Editorial: Reduction in city

EDITORIAL

Reduction in city services unnecessary

At the end of July, Mayor Andy Letham warned that people were “going to notice” the service cuts that were coming. Ditching and brushing,grass-cutting and street sweeping, servicecentres and arenas — all of this and maybe more affected by the pandemic. This is utter nonsense for citizens to have to accept.

Let’s back up though. Municipal governments have extremely limited fiscal autonomy. There is only so much money coming in from municipal transfers, property taxes and grants, and this prevents cities from solving challenges as they arise — especially the challenge of a global pandemic.

Given this fiscal constraint, it’s not a surprise that the mayor and council are looking for answers to their budget woes. Letham’s reluctance to raise taxes is reasonable — and something the Advocate supports. The middle class, especially, has been taxed enough.

We have been taught all our lives that government should budget like a household. That’s true for municipal governments, and it’s even true for provincial governments. But it is not true for the federal government.

Unlike a household, the federal government issues the very currency it spends. It only needs to keep control over inflation. It does not need to worry about running a perfectly manageable deficit.

Canada has complete monetary sovereignty. That is, we can use our currency-issuing power to tackle whatever social policy challenges we need to turn our attention toward to create a better and more equitable nation. This includes giving more money to our provinces and cities, which deal more with managing the day-to-day services we depend on.

We have the ability to create better cities, with robust, meaningful services like vibrant libraries and top-notch waste management. There is no need to slash services if the federal government simply acts with more ingenuity — and honesty. The mayor and council should be demanding more from their federal partners.

LETTER SPOTLIGHT

City’s decision on Kent Street trees ‘ludicrous’

I am stunned and disappointed that the city would not use the silva cells (New project in downtown Lindsay supports healthy tree canopy — August edition) on both sides of Kent Street.

These cells have a proven efficacy; we do not need to measure their effectiveness as the director of engineering, Juan Rojas, suggests.

This process has been proven throughout the world, including over 100 trees thriving at the Museum of Modern Art in New York. The idea that you would use a successful, proven system on one side of a street and a proven failure of a system on the other is ludicrous.

This is about money, not science, and Rojas knows it. I have seen tree canopies all over the world but never where one side has beautiful healthy trees and the other side dead or dying ones. David Hodgson, Burnt River