Enhancing the Social Life Through Urban Agriculture - Urban Strategy

USING THE SEMIPUBLIC & SEMIPRIVATE SPACE FOR ENHANCING THE SOCIAL LIFE IN KERNERVIERTEL

USING THE SEMIPUBLIC &SEMIPRIVATE SEMIPRIVATE SPACE FOR USING THE SEMIPUBLIC && SEMIPRIVATE SPACE FOR USING THE SEMIPUBLIC SPACE FOR ENHANCING THE SOCIAL LIFE IN KERNERVIERTEL ENHANCING THE SOCIAL LIFE ININ KERNERVIERTEL ENHANCING THE SOCIAL LIFE KERNERVIERTEL

SEMIPUBLIC & & SEMIPUBLIC SEMIPRIVATE SEMIPRIVATE

Belonging to or for the use of one Belonging to or for the use of one particular person or group of people only. particular person or group of people only.

(Oxford dictionaries) (Oxford dictionaries)

CONSEQUENCES

Start START

2 WEEKS 2 WEEKS 2 WEEKS

Seasonal festivals Seasonal festivals

Extracted from: http://arbustaAuthor: Marco Clausen Extracted from: http://arbustach.km32308.keymachine.de/images/urban_gardeni Author: Marco Clausen ch.km32308.keymachine.de/images/urban_gardeni ng_/Urban_Gardening_UdK.jpg ng_/Urban_Gardening_UdK.jpg

Educational activities Educational activities

Author: Marco Clausen Author: Marco Clausen

Author: Abstractdesignlabs Author: Abstractdesignlabs

TOOLS TOOLS RESOURCES RESOURCES

2 WEEKS2 WEEKS 2 WEEKS

EXPERIMENT EXPERIMENT EXPERIMENT EXPERIMENT IMPLEMENTATION EXPERIMENT IMPLEMENTATION EXPERIMENT IMPLEMENTATION

Analysis of current Analysis of current Analysis of current physical situation physical situation physical situation

Analysis laws and Analysis of lawsof and Analysis of laws and regulations regarding regulations regarding the the regulations regarding the land use land use land use

Definition of preliminary Definition of preliminary Definition of preliminary gardening) activityactivity (urban (urban gardening) activity (urban gardening) on own based on ownbased assumptions based on own assumptions assumptions and observations. and and observations. observations.

on different TestingTesting on different spatial spatial Testing on different spatial typologies and analysis typologies and analysis of the of the typologies and analysis of the perception towards the urban perception towards the urban perception towards the urban gardening activity gardening activity in S-Pu and in gardening activity in S-Pu and Semi-Public and Semi-Private S-Pr spaces.

S-Pr spaces. spaces.

Avaliability of information Avaliability of information Avaliability of information

Internet research, Internet research, Internet research, Interviews with public Interviews with public Interviews with public officials

Human HumanInformation Information Human Information

Processing of analysis Processing of analysis Processing of analysis and information and information and information

Selected potential sites

Strolling, mapping, Strolling, mapping, Strolling, mapping, Brainstorming, Brainstorming, Brainstorming, Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking

Human

DESIGNDESIGN DESIGN 1) (STAGE(STAGE 1) (STAGE 1)

Budget

BudgetMaterial & Material & Budget Equipmet Material & Equipmet Equipmet

ENGAGEMENT WITH THE ENGAGEMENT WITH THE ENGAGEMENT WITH THE COMMUNITY COMMUNITY COMMUNITY

First design approach First design approach to the to the First design approach to the implementation implementation of urbanof urban implementation of urban agriculture most suitable agriculture in mostin suitable agriculture in most suitable typologies typologies typologies

of the community AnalysisAnalysis of the community Analysis of the community needs, needs, interests andinterests opinions,and needs, interests and opinions, opinions, regarding the regarding the proposed regarding the proposed proposed design (urban design (urban agriculture) design (urban agriculture) agriculture)

Community participation

Processing of analysis Processing of analysis Processing of analysis and information and information and information

Strolling, selecting, Strolling, selecting, Strolling, selecting, placingplacing placing

Human Information Information Human Information

2 MONTHS 2 MONTHS 2 MONTHS

PILOT DESIGN PILOT DESIGN PILOT DESIGN

EXPERIMENT DESIGN EXPERIMENT DESIGN EXPERIMENT DESIGN

Not applicable

3 MONTHS 3 MONTHS 3 MONTHS

Strolling, Mapping, Strolling, Mapping, Strolling, Mapping, Brainstorming, Brainstorming, Brainstorming, Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking

Human

introductory Surveys,Surveys, introductory Surveys, introductory meetings, workshops, meetings, workshops, meetings, workshops, urban walks, urban walks, urban walks, mapping activity activity mapping activity mapping

Human Information from Knowledge Information from Knowledge Human from Knowledge Current Situation Current Information Situation CurrentAnalysis Situation Analysis Analysis

Space to Hold Space to Hold Material & Material & Space to Hold Material & & Equipmet Meetings &Meetings Equipmet Meetings & Equipmet Activities Activities Activities

1 YEAR 1 YEAR 1 YEAR

2 YEARS 2 YEARS 2 YEARS

IMPLEMENTATION IMPLEMENTATION IMPLEMENTATION DESIGNDESIGN DESIGN 2) (STAGE(STAGE 2) (STAGE 2)

Adding Adding input of theinput neigh-of the Adding input of the neighto the proposal bors neighbors to the proposal bors to the proposal designagriculture) (urban agriculture) design (urban design (urban agriculture)

Processing of community input, community participation participation participation Brainstorming, participatory Brainstorming, participatory Brainstorming, participatory planning, mapping of available planning, mapping of available planning, mapping of available land lentneighbours, by the neighbours, land lent by the land lent by the neighbours, benchmarking benchmarking analysisanalysis benchmarking analysis

Human

from InformationInformation from Human from Human Current Situation Current Information Situation CurrentAnalysis Situation Analysis Analysis

8 YEARS 8 YEARS 8 YEARS

GROWTH AND EXPANSION GROWTH AND EXPANSION GROWTH AND EXPANSION NEW LOCAL NEW LOCAL NEW LOCAL PARTNERSHIPS PARTNERSHIPS PARTNERSHIPS

IMPLEMENTATION IMPLEMENTATION IMPLEMENTATION LAUNCHING LAUNCHING LAUNCHING

Implementing Implementing individualindividual & Implementing individual & & communal comunal urban gardens urban comunal urban gardens gardens, provide technical knowledge

NEWSCALE LOCAL SCALE NEW LOCAL NEW LOCAL SCALE ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES

NEW EXTERNAL NEW EXTERNAL NEW EXTERNAL PARTNERSHIPS PARTNERSHIPS PARTNERSHIPS

NEW CITY SCALE NEW CITY SCALE NEW CITY SCALE ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES

New activities introduced:New local New and city levelNew activities New activities introduced: CreatingCreating new localnew local New activities introduced: andlocal city level introduced: Creating new local New activities introduced: New local and city level New activities introduced: partnerships Communal Kitchens, partnerships Neighbourhood partnerships Hands-on workshops, Com- weeklypartnerships created created Neighbourhood festival festival partnerships Hands-on workshops, Compartnerships created Neighbourhood festival markets, knowledge munal Kitchens, Saturday munal Kitchens, Saturday exchange, conferences, new markets, knowledge markets, knowledge channels of communication exchange, conferences, new exchange, conferences, new channels of communica on channels of communica on

Approved design, approved funding, defined intervention spaces

Phase 3 showing positive indicators of success, success, contractscontracts success, contracts approved

Community participation, technical knowledge, funding

Indicators of success of phase 3 showing strong fundations for growing.

Strong alliances, appropriate funding, legal ground available

Canvas business Metodology Canvas business Marketing, event planning, Canvas business Metodology design, design, Canvas business model, model, Marketing, event planning, Canvas business Metodology design, Canvas business model, Marketing, event planning, model, negotiation, workshops, workshops, marketing negotiation, negotiation, stakeholder event design, model, negotiation, marketing stakeholder event design, model, negotiation, workshops, marketing negotiation, stakeholder event design, stakeholder mapping, market analysisbenchmarking benchmarking stakeholder mapping, mapping,mapping, market analysis analysis analysis stakeholder mapping, mapping, market analysis benchmarking analysis market analysis market analysis market analysis

Urban gardening, Urban agriculture, Urban agriculture, workshops trainingtechnical workshops training workshops individual support

Land or SpaceAvailable Budget Equipment,Equipment, Knowledge Knowledge Budget Incentive Incentive Land or Land Space Equipment, Budget PackageIncentive Seeds & Raw Knowledge Seeds & Raw Package SeedsMaterials & Raw Package Materials Materials

Knowledge Knowledge Incentive Incentive KnowledgePackageIncentive Package Package

Budget Budget Budget Budget & Working Knowledge Knowledge Material & Material Working Available Available Knowledge Knowledge Incentive Incentive Budget Budget Knowledge Material & Equipmet Force Land Equipmet Force Working Land Available KnowledgePackageIncentive Package Equipmet Force Land Package

Public Public

Public Civil society

Civil society Civil society Private

Private

Communication Communication Channels Channels

1 WEEK 1 WEEK 1 WEEK

ANALYSIS LEGALLEGAL ANALYSIS LEGAL ANALYSIS

Human HumanInformation Information Human Information

Researchers/ Researchers/ Researchers/ Designers Designers Designers

Private Changed role

Identifying potential areas areas Identifying potential Identifying potential areas of intervention (Semi-public, intervention (Semi-public, ofofintervention (Semi-public, Semi-private) Semi-private) Semi-private)

