, and a new, full rand offers better support. The midsole has been re-sculpted for better flexion, and now features the DNA cushioning element instead of the HydroFlow cassette of the last six incarnations. DNAâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s adaptable and rubbery feel offers a smoother ride than did the HydroFlow. The outersole sports new flex grooves but maintains the midfoot pods that give the shoe its full-contact stability. The Caterpillar Crashpad that has been used in many of Brooksâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; models finally debuts in the Dyad. â&#x20AC;&#x153;The combination of fit, cushioning, and support is great. My runs are usually up to 45 minutes, but in these I feel that Iâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;m just getting started by the end.â&#x20AC;?

Updates the Dyad 6 â&#x20AC;˘ Recommended for: medium- to low-arched feet with neutral biomechanics to mild overpronation â&#x20AC;˘ Sizes: Men 7â&#x20AC;&#x201C;13,14,15 (D), 8â&#x20AC;&#x201C;13,14,15 (2E,4E); Women 6â&#x20AC;&#x201C;11,12 (B), 7â&#x20AC;&#x201C;11,12 (D,2E) â&#x20AC;˘ Weight: Men 13.9 oz. (size 11); Women 11.8 oz. (size 8) â&#x20AC;˘ Shape: semi-straight â&#x20AC;˘ Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobel board

'$$ ( $() :24665 The Ghost is the workhorse of Brooksâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; neutral shoes. The midsole has been resculpted, extending the crashpad and eliminating the lateral TPU shank. The ride is resilient and ample, if not plush, and designed for comfortable high mileage. The outersole lugs are now linked together laterally from the heel to toe, for better grip and flex. The heel articulates well, with the extended Caterpillar Crashpad allowing the lateral side to accommodate a variety of footstrikes. The thickness of the sole makes the ride a little firmer with a bit more stability and support.

The upper features a similar two-layer, breathable, open mesh. The interior has a healthy layer of foam at the ankle collar and tongue, and a corduroy-like texture in the heel and under the tongue wicks moisture away and keeps the foot from shifting. A new, elasticized lace loop at the instep provides better security yet still flexes well. The Ghost is even better at providing neutral, long-lasting cushioning. â&#x20AC;&#x153;Loved the fit. It had cushion when I ran on the street.

Overall, they felt balanced and secure. The weight of this shoe is awesome. I donâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t feel like my feet are dragging or working extra hard!â&#x20AC;?

Updates the Ghost 4 â&#x20AC;˘ Recommended for: medium- to higharched feet with neutral biomechanics â&#x20AC;˘ Sizes: Men 7â&#x20AC;&#x201C;13,14,15 (D), 8â&#x20AC;&#x201C;13,14,15 (B,2E); Women 5â&#x20AC;&#x201C;12 (B), 6â&#x20AC;&#x201C;12 (2A,D) â&#x20AC;˘ Weight: Men 12.3 oz. (size 11); Women 9.6 oz. (size 8) â&#x20AC;˘ Shape: semi-curved â&#x20AC;˘ Construction: Strobel sliplasted, EVA Strobel board

.*#$ + # " 72468: BEST SHOE Neutral F A LL 2 012

'$$ ( !- ' # 6524695 The Glycerin is Brooksâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; premium neutral shoe, and the 10 focuses on â&#x20AC;&#x153;premium-izingâ&#x20AC;? a few areas. The upper adopts a full rand for support, but in a scaled-back approach that relies on suede straps to provide a softer, but surprisingly tough structure. The midfoot TPU cage allows the lacing to flex where needed while effectively supporting the foot. The mesh is a new design with a more weather-repellent microfiber element.

Inside, a foot-conforming layer of foam with a textured surface keeps the foot in place. The midsole cushioning is now a plush blend of responsive performance and cushy protection. The sidewall grooves essentially turn the entire lateral side into an extended crashpad.

The outersole has good longitudinal flexibility. The heel clefts are gone, but the keyhole-shaped openings in the pods allow articulation. Its combination of protection, plush comfort, and great cushioning earned the Glycerin our Best Neutral Shoe honors.

The Enigma reaches Round 2 with the usual soft-touch updating that Mizuno is known for. The upper is a new, open stretch mesh, a bit different in weave, but with the flexible and adaptable fit of the original. The saddle overlays are completely redesigned; however, they still provide the supportive fit of Round 1. The DynaMotion articulated top eyelet is now attached to the saddle overlay, but the thin, suede material on the eyestay gives it almost as much mobility as before and allows a snug fit at the ankle. The sueded overlays at the toe and midfoot are soft against the foot and supportive.

The well-loved AP+ midsole and its cushy feel are present and accounted for, and the minor alterations in the full-length parallel Wave plate continue to provide the responsive ride that impressed many testers when it debuted. The X-10 outersole is still tough carbon rubber in the heel and a blown rubber forefoot.

The Enigma 2 adds up to responsive cushioning for significant training mileage. â&#x20AC;&#x153;Good durability, and the shoe provided good support.

Just a little heavier than others. The biggest plus of the shoe was its cushioning, and that is the one very big up-side.â&#x20AC;?

