2014 Grad Survey

GRADUATE FOLLOW-UP

SURVEY

2012 2013

Including the EMPLOYER FOLLOW-UP of the 2012-2013 CLASS

Prepared by the OFFICE of WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT Barry Kinsey, Director 384-4124

April 2014

This year there were 523 students who completed the requirements of his or her degree/program between the dates of July 1, 2012 and June 30, 2013. At least one attempt was made to contact each of these completers to respond to the survey.

Graduates had two options to complete the survey: Web based survey and the traditional mail survey.

Of the 523 graduates we had incomplete contact information on 27. A total of 100 graduates did respond for a return rate of 20.2%.

In addition to contacting graduates, we also contacted employers of graduates. These employer names were supplied by the graduate as part of their survey. We sent out 34 surveys and 11 were returned.

This information is reported on pages 11 - 13.

The report also includes a brief survey to those current students who have completed at least 40 credit hours. In this survey we asked, via email, 1331 students (146 responses) to evaluate the College’s services and programs. This is reported out on page 10 and can be compared to the responses of our graduates to the same questions on page 9.

I would like to thank all involved in producing the 2012-13 Graduate Follow-Up Survey; beginning with our student assistant, Chelsea Siebarth, who assisted with the organization of data. I would also like to thank Mr. James Ross, Director of Data Processing Services and Ms. Sue McKee, Computer Programmer, for all of their assistance.

If you have any comments or questions regarding this report, please contact me at the Office of Workforce Development (734) 384-4124.

Sincerely,

Barry Kinsey, Director Office of Workforce Development

1

MONROE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2013-2014 GRADUATE FOLLOW-UP SURVEY REPORT Table of Contents Demographic Analysis of Graduates. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Awards by Graduation Date Awards Analysis (Associate Degrees & Certificates) Gender Analysis Age Analysis Awards by Completion Date Dual Awards Occupational vs. Transfer Program Graduates by Residence Zip Code

Demographic Analysis of Respondents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Total Graduate Population Respondents by First Award Respondents by Graduation Date (first award only) Respondents by Age Respondents by Gender

Respondents by Occupational Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Goal Satisfaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Continuing Education Status. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Graduates’ Evaluation of College Services & Programs. . . . . 9 Students Who Have Completed 40+ Credit Hours Evaluation of College Services & Programs. . . . . . . . . . . 10 Employer Survey Report. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

3

Demographic Analysis of Entire Class 2012-13 Total Number of Graduates In Class

2012-13 523

2011-12 532

Awards by Graduation Date 2012-13 2011-12 Number % of Total Number % of Total July 2012 38 7.3% 35 6.6% December 2012 171 32.7% 173 32.5% May 2013 241 46.1% 256 48.1% June 2013 73 14.0% 68 12.8% Total 523

532

Awards Analysis (Associate Degrees & Certificates)

2012-13 2011-12

1st Award % of Total 2nd Award 1st Award % of Total 2nd Award Applied Science 281 53.7% 6 275 51.7% 12 Arts 1 0.2% 0 2 0.4% 0 Fine Arts 3 0.6% 0 5 0.9% 2 Commerce 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 Science 186 35.6% 0 187 35.2% 2 PDA 6 1.1% 1 5 0.9% 0 Certificates 45 8.6% 27 58 10.9% 21 Total

523 34 532 37

Gender Analysis

2012-13 2011-12

Number % of Class Number % of Class Male 187 35.8% 185 34.8% Female 336 64.2% 347 65.2% Total 523

532

Age Analysis

2012-13 2011-12 Younger than 20 8 1.5% 2 0.4% 20-25 260 49.7% 278 52.3% 26-30 69 13.2% 77 14.5% 31-35 47 9.0% 48 9.0% 36-40 47 9.0% 47 8.8% 41-50 66 12.6% 59 11.1% Over 50 26 5.0% 21 3.9% Total 523

532

1

Awards by Completion Date (First awards only)

July December May June

2012 2012 2013 2013 Total Applied Science 14 81 140 46 281 Arts 0 1 0 0 1 Commerce 0 0 1 0 1 Fine Arts 0 0 2 1 3 Science 19 64 80 23 186 PDA 2 2 2 0 6 Certificate 3 23 16 3 45 Total 38 171 241 73 523