SUCCESS

KEY ACTIVITIES KEY ACTIVITIES

1 WEEK 1 WEEK 1 WEEK

SPATIAL ANALYSIS SPATIAL ANALYSIS SPATIAL ANALYSIS

Strolling, mapping, Strolling, mapping, Strolling, mapping, observation observation observation

STAKEHOLDERS STAKEHOLDERS

To enhance To enhance community community social bonds social bonds

OUTCOMES OUTCOMES

Urban Agriculture Urban Agriculture

To improve To improve Neighborhood Neighborhood Identity Identity

OUTCOMES

To enhance To enhance the Local the Local Economy Economy

To create To create livelylively spatial spatial conditions conditions for neighbors for neighbors of allofages all ages

INDICATORS OF SUCCESS INDICATORS OF INDICATORS SUCCESS OF

GOALS GOALS

STRATEGYTOOLS

hubs of production, recreation & social interacion hubs of production, recreation & social interacion

RESOURCES

Turning Kernerviertel’s semipublic andand semiprivate spaces intointo Turning Kernerviertel’s semipublic semiprivate spaces

STAKEHOLDERS

VISION VISION

1 WEEK 1 WEEK 1 WEEK

ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

PRECONDITION PREPRECONDITION CONDITION

PRIVATE PRIVATE

START

DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION

The spaces which act as the transition The spaces which act as the transition between the public and private. For the between the public and private. For the scope of this project, refer to the spaces scope of this project, refer to the spaces which have the potential to gather which have the potential to gather people towards a certain activity but do people towards a certain activity but do not belong to a specific not belong to a specific individual/collectivity or are completely individual/collectivity or are completely public. E.g. Frontyards, courtyards, alleys, public. E.g. Frontyards, courtyards, alleys, balconies. balconies.

SPATIAL CONSEQUENCES SPATIAL SPATIAL CONSEQUENCES

PUBLIC PUBLIC

DESCRIPTION

“A public space refers to an area or place “A public space refers to an area or place that is open and accessible to all peoples, that is open and accessible to all peoples, regardless of gender, race, ethnicity, age or regardless of gender, race, ethnicity, age or socio-economic level…” (UNESCO) socio-economic level…” (UNESCO)

Sally Ejeilat, Giancarlo Muñoz, Juan Sebastián Your names, your names Benítez Your names, your names

Researchers/ Citizen’s Citizen’s Public order Researchers/ Public order Researchers/ Public order service Citizen’s Designers Designers service office Designers building service building building

-Knowledge of the legal -Knowledge of the legal -Knowledge of the legal situation situation situation -Identifying any legal -Identifying anylegal legal -Identifying any holdbacks holdbacks holdbacks

Researchers/ Researchers/ Researchers/ Designers Designers Designers

Final design of the of the Finaldesign design Final of the experiment experiment experiment

Researchers/ Researchers/ Kernerviertel Kernerviertel Researchers/ Kernerviertel Designers Residents Designers Residents Designers Residents

Perception of the neighof the neighPerception Perception of the neighbours towards the urban bourstowards towards theurban urban bours the gardening idea.

Most feasible gardeningidea. idea.Most Mostfeasible feasible gardening typologies to worktoonwork on typologies typologies to work on Neighbours Neighbours Neighbours approval approval approval

Integ r ate Re se rch sig / W T 2016/17 / sit Unyiver sittga y St tga&r t, P rof.

Aesty r/idPL e y /A nt P rof.

A ntma je Stok K at a r i na Bajc Ya si ne njid L en k a Vojtová // St rateg y De velopment Integ r ate d Re se adrch & aDe sig&n De / W T n2016/17 / Un iver St ut r t,utSI IL SI PÖ&//ILPPÖ rof.//A st r id L rof. je Stok n / Kma at n a r/i na Bajc / Ya si ne/ Mou st aMou njid ist/a L en ki a/ Vojtová // St r ateg y De velopment Modu leModu le Integ r ate d Re se a rch & De sig n / W T 2016/17 / Un iver sit y St ut tga r t, SI & IL PÖ // P rof. A st r id L e y / P rof. A nt je Stok ma n / K at a r i na Bajc / Ya si ne Mou st a njid i / L en k a Vojtová // St r ateg y De velopment Modu le

YES

YES YES

NO

NO NO

Researchers/ Researchers/ Researchers/ Designers Designers Designers

Preliminary design of Preliminary design Preliminary design ofof a proposal a proposal a proposal

Researchers/ CommunityCommunity Kernerviertel Researchers/ Kernerviertel Researchers/ Community Kernerviertel Designers committees Residents Designers committees Residents Designers committees Residents

-Community input input -Community -Community input -Comparison between our -Comparison between our -Comparison between our initial assumptions and initial assumptions and initial assumptions and community needs needs community community needs Neighbours Neighbours Neighbours approval approval approval

YESYES YESYES YESYES NONO NONO NONO

Researchers/ Kernerviertel Researchers/ Kernerviertel Researchers/ Kernerviertel Designers Residents Designers Residents Designers Residents

-Discarding unsuitable, unavailable -Discarding unsuitable, unavailable -Discarding unsuitable, unavailable land land land -Planned budget budget -Planned -Planned budget -Final proposal design ready for -Final proposal design ready -Final proposal design ready forfor implementation implementation implementation

Amt für Amt für Kernerviertel Tenant Organizers OrganizersLocal Funding Sponsors Sponsors Volunteers Volunteers Organizers Organizers Public Amt für Amt für Events planner Kernerviertel Tenant KernerviertelKernerviertel Negotiation/Negotiation/ Local Funding Public Events planner LocalFunding Funding Local Funding Amt Amt Kernerviertel Organizersbusinesses Local Funding Volunteers Organizers Kernerviertel organizations Stadtplanung und für Stadtplanung und für Residents farmers Tenant organizations organizations Stadtplanung und Residents Stadtplanung und Residents farmers MarketingNegotiation/ team businesses organizations Sponsors schools businesses Residents Marketing team Local businesses Events planner schools Public organizations Stadtplanung und Stadtplanung und Residents farmers organizations schools businesses Residents Marketing team businesses Stadterneuerung Stadterneuerung Stadterneuerung Stadterneuerung Stadterneuerung Stadterneuerung

-A new production activity -A new production activity -A-Interaction new production activity between neighbours (new internal social connections) -Interaction between neighbours (new internal social connections) -Interaction between neighbours -Local partnerships are created (new internal social connections)

Level ofLevel production/ interest interest and production/ and Level of of production/ interest and cooperation of neighbors cooperation neighbors cooperation of of neighbors

HIGH YES HIGH HIGH YESYES LOW NO LOW LOW NONO

-Set of new -Set of new -Set of new partners,partners, inventorsinventors partners, inventors -Refined economic/ BusinessBusiness model model Business model

Production, recreation Production, recreation Production, recreation and Social interaction Social interaction andand Social interaction in a localinlevel a local level in a local level

-Set of new -Setpartners, of new partners, -Set of new partners, inventorsinventors inventors -Refined economic/ BusinessBusiness model model Business model

Production, recreation Production, recreation Production, recreation and Social interaction Social interaction andand Social interaction in a localin and a local in a local andand external external level level external level

HIGH HIGH Model expansion/ Model expansion/ HIGH Model expansion/ SponsorsSponsors support/support/ Sponsors support/ Event attendance Event attendance LOW LOW Event attendance LOW

1

1

1

USING THE SEMIPUBLIC &SEMIPRIVATE SEMIPRIVATE SPACE FOR USING THE SEMIPUBLIC && SEMIPRIVATE SPACE FOR USING THE SEMIPUBLIC SPACE FOR ENHANCING THE SOCIAL LIFE IN KERNERVIERTEL ENHANCING THE SOCIAL LIFE ININ KERNERVIERTEL ENHANCING THE SOCIAL LIFE KERNERVIERTEL

SEMIPUBLIC & & SEMIPUBLIC SEMIPRIVATE SEMIPRIVATE

Belonging to or for the use of one Belonging to or for the use of one particular person or group of people only. particular person or group of people only.

(Oxford dictionaries) (Oxford dictionaries)

CONSEQUENCES

Start START

2 WEEKS 2 WEEKS 2 WEEKS

Seasonal festivals Seasonal festivals

Extracted from: http://arbustaAuthor: Marco Clausen Extracted from: http://arbustach.km32308.keymachine.de/images/urban_gardeni Author: Marco Clausen ch.km32308.keymachine.de/images/urban_gardeni ng_/Urban_Gardening_UdK.jpg ng_/Urban_Gardening_UdK.jpg

Educational activities Educational activities

Author: Marco Clausen Author: Marco Clausen

Author: Abstractdesignlabs Author: Abstractdesignlabs

TOOLS TOOLS RESOURCES RESOURCES

2 WEEKS2 WEEKS 2 WEEKS

EXPERIMENT EXPERIMENT EXPERIMENT EXPERIMENT IMPLEMENTATION EXPERIMENT IMPLEMENTATION EXPERIMENT IMPLEMENTATION

Analysis of current Analysis of current Analysis of current physical situation physical situation physical situation

Analysis laws and Analysis of lawsof and Analysis of laws and regulations regarding regulations regarding the the regulations regarding the land use land use land use

Definition of preliminary Definition of preliminary Definition of preliminary gardening) activityactivity (urban (urban gardening) activity (urban gardening) on own based on ownbased assumptions based on own assumptions assumptions and observations. and and observations. observations.

on different TestingTesting on different spatial spatial Testing on different spatial typologies and analysis typologies and analysis of the of the typologies and analysis of the perception towards the urban perception towards the urban perception towards the urban gardening activity gardening activity in S-Pu and in gardening activity in S-Pu and Semi-Public and Semi-Private S-Pr spaces.

