Carlsbad Trails Master Plan

Trails Master Plan FINAL DRAFT - February 2015

Prepared for:

Prepared by KTU+A: Michael Singleton, Principal John Holloway, Sr. Associate Kristin Bleile, GIS Michael J. Johnston, Graphics & Renderings

Additional support from: Marshall Plantz Liz Ketabian Steve Jantz Kyle Lancaster Pam Drew Doug Bilse Kasia Trojanowska

TOC Table of Contents

Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5

Project Study Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Trails and Active Transportation Strategies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Citywide Trails Program Mission Statement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Trails Master Plan Purpose. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Document Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Chapter 2: Project Background 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5

Previous Planning Efforts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Recent and Current Planning Efforts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Important Future Transportation Plans with Trail Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

A Vision for the Future . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Trail Master Plan Goals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Chapter 3: Public Outreach Summary

3.1 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.2 Public Outreach Purpose and Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.3 Workshop Attendance and Participation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.4 Public Workshop Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.5 Online Engagement: Survey & Interactive Maps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.6 Summarized Results of the Survey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1-1 1-1 1-2 1-2 1-3

2-1 2-2 2-4 2-5 2-6

3-1 3-2 3-2 3-2 3-3 3-7

Chapter 4: Trail Typology

4.1 Trail Types. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 4.2 Carlsbad’s Existing Trail System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-9 4.3 Trail Amenities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-9

Chapter 5: Analysis of Existing Conditions

5.1 Land Uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.2 Existing Pedestrian Systems. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.3 Existing and Proposed Bike System. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.4 Existing Park and Open Space System. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.5 Origins and Destinations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.6 Existing Public Property Ownership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.7 Existing Private Property Ownership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.8 Existing Vegetation Communities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.9 Existing Topography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.10 Existing Preserve System. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.11 Challenges to Trail Development. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.12 Gap Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.13 Existing Walktimes from Trail Heads. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

City of Carlsbad Trails Master Plan

5-1 5-1 5-2 5-3 5-3 5-3 5-3 5-4 5-4 5-4 5-5 5-5 5-7

iii

Chapter 6: Future Trail Recommendations

6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9

Standards for Trail Type 1- Nature Trail. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-2 Standards for Trail Type 2- Recreation Trail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-2 Standards for Trail Type 3- Dirt Trail or Utility Roadbed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-3 Standards for Trail Type 4- Roadside and Connector Trails. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-3 Standards for Trail Type 5 - Connecting Sidewalks & Street Crossings . . . . . 6-4 Standards for Trail Type 6- Paved Multi-use Path or Trail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-4 Composite of All Trail Types. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-4 Subarea Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-4 Special Trail Designations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-34

Chapter 7: Trail Standards

7.1 Overall Design Objectives. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-1 7.2 Design Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-1 7.3 State and Federal Trail Standards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-3 7.4 Guidelines for Trail Layout and Location. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-4 7.5 Accessibility Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-6 7.6 Trail Surface Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-7 7.7 Trail Edging and Fencing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-14 7.8 Trail Access and Trailhead Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-16 7.9 Supporting Infrastructure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-23 7.10 Bridges and Tunnels. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-24 7.11 Boardwalks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-27 7.12 Lighting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-27 7.13 Signage Guidelines and Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-28 7.14 Specific Trail Signage Guidelines and Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-31 7.15 Design for Risk Management Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-35 7.16 Specific Standards for Open Space Trails (Type 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-36 7.17 Specific Standards for Open Space Trails (Type 2 and 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-36 7.18 Specific Standards for Roadside & Connector Trails (Type 4) and

Paved Multi-use Paths (Type 6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-38

Chapter 8: Trail Operations and Maintenance

8.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8.2 Overview of Trail Maintenance Responsibilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8.3 Maintenance Schedules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8.4 Trail Closures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8.5 Carlsbad’s Trail Maintenance Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8.6 Operation and Maintenance Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8.7 Safety and Enforcement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8.8 Trail Volunteer Programs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Chapter 9: Funding Opportunities 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7

General Funding Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Federal Funding Opportunities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

State Funding Opportunities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Regional Funding Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Local Funding Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Non-Traditional Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Funding Matrix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Appendix A: Public Input

8-1 8-1 8-1 8-2 8-3 8-5 8-5 8-7

9-1 9-2 9-4 9-6 9-6 9-7 9-8

Chapter 1 Introduction

Trails Master Plan

1

Introduction

1.0 Overview

Carlsbad is an affluent seaside resort community occupying a 7-mile stretch of Pacific coastline in North San Diego County, California. Located approximately 35-miles north of downtown San Diego, it is referred to as “The Village by the Sea” by locals. Carlsbad’s Mediterranean climate attracts visitors year-round and supports an active sports community where numerous world class athletes train and live. The many healthy, active life style opportunities in Carlsbad attract families and businesses to this vibrant seaside community.

Carlsbad is as much a way of life as it is a city. A way of life that is focused on the beaches, lagoons and hillsides and how the community utilizes these places. The community is proud and protective of a quality of life that is connected to its environment.

Trails connect Carlsbad citizens and visitors to its beaches, coastal resources and activities as well as to the city’s 3 unique lagoons: Buena Vista; Agua Hedionda; and Batiquitos. The trails provide access to and public education of the diverse and natural resources and result in an increased sensitivity and respect for nature and wildlife. Trails connect people to nature.

Trails support physical activity for residents and visitors alike. Some of the best forms of exercise are walking, hiking, jogging, running or cycling. Trails connect people with their physical well being.

Healthy forms of activity are not only providing exercise, but also providing opportunities for residents and visitors to connect to various destinations throughout the city. Trails connect people to their community.

Trails encourage social interaction and improved opportunities for community connectivity. Trails help connect people with people.

1.1 Project Study Area The study area includes all of the City of Carlsbad and focuses on the open space, parks, beaches and the recreation and circulation trail system that connects them (see”Figure 1.1: Vicinity Map”) .

Figure 1.1: Vicinity Map

1.2 Trails and Active Transportation Strategies Trails often also provide a transportation function by providing non-vehicular modes of moving about the city. The concurrent Carlsbad Active Transportation Strategy (CATS) plan is being coordinated with this trail planning effort. Although thought of as being supportive of just recreational activities, certain trail segments provide a link to important destinations in Carlsbad - destinations such as golf courses, the flower fields, Legoland, nature centers, nature preserves, schools, work, shopping areas, restaurants, or recreational areas. Trails connect people with destinations via non-motorized transportation options.

Chapter 1 • Project Introduction

1-1

City of Carlsbad

1.3 Citywide Trails Program Mission Statement The primary purpose of the Carlsbad Citywide Trails Program is provided in the mission statement below:

“The Citywide Trails Program strives to meet the leisure and recreational needs of Carlsbad residents while protecting and preserving open spaces and coastal resources in accordance with the City of Carlsbad General Plan”

1.4 Trails Master Plan Purpose This plan will build on the previous efforts completed by staff, volunteers and private development partners completed over the past 2 decades for Carlsbad’s vibrant citywide trails program. Since the Open Space Conservations Resource Management Plan (OSCRMP) was approved in the mid 1990’s, until this current undertaking, much of the trail system was made possible via many satellite policies and planning efforts. This update for the trails planning in the city will provide a comprehensive planning document to reference for developing and maintaining the city’s trail system into the future and takes into consideration both the larger public and private projects more recently underway in the coastal corridor and opportunities to see some of the trails developed along with the Carlsbad Active Transportation Strategies program. Important east/west connections around the city’s major lagoons out to the Pacific Coast and how those are envisioned to come to fruition are also identified in this plan. This plan refines the original trails master plan outlined in the OSCRMP as a backbone for the trail system in the city’s open space areas and how it, can be taken further to provide a truly unique trail destination system once areas in the coastal corridor are fully developed, while at the same time providing “near home” trail use for all residents of the city by providing the full trail system connectivity to the whole community.

1-2

Chapter 1 • Project Introduction

Trails Master Plan

1.5 Document Organization Below is a summary of what each chapter provides as a way to assist in finding general topics relating to the development of the document.

Chapter 1: Introduction (this chapter)

This chapter provides an overview as to why the “Trails Master Plan� is being updated and includes the citywide trails program objectives, and Mission Statement.

Chapter 2: Project Background

Many planning efforts in the past have been responsible for the development of the extensive trail system that currently exists in Carlsbad. A strong foundation has been created in many planning documents. This chapter discusses these efforts and summarizes the goals and policies that are relevant to trails.

Chapter 3: Public Outreach Summary

Public input on this plan included an on-line survey, as well as an on-line mapping tool that was used by the general public to identify locations in Carlsbad that represent concerns or opportunities. A public open-house and workshop was conducted to obtain additional input. This chapter summarizes the key findings from the public outreach conducted for the Trails Master Plan Update.

Chapter 4: Trail Types Defined

This chapter describes six trail types including trail surfaces for them. Explicit details of these trail types, with photo examples and diagrams for them are included in this chapter.

Chapter 5: Analysis of Existing Conditions

One goal of this plan is to provide an equitable distribution of recreational trails throughout the sub-areas of Carlsbad. This chapter looks at the connections between trails, open spaces, park facilities, neighborhoods, businesses and other destinations and identifies connectivity associated with these linkages.

Chapter 6: Future Trail Recommendations

This chapter is the main focus for all future trail development in the city. Recommendations for expanded trail facilities, and construction of open space trails and trails associated with the CATS, are made in this chapter.

Chapter 1 • Project Introduction

1-3

City of Carlsbad

Chapter 7: Trail Standards

The proper layout, materials and construction of trails are paramount in providing a positive trail user experience. Safety, convenience and amenities are discussed in this chapter, along with geometric requirements of width and gradient along with trail amenities (signage, fencing, and seating).

Chapter 8: Trail Maintenance and Operations

Maintenance requirements and standards as well as methods to encourage the volunteer community to assist with maintenance and operations for the trails, is a focus of this chapter.

Chapter 9: Funding Opportunities

Opportunities to leverage private and public funds with grants and other various sources of trail funding are discussed in this chapter.

Appendix A- Public Input

Chapter 4 provided a summary of the public input obtained on this project.

This section provides the documentation of all input received, as well as the categorization of general themes and primary suggestions that the public input identified.

1-4

Chapter 1 • Project Introduction

Chapter 2 Project Background

Trails Master Plan

2

Project Background

The City of Carlsbad has been working for many years to develop and implement a comprehensive trails system. As early as the early 1990s, residents recognized the natural beauty of the many open space areas and the city’s three large lagoon and wetland areas as desirable recreational opportunities. Over the years, several important planning documents consistently provided guidance during growth of the city to ensure that the unique natural resources were protected and yet available for enjoyment by residents and visitors to the Village by the Sea. Several important planning documents that have provided guidance for the trail development are presented below to provide context on how the trails system has developed to date.

2.1 Previous Planning Efforts Trails Feasibility Study Beginning in 1990, a Trails Feasibility Study laid the groundwork for planning trails within the city. The alignments came out of efforts provided by an Open Space Ad Hoc Committee appointed by city council to advise on the development of an open space trail system.

The Open Space and Conservation Resource Management Plan expanded upon the study and provided conceptual trail alignments used to plan the city’s trail network.

Open Space and Conservation Resource Management Plan (OSCRMP) The Open Space and Conservation Resource Management Plan (1992) provided the framework for the city’s trail development to date as the conceptual alignments laid out for the system were utilized as the city was rapidly developing in the 1990’s up to present times. Specific trail links were identified that were conceptual in nature and flexibility allowed fine tuning as private and public opportunities for development occurred.

The plan was intended to protect the open space resources and landscape identity of the City of Carlsbad while allowing for growth opportunities identified in the city’s long-range plans. The plan defined a program for implementation of an integrated open space and trails system incorporating: •

Open space for the preservation of natural resources, such as wetlands and other valuable habitats;

•

Open space for the managed production of resources, such as agricultural lands;

•

Open space for outdoor recreation, including parks and other open space recreation areas;

•

Open space for aesthetic, cultural and educational purposes, including key scenic and cultural resources;

•

Open space for public health and safety, such as floodways; and

•

Open space for the proposed Carlsbad Trail System.

Chapter 2 • Project Background

2-1

City of Carlsbad Citywide Trails Program Report In 2001, the City Council approved the Citywide Trails Program Report which outlined the future vision and immediate steps to be taken to implement what was commonly referred to for the next decade as the Citywide Trails Plan. The report outlined ambitious steps to make available more trails to the public and offered up a new classification of trails aligned with the Circulation Element of the General Plan, and referred to as Circulation Element Trails. The report identified approximately 14 miles of existing recreational trails at the time and approximately 5 miles of circulation element trails more commonly referred to today as Class 1 multi-use trails by transportation standards. The report also outlined next steps for the city to prepare and put in place policies for plan review, Trail IOD acceptance, and maintenance and operations standards.

Citywide Trails 5 Year Implementation Plan (2002) In 2002 as part of ongoing efforts to Implement the Citywide Trails program, a city goal team prepared a 5-year work plan that identified which city trail segments would be accepted (previously privately maintained and used) and built over the next 5 years, both as part of private development and by the city. Funding options and the implementation of a city trail volunteer program were also identified as goals for carrying out the 5 year work plan. In February of 2002 the city council approved funds for the Citywide Trails Program and maintenance be allocated from the General Fund (AB 16,55).

Citywide Trails Maintenance Plan (2002) Objectives • Proper maintenance of citywide trails.

Policies • City will be responsible for signage and markers, fencing, dog waste receptacles, trail amenities and edging materials.

•

City is not responsible for landscape/irrigation off the trail, drainage if part of HOA or private residential area.

2.2 Recent and Current Planning Efforts General Plan - Open Space & Conservation Element (2006) Goals: III.A.1 – A city with open space areas connected by Greenways.

III.A.2 – A city with a Carlsbad Trail System.

Objectives: III.B.1 – To ensure that there is continuity and environmental sensitivity in the routing and design of the trail system.

III.B.2 – To route trails near environmentally sensitive areas only with appropriate buffers or fencing.

III.B.3 – To provide trails that serve as pedestrian and bicycle transportation between residential and commercial areas.

III.B.4 – To develop and implement Financing Mechanisms for the acquisition, construction, and maintenance of the Citywide greenway and trail system.

III.B.5 – To finance, manage, and acquire land for a Carlsbad Trails System.

2-2

Chapter 2 • Project Background

Trails Master Plan

Bikeway Master Plan (2007) Policies: 1.1.2 Coordinate the location of bicycle routes with the Parks and Recreation Element and the Open Space and Conservation Element.

1.1.3 Extend bicycle routes to cultural, educational and recreational facilities.

1.1.5 Improve bicycle access to beach areas.

1.1.7 Encourage passive and active use of the railroad right of way as a trail linkage and bicycle pathway.

1.1.6 Seek funding for bicycle transportation through regional, state and federal funding programs.

1.1.7 Install trail systems within existing and new industrial developments.

Pedestrian Master Plan (2008) Goals: 3.4.1.1 – A city with neighborhoods that have a sense of community where residents, including children, the disabled and the elderly, feel safe and comfortable traveling to daily destinations; where homes and trees line the streets; where central gathering places create focal points; and where recreation areas are provided for a variety of age groups.

Objectives: 3.4.2.1 – To ensure that new development is designed with the focus on residents instead of the automobile by providing: pedestrian-friendly, tree-lined streets; walkways to common destinations such as schools, parks and stores; homes that exhibit visual diversity, pedestrian-scale and prominence to the street; and recreation amenities for a variety of age groups.

3.7.2.1 – To encourage the use of the excess railroad right-of-way for landscaping, parking facilities, recreation areas, trails and similar uses.

Carlsbad General Plan The Carlsbad General Plan update will be adopted in early 2015 by the city. Prior to this, the last comprehensive update was completed in 1994, with an update to the Circulation and Land Use Elements in 2004. The updated Mobility Element changes the typical circulation paradigm to focus on Livable Streets. Whereas the 2004 Circulation Element encouraged alternative transportation within the city under its own set of policies, the updated Mobility Element focuses on multi-modal transportation as a major tenet of the General Plan, with the majority of policies having a multi-modal focus. As such, the dialogue between alternative transportation and automobile travel are intertwined throughout the document. The following three core values are part of the nine core values that relate to this trails master plan: •

Prioritize protection and enhancement of open space and the natural environment. Support and protect Carlsbad’s unique open space and agricultural heritage.

•

Promote active lifestyles and community health by furthering access to trails, parks, beaches and other recreation opportunities.

•

Increase travel options through enhanced walking, bicycling, and public transportation systems. Enhance mobility through increased connectivity and intelligent transportation management.

Chapter 2 • Project Background

2-3

City of Carlsbad

2.3 Important Future Transportation Plans with Trail

Projects

North Coast Corridor Public Works Plan/Transportation and Resource Enhancement Program (PWP/TREP- 2014) Caltrans and SANDAG have prepared the NCC PWP/TREP to function as a single integrated document for comprehensively planning, reviewing, and authorizing the NCC’s transportation, community, and resource enhancement projects within the NCC extending from La Jolla to Oceanside along the North San Diego County coastline. The NCC PWP/TREP creates a framework within which identified projects can be analyzed and implemented over the next 30 to 40 years under a coordinated plan. Altogether, the proposed NCC PWP/TREP is a multi-modal transportation program that would implement a variety of improvements (highway, rail, bicycle, pedestrian) to meet the NCC’s different transit needs. The non-highway improvements would increase capacity within the corridor; however, even collectively, they would not be able to accommodate projected corridor travel growth or avoid improvements to the I-5 corridor that will be critical to maintaining an efficient, uncongested transportation system in the NCC that meets all of the travel demands of residents, commuters, visitors, and goods movement. The suite of projects included in the NCCPWP/TREP represents the mix of infrastructure improvements that would best achieve the transportation goals of the project while avoiding and minimizing impacts to sensitive coastal resources, including wetlands.

Many of the corridor’s existing bicycle paths and pedestrian trails are fragmented due to topographical and infrastructure barriers; however, the proposed bicycle and pedestrian improvements would create or substantially improve many of these necessary connections, including 26 highway over- and under-crossings that would be reconstructed with improved facilities. These pedestrian bridges and enhanced sidewalks/bike lanes would provide safe, non-automobile-dependent routes to and within the Coastal Zone.

North Coast Bike Trail A key component of the NCC PWP/TREP is the proposed North Coast Bike Trail, a new facility that would run the entire 27 mile length of the NCC, roughly parallel to Interstate 5. It would consist of both separated and shared bicycle facilities, located partially in the I-5 right-of-way and partially on adjacent city streets. Caltrans is continuing to work with local jurisdictions to determine the preferred alignment for this shared facility. As part of the highway construction, Caltrans would complete those portions of the bikeway that fall within the I-5 right-of-way, and coordination with local jurisdictions would ensure connectivity to trail segments outside of the highway R.O.W. Coastal Rail Trail The Coastal Rail Trail is a dedicated bicycle facility in the region’s coastal corridor, with most segments in or adjacent to the LOSSAN rail right-of-way. Once fully completed, the Coastal Rail Trail would provide a continuous north-south bicycle route—mostly comprising Class I facilities—through the NCC with direct access to coastal resources and recreational facilities. Caltrans and SANDAG have identified opportunities to complete approximately seven miles of the Coastal Rail Trail within the LOSSAN rail right-of-way as part of the NCC PWP/TREP improvements. These segments also will contribute to the completion of the California Coastal Trail, a planned 1,200-mile public right-of-way spanning the entire California coastline.

2-4

Chapter 2 • Project Background

Trails Master Plan

The Coastal Rail Trail segments planned in the NCC PWP/TREP—all of which are immediately adjacent to the coast—will support the development of the California Coastal Trail in the NCC by providing additional options for non-motorized travel along the coast.

2.4 A Vision for the Future The vision statement is shown on Figure 2-1. The vision was development based on comments received from the public as part of the public outreach process for the Carlsbad Active Transportation Strategies plan and Trails Master Plan.

Taking the Right Steps The Carlsbad Trails Master Plan includes a program vision and supporting goals that are intended to provide guidance for future decisions related to trail development in Carlsbad. The goals are a set of overarching principles that are used to guide decision making. Objectives are specific, measurable steps that can be taken to meet the goal.

Together, goals and objectives can help achieve the vision for the future of the Carlsbad trails system.

Figure 2.1: Steps Needed for Reaching the Public’s Vision

Chapter 2 • Project Background

2-5

City of Carlsbad

2.5 Trail Master Plan Goals As a result of the public workshop and surveys, the project team assembled the following major goals related to the project vision statement. These Include: 1) Create a Connected and Complete Trails System • Complete trail segments that close gaps in the current trails system. It is important to not only connect a localized group of trails, but to connect different subareas in Carlsbad with each other, including the three lagoons, open space, canyons and hillsides.

•

Develop trails that connect different segments together to create loops.

Loops are preferred by trail users and they limit the amount of cut-through trails that can create potential environmental problems. Loop systems will require connectivity via use of sidewalks, roadside trails or bike lane or bike route facilities.

•

Provide a well distributed trail system that serves all sub-areas of Carlsbad with close and convenient access to the centers of residential development, tourist facilities and other activity centers. A well distributed system is not only equitable but it increases the chances of residents walking or biking within the subarea.

2) Accommodate a Variety of Trail Users in a Safe and Environmentally Sensitive Manner • Continue to develop multi-use trails that support a variety of users.

•

Identify areas of conflict between trail use and adjacent land uses or sensitive habitats and provide for design guidelines or other measures to reduce these conflicts.

•

Educate trail users on the importance of trail etiquette, as well as the importance of sensitive habitat in an effort to gain respect for protection of sensitive habitat areas.

3) Identify Existing & Future Trail Development (Refer to Appendix B) • Identify future trail opportunities associated with private development early and continue developing private partnership opportunities to develop citywide trails system.

•

Continue to require major developments to dedicate public trail easements that provide the broader community connectivity for residents, tourists and visitors alike.

•

Consider the direct purchase of important access and trail connections where necessary to provide important trail connections when offers of dedication may not be feasible or granted to maintain the publics access for critical and vital connections of the trails system.

4) Integrate Transportation Related Facilities as Part of the Trails System • Recognize and consider the use of on-road and near-road walking and bike facilities to be part of the trail system as a way to encourage, healthy activity and alternate transportation opportunities that start at the “front door” instead of the “car door”.

2-6

Chapter 2 • Project Background

Chapter 3 Public Outreach Summary

Trails Master Plan

3

Public Outreach Summary

This chapter summarizes the public input that was collected for the City of Carlsbad’s Trails Master Plan (TMP) and Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS) projects. The reviewer should note that some of this input is specific to the CATS project, but has been included here to determine if there are parts of the comments that may also apply to the TMP. This chapter is arranged into four sections; the information contained in each section is described below: 1.

Overview: Provides an overview of the public workshop and online survey, including the format of the meetings and ways that input was provided. Meeting attendance and number of comments shared through online survey are also described.

2.

Focus Areas: Identifies areas and specific locations that were frequently identified during the public workshop and online survey. A summary map of geographic-specific comments is included.

3.

Major Themes: Provides a list of general themes that were identified through the public workshop and online survey. These themes are not related to a specific geographic location, but are general comments that are applicable throughout the city.

4.

Appendices: Documents all the comments collected through the public workshop and online survey.

3.1 Overview

Public input for the City of Carlsbad’s TMP and CATS projects was collected through a comprehensive public engagement process that included a public workshop and online survey. The public workshop was held at the City of Carlsbad’s Faraday Center on February 26, 2014 from 6:00 to 8:00 pm and online survey was conducted from November 27, 2013 to February 28, 2014 through an online survey and interactive map that were available on the City of Carlsbad’s website.

3.2 Public Outreach Purpose and Objectives

The purpose of the public workshop and online survey was to provide information to the public and stakeholders about the CATS and TMP projects, and to solicit feedback and comments to be considered when finalizing and prioritizing recommendations included in both plans. The meetings and online survey provided a forum for the public to share ideas, comments and concerns, and to identify geographic areas where improvements are desired. Specific objectives of the public workshop and online survey included: •

Providing an overview of the purpose, process, outcomes, and next steps for the CATS/TMP projects, including why the CATS and TMP are being coordinated.

•

Working with the public to identify specific locations where physical improvements may be able to improve the safety, conditions, and experience for people who walk, bike, and hike in Carlsbad.

•

Obtaining feedback from the public to help develop and prioritize recommendations for inclusion in the CATS/TMP.

Chapter 3 • Public Outreach Summary

3-1

City of Carlsbad

3.3 Workshop Attendance and Participation A total of 34 people attended the public workshop, 329 partial and completed surveys were collected; and 272 comments were shared on the interactive map. The number of comments collected from each public input strategy is presented below on “Table 3.1: Comments Received”.

Table 3.1: Comments Received Public Input Method

Number of Comments

Public Workshop Map Comments

53

Vision

22

Bike Facility Stars

84

Trail User Stars

101

Trail Type Stars

81

Comment Cards

26

Online Survey Partial Surveys

31

Completed Surveys

301

Online Interactive Maps Walking Map

107

Biking Map

130

Hiking/Trails Map

35

3.4 Public Workshop Format The public workshop utilized an open house format with a presentation integrated into the meeting. The open house included display boards on different topics related to the TMP and CATS projects with maps and other activities designed to collect input from those who attended.

Workshop participants had an opportunity to talk directly to city staff and consultants about the TMP and CATS projects, to view display boards, maps, fact sheets, and additional information. All display boards that were included in the open house are included in Appendix A. The fact sheet for the TMP and CATS projects is included in Appendix A as well.

At the beginning of the open house, the project team gave a presentation followed by a brief question and answer period. Although many people were able to provide comments on the open house boards prior to the presentation and talk with staff, workshop participants were able to participate in the open house process and provide comments following the presentation as well.

There were several ways that the public was able to provide input during the public workshop, including commenting on maps, comment cards, using sticky notes to comment on a vision statement for the TMP and CATS projects, and using colored stars to indicate items or topics the attendee liked.

Notes were solicited to help prioritize suggested ideas for different bicycle and trail facilities and improvements. A record of the comments that were collected during the public workshop is included in Appendix A. In addition, each person who attended the public workshop was given a comment card when they signed in to the meeting. The comment cards provided a way for the public to provide written comments and share ideas related to the TMP and CATS. All the comment cards and written comments that were submitted during the public workshop are included in Appendix A.

3.5 Online Engagement: Survey & Interactive Maps The survey included 15 questions (multiple-choice, rating scale, open ended) related to walking, biking, and trail use in the City of Carlsbad. The survey also included demographic questions. Three interactive maps were also available for the public to provide comments on biking, walking, and hiking/trails in Carlsbad and their specific location within the city. The survey questions are provided in Appendix A, along with the survey results.

3-2

Chapter 3 • Public Outreach Summary

Trails Master Plan

Geographic Area Summary There were several specific areas in the city that received a large number of comments during the public workshop and online survey process. Below is a summary of major inputs based on geographic areas (see Figure 3.2 : Geographic Locations of Notes and Comments). Note the numbers below are keyed with Figure 3.2 to emphasize the geographic concentration of comments. Also to note on this Figure, the higher the number of comments, the darker red areas on the map will be shown.

1

Carlsbad Blvd: Many people shared a vision of Carlsbad Boulevard as a great place for walking, biking, running, pushing a stroller, using a wheelchair, or walking a dog along the entire length of the city’s coastline. However, many people identified existing conflicts between different users on Carlsbad Boulevard that often create unsafe conditions for pedestrians and bicyclists. A large number of the comments addressed improving the segment of Carlsbad Boulevard from Cannon Drive to La Costa Avenue. Other comments included suggestions to extend the seawall and other user facilities such as restrooms and parking.

2

Interstate 5 and Railroad Corridor: Chestnut Street and the Coastal Rail Trail: The freeway and railroad tracks were identified as barriers to accessing the coastal area of the city. There were many suggestions for improved crossings, particularly over the railroad tracks at Chestnut Street. Other suggestions included freeway crossings at Batiquitos Lagoon, Agua Hedionda Lagoon, and Buena Vista Lagoon. Improvements at Palomar Airport Road, Carlsbad Village Drive, and Tamarack Drive were also commonly suggested. There was also support for completing the Coastal Rail Trail throughout the length of the city as a way to travel on a bike or by foot.

3

Lake Calavera: Lake Calavera was identified as an important open space area.

Some comments identified it as a place with valuable recreational opportunities for bikers and hikers, while other comments described it as an important habitat area.

Although different strategies for balancing recreation and conservation were suggested (including trail closures, trail maintenance, fencing, signage, enforcement, and new trails), many of the comments supported both recreation and conservation. Some comments expressed a strong desire to expand mountain biking, including areas to the west and south of Lake Calavera. Another suggestion included the “Waves to Waterfall” trail from the beach eastward along Buena Vista Creek to El Salto Falls.

4

Batiquitos Lagoon, Agua Hedionda Lagoon, and Buena Vista Lagoon: There was strong support for loop trails that create new recreational opportunities and increase access to these valuable open space areas. However, other comments identified the need to protect sensitive habitat. Many noted the safety and beauty of the lagoons as reasons why they are great places for a variety of recreational opportunities. Comments also described how improving crossings under Interstate 5 would enhance recreation at the lagoons.

5

Carlsbad Village: As one of the most popular destinations for walking and biking, Carlsbad Village received a large number of comments about different ways to enhance the safety in the area and make it more enjoyable. Prioritizing parallel streets to Carlsbad Village Drive for bicyclists, such as Grand Avenue and Oak Avenue, was suggested in multiple comments. Improvements to crossings and lighting were also recommended.

Some comments suggested closing part of State Street permanently or temporarily (like the farmers market does now). Improving the crossing over the railroad tracks and under Interstate 5 on Carlsbad Village Drive was also identified as a priority.

Chapter 3 • Public Outreach Summary

3-3

City of Carlsbad

6

La Costa Avenue: People identified the need for increased safety for bicyclists and pedestrians along La Costa Avenue. Recommendations ranged from completing the existing sidewalk system to creating new bike lanes/cycle tracks that separate bicycles and pedestrians from traffic. These comments were suggested along La Costa Avenue from Santa Fe Road west to the coast.

7

El Camino Real: There were a number of comments related to increasing safety for bicyclists and pedestrians along El Camino Real. Comments included recommendations to complete the existing sidewalk system, lower speed limits along El Camino Real, improve the safety for existing bicycle lanes, and install new bicycle lanes that separate bicyclists from cars.

8

Highland Drive: Comments regarding Highland Drive focused on upgrading the sidewalks and bike paths along this segment of road. Several comments recommended completing or upgrading the existing sidewalk system to create safer routes to school. Additional comments suggested creating more bike lanes and increasing the safety for existing lanes.

Major Themes The major themes discussion below provide a list of reoccurring ideas or topics that were identified through the public workshop and online engagement process. Unlike the Focus Areas discussed in the previous section, the major themes can apply to multiple locations throughout the city, broad areas within the city, or general concepts that apply to the whole city.

Focus on Pedestrians- Upgrade sidewalks, intersections and street crossings: A variety of improvements to street intersections, crossings and sidewalks were recommended. Many comments identified a specific location where improvements are needed to improve the safety and experience of walking in neighborhoods, especially to provide safe routes for children to walk to school. Comments included identification of missing segments of sidewalk, crosswalk improvements (e.g., marked crosswalks and flashing lights in high-traffic areas),and traffic calming elements (e.g., speed bumps, stop signs, traffic signals).

Improve safety and experience for bicyclists: A large number of comments identified the need to increase the number of bike facilities (paths, on-street bike lanes, etc.), as well as improve the safety of existing facilities. There were many comments regarding more separation between cars and bicycle lanes to increase safety and decrease conflicts. Several comments addressed the need to educate drivers on the proper etiquette for sharing the road with bicyclists. Additionally, increased signage and warning signs were recommended throughout Carlsbad.

Access to open spaces and balancing recreation and habitat conservation: There were many comments that related to access to open spaces in the city and the sometimes conflicting need to protect habitat. Many comments suggested that the city needs to continue to prioritize the management of the current open spaces and some comments recommended acquisition of land for new open space areas.

3-4

Chapter 3 • Public Outreach Summary

Trails Master Plan Figure 3.2: Geographic Locations of Notes and Comments

4

5

3

8

1

4

2

7

4 6

Chapter 3 • Public Outreach Summary

3-5

City of Carlsbad Connect existing trails and develop new trails: Many comments identified a need to create more connections between existing trails and open spaces throughout the city. Some comments expressed support for accommodating a wider variety of uses in open spaces, such as biking or dog walking. There were also many comments that expressed support for expanding opportunities for mountain biking throughout the city. Other comments suggested the need to manage conflicts between different users such as joggers and bicyclists. Other recommendations included adding different types of on-street facilities and different trail types such as nature trails.

Physical and service improvement for trails: There were a variety of service improvements suggested for the existing trail system to create a safer and more convenient trail system. Comments identified the need for amenities including trash cans, pet waste receptacles, and bathroom facilities. Other comments identified the need to make trails safer through elements such as increased lighting or increasing enforcement (rangers).

Support for improvements that have already been completed: Many comments expressed approval for the existing walking and biking facilities in Carlsbad and acknowledged the city’s efforts for creating a walkable and bikeable community.

According to the comments, these improvements have helped to create safe and efficient walking paths throughout the city that allows residents to get around to various locations throughout the city. Other comments expressed concern about the application of sharrows.

3-6

Chapter 3 • Public Outreach Summary

Trails Master Plan

3.6 Summarized Results of the Survey The format and questions of the survey are shown on the following pages (see “Table 3.2: Online Survey Results”.

The summarized results of this survey are provided next to the survey form.

Below are key findings from the survey, with some categories combined for simplification.

Question 1 – Recreation and Exercise Activities

Table 3.2: Online Survey Results 1

1. 62% of people said that they walk for fun or for exercise daily (29%) or several days a week (33%). It is also the most popular daily activity.

Another 23% said they do it at least once a week.

2. Other activities that people do frequently (daily, several times a week, and weekly combined) include: hiking or going for nature walks 58%, bike riding (52%), and running or jogging (46%).

Question 2 – Walking for Transportation 1. 35.7% of people said that they regularly walk for transportation (at least weekly).

2

2. In total, 57.5% of people said that they do walk for transportation at least seasonally; 41.9% of people do not at all.

Question 3 – Reasons for Not Walking for Transportation 1. 69.7% of people said that it is “too far to walk where I want.”

3

2. 25.6% of people said that they “feel unsafe based on the speed of nearby cars.”

3. Feeling unsafe because of darkness (12.8%), feeling unsafe when crossing the street (10.2%), and there are no sidewalks to where I want to walk (15.8%) were also common responses.

Question 4 – Biking for Transportation 1. 33.2% of people said that they regularly bike for transportation (at least weekly).

2. In total, 51.4% of people said that they do bike for transportation (at least seasonally); 46.8% of people do not at all.

Chapter 3 • Public Outreach Summary

4

3-7

City of Carlsbad 5

Question 5 – Reasons for Not Biking for Transportation 1. 53.7% of people said that they “feel unsafe based on the speed or number of cars.”

2. 38.6% of people said that they do not ride a bike for transportation because of “missing bike trail, path, or route between the places I want to ride.”

3. 26.6% said that the “hills are too steep for me to ride.”

6

4. “Too far to ride where I need to go” (17.0%) and “I do not own a bike” (16%) were also common responses.

Question 6 – Opinion on Services and Facilities Offered 1. 63% of people said they were satisfied (very or somewhat) with trails in natural areas; 17% said that they were not satisfied (very or somewhat).

2. 60% of people said they were satisfied (very or somewhat) with trails in developed parks; 12% said that they were not satisfied (very or somewhat).

7

3. 41% of people said there were not satisfied (very or somewhat) with safe biking routes to school, transit, or work; 23% of people said they were satisfied (very or somewhat).

Question 7 – Live in Carlsbad 1. 12.1% of respondents do not live in Carlsbad; 2. 33.7% of respondents live in Northwest Carlsbad.

Question 8 – Zip Code Where you Live Question 9 – Work in Carlsbad

8

1. 41% of respondents do not work in Carlsbad; 2. 24.3% of respondents work in Northwest Carlsbad.

9

Question 10 – Use of Transportation Options 1. 56% regularly (5 days a week or almost every day) drive to work alone.

2. For discretionary trips (to non-work or nonschool locations), 21% regularly walk and 14% regularly ride a bike (5 days a week or almost every day); 44% irregularly walk and 40% irregularly ride a bike (at least once a week or at least once a month).

3. 20% irregularly ride the coaster, Amtrak, or sprinter (at least once a week or at least once a month).

4. 9% regularly (5 days a week or almost every

3-8

Chapter 3 • Public Outreach Summary

Trails Master Plan

day) ride a bike to work; 17% irregularly ride a bike to work (at least once a week or at least once a month).

10

Question 11 – Prioritizing Transportation Improvements 1. 42% of people responded that they thought it was most important that the city should add more pathways that are separated from cars. This was also the improvement with the ranking score that showed it has the most support.

2. There was also support for adding more on-street bike paths, lanes, or routes, and adding more sidewalks and crosswalks to improve walking.

11

Question 12 – Prioritizing Recreation Improvements (Order of Ranked Score):

1. The city should add more trails in parks and open space areas (22.5).

2. More near-street walkways for recreational users are needed (3.1).

3. More on-street bike lanes, routes, and paths are needed (2.9).

4. More trails where I can hike or run without fear of high-speed cyclists (3.4).

5. More mountain biking options on existing and future trails are needed (3.6).

12

6. More equestrian trails and supporting facilities are needed (5.4) Question 13 – Gender 1. 45.4% Male 2. 42.2% Female (remainder did not respond) Question 14 – Age 1. 24 or less = <2% 2. 25-34 = 7.2% 3. 35-44 = 22.1% 4. 45-54 = 24.9% 5. 55-64 = 23.4%

13

6. 65+ = 9.7%

14

Chapter 3 • Public Outreach Summary

3-9

City of Carlsbad Figure 3.3: Note Summary of Comments

3-10

Chapter 3 â&#x20AC;˘ Public Outreach Summary

Chapter 4 Trail Typology

Trails Master Plan

4

Trail Typology

This chapter summarizes the recommended trail classification system for the City of Carlsbad. Typology typically refers to the type of use of the trail and the associate type of trail surface material. Trail design guidelines found in subsequent chapters are organized around the trail types. The trail types are also let trail users know what they should expect in terms of width, trail surface, steepness, firmness of the surface and amenities that will all affect the trail users experience.

4.1 Trail Types Carlsbad’s trail types were developed specifically to address local conditions. An overview of the proposed trail types can be found on “Table 4.1: Summary of Trail Types and Application of General Standards”. The development of the trail design criteria was intended to enhance public welfare, improve safety, minimize maintenance and avoid environmental impacts. The standards define maximum width, the range of surface types and overall grades for open space trails (Types 1, 2 and 3) and for transportation based trails (Types 4, 5 & 6). The widths are developed to accommodate a range of users, with wider trails required for areas with multiple user types and high volumes of users.

Carlsbad trails range from very natural and challenging such as this Type 1: Nature Trail shown above, to very urban and improved as shown below with this Type 6: Multi-use Path

Chapter 4 • Trail Typology

4-1

City of Carlsbad Table 4.1: Summary of Trail Types and Application of General Standards

✔

✔

Open Space and Wide Dirt Nature, Exercise, Natural Areas, Trail or 3 Utility Dog Walking and Typically on Utility Access Utility Access Roadbed Roads

8'

10'

14' 20.0% 8.3% 5.0%

?**

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

?**

✔

✔

✔

✔

RECREATION TRAIL TYPES (SOFT OR FIRM SURFACE TRAILS IN OPEN SPACE) Nature Trail

1

✔

?*

Equestrian

14.0% 5.0% 5.0%

Hiker / Nature Walker

8'

Jogger / Runner

6'

Social / Exercise / Dog Walker

4'

✔

Stroller / Kids Push Bikes

Nature, Adventure, Recreation Open Space and Exercise, Dog 2 al Trail Parks Walking and Social Interaction

Mountain / BMX Bike

25.0% 8.3% 5.0%

Hybrid/Cruiser/Recreation Bike

4'

Roadbike (high press. thin tired)

4'

Maximum Cross-slope

2'

Ideal Slope

Nature Appreciation, Open Space and Birding, Adventure, Fresh Natural Areas Air, Low Impact Exercise

Maximum Slope*

Location General (Open Activities Space or Trail Type Supported Roadway)

Wheelchair*

Trail Users Supported

Maximum Width

Slope

Ideal for Trail User Experience

Width

Minimum Width

TRAIL OR ROUTE TYPE #

General Descriptions

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION / REC. TRAILS (FIRM OR HARD SURFACE MOSTLY NEAR ROADS) Park Circulation, Separated from Roadside Roadways Exercise, or 4 Connector Transportation taking the place Connector, Social of Concrete Trails Interaction Sidewalks

5'

8'

12'

Follows road 5.0% 2.0% slope

Connector Exercise and Sidewalks Transportation Connecting 5 or Special Street Trailheads and Crossings Parks

Attached to Roadways as Sidewalks or Across Intersections

4'

6'

8'

Follows road 5.0% 5.0% slope

Paved Exercise, Multiple Multi-use Mixed Modes, Trail (Class Social Interaction 6 1: all Nonand motorized Transportation Users)

Near Roadways taking the place of Concrete Sidewalks or Through Parks and Open Space

8'

14'

16'

8.3% 5.0% 2.0%

✔

✔

* Wherever feasible, new trail construction will comply with the ADA Outdoor Accessibility Guidelines per AASHTO

4-2

✔

✔

✔

?*

✔

✔

✔

✔

?*

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

** Compatibility with user type will depend on skill level and tire type

Chapter 4 • Trail Typology

Trails Master Plan Type 1: Nature Trail Typically these are located in natural open space, are two to four feet wide and surfaced with local naturally occurring materials, usually a mix of soil and fine to coarsely broken rock (see “Figure 4.1 “Type 1” Nature Trail Diagram and Sample Images”). In order to limit impacts of Type 1 trails, the widths and horizontal and vertical changes can be more abrupt. By providing flexibility in layout, sensitive or protected habitat can be avoided or impacted to the least degree possible and the relationship of the trail to nature can be better integrated. However, this flexibility also results in less access to those with limited physical endurance and would not likely be considered ADA accessible due to vertical slope and trail surfaces. Federal and State ADA guidelines only allow for a trail route to exceed minimum standards if compliance would be too damaging to cultural, historic or natural resources. Note that many of the design factors applicable to Type 1 trails are also applicable to Type 2 trails.

Figure 4.1 “Type 1” Nature Trail Diagram and Sample Images

Chapter 4 • Trail Typology

4-3

City of Carlsbad Type 2: Recreation Trail This trail type is similar to Type 1 trails, but are four to eight feet wide and are generally graded to meet ADA standards (see “Figure 4.2: “Type 2” Recreation Trail Diagram and Sample Images”). A Type 2 trail is often, though not always, constructed to the width, vertical slope and surface treatment standards to meet accessibility requirements.

These multi-use trails accommodate a broader range of user skills and trail users. Type 2 trails can be used by mountain bikes but most road bikes would not consider using them because of the dirt and dust and potential paint chipping that can occur from small rocks that are often dislodged by higher pressure tires. However, Type 2 trails will typically adhere to grades and levels of compaction, making them usable for recreation bikes. The majority of recreational walkers and bikers, and persons with a wide range of physical abilities are going to prefer Type 2 trails.

Figure 4.2: “Type 2” Recreation Trail Diagram and Sample Images

4-4

Chapter 4 • Trail Typology

Trails Master Plan

Type 3: Wide Dirt Trails or Utility Roadbeds These trails are generally unpaved roads at the periphery of open spaces, usually with a surface of imported or locally sourced crushed rock (see “Figure 4.3: “Type 3” Wide Dirt Trails or Utility Roadbed Diagram and Sample Images”).

These utility easements or maintenance access roads are often used as trails. They vary greatly in width from 8 feet to 14 feet. Sometimes these roads also serve as a firebreak when located in native canopy hillsides, valleys or canyons. They are often steep with wide radius turns. They do not meet ADA standard due to steepness or surface treatments. They are not likely to include amenities since they are joint use access roads, subservient to the primary utility access function and requirements. The loose nature of gravel surfaces makes these trail types less desirable for strollers or medium to thin tired bikes.

Figure 4.3: “Type 3” Wide Dirt Trails or Utility Roadbed Diagram and Sample Images

Chapter 4 • Trail Typology

4-5

City of Carlsbad Type 4: Roadside or Connector Trails To be called a Type 4 Roadside or Connector Trail (see “Figure 4.4: “Type 4” Roadside or Connector Trail Sample Images”), it must provide a trail like experience, even if it is along a roadway. A regular sidewalk against the edge of the road is not a trail experience and would be a Type 5 Connector Sidewalk or Crosswalk. A Type 4 trail is typically stabilized decomposed granite with a width between 5 feet and 10 feet and separated from the vehicle traffic by at least a 5’ buffer. Connectivity to open space is desirable and assumed for this definition. In some cases they may be concrete or asphalt walkways. In other cases these trails may be connections through parks or on the beach.

Figure 4.4: “Type 4” Roadside or Connector Trail Sample Images

4-6

Chapter 4 • Trail Typology

Trails Master Plan

Type 5: Connector Sidewalks or Special Street Crossings This connector type is a walkway or trail not in open space but along roadways. A walkway that is away from the road, under this study, would be classified as a either a Type 4 Connector Trail or a Type 6 Class 1 Multi-use Path. But a roadway edge sidewalk that is paved with little or no buffer is considered to be a Type 5 Connector Sidewalk (see “Figure 4.5: “Type 5” Connector Sidewalks or Special Street Crossings Sample Images”). This category also includes mid-block crossings (signalized or non-signalized) and regular intersection crosswalks if they are used to access trails.

Based on the definition in this plan, a connector sidewalk needs to connect an existing open space trail (Type 1, 2, or 3) or another circulation based trail (Type 4 or 6). Most of the sidewalks that fall under this category already exist and are being included to show how the other trail types can be connected via the sidewalk system. This trail type does not provide a trail experience. Trail Type 4 provides a better near roadway trail experience. However, the ability to have all trails connected with Type 4 facilities is not realistic given the current investment in existing walkways and the prohibitive cost of converting to Type 4 Roadside Trails. Therefore, existing sidewalks should continue to be used to connect other trail systems. They should be listed on trail maps so the trail user can find a way to access the trail without needing to park at a trailhead and they should include route markings (signs, stencils or on-ground markers).

Figure 4.5: “Type 5” Connector Sidewalks or Special Street Crossings Sample Images

Chapter 4 • Trail Typology

4-7

City of Carlsbad Type 6: Paved Multi-use Trails (Class I) These trails are always firm surface trails or paths paved with asphalt, and occasionally concrete (see “Figure 4.6: “Type 6” Paved Multi-use Trail Diagram and Sample Images”). Type 6 trails are off the roadway and range from 8 feet to 16 feet wide; essentially broad trails with exclusive right-of-way for bicycles, pedestrians and other non-motorized users. These trails are often found in parks, along river and beachfronts, and in greenbelts or utility corridors where right-of-way exists and virtually no motorized vehicles to be concerned with. This condition allows for fewer trail user conflicts and higher trail use where there may be desirable features or activities that warrant higher volumes of trail use. These types of trails are the most desirable trail types expressed by citizens for areas where there is a strong desire for recreational and transportation alternatives, such as the Coastal Rail Trail overlooking or along the lagoons, the beaches, the flower fields or other destinations to major activities.