Updates the Wave Enigma â&#x20AC;˘ Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics â&#x20AC;˘ Sizes: Men 7â&#x20AC;&#x201C;13,14,15; Women 6â&#x20AC;&#x201C;11 â&#x20AC;˘ Weight: Men 12.8 oz. (size 11); Women 10.0 oz. (size 8) â&#x20AC;˘ Shape: semi-curved â&#x20AC;˘ Construction: Strobel slip-lasted

â&#x20AC;&#x153;Really enjoyed this shoe, and would recommend it.

Good comfort, good fit, held up very well. The look was nice; the feel was better.â&#x20AC;?

Updates the Glycerin 9 â&#x20AC;˘ Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics â&#x20AC;˘ Sizes: Men 7â&#x20AC;&#x201C;13,14,15 (D), 8â&#x20AC;&#x201C;13,14,15 (B,2E); Women 5â&#x20AC;&#x201C;12 (B), 6â&#x20AC;&#x201C;12 (2A,D) â&#x20AC;˘ Weight: Men 13.9 oz. (size 11); Women 10.0 oz. (size 8) â&#x20AC;˘ Shape: semi-curved â&#x20AC;˘ Construction: Strobel slip-lasted, EVA Strobel board

' (*(? 7>24655 The Pegasus has a legacy that stretches back three decadesâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;easily the longest run in the industry. The new upper is an engineered mesh, alternating open areas for breathability and closed areas for support. Welded supportsâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;both internally and as an external saddleâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;provide security to the fit, and the eyestay is segmented into three pairs of eyelets, allowing them to flex separately as the foot moves. The midsole is Cushlon, and the crashpad has been removed in favor of a new geometry with sidewall grooving that allows a smooth lateral release and streamlines the transition. The outersole features a well-segmented layer of â&#x20AC;&#x153;environmentally preferredâ&#x20AC;? rubber with waffles medially and a texture of tiny fins on the lateral side that add traction and a tactile feel to the ride. The net effect is a versatile neutral shoe for high-mileage training. â&#x20AC;&#x153;Very comfortable right away. Perfect width, nice rounded toe box, soft upper with no seams, excellent ankle room. I noticed the cushion more towards the front of the foot vs. the heel, but was pleased by how cushiony it felt on my foot.â&#x20AC;?

Updates the Pegasus+ 28 â&#x20AC;˘ Recommended for: medium- to high-arched feet with neutral biomechanics â&#x20AC;˘ Sizes: Men 6â&#x20AC;&#x201C;13,14,15; Women 5â&#x20AC;&#x201C;12 â&#x20AC;˘ Weight: Men 11.2 oz. (size 11); Women 9.0 oz. (size 8) â&#x20AC;˘ Shape: semi-curved â&#x20AC;˘ Construction: Combination Strobel lasted, EVA Strobel board (forefoot)

20

M I S S O U R I R U N NE R A ND T R I A T H L E T E FALL 2012

www.morunandtri.com

Olympic Trials’ 10 Special Moments

A Daily Journal from the 2012 U.S. Olympic Team Trials / Track & Field

basically provided by Lucas—were essential to put Conley in 3rd with a qualifying mark and send her to the Olympic Games.

By Dave Hunter Photos by PhotoRun.net If you reflect on the recently completed Olympic Trials, it is difficult—but nonetheless entertaining—to select 10 special moments from the cornucopia of memorable performances—some exhilarating, some heartbreaking, some frustrating—that highlighted 10 marvelous days of track & field. It’s tough to limit the list to only 10. I was forced to leave out some stunning moments (e.g., Brittany Borman’s final-round javelin throw—a PR “A” standard heave that won the event and placed her on the Olympic team). Here are my 10 picks, 5 from the women’s events and 5 from the men’s events.

#3: Career-Spanning High Jumpers The women’s high jump provided a unique opportunity to see

TOP 5 WOMEN’S MOMENTS #5: Chantae McMillan’s ‘A’ Standard Performance in the Heptathlon Knowledgeable track & field fans wrote off McMillan’s chances for an Olympic berth when, in the heptathlon’s fifth event, she turned in an 18'1½" subpar performance in the long jump. McMillan, who lacked the all-important Olympic “A” standard of 6,150 points, rallied to score 1,720 points over the last two events, finishing with 6,188 points to snare 3rd and secure her ticket to London. #4: The Electrifying Conley–Lucas Finish in the 5000 In one breathless moment during the chaotic finish to the women’s 5000, Kim Conley, who had lacked the “A” standard, outleaned a wobbly Julia Lucas at the line for the final Olympic spot. Conley’s dramatic rush over the final lap allowed her to beat Lucas by 0.04 seconds and to achieve the essential “A” standard by 0.21 seconds. Ironically, it was Lucas’ self-initiated drive over the final 1200 meters that left her defenseless and unable to respond on the final straightaway, which provided the essential up-tempo race pace over the final three laps that allowed Conley to secure her “A” standard. Both of those elements— www.morunandtri.com

G a b r i e l l e W i l l i a ms

B r i g e t ta B a r r e t t

four athletes who represent the evolution of a high jumper: (1) the emerging, young, recordbreaking talent (Gabrielle Williams, who tied the 15-yearold age group world record); (2) the likely next great up-and-

coming high jumper (Brigetta Barrett, who set two PRs on her way to clearing 2.01 and making her first Olympic team); (3) the dominant reigning indoor world champion in her prime (OT C h a u nt e L o w e winner Chaunte Lowe) and (4) the aging, legendary athlete who is able to summon up the talent and the effort to make a fifth Olympic team (high-jumping icon Amy Acuff ).