S-Pr spaces. spaces.

Avaliability of information Avaliability of information Avaliability of information

Internet research, Internet research, Internet research, Interviews with public Interviews with public Interviews with public officials

Human HumanInformation Information Human Information

Processing of analysis Processing of analysis Processing of analysis and information and information and information

Selected potential sites

Strolling, mapping, Strolling, mapping, Strolling, mapping, Brainstorming, Brainstorming, Brainstorming, Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking

Human

DESIGNDESIGN DESIGN 1) (STAGE(STAGE 1) (STAGE 1)

Budget

BudgetMaterial & Material & Budget Equipmet Material & Equipmet Equipmet

ENGAGEMENT WITH THE ENGAGEMENT WITH THE ENGAGEMENT WITH THE COMMUNITY COMMUNITY COMMUNITY

First design approach First design approach to the to the First design approach to the implementation implementation of urbanof urban implementation of urban agriculture most suitable agriculture in mostin suitable agriculture in most suitable typologies typologies typologies

of the community AnalysisAnalysis of the community Analysis of the community needs, needs, interests andinterests opinions,and needs, interests and opinions, opinions, regarding the regarding the proposed regarding the proposed proposed design (urban design (urban agriculture) design (urban agriculture) agriculture)

Community participation

Processing of analysis Processing of analysis Processing of analysis and information and information and information

Strolling, selecting, Strolling, selecting, Strolling, selecting, placingplacing placing

Human Information Information Human Information

2 MONTHS 2 MONTHS 2 MONTHS

PILOT DESIGN PILOT DESIGN PILOT DESIGN

EXPERIMENT DESIGN EXPERIMENT DESIGN EXPERIMENT DESIGN

Not applicable

3 MONTHS 3 MONTHS 3 MONTHS

Strolling, Mapping, Strolling, Mapping, Strolling, Mapping, Brainstorming, Brainstorming, Brainstorming, Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking

Human

introductory Surveys,Surveys, introductory Surveys, introductory meetings, workshops, meetings, workshops, meetings, workshops, urban walks, urban walks, urban walks, mapping activity activity mapping activity mapping

Human Information from Knowledge Information from Knowledge Human from Knowledge Current Situation Current Information Situation CurrentAnalysis Situation Analysis Analysis

Space to Hold Space to Hold Material & Material & Space to Hold Material & & Equipmet Meetings &Meetings Equipmet Meetings & Equipmet Activities Activities Activities

1 YEAR 1 YEAR 1 YEAR

2 YEARS 2 YEARS 2 YEARS

IMPLEMENTATION IMPLEMENTATION IMPLEMENTATION DESIGNDESIGN DESIGN 2) (STAGE(STAGE 2) (STAGE 2)

Adding Adding input of theinput neigh-of the Adding input of the neighto the proposal bors neighbors to the proposal bors to the proposal designagriculture) (urban agriculture) design (urban design (urban agriculture)

Processing of community input, community participation participation participation Brainstorming, participatory Brainstorming, participatory Brainstorming, participatory planning, mapping of available planning, mapping of available planning, mapping of available land lentneighbours, by the neighbours, land lent by the land lent by the neighbours, benchmarking benchmarking analysisanalysis benchmarking analysis

Human

from InformationInformation from Human from Human Current Situation Current Information Situation CurrentAnalysis Situation Analysis Analysis

8 YEARS 8 YEARS 8 YEARS

GROWTH AND EXPANSION GROWTH AND EXPANSION GROWTH AND EXPANSION NEW LOCAL NEW LOCAL NEW LOCAL PARTNERSHIPS PARTNERSHIPS PARTNERSHIPS

IMPLEMENTATION IMPLEMENTATION IMPLEMENTATION LAUNCHING LAUNCHING LAUNCHING

Implementing Implementing individualindividual & Implementing individual & & communal comunal urban gardens urban comunal urban gardens gardens, provide technical knowledge

NEWSCALE LOCAL SCALE NEW LOCAL NEW LOCAL SCALE ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES

NEW EXTERNAL NEW EXTERNAL NEW EXTERNAL PARTNERSHIPS PARTNERSHIPS PARTNERSHIPS

NEW CITY SCALE NEW CITY SCALE NEW CITY SCALE ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES

New activities introduced:New local New and city levelNew activities New activities introduced: CreatingCreating new localnew local New activities introduced: andlocal city level introduced: Creating new local New activities introduced: New local and city level New activities introduced: partnerships Communal Kitchens, partnerships Neighbourhood partnerships Hands-on workshops, Com- weeklypartnerships created created Neighbourhood festival festival partnerships Hands-on workshops, Compartnerships created Neighbourhood festival markets, knowledge munal Kitchens, Saturday munal Kitchens, Saturday exchange, conferences, new markets, knowledge markets, knowledge channels of communication exchange, conferences, new exchange, conferences, new channels of communica on channels of communica on

Approved design, approved funding, defined intervention spaces

Phase 3 showing positive indicators of success, success, contractscontracts success, contracts approved

Community participation, technical knowledge, funding

Indicators of success of phase 3 showing strong fundations for growing.

Strong alliances, appropriate funding, legal ground available

Canvas business Metodology Canvas business Marketing, event planning, Canvas business Metodology design, design, Canvas business model, model, Marketing, event planning, Canvas business Metodology design, Canvas business model, Marketing, event planning, model, negotiation, workshops, workshops, marketing negotiation, negotiation, stakeholder event design, model, negotiation, marketing stakeholder event design, model, negotiation, workshops, marketing negotiation, stakeholder event design, stakeholder mapping, market analysisbenchmarking benchmarking stakeholder mapping, mapping,mapping, market analysis analysis analysis stakeholder mapping, mapping, market analysis benchmarking analysis market analysis market analysis market analysis

Urban gardening, Urban agriculture, Urban agriculture, workshops trainingtechnical workshops training workshops individual support

Land or SpaceAvailable Budget Equipment,Equipment, Knowledge Knowledge Budget Incentive Incentive Land or Land Space Equipment, Budget PackageIncentive Seeds & Raw Knowledge Seeds & Raw Package SeedsMaterials & Raw Package Materials Materials

Knowledge Knowledge Incentive Incentive KnowledgePackageIncentive Package Package

Budget Budget Budget Budget & Working Knowledge Knowledge Material & Material Working Available Available Knowledge Knowledge Incentive Incentive Budget Budget Knowledge Material & Equipmet Force Land Equipmet Force Working Land Available KnowledgePackageIncentive Package Equipmet Force Land Package

Public Public

Public Civil society

Civil society Civil society Private

Private

Communication Communication Channels Channels

1 WEEK 1 WEEK 1 WEEK

ANALYSIS LEGALLEGAL ANALYSIS LEGAL ANALYSIS

Human HumanInformation Information Human Information

Researchers/ Researchers/ Researchers/ Designers Designers Designers

Private Changed role

Identifying potential areas areas Identifying potential Identifying potential areas of intervention (Semi-public, intervention (Semi-public, ofofintervention (Semi-public, Semi-private) Semi-private) Semi-private)

SUCCESS

KEY ACTIVITIES KEY ACTIVITIES

1 WEEK 1 WEEK 1 WEEK

SPATIAL ANALYSIS SPATIAL ANALYSIS SPATIAL ANALYSIS

Strolling, mapping, Strolling, mapping, Strolling, mapping, observation observation observation

STAKEHOLDERS STAKEHOLDERS

To enhance To enhance community community social bonds social bonds

OUTCOMES OUTCOMES

Urban Agriculture Urban Agriculture

To improve To improve Neighborhood Neighborhood Identity Identity

OUTCOMES

To enhance To enhance the Local the Local Economy Economy

To create To create livelylively spatial spatial conditions conditions for neighbors for neighbors of allofages all ages

INDICATORS OF SUCCESS INDICATORS OF INDICATORS SUCCESS OF

GOALS GOALS

STRATEGYTOOLS

hubs of production, recreation & social interacion hubs of production, recreation & social interacion

RESOURCES

Turning Kernerviertel’s semipublic andand semiprivate spaces intointo Turning Kernerviertel’s semipublic semiprivate spaces

STAKEHOLDERS

VISION VISION

1 WEEK 1 WEEK 1 WEEK

ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS

PRECONDITION PREPRECONDITION CONDITION

PRIVATE PRIVATE

START

DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION

The spaces which act as the transition The spaces which act as the transition between the public and private. For the between the public and private. For the scope of this project, refer to the spaces scope of this project, refer to the spaces which have the potential to gather which have the potential to gather people towards a certain activity but do people towards a certain activity but do not belong to a specific not belong to a specific individual/collectivity or are completely individual/collectivity or are completely public. E.g. Frontyards, courtyards, alleys, public. E.g. Frontyards, courtyards, alleys, balconies. balconies.

SPATIAL CONSEQUENCES SPATIAL SPATIAL CONSEQUENCES

PUBLIC PUBLIC

DESCRIPTION

“A public space refers to an area or place “A public space refers to an area or place that is open and accessible to all peoples, that is open and accessible to all peoples, regardless of gender, race, ethnicity, age or regardless of gender, race, ethnicity, age or socio-economic level…” (UNESCO) socio-economic level…” (UNESCO)

Sally Ejeilat, Giancarlo Muñoz, Juan Sebastián Your names, your names Benítez Your names, your names

Researchers/ Citizen’s Citizen’s Public order Researchers/ Public order Researchers/ Public order service Citizen’s Designers Designers service office Designers building service building building

-Knowledge of the legal -Knowledge of the legal -Knowledge of the legal situation situation situation -Identifying any legal -Identifying anylegal legal -Identifying any holdbacks holdbacks holdbacks

Researchers/ Researchers/ Researchers/ Designers Designers Designers

Final design of the of the Finaldesign design Final of the experiment experiment experiment

Researchers/ Researchers/ Kernerviertel Kernerviertel Researchers/ Kernerviertel Designers Residents Designers Residents Designers Residents

Perception of the neighPerception of the neighPerception of the neighbours towards the urban bourstowards towards theurban urban bours the gardening idea.