Dual Awards

AAS 6 AFA 0 AS 0 PDA 1 CER 27 Total 34

Occupational vs. Transfer Programs

2012-13

2011-12

Occupational Program Graduates

330

63.1%

338 63.5%

Transfer Program Graduates

193

36.9%

194 36.5%

Total

523

532

Graduates by Residence Zip Code

(Top 6)

2012-13 2011-12

Monroe 198 37.9% Monroe 179 33.6% Lambertville/Temperance 67 12.8% Lambertville/Temperance 70 13.2% Carleton 32 6.1% Newport 32 6.0% Newport 30 5.7% Carleton 25 4.7% Dundee 29 5.5% Toledo 24 4.5% Toledo 21 4.0% Petersburg 19 3.6%

Total 377 72.1% Total 349 65.6%

2

Demographic Analysis of Respondents

2012-13 2011-12 Total Graduate Population 523 532 Bad Data/Incomplete Info. on Graduate 27 10 Total analysis population 496 522 Total Number of Responses 100 133 Percentage of Graduates

20.2%

25.5%

Respondents by First Award

% of A in Th wards is Fi eld

% Resp of All ond ents

Resp ond ents

% of A in Th wards is Fi eld

% Resp of All ond ents

Resp ond ents

2012-13 2011-12

Applied Science 60 60.0% 21.4% 75 56.4% 27.3% Arts 0 0.0% 0.0% 1 0.8% 50.0% Fine Arts 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% Commerce 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% Science 33 33.0% 17.7% 44 33.1% 23.5% PDA 1 1.0% 16.7% 0 0.0% 0.0% Certificate 6 6.0% 13.3% 13 9.8% 22.4% Total 100 133

Occupational 67 67.0% 23.1% 88 66.2% 30.3% Transfer 33 33.0% 16.2% 45 33.8% 22.1%

Respondents by Graduation Date (first award only)

August 2012 December 2012 April 2013 June 2013 Total

8 8.0% 21.1% 34 34.0% 19.9% 43 43.0% 17.8% 15 15.0% 20.5%

% of for T Awards his D ate

% Resp of All ond ents

ents

ond Resp

% of for T Awards his D ate

% Resp of All ond ents

Resp

ond

ents

2012-13 2011-12

6 4.5% 17.1% 42 31.6% 24.3% 69 51.9% 27.0% 16 12.0% 23.5%

100 133

3

Respondents by Age

Under 20 20-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-50 Over 50

3 45 6 11 12 14 9

3.0% 100.0%

45.0% 14.7% 6.0% 6.8% 11.0% 24.4% 12.0% 34.3% 14.0% 21.2% 9.0% 33.3%

0 58 18 12 18 20 7

0.0% 43.6% 13.5% 9.0% 13.5% 15.0% 5.3%

% of A for T wards his A ge

% Resp of All ond ents

Resp ond ents

% of A for T wards his A ge

% Resp of All ond ents

Resp ond ents

2012-13 2011-12

0.0% 19.0% 20.5% 26.7% 51.4% 30.3% 25.9%

Total 100 133

Respondents by Gender

2012-13 2011-12

Respondents % of Total Respondents % of Total Male 26 26.0% 92 69.2% Female 74 74.0% 41 30.8% Total 100 133

4

Respondents by Occupational Area

% of Total

Graduates This Category

Responses

% of Major

% of Total This Category

ASSOCIATE DEGREES Associate of Applied Science (no designation) 33 11.7% 4 12.1% 6.5% Associate of Arts 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0.0% Associate of Commerce 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0.0% Accounting 16 5.7% 4 25.0% 6.5% Administrative Professional: Admin 1 0.4% 1 100.0% 1.6% Administrative Professional: Medical 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0.0% Application Software Specialist 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0.0% Auto Engineering Technology 4 1.4% 0 0.0% 0.0% Business Management 32 11.3% 9 28.1% 14.5% Chemistry 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0.0% CIS: Computer Programming 2 0.7% 0 0.0% 0.0% CIS: End User Support Specialist 3 1.1% 0 0.0% 0.0% CIS: Internet Professional Web 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0.0% CIS: PC Support Technician 4 1.4% 1 25.0% 1.6% CIS: System Administration Specialist 8 2.8% 2 25.0% 3.2% CIS: Web Development 1 0.4% 1 100.0% 1.6% Construction Management Technology 3 1.1% 1 33.3% 1.6% Criminal Justice 17 6.0% 2 11.8% 3.2% Culinary Skills & Management 11 3.9% 2 18.2% 3.2% Early Childhood Development 10 3.5% 0 0.0% 0.0% Fine Arts 2 0.7% 0 0.0% 0.0% General Technology 4 1.4% 0 0.0% 0.0% Graphic Design Digital Media 11 3.9% 2 18.2% 3.2% Graphic Design Illustration 1 0.4% 1 100.0% 1.6% Industrial Electricity/Electronics Technology 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0.0% Industrial Management - Plant 1 0.4% 1 100.0% 1.6% Manufacturing Technology 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0.0% Mechanical Design Technology 2 0.7% 1 50.0% 1.6% Mechanical Engineering Technology 3 1.1% 2 66.7% 3.2% Medical Office Coordinator 3 1.1% 0 0.0% 0.0% Metrology Technology 1 0.4% 1 100.0% 1.6% Nuclear Engineering Technology 2 0.7% 1 50.0% 1.6% Nursing 57 20.1% 17 29.8% 27.4% PDA 6 2.1% 1 16.7% 1.6% Respiratory Therapy 26 9.2% 5 19.2% 8.1% Teacher Paraprofessional 3 1.1% 1 33.3% 1.6% Welding Technology 8 2.8% 2 25.0% 3.2% Total 283 62 21.9%

