Issuu

JOSHUA YATES

contents new construction

the brooklyn zinc prospect heights 3 family the clinton hall

conversions

p 42

the billiard factory lofts

renovations

p 60

395 bleecker street 218 / 220 park place project index

p 82

new construction

the brooklyn zinc 313 st. marks avenue brooklyn, n.y. s3arcitecture 2/2012 - 2/2018 85,000 square feet 75 units phases; sd,dd,cd,ca

prospect heights 3 family 730 bergen street brookyn, n.y. s3arcitecture 2/2012 - 11/2018 5,100 square feet 3 units phases; sd,dd,id,cd,ca

the clinton hall 269 washington avenue & 238 hall street brooklyn, n.y. s3arcitecture 11/2011 - 12/2017 9.858 square feet 20 units phases; sd,dd,id,cd,ca landmarks 3

corrugated zinc facade punctuated by joy yellow â€œeye-lidâ€? solar shades

the brooklyn zinc 313 st. marks avenue, bklyn

PROJECT BREAKDOWN TYPE New Construction CLASS Residential LOCATION Brooklyn N.Y. LOT AREA 22,012 SF PROJECT AREA 85,000 SF PROJECT HEIGHT 50’ (4 Stories) UNIT COUNT 75 PARKING SPACES 38 YEARS ACTIVE 2/2012 - 2/2018

Located directly across the street from The Billiard Factory, this ground-up project was for the same development firm and had some similar characteristics. The site was a long time neighborhood parking lot on grade, the 31,000 square foot through block lot has frontages on both St. Marks Avenue and Bergen Street. This was a result of the reworked street grid in Prospect Heights that has affected many building in the neighborhood, including The Billiard Factory. This site was an odd shape and could best be described as a deflated 11 point ( 12 sided? ) star. The frontage along St. Marks Avenue was a substantial 121.8 linear feet, accounting for just over 25% of the entire block’s frontage, this building massing of proposed building volume

was going to have an major impact on a block that was already seeing quite a bit of change. Conversely, the frontage along Bergen Street was a meager 16.25 foot, the blunt end of a wedge. The implications of the required rear yard equivalent for a throughlot automatically lead us to deduce that we would be dividing the lot into two separate lots. One lot would be for a large apartment building on St. Marks and the second lot for a smaller apartment building on Bergen Street, more in the scale of the neighboring multi-family townhomes. For this project we were dealing with R6B zoning, 2.0 FAR, 60% lot coverage, 40’ maximum base height and a 50’ maximum building height. The additional parameters we would contend with on this project were sub-grade parking,which was required due to the potential number of units and the inclusion of affordable housing units. The aforementioned deflated star shape of the original site meant that we would not be able to divide the depth of the site evenly. Instead it would have to be a very deep building in order to maximize our allowable square foot, we would therefore have a winding double loaded corridor that wrapped around the courtyard. But since we had dealt with this on the Billiard Factory project we were well versed in the repercussions of this situation. The site’s configuration winds behind neighboring lots’ rear 6

tax map of site showing proposed zoning lot division

yards, demanding that we also provide a side-rear yard to comply with rearyard set backs as per zoning code. With the addition of the eastern wing holding a double loaded corridor the shape of our building went from a doughnut to a coffee cup.

the site had been an on grade parking lot for decades prior to construction

preliminary foundation work and excavation

completed decking at ground floor

The building contains 75 units, ranging from studios to three bedroom units, with 15 of them allocated to affordable housing. 75% of the units feature private outdoor space consisting of either private ground floor yards, terraces, and/or balconies. For the units not provided with private outdoor space there is ample public outdoor space provided at the rearyard, the inner courtyard as well as the roof, and if a tenant was so inclined, there are also private “cabana” spaces on the roof that can be included in one’s lease. For this project we also chose to situate the public amenities on the top floor allowing for open airy views within the public spaces accessible to the whole community of residences but also allowing us to keep the number of units on the top floor at 11. This in turn allowed us to take advantage of the corridor density regulation that permits builders to write off 50% of corridor square footage. Along with the other 50% of corridor on this floor and every other floor (which we could write off for providing natural light at vertical core) we gained another 1000 rentable square feet—2 rentable units. This is a prime 7

second floor plan

roof plan

ground floor plan

cellar plan

third floor plan

fourth floor plan

rendering of proposed st marks avenue facade design

example of how an architect can use the building code to benefit both the builder and the renter rather than the code being detrimental to both. The front facade of the building is another study, this one in the allocation of resources and the benefits one can reap from it. The Brooklyn Zinc is a rental building and that usually implies a certain construction budget, but the one place an architect can get a developer to really spend money is on the front facade of a building. As the ‘face’ of the building it is a seen as advertising and helps the developer create a sense of place; differentiating the look of the facade helps to rent apartments in a crowded and sometimes nondescript market. Knowing this, we choose to accentuate the building face, to play up the idea of a facade as just a scrim, a thin curtain draped upon the building’s front. This concept took us to rainscreens with which we knew we could achieve the perceptible thinness we hoped to convey. Along with the thin attributes of the facade we also wanted to emphasis the sweeping length of the building’s frontage. This idea lead us to corrugated zinc paneling, a clean contemporary take on an industrial material. Zinc is self healing and can be easily bent and curved to achieve a smooth undulating form to match the building’s massing. In addition, the horizontally run corrugation exaggerated the sweep and length of the building and the lap joints of the panels allowed for a visual understanding of the material’s thinness. The corrugated 11

completed st marks avenue facade

zinc rainscreen also allowed us to push the facade back at the fourth floor to accommodate the building set back. We achieved this effect by simply “tearing” the scrim like a sheet of paper. We employed a complementary peel at the ground floor to create the building entrance, thereby using the lines of corrugation to draw you into the building. To create further balance from the top of building to the bottom, we wrapped the center portion of the ground floor in a dark, honed, concrete panel. This material is a bit more resilient to the everyday wear and tear at the street level and it helped to mirror the massing of the fourth floor with it’s “dormer” and set back. Having landed on a facade concept that was pretty monolithic both in terms of material and coloring we wanted to balance it by injecting a more playful aspect. We started by staggering the windows horizontally from floor to floor, again emphasizing the length of the facade. Next we conceived of a solar shade or “eyelid” to wrap the windows. This added another layer of shadow play that was begun by the corrugated zinc and finished by creating pockets of depth in our intentionally thin facade. Designed to bounce early morning light into the units, the asymmetrical eyelids permit low winter sunlight in while providing shade from high summer sun. Painted white on the interior face, the shades reflect light within the building. The exterior face of the shades were painted in a “Joy” yellow to add a hint of whimsy to the cool grey palette of 13

aerial view of building mid construction

building section looking west, cutting through main portion of building at the central courtyard

the zinc. By juxtaposing the shades and the corrugation we allowed the eye a clearer reading of the zinc’s profile and depth, so that the curves became visible as more than just horizontal lines. The facade design became such an essential part of the building that it seemed only natural that the building take the name of it’s material, hence, The Brooklyn Zinc. The cellar provides ample parking for more than the required 38 spots. It also features a laundry room with industrial sized washers and dryers to supplement the ones in each apartment, as well as a “pet spa”, an amenity that has become quite popular in newer buildings throughout the borough. The ground floor of the building contains the buildings entry and lobby with a desk for a doorman, a mail room, package storage and 20 units, half of which are duplexes with rooms in the cellar as well as view of central courtyard

building section looking west, cutting through eastern wing of building at rearyards

direct access to the parking garage. There is access to the public inner court, the double elevator bank, two remote stairwells, a small seating lounge and entry to the +7400 square foot rear yard. The second floor is home to 23 units and the third floor to another 22. The fourth and final floor contains 10 units, each with their own outdoor terrace or balcony, and a large amenity space with an array of programming from a gym to a screening room as well as a lounge and a full kitchen.

ZINC COPING

STEEL CLEAT

FLASHING

J-CHANNEL

5 8"

DENSGLASS

3" G90 GALVANIZED Z-CLIP

1 12" ROXUL STONE WOOL INSULATION ON STICK PINS

LIQUID APPLIED VAPOR PERMEABLE LIQUID APPLIED VAPOR PERMEABLE AIR / WEATHER BARRIER AIR / WEATHER BARRIER

5/8" DENSDECK MINIMUM 2' ABOVE SLAB

CAP FLASHING W/ CLEAT

CONCRETE ROOF TILE CAP FLASHINGON W/ LEVELERS CLEAT

CONTINUOUS FLASHINGS

CONTINUOUS FLASHINGS 5 8" DENSDECK COVERBOARD

SBS RIGHT ANGLE FLASHING WOOD BLOCKING, AS PER FIRESTONE SBS DETAIL

SBS RIGHT ANGLE FLASHING SBS ROOFING SYSTEM MANU. SBS ROOFING SYSTEM MANU. WOOD BLOCKING, AS PER VAPOR BARRIER VAPOR BARRIER FIRESTONE SBS DETAIL

3" G90 GALVANIZED Z-CLIP

AIRSPACE

FLEXIBLE FLASHING OVER POUR STOP AND CONCRETE

1 12" ROXUL STONE WOOL INSULATION ON STICK PINS

5/8" DENSDECK MINIMUM 2' ABOVE SLAB

CONCRETE ROOF TILE ON LEVELERS

STAGGERED / SLOPED INSULATION BOARD MIN 2"

CORRUGATED ZINC PANEL; OR SOLID AND PERFORATED

1 12" ROXUL STONE WOOL INSULATION ON STICK PINS

LIQUID APPLIED VAPOR PERMEABLE LIQUID APPLIED VAPOR PERMEABLE AIR / WEATHER BARRIER AIR / WEATHER BARRIER

SBS ROOFING

3" G90 GALVANIZED Z-CLIP

FLEXIBLE FLASHING WHERE FLEXIBLE FLASHING WHERE DENSDECK & DENSGLASS MEET, DENSDECK & DENSGLASS MEET, TYP. TYP.

CORRUGATED ZINC PANEL; OR SOLID AND PERFORATED

DENSGLASS

CORRUGATED ZINC PANEL; CORRUGATED ZINC PANEL; BOTH SOLID OR PERFORATED BOTH SOLID OR PERFORATED

3" G90 GALVANIZED Z-CLIP

1 12" ROXUL STONE WOOL INSULATION ON STICK PINS

5 8"

DENSGLASS

SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH AIR & WEATHER BARRIER, TYP.AIR & WEATHER BARRIER, TYP.

CORRUGATED ZINC PANEL; CORRUGATED ZINC PANEL; BOTH SOLID OR PERFORATED BOTH SOLID OR PERFORATED

521" FOIL FACED BATT INSULATION 521" FOIL FACED BATT INSULATION

SBS ROOFING 5

CONTINUOUS FLASHINGS

5/8" DENSDECK MINIMUM 2' ABOVE SLAB

CONTINUOUS FLASHINGS

DENSDECK COVERBOARD STAGGERED / SLOPED INSULATION BOARD MIN 2"

CAP FLASHING W/ CLEAT

SBS RIGHT ANGLE FLASHING

WOOD BLOCKING, AS PER FIRESTONE SBS DETAIL

LIQUID APPLIED VAPOR PERMEABLE LIQUID APPLIED VAPOR PERMEABLE AIR / WEATHER BARRIER AIR / WEATHER BARRIER

The roof is comprised of over 5800 square feet of open terrace along the northern edge (rear facade) of the building with sweeping views of the Brooklyn and Manhattan skylines. Complete with barbecues, a life size chess board, a verandah and 2 bocce courts, the roof is a true extension of the rear yard and an example of complete living.

DENSGLASS

6" CFS STUD, SEE STRUCTURAL6" CFS STUD, SEE STRUCTURAL

6" CFS STUDS WITH 6" CFS STUDS WITH 521" FOIL FACED BATT INSULATION 521" FOIL FACED BATT INSULATION

ARTFLASH FOIL FLASHING TAPE

90 GALVANIZED HARDWARE

BACKER ROD & SEALANT, TYP.

ELLA 49A1M134, LK ALL AROUND

PTD MDF SILL

IONS THROUGH R BARRIER, TYP.

TAPE JOINT & CEMENT TYP.

NEW WALL R-VALUE = 30.84

PERFORATED ALUMINUM PROFILE LIQUID APPLIED VAPOR PERMEABLE AIR / WEATHERTHROUGH BARRIER SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS AIR & WEATHER5 BARRIER, TYP. WP-19 8" DENSGLASS 5 8" DENSGLASS

APARTMENT

LIQUID APPLIED VAPOR PERMEABLE AIR / WEATHER BARRIER 112" PERFORATED Z CHANNEL

WP-1

NEW WALL R-VALUE = 30.84 (2) LAYERS 58" GYPSUM W.B. TYPE "X" STC RATING OF 52 TESTED WP-24 IN COMPLIANCE WITH ASTME90

SED FASTENER

D HAT CHANNEL

APARTMENT 1

52" FOIL FACED BATT INSULATION APARTMENT

OUTSIDE

G90 GALVANIZED HAT CHANNEL 112" RIGID INSULATION 3

WP-7

6" CFS STUD, SEE STRUCTURAL

FIBER CEMENT PANEL EXPOSED FASTENER

NEW WALL 521" FOIL FACED BATT INSULATION R-VALUE = 33.64

112" PERFORATED Z CHANNEL

NEW WALL R-VALUE = 33.64

G90 GALVANIZED HAT CHANNEL

FIBER CEMENT PANEL

6" CFS STUD, SEE STRUCTURAL

ENLARGED WALL SECTION - CEMENT PANEL @ WINDOW SILL

SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"

ENLARGED WALL SECTION - CEMENT PANEL @ WINDOW SILL

SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"

6" CFS STUD, SEE STRUCTURAL 521"

OR PERMEABLE THER BARRIER

SED FASTENER

TED Z CHANNEL

FOIL FACED BATT INSULATION

NEW WALL R-VALUE = 33.64

ERE DENSDECK ASS MEET, TYP.

IONS THROUGH R BARRIER, TYP.