Most feasible gardeningidea. idea.Most Mostfeasible feasible gardening typologies to worktoonwork on typologies typologies to work on Neighbours Neighbours Neighbours approval approval approval

Integ r ate Re se rch sig / W T 2016/17 / sit Unyiver sittga y St tga&r t, P rof.

Aesty r/idPL e y /A nt P rof.

A ntma je Stok K at a r i na Bajc Ya si ne njid L en k a Vojtová // St rateg y De velopment Integ r ate d Re se adrch & aDe sig&n De / W T n2016/17 / Un iver St ut r t,utSI IL SI PÖ&//ILPPÖ rof.//A st r id L rof. je Stok n / Kma at n a r/i na Bajc / Ya si ne/ Mou st aMou njid ist/a L en ki a/ Vojtová // St r ateg y De velopment Modu leModu le Integ r ate d Re se a rch & De sig n / W T 2016/17 / Un iver sit y St ut tga r t, SI & IL PÖ // P rof. A st r id L e y / P rof. A nt je Stok ma n / K at a r i na Bajc / Ya si ne Mou st a njid i / L en k a Vojtová // St r ateg y De velopment Modu le

YES

YES YES

NO

NO NO

Researchers/ Researchers/ Researchers/ Designers Designers Designers

Preliminary design of Preliminary design Preliminary design ofof a proposal a proposal a proposal

Researchers/ CommunityCommunity Kernerviertel Researchers/ Kernerviertel Researchers/ Community Kernerviertel Designers committees Residents Designers committees Residents Designers committees Residents

-Community input input -Community -Community input -Comparison between our -Comparison between our -Comparison between our initial assumptions and initial assumptions and initial assumptions and community needs needs community community needs Neighbours Neighbours Neighbours approval approval approval

YESYES YESYES YESYES NONO NONO NONO

Researchers/ Kernerviertel Researchers/ Kernerviertel Researchers/ Kernerviertel Designers Residents Designers Residents Designers Residents

-Discarding unsuitable, unavailable -Discarding unsuitable, unavailable -Discarding unsuitable, unavailable land land land -Planned budget budget -Planned -Planned budget -Final proposal design ready for -Final proposal design ready -Final proposal design ready forfor implementation implementation implementation

Amt für Amt für Kernerviertel Tenant Organizers OrganizersLocal Funding Sponsors Sponsors Volunteers Volunteers Organizers Organizers Public Amt für Amt für Events planner Kernerviertel Tenant KernerviertelKernerviertel Negotiation/Negotiation/ Local Funding Public Events planner LocalFunding Funding Local Funding Amt Amt Kernerviertel Organizersbusinesses Local Funding Volunteers Organizers Kernerviertel organizations Stadtplanung und für Stadtplanung und für Residents farmers Tenant organizations organizations Stadtplanung und Residents Stadtplanung und Residents farmers MarketingNegotiation/ team businesses organizations Sponsors schools businesses Residents Marketing team Local businesses Events planner schools Public organizations Stadtplanung und Stadtplanung und Residents farmers organizations schools businesses Residents Marketing team businesses Stadterneuerung Stadterneuerung Stadterneuerung Stadterneuerung Stadterneuerung Stadterneuerung

-A new production activity -A new production activity -A-Interaction new production activity between neighbours (new internal social connections) -Interaction between neighbours (new internal social connections) -Interaction between neighbours -Local partnerships are created (new internal social connections)

Level ofLevel production/ interest interest and production/ and Level of of production/ interest and cooperation of neighbors cooperation neighbors cooperation of of neighbors

HIGH YES HIGH HIGH YESYES LOW NO LOW LOW NONO

-Set of new -Set of new -Set of new partners,partners, inventorsinventors partners, inventors -Refined economic/ BusinessBusiness model model Business model

Production, recreation Production, recreation Production, recreation and Social interaction Social interaction andand Social interaction in a localinlevel a local level in a local level

-Set of new -Setpartners, of new partners, -Set of new partners, inventorsinventors inventors -Refined economic/ BusinessBusiness model model Business model

Production, recreation Production, recreation Production, recreation and Social interaction Social interaction andand Social interaction in a localin and a local in a local andand external external level level external level

HIGH HIGH Model expansion/ Model expansion/ HIGH Model expansion/ SponsorsSponsors support/support/ Sponsors support/ Event attendance Event attendance LOW LOW Event attendance LOW

1

1

1

In order to complement the suitability analisis of the different semipublic and semiprivate spaces in Kernerviertel for the implementation of urban gardening, it was considered necessary to map the different typologies in terms of their general spatial features. By strolling, mapping and observing, categories were defined and illustrated to show the main characteristics and special variations.

1 WEEK

DESCRIPTION

ANALYSIS SPATIAL ANALYSIS

LEGAL ANALYSIS

Analysis of current physical situation

Analysis of laws and regulations regarding the land use

Frontyards

Identifying potential areas of intervention (Semi-public, Semi-private)

Researchers/ Designers

Public order office

Sealed area

F/O

Citizen’s service building

-Knowledge of the legal situation

Ca: Closed Alley

Cy/By/Ca

Cy/By/Ca

F/O

F/O

F/O

F: Fenced

O: Open

Semi-Public Spaces as Empty Spaces With Natural Elements

COURTYARDS ALLEYS FRONTYARDS

Planted frontyards

Private parking spots

Green area

Sealed area

Planted frontyards

Balconies

Inaccessible

Accessible

Inaccessible

Integ r ate d Re se a rch & De sig n / W T 2016/17 / Un iver sit y St ut tga r t, SI & IL PÖ // P rof. A st r id L e y / P rof. A nt je Stok ma n / K at a r i na Bajc / Ya si ne Mou st a njid i / L en k a Vojtová // St rateg y De velopment Modu le

: Entrance to buildings

Cy/By/Ca

F/O

F/O

Accessible

Inaccessible

Tunneled alley

Cy/By/Ca

F/O

O: Open

Accessible

Cy/By/Ca

Green division

Alleys

Courtyards Cy: Courtyard

Accessible

Semi-Public Spaces as Car Parking Spaces Balconies

Ca: Closed Alley

Cy/By/Ca

F: Fenced

Inaccessible

Balconies

Sealed area - 1 access

Divided sealed area - 2 accesses

Flat surface

Flat fenced surface

Internal smallF/O green F: Fenced area

Flat and green surface

-Identifying any legal holdbacks

Balconies

F/O

Private parking spots

: Entrance to buildings

Cy/By/Ca

By: Backyard

Cy/By/Ca

Frontyards

Semi-Public Spaces as Bike Parking Spaces Or Trash Container Areas Green area

Researchers/ Designers

By: Backyard

Cy/By/Ca

Civil society

Further analisis is needed to choose the most suitable typology for the pilot implementation.

Alleys Cy: Courtyard

Variations

OUTCOMES

Information

Public

Private

INDICATORS OF SUCCESS

Human

Semi-Public Spaces as Empty Spaces

Plan

Information

Portions of green and sealed areas are just illustrative.

Sections

STAKEHOLDERS

Human

These are general categorizations and do not reflect the actual size or shape of the blocks.

Cy: Courtyard

By: Backyard

Cy/By/Ca

Ca: Closed Alley

Cy/By/Ca

Cy/By/Ca

Plan

Internet research, Interviews with public officials

RESOURCES

TOOLS

Strolling, mapping, observation

Avaliability of information

Alleys

F/O

Internal º green area F/O 1 accessO: Open

F/O

Internal medium green area - 2 access

Steep green surface + bottom backyard

Steep green surface + top and bottom backyard

Variations

Accesibility to the site Not applicable

ANALYSIS DEVELOPMENT

PRECONDITION

Semi-Public Spaces as Car Parking Spaces

Frontyards

Plan

2 WEEKS

ACCORDING TO THE SPACE

Sections

Start

ACCORDING TO THE USE

Variations

SEMIPUBLIC & SEMIPRIVATE TYPOLOGIES KERNERVIERTEL

Sections

SPATIAL CONSEQUENCES

USING THE SEMIPUBLIC & SEMIPRIVATE SPACE FOR ENHANCING THE SOCIAL LIFE IN KERNERVIERTEL

Sally Ejeilat, Giancarlo Muñoz, Juan Sebastián Benítez

Tunneled alley

Green division

Balconies

Balconies

Balconies

Balconies

Balconies

Balconies

2

In order to complement the suitability analisis of the different semipublic and semiprivate spaces in Kernerviertel for the implementation of urban gardening, it was considered necessary to map the different typologies in terms of their general spatial features. By strolling, mapping and observing, categories were defined and illustrated to show the main characteristics and special variations.