The AASHTO Guide’s “shared-use path” is synonymous with a Type 6 trail. A Caltrans Class 1 Multi-use Path is also synonymous with a Type 6 trail. For most Type 6 trails, cyclists are likely the primary user group and often include tandem, recumbent and hand-powered three-wheelers. These trails can be effective transportation corridors if they provide few roadway crossings and have effectively handled the crossing of streets that contain motor vehicles. However, if they include multiple stop signs across tightly spaced block layouts, then progress along them may slower than on adjacent parallel streets. For the experienced cyclist wanting to get from point “A” to point “B” as quickly as possible, adjacent streets may be preferred, especially if the trail includes a high percentage of walkers and family groups. The inexperienced cyclist, on the other hand, greatly prefers this type of trail system since it offers all the benefits of a paved roadway surface without the stress associated with motor vehicles passing nearby.

Figure 4.6: “Type 6” Paved Multi-use Trail Diagram and Sample Images

4-8

Chapter 4 • Trail Typology

Trails Master Plan

4.2 Carlsbad’s Existing Trail System Most of the trails developed in Carlsbad that are in open space areas of the city fall into the Type 2 category of multi-use recreational trails (see Table 4.2: Summary of Existing Trails by Type). They have been constructed using highly compacted decomposed granite surfaces and are typically 8-10’ wide. There are also a large number of Roadside and Connector Trails (Type 4) and Connector Sidewalks (Type 5) composed of concrete, asphalt or compacted and stabilized decomposed granite.

These trails were built as part of adjacent developments to design standards that have been in place for many years and align with many of the design guidelines outlined in the 1992 OSCRMP. Table 4.2: Summary of Existing Trails by Type Type 1 trails tend to be in areas of steeper terrain and, in MILES OF OPEN SPACE (UNPAVED) RECREATIONAL TRAILS many instances, were not related to developments or conExisting % of Total structed to any standard. Many of these trails were simply created as a foot worn path, old agricultural road, or Nature Trail 18.1 17.3% mountain biking trails, with minor trail construction efforts 1 or surface improvements. The experience on these trails is a bit more interesting and closer to the natural resources of the trailside setting. These nature trails tend to have more varied grades, high variability in widths, and often 40.4 38.6% 2 Recreation Trail have tighter curves and less fencing or railing.

The distribution of trails tend to follow the steeper areas of Carlsbad where development is more difficult, or near canyons, riparian zones or around the lagoons. The newer developed areas of the city tend to have a greater extent of trails, with the older gridded portion of Carlsbad Village having very few open space areas or trail systems. Certain areas, such as the northeast corner of the Lake Calavera Preserve or the southwest corner of the Rancho La Costa Preserve, have a high concentration of Type 1 and Type 2 trails with a complex criss-cross pattern of trails, indicating a heavy use by mountain bike riders.

4.3 Trail Amenities

3

Wide Dirt Trail or Utility Roadbed Total Miles of Open Space Trails

22.6

21.5%

81.1

77.4%

MILES OF CIRCULATION (MOSTLY PAVED) TRAILS

4

Roadside or Connector Trails

Connector

Existing

% of Total

11.8

11.3%

Since this trail type is not a

Sidewalks or complete trail experience, it Most of the existing trails in the city include trailheads 5 is not counted in the total Special Street with kiosks, signs, trash receptacles, pet stations, entry trail miles below Crossings signs and regulatory signs. Only a few have benches, viewing points or overhead shade structures. Some of Multi-use Paved the more developed trails include off-street parking lots Path or Trail 11.8 11.3% 6 or parklets adjacent to trailheads that are part of a private (Class 1) HOA. Some of the trailheads rely on adjacent street parking, and most of the major streets that have roadside trails 23.7 22.6% Total Circulation Trails (Excluding Type 5) have on-street parking restrictions making access to some of these trails (by those living outside of the adjacent com- GRAND TOTAL MILES OF EXISTING TRAILS IN CARLSBAD 104.8 munity) an inconvenience. Most of the open space trail systems do not have public drinking fountains or restroom facilities such as the Lake Calavera Preserve and the Rancho La Costa Preserve. Some have port-a-pottys such as Hosp Grove.

Chapter 4 • Trail Typology

4-9

City of Carlsbad Figure 4.7: All Existing Open Space Recreation Trail Types (1,2 & 3)

4-10

Chapter 4 â&#x20AC;˘ Trail Typology

Trails Master Plan Figure 4.8: All Existing Circulation Trail Types (4, 5 & 6)

Chapter 4 â&#x20AC;˘ Trail Typology

4-11

City of Carlsbad Figure 4.9: Composite of Existing Trail System

4-12

Chapter 4 â&#x20AC;˘ Trail Typology

Trails Master Plan

5

Analysis of Existing Conditions

The existing context and conditions of Carlsbad need to be considered and analyzed to assist in making decisions on where future trails and CATS related infrastructure can provide for a fully integrated trail system.

5.1 Land Uses Existing land uses often set the pattern of mobility around a city as well as the preferred methods for mobility. A well integrated community that has a mix of housing, retail, schools and businesses will generally have lower overall number of daily vehicular trips and vehicle miles traveled. Mixed use communities have a higher number of non-vehicular trips taken by walking and bike. For areas where a large number of parcels are all the same type of land use, some daily activities require driving to destinations that may be a great distance away. Carlsbad has both of these conditions.

The Carlsbad Village area contains a good mixture of land uses within close proximity of each other. However, many of the other development patterns in Carlsbad are single land uses covering large areas, segregated from locations of employment and retail. The existing land uses are shown in “Figure 5.1: Existing and Future Land Uses”.

Future development opportunities are scattered throughout Carlsbad, with a concentration of newer development in the north associated with Bressi Ranch, Robertson Ranch, Quarry Creek and Sunny Creek. The future land use map (see “Figure 5.1: Existing and Future Land Uses”) shows the locations of potential roadway extensions needed to support the proposed land uses. Note that the extension of Cannon Road to the east boundary of the city is no longer being supported.

5.2 Existing Pedestrian Systems There is a link between the existing pedestrian system and the trail system. Much of the trail connectivity for walking, hiking or biking, also incorporates many miles of city sidewalks or roadside trails. The CATS program will be making further recommendations on how to expand the existing roadside based pedestrian system.

This Trails Master Plan will identify the roadside assets that should be more clearly defined for trail purposes and how open space trails may provide for needed bike or pedestrian linkages that would benefit transportation needs.

Chapter 5 • Analysis of Existing Conditions

5-1

City of Carlsbad Figure 5.1: Existing and Future Land Uses

R-4

LN

0.5

Right of Way

1

R-23

L

P

LE

BA

P

R-8 R-8

OS

R R-4

L

R-8

CH

O

P R-4

P

OS

R-4

R-4

R-23

R-4

R-15 R-8

City L

R-4

OS

Review

P OS

OS

R-1.5

OS

P

LN

Source: City of Carlsbad, 2013; SANDAG, 2013; Dyett & Bhatia, 2013.

Airport Influence Area 2-15

5.3 Existing and Proposed Bike System Review Area 2

500 ACRES

100 ACRES

P

C

OS R-1.5

The CATS project is focusing on where improvements to the circulation system could be made to improve active transportation in Carlsbad, with a primary focus on bike and pedestrian facilities. The distances between land uses in most areas of Carlsbad (except for the Carlsbad Village area) are too great to have a major shift to pedestrian modes for primary circulation trips to work or for retail access because it takes longer than 15 minutes to walk. However, the distances for bike travel 2-15 are not that great to overcome. In addition, the Type 4, 5 and Type 6 trails, especially as proposed in this Trails Master Plan, have the potential to function as circulation routes as well. Parts of the proposed trail system may in fact offer short cuts through open space that will connect circulation trips better between origins and destinations. The existing and proposed bike facility system is shown on “Figure 5.2: Existing and Future Bike Facilities”.

0

0.5

1

2

Miles

OS

Source: City of Carlsbad, 2013; SANDAG, 2013; Dyett & Bhatia, 2013.

5-2

Review

R-4

Miles

OS

City Limits

Airport Influen

OS

OS

L

Right

R-1.5

ST R-4

R-8

ACERVO

P

ELONA RC

FE R D

R-4

R-15 R-8

EN CI A

L

N TA

OS

Lagoo

R-8 R-1.5

CA M R-15

OS

C AL

D

R-15

A AV OST AC

R-4

R-8

P

C

R-15

R-23

R-8

R-15

R-4

R-4

R-23 R-15

VC

GC

ENCINITAS

2

R-8

Railro R-15

SA

L P

Planne

R-4

OS

OS

R-23

AVE

CF

C ALL E

FE R D

N TA

ACERVO C ALL E

SA

N

RA

VC

Major

P

R-4

R-1.5

N

T E RD

ALICAN

R-4 R-15

OS

Highw R-15

R-4

E O NIP R JU

0

R-1.5

Review Area 1

R-4

R-4

R-8

Coast

R-8

R-4

Lago o n

R-1.5 R-4

R-1.5

TC Tr R-8

R-8

P

R-4

OS

OS

Lagoons

A

A

P Railroad

DR

100 ACRES

SE

Planned Street

LRO

R-4 OS

OS

OS

OS

R-4

500 ACRES

ME

R-23

15 R-8

OS

OS

P

E O NIP R JU

R-4 R-4

S

R-4

R-4 R-1.5

ST

CA M

R-8

P

Review Area 2

A LG

R-8

RD

E

EN CI A

O

R-8

AL

A

D

CH

L

Review Area 1

R-4

ST

R-4

R-4

OS O

R-15

R-8

R-15 R-8 R-15

R

R-4 R-15 P R-4 R-8 P R-1.5

R-4 Major Street

R-15 R-8 OS

P

R-4

C O STA

R-4

CF

OS

CF Co

R-4

GC

RN R

OS

R-8

R-4

R-23

City Limits

Airport Influence Area

E RTH

P

R-8

Corridor

CoastalR-4ZoneOS Highways

L L

R-8

R-15 L

P Publ

R-4

LN

IA

O Offi

R-23

R-15

City of Encinitas

O NO

B

ONA CF CEL AR

Right of Way

R-1.5

E O NIP R JU

LE

E

P

C AL

P

P R-8

R-8

S

OS

OS OpenR-1.5 Space CA M

R-8

R-15

R-4

OS

R-15

R-4

Lagoons

R-8

T TC STransportation

R-15

LA

R-15 CF Community Facilities

EN CI A

A STA V CO

R-23

LA

ET T

R-4

R-4

R-8

R-8

S O IN

E

R-4

VC R-8

U ITO S DR R-4

OS

P

R-8

R-4

P

R-15

P

RE

R

R-23

R-4

B a tiquitos

OS

A

R-8

DIEG

ED

R-15 R-23 R-15 R-8 R-8 4 R-8

R-8

.5

D

R-4

R-8 R-4

PI/O P City of San Marcos

R-4

R-4 P R-4

PI Plan

R-8

CF

R-4

OS

R-4

Railroad

P

C

R-15

P

L CF R-15

RT

R-4

AV IAR

SAN

R-8

OS

R-8 R-8

R Reg R-30

PI

RD

T

R-23

Planned Street

R-4

A

OS ELR

R-4 R-4

R-4

Major Street

P Public

R-1.5

R-15 GC R-30

R-8

R-4

R-8

R-4

IA ETT

R-8 L

VC

Highways

CF

NS

R-15/VC

Coastal Zone

P

O Office

I PO R-8

GC

R-8 R Regional Commercial

R-4 R-15 PI/O Planned Industrial/Office

R-4

OS

R-15

OS Open Space

R-8

R-8

R-8 O R-15 R-8 R-8 R-23 R-15 R-23 R-23 OS

MIN O CA

R-23

R-4

O

LE ROB CF

VIDA C A M INO

OS

R-23

R-8

EL

City of R-1.5 San Marcos R-8 R-4

VC Visitor Commercial

PIR-8Planned Industrial

R-1.5 P R-4

R-8

VC

VC

DR

R-8

RD LG A

R-15

R-4

CF Community Facilities

SE

RT

ST

R-8

R-4

GC General Commercial

Transportation Corridor VC/OS Visitor Commercial/Open TC Space

A

OS

P Public

R-8

R-15

R-4

OS

R-8

GC

PI

R-30

TI Q BA

LRO

UE

E

R-30

R-4

CF

R-4

L Local Shopping Center

R-23

ME

INS

O Office

R-4

EL F

PO

R-23 R-1.5

PI

PI

R-4

R-4

GC

BLVD AD

R-4 P R-4

PI/O Planned Industrial/Office

V VillageCity of R-4

R-15

IA L N SAN MARCOS ET T

R-30 Residential 23-30 du/ac San Marcos

R-8

R-4

P

MCCLELLAN -PALOMAR AIRPORT

P

O

P

AIRPO R

R PALO M A

Y KW

R-4

CF

R-4

P R-23

VC/O

UE

R-8

PI Planned Industrial

LSB CAR OS

R-4

R-23 Residential 15-23 du/ac

VC Vis

City of Vista OS

PI/O

RD

VC

R-30

O PI

R-30 PI

P

PI

R-8

PI/O

R-15

R-23

O R-30 R-4

P Space VC/OS Visitor Commercial/Open R-30 R-15/VC Residential 8-15 du/ac/Visitor Comm.

R Regional Commercial

PI

R-23

R-8 VC

OS

RD

PI L CF R-15

OS

VC Visitor Commercial

R-15 Residential 8-15 du/ac

OS

R-8

GC General Commercial

PORT

O

EL F

City of Vista

AI R

PALOM A R

P R OS GC O R-8 O GC P O

PI Center

R-15

O PI

VC

L Local Shopping

SAN MARCOS R-8 Residential 4-8 du/ac

PI

R-4

V Village

R-4 Residential 0-4 du/ac

OS

VC

VC du/ac VC R-30 Residential 23-30

GC G SAN MARCOS

PI

OS OS

VC

R

L Loca

OS R-4

R-8

A

OS

P PI/O

PI

R-23 Residential 15-23 du/ac

R-1.5 Residential 0-1.5 du/ac

PI

R

R-4 R-23

O

PI R-15/VC Residential 8-15 du/ac/Visitor Comm.

OS

GENERAL PLANUse Map Figure 2-1: Land Land Use Plan Maerkle Reservoir78

Y

PI

Residential 4-8 du/ac

R ER-23 AL L

R-1.5

RA

RD

R-15 R-4 Residential 8-15 du/ac

Figure 2-1

LO M AR AIRPO RT

N

D

R-8 R-4

O c e a n

R-30 PI

ANNO

VC

R-4 Residential 0-4 du/ac

R-15 R-15

R-4

DA

BLV

R-1.5 Residential 0-1.5 C du/ac

O

V Villa

Maerkle Reservoir

R-4 R-1.5

R-4

R-4

FA

D

78

y of anside

VC

R-4

MI N

R-8

R-15

R-30 R

R-8

RA

BA

P

OS

R-8

R-23 R

R-4

T E RD

RLS

Land Use Plan VC/OS

N NO AN

R-15

L agoo n

EL R-8 CA

R-15/V

R-30 R-4 R-15

R-15 R-23 R-30

R

R-15 R

P

ALICAN

CA

Ag u a

P

P

R-8

R-23 L CF

R-4

R-8

GENERAL PLAN HUse ed ionMap da Figure 2-1: Land

P a c i fi c

R-8 GC R-15

P

R-23 VC

E

AV

R

OS

OS

OS

OS

ED

R-15

Figure 2-1

R-8

R-4 H ILLSID

OS

M T A R-4 CF

P VC R-23 R-15 R-15 R-4 R-4 R-8 VC R-23 R-15 VC R-8

R-8

R-4

AC

R-4

AMBRO SIA

AR

City of Oceanside

E

M TAL

P

VE KA

R-8 R

OS

D

VC

R-30

P

BLV

R-15 R-23

P

R-4 R

R-4 R-23

E EG

R-23

R-8

LL CO

O VC

OS

R-8

OS P

R-4

L

GC

V TA NU ES T CH R-4

P

R-8

P

R EA

-23 15 R R-

VC

OS

R-15

R-4

R-1.5

Calavera Lake

R-4

R-8 R-4

78

R-8

OS

INO

P

R-4 P

R-4

P

OS

DV BA

Land Use P

R-4

R-4

D

S

L O AR R-8 R-15 VC P C O O GC V R-8 O R-30 OS

R-15

R-4

GENERAL Figure 2-1:

R-23 CF

CF R-15

ACK

AG E

R-4

OS

C AM

R-4 R-23 R-15

R-1.5

R-8

R-8 O R-4 R R-15 PD

R-8

R-4

P

O

L

RD

EL

R-15

OS

IL L

OS

Buena Vista Lagoon OS

RO M AR N

R-4

R-23

R-4

AR

Oceanside

Figure 2-1

R-8 R

V

78

R

C

OCEANSIDE City of

Chapter 5 • Analysis of Existing Conditions

0

Source: City of Ca

Trails Master Plan

5.4 Existing Park and Open Space System

Under this plan, trail connections are focused on parks, open space and the beaches of Carlsbad. The Carlsbad park system includes a wide range of community and neighborhood parks, well distributed throughout the developed areas of the city (see “Figure 5.3: Existing Park and Open Space System”) . These parks include varying levels of active and passive facilities. A fairly significant number of the smaller parks are Home Owner Association (HOA) based parks reserved for the local residents of the development and fully maintained by the HOA. Many of these smaller parks are near trail heads of the existing trail system (see “Figure 5.4: Major Trailheads, Origins and Destinations of Recreational Interest”).

Open space is equally well distributed throughout the city, with hills to the east, canyons leading to the beaches on the west, and lagoons reaching a significant distance inland. These open spaces were preserved for a variety of reasons, including habitat preserves and open space access through trails. Access to open space and trails continues to be a high priority to Carlsbad residents as demonstrated in annual citizen surveys, so this feature of the city and this land use is an important lifestyle issue for residents (see ”Figure 5.3: Existing Park and Open Space System”). The major trailheads and other recreation based destinations are shown on (see “Figure 5.4: Major Trailheads, Origins and Destinations of Recreational Interest”).

5.5 Origins and Destinations

Future development of the trails in Carlsbad examines the origins, destinations and the desired connections between neighborhoods, beaches, lagoons, schools, parks and other activity centers. Origins are generally defined for trails and pedestrian analysis as where people live and lodge (campgrounds and hotels). Destinations are places where people visit, such as work, school, shopping, parks restaurants, and in particular to Carlsbad’s major activity centers, such as major shopping outlets, lagoons, nature preserves, Legoland, Flower Fields, Palomar Airport, and seven miles of beaches. Connections are the roadways, bike facilities, sidewalks and trails that get people from the origin to the destination and vice versa.

5.6 Existing Public Property Ownership

Closely related to public open space, publicly owned lands are generally available for public access, unless the access would be dangerous to the users, would interrupt operations, or would cause major impacts to sensitive areas, habitats, or resources.

5.7 Existing Private Property Ownership

Although a significant portion of Carlsbad is maintained as public parkland and open space systems, the remaining portion is privately owned and either currently developed or likely to be developed in the future. Normally, most privately held land would be considered inaccessible or unobtainable when considering a trail system. However, for larger parcels with development proposal, adopting preliminary trail alignments is common and allowed under the Subdivision Map Act of California. If a trail has been identified in an adopted plan, then the local municipality can require the dedication of an easement and the construction of the project as part of the approval process. For the purposes of this plan, all properties where a trail easement has been negotiated or has been discussed represents an opportunity for a future trail. For smaller parcels already developed, the alignment of a trail system would be challenging and should normally be avoided. In some of these cases, an access easement, utility easement or developed or undeveloped right-of-way may be possible.

Chapter 5 • Analysis of Existing Conditions

5-3

City of Carlsbad

5.8 Existing Vegetation Communities

One of the typical goals of a trail is to provide access to rich and diverse natural open spaces, including lagoons, bluffs, hillsides and riparian corridors. However, having the trail too close to these areas can also create some unacceptable levels of disturbance. The methodology table classifies certain types of vegetation communities and habitats that are typically more sensitive to adjacent uses than others.

During the design, engineering and environmental phase, trails can be adjusted to avoid or lessen environmental impacts. Locating a trail through sensitive protected habitat areas should be avoided. For the purposes of this document, the general vegetation cover for Carlsbad, has been used to identify areas with likely high challenges for new trail development or areas of opportunities based on levels of disturbance and the extent of non-native vegetation patterns.

5.9 Existing Topography Existing topography plays a major role in siting trails that will be sustainable. Onroad facilities typically should be held at maximum slopes of under 10% and walkways under 8%. However, trails, by their very nature, often strive to access hilltops and across slopes. So although a slope may be steep, the trail design determines the actual longitudinal slope, not the “fall line” slope. It should be noted that the ability to make a trail ADA accessible becomes much more challenging on steeper slopes and the overall grading, retaining wall and drainage improvements are more expensive the steeper the slope. The ability to create a cross slope trail that is cut into a steep slope becomes prohibitively expensive if the slopes are greater than 45%. But slopes under 20% are not that difficult to make relatively gentle with moderate costs. The areas of potential future trails that go through steep topographic areas have been mapped and considered to be constraints to trail development. Areas that are flat are considered to be opportunities for new trail development based on ease of construction, but these areas may or may not offer the trail experiences and vistas that many come to expect on trails networks.

5.10 Existing Preserve System The existing Habitat Management Plan for the City of Carlsbad includes guidelines for the development of trails in sensitive habitat areas. These considerations and guidelines will be vital for the future development of any future trails in these areas. It should be noted however, that most of the open space trail system where there is sensitive habitat have already been developed. The trail types most desirable to develop here will be Type 1 and possibly Type 2 or Type 6 trails around the Agua Hedionda Lagoon areas near the coastal corridor. Environmental review for the trails in these areas will be part of the CATS program or future planning associated with the I-5 widening projects.

Please refer to “Figure 5.5: Habitat Management Plans and the Preserve System”.

5-4

Chapter 5 • Analysis of Existing Conditions

Trails Master Plan

5.11 Challenges to Trail Development

The results of the gap analysis and community input provided information on where gaps need to be filled to create a more complete and connected trail system. Another level of analysis is useful to determine the types of challenges that may be present if new trail construction is proposed in different areas of the city. A ranking methodology was developed to allow the GIS data layers to identify where a higher level of challenge is expected for new trail development (see”Table 5.1: Methodology to Rank Challenges to Trail Development”). Some of these factors should be considered as fatal flaws and the trail should not be considered at all, while others, because of the importance of the connection or the quality of the area to be accessed, are not necessarily fatal flaws and further review and analysis should be conducted to see if the impacts can be limited and the issues addressed. The table shows the level of challenge or opportunity the site condition may represent. The individual cells try to provide a level of metric used to determine which category different site features fit within.

5.12 Gap Analysis Gap analysis is a term used to describe existing, missing links or “gaps” in the trails system that should be high priorities for “closing” in the future. A gap could simply be an unimproved or under-improved portion of a trail between an origin and a destination.

A gap could also be a trail that just “dead-ends” even though it may be adjacent to open space that could provide a trail connection. Finally, a gap can also be the lack of sidewalks or roadside trails and on-road bike facilities that get people from where they live (origins) and where they want to go. A GIS-based gap analysis was completed for the trails system using a process of overlaid maps with various walk time elements that help to highlight gaps (see “Table 5.2: Gap Analysis Methodology”). A walktime analysis is a method in which the GIS software looks at an origin point and a destination point, and determines, based upon a 2.5 mile per hour speed of a pedestrian, how far one can get in a predetermined length of time. In the case of this study, a 15 minute walk is considered to be reasonable for persons that may wish to walk to parks, open space and trails, shopping centers, schools, the beaches and other major destinations.

The main purpose for providing trails in Carlsbad is to provide for active lifestyle opportunities that can enhance health and quality of life for both citizens and visitors.

The benefits for outdoor exercise that trails can provide are a desirable feature of Carlsbad’s recreational opportunity that provides citizens an affordable way to mental and physical health. Based on personal fitness guidelines, the minimum walking or exercise time for adults is 30 minutes a day. Having a 10 minute walk out, a 10 minute walk around a recreation space, and a 10 minute walk back meets these guidelines.

When an origin is not connected in a 10 minute period with a destination, then a gap is considered to occur. This gap could be closed by providing other on-street improvements (bike lanes or sidewalks) to allow different and perhaps shorter connections, or through the addition of a trail through an open space that may also reach a destination on the other side of an open space.

Chapter 5 • Analysis of Existing Conditions

5-5

5-6

0.5 to 1.5

1.00

0.50

1.50

4. Topography

5. Preserve Status / Habitat

1.50

2. Private Property

3. General vegetation cover (within 12.5' of trail centerline)

1.50

1. Public Ownership of Lands

-0.5

Slightly constrained but still implementable

Publically owned lands by quasi-public agencies where primary use is not focused on public access

0.5

Slight opportunity that helps implementation

Minor Challenge Minor Opportunity

High Opportunity

Publically owned undeveloped lands, easements and semideveloped ROW

1

Publically owned dedicated open space, parkland or undeveloped ROW

1.5

Moderate opportunity Great opportunity for trail alignment & for trail alignment & implementation ease of implementation

Moderate Opportunity

Steep slopes 20-45%

Moderately steep slopes 1020%

Flat 0-3%

Gentle slopes 3-5%

Next to agricultural areas, Non-native and nongroves or agriculture being sensitive vegetation areas converted to trail use

Moderate slopes 5%-8.3

Newly graded or cleared area or highly disturbed open areas

Level 1: Open space for Level 2: Open space for Level 3: Open space for Level 4: Natural open Level 5: Open space for Level 6: Open space for preservation of sensitive preservation of sensitive general biodiversity with no space, non-sensitive wildlife unprogrammed recreation aesthetic, cultural, active sensitive plants or wildlife or disturbed vegetation not transportation wildlife species (no trails plant species, natural (trails encouraged) intended to be used for allowed due to habitat resources & general habitats species (trails allowed development and through non-sensitive (trails only allowed on destruction from new trails mitigation (trails educational purposes existing trailbeds, roadbeds habitat areas, signage & or fringe affects) encouraged) (trails required) mitigation required) or other disturbed nonhabitat areas)

Excessively steep >45%

Wetland, vernal pools, Riparian woodland, Non-native grasslands or natural areas that are emergent wetlands, chaparral, oak woodland, marshland, riparian scrub, coastal sage, maritime scrub disturbed open water, creekbed, & & native grasslands willow woodland

Private residential property Private residential property Private commercial property Subdivision or discretionary Pre-application review or Property identified as part (>5 acres) approval pending; trails of the I-5 PWP, or a (<5 acres) application submitted have not been previously where a trail has been granted easement exists identified in OSCRMP or identified in OSCRMP (that has not been constructed) other plans

-1

Constrained with challenges for implementation

Highly constrained with significant implementation challenges -1.5

Moderate Challenge

High Challenge

PROJECT OPPORTUNITY FACTORS

Raw Score:

Non-road Based Trails (Type 1, 2, 3 and 6)

Importance

City of Carlsbad

Table 5.1: Methodology to Rank Challenges to Trail Development

Chapter 5 â&#x20AC;˘ Analysis of Existing Conditions

Trails Master Plan

The goal of any active transportation plan is to have people drive less and use other modes of transportation, to combine trips or to shorten trips. One important way the trails master plan can help in these general circulation goals is to create recreation and outdoor healthy activity that can start at the “front door” instead of the “car door”. In other words, a walk to the park or a trail should be encouraged to start at a person’s front door. This not only cuts down on trips, but it also reduces the impact on neighborhood parking of trailhead parking areas. An overall goal of the fully built out trails system is to have all residential and commercial units in Carlsbad located within a 10 minute walk of a trailhead, a park or near an open space, beach or other recreational destination.

5.13 Existing Walktimes from Trail Heads As shown on “Figure 5.6: Ten Minute Walktime Zones from Trailheads”, most of Carlsbad’s housing is within a 10 minute walk of some type of park, beach, open space, trail or trailhead. This map can be used to determine if tourist oriented origins (hotels and lodges) are within a 10 minute walk of open space or other tourist oriented destinations.

Table 5.2: Gap Analysis Methodology

Chapter 5 • Analysis of Existing Conditions

5-7

City of Carlsbad

Carls b

ad V

illag

e A re

a

Figure 5.2: Existing and Future Bike System

8

Chapter 5 â&#x20AC;˘ Analysis of Existing Conditions

City of Carlsbad

Trails Master Plan

Figure 5.3: Existing Park and Open Space System

9

Chapter 5 â&#x20AC;˘ Analysis of Existing Conditions

City of Carlsbad

Trails Master Plan

Figure 5.4: Major Trailheads, Origins and Destinations of Recreational Interest

10

Chapter 5 â&#x20AC;˘ Analysis of Existing Conditions

City of Carlsbad

Trails Master Plan

Figure 5.5: Habitat Management Plans and the Preserve System

11

Chapter 5 â&#x20AC;˘ Analysis of Existing Conditions

City of Carlsbad

Trails Master Plan

Figure 5.6: 10 Minute Walktime Zones from Existing Trailheads

12

Chapter 5 â&#x20AC;˘ Analysis of Existing Conditions

Chapter 6 Future Trail Recommendations

Trails Master Plan

6

Future Trail Recommendations

The focus of this plan is to recommend additional trails that will help to complete the trail system that has been steadily increasing in mileage and functionality. A formal trail system did not occur prior to 1990. The 1992 Open Space and Conservation Resource Management Plan (OSCRMP) put the city on course for an extensive trail system. The development of much of Carlsbad occurred after 1990. The inclusion of a defined plan helped direct new development and assure the inclusion of trail easements and construction as part of new neighborhoods. Although significant portions of Carlsbad will include future construction and development, the focus of the trail program efforts now are on connecting existing trails and the closure of gaps between existing trails. The plan also recommends expanding the trail and open space experience by using utility roads (Type 3), and better connected multi-purpose trails (Type 6).

A second focus of the plan is to develop trails in loop systems, where users have a variety of hiking routes to choose from and where the number of dead ended trails are minimized. Loop trails also provide the comfort of knowing that the trail will bring them back to the starting point, thus reducing the chance of becoming lost.

A third focus of the plan is to extend the trail system out and away from trailheads towards where trail users live. This is accomplished through the increased reliance on roadside trails (Type 4) and connecting sidewalks and special street crossings (Type 5). This approach extends the trail system by using existing paths wherever possible, perhaps enhancing them with signage and improved street crossings. This approach can also result in less driving to trailhead parking lots and help to reduce impacts on existing neighborhood parking areas. This approach can help to lower overall vehicle miles traveled, which will in turn reduce green house gas emissions.

Finally, a connected system that allows the exercise and recreation experience to start at a persons front door instead of at their car door, will encourage more people to participate in healthy activities such as walking and bike riding to destinations.

A final focus of this plan is the continued implementation of a trail classification which communicates to trail users information about the conditions of the trail such as the difficulty level, the surface treatments of the trail tread and the overall width and expected grade. This information will help the user to determine the type of recreation they want to engage in such as a family bike ride, run with a jogger or a mountain bike adventure. The trail classification system helps more clearly define the conditions of the trail to its potential users. The classification system can also accommodate the requirements of the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) by identifying trail types compatible with ADA design requirements for the maximum slope, trail surface and accessibility standards.

Chapter 6 â&#x20AC;˘ Future Trail Recommendations

6-1

City of Carlsbad

6.1 Standards for Trail Type 1- Nature Trail

The primary focus of this trail type is nature appreciation and education. These trails should be kept to a minimum of width and without railings or fences (unless next to sensitive habitats) in order to maximize the trail user experience and limit the amount of disturbance in natural areas. Fencing is allowed and suggested, but fence types that are visually obtrusive could restrict the movement of wildlife (such as chain link fences) and are discouraged. The objective of the trail is to have the least impact on the adjacent sensitive or natural resources of the area. As such, grading would not require making trails level and in many cases, the trail would not meet ADA requirements since implementation of these grade restrictions would result in damage to natural resources and a change in character of these natural areas. Public education and interpretive panels are highly recommended. It is important to promote education and environmental sensitivity through interpretive signage and the overall experience of the trail users. The trail surfaces should be soft surfaces since ADA use and commute-based bike use are not anticipated. Abrupt changes in elevation, path obstructions and trip hazards should be expected by trail users, mountain biking and equestrian use would be allowed, if authorized by the city in specific locations. Regular road bikes or commute / hybrid bikes are not likely to be able to pass through these soft surface and highly changing trails. Trail widths should be minimal, down to two feet in some cases. The need to accommodate side by side walking is not a priority. Width for two hikers passing can be as little as two feet in a natural setting. Amenities are kept to a minimum, although trailhead kiosks, trash containers, regulatory signs, interpretive panels and viewpoints should be provided. No lighting is desired. Off-street parking is generally not needed unless the trail connects to a variety of other trail types that may generate larger than normal trail user levels.

6.2 Standards for Trail Type 2- Recreation Trail

A recreation trail is intended to be a firm surface trail type that meets the grade limitations of ADA (less than 8.33%) and constructed of a compacted chipped stone or compacted decomposed granite that a wheelchair, wide-tired jogger or medium-tired bike can maneuver. Even though these activities can be accommodated on this type of surface, the trail will still compress and be relatively loose, so highly efficient travel and speeds are not likely. The intent of the trail is to provide a uniform improvement that provides direct or indirect access to parks or through open spaces. An edge definer such as split rail or peeler log with notched vertical posts should be included on at least one side. The trail needs to be wide enough to accommodate multiple users walking together or for bikes to pass a group of two walkers or to make sure there is enough width to allow for two opposing directions to pass each other safely. At the same time, the trail is not intended to be wide enough for vehicular travel or maintenance vehicles. Trails need to keep the balance between the desire to limit impacts on the natural environment and preserve the proper scale user experience with the ability to accommodate a broader spectrum of users and use levels.

6-2

Chapter 6 â&#x20AC;˘ Future Trail Recommendations

Trails Master Plan

6.3 Standards for Type 3- Dirt Trail or Utility Roadbed

This trail type primarily consists of easements and unpaved utility roads scattered throughout the community. Because of the history of the various incarnations of the Encina Power Plant, the need for significant regional transmission facilities is obvious. Instead of following closely along a few corridors, these utility line corridors tended to quickly split along diagonal lines leading away from the power plant. Most cities often have a difficult time arranging for trail use within these utility easements. However, with persistence and the proven track record that Carlsbad has had with SDG&E and its parent company, Sempra Energy, these trail types are considered to be feasible. The wide range of state and federal laws that protect easement holders and property owners from liability associated with public use of private lands or easements is clearly ingrained in the legal system and should make it easier to obtain these public use agreements. The current utility corridors have extensive use already, but a more clearly defined and mapped system would enable the city to post regulations, thereby further decreasing liability and risk.

The overall width of this trail type is generally enough to accommodate wide utility maintenance vehicles. The surface conditions (gravel) may often be too loose for many uses to travel through comfortably. The steepness of many of these utility road segments is such that some users would find them challenging. Because of the diagonal orientation that crosses a generally trending east/west and north/south street orientation, these trails may cut down on the overall length of these routes compared to on-road routes. This phenomenon would indicate some potential use of these trails for circulation purposes, although if this is the case, then a Type 2 or Type 6 system may need to be designated along these routes.

6.4 Standards for Type 4- Roadside & Connector Trails Carlsbad has been the pioneer in the region for establishing great examples of roadside trails. Many municipalities have meandering walkways or equestrian trails along many of its roads. But not many have the look and appearance of a soft surface natural trail, while offering the performance of a firm surface. The intent of the Type 4 trail is to be located along a highly traveled road but in a manner that is well buffered from the roadway. This requires both a visual separation between the roadway and the trail, as well as physical barriers that make the trail user feel comfortable that they are protected from vehicular collisions. The use of trees in the buffer area should be more frequent. Trees provide a protective barrier against vehicles that may leave the road surface.

This category of trail also includes the simple designation of existing walkways and sidewalks as Type 4 connectors. This may require nothing more than signage that provides the casual user with wayfinding direction. Not all on-street or near-street roadside trails have been suggested for designation, but many of the streets have been designed to a standard that fit into this category. If they do not connect with existing or proposed recreational trails, then they have not been classified as a Type 4 trail.

Chapter 6 â&#x20AC;˘ Future Trail Recommendations

6-3

City of Carlsbad

6.5 Standards for Type 5 - Connecting Sidewalks and Special Street Crossings

A Type 5 trail is intended to support near roadway connections by pedestrians, in order to walk to other open space trails and trailheads. The trail type should be considered serving the same function as a Type 4 trail that connects to various types of other trails, but a Type 5 does not provide any real trail experience. However, it does provide a way of connecting to the open space and trail system and it provides looping opportunities that allows for a way back that may be different from a trail out. These trails are really sidewalks. It should be noted that not all city sidewalks fall under this category. Just those sidewalk systems that can help tie together a number of open space, beach and park uses.

This category also includes a number of in the road trail crossings that utilize either a signalized intersection, an intersection controlled by stop signs or a mid-block crossing that utilizes either a HAWK (Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon) or a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB).

6.6 Standards for Type 6- Paved Multi-use Path or Trail

This trail type is the ultimate in accommodating a variety of user types in an efficient trail surface. For some, the level of improvement is not consistent with their trail user experience desire. But for others, especially those on bikes, is superior to roadside bike systems that are exposed to fast moving vehicles. This trail type needs to follow Class 1 Caltrans standards. Bikes of many kinds will utilize this type of facility, as will many of the other wheeled uses such as skateboards, in-line skates and running strollers. Because of the potential speed differences between users, a centerline and directional arrows are required. It is also suggested to include a soft surface side trail for runners and hikers who would prefer a slightly softer surface. By its very nature, this trail type can and should be used as a circulation-based trail that provides direct and protected connections between major destinations and regionally traveled bike corridors.

6.7 Composite of All Trail Types

“Figure 6.1: Composite of Existing & Proposed Trails” is a composite map of all existing, proposed on disturbed and proposed new construction identified by Trail Type with a background segment color if they are also trails of special designation.

For a quantification of existing and proposed trails, please see “Table 6.1- Summary of Existing and Proposed Trails” and “Table 6.2- Adjusted Trail Summaries based on Trails with Trails Like User Experience”.

6.8 Subarea Future Recommendations

The following pages discuss the distribution of trails within each of the 13 subareas identified in this plan. Each subarea represents the desire to have a distributed open space and trail system in close proximity to the local population. The 13 subareas have also been summarized on “Figure 6.2- Trail Subarea Map”.

6-4

Chapter 6 • Future Trail Recommendations

City of Carlsbad

Trails Master Plan

Figure 6.1: Composite of Existing & Proposed Trails

6-5

Chapter 6 â&#x20AC;˘ Future Trail Recommendations

City of Carlsbad

Trails Master Plan

Figure 6.2: Trail Subarea Map

6-6

Chapter 6 â&#x20AC;˘ Future Trail Recommendations

Trails Master Plan

Table 6.1: Summary of Existing and Proposed Trails MILES OF OPEN SPACE (UNPAVED) RECREATIONAL TRAILS Existing

Proposed

Total

% Change

1

Nature Trail

18.1

4.5

22.6

24.9%

2

Recreation Trail

40.4

11.8

52.2

29.2%

3

Wide Dirt Trail or Utility Roadbed

22.6

0.1

22.7

0.4%

81.1

16.4

97.5

20.2%

Total Miles of All Open Space Trails

MILES OF CIRCULATION (MOSTLY PAVED) TRAILS

4

Roadside or Connector Trails

5

Connector Sidewalks or Special Street Crossings

6

Multi-use Paved Path or Trail (Class 1) Total Miles of Circulation Trails

GRAND TOTAL MILES OF TRAILS IN CARLSBAD

Existing

Proposed

Total

% Change

11.8

6.2

18.0

0.52

Since this trail type is not a complete trail experience, it is not counted in the total trail miles below

11.8

10.6

22.4

0.90

23.7

16.8

40.5

71.0%

Existing

Proposed

Total

% Change

104.8

33.2

138.0

31.7%

Chapter 6 â&#x20AC;˘ Future Trail Recommendations

6-7

City of Carlsbad

Subarea 1: Buena Vista Lagoon & Hosp Grove Buena Vista Lagoon is a visually dominant element of this subarea, although it cannot be seen from many locations until you are at its edge or on a slope overlooking the lagoon. Hosp Grove, with its very mature eucalyptus trees, creates a large shaded area environment that is interesting to walk through (see “Figure 6.3: Subarea 1 Map”).

General Recommendations The major changes in this area include extensions of connections to the lagoon by way of Jefferson Street, trails along Buena Vista Creek, connections that provide a loop using both Buena Vista Creek and trails within the redeveloped South Coast Quarry to the east, and connections with Hidden Canyon Park and trails.

Subarea 1 General Description: Walk along the edge of Buena Vista Lagoon or view it from the Eucalyptus forest found within Hosp Grove. Follow along Buena Vista Creek at the north edge of the City of Carlsbad to connect with other natural areas, creek corridors and hills to the east. You can also reach the beach at the north end of Carlsbad.

Destinations: Buena Vista Lagoon, Buena Vista Creek, Hosp Grove, Westfield Plaza Camino Real and the beach.

Range of Difficulties: Moderate to steep trails leading through Hosp Grove. The rest of the trails in this subarea are relatively flat. Much of the trails are shaded in the grove.

Range of Surface Types: Most of the trails in Hosp Grove are soft surface trails with the more heavily used trails slightly compacted. The beach trails are compacted soil with a fair amount of sand. The Buena Vista trails include some gravel areas in the existing roadbed sections.

Possible Loops: A loop can be made from Hosp Grove West to East using the proposed mid-block crossing. Several miles of trails can be joined to make a longer trail experience. A loop will be possible in the future around the shopping center, north along Buena Vista Creek and then back along Marron Road. A small loop uses Jefferson and Laguna Drive with a segment along the south edge of the west end of the Lagoon.

6-8

Chapter 6 • Future Trail Recommendations

Trails Master Plan Figure 6.3: Subarea 1 Map

Chapter 6 â&#x20AC;˘ Future Trail Recommendations

6-9

City of Carlsbad

Subarea 2: Buena Vista Creek The Buena Vista Creek Subarea includes the Buena Vista Creek along the north edge of the study area, of which portions are actually outside the City of Carlsbad boundaries. The area is mostly arranged around landforms between housing developments to the south, the South Coast Quarry in the center, and intensive apartment development to the west. Highway 78 is to the north. Much of the area is currently undeveloped, but will be developed in the near future (see “Figure 6.4: Subarea 2 Map”).

General Recommendations Since much of the area has not been developed, it is important to decide now what is expected through this area before plans are completed and commitments for easements are finalized. Several easements have already been worked out on the property and have been shown on the Subarea 2 map.

Subarea 2 General Description: Discover Hidden Canyon and the views that the slopes in this area afford the trail user. Future conditions will provide access to Buena Vista Creek and connections to other parts of Calavera Hills to the south.

Destinations: Buena Vista Creek and adjacent canyons and hillsides. Connections to Westfield Plaza Camino Real are planned for the future as well.

Range of Difficulties: Moderately steep trails leading up Carlsbad Village Drive.

Mostly level trails proposed through the former South Coast Quarry site.

Range of Surface Types: Most of the trails in this area are intended to be soft surface Type 1 with some firm surface trails (Type 2) and dirt roadbeds (Type 3) connected to provide a full trail system for the area. As such, trail surface conditions change fairly frequently.

Possible Loops: In the future, a loop around the entire former South Coast Quarry is possible. This would include Buena Vista Creek, a crossing of Buena Vista Creek to the east, then full routing through the future development project, back to Marron Road and El Camino Real.

6-10

Chapter 6 • Future Trail Recommendations

Trails Master Plan Figure 6.4: Subarea 2 Map

Chapter 6 â&#x20AC;˘ Future Trail Recommendations

6-11

City of Carlsbad

Subarea 3: Carlsbad Village At the heart of Carlsbad, the trail systems in this area will provide access around downtown and to parks and the coastal bluffs and beaches. An important segment of the Coastal Rail Trail is also at the center of this subarea (see “Figure 6.5: Subarea 3 Map”).

General Recommendations The primary focus of this plan area relates to completing the connections to major trail systems that already exist, such as the Coastal Rail Trail and the Carlsbad Boulevard seawall walk and upper bluff walk. Future connections for on-road bike facilities (Type 5) are also proposed by Caltrans.

Subarea 3 General Description: Connect with the heart of Carlsbad, and enjoy the local charm of Carlsbad Village. Use the Coastal Rail Trail or, if you want to see more blue, walk along the seawall or on top of the coastal bluffs along Carlsbad Boulevard.

Destinations: Various downtown destinations including the Coaster station, hotels, shopping, various parks and of course, the beaches.

Range of Difficulties: All trails in this subarea are mostly flat with the exception of ramps leading to the Seawall walk.

Range of Surface Types: All trails in this area are considered to be hard surface asphalt or concrete. These surfaces accommodate all trail users although bikes should utilize Carlsbad Boulevard and other key streets. Only pedestrians are allowed on the Seawall trail.

Possible Loops: Various loops are possible, especially if you tie together the coastal bluff trails on the west with the Coastal Rail Trail on the east. Urban walks are possible throughout the area, including one that will get you up to Buena Vista Lagoon and out to the north end of Carlsbad’s beaches.

6-12

Chapter 6 • Future Trail Recommendations

Trails Master Plan Figure 6.5: Subarea 3 Map

Chapter 6 â&#x20AC;˘ Future Trail Recommendations

6-13

City of Carlsbad

Subarea 4: Calavera Hills / Robertson Ranch Calavera Hills has some of the most progressive trail systems in the city. This is a result of the development that has occurred and the integration of trails into the site planning and construction of these new communities (see â&#x20AC;&#x153;Figure 6.6: Subarea 4 Mapâ&#x20AC;?).

General Recommendations There are a number of long canyons with trails, but they are not currently designated or have missing links and difficult road crossings. Since Roberston Ranch is still under development, many of these future trails will be or have already been incorporated into the proposed plans. El Camino Real is missing some significant walkway connections through this study area and future Type 4 roadside trails are recommended.

Subarea 4 General Description: Find your way through the neighborhoods and canyons of Calavera Hills. Distant views to the north and then again to the west are available when you reach the summit of some of these hills.

Destinations: Various parks and schools are located in the area, along with community gardens and natural open space areas.

Range of Difficulties: Most of the trails follow the grade of the adjacent road and are moderately steep, but should be achievable by most trail users.

Range of Surface Types: Most trails in this subarea are highly compacted decomposed granite trails. Most bikes can use these trails unless the bike has very high pressure and narrow tires. On-street bike connectors do not exist in this area, although various bike facilities exist along roadways. These bike facilities are not critical links to these trail systems.

Possible Loops: With the completion of Village H North canyon based Type 3 utility road and Type 2 recreational trails, it will be possible to use some of the north / south canyons to make a paired loop using Carlsbad Village Drive Type 4 trails on the north and Tamarack on the south to connect these two canyons. Future loops will be available around new development in the Robertson Ranch area.