OUTSIDE

CEMENT PANEL

D PERFORATED C CHANNEL

SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"

EXPOSED FASTENER WP-19 5 8" DENSGLASS DENSDECK, MIN 2' ABOVE SLAB

SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH 112" RIGID INSULATION WP-15 AIR & WEATHER BARRIER, TYP. 5

521" FOIL FACED BATT INSULATION WP-17

G90 GALVANIZED HAT CHANNEL OUTSIDE

WP-7 5

APARTMENT NEW WALL

R-VALUE = 33.64

3 3 8" FIBER CEMENT PANEL 8" FIBER CEMENT PANEL

6" CFS STUD, SEE STRUCTURAL (2) LAYERS 58" GYPSUM W.B. TYPE "X" STC RATING OF 52 TESTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH ASTME90 SPRAY INSULATION WP-16 NFPA FIRE RATING ASTME 119.251

G90WP-2 GALVANIZED HAT FLASHING CHANNEL FLEXIBLE

AIR / WEATHER PERFORATED ALUMINUMBARRIER PROFILE

2'-0"

PERFORATED ALUMINUM PROFILE G90 GALVANIZED CHANNEL METAL FLASHING SET IN MASTIC TO OVERLAP FOUNDATION WALL WITH WATERPROOFING DRIP EDGE

MINUM PROFILE

SHIM AS NECESSARY

ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD EXPANSION JOINT SEALANT WINDOW & FRAME CONCRETE SIDEWALK SEE BPP OUTSIDE

IC TO OVERLAP ATERPROOFING

JOINT SEALANT

APARTMENT

SLOPE 81" : 12" MIN

ETE SIDEWALK SEE BPP

FLEXIBLE FLASHING OVER POUR STOP AND CONCRETE

521" FOIL FACED BATT INSULATION

(2) LAYERS 58" GYPSUM W.B. TYPE "X" STC RATING OF 52 TESTED WP-24 IN COMPLIANCE WITH ASTME90 NEW WALL FIRE RATING ASTME 119.251 NFPA R-VALUE = 33.64

LIQUID APPLIED VAPOR PERMEABLE 112" PERFORATED Z CHANNEL AIR / WEATHER BARRIER

PELLA SMARTFLASH FOIL BACKED 112" RIGID TAPEINSULATION ALONG ALL WP-28 BUTYL FLASHING FOUR SIDES OF WINDOW 112" G90 GALVANIZED PERFORATED SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS C THROUGH CHANNEL & WEATHER BARRIER, TYP. LIQUIDAIR APPLIED VAPOR PERMEABLE

(2) LAYERS 58" GYPSUM W.B. TYPE "X" STC RATING OF 52 TESTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH ASTME90 FIRE RATING ASTME 119.251 NFPA

GID INSULATION

ENLARGED WALL SECTION - CEMENT PANEL @ ZINC RAIN SCREEN 6" CFS STUD, SEE STRUCTURAL

FLEXIBLE FLASHING WHERE DENSDECK EXPOSED FASTENER & DENSGLASS MEET, TYP.

APARTMENT

D HAT CHANNEL

DENSGLASS

LIQUID APPLIED VAPOR PERMEABLE AIR / WEATHER BARRIER

WP-1

N 2' ABOVE SLAB

2'-0"

DENSGLASS

OR PERMEABLE THER BARRIER

WP-17

EXPOSED FASTENER

6" CFS STUD, SEE STRUCTURAL

CEMENT PANEL

FIRE RATING ASTME 119.251 NFPA

OUTSIDE

521" FOIL FACED BATT INSULATION WP-17

TED Z CHANNEL

APARTMENTS ARE FULLY SPRINKLERED

FLEXIBLE FLASHING, POSITIVE SEAL FLEXIBLE FLASHING OVER AIR & WEATHER BARRIER

(2) LAYERS 58" GYPSUM W.B. TYPE "X" STC RATING OF 52 TESTED WP-24 IN COMPLIANCE WITH ASTME90 FIRE RATING ASTME 119.251 NFPA

The Building, with it’s bold yet subtle namesake facade, is a clean, mature and contemporary addition to a neighborhood that is undergoing a rejuvenation. The long sweeping lines of the zinc echoing the horizontal orientation of the neighboring brick buildings while still signaling the new Brooklyn.

OUTSIDE

NEW WALL R-VALUE = 30.84

ENLARGED WALL SECTION - CEMENT PANEL @ WINDOW HEADER SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"

NG OVER POUR AND CONCRETE WP-7

FIBER CEMENT PANEL

DENSGLASS

(2) LAYERS 85" GYPSUM W.B. TYPE "X" STC RATING OF 52 TESTED WP-24 IN COMPLIANCE WITH ASTME90 FIRE RATING ASTME 119.251 NFPA

LIQUID APPLIED VAPOR PERMEABLE AIR / WEATHER CRUSHED STONE BARRIER

521" FOIL FACED BATT INSULATION WP-17

EXPOSED FASTENER WP-19 WP-1

STONE WP-2

ACOUSTICAL OUTLINE SPECIFICATIONS AS1- NOISEPROOFING COMPOUND: GREEN GLUE, GREEN GLUE AS2- DECK-SUSPENDED CEILING HANGER @ UNDERSIDE OF 4TH FL SLAB @ GYM: KINETICS NOISE CONTROL, MODEL ICC AS3- RESILIENT PARTITION ISOLATION PAD @ NON-STRUCTURAL WALLS: KINETICS NOISE CONTROL, MODEL WALLMAT AS4- FLOOR UNDERLAYMENT @ APARTMENT WOOD FLOORS: KINETICS NOISE CONTROL, ISOLAYMENT QT-F AS5- FLOOR UNDERLAYMENT @ APARTMENT TILE FLOORS: KINETICS NOISE CONTROL, ISOLAYMENT QT-F05-W AS6- STUD WALL CLIP ISOLATOR @ EXTERIOR WALL OF 3RD FLOOR APARTMENTS UNDER GYM: KINETICS NOISE CONTROL, MODEL ISOMAX CLIP AS7- ROOF PAVER LEVELER: HANOVER, COMPENSATOR SYSTEM AS8- ROOF PAVER: HANOVER, ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE PAVER, 23.5” X 23.5” X 2.125” AS9- HILTI FS JOINT SEALER CP 606 RED (WHITE) AS10- MAPEGUARD 2, CRACK ISOLATION & SOUND REDUCTION SHEET MEMBRANE

SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"

APARTMENT

SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"

(2) LAYERS 58" GYPSUM W.B. TYPE "X" STC RATING OF 52 TESTED WP-24 IN COMPLIANCE WITH ASTME90 FIRE RATING ASTME 119.251 NFPA

521" FOIL FACED BATT INSULATION WP-17 NEW WALL R-VALUE = 33.64 6" CFS STUD, SEE STRUCTURAL

SPRAY INSULATION WP-16

HAVE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. FOUR SIDES OF WINDOW CONTRACTORS SHALL VERIFY AND BE

THE DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS SHOWN BY

THESE DRAWINGS. SHOP DETAILS MUST BE PERFORATED ALUMINUM PROFILE

SUBMITTED TO THIS OFFICE FOR REVIEW BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH FABRICATION. G90 FOR GALVANIZED CHANNEL NOT VALID CONSTRUCTION UNLESS SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT AND APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS

SHIM AS NECESSARY

DRIP EDGE

ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD ISSUE WINDOW & FRAME

DATE

FOR

OUTSIDE

APARTMENT

11 07.02.2014 UPDATE 12 08.21.2014 UPDATE 13 10.31.2014 UPDATE

14 01.13.2015 UPDATED PER RFIs

ENLARGED WALL SECTION - CEMENT PANEL @ WINDOW HEADER SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"

15 06.05.2015 UPDATE 16 07.07.2015 PAA 17 10.22.2015 EN UPDATE 18 02.19.2016 PAA WP-7 3 8" FIBER CEMENT PANEL

(2) LAYERS 85" GYPSUM W.B. TYPE "X" STC RATING OF 52 TESTED WP-24 IN COMPLIANCE WITH ASTME90 FIRE RATING ASTME 119.251 NFPA

521" FOIL FACED BATT INSULATION WP-17 NEW WALL R-VALUE = 33.64

G90 GALVANIZED HAT CHANNEL

FLEXIBLE FLASHING, POSITIVE SEAL OVER AIR & WEATHER BARRIER

SPRAY INSULATION WP-16

313 ST. MARKS AVE.

6" CFS STUD SHIM AS NECESSARY

SILL FLASHING,PROVIDE DRIP

EDGE AND CAULK ALL AROUND ENLARGED WALL SECTION DTLS

CELLAR

SEAL & SIGNATURE

PTD MDF STILL

detail sections of zinc rain screen 1

CONCRETE FOUNDATION, SEE STRUCTURAL

ENLARGED WALL SECTION - CEMENT PANEL @ ZINC RAIN SCREEN

OUTSIDE

DRAWING NAME:

NEW WALL R-VALUE = 0.96 SHIM AS NECESSARY

ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD WINDOW & FRAME

ENLARGED WALL SECTION - CEMENT PANEL @ GRADE

NEW WALL R-VALUE = 33.64

PELLA SMARTFLASH FOIL BACKED BUTYL FLASHING TAPE ALONG ALL FOUR SIDES OF WINDOW G90 GALVANIZED CHANNEL 313 ST. MARKS AVENUE BROOKLYN, NY 11238 SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH AIR & WEATHER BARRIER, TYP.

SPRAY INSULATION WP-16

ENLARGED WALL SECTION - CEMENT PANEL @ GRADE SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"

ENLARGED WALL PLAN - CEMENT PANEL @ WINDOW JAMB

SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"

APARTMENT

FOR ALL DIMENSIONS AND SEAL RESPONSIBLE ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH CONDITIONS ON THE JOB AND THIS OFFICE AIR &BEWEATHER TYP.FROM MUST NOTIFIED OFBARRIER, ANY VARIATIONS

6" CFS STUD

NEW WALL R-VALUE = 30.84

6" CFS STUD, SEE STRUCTURAL

EXPOSED FASTENER MT-1 ALUMINUM SOLAR SHADE, "EYELID" PT-1 POWDER COATED PAINT, BENJAMIN MOORE " WP-19 5 8" DENSGLASS PURE JOY" PT-2 POWDER COATED PAINT, TO MATCH PELLA WP-1 LIQUID APPLIED VAPOR PERMEABLE "CLASSIC WHITE" AIR / WEATHER BARRIER PT-3 POWDER COATED PAINT, TO GREY OF ZINC 1 1 " PERFORATED Z CHANNEL 2 PANELS

PROJECT:

(2) LAYERS 58" GYPSUM W.B. TYPE "X" STC RATING OF 52 TESTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH ASTME90 FIRE RATING ASTME 119.251 NFPA

521" FOIL FACED BATT INSULATION

WP-28

GRACE HYDRODUCT SILL FLASHING,PROVIDE DRIP EDGE AND CAULK ALL AROUND

CELLAR

(2) LAYERS 58" GYPSUM W.B. TYPE (2) "X" LAYERS 58" GYPSUM W.B. TYPE "X" STC RATING OF 52 TESTED STC RATING OF 52 TESTED APARTMENTS ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ASTME90IN COMPLIANCE WITH ASTME90 FULLY SPRINKLERED FIRE RATING ASTME 119.251 NFPA FIRE RATING ASTME 119.251 NFPA

GEORGIA PACIFIC, DENSDECK OUTSIDE MEPFS ENGINEER : WP12- RIGID INSULATION (ROOFING): DOW STYROFOAM, ROOFMATE, TAPERED ETTINGER ENGINEERING WP13- STOGUARD GOLD COAT, FLUID APPLIED ASSOCIATES VAPOR PERMEABLE BUILDING WRAP 112" RIGID WP14- INSULATION (ZINC RAIN SCREEN): ROXUL, 505 EIGHTH AVE,INSULATION 24TH FLR STONE WOOL CAVITY ROCK NEW YORK, NY 10018 WP15- INSULATION (FIBER CEMENT RAIN EXPOSED FASTENER SCREEN): OWENS CORNING, FOAMULAR T 212-244-2410 250/CW25 1F12212-643-1606 " PERFORATED Z CHANNEL WP16- SPRAY INSULATION: ICYNENE, CLOSED CELL, MD-C-200 WP17- BATT INSULATION AT EXTERIOR WALLS: 7 8" G90 GALVANIZED HAT CHANNEL OWENS CORNING, ECO TOUCH, FOIL INTERIOR DESIGN : FACED, R19 DURUKAN DESIGN WP18- BATT INSULATION AT INTERIOR WALLS: 3 OWENS CORNING, ECO TOUCH, PAPER 8" FIBER CEMENT PANEL 16 W 37TH ST FACED, R38 SUITE 3 WP19- SHEATHING AT EXTERIOR WALLS: NEW YORK, NY 10018 GEORGIA PACIFIC, DENSGLASS WP20- SHEATHING AT EXTERIOR WALLS UP TO 2' T 212-596-4041 ABOVE HORIZONTAL SURFACES: GEORGIA PACIFIC, DENSDECK F 212-596-4042 WP21- GYPSUM WALL BOARD (NON-RATED): GEORGIA PACIFIC, TOUGH ROCK WP22- GYPSUM WALL BOARD (MOISTURE COORDINATION : RESISTANT): GEORGIA PACIFIC, TOUGH ROCK, MOLD-GUARD REUVEN KALISCH WP23- CEMENT WALL BOARD (AT SHOWERS): RELIABLE EXPEDITING INC. GEORGIA PACIFIC, DENSSHIELD WP24- GYPSUM WALL BOARD (RATED): GEORGIA 777 KENT AVE,5 8SUITE 212 " DENSGLASS WP-19 PACIFIC, TOUGH ROCK, FIREGARD, TYPE X BROOKLYN, NY 11205 WP25- GRACE BITUTHENE3000 WP-1 LIQUID APPLIED VAPOR PERMEABLE WP26- GRACE PREPRUFE 160R T 718-797-2710 AIR / WEATHER BARRIER WP27- GRACE HYDRODUCT 220 WP28- PELLA SMARTFLASH FOIL BACKED BUTYL FLASHING TAPE EXPOSED FASTENER WP29- STOGUARD TAPE 9 WP30- 1" DENSGLASS SHAFTLINER PANEL DISCLAIMER: 112" SHALL RIGIDNOT INSULATION WP-15 WP31- OMEGA LITE PANEL THE ARCHITECT HAVE CONTROL OR CHARGE OF AND SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE WP32- PELLA BREAK METAL FOR CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, SILL FLASHING #49A1M134 5 DEVIATIONS, TECHNIQUES, GALVANIZED HATSEQUENCES CHANNELOR 8" G90 WP33- ALSAN RS BALCONY/PARKING SYSTEM: PROCEDURES, OR FOR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS AND PROGRAMS IN CONNECTION WITH THE 222/276 PRIMER, 230/260 LO, FLEECE 3 WORK, FOR THE ACTS OR OMMISIONS OF THE WP-7 8" FIBER CEMENT PANEL REINFORCEMENT, 230/260 LO, 233 CONTRACTOR, SUB-CONTRACTORS, OR ANY SELF-LEVELING MORTAR, QUARTZ "0", 288 OTHER PERSONS PERFORMING ANY OF THE WORK, OR FORFLEXIBLE THE FAILURE OF ANY OF THEM COLOR FINISH IN STONE GREY WP-2 FLASHING TO CARRY OUT THE WORK IN ACCORDANCE WP34- DOW - STYROFOAM BRAND SILL SEAL WITHSMARTFLASH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. PELLA FOIL BACKED FOAM GASKET WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ONALONG THIS DRAWING FLASHING TAPE ALL SHALL WP-28 BUTYL

NEW WALL R-VALUE = 33.64

G90 GALVANIZED HAT CHANNEL

FLEXIBLE FLASHING, POSITIVE SEAL OVER AIR & WEATHER BARRIER

PELLA SMARTFLASH FOIL BACKED BUTYL GRACE BITUTHENE 3000FLASHING TAPE ALONG ALL FOUR SIDES OF WINDOW G90 GALVANIZED CHANNEL SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH AIR & WEATHER BARRIER, TYP.