1 WEEK

DESCRIPTION

ANALYSIS SPATIAL ANALYSIS

LEGAL ANALYSIS

Analysis of current physical situation

Analysis of laws and regulations regarding the land use

Frontyards

Identifying potential areas of intervention (Semi-public, Semi-private)

Researchers/ Designers

Public order office

Sealed area

F/O

Citizen’s service building

-Knowledge of the legal situation

Ca: Closed Alley

Cy/By/Ca

Cy/By/Ca

F/O

F/O

F/O

F: Fenced

O: Open

Semi-Public Spaces as Empty Spaces With Natural Elements

COURTYARDS ALLEYS FRONTYARDS

Planted frontyards

Private parking spots

Green area

Sealed area

Planted frontyards

Balconies

Inaccessible

Accessible

Inaccessible

Integ r ate d Re se a rch & De sig n / W T 2016/17 / Un iver sit y St ut tga r t, SI & IL PÖ // P rof. A st r id L e y / P rof. A nt je Stok ma n / K at a r i na Bajc / Ya si ne Mou st a njid i / L en k a Vojtová // St rateg y De velopment Modu le

: Entrance to buildings

Cy/By/Ca

F/O

F/O

Accessible

Inaccessible

Tunneled alley

Cy/By/Ca

F/O

O: Open

Accessible

Cy/By/Ca

Green division

Alleys

Courtyards Cy: Courtyard

Accessible

Semi-Public Spaces as Car Parking Spaces Balconies

Ca: Closed Alley

Cy/By/Ca

F: Fenced

Inaccessible

Balconies

Sealed area - 1 access

Divided sealed area - 2 accesses

Flat surface

Flat fenced surface

Internal smallF/O green F: Fenced area

Flat and green surface

-Identifying any legal holdbacks

Balconies

F/O

Private parking spots

: Entrance to buildings

Cy/By/Ca

By: Backyard

Cy/By/Ca

Frontyards

Semi-Public Spaces as Bike Parking Spaces Or Trash Container Areas Green area

Researchers/ Designers

By: Backyard

Cy/By/Ca

Civil society

Further analisis is needed to choose the most suitable typology for the pilot implementation.

Alleys Cy: Courtyard

Variations

OUTCOMES

Information

Public

Private

INDICATORS OF SUCCESS

Human

Semi-Public Spaces as Empty Spaces

Plan

Information

Portions of green and sealed areas are just illustrative.

Sections

STAKEHOLDERS

Human

These are general categorizations and do not reflect the actual size or shape of the blocks.

Cy: Courtyard

By: Backyard

Cy/By/Ca

Ca: Closed Alley

Cy/By/Ca

Cy/By/Ca

Plan

Internet research, Interviews with public officials

RESOURCES

TOOLS

Strolling, mapping, observation

Avaliability of information

Alleys

F/O

Internal º green area F/O 1 accessO: Open

F/O

Internal medium green area - 2 access

Steep green surface + bottom backyard

Steep green surface + top and bottom backyard

Variations

Accesibility to the site Not applicable

ANALYSIS DEVELOPMENT

PRECONDITION

Semi-Public Spaces as Car Parking Spaces

Frontyards

Plan

2 WEEKS

ACCORDING TO THE SPACE

Sections

Start

ACCORDING TO THE USE

Variations

SEMIPUBLIC & SEMIPRIVATE TYPOLOGIES KERNERVIERTEL

Sections

SPATIAL CONSEQUENCES

USING THE SEMIPUBLIC & SEMIPRIVATE SPACE FOR ENHANCING THE SOCIAL LIFE IN KERNERVIERTEL

Sally Ejeilat, Giancarlo Muñoz, Juan Sebastián Benítez

Tunneled alley

Green division

Balconies

Balconies

Balconies

Balconies

Balconies

Balconies

2

USING THE SEMIPUBLIC & SEMIPRIVATE SPACE FOR ENHANCING THE SOCIAL LIFE IN KERNERVIERTEL

Sally Ejeilat, Giancarlo Muñoz, Juan Sebastián Benítez

LOCATION 4 Alleys

Cy/By/Ca

Cy/By/Ca

Cy/By/Ca

2 WEEKS

Cy/By/Ca

STAKEHOLDERS OUTCOMES INDICATORS OF SUCCESS

Information

Budget

Material & Equipmet

Final design of the experiment

Researchers/ Designers

“These Bio-Vegetables were planted in Kernerviertel by one of your neighbors. Would you do the same?”

NO

Plan

Alleys

Courtyards Cy/By/Ca

Cy/By/Ca

Sections

SECTION

Cy/By/Ca Plan

Sections

Plan

Cy/By/Ca Cy/By/Ca

PLAN

Cy/By/Ca

ENGAGEMENT WITH THE COMMUNITY

DESIGN (STAGE 2)

First design approach to the implementa�on of urban agriculture in most suitable typologies

Analysis of the community needs, interests and opinions, Courtyards regarding the proposed design (urban agriculture)

Adding input of the neighbors to the proposal design (urban agriculture)

Processing of analysis and information

Community participation

Processing of community input, community participation

Strolling, Mapping, Brainstorming, Benchmarking

Surveys, introductory meetings, workshops, urban walks, activity mapping

Brainstorming, participatory planning, mapping of available land lent by the neighbours, benchmarking analysis

Variations

Sections Variations

Sections Variations

Variations

Sections Variations

Sections

Variations

Variations

Sections

Sections

DESIGN (STAGE 1)

Cy/By/Ca

Sections

Plan

Sections Variations

Plan

Sections

Plan

PICTURE

SECTION

Variations

Plan

PLAN

PICTURE

SECTION

Cy/By/Ca

Human

UNSUCCESSFUL ATTEMPT

LOCATION 3 Alley

YES

YES! I would love to do the same.

Sadly, I don‘t have time, but I would like to receive a weekly/ monthly vegetable basket for a reasonable price

Variations

Potential and suitability for the implementation of urban agriculture

Variations

Towards the idea of the urban agriculture.

Perception of the neighbours towards the urban gardening idea. Most feasible typologies to work on

Neighbours approval

Plan

Sections

Sections Plan

PLAN

Sections

SPATIAL TYPOLOGIES

Variations

SOCIAL PERCEPTION

Boxes filled with vegetables were prepared and located in different places around Kernerviertel. All of them had one statement and one question with three possible answers. Free vegetables were offered in exchange for answering the small survey.

Kernerviertel Residents

Cy/By/Ca

Cy/By/Ca

FAILED!

5 HOURS LATER...

2 MONTHS

Courtyards

UNDERSTAND

DESCRIPTION

Researchers/ Designers

Cy/By/Ca

Cy/By/Ca

Variations

Cy/By/Ca

Sections

ANALYZE

Variations

Strolling, selecting, placing

Cy/By/Ca

Frontyards Alleys

Frontyards

Courtyards

Variations

AIM OF THE EXPERIMENT TEST

Strolling, mapping, Brainstorming, Benchmarking

Human

Alleys Cy/By/Ca

Variations Sections EXPERIMENT DEVELOPMENT

PRECONDITION

Accesibility to the site Selected potential sites

RESOURCES

TOOLS

Processing of analysis and information

Sections

Frontyards

Plan

Tes�ng on different spa�al typologies and analysis of the percep�on towards the urban gardening ac�vity in Semi-Public and Semi-Private spaces.

Sections

Defini�on of preliminary ac�vity (urban gardening) based on own assump�ons and observa�ons.

Alleys Cy/By/Ca

Plan

EXPERIMENT IMPLEMENTATION

Variations

DESCRIPTION

Frontyards

EXPERIMENT DESIGN

3 MONTHS

PILOT DESIGN

Plan

Cy/By/Ca

Courtyards

Information from Current Situation Analysis

Knowledge

Space to Hold Meetings & Activities

Material & Equipmet

Human

PILOT DESIGN

Frontyards

PICTURE

Cy/By/Ca

Plan

Cy/By/Ca

Plan

Cy/By/Ca

EXPERIMENT

Courtyard

LOCATION 2

Courtyards

Plan

1 WEEK

Plan

1 WEEK

LOCATION 1

Alleys

Plan

Frontyards

Variations

EXPERIMENTING Urban Agriculture

Plan

SPATIAL CONSEQUENCES

SUCCESSFUL ATTEMPTS

Information from Current Situation Analysis

OUTCOME • As a result of the 3 successful attempts: • 6 people out of 8 manifested high willingness to the idea of urban gardening.

• 2 people out of 8 stated their lack of time but showed interest in buying local production frequently.

• No person manifested lack of interest in the idea of urban gardening.

• As a result of the unsuccessful attempt: • Some people were not very open to “strangers” in their courtyards.

• The experiment was not successful in some typologies, reason why it was not possible to prove the interest of some people in urban gardening. It is necessary to find another way to approach them.

• Even though there is a favorable tendency towards the idea of urban gardening in the neighborhood, the sample made is still very small.

Further scaling of testing and experiments are needed to give stronger support to the strategy implementation.

Researchers/ Designers

Preliminary design of a proposal

Kernerviertel Residents

Researchers/ Designers

Community committees

-Community input -Comparison between our initial assumptions and community needs

Neighbours approval

Kernerviertel Residents

Researchers/ Designers

-Discarding unsuitable, unavailable land -Planned budget -Final proposal design ready for implementation

YESYES NONO

I am not interested. I would rather buy it in the supermarket

Integ r ate d Re se a rch & De sig n / W T 2016/17 / Un iver sit y St ut tga r t, SI & IL PÖ // P rof. A st r id L e y / P rof. A nt je Stok ma n / K at a r i na Bajc / Ya si ne Mou st a njid i / L en k a Vojtová // St rateg y De velopment Modu le

3

USING THE SEMIPUBLIC & SEMIPRIVATE SPACE FOR ENHANCING THE SOCIAL LIFE IN KERNERVIERTEL

Sally Ejeilat, Giancarlo Muñoz, Juan Sebastián Benítez

LOCATION 4 Alleys

Cy/By/Ca

Cy/By/Ca

Cy/By/Ca

2 WEEKS

Cy/By/Ca

STAKEHOLDERS OUTCOMES INDICATORS OF SUCCESS

Information

Budget

Material & Equipmet

Final design of the experiment

Researchers/ Designers

“These Bio-Vegetables were planted in Kernerviertel by one of your neighbors. Would you do the same?”