A m y A c u ff FALL 2012

M IS S O U RI RU N NE R A N D T RI A T H L E T E

21

#2: Allyson Felix’s Spectacular 200 Meter Win After enduring a week of distraction and hubbub that resulted from the quirky dead heat 3rd-place tie with Jeneba Tarmoh in the 100 meters, the poised Allyson Felix came out for the Trials 200 final, dominated the race from the gun, and won in a dazzling time of 21.69— the third-fastest time ever run by an American and the fastest 200 ever run by a woman on American soil. Only Florence Griffith-Joyner, Marion Jones and Merlene Ottey have ever run faster. In securing her 2012 Olympic team position (first), Felix soundly defeated a world-class field that included world championship gold medalists Carmelita Jeter and Sanya Richards-Ross.

tion for Tarmoh to withdraw unexpectedly only fuels unfortunate speculation that some sort of nefarious and undetectable consideration was provided to Tarmoh to throw in the towel.

For Allyson Felix, destined to be recognized as one of the greatest sprinters in track & field history, she will compete in the 100 meters in London and her 2012 Olympic dream of winning possibly four Gold medals remains alive. For Tarmoh, a solid competitor who heretofore has never made an Olympic team, she is destined to be a footnote to the 2012 Trials. The track & field community will speculate about this for many years.

TOP 5 MEN’S MOMENTS #5: George Kitchens’ Long Jump Magic

#1: The Felix–Tarmoh 100 Meter Tie Unheralded, unattached George Kitchens began the long jump final without an “A” standard mark and against a strong field that included Will Claye, Christian Taylor, and Dwight Phillips—all of whom have won Olympic or World Championship medals. Undaunted, Kitchens uncorked a thirdround jump of 8.21m [26'11¼"] to achieve the “A” standard, capture 3rd place, punch his ticket to London and deny reigning triple jump world champion Christian Taylor an Olympic long jump berth. #4: 110 Hurdle Final

In future years when track & field fans reflect on the 2012 Olympic Trials, one memory will not be of exhilarating athletic success or a last-minute winning race surge, jump or throw. It will be about the improbability, the bewilderment, the covert meetings, the agonizing and often-inexplicable delays, the announced-and-then-altered resolution process and, finally, the disappointing and downright sad outcome that was borne out of the down-to-the-one-thousandth-of-a-second 3rd-place tie between Allyson Felix and Jeneba Tarmoh in the women’s 100 meter final. With Tarmoh surprisingly withdrawing from the highly anticipated match race to settle the issue, the matter was resolved, not on the track, but in a covert manner, which may never be completely known or fully understood. [Editor’s Note: This column was written prior to the Olympic games.] Some point out that Tarmoh is still eligible to serve as an alternate for the 100 and to participate, if selected, on the USA 4x100 relay team. But that would have been the case even if she had participated in the match race and lost. For a growing segment of the track & field community, the apparent absence of any motiva-

22

M I S S O U R I R U N NE R A ND T R I A T H L E T E FALL 2012

So much happened in less than 14 seconds: Aries Merritt won in a superb world-leading time of 12.93. Jason Richardson, 2nd in 12.98, became the first American to post two sub-13 clockings in the same Olympic Trials. Third-place finisher Jeff Porter, in a move reminiscent of Christian Smith’s desperate lunge in the ’08 OT 800 final, dove his way onto the Olympic team. And the subpar performance of David Oliver fueled further speculation about his ability to regain his former dominant position in this event. www.morunandtri.com

#3: Lance Brooks’ Storybook Throw

Galen Rupp is beloved by the Hayward Field faithful. But even his most ardent fans have occasionally entertained doubt about his closing leg speed and his gritty determination against the most elite competitors over the final 200. He erased any lingering doubts at these Trials when, as expected, he was mano a mano against his nemesis Bernard Lagat over the final 400 of the 5000 final. This time Rupp possessed that extra gear he needed over the final 80 meters to better Lagat at the line by 0.15 seconds. Rupp’s winning time of 13:22.67 took down the 40-year-old Olympic Trials 5000 record held by Rupp’s idol, the legendary Steve Prefontaine. The win allowed Rupp to complete an extremely rare Olympic Trials 5000/10,000 double—last completed 60 years ago in the ’52 Olympic Trials by Curt Stone. #1: Ashton Eaton’s Decathlon World Record