ODUCT

RESILIENT CHANNEL

architecture

WP-2

WP-28

NEW WALL R-VALUE = 0.96

PENCIL ROD

RESILIENT CHANNEL

EITHER SOLID OR PERFORATED CHRISTOPHER DIERIG, RA THERMAL & WATER PROOFING OUTLINE WP1- LIQUID APPLIED VAPOR PERMEABLE AIR/ ENLARGED WALL - RAINSCREEN ENLARGED @ DROPSLAB SECTION - RAINSCREEN @ DROPSLAB S3SECTION 3" G90 GALVANIZED Z CHANNELWALL WEATHER BARRIER: GRACE 16 W 37TH ST SCALE: 3" = 1'-0" PERM-A-BARRIER VP SCALE: 3" = 1'-0" SUITE 3 WP2- WALL FLASHING: GRACE PERM-A-BARRIER AIR SPACE NEW YORK, NY 10018 WALL FLASHING WP3- VAPOR BARRIER BY SBS ROOF SYSTEM 1 12" ROXUL STONE WOOL MANUFACTURER T 646-755-3023 INSULATION ON STICK PINS WP4- EXPANSION JOINT SEALANT: ELASTA GEL F 646-224-9537 6170 EPOXY OR GRACE BRAND SEALANT, TBD WWW.S3ARC.COM LIQUID APPLIED VAPOR PERMEABLE WP5- SEISMIC GAP: EMSEAL, SEISMIC AIR / WEATHER BARRIER COLORSEAL WP6- EIFS: STOCORP, ADVANCED CAVITY WALL FLEXIBLE FLASHING SPECIFICATIONS, A500E WP7- FIBER CEMENT PANEL: EASTERN CONSULTANTS : FLASHING CONTINUOUS ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS, NATURA BLACK N073, 888-572-6357 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING WP8- ZINC PANEL (SOLID): VM ZINC, VMZ PERFORATED ALUMINUM PROFILE : CORRUGATED PANEL, QUARTZ-ZINC, 1.0 WSP CANTOR SEINUK SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH MM, 646-671-0853 228 45TH STREET, 3RDTYP. FLR AIR &E WEATHER BARRIER, WP9- ZINC PANEL (PERFORATED): VM ZINC, VMZ NEW YORK, NY 10017 PERF-CORRUGATED PANEL, QUARTZ-ZINC, 5 8" DENSGLASS 1.0 MM, 646-671-0853 T 212-687-9888 WP10- ROOFING: FIRESTONE, SBS, 2 PLY TORCH LIQUID APPLIED VAPOR PERMEABLE DOWN AIR / WEATHER BARRIER WP11- ROOFING INSULATION COVER BOARD:

112" PERFORATED Z CHANNEL

E 3000

FOIL FACE BATT INSULATION

PENCIL ROD

CORRUGATED ZINC PANEL; ARCHITECT / APPLICANT :

WP-2

SED FASTENER

DENSGLASS

CONCRETE ON STEEL DECKING, CONCRETE COLD FORMED ON STEEL DEC STEEL FRAMING & BEAMS, SEE STEEL STRUCTURAL FRAMING & BEAMS, FOIL FACE BATT INSULATION

ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD WINDOW & FRAME

EXPOSED FASTENER CONTINUOUS FLASHING

GID INSULATION

BACKER ROD

HILTI FS JOINT SEALER

WP-15 112" RIGID INSULATION

OR PERMEABLE THER BARRIER

BACKER ROD

TAPE JOINT & CEMENT TYP.

NOTE: NO CORRUGATED ZINC AT NOTE: INSIDE NO OF CORRUGATED ZINC AT INSIDE OF PARAPET AT ROOF. REPLACE WITH PARAPET DRAINABLE AT ROOF. REPLACE WITH DRAINABLE EIFS AS PER 3/A-313 EIFS AS PER 3/A-313

POSITIVE SEAL ATHER BARRIER

HILTI FS JOINT SEALER

WP-28 PELLA SMARTFLASH FOIL ENLARGED WALL SECTION - RAINSCREEN CORRUGATED ZINC PANEL; ENLARGED WALL @ PARAPET SECTION - RAINSCREEN @ PARAPET BACKEDSOLID BUTYL FLASHING TAPE EITHER OR PERFORATED SCALE: 3" = 1'-0" SCALE: 3" = 1'-0" 5 (2) LAYERS 8" GYPSUM W.B. TYPE "X" SHIM AS NECESSARY 3" G90 GALVANIZED Z CHANNEL STC RATING OF 52 TESTED BACKER ROD & SEALANT, TYP. IN COMPLIANCE WITH ASTME90 AIR SPACE FIRE RATING ASTME 119.251 NFPA 1 1 2" G90 GALVANIZED BACKER ROD & HARDWARE SEALANT, TYP. 1 12" ROXUL STONE WOOL 49A1M134, WP-32 SILL FLASHING,PELLA INSULATION ON STICK PINS PROVIDE DRIP EDGE AND CAULK ALL AROUND PTD MDF SILL SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH LIQUID APPLIED VAPOR PERMEABLE AIR & WEATHER BARRIER, TYP. AIR / WEATHER BARRIER

SHIM AS NECESSARY

& SEALANT, TYP.

5 8"

DENSGLASS

3" G90 GALVANIZED Z-CLIP

SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH AIR & WEATHER BARRIER, TYP.AIR & WEATHER BARRIER, TYP.

UM CLAD WOOD NDOW & FRAME

5 8"

SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH AIR & WEATHER BARRIER, TYP.AIR & WEATHER BARRIER, TYP.

CONCRETE FOUNDATION, SEE STRUCTURAL

DATE

APARTMENT PTD MDF STILL

ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD : 01.30.13 WINDOW & FRAME

JOB #

: 1214

DWG BY

: JY, ZC, WJ

CHECKED

: CD

DRAWING # :

A-305.00

PAGE # :

ENLARGED WALL PLAN - CEMENT PANEL @ WINDOW JAMB SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"

detail photos of zinc rain screen

1 4"

534" 6"

2" 1 4"

4" 1'-0" 1134"

1 1 4" 4"

8" 8"

4'-4" 4'-4"

1 1 3'-03'-0 2" 2"

1 4"

2'-141"

LOUVER SECTION

SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"

CORRUGATED CORRUGATED ZINC CORRUGATED PANEL ZINC ZINC PANEL PANEL

LOUVER FRONT ELEVATION LOUVER FRONT ELEVATION

GEORGIA PACIFIC, DENSDECK

RESILIENT RESILIENT CHANNELCHANNEL

WP-17

1 1 4" 4"

1 4"

534"

1 1 4" 4"

6" 4"

1 4"

1 4" 1 4"

1 4"

534" 534" 41" 6" 6"

SCALE: 1" =SCALE: 1'-0" SCALE: 1" =1"1'-0" = 1'-0"

ROCK, MOLD-GUARD ROCK, ROCK, MOLD-GUARD MOLD-GUARD REUVEN KALISCH REUVEN REUVEN KALISCH KALISCH WP26- GRACE PREPRUFE 160R TINC. 718-797-2710 WP23- CEMENT WP23WP23WALL CEMENT CEMENT BOARD WALL (AT WALL BOARD SHOWERS): BOARD (AT(AT SHOWERS): SHOWERS): RELIABLE RELIABLE EXPEDITING EXPEDITING INC. INC. WP27- GRACE HYDRODUCT 220 RELIABLE EXPEDITING GEORGIA PACIFIC, GEORGIA GEORGIA DENSSHIELD PACIFIC, PACIFIC, DENSSHIELD DENSSHIELD WP28PELLA SMARTFLASH FOIL BACKED BUTYL WP24- GYPSUM WP24WP24WALL GYPSUM GYPSUM BOARD WALL (RATED): WALL BOARD BOARD GEORGIA (RATED): (RATED): GEORGIA GEORGIA 777 KENT AVE, 777777 KENT SUITE KENT AVE, 212 AVE, SUITE SUITE 212212 FLASHING TAPE

PACIFIC, TOUGH PACIFIC, PACIFIC, ROCK, TOUGH TOUGH FIREGARD, ROCK, ROCK, FIREGARD, TYPE FIREGARD, X TYPE TYPE X X BROOKLYN, BROOKLYN, NY BROOKLYN, 11205 NYNY 11205 11205 4WP25- GRACE WP25WP25BITUTHENE3000 GRACE GRACE BITUTHENE3000 BITUTHENE3000 DISCLAIMER:

3 3

SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"

LOUVER SECTION LOUVER LOUVER SECTION SECTION

OR ACCEPTED ALTERNATIVE OR ACCEPTED ALTERNATIVE WP25- GRACE BITUTHENE3000

WP29- STOGUARD TAPE 9 WP30- 1" DENSGLASS SHAFTLINER PANEL

1 4"

LOUVER SECTION

SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"

SCALE: 1" =SCALE: 1'-0" SCALE: 1" =1"1'-0" = 1'-0"

NEW WALL R-VALUE = 30.84 FLANGE

6" CFS STUD, SEE STRUCTURAL

SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH AIR & WEATHER BARRIER, TYP.

WP-2

SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH AIR & WEATHER BARRIER, TYP.

WELDED CONNECTION, TYP.

521" FOIL FACED BATT INSULATION

WP-17 FIXED PANE WINDOW

LIQUID APPLIED VAPOR PERMEABLE AIR / WEATHER BARRIER WP-1

5 (2) LAYERS W.B. TYPE "X" 8" GYPSUM FLANGE FLANGE FLANGE STC RATING OF 52 TESTED WP-24 IN COMPLIANCE WITH ASTME90

FLEXIBLE FLASHING

WP-2

FLEXIBLE FLASHING

FIRE RATING ASTME 119.251 WELDED CONNECTION, WELDED WELDED CONNECTION, CONNECTION, TYP. TYP. TYP.NFPA INTERIOR OF ALUMINUM LOUVER

PAINTED TO MATCH PELLA WINDOW COLOR "CLASSIC WHITE"

CONTINUOUS FLASHING AT METAL EYELID

SHIM AS NECESSARY FIXED PANEFIXED WINDOW FIXED PANE PANE WINDOW WINDOW

SLOPE 1 4" PER 12" (TOP & BOTTOM)

BREAK METAL SOLAR LOUVER

PELLA WINDOW, FRAME COLOR TO BE INTERIOR OF INTERIOR ALUMINUM INTERIOR OF OF ALUMINUM LOUVER ALUMINUM LOUVER LOUVER CLASSIC WHITE PAINTED TOPAINTED MATCH PAINTED PELLA TO TO MATCH MATCH WINDOW PELLA PELLA WINDOW WINDOW COLOR "CLASSIC COLOR COLOR WHITE" "CLASSIC "CLASSIC WHITE" WHITE"

PELLA SMARTFLASH FOIL BACKED BUTYL FLASHING TAPE WP-28

PELLA SMARTFLASH FOIL BACKED BUTYL FLASHING TAPE

WP-28

313 ST. MARKS AVE.

OPERABLE CASEMENT WINDOW

1 1 METAL METAL 4" BREAK METAL 4" BREAK 4" BREAK SOLAR LOUVER SOLAR SOLAR LOUVER LOUVER

EXTERIOR OF LOUVER PAINTED, BENJAMIN MOORE "PURE JOY,"

OR ACCEPTED ALTERNATIVE PELLA WINDOW, PELLA PELLA FRAME WINDOW, WINDOW, COLOR FRAME FRAME TO BE COLOR COLOR TO TO BE BE CLASSIC WHITE CLASSIC CLASSIC WHITE WHITE

ENLARGED SOLAR LOUVER DTLS

313 313 ST. 313MARKS ST. ST.MARKS MARKS AVE.AVE. AVE.