NO

Plan

Alleys

Courtyards Cy/By/Ca

Cy/By/Ca

Sections

SECTION

Cy/By/Ca Plan

Sections

Plan

Cy/By/Ca Cy/By/Ca

PLAN

Cy/By/Ca

ENGAGEMENT WITH THE COMMUNITY

DESIGN (STAGE 2)

First design approach to the implementa�on of urban agriculture in most suitable typologies

Analysis of the community needs, interests and opinions, Courtyards regarding the proposed design (urban agriculture)

Adding input of the neighbors to the proposal design (urban agriculture)

Processing of analysis and information

Community participation

Processing of community input, community participation

Strolling, Mapping, Brainstorming, Benchmarking

Surveys, introductory meetings, workshops, urban walks, activity mapping

Brainstorming, participatory planning, mapping of available land lent by the neighbours, benchmarking analysis

Variations

Sections Variations

Sections Variations

Variations

Sections Variations

Sections

Variations

Variations

Sections

Sections

DESIGN (STAGE 1)

Cy/By/Ca

Sections

Plan

Sections Variations

Plan

Sections

Plan

PICTURE

SECTION

Variations

Plan

PLAN

PICTURE

SECTION

Cy/By/Ca

Human

UNSUCCESSFUL ATTEMPT

LOCATION 3 Alley

YES

YES! I would love to do the same.

Sadly, I don‘t have time, but I would like to receive a weekly/ monthly vegetable basket for a reasonable price

Variations

Potential and suitability for the implementation of urban agriculture

Variations

Towards the idea of the urban agriculture.

Perception of the neighbours towards the urban gardening idea. Most feasible typologies to work on

Neighbours approval

Plan

Sections

Sections Plan

PLAN

Sections

SPATIAL TYPOLOGIES

Variations

SOCIAL PERCEPTION

Boxes filled with vegetables were prepared and located in different places around Kernerviertel. All of them had one statement and one question with three possible answers. Free vegetables were offered in exchange for answering the small survey.

Kernerviertel Residents

Cy/By/Ca

Cy/By/Ca

FAILED!

5 HOURS LATER...

2 MONTHS

Courtyards

UNDERSTAND

DESCRIPTION

Researchers/ Designers

Cy/By/Ca

Cy/By/Ca

Variations

Cy/By/Ca

Sections

ANALYZE

Variations

Strolling, selecting, placing

Cy/By/Ca

Frontyards Alleys

Frontyards

Courtyards

Variations

AIM OF THE EXPERIMENT TEST

Strolling, mapping, Brainstorming, Benchmarking

Human

Alleys Cy/By/Ca

Variations Sections EXPERIMENT DEVELOPMENT

PRECONDITION

Accesibility to the site Selected potential sites

RESOURCES

TOOLS

Processing of analysis and information

Sections

Frontyards

Plan

Tes�ng on different spa�al typologies and analysis of the percep�on towards the urban gardening ac�vity in Semi-Public and Semi-Private spaces.

Sections

Defini�on of preliminary ac�vity (urban gardening) based on own assump�ons and observa�ons.

Alleys Cy/By/Ca

Plan

EXPERIMENT IMPLEMENTATION

Variations

DESCRIPTION

Frontyards

EXPERIMENT DESIGN

3 MONTHS

PILOT DESIGN

Plan

Cy/By/Ca

Courtyards

Information from Current Situation Analysis

Knowledge

Space to Hold Meetings & Activities

Material & Equipmet

Human

PILOT DESIGN

Frontyards

PICTURE

Cy/By/Ca

Plan

Cy/By/Ca

Plan

Cy/By/Ca

EXPERIMENT

Courtyard

LOCATION 2

Courtyards

Plan

1 WEEK

Plan

1 WEEK

LOCATION 1

Alleys

Plan

Frontyards

Variations

EXPERIMENTING Urban Agriculture

Plan

SPATIAL CONSEQUENCES

SUCCESSFUL ATTEMPTS

Information from Current Situation Analysis

OUTCOME • As a result of the 3 successful attempts: • 6 people out of 8 manifested high willingness to the idea of urban gardening.

• 2 people out of 8 stated their lack of time but showed interest in buying local production frequently.

• No person manifested lack of interest in the idea of urban gardening.

• As a result of the unsuccessful attempt: • Some people were not very open to “strangers” in their courtyards.

• The experiment was not successful in some typologies, reason why it was not possible to prove the interest of some people in urban gardening. It is necessary to find another way to approach them.

• Even though there is a favorable tendency towards the idea of urban gardening in the neighborhood, the sample made is still very small.

Further scaling of testing and experiments are needed to give stronger support to the strategy implementation.

Researchers/ Designers

Preliminary design of a proposal

Kernerviertel Residents

Researchers/ Designers

Community committees

-Community input -Comparison between our initial assumptions and community needs

Neighbours approval

Kernerviertel Residents

Researchers/ Designers

-Discarding unsuitable, unavailable land -Planned budget -Final proposal design ready for implementation

YESYES NONO

I am not interested. I would rather buy it in the supermarket

Integ r ate d Re se a rch & De sig n / W T 2016/17 / Un iver sit y St ut tga r t, SI & IL PÖ // P rof. A st r id L e y / P rof. A nt je Stok ma n / K at a r i na Bajc / Ya si ne Mou st a njid i / L en k a Vojtová // St rateg y De velopment Modu le

3

USING THE SEMIPUBLIC & SEMIPRIVATE SPACE FOR ENHANCING THE SOCIAL LIFE IN KERNERVIERTEL

Sally Ejeilat, Giancarlo Muñoz, Juan Sebastián Benítez

SPATIAL CONSEQUENCES

Vision

1 YEAR

IMPLEMENTATION

INDICATORS OF SUCCESS

OUTCOMES

STAKEHOLDERS

Available Land

Kernerviertel Residents

Equipment, Seeds & Raw Materials

Tenant farmers

Knowledge

Organizers

Budget

Local businesses

Incentive Package

Funding organizations

Amt für Stadtplanung und Stadterneuerung

-A new production activity -Interaction between neighbours (new internal social connections) -Local partnerships are created

Level of production/ interest and cooperation of neighbors

HIGH YES LOW NO

OUTCOMES

Urban gardening, technical workshops individual support

IMPLEMENTATION DEVELOPMENT

DESCRIPTION PRECONDITION

Approved design, approved funding, defined intervention spaces

RESOURCES

Implementing individual & communal urban gardens, provide technical knowledge

TOOLS

IMPLEMENTATION LAUNCHING

Gathering spaces Shared working spaces facilitate social encounters and spontaneous gatherings between neighbours and tenant farmers Multiple uses Urban gardening activities can be performed without modifying existing uses given to the space such as parking or trash storage Reactivation of underused areas Urban gardening offers a new purpose to otherwise abandoned and underused spaces

Integ r ate d Re se a rch & De sig n / W T 2016/17 / Un iver sit y St ut tga r t, SI & IL PÖ // P rof. A st r id L e y / P rof. A nt je Stok ma n / K at a r i na Bajc / Ya si ne Mou st a njid i / L en k a Vojtová // St rateg y De velopment Modu le

Adaptability The large variety of existing planting methods allows urban gardening to be implemented under different conditions even if there are limitations such as no natural soil available or limited exposure to sunlight.

Improvement of environmental and spatial qualities Besides creating a pleasant atmosphere and giving aesthetic qualities to the spaces between buildings, urban farming contributes to the enhancement of the environmental qualities on a micro level.

4

USING THE SEMIPUBLIC & SEMIPRIVATE SPACE FOR ENHANCING THE SOCIAL LIFE IN KERNERVIERTEL

Sally Ejeilat, Giancarlo Muñoz, Juan Sebastián Benítez

SPATIAL CONSEQUENCES

Vision

1 YEAR

IMPLEMENTATION

INDICATORS OF SUCCESS

OUTCOMES

STAKEHOLDERS

Available Land

Kernerviertel Residents

Equipment, Seeds & Raw Materials

Tenant farmers

Knowledge

Organizers

Budget

Local businesses

Incentive Package

Funding organizations

Amt für Stadtplanung und Stadterneuerung

-A new production activity -Interaction between neighbours (new internal social connections) -Local partnerships are created

Level of production/ interest and cooperation of neighbors

HIGH YES LOW NO

OUTCOMES

Urban gardening, technical workshops individual support

IMPLEMENTATION DEVELOPMENT

DESCRIPTION PRECONDITION

Approved design, approved funding, defined intervention spaces

RESOURCES

Implementing individual & communal urban gardens, provide technical knowledge

TOOLS

IMPLEMENTATION LAUNCHING

Gathering spaces Shared working spaces facilitate social encounters and spontaneous gatherings between neighbours and tenant farmers Multiple uses Urban gardening activities can be performed without modifying existing uses given to the space such as parking or trash storage Reactivation of underused areas Urban gardening offers a new purpose to otherwise abandoned and underused spaces

Integ r ate d Re se a rch & De sig n / W T 2016/17 / Un iver sit y St ut tga r t, SI & IL PÖ // P rof. A st r id L e y / P rof. A nt je Stok ma n / K at a r i na Bajc / Ya si ne Mou st a njid i / L en k a Vojtová // St rateg y De velopment Modu le

Adaptability The large variety of existing planting methods allows urban gardening to be implemented under different conditions even if there are limitations such as no natural soil available or limited exposure to sunlight.

Improvement of environmental and spatial qualities Besides creating a pleasant atmosphere and giving aesthetic qualities to the spaces between buildings, urban farming contributes to the enhancement of the environmental qualities on a micro level.