Not unlike many U.S. discus athletes, unheralded discus thrower Lance Brooks came to Eugene lacking the 65.00m mark that would give him the coveted “A” standard. Veteran discus fans were frankly surprised this virtual unknown even made it into the finals. Leading after every round of the finals, Brooks still lacked the “A” standard mark that several of his trailing competitors had already secured. In a finish that defied belief, Lance Brooks, down to his sixth and final throw, and exhorted onward by the frenzied Hayward Field crowd, dropped a bomb by spinning the platter 65.15m—just surpassing the “A” standard mark he needed to secure his appearance in the London Games. This fairy tale finish took on added luster when Brooks’ podium remarks suggested he did not fully appreciate that, notwithstanding an OT discus win, his “A” standard sixth throw was essential to permit his Olympic participation. #2: Galen Rupp’s Dramatic 5000 Win

www.morunandtri.com

You could feel the electricity in Hayward Field when Ashton Eaton began Day 1 of the decathlon by setting decathlon world records in the first two events. With Eaton having amassed 2,164 points after the 100m and the long jump, both the athlete and the fans sensed that something special might be unfolding. Competing on the 100th anniversary of the decathlon and of Jim Thorpe’s victory in the inaugural Olympic decathlon, Eaton appeared unchallenged by his competitors and battled only with the swirling winds and periodic cloud bursts that plagued the 10 events. Undaunted, Eaton soldiered on by winning six of the first nine events. With 8,189 points entering the final event—the 1500—Eaton and the Hayward Field fans had been advised that a time of around 4:17 would allow him to surpass the 11-year-old record of 9,026 held by Roman Sebrle. With all of the living American Olympic decathlon Gold medalists in attendance in the stands, Eaton ran an evenly-paced 4:14.48 to win the 1500, to post 9,039 points, and to set a new world record. No one who witnessed this record-breaking display of athletic prowess will ever forget it. L

FALL 2012

M IS S O U RI RU N NE R A N D T RI A T H L E T E

23

Continued from Page 14 #4) Marquette When you are trying to be a great team, it is always nice to start off with just 1 point. The Mustangs will likely be able to enjoy that nicety most times out this fall with Noah Kauppila leading their charge. If senior Adam Roderique, who ran 4:19 on the track, can continue his rise, they will pack a really good 1-2 punch. They also return one of the top freshmen from a year ago, Grant Dolan, who could turn into one of the best #3s in the state. #5) Glendale If anyone can challenge Blue Springs for lowest score through two it will be Glendale, which returns State 8th-placer Chris Mooneyham and State 1600 champ Spencer Haik. They also return three athletes with State Meet experience, which is always important come November. #6) Warrensburg The defending Class 3 champs put on a clinic in pack-running last fall when they put their top four across the line within 5 seconds of one another at State. All four are back for more in 2012, as is their fifth boy. That’s right … the Tigers return all five scorers. #7) Rockhurst 2011 was a special year for the Hawklets as they earned runner-up honors in Class 4, led by senior star Zach Herriott.

The bad news is they return only one from that squad, but the good news is they have built a huge and successful Junior Varsity program the last several years, so the bodies are there to step in and succeed right away. #8) Parkway West These guys are always good and they always seem to run well in November. They have a lot to be excited about in 2012 with two seniors coming back, Kevin Koboldt and Chris Carter, who finished 57th and 58th a year ago, respectively. #9) West Plains The Zizzers were 3rd in 2011, but return only one from that group. Still, you never count out West Plains. They train hard, and hard work pays off. It is a pretty simple formula, really. #10 TIE) Eureka The Wildcats were a solid team last year and they return four from their top seven. If those four improve their places from a year ago, as we expect they will, the big E will once again be a top 10 squad in November. #10 TIE) MICDS The Rams have one of the best overall runners in the state in 4:11 miler Amos Bartelsmeyer, which helps a ton. On top of that they return five from their 3rd-place squad in 2011. Watch out for these guys as they may give Warrensburg a run for their money in Class 3.

INDIVIDUAL RANKINGS All season long we will try to keep an eye out for the top 15 runners in the state. These are the top 15 regardless of Class. Occasionally we miss a runner or two, so we apologize if we shorted you or your teammate. Feel free to email Ben at ben@bigriverrunning.com if you know someone who should be on the Big River Top 15. Enjoy!!

TOP 15 GIRLS #1) Hannah Long, SO, Eureka You can’t ask for a much better freshman year than Long had in 2011–12. Still, a runner-up finish at State Cross Country, an 11th-place finish at Foot Locker Midwest and three silver medals at the State Track Meet will surely leave the Eureka star hungry for more.