6-14

Chapter 6 â&#x20AC;˘ Future Trail Recommendations

Trails Master Plan Figure 6.6: Subarea 4 Map

Chapter 6 â&#x20AC;˘ Future Trail Recommendations

6-15

City of Carlsbad

Subarea 5: Lake Calavera The Lake Calavera Subarea has the highest concentration of trails compared to any other subarea in Carlsbad. These trails provide access to several diverse and scenic areas and are used by residents in Calavera Hills and San Marcos to the east, as well as visitors (see â&#x20AC;&#x153;Figure 6.7: Subarea 5 Mapâ&#x20AC;?).

General Recommendations Since this area has many miles of trails scattered throughout the natural open spaces of the subarea, very few new trails are needed. In fact, because of erosion problems and conflicts with some of the preserve priority goals in this area, some trails have been blocked off in the past. The extensive number of volunteer trails indicate that trail users were creating new trails that are impacting the natural resources and sensitive habitat protection goals of the preserves. But blocking all of the trails off is not the answer either. The preserve managers, city staff and interested mountain biking and hiking groups should all work together to agree on what trails should be closed, which ones will need enhancements and where new connectors may be warranted. If the advocate groups work with the city to help remove some of the duplicate and damaging trails from this area, then adding more responsible trails would be possible, especially with the volunteer help of many of the mountain biking club members interested in having more trails in this area.

Subarea 5 General Description: A volcano, a lake, wetlands and rolling hills await you, with many trail choices that will entice a broad range of users to this subarea.

Destinations: Lake Calavera and the 22 million year old volcanic plug, as well as creeks, riparian areas and distant views.

Range of Difficulties: Some of the trails in this area are steep and taxing to the inexperienced trail user. Other trails are moderate in difficulty and should be hikeable by most trail enthusiasts.

Range of Surface Types: Compacted native soils and some gravel areas dominate on most of the existing trails.

Possible Loops: Nice loops already exist around the lake and if, College Boulevard is used to complete the loops, several major north and south trails can be paired up with the Type 4 trails along College Boulevard.

6-16

Chapter 6 â&#x20AC;˘ Future Trail Recommendations

Trails Master Plan Figure 6.7: Subarea 5 Map

Chapter 6 â&#x20AC;˘ Future Trail Recommendations

6-17

City of Carlsbad

Subarea 6: Agua Hedionda Lagoon One of the rare recreation-based lagoons in Southern California is represented by Agua Hedionda. This lagoon receives year round recreational and boating use by residents and visitors. Though access to the water is open in several areas, trail access along its northern and southern edges is surprisingly limited. Future development of the strawberry fields may change this, along with proposed trails planned by Caltrans. (see “Figure 6.8: Subarea 6 Map”).

General Recommendations This is the missing link for the Coastal Rail Trail and other future trails through the area. The Encina Power Plant has created barriers to north / south travel through this area, along with the fact that the lagoon slopes are steep and the I-5 freeway has no current underpass capability. With the decommissioning of the power plant, the expansion of I-5, an increased focus on the completion of the Coastal Rail Trail, and the LOSSAN double tracking and improvement projects, several viable connections through this missing link are possible.

Subarea 6 General Description: A rare opportunity to get close to (and actually in) a coastal lagoon. Current trails are limited to the west end of the lagoon, but future trails will eventually allow for access around most of the lagoon.

Destinations: Carlsbad beaches and coastal bluffs to the west, the existing Coastal Rail Trail to the north and the recreational waters and beaches associated with Agua Hedionda Lagoon. A connection to the existing Agua Hedionda Discovery Center is possible as well.

Range of Difficulties: Mostly level trails leading around parts of the lagoon.

Range of Surface Types: Very soft sandy surface trails exist in this subarea. Type 4 trails are often firm surface DG trails. Type 5 trails are typically asphalt or concrete.

Possible Loops: The variations of the Coastal Rail Trail and the Carlsbad Boulevard Realignment Coastal Bluff trails will allow for significant loops through this area. The addition of the strawberry fields north shore trail and the Caltrans I-5 bridge modifications and underpasses will allow for several loops, including a figure eight around the full length of the lagoon.

6-18

Chapter 6 • Future Trail Recommendations

Trails Master Plan Figure 6.8: Subarea 6 Map

Chapter 6 â&#x20AC;˘ Future Trail Recommendations

6-19

City of Carlsbad

Subarea 7: Sunny Creek & Carlsbad Oaks North The Sunny Creek Subarea used to include a variety of mountain bike trails throughout various canyons, but these trails were lost when significant business park development occurred. Some remnants of these trails still exist and have been recommended for redesignation.

A large portion of this area will be developed and will include roadway extensions and several trail dedications have already been arranged (see “Figure 6.9: Subarea 7 Map”).

General Recommendations The previously used Flightline Trail and other associated routes have been eliminated by development or restricted in some manner. Although the full extent of the original trails in this area cannot be preserved, some of the trails should be allowed and improved. Most of the improvements in the northwest corner of this subarea are dedicated as trail easements and will be built by the future development. Several areas south of Lake Calavera and south of Cannon Road are intended to be used as a variety of Type 1 trails that should include mountain bike uses. Areas to the north of Cannon Road in Subarea 5 will need to have more restrictive use and trail development because of the sensitive nature of this preserve area. However, areas to the south of Cannon Road should be considered for trail use. Another extension of a trail system up to Merkle Reservoir is proposed. A loop around the reservoir would need to be designed to avoid conflicts with the operations and security of the reservoir. A connection to the residential neighborhoods in San Marcos would also be a benefit for the region.

Subarea 7 General Description: Discover some of the hidden canyons and old agricultural farms of this more isolated portion of Carlsbad. In the future, head for the hills and take in the views from Merkle Reservoir.

Destinations: Merkle Reservoir and the Safety Center Skate Park Range of Difficulties: Moderately steep trails leading up to Merkle Reservoir.

Range of Surface Types: Future trails will include a variety of surfaces that will allow most bike use and all foot uses.

Possible Loops: Several loops have been provided in areas south of Cannon and Sage Creek High School.

6-20

Chapter 6 • Future Trail Recommendations

Trails Master Plan Figure 6.9: Subarea 7 Map

Chapter 6 â&#x20AC;˘ Future Trail Recommendations

6-21

City of Carlsbad

Subarea 8: Palomar Subarea 8 contains many tourist related destinations, recreation opportunities, retail and a major employment center. All of this activity is located next to the natural areas of Agua Hedionda Lagoon. The area also includes Palomar Airport. The area has significant topographic changes, although the tops of the hills and mesas have been graded to create a series of pads and slopes to accommodate the extensive business park (see “Figure 6.10: Subarea 8 Map”).

General Recommendations Most of the area is already covered by a variety of trails.

A new Type 2 Recreation Trail is proposed along the west side of the flower fields pending future development. Additional options that extend the trails through The Crossings Golf Course are planned to go under the Cannon Road bridge. The completion of trails in Veteran’s Memorial Park are also important, as are trails from the crest of the hill down to Cannon Road. Additional roadside trails are proposed along Cannon Road and can connect the natural areas and hillsides to the Agua Hedionda Discovery Center. Extensions of the Coastal Rail Trail and the Carlsbad Boulevard Realignment Study Coastal Bluff trail make up the majority of the changes on the west side of I-5.

Subarea 8 General Description: A lot is happening in this subarea. Climb to the top of Veteran’s Memorial Park and see for yourself. Walk or ride some of the best looped trails that lead around Legoland and the flower fields.

Destinations: Legoland, The Crossings Golf Course, Veteran’s Memorial Park, Agua Hedionda Discovery Center, the flower fields, the Carlsbad Outlet Stores (including locations to eat), and the coastal bluff located west of Carlsbad Blvd.

Range of Difficulties: Moderately steep trails leading up to Veteran’s Memorial Park and south of The Crossings Golf Course. Most other trails are level or have gentle slopes.

Range of Surface Types: Trails around Legoland are hard surfaces. Trails along Palomar Airport Road are highly compacted firm surfaced. Segments of the Coastal Rail Trail and the Carlsbad Boulevard Realignment will be hard surfaces.

Possible Loops: Loop around the flower fields and Legoland already exist. Make a loop through the golf course, under Cannon Road and back to the Discovery Center along Cannon Road and through Veteran’s Memorial Park. Create loops out of segments of the Coastal Rail Trail and the Carlsbad Boulevard new Coastal Bluff trail.

6-22

Chapter 6 • Future Trail Recommendations

Trails Master Plan Figure 6.10: Subarea 8 Map

Chapter 6 â&#x20AC;˘ Future Trail Recommendations

6-23

City of Carlsbad

Subarea 9: Poinsettia The Poinsettia Subarea consists primarily of residential neighborhoods with some commercial office west of I-5, along Palomar Airport Road and at the east side of the study area (see “Figure 6.11: Subarea 9 Map”).

General Recommendations Changes in this area include the extension of the Coastal Rail Trail, the creation of the Coastal Bluff Trail associated with the Carlsbad Boulevard Realignment Project, and several conversions of utility access roads into improved trails. An effort has also been made to extend the various trails along Palomar Airport Road to make the existing trail segments more usable. Caltrans is also proposing to improve Palomar Airport Road bridge, while the city is likely to demolish the existing bridge connecting Carlsbad Boulevard with Palomar Airport Road.

Subarea 9 General Description: The coastal bluffs of this subarea are its primary attraction. You can follow along creeks and open space when using trails along Palomar Airport Road.

Destinations: Pointsettia Community Park, South Carlsbad State Beach and Aviara Community Park.

Range of Difficulties: Moderate slopes exist on the east end of the subarea while more level trails exist on the west.

Range of Surface Types: Many of the existing and proposed trails are hard or firm surfaces, allowing most bikes to utilize the trails. The trails along the utility access roads are very steep and mostly gravel and compacted native soils.

Possible Loops: Loops can be made by using the north / south open space trails, connected up with east / west circulation trails that are mostly along roadways.

With several parallel facilities proposed along the coast, loops can also be created by using several segments of each specialty trail.

6-24

Chapter 6 • Future Trail Recommendations

Trails Master Plan Figure 6.11: Subarea 9 Map

Chapter 6 â&#x20AC;˘ Future Trail Recommendations

6-25

City of Carlsbad

Subarea 10: Bressi Ranch & Carrillo Ranch Leo Carrillo Ranch Historic Park anchors this subarea.

The long east / west canyon that parallels Poinsettia Lane is a dominant landform for the area. The new Alga Norte Park is also another important feature along Poinsettia (see “Figure 6.12: Subarea 10 Map”).

General Recommendations The primary recommendation for this subarea is to extend the trails to the west of Rancho Carrillo. Improving the diagonally oriented utility access road through this area is also an important aspect, although portions of the route are interrupted by a golf course. Some of the trails located along Poinsettia are actually more like Type 2 recreation trails, although the route is adjacent to a roadway. Another connection through the canyon east of Carrillo Ranch up to Palomar Airport Road may provide an important circulation connection through this area and is recommended to be a Type 6 multi-use trail.

Subarea 10 General Description: Visit Carillo Ranch and walk or ride a loop around this unique and historic Carlsbad treasure. Multiple trails exist around the new Alga Norte Park that can take you to the tops of this area’s hills.

Destinations: Alga Norte Park and Leo Carrillo Ranch Historic Park Range of Difficulties: The landforms of the area vary and include some steeper sections.

Range of Surface Types: The trails include chipped stone, asphalt and compacted decomposed granite which can handle most bikes except for high pressure narrow tires.

Possible Loops: Several existing loops can be taken around both Carrillo Ranch and Alga Norte Park. This plan recommends the extension of the Carrillo Ranch trails towards the west, which can result in another loop option.

6-26

Chapter 6 • Future Trail Recommendations

Trails Master Plan Figure 6.12: Subarea 10 Map

Chapter 6 â&#x20AC;˘ Future Trail Recommendations

6-27

City of Carlsbad

Subarea 11: Aviara & Batiquitos Lagoon Batiquitos Lagoon is a commonly viewed visual asset of Carlsbad, especially since it forms the southern boundary of the city. Some of the heaviest used trails can be found in this subarea. Although many of these trails are nature trails by the context of the setting, they are classified as Type 2 recreational trails because of their overall width (see “Figure 6.13: Subarea 11 Map”) .

General Recommendations Most of the trail system is well developed in this subarea. A connection to the west side of the lagoon is not currently possible, but as a result of planned improvements by Caltrans, access between the two sides and parallel to the bridge are now possible. Other general improvements include the use of the utility easement roads. This subarea also contains a recommended rail side Coastal Rail Trail alignment on the east side of the rail line located south of the Poinsettia Coaster Station.

Subarea 11 General Description: Serene views of Batiquitos Lagoon are available from several miles of trails either on the east side, or from the upper bluffs on the west side of I-5. Future connections will allow for even more access over and along the lagoon.

Destinations: Batiquitos Lagoon, Lagoon Nature Center and the Aviara Golf Course Range of Difficulties: All trails in this subarea are mostly flat.

Range of Surface Types: Most trails are compacted native soil or decomposed granite. Most of the existing trails on the west side of I-5 are paved on-road bike facilities. Proposed Type 6 trails will be hard surface.

Possible Loops: Several loops already exist through Aviara, but these routes are not well marked along the roadway segments. A loop exists around the lagoon, but is not used by many on foot because of the adjacent high speed traffic. With the combination of the North Coast Bike Trails by Caltrans and the proposed Coastal Rail Trail and Carlsbad Boulevard Realignment Coastal Bluff trail, several coastal loops will be possible.

6-28

Chapter 6 • Future Trail Recommendations

Trails Master Plan Figure 6.13: Subarea 11 Map

Chapter 6 â&#x20AC;˘ Future Trail Recommendations

6-29

City of Carlsbad

Subarea 12: La Costa North La Costa North contains the second highest concentration of trails, although most are Type 1 nature trails on steeper hillsides. Significant open space resources exist, including the very large and steep Box Canyon area. The La Costa Hotel, Resort and Golf Course also comprises a large portion of the subarea. The area also contains two major utility corridors that contain utility access roads that are used by many trail users, although not officially designated. Another significant trail assets is related to the old Rancho Santa Fe road that has been re-purposed as a Type 6 multi-use trail (see “Figure 6.14: Subarea 12 Map”).

General Recommendations Most of the recommendations in this area are associated with turning the rough utility roads into more refined pathways and closing the gap of missing roadbed connections. In order to make this work, a number of mid-block crossings are needed to provide safer roadway crossings. Several survey comments asked for connections all the way around or across Box Canyon, but is not possible due to the steepness of the canyon and the sensitivity of the habitats in the canyon. However, some additional trails are proposed for the southeast side of the canyon and other loops are established by designating some of the roadside trails and walkways.

Subarea 12 General Description: Look over Batiquitos Lagoon from the hills around Denk Peak and the Mahr Reservoir or look into the dramatic Box Canyon area. These dynamic views are worth the walk.

Destinations: Mahr Reservoir, Denk Peak and La Costa Golf Course and Spa. Range of Difficulties: Moderately steep trails leading up to Denk Peak and around Box Canyon.

Range of Surface Types: Most of the trails are compacted native soil, but because of the steepness, are only usable by mountain Bikes or by foot.

Possible Loops: Several loops exist as part of the La Costa Preserve area. If the two utility corridors are improved, then these corridors can be used as a loop system.

The upper Box Canyon trails can be used to loop back on itself if some of the roadside walkways are combined.

6-30

Chapter 6 • Future Trail Recommendations

Trails Master Plan Figure 6.14: Subarea 12 Map

Chapter 6 â&#x20AC;˘ Future Trail Recommendations

6-31

City of Carlsbad

Subarea 13: La Costa South

La Costa South includes several older developments scattered among rolling hills with some canyons, ponds and other open spaces. The open space percent of total acres is lower than most subareas, except for the hills located to the west of El Camino Real, which contain significant open space resources (see â&#x20AC;&#x153;Figure 6.15: Subarea 13 Mapâ&#x20AC;?).

General Recommendations This subarea contains many trails even though the open space is limited. Since there are limited open space areas accessible from trails, expanded trail development is also limited. Connections to trails found in Encinitas known as the Ranch could be increased, but private property owners in this area may be reluctant to allow new connections through or next to their property.

Subarea 13 General Description: Whether along creeks, through open space canyons or along open water bodies, this subarea has some of the older trail systems with mature vegetation and adjacent riparian areas or planted slopes.

Destinations: The Forum Shopping Center, schools, several water bodies and a few wide open canyons.

Range of Difficulties: Most trails in this area are flat.

Range of Surface Types: Most trails in this area have compacted decomposed granite surfaces that can work for most users except for bikes with narrow high pressure tires.

Possible Loops: Loop opportunities for new trails are limited to using various streets as connectors. The Type 4 trails can help connect the open space trails, especially those along Calle Barcelona. Other loops are more difficult to connect since they do not have parallel trail segments.

6-32

Chapter 6 â&#x20AC;˘ Future Trail Recommendations

Trails Master Plan Figure 6.15: Subarea 13 Map

Chapter 6 â&#x20AC;˘ Future Trail Recommendations

6-33

City of Carlsbad

6.9 Special Trail Designations

The following discussion is centered on trails with special designations or purposes.

Coastal Rail Trail Many alternatives have been discussed regarding the preferred route for the Coastal Rail Trail. The routes north of the north end of the existing segment are fixed, but the southern route can include variations through the Encina Power Station Plant. It will need to be determined whether or not the trail is best on the east or west side of the tracks (see “Figure 6.16: Proposed Coastal Rail Trail Future Alignments”). Also, south of the Poinsettia Coaster Station, it is possible to follow the rail line for a longer period of time until joining back with Avenida Encinas.

Caltrans North Coast Bike Trail As part of the Caltrans led I-5 North Coast Corridor Public Works Plan, the North Coast Bike Trail will provide alignments of new bike facilities, primarily in or near the I-5 right-ofway (see “Figure 6.17: Proposed Caltrans North Coast Bike Trail”). The north end of the trail will correspond with the Coastal Rail Trail.

Carlsbad Boulevard Realignment Coast Bluff Trail This project proposes to shift the roadway to the east, thereby creating surplus rightof-way and pavement located west of Carlsbad Boulevard (see “Figure 6.18: Proposed Carlsbad Boulevard Realignment- Coastal Bluff Trail”). This plan suggests that the trail be named the Coastal Bluff Trail.

California Coast Trail The California Coastal Conservancy is championing a network of roads, walkways, trails and beaches as a 1,200 mile long mapped route for hikers, runners and cyclists. The segment that comes through Carlsbad is not well defined, but it is likely to follow parts of the Coastal Rail Trail across Buena Vista Lagoon and then follow a series of streets through Carlsbad Village and potentially use the proposed Coast Bluff trail (see “Figure 6.19: Proposed California Coast Trail”).

6-34

Chapter 6 • Future Trail Recommendations

Trails Master Plan

Figure 6.16: Proposed Conceptual Coastal Rail Trail Future Alignments

Chapter 6 â&#x20AC;˘ Future Trail Recommendations

6-35

City of Carlsbad Figure 6.17: Proposed Conceptual Caltrans North Coast Bike Trail

6-36

Chapter 6 â&#x20AC;˘ Future Trail Recommendations

Trails Master Plan

Figure 6.18: Proposed Conceptual Carlsbad Blvd. Realignment - Coastal Bluff Trail

Chapter 6 â&#x20AC;˘ Future Trail Recommendations

6-37

City of Carlsbad

Figure 6.19: Proposed Conceptual California Coast Trail

6-38

Chapter 6 â&#x20AC;˘ Future Trail Recommendations

Chapter 7 Trail Standards

Trails Master Plan

7 Trail Standards This chapter summarizes guidelines and standards for pedestrian and bicycle multi-use paths that may be part of the City of Carlsbad trail network. These design standards and guidelines have been incorporated into the alignments in Chapter 6, Trail Recommendations. Federal, state or local environmental regulations may apply to trails and other associated development. Responsible trail system design generally strives to limit impacts, but trails are also often sited in sensitive areas. The application of design standards and guidelines, coupled with impact avoidance and protective measures, must be made to offset potential impacts.

7.1 Overall Design Objectives The city’s objective is to design, construct, and maintain trails that: • Provide safe non-motorized transportation links and/or close-to-home recreation opportunities; •

provide legal public access to destination points and other areas of interest;

•

blend with the surrounding environment and minimize impacts on the natural environment;

•

minimize impacts on adjacent landowners; and

•

require minimum levels of maintenance.

7.2 Design Considerations 1. Human Factors Trails must be planned and constructed with the needs of the trail user in mind.

Trail users favor routes that connect areas of significant community activity, such as schools, businesses, shopping areas and parks, as well as other areas of interest such as viewpoints, water, natural areas, scenic corridors, and interesting geologic features. Visual qualities are important to them as well; therefore, trails should be designed to blend with the surrounding environment and to provide vistas. Human behavior should be considered as well. For example, many trail users favor routes that loop back to the trailhead instead of an out and back experience. This relates to the desire of many trail users to experience new views and conditions that are afforded by looped trails. This desire is often to blame for new unauthorized trails being created by “off-trail” uses. When possible, looped trails should be considered where possible.

2. Coinciding Easements Trails are frequently located within common tracts and easements dedicated for other purposes such as drainage, flood control, public utilities, natural open space, and scenic corridors. In situations where these easements are wider than needed for primary access for maintenance, it may be advantageous to dedicate the same area for the purposes of public trail use. This will increase the flexibility to properly lay out, design, and construct public trails, and will allow the trail to be positioned away from undesirable areas such as low-flow wash channels, areas of extreme topography, dense vegetation, critical habitats and adjacent properties. This will also allow future realignment of the trail, should such a realignment become necessary.

Chapter 7 • Trail Standards

7-1

City of Carlsbad 3. Adjacent Landowner Privacy The privacy of landowners adjacent to trails and trail access facilities is an important design consideration. Privacy can be maintained or improved by modifying the trail alignment, planting landscape buffers, installing walls, fencing, creating grade separations, or using a combination of these methods.

4. Trail Viewshed The line of sight from a trail to the surrounding landscape, and from the surrounding landscape to a trail, are important design factors. Views from the trail to the surrounding landscape improve the quality of the trail users’ experience; therefore, trails should be designed to provide varying views of the surrounding area. Obscuring views of the trail from the surrounding property is important to adjacent landowners who may not want to view the trail from their property.

5. Circulation/Mobility Element Trails The design, construction and maintenance of trails within the City of Carlsbad will take into account the City of Carlsbad Landscape Manual Guidelines when Circulation Element trails are constructed within or near public street right-of-ways. A twofoot maintenance zone adjacent to the trail shall not include utility or irrigation valve boxes, or electrical boxes. See the construction detail for Circulation Element Trails.

NOTES: A. TRAIL WIDTH MAY VARY DEPENDING UPON LOCATION WITHIN OPEN SPACE OR LANDSCAPED AREAS. TRAIL TREAD WIDTH TO BE 8' UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. B. CONSTRUCTION THE TRAIL TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE . PROVIDE FOR A MINIMUM OF 2% CROSS SLOPE IN DIRECTION OF PARKWAY. C. INSTALL 18" WIDE MULCH MAINTENANCE AREA ON BOTH SIDES OF TRAIL. D. MATERIALS AND METHODS FOR TRAIL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STABILZED DECOMPOSED GRANITE ATTACHED SPECIFICATIONS. E. SLOPE CONCRETE HEADER CONTINUOUS WITH PARKWAY CROSS SLOPE AND LONGITUDINAL GRADE. F. STABILIZED DECOMPOSED GRANITE MATERIALS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINGEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.

1 2

3

4

5 6

8

4"

7

KEY 1

TRAIL EASEMENT - TWELVE (12') FOOT MIN. UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE ON SITE IMPROVEMENT AND GRADING PLANS.

2

EIGHT FOOT (8') WIDE STABILIZED DECOMPOSED GRANITE TRAIL TREAD.

3

18" MAINTENANCE ZONE ON BOTH SIDES. NO IRRIGATION HEADS OR APURTENCES SHALL BE PLACED IN THIS ZONE. LOW GROUNDCOVERS 6" OR LESS MAY BE ALLOWED.

4

DECOMPOSED GRANITE WITH STABILIZER. COLOR SHALL BE BUFF, GRAY OR LIGHT TAN. SUBMIT SAMPLE TO OWNER FOR APPROVAL. INSTALL IN TWO-2" LIFTS. COMPACT BETWEEN LIFTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS.

5

6" WIDE x 8" DEPTH CONCRETE EDGE (CURB)

6

2" DEEP X 18" WIDE MULCH AREA , FINISH GRADE OF MULCH SHALL BE 1/4" BELOW TOP OF CONCRETE EDGING.

7

90% COMPACTED NATIVE SOIL.

8

FINISHED GRADE.

NOTE: WHEN TRAIL EXCEEDS 8% SLOPE ( LONGITUDINAL GRADES) POLYPAVMENT STABILILZED DECOMPOSED GRANITE MATERIALS MAY BE USED OR OTHER APPROVED PAVING MATERIALS WITH FINAL APPROVAL BY THE CITY ENGINEER.

STABILIZED DECOMPOSED GRANITE TRAIL - CONCRETE EDGING NOT to SCALE

Sample detail for roadside trail (Type 4) - assuming a firm surface of compacted DG

6. Sensitive Wildlife Habitat Trail design and construction within coastal sage open space areas should be evaluated in terms of the effect that the trail will have on sensitive wildlife habitats.

Pertinent resource agencies such as the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and California Coastal Commission (in coastal zones) should be consulted during the master planning process or during the trail design process for all projects that have coastal wetlands trail segments to assure that the trail will not have a negative impact on such resources. Seasonal trail closures may be necessary in some situations and the Habitat Management Plan Open Space Management Agreement shall also be taken into consideration for future trail alignments and construction.

7-2

Chapter 7 • Trail Standards

Trails Master Plan

7. Archaeological and Cultural Resources Trail design and construction should be evaluated in terms of the effect the trail will have on archaeological or cultural resources. Trail construction must be done in accordance with local archaeological ordinances. Potential options to prevent and mitigate damage to these resources include: •

Altering the trail alignment to avoid archaeological and cultural resources;

•

protecting the resources by utilizing methods to obscure them from view;

•

mitigating the cultural resource, which involves removal and thorough documentation of the items by a professional archaeologist; and

•

the documentation of the resource may be interpreted as part of the trail opportunity.

8. Design for Shared-Use Trails within the City of Carlsbad are typically open to all non-motorized uses unless otherwise stated. Bicycle use on the Batiquitos Lagoon North Shore Trail is prohibited however, and resource agencies may also require restricted uses on some trails in the city. Decisions to prohibit any non-motorized use from City of Carlsbad trails must be based on coordinated planning efforts involving appropriate user groups and city staff.

The following means of preventing potential user conflicts are based on methods identified in “Conflict of Multiple Use Trails” (Moore, 1994), and should be considered when planning, designing, constructing and maintaining shared-use trails: •

Separate user types at trailheads and along the first, most crowded, stretches of trail;

•

provide adequate sight distances;

•

build and maintain trails wide enough for safe passing, and/or provide periodic turnouts;

•

design trails to control speeds where necessary by varying the trail surface and avoiding long, straight downhill stretches;

•

provide adequate trailhead facilities for all user types; and

•

provide signage indicating trail uses allowed for a particular trail.

7.3 State and Federal Trail Standards California Department of Transportation California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) Although the recreational trails (Type 1, 2 and 3) are outside of roadway right of ways, the circulation trails (Type 4, 5 and 6) are commonly in or next to public rights of way with vehicular traffic. In these cases, the California MUTCD is considered to be the guiding document published by the State of California, Department of Transportation (Caltrans). The intent of the document is to adopt uniform standards and specifications for official traffic control devices in California. Traffic control devices are defined as all signs, signals, markings and other devices used to regulate, warn or guide traffic, placed on, over or adjacent to a street, highway, pedestrian facility or bikeway by authority of a public agency or official having jurisdiction, or, in the case of a private road, by authority of the private owner or private official having jurisdiction. The CA MUTCD is not applicable to privately owned and maintained roads or commercial establishments in California, unless the particular city or county enacts an ordinance or resolution to this effect.

Chapter 7 • Trail Standards

7-3

City of Carlsbad The CA MUTCD 2012 edition incorporates the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) MUTCD (2009 Edition) and includes all policies on traffic control devices issued by Caltrans since 2010 and other editorial, errata and format changes that were necessary to update the previous documents. The CA MUTCD does not supersede Caltrans’ Standard Plans, Standard Specifications or its Special Provisions publications, but all CA MUTCD standard statements must be met.

California Department of Transportation Highway Design Manual (HDM) The Highway Design Manual is used by Caltrans staff and non-Caltrans project managers and planners for project designs within the Caltrans right-of-way and elsewhere. The design standards cover a wide array of focus areas including drainage, pavement and basic design policies. HDM Chapter 1000 specifically addresses bikeway planning and design and defines three bikeway types that coincide with Carlsbad’s trail types as described in the following sections. Any trail designated to encroach into or travel within the Caltrans right-of-way must be designed per HDM Chapter 1000, as well as any on-street bicycle facility. However, because HDM Chapter 1000 is essentially the state standard for bicycle facilities, even facilities outside the Caltrans right-of-way should be built to HDM Chapter 1000 criteria to maintain eligibility for federal funding, which is administered in California by Caltrans. The entire document is available online at: www.dot.ca.gov/hq/oppd/hdm/hdmtoc.htm.

Additional references include: • NPS Trails Management Handbook, U.S.D.I. National Park Service, 1983.

•

Trail Construction / Maintenance Notebook, U.S.D.A. Forest Service, 1996.

•

Trails for the 21st Century, Rails to Trails Conservancy, 1993.

7.4 Guidelines for Trail Layout and Location Necessary steps to properly layout a trail are consistent for most all trails. The following sections cover the steps needed for a successful trail layout and construction.

Reconnaissance Application of sound principles of trail location, alignment and grade will minimize future operation and maintenance problems. The first step is to examine the most recent topographic maps and aerial photos of the area to identify significant landforms, drainage patterns and vegetation. The next step, for which there is no substitute, is to walk the area and examine potential routes. Conduct a systematic study of the area by walking various routes and viewing the area from different vantage points. Control points, which are features that are favorable for or inhibit trail construction, should be identified through this process. The control points will help to identify the best possible route, with the understanding that situations may exist where trails must pass through negative control points. Control points which are favorable for trail construction are: • Road crossings such as underpasses, overpasses and intersections with traffic signals or stop signs;

7-4

•

natural wash crossings;

•

ridgelines;

•

hillside benches;

•

areas of light vegetation;

•

scenic vistas;

•

areas of well drained soils; and

•

areas with good trailhead access.

Chapter 7 • Trail Standards

Trails Master Plan

Control points, which will inhibit trail construction and should be avoided are: • Wet areas and poorly drained flat areas; •

sensitive wildlife habitats;

•

wash bottoms;

•

areas adjacent to sources of excessive noise, such as airports;

•

areas adjacent to plants that are poisonous to horses, such as oleanders;

•

steep rock slopes;

•

unstable or fragile soils;

•

abrupt elevation changes;

•

bluffs, ledges and cliffs except where featured as scenic resources;

•

frequent wash crossings;

•

locations requiring bridges or culverts;

•

areas of heavy or fragile vegetation;

•

areas requiring switchbacks;

•

areas of archaeological/cultural sensitivity;

•

unsafe or uncontrolled road crossings; and

•

knows habitats of threatened or endangered plant or animal species.

Grade The degree to which a trail rises or falls over a linear distance is an important factor in determining the length of the trail, level of difficulty, appropriate user types, and drainage and maintenance requirements. Occasional fluctuations in the trail grade should be considered to provide variation for trail users and to facilitate proper drainage. Frequent or drastic changes in grade should be avoided. The grade line between control points can be plotted on paper to determine if switchbacks or other special features will be needed to sustain a certain grade. On moderate to steep side slopes, a periodic reverse in the grade should be included to create dips for drainage purposes. When grade dips are included in the initial trail construction, the need for waterbars is eliminated.

Drainage Proper drainage of surface water is the most important factor in the design, construction, and maintenance of trails. Surface erosion resulting from improper drainage will have a detrimental impact on the trail surface, causing damage to the natural environment and increasing maintenance requirements. The potential for erosion depends on three factors: soil type, velocity of water on the trail, and the distance water travels down the trail. Alteration of any of these factors can reduce the potential for erosion. Proper outsloping of the trail tread and the installation of grade dips or waterbars will help decrease the potential for erosion of the trail surface. If distances allow, grade dips are preferred over waterbars. Existing drainage patterns of the surrounding area, such as concentrated drainage channels, must be maintained. Attempts to alter the existing drainage patterns will have a negative effect on the natural environment, and will most likely result in severe damage to the trail.

Chapter 7 • Trail Standards

7-5

City of Carlsbad

7.5 Accessibility Requirements Federal and State of California laws and regulations require that all public facilities be made accessible to people of all ages and abilities. The concept of universal access takes this requirement a bit further and suggests that making all public facilities easier to access benefits all members of society, even those without formal disabilities, including the aged and youth with underdeveloped motor skills. On the other hand, certain types of activities in certain types of unimproved areas are not expected to be made fully accessible if meeting the minimum requirements would be considered damaging to the natural, historical or cultural environment. The primary requirement for accessibility includes grade of the slope and cross slope of the trail and the trail surfaces.

It is the intent of this Master Plan is to designate Trail Type 2 (recreation trail), Type 4 (roadside trail or connector trail) , Type 5 (sidewalk connector and special street crossings) and Type 6 (class 1 multi-use path) as accessible facilities. Trail Type 1 (nature trail) and Trail Type 3 (dirt roadbed) are commonly sited in areas where a 5% or 8.33% trail slope is not obtainable. To meet this standard, major grading and switchbacks would be needed, making a trail like this damaging to vegetation, habitats, landform, cultural resources and other features. Cross slopes of less than 2% are not obtainable on these trail types due to drainage requirements. Finally, the preferred surface treatments for Trail Type 1 and 3 do not support assisted-walking devices or wheelchairs.

ADA regulations require for compliance on portions of a trail where damage to the natural, historical or cultural requirements would not occur. These regulations also allow for the provision of a similar experience on similar trails, without making all trails fully accessible. Since Trail Type 2, 4, 5 and 6 would be accessible, then the City of Carlsbad will have made reasonable and positive steps to provide access to similar trail experiences throughout the city, reserving those facilities that are through natural, steep terrain, as not accessible in order to avoid damage to the trails resources.

Making a trail accessible to people with disabilities involves more than just the trail itself. It also requires that an accessible pathway leads to the trailhead or that the trailhead access point is fully accessible, including the parking lot. Access points along the trail should also be accessible to people with disabilities. The facilities around the trail should be designed for access. For example: • Trailhead and destination areas with parking and restrooms should conform to ADAAG requirements for accessible parking and restrooms.

7-6

•

Elements such as picnic areas should be connected with a pathway that meets the accessible design recommendations for accessible trails.

•

Signage at access points should conform to ADAAG requirements for font size, font type and contrast.

•

While pathways connecting with accessible trails should provide the same accessibility standard of the trail itself, tread width may be adjusted based on expected use levels.

Chapter 7 • Trail Standards

Trails Master Plan

7.6 Trail Surface Standards Samples of trail surface options are shown on “Table 7.1: Trail Surfaces Samples”.

Trail width and grade standards are shown on “Table 7.2: Standards for Trail Types”.

Surface types recommended for different trail types are shown on “Table 7.3: Recommended Surfaces and Edge Treatments”.

Advancements in new paving types are on-going. Performance is the most important selection criteria for selecting pavement types. The critical performance criteria are based on the movement of wheeled bikes, strollers and wheel chairs, as well as price, longevity and aesthetics. For transportation funded projects or those taking credit for bike related active transportation, a hybrid commute bike should be considered the minimum standard for accommodating. These bikes have slightly wider tires and lower pressure (60-100 pounds per square inch) than a comparable high performance road bikes (100-160 psi) used by more advanced competitive and serious cyclists. A cyclist with a very light and expensive bike is not likely to ride on any surface other than asphalt or concrete, partially due to stability of the bike, drag on the wheels and possible dirt, sand and paint chipping resulting from high pressure tires that often shoot up small particles of rock.

A hybrid commute bike with thinner tires is considered to be the minimum requirement to determine if the trail is usable as a transportation asset.

This type of bike can handle firm surface compacted trails but cannot handle the soft surfaces that a wide, medium pressure tire of a mountain bike can handle.

General Surface Classifications •

Soft surface trails consist of local native soils with some additional material often added to improve compaction, traction and erosion resistance. Trail surfaces can be loose packed sand (a), gravel or uncompacted decomposed granite (b), or native soil (c).

•

Firm surface trails include all firm surfaces such as compacted crushed stone (d) and compacted, emulsified or cemented particles of decomposed granite (e).

•

Hard surface trails include asphalt or colored asphalt (f), concrete or colored concrete (g) and permeable concrete or permeable asphalt (h).

Chapter 7 • Trail Standards

7-7

City of Carlsbad No expectation for ADA access or use by high pressure-narrow profile tires should be implied for Trail Types 1 or 3. A Type 2 trail, on the other hand, should be a firm surface which requires either heavily compacted native soil (with only a small percentage of sand or clay), compacted decomposed granite, crushed compacted stone or chipped stone, stabilized decomposed granite (stabilizers or emulsifiers are additives that bind the soil particles of decomposed granite), or a cement added to the soil mix. In general, if an asphalt or concrete surface is used, it would be considered a hard surface paved trail and should be classified as a Type 4 roadside trail, a Type 5 sidewalk connector or a Type 6 paved multi-use trail.

Paved trails (some type 4’s and all type 5’s and 6’s) will typically be asphalt, but may be concrete where warranted. New surfaces of highly compacted and emulsified decomposed granite can be used, or varieties of colored asphalt, colored concrete or permeable asphalt or permeable concrete can be considered. Although much more expensive than standard asphalt or concrete, these enhanced pavement types are useful for their aesthetic appeal, long wear patterns and ability to infiltrate runoff (permeable surface types only).

Since bicycles are easily deflected by surface irregularities, care must be taken to maintain a smooth surface and to avoid longitudinal gaps. Striping or other surface markings must be non-skid paint, emulsified plastic or tape designed for that purpose.

A regular sweeping plan will be necessary, especially wherever a paved trail must be installed low in the topography where debris from winter storm flows may accumulate, such as dipping down to pass under a bridge. Since the trail will be inundated more often than other segments, these specific locations may be more durably constructed with concrete.

For this plan, the majority of the accessibility recommendations for Type 6 trails are based on the AASHTO “shared-use path” guidelines. However, additional issues not addressed in the AASHTO bicycle facility guide, such as protruding objects, are also included in this section addressing the similarities of Types 4 and 6 trails. Also, grade recommendations in this plan are based on those developed in the Regulatory Negotiation Committee for Outdoor Developed Areas because the maximum grades identified for cyclists in the AASHTO bicycle facility guide do not satisfactorily address the needs of some people with mobility impairments.

Surface Firmness, Stability and Slip-resistance Surface condition is a significant factor in how easily a person with a disability can travel along a trail. Trail surface firmness, stability and slip-resistance affects all users, but are particularly important for people using mobility devices such as canes, crutches, wheelchairs, or walkers. The accessibility of the trail surface is determined by a variety of factors including: • Surface material; •

surface firmness and stability;

•

slip-resistance;

•

changes in level; and

•

size and design of surface openings

Surfacing material significantly affects which user groups will be capable of using them. Trails surfaced with loose aggregates are unusable by in-line skaters and many cyclists, and reduce all cyclists’ speed. Paved surfaces should be provided in areas subject to flooding or drainage problems, in areas with steep terrain, and in areas where cyclists or in-line skaters are the primary users.

7-8

Chapter 7 • Trail Standards

Trails Master Plan Table 7.1: Trail Surfaces Samples

A. Sand

B. Native Soil

C. Gravel

D. Crushed Stone

E. Decomposed Granite

CitySURFACE Trail Standard Design Guidelines SOFT FIRMTable SURFACE

GUIDELINES

City Trail Standard Design Guidelines Table NOTES

TYPE 1

TYPE 2

TYPE 4

TYPE 6

or 6 Multi-use Path TYPE 1Primitive TYPE 2Open Space TYPE 4 RoadsideTYPE Open Space Recreation Primitive Open Space Roadside or Connector Multi-use Path Nature Trail Trail Open Space Recreation Trail Connector Tread Width 1, 1aNature Trail 2’ or > Trail 4’ - 8’ Trail 5’-12’ 8’ – 16’ TreadEasement Width 1, 1a 2’ or > 4’ - 8’ 5’-12’ 8’ – 16’ Easement Width 2, 3, 6 10’-20’ 10’ – 20’ 12’ 12’ – 20’ Width 2, 3, 6 10’-20’ 10’ – 20’ 12’ 12’ – 20’ Recreation/ Recreation/ Recreation/ Recreation/ Recreation Recreation/ Non Motorized Non Motorized Recreation Recreation/ Non Motorized Non Motorized Function Transportation Function Transportation Transportation Transportation

GUIDELINES

NOTES

Grade Grade

4

4

Cross SlopeSlope Cross Surface Surface Material* 7 Material* Anticipated Anticipated User Volume User Volume Horizontal Horizontal 5 Clearance Clearance Vertical Clearance Vertical

Clearance

Notes:

7

<25% <25%

<8.33%

<8.33% <15%

1 – 8% 1 – 8% 1 – 5% 1 – 5% 1 - 2% 1 - 2% 1 – 2% SuitableSuitable Native Native D.G. or D.G. or D.G./BindingD.G./Binding Asphalt or Soil Suitable Native Agent w/concrete Concrete Soil Suitable Native Agent w/concrete Soil or wood header

Soil

or wood header

Med – Low Medium Medium 1’ Beyond Med Tread– Low2’ Beyond Medium 1’ Beyond Tread 2’ Beyond Edge Tread Edge At Edge

5

<15% <8.33%

10’

Edge 10’

10’

Tread Edge 10’

12’

F. Asphalt

G. Concrete

H. Permeable Paving

HARD SURFACE Table 7.2: Standards for Trail Types

<8.33% 1 – 2% Asphalt or Concrete

High

Medium High 2’ Beyond Tread 2’ Beyond Tread Edge At Edge Edge 12’

12’

12’

1) Tread width within the *optimum range will be based on site-specific conditions.

Notes: 1a) When Trail shares utility access maintenance easements, or roadways, the trail width and surfacing 1) materials Tread width the *optimum will be basedofonthesite-specific shall bewithin acceptable to all partiesrange sharing jurisdiction right of way,conditions. while also providing for When shares standards. utility access or roadways, the trail public1a) safety and Trail maintenance San maintenance Diego Regionaleasements, Standards shall take precedence overwidth these and surfacing betrails acceptable to in allutility parties sharing jurisdiction of the right way, while also providing for designmaterials guidelinesshall where are shared access or maintenance areas where theof Regional Standards are called out.safety and maintenance standards. San Diego Regional Standards shall take precedence over these public 2) Easementdesign width within the *optimum rangeare will be dependant onaccess topographical or environmental conditions, i.e. guidelines where trails shared in utility or maintenance areas where the Regional Standards steep slope, are rugged called terrain, out. rock outcroppings, or sensitive biological resources or habitat which require the maximum easement width.

2) Easement width within the *optimum range will be dependant on topographical or environmental conditions, i.e.

3) These are *optimum grade ranges. The following additional criteria can be applied to Type 1 and 2 trails if steepbyslope, rugged terrain, rock outcroppings, or sensitive biological resources or habitat which require the warranted site conditions. width.

•maximum Ideal: 0%easement - 5% 3) •These are *optimum grade ranges. following additional Acceptable: Average running grade The of 10% or less, for distancescriteria over 200can feetbe applied to Type 1 and 2 trails if by site conditions.

•warranted Acceptable: Average running grade of 15% or less, for distances under 200 feet • Ideal: Average 0% - 5%running grade of 20% or less, for distances under 100 feet • Acceptable: • Sufficient switchbacks should be provided to avoid excessive grades • Acceptable: Average running grade of 10% or less, for distances over 200 feet • Type trails may exceed 20% grade due grade to existing conditions environmental constraints but for • 1Acceptable: Average running of 15% or less,orfor distances under 200 feet running grades of only brief distances.

• Acceptable: Average running grade of 20% or less, for distances under 100 feet 4) Type 2 trails at 4 feet shall provide horizontal clearance 1 foot beyond tread edge to a minimum height of 3 feet.

• Sufficient switchbacks should be provided to avoid excessive grades 5) Circulation Element type 4 and type 6 trails are associated with the road right-of-way. The minimum width • Type 1totrails may exceed grade to recreational existing conditions or environmental constraints but for specified corresponds the current standard20% for high use,due multi use. Depending on the running grades of only brief distances. discretionary project being contemplated, an additional 5 feet of road right-of-way may be required, thus 4) Typea 2total trails at 4offeet shall horizontal clearance 1 foot beyond tread edge to a minimum height of 3 feet. providing width 15 feet forprovide trail / parkway purposes.

6) Optimal pathways Element have separation roadway, is often limited due to road right-of5) Circulation type 4from and the type 6 trailsbut areimplementation associated with the road right-of-way.

The minimum width way widths, topographic conditions, increased construction specified corresponds to the and current standard for highcost. use, multi recreational use. Depending on the 7) All decomposed granite materials have a stabilizing agent incorporated blended at the batch or discretionary project beingshall contemplated, an additional 5 feet ofand road right-of-way mayplant be required, thus quarry. Approved types include but are not limited to: (grades over 8%) Polypave, Color shall be gold or tan and providing a total width of 15 feet for trail / parkway purposes. a submittal sample shall be provided to the Project Engineer for approval through the typical submittal process.

6) Optimal pathways have separation from the roadway, but implementation is often limited due to road right-ofway widths, topographic conditions, and increased construction cost.

* “Optimum” means the best or most favorable condition for a particular trail situation from the perspective of Chapter 7 • Trail Standards 7) All decomposed granite materials shall have a stabilizing agent incorporated and blended at the batch plant or responsible management.

quarry. Approved types include but are not limited to: (grades over 8%) Polypave, Color shall be gold or tan and a submittal sample shall be provided to the Project Engineer for approval through the typical submittal process.

* “Optimum” means the best or most favorable condition for a particular trail situation from the perspective of

7-9

City of Carlsbad Table 7.3: Recommended Surfaces Treatments

TRAIL OR ROUTE TYPE #

Name

Trail Type Name

Surface (Tread) Type

SOFT SURFACE: Uncompacted native soil

SOFT SURFACE: Crushed rock, sand or gravel

SOFT SURFACE: Uncompacted decomposed granite (DG)

HARD SURFACE: FIRM SURFACE: FIRM SURFACE: HARD SURFACE: HARD SURFACE: Highly compacted Heavily compacted Standard or colored Standard or colored Permeable concrete or emulsified DG chipped stone asphalt concrete or asphalt

NATURAL TRAIL TYPES (SOFT OR FIRM SURFACE TRAILS IN OPEN SPACE)

1 Nature Trail

2

✔

✔

✔

Recreational Trail

Wide Dirt Trail or Utility 3 Roadbed

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION / RECREATION TRAILS (FIRM OR HARD SURFACE MOSTLY NEAR ROADS)

4

Roadside or Connector Trails

✔

✔

✔

Connector Sidewalks or 5 Special Street Crossings

✔

✔

✔

Paved Multiuse Trail (Class: all Non6 motorized Users)

✔

✔

✔

7-10

✔

✔

Chapter 7 • Trail Standards

Trails Master Plan

Firmness is how a surface resists deformation by indentation when a person walks or wheels across it. A firm surface does not compress significantly under the forces of trail use.