OPERABLE OPERABLE CASEMENT OPERABLE CASEMENT WINDOW CASEMENT WINDOW WINDOW

FIXED CASEMENT WINDOW & FRAME SEE SCHEDULE FOR EXTERIOR OF EXTERIOR EXTERIOR LOUVER OF PAINTED, OF LOUVER LOUVER PAINTED, PAINTED, DETAILS BENJAMIN MOORE BENJAMIN BENJAMIN "PURE MOORE MOORE JOY,""PURE "PURE JOY," JOY," OR ACCEPTED OROR ACCEPTED ALTERNATIVE ACCEPTED ALTERNATIVE ALTERNATIVE LOUVER ISOMETRIC SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"

ENLARGED ENLARGED ENLARGED SOLAR SOLAR SOLAR LOUVER LOUVER LOUVER DTLS DTLS DTLS

A-312.00

7'-6"

WP26- GRACE WP26WP26PREPRUFE GRACE GRACE PREPRUFE 160R PREPRUFE 160R 160R WP31OMEGA LITE PANEL THE ARCHITECT SHALL NOT HAVE CONTROL OR T 718-797-2710 T 718-797-2710 T 718-797-2710 CHARGE OF AND SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE WP32PELLA220 BREAK WP27- GRACE WP27WP27HYDRODUCT GRACE GRACE HYDRODUCT 220 HYDRODUCT 220 METAL FOR CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, SILL FLASHING #49A1M134 WP28- PELLA WP28SMARTFLASH WP28PELLA PELLA SMARTFLASH FOIL SMARTFLASH BACKED FOIL BUTYL FOIL BACKED BACKED BUTYL BUTYL DEVIATIONS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES OR WP33ALSAN RS BALCONY/PARKING SYSTEM: PROCEDURES, OR FOR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS FLASHING TAPE FLASHING FLASHING TAPE TAPE AND PROGRAMS IN CONNECTION WITH THE 222/276 WP29- STOGUARD WP29WP29STOGUARD TAPE STOGUARD 9 TAPE TAPE 9 9 PRIMER, 230/260 LO, FLEECE WORK, FOR THE ACTS OR OMMISIONS OF THE REINFORCEMENT, 230/260 LO, 233 CONTRACTOR, SUB-CONTRACTORS, OR ANY WP30- 1" DENSGLASS WP30WP301" DENSGLASS 1"SHAFTLINER DENSGLASS SHAFTLINER PANEL SHAFTLINER PANEL PANEL SELF-LEVELING MORTAR,DISCLAIMER: QUARTZ "0",DISCLAIMER: 288DISCLAIMER: OTHER PERSONS PERFORMING ANY OF THE WP31- OMEGA WP31WP31LITE OMEGA PANEL OMEGA LITE LITE PANEL PANEL THE ARCHITECT THE SHALL THE ARCHITECT ARCHITECT NOT HAVE SHALL CONTROL SHALL NOT NOT HAVE OR HAVE CONTROL CONTROL WORK, OR FOR THE FAILURE OF OR ANYOR OF THEM COLOR FINISH IN STONE GREY CHARGE OF AND CHARGE SHALL CHARGE OF NOTAND OF BE AND RESPONSIBLE SHALL SHALL NOT NOT BE RESPONSIBLE BE RESPONSIBLE TO CARRY OUT THE WORK IN ACCORDANCE WP32- PELLA WP32BREAK WP32PELLA PELLA METAL BREAK BREAK METAL METAL WP34DOW - STYROFOAM BRAND SILL SEAL FORFOR FOR CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION MEANS, CONSTRUCTION METHODS, MEANS, MEANS, METHODS, METHODS, WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. SILL FLASHING SILL SILL #49A1M134 FLASHING FLASHING #49A1M134 #49A1M134 FOAM GASKET WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ON THIS SHALL DEVIATIONS, TECHNIQUES, DEVIATIONS, DEVIATIONS, SEQUENCES TECHNIQUES, TECHNIQUES, OR SEQUENCES SEQUENCES OR DRAWING OR HAVE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. WP33- ALSAN WP33RS WP33BALCONY/PARKING ALSAN ALSAN RS RS BALCONY/PARKING BALCONY/PARKING SYSTEM: SYSTEM: SYSTEM: PROCEDURES, PROCEDURES, OR FOR PROCEDURES, SAFETY OR PRECAUTIONS FOR OR FOR SAFETY SAFETY PRECAUTIONS PRECAUTIONS CONTRACTORS VERIFY AND BE AND INAND CONNECTION PROGRAMS PROGRAMS INWITH CONNECTION IN CONNECTION THE SHALL WITH WITH THETHE 222/276 PRIMER, 222/276 222/276 230/260 PRIMER, PRIMER, LO, 230/260 FLEECE 230/260 LO,LO, FLEECE FLEECE AND PROGRAMS ACOUSTICAL OUTLINE SPECIFICATIONS FOR ALL DIMENSIONS WORK, FOR THE WORK, ACTS WORK, FOR OR OMMISIONS FOR THERESPONSIBLE THE ACTS ACTS OR OFOMMISIONS OR THE OMMISIONS OF THE OF THEAND AS1- NOISEPROOFING COMPOUND: GREEN GLUE, REINFORCEMENT, REINFORCEMENT, REINFORCEMENT, 230/260 LO, 230/260 233230/260 LO,LO, 233 233 CONTRACTOR, CONDITIONS ON THE JOB AND THIS OFFICE CONTRACTOR, SUB-CONTRACTORS, CONTRACTOR, SUB-CONTRACTORS, SUB-CONTRACTORS, OR ANY OR ANY OR ANY MUST BE NOTIFIED OF ANY VARIATIONS FROM GREEN GLUE SELF-LEVELING SELF-LEVELING SELF-LEVELING MORTAR, QUARTZ MORTAR, MORTAR, "0",QUARTZ 288 QUARTZ "0","0", 288 288 PERSONS LOUVER ISOMETRIC LOUVER ISOMETRIC OTHER OTHER PERFORMING OTHER PERSONS PERSONS ANY PERFORMING OF PERFORMING THE ANY ANY OF THE OF THE THE DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS SHOWN BY AS2DECK-SUSPENDED CEILING WORK, HANGER @ WORK, OR FOR THEWORK, FAILURE OR FOR OR OF FOR THE ANY THE FAILURE OFFAILURE THEM OF ANY OF ANY OF THEM OF THEM COLOR FINISH COLOR COLOR IN STONE FINISH FINISH GREY IN STONE IN STONE GREY GREY THESE DRAWINGS. SHOP DETAILS MUST BE TO CARRY OUTTO THE CARRY TO WORK CARRY OUT IN ACCORDANCE OUT THETHE WORK WORK IN THIS ACCORDANCE IN ACCORDANCE UNDERSIDE OF SILL 4TH FL SLAB @ GYM: SUBMITTED TO FOR REVIEW WP34- DOWWP34- STYROFOAM WP34DOW DOW - STYROFOAM -BRAND STYROFOAM SILL BRAND SEAL BRAND SILL SEAL SEAL SCALE: 1"OFFICE = 1'-0" SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" WITH THE CONTRACT WITH THE DOCUMENTS. THE CONTRACT CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. BEFOREDOCUMENTS. PROCEEDING WITH FABRICATION. KINETICS NOISE CONTROL, MODEL ICCWITH FOAM GASKET FOAM FOAM GASKET GASKET WRITTEN DIMENSIONS WRITTEN ON DIMENSIONS THIS DIMENSIONS DRAWING ONFOR THIS ON SHALL THIS DRAWING DRAWING SHALL SHALL NOT VALID CONSTRUCTION UNLESS THERMAL & WATER PROOFING OUTLIN AS3- RESILIENT PARTITION ISOLATION PAD @WRITTEN SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT AND HAVE PRECEDENCE HAVE HAVE OVER PRECEDENCE PRECEDENCE SCALED DIMENSIONS. OVER OVER SCALED SCALED DIMENSIONS. DIMENSIONS. WP1- LIQUID APPLIED VAPOR PERM NON-STRUCTURAL WALLS: KINETICS CONTRACTORS BY THE DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS CONTRACTORS SHALL CONTRACTORS VERIFY APPROVED AND SHALL SHALL BEVERIFY VERIFY AND AND BE BE ACOUSTICAL ACOUSTICAL OUTLINE ACOUSTICAL SPECIFICATIONS OUTLINE OUTLINE SPECIFICATIONS SPECIFICATIONS WEATHER BARRIER: GRACE NOISE CONTROL, MODEL RESPONSIBLE WALLMAT FOR RESPONSIBLE RESPONSIBLE ALL DIMENSIONS FORFOR ALL AND ALL DIMENSIONS DIMENSIONS ANDAND AS1- NOISEPROOFING AS1AS1NOISEPROOFING NOISEPROOFING COMPOUND: COMPOUND: GREEN COMPOUND: GLUE, GREEN GREEN GLUE, GLUE, CONDITIONS ON CONDITIONS THE CONDITIONS JOB AND ONTHIS THE ON THE OFFICE JOBJOB ANDAND THISTHIS OFFICE OFFICE AS4- FLOOR UNDERLAYMENT @ APARTMENT PERM-A-BARRIER VP NEW WALL BE NOTIFIED MUST MUST OFBE ANY NOTIFIED BEVARIATIONS NOTIFIED OF ANY OFFROM ANY VARIATIONS VARIATIONS FROM FROM ISSUE GREEN GLUE GREEN GREEN GLUE GLUE WOOD FLOORS: KINETICSMUST NOISE WP2- WALL FLASHING: GRACE PER R-VALUE = CONDITIONS 30.84 THE DIMENSIONS THE AND THE DIMENSIONS CONDITIONS DIMENSIONS AND SHOWN AND CONDITIONS BY SHOWN SHOWN BY BY AS2- DECK-SUSPENDED AS2AS2DECK-SUSPENDED DECK-SUSPENDED CEILING HANGER CEILING CEILING @HANGER HANGER @ @ CONTROL, ISOLAYMENT QT-F THESE DRAWINGS. THESE THESE SHOP DRAWINGS. DETAILS DRAWINGS. SHOP MUST SHOP DETAILS BE DETAILS MUST MUST BE BE WALL FLASHING DATE FOR # AS5UNDERLAYMENT @ APARTMENT TILE UNDERSIDEUNDERSIDE OF UNDERSIDE 4TH FL SLAB OFFLOOR OF 4TH @4TH GYM: FL SLAB FL SLAB @ GYM: @ GYM: SUBMITTED TOSUBMITTED THIS SUBMITTED OFFICETO FOR THIS TOREVIEW THIS OFFICE OFFICE FORFOR REVIEW REVIEW WP3- VAPOR BARRIER BY SBS ROO FLOORS: KINETICS NOISE CONTROL, BEFORE PROCEEDING BEFORE BEFORE WITH PROCEEDING PROCEEDING FABRICATION. WITH WITH FABRICATION. FABRICATION. KINETICS NOISE KINETICS KINETICS CONTROL, NOISE NOISE MODEL CONTROL, CONTROL, ICC MODEL MODEL ICCICC MANUFACTURER 07.02.2014 UPDATE 11 6" CFS STUD, SEE STRUCTURAL NOT VALID FOR NOT CONSTRUCTION NOT VALID VALID FOR FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS CONSTRUCTION UNLESS UNLESS ISOLAYMENT AS3- RESILIENT AS3AS3PARTITION RESILIENT RESILIENT PARTITION ISOLATION PARTITION ISOLATION PAD ISOLATION @ QT-F05-W PAD PAD @ @ SIGNED AND SEALED SIGNED SIGNED BYAND THE AND SEALED ARCHITECT SEALED BY THE BY AND THE ARCHITECT ARCHITECT ANDAND WP4- EXPANSION JOINT SEALANT: AS6- STUD WALL CLIP ISOLATOR @ EXTERIOR NON-STRUCTURAL NON-STRUCTURAL NON-STRUCTURAL WALLS: KINETICS WALLS: WALLS: KINETICS KINETICSAPPROVED 08.21.2014 UPDATE BY THE APPROVED APPROVED DEPARTMENT BY THE BY 12THE OF DEPARTMENT BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS OF BUILDINGS 6170 EPOXY OR GRACE BRAN WALL OF 3RD FLOOR APARTMENTS UNDER NOISE CONTROL, NOISE NOISE MODEL CONTROL, CONTROL, WALLMAT MODEL MODEL WALLMAT WALLMAT GYM: KINETICS NOISE CONTROL, MODEL TBD 10.31.2014 UPDATE 13 1 AS4- FLOORAS4UNDERLAYMENT AS4FLOOR FLOOR UNDERLAYMENT UNDERLAYMENT @ APARTMENT APARTMENT @ APARTMENT 52" FOIL FACED BATT INSULATION ISOMAX@ CLIP WP-17 WP5- SEISMIC GAP: EMSEAL, SEISM ISSUE ISSUE ISSUE WOOD FLOORS: WOOD WOOD KINETICS FLOORS: FLOORS: NOISE KINETICS KINETICS NOISE NOISEHANOVER, 14 01.13.2015 UPDATED PER RFIs AS7ROOF PAVER LEVELER: COLORSEAL CONTROL, ISOLAYMENT CONTROL, CONTROL, ISOLAYMENT QT-F ISOLAYMENT QT-F QT-F COMPENSATOR SYSTEM 15 06.05.2015 WP6- EIFS: STOCORP, ADVANCED C DATE DATE FOR FOR UPDATE #TILE DATE# # FOR AS5- FLOORAS5UNDERLAYMENT AS5FLOOR FLOOR UNDERLAYMENT UNDERLAYMENT @ APARTMENT @ APARTMENT @TILE APARTMENT TILE AS8ROOF PAVER: HANOVER, ARCHITECTURAL (2) LAYERS 85" GYPSUM W.B. TYPE "X" SPECIFICATIONS, A500E FLOORS: KINETICS FLOORS: FLOORS: NOISE KINETICS KINETICS CONTROL, NOISE NOISE CONTROL, CONTROL, CONCRETE PAVER, 23.5” X 23.5” X 2.125” 16 07.07.2015 STC RATING OF 52PAA TESTED 07.02.2014 UPDATE 07.02.2014 07.02.2014 UPDATE UPDATE 11RED 11 11 WP7- FIBER CEMENT PANEL: EASTE WP-24 AS9-QT-F05-W HILTI FS JOINT SEALER CP 606 (WHITE) ISOLAYMENT ISOLAYMENT QT-F05-W ISOLAYMENT QT-F05-W IN COMPLIANCE ASTME90 17 10.22.2015WITH EN UPDATE AS10MAPEGUARD CRACK ISOLATION & SOUND ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS AS6- STUD WALL AS6AS6STUD CLIP STUD ISOLATOR WALL WALL CLIP CLIP @ ISOLATOR EXTERIOR ISOLATOR @2,EXTERIOR @ EXTERIOR UPDATE 08.21.2014 08.21.2014 UPDATE UPDATE 12 08.21.2014 12 12 FIRE RATING ASTME 119.251 NFPA REDUCTION SHEET MEMBRANE BLACK N073, 888-572-6357 WALL OF 3RD WALL FLOOR WALL OF OF 3RD APARTMENTS 3RD FLOOR FLOOR APARTMENTS APARTMENTS UNDER UNDER UNDER 18 02.19.2016 PAA WP8- ZINC PANEL (SOLID): VM ZINC GYM: KINETICS GYM: GYM: NOISE KINETICS KINETICS CONTROL, NOISE NOISE MODEL CONTROL, CONTROL, MODEL MODEL UPDATE 10.31.2014 10.31.2014 UPDATE UPDATE 13 10.31.2014 13 13 ISOMAX CLIP ISOMAX ISOMAX CLIP CLIP CORRUGATED PANEL, QUAR MT-1 ALUMINUM SOLAR SHADE, "EYELID" UPDATED 01.13.2015 01.13.2015 UPDATED UPDATED RFIs PER PER RFIs RFIs 14 01.13.2015 14 14 AS7- ROOF AS7PAVER AS7ROOF LEVELER: ROOF PAVER PAVER HANOVER, LEVELER: LEVELER: HANOVER, HANOVER, MM, 646-671-0853 SHIM ASPER NECESSARY PT-1 POWDER COATED PAINT, BENJAMIN MOORE " COMPENSATOR COMPENSATOR COMPENSATOR SYSTEM PURE SYSTEM SYSTEM WP9- ZINC PANEL (PERFORATED): V JOY" 15 06.05.2015 15 15 UPDATE 06.05.2015 06.05.2015 UPDATE UPDATE AS8- ROOF AS8PAVER: AS8ROOF ROOF HANOVER, PAVER: PAVER: ARCHITECTURAL HANOVER, HANOVER, ARCHITECTURAL ARCHITECTURAL PERF-CORRUGATED PANEL, PT-2 POWDER COATED PAINT, TO MATCH PELLA CONCRETECONCRETE PAVER, CONCRETE 23.5” PAVER, XPAVER, 23.5” 23.5” X 2.125” 23.5” X 23.5” X 23.5” X 2.125” X 2.125” "CLASSIC WHITE" 1.0 MM, 646-671-0853 16 07.07.2015 16 16 PAA PAA PAA 07.07.2015 07.07.2015 PT-3 POWDER COATED PAINT, TO GREY OF ZINC AS9- HILTI FS AS9JOINT AS9HILTI HILTI SEALER FS FS JOINT JOINT CPSEALER 606 SEALER REDCP (WHITE) CP 606606 RED RED (WHITE) (WHITE) WP10- ROOFING: FIRESTONE, SBS, 17 10.22.2015 17 17 10.22.2015 EN10.22.2015 UPDATEENEN UPDATE UPDATE PANELS AS10- MAPEGUARD AS10AS10MAPEGUARD 2, MAPEGUARD CRACK ISOLATION 2, CRACK 2, CRACK ISOLATION & SOUND ISOLATION & SOUND & SOUND DOWN REDUCTIONREDUCTION SHEET REDUCTION MEMBRANE SHEET SHEET MEMBRANE MEMBRANE WP11- ROOFING INSULATION COVER 18 02.19.2016 18 18 02.19.2016 02.19.2016 PAA PAA PAA GEORGIA PACIFIC, DENSDEC WP12- RIGID INSULATION (ROOFING MT-1 ALUMINUM MT-1 MT-1 ALUMINUM SOLAR ALUMINUM SHADE, SOLAR SOLAR "EYELID" SHADE, SHADE, "EYELID" "EYELID" STYROFOAM, ROOFMATE, TA PROJECT: PT-1 POWDER PT-1 PT-1 COATED POWDER POWDER PAINT, COATED COATED BENJAMIN PAINT, PAINT, MOORE BENJAMIN BENJAMIN " MOORE MOORE " " WP13- STOGUARD GOLD COAT, FLU PURE JOY" PURE PURE JOY" JOY" VAPOR PERMEABLE BUILDIN PT-2 POWDER PT-2 PT-2 COATED POWDER POWDER PAINT, COATED COATED TO MATCH PAINT, PAINT, PELLA TO TO MATCH MATCH PELLA PELLA WP14- INSULATION (ZINC RAIN SCRE 313 ST. MARKS AVENUE BROOKLYN, NY 11238 "CLASSIC WHITE" "CLASSIC "CLASSIC WHITE" WHITE" STONE WOOL CAVITY ROCK PT-3 POWDER PT-3 PT-3 COATED POWDER POWDER PAINT, COATED COATED TO GREY PAINT, PAINT, OF TO ZINC TO GREY GREY OF OF ZINC ZINC WP15- INSULATION (FIBER CEMENT PANELS PANELS PANELS DRAWING NAME: SCREEN): OWENS CORNING, 250/CW25 WP16- SPRAY INSULATION: ICYNEN CELL, MD-C-200 WP17- BATT INSULATION AT EXTERI PROJECT: PROJECT: PROJECT: OWENS CORNING, ECO TOUC SEAL & SIGNATURE DATE : 01.30.13 FACED, R19 JOB # : 1214 WP18- BATT INSULATION AT INTERIO FIXED CASEMENT 313 ST. MARKS 313313 ST. AVENUE ST. MARKS MARKS BROOKLYN, AVENUE AVENUE BROOKLYN, NY BROOKLYN, 11238 NYNY 11238 11238 OWENS CORNING, ECO TOUC DWG BY : JY, ZC, WJ WINDOW & FRAME FACED, R38 SEECHECKED SCHEDULE FOR : CD WP19- SHEATHING AT EXTERIOR WA DETAILS DRAWING NAME: DRAWING DRAWING NAME: NAME: GEORGIA PACIFIC, DENSGLA DRAWING # : WP20- SHEATHING AT EXTERIOR WA ABOVE HORIZONTAL SURFAC PACIFIC, DENSDECK WP21- GYPSUM WALL BOARD (NONPAGE # : GEORGIA PACIFIC, TOUGH R : DATE 01.30.13 : 01.30.13 : 01.30.13 SEAL & SIGNATURE SEAL SEAL & SIGNATURE & SIGNATURE DATE DATE WP22- GYPSUM WALL BOARD (MOIS RESISTANT): GEORGIA PACIF JOB # JOB # # : JOB 1214 : 1214 : 1214 ROCK, MOLD-GUARD DWG BY DWG : DWG JY,BY ZC, BYWJ: JY, : JY, ZC,ZC, WJWJ WP23- CEMENT WALL BOARD (AT SH GEORGIA PACIFIC, DENSSHIE CHECKED CHECKED : CHECKED CD : CD : CD WP24- GYPSUM WALL BOARD (RATE DRAWING #DRAWING : DRAWING # :# : PACIFIC, TOUGH ROCK, FIRE WP25- GRACE BITUTHENE3000 WP26- GRACE PREPRUFE 160R WP27- GRACE HYDRODUCT 220 WP28- PELLA SMARTFLASH FOIL BA PAGE # : PAGE PAGE # :# : FLASHING TAPE WP29- STOGUARD TAPE 9 WP30- 1" DENSGLASS SHAFTLINER P WP31- OMEGA LITE PANEL WP32- PELLA BREAK METAL OUTSWING CASEMENT SILL FLASHING #49A1M134 WINDOW & FRAME WP33- ALSAN RS BALCONY/PARKING SEE SCHEDULE FOR 222/276 PRIMER, 230/260 LO, DETAILS REINFORCEMENT, 230/260 LO SELF-LEVELING MORTAR, QU COLOR FINISH IN STONE GRE WP34- DOW - STYROFOAM BRAND S FOAM GASKET