#2) Nicole Mello, SR, Hickman Mello was Missouri’s only representative at the Foot Locker National Championships in 2011. Qualifying for the Finals was a huge piece of redemption after a fall at State cost her any chance of running with the leaders, and she eventually finished 9th. We could see a legendary battle this November between Mello and Long. #3) Kaitlyn Fischer, SR, Herculaneum Fisher has won six individual State titles on the track and has two 2nds and a 3rd to her credit in cross country. She enters this season having run the fastest 3200 in 2012 of any returner and is coming off an eye-popping 17:34 at the Saint Louis Track Club Cross Country Kickoff. That time just cannot be ignored. #4) Saga Barzowski, SR, Arcadia Valley The two-time Class 2 State cross country champ is back again for her senior campaign. She is also the two-time defending Class 3 champ in the 1600 and 800 on the track and owns PRs of 2:15 for 800 meters, 11:14 for 3200 and 5:02 for a full mile. Her fourth straight battle with Fischer in November should be nothing short of epic. #5) Brigette Caruthers, SR, Branson Caruthers may not have the track credentials of some of the girls on this list, but this is cross country and her results speak for themselves. In 2011 she was 5th at the Forest Park Cross Country Festival, 1st at the always tough Central Ozarks Conference Meet and 3rd at the Class 4 State Meet in an impressive 18:49 on the difficult layout in Jefferson City. #6) Taylor Werner, FR, Ste Genevieve It is always tough to rank a freshman in the pre-season because you are making sort of an educated guess. However, after she ran 5:00 for a full mile as an 8th-grader at the Festival of Miles and beat many of the girls on this very list save for #1 Long, it’s not really going out on a limb to say Werner is pretty darn good. #7) Jill Whitman, JR, Cor Jesu Only 21st at the Class 4 State Meet, Whitman comes in at #7 on the heels of a breakout track season that saw her run PRs of 5:01 and 11:11 and grab 3rd in the 1600 and 2nd in the 3200 at State Track. #8) Sophia Racette, SO, Nerinx Hall Racette was impressive every time out last fall, no easy feat for a freshman. She enters her sophomore campaign after a track season that saw her run 5:18 and 11:21. She also showed her strength last February when she finished 26th at the USA Junior Cross Country Championships over 6K. #9) Olivia Franklin, SO, Kearney Franklin won the Class 3 State Meet as a freshman and returns to defend her title against five other underclassmen who were in the top 10. Her 11:13 on the track was a good sign that she’ll be a force once again this fall. #10) Nicole Lee, JR, Clinton Lee enters the cross country season on a high after capturing the Class 3 State 3200 title on the track. She was 4th at State cross country in 2011 and will no doubt be looking to take home top honors this time around. #11) Melissa Brown, JR, Oakville Brown burst onto the scene last September when she finished 2nd at the Forest Park Cross Country Festival. She continued to impress all year and ended up 8th at State in Class 4 despite battling a side-stitch for much of the race.

Continued on Page 26 24

M I S S O U R I R U N NE R A ND T R I A T H L E T E FALL 2012

www.morunandtri.com

AND THEN JAMAICA CONQUERED ENGLAND

www.morunandtri.com

FALL 2012

M IS S O U RI RU N NE R A N D T RI A T H L E T E

25

Continued from Page 24 #12) Sammy Laurenzo, JR, Liberty North Laurenzo was dominant for much of the year in 2011, and we expect more of the same in 2012.

She was not at full strength when she finished 5th at State so we hope to see a 100% Laurenzo on the line this November. #13) Kiersten West, JR, Lee’s Summit West No Big River Rankings would be complete without some Lee’s Summit West representation.

West, LSW’s #1 from 2011, was 10th a year ago and looks to lead the Titans to a sixth straight title this fall. #14) Kristen Adams, JR, Francis Howell Adams leads a Francis Howell squad that just might have something to say about that sixth title for LSW. She was sectional champ and 11th at State in 2011 and with training partners Whitney Adams, Valeska Halimicek and Rebecca Turney by her side, this junior could be a major force this fall. #15) Alyssa Jones, SR, Rockwood Summit Jones has really good career credentials with track PRs of 5:12 and 10:53 and State cross country finishes of 7th and 12th. Her 10:53 is the best 3200 PR of anyone in the state, and we could definitely see her besting that 7th-place State finish from 2010 this November.

Honorable Mention Savannah Beaver, Maddy Brown, Courtney Coppinger, Kayla Funkenbusch, Lane Maguire, Libby Nisbet, Samantha Phillips, Courtney Rogers, Kaley Ruff, Katie Tuck, Kennadee Williams.

TOP 15 BOYS #1) Noah Kauppila, JR, Marquette Fulfilling all the expectations his stellar freshman year, Kauppila shined as a sophomore, finishing 4th at the Missouri Class 4 State Meet and 14th at the Foot Locker Midwest Regional. His track season was just as impressive, where he split 1:52 in the 4x8, ran 4:16 for 1600 and was the state champ at 3200 in 9:11.

#2) Simon Belete, SR, Blue Springs Belete had his best race of the season at the State Meet, where he finished 5th in 16:17, just two ticks back of #1 Kauppila. Proving that he is indeed a big meet performer, he ran superbly at the State Track Meet as well, finishing 4th in the 3200 in 9:17. #3) Amos Bartelsmeyer, SR, MICDS The top returner in Class 3, Bartelsmeyer was national class on the track, running a solo 4:14 to win the State Meet on a brutally hot day and following up with 4:11 full mile on a cold, windy night at the Festival of Miles. Only 4th in Class 3 cross country, look for that to change this fall as 2011 was his first-ever cross country season. #4) Spencer Haik, JR, Glendale The Glendale junior gets the nod at #4 mainly on the heels of his performance at the Class 4 State Track Meet, where he took home top honors in the 1600 in 4:15. Combine that with the strength he showed in finishing 14th last year in Jefferson City and you have the makings of a dangerous cross country runner this season. #5) Colton Rockhold, JR, Truman Rockhold burst onto the scene this past track season with a 9:22 at the Kansas Relays where he bested #2 Belete, among others. His 10th-place finish in the State 3200 was another solid performance and his 16:08 at the Saint Louis Track Club Cross Country Kickoff on August 4 was proof that he can be a force this fall. #6) Chris Mooneyham, SR, Glendale Mooneyham is the third best returner overall from last fall’s State Meet where he was 8th in Class 4 in