4

The activity of urban gardning proves to be succesful and highly replicable in other parts of the neighbourhood, exponentially increasing social interaction between neighbors as well as spatial relations between segregated and underused areas. The linkage of this productive clusters with the existing vehicular and pedestrian flows allows the creation of a network that facilitates the exchange of knowledge and goods between neighbours and external partners In a second stage of expansion new strategic partnerships with new stakeholders (such as the private and public schools) are being made as new activities are introduced, which might include: urban gardening workshops, Saturday ma activation of communal kitchens, farming related conferences, among others, which are to be organized periodically, either in an isolated manner or simultaneously as part of a major event such as a Seasonal Neighbourhood Festival

SPATIAL CONSEQUENCES

2 YEARS

OUTCOMES

New ac�vi�es introduced: Neighbourhood fes�val

Phase 3 showing positive indicators of success, contracts approved

Community participation, technical knowledge, funding

Indicators of success of phase 3 showing strong fundations for growing.

Canvas business model, negotiation, stakeholder mapping, market analysis

Metodology design, workshops, marketing

Canvas business model, negotiation, stakeholder mapping, market analysis

Knowledge

Kernerviertel Residents

Incentive Package

Volunteers

Knowledge

Organizers

-Set of new partners, inventors -Refined economic/ Business model

Material & Equipmet

Funding organizations

Budget

Sponsors

Production, recreation and Social interaction in a local level

Knowledge

Negotiation/ Marketing team

Incentive Package

Local businesses

PRECONDITION

New local and city level partnerships created

TOOLS

New ac�vi�es activities introduced: New introduced: Communal Kitchens, Hands-on workshops, Comweekly munal markets, Kitchens,knowledge Saturday exchange, conferences, markets, knowledgenew channels communication exchange,ofconferences, new channels of communica�on

Strong alliances, appropriate funding, legal ground available

Marketing, event planning, event design, benchmarking analysis

Working Force

Events planner

-Set of new partners, inventors -Refined economic/ Business model

Available Land

Public schools

Budget

Amt für Stadtplanung und Stadterneuerung

Production, recreation and Social interaction in a local and external level

Model expansion/ HIGH Sponsors support/ Event attendance LOW

Integ r ate d Re se a rch & De sig n / W T 2016/17 / Un iver sit y St ut tga r t, SI & IL PÖ // P rof. A st r id L e y / P rof. A nt je Stok ma n / K at a r i na Bajc / Ya si ne Mou st a njid i / L en k a Vojtová // St rateg y De velopment Modu le

RESOURCES

Crea�ng new local partnerships

STAKEHOLDERS

NEW CITY SCALE ACTIVITIES

OUTCOMES

NEW EXTERNAL PARTNERSHIPS

INDICATORS OF SUCCESS

NEW LOCAL SCALE ACTIVITIES

GROWTH AND EXPANSION DEVELOPMENT

STAKEHOLDERS

RESOURCES

TOOLS

PRECONDITION

DESCRIPTION

NEW LOCAL PARTNERSHIPS

NEW LOCAL PARTNERSHIPS

NEW LOCAL SCALE ACTIVITIES

ƌĞĂƟŶŐ ŶĞǁ ůŽĐĂů ƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŚŝƉƐ

EĞǁ ĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐ ŝŶƚƌŽĚƵĐĞĚ͗ ,ĂŶĚƐͲŽŶ ǁŽƌŬƐŚŽƉƐ͕ ŽŵͲ ŵƵŶĂů <ŝƚĐŚĞŶƐ͕ ^ĂƚƵƌĚĂLJ ŵĂƌŬĞƚƐ͕ ŬŶŽǁůĞĚŐĞ ĞdžĐŚĂŶŐĞ͕ ĐŽŶĨĞƌĞŶĐĞƐ͕ ŶĞǁ ĐŚĂŶŶĞůƐ ŽĨ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝĐĂƟŽŶ

Phase 3 showing positive indicators of success, contracts approved

Community participation, technical knowledge, funding

Canvas business model, negotiation, stakeholder mapping, market analysis

Metodology design, workshops, marketing

Knowledge

Kernerviertel Residents

Incentive Package

Volunteers

Knowledge

Material & Equipmet

Organizers

Funding organizations

-Set of new partners, inventors -Refined economic/ Business model

Budget

Sponsors

Production, recreation and Social interaction in a local level

Model expansion/ HIGH Sponsors support/ Event attendance LOW

Scenario

NEW EXTERNALThe PARTNERSHIPS

NEW CITY SCALE activity of urban gardeACTIVITIES ning proves to be succesful and EĞǁ ůŽĐĂů ĂŶĚ EĞǁ ĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐ ĐŝƚLJ ůĞǀĞů highly replicable ŝŶƚƌŽĚƵĐĞĚ͗ in other parts ƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŚŝƉƐ of the EĞŝŐŚďŽƵƌŚŽŽĚ neighbourhood, expoĐƌĞĂƚĞĚ ĨĞƐƟǀĂů nentially increasing social interaction between neighbors Indicators of success Strong alliances, as well as spatial relations betof phase 3 showing appropriate funding, ween legal ground available segregated and underustrong fundations for growing. sed areas. The linkage of this

clusters with the Canvas businessproductive Marketing, model, negotiation, planning, and pedestexistingevent vehicular stakeholder mapping, event design, allows the creation market analysisrian flows benchmarking analysis of a network that facilitates the exchange of knowledge and goods between neighbours and external partners. In a sestageAvailable of expansion new IncentivecondWorking Budget Knowledge Package Force Land strategic partnerships with new stakeholders (such as the private and public schools) are being made as new activities are introduced, which might include: urban gardening workshops, Saturday markets, activation of communal kitchens, farming related confeProduction, others, recreation which -Set of new partners, rences, among inventors and Social interaction are to be inorganized periodical-Refined economic/ a local and external Business model level ly, either in an isolated manner or simultaneously as part of a major event such as a Seasonal Neighbourhood Festival

GROWTH AND EXPANSION DEVELOPMENT

DESCRIPTION

8 YEARS

GROWTH AND EXPANSION

INDICATORS OF SUCCESS

8 YEARS

GROWTH AND EXPANSION

2 YEARS

Sally Ejeilat, Giancarlo Muñoz, Juan Sebastián Benítez

Scenario

SPATIAL CONSEQUENCES

USING THE SEMIPUBLIC & SEMIPRIVATE SPACE FOR ENHANCING THE SOCIAL LIFE IN KERNERVIERTEL

USING THE SEMIPUBLIC & SEMIPRIVATE SPACE FOR ENHANCING THE SOCIAL LIFE IN KERNERVIERTEL

Negotiation/ Marketing team

Local businesses

Events planner

Public schools

Google Earth Pro 7.1.5.1557

Amt für Stadtplanung und Stadterneuerung

Urban gardening

Local market

Base map source: Google Earth Pro V 7.1.5.1557. (23 June, 2016). Kernerviertel, Stuttgart. 48º47’11.79” N, 9º11’37.89” E , Eye alt 1352 feet. Image Landsat, Copernicus. http://www.earth.google.com [February 26, 2017].

Workshops

Integ r ate d Re se a rch & De sig n / W T 2016/17 / Un iver sit y St ut tga r t, SI & IL PÖ // P rof. A st r id L e y / P rof. A nt je Stok ma n / K at a r i na Bajc / Ya si ne Mou st a njid i / L en k a Vojtová // St r ateg y De velopment Modu le

Conclusions

- The first approach with the neighbors shows a favorable tendency to approve the introduction of urban gardening in Kernerviertel. Scaling and involvement of a representative sample is needed for further analysis and stronger conclusions regarding the neighbors interest towards the idea.

- Continuous involvement and feedback of the neighbors is necessary in all the stages of the strategy and represents the most important asset for the success of the project.

- Strong connections and good relations are needed between public and private stakeholders.

- Already existing incentives given by the municipality provides the project with a strong base for the startup.

- Further research is needed for analyzing the suitability of the different spatial typologies for implementing the urban gardening in terms technical aspects as exposure to sunlight during the year, quality of soil, among others.

References

- Deutsches Rotes Kreuz [online] Available at: https://www.drk.de/en/ - Drieënhuizen, R. and Leferink, N. (2014). Means to stimulate the semi-public space in the architectural realm of dwelling. Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Architecture, Dwelling Graduation Studio, Dutch Housing Studio, p. 126.

- Fleet Farming [online] Available at: http://fleetfarming.org/ - Investopedia, Private Sector. [online] Available at: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/private-sector.asp [Accessed Jan. 2017].

- Muñoz, G. and Gaietto, G. (2016). Office of Public Order affairs, relations and alliances.

- Netzwerke 21, Die Netzwerke. [online] Available at: http://netzwerke-21.de/?page_id=5 - Pierre, J. (1999) Models of Urban Governance. The Institutional Dimension of Urban Politics. Scotland: University of Strathclyde - Prinzessinengarten [online] Available at: http://prinzessinnengarten.net/ Stuttgart.de [online] Available at: https://www.stuttgart.de/ [Accessed Dec. 2016].

- Stuttgart.de, Programm für mehr Grün in der Stadt [online] Available at: https://www.stuttgart.de/ [Accessed Feb. 2017].

- UNESCO.org, Inclusion Through Access to Public Space. [online] Available at: http://www.unesco.org/ new/en/social-and-human-sciences/themes/urban-development/migrants-inclusion-in-cities/goodpractices/inclusion-through-access-to-public-space/ - Zimmermann, A. and Maennling, C. (2007) Multi-stakeholder management: Tools for Stakeholder Analysis: 10 building blocks for designing participatory systems of cooperation. Eschborn, Germany: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit.