CERTIFICATE PROGRAMS Accounting 1 2.9% 0 Administrative Office Assistant 7 20.6% 2 Administrative Office Specialist 1 2.9% 1 CIS: PC Support Technician 1 2.9% 0 CIS: Web Design 1 2.9% 0 Early Childhood Development 2 5.9% 0 Mechanical Design Technology 1 2.9% 0 Phlebotomy Technician 7 20.6% 0 Practical Nursing 5 14.7% 0 Production and Processing Tech CAD/CAM 1 2.9% 0 Production and Processing Tech CNC 2 5.9% 0 Welding: Advanced 3 8.8% 1 Welding: Basic 2 5.9% 1

Total

34

0.0% 28.6% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 50.0%

0.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 20.0%

5 14.7%

5

6

Emp loym e R n e t l a te Con d and/ t. Ed o ucat r ion

C o n ti Educ nuing atio n

Othe

r

Un e m p

by C loyed hoic e Une m Seek ployed ing

P a r t Unre Time lated

Pa t r Rela Time ted

Fu l l T Unre ime lated

F lu l Rela Time ted

Resp o this nses to Que stion

tes dua Gra 283 62 21 7 6 11 0 1 3 3 9 26

46

43.5% 41.9% 74.2%

Total

34 5 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

5

4

20.0% 100.0% 80.0%

CERTIFICATE PROGRAMS Accounting 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA Administrative Office Assistant 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 50.0% 100.0% 50.0% Administrative Office Specialist 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% CIS: PC Support Technician 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA CIS: Web Design 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA Early Childhood Development 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA Mechanical Design Technology 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA Phlebotomy Technician 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA Practical Nursing 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA Production and Processing Tech CAD/CAM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA Production and Processing Tech CNC 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA Welding: Advanced 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% Welding: Basic 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Total

ASSOCIATE DEGREES

Associate of Applied Science (no designation) 33 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 4 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Associate of Arts 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA Associate of Commerce 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA Accounting 16 4 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 3 50.0% 75.0% 75.0% Administrative Professional: Admin 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Administrative Professional: Medical 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA Application Software Specialist 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA Auto Engineering Technology 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA Business Management 32 9 2 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 6 9 33.3% 66.7% 100.0% Chemistry 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA CIS: Computer Programming 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA CIS: End User Support Specialist 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA CIS: Internet Professional Web 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA CIS: PC Support Technician 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% CIS: System Administration Specialist 8 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% CIS: Web Development 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% Construction Management Technology 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% Criminal Justice 17 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% Culinary Skills & Management 11 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Early Childhood Development 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA Fine Arts 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA General Technology 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA Graphic Design Digital Media 11 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 50.0% 100.0% 100.0% Graphic Design Illustration 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Industrial Electricity/Electronics Technology 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA Industrial Management - Plant 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% Manufacturing Technology 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA Mechanical Design Technology 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Mechanical Engineering Technology 3 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% Medical Office Coordinator 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA Metrology Technology 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Nuclear Engineering Technology 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% Nursing 57 17 10 0 2 3 0 0 0 1 1 1 13 70.6% 5.9% 76.5% PDA 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% Respiratory Therapy 26 5 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 20.0% 0.0% 20.0% Teacher Paraprofessional 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% Welding Technology 8 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Ente r Milit ed ar y Ser v ice Ap p r Prog enticesh ip ram

Status of Respondents by Occupational Degree

Job P la Rate cement Resp o to T h ese Q ndents uestio ns Con tin Educ uing a Resp tion Ra te o Thes ndents t o e Qu estio ns J o b / C Educ ontinui n a Resp tion Ra g te o Thes ndents t e Qu o estio ns

Goal Satisfaction Question What was your goal when you initially enrolled at MCCC?