26

M I S S O U R I R U N NE R A ND T R I A T H L E T E FALL 2012

16:23. He also finished a respectable 27th at the USA Junior Cross Country Championships in February. His track season produced a 9:29 PR for 3200, and with #4 Haik as a training partner, Mooneyham should be a top contender in any meet he goes to this season. #7) Stephen Mugeche, SO, Blue Springs We really like this kid. As a freshman he finished 45th at the State Cross Country Meet, which is hard to do. Then he exploded on the track, running 9:26 for 7th in the 3200. Remind you of anyone? Kauppila was 7th in 9:25 his freshman year. If that’s any indication, and we think it is, you may see Mugeche move up a few notches through the course of this season. #8) Billy Leighton, SR, Cape Girardeau Central Leighton has been turning heads since he was in middle school and as he enters his senior year he does so with some really solid credentials. His 2011 campaign was highlighted by an 11th-place finish at the Class 4 State Meet in 16:30.

Known as a ferocious trainer, we would bet he’s in amazing shape and has big goals for this fall. #9) Nicholas Stewart, SR, McCluer North Stewart is really, really good, but we feel like he flies under the radar for some reason. Perhaps this will be the year that everyone takes notice. The McCluer North senior was 18th at the State Meet in 2011, and his track season included a 1:53 800, a 4:19 1600 and a 9:20 3200. That kind of speed and strength is lethal and will certainly make him a threat every time he toes the line. #10) Nathan Keown, SR, Rock Bridge Keown now takes the reins as the #1 boy on a powerful Rock Bridge squad after 3 years behind 2011 state champ Caleb Wilfong and 2012 state 800 champ Jordan Cook.

Keown ran in the 15:40s multiple times last fall, though he ended up a disappointing, for him, 27th at the State Meet. Look for that to change in a big way this time around. #11) Adam Roderique, SR, Marquette Roderique seemed to really come into his own this past track season where he ran right on the heels of his teammate Kauppila in several 1600 races. He produced a 4:19 PR in the 4-lapper and was 9th in that event at State. Only 56th a year ago on the grass, we expect he will be a sure bet for a high All-State finish in 2012. #12) Derek Legenzoff, SR, Lafayette The Lafayette senior grabbed 24th to earn All-State honors last fall and followed it up with a solid track season that included PRs of 4:31 and 9:38. #13) Evan Schulte, JR, Rock Bridge Schulte was the third-best sophomore at last year’s State Meet behind only Kauppila and Haik. If the recent history of the Rock Bridge program is any indication, and we think it is, Schulte should be a force on the State scene this fall. #14) Ian Frazier, SR, Kickapoo Frazier was just one spot and two ticks behind Schulte at last year’s State Meet. He also dipped under 16 minutes twice, showing that his performance in Jeff City was no fluke. Look for a possible top-10 finish from the Kickapoo senior in November. #15) Kirk Smith, SR, John Burroughs Smith was 5th in Class 3 in 2011 and we put a lot of stock in that. Just one spot behind #3 Bartelsmeyer at that meet, Smith is the second-best Class 3 returner and should be a contender anywhere he runs this fall.

Honorable Mention Austin Del Rosso, Jason Fambrough, Brian Hernan, Ryan Jackson, Sheldon Keence, Matt Nicholson, Elvir Sarajlic, Tyler Rush, Dillon Williams

www.morunandtri.com

S t. Lou isa n Ta k es o n B ad w at er C ou rse f o r Great er Go od

by Mike Meehan “Nervous yet?” Tim Burke was asked on his blog a few days before he would run 146 miles through some of the most extreme conditions on Earth.

Burke’s journey would stretch from the lowest to the highest points in the continental U.S. He would follow the course of the Badwater Ultramarathon, known as “the world’s toughest footrace.” Starting at 282 feet below sea level in Badwater, California, he would run through a low nighttime temperature of 90° to a daytime high of 118° in Death Valley’s steamy desert and then hike to the top of Mount Whitney, more than 14,780 feet above the desert floor.

The 43-year-old St. Louisan ran Badwater to raise money for a new school for the city’s SouthSide Early Childhood Center. As the father of two adopted children and a member of the Center’s board of directors, helping children succeed is one of Burke’s passions. The Center helps at-risk children succeed in school by eliminating barriers to their success by creating a healthy, nurturing learning environment that they may not have at home.

“I think about all of the barriers that [these kids] have to break to get to that point and what their families do in sacrificing to get their children to that point. I see some parallels to [running Badwater].

I’m trying to break that mental barrier that I’m going through to run three-plus days [and the] physical barriers of getting ready for that,” Burke explained.

After spending more than 6 months training, which included hiring a coach and training in Death Valley’s extreme heat, Burke and his support crew traveled to California in July to run Badwater.