Stability is the degree a surface remains unchanged by contaminants or applied force so that when the contaminant or force is removed, the surface returns to its original condition. A stable surface is one not significantly altered by a person walking or maneuvering a wheelchair on it.

Slip-resistance is based on the frictional force necessary to permit a person to move across a surface without slipping. A slip-resistant surface does not allow a shoe, wheelchair tires, or a crutch tip to slip when crossing the surface. Types 4, 5 and 6 trails should have a firm and stable surface because when a person walks or wheels across a surface that is not firm and stable, energy that would otherwise cause forward motion instead deforms or displaces the surface or is lost through slipping.

Asphalt and concrete are firm and stable. Under dry conditions, most asphalt and concrete is also fairly slip-resistant. Other trail materials, such as compacted crushed stone or decomposed granite, are also firm and stable under most conditions, but are sometimes too loose to be ADA-compliant. The addition of bonding agents or emulsifiers can address this issue and will improve longevity. Type 4, 5 and 6 trails should be designed to be slip-resistant during wet weather conditions. U.S. Access Board Technical Bulletin #4 addresses slip-resistance for more detail.

Paving Patterns Hardscape surface design qualities can be used to reinforce Carlsbad trail branding.

There are a wide variety of options to choose from in terms of style and materials.

Concepts to consider include a consistent use of materials, finishes, color, stamping or score patterns. Selections should be based on the desired trail theme and cost.

Also, it is likely that the level of design would be higher at nodes such as trailheads.

Abrupt Level Changes Changes in level are defined as the maximum vertical change between two adjacent surfaces. Problematic examples that may occur along Types 4 and 6 trails include uneven transitions between trail bridge surface or walkways, or cracks or change in natural ground level (often caused by seismic activity or tree roots).

Although abrupt level changes are not desirable for people with mobility impairments, they are potentially even more of an issue for cyclists and in-line skaters and can also cause pedestrians to trip and fall. The risk is particularly acute for those who have difficulty lifting their feet off the ground or who have limited vision and may be unable to detect the level change. Catching a wheel on an obstacle or level change can easily tip wheeled devices as the individual’s momentum continues forward despite the wheels having suddenly stopped. Minimizing or eliminating abrupt level changes will greatly improve Type 6 trail safety for all users.

For Types 4, 5 and 6 trails, the following recommendations should be followed: • Vertical level changes should not be incorporated in new construction; •

if unavoidable, small level changes up to a quarter inch may remain vertical without edge treatment;

•

a beveled surface with a maximum slope of 50 percent should be added to small level changes; and

•

level changes, such as curbs exceeding one-half inch, should be ramped or removed.

Chapter 7 • Trail Standards

7-11

City of Carlsbad Trail Drainage Structures Trail drainage openings are spaces or holes in the paved trail surface. On recreation trails, openings may occur naturally, such as a crack in a rock surface. However, on Type 4 and 6 trails, openings are usually constructed, such as spaces between the boardwalk planks to allow water to drain from the surface. A catch basin or trench drain grate is an example of a drainage structure with openings that allow water to drain into a conveyance system, typically a framework of latticed or parallel bars that prevents large obstacles from falling through a drainage inlet but permits water and some sediment to pass through.

Openings, such as drainage grates, should be located outside the trail tread.

Wheelchair casters or walkers, crutch and cane tips, in-line skate wheels and narrow bicycle tires can get caught in poorly placed grates or gaps, creating a serious safety hazard. If placing openings in the trail cannot be avoided, employ the following specifications: •

Width - The size of the open space should not permit a 1 1/2” diameter sphere to pass through the opening. If a wider gap is unavoidable because of existing design constraints, it may be acceptable to extend the width to a maximum of three-quarters inch.

•

Orientation - If the open space is elongated, it must be oriented so that the long dimension is perpendicular to the trail.

Grade and Cross Slope People with mobility impairments find negotiating steep grades difficult because of the additional effort required to travel over sloped surfaces. Manual wheelchair users may travel rapidly downhill, but will be significantly slower uphill because more energy is required to traverse sloped surfaces than level surfaces. Powered wheelchairs use more battery power on steep grades because they must compensate for the difficult terrain. Also, both powered and manual wheelchairs are less stable on sloped surfaces, particularly if wet. Steep running grades are particularly difficult for users with mobility impairments when resting opportunities are not provided, but even less severe grades that extend over longer distances may tire users as much as shorter, steeper grades. In general, running grades on Type 2, 4 and 6 trails should not exceed five percent and the most gradual slope possible should be used. If steeper segments are incorporated into the shared-use trail, the total running grade exceeding 8.33 percent should be less than 30 percent of the total trail length. In general, the lengths of the steep sections should be minimized and kept free of other access barriers.

Because negotiating a steep grade requires considerable effort, users should not be required to exert additional energy to simultaneously deal with other factors, such as steep cross slopes and vertical level changes. Note that although the recommended maximum grades are similar to those recommended in the 1999 AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, the maximum distances are significantly shorter. When designing trails where maximum grades must be met, the following recommendations should be used:

7-12

•

8.3 percent for a maximum of 200 feet;

•

10 percent for a maximum of 30 feet; and

•

12.5 percent for a maximum of 10 feet

Chapter 7 • Trail Standards

Trails Master Plan

Near the top and bottom of the maximum grade segments, the grade should gradually transition to less than five percent. In addition, rest intervals should be provided within 25 feet of the top and bottom of a maximum grade segment. Rest intervals may be located on the trail, but should ideally be located adjacent to the path for the safety of all users. Well-designed rest intervals should have the following characteristics: • Grade not exceeding five percent; •

cross slopes on paved surfaces not exceeding two percent and cross slopes on non-paved surfaces not exceeding five percent;

•

firm and stable surface;

•

width equal to or greater than the width of the path segment leading to and from the rest interval;

•

minimum length of 60 inches; and

•

minimize change of grade and cross slope on the segment connecting the rest interval with the trail.

Cross Slope and Drainage Severe cross slopes can make it difficult for wheelchair users and others to maintain lateral balance because they must constantly work against the force of gravity pulling them sideways, causing them to veer downhill. The impacts of cross slopes are compounded when combined with steep grades or unstable surfaces. Cross slope can be a barrier to people with mobility impairments, but some cross slope is necessary to drain water quickly off of trails. The negative effect cross slopes have on pedestrian mobility must be balanced against the necessity of including cross slopes to provide adequate drainage. The minimum cross slope necessary should be used for Types 4, 5 and 6 trails. For asphalt and concrete, a cross slope of two percent should be adequate. For non-paved Trail Types 1, 2 and 3 with surfaces such as crushed aggregate or native soil, the maximum recommended cross slope is five percent.

Protruding Objects Examples of protruding objects include light posts, poorly maintained vegetation and signs. Visually impaired users who use guide dogs for navigation need clearance to avoid pathway obstacles up to 80 inches high. Objects that protrude into a trail, but are higher than 80 inches, tend to go unnoticed because most pedestrians require less than 80 inches of headroom.

People with vision impairments who use long white canes to navigate can easily detect objects on trails below 27 inches. However, objects that protrude into the trail between 27 inches and 80 inches are more difficult to discern because the cane will not always come in contact with the object before the pedestrian does. Ideally, objects should not protrude into any portion of the clear tread width of trails. If an object must protrude into the travel space, it should not extend more than four inches. Also, a vertical clearance of eight feet should be provided rather than the 80 inches needed for pedestrians to accommodate other trail users, such as cyclists.

On shared-use trails where there is the potential for equestrian use or emergency or maintenance vehicles access, it may be necessary to increase the vertical clearance.

In addition, when an underpass such as a tunnel is used, a minimum of ten feet of vertical clearance is recommended.

Chapter 7 • Trail Standards

7-13

City of Carlsbad

7.7 Trail Edging and Fencing Trail edging is designed to control the horizontal movement of trail users for safety or protection of adjacent habitats or property (see â&#x20AC;&#x153;Table 7.4: Recommended Edging and Fence Treatmentsâ&#x20AC;?). Since the linear requirements are often long for trails, selecting the right type of edge can make a great difference in the overall costs. In some cases, the edge treatment may be an aesthetic choice, while in other cases a fence is required to prevent access into sensitive areas or private property.

Rock edge definer

Minor Edge Definers In many cases, especially on Trail Types 1 and 2, keeping trail users on the path is important to prevent new volunteer trails or cut-throughs. Controlling directional use may be as simple as keeping existing taller vegetation in place, or by using rocks or logs to define an edge. Signage can also be placed every 100 feet or so to remind users to stay on the trail. When trying to block off a volunteer cut-through trail, piled cut vegetation and signage is often the most effective. Rock edge definers or cut log definers may be appropriate in many areas to direct movement and control access.

Fencing

Log edge definer

Fencing comes in a wide array of materials and designs. Primarily the types found along trails include wire, chain link, post and rail, post and cable or welded wire segments. The purpose of fencing is to deter trail users from going off trail and to protect against access into areas with sensitive habitat or for safety.

Single strand or braided wire fence on vertical metal posts is the least intrusive of the fencing types and denotes a rural or natural containment system best used with Trail Type 1. Barbed wire or constantine razor wire is not recommended and is not allowed.

An individual who wants to obtain access into an area can find a way regardless of the fencing. This treatment can pose a safety hazard and is not appropriate.

Sample details for fencing

7-14

Chapter 7 â&#x20AC;˘ Trail Standards

Trails Master Plan Table 7.4: Recommended Edging and Fencing Treatments

TRAIL OR ROUTE TYPE #

Name

Edge / Fencing Treatments

Shovel Cut Edge / Rock Edge / Tree Trail Type Name Limb Edge

Existing Peeler Log Chain Link / Vegetation Edge or New Braided Wire Wood Post and with Notched Vinyl Covered Metal Post and Metal Post & Welded Wire or Rope / Cable Rails Chain Link Cable Pipe Rail Mesh Fence Planter Areas Fence

NATURAL TRAIL TYPES (SOFT OR FIRM SURFACE TRAILS IN OPEN SPACE)

1

Nature Trail

✔

2 Recreational Trail

Wide Dirt Trail or

3 Utility Roadbed

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION / RECREATION TRAILS (FIRM OR HARD SURFACE MOSTLY NEAR ROADS) Roadside or

4 Connector Trails

5

Connector Sidewalks or Special Street Crossings

Paved Multi-use Trail (Class: all 6 Non-motorized Users)

Chapter 7 • Trail Standards

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

7-15

City of Carlsbad Chain link fencing can be used along Trail Type 2 and Trail Type 6 as an appropriate edge definer. The chain link should be black vinyl coated or utilize a stain such as “Nativa” to avoid the cold gray look of galvanized metal. In most cases, a wide open chain link of one inch openings or greater is preferable, since closer spaced chain link tends to close in visually when looking down a long segment of the fence. In most cases, a 42-inch high fence is adequate to contain users and define an edge.

Chain link can also be framed with wood or a metal cap to improve its overall rustic look in and around natural areas. Note that this type of fencing prevents some wildlife from traversing the trail, so if the trail is within a wildlife corridor, open railing options or wire may be more appropriate.

Welded wire fencing can be used along Trail Type 6 near the railway. NCTD has requested that a stronger fence be used to deflect any flying material or ballast that could be airborne with a fast moving train. The costs of these fence types are not warranted in general purpose locations, although they do provide vine support.

Railings Railings provide a compromise between low edge definition and enclosed fencing.

If edge protection is needed, the railing should be a minimum height of 42 inches.

Railings for Type 1 trails should be used only where a drop-off occurs that needs safety protection. To control access, a variety of railing types can be used, including post and rope, peeler log with bolted rails, or peeler log with fitted rail. The post and rope, post and cable, or post and chain edge definers are recommended for Trail Type 1. The other railing based edge definers should be used on Trail Type 2 or near road Trail Type 4 or Type 6. The peeler logs seem to work best for Trail Type 2, along roadways for Trail Type 4 and for stand alone multi-use trails referred to as Trail Type 6. The post and cable or metal railing posts are more expensive, but where maintenance is an issue, such as along the coast, they may be worth the expense.

7.8 Trail Access and Trailhead Facilities Trail system access points may be provided with various levels of amenities, depending on likely user levels and types, how users will arrive and what amenities may be desired or needed. Planned trail amenities can include design features such as bridges, rest areas and vista points, as well as intersection treatments, plant material, fencing, striping and signage. (see “Table 7.4: Amenities applied to different trail types:”).

Staging Areas Staging areas should be provided at major trail system access points. They should be sited above any potential flood flows, especially restroom facilities. Major staging areas should include all of the following: • Shade trees (or optional shade structures); • seating (benches; • picnic tables; • bicycle racks (no long-term storage); • water for trail users; • interpretive and directional signage; • trash receptacles; • off–street parking for 20 cars; • restrooms (optional); and • minimal security lighting (optional).

7-16

Chapter 7 • Trail Standards

Trails Master Plan

Three strand twisted wire fence

Post and cable

Peeler log, bolted

Peeler log, notched

Black vinyl covered chain link

Welded wire

Metal post and cable

Metal post and three metal rails

Chapter 7 â&#x20AC;˘ Trail Standards

7-17

City of Carlsbad Traiheads A trailhead is defined as a less developed access point to a trail system that functions as a rest area and orientation point. It is typically smaller, accommodates less people and has fewer facilities than a staging area. Trailheads may provide users the following limited features: • Seating and/or picnic tables (not suggested if homeless and loitering are considered a problem in the area); •

trash receptacles;

•

bicycle racks (no long-term storage);

•

hitching posts (if equestrian use is anticipated);

•

shade trees;

•

interpretive and directional signs; and

• shade structures.

All Carlsbad trailheads should include trail identification signs, regulatory signs, trail user posts and a kiosk that can provide a place for maps and announcements.

Restrooms A portable toilet is an interim facility that may be provided early in a staging area’s development. Portable toilets may also be brought in temporarily for special events. A permanent restroom or comfort station building is an optional facility may be provided at a later date at a staging area if demand warrants it. Maintenance costs are high as are the capital costs, so most trailheads do not warrant this facility. A major staging area may warrant the costs of a restroom facility. If a trailhead is next to a park, joint use of that facility would be logical, or a capital cost born by the trail system with maintenance costs born by the park might be a workable solution.

Minimal level of entry elements

Moderate level of entry elements

7-18

High level of entry elements

Chapter 7 • Trail Standards

Trails Master Plan

Shade Structures A shade structure is an open frame design feature at a staging area, trailhead or rest area. A shade structure may be provided as an option at staging areas and trailheads. However, wherever possible, shade should instead be provided by trees, especially native species. Shade structures are also valuable at the mid-points of trails or where views are available. Benches and tables should be placed under the shade structure whenever possible.

Turnouts, Vista Points and Rest Areas The trail system may have turnouts, vista points and rest areas along its routes. The characteristics and design for each are described below.

Rest Areas Rest areas provide an opportunity for users to move off the trail to stop and rest.

Periodic rest areas are beneficial, particularly for people with mobility impairments who typically expend more effort to walk than other users. Rest areas are especially crucial when grade or cross slope demands increase. Rest area frequency should vary depending on the terrain and intended use. Popular and more difficult trails should therefore have more frequent opportunities for rest.

If a rest area is only provided on one side of the trail, it should be on the uphill side.

Having separate rest areas on both sides of the trail is preferred when there is a higher volume or multi-use with cyclists that may travel at higher speeds. This reduces the trail users need to cross in front of other trail users. In general, rest areas should have the following design characteristics: • Cross slopes on paved surfaces not exceeding two percent and cross slopes on non-paved surfaces not exceeding five percent; •

firm and stable surface;

•

minimum length of ten feet and width of four feet for a standard six foot bench or seat;

•

minimal change of grade and cross slope on the segment connecting the rest area with the pathway; and

•

ADA accessible seating whenever any seating is provided.

Simple wood structure and table

Chapter 7 • Trail Standards

High level shade structure and benching

7-19

City of Carlsbad Seating can be important for people with disabilities and those who may have difficulty getting up from a seated position on the ground. Some seating should have backrests to provide support when resting and at least one armrest to provide support to help disabled users resume a standing position. Accessible seating should provide the same benefits as seating for users without disabilities. For example, providing space for a wheelchair facing away from an attractive view would not be appropriate.

Turnouts High level of amenities for a viewing location

A turnout is defined as either a widened section of trail that allows faster trail users to pass or a side path that allows slower trail users to pull over and rest away from the main trail. Turnouts should have: • Widened pathway; •

shade trees and native vegetation;

•

directional and/or mileage signs (optional); and

•

fencing as needed.

Vista Points This is a type of turnout/rest area specifically focused on scenic views. Vista points will have similar features as turnouts. If located on a bridge deck, they will be more limited with only a widened pullout and, if room is available, a bench and signage.

In general, interpretive signage may be especially appropriate at viewpoints where trail users are more likely to pause.

Views entice the trail user to stop

Simple way to enhance the view experience

Views can be framed with structure placement

Rustic benches are appropriate for the Type 1 trails

7-20

Chapter 7 • Trail Standards

Trails Master Plan Table 7.5: Amenities applied to different trail types:

Recreational ✔ Trail

Wide Dirt Trail or Utility 3 Roadbed

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

Pedestrian Level Trail Lighting

✔

Security Level Lighting

✔

✔

Native Trees & Shrubs

2

✔

Non-native Shade Trees and Shrubs

1 Nature Trail

Drinking Fountain

✔

NATURAL TRAIL TYPES (SOFT OR FIRM SURFACE TRAILS IN OPEN SPACE)

Bike Racks

✔

Dog Waste Dispenser

✔

Trash Receptacle

✔

Benches

✔

Picnic Tables

✔

Vista Pullouts or Viewpoints

✔

Public Art

✔

Interpretive Facilities

Trail Users Post with Icons

✔

Overhead Shade Structures

Trail Name & Regulatory Sign

✔

Gateway Monument or Overhead

Minor Kiosk with Maps

Major Kiosk with Info & Maps

Restrooms

On-Street Parking

Trail Type Name

Possible Amenities

Off-Street Parking

TRAIL OR ROUTE TYPE #

Name

✔

✔

✔

✔

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION / RECREATION TRAILS FIRM OR HARD SURFACE TRAILS MOSTLY NEAR ROADS) Roadside or 4 Connector Trails

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

Connector Sidewalks or 5 Special Street Crossings Paved Multiuse Trail (Class: all 6 Nonmotorized Users)

✔

✔

✔

Chapter 7 • Trail Standards

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

✔

7-21

City of Carlsbad Trail Structures Trail structures such as retaining and seat walls, shade structures and other physical enhancements should include design features that include a consistent use of materials, forms, finishes and colors that are consistent with the Carlsbad Trail Program branding or the master planned community branding where a trail may be located within a master planned community. The Carlsbad Parks and Recreation Department reviews development plans where future trails are to be guilt and provides guidance on a case by case basis regarding special characteristics that can be included as part of the trail system they will be developed privately but have public use. Contact the Parks and Recreation Department (760 434-2826) with regard to final design and adherence to the city trail standards.

Public Art A creative trail art program that provides beauty and learning opportunities is encouraged with the development of new trails. Local artists can be commissioned to create art for the trail system, making it unique, educational and memorable.

Themes should draw from the local natural and cultural environment. Many trail art installations can function as or be incorporated into signs, benches, shelters, or even the pavement surface.

Artistic sculptural expressions, entry signage and amenity special treatments are all artistic expressions

7-22

Chapter 7 â&#x20AC;˘ Trail Standards

Trails Master Plan

7.9 Supporting Infrastructure Drainage Crossing Structures The Carlsbad trail system may require the design and construction of drainage crossing structures, and trails should be designed so that no adverse drainage impacts occur due to construction. To minimize potential impacts, trail design should give careful consideration to ponding along property lines and to prevent trail fill from blocking existing drainage patterns. Drainage structures may require review and permitting from agencies such as the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Regional Water Quality Control Board.

Culverts A culvert is a drain or pipe that allows water to flow under the trail. Culverts are generally smaller than bridges, ranging from small pipes to large reinforced concrete structures. Culverts should be provided at appropriate intervals and should be sized to convey appropriate drainage flows. A culvert can be a cost-effective solution to bridge a minor drainage flow. Consideration should be given to design provisions such as rock edging and energy dissipaters to prevent downstream erosion in case the culvert clogs with debris and flows overtop the trail. Where culverts are employed, regular maintenance during the rainy season is recommended to clear debris.

Culverts tend to be maintenance intensive and can detract from the aesthetics of the natural environment. Culverts should only be constructed where a gentle grade must be maintained, such as with a barrier-free trail or where there is permanently flowing water. In all other situations, a wash crossing should be used. Rock or pipe culverts must match the downstream gradient and have a diameter of at least 12 inches to accommodate necessary cleaning. Improperly constructed culverts will clog with debris causing water to flow over and damage the trail tread. All rock use in the construction of culverts must be native.

The proper construction of rock culverts depends greatly on the proper selection and placement of rocks of sufficient size and shape. The bottom surface of the drainage must be armored with rocks to prevent erosion. Stone headwalls must be placed to armor the outside faces of the crossing. All rocks must be firmly placed similar to the construction of a retaining wall. For pipe culverts, pipe diameter must be at least 12 inches. Embed the pipe in a stable foundation of gravel and soil, and backfill with compacted gravel and soil. Construct a headwall of firmly placed native stone to protect the outside faces of the tread crossing and cover the pipe so it cannot be viewed from the trail. The trail tread should be at least six inches higher than the top of the pipe.

Causeways Causeways are raised portions of trails used where trails must cross poorly drained areas or where seeps moisten soil tread. These are paths elevated above wet ground using a permeable fill material as a base. Path edges incorporate small boulders or rock rip-rap, usually locally sourced, to contain the permeable fill. Adding rock and elevating the trail allows water to drain to the side and helps prevent the widening that occurs when users try to walk around damp areas. Path construction and detailing depends on site water table depth and surface flows. A stable paving base must be established while allowing for water flow under the trail and should be designed so as not to be compromised by future water flows. Base fill must be firm mineral coarse-grained or granular material, or small, well-graded angular rocks. Causeways are not intended for use to cross wetlands.

Chapter 7 â&#x20AC;˘ Trail Standards

7-23

City of Carlsbad Stone Retaining Walls Stone retaining walls are used to stabilize trails with steep side slopes. Retaining walls are more solid than rip-rap as they must support the full weight of the trail tread. A solid foundation is key to the strength and durability of a retaining wall. The use of retaining walls alongside trails will require specific analysis on a case by case basis to determine the best methods of construction and may require great skill and previous experience or engineering and should be undertaken by skilled and professional construction crews.

Rip-Rap Unlike a retaining wall, rip-rap does not support the weight of the trail tread. Instead, rip-rap is used to stabilize steep slopes above and below the trail tread (backslope and fillslope, respectively). Begin by clearing a firm foundation at the downhill edge of the rip-rap. Set the larges rocks in the foundation. Place smaller rocks on the surface of the slope continuing up the slope to the desired location. Be sure that the rip-rap does not impede the flow of surface water off the trail tread. Rip-rap can also be used to protect drainage and lead-off ditches from heavy erosion, and to stabilize switchback turns. Rip-rap should be constructed of native rock. If cement is used to provide additional stability, it must be colored to match the native rock.

Wash Crossings When trails cross washes, the greatest concern is protecting the trail from flowing water. The trail segments approaching the crossing, and the location where the trail meets each edge of the wash, must be stabilized with securely placed rocks.

Trail segments approaching the wash should range from 8 to 15 percent for all trail classifications, and cross at a 90 degree angle to the wash to prevent water from leaving the primary channel and flowing along the trail surface. The slopes adjacent to the trail may need to be stabilized with rip-rap. A row of large rocks should be embedded along the wash banks at the point of contact with the trail. Be sure that the flowing water will not undercut these rocks.

Trail Access Gates Gates are typically employed and designed to restrict motorized access to non-motorized use trails, but where vehicular access is needed for maintenance and emergency purposes. Typically these gates should be located at trailheads, where trails cross major roads, and at other points where motorized vehicles are likely to attempt to access a trail. These gates must be constructed of heavy gauge metal or other durable low-maintenance materials.

7.10 Bridges and Tunnels Future development of the Carlsbad trail system is likely to include bridge crossings, especially in the I-5 corridor areas of the cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s three lagoons. The new structures for the trail system that are part of the transportation infrastructure will create opportunities for overlooks, habitat protection, loop trails and critical east/west trail connections to the coast. Bridges can also provide maintenance and emergency service access. Likely potential use, cost-effectiveness and physical constraints should drive bridge location selection. The following conceptual bridge criteria will serve as a guideline for the development of potential trail bridge crossings.

7-24

Chapter 7 â&#x20AC;˘ Trail Standards

Trails Master Plan

Wood Trail Bridge Wooden bridges can provide a cost-effective solution in bridging minor drainage crossings while supporting local trail character. Bridges should be level and avoid a step-up if the trail is intended to be ADA-compliant or will be used by cyclists. Since the life span of wood is limited, recycled plastic composite lumber may be considered as a feasible alternative for the required deck material. If the fall distance is greater than 30 inches, guardrails should be at least 42 inches higher than the bridge surface. Spans greater than ten feet should generally be engineered and may require site-specific geotechnical work. It should be noted that long span wood construction requires similar requirements for abutments and foundation supports as steel bridges.

Ultimate in safe street crossings, but not always used

Prefabricated Steel Truss Trail Bridge The most common use of prefabricated steel truss bridges is for trail applications in conjunction with parks and trails. Such bridges can be used on relatively long spans of over 100 feet, with virtually unlimited spans possible with intervening supports.

Design considerations for prefabricated steel truss bridges include finishes such as weathered (Cor-Ten) steel, paint or galvanizing, as well as deck options such as castin-place reinforced concrete, precast planks, open grating, or composite or wood decking. Prefabricated steel truss bridges are available in a variety of design styles and truss types to accommodate project aesthetic and clearance requirements.

New bridges should emulate existing installations in the area.

Bridge Width

Safe crossing if highly visible and lighted

For Type 6 trails, bridges would be typical of those commonly used for trails and should be the width of the connecting trail. When a wider multi-purpose bridge is desired to accommodate higher use levels, or to support maintenance or patrol vehicles, bridges should be a minimum of 20 feet wide and constructed to the required load rating.

Tunnels Tunnels are warranted as methods to get across very busy streets and, if planned for well in advance of roadway extensions, can be feasible regarding costs of construction. However, in most cases, an at-grade roadway crossing with improved pedestrian crossing facilities are more likely to be used by the general public at a lower expense. When essential, the most important aspect of the tunnel is to ensure high visibility for tunnel users and avoid hiding places and alcoves. The use of lighting in the tunnel is also essential since sunlight at two ends makes it very difficult to see through during the day because of high contrast, or if during the night, too dark to pass through.

Tunnels are typically constructed of pre-cast concrete box culverts. Other varieties of culverts are acceptable provided they meet the required dimensions, and allow footing that is appropriate for all types of trail users. The width of a trail traveling through an underpass should not be less than 12 feet. Vertical clearance is an important concern, particularly for equestrian trail users. The minimum vertical clearance is 9 feet at a distance of 4 feet from the centerline, and 11 feet at a distance of 3 feet from the centerline. Natural or vandal-resistant electric lighting should be installed for safety.

Sight distances approaching and exiting the underpass must be adequate for safety.

Underpass design must not allow the accumulation of nuisance water on the trail. If water does not drain from the underpass by gravity flow, a pump system must be provided to remove the water. The surface of the underpass should be slip resistant.

Chapter 7 â&#x20AC;˘ Trail Standards

7-25

City of Carlsbad Mid-block Road Crossings Allowing trails to end at the middle of a busy street is not proper trail planning and should be avoided. Placing signs stating the need to walk to the nearest intersection is not a solution unless it is less than 100 feet to the intersection. If the distance is less than 100 feet in either direction, it is reasonable to expect a trail user to use the intersection. If it is further, it is much more likely that a trail user will jaywalk across the roadway. A variety of mid-block crossings address this issue and can improve safety.

If only one lane exists in each direction, then a non-controlled crossing may work if median refuges, high visibility striping, signage and mid-street rubberized warnings stating the state law requiring drivers stop for pedestrians are installed. For multiple lanes, a HAWK or a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon system should be used.

Marked crosswalks is okay if only one lane each direction

Multiple lanes require positive protection such as this Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon

7-26

Uncontrolled crosswalks should include signage, a median refuge and a state yield law sign

A hybrid signal and warning system known as a HAWK (high intensity activated crosswalk beacon) or PHB (Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon) is very effective at stopping vehicles

Chapter 7 â&#x20AC;˘ Trail Standards

Trails Master Plan

7.11 Boardwalks Boardwalk construction may be used to span sensitive areas such as stream riparian zones, unavoidable wet areas and depressions, and in areas of steep slopes. They can also be used to provide trail access in areas where grading and filling may harm tree roots or create trail surfaces that wildlife will not cross. Boardwalks should be considered in relation to environmental impacts, available budget, potential user needs, and operations and management issues. The following conceptual boardwalk criteria will serve as a guideline for the development of any boardwalks identified in the trail system.

Boardwalk Materials Proposed boardwalks must meet AASHTO design recommendations for Type 6 trails. Boardwalks should be structurally designed to support the weight of a small truck or a lightweight maintenance vehicle. For boardwalk deck construction, wood lumber is typical. Composite lumber provides a longer useful life compared to wood, is a heavier weight material to reduce floating in flood-prone sites and the pronounced texture can reduce slippery surfaces. While composite lumber typically costs more than wood, its durability can make it more cost-effective over the life of the structure and is now commonly employed for boardwalks and bridge decks in open space.

Sample boardwalk at San Dieguito Lagoon

Boardwalk Height from Ground The boardwalk height should be set to allow small animal movement under the structure, a minimum of six inches above grade. Footings will vary depending on soil conditions, and a geotechnical investigation is recommended. Prefabricated modular footings are recommended to reduce construction environmental impacts.

Boardwalk width should be the same as that of the trail type for which it is built.

New boardwalk crossing at Calavera Lakes

Boardwalk Railings AASHTO recommends 42 inch high railings on any structure or path more than 30 inches above adjacent grade. Boardwalks less than 30 inches above grade may not require a railing according to current building standards. Curb rails alongside the edge of boardwalks are highly recommended to assist in warning trail users that they are traveling close to the edge.

7.12 Lighting The need for lighting should be carefully determined on a case-by-case basis. In general, trails themselves should not be lighted, but where there is a demonstrated need, lighting does allow nighttime use of specific trail segments and provides a measure of trail safety. For example, lighting may be considered at bridges, at public gathering areas along the trails and at trail access points. Lighting should not be considered where nighttime use is not expected or allowed, adjacent to sensitive wildlife habitat areas, or along residential areas unless shielded. Matching or complimenting light fixture style and types with other site furnishings will strengthen the overall trail branding.

Light color should be considered in the selection, since consistent color illumination will visually enhance and link the trail at night. All light sources should provide a warm white color light. A wide variety of lighting options are available in terms of style and material selection, as well as energy efficiency. A licensed or qualified lighting expert should be consulted before making any lighting design decisions. Doing so can reduce up-front fixed costs and long-term energy costs. As appropriate, dark sky-compliant lighting should be selected to minimize light pollution cast into the sky while maximizing light cast onto the ground. Stand-alone solar-powered light

Chapter 7 â&#x20AC;˘ Trail Standards

7-27

City of Carlsbad fixtures continue to come down in cost as fixture, battery and photovoltaic technology improves, and should be utilized where possible for new installations or retrofit projects, especially where supplying electrical power may be prohibitively expensive.

Roadway Crossings The design of all trail roadway crossings should include lighting for the comfort, safety and convenience of roadway and trail users. Properly designed lighting provides cues to drivers to expect trail users at crossings. FHWA HT-08-053, The Information Report on Lighting Design for Mid-block Crosswalks, found that a vertical illumination of 20 lux in front of the crosswalk, measured at a height of five feet from the road surface, provided adequate detection distances in most circumstances.

Although this research specifically addressed mid-block crosswalk placement, the report includes a brief discussion of considerations in lighting crosswalks co-located with intersections and the same lighting principles apply there. Illumination just in front of crosswalks creates optimal visibility of pedestrians. Crosswalk lighting should also provide color contrast from standard roadway lighting.

Energy Conservation Where lighting is included in projects, some trail and roadway or crossing lighting may be required. The use of energy-efficient Light Emitting Diode (LED) lighting fixtures should be considered for these applications. LED lighting is becoming an alternative illumination source to replace commonly used high pressure sodium vapor (HPSV) lighting.

Type 4 or 6 trails benefit from lighting but great care is needed not to spill over light into adjacent wildlife or development

LED efficiency benefits include long life (up to 100,000 hours) and reduced maintenance due to longer periods between lamp module replacements, but the greatest benefit is reduced energy consumption by as much as an estimated 60 percent when compared to comparable output HPSV lamps. LED can have a lifetime of 12-15 years and a cost recovery of approximately three years.

LED lighting can be used with various light fixtures for various applications. The benefit of lower energy consumption and reduced maintenance costs are very attractive and support the installation of LED lighting. The following is a brief summary of advantages to using LED lighting versus conventional technology: • Low power consumption and reduced maintenance costs; • dimming capability; • more accurate color rendering; • quick turn on and restart; • does not contain toxic lead or gas; • ease of light spillage control where light is undesirable; • and high output at low temperatures

7-28

Chapter 7 • Trail Standards

Trails Master Plan

7.13 Signage Guidelines and Standards Signs provide information. They need to do so in a consistent and clear manner. Too many signs negatively affect the trail user experience and clutter the visual environment. Finding the right balance is important. Signs should be limited to trailheads and key decision points for wayfinding along the trail or where important educational opportunities exist. Regulatory signs may need to be placed in areas where extra controls and instructions are needed.

City of Carlsbad Trail Signage Guidelines and Standards The City of Carlsbad has developed guidelines and standards that should be considered the primary guidance for any signage issues, including specifications such as size and color. The following guidance should be considered supplemental to the city’s requirements.

Signage and Trail Branding Trail signage systems with clear thematic design provide messaging consistency.

The Carlsbad trail system’s existing route signage conveys uniform quality and credibility, enhancing the trail experience. Incorporating the branding or themes in basic amenities such as site furnishings, fencing and gates, lighting, hardscape and structures, signage and art pieces help reinforce the Carlsbad trail brand or “sense of place.” Some trail elements and amenities that can incorporate Carlsbad trail branding are described in the following sections.

Trailhead Signage and Information Signs that clearly describe trail conditions are an essential component of trail experience. Signs should be provided in an easy-to-understand graphic format with limited text. Providing accurate, objective information about actual trail conditions will allow people to assess their own interests, experience and skills and to determine whether a particular trail is appropriate or provides access to them with their assistive devices. Providing users with trail condition information is strongly recommended for the following reasons:

Branded directional sign

• Users are less likely to find themselves in unsafe situations if they understand the demands of the trail before beginning.

• Frustration is reduced and people are less likely to have to turn around on a trail because they can identify impassible situations, such as steep grades, before they begin.

• Users can select trails that meet their skill level and desired experience.

• The level of satisfaction increases because the user is able to select a trail that meets his or her expectations.

• If more difficult conditions will be encountered, users can prepare for the skill level and equipment required.

At a minimum, the following information should be provided at all trailheads on the main trailhead sign: • Trail name; • permitted users; • path length; • elevation change over total length and maximum elevation obtained; • average running grade and maximum grades that will be encountered; • average and maximum cross slopes; • average tread width and minimum clear width; • surface type; and • surface firmness, stability and slip-resistance

Chapter 7 • Trail Standards

7-29

City of Carlsbad A comprehensive signage system ensures that information is provided regarding the safe and appropriate use of all trails, both on and off-road. Signage should establish style, font and color consistency and present a unified appearance to promote the perception and branding of the Carlsbad trails as a unified system. Project signage may include directional, distance, interpretive and regulatory/advisory.

Too crowded and poorly arranged signage

Directional and other typical signage will occur primarily at staging areas, trail heads and potentially other locations where users may regularly access the trail system.

Trail distance markers should occur on a regular interval of at least once per quarter mile for any trail more than one-half mile long. These markers are useful to both trail users and to first responders to locate injured persons. Interpretive signage may occur almost anywhere to coincide with a point of public interest, but will likely be more condensed at the staging areas, trail heads and vista points where users are more likely to spend time off the actual trail surface resting or enjoying the view. For all but regulatory signs, this system’s signage should be comprehensively designed as a definitive signature element encompassing the overall trail system.

Regulatory Signage Regulatory signs should state the rules and regulations associated with trail usage, and identify the managing agency. The trail regulations message is to promote user safety and enhance the user enjoyment. It is important to post trail use regulations at trailheads and key access points. Typical trail regulation signs may include: • Route identification, reassurance and confirmation;

Well arranged and designed signage

•

guidance and distance to trail destinations and key points of interest;

•

safety features and user safety;

•

warnings of known hazards;

•

hours of operation;

•

pedestrian, bicycle, equestrian and vehicular traffic control;

•

dog leash requirements;

•

alcoholic beverages are not permitted on trails;

•

notice of restrictions where use control is necessary;

•

do not wander off of trail onto adjacent properties; and

•

resource protection information.

Bike Route Signage Mainly within public right-of-ways, Class III bicycle routes are identified through route signage using the standard “Bike Route” sign. The CA MUTCD allows alternative bicycle route sign plaques to reflect a numerical route or name designation placed below the route signage. For Class I paved trails, supplemental signs and plaques can be used to direct cyclists and pedestrians to destinations.

Directional Signs

Simple directional sign

Directional signs should provide route and distance information to major destinations and trail amenities. Directional signs should be installed at staging areas, access points and major trail intersections.

Trail Markers Trail markers provide visual reassurance that the user is on the desired trail. Trail markers can also double as distance markers and should occur at regular intervals of at least every quarter mile. These markers are useful for recreational purposes, as well as for providing first responders a means to locate injured persons.

7-30

Chapter 7 • Trail Standards

Trails Master Plan

Kiosks Kiosks provide visitors with information to orient themselves, learn about trail conditions and opportunities, trail regulations, hours of operation, local events such as activities programmed for the Parks and Recreation Department or the Carlsbad Trail Volunteer Program, or within the open space. Kiosk design and style should reflect Carlsbad trail sign system character and branding. Kiosks should be readily identifiable by trail users as informational contact stations and provide elements such as bulletin boards, regional trail maps, rules and regulations and accessibility advisories.

Interpretive and Educational Signage Interpretive signs enhance the trail or bikeway experience by providing information about the history and culture of the area. Such exhibits may discuss local ecology, people, environmental issues and other educational information. Educational signage may be placed at scenic view areas or in relation to specific elements being interpreted. They may take on many forms including textual messages, plaques, markers, panels and demonstrations.

Warning signage should be made into permanent signage

Interpretive signage may occur almost anywhere to coincide with a point of public interest, but will likely be more condensed at staging areas, trailheads and vista points where users are more likely to spend time off the actual trail surface resting or enjoying the view. Because interpretive signs need to relate directly to the needs of a site, no specific guidelines have been established for their format. However, interpretive signs should be concise and integrated into an overall area sign plan, including the wayfinding signs mentioned previously. In addition, they should be constructed of highly resilient materials with easily cleaned or repaired surfaces.

7.14 Specific Trail Signage Guidelines and Standards Locations The proper location of signage is important to ensure the safety of trail users, preserve the natural environment, and promote the presence of the trail. The number and location of signs should be carefully considered, as a lack of signage or poorly located signs can create hazardous situations for trail users. An overabundance of signs can also detract from the aesthetics of the trail and decrease the quality of the trail usersâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; experience.

Trail signs are typically located at trailheads, trail intersections, and locations where trails cross roadways, and at any other areas where it may be difficult to follow the route of the trail. Trail signs should be installed two feet from the edge of the trail to allow proper clearance by trail users.

Signage Types and Location Requirements Primary Signage Location Requirements: Staging Areas/Primary Access Points- Indicate locations on improvement and landscape plans for primary signage locations. Final locations must meet the approval of the City of Carlsbad.

Chapter 7 â&#x20AC;˘ Trail Standards

7-31

City of Carlsbad Required Elements: Preferable information and amenities for this type of signage would be a kiosk or monument with a panel to include: • Trail map; •

trail regulations (attached at end of this section);

•

brochure dispenser for trail maps/brochures;

•

pet waste station with appropriate signage and waste receptacles; and

•

interpretive Information i.e. Historical facts and/or information on local flora and fauna or cultural resources.

Trail Interpretive Signage: Trail interpretive signage may be located at primary entry points, usually referred to as trailheads or trail access points, trail nodes or staging areas. This signage informs the trail users about the unique habitat, wildlife or other characteristics of the trail and to educate the public about the open space system that the trail is located within or about the citywide trail system. It may also include information on trail rules and connections to other points of interest associated with the community such as nearby city parks and trails or nearby schools and businesses. Typically there are two physical components to this type of signage: A base and an interpretive panel with a narrative of information for the trail user as described above.

Moderate level of kiosk displaying some interpretive material

Interpretive Panels: Interpretive signage panels should consist of a durable material that can withstand the outdoor elements of Southern California and should meet the approval of the city. The City of Carlsbad logo should be included on the interpretive panel. Submit a sample or specification of the materials to be used, a mock up indicating the proposed size, layout, background color and design to the City Parks and Recreation Department.

Interpretive Signage Supports: Recyclable plastic materials and metal posts with a painted powder coat type finish are also acceptable for interpretive sign supports and bases. All post footers must have a 3 foot deep by 12 inch round minimum concrete base.

High level of interpretive signage

ADA Compliance: All interpretive signage must be accessible to those with disabilities and comply with the most recent requirements and guidelines for Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines; Recreation Facilities. At trailhead parking areas, ADA signage and parking space stamping must be in compliance with current San Diego Area Regional Standard Drawings.

Trail Regulation Signage Standard Specifications Location Requirements: Trailheads and Staging Areas A. Blanks Sign blanks must be 0.080 gauge aluminum. Blanks must be covered with reflective sheeting of street transportation quality vinyl. There must be two pre-drilled 3/8” holes. The holes must be centered horizontally with the center of each hole being ½” from the top and bottom edges. Corners must be rounded with a 1” to 1-½” radius, dependent on the size of the sign.

B. Lettering Font must be Garamond. Point size should be relative to the size of the sign.

7-32

Chapter 7 • Trail Standards

Trails Master Plan

C. Colors Background must be dark brown, Pantone 7532 C (CMYK: 50,60,70,35) with reflective white lettering and symbols. There must be a ¼”- ½” white reflective border.

D. Dimensions 22” wide by 28” high with rounded corners (approx. 1.5 “) E. Typeface

Mixed lowercase and uppercase: - Body text: Arial Bold, 36 pt., tracking: 60 - First initial, header: Adobe Garamond Pro, Semibold, 172 pt.

- Remaining header text: 142 pt - Subheader: Arial Bold, 56 pt., tracking 60 - Sidebar: Adobe Garamond Pro, Bold, 122 pt., tracking 150

F. Border White reflective border is approx. 21 points wide (on top, bottom and right) and 3.25” wide on left) and positioned ½” from edge.

G. Art Ready Graphics (City Seal) Available by contacting the City of Carlsbad Recreation Department Graphics division. Phone 760 434-2826, to arrange for art ready graphics.

H. Sign Mounting Hardware 3/8” vandal resistant steel drive rivets.

I. Sign Post/Anchor Specifications 1) Posts-Posts shall be constructed of 1 ¾” x 1 ¾” 12-gauge square steel tubing with 7/16” pre-punched knockouts on 1” centers. Post lengths must be 8’ to allow for 2’ burial below finish grade within the sign post concrete footing. All steel posts shall be sandblasted with 100-grit sand and chemically treated to provide a natural looking “rust” finish. The application of rust-colored paint is not acceptable.

1) Anchors - Anchors shall be 2” x 2” x 30”, 12-gauge galvanized square tubing with 7/16” pre-punched knockouts on 1” centers.

2) Sleeves - Sleeves shall be 2 ¼” x 2 ¼” x 12”, 12-gauge galvanized square tubing with 7/16” pre-punched knockouts on 1” centers.

3) Anchor Assembly Hardware - 3/8” vandal resistant steel drive rivets.

4) Telescoping Properties - The finish post, anchor and sleeve must be straight with a smooth uniform finish to allow each component to telescope with each consecutive larger or smaller piece.

J. Installation Sign posts are to be installed at locations which meet the approval of the City of Carlsbad. The final height of the metal post shall be 6’ above finish grade. The signage should be placed in more prominent locations such as trail access points or major trail junctions. All signs are to be mounted to the posts with 3/8” vandal resistant drive rivets.

Chapter 7 • Trail Standards

7-33

City of Carlsbad Trail “Post” Specifications Trail post markers typically refer to a post placed alongside the trail. The post will typically have symbols or text to identify the trail uses, location (i.e. 0.25 miles) or directional arrows directing trail users along the way. This section shall apply to: • Trail Head and Main Trail Access Points • Directional Markers • Mile Markers Trail Head/Trail Entrance Markers Location Requirements: Locations for trail entrance markers shall be indicated on improvement plans and landscape plans. Trail post markers will be required at secondary entrances and key entry points to citywide trails.

Standard entry marker

Materials Requirements: Trail markers shall be 6”x6” flat bevel top hardwood treated lumber or recycled plastic. Color shall be Desert Tan for recycled plastic products.

Trail Post Placards for Trail Entrance Markers: Trail head or trail access markers shall include placards showing trail uses and the citywide trail logo for the purposes of designating a citywide trail from private community trails. (Private community trails are typically short spur trails that connect to the city’s public trails used by residents of a master planned community to access the Citywide trail system.)

The trail use placards shall include at a minimum of four per post: a hiker, bicycle, dog on a leash, and the city trail logo. Citywide trail logo placards are available from the Parks Maintenance Supervisor at 760 434-2826. Trail use placards can be provided by the City of Carlsbad. The trail head markers shall extend 42-48” above grade and be placed alongside the trail at 18”-24” off of the trail edge.

Standard regulatory sign

Branded trailhead entry signage

Trail Mile Markers Requirements: Mile markers for the trail will be standardized for easy reference by maintenance, police and fire personnel. Mile markers will be required on any trail that is over 0.5 miles long, with trail mile markers posted every 0.25 miles. Trail mile markers shall be 6”x6” flat bevel top premium grade recycled composite plastic lumber. Color shall be approved by Parks and Recreation Department.

Posts shall have a graffiti resistant type coating. The trail head markers and mile markers shall extend 40” above grade and be placed alongside the trail, 18” off of the trail tread. An approved equal may be substituted with city approval. On mile markers, the number should be placed on two sides of the marker so that it can be seen in both directions of travel by trail users. The number shall be routed or engraved into the post 2” below the bevel and shall be a 3” letter height. The routed number shall be finished in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations and painted either a dark brown or dark forest green color to provide sufficient visual contrast from the post color so that the number is readily discernible.

Citywide Trail Logo The city’s trail logo may be obtained in a digital format for signage use by contacting the City Parks and Recreation Department at 760 434-2826.

Specialty Signage Private Property: Signage requests made to the city and/or when permission is granted by the city to install signage, for example when an HOA managed area is adjacent to an existing citywide trail and they would like to post additional signage.

Resource Agency, Conservation or Sensitive Habitat Areas (adjacent to trail): This refers to signage often required by resource agencies such as the CA Department of Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, or the Center for Natural Lands Management.