5

The activity of urban gardning proves to be succesful and highly replicable in other parts of the neighbourhood, exponentially increasing social interaction between neighbors as well as spatial relations between segregated and underused areas. The linkage of this productive clusters with the existing vehicular and pedestrian flows allows the creation of a network that facilitates the exchange of knowledge and goods between neighbours and external partners In a second stage of expansion new strategic partnerships with new stakeholders (such as the private and public schools) are being made as new activities are introduced, which might include: urban gardening workshops, Saturday ma activation of communal kitchens, farming related conferences, among others, which are to be organized periodically, either in an isolated manner or simultaneously as part of a major event such as a Seasonal Neighbourhood Festival

SPATIAL CONSEQUENCES

2 YEARS

OUTCOMES

New ac�vi�es introduced: Neighbourhood fes�val

Phase 3 showing positive indicators of success, contracts approved

Community participation, technical knowledge, funding

Indicators of success of phase 3 showing strong fundations for growing.

Canvas business model, negotiation, stakeholder mapping, market analysis

Metodology design, workshops, marketing

Canvas business model, negotiation, stakeholder mapping, market analysis

Knowledge

Kernerviertel Residents

Incentive Package

Volunteers

Knowledge

Organizers

-Set of new partners, inventors -Refined economic/ Business model

Material & Equipmet

Funding organizations

Budget

Sponsors

Production, recreation and Social interaction in a local level

Knowledge

Negotiation/ Marketing team

Incentive Package

Local businesses

PRECONDITION

New local and city level partnerships created

TOOLS

New ac�vi�es activities introduced: New introduced: Communal Kitchens, Hands-on workshops, Comweekly munal markets, Kitchens,knowledge Saturday exchange, conferences, markets, knowledgenew channels communication exchange,ofconferences, new channels of communica�on

Strong alliances, appropriate funding, legal ground available

Marketing, event planning, event design, benchmarking analysis

Working Force

Events planner

-Set of new partners, inventors -Refined economic/ Business model

Available Land

Public schools

Budget

Amt für Stadtplanung und Stadterneuerung

Production, recreation and Social interaction in a local and external level

Model expansion/ HIGH Sponsors support/ Event attendance LOW

Integ r ate d Re se a rch & De sig n / W T 2016/17 / Un iver sit y St ut tga r t, SI & IL PÖ // P rof. A st r id L e y / P rof. A nt je Stok ma n / K at a r i na Bajc / Ya si ne Mou st a njid i / L en k a Vojtová // St rateg y De velopment Modu le

RESOURCES

Crea�ng new local partnerships

STAKEHOLDERS

NEW CITY SCALE ACTIVITIES

OUTCOMES

NEW EXTERNAL PARTNERSHIPS

INDICATORS OF SUCCESS

NEW LOCAL SCALE ACTIVITIES

GROWTH AND EXPANSION DEVELOPMENT

STAKEHOLDERS

RESOURCES

TOOLS

PRECONDITION

DESCRIPTION

NEW LOCAL PARTNERSHIPS

NEW LOCAL PARTNERSHIPS

NEW LOCAL SCALE ACTIVITIES

ƌĞĂƟŶŐ ŶĞǁ ůŽĐĂů ƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŚŝƉƐ

EĞǁ ĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐ ŝŶƚƌŽĚƵĐĞĚ͗ ,ĂŶĚƐͲŽŶ ǁŽƌŬƐŚŽƉƐ͕ ŽŵͲ ŵƵŶĂů <ŝƚĐŚĞŶƐ͕ ^ĂƚƵƌĚĂLJ ŵĂƌŬĞƚƐ͕ ŬŶŽǁůĞĚŐĞ ĞdžĐŚĂŶŐĞ͕ ĐŽŶĨĞƌĞŶĐĞƐ͕ ŶĞǁ ĐŚĂŶŶĞůƐ ŽĨ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝĐĂƟŽŶ

Phase 3 showing positive indicators of success, contracts approved

Community participation, technical knowledge, funding

Canvas business model, negotiation, stakeholder mapping, market analysis

Metodology design, workshops, marketing

Knowledge

Kernerviertel Residents

Incentive Package

Volunteers

Knowledge

Material & Equipmet

Organizers

Funding organizations

-Set of new partners, inventors -Refined economic/ Business model

Budget

Sponsors

Production, recreation and Social interaction in a local level

Model expansion/ HIGH Sponsors support/ Event attendance LOW

Scenario

NEW EXTERNALThe PARTNERSHIPS

NEW CITY SCALE activity of urban gardeACTIVITIES ning proves to be succesful and EĞǁ ůŽĐĂů ĂŶĚ EĞǁ ĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐ ĐŝƚLJ ůĞǀĞů highly replicable ŝŶƚƌŽĚƵĐĞĚ͗ in other parts ƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŚŝƉƐ of the EĞŝŐŚďŽƵƌŚŽŽĚ neighbourhood, expoĐƌĞĂƚĞĚ ĨĞƐƟǀĂů nentially increasing social interaction between neighbors Indicators of success Strong alliances, as well as spatial relations betof phase 3 showing appropriate funding, ween legal ground available segregated and underustrong fundations for growing. sed areas. The linkage of this

clusters with the Canvas businessproductive Marketing, model, negotiation, planning, and pedestexistingevent vehicular stakeholder mapping, event design, allows the creation market analysisrian flows benchmarking analysis of a network that facilitates the exchange of knowledge and goods between neighbours and external partners. In a sestageAvailable of expansion new IncentivecondWorking Budget Knowledge Package Force Land strategic partnerships with new stakeholders (such as the private and public schools) are being made as new activities are introduced, which might include: urban gardening workshops, Saturday markets, activation of communal kitchens, farming related confeProduction, others, recreation which -Set of new partners, rences, among inventors and Social interaction are to be inorganized periodical-Refined economic/ a local and external Business model level ly, either in an isolated manner or simultaneously as part of a major event such as a Seasonal Neighbourhood Festival

GROWTH AND EXPANSION DEVELOPMENT

DESCRIPTION

8 YEARS

GROWTH AND EXPANSION

INDICATORS OF SUCCESS

8 YEARS

GROWTH AND EXPANSION

2 YEARS

Sally Ejeilat, Giancarlo Muñoz, Juan Sebastián Benítez

Scenario

SPATIAL CONSEQUENCES

USING THE SEMIPUBLIC & SEMIPRIVATE SPACE FOR ENHANCING THE SOCIAL LIFE IN KERNERVIERTEL

USING THE SEMIPUBLIC & SEMIPRIVATE SPACE FOR ENHANCING THE SOCIAL LIFE IN KERNERVIERTEL

Negotiation/ Marketing team

Local businesses

Events planner

Public schools

Google Earth Pro 7.1.5.1557

Amt für Stadtplanung und Stadterneuerung

Urban gardening

Local market

Base map source: Google Earth Pro V 7.1.5.1557. (23 June, 2016). Kernerviertel, Stuttgart. 48º47’11.79” N, 9º11’37.89” E , Eye alt 1352 feet. Image Landsat, Copernicus. http://www.earth.google.com [February 26, 2017].

Workshops

Integ r ate d Re se a rch & De sig n / W T 2016/17 / Un iver sit y St ut tga r t, SI & IL PÖ // P rof. A st r id L e y / P rof. A nt je Stok ma n / K at a r i na Bajc / Ya si ne Mou st a njid i / L en k a Vojtová // St r ateg y De velopment Modu le

Conclusions

- The first approach with the neighbors shows a favorable tendency to approve the introduction of urban gardening in Kernerviertel. Scaling and involvement of a representative sample is needed for further analysis and stronger conclusions regarding the neighbors interest towards the idea.

- Continuous involvement and feedback of the neighbors is necessary in all the stages of the strategy and represents the most important asset for the success of the project.

- Strong connections and good relations are needed between public and private stakeholders.

- Already existing incentives given by the municipality provides the project with a strong base for the startup.

- Further research is needed for analyzing the suitability of the different spatial typologies for implementing the urban gardening in terms technical aspects as exposure to sunlight during the year, quality of soil, among others.

References

- Deutsches Rotes Kreuz [online] Available at: https://www.drk.de/en/ - Drieënhuizen, R. and Leferink, N. (2014). Means to stimulate the semi-public space in the architectural realm of dwelling. Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Architecture, Dwelling Graduation Studio, Dutch Housing Studio, p. 126.

- Fleet Farming [online] Available at: http://fleetfarming.org/ - Investopedia, Private Sector. [online] Available at: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/private-sector.asp [Accessed Jan. 2017].

- Muñoz, G. and Gaietto, G. (2016). Office of Public Order affairs, relations and alliances.

- Netzwerke 21, Die Netzwerke. [online] Available at: http://netzwerke-21.de/?page_id=5 - Pierre, J. (1999) Models of Urban Governance. The Institutional Dimension of Urban Politics. Scotland: University of Strathclyde - Prinzessinengarten [online] Available at: http://prinzessinnengarten.net/ Stuttgart.de [online] Available at: https://www.stuttgart.de/ [Accessed Dec. 2016].

- Stuttgart.de, Programm für mehr Grün in der Stadt [online] Available at: https://www.stuttgart.de/ [Accessed Feb. 2017].

- UNESCO.org, Inclusion Through Access to Public Space. [online] Available at: http://www.unesco.org/ new/en/social-and-human-sciences/themes/urban-development/migrants-inclusion-in-cities/goodpractices/inclusion-through-access-to-public-space/ - Zimmermann, A. and Maennling, C. (2007) Multi-stakeholder management: Tools for Stakeholder Analysis: 10 building blocks for designing participatory systems of cooperation. Eschborn, Germany: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit.

5