Here’s their story: On July 2 at 3 a.m., with the temperature near 90°, Burke and his support crew embark on their journey. Taking it slow, trying to conserve energy, they cover the first 42 miles of mostly flat terrain in under 10 hours. However, the next day would be much harder.

Burke’s enthusiasm would get the better of him as he tries to do too much. He is www.morunandtri.com

Photo courtesy of Tim Burke

on the verge of dehydration and can’t digest anything when he nears the 50-mile mark. At the urging of his support crew, he slows down and eventually gets back on track.

“When I went up the Townes Pass climb, the first big climb, it was into a 20mile-per-hour headwind. I should have been going a lot slower. I was anxious; I felt like we were going to do a lot more. So I got that in my head, and that was just a mistake,” Burke admits to me later. “I had prepared for the mental issues and prepared for the physical issues. I didn’t think my stomach was what was going to throw me.”

On Day 2 of the journey, with his run on the verge of ending prematurely due to exhaustion and stomach issues, Burke takes a risk by eating some solid food. Thanks to a hearty breakfast of eggs, sausage, and potatoes, plus a few McDonald’s cheeseburgers along the way, Burke regains his strength and continues. After reaching the 100-mile mark, fatigue starts to catch up with him again. With the full effects of 2 days on the trail taking their toll, Marcia Rasmussen meets up with him. The same person, who days earlier asked Burke on his blog if he was nervous, offers her sup-

port.

Rasmussen, a veteran ultrarunner and outdoor survivalist, had heard about Burke’s Badwater attempt and drove 6 hours with her husband to meet him. “I heard that he was going to be out, so I contacted him and tried to be there when he finished,” she says.

[Rasmussen has made the solo crossing three times and has helped others make the trek as a crew member. She was part of an unofficial group of runners that met each year from 2005–07 to make the Badwater journey together. Although the group runs were discontinued, Rasmussen has remained one of the primary supporters of those completing the solo trek. “[Badwater] started with one person doing it by himself and we try to keep that spirit alive,” she explains.]

Having been in Burke’s mental and physical state on a few occasions herself, Rasmussen offers to pace Burke part of the way, which ends up being 14 miles. As they run together, she shares her experiences of running Badwater’s grueling course. “That’s a rough stretch of the course. It looks like you’re not moving or getting any closer [to the end], with miles and miles to go,” she explains.

FALL 2012

M IS S O U RI RU N NE R A N D T RI A T H L E T E

27

=SYV HEMP] YTHEXIW SR XLI PEXIWX MR XVEGO JMIPH GVSWW GSYRXV] VSEH VEGMRK ERH QEVEXLSR VYRRMRK 7MKR YT EX [[[ VYRFPSKVYR GSQ ERH KIX ]SYV EXLPIXMGW JM\ EX PIEWX HE]W E ]IEV

,I] [I RIIH E FVIEO SRGI MR E [LMPI XSS

“From about 6:30 or 7 [p.m.] until 1:30 in the morning she came out and paced me.

It allowed my crew some time to rest. They had been doing so much work, it was good for them to get some actual down time rather than nervous down time,” Burke recalls.

The conversation and experiences that she shares take Burke’s mind off his pain.

“It was just good conversation and it really made a very long and boring, middle of the night, potentially lonely part of the road go by pretty quickly,” he says.

When they reach the base of Mount Whitney, some 135 miles from where he started, Rasmussen presents Burke with a finishers’ belt buckle to mark his accomplishment, continuing a tradition that she helped start.

On the third day of the trek, Burke completes the final leg of his journey by hiking 11 miles up Mount Whitney.

Eighty-one hours and 146 miles after he started, Burke stood at the summit of the tallest peak in the continental U.S., 14,505 feet above sea level.

Back in St. Louis: By completing one of the world’s toughest physical challenges, Burke hoped to show that anything was possible through hard work. “There are not a lot of things that are impossible if you dedicate the time and you prepare yourself for it. That’s what we’re trying to do [at the children’s center].”

So far, his efforts have raised $49,000 for the new school.

“I was able to get through this journey on the inspiration from the kids, the training from my coach, the on-site support from my crew and the great support that I experienced from both people I know and complete strangers,” Burke said, reflecting on his accomplishment.

Although Rasmussen was quick to point out that her role in Burke’s success was minimal, her support left a lasting impression on him. “I’m honored to say that I know and spent time with her, and more importantly, that she thought enough to spend time with me,” Burke said of Rasmussen.

“That’s what I like about the ultrarunning community. There’s a camaraderie of shared pain … people know what you’re going through.”L For more information about Tim Burke’s run, including photos and video, visit 1inspiredidiot.com/

Photo courtesy of Tim Burke

28

M I S S O U R I R U N NE R A ND T R I A T H L E T E FALL 2012

www.morunandtri.com

OLY MPIC WRAP

C h ri st i a n T a yl o r PhotoRun.net

By Elliott Denman New York, New York was blown out of the water in its bid, Seven years ago, to stage the Games of the XXX Olympiad.

“Good try, Gotham, well done, but not really what we were looking for,” the NYC delegation, in effect, was told.

It boiled down to a Paris–London race. Any few votes here—or there—could swing it one direction or other. London got those votes and became the International Olympic Committee’s choice.