7-34

Chapter 7 • Trail Standards

Trails Master Plan

Contact the specific agency for signage requirements and locations for installations adjacent to open space areas not specific to the trail. This type of signage will not be provided or installed by the city unless directed to do so by the resource agency as part of city developed trails.

7.15 Design for Risk Management Considerations

The International Mountain Biking Association’s (IMBA) Managing Mountain Biking: IMBA’s Guide to Providing Great Riding provides an excellent overview of safety and risk management concepts and guidance that are applicable to all types of trails and paths. Much of the information provided here is abstracted from that document. Risk management’s role is not to remove all risk, and therefore the challenging or interesting aspects of a trail system, but to identify and address unreasonable hazards that might cause harm to trail users.

The majority of information sources that addresses risk management on trails agree that the best overall risk management practices are to properly design, construct and maintain trails. When it comes to trails, the old cliché of “prevention is the best medicine” holds true. Risk management techniques both protect trail users from injury and offer a measure of protection from lawsuits for trail managers.

The following risk management practices come from multiple resources and are condensed here for easy reference. These include design techniques, plan implementation and policy guidelines: •

•

Design for risk management: Many risk management concerns can be mitigated and addressed before a trail system is constructed simply by understanding what risks currently exist in the environment and identifying and understanding the intended users.

Design the trail system according to generally-accepted standards: Hazards and liability can be limited by adopting generally-accepted design standards during the trail design phase. Documents such as the 2010 Draft AASHTO Guide for the Planning, Design, and Operation of Bicycle Facilities and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) guidelines are accepted and used by most design professionals and reviewing agencies.

Design the trail system using CPTED principles: CPTED stands for Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design and is defined as the “multidisciplinary approach to deterring criminal behavior through environmental design.” The four main CPTED principles are: •

•

•

•

Natural surveillance: Keep the environment maintained so people can be easily seen by other users, staff, and anyone who may pass by the trail system. Design landscaping to avoid blind spots and hiding places. Ensure adequate light levels.

Natural access control: Control natural access by some means such as fences or landscaped areas. For example, for a hiking only trail, access methods should clearly signal “walk here” and “do not walk” there, so that a walker would not look out of place.

Territoriality: Use territoriality reinforcement to distinguish public and private spaces, including signage and landscaping. This is intended to indicate that someone owns and cares about a space. A space that looks cared for can deter illegal or undesirable activities.

Maintenance: Only build what can be maintained. Without maintenance, a public area invites criminal behavior such as graffiti and other vandalism.

Chapter 7 • Trail Standards

7-35

City of Carlsbad

7.16 Specific Standards for Open Space Trails (Type 1) Grade Maximum sustained grades should not exceed 15%. A maximum grade of 20% is allowed for wash crossings, grade dips, and other trail segments to avoid impassable areas for a distance not to exceed 25 linear feet. Switchbacks may be utilized when surrounding terrain has a side slope of 20 to 45%. Switchbacks supported by retaining walls may be utilized when surrounding terrain has a side slope up to 55%.

Tread Type 1 trails should have a minimum width of two feet. The trail surface should be native soil and must be smooth and free of major obstacles. Compaction of the surface may be necessary to prevent damage from use and to increase resistance to erosion.

Vegetation Clearance Trails should be designed to have a minimum impact on plants identified for protection in the cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s HMP Plan. Trail alignments that avoid and have the least impact on surrounding vegetation are preferred. If the trail must pass within an unacceptable distance of any plants, the preference is to relocate the plants rather than destroy them. Vegetation may not exceed a mature height of three feet within a three-foot distance of the trail tread. Vertical clearance must be at least eight feet above the trail tread. This in no way implies that the trail corridor should be devoid of plants.

Low growing coastal sage scrub presents no hazard to trail users, and therefore is acceptable to have within the clearing limits. The purpose of the vegetation clearing limits is to keep taller, potentially more dangerous plants such as thorny trees and larger cacti a safe distance from the trail. All remaining roots and stumps must be grubbed out of the trail surface to provide a smooth tread.

Drainage The trail surface must have a cross slope of no less than two to three percent. This is critical in preventing water from pooling on and channeling down the trail. If the trail traverses the side slope of a hill, the cross slope of the trail surface must be downward from the uphill to the downhill edge of the trail (outslope). This will allow surface water to drain off the edge of the trail rather than running down the length of the trail. The installation of erosion control structures may be required.

The cross slope of such a trail tread must NOT be downward from the downhill to the uphill edge of the trail (inslope). Such a scenario will result in water channeling down the length of the trail, causing extreme levels of erosion. If the trail is located on level ground, the trail surface should be crowned to drain water off the trail and prevent pooling.

7.17 Specific Standards for Open Space Trails (Type 2 and 3) Grade Type 2 trails will need to be held to ADA requirements of 8.33%. Barrier-free trails are designed to provide opportunities for persons with physical disabilities including mobility, visual, and hearing impairments, and shall meet the standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act Guidelines (ADA). This manual contains only general guidelines for the design and construction of barrier-free trails. The planning, design, and construction of barrier-free trails within the City of Carlsbad requires the involvement and subsequent approval of appropriate city representatives, including the Recreation and Engineering staff.

7-36

Chapter 7 â&#x20AC;˘ Trail Standards

Trails Master Plan

Type 2 trails must be designed with the least possible longitudinal slope. The maximum sustained grade shall not exceed 8.33%. Trail segments that exceed the maximum 5% sustained grade limit must be constructed according to handicapped accessible ramp standards. Barrier-free trails must not be constructed on side slopes greater than 40%. Total trail distance should not exceed 1.5 miles.

Tread There are many varieties of accessible surface materials available. The chosen surface must be stable, firm and slip resistant. The material must match the surrounding environment. Trail Type 2 widths will vary from four to eight feet with six feet considered to be the most desirable in sensitive habitat areas. No maximum width standard is applied to Trail Type 3 except they should be at least ten feet wide to accommodate maintenance and utility vehicles. Type 3 trails should be in accordance with the utility requirements for access and maintenance needs. The trail tread should be comprised of native soils in undisturbed sensitive habitat or vegetation areas, and decomposed granite in areas that have been graded, landscaped, or will otherwise remain significantly unnatural. Compaction of a native soil tread surface may be necessary to prevent damage from use and to increase resistance to erosion. If decomposed granite is used, it must be Âźâ&#x20AC;? minus Madison Gold (or similar), wetted and compacted to a four inch depth. A stabilizer may also be added to the decomposed granite according to the manufacturer specifications. The trail tread must be smooth and free of all obstacles. The trail tread must be delineated from the surrounding terrain.

Edging For Trail Type 2, edging materials should be four to six inch wide concrete, with a twelve inch depth minimum, control joints shall be located approximately every eight feet on center.

Vegetation Clearance Trails should be designed to have a minimum impact on plants identified for protection in the City of Carlsbad. Trail alignments that avoid and have the least impact on surrounding vegetation are preferred. If the trail must pass within an unacceptable distance to any plants, the preference is to relocate the plants rather than destroy them. Vegetation may not exceed a mature height of three fee within a three foot distance of the trail tread. Vertical clearance must be at least ten feet above the trail tread. This in no way implies that the trail corridor should be devoid of plants. The purpose of the vegetation clearing limits is to keep taller, potentially more dangerous plants such as thorny trees and larger cacti a safe distance from the trail. All remaining roots and stumps must be grubbed out of the trail surface to provide a smooth tread.

Drainage The trail surface must have a cross slope of one to three percent. This is critical in preventing water from pooling on and channeling down the trail. If the trail traverses the side slope of a hill, the cross slope of the trail surface must be downward from the uphill to the downhill edge of the trail (outslope). This will allow surface water to drain off the edge of the trail rather than running down the length of the trail. The cross slope of such a trail tread must not be downward from the downhill to the uphill edge of the trail (inslope). Such a scenario will result in water channeling down the length of the trail causing extreme levels of erosion. If the trail is located on level ground, the trail surface should be crowned to drain water off the trail and prevent pooling. The longitudinal slope of barrier-free trails must be kept to the minimum standard, therefore the installation of erosion control structures is not necessary.

Chapter 7 â&#x20AC;˘ Trail Standards

7-37

City of Carlsbad

7.18 Specific Standards for Roadside & Connector Trails (Type 4) and Paved Multi-use Paths (Type 6) Grade In most cases, grades for Circulation Element Trails will be compatible with determined road grades since the Circulation Element Trails are adjacent to the city’s roadways.

Tread Transportation based Type 4 Roadside or Connector Trails should have a standard width of at least five feet but can be up to twelve feet. The trail can either be hard surface asphalt or concrete or a firm surface such as stabilized decomposed granite.

DG should be used in areas that are not heavily used and along natural open space areas or when the character of the trail is intended to be more natural in appearance. If decomposed granite is used, it must be ¼” minus Coyote Gold (or similar), wetted and compacted to a four inch depth. A soil stabilizer should be added to the decomposed granite according to the manufacturers specifications and installed per the city specifications for installation of stabilized decomposed granite trails. The trail tread must be delineated from the surrounding terrain. For example, utilizing decomposed granite of a different though similar color in the surrounding landscape will help distinguish the trail tread. The location of landscape plants, fences and other physical barriers can also be used to delineate the trail.

Because of the nature of the uses on a multi-use trail, all Type 6 trails are defined as paved trails and therefore must consist of concrete or asphalt surfaces.

Edging Edging materials shall be four to six inch wide concrete, with a twelve inch depth minimum, control joints should be located approximately every eight feet on center.

Vegetation Clearance Trails should be designed to have a minimum impact on plants identified for protection in the City of Carlsbad. Trail alignments that avoid and have the least impact on surrounding vegetation are preferred. If the trail must pass within an unacceptable distance to any plants, the preference is to relocate the plants rather than destroy them.

Vegetation may not exceed a mature height of three feet within a three foot distance of the trail tread. Vertical clearance must be at least 10’ above the trail tread. This does not imply that the trail corridor should be devoid of plants. The purpose of the vegetation clearing limits is to keep taller, potentially more dangerous plants such as thorny trees and larger cacti a safe distance from the trail. All remaining roots and stumps must be grubbed out of the trail surface to provide a smooth tread.

Drainage The trail surface may have a cross slope minimum of 1.5% to a maximum of 5%.

This is critical in preventing water from pooling on and channeling down the trail.

If the trail traverses the side slope of a hill, the cross slope of the trail surface must be downward from the uphill to the downhill edge of the trail (outslope). This will allow surface water to drain off the edge of the trail rather than running down the length of the trail. If the trail is located on level ground, the trail surface should be crowned to drain water off both sides of the trail and prevent pooling.

7-38

Chapter 7 • Trail Standards

Chapter 8 Trail Operation and Maintenance

Trails Master Plan

8

Trail Operations and Maintenance

8.1 Introduction Proper maintenance of the City wide trail system is of utmost importance for providing a safe and productive use of the facility, protecting the financial investment each community has made in constructing the trails, and for continued future recreational benefit to citizens and visitors of the City.

8.2 Overview of Trail Maintenance Responsibilities The following list represents the major trail maintenance tasks that will be performed by the City’s Park maintenance staff: •

• • •

Coordination with Home Owners Association trails maintenance personnel (for developer built trails) on maintenance issues during the period of transition from private trail use to public trail use.

Coordination with City Trail Volunteer Program Coordinator and trail volunteers who assist, in the maintenance duties of the Citywide trails.

Routine inspections.

Assistance in responding to maintenance for the trail system pertaining to those items raised by trail users and/or trail volunteers performing the routine trail inspections and maintenance duties.

8.3 Maintenance Schedules Trail system maintenance begins immediately following construction and is an on-going aspect of operations. Not only do maintenance activities keep the trails in good condition, they help ward off claims of negligence and illegitimate or undesirable uses. This section discusses typical maintenance schedules that will protect the city’s trail system investment (see “Table 8.1 Trail Maintenance Activities and Frequencies”). Trail operations and management require daily tasks, whether it is a vandalized sign or an injured trail user, the city must be prepared to deal with all types of concerns.

Chapter 8 • Trail Operations and Maintenance

8-1

City of Carlsbad Table 8.1 Trail Maintenance Activities and Schedule Maintenance Item

Estimated Frequency

Trash pick-up

2x per week

Remove fallen trees

As needed

Pothole filling

As needed

Bollard repair or replacement

As needed

Graffiti removal

Monthly or as needed

Refill Dog waste bags

Min. 1x per week

Pavement sweeping

4x per year

Weed control

2x per year or as needed

Tree pruning if encroachment on trail

2x per year

Sign replacement / repair

As needed

Fence repair and replacement

As needed

Clean drainage system

1x per year or after storm

Drinking fountain repair or maintenance

As needed

Bench repair or maintenance

As needed

Pavement sealing/repaving

3-5 years as needed

Unpaved trail tread maintenance

1x per year or as needed

Kiosk repair and maintenance

As needed

Dog station replacement and repair

As needed

Trail edging repair or replacement

As needed

The City will adhere to the general maintenance schedule identified above and will take appropriate immediate actions to address any condition deemed a safety hazard. Many of these maintenance items are dependent on the type and amount of landscaping and supporting infrastructure that is developed along the trail. Maintenance activities will be coordinated so as to minimize impacts to trail users and to maximize cost efficiencies through the use of trail volunteers.

8.4 Trail Closures The trail may be closed if any heavy equipment is expected to use the trail, or when any maintenance activities are occurring that could be unsafe for the general public.

Trail users will need to be managed during these closures. Parks Maintenance is responsible for advising the City Trail Manager at least five (5) working days in advance of such scheduled maintenance and to coordinate and provide the appropriate measures to close the segment of Trail, arrange detours, and notify the public.

The policy for the procedures that will be followed prior to the Trail closing, including a variety of means to inform the public, are listed below: â&#x20AC;˘

8-2

The Trails Manager will provide at least 48 hours advance notice to volunteer Trail captains on the impacted segments to be closed indicating the expected duration of the closure. The Trails Manager and Parks Maintenance staff will coordinate in efforts to keep the public informed regarding the trail closure and make every effort to keep the closure period as short as possible;

Chapter 8 â&#x20AC;˘ Trail Operations and Maintenance

Trails Master Plan

• •

The City will physically close off the Trail that is being worked on with barriers, and post “Trail Closed” signs with a contact number for information.

The City will provide detour signs where Trail users can reasonably be detoured to other routes If no reasonable alternate routes are available, the Trail should have an “End Trail” sign and provide access to the sidewalk system.

Permanently Close Chronic Problematic Trails Trail segments may need to be permanently closed due to degradation or if they pose hazards to users, or have begun to adversely impact sensitive environmental or cultural resources. In these instances, it must be clearly communicated well in advance to staff, trail users and any other relevant groups that the trail is closing.

Newsletters, kiosk notices, email, websites and meetings can be used to forewarn visitors that a specific section of trail will no longer be open and to explain the rationale behind the closure. Signs should be posted in advance of the closure and left up until no evidence of the trail remains so visitors are not tempted to detour from the new route. Other techniques include installing gates, planting vegetation at access points, and camouflaging access points with stumps, logs or brush.

Temporarily Close Trails Due to Inclement Weather and Emergencies There may be times when it is appropriate to temporarily close the trail system due to emergency situations, inclement weather, flooding, or accidents. The operations and management plan should include an inclement weather policy that details procedures for warning visitors of poor trail conditions, closures and detours.

If there are locations prone to flooding or other issues that result from severe weather events, consider posting an inclement weather policy on the city website, on signs at the trailhead, in newsletters and via email list-serves. Seasonal trail closures are common where weather conditions are known to be consistently poor.

Citywide Trail Inspection Form Date:______________ Trail Name

Standards

The city has developed a trails inspection form to identify, record, and respond to maintenance problems, and to keep written records of such actions (see “Table 8.2 Trail Maintenance Inspection Form”). The following maintenance duties are considered basic to all soft surface trails.

Nearest Cross Streets

Type

Comments

Open Space Trail Circulation Element Trail

Item Surface Condition Type___________ Erosion

8.5 Carlsbad’s Trail Maintenance

Inspected By:_______________________

Edging Type____________ Landscaping Pruning Planting Removals

Signage Fencing Type___________ Drainage Swales Steps/Stairs/Perons Handrails Other: (Mark only if repairs are needed)

Condition

Location

Repairs Needed

Good Poor Present Not Present Good Poor

Good Poor Good Poor Concrete Earth/Stone Good Poor

Benches Drinking Fountains Trash Containers Dog Waste Dispenser For immediate trail maintenance items, please contact Park Maintenance at 434-2985 Such examples would include trees fallen over trails or drainage wash outs after a storm event.

Table 8.2 Trail Maintenance Inspection Form

Chapter 8 • Trail Operations and Maintenance

8-3

City of Carlsbad A. Slough and Berm Removal Slough (pronounced â&#x20AC;&#x153;sluffâ&#x20AC;?) is material that has moved downhill from the backslope and been deposited along the uphill edge of the tread. This process causes trail users to travel along the outside edge of the trail. The tread eventually narrows and moves downhill from its original location, resulting in an unsafe situation. The slough must be removed to reestablish the proper backslope. The excess material may be used to fill holes in the trail and reestablish the outslope, or to build up the downhill side of waterbars. Berm is soil that has built up on the downhill edge of the trail tread. Berm prevents water from flowing off the side of the trail and allows water to channel down the trail, causing erosion. A berm may also cause nuisance water to pool on the trail surface, resulting in soil saturation. Saturated soil is damaged easily and forces trail users to detour around the area, causing the trail to widen. Berms should never be constructed intentionally, and should be eliminated whenever present.

B. Vegetation Clearance Maintenance All plants encroaching on the vegetation clearance limits for the particular trail classification must be cut back. Branches should be close to the main stem without cutting into the branch collar. Plants being removed must be cut flush with the ground and stumps must be removed to prevent safety hazards. All plants growing within the trail tread must be grubbed-out. Trails within landscaped areas may be sprayed with herbicide. All removed plant material must be scattered in a location not visible from the trail.

C. Tread Maintenance In addition to slough and berm removal, the remaining trail tread should be restored to a safe walking condition. All loose rocks, rock points, stumps and roots protruding from the trail surface should be removed. All holes should be filled to create a smooth, obstacle-free trail tread. Maintaining a proper outslope is critical to the long-term condition of the trail.

D. Drainage Maintenance Special attention should be directed to the maintenance of drainage structures.

These structures are extremely important in protecting the trail from erosion. If they are not maintained properly, the trail will be prone to erosion, and may become unsafe for public use and require extensive amounts of labor to repair. All repairs to drainage structures must restore them to their original standard construction specifications.

E. Special Structure Maintenance Structures such as waterbars, culverts, switchbacks, retaining walls, wash crossings, overpasses, bridges, etc. are rather expensive and labor intensive to construct.

Proper maintenance will prolong the life of the structures and help prevent safety hazards. All repairs to special structures must restore them to their original standard construction specifications.

G. Emergency Access The Trail shall be cleared and maintained in a manner that ensures that emergency (police and fire) vehicles have access to the Trail. Emergency access for safety, security, or maintenance purposes is based on an established protocol between the parks, fire and police departments. Protocol will be developed along with an

8-4

Chapter 8 â&#x20AC;˘ Trail Operations and Maintenance

Trails Master Plan

Emergency Plan that will be developed by each department. The initial responding party will notify the other departments as soon as possible. If removable bollards are installed all appropriate police and fire personnel shall have the keys for access.

8.6 Operation and Maintenance Plan Maintenance plans and policies are one of the primary ways to limit hazards and lawsuits, as well as ensure a trail system remains attractive and usable. Periodic inspections, documentation of hazards and remedies, and maintenance activities should all be part of a well-rounded plan. Carlsbad Operations and Maintenance Plan (OMP) includes the following: • • • •

•

Contact information for trail managers, organizations, and/or volunteers responsible for maintaining the trail system.

Written inspection and maintenance policies that include tasks, timeframes and responsible parties.

Inspection forms that document date, time, person/group, trail condition, hazards and other pertinent information, see Table 8.2.

Trail maintenance schedule that identifies timeframes for regularly-scheduled maintenance activities such as pruning, trash pick-up and fixing potholes or erosion, see Table 8.1.

List of constructed features, such as bridges, culverts and fences that require regular inspection and maintenance.

The following are included in the OMP: • List of personnel with keys to locked gates and bollards; • list of locked access points and how they are locked; • plans for quickly dealing with unexpected events such as storm damage; • daytime and nighttime contact information for trail managers; • contact information for any local or state or violation information, including local law enforcement, fire and other first responders, both emergency and nonemergency contacts; • CA Department of Fish and Wildlife (poaching, unlicensed fishing); and • animal control or shelters (loose or lost pets).

8.7 Safety and Enforcement To minimize liability, it is critical to adhere to established standards in trail design, signage, and maintenance. California State Statute 831.4 provides for substantial immunity to public agencies that construct and operate trails in accordance with widely accepted standards or guidelines, such as the California State Parks Trail Design and Maintenance Guidelines. Measures listed to minimize liability include: • • • • • •

Post trail regulations and provide enforcement.

Post warning signs for known hazards that are not easily identified Keep accurate routine maintenance records.

Inspect the trail regularly for hazards; Evaluate and address hazards and maintenance problems reported by trail users with appropriate measures as soon as possible.

Ensure that there are adequate emergency access points to the trail along its entire corridor.

Chapter 8 • Trail Operations and Maintenance

8-5

City of Carlsbad Safety of trail users must be paramount in priorities. This section describes basic safety elements that need to be reviewed and encouraged. This section also looks at some of the management strategies to ensure that trail users are following the regulations necessary to protect other users and resources found along the trail.

Utilize a Trail I.D. System Trail Identification Signs have been placed at trailheads that correspond with GPS Coordinates that have been mapped by the city’s GIS staff and provided to Police and Fire . Trail names and corresponding GPS coordinates are effective in assisting fire and safety personnel in locating trail users who may need assistance in emergencies. Trail identifications are also useful for maintenance staff to locate trail maintenance areas on some of the longer trail systems, such as at Lake Calavera, Hosp Grove and the Rancho La Costa preserve. These trail head signs also indicate trail difficulty, length, surface type and are typically posted along with the trail rules and regulations,. Some systems include distance markers or other signage indicating where trail users are located in relation to trail heads or access points.

Develop an Emergency Response Plan Emergency response plans clearly indicate how emergency situations, such as injured, lost hikers, or stranded cyclists, can be assisted. While not every emergency can be imagined and there will be unforeseen instances, having a plan that covers typical emergencies will go a long way to providing care for trail users and limiting liability. Emergency response plans should include the following: • Emergency contact information for local police, hospitals, fire, and rescue agencies.

• Emergency contact information for specialized services such as search-andrescue groups, tow trucks, and helicopter services.

• 24-hour contact information for trail managers or responsible trail organizations.

• Identification of all potential trail or path access points, the limitations of each access point (vehicle size, difficult terrain, etc.), list of personnel responsible for keys to any locks at any locked access point.

• Inclement weather plans for closing sections of trail that may be hazardous during events such as storms. These plans should also include evacuation methods to use during an emergency.

Monitor the Trail System Monitoring or policing is a general term for actively watching over trail users and activities and may be accomplished by local law enforcement, volunteer safety patrols and other trail users. The Rails-to-Trails Conservancy recommends that local law enforcement agencies tasked to monitor trails do so on bicycles rather than in cars or ATVs. Bicycle-mounted police have more maneuverability, lower associated costs, do less damage to trails, and tend to have better public relations.

Volunteer safety patrols consist of volunteers who walk, bike or ride trails and paths and watch for trail violations or users in need of assistance. This practice is fairly common in the State Park system, for instance, and can be adapted to any type of trail system. The International Mountain Bicycling Association’s (IMBA) Managing Mountain Biking: IMBA’s Guide to Providing Great Riding offers “10 Traits of Highly Successful Patrols,” useful information for anyone interested in starting or enhancing a trail or path safety patrol.

8-6

Chapter 8 • Trail Operations and Maintenance

Trails Master Plan

The following tips are adapted from IMBA’s text. Safety patrols should: • Be professional and organized; • communicate through meetings, websites and newsletters; • consider using volunteers who are part of the trail community; • offer training in public engagement, first-aid and risk management; • dress to be visible and recognizable on the trail; • engage in community activities; • partner with local emergency services; • manage volunteers effectively; • engage the media in a positive manner; • fund-raise to support patrol activities and purchases; and • make training and patrols interesting and fun.

Enforce of Rules and Regulations Rules and regulations are useful to deter unlawful and undesirable activity on trail systems. While the majority of visitors who read rules and regulations will abide by them, enforcement may be necessary to promote the safety and enjoyment of all users. In most cases, professional law enforcement officers are responsible for issuing citations for legal violations such as littering, after hours use and unauthorized vehicle use. While volunteer patrols cannot enforce laws, they can aid law enforcement officers by noting and calling in criminal activity and providing emergency relief until professionals arrive. Patrol members should be trained to understand the extent of their enforcement capabilities and how to contact the proper authorities.

8.8 Trail Volunteer Programs Volunteers fill many different positions throughout the city, and volunteer groups also assist the Parks & Recreation Maintenance Department with Carlsbad’s trails.

Trails volunteers perform trails maintenance and assist with trails improvements such as installation of directional and interpretive signage, kiosks and other trails amenities. Volunteers play a vital role in the construction of new trails throughout the city. In Carlsbad the two primary volunteer programs include the Citywide Trails Program and Adopt-a-Trail Program. Management responsibilities are outlined and agreed upon by those who sign up to volunteer. The city’s Second Saturday trail work events are very popular and enlist hundreds of volunteer throughout the year to assist in new trail building as well as many other important tasks associated with keeping the trails safe and enjoyable for residents and visitors alike. In addition to the city’s trial volunteers, the 3 lagoon foundations also have ongoing trail volunteer programs and training at their respective nature centers. To be a city trails volunteer, you must submit an application with the Community Volunteer Coordinator and attend a mandatory volunteer orientation. Visit the City’s website at www.Carlsbadca.gov/trails for more information on the City’s Trail Volunteer Program.

Chapter 8 • Trail Operations and Maintenance

8-7

City of Carlsbad

R

egulations

FOR TRAIL USE

CITY OF CARLSBAD

1.

Stay on the designated trail.

2.

Put litter in containers provided. Do not leave or deposit any litter. CMC 11.32.030(1)

3.

Pick up after your pet. CMC 7.08.010, SDCC 62.670

4.

All pets must be on a hand-held leash under 6â&#x20AC;&#x2122; long. CMC Sec. 7.08.010, SDCC Sec. 62.669.

5.

Bicycle riders 17 years and younger must wear a helmet. V.C.21212

6.

Bicycles should be driven at safe speeds considering all other trail users.

7.

Ride or walk on right side when traffic is coming from the opposite direction or when someone signals they would like to pass.

8.

Motorized vehicles and horses are not allowed on this trail. (CMC Secs. 11.32.030(11), 11.32.030(19).

9.

No smoking, fires or firearms. CMC Secs.

11.32.030(2), 11.32.030(4).

10. Report accidents or emergencies to the Police Department (Dial 911).

11. Report trails maintenance problems or vandalism to the Parks Department at 434-2824.

Standard Trail Regulation Sign

8-8

Chapter 8 â&#x20AC;˘ Trail Operations and Maintenance

Chapter 9 Funding Opportunities

Trails Master Plan

9

Funding Opportunities

In general, Carlsbad has funded the majority of its trail systems by way of private developer dedications and permit requirements. Although this methodology will continue into the future, the ultimate number of new developments is finite and other sources of funding will be needed, especially for existing built areas of the city. This chapter identifies a broad range of funding sources and grant programs that could assist to the City of Carlsbad and its expanding trail system.

9.1 General Funding Framework Under current competitive grant programs, it is imperative that organizations seeking grants look well beyond the traditional recreational trail grant sources. Many organizations and agencies are trying to stretch their general development funds through grant funding. The competitive nature of grant awards these days, requires a project that will deliver multiple benefits. The following pertinent categories or criteria are listed in the funding matrix table (see “Table 9.1: Federal Funding Grant Sources”, “Table 9.2: State Funding Grant Sources”, and “Table 9.3: Regional / Local Funding Grant Sources”) and are represented by the following terms and icons:

Urban Forestry: The types of grants that can be obtained require the applicant to show how the project and its elements can use trees to improve air quality, shade, urban heat island reduction, traffic calming, water quality improvements, runoff control, windbreaks and the protection of pedestrian environments.

Building Healthy Communities: Facilities that allow for exercise for the general public to improve their overall health, including both physical and mental health benefits.

Nature Education: Trail projects that improve access to nature, appreciation of undisturbed wildlands and the encouragement of activity in natural settings fall under this category.

Habitat Protection: Trail projects that are part of a preserve system that can serve to protect, preserve, enhance, restore or provide education about the city’s habitat preserves are included in this category.

Water Quality: Trail projects that include protection of watersheds, creeks, streams, rivers, wetlands and the city’s three lagoons fall into this category. This category includes water conservation as well as water quality improvements.

Active Transportation: Transportation projects that address congestion, reduction of auto trips, greenhouse gas emissions, bike use, bike safety, bike education, pedestrian facilities, pedestrian safety and education, as well as improved connections with bike or walking facilities.

Chapter 9 • Funding Opportunities

9-1

City of Carlsbad

9.2 Federal Funding Opportunities Federal funding is sometimes administered through the state (Caltrans and the State Resources Agency) and regional planning agencies. Many of these funding programs are oriented toward transportation, with an emphasis on reducing auto trips and providing inter-modal connections. Federal funding is intended for capital improvements safety education programs, and projects related to the transportation system. Some of the most relevant Federal grant programs have been listed below.

Not all grants listed on the tables at the end of the chapter have been included in the text descriptions below.

In July 2012, Congress passed a transportation bill: Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21). Since October 2012, Safe Routes to School (SRTS) activities have been eligible to compete for funding alongside other programs, including the Transportation Enhancements program and Recreational Trails program, as part of a new program called Transportation Alternatives.

Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) This program (LWCF) provides grants for planning and acquiring outdoor recreation areas and facilities, including trails. LWCF is administered by the National Parks Service and the California Department of Parks and Recreation and has been reauthorized until 2015. Cities, counties and districts authorized to acquire, develop, operate and maintain park and recreation facilities are eligible to apply. Applicants must fund the entire project and will be reimbursed for fifty percent of costs.

Eligible project must meet two specific criteria. The first is that projects acquired or developed under the program must be primarily for recreational use and not transportation purposes, and the second is that the lead agency must guarantee to maintain the facility in perpetuity for public recreation. Applications are considered using criteria such as priority status within the State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP). The State Department of Park and Recreation will select which projects to submit to the National Park Service (NPS) for approval. Final approval is based on the amount of funds available that year, which is determined by a population-based formula. Trails are the most commonly approved project. The grant process for local agencies is competitive, and 40 percent of grants are reserved for northern California.

Federal Lands Highway Funds This programâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s (FLH) funds may be used to build bicycle and pedestrian facilities in conjunction with transit, roads and parkways on federal or Indian lands. The projects must be transportation-related and tied to a plan adopted by the state and local metropolitan planning organization. FLH funds may be used for planning and construction.

Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Administered by Caltrans, these program funds are intended to help achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on public roads. HSIP requires Caltrans to develop and implement a Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) that identifies improvements. Caltrans sets aside funds for construction and operational improvements on high-risk rural roads and may use the remainder of funds for bicycle and pedestrian pathways or trails and education and enforcement. Previous application deadlines have been in October.

9-2

Chapter 9 â&#x20AC;˘ Funding Opportunities

Trails Master Plan

Transportation Alternatives Grant Program In July 2012, Congress passed Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP21). Since October 2012, Safe Routes to School (SRTS) activities have been eligible to compete for funding alongside other programs, including the Transportation Enhancements program and Recreational Trails program, as part of a new program called Transportation Alternatives.

The RTP provides funds annually for recreational trails and trails-related projects. The RTP is administered at the federal level by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and at the state level by the California State Parks and Recreation Office of Grants and Locals Services (OGALS). MAP-21 did not directly amend the RTP as a program, but authorized its funding as a set-aside of the new Transportation Alternatives Program (TA).

Funding for the Transportation Alternatives program is derived from a number of former programs previously funded under the Transportation Enhancements, Recreational Trails and Safe Routes to School programs under SAFETEA-LU. Under MAP21, states sub-allocate 50 percent of their Transportation Alternatives (TA) funds to MPOs and local communities to administer grant programs and to distribute funds for projects. States can use the remaining 50 percent for TA projects or can spend these funds on other transportation priorities.

Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance Program (RTCA) This program (RTCA) is a National Park Service program that provides technical assistance via direct staff involvement to establish and restore greenways, rivers, trails, watersheds and open space. The RTCA program provides planning assistance only.

Projects are prioritized for assistance based upon criteria that include conserving significant community resources, fostering cooperation between agencies, serving a large number of users, encouraging public involvement in planning and implementation and focusing on lasting accomplishments. Federal agencies may be the lead partner only in collaboration with a non-federal partner.

Various Grants from Housing and Urban Development (HUD) HUD grant programs change from year to year depending on congressional funding levels. Sometimes these programs are in conjunction with Federal EPA and the Department of Transportation. They have included such sources and grant titles as Choice Neighborhoods Planning Grants; Sustainable Communities Planning Grant and Incentive Program, and the Urban Revitalization and Livable Communities Act. ACHIEVE, Communities Putting Prevention to Work Chronic diseases are among the most common and costly of all health problems in the United States, but they also are among the most preventable. Lack of physical activity and poor nutrition—two modifiable risk factors for obesity—and tobacco use are responsible for much of the illness, suffering, and death related to chronic diseases. To help address these health issues, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) created Communities Putting Prevention to Work (CPPW), which is led by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Through CPPW, communities—including urban, small, rural, and tribal areas—are implementing environmental changes to make healthy living easier, such as improving means for safe active transportation for pedestrians, bicyclists, and mass transit users; ensuring provision of healthy food and beverage options in schools; limiting exposure to secondhand smoke; and increasing available tobacco cessation resources.

Chapter 9 • Funding Opportunities

9-3

City of Carlsbad

9.3 State Funding Opportunities State funding for trail projects comes from a variety of sources, including federal allocations to state governments and voter-approved bonds. State of California agencies typically charged with administering these funds include Caltrans and State Parks Office of Grants and Local Services (OGALS).

Statewide Park and Community Revitalization Program This program provides competitive grants for new parks and recreational facilities for the most under served communities in California. Neighborhood and regional trails are eligible for the grant program. Grants from $100,000 to $5,000,000 are awarded and no local matching funds are required. This grant is administered through the California Department of Parks and Recreation through OGALS. Land and Water Conservation Fund This California Parks and Recreation grant typically allocates $3-4 million statewide awarded annually for trail projects that benefit public land and water conservation projects. A maximum award request is for projects of $2,000,000 or less.

Habitat Conservation Funds (HCF) Authorized by the California Wildlife Protection Act in 1990, Habitat Conservation Funds can be used for the construction of trails for the purpose of protecting wildlife corridors. The program allocates $2,000,000 per year to the California Department of Parks and Recreation to administer to public agencies. This program sunsets in FY 2019/20. Eligible projects include nature interpretation programs to bring urban residents into park and wildlife areas, protection of various plant and animal species, and acquisition and development of wildlife corridors and trails.

California Park Propositions The following proposition based initiatives are administered through the California Department of Parks and Recreation: On March 7, 2000, voters passed Proposition 12 by 63.2 percent, the $2.1 billion “Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000” (2000 Bond Act). As passed, this bond act provided funds for local assistance grants.

On March 5, 2002, voters passed Proposition 40 by 56.8 percent, the $2.6 billion “California Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe Neighborhood Parks, and Coastal Protection Act of 2002” (2002 Resources Bond). The passage of Proposition 40 provided funds for local assistance grants.

Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program (EEMP) This program (EEMP) provides grant opportunities for projects that indirectly mitigate environmental impacts of new transportation facilities. Projects should fall into one of the following three categories: highway landscaping and urban forestry, resource lands projects or roadside recreation facilities. The local Caltrans district must support the project. The program is administered by SANDAG. Public Access Development Program This program handled through the California Wildlife Conservation Board funds land acquisitions that preserve wildlife habitat or provides recreational access for hunting, fishing or other wildlife-oriented activities. Up to $250,000 is available per project with applications accepted quarterly. Eligible projects include interpretive trails, river access and trailhead parking areas. The state must have a proprietary interest in the project. Local agencies are generally responsible for the planning and engineering phases.

9-4

Chapter 9 • Funding Opportunities

Trails Master Plan

Coastal Conservancy Grants To achieve its goals, the Coastal Conservancy awards grants to public agencies and nonprofit organizations. Some examples of the kinds of projects the Coastal Conservancy funds include trails and other public access to and along the coast, natural resource protection and restoration in the coastal zone or affecting coastal areas, restoration of coastal urban waterfronts, protection of coastal agricultural land, and resolution of land use conflicts.

California River Parkways and Urban Streams Restoration Grant The goal of this program is to provide recreational, wildlife, flood management, water quality and urban waterfront revitalization benefits to communities along river corridors. The grant is administered by the CA Dept. of Water Resources. Trail-related projects are a strong component of the program by achieving recreation, interpretation and potentially conversion of abandoned industrial lands goals. Public access is a fundamental requirement of the program.

Sustainable Communities (Sustainable Transportation Planning Grants) This fund, administered by Caltrans, provides funding for innovative planning projects that exemplify livable community concepts including bicycle and pedestrian improvement projects. Eligible applicants include local governments, metropolitan planning organizations and regional transportation planning agencies. A 10 percent local match is required and projects must demonstrate a transportation component or objective. Statewide, $3 million is available annually.

Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) Caltrans administers the Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA), state funding for local planning and construction projects that improve the safety and convenience of bicycling for transportation (e.g., bikeways accessing schools, employment centers and transit). Applicants must have an approved Bicycle Transportation Plan (BTP) and their project must meet Caltrans Highway Design Manual (HDM) Chapter 1000 requirements and California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) standards.

Recreational Trails Program (RTP) Funding Update Recently, the Governor signed legislation that creates the new Active Transportation Program (to be administered by Caltrans), and enables a portion of the RTP funding to remain with the California Department of Parks and Recreation.

Active Transportation Program (ATP) The State of California created the Active Transportation Program (ATP) with Senate Bill 99 and Assembly Bill 101. This program is intended to encourage increased use of active modes of transportation and consolidates various federal and state transportation programs, including the Transportation Alternatives Program, Bicycle Transportation Account, and State Safe Routes to School into a single program. Program funding will be awarded both in a statewide and regional competition.

Approximately $360 million statewide has been budgeted for the ATP over three years, beginning with FY 2014. Approximately $60 million per year will be competitively awarded for projects selected by the California Transportation Commission.

Of this, $24 million per year is available for Safe Routes to School, with at least $7.2 million for non-infrastructure grants.

Chapter 9 â&#x20AC;˘ Funding Opportunities

9-5

City of Carlsbad

9.4 Regional Funding Sources Local sources for trail implementation come from local and state sales tax revenues that are administered locally through regional governments such as SANDAG or local districts such as Caltrans District 11. Other sources of local funding include private investments from developers or public investments from the City of Carlsbad.

Transportation Development Act Transportation Development Act Article III funds are state block grants awarded monthly to local jurisdictions for transit, bicycle and pedestrian projects in California.

Funds for pedestrian projects originate from Local Transportation Funds (LTF), which are derived from a quarter percent of the general state sales tax. LTF are returned to each county based on sales tax revenues. Article 3 of the Transportation Development Act sets aside two percent of LTF for bicycle and pedestrian projects. Eligible trail projects include construction and engineering for capital projects, maintenance of bikeways and development of comprehensive bicycle or pedestrian facilities plans.

This program is administered through both SANDAG and Caltrans.

Regional Grants from SANDAG SANDAG, as the local metropolitan planning organization for San Diego County, is responsible for several grant programs that have some relevance for trails used for transportation purposes. Beyond Transnet based program funding in the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) and the Smart Growth Incentive Program, SANDAG administers the Active Transportation Program and the Healthy Works / Communities Putting Prevention to Work (CPPW) grant program. Also, depending on the project type, trails and habitat restoration projects could qualify under the Transnet Environmental Mitigation Program.

9.5 Local Funding Sources A variety of local funding sources has been listed under the City of Carlsbad or through the development review and approval process involving local landowners and developer. A special consideration for Carlsbad is Proposition “C”. In 2002, voters passed Proposition C, which allowed the City Council to exceed a $1 million amount on four projects: the City of Carlsbad Safety Training Center, a new swimming pool complex (Alga Norte Community Park), an extension of Cannon Road, and acquisition of open space and trails. Proposition C did not direct the City Council to spend a specific amount of money on open space and trails by a certain time. Instead, it provided voter authorization to spend more than the $1 million limit if one or more properties became available and the city felt it was in the taxpayers’ best interest to purchase it for open space/trails purposes.

9-6

Chapter 9 • Funding Opportunities

Trails Master Plan

9.6 Non-Traditional Sources American Greenways Program Administered by The Conservation Fund, this program provides funding for the planning and design of greenways and unpaved trail development. Eligible applicants include local, regional or statewide non-profit organizations and public agencies. Grants are small. The maximum award is $2,500, but awards typically range from $500 to $1,500.

Bikes Belong Grant Bikes Belong is an organization sponsored by bicycle manufacturers with the intent to increase bicycle riding in the United States. Bikes Belong provides grant opportunities of up to $10,000, with no required match, to organizations and agencies seeking to support bicycle facility and advocacy efforts. Eligible projects include paved bicycle paths, rails-to-trails and mountain bike trails.

Health Care Organizations Health care organizations have been partnering with public agencies and municipalities for funding projects that provide opportunities and facilities that encourage people to engage in more physical activity. An example is Kaiser Permanenteâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Community Benefit program, which provided over $634 million in 2010 funding and grants for programs to support healthy people and healthy living.

California Conservation Corps (CCC) California Conservation Corps (CCC) is a public service program employing youth in natural resource work that occasionally provides assistance on construction projects. The CCC may be written into grant applications as a project partner, but to utilize CCC labor, project sites must be public land or be publicly accessible. CCC labor cannot be used to perform regular maintenance, but it can perform annual maintenance, such as the opening of trails in the spring.

Chapter 9 â&#x20AC;˘ Funding Opportunities

9-7

City of Carlsbad

9.7 Funding Matrix The following three tables show how the various funding sources may be applicable for park lands acquisition, trail development or the maintenance and operations of trails. The table also ranks the grants based on the planning and transportation trends that many of these grants strive for in their application ranking process.

There are many more sources than shown on these tables and some may or may not be applicable for trails. The relevance will depend on if the trails have a transportation component to them, if they will improve environmental conditions, public safety or the general health of the community.

Table 9.1: Federal Funding Grant Sources

4

4

Maint. & Operations

FUNDING ORIGIN

Trail Development

FUNDING SOURCE

TYPICAL APPROACHES Park Land Acquisition

CARLSBAD TRAILS MASTER PLAN

FUNDING USES

ATYPICAL APPROACHES Urban Forestry

Building Nature Health Education Communities

Habitat Protection

Water Quality

Active Transport

Federal Funding Sources Land and Water Conservation Fund (LCWF)

U.S. National Park Service/California Dept. of Parks & Rec.

Federal Lands Highway Funds

U.S. FHWA

4

Highway Safety Improvement ProgramTransportation Alternatives Grant

U.S. FHWA

4

Recreational Trails Program- Transportation Alternatives Grant

U.S. FHWA

4

Safe Routes to School, Mini-grants- Transportation Alternatives Grant

National Center for Safe Routes to School & Caltrans / U.S. FHWA

4

Sustainable Communities Planning Grant and Incentive Program

U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)

4

Urban Revitalization & Livable Communities Act

U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)

4

ACHIEVE, Communities Putting Prevention to Work, Pioneering Communities

Center for Disease Control & Prevention

9-8

4

4

4 4

4

4 4

4

4

4 4 4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4 4

Chapter 9 â&#x20AC;˘ Funding Opportunities

Trails Master Plan Table 9.2: State Funding Grant Sources

Maint. & Operations

FUNDING ORIGIN

Trail Development

FUNDING SOURCE

TYPICAL APPROACHES Park Land Acquisition

CARLSBAD TRAILS MASTER PLAN

FUNDING USES

ATYPICAL APPROACHES Urban Forestry

Building Nature Health Education Communities

Habitat Protection

Water Quality

4 4 4 4 4 4

4 4 4 4 4

4 4

4

Active Transport

State Funding Sources Statewide Park & Community Revitalization CA Dept. of Parks & Rec. (OGALS)

4 4 4 4 4

Land and Water Conservation Fund

CA Dept. of Parks & Rec. (OGALS)

Habitat Conservation Funds

CA Dept. of Parks & Rec. (OGALS)

Proposition 12 - 2000 Parks Bond Act

CA Dept. of Parks & Rec. (OGALS)

Proposition 40 - 2002 Resources Bond

CA Dept. of Parks & Rec. (OGALS)

Recreational Trails Program

CA Dept. of Parks & Rec. (OGALS)

Proposition 117 - Habitat Conservation

CA Dept. of Parks & Rec. (OGALS)

4

4

4

4

Watershed Program

CA Dept. of Parks & Rec. (OGALS)

4

4

4

4

4

Stormwater Flood Management Prop. 1E

CA Dept. of Water Resources

4

4

4

4

Environmental Enhancement & Mitigation Program (EEMP)

State Resources Agency / Natural Resources Agency / Dept. of Water

4

4

4

4

Public Access Development Program

Wildlife Conservation Board

4 4

4 4

4 4

4 4

4

4

4

Coastal Conservancy Grants

CA Coastal Conservancy

California River Parkways & Urban Streams Restoration Grant

California Natural Resources Agency / Department of Water Resources

Sustainable Communities (STPC)

Caltrans

Statewide Active Transportation Funding

Caltrans

Bicycle Transportation Account

Caltrans

Traffic Safety Grants

Office of Traffic Safety

Sustainable Communities Planning, Regional SB 375

Strategic Growth Council/Dept. of Conservation

Chapter 9 â&#x20AC;˘ Funding Opportunities

4 4

4 4 4 4

4

4 4

4

4

4

4

4

4 4 4 4 4

4

4

4

4 4 4 4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4 4 4 4 4

9-9

City of Carlsbad Table 9.3: Regional / Local Funding Grant Sources

Maint. & Operations

FUNDING ORIGIN

Trail Development

FUNDING SOURCE

TYPICAL APPROACHES Park Land Acquisition

CARLSBAD TRAILS MASTER PLAN

FUNDING USES

ATYPICAL APPROACHES Urban Forestry

Building Nature Health Education Communities

Habitat Protection

Water Quality

Active Transport

Regional Funding Sources Transportation Development Act

SANDAG / Caltrans

Transnet Sales Tax Transportation FundingEnvironmental Mitigation

SANDAG

Smart Growth Planning & Construction Grants

SANDAG

Active Transportation Grants

SANDAG

Healthy Works / Communities Putting Prevention to Work

SANDAG

4

4

4 4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4 4 4 4

Local Funding Sources Proposition “C”

City of Carlsbad

Utility Easement Agreements / Revenues

City of Carlsbad

General Fund

City of Carlsbad

Land / Facilities Dedication

City of Carlsbad / Developers

Right of Way / Easement Dedications

City of Carlsbad / Developers

Park Dedication Fees

City of Carlsbad / Developers

Park Impact Fees

City of Carlsbad / Developers

Private Development Agreements & Easements

City of Carlsbad / Developers

4

4

4 4

4

4 4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

Non-Traditional Sources American Greensway Program

The Conservation Fund

Bikes Belong Grant

Bicycle Manufacturers of America

Health Care Organizations

Varies

California Conservation Corps Labor Grants

California Conservation Corps

9-10

4

4

4

4

4

4

4 4

4

4 4

4

4

Chapter 9 • Funding Opportunities

APPENDIX A Public Outreach Summary

6

6

14

2

8

13

11

2

1 12

5

16

14

16

9 2

12

14

12

Trail Type Preference (right hand notes) and Stakeholder Trail Activity Preferences (bottom notes)

: Bike Facility Type the Stakeholder is Most Comfortable With

Recreation Trail User Survey Below is a summary of a trail user survey administered by Park and Recreation in 2011 (see â&#x20AC;&#x153;Table 4.4: City of Carlsbad Trail Survey Results (2011)â&#x20AC;?. The results are included here as a supplement to the more specific surveys developed by the trails master plan effort.