Goal

Satisfied

Yes No Total

a. To take courses to improve my skills at my current job.

0 1 1 b. To obtain a certificate in an occupational area.

2 1 3 c. To earn an associate degree in an occupational area 44 10 54 leading to employment in that field. d. To earn an associate degree to transfer to a college or 29 2 31 university leading to a bachelor’s degree. e. For Self Improvement 4 0 4 *7 records did not specify Total

79

14

93

% of Total 84.9% 15.1%

89% of respondents achieved their initial goals in the 2011-12 survey 83.2% in the 2010-11 survey

Question If you are employed full or part-time in a field unrelated to your area of study at MCCC, as marked on page 1, please indicate why:

2012-13 2011-12 1. Was not interested in seeking a position 1 3.7% 2 4.7% in my field of study 2. Found better opportunities in the field or job 2 7.4% 4 9.3% where I am currently employed.

3. Attempted to, but could not find a position in my 8 29.6% 16 37.2% field of study.

4. Temporary job while continuing my education.

10 37.0% 19 44.2% 5. Other 6 22.2% 2 4.7% Total

27 43

Question

When were you hired into your current position?

2012-13 2011-12 1. Prior to enrolling at MCCC 13 16.0% 27 23.3% 2. While enrolled at MCCC 31 38.3% 36 31.0% 3. After graduating from MCCC 28 34.6% 46 39.7% 4. Not Applicable 9 11.1% 7 6.0% Total

81 116 7

8

Total Awards

281 1 1 3 186 6 45

Total # of Responses

60 0 0 0 33 1 6

Continuing at MCCC

7 0 0 0 7 0 6

Total

20

3.8%

20.0%

3

% of Responses

% of Awards 0.6% 3.0%

0.2% 1.7% 0.0% NA 0.0% NA 0.0% NA 0.4% 6.1% 0.0% NA 0.0% 0.0%

Enrolled at a College/University 32

16 0 0 0 16 0 0

% of Responses

% of Awards 6.1% 32.0%

5.7% 26.7% 0.0% NA 0.0% NA 0.0% NA 8.6% 48.5% 0.0% NA 0.0% 0.0%

Plan to Continue College Level Education within 1 Year

30

24 0 0 0 6 0 0

% of Responses

% of Awards 5.7% 30.0%

8.5% 40.0% 0.0% NA 0.0% NA 0.0% NA 3.2% 18.2% 0.0% NA 0.0% 0.0%

Do Not Plan To Continue 10

9 0 0 0 1 0 0

% of Responses % of Awards

1.9% 10.0%

3.2% 15.0% 0.0% NA 0.0% NA 0.0% NA 0.5% 3.0% 0.0% NA 0.0% 0.0%

20.3% 95.0% 0.0% NA 0.0% NA 0.0% NA 17.2% 97.0% 0.0% NA 13.3% 100.0%

95 18.2% 95.0%

57 0 0 0 32 0 6

Total

Currently Enrolled by Award

% of Grads % of Grads

# of Continuing Continuing

Graduates Education (Based upon 100 responses) Education Continuing at MCCC 20 33.3% A.A.S. 40.0% University of Toledo 10 16.7% A.A. NA Eastern Michigan University 9 15.0% A.C. NA Siena Heights University 8 13.3% A.F.A. NA Others 13 21.7% A.S. 78.5% *4 incomplete records P.D.A. 0.0%

Certificate 100.0%

Total 60

Total 50.4%

College/University of Choice

523 100

% of Responses

2.5% 11.7% 0.0% NA 0.0% NA 0.0% NA 3.8% 21.2% 0.0% NA 13.3% 100.0%

% of Awards

*5 incomplete records

Applied Science Arts Commerce Fine Arts Science PDA Certificate

Primary/First Award 1 0 0 0 2 0 0

Enrolled at another Community College

% of Awards

Continuing Education Status

% of Responses

Academic Advising & Counseling Bookstore Cafeteria Career Center Co-op, clinical experience, internships Enhancement of decision making skills Financial Aid Value of Hands-on or lab experiences Helpfulness exhibited by instructors Learning Assistance Lab Learning Recourses Center/Library Quality of equipment, tools or instructional materials Problem solving/ critical thinking skills Quality of instructors & instruction provided Relevance of classes & coursework Student Activities Office of Workforce Development Enhancement of writing and other communication skills Regional Computer Testing Center/RCTC 100 100 100 99 100 100 98 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 95