LOUVER FRONT LOUVER LOUVER ELEVATION FRONT FRONT ELEVATION ELEVATION

SCALE: 1" =SCALE: 1'-0" SCALE: 1" =1"1'-0" = 1'-0"

LOUVER FRONT ELEVATION

SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"

LOUVER SECTION LOUVER LOUVER SECTION SECTION

LIQUID APPLIED VAPOR PERMEABLE AIR / WEATHER BARRIER WP-1

1 4"

4" 4"

LOUVER SECTION

CALE: 1" =SCALE: 1'-0" SCALE: 1" =1"1'-0" = 1'-0"

2" 2"

6" 6"

SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"

OUVER SECTION LOUVER LOUVER SECTION SECTION

534"

534" 534"

534" 6"

EXTERIOR FACE EXTERIOR EXTERIOR OF FACE FACE OF OF CORRUGATED CORRUGATED ZINC CORRUGATED PANEL ZINC ZINC PANEL PANEL

2" 2"

EXTERIOR FACE OF CORRUGATED ZINC PANEL

8" 8"

1 4"

EXTERIOR FACE OF CORRUGATED ZINC PANEL

534"

EXTERIOR FACE EXTERIOR EXTERIOR OF FACE FACE OF OF 4" CORRUGATED CORRUGATED ZINC CORRUGATED PANEL ZINC ZINC PANEL PANEL

8" 8"

8" 1 4" 1 4"

2" 1 4"

1 4" 1 4"

1 4"

4" 4"

2" 2" 6"

8" 8"

LOUVER ISOMETRIC LOUVER LOUVER ISOMETRIC ISOMETRIC

SCALE: 1" =SCALE: 1'-0" SCALE: 1" =1"1'-0" = 1'-0"

OUTSWING CASEMENT WINDOW & FRAME SEE SCHEDULE FOR DETAILS

A-312.00 A-312.00 A-312.00

ACOUSTICAL OUTLINE SPECIFICATION AS1- NOISEPROOFING COMPOUND: GREEN GLUE AS2- DECK-SUSPENDED CEILING HA UNDERSIDE OF 4TH FL SLAB KINETICS NOISE CONTROL, M AS3- RESILIENT PARTITION ISOLATIO NON-STRUCTURAL WALLS: K NOISE CONTROL, MODEL WA AS4- FLOOR UNDERLAYMENT @ APA WOOD FLOORS: KINETICS N CONTROL, ISOLAYMENT QT-F AS5- FLOOR UNDERLAYMENT @ APA FLOORS: KINETICS NOISE C ISOLAYMENT QT-F05-W AS6- STUD WALL CLIP ISOLATOR @ WALL OF 3RD FLOOR APART GYM: KINETICS NOISE CONT ISOMAX CLIP AS7- ROOF PAVER LEVELER: HANOV COMPENSATOR SYSTEM AS8- ROOF PAVER: HANOVER, ARC CONCRETE PAVER, 23.5” X 23 AS9- HILTI FS JOINT SEALER CP 606 AS10- MAPEGUARD 2, CRACK ISOLA REDUCTION SHEET MEMBRA

BACKER ROD & SEALANT, TYP. SHIM AS NECESSARY SHIM AS NECESSARY PTD MDF SILL PT-2

PT-1

PTD MDF SILL

POWDER COATED ALUMINUM EYELID

MT-1

SLOPE PELLA SMARTFLASH FOIL BACKED BUTYL FLASHING TAPE

SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH AIR & WEATHER BARRIER, TYP.

SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH AIR & WEATHER BARRIER, TYP. WP-2

FLEXIBLE FLASHING

PROVIDE SEALANT AT ALL FOUR SIDES OF PTAC UNIT

FLEXIBLE FLASHING

PROVIDE SEALANT AT ALL FOUR SIDES OF PTAC UNIT

MT-1 ALUMINUM SOLAR SHADE, "EY PT-1 POWDER COATED PAINT, BENJ PURE JOY" PT-2 POWDER COATED PAINT, TO M "CLASSIC WHITE" PT-3 POWDER COATED PAINT, TO G PANELS

DRIP EDGE

PTAC

3" G90 GALVANIZED Z-CLIP

2'-6 1/2" AFF

CORRUGATED ZINC PANEL; PERFORATED PANELS IN FRONT OF PTAC WP-9

PTAC

3" G90 GALVANIZED Z-CLIP

AIRSPACE

2'-6 1/2" AFF

WP-16 SPRAY INSULATION

1'-4 1/4"

WP-2

WP-28

PELLA SMARTFLASH FOIL BACKED BUTYL FLASHING TAPE WP-28

1'-4 1/4"

4'-4" 4'-4"

534" 534" 4"6" 6"

534" 4'-4"

1 4"

2" 3'-0" 3'-0"

3'-0" 4'-4"

1 4"

3'-0"

534"

8'-10"

7'-621"

8'-10" 8'-10"

7'-621"

5'-541" 5'-541"

5'-541"

FOIL FACE BATT INSULATION

(2) LAYERS 58 " GYPSUM W.B. TYPE "X" STC RATING OF 52 TESTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH ASTME90 FIRE RATING ASTME 119.251 NFPA

1 4"