City of Carlsbad Trail Survey Results (2011)

Daily 39 13% 3 1% 13 5% 29 10% 88 29% 11 4% 38 13% 4 2%

Several days a week 71 24% 3 1% 26 10% 64 23% 100 33% 48 17% 90 30% 5 2% Weekly 63 21% 2 1% 31 12% 36 13% 69 23% 34 12% 56 19% 19 7%

Daily Several days a week Weekly Monthly Seasonally Not at All No Responses Total

Number of Response(s) 21 38 59 42 30 138 1 329

Response Ratio 6.3% 11.5% 17.9% 12.7% 9.1% 41.9% <1% 100%

How often do you walk for transportation? For example, walking to get to work or school, to go shopping, or to get to the bus or the train.

Skateboarding, in-line skating, roller skating, or ElliptiGO速

Bike ride for fun or exercise

Mountain biking

Walk for fun or for exercise

Running or jogging

Nature observation or birding

Horseback riding

Hike or nature walk

Top number is the count of respondents selecting the option. Bottom % is percent of the total respondents selecting the option.

How often do you do the following for recreation or exercise?

Survey Name: Carlsbad v2 Response Status: Partial & Completed Filter: None Apr 08, 2014 9:44:55 AM

Constant Contact Survey Results

Monthly 63 21% 2 1% 40 15% 19 7% 26 9% 37 13% 33 11% 5 2%

Seasonal ly Not at all 40 20 14% 7% 15 235 6% 90% 56 102 21% 38% 19 117 7% 41% 9 11 3% 4% 30 127 10% 44% 30 55 10% 18% 24 203 9% 78%

Response Ratio 69.7% 25.6% 10.2% 15.8% 2.5% 12.8% 3.5% 1.0% 4.1% 12.8% 100%

Daily Several days a week Weekly Monthly Seasonally Not at All No Responses Total

Number of Response(s) 23 37 50 30 30 154 5 329

Response Ratio 6.9% 11.2% 15.1% 9.1% 9.1% 46.8% 1.5% 100%

How often do you ride a bike for transportation? For example, biking to get to work or school, to go shopping, or to get to the bus or the train.

Too far to walk to where I want to walk Feel unsafe based on the speed of nearby cars Feel unsafe when crossing the street There are no sidewalks to where I want to walk There are no crosswalks to where I want to walk Feel unsafe because of darkness Feel unsafe because of crime Not physically able to walk much of a distance at all I do not enjoy walking Other Total 40 Comment(s)

Number of Response(s) 136 50 20 31 5 25 7 2 8 25 195

Please indicate the reasons why you might not walk in Carlsbad (check all that apply):

Response Ratio 38.6% 17.0% 53.7% 26.6% 2.0% 16.0% 8.0% 100%

112 Comment(s)

Safe biking routes to school, transit, or work

Bike paths, routes, or lanes connecting open space and parkland Bike paths, routes, or lanes that connect with places of work, shopping, etc.

Bike paths through open space or parkland

Safe walking routes to school, transit, or work

Walkways connecting developed areas to open space Walkways connecting to places of work, shopping, etc.

Trails in developed parks

Trails in natural areas

Top number is the count of respondents selecting the option. Bottom % is percent of the total respondents selecting the option.

Very satisfied 72 24% 76 25% 36 12% 27 9% 30 10% 19 6% 17 6% 18 6% 19 6%

Somewhat satisfied 119 39% 104 35% 85 29% 82 28% 67 23% 65 22% 58 19% 61 20% 50 17%

Neutral 40 13% 59 20% 65 22% 78 26% 82 28% 67 22% 69 23% 68 23% 72 24%

What best describes your opinion on the services and facilities that the City of Carlsbad offers:

Missing bike trail, path, or route between the places I want to ride Too far to ride to where I need to go Feel unsafe based on the speed or number of cars Hills are too steep for me to ride I am not physically able to ride a bike much of a distance at all I do not own a bike I do not enjoy biking Total 61 Comment(s)

Number of Response(s) 77 34 107 53 4 32 16 199

Please indicate the reasons why you might not ride a bike in Carlsbad (check all that apply):

Somewh at not Not satisfied satisfied Not sure 19 34 21 6% 11% 7% 11 24 26 4% 8% 9% 51 34 24 17% 12% 8% 48 37 25 16% 12% 8% 41 40 37 14% 13% 12% 39 65 45 13% 22% 15% 50 63 42 17% 21% 14% 52 63 38 17% 21% 13% 57 67 38 19% 22% 13%

Yes. I work or go to school in Northwest Carlsbad (92008).

Yes. I work or go to school in Northeast Carlsbad (92010).

Yes. I work or go to school in Southeast Carlsbad (92009).

Yes. I work or go to school in Southwest Carlsbad (92011).

No. I do not work or go to school in Carlsbad.

Other No Responses Total

Do you work or go to school in Carlsbad?

34 Response(s)

Please enter the 5 digit zip code for where you live:

Yes. I live in Northwest Carlsbad (92008).

Yes. I live in Northeast Carlsbad (92010).

Yes. I live in Southeast Carlsbad (92009).

Yes. I live in Southwest Carlsbad (92011).

No. I do not live in Carlsbad No Responses Total

Do you live in Carlsbad?

Number of Response(s) 80 16 23 26 135 33 16 329

Number of Response(s) 111 50 54 58 40 16 329

Response Ratio 24.3% 4.8% 6.9% 7.9% 41.0% 10.0% 4.8% 100%

Response Ratio 33.7% 15.1% 16.4% 17.6% 12.1% 4.8% 100%

Walk to non-work or non-school locations

Walk to work or school

Ride a bike to non-work or non-school locations

Ride a bike to work or school

Take a public bus

Take a train (Coaster, Amtrak, or Sprinter)

Drive in a carpool or vanpool

Drive alone to work

Top number is the count of respondents selecting the option. Bottom % is percent of the total respondents selecting the option.

At least 5 days a week 87 32% 4 2% 5 2% 0 0% 13 5% 17 6% 7 3% 20 7%

Almost every At least once day a week 66 33 24% 12% 6 14 2% 5% 2 10 1% 4% 2 2 1% 1% 11 27 4% 10% 23 72 8% 26% 5 9 2% 3% 38 75 14% 27%

How often do you use the following transportation options? Choose all that apply.

84 Response(s)

Please enter the 5 digit zip code for where you work or go to school:

At least Very once a infreque month ntly 13 18 5% 7% 16 31 6% 12% 42 101 16% 38% 16 39 6% 15% 19 38 7% 14% 39 37 14% 13% 15 32 6% 12% 46 33 17% 12%

Never 58 21% 192 73% 109 41% 205 78% 160 60% 88 32% 198 74% 62 23%

Top number is the count of respondents selecting the option. Bottom % is percent of the total respondents selecting the option.

More equestrian trails and supporting facilities are needed More mountain biking options on existing and future trails are needed More trails where I can hike or run without fear of high-speed cyclists are needed More near-street walkways for recreational users are needed More on-street bike lanes, routes, and paths are needed The city should add more trails in parks and open space areas 61 Comment(s) 1 4 1% 61 22% 33 12% 51 18% 60 21% 71 25%

Most Important

1 39 14% 59 21% 117 42% 18 6% 20 7% 21 8% 4 1%

Most Important

Please rank the following recreation related trail improvements:

Top number is the count of respondents selecting the option. Bottom % is percent of the total respondents selecting the option.

The city should add more sidewalks and crosswalks to improve walking The city should add more on-street bike paths, lanes, or routes The city should add more pathways that are separated from cars The city should concentrate on reducing the speed and number of vehicles in certain areas The city should concentrate on improving public transit facilities and making transit more The city should concentrate on relieving car traffic on city streets The city should focus on other ways of improving transportation 76 Comment(s)

Please rank the following transportation related improvements:

2 3 1% 24 9% 55 20% 64 23% 46 16% 88 31%

2 45 16% 61 22% 66 24% 41 15% 30 11% 21 8% 14 5%

3 14 5% 26 9% 60 21% 62 22% 62 22% 56 20%

3 56 20% 43 15% 37 13% 50 18% 37 13% 34 12% 21 8%

4 20 7% 42 15% 48 17% 69 25% 55 20% 46 16%

4 52 19% 31 11% 24 9% 59 21% 43 15% 33 12% 36 13%

5 45 16% 103 37% 59 21% 26 9% 32 11% 15 5%

5 32 12% 35 13% 18 6% 36 13% 46 17% 70 25% 41 15%

6 194 69% 24 9% 25 9% 8 3% 25 9% 4 1%

6 25 9% 26 9% 9 3% 41 15% 55 20% 68 24% 54 19%

7 29 10% 23 8% 7 3% 33 12% 47 17% 31 11% 108 39%

17 years or younger 18 - 24 25 - 34 35 - 44 45 - 54 55 - 64 65+ No Responses Total

What is your age?

Male Female No Responses Total

What is your gender?

Number of Response(s) 1 3 24 73 82 77 32 37 329

Number of Response(s) 149 139 41 329

Response Ratio <1% <1% 7.2% 22.1% 24.9% 23.4% 9.7% 11.2% 100%

Response Ratio 45.2% 42.2% 12.4% 100%

Please indicate the reasons why you might not walk in Carlsbad (check all that apply): - Other responses Answer crowded on boardwalk kids to transport While I appreciate the opportunity to walk... (See comments below) problems with dogs off leashes and dog poop.

Traffic noise and exhaust, lack of separation between walk and traffic no options nearby nothing comes to mind absence of public restrooms See comments Need tools for my work distance to walk to work is too far Lack of restroom facilities No close appealing destinations I work out at the gym 3 times weekly We live on mesa -no bus connectors, not enough walking trails No trails as far as the coast Young children Connecting bus service inadequate City is not pedestrian friendy I usually opt to ride my bike.

I ride a scooter for errands time availability Shopping centers are not pedestrian friendly. non resident

I would suggest a trail around agua hedionda. Something like Crystal Springs Reserve Trail in Burlingame, California. It runs along a protected reserve and reservoir, allows for wildlife, walkers, bikers, horses, which would be a great asset for Carlsbad.

Bike lanes and sidewalks are too close to cars Some of the neighborhoods in Old Carlsbad need sidewalks that continue throughout the neighborhood. I find that this is a need especially around the CHS. I also would like a more pedestrian friendly downtown Carlsbad area. I would ride my bike and run much more often if the traffic flow wasn't so bad. ie fast cars,lots of cars Currently, there is nothing really within a short walking distance. If there were, I would be more likely to walk. I do walk frequently in my neighborhood, and typically, feel very safe here.

I do walk in my local Terramar neighborhood and on adjac parkland.

I typically ride my bike down to the Village and then walk around where I want to go... no reason not to walk in Carlsbad.

Please indicate the reasons why you might not walk in Carlsbad (check all that apply): - Comments Answer No dedicated walking spaces- sidewalks etc along 101 heading South towards Leucadia. I have to walk in the bike lanes everyday.

I have three kids I drop off on the way to work.

I'm a leisurely walker because of arthritis, but I still try to get out there and walk. I'd like more "sidewalks" made of dirt, like on Cannon Rd going up to the Sage HS. Concrete is harder on the joints. Seems to me that those dirt sidewalks would be more economical to make and maintain.

No sidewalks along 101 from Poinsettia to Village While I appreciate the opportunity to walk, life is busy and there are usually multiple errands to accomplish and there is usually not time for walking in lieu of driving...

Crosswalks are still scary - we desperately need more on Carlsbad Boulevard between Tamarack and the Power Plant, and an all-ways cross at Tamarack and the beach like they have up in the Village at Grand and CVD. Some places have a lot of dog poop along the trail (beach sidewalk along Carlsbad Blvd.); some places have people with dogs off leash (Calavera nature trails).

Lagoon trails are too short-need to be extended.

Unfortunately, like many suburbs, Aviara is not built for walking unless you're close to a strip mall Need a trail around agua hedionda.

I take my dog for long walks at the Batiquitos Lagoon, and around my neighborhood. I'd like to walk to the beach and closest park, but the traffic volume, speed, noise, and lack of separation between street and sidewalk make that overwhelmingly unpleasant. I'd also like to walk my dog along the beach, but again, there's no decent pathway.

I can walk to the Forum but everywhere else is too far to walk Great community to take a walk. Still lots of open space. I'd like to see city meet-up walking groups to encourage one another. It would be special to see a nature journaling program with our city trail system.

Instead of bike lanes, you ought to concentrate on more sidewalks. I once saw a poll that said that only 1% of the citizens rode bicycles. I think we're spending an awful lot of money to accommodate 1% of the population.

Every so often there is no sidewalk as I am walking and at times it is near a curve I might walk my kids to Kelly school but the sidewalk is incomplete on El Camino Real and I also do not want to walk them past the day laborers that gather daily in the parking lot by the liquor store & nursery there. other cities with raised medians (in the roads) have installed public restrooms within these locations. Carlsbad has many of these raised medians, such as along College, Cannon, El Camino Real, 101, etc. Before spending more money on new trails, come back to these locations (plus the center of any of the too few traffic-circles) and construct restrooms. Will benefit walkers, joggers, bicyclists, skateboarders, and even drivers.

Would love to take my kids on more walks, if there were more walking areas not next to cars.

Would LOVE a trail around agua hedionda. If you could look at Crystal Springs Reserve Trail in Burlingame, CA and incorporate a trail like that, which also surrounds a protected area, allows for wildlife, and walkers, bikers, horses, around a protected area, which would be an enormous attraction for Carlsbad.

Wish there were more trails, especially easy to walk trails.

I would like to spend time enough to reach the coast or ride & park at the coast We think there are many great places to walk here in Carlsbad starting with our own neighborhood, downtown, the beach walk, Aviara....lots!

We live in South Carlsbad just east of the 5. There aren't many restaurants or cafes or shopping in comfortable walking distance. I walk for leisure/exercise...but not really to get anywhere in particular.

Once my kids move out of the house I would love to reloc into the village.

City of Carlsbad is not pedestrian friendly. Even new developments are not pedestrian friendly. It is inconvenient and dangerous to walk in Carlsbad.

Some of the streets when crossing into another street do not follow with the same paths or often end and start down the street do not connect to continue the path weather it be for walking or biking also to be more lit up at night.

The walk is not enjoyable. traffic is too close or loud.

The 'walkability of my neighborhood does not have the services or resources that I use on a regular basis. e.g. market, restaurant, coffee shop

The city rezoned a small shopping center at the corner of CBD Village Dr and College, that WOULD have been the only shopping area us folks up here on the mesa could have walked to. Perhaps you should allow an upscale convenience store on the corner of Glasgow and CBD Village. We really can't walk to ANYTHING....We need small City run connector buses to get up and down the mesa or I am looking into an electric bike or scooter since College will be hellish to drive once development is done.

We need an upscale convenience store on the corner of Glasgow and CBD Village Dr., accrosst he street was suppose to be a shopping center but much to my chagrin it was changed to housing. 4 entier nieghborhoods have no where they can walk to to buy groceries.

I love walking on the trails and beaches, but would not consider walking to work. Too far, too dark.

We do not let our kids walk to school due to the busy streets and the risk of crime. It would be great to see more supervision for the kids walking home.

In addition to working out at the gym MWF, I play senior softball on Tuesdays and Thursdays. With this exercise I don't feel the need to do additional walking.

I don't like to walk where there is traffic. I'd rather drive to the Sea Wall or the Batiquitos Lagoon Trail and enjoy the walk without the sounds/smells of cars.

I live in Calavera Hills-walking to the village & back is a bit much for dinner & such...I do walk to the College/Marron road area, but the shopping & restaurants are not very desirable there & with the low income housing going in, can't imagine it improving. If I'd known, I might have chosen a different location in Carlsbad.

Other than the trails, the main drawback of my area is that it's not walk or bike friendly. If I was closer to el cam or the vill, I'd walk more for everything.

Also, no place to lock up bike at destination. Do not feel safe leaving my bike.

Large family bikes don't have the carry capacity and the hills to the stores with a full bike are tough.

Also work is too far and most shopping is combined with trips home from work.

Can't combine bike with bus route since east to west travel by bus is limited to non-existent.

Well teh hills are steep but we bought an electric bike to help with the steepness.

Speed of traffic on Carlsbad Blvd (101) from the Village to Tamarack is too fast...and then from Tamarack to La Costa also too fast. I've been buzzed by traffic coming out of the village at 40mph...and heading south from Tamarack by 60+mph.

I would like to ride bikes with my kids to school, but the speed and number of cars as well as cyclists on Carlsbad Blvd. Makes it unsafe.

I prefer using bike paths or be in places where there is a bonafide physical barrier between me an a 4000pound vehicle... I don't trust California drivers quite frankly. I think this is the number one impediment to increasing cycling in Southern California and in our city in particular Not enough paved dedicated bike trails There is no reason not to ride a bike in Carlsbad!

Recent bike lane improvements all over the city are outstanding... but there's one HUGE hole. I live off La Costa Avenue (LCA), and bicycling LCA eastbound from El Camino Real is nearly an act of suicide these days (it's bad enough for cars, given the traffic speed and density). It would surely help to give eastbound LCA the same single-lane treatment as westbound, and restore the bike lane that was removed in the late '80s.

Need bike trails that are not along roadways-protected from vehicle traffic.

The question I responded to was biking for transportation or shopping. I work from home but riding to shop isn't convenient due to location of shopping and my home. I do ride for exercise but am becoming less and less comfortable due to excessive auto speed in Aviara and other Carlsbad neighborhoods, including the coast where the speed limit is posted as 30/35, which is regularly exceeded by motorists in Carlsbad There are no extended, connected, protected bike paths along the beach, rail right-of-way, or anywhere else. The city missed a bet in not planning for greenbelts where dog-walking, biking, skating, jogging can be done along extended paths away from Carlsbad's damned traffic.

I am an avid cyclist. I no longer ride on roads because drivers are distracted or belligerent. Trails and / or bike paths are typically too short to provide a reasonable workout. Example: La Costa Valley Trail. Very short.

Carlsbad has done a very poor job in slowing down cars and encouraging safe biking, especially the coast highway! As a former competitive rider, I feel very unsafe with the idiots in cars who speed and/or drive in the bike lane.

I ride my bike 5 days a week for exercise before work.

The crazy bikers on the road. They have almost hit me as a pedestrian a few times.

Need more trails away from cars!!!

Will do it on the beach sidewalk in Santa Monica Cars dominate where bike lanes do exist. Bike lanes are too narrow and appear to be an after thought. Seattle has great bikes paths. San Diego could learn from them.

Some hills are too steep to ride. I would increase the number of bike rides if bike paths were available that did not require going up and down several hills. i.e. getting from El Camino Real to the beach.

Biking is not family friendly in Carlsbad - we need more dedicated bike/walking paths that are away from traffic. See how Irvine, CA does with their bike paths very nicely done and get lots of use.

Please indicate the reasons why you might not ride a bike in Carlsbad (check all that apply): - Comments Answer Runners running in bike lane and women with strollers pose a danger for cyclists having to merge into traffic to pass as these joggers do not yield to the cyclists.

Time to create a jogging path or encourage joggers to use those currently available. i HAVE MOVED HERE FROM MELBOURNE aUSTRALIA WHICH HAS A LOT OF BIKE PATHS. SEVERAL TIMES I HAVE RIDDEN ALONG THE COast highway I don not feel at all safe the bike lanes are too narrow and the cars wizz past you I am very frustrated by the attitude of bike riders in Carlsbad. I've seen them use crosswalks, sidewalks, and run red lights. They ride two and three across in the bike lane designed for one bike causing a traffic hazard. I have never seen a bike rider pulled over by the police. They are rude, inconsiderate, break the law regularly and know that if they get hit they'll sue your life away. Ban all bike riding on streets in Carlsbad. They have plenty of trails to go be jerks on.

I have no interest in biking to work. It would take too long, I'd have to keep fresh clothes at work and would have to shower once I arrived. This would add way too much time to my "work" hours - it makes absolutely no sense. I get plenty of exercise without having to bike to work I enjoying riding but it is tough to bring the kids with the speed of the cars and lack of bike lanes in some areas.

I do mean to ride my bike more but I'm nervous of the traffic Most trails are less than 4 miles long, unless I am mistaken. The San Luis levy trail from Vista to Oceanside is a perfect example of people friendly trails for walking, running & biking.

I dress in business casual -- not good for a bike.

I ride a motorcycle to the Poinsettia Coaster Station (2 miles) and take the train to San Diego to work. I ride my bike recreationally in my home town of Carlsbad.

I love Lake Calavera!

I'm retired, so no need to go to work. I'd ride to the store, but we're in the middle of many large hills, so it'd be tough. see previous comment. I especially think downtown Carlsbad needs to be friendly to walkers, shoppers, bicyclists, etc.

I lack the free time. I love to bicycle.

I miss my dog to much to take the bike so I just walk so we can go out together. cars are the main reason. It is too dangerous to ride with cars. I would ride everywhere if it weren't for cars need more child-proof bike lanes (with actual separation from cars) I would road-bike a lot more if it were safer. Everyone in my neighborhood knows one or more people who were killed while road biking (not necessarily in Carlsbad).

Cars routinely go through red lights in Carlsbad. Cars here also routinely make high-speed right-on-reds. Need to get the Carlsbad police to issue tickets and give Carlsbad a reputation as a place that values safe driving.

In general, I think speed limits are too high in north county. Example, 50 mps on Poinsettia between Melrose and ECR. There are two elementry schools on that route. Same with Faraday between ECR and Melrose. 50 mph on a curved road.

I like water frontage like Oside strand which I go to for that reason.

Removed the right hand turning lane at El Camino Real and College...very unsafe intersection now. Will ride on the side walk because of it. :) I just walk up the hills that are too steep to ride up!

Why can't San Diego be like LA and Orange county and have more bike paths? In Carlsbad, bikes share the roads with cars. This is very unsafe and scary.

There have unsolved deadly hit-run- accidents btwn cars and bikes.

I am only interested in riding my bike when I am separated from vehicles with some type of physical barrier (not just a line on the street).

(While improvements have been made on E /N cbad vil near me -it's not safe. Sure bikers now have the right to "use full lane", but it's risky. If a speeding car comes around the corner and you're in the middle of the lane since there is no shoulder, you're dead. A car behind me tried to force me off the road beeping, yelling etc. Tough /unsafe to get to the coast crossing the freeway areas on cbad /tam / cannon. (Chestnut is best) College is crazy too if you are trying to get to the bike path...

I used to commute daily on a bike but was hot by a car on Palomar Airport Road. After that, I do not feel safe ridins on the roads. My husband was hit once on Carlsbad roads as well.

Really hate that bicyclists are expected to ride in car lane for quite a distance on Carlsbad Village Drive between College and Tamarack. Would not feel safe and if many people actually rode bikes, congestion would be terrible.

Bike (and walking) trails separated from traffic are what are needed. The city has created a lethal cituation for bike riders on CBV Village between Victoria and Pontiac. To say cars movign 40-50 MPH are suppose to slow and FOLLOW bike riders moving 10-14 MPH is assinine. I support bike lanes - this is neither safe nor effective - MAKE a separte lane for bikes here. I was hit by a car - I speak from experience. There are shadows here and people not paying attention. It is unsafe.

I do not enjoy riding next to cars. WE need separated biking lanes if people are to ride for shopping, or city run buses that help connect us.

I'd like to see more dedicated paved bike trails, not bike lanes on streets. Particularly along the Coast Highway, which would be a big attraction for bicyclists.

Would LOVE a trail around agua hedionda. If you could look at Crystal Springs Reserve Trail in Burlingame, CA and incorporate a trail like that, which also surrounds a protected area, allows for wildlife, and walkers, bikers, horses, around a protected area, which would be an enormous attraction for Carlsbad.

Are bicycles taxed by the City of Carlsbad? If not, when will this happen? The new "bicycle" lanes are extremely annoying and if those cyclists are not helping pay for the privilege, they SHOULD BE!

From my experience as a car driver on Carlsbad Blvd., the wider bike lanes have encouraged bikers to ride side by side so they can chat with each other while riding. While enjoyable for them, it does not keep them safer than before, as they tend to sway out in the roadway even more now. Is it possible that bikers are NOT aware they are supposed to ride single lane? I would love to see signs instructing bikers to ride SINGLE file. This will help me as a driver keep them safe.

Thanks!

I ride my bike frequently for recreation/exercise but I do not commute anywhere using a bike. I work from home so its not necessary. I do however notice some areas that need lane improvement.

City could use non-car routes/paths for biking and walking.

Also, work from home so don't have daily commute. Prefer to run over biking. paths need to continue to many end and then start up at another point Carlsbad making roads more safe for cyclists would encourage me to bike more often.

I would ride to Chase field all the time but do not find the route safe for my kids even though I could do it.

I mountain bike daily but have no interest in road biking Need to re-open the Flightline Trail Network. Please inform Markus at CNLM that there are enough trails there, and mountain bikers will develop and police it.

One of our favorite places to ride, from our house on Skyline Road in Carlsbad, to the Oceanside Harbor and back is just now getting an improvement, Coast Hwy. by the lagoon!! We are excited to go this way again once the construction is complete. This has been the only place where we have felt unsafe.

bike lines still very treacherous throughout North County due to motorist & pedestrian lack of attention, overcrowding

The city lacks bicycle trails. There are many bike lanes but no safe trails of any distance to ride with a younger child that is safe from car traffic. street bike paths could be wider I greatly appreciate the city's efforts to make the Village area more walkable. More of these efforts, please!

Notwithstanding the difficulty with hills. I do not feel safe taking my children on bike rides in Carlsbad and they are 16 and 12!

Need a trail around agua hedionda.

You don't have pathways, you have tiny bits and pieces of what ought to be extended pathways but aren't.

I am very displeased with the amount of dog waste that is on the Aviara golf path that starts/ends off Ambrosia near the Serenata homes & around the Batiquitos Lagoon. While waste bags are provided, it is appalling that many dog owners do not pick up after their pets. It is so disgusting especially on the path off Ambrosia with piles every 2 feet. Recommend regularly cleaning of the paths or rules that ban pets from the paths so that ALL of us residents/taxpayers can enjoy outdoor walks. again, trails are too short to be meaningful I think we can do better. For example the space under the power lines should be one continuous bike / waling trail. Why limit it to just between streets.

The lack of sidewalks is a danger for school children walking/ biking to school.For example: Corner of Tamarack and Garfield on the East side of Garfield. There isn't a sidewalk and no room to get away from the cars.

I love that Carlsbad has an abundance of "bike lanes" on our roads (I ride road bike on roads, not on trails)...but wish there was a physical barrier (be it posts, landscaping, etc.) between the bike lane and the actual road. Drivers will never stop demanding the full road and some think of it as sending a message by riding right on the white line.

I live along the coast near the State Campground and there are not adequate pedestrian routes to take you toward the village or even the outlets.

Glaring "hole" is Carlsbad Boulevard/Coast Highway south of Power Plant. Tiny thin bike lane, with no berm separating it from street, has to be shared by bicyclists and joggers - one of the most beautiful stretches of coastline in the entire county and yet we run/bike in fear of our lives!

I wish there were more biking/walking routes throughout Carlsbad. please re open box canyon for hiking.

The Village area needs more/better bike/walk access over the RR tracks to the area along the beach The bike paths seem to be constrained for transportation - normal speed bicycling - due to the presence and number of pedestrians; walkers, runners, dogs, baby carriages, etc.

The bike lanes have improved dramatically and I greatly appreciate it.

I am not aware of all the options available. Would love to see a map of all hiking and biking trails. we need more Bike paths that connect to shopping and to school and also to the large office parks Fence along east side of rail tracks from Tamarack to CBad Village Dr. have cut off safe and convenient access to the beach for those living east of the tracks and to senior center and schools for the elderly and children who live west of the tracks. Kids are still having to climb the fence daily to get to and from school.

Also, our city needs more trails for mountain biking (expand Calavera trail network) and more skate parks in the village area for the less-privileged kids.

What best describes your opinion on the services and facilities that the City of Carlsbad offers: - Comments Answer I am quite satisfied realy. I just really, really wish the the crosswalks on 101 between Tamarack and Chestnut were more visable to motorists. You can't see people crossing at night till it is almost too late !

Awareness of trails needed. I do not know where to find trail sites or maps.

Pedestrian sidewalks are narrow, often putting bikers and people too close to heavy motorized vehicles. This makes the most direct walks to schools and shopping centers unpleasant with the noise and street closings. There is no shade. It is just too exposed to be pleasant. In addition, sidewalks on less busy roads are often missing, which puts people and byciclists on the street with cars. Drivers are still accustomed to looking for other cars or larger vehicles, not for people or byciclists. preserve open space! Preserve open space connections to open space. I remember when the area I live in was all open space and now calavera is a small patch of land that is slowly being made smaller and isolated. One can not longer walk from the lagoon to calavera without encountering many major car busy streets.

Carlsbad has the worst walking and bike paths. This city is to ready to develop housing and commercial buildings without any real effort to preserve open space, create safe bike paths or even plan for walkability.

I think in general bike lanes need to be improved. Bikes are not cars and should not be treated as such.

Walking from the Cove to the Village is all on residential streets. Safe sidewalks most of the way, it would be a nice-to-have for a walking path away from the car exhaust, particularly when going uphill.

The bike lane behind LEGOLAND is the only safe route I know of in Carlsbad but it doesn't connect to anything.

I live in the Bristol Cove community and the number one improvement I would like to see is a public walk/bike path along Agua Hedionda lagoon to the ocean.

That level access path would also connect El Camino to the beach, avoiding the hills.

Because of the topography Carlsbad has many blind hills and corners with high speeds which make biking/walking dangerous.

Separate bike trails for people who want to ride to work, etc. would be nice, but mixing bikes and cars on the same roads is a disaster (like what they did with Hwy. 101 in Encinitas. need safe bike path north - south and east - west. not bike laneâ Ì ELNH RQO\ SDWK Carlsbads bike and walking routes seem poor compared with other cities. All major roads should have bike/walkways physically separate from motorways especially routes taken by kids to go to school. Carlsbad is a driving city not friendly to human propulsion.

Trails: what trails exist are good but I would like to see the system expanded to connect the various trails for a longer trail experience with less road route needed

We need a walking /biking trail to go over Agua Hedionda lagoon to connect with businesses over in the outlet center and eateries Not safe walking to school: Walking on El Camino Real to Kelly school would require my kids to walk without sidewalks very close to the speeding cars as well as pass the large group of day laborers who hang out in the parking lot outside the liquor store/nursery. Neither one of those scenarios are safe for elementary school kids.

I don't use a bike.

Again, with so few of the people biking, why are we spending so much to accommodate them? A lot more people walk for exercise and enjoyment, but they aren't as vocal and don't have an organization promoting them.

Not safe going north on el fuerte 7400 to school is missing sidewalk and has bushes planted. Forced to go to street with cars coming 45 miles on a curb.

I'm used to this. I applaud the City for recognizing the huge benefits to everyone when making pedestrian and cycling inhancements.

I'm frustrated by the shortage of trails available for mountain biking, and trail closings.

Traffic is often heavy and too fast for safe bike riding along larger streets.

The biggest issue from our family perspective.. we have had multiple situations that have curbed our bike riding.. when you ride, it can be day or night... Carlsbad PD on several occasions has followed or questions family members or friends if rididng late at night.. ALL of our family carry our attorneys card and call to allow him to either hear or record the contacts... If CARLSBAD wants people to ride more then they must realize not all cyclists have DUIs or carry drugs...

http://www.makarapeak.org

Regarding the last point, biking routes for adults are fine but are not safe for kids (i.e. routes to schools. Elementary school kids shouldn't be mixing with the high speed traffic that is common on Carlsbad arterials. Also, I strongly support the creation of a bike park in Carlsbad. Boulder, CO; Fresno, CA, Trexlertown, PA all have great model facilities that, combined, offer space for road, track, BMX, MTB, and cyclocross cycling.

I think Carlsbad has done a reasonable job, for a southern California city. That said, I believe that there are significant enhancements that can be made to improve bicycle transportation in town http://www.nzcycletrail.com

I want safer biking lanes everywhere. We need more separation of cars and bikes. I think the sidewalk is the only safe place to bike. Bikers are in serious danger in the lanes next to car lanes. I would bike exclusively if I felt safer from cars and trucks speeding from behind.

I'd love to see all of the Lake Calavera Preserve open space available for mountain biking!

Some times I can't find where the trails start or will end up.

Carlsbad has many bike lanes on major roads. As far as I've seen, tho, there are few dedicated bike paths.

Think Mission bay and beaches and complete transit connect...

Carlsbad Village is better than most areas in Carlsbad but the area is still designed for the car first and everything else afterwards. This makes biking feel dangerous most of the time, walking is better but cars still come first. An exception is the coastal walk path between Pine and Tamarack, also the rail trail section for biking.

Am close to the RR tracks & would like to see the Coast Trail completed so can get downtown easier. Also, need more continuous sidewalks in City to get to downtown & shopping It is not safe riding with significant vehicle traffic traveling at 50mph+ in most cases.

Carlsbad has done a great job of improving the bike lanes throughout the city. the main routes connecting schools and work places are via high speed limit roads.

I commute to work daily and see children trying to commute safely to school. It is very dangerous for them because of the high speed limits. Examples are Poinsettia Lane, East of I-5, Cassia Way, Paseo Del Norte, etc. I drive from time to time and just think the speed limits could be reduced to protect everyone in the city.

The number of walking and bike paths and such are currently very sufficient in most areas of the city.

I feel we are lacking enough dog parks throughout the city and would like to see more of them. In regards to biking, I would bike more often if I had an electric bike to use while biking the steep hills.

Would like to see more mountain biking trails preserved and more mountain biking trails available.

There is still no sidewalk on parts of Alga Road. Cars going over 50 mph and walkers in a bike lane are not a good combination.

The bike ways along coast high way are very rough and need to be smoother. The bike ways on Grand Avenue in the village is a disaster, there is no lane definition and it is full of bumps and dips.

Bike lanes designated only by paint aren't truly safe but the sharrows are a great improvement and I hope you expand their use.

I ride my bike to work 2-3 days a week and, on my route, the bike lanes disappear where I need them the most -- the I-5 overpass on Palomar Airport Road. This area is very congested and the bike lanes are disappear only in this stretch. This actually prevents me from biking during December and January when it's too dark after work. I don't feel that it's safe.

Make it a city ordinance (and post it) that bikes are not to ridden 2 or 3 abreast but only single file unless lanes are big enough for 2 across max. Hatched areas next to vehicle lanes are not for bikes or pedestrians but as buffers to keep bikers safe. Also,keep pedestrians out of the street bike lanes or otherwise! This is such problem on Carlsbad Blvd.

I would suggest a trail around agua hedionda. Something like Crystal Springs Reserve Trail in Burlingame, California. It runs along a protected reserve and reservoir, allows for wildlife, walkers, bikers, horses, which would be a great asset for Carlsbad.

I have a big complaint about the mountain bike paths in Carlsbad's natural areas. The mountain bikers go wherever they feel like and are destroying these areas.

The city needs to establish well defined trails and take stricter measures to ensure that the bikers confine their activities to these trails.

I don't consider bike lanes to be safe for kids, and hardly so for adults.

Most of the bike paths in Carlsbad are narrow and are shared with cars. I would like to see more bike paths dedicated to bikes in Carlsbad. Like the bike path that runs along the railroad track. It would be great if that trail could be extended to our neighboring beach cities. I would like to see more communication shared with the general public about the sharrows. It would also be nice to have been easy to read biking maps that would indicate areas you could ride without cars.

Need more dedicated bike paths - for example, it would be amazing to put one around the perimeter of Batiquitos Lagoon and/or along the beach (like Manhattan/Hermosa Beach in LA).

Would LOVE a trail around agua hedionda. If you could look at Crystal Springs Reserve Trail in Burlingame, CA and incorporate a trail like that, which also surrounds a protected area, allows for wildlife, and walkers, bikers, horses, around a protected area, which would be an enormous attraction for Carlsbad.

Would love a trail from the Agua Hedionda Disocvery Center down to the lagoon/ocean i am very pleased to see trail upgrades to Lake Calavera Trail system. new bridges over chronically muddy sections. also pleased to see quality construction with termite resistant materials.

I work @ the airport. I know Palomar Airport is county property, but I wanted to let you know: the exit out of McClellan-Palomar Airport is dangerous Carlsbad is well forward with this kind of resident friendly activity.

We are hopeful that there will one day be connecting bike paths and trails all over Carlsbad! We have so enjoyed the rail trail in the Village and just wished it went farther!

Cars cut across cross walks even though people are using them. Cannon and Coast Hwy needs a "cross walk " only signal.

The bridge that connects Palomar Airport Road to Carlsbad Blvd is unsafe for both walking and biking. It seems like there several restaurant staff that walk over this bridge to go between the bus stops on the 101 and the restaurants on Avenida Encinias. There are also several Terramar residents and beachgoers that walk and bike over the bridge to visit the restaurants.

Sidewalks and bike trails need to be wider, so 2 people can meet 2 people and pass each other and so there is a buffer between the bike rider and cars.

Want to see the ENTIRE open space around Calaveras Lake saved. We need more areas like this. Once they are destroyed we can NEVER get them back.

We do not need to make everything concrete. The new path along Cannon is awesome, need more of this built around Carlsbad. Need a walking trail around the lagoon by the 78 like there is one at Batiquitos, need to preserve the old Adobe and make walking trails there too. Set the land aside now before it is too late!!!!

I feel the city has done an excellent job, especially in recent years, establishing safe walking and biking areas.

We want to have kids ride to high school but the traffic on Valley/Monroe/Chestnut/Basswood is horrific. Dangerous. Car driven by parents and kids don't watch out for cyclist. Very discouraging.

WE NEED bike paths, not bike lanes. BIKE lanes are scary and unsafe. Bike paths keep bikes and cars apart. Much better way to safely cycle.

Great job on hiking trails. We've still got a long way to go to make safe biking paths, routes, connections in Cbd & to surrounding areas. Would love to see a safe route to the coast, work with other communities for continuous routes, connecting bike trails that facilitate both leisure & commuter riding. Really need to educate drivers as to what "bikers may use full lane" means so we bikers don't become road rage victims.Improving safety & routes will create a truly bike friendly community.

Wish I could say I walk or ride more. Just too lazy We need safer conditions to bicycle ride. I live near Batiquitos Lagoon and the Batiguitos Lagood Drive has cars that are always spedding despite the new signage for speeds.

My granddaughter goes to Hope Elementary. From Vancouver Street she must travel along Carlsbad Village Drive. In order to have a sidewalk she needs to cross the street at Pontiac. This is a very dangerous intersection for pedestrians. We sorely need sidewalks along the north edge of CVD so the kids don't have to cross CVD. This is why I live here... :) Land needs to be purchased NOW to allow more space for recreational biking, hiking and conservation of wildlife other than threatened and endangered species.

I'm deeply disturbed that the upcoming general plan specifies little - if any NEW Land purchases by the city in our town. Trying to use land for both recreation and conservation degrades i. There are not enough off road areas for hiking and biking. Get off your political arses and BUY KATO and MANDANA now. This city could care less.

WE need more open space. Why isn't the city REALLY working to acquire Kato/Mandana properties? They need to keep their Prop C commitment. We should be allowed to take our dogs on trails in developed parks. We need dog station pick ups on all 48 miles of the city trails. We can build kiosks to hold the trash receptacles and volunteers will take them to the curb and back.

Please do not add the "sharows" like other cities have. Bikers already do not obey traffic laws (don't ride speed limit, don't stop at stop signs, etc). Cars are not the issue, it's 99% of the time a bike rider that make the roads miserable & dangerous for the auto comuters. They ride too close to cars, ride on sidewalks, ride the wrong direction. There are too many people in this town, this county, to make driving conditions worse for auto commuters merely to "accomodate" the bike riders.

The bridge where Palomar Airport connects to Carlsbad Blvd is unsafe for both walking and biking. I seems like there are a lot of workers at the restaurants that walk over the bridge to the 101 to catch the bus, and there are a number of people in Terramar who walk and bike to the restaurants off Avenida Encinias.

Need more singletrack trails, not graded DG pathways aka "Sand Sidewalks" that pass as trails.

Distracted drivers and burying cycling friends killed by same is keeping me off my road bike!

Inadequate primitive trails suitable for trail running and mountain biking There are nice trails in Carlsbad but many are not legal. Please develop a trails plan for Calavera. Flightline needs to be reopened, the need exists for more trails and more connections between open spaces. Trails can easily be built on hillsides such as next to Poinsettia Ln, Cannon Rd and can connect larger open spaces such as LaCosta, Box Cyn, Flightline, Calavera. Think big, how can small open spaces be connected with small green spaces to create long distance routes within Carlsbad. no parking at trailheads like Cannon Road Appreciate improvements Cbad has recently made re: bike lanes, but need to see more. Folks need to feel safe using alternative transpo such as bicycles & walking.

Would really like to see the Rail Trail extended to Encinitas.

I feel Carlsbad miss challenging trails to ride mountain bike/BMX. And many open spaces has been developped in the last 10 years. Carlsbad Northwest has a decent infrastructure to be able to commute on a bike but it is not integrated well enough with other infrastructure to make it viable for me (poor public transportation system/ not enough coaster), not too many place too secure/park a bike (bike rack) in town/mall...etc More mountain bike options and trails need to be developed and encouraged at places such as Calavera and La Costa.

It is inproving let's keep going forward.

The City has not a good job in 'improving' existing services, but has not kept up with the expanding needs of the community. e.g. The area along the beach is in desperate need of upgrades for walkers, runners, cyclist to co-exist.

I'd like to see more single track mountain bike trails. Those are narrow (12 to 18 inches wide), swoopy, curvy, bermy, technical is some areas, and sometimes rocky (non-sanitized). This means we do not want groomed, wide trails that will accommodate double-wide strollers. That is the antithesis of 'getting out on the trail'. Local citizens crave the experience of something a little more natural, with, dare I say it... the thrilling possibility of true excitement!

I am concerned that the evironmentalists are allowed too much control over lands and policies. Example is the Calavera Hills Preserve. Over the years, while some improvements are nice, too much restriction is imposed by I those I suppose to be the environmentalists.

I would like to see a path continued along the train tracks A master map would help quite a bit. The broken up maps are hard to follow This is the safest place I have ever lived. And I've lived a lot of places. But, with the exception of the village, (and maybe Bressi Ranch) this is a suburban community designed for and around cars. Thats just the way it it. You cant fix it.

I work from home and don't own a bicycle, so I can't provide much input here! exisitng trails need to be connected. I do no not feel that multi-purpose roads (lanes for simultaneous use of bikes and cars) are safe - as the one in Luecadias on the 101. I feel that is an accident waiting to happen and hope Carlsbad does not plan on creating those. boardwalk at beach not satisfied because it has turned into a dumping for dogs all along the entire walk way GROSS love animals but not the pee and poop left on the walking area you constantly have to look down so you don't step on pee or poop the point is to enjoy the view this city has to offer.Something has to be done it stinks really stinks what do all the people think who pay good money to visit our beautiful city.Other boardwalks do not have this issue please look into a resolution to this Need widened roads along northern side of Agua Hedionda Lagoon for biking and walking/running We need more mountain bike trails. La Costa is awesome. Please expand south to ajoining areas.

Would like to see more multi use trails - horse/hike/bike & more hike/bike where equestrian not possible.

Connect parks and open spaces with trails. An unpaved DG sidewalk is not a trail.

Trails should not be basically dirt roads. Trails should blend in to the natural areas and provide enough challenge and variety for recreation. We don't need more dirt super-highways through the remaining open space.

Carlsbad needs more trails to replace the open space recently lost. Trails should focus on a natural small footprint. Not wide and steeply graded fire-roads.

Do you work or go to school in Carlsbad? - Other responses Answer I stay at home with my kids Used to live in Carlsbad, then commuted from Oceanside to Encinitas.

Retired retired My kids go to school in NW Carlsbad unemployed I work in Vista - my kids go to school in Carlsbad I used to work in Carlsbad.

Retired Retired I work from home (92008) most days but my office is near the Sports Arena Both my kids go to school in Carlsbad work from home retired I am self employed all over north county. school in southeast carlsbad Retired Retired Occasionally My kids go to school in Carlsbad.

Work out of the home (apartment) child attends sage creek child attends sagecreek i work in 92056 We are both retired, but we did work and our kids went to school , mostly walkin retired home owner 92008 retired Retired(active outdoors - keep moving!!) i own and work at a biotech company in Carlsbad work in Solana beach (would love ride coaster if it would be more frequent) Stay at home Parent Encinitas

Traffic in Carlsbad is beyond the pale and not correctable.

Again, recommend special paths for folks to walk pets and restrict others so that those of us without pets can enjoy a clean path devoid of pet waste.

I think the city should make a more efficient bus route system.

Bike lanes are mostly excellent, with notable exception of La Costa Avenue eastbound between El Camino Real and Romeria.

City has done a great job with the increase in bike lanes/parking stations in the city. Needs to improve public transit infrastructure, i.e. benches with shade/rain cover at more bus stops. Also, more focus on pedestrians, i.e. allow access across rail tracks between Tamarack and CBad Village Dr. (i.e. at Chestnut). Kids who live west of the tracks are forced to climb the fence or are routed >1/2 mile to Tamarack or CBad Village Dr. and must cross the freeway. This has decreased public safety. note: each item should be able to have it's own rank. Some might be '1' but that is not allowed The City needs to do the bike paths and crosswalks smarter-the new crosswalks on Carlsbad Blvd are a good idea, BUT they are done in a dangerous manner.

Since there is no light to push when a pedestrian crosses, having a 2 lane road with a crosswalk is a recipe for disaster. The pedestrian cannot see if the 2nd lane car will stop when crossing the street. Also, they are too dark at night!!! I almost hit 2 people the other night driving the speed limit because the crosswalk is not well-lit. even new strip malls like the "Commons" (is that what it's called? At Palomar Airport and El Camino Real. Come on, it's not a "village" it's a strip mall!) are not designed for walking or bicycling. If I DID want to ride with my kids to go there to get something to eat, it's unsafe trying to navigate the parking lot on a bike or on foot because cars go to fast and aren't really looking for cyclists/pedestrians. Appropriate paths SHOULD have been included to encourage safe walking or riding.

create more viable separated bike paths to allow real bike communing.