And now that London’s Games have safely been tucked away in the history books, we can say we are mighty darn glad, too, that the vote went the way it did.

Might New York, New York have done as well as London? Call that a definite very-very-very long stretch. Might Paris have done as well as London? Just might, but again, a big stretch.

In 16 incredible days, London got on with it magnificently. It deserves the praise of the universe for the job it did.

Everything Lord Sebastian Coe, the visionary and architect behind it all, said at the closing ceremonies was right on the money. “Today sees the end of a wonderful Games in a wonderful city,” he told the 80,000 in the Olympic Stadium seats and a likely worldwide television audience of over a billion.

“For the third time in its history, London was granted the trust of the Olympic movement and once again we have shown ourselves worthy of that trust. Thank you to the people who built the stadiums, the people who created a new neighborhood [in East London] in an old city, the people who stood guard to keep us safe.

Thank you to the tens of thousands of volunteers who gave their time, their boundless enthusiasm, and their goodwill, and who have the right to say, ‘I made London 2012.’

“And thank you to the people of this country. The British people got behind London’s bid and they got behind London’s Games. www.morunandtri.com

London 2012 has played host to some incredible sport, to aweinspiring feats that are the synthesis of incredible determination and skill by the world’s greatest sportsmen and women. To all the Olympians who came to London to compete—thank you.

“On the first day of these Games, I said we were determined to do it right. I said these Games would see the best of us. On this last day, I can finish with these words: When our time came, Britain, we did it right.”

Likely the London Games will be called the best ever, certainly very long miles better than the last Summer Games the U.S. hosted—Atlanta 1996. Probably a tad better than the second Games Down Under—Sydney 2000. But just a tad. An improvement in so many ways over Athens 2004. Outspent by far—but certainly not outdone—by Beijing 2008.

Athletics—track & field was, of course, only one of 31 Olympic sports—and that number depends on how you do the counting.

And consider all the glories in athletics that London 2012 gave us …

MOST MEMORABLE ON THE MEN’S SIDE • Usain Bolt and Yohan Blake dominating the dashes, but having to run for their lives to beat the U.S. in the greatest 4x100 relay race the world has ever seen.

• Young Kirani James taking the 400 in a strange Americanless 400.

• David Rudisha leading home the pack in the greatest 800 meter race ever run.

• Mo Farah sweeping the 5K and 10K, the latter slow as molasses but nevertheless enthralling.

• Aries Merritt and Felix Sanchez out-hurdling the world.

Four one-time-or-another U.S. collegians racing off with the 4x400—and beating the U.S. FALL 2012

M IS S O U RI RU N NE R A N D T RI A T H L E T E

29

LO HACES ASÍ—STEP BY STEP, ONE, TWO. IN A ROCK ‘N’ ROLL RACE, LIVE BANDS AND CHEERING FANS PUT YOU ON CENTER STAGE. JUST MOVE WITH THE MUSIC, BREAK A SWEAT, AND FEEL A LITTLE SWING IN YOUR STRIDE. HERE, YOU’RE THE STAR, SO SAVOR EACH STEP OF THE WAY. ALL TOGETHER NOW: JOURNEY ON.

PhotoRun.net

• Christian Taylor tripling the pleasure in the TJ. • Will Claye double-medaling the LJ and TJ. • Keehorn Walcott—of Trinidad and Tobago, too—spearing javelin Gold.

• Ashton Eaton and Trey Hardee doing the old decathlon 1-2.

• Ding Chen finally walking China to its first 20K Gold; 50Ker Sergey Kidyapkin of Russia winning the Games’ longest, toughest footrace.

• Stephen Kiprotich of Uganda joining Johnny Hayes (USA) and Delfo Cabrera (Argentina) as London’s Olympic marathon champions.

OCT. 21, 2012 MUÉVELO. REGISTER AT COMPETITOR.COM

MARVELS ON THE WOMEN’S SIDE

TM

30

• Shelly-Ann Fraser-Pryce, the double double-barreled 100 titlist.

• Allyson Felix and Sanya Richards-Ross, first with individual Golds, then more-so magnificent, baton in hand.

• Awesome Aussie hurdler Sally Pearson.

• Jenn Suhr, vaulting off the injury list and up-up-over the PV heights.

• Brittney Reese, longing for LJ win and getting it.

• Just-20 Elena Lashmanova, baby-facing to 20K Gold.

• And Jessica Ennis, boosting all British spirits and jump-starting an array of GB successes.

All these, and so many more, “did it right.”

May the spirit of all of them, as the good Lord Coe put it, “inspire a generation.” L

M I S S O U R I R U N NE R A ND T R I A T H L E T E FALL 2012

B r i tt n e y R e e s e PhotoRun.net www.morunandtri.com

www.morunandtri.com

FALL 2012

M IS S O U RI RU N NE R A N D T RI A T H L E T E

31

MINIMIZE THE POUNDING, MAXIMIZE YOUR RUN. ARMED WITH THE CUSHIONING POWER OF GEL速, THE GEL-NIMBUS速 14 DELIVERS A PLUSH YET STABLE RIDE SO YOU GET MORE OUT OF EVERY STEP.

GEL- NIMBUS速 14

ASICS . COM