FOIL FACE FOIL BATT FACE BATT INSULATION INSULATION WP-17

WP13- STOGUARD WP13WP13STOGUARD GOLD STOGUARD COAT, GOLD FLUID GOLD COAT, APPLIED COAT, FLUID FLUID APPLIED APPLIED STONE WOOL CAVITY ROCKASSOCIATES ASSOCIATES ASSOCIATES NEW YORK, NY 10018 WP15INSULATION (FIBER CEMENT RAIN VAPOR PERMEABLE VAPOR VAPOR PERMEABLE BUILDING PERMEABLE WRAP BUILDING BUILDING WRAP WRAP SCREEN): OWENS CORNING, FOAMULAR WP14- INSULATION WP14WP14INSULATION (ZINC INSULATION RAIN (ZINC SCREEN): (ZINC RAIN RAIN ROXUL, SCREEN): SCREEN): ROXUL, ROXUL, TFLR 212-244-2410 505 EIGHTH505 AVE, 505 EIGHTH 24TH EIGHTH AVE, AVE, 24TH 24TH FLRFLR 250/CW25 STONE WOOL STONE STONE CAVITY WOOL WOOL ROCK CAVITY CAVITY ROCK ROCK FNY 212-643-1606 NEW YORK,NEW NY NEW 10018 YORK, YORK, NY 10018 10018 SPRAY INSULATION: ICYNENE, CLOSED 1WP161 WP15INSULATION WP15WP15INSULATION (FIBER INSULATION CEMENT (FIBER (FIBER RAIN CEMENT CEMENT RAIN RAIN METAL 4" BREAK 4" BREAK METAL CELL, MD-C-200 SCREEN): OWENS SCREEN): SCREEN): CORNING, OWENS OWENS FOAMULAR CORNING, CORNING, FOAMULAR FOAMULAR T 212-244-2410 T 212-244-2410 SOLAR SOLAR LOUVER WP17BATTLOUVER INSULATION AT EXTERIOR WALLS: T 212-244-2410 250/CW25 250/CW25 250/CW25 F 212-643-1606 F 212-643-1606 OWENS CORNING, ECO TOUCH, FOIL F 212-643-1606 INTERIOR DESIGN : WP16- SPRAY WP16INSULATION: WP16SPRAY SPRAY INSULATION: ICYNENE, INSULATION: CLOSED ICYNENE, ICYNENE, CLOSED CLOSED FACED, R19 DURUKAN DESIGN CELL, MD-C-200 CELL, CELL, MD-C-200 MD-C-200 WP18- BATT INSULATION AT INTERIOR WALLS: WP17BATT WP17INSULATION WP17BATT BATT INSULATION AT INSULATION EXTERIOR AT WALLS: AT EXTERIOR EXTERIOR WALLS: OWENS CORNING, ECO TOUCH, PAPER PELLA WINDOW, FRAME COLOR TO BE WALLS: PELLA WINDOW, FRAME COLOR TO BE 16DESIGN W 37TH OWENS CORNING, OWENS OWENS ECO CORNING, CORNING, TOUCH, ECO FOIL ECO TOUCH, TOUCH, FOIL FOIL INTERIOR DESIGN FACED, R38 INTERIOR INTERIOR : DESIGN : ST : CLASSIC WHITE CLASSIC WHITE SUITE 3 WP19SHEATHING AT EXTERIOR WALLS: FACED, R19 FACED, FACED, R19 R19 NEW YORK, NY 10018 DURUKAN DURUKAN DESIGN DESIGN GEORGIA PACIFIC, DENSGLASS WP18- BATTWP18INSULATION WP18BATT BATT INSULATION AT INSULATION INTERIOR ATWALLS: AT INTERIOR INTERIOR WALLS: WALLS:DURUKAN DESIGN WP20SHEATHING AT EXTERIOR WALLS UP TO 2' OWENS CORNING, OWENS OWENS ECO CORNING, CORNING, TOUCH, ECO PAPER ECO TOUCH, TOUCH, PAPER PAPER T 212-596-4041 GEORGIA 16 W 37TH ST 16 W 16 37TH W 37TH ST ST FACED, R38FACED, FACED, R38R38 ABOVE HORIZONTAL SURFACES: PACIFIC, DENSDECK SUITE 3 SUITE SUITE 3 3 F 212-596-4042 WP19- SHEATHING WP19WP19SHEATHING ATSHEATHING EXTERIOR AT WALLS: AT EXTERIOR EXTERIOR WALLS: WALLS: WP21- GYPSUM WALL BOARD (NON-RATED): NEW YORK,NEW NY NEW 10018 YORK, YORK, NYNY 10018 10018 GEORGIA PACIFIC, GEORGIA GEORGIA DENSGLASS PACIFIC, PACIFIC, DENSGLASS DENSGLASS OPERABLE CASEMENT WINDOW OPERABLE CASEMENT WINDOW GEORGIA PACIFIC, TOUGH ROCK WP20- SHEATHING WP20WP20SHEATHING ATSHEATHING EXTERIOR AT WALLS AT EXTERIOR EXTERIOR UPWALL TO WALLS 2' WALLS UP UP TO TO 2' 2' WP22GYPSUM BOARD (MOISTURE COORDINATION : T 212-596-4041 T 212-596-4041 ABOVE HORIZONTAL ABOVE ABOVE HORIZONTAL SURFACES: HORIZONTAL SURFACES: GEORGIA SURFACES: GEORGIA GEORGIA RESISTANT): GEORGIA PACIFIC, TOUGH T 212-596-4041 F 212-596-4042 F 212-596-4042 F 212-596-4042 PACIFIC, DENSDECK PACIFIC, PACIFIC, DENSDECK DENSDECK ROCK, MOLD-GUARD REUVEN KALISCH WP21- GYPSUM WP21WP21WALL GYPSUM GYPSUM BOARD WALL (NON-RATED): WALL BOARD BOARD (NON-RATED): (NON-RATED): WP23CEMENT WALL BOARD (AT SHOWERS): RELIABLE EXPEDITING INC. EXTERIOR OF TOUGH LOUVER PAINTED, EXTERIOR OF LOUVER PAINTED, GEORGIA PACIFIC, DENSSHIELD GEORGIA PACIFIC, GEORGIA GEORGIA PACIFIC, PACIFIC, ROCK TOUGH TOUGH ROCK ROCK WP24GYPSUM WALL BOARD (RATED): GEORGIA BENJAMIN MOORE "PURE JOY," BENJAMIN MOORE "PURE JOY," 777 KENT AVE, SUITE 212 WP22- GYPSUM WP22WP22WALL GYPSUM GYPSUM BOARD WALL (MOISTURE WALL BOARD BOARD (MOISTURE (MOISTURE COORDINATION COORDINATION : : : NY 11205 PACIFIC, TOUGH ROCK, FIREGARD, TYPE X COORDINATION BROOKLYN, RESISTANT): RESISTANT): GEORGIA RESISTANT): PACIFIC, GEORGIA GEORGIA TOUGH PACIFIC, PACIFIC, TOUGH TOUGH

8'-10" 7'-621" 7'-621"

7'-6"

8'-10"

8'-10" 8'-10"

7'-621" 5'-541"

7'-6" 7'-6"

7'-6"

8'-10"

7'-621"

7'-621" 7'-621"

7'-621"

7'-6"

8'-10"

7'-621" 7'-621"

7'-621"

7'-6"

8'-10" 8'-10" 7'-6" 7'-6"

8'-10" 1 EQ.EQ. 4"

EQ.

FOIL FACE BATT INSULATION

5 (2) LAYERS 58 " GYPSUM W.B. TYPE "X" (2) LAYERS (2) 58LAYERS " GYPSUM W.B. TYPE W.B. "X" TYPE "X" 8 " GYPSUM STC RATING OF 52 TESTED STC RATING STCOF RATING 52 TESTED OF 52 TESTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH ASTME90 IN COMPLIANCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ASTME90 WITH ASTME90 FIRE RATING ASTME 119.251 NFPAFIRE RATING FIREASTME RATING119.251 ASTMENFPA 119.251 NFPA

EQ.

1134"

EQ.EQ.

WP-17

RESILIENT CHANNEL

WP-17

1'-0"

1 " EQ. 4"

EQ.

1 1 3'-03'-0 2" 2"

MEPFS ENGINEER :

ETTINGER ENGINEERING

INTERIOR OF ALUMINUM LOUVER INTERIOR OF ALUMINUM LOUVER GEORGIA PACIFIC, GEORGIA GEORGIA DENSDECK PACIFIC, PACIFIC, DENSDECK DENSDECK WP13STOGUARD GOLD COAT, FLUID APPLIED ASSOCIATES MEPFS ENGINEER MEPFS MEPFS ENGINEER : ENGINEER : : WP12RIGID WP12INSULATION WP12RIGID INSULATION (ROOFING): INSULATION (ROOFING): DOW (ROOFING): DOW DOW VAPOR PERMEABLE BUILDING WRAP PAINTED TO MATCH PELLA PAINTED WINDOW TORIGID MATCH PELLA WINDOW STYROFOAM, STYROFOAM, ROOFMATE, STYROFOAM, ROOFMATE, TAPERED ROOFMATE, TAPERED TAPERED ETTINGER ENGINEERING ETTINGER ETTINGER ENGINEERING WP14INSULATION (ZINC RAIN SCREEN): ROXUL, 505ENGINEERING EIGHTH AVE, 24TH FLR COLOR "CLASSIC WHITE" COLOR "CLASSIC WHITE"

RESILIENT CHANNEL

3'-021" 1 4"

3'-021"

SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"

DOWN DOWN DOWN WP12- RIGID INSULATION (ROOFING): DOW WP11- ROOFING WP11WP11INSULATION ROOFING ROOFING INSULATION COVER INSULATION BOARD: COVER COVER BOARD: BOARD:TAPERED STYROFOAM, ROOFMATE,

SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"

6 6 1'-0" CALE: 1" =SCALE: SCALE: 1" =1"1'-0" = 1'-0"

architecture architecture architecture architecture

LOUVER SECTION

OUVER SECTION LOUVER LOUVER SECTION SECTION

1 4"

2'-141" 2'-141"

2'-141"

CHRISTOPHER CHRISTOPHER CHRISTOPHER DIERIG,CHRISTOPHER RADIERIG, DIERIG, RA RA DIERIG, RA THERMAL &THERMAL WATER THERMAL PROOFING & WATER & WATER PROOFING OUTLINE PROOFING OUTLINE OUTLINE THERMAL & WATER PROOFING OUTLINE WP1LIQUID APPLIED VAPORAIR/ PERMEABLE WP1- LIQUID WP1APPLIED WP1LIQUID LIQUID VAPOR APPLIED APPLIED PERMEABLE VAPOR VAPOR PERMEABLE AIR/ PERMEABLE AIR/ S3 AIR/S3S3 S3 WEATHER BARRIER: GRACE WEATHER BARRIER: WEATHER WEATHER GRACE BARRIER: BARRIER: GRACE GRACE 16 ST W 37TH ST PERM-A-BARRIER VP 16 W 37TH ST 16 W 16 37TH W 37TH ST PERM-A-BARRIER PERM-A-BARRIER PERM-A-BARRIER VP VP VP WP2WALL FLASHING: GRACE PERM-A-BARRIER SUITE 3 SUITE SUITE 3 3 SUITE 3 WP2- WALL WP2FLASHING: WP2WALL WALL FLASHING: GRACE FLASHING: PERM-A-BARRIER GRACE GRACE PERM-A-BARRIER PERM-A-BARRIER NEW YORK, NY 10018 WALL FLASHING NEW YORK,NEW NY NEW 10018 YORK, YORK, NYNY 10018 10018 WALL FLASHING WALL WALL FLASHING FLASHING WP3- VAPOR BARRIER BY SBS ROOF SYSTEM WP3- VAPOR WP3BARRIER WP3VAPOR VAPOR BYBARRIER SBS BARRIER ROOF BY BY SYSTEM SBS SBS ROOF ROOF SYSTEM SYSTEM MANUFACTURER T 646-755-3023 MANUFACTURER MANUFACTURER MANUFACTURER 646-755-3023 T 646-755-3023 T 646-755-3023 WP4- EXPANSION JOINT SEALANT: T ELASTA GEL F 646-224-9537 WP4- EXPANSION WP4WP4EXPANSION JOINT EXPANSION SEALANT: JOINT JOINT SEALANT: ELASTA SEALANT: GEL ELASTA ELASTA GEL GEL F 646-224-9537 F 646-224-9537 F 646-224-9537 6170 EPOXY OR GRACE BRAND SEALANT, 6170 EPOXY6170 OR 6170 GRACE EPOXY EPOXY OR BRAND OR GRACE SEALANT, BRAND BRAND SEALANT, SEALANT, TBDGRACE WWW.S3ARC.COM TBD TBD TBD WP5- SEISMIC GAP: EMSEAL, SEISMIC WWW.S3ARC.COM WWW.S3ARC.COM WWW.S3ARC.COM COLORSEAL WP5- SEISMIC WP5WP5GAP: SEISMIC SEISMIC EMSEAL, GAP: GAP: SEISMIC EMSEAL, EMSEAL, SEISMIC SEISMIC FLANGE WP6- EIFS: FLANGE STOCORP, ADVANCED CAVITY WALL COLORSEAL COLORSEAL COLORSEAL SPECIFICATIONS, A500E WP6- EIFS: WP6STOCORP, WP6EIFS: EIFS: ADVANCED STOCORP, STOCORP, ADVANCED CAVITY ADVANCED WALL CAVITY CAVITY WALL WALL WP7- FIBER CEMENT CONSULTANTS : SPECIFICATIONS, SPECIFICATIONS, SPECIFICATIONS, A500E A500E A500E PANEL: EASTERN ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS, NATURA WP7- FIBERWP7CEMENT WP7FIBER FIBER PANEL: CEMENT CEMENT EASTERN PANEL: PANEL: EASTERN EASTERN CONSULTANTS CONSULTANTS CONSULTANTS : : : BLACK N073, 888-572-6357 WELDED CONNECTION, TYP. WELDED CONNECTION, TYP. ARCHITECTURAL ARCHITECTURAL ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS, PRODUCTS, NATURA PRODUCTS, NATURA NATURA STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING : WP8- ZINC PANEL (SOLID): VM ZINC, VMZ BLACK N073, BLACK 888-572-6357 BLACK N073, N073, 888-572-6357 888-572-6357 CORRUGATED PANEL, QUARTZ-ZINC, 1.0 WSP CANTOR SEINUK STRUCTURAL STRUCTURAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING : : : WP8- ZINC PANEL WP8WP8ZINC (SOLID): ZINC PANEL PANEL VM(SOLID): ZINC, (SOLID): VMZ VM VM ZINC, ZINC, VMZ VMZ MM, 646-671-0853 228 E 45TH STREET, 3RD FLR CORRUGATED CORRUGATED CORRUGATED PANEL, QUARTZ-ZINC, PANEL, PANEL, QUARTZ-ZINC, QUARTZ-ZINC, 1.0 1.0 1.0 WP9ZINC PANEL (PERFORATED): VM ZINC, VMZ WSP CANTOR WSP WSP SEINUK CANTOR CANTOR SEINUK SEINUK NEW YORK, NY 10017 MM, 646-671-0853 MM,MM, 646-671-0853 646-671-0853 PERF-CORRUGATED PANEL,228 QUARTZ-ZINC, E 45TH 228 STREET, 228 E 45TH E 45TH 3RD STREET, FLR STREET, 3RD 3RD FLRFLR 1.0 646-671-0853 WP9-PANE ZINC PANEL WP9WP9ZINC (PERFORATED): ZINC PANEL PANEL (PERFORATED): (PERFORATED): VMMM, ZINC, VMZ VMVM ZINC, ZINC, VMZ VMZ TNY 212-687-9888 NEW YORK,NEW NY NEW 10017 YORK, YORK, NY 10017 10017 FIXED PANE WINDOW FIXED WINDOW WP10- ROOFING: FIRESTONE, SBS, 2 PLY TORCH PERF-CORRUGATED PERF-CORRUGATED PERF-CORRUGATED PANEL, QUARTZ-ZINC, PANEL, PANEL, QUARTZ-ZINC, QUARTZ-ZINC, DOWN 1.0 MM, 646-671-0853 1.0 1.0 MM,MM, 646-671-0853 646-671-0853 T 212-687-9888 T 212-687-9888 WP11ROOFING INSULATION COVER BOARD: T 212-687-9888 WP10- ROOFING: WP10WP10FIRESTONE, ROOFING: ROOFING: FIRESTONE, SBS, FIRESTONE, 2 PLY TORCH SBS, SBS, 2 PLY 2 PLY TORCH TORCH

3'-021"

1 4" 1 4"

1 4"

EXTERIOR FACE OF CORRUGATED ZINC PANEL

534"

ARCHITECTARCHITECT / APPLICANT ARCHITECT / APPLICANT : / APPLICANT : : ARCHITECT / APPLICANT :

4'-4"

3'-021"

1 4"

534" 1 4"

1 1 3'-021" 4"EXTERIOR 4" FACE EXTERIOR EXTERIOR OF FACE FACE OF OF

1 4"

1'-0" 1'-0" 1 3 3 " 411 " 4" 411

534" 4" 534" 6" 6"

1 4"

1 1 3'-03'-0 2" 2"

4" 4"

1'-0" 1134"

4'-4"

543"

8" 8"

2" 2"

534"

3'-0"

8" 8"

4" 4"

534"

2" 2"

4'-4"

1 4"

3'-021"

6" 1 4"

543" 543"

1 4"

1 4" 1 4"

4'-4" 4'-4" 3'-0" 3'-0"

1 4"

4'-4" 3'-0"

1 4"

6" 6" 1 1 4" 4"

SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"

1 4"

4" 4"

6" 543"

LOUVER SECTION

SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"

8" 8"

1 4"

LOUVER SECTION

LOUVER SECTION SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"

1 4" 1 4"

LOUVER SECTION

SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"

534"

EXTERIOR FACE OF EXTERIOR FACE OF 2" CORRUGATED ZINC PANEL CORRUGATED ZINC PANEL EXTERIOR FACE OF EXTERIOR FACE OF 2" CORRUGATED ZINC PANEL CORRUGATED ZINC PANEL

2" 1 4"

1 4"

4'-4"

1 4"

3'-0"

4'-4"

3'-0"

PROJECT

313

313 ST. M

DRAWING SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH AIR & WEATHER BARRIER, TYP. WP-14

SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH AIR & WEATHER BARRIER, TYP.