Cars often speed through the neighborhood along Mimosa/Manzanita/Catalpa (neighborhood at SW corner of Alga and El Camino Real). I think stop signs or speed bumps to reduce speed are important (a large number of children live and play in the area) and these changes will greatly help with the problem!!!

create a strong ped/bike infrastructure within 5-miles around mixed-use and employment centers.

Need to have more convenient ways of using mass transit to get to the sprawling office parks of eastern Carlsbad! use more traffic circles and reduce traffic signals.

Please rank the following transportation related improvements: - Comments Answer I hate to say it but as a family we drive outside Carlsbad to go for a family bike ride. We drive up to San Clemente and Santa Monica because the bike lanes are away from traffic traveling at 50 mph.The bike lanes here are just not family friendly in a city we love to live in.

Round-abouts. These need to be added all over the city, removing many stop signs. Keep traffic flowing, reduce the wast of gas etc by coming to a complete stop and being the only traffic (bike, car, pedestrian) for a mile.

I hate the multi use lanes now in Encinitas in Solana Beach. I do not feel they are safer for either the bike nor the car. They cause nothing but traffic backups and unsafe lane use.

When planning for pedestrian connections, it is not just providing access, but also providing a pleasant pedestrian experience that makes people want to walk in those locations. The downtown village improvements are going in the right direction, but other connections could also be made throughout the community that focus on sights, sounds, etc. from the appropriate landscape choices, etc. to locate adjacent to walkways.

A bike/walking path over the RR tracks at Chestnut Ave. would be great!! Many senior citizens in The Village area would be much safer walking or using their scooters to get to the beach that way.

It would be great if the bike lanes on major routes (El Camino Real, Coast Highway, Poinsettia Lane) could be street sweep-ed on a regular basis. All the debris from traffic and constant construction pushes into the bike lanes and causes flat tires and dangerous cycling.

Need to destroy the "stigma" of using mass transit! Make mass transit (esp. bus) cool!

I would suggest a trail around agua hedionda. Something like Crystal Springs Reserve Trail in Burlingame, California. It runs along a protected reserve and reservoir, allows for wildlife, walkers, bikers, horses, which would be a great asset for Carlsbad.

The police need to enforce the speed limits. I believe the posted speed limits are not suggestions, but drivers frequently, perhaps even usually, exceed these limits, making the streets much less safe for children, older adults, walkers and bicyclists.

Signal Lights need to be synchronized or at least more intelligent at discerning if there is a need to change. Too much time and gas is wasted at stoplights. Isn't there a plan to install optically-tripped signals? Secondly, the speed limit on Aviara Pkwy is way too low. For a divided road with only cross street access, it should be 50mph. Thank you.

Reducing speeds in the village and adding additional sharrows on Carlsbad Village Drive and State street would help. I'm the owner of Pedego Carlsbad an electric bike shop located on Carlsbad village Dr. Several of my clients/local tourists are intimidated by the amount of traffic and speed of the vehicles traveling through the village. Cars and motorcycles travel way to fast on Carlsbad Village Drive. In the eight months I've owned the shop, I haven't seen any speed traps posted to help keep s Make safer bike paths much more separate from cars and trucks.

I would never drive if there was adequate public transportation from the residential areas to the village! A trolley/tram route (or something similar) down CVD from College to the Village would be perfect for me.

With our weather and unanimous focus on healthy lifestyles Carlsbad should have the best and most bike pathways that are separated from cars. I want to ride bikes with my family from Southwest Carlsbad near Tip Top meats to the Village to shop, eat, and enjoy the ride.

More dedicated bike/walking paths (away from traffic).

Would LOVE a trail around agua hedionda. If you could look at Crystal Springs Reserve Trail in Burlingame, CA and incorporate a trail like that, which also surrounds a protected area, allows for wildlife, and walkers, bikers, horses, around a protected area, which would be an enormous attraction for Carlsbad.

the "all-way" stops are absurdâ Ì DQG WKHUH DUH WRR PDQ\ RI WKHP It's imperative that city leaders improve traffic conditions for bicyclists, pedestrians, AND people who have to drive cars. We should not make life more difficult for drivers, increasing congestion, etc. in a misguided effort to force people to use other types of transportation (because most of them can't!).

The city should build dedicated right turn lanes at all intersections to keep cars backing up.The city should have more yield signs rather than stop signs wherever possible. Left turns on green lights should be allowed where there are good sight lines to observe on coming traffic. ie. after left turn arrow has expired you can still make left turn on green when safe. Freeway on-ramps should be improved particularly at El Camino Real and 78 and College and 78 to reduce traffic jams.

3) use every resource possible to get people out of their cars.

I ride a bicycle 5-7 days a week, almost all the time through some part of Carlsbad, and while Carlsbad does a better job than most towns in the area, there is a lot of room for improvement for making it safer for pedestrians & cyclists. Speed & phone use by car drivers should be enforced/fined more. My cyclist friends & I have daily run-ins with drivers not paying attention, driving in the bike lanes, cutting us off, speeding & using phones while driving.

We need dedicated bike paths removed from cars. We need such paths that enable crossing major intersections and I5.

I think one of the problems that socal has when developing bike and pedestrian "transportation" is an unwillingness to compormise on automobile access. There are times when you will have to choose pedestrians and bikes over cars and that seems to be a difficult decision in southern california More bike lanes!!

Carlsbad had crosswalks.. BUT in the village, when a car is waiting for a ped. to cross.. others will drive around.. also I see many people turn and go thru crosswalks while peds. are in them.. and the cars see the peds in them.. Dangerous Again, the bicycling folks are very vocal and organized in their efforts to get the city to spend more and more money for bike lanes, etc. The walking public (who by far outnumber the bike riders) are not nearly as vocal or organized. There are many neighborhoods and areas without sidewalks making it dangerous to walk.

2) stop building more frewy lanes. work on getting the coaster to be GREAT alternative

1) it should be easy and fast to get to the airport via public transportation.

I work out of home, so a lot of the questions don't make sense. However my hot buttons are:

The city should save more OPEN NATURAL SPACE that can be used by the residence for exercise, nature watching, relaxation and enjoyment.

A pedestrian railway underpass at Chestnut for coastal access. Crosswalks or roundabouts needed on Madison and Roosevelt between Carlsbad Village drive and Magnolia. Empty lot on Madison between Pine and Chestnut needs to be converted to a dog park or ornamental garden park. No more sports parks in the Barrio! Walkway added along the west side of Pine Ave. park. Additional parking spaces should be added along the west side of pine ave. park. Chestnut sidewalk to rail trail improvement My concern is not the traffic but rather the sharing of the coast road for runners and bikers. There are many precarious spots along the road- south of Cannon on HWY 1- that do not have any space for a runner and a biker to pass safely without one stepping or riding into the roadway. The road is narrow (just one lane each direction) but there is very little space for runners and bikers.

The city should look at upgrading traffic light systems from timers to sensors that detect car queue's at light intersections in order to improve vehicle gas efficiency. Too many lights are on timers and created needless stopping by vehicles at intersections.

I noticed the poorly timed stoplights on Carlsbad Blvd. It was a joke, the lights were green but no one could move one inch because the next set of lights stayed red. What a mess!

92008 needs sidewalks on ALL streets. Many streets date from an era when sidewalks were not routinely added as houses were built. No section of a street should be "grandfathered in" and permitted to go without sidewalks. Quaintness and a rural feeling have no place in 2014. It is dangerous to walk on sections of Adams, Highland, Sunnyhill, Skyline, Donna, Valley, Park etc.

I applaud this survey! One concern in 90210 is the congestion on College in both directions. College is a cluster / congestion mess and with the bunch of low income housing coming in near Walmrt-it will be terrible -unsafe to bike&unpleasant in general. Congestion has also significantly increased on college due to the new high school and the low income housing at the bottom of the hill.I chose CH because it was trail close. Had no idea I'd be surrounded by low income&congestion. DISAPPOINTING. Unrealistic ranking system- people don't really think like this. I have attempted to commute by train from Carlsbad but schedules are too infrequent. There are no bus routes on Pointsettia inland so I have had to walk to the 101 to catch a bus. I leave from oceanside to catch the Amtrak train.

While on subject of safety, could use a traffic light at corner of Pontiac and Tamarack (always hazardous turning onto Tamarack).

It is my understanding that only 1% of the residents use bicycles. If that's true, then I think we are spending way too much money and time accommodating them.

The money would be better spent on sidewalks and improving the walking experience.

More singletrack!

Crosswalks in the downtown area are unsafe and should be painted a prominent color. The city should implement small buses or even cars that take people shopping. Every neighborhood should be able to walk to meet their basic needs. Rezone Glasgow and CBV to an upscale organic market.

More paved bicycle pathways separated from cars. the city should work on developing the trail system further for walking, running --not biking

I have heard of some cities that give a financial incentives to commute by walking, riding, etc. My son gets $20/month in San Luis Obisbo to ride his bike to work part-time.

I think Carlsbad is doing an excellent job in this category.

I'd like to see a dedicated bike / walk path from El Camino to the ocean parallel to Cannon. yes, there are bike lanes on Cannon, but the city needs more dedicated paths. there is presently a (dirt) road through part of this. #1 - Have biking and rollerblade trails far away from cars Smooth traffic separated ped and bike and public transport options immediately relieve traffic problems Complete Coast Trail should be #1 priority for City we need bike/walking paths that are separate from cars. These would be utilized far more for transportation to work The amount of bike paths on city streets is more than enough. If the riders would actually follow the rules of the road, like not continuing through a red light (which cars can't do and I see bikes do frequently) or staying within the bike lane (like cars have to do) bicyclists would have less of a problem.

We have tried using the Coaster on many occasions but due to the lack of available times we have not used it often. again, child-safe bike ways on the 101 corridor would be a great plus for families People are not going to ride bikes on the roads until drivers know they'll get ticketed for running red lights.

Just get one or more alternatives to Carlsbad Blvd even if one or two bridges are necessary over the lagoons, to do it. If Encina PP goes away that should make it easier to create a new avenue next to railroad and/or I-5(for local traffic). I hate the big trucks parking and waiting along bluff between Cerezo and Manzano.

Again, please make sidewalks and bike paths wider.

Because Carlsbad is attractive it atracts people & businesses to the area. This means controling traffic is almost counter active. Off road activity is where most options lie for the casual user to both get from a to b & excercise.

Open space in truly natural settings must be the highest priority! We still have some areas left and we must secure these so that trails can be linked.

I know that the city tries to make the traffic lights efficient - they still need work, to be efficient, and to work in bright sun or fog, when they tend to go on maximum length whether or not there's vehicles in various directions.

Because of the additional traffic due to Sage Creek High School College Blvd southbound should be put through to Palomar Airprt Rd which would help with the traffic backup on Cannon Rd and College Blvd. Thank you.

A NO car Village area. AND a parking garage.

If there were convenient public transportation, I would consider reducing cars in household from 3 to 2. When I lived in other places I used public transportation.

I would have NO OBJECTION to bussing running down suburban streets like in canada, europe, et al. My neighbors disagree.

Ultimately city should reduce developement of more housing, which will keep more cars off the road in the future.

Need more open space trails & would like to see connector trails to other park areas further developed for long hikes/bike rides This question has a bias, it assumes I agree with all these proposition I don't think point after 5 are worth pursuing I'd like to see it be safe for kids to ride their bikes places.

Fireroads are not trailsâ æk æk æk æk æk æk æ Improvements I need to see them so the next survey is positive.

We have the best climate in the US. So why do more people not commute by bike? Because road connections are poor given all the freeways we have to cross.

With efficient routes bike commuting would be easier, safer and help get cars off the road. Bike paths and lanes help, but also consider how people could commute on trails. By creating long distance routes which include trails in preserves/parks these would be very popular and efficient ways to get around.

I would suggest a trail around agua hedionda. Something like Crystal Springs Reserve Trail in Burlingame, California. It runs along a protected reserve and reservoir, allows for wildlife, walkers, bikers, horses, which would be a great asset for Carlsbad.

One of the things that brought us to Carlsbad was the open spaces and agricultural areas. We need to preserve all the open space we can and provide well defined hiking paths that are linked from area to area - a true network of trails across teh entire city and linking to surrounding cities' trail systems. The eucalyptus grove at Village H needs to be reopened to the community, we used to walk that trail EVERY DAY and it is sorely missed.

The City should aggressively acquire more open space for preservation.

Would LOVE a trail around agua hedionda. If you could look at Crystal Springs Reserve Trail in Burlingame, CA and incorporate a trail like that, which also surrounds a protected area, allows for wildlife, and walkers, bikers, horses, around a protected area, which would be an enormous attraction for Carlsbad.

It's very hazardous right now.

More lighting, more safety , "eyes on the street(eyes on the trails) , safer for women and children, maybe use CCC or Boy Scouts or some similar group - give young kids work experience and jobs as "safety scouts". Trim bushes so "bad guys" can't hide there. Make the trails more inviting. the bataquitos lagoon trail west of I-5 needs to be completed. The developer paid the funds and dedicated the easement fr the trail. the City should built this now.

MTB trails have been greatly reduced as large swaths of public land have been closed to access especially south of Calavera Lake. This has increased the number of bikers on the few remaining trails and has led to increased friction with other users (hikers). By increasing the number of trails we would ease the traffic on the few remaining trails that exist in that area and thus decrease conflict while simultaneously increasing public safety. This would also attract increased tourism and money. note: each item should be able to have it's own rank. Some might be '6' but that is not allowed The 56 bike path is a good example, yet I quite often see people walking in the SAME direction as bikes on the bike path, even when there's an adjoining dirt path!

Need trail around agua hedionda.

You need extended, interconnected greenbelts away from cars, for bikes and for walkers/joggers. Did I mention extended and interconnected?? You should be able to go north to south, east to west across the city, connect to the beach, walk or bike along the beach, for miles and miles and miles on protected pathways that don't have cars whizzing past.

The city needs to acquire more natural open space as the population grows. Some open space areas like Lake Calavera are overused/abused.

Need a bike park Concentrate on sidewalks, not bike lanes.

On street bike lanes are better than nothing but are not safe. We have monuments that are dedicated to people who have died riding bikes in Carlsbad. That shouldn't happen. Bike/walking lanes need to have a physical barrier not allow cars to contact bikes/walkers.People would use human power more if the options were safer. Open areas should allow mountain bikers to build there own trails rather than building only generic safe trails to give variety to more skill levels.

Please rank the following recreation related trail improvements: - Comments Answer I would like to see more trails around Agua Hedionda Lagoon that are easily accessed. The ones around Batiquitos are better.

I don't ride horses...maybe if there were more options I would try! Thank you for making the trails more defined than a few years ago, I would rather walk with no fence and signs but too many people made their own path and it was ruining open spaces. separating bike and pedestrians is good, keep the bikes safe from cars and pedestrians safe from bikes.

Mountain biking should be promoted. I believe it brings in good income and good people. It's a shame that San Diego County in general doesn't understand. It could be yet another reason to visit the area.

It would be nice to have some more trails around Agua Hedionda and Bataquitos lagoons.

Speaking for senior citizens again....We need a safer/shorter route for walking or using scooters to get to the beach from the South Village area...Chestnut St. over/under RR Tracks preferably.....Half way between Tamarack and Carlsbad Village Drive...

Open space is becoming more and more appealing to the younger generations who are starting families. Health and nature go hand in hand. Set the open space aside for human enjoyment and it will better our community, increase the desire for people to reside here, improve our tourism etc.

Extension of the rail trail providing continuous off street riding and walking along the full North South corridor. Addition of a coastal walking and riding trail through state parks at the coast.

Why can't we have more paths for both bikes and rollerbladers?????

The regular availability to restroom facilities is important for trail walkers, runners, bicyclists.

In general, the city has done a good job with walking / hiking trails. Would love to see more on & off road biking trails that network or matrix and make longer course an commuting an option. There is an open space on the s.side of cbad vil & glassgow (off of college)that has no public access - it would be nice to have a trail or vista picnic area there - should be a nice view. Love the emphasis the city has on open space - need to preserve them for public access & enjoyment on foot or wheels.

I feel safety is a concern not because of high-speed cyclists( a leading choice, I think to list) but as a woman the seclusion of some of the trails makes me uneasy. I do know that homeless populations live in the canyons and rural areas so I feel leary going by myself alone on some trails.

I would love to have a safe place to Rollerblade. Sadly, there is limited area we are allowed to so at the beach, and not many sidewalk areas where it's safe to do so. Would be nice to have a loop somewhere similar to Miramar reservoir.

Same comment on cyclists. I think they have a very vocal group that gets much more attention than they really deserve or need.

(Note: I tried to leave #6 unranked because I have not seen any problems between bikers and hikers (speaking as a biker...))

The city needs to BUY more land. You cannot continue to use conservation lands for recreational uses as the number of users go up. There are considerations other than simply endangered species. Like all the rest of the critters - who need an undisturbed home.

I would like to see the Batiquitos Lagoon Trail WEST OF I-5 finally completed and joined to the existing lagoon trail east of I-5 to provide a nice walking workout away from speeding cars!!!! It has been promised for TOO LONG! Please do it!

I don't know if more equestrian or mountain biking trails are needed, so I can't answer fairly.

On-street bike paths are of limited benefit, due to distracted drivers... none of the above is presently bad.

Who has horses in this city?

Bell systems help mountain bikers / equestrians / hikers all safely use the same trail systems â Ì HGXFDWLRQ WR XVHUV RI WKH V\VWHPV DV ZHOO DV SURSHU VLJQDJH DV to the right of way (horse/hike/bike)help remind trail users of yield right of ways.

Please open more multi use trails. Please open open more open space to trails.

Any open space should have 10" wide trails for hiking, mountain biking, and equestrian use. Would have very little impact on native plants and wildlife. 10".

I think fear of cyclists on trails is unwarranted. Cyclists can pass walkers safely.

Better enforcement of trail use, especially protecting habitat from off trail use by mountain bikers, should be the highest priority. #1 - More OFF-street bike lanes Bicycles and ped scan function together easily on non vehicle marked trails Complete Coast Trail should be #1 priority for City more off-street bike/walking paths that connect residential to business parks and beach.

PLease do not count my votes for recreation trails improvements - the survey wouldn't let me not put them in order to continue. Sidewalks and walkways are needed where there are none, so people don't have to walk in the street. Other than that, there are enough bike lanes, mountain biking trails, bike lanes, etc.

Mountain biking is very popular and good exercise, but it also can and frequently does, destroy the natural environment. Just look at Mt. Calavera, particularly the south slope. It needs to be regulated! As for equestrian trails, I have lived in Carlsbad for 17 years and never seen a horse, other than in a parade. Do some Carlsbad residents have horses? I entered a # above for equestrian trails, but doubt they are necessary at all.

The biggest need is for parking at trail-heads to provide access for those of us who want to explore the city's trail system. Only a few locations have parking. Any street side parking is prohibited due to bike lanes. We non-bikers would like equal consideration. There are many areas we would go to if we could park.

Carlsbad trails are heavily used and more trails are needed for all users. I am disappointed by the wording regarding "high speed cyclists" as I don't find this to be the case. There is good reading in the CA State Parks Trail Conflict Study http://www.parks.ca.gov/pages/980/files/app_c_trailuseconflictstudy_chginuse_draft.pdf. See section 1.2.3 Research findings which concludes conflict is more based on perception and attitudes than actual incidents.

Mountain bike is my favorite activity (I'm racing pro) and it's a reason why I moves from Europe in Carlsbad but the number or trails (and especially legal trails) have reduced a lot these last 10 years. There is almost not option for me to ride and to introduce my son to mountain biking in Carlsbad.

All trails should be "shared" for hikers, horses & mountain bikers Especially on Aviara Parkway from Mimosa to Ambrosia. There needs to be a walk path other than the sidewalk for children to and from school. More than 2 kids walking together, every day I see the 3rd or more meander into the bike lane on a VERY HIGH TRAFFIC STREET. I want my children to walk but don't trust the sidewalk because there is no guard against stepping into the street. 25mph is the speed limit, cars are coming down a hill while heading West and it is difficult to get to 25mph.

With good trail & path design runners & hikers would not be fearful of cyclists Pedestrians without earphones who are paying attention should not fear cyclists with bells who are paying attention. A little money spent fostering curtious behavior by both groups would be well spent.

Fireroads are not trails.

More real mountain bike trails - become a 'destination stop' for mountain bikers - possibly in partnership with adjacent cities.

Re-open Flightline!

Bicycle pump track and skills area in existing parks. Can you be used by kids while their brothers/sisters practice play in other sporting events.

A mountain bike skills park would be a major attraction for Carlsbad/North County. It would be somthing for dad/mom to do while the kids are at Legoland!

we need more open space to recreate so that we can maintain a healthy, positive lifestyle as the cities in southern California grow.

Additional trail expansion should be the number 1 priority for Carlsbad. These trails should be 2 feet in width to maximize the natural area and should accommodate all users. (same question bias as previous, I don't agree with prosition with >priority>3

The majority of trails should be multi-use. Bad trail interactions are solvable through education, not exclusion. If single-use trails are used, it's important to have equitable proportioning of those trails. If you're going to have pedestrian only trails, you should also have bike and equestrian only trails to complement them.

The entire older part of Carlsbad needs redesign of streets to make it more pedestrian friendly. 92008 has many areas without sidewalks- especially near the schools, of Magnolia, Carlsbad High and Valley Middle. It really isn't safe to be walking or riding your bike when school is starting, or ending.

The sidewalk along the beach near the grassy park near the surf shop then going south. The amount of dog waste is very bad. I would like to see it cleaned up and perhaps consider posting signs that encourage dogs using the grass instead of the sidewalk. Thanks.

Corner of Tamarack and Garfield. No sidewalks in this area makes is very difficult to walk to Jefferson Elem. School.

All of Garfield should have sidewalks because it is frequently used to walk to town.

Along PCH runners have to share bike path in some areas near residential sections and bikers seem to get annoyed with runners (me) are on the bike path but too many walkers on the sidewalk with strollers and dogs so runners have to go to bike path to keep any kind of pace.

why no sidewalks on Highland and near schools? very dangerous for kids Carlsbad Village and along 101. Around lagoon, can't see walkers at night.

I run along the coast highway 3 times a week. it is really crowded and in certain parts there are no sidewalks for us to use so we are forced to use the bike lane.

On a few occasions there have been issues with the bike people pushing a friend of mine yelling get out of our lane...Well if there was some place for us to go other then down the side of the cliff we would be happy to..If possible there should be a "mini" lane for us runners and walkers...the bikes can go into the lanes with traffic but we cant...it is so scary and the boardwalk is to crowded by tamarak to pass people that are out for a stroll and are walking 4 people wide. You say excuse me and they dont move...

The pathway near Tamarack at the beach is too narrow - especially over the bridge. One lady with a stroller will clog up the entire lane, forcing walkers to walk in bike lane.

Close off State Street between Carlsbad Village Drive and Grand and make it a pedestrian ONLY zone. That means WALKING ONLY with NO bicycles, skateboards, roller skates/blades, etc. Better enforcement of biking laws, especially on Carlsbad Blvd. from Palomar Airport Road to the other end. Bicyclers are mainly (not all) young, healthy individuals. Don't allow them to ride around the Village. Make them park around the periphery and walk. When replacing sidewalks, use dirt instead of concrete. Again, look at the sidewalks along Cannon between El Camino and College.

Shopping centers and downtown business district are connected to residential areas via busy streets such as Carlsbad Villabe Dr., Tamarack Ave. and Monroe St. It is not pleasant to walk along those routes. Cars travel too fast. Bikes and pedestrians compete with distracted drivers at crossings. There is no buffer between cars and byciclists and pedestrians. There is no shade along those streets, which are the most direct way to reach businesses, shopping centers, and schools. Sidewalks are too narrow, and they are frequently used by younger kids who don't want to ride their bikes on the bike paths along motorized vehicles.

Although I understand those streets are there to get you from point A to point B, they should also include ammenities for people who used them to get from point A to point B by walking or biking.

Flashing lights on crosswalks on Carlsbad Blvd., but the improvements made were a huge positive, thanks.

Sidewalks are needed along the state park area.

Better pedestrian connections are needed in the area around the La Costa Resort, the adjacent Albertson's shopping center and the Von's shopping center at the corner of Alga and El Camino Real.

Generally, the area along the coastline could be greatly improved with wide paths for both people and bikes. The bridge is way to narrow around the powerplant.

Help us identify areas where we can improve the safety and conditions for people who walk in Carlsbad. Are there any areas where more sidewalks, Answer I walk from Cannon Road to Leucadia weekly. I have to share the road (bike lane) with bikes and cars. Bicyclists are not happy to share the road at all with us.

We often have to jump onto the curb to get out of the way. Encinitas is a little better, but for people who log 10+ miles, there are really no roads that offer sidewalks or paths that allow us to walk freely. We do use and appreciate the use of the State Parks Campground to get off the road for part of our walks.

A pathway from Oceanside to Encinitas would be great, but any long stretch of paved or dirt paths offering 10+ miles of safe, dedicated paths would be appreciated.

Need a way to safely cross the tracks for the CRT. Pedestrian access for the Palomar Airport Rd bridge over the railroad tracks and Carlsbad Blvd is horrendous. This a key coastal access point near several hotels and residences.

Please consider adding a sidewalk on Arenal, to the east of El Camino Real.

Sequestered (from vehicular traffic) walking/running paths

2. Would be great if we eventually had bike lanes with separators from traffic (e.g. La Costa from RSF to ECR) Walkway over RR tracks at Chestnut in the South Village area would be great for EVERYONE! All dirt trails along the extent of the railroad tracks should be connected for a longer walk/run route (where dogs are allowed, since they are not allowed on the beach). That is, connected from La Costa Ave (south Cbad) to the northern most point of Cbad. Safety measures, including enforcement of leash laws on nature walks, including along railroad tracks and Ponto (where pit bulls are now congregating). Wider trails along (uninterupted) the extent of along the 101 should be connected for a longer walk/run route and full access to beach, to bus, etc., both sides of street and safe distance from bikes and cars. That is, connected from La Costa Ave (south Cbad) to the village, Laguna and Carlsbad Drive - the northern most point of Cbad. Better walkways, better lighting for access to 101 Breeze during service hours (sometimes dark, have to cross RR tracks). More Coaster stops, more frequent, please. Especially days of events, such as the Surfing Madonna event (11/16), marathons.

The wood bridges throughout lake calavera need some repairs. It's hard to get through the trails without crossing muddy water.

Need more dedicated direct paths for biking and jogging that connects south eastern parts of the city to the beach areas. Need paths that do not require crossing streets but allow to go over or under roads to make jogging and biking convenient and safe.

All of my walking routes have very nice sidewalks in place. a key area for bike and ped safety improvements is on the west side of Carlsbad Blvd/PCH @ Avenita Encias next to the St Beach. there is no sidewalk and only a bike lane. cars turn and block this area trying to get a parking spot and also cars swing wide making a lt turn from wb ave encinas to sb PCH. I have seen many near fatalities here due to auto movements into the bikelane, many tring to use the parking area. All ped and bike movements (there are many runners on PCH) only have the bike lane that the cars intrude on, and the lt turn sb from ave encinas makes this worse. It is only a matter of time till more are hurt here. We almost got run over by a car a few months back. this is a good are to replace the intersection with a traffic circle and make ped/bike travel safe.

I think Carlsbad is doing an awesome job. The problem is the disconnect between drivers (who do not also ride a bike or use the sidewalks) and the rest of us.

And because so many bicyclists fail to use the roads properly (cruiser bikes riding in the wrong direction, bicyclists running lights and stop signs), drivers will remain angry. More education and/or enforcement of proper riding and driving behavior will go a long way. I ride my road bike 10,000 miles/year here in north county. I follow all road rules. But I get run off the road, nearly clipped, and harassed by drivers because I represent all bikes. It is terrifying, but I would hate to give up what I love most about living here - riding year around.

We absolutely need sidewalks and areas for pedestrians along the west side Carlsbad Blvd. between Cannon and Las Costa. Between the high speed cyclists and fast, distracted motorists looking at the ocean, it is very dangerous for walkers and runners.

Priorities: 1. Bike/jogging/walking paths, Carlsbad Boulevard, La Costa north to power plant.

2. Crosswalks along Carlsbad Boulevard between Tamarack and power plant (no way to cross right now except risking life and dodging cars! - and this is one of our most popular beaches!!!)

3. Need all-way crosswalk at Tamarack and Carlsbad Boulevard like the ones at Carlsbad Village Drive and Grand.

4. Sidewalks in Olde Carlsbad.

5. Marked crosswalks (people don't stop at unmarked ones!) on Hillside, and Tamarack and Sunnyhill.

Chestnut Train bypass crossing. Keep the all of us off our busy streets. Carlsbad Village Dr & Tamarack not bike or walking friendly. The beach is over crowded with cars. i think it would be great to turn state street between grand and carlsbad village dr. into a promenade.

1. La Costa Ave - consider a bike lane from ECR to RSF.

The biggest improvement the city can make with regards to safety and in increasing property values(and tax revenue) in the high-density Village area is to provide access across the tracks between Tamarack and CBad Village Dr. The Village area is touted as a ped-friendly area, but for those who want to get to the beach who live east of the tracks and those who live on the west side that would like to access the Coastal Rail Trail, the Senior Center, Pine Park, Jefferson Elem., Valley Middle, and/or Carlsbad High Schools the rail fence has become an obstacle. Before, I and many others, used to be able to walk to the beach with surfboard underarm. Now we must drive to the beach and end up taking numerous parking spaces despite living blocks from the sand. Kids are still climbing the fence daily just to get to and from school or are routed to dangerous freeway crossings. Encinitas is a city that is doing things right with several rail crossings completed(Swami's) or in the city plans.

There should be a crosswalk entering into Poinsettia Elementary school.

In the area of schools in northwest Carlsbad.

New sidewalks and crosswalks need to done in a smart manner-not just placed without thought. There are so many signs on Carlsbad Blvd that its become a form of visual blight. Does the City employ traffic planners who use proven data and studies to add "improvements" to crosswalks, bike lanes, etc.?? I think its great that the City wants to encourage biking and hiking, but its hard to do in built-out areas. It needs to be done smartly so it don't become safety hazards for the bikers and hikers.

1) The large trucks parked on Pio Pico (near the Library Learning Center) make crossing the street quite hazardous. Is there any help for this? If the drivers have pulled over to sleep, perhaps an alternative space can be provided for this?

2) The walk-signal technology in the Village seems possibly outdated. For example, if I arrive at the crosswalk while the light is green--and at a time when the light is going to remain green for awhile--then pressing the walk button should trigger the walk signal. Instead, it seems that unless one arrives in advance it is necessary to wait a full cycle for the walk signal to reappear. (I hope I'm explaining this clearly enough...)

3)The church at the corner of Washington Street and Carlsbad Village Drive seems to have made changes intended to discourage pedestrian passersby, which is their prerogative, I suppose. But perhaps there should be an actual sidewalk here?

Any "strip" mall primarily, the new "commons" or whatever it's called but also the outlet mall and new mall across the street from the outlet mall.

If the Westfield mall is being redesigned, it'd be nice to consider making it more friendly for pedestrians and bike riders. The mall across the street is even less safe Pio Pico should be a safer walk!

Need a trail around agua hedionda. There are trails around protected areas all over the u.s. You can make a trail without interrupting surrounding areas for walkers, bikers, dog walking, joggers. I think it would be extremely popular.

See above. You folks seem to be thinking about Carlsbad as a series of neighborhood chunks, with leetle bits of so-called "paths" in each of them somewhere.

Not a good concept. The idea of greenbelts has been around since Frederick Law Ohlmstead, and they've been used really well in places like the Irvine neighborhoods. Carlsbad has nothing comparable. Your longest so-called paths in my neighborhood are scrubby little footpaths on hillsides between houses, where you feel like you're trespassing, and are neither pleasant nor useful.

Helping you identify a city-wide greenbelt is above my pay category. You might consider hiring a landscape architecture firm, rather than leaving it all to developers.

I do not live in Carlsbad, but while visiting I have never had trouble finding safe and efficient walking paths Build sidewalks on Carlsbad Blvd. starting from Cannon Road & going north to connect with the boardwalk. Some areas along the boardwalk nĂ&#x192; Ă&#x2020;Â&#x2039;HG ZLGHQLQJ The landscaping along Carlsbad Blvd. & particularly from Tamarack & going north is in dire need of improvement. It is pathetic to see dead trees, dry grass .

Landscaping is also needed along Coast Hwy/ Carlsbad Blvd.- plant more trees & plants in the medians. can't think of any near where I live

Carlsbad Blvd. between Pine and Tamarack has a bunch of crosswalks that get a lot of use. The northbound side is pretty good, as there are no impediments to visibility. Riding southbound in the bike lane, however, it's often VERY difficult to see pedestrians entering a crosswalk from the west because of parked cars (and pedestrians can't see bicyclists for the same reason). If the parking space immediately north of each crosswalk was kept open, I think that would help visibility a lot. I've noticed the spiffy new flashing light at the crosswalk over Carlsbad at Oak St. All of the other crosswalks REALLY need those lights, too.

The area along the seawall in Carlsbad is busy with foot and bicycle traffic, but the cars speed there so it is difficult to walk safely. Also the speed of traffic along La Costa Avenue is high so walking on the sidewalk can be risky.

In addition to the bike the village campaign there should be a walk the village campaign - maybe coinciding with the farmer's market as that already shuts down State street to vehicles. Promoting the walkability of the town would do wonders. Walking paths and maps should be provided for visitors that also highlight the shops and restaurants that are off the beaten path, perhaps with adjoining walk the village signs/arrows/directions (done stylistically, like the bike the village bike racks).

Highland Drive between Hillside and Carlsbad Village Drive Bike lanes everywhere are needed that do not share the road with cars.

Complete sidewalk on El Camino Real between Cannon and Kelly Drive. Create trail loop around Agua Hedonia Lagoon.

Overpasses for very busy streets? This would be expensive, but when trying to cross streets with six+ lanes of car traffic going 55+ MPH (even if they're stopped for a moment at a red light), it can be pretty terrifying. Add small children and/or groceries, carts, etc., and it's even worse.

The most glaring safety problems I see are El Camino Real between Cannon and Kelly Dr. on the West side of the street. The existing bike lane pinches down to nearly nothing on a blind curve/hilltop with cars travelling at 55-65 MPH. Kids from Evans Point area SW corner of Cannon and El Camino Real could ride/walk to school but don't because it is very unsafe.

Ambrosia Lane at Aviara Oaks school is another dangerous street. There are nearly no school signs the street is twisty and hilly, cars are allowed to park on both sides and the speed limit is 35 MPH a little North of the school. Many kids walk and ride bikes/scooter/skateboards on this road at their peril.

I would suggest a physical barrier to prevent cars from hitting kids. Possibly no parking on one side and a barrier rail with a bike lane behind it separate from the sidewalk so bikes and peds can travel at their own speeds.

I think Carlsbad is doing a pretty good job in this area. Carlsbad is a very walkable town.

The sidewalk on the south side of Grand between Carlsbad Boulevard and State Street could be cleaned up - it is narrow and not very clean.

Added comments on map regarding crossing Rancho Santa Fe Rd. and traffic calming on Xana Way. please see above.. Making motorists accountable for going into the path of ped. crossing roads is a priority There are many areas, mostly in old Carlsbad, where there are no sidewalks. This is where the emphasis should be. Areas along Carlsbad Village Drive for children walking to and from Hope Elementary need sidewalks on both sides of the streets. Aviara Avenue between Plum Tree and Poinsettia needs sidewalks on both sides of the street, etc.

Carlsbad needs a coast NO DOG Walking area. Those dog walkers are a safety issue with their long leashes and dog stuff on the sidewalks!!!

Coast highway south of Terra Mar to La Costa Sidewalk to continue from the lower part of el fuerte street, 7200 el fuerte block, north to Babilona. The cars come around a curve and do not see 100%. Forced into street traffic .not only is it dangerous but against ADA. Told people bought prior to this but that does not exempt them. Bushes were planted in city right away. Why has this been this way for years? I see children in the street due to this. Also enforce codes for keeping shrubbery cut back. On the 7400 block of el fuerte bushes with thorns are in the walkway.

DOWNTOWN CARLSBAD and DOWN the LAGOON ROUTE on JEFFERSON STREET Would love Carlsbad to get together with the City of Solana Beach and follow their strategies and ideas. They have lowered their train tracks, which lowers noise of horns, and accidental deaths from crossings. Or add double gates and put "no horn" signs in the village where residents are. Another idea is a wooden raised pathway over the lagoons along the freeway for pedestrians and bikes. DEFINITELY need guard rails or solid walls along 5 Frwy next to Pio Pico!! There is only a chain link fence between Chestnut and Magnolia and there are children that walk along there to and from the many schools and residents.

See comments above about the coast highway and traffic. The posted speed is 35 mph but I regularly see people speeding on the stretch of roadway south of Tamarack. Similarly, both El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road are no longer usable as safe bike routes. Why? Because Carlsbad is greedy! Instead of limiting the ugly sprawl of stucco boxes, the greed merchants at City Hall have made it their life mission to develop every square inch of what was once a peaceful "small" town. The result is too many people with too many cars! I've been here for 36 years and the quality of life is no longer a source of pride. By way of example, simply look at the annual TGIF Jazz in the parks. Used to be a person could come home from work, load the car with chairs and a cooler and find a nice spot to enjoy the festive atmosphere. Now, if you're not planted on the ground by noon, you may as well forget finding a spot. Nice work, Carlsbad!

Hardly anyone lives close enough to anything to walk there. The city should focus on making everything accessible to bikes. I would bike for my groceries if I felt safe from car traffic. I do not feel safe in bike lanes right next to car lanes.

I love to walk and also love to run while training for the Carlsbad Marathon. One of my favorite routes is along the coast. I would love to have a running/walking trail that crosses over the Buena Vista lagoon on the north end of Carlsbad both parallel and next to the train tracks.

Alternatively, the path could be next to and parallel Carlsbad Blvd.

Ideally, I'd love if it would connect from Ocean St. on the North end of Carlsbad near Normandy Ln. to the Oceanside bike/walking path that starts at around 2000 Broadway St. in Oceanside.

This would provide a continuous ride/walk along the coast from the Carlsbad path on the Ocean near the Harbor Fish Cafe to the Oceanside Pier.

Of course, improved sidewalks along Ocean St. would be nice, too.

Secondarily, I'd like to be able to walk or run along a trail heading south from the Beach Walk that isn't right next to Carlsbad Blvd. It is especially dangerous around Cannon where the sidewalk disappears.

A crosswalk is needed between Valley Middle School and Magnolia Elementary on Valley Street between the 2 back gates. Many kids cross to get their siblings or get in a car and it is very dangerous. there need to be walkways / sidewalks along El Camino real between Cannon and Chestnut.

Lightening on streets towards train station avoid blind and risky corners Finish sidewalk on north side of Tamarack between Carlsbad Village Drive & Pontiac.

CVD near/under the 5 connecting the residential to the Village area.

Complete Coast Trail along RR tracks and through City from Oceanside to Leucadia as # 1 priority

I would suggest a trail around agua hedionda. Something like Crystal Springs Reserve Trail in Burlingame, California. It runs along a protected reserve and reservoir, allows for wildlife, walkers, bikers, horses, which would be a great asset for Carlsbad.

The drive between the Aviara Von's Center lower lot and upper lot on the east side needs a side walk.

I would like to see vehicles eliminated on S street between Carlsbad Village and Grand Ave. It's mostly shopping and dinning, and it would be a lot safer if it was limited to foot traffic. I would also like to see bike lines on state street going towards Oceanside. Perhaps a local City official can ride the coast from Carlsbad towards San Diego and look at the improvements that could be made in widening the current bike path. Some areas are very narrow or non existing. Not allowing parking on some strengths of the beach road. Most importantly the city could improve safty by slowing down the traffic traveling through the village.

Recommend trail around agua hedionda. Check out Crystal Springs Reserve Trail in San Mateo County, around a water reserve, allows walkers, bikers, horses, around a protected area, which would be a fabulous addition to Carlsbad.

Would LOVE a trail around agua hedionda. If you could look at Crystal Springs Reserve Trail in Burlingame, CA and incorporate a trail like that, which also surrounds a protected area, allows for wildlife, and walkers, bikers, horses, around a protected area, which would be an enormous attraction for Carlsbad.

Its impossible to walk across the bridge over the train tracks on Palomar Airport Road. When that bridge was redone about 4-5 years ago the city didn't even widen it. Its still a death trap.

I live in Oceanside across from Calaveras preserve. For some reason when the City of Carlsbad hosts any kind of event, volunteer, bike demo, etc. it is located here in Oceanside. Why isn't the city encouraging parking in Carlsbad?Parking in CARLSBAD needs to be improved by the dam so that more people who are using the city of Carlsbad property can park and make noise in Carlsbad. I own my home but it doesn't stop people using the trails from using my water, playing loud music, talking at a decibel loud enough for the whole neighborhood to hear, drinking beer after their ride in front of my house. The city of Carlsbad doesn't want these kinds of things happening to their residents so no improvements or additional parking has been added in Carlsbad. If more parking was provided over by the dam and basketball park, it would not affect the residents as much because none of their houses are directly facing the street.

A walk/bike path along Agua Hedionda Lagoon from El Camino to the beach -- would allow level access to the coast route/inland public transportation routes, is scenic and away from cars.

The walkways under the 1-5 into the village at CVD and Chestnut need to be improved. There should be a bridge at Chestnut over the train tracks to the beach.

Corner of Carlsbad Village Drive and State Street. Cross walk is not high lighted. I see people almost get hit daily. Needs some kind of reflection along cross walk to slow down cars and make people feel safe when they cross the street create a separated bike/walk way along the 101 from la costa to village. This was done few years ago in the city from where I come from in Italy by reclaiming an unused train line and it is now one of the major attractions for residents and turists improving the life of most people (more exercise), kids and attracting scores of tourists... complete the CRT, with more access points.

Jefferson Street in between Las Flores and Marron Rd. There is no sidewalk and only a bike lane for pedestrians to walk in. This makes it difficult for the cyclist to not hit a pedestrian by entering the car lanes.

On Coast Highway between Cannon up until the boarder of Encinitas by Ponto beach. There is no sidewalk for those that want to walk safely. Walking on the beach is an option but sidewalks are nicer.

On Coast high way between Vista Way and the bridge entering Carlsbad Village. We need a sidewalk alongside by the Lagoon. People walk that daily to get into Oceanside, Also it need to be well lit for night time it is hard to see people.

On Jefferson ave between the 5 freeway and the mall. Also, the shopping centers should be more pedestrian friendly, specifically the Carlsbad Mall and the Vons/Sprouts shopping centers. You cannot get from the sidewalk to the store entrance while staying on a sidewalk.

Keep joggers and bikers off the pavement reserved for traffic on streets.

Need to make nature trails around the lagoon by the 78. So many people would utilize this are like we do at Batiquitos. Stop building in open space. Let's fix up areas that need to be improved versus just building new. Reduce, reuse, recycle this needs to be the next focus for city building.

Speeding traffic on Madison and Roosevelt Streets between Carlsbad Village drive and Magnolia is serious safety problem. This is a walking neighborhood with many children, bike riders and dog walkers. Roundabouts and / or landscaped crosswalks are needed to slow and calm traffic. Pine and Chestnut would be good locations along Madison and Roosevelt for Roundabouts or landscaped crosswalks.

The east west corridor of Chestnut leading from Pine park to the rail trail lacks a sidewalk west of Roosevelt.

We host a marathon run but along the race route (Hwy. 1) there is little practice space. The bike lane is wonderful up to Cannon and then there is a little bike lane and no sidewalk or space for a runner. Further south the bike lane is evident but where does a runner safely step? Bikers have to share their lane and it can become dangerous with a group of bikers, runners and traffic.

For high number of cyclists, there should be a safer bike lane system throughout the city. It's simply too dangerous to ride a bike on the major arteries throughout Carlsbad (i.e. El Camino Real, Rancho Santa Fe Rd and La Costa Ave. Around the High School.

On El Camino so students can ride safely to Sage Creek Walking ability from Tamarack to Sage Creek (cannon) On Carlsbad Blvd. Stop the dog walkers. They poop and pee all over the sidewalks. They stop walkers from safely walking as they have no regard.

Crossings on Carlsbad Blvd should not only have flashers for cars, but also flashers in the road so that at night, you can see people crossing. It is extremely dangerous.

No sidewalks on Valley street, where many students walk to or from the middle or high school? Unbelievable!

Highland is terrible without the sidewalks.

I often like riding my bike along the beach from Oceanside to Carlsbad. There are some bike lanes but often cars are parked on the side or they are too narrow.

My wife and I run/walk/hike daily in Carlsbad as well as road bike. We live off of Adams street near Aqua Hedionda. It seems that this is one of the prettiest and most natural area of Carlsbad, but also seems very inaccessible. It is a dangerous road to walk on with no sidewalks or paths. Furthermore the wildlife preserve is all fenced with no nature trails. We are both veterinarians and would also love to see as much dog friendly areas as possible. Please let leashed dogs go anywhere (beaches included). Peoples pets are part of the family and should be allowed to participate in life. Feel free to contact me for further discussion of these topics.

Poinsettia Lane (East of I-5) after you cross Aviara Parkway. The South side of the road (heading East) has a partial sidewalk and then just stops. Many pedestrians are sharing the bike lane with cyclists. Often times it puts both the pedestrian and cyclist in a dangerous position. I'm both a cyclist and walker to I don't have a bias. There seems to be plenty of room to create a linking sidewalk to those that already exist on other stretches of the road.

I would say that any hike/walk that takes would normally take more than an hour for the average walker should be accompanied with restroom facilities to make the area more desirable. see above Expand beach board walk and allow dogs on lower path. I like to walk my dog along the boardwalk along Carlsbad Blvd., however, the path gets very crowded and is too narrow south of Tamarack. Wider board walk is needed and would be nice to allow dogs on lower seawall path.

I'll have to think about it and fill in the map...

An area for walkers along the coast just north of the carlsbad campgrounds. Walkers use the bike lane to traverse from north of campgrounds to just past Palomar Airport Road. On busy weekend mornings it is very congested and dangerous along this route.

Crosswalk for Batiquitos Lagoon- to cross Batiquitos Drive to get to Gabbiano Lane.

No right turn on red light from Pointsettia (heading East) to Batiquitos Lane. My daughter was almost hit when we had a right of way and cars were turning right on red. The turning cars are blinded by the cars heading straight.

El camino Real between Kelly and Cannon More sidewalks in almost all areas, especially in the older sections. Most of the newer developments have adequate sidewalks to accommodate the walking public.

(See map.)

We need crosswalks marked in our neighborhood. Such as Victoria and Pontiac. Even in front of the new stop signs going in at Lyons & Pontiac and Haverhill & Pontiac. Without buses to get people up and down the mesa, like to the downtown area - the close by shopping centers IN O'side etc. People will not walk. I would gladly walk if we had small efficient connector trasportation. I WANT to get out of the car lifestyle, unfortunately our city has not been planned to do so. We need neighborhood amenities....

A safe path to cross over (or under) the train tracks at Chestnut would be a huge improvement.

The bridge over the train tracks that connects Palomar Airport Road to Carlsbad Blvd is unsafe for both walking and biking. It seems like there several restaurant staff that walk over this bridge to go between the bus stops on the 101 and the restaurants on Avenida Encinias. There are also several Terramar residents and beachgoers that walk and bike over the bridge to visit the restaurants.