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

# of Responses

100 100 100 100

# of Applicable Responses

100 100 100 100

Outstanding

29

33

16

39 14

34

43

21

29

38 27

30

40 27

16

27 27 14 13

% of Applicable Responses

30.5%

33.0%

16.0%

39.0% 14.0%

34.0%

43.0%

21.0%

29.6%

38.0% 27.0%

30.3%

40.0% 27.0%

16.0%

27.0% 27.0% 14.0% 13.0%

Good

32

45

15

53 17

54

45

49

44

46 28

44

46 24

16

35 37 20 14

% of Applicable Responses

33.7%

45.0%

15.0%

53.0% 17.0%

54.0%

45.0%

49.0%

44.9%

46.0% 28.0%

44.4%

46.0% 24.0%

16.0%

35.0% 37.0% 20.0% 14.0%

Average

6

16

10

7 15

9

12

19

8

15 8

15

12 11

6

20 28 18 13

% of Applicable Responses

6.3%

16.0%

10.0%

7.0% 15.0%

9.0%

12.0%

19.0%

8.2%

15.0% 8.0%

15.2%

12.0% 11.0%

6.0%

20.0% 28.0% 18.0% 13.0%

% of Applicable Responses

Needs Improvement

2

3

6

1 8

3

0

6

4

1 4

5

2 7

7

Not Applicable

55 55.0%

4 4.0% 1 1.0% 35 35.0% 54 54.0%

% of Responses

2.1%

3.0%

6.0%

1.0% 8.0%

3.0%

0.0%

6.0%

4.1%

1.0% 4.0%

5.1%

5.0%

0.0%

0.0%

5.0%

3.0% 26 26.0%

3

53 53.0%

0 0.0% 46 46.0%

0

0

5

13 13.0%

0 0.0% 33 33.0%

5

2.0% 0.0% 7.0% 31 31.0%

7.0%

14 14.0% 7 7.0% 13 13.0% 6 6.0%

Graduates’ Evaluation of College Services and Programs

9

Academic Advising & Counseling Bookstore Cafeteria Career Center Co-op, clinical experience, internships Enhancement of decision making skills Financial Aid Value of Hands-on or lab experiences Helpfulness exhibited by instructors Learning Assistance Lab Learning Recourses Center/Library Quality of equipment, tools or instructional materials Problem solving/ critical thinking skills Quality of instructors & instruction provided Online Classes Relevance of classes & coursework Student Activities Office of Workforce Development Enhancement of writing and other communication skills Regional Computer Testing Center/RCTC 133 145 95 116 137 141 145 96 143 80 55 134