1 12" ROXUL STONE WOOL INSULATION ON STICK PINS WP-2

WP-14 BACKER ROD & SEALANT, TYP.

FLEXIBLE FLASHING

LIQUID APPLIED VAPOR PERMEABLE AIR / WEATHER BARRIER WP-1 WP-19

DENSGLASS

SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"

detail and sections of zinc rain screen and “eye lid” solar shades

SEAL & SIG BACKER ROD & SEALANT, TYP.

FLEXIBLE FLASHING

LIQUID APPLIED VAPOR PERMEABLE AIR / WEATHER BARRIER WP-1 WP-19

ENLARGED WALL SECTION - RAINSCREEN @ WINDOW (EYELID)

ENLA

1 12" ROXUL STONE WOOL INSULATION ON STICK PINS WP-2

DENSGLASS

ENLARGED WALL SECTION - RAINSCREEN @ WINDOW (NO EYELID) SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"

detail photos of “eye-lid” solar shades

rearyard and facade

rendering of proposed bergen street facade design

prospect heights 3 family 730 bergen street, bklyn PROJECT BREAKDOWN TYPE New Construction CLASS Residential LOCATION Brooklyn N.Y. LOT AREA 2,500 SF PROJECT AREA 5,100 SF PROJECT HEIGHT 50’ (5 Stories) UNIT COUNT 3 PARKING SPACES 3 YEARS ACTIVE 2/2012 - 11/2018

This blunt-tipped, wedge shaped parcel began as part of the same parking lot on which The Brooklyn Zinc was built. Once the two lots were separated, the as-of-right zoning allowed for a 7 unit building with a max height of 50’. This multi-family townhouse may share a cellar and sub-grade parking with it’s big sister the Zinc, but the client, recognized that two building looked out on to two very different blocks so we would need to develop a different visual language for this project. There would be no zinc or eyelids, instead this narrow-faced building, measuring in at just over 16 feet wide would need to become more contextual,draped in brick.

massing of proposed building volume

cellar floor plan

ground floor plan

second floor plan

third floor plan

fourth floor plan

building section looking west, highlighting the unit arrangement

penthouse floor plan

The cone-shaped plan creates compressed spaces at the street facade putting the main focus programmatically towards the rear of the building which flares out like a fan. To avoid an elevator requirement the building was designed as a 3 family building, with the units spanning a basement, 4 stories and a penthouse. Divided into two duplex and one triplex apartment, these units were originally envisioned as rental apartments with a similar level of finish as the Zinc but as the economy changed over the course of design and construction, the client decided to transition these three units to condos, upgrading finishes and redesigning floor plans to include master suites.

1940â€™s tax photo showing loading dock at far right

the site had been an on grade parking lot for decades prior to construction

Unit 1 on the ground floor is a duplex to the cellar, featuring an accessory space with skylights and a half bathroom. It has access to the front half of the rear yard through a glazed french door off the living room. Unit 2 stretches across all of the second floor, as well as the rear half of the 3rd floor. It is a 3 bedroom unit with a home office and access to the back half of the rear yard via a landing and exterior staircase off the rear facade. Unit 3, the triplex, begins on the front half of the 3rd floor with living room, dining room, kitchen and a half bath. On the fourth floor there is a master suite, 2 bedrooms and a bathroom. The connected penthouse could be a den as easily as it could be an additional bedroom with a wrap around terrace.

proposed elevation of bergen street facade

rendering of proposed bergen street facade

completed bergen street facade

kitchen and dining area in unit 2

dining area and living room in unit 2

master bed room

In addition to the appeal and perks of living in private townhouse style building, the residents would enjoy direct access to the parking in the cellar of The Brooklyn Zinc as well as the gym and amenities space. Providing the best of all worlds, small building exclusivity with big building benefits. This building, unlike the Billiard factory and the Brooklyn Zinc, each of which had a large impact both visually and in terms of density and population, 730 Bergen is a modest brick face townhouse that almost sneaks its way into the neighborhood. The slim facade, the treated brick and its overall scale, seem to fight to not be notices. If not for the new windows and hardware, one would think this was merely the product of a renovation and not a completely new ground up development. The contextual approach, a departure from the more contemporary work I am more used to, allowed for more attention and detailing within the private condo residences.

master bathroom

living room

the clinton hall 269 washington avenue 238 hall street, bklyn

PROJECT BREAKDOWN

TYPE CLASS LOCATION LOT AREA PROJECT AREA PROJECT HEIGHT UNIT COUNT PARKING SPACES YEARS ACTIVE

New Construction / Landmark Residential Brooklyn N.Y. 9,958 SF (5,000 SF + 4,958 SF) 23,880 SF (10,350 SF + 10,530 SF)

50’ (5 Stories) 20 (10 units per building) 0 11/2011 - 12/2017

This project in Clinton Hill began as a vacant through-lot stretching from historic Washington Ave. To the west through to Hall St. on the east. Looking out onto the lush grounds of the Pratt Institute campus and directly across from the school’s library with it’s interiors designed by the Tiffany Glass & Decorating Company, this project of sister buildings sought to cater to two distinct demographics of the neighborhood; an older familycentric population and students of the institute. The lot sits in the heart of the Clinton Hill historic district and required both community board approval as well as Landmarks approval. It was an involved process to get permission to create these two new massing of proposed building volumes, 238 hall street above, 269 washington ave below

446

421

128 135

219

234

Fult on S tr

eet

A Putnam

venue

Historic District Boundaries

storic District lyn ember 10, 1981

Br oa d

wa y

Atlantic Avenue

Av en u

strict Boundaries

4th

Eastern Parkway

photo montage of washington avenue historical context, from landmarks preservation presentation

tion, April 2014 tion, April 2014

gton Avenue gton Avenue

Block 1918, Lot 18 & 238 Hall Street Block 1918, Lot 18 & 238 Hall Street

3architecture SS3 architecture

Block 1918, Lot 15 Block 1918, Lot 15

Dekalb Dekalb Avenue Avenue

Willoughby Willoughby Avenue Avenue

Proposed Proposed Building Building

photo montage of washington avenue site prior to construction

253 Washington Ave., 253 Washington c.1928 Ave., c.1928

257 Washington Avenue 257 Washington Avenue St. Luke’s Evangelical Lutheran St. Luke’s Evangelical Church, c.1894Lutheran Church, c.1894

22’ 22’

275 Washington Ave. 275 Washington Ave. Henry McCoun Henry House,McCoun c.1873 House, c.1873

Proposed Proposed Building Building

22’ 22’

28’ 28’

32.9’ 32.9’

277 Washington Ave. Washington (The277 Francine Tower),Ave. c.1925 (The Francine Tower), c.1925

Property Line Property Line Sidewalk Sidewalk Proposed Location of Building Setbacksof 269 Washington Ave ngton Avenueelevations Proposed in Context and set Building back diagram along washington avenue, showing existing context and proposed new building Proposed Location of Building Setbacksof 269 Washington Ave

ngton Avenue -

Proposed Building in Context

Av en u

Atlantic Avenue

4th

Eastern Parkway

Washington

photo montage of hall street historical context, from landmarks preservation presentation

3architecture SS3 architecture

14 Block 1918, Lot 18 & 238 Hall Street Block 1918, Lot 18 & 238 Hall Street

Block 1918, Lot 15 Block 1918, Lot 15 Proposed Proposed Building Building

277

277 photo montage of hall street site prior to construction

Rear Facade of 277 Washington Ave. Rear(The Facade of 277 Washington Francine Tower), c.1925 Ave. (The Francine Tower), c.1925

246 Hall Street 246 Hall Street Carriage House of the Carriage HouseHouse, of the Henry McCoun Henry McCoun House, c.1873 c.1873

246 246

238 238

Proposed Proposed Project Site Project Site

Street View Street View

257 257

Rear Facade of 257 Wash Rear Facade 257 Wash ington of Avenue ington Avenue St. Luke’s Parish House & St.Sunday Luke’s Parish School,House c.1924& Sunday School, c.1924 2.7’ 2.7’

Existing Fence on PropExistingerty Fence Lineon Property Line

Sidewalk Sidewalk Street Street Proposed Location of Building Setbacksof 269 Washington Ave elevations and set back diagram along hall street, showing existing context and proposed new building Proposed Location of Building Setbacksof 269 Washington Ave 33 Proposed Building in Context 20 FT 20 FT

Proposed Building in Context

16 W 37t Su 16 W 37t New York, Su New York,

Willoughby Willoughby Avenue Avenue

14 ue ue

21 21

S3architecture

C Presentation, April 2014

9 Washington Avenue Block 1918, Lot 18 & 238 Hall Street Block 1918, Lot 15

1. North View A

2. South View A

rendering of proposed washington avenue facade 4. North View B

“landmark” buildings on what was once the site of the Samuel Beard House but for the last 40 years had been an ad hoc public garden. 3. South View B

The site fell with in general Landmark 69 Washington Avenuedesignation; - Views to Penthouse district in addition to which, to the north lay the specifically landmarked neo-gothic St. Luke’s Evangelical Lutheran Church which was built in 1894 and designed by J.W. Walter. The church grounds continue alongside our lot through the block to Hall St. and features a Sunday school and parish house. The parish house was built in 1924, its brick structure combining Gothic and Romanesque to create a retardataire design with a tall crenelated corner tower and corbelled cornice.

253 Washington 257 Washington Avenue Ave., c.1928 St. Luke’s Evangelical Lutheran Church, c.1894

275 Washington Ave. Henry McCoun House, c.1873

277 Washington Ave. (The Francine Tower), c.1925

3 19

To the south, is the specifically landmarked Henry McCoun Mansion, one of the few freestanding early residences remaining on Washington Ave. An Italianate design with NeoGrec and Second Empire elements, it was built in 1873. On Hall St. is 34

Proposed Building

completed elevation, 269 washington avenue

16 W 37th St Suite 3 New York, NY 10018

S3architecture

C Presentation, April 2014

9 Washington Avenue Block 1918, Lot 18 & 238 Hall Street Block 1918, Lot 15

1. South View A

2. South View B

rendering of proposed hall street facade

a two story vernacular brick building that was originally a carriage house and coachman’s residence.

The greatest challenge of turning this 3. North View A vacant lot into a two building project 38 Hall Street - Views to Penthouse would be navigating the grey area between the zoning code and the landmark preservation commission. These two bodies have regulations and requirements that often seem at odds of not contradictory, especially when designing a new building.

4. North View B 277 Washington Ave. (The Francine Tower), c.1925

246 Hall St. Carriage House, c.1873

Proposed Project Site

257 Washington Avenue St. Luke’s Parish House & Sunday School, c.1924

3 29

Originally these two buildings were envisioned as a matching set, however, as the process unfolded this turned out not to be feasible. On our first visit to the site, (with site survey in hand from our client’s recent purchase of the lot) we discovered that the cornice of the landmarked McCoun Mansion extended almost 24” over the lot line at a height that would align it with the middle of our 4th floor. Obviously, there was no way to remove or change the neighbor’s cornice even though it crossed over completed elevation, 238 hall street

16 W 37th St Suite 3 New York, NY 10018

the lotline. Moving our building’s eastern wall so that it just cleared the cornice was not an option either. Zoning code in R6 districts requires that new buildings be built out to the side lot lines; if any space is to be left unbuilt between a new building and it’s neighbor, there is a 8’ minimum width that stretches the length of the entire site. This was the moment at which the “twin” buildings went their separate ways. The first concept involved setting the new building off the lot-line by 26”, so it would just evade the neighbor’s cornice. We hoped that the plan examiners would be sympathetic to our situation and the need to respect the landmarked status of our neighbor. They were not.

For the second concept we re-ran the square footage with the 8’ wide side yard, but we found we could not maximize the allowed bulk due LPC Presentation, April 2014 C Presentation, April to 2014 the very deep required set-back 269 Washington Avenue Block 1918, Lot 18 &S3238 Hall Street Block 1918, Lot 15 architecture 69 Washington Avenue Block 1918, Lot 18 & 238 Hall Street Block 1918, Lot 15 off the street. The plan examiner was willing to give us some wiggle room 16 W 37th St Suite 3 New York, NY 10018

269 washington avenue, with obscured views of the set back fourth floor mezzanine

Washington Ave.

19’ Sidewalk West Elevation

269 washington avenue, proposed elevation

69 Washington Avenue - Building Elevations

42’ Street

19’ Sidewalk

22’ Yard

North Elevation

269 washington avenue, sightline visibility study from across washington avenue 12

Penthouse Exposure Relative

on the set back but the community board and the LPC were not. We tried several iterations of redividing the site by transferring a 26” sliver of the site to either the sister building facing Hall St. or to the neighboring mansion but the DOB and DOF do not allow for the creation of a lot narrower than 16’ wide and they maintain that during the process of a land transfer a new lot is created (albeit on paper), therefore this was not allowed either.