On Cannon Road, under the I-5 bridge, the connection between the 101 and the businesses and restaurants on Paseo del Norte (outlets and surrounding area), is a very dirty and unpleasant walk. The ice plants are encroaching onto the sidewalks, making it difficult to navigate a baby stroller.

Highland Drive has no walking or biking paths.

A sidewalk along the east end of Batiquitos Lagoon, along El camino Real and the bridge.

There should be a sidewalk on El Camino Real heading north, before Chestnut. we have many canyons in this area, most of which are ideal for walking & riding. Unfortunately they become a problem as & when it gets dark. Not only from a human stand point but from animals & unseen hazards because of bad light. They are ideal because of the quiet, the beauty & the fact they are mostly away from traffic. As most are soft surface like sand or d-g they are reasonably inexpensive as opposed to building paths & covering with environmentally unfriendly asphalt etc. They do however require upkeep.

There isn't a route from our neighborhood to the local shopping area/library. There are sidewalks in our immediate neighborhood, but after emerging onto Alga (from Corintia or Cazadero), there is no uninterrupted sidewalk/path along Alga up to the shopping/community district on the corner of Alga/El Camino Real/Aviara. Alga is a busy road so it's not safe to walk along the edge, especially with young children.

See comment above about extending the Batiquitos Lagoon Trail WEST of I-5.... It would serve both Aviara and San Pacifico communities as well as others nearby (without DRIVING to the trailhead).

Keeping the squirrel population down on the seawall helps walking ALOT! The biggest improvement I'd want to see is coastal walk paths that do not obstruct the bike lane(s). For example along the coast from La Costa all the way down to Canon Rd. Crossing by Park And Hillside is tricky to cross due to speedy traffic.

I simply walk around my neighborhood and surrounding areas. It is fine THE PACE / SPEED OF AUTO TRAFFIC IN HIGHER PEDESTRIAN AREAS NEEDS TO BE HELD DOWN LIKE ON CARLSBAD BLVD OR IN THE VILLAGE C.V.D. REPLACE SIGNALS WITH ROUNDABOUT INTERSECTION AS MOTORIST SPEED TO MAKE SURE THEY GET THROUGH THE NEXT LIGHT.

Completing Poinsettia to El Camino Real would be a big help for traffic and walking in this area, and improve access to the new Alga Norte Park.

Going left on to carlsbad villace dr from glasgow dr going down the hill they put up guard rails on right side of road need to continue path to be more save from car traffic.s Link rancho la costa reserve with elfin forrest trail network IMHO not needed 1) connecting a nature trail, running path, walk way from the East point of Batiquitos lagoon along the West side of El Camino Real heading south to La Costa Ave. 2) Safer and nicer wide multi-purpose use lane along the 101 from the Campground North to the desalination plant. There are spots along there that it does not connect and the person needs to enter the street along the guard rail. Very unsafe for the amount of use it receives.

3)Love the Poinsettia path from El Camino Real to Melrose. Great job!

There is VERY, VERY UNSAFE TRAFFIC at the Aviara Oaks Elementary School. Parents are required to use Ambrosia for parking however there is NOT safe easement to access the school to pickup students. There are approximately 6 trails leading from Ambrosia, down the steep hillside, crossing 3 lanes of traffic with no sidewalk to get to the Elementary school. It is unrealistic to walk the sidewalk south to the driveway entrance. NO ONE does it. EVER. I have seen children fall down the slope, children almost get hit by cars on the drive way. Parents not watching for cars walking accross 3 lanes of pickup traffic. IT IS TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE!!!! come out at 2:30 pm to the school M, T, W, F, 1:20pm TH, and see the CRAZYNESS!!!!! It is wrong to have the Principal directing 3 lanes of traffic so that students can cross at a corner, towards parked cars, no sidewalk, to walk where? Up a giant slope to their car on Ambrosia!!!

We need stairs and cross walk! Please Respond.

There is no walkable shopping in my neighborhoog without crossing I5 on Poinsettia. That experience ranges from unpleasent to frightening. Not sure what can be done, but my "go to" is to drive the 1 mile there and back, which is a shame!

The city is pretty loaded up with stop lights and stop signs. I think Carlsbad Boulevard should be monitored to urge people (or give them tickets) to NOT run against the cyclists who use the bicycles lanes. Every day I see young mothers with babies in strollers running against the traffic in the cycle lane. Also, more runners, in general, seem to be doing this. They and the cyclists (or a car) are going to clash some day, with disastrous results.

East side parking for Calaveras Beach cross walks need to have a pedestrian initiated flashing lights to warn motorist of intent to cross. Too many people do not stop when they should....because they are not paying attention.

I would embrace a public transit option that ran east from the village all the way to Oceanside. Something interesting like a trolley.

But here is what is really needed: More Public Transit Routed to Carlsbad High. Presently there is one bus route with limited hours stopping at the high school. I think there are none to LCC. These woutes should be increased and improved, and car drop off at the HS's should be made more difficult. Get these kids on busses. Please.

The 101 Freeway in the ponto area (and other sights) needs elevated over-road pedestrian bridges to access the beach from the east side of highway. It should have been in the development contract that the the Hilton should have been responsible for building one right in front in order to reduce pedestrian traffic over highway (families/tourists dragging beach gear across road as the time beeps down for crossing) South side of Poinsettia between Aviara and Blackrail needs better maintenance - some brushes force pedestrians into the cycle lane, near vehicles.

1) Lower speed limits on el camino by at least 5mph. 2) Add signage warning motorists to look for cyclists when making right turns on streets with bike lanes. 3) Enforce no parking or standing in bike lanes, except for emergency, and strongly enforce phone useage when driving. 4) Where parking is allowed next to a bike lane put up signs warning drivers to check for traffic before opening the car door. 5)Install temporary ramps to allow cyclists to access sidewalks during construction on Cannon--this is needed immediately. 6) Yield to bicycles signs at freeway entrances,or paint it on the road.Remember, the 3 foot clearence law for cyclists become effective 9-1-14. It would be a good idea to get some signs ready.

All the areas where people come into contact with vehicles. see above. Also there is a need to create a bike path along PCH that is more protected from cars. The car speeds on PCH are a hazard given teh increasing bike travel on PCH. Paved asphalt path around Lake Calavera (like Lake Miramar or Lake Murray). Consider creating paved path like San Luis Rey River Trail in Oceanside.

Overall Carlsbad has decent bike lanes compared with other cities.

Same as above. Chestnut bypass. biking on Carlsbad Village Dr. between the 5 and Coast Highway is always a little concerning and could be improved.

Need more dedicated direct paths for biking and jogging that connects south eastern parts of the city to the beach areas. Need paths that do not require crossing streets but allow to go over or under roads to make jogging and biking convenient and safe.

I really appreciate all of the work that Carlsbad has put into improving bike lanes throughout the city. Keep up the great work! As I commented earlier, it would be great if the bike lanes could be swept.

The route along coast highway has a dangerous combination of pedestrians and cyclists. Many runners choose to use the bike lane instead of the pedestrian footpath/sidewalk. Also need to keep bike lanes free to broken glass and debris.

All the areas without clear lines of sight.

Help us identify areas where we can improve the safety and conditions for people who bike in Carlsbad. Are there any areas where more paths, lanes, Answer Coast hwy between Canon and Carlsbad Village Dr. make bikers obey laws and not ride on the wrong side of street (coast highway especially) Don't need any more special interest money spent for bikers.

I bike along the coast 3-5 times a week. The main issues I encounter are runners in bike lane and glass on the road. I am happy and grateful for all the improvements that have been made to the road and bike lanes. Continuing to educate drivers to share the road and accept cyclists will be an ongoing battle and advocacy responsibility of individual cyclists and communities. Enforcing cyclists to follow the rules of the road is also important. I stop at stop signs and get frustrated by groups that don't because they make all of us look bad. If just some cars stopped at traffic signals, we would have big problems! We live in the best place for cycling and encouraging more to do so is a good plan! Sharrows, lanes, well groomed streets and signage all improves my ride. Thanks for caring!

Bikes would be safer on 101 if the walkers/ runners weren't there too. More off roads paved or dirt would also be helpful.

Chestneu Ave is a great place to prioritize bikes as it goes under the freeway and is close to the village.

Same as above Palomar Airport Road in its entirety and Carlsbad Village Drive east. It is too narrow or too fast to feel comfortable commuting on these roads.

More separate biking trail/walking pathways. Divided trail (like the coastal rail trail between Tamarack and the village). Since there is so much traffic, it is dangerous to ride on the side of the road.

Not a biker so not sure.

The only thing I can think of is more of a barrier between cars and cyclists like you have done on Carlsbad Blvd between Tamarack and Cannon.

Faraday going East from El Camino Real has no bike lane and is a bit hazardous.

Narrow driver focus, slow drivers down, use roundabouts La Costa Avenue eastbound from El Camino Real to Romeria has no bike lane and REALLY REALLY needs one.

Kudos to the city for all of the bike-friendly improvements made as of late, i.e. bike lanes, parking stations, etc. It has definitely improved safety for myself and my family when we ride which is quite frequently whether it be to commute or for pleasure.

As mentioned above however, there are few areas that are lacking. More separation of cyclists from vehicular traffic would be great. Providing bicycle access across the tracks between Tamarack and CBad Village Dr. would be a good example. Cyclists, rather than being able to ride to and from the coast in an area that is much lower density with regards to vehicular traffic are routed to CB Village Dr. and/or Tamarack where they are forced to contend with very dangerous freeway crossings with multiple freeway on and off ramps.

Additionally, more miles of mountain bike trails would be greatly appreciated by the large population of riders living in or visiting our city. The area south of Calavera Lake would be a prime area for this.

Under the 5 at Carlsbad Village Drive needs improvement for bicycles. The shops on El Camino Real (north and south) need bike racks as does the mall. The city desperately needs bike trails that are away from cars for younger riders and families. Ones that allow for travel to and from different ends of town. What is happening with the trail next to the train tracks that is suppose to connect Oceanside to San Diego?

Poinsettia Lane between 101 and Aviara pky 101 between Oceanside and Carlsbad Separate bicyclists from motorists along Carlsbad Blvd., Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real.

It would be great to have regional bike trails that connect several north county cities-so this needs to be planned with other jurisdictions. Look at other areas where they have regional cooperation to achieve recreation goals as a model. I haven't seen any examples of planning that speak to regional recreation-its all within the City of Carlsbad. Well, although it may seem like it, Carlsbad is not an island. Where are the examples of cooperation with other cities in planning trails and recreation? People that don't bike may think that a 2 mile bike path within the City is a great achievement, but for people that actually bike, that is way to short to bother with. Does the City get bonus points from someone for putting up more signs? Besides creating visual blight, they are ignored if there are too many of them. Will these comments be available to be seen by the public once the surveys are complete? I think that is the only fair and honest way to present the survey results.

Primarily where you need to cross the freeway. The City of Carlsbad has done an OUTSTANDING job improving the bike paths on the coast.

Also as mentioned, it's rather unsafe to try to stop for food or shopping on a bike in ANY of the malls in Carlsbad Need a trail around agua hedionda. There are trails around protected areas all over the u.s. You can make a trail without interrupting surrounding areas for walkers, bikers, dog walking, joggers. I think it would be extremely popular.

There are sometimes bike-riders on the Batiquitos Lagoon trail, even though it's clearly posted to be illegal on that trail. One guy told me that the La Costa Resort people told him he could bike there; another man said there wasn't anywhere else he could ride with his kids that was safe from traffic.

I don't really care where you put this stuff, as long as you find an appropriate extended route and do it. I don't count that as likely. You seem remarkably clueless.

Build a path or trail along Carlsbad Blvd. starting from Cannon Road south to La Costa Blvd. create a continuum from the power plant all the way to the south end of Carlsbad under the power lines. This is a great choice.

Coast Highway Elm (CV Drive) Palomar Airport Road El Camino Real Parts of the Village signs cautioning drivers that bike lanes are for BIKES. Police enforcement of drivers getting in bike lanes to make turns WAY before it is legal to do so. Police enforcement of cars speeding & using cell phones while driving. Street sweeping to remove glass/debris from bike lanes. Upkeep on bike lanes in some areas.

Bike access for the Palomar Airport Rd bridge over the railroad tracks and Carlsbad Blvd is horrendous. This a key coastal access point near several hotels and residences.

Cars often speed through the neighborhood along Mimosa/Manzanita/Catalpa (neighborhood at SW corner of Alga and El Camino Real). I think stop signs or speed bumps to reduce speed are important (a large number of children live and play in the area) and these changes will greatly help with the problem!!!

Heading east on Poinsettia and east of Ambrosia. There is an approximately 90 degree left hand turn from the terminus of Poinsettia and onto Cassia. I ride this street often on a bicycle to get to work.

When cycling on Poinsettia, and to transition to Cassia safely, the cyclist almost always must move well into the lane. This always causes confusion to automobile drivers as they seem incapable of sharing the road or realizing that bicycles do not turn like autos. Bicycles and motorcycles, when turning, typically start wide and move inside. The confusion is exacerbated by the auto lanes going from two to one just prior to this turn.

I believe signage and/or sharrows may help the situation. I'm certain that there will be an auto vs. bike accident if not addressed. Just this morning, six of us on bicycles were approaching the turn when an SUV came too close to us. We signaled our intent take the lane, but the SUV diverted into the oncoming lane in order to avoid our group.

We need bike paths that go east/west that SAFELY bridge major streets and I5. The bike path along the Coast by the camp grounds could be really cool if developed.

I ride Carlsbad Boulevard from the Village to La Costa Avenue and the recent improvements are great.

Added comment on map regarding left turn from EB La Costa Ave onto NB El Camino Real.

Far east end of faraday where bike lanes disappear despite heavy rush hour traffic I think the area where palomar airport rd and coast highway intersect needs improvement. There have been serious accidents in that area and the traffic pattern (designed to expedite automobile traffic puts cyclists in danger.

This would take awhile, to answer this question....

Street sweep high bike use streets, lots of flats right after it rains...

Construction areas are the most dangerous for cycling. They take away all of the bike lane and shoulder. I have to risk my life to ride down Cannon right now.

Either keep a lane for cycling/walking or make an elevated path or tunnel like they do downtown at construction sites.

Need curbs to separate bikes from cars!!!

Open more trails in Calaveras and east of the safety center The Bressi Ranch neighborhood has a strange curb design that dramatically narrows the road in multiple places. These 'bottle-necks' force cyclists directly into the traffic lane since the road narrows so much.

DOWNTOWN CARLSBAD on GRAND AVENUE & JEFFERSON STREET See above Separate bike paths! need dedicated north - south bike path next to amtrak line. PCH is heavily used to bikeâ ÆæDQG LV GDQJHURXV All major routes in Carlsbad should have a bike lane and a walking lane physically separate from motor vehicles to give people the option to not drive. Some type of rail or even trees would work but it should be impossible for an inattentive driver to take out a bike or ped.

More people could ride to work, school, the beach, flower fields, shopping, to eat etc.

I believe it would increase property values, improve quality of life, save fossil fuels, improve tourism and promote healthier lifestyles.

Also see above, walking and biking are very similar and should addressed together.

Biking along La Costa Avenue between Rancho Santa Fe and the coast has improved in the last year with the addition of the bike lane headed West but there is no way to bike safely going East because there is no bike lane. Also the bike lane along the coast near Tamarack and Cannon is narrow and could be widened and traffic slowed even further.

I love the share lane on CVD - the thing prohibiting me from riding my bike more is a fear of cars.

The lagoon crossing into Oceanside needs to be improved. Riding along the coast and along CVD in the village also needs to improve and made safer.

Palomar airport road over the train tracks. I want a bike path along the train tracks up and down the coast. Safe and away from cars.

Would love to see more dedicated bike paths (like in Irvine, CA or Manhattan/Hermosa Beach, CA) - Carlsbad currently is NOT a family-friendly biking/walking city. A dedicated biking/walking path around Batiquitos Lagoon would be great, or along El Camino Real from La Costa Ave going south (separate from bike lane - that is dangerous), or along the beach.

I would feel much more comfortable having my son ride his bike places if the major streets had a separated lane for biking. Stockholm is a great example of the effectiveness of this design. The big ones are El Camino, Alga, Aviarra Parkway, Palomar Airport.

Recommend trail around agua hedionda. Check out Crystal Springs Reserve Trail in San Mateo County, around a water reserve, allows walkers, bikers, horses, around a protected area, which would be a fabulous addition to Carlsbad.

Better signage and public education in south carlsbad and into encinitias on coast highway for bike lanes (many drivers now confused about where cyclists belong).

Where possible, make crosswalk buttons more accessible to bicycle riders without having to leave the street.

Intersection of Innovation and Gateway Road needs a stoplight. It is very difficult to see oncoming traffic because of the hill.

Since CVD is by far the busiest road in the Village. Make Grand and Oak more bike friendly.

Complete Coast Trail along RR tracks and through City from Oceanside to Leucadia as # 1 priority Along North-South El Camino Real, El Fuerte, Aviara, East-West Palomar Airport rd, Alga, La Costa, Faraday, Cannon from El Camino to 101.

Carlsbad has done a great job in improving bike lanes throughout the city! Well done! I commute on a daily basis. With all of the construction and new Lowes on El Camino, the bike lanes are full of debris and it is getting worse. I don't know what the street sweeping schedule is, but it would be great if a street sweeper could make a run through the major bikes lane routes that connect people and work/school. These routes include: Poinsettia Lane, Cassia Way, all of El Camino throughout Carlsbad, PCH throughout Carlsbad, and Palomar Airport Road. This would be greatly appreciated!

The existing bike paths need better maintenance. Fix the potholes and buckled asphalt. Repaint the worn out lane markers. Carlsbad Blvd between Poinsettia and Palomar Airport Road needs its bike lane resurfaced. create a separated bike/walk way along the 101 from la costa to village. This was done few years ago in the city from where I come from in Italy by reclaiming an unused train line and it is now one of the major attractions for residents and tourists improving the life of most people (more exercise), kids (more fun) and attracting scores of tourists...they come from all over Europe to enjoy a car-free ride/walk along the beach.

Have you ever noticed that there are no kids and family biking along the 101 ? There is no place where to ride safely with kids close to the ocean !!! and in neighborhoods because of hilly streets no easy biking for kids either and much less bike lane too.

Biking the transition on 101 north into Oceanside is dangerous. Just past the train tracks. Traffic entering from east side does not have to yield to bikers and merging into the bike lane is scary.

Bike lines on State Street heading towards oceanside. More Sharrows on streets without bike lanes State street There are plenty of sidewalks for very few walkers. The city needs to focus on safe bike paths on roadways. Perhaps run bike lanes along sidewalks not the street. Bikers and walkers are closer in speed than, bikers and cars. Collisions on sidewalks between bikers and pedestrians would be far less deadly than between bikers and cars!!!

Please start with Poinsettia Lane toward Coast Highway toward downtown Carlsbad.

I am an avid mountain biker, so the more tough trails available the better. Not everything has to be sanitized to the point of sheer boredom.

Mainly, I would like bikes to travel separate from walkers and joggers. This would improve the safety for both groups.

I'd like to see a dedicated bike / walk path from El Camino to the ocean parallel to Cannon. yes, there are bike lanes on Cannon, but the city needs more dedicated paths. there is presently a (dirt) road through part of this.

I feel like bike lanes are too close to cars which is stressful for drivers and dangerous for cyclists Bike lanes need to be completely seperate from streets.

Areas safe and open away from cars and "bushes" mission bay type parks allow single women to bike and run safely in very open public spaces free of unknown encounters...biking on the beach with a boardwalk and businesses for example....

Any additional safety measures to keep bicyclists separated from car traffic.

I would suggest a trail around agua hedionda. Something like Crystal Springs Reserve Trail in Burlingame, California. It runs along a protected reserve and reservoir, allows for wildlife, walkers, bikers, horses, which would be a great asset for Carlsbad.

Riding a bike in Carlsbad is taking your life in your hands on a daily basis, but not all of that is the city's doing. But a good example of something the city could do is put a stop sign where State Street hits the Coast Hwy. I've seen people hit here because they aren't looking and the cars think they have the right a way.

Longer bike trails to enable cyclists to have a Carlsbad trail link up to an Encinitas or Vista or Oceanside trail providing say 20 or 30 or 40 mile trails.

Giving cyclists the ability to choose not to have to share the trip with motor vehicles at sometimes significant danger.

Would LOVE a trail around agua hedionda. If you could look at Crystal Springs Reserve Trail in Burlingame, CA and incorporate a trail like that, which also surrounds a protected area, allows for wildlife, and walkers, bikers, horses, around a protected area, which would be an enormous attraction for Carlsbad.

The road that connects North Carlsbad to South Oceanside is kind of sketchy for bikes. A better bike lane would help a lot.

Paved, separate paved bike paths along the Coast Highway, linking the lagoons and perhaps other tourist attractions such as Legoland and the flower gardens.

Or dedicated, separate paved bike paths where more feasible so road bicyclists can do at least a 20 mile ride without fear of cars. A parking area to accommodate cyclists who drive to the area would be nice.

safer biking areas along Batiquitos Drive Again, I feel that the city is expending much more money and effort accommodating this very small, but very vocal, group of citizens than is prudent.

WE need more land purchased to help separate conservation lands from recreational lands. Again if we had small, I mean TINY busses that could accomodate bikes to help people get places - like to the beach in summer I think they would be used. People shop on a weekly schedule, this could be planned for and busses could get them there. But don't wait for NCTD to do. Expend our city resources actually helping our citizens achieve the ability to ride.

Serious improvement needed in right hand turning lane going south on el camino real and college. Scarey intersection for cyclists.

Continuous off street rail trail from Oceanside border to Leucadia.

I think the bike lanes have been well improved, but there can always be more!

Please get a bike path that runs north-south along the beach. Also, a path that runs east-west would be nice. More paths that encircle the lagoons would be great! A path around the La Costa area would be great and a bike path that encircles Batiquitos Lagoon would be great!!!

Yes - some thoughts... As mentioned getting to the coast from NE Cbad is a challenge via cbd vil, tam, or cannon - unsafe to traverse over the freeway areas.

Cbad is especially congested and is very narrow coming and going. Also unsafe to traverse College to get to the Oceanside bike path...

(Not to mention that those are all very hilly routes - not for everyone.)

With the plans for all the low income housing down by Walmart, the conditions & congestion will only get worse. Not sure what can be done... Perhaps an alternate route from NE cbd vill via el cam to Jefferson? Right now, el cam is too congested for safe riding...Is Marron road going to go through? If so, need to make it safe for bike to approach / access from Cal Hills. Any new road openings or trail connectors going to happen near the new high school to provide a new inland bike route to melrose, etc...?

The bike paths along the coast are used by bikes and pedestrians and runners. It makes it quite dangerous for cyclists. Cyclists have to enter the car lane in order to go around pedestrians and runners. The wider bike lanes are awesome but it seems now the runners and walkers just take up more of the bike lane, so cyclists still have to enter the car lane.

Palomar Airport Road needs more protection for bicyclists.

El Camino Real between Kelly and Cannon Carlsbad Village Drive Too many cars turn left on a red light. Traffic lights are incapable of change when only a cyclist is siting Bike lanes at sides of road are fairly plentiful but I don't dare let my kids ride to school (about 3 mi) as do not feel the lanes are very wide or that drivers are sufficiently aware of bicyclists, or bike lanes are not available everywhere. I know a teenager who was injured fairly seriously when clipped by car driving by (somewhere near Monroe pool I think). And areas where bike lane disappears and bike symbols are on ground in normal car lane don't seem all that safe.

On Coast High Way after Tamarack and headed south the bike lanes are rough and not smooth. It makes an uncomfortable ride making me want to ride on the line near the cars. So maybe smooth it out please.

At the Train Crossing at Carlsbad Village Drive. The roadway surrounding the area is also very rough and makes it unpleasant to ride over.

Grand Avenue in Carlsbad Village, needs some lane definition, and it overall needs a makeover. We need bike lanes, the parking needs to be redone, its unsafe for cyclists because there is too much going on. Maybe make it like Carlsbad Village Drive. Clean it up.

The Bridge crossing over from Coast High Way onto Palomar Airport road is also a very dangerous area to ride because Cars are going in all sorts of directions.

How come there just isn't a three way stop like at Poinsettia ln?

Bike lanes desperately needed on I-5 overpass on Palomar Airport Rd. Single file riding mandatory with fines for those who don't abide, since auto drivers now have to allow for extra space between them and bike, with new law.

Lincoln and Oak is such a screwed up area---because delivery trucks to 7-11 park on Lincoln in the street (s/b roadway). This forces drivers to pass on the wrong side of the road. It's not safe and by law there should be a flagman and cones! Suggestion: Paint the curb yellow and ask 7-11 to pay for that privilege of parking there. I say $10K-$20K a year. Bikes safety will be enhanced there also with some safety improvements.

BIKE PARK!!!

The bike lane next the railroad could be connected with the 101 Veteran's Park on Faraday should be mountain bike friendly. That is the highest and best use for those hilly acres and the city has a large population of Mountain bikers. There should also be connector trails between open space areas.

Bike & hike trails in Calavera

separate bike lanes that bike riders actually have to use would be great. keep cars on the road, and bike riders in a separate bike lane.

Make bike riders more accountable to uphold bike riding laws.

Have local police actually ticket bike riders when they run a stop sign.

The bridge over the train tracks that connects Palomar Airport Road to Carlsbad Blvd is unsafe for both walking and biking.

Highland Drive has no walking or biking paths.

I can't think of any @ the moment.

The coast road seems to be ok but for some it is too hilly from south to north & visa versa. Inland roads tend to hold the faster, denser traffic. If the housing development continues to grow we will run out of untouched, quiet, friendly land on which to install pathways for all of us to enjoy.

Again, the bikers need to ride single file, when they are riding side by side it is dangerous for all of us.

I'll add suggestions to the interactive map but overall my suggestion is to maintain the bike lanes where they exist (i.e. large cracks in bike lane). Also, make bike lanes bigger especially where the black top edge is right in the middle of the bike lane.

Crossing by Park And Hillside is tricky to cross due to speedy traffic.

More places for mountain bikers to freely put jumps and other trick areas I would like to asee the walkway, bikepath extended south beyond Tamarac along the tracks There are a lot of nice areas that need connecting and mapping. I ride all over Carlsbad all the time, trying to use off-street paths (paved, non-paved, & DG) and it's halfway to paradise. There are some great paths, but they are sort of short and disconnected.

Specifically, if you could improve Southbound egress from the Lake Calavera system and connect the trails Ridgeline and Bobcat (CNLM) without having to go on city streets, I'd be in hog heaven.

Thanks for working on this! I love Carlsbad!

El Camino Real between Canon and Tamarack, there are some areas where the bike lane is to narrow and blocked from drivers view.

Also, going west on Canon (when construction is not going on), as you approach i-5, the raised manhole covers and narrowing bike lane make things unsafe, as does the layout for bikes to merge with the two turn lanes to get on I-5 north OVER THE LAST FEW YEARS THE CITY HAS DONE A GOOD JOB AT EXPANDING THE LOCATIONS AND LANES FOR BIKING. TODAY THERE ARE MANY MORE PEOPLE RIDING BIKES IN THE VILLAGE BUT 1/2 ARE ON THE SIDEWALKS GRAND AVE NEEDS TO BE REWORKED SO THOSE ON BIKES FEEL ITS OK AND SAFE TO RIDE OFF THE WALKS ON THE STREETS. GRAND NEEDS A MAJOR REWORK I would love to ride my bike on the cement walk right along the ocean, instead of on the road. Maybe consider just during certain hours - off peak hours for walkers. From a recreational perspective, this would be awesome. connect existing trails Designate the streets of Jefferson, Chinquapin, Adams and Park as the bike trail going east/west to/from the coast and ECR. Have street sweepers actually clean the bike lanes instead of just depositing all the street debris in the bike lanes.

Mountain biking is a huge sport and the city can bring in lots of business by becoming a mountian bike mecca like Moab. Calavera and La Costa biking trails are well known and should be expanded with single track trails only. No wide trails are necessary.

Please open more multi use trails. Carlsbad has MANY open space areas which could have trails but are set aside as preserve offset. These areas can hold trails without compromising nature. We can have a network of trails (not DG unpaved sidewalks) which can connect the city. We can connect businesses, parks and retail areas with true trails providing a nature experience and safe transportation / recreation.

ATB trails in Calvera Need more mtn bike trails please, and safer wider bike lanes A dedicated bike only lane segregated from traffic that runs North/South along the El Camino portal would be key for cyclist safety.

More bike lane in Carlsbad Village Drive, especially to connect to the 101/beach.

I generally avoid the downtown/village area on my bike.

Coast Highway from 78 to Palomar Airport is a pretty scary ride. A separate dedicated bike trail would be great.

The recent closing of so many trails in Calaveras has caused me to spend less time in and around Carlsbad ( an less money too...)

La Costa Preserve Mountain biking area Calaveras Mountain Biking Area Create a Pump track Create a bike park Citizens require places to recreate, particularly where it feels more natural and less constructed/manicured. Please consider trying to reach out and partner with your sister cities: Oceanside, Vista and Carlsbad. (but don't let potential reluctance slow down your own efforts).

The Calavera Lake area is a pretty good example of an open area that is appreciated and enjoyed by a large community of bikers, hikers, horse-back riders (although a small user group), and others. We need more trails (and less wide fire-roads and less wide double-track trails).

Henk Mountain in La Costa is also a fairly good example good natural trails, as well as a good working relationship between the trail maintenance advocates and land managers.

We want more of this!

Eastbound La Costa Avenue just east of El Camino Real needs a bike lane!

Remember the entire coast highway is a bike superhighway (esp. on weekends). Needs to be kept free of debris, cracks, holes, etc. which can cause accidents or force riders into traffic lanes. Sharrows in both directions from Tamarack to the Oceanside line might not be a bad idea. Care needs to be taken in the design of the traffic circle near Oceanside to prevent creating additional hazards to cyclists. Signs at both ends of town indicating where long-distance cyclists can find food, water, repairs, and lodging would be very helpful and appreciated!

More connectivity is the biggest thing. To get more people out on bikes there need to be logical and convenient routes from place to place. Too often freeways become barriers because they can only be crossed at certain streets. An obstacle such as a large park can easily be driven around in a car, but this is very time consuming to circumnavigate by bike. For that reason, good trail networks which include parks and open spaces are important to improving connectivity. Good networks with connectivity will vastly improve recreational opportunities in Carlsbad. Open spaces will continue to shrink with housing development, so one of the best opportunities left is to use smaller open spaces along roads to develop trails. Areas along Poinsettia Lane, Cannon Road, and El Camino Real are good examples. A trail can easily be built along the hill slope with minimal impact on the environment.

I have had it with the preferential treatment given to bikers. If they assume much of the cost to make Carlsbad a cycle-friendly place, I might not be QUITE so hostile.

I hope there is a bike and walk path aroung the new Alga Norte Community Park.

The city should pay for the maintainance of all trails and not expect HOAs to maintain them for use by the public. Include the facilities in the Landscape and Lighting District. Include all properties in the City in one district instead of having property owners in LLD 2 subsidize those in LLD 1.

Please provide trails that are not connected to roads. Please work with the Dept. of Fish and Wildlife to build trails around the Aqua Hedionda Lagoon.

Carlsbad is more walkable than all of the surrounding areas (Oceanside, Leucadia, Encinitas, Solana Beach, Del Mar...) THANK YOU!!!

Please provide any other comments about trails, biking, or walking in Carlsbad that you want us to consider when updating the City's Trails Master Plan Answer Connecting current paths and adding paths for longer mileage runners/walkers would be appreciated. way too much development in Carlsbad. Stop the over development and let us, those who were born and raised, enjoy the life here. we dont need more people nor businesses!

At this stage I haven't used the city trails, i walk locally around Carlsbad. I am nervous about riding my bike due to narrow bike paths...where I lived in Melbourne on the beach the bile paths were separated and therefore very safe...

You are totally ignoring the retired population in Carlsbad. We don't go far when we shop, so we spend most of our money in Carlsbad. We own homes, pay taxes, yet you haven't done a whole lot to accommodate the elderly, especially the handicapped and especially in the Village.

Please connect the bike/walk trail that ends at Cannon on the coast to the Poinsettia station or west at Palomar Airport Road prefer rally along the railroad tracks along Cannon Lake.

Make Carlsbad more pedestrian and bike friendly in residential areas near business hubs such as the Westfield Mall and Downtown area so people don't have to hop on their cars to get there. Give them something to look at, some shade, some place to talk and interact thinking less about the speeding cars along those streets.

I bike around the village for fun but also race and must use the streets so this is not from someone who is anti-bike. Carlsbad must get control of the road bike population, not cruisers but us spandex wearing exercising/training groups. We run stop signs, stop lights and bend the rules compromising safety and creating a hostile environment Cheaper Coaster fares for short distances would also be a plus. I know I would take the Coaster 1 stop if it wasn't for the price.

Thank you for doing this survey.

The more the trails are easily accessed and connect to one another, the more people will use them.

Chestnut bypass. This has been discussed at the Barrio meetings.

I would like to see box canyon re opened for hiking and also state st. between grand and carlsbad village dr be made into a walking promenade.

More beach walking areas would be nice Need more dedicated direct paths for biking and jogging that connects south eastern parts of the city to the beach areas. Need paths that do not require crossing streets but allow to go over or under roads to make jogging and biking convenient and safe.

More hiking trails and preservation of the last remaining open areas would be greatly appreciated.

Trails are great! But more needs to be done to make them user friendly...see Cowles Mountain in the Mission Trails. More lighting, more safety , "eyes on the street(eyes on the trails) , safer for women and children, maybe use CCC - give young kids jobs as "safety scouts". Trim bushes so bad guys can't hide there.

Make the trails more inviting. build the dedicated and already developer bataquitos lagoon trail west of I-5.

Why don't paths around Leo Carrillo Ranch allow bikes?

Extend the CRT south Extend Batiquitos Lagoon trail east to ECR and west to coast highway. Additionally allow bicycle access on this trail.

I think City of Carlsbad staff is fantastic. Keep up the good work.

Pedestrian/bike crossing at Chestnut across tracks - increased public safety, pedestrian-friendly, increased property values leading to increased city tax revenue!

Win! Win! Win! More mountain bike/hiking trails - decreased traffic/user conflict, increased safety, less illegally built trails to satisfy demand, more tax revenue! Win! Win! Win!

My primary concern has become the speed issue, EVERYWHERE in Carlsbad.

I live off Poinsettia and have noticed over the years it has become a bypass for those that work off Palomar Airport so the traffic and speed have increased considerably.

Even the bike paths along PCH are much better, I RARELY see cars traveling the posted speed limit Need a trail around agua hedionda. There are trails around protected areas all over the u.s. You can make a trail without interrupting surrounding areas for walkers, bikers, dog walking, joggers. I think it would be extremely popular.

Carlsbad was designed for big clumps of tan stucco intersected by wide avenues of fast-moving, noisy, exhaust-filled traffic. I see no evidence any provision was made for any kind of extended greenbelts or bike/walking trails that connect to anywhere or have any utility. I think it's too late to undo the developer-dominated city model you built.

We really enjoy the nature trails and scenic paths along waterways and green areas. Would like to walk more, but current conditions as mentioned in my previous comments need to be addressed to make it more enjoyable and less frustrating for us. Please consider all citizens when updating your plan not just the pet owners. Thanks.

I have lived continuously in Carlsbad for the past 4 years & to date have seen very few trails close to my home located on Poinsettia Cove/ Carlsbad Blvd. I am familiar with the Batiquitos trail but that's a short trail. City of Mission Viejo is the model & standard for other cities in terms of trails & beautiful landscaping throughout the city. fix the coaster to SDX, add trails / under and overpasses so that you can travel along the power lines from one side of the city to the other.Third, bike lanes are OK but they provide no protection look for alternatives that can get you from point a (your house) to the store (for example) while dealing with the least amount of cars.

Something needs to be done about the abuse of some mountain bikers at Lake Calavera to the habitat conservation areas - more education maybe. Dedicated areas for bikers that will help minimize habitat degradation?

I would be willing to work with the city parks and recreation in implementing a "Nature Journaling Program" that utilizes our nature centers, our coastline, our walking trails, lagoons and open space sites.

Bike lanes or signs cautioning drivers in areas where there are no bike lanes. Education of drivers/enforcement of drivers breaking laws like obstructing bike lanes & using cell phones while driving.

Carlsbad Village is a great community. Go there almost every day. The Carlsbad camp ground could be developed for biking.

Thank you for your efforts....this is what makes Cities enjoyable...space, freedom to move and enjoy the outdoors.

I think enlisting the help of organizations like SDMBA to maintain trails and educate riders on responsible use of trails would be a better strategy than simply closing trails altogether.

Build a Bike Park, A coastal rail trail connecting the cities would be nice.

Many walking trails are very hot in the summer -- some shade trees would be nice.

The bridge over the creek crossing in Lake Calavera park is not safe. It's not even stable as it moves around and is uneven. Also, on the Lake Calavera trails, too many dogs are unleashed. I've had multiple times when unleashed dogs have came after me or my dog while walking or running. I wish the leash law was enforced more strictly..

Not bad but could be better Hope lagoon trail continues to be clean and dog owners continue to be responsible.

See above This has long been a sore subject for me, I've always thought Carlsbad could do better. When I go to other cities and see what they have done it makes me disappointed in Carlsbad, we should be the best, we have great potential.

I think this should be a priority for our city.

Add more trails in the eastern portion of carlsbad especially near the lagoons. Add a loop around each lagoon with dedicated parking areas. Add trails near El Camino Real and Cannon linking Cannon with Lake Calaveras. Add sidewalk along the coast highway near the campground at South Carlsbad.

Maintain & expand open space & agriculture. It is what sets Carlsbad apart and makes this city so wonderful to live in. Make the village as bike & pedestrian friendly as possible. Linking with trolley/tram/double decker bus-type service to outlying free parking areas, shopping areas (outlet mall, Westfield, LA Costa)& neighborhoods would be awesome Focus on cruising bikes around the village and up and down the beach.

Prioritize bikes and walking paths over cars.

Creating progress without obvious development . Too much concrete is no good. We need more trash cans and anti smoking. Bathrooms are necessary on long trails. Let's keep it clean!

We need more open space, trails for running and hiking, and would love a downtown CArlsbad area with less cars and more meandering people.

Complete Coast Trail along RR tracks and through City from Oceanside to Leucadia as # 1 priority connect off-street bike paths to business parks, residential and recreation Keep up the great work!

Please use signage and enforcement to help keep bicyclists and drivers following the rules of the road, of the bike trails and of the walking trails.

Opinion: A creative biking/hiking/walking trail between El Salto waterfalls/Quarry Creek Shopping Center and Plaza Camino Real (through the Buena Vista Creek Valley) would be a way for people to enjoy the valley, connect two shopping areas, and provide connectivity between the yet to be built Quarry Creek residential area and the rest of Carlsbad.

Carlsbad is a sprawled out city. Excessive money should not be spent on trails and biking facilities that will only be used infrequently at the expense of good roads for people to navigate around the city..

Walkers and runners frequently use the coastal areas. Options like trails around the lagoon areas would greatly increase use and decrease congestion along the beach.

Overall, the trails and bike paths are phenonimal in Carlsbad. Encinitas and Solana Beach should take the playbook from Carlsbad.

We have way to many unnecessary Bike racks in the Village. I know we are trying to promote cycling, but we should really have made the streets safer before adding so many bike racks in places that don't need that many.

LOVE all the trails!! keep up the good work.

Get busy on having the rail trail extended over the Agua Adionda Lagoon now.

The most important is the pedestrian railway underpass at Chestnut.

Carlsbad is doing an excellent job to encourage people to walk, bike and utilize the city to enjoy the outdoors. I love the new bike parking stalls in the Village and the X cross walks- Great Work!

I did, see previous response Also, more path across the train tracks. Why can't we cross the tracks as pedestrians across Chestnut Ave? There is a theme to my comments: Restroom facilities handy for us baby boomers. I currently walk regularly at the So. Carlsbad State Beach. Why? Because it is beautiful there are the beach/ocean and there are restroom facilities regularly available. Some trails in Carlsbad that do not have easy access to restrooms are less desirable.

I'd like to see a jogging trail (dirt / small stones) in the park to be built off Cannon at Wind Trail. Something to circle the park, whatever the other uses are.

I would suggest a trail around agua hedionda. Something like Crystal Springs Reserve Trail in Burlingame, California. It runs along a protected reserve and reservoir, allows for wildlife, walkers, bikers, horses, which would be a great asset for Carlsbad.

I recently moved here from San Francisco without a car and the lack of public transportation is appalling. I have to borrow a car to do anything and everything. I walk daily to my parents house but have to get dropped off to go to work if their car is not available. It costs a huge amount of money to own a car here and pay for gas, etc.

I would like to see an attempt made to connect the various trails. I have walked on most of the designated trails, but frequently find them too short for good walking or hiking. If they were interconnected they would be more useful and interesting.

Every trail head needs parking, please.

I walk the Aviara trails frequently, and I don't see a problem with allowing bikes to pass thru the trails. Maybe make them a little wider.

The thing that gives Carlsbad a competitive advantage is the Ocean. Please consider extending (by adding paths) the Ocean Walk north and south.

I'd like to see more Mountain Biking on dirt trails. Opening all of Lake Calavera's natural areas is perfect. There are numerous mountain bike trails already there!

Recommend trail around agua hedionda. Check out Crystal Springs Reserve Trail in San Mateo County, around a water reserve, allows walkers, bikers, horses, around a protected area, which would be a fabulous addition to Carlsbad.

Would LOVE a trail around agua hedionda. If you could look at Crystal Springs Reserve Trail in Burlingame, CA and incorporate a trail like that, which also surrounds a protected area, allows for wildlife, and walkers, bikers, horses, around a protected area, which would be an enormous attraction for Carlsbad.

more bike paths in the downtown carlsbad village area the path along the train tracks to go to the lagoon to continue not end Carlsbad needs to open a bike skills park. This bike park should be near houses schools and open space.

Again, keeping in mind that more houses are not always in the best interest of the public. the developers are the ones who win when precious open space is mowed down to accommodate more overpriced neighborhoods. let's take care of the open space we have left and hopefully add to it!!Our well being demands it!!!

As a small business owner I would consider bike trails as a reason on where to relocate my company. Also as a recreational mountain biker where I spend my downtown and my money during downtime is where the bike trails are.

Please consider a bike park for Carlsbad - this is important to teach our children and community how to ride safely and provides a safe environment to learn various forms of biking.

I would like to see more of the running trails expanded, or connected to other trail systems. I also think there are many unused areas where trails would be beneficial....for example, north of tamarack along both sides of el camino real. NOt a neccesisty, but woudl provide runners an off-street scenic option

You have places for skaters but no where for mountain bike jumps Overall pretty good If you could worth with SDGE to solidify a path under their massive power lines easement, that'd be great. Some sections are there, it'd be pretty easy to expand.

We really enjoy the trails along Batiquitos Lagoon - thanks so much for maintaining these.

The more dirt paths there are that can be used by people to ride or walk completely away from cars, and still get somewhere useful, the better.

We need dog poop receptacles and signage on all 48 miles of trails, and in the neighborhoods. Work out a deal with waste management to pick up small automated trash cans and have scouts build small 3 sided enclosures so the trash cans aren't visible. Volunteers would get the to the curb and back. PEOPLE need to be educated about water quality.

It would be nice if we could use the Coastal Rail Trail to ride our bikes to Oceanside or Encinitas as an alternative to the car-congested 101. see above,more walking, hiking trails. lets balancethe pressure for only bikes a balanced program including walking hiking Love the seawall and sidewalks on Carlsbad Blvd.

We need a trail from the Agua Hedionda Discovery Center to the lagoon! And to the ocean! if lake calvera continues to grow in popularity with the currenty upgrades it might be a nice touch to label the trails with signage. perhaps naming each trail like at a ski resort and ranking the difficulty in hiking, biking, horseback riding the said trial.

I can't think of any @ the moment.

Distance can be an obsticle for a lot of people so pathways that accomodate both short & medium trail walkers is ideal. On the other hand Carlsbad has a rich history of enthusiastic bikers form both amateur & professional so longer trails can still be used.

See comments above about extending the Batiquitos Lagoon Trail WEST of I-5. It's time!!!

Thank you for the provided trails, and thank you for trying to provide even more. I love to walk.

Allow leashed dogs into our public parks. They are part of the family, our exercise and fitness buddies. The current policy makes us feel Carlsbad is not dog friendly. Dog parks are not family parks.

I (and many other people) use the coast for biking and running. A lot of the coast only has a bike lane so it would be great to have a walk path also to avoid bike/runners sharing the same lane (unless its much wider than current) The trails for biking, walking, hiking, horses, etc., are a huge asset and plus for the city. It brings in the rural into our otherwise urban existence. These are invaluable as we stay connected to the beauty around us. However, let's not let the environmentalists hijack the policies and practices governing such.

Think big picture connections and safety from one are in the community to another and one community to the next.I will spend some times with the maps and make more specific suggestions.

Allow more mountain biking trails in more areas.

Listing of known homeless population campsites. Include better access to public transportation. Have Zipcar stations, public bicycles (Like the Chase bikes in NYC), more frequent train stops at stations.

The Agua Hedionda Lagoon does not have a trail that circumnavigates it. Connect the isolated trails so that a hiker or jogger can run all the way around it.

BIKE PARK!!!

When considering adding trails within open space or connecting open space areas, please, put it singletrack trails as opposed to 8+ feet wide dirt sidewalks. The former is preferred over the later for the aesthetics and overall natural experience.

Add more sanctioned and approved Mountain Bike trail options at places like Calavera, La Costa Preserve, and others. This would help protect the natural habitat as well. Santa Cruz is a good example of the city encouraging mountain biking through good signage, safe mountain biking trails, and active maintenance and construction of new trails.

More mountain bike trails, please.

More 'real' single-track mountain bike trails.

PLEASE focus on re-opening the Flightline Trail Network. I was told by Markus at CNLM that the area was County Property? The mountain biking community will gladly develop, maintain, and police the trail network.

Reopen Flightline in the CNLM openspace off Faraday.

Bicycle pump track and skills area in existing parks. Can you be used by kids while their brothers/sisters practice play in other sporting events.

It seems that people entering onto a main road, such as Carlsbad Village Drive, are given preferential treatment when it comes to the light changing. They should be required to make right-turn only turns during high traffic times.

We need more docent lead walks on the beautiful trails of Carlsbad--we used to do this years ago.

Veterans Park would be a great location for a bike park.

I mostly ride Calavera Lake and La Costa trails in Carlsbad and I'd love to see these trails network to be protected and extended. Cavalera lake has many trails illegals ans there is very little public access (parking lot) to access the network. There isn't bike skills park/pumptrack/bmx area in Carlsbad for mountain biker / bmxers and kids/family Traffic around Aviara Oaks Elementary School is a nightmare!!! Also, Cars are backing up on Aviara Parkway and Ambrosia waiting to pickup students. On Ambrosia, cars use a single lane with red curb and double park. Drivers become impatient and pass over double yellow toward oncoming traffic to continue North on Ambrosia. Persons jaywalk here to.

Bike & hike trails in Calavera