143 146 144 142 145 145 145 145 144 145 144 145

97

138 110

145 145

145

47

146

# of Responses

135 139 87 70

# of Applicable Responses

143 146 142 144

Outstanding

42

37

13

49 23

56 24

39

32

50

64 43

56

42 56

15

38 34 20 17

% of Applicable Responses

43.3%

27.6%

23.6%

34.3% 28.8%

38.6% 25.0%

27.7%

23.4%

43.1%

44.1% 45.3%

42.1%

30.4% 50.9%

31.9%

28.1% 24.5% 23.0% 24.3%

Good

43

74

28

85 37

80 44

84

80

53

69 43

51

75 36

18

65 69 34 37

% of Applicable Responses

44.3%

55.2%

50.9%

59.4% 46.3%

55.2% 45.8%

59.6%

58.4%

45.7%

47.6% 45.3%

38.3%

54.3% 32.7%

38.3%

48.1% 49.6% 39.1% 52.9%

Average

7

19

11

6 13

9 19

14

12

10

11 4

11

19 12

7

16 28 22 10

% of Applicable Responses

7.2%

14.2%

20.0%

4.2% 16.3%

6.2% 19.8%

9.9%

8.8%

8.6%

7.6% 4.2%

8.3%

13.8% 10.9%

14.9%

11.9% 20.1% 25.3% 14.3%

% of Applicable Responses

Needs Improvement

0.7% 5.5%

5

3

3

3 6

0 8

3

13

3

1 5

5.2%

2.2%

5.5%

2.1% 7.5%

0.0% 8.3%

2.1%

9.5%

2.6%

0.7% 5.3%

15 11.3%

1 6

7 14.9%

15 11.1% 8 5.8% 11 12.6% 6 8.6%

% of Responses Not Applicable

7.0%

2.8%

5.5%

7.6% 48 33.1%

11

89 61.8%

1 0.7% 65 44.8%

0 0.0% 49 33.8%

4

8

26 18.3%

1 0.7% 49 34.0%

10

7 4.8% 35 24.1%

99 67.8%

8 5.6% 7 4.8% 55 38.7% 74 51.4%

Students Who Have Completed 40+ Credit Hours Evaluation of College Services & Programs

10

11

Good Adequate

Not Applicable

Question Completed

54.5% 63.6% 63.6% 63.6% 63.6% 54.5%

36.4% 27.3% 18.2% 27.3% 27.3% 36.4%

Good

9.1% 9.1% 9.1% 9.1% 0.0% 9.1%

Adequate

0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 9.1% 0.0%

0.0% 0.0% 9.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Not Applicable

Equipment or Instrument Use Manual Dexterity Meeting and Dealing with the Public Quality of Finished Work Quantity of Finished Work Work-related Technical Knowledge

Outstanding

Needs Improvement

11 11 11 11 11 11

Question Completed

Critical Thinking 45.5% 36.4% 9.1% 9.1% 0.0% 11 Listening 63.6% 36.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11 Mathematical 45.5% 36.4% 9.1% 0.0% 9.1% 11 Oral Communications 72.7% 18.2% 9.1% 0.0% 0.0% 11 Problem Solving 45.5% 27.3% 18.2% 9.1% 0.0% 11 Reading/Using Technical Manuals 54.5% 27.3% 9.1% 0.0% 9.1% 11 Written Communication 27.3% 63.6% 0.0% 0.0% 9.1% 11 Planning/Organization 63.6% 27.3% 0.0% 9.1% 0.0% 11

2. Please rate the “specific work skills” demonstrated by this individual:

Percentage of Respondents

Surveys w/

Outstanding

Needs Improvement

and training received by the employee. Of this number, 11 or 32% of the employers responded.

1. Please rate each of the following “basic employability skills” listed below as they are demonstrated by the graduate:

Percentage of Respondents

Surveys w/

Employer Survey Report

This year, 34 employers of MCCC graduates were mailed a survey asking for opinions related to the preparation, education

12

27.3% 18.2% 27.3% 36.4% 0.0%

63.6% 81.8% 72.7% 54.5% 81.8%

Good

0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 9.1%

0.0%

Adequate

0.0% 0.0% 9.1% 9.1%

9.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

0.0%

Not Applicable

11 11 11 11

11

Surveys w/ Question Completed

5. With relation to this person’s work, how satisfied are you with his/her training or preparation?

Very Satisfied 54.5% Somewhat Satisfied 9.1% Somewhat Dissatisfied 9.1% Very Dissatisfied 0.0%

No Basis for Opinion 0.0%

4. Please rate this person’s preparation for performing this work compared to others in the same o r similar work group.

This person is better prepared 54.5%

This person is equally prepared 36.4%

This person is less prepared 9.1%

I have no basis for comparison 0.0%

Responsibility & Working Independently Cooperative Attitude and Cooperation with Supervisors Personal Appearance Initiative & Working W/out Supervision Punctuality and Attendance

Outstanding

Needs Improvement

3. Please rate the “general employment attitudes and demeanor” demonstrated by this individual:

Percentage of Respondents

13

7. In seeking entry level employees, which colleges/universities would you consider to be MCCC’s “competition”?

University of Toledo

6

Owens Community College 4

Eastern Michigan University 3

Henry Ford Community College 3

Wayne County Community College 3

Washtenaw Community College 2

University of Michigan

1

6. What was the PRIMARY source for hiring this person?

Applicant applied on his/her own initiative 23.5%

Applicant responded to a classified advertisement 11.8%

Contact from a MCCC faculty member 0.0% Local or regional job fair 0.0%

Mutual acquaintance recommendation/personal contact 17.6%

Clinical/co-op/experiential education participant 5.9%

Private or public employment agency 0.0%

Other 5.9%