C Presentation, April 2014

9 Washington Avenue Block 1918, Lot 18 & 238 Hall Street Block 1918, Lot 15

Finally we landed on a solution that satisfied everyone: the DOB, the client and the landmarks commission. The first three floors would be built out to the lot line adjacent to the neighbor while the fourth floor would have a side yard set-back of 8’ for the entire length of the building. The 3 story section of the building were set-back back from the street to align more closely LPC Presentation, April 2014 with the neighboring mansion 269 Washington Avenue Block 1918, Lot 18 & 238 Hall Street Block 1918, Lot 15 while 3architecture S the larger bulk of the main structure aligned with the church to the north. 16 W 37th St Suite 3 New York, NY 10018

238 hall street, with obscured views of the set back fourth floor mezzanine

Hall St.

13’ Sidewalk

238 hall street, proposed elevation

East Elevation

38 Hall Street - Building Elevations

33’ Street

13’ Sidewalk North Elevation

Penthouse Exposure Relative to37Street Width

238 hall street, sightline visibility study from across hall street

15 15

Lot LotLines Lines

Rear Rear Yard Yard

Unit Unit1C 1C

Unit 1C

Unit 1B

Unit Unit1B 1B

Unit4A 4A Unit

Roof RoofTerrace Terrace

Rear Yard Front Yard

Unit Unit1C 1C

Unit Unit1B 1B

Unit Unit3C 3C Unit Unit3A 3A

Unit 1C

Unit Unit3B 3B

third floor plan

Unit Unit1A 1A

Washington Avenue Unit 1B

Washington Avenue Avenue Washington

269 Washington Avenue - Building Floor Plans

Sidewalk

fourth floor plan

269 269Washington WashingtonAvenue Avenue--Building BuildingFloor FloorPlans Plans

Sidewalk Sidewalk

Unit 1A

The complexity of the Washington Ave. building coupled with it’s more desirable address on a wide and historic avenue meant that this building catered to a more mature and family-oriented customer. With a few duplexes, two and three bedroom units with higher end finishes it is perfect for a longterm renter with children while the Hall St. building, facing the Pratt campus, was designed as “postdorm” style housing for students. This building featured two 4 bedroom units on each floor, smaller kitchens and heartier finishes that could withstand the abuse of a more transient population. One thing the two sister do share is the sweeping communal rear-yard. Extending between the two buildings, Lot LotLines Lines

Terrace Terrace

Unit Unit4B 4B

Unit Unit4A 4A

Lot Lines

Unit 1A

Unit Unit1A 1A

fourth floor mezzanine plan

Front Yard Yard Front

ground floor plan

cellar plan

Unit Unit2A 2A

Roof Roof

The building facing Hall St. was a different and simpler story. Nested between two back building/ service structures—a carriage house and a rectory—there was no required set back. We opted for a darker, more contemporary palate while still employing the vernacular brick of the adjacent back buildings. This building was straightforward with simple floor plans that could be repeated from floor to floor.

roof plan Lot Lines

second floor plan

Scale: Scale:1/16” 1/16”==1’-0” 1’-0”

16 16WW37th 37thStSt Suite Suite33 New NewYork, York,NY NY

architecture SS33architecture Scale: 1/16” = 1’-0”

Unit 2A

This was a move appreciated by all parties, both the community board and LPC liked that it was contextual and respectful to the neighbors while the client liked that it allowed us to make use of all the as-of-right square footage and we, the designers, liked that it created a break in the facade, a shadow line and a bit of variation.

tt 4B 4B

oor Plans

Terrace Terrace

Sidewalk Sidewalk HallStreet Street Hall

Lot Lines Unit 4C

16 16 W W 37th 37th St St Suite Suite 33 New New York, York, NY NY

Unit 1B

roof plan

Terrace

Lot Lines

Unit 1C

Unit 1B

Unit 3A

Terrace

Unit 4B

Sidewalk Rear Yard

Unit 4A Unit 4A

Unit 4C

Unit 3B Unit 4B

Unit 1A

Unit 4C

238 Hall Street - Building Floor Plans

second floor plan

Hall Street

fourth floor mezzanine plan

The two buildings with their common yard and diverse community represent a perfect microcosm of the neighborhood; a mix of new and historic, young and old.

S3architecture

Sidewalk

Unit 4A Unit 4A

Roof Terrace Terrace

Unit 4B

Unit 1A

Unit 4C

Unit 2A

Unit 4C

Unit 1C

Terrace

Lot Lines

Unit 1B Unit 2B

Scale: 1/16” = 1’-0”

Rear Yard

architecture S3architecture

Unit 3A Unit 4A

Roof RoofTerrace Terrace

Unit 4B

Unit 1A

Unit 3B

Unit Unit 2A 2A

Unit Unit 2B 2B

Unit 1C

Unit 1B

25 25

Scale: Scale: 1/16” 1/16” = = 1’-0” 1’-0”

238 Hall Street - Building Floor Plans

Rear Yard

we envisioned this space as a park. Keeping in mind that not everyone would be using it at the same time we hoped individuals would enjoy the unprecedented 60’ open space. Each of the four ground floor units across the two buildings had accessory spaces in the basements that opened on to their own private sub-grade yards; this allowed each of the ground floor units privacy by limiting visual access to their rear windows and gave the rear yard a feeling of being removed and independent from the two buildings. The common outdoor space came equipped with barbecues, a fire pit, and covered bike storage (in addition to the required storage within the building) and features a series of stepped terraces that straddle the change in elevation through the block.

Hall Street 16 W 37th St Suite 3 New York, NY

Unit 1B

fourth floor plan Terrace

Unit 1C

16 W 37th St Suite 3 New York, NY

third floor plan

S3architecture

cellar plan

Unit 4A Roof Terrace Terrace

Sidewalk Hall Street

Unit 3A Unit 3A

Unit 3B Unit 3B

Unit 4B

Unit 2A

Unit 1A Unit 1A Unit 1A

Unit 2B

Unit 4C

Unit 1C Unit 1C

Unit 1B Unit 1B

Scale: 1/16” = 1’-0”

238 Hall Street - Building Floor Plans 238 Hall Street - Building Floor Plans

ground floor plan

Lot Lines Lot Lines Unit 4C Unit 4C

Unit 2A

Unit 2B

LPC Presentation, April 2014

269 Washington Avenue Block 1918, Lot 18 & 238 Hall Street Block 1918, Lot 15 At the green space of the thru lot, the lack of exposure to the street allows the rear building elevations to offer contemporary design elements. This includes balconies, private patios and terraces, and due to interior programmatic layouts, offset and/or unique window sizes. The direct aesthetic relationship between the rear yards of 269 Washington Ave. and 238 Hall St. creates an active, yet contained environment within the shared green space.

rendering of proposed washington avenue rear facade

238 Hall Street - Proposed Design

completed rear elevation, 269 washington avenue

rendered birds-eye perspective of both buildings, illustrating the communal rearyard

269 Washington Avenue Rear Courtyard View

S3architecture

16 W 37th St Suite 3 New York, NY 10018

Shared Rear Courtyard

rendering of proposed hall street rear facade

238 Hall Street. Rear Courtyard View 9

completed rear elevation, 238 hall street

conversions

billiard factory lofts 363 prospect place brooklyn, n.y. s3arcitecture 8/2011 - 12/2016 42,000 square feet 44 units phases; sd,dd,id,cd,ca

completed prospect place facade

rendering of proposed prospect place facade design

original condition of prospect place facade

billiard factory lofts 363 prospect place, bklyn

PROJECT BREAKDOWN TYPE Conversion / Addition CLASS Residential LOCATION Brooklyn N.Y. LOT AREA 16,000 SF PROJECT AREA 42,000 SF PROJECT HEIGHT 50' (4 Stories) UNIT COUNT 44 PARKING SPACES 0 YEARS ACTIVE 8/2011 - 12/2016

massing of proposed building volume

In the heart of the rejuvenated Prospect Heights neighborhood, these loft residences grew out of the original Irving Kaye Billiard Factory built in 1960. The Irving Kaye company turned out a wide variety of billiard tables, pinball machines, foosball tables, arcade games and even hand dryers from their Brooklyn headquarters until 1970 when the company moved to Stamford, Connecticut. The through-block warehouse was then owned and operated as an ambulance garage and repair station by Brooklynâ€™s Jewish Hospital which was later acquired by Interfaith Hospital. The buildingâ€™s use and maintenance, began to wane until the building was ultimately sold to Industry Capital, a new development firm run by three

massing of original building volume

original condition of prospect place facade

local Brooklyn brothers and their childhood friend. Located just steps from the commercial strip along Washington Avenue, the existing two-story panhandle shaped brick factory building provided pedestrian entrances on both Prospect Place and St. Marks Avenue as well as 3 vehicular entrances on St. Marks, including one with a ramp to the second floor. Not only did the building have frontage on two streets, but due to the angle at which Washington Avenue cuts through the regular street grid of Prospect Heights, the zoning lot was divided by district boundaries; 15.45% of the lot fell within a R6A zoning district and 84.55% fell within a R6B zoning district.

demolition of existing slab to make way for proposed central courtyard

We performed an extensive zoning study that considered all the ramifications of a through-lot sitting 46

existing concrete encased steel column

new steel and temporary wood bracing

existing driveway facade

original condition of st marks ave facade

within two zoning districts along with a detailed neighborhood analysis. Based on our findings we determined that we would add two stories on top of the existing building thereby taking advantage of the current building height maximum. This also allowed us to provide tall loft ceilings in all the units, both those located in the original building as well as those located in the new upper floors. In the end the building would contain 44 units based upon the weighted average of zoning density of R6A and R6B. The building bulk along with its long winding corridors would require fire doors, two vertical means of egress as well as two separate building exists and one elevator. The slope through the block caused the ground floor slab of the existing structure to be more then 4â€™ below the sidewalk elevation along Prospect Place, our proposed main entrance, and to create a level ground floor slab through the building, caused the St. Marks slab to be a little over original hand painted signage

2’ above the sidewalk elevation. This meant we would have to provide a wheel chair lift at our main entrance on Prospect Place to bring people down 4’ to get to main level and then access the elevator and ground floor units. The building exit on the St. Marks side of the building was at the far end of the rearyard which could easily be sloped over the 74’ length to the street line. After years of abuse and neglect, most of the existing building had to removed and rebuild, including but not limited to all the existing floor slabs including

1st floor

2nd floor

mezzanine level

the roof and large portions of the perimeter wall with the entire facade along St. Marks avenue having to be replaced. Most of the existing steel columns remained in place as well as the steel beams for the second floor but all of the steel for the roof, which would now be our new third floor had to be removed because the original steel was install to create sloped roofing for drainage. It was deemed cheaper to replace all the steel since we were already removing the roof slab and the cost to level a slab on sloped steel would no longer be efficient.

3rd floor

4th floor

roof

proposed prospect place elevation, showing original two story structure with two story addition above

proposed building section looking west, cutting through main portion of building

proposed st marks avenue elevation showing the former garage bays at far right with glass infill

proposed building section looking west, cutting through courtyard, third floor roof terrace and the finger portion of building

aerial view of building looking east, showing courtyard, third floor and roof terrace

prospect place facade

The original two floors of the building would house the bulk of the rental units, 31 of the 44 unit total. Each of these units provided 14â€™ lofted ceiling. When possible, these units would feature exposed brick and other historic detailing ranging from reclaimed steel or existing painted signage. Eight units on each of the first two floors would have views out on to the new +1200 square foot inner courtyard, with the lower eight units sharing access to the private yard. The ground floor also contained storage space well exceeding the 22 bike minimum as well as a mail room, a package room with cold storage and 3000 square feet of public and private rear yards along St. Marks Ave. The lower two floors fell under section 28 of the zoning code, (regarding the conversion of existing commercial spaces). In this scenario, code permits increased allowable distances from windows and allows skylights to be calculated to satisfy required light and air requirements. Even with these relaxed requirements, the

original condition of st marks avenue facade

rendering of proposed st marks avenue facade design

completed st marks avenue facade

rendering of unit 3a, showing kitchen, living room & dining room

unit 3a located within the vertical addition, showing kitchen, living room & dining room

majority of the existing building was over 176' deep and the first floor units could not make use of skylights. To solve for this, we proposed a central courtyard that would cut into the middle of the building. This allowed us a double-loaded corridor that served units facing both the street and the courtyard. The two uppers floors of the new addition had to conform to all zoning regulations of new ground-up construction, including a 60% lot coverage calculation that required that the third and fourth floors be considerably smaller than the first and second floors. (Happily, the first and second floors had their existing +75% lot coverage grandfathered in). The floors contained within the upper enlargement would also need to conform to front lot-line setback regulations, rear yard equivalent regulations for through-lots, and their associated setbacks. All of these prescriptions had to be filtered through allocation of square footage across the two zoning districts.

sample kitchen

living space in a unit within the original portion of the billiard factory

All these parameters lead to an angular, snaking form containing 13 of the 44 unit total, ranging from single story, duplexes, and triplexes, a gym,a yoga studio, a billiard room and over 7300 square feet of both public and private terraces. The hard angular aspects included in the new two story addition are directly influenced and derived from the conflicting zoning districts as well as the neighborhood map which features many intersections that are not perpendicular. living space in a 2nd floor unit highlighting tall ceilings and exposed original brick

Aesthetically, we proposed that the most respectful way to honor to the original building and its industrial roots was to create the addition as â€œotherâ€?, a contemporary addition that sought not to blend in and blur the line, but rather, be a celebration and product of the new Prospect Heights. This direct contrast served to highlight the original building as well as complement it. We bathed the existing brick building in a dark grey color that felt stylish but also concealed the signs of age and previous repairs and renovations. The newer upper portion of the building, was drenched in a chalky blue with large black volumes projecting out where we had the opportunities for zoning Dormers and cantilevers that contributed to maxing out our allowable zoning square footage. To further tie together the old and the new we commissioned No Entry Design to hand paint the buildingâ€™s signage. All adding up to a contemporary yet inoffensive addition to both the building as well as the evolving neighborhood.

unit 3a, showing kitchen, living room, dining room & staircase

LONG ISLAND CITY,LONG NY 11101 ISLAND CITY, NY 11101

1 2"

NOSING

1 2"

R2 "

T 718-752-1500 F 718-752-9404

WWW.SHARONENGINEERING.COM WWW.SHARONENGINEERING.COM

1 2"

TREAD FLOOR OR STAIR TREAD

COORDINATION : COORDINATION :

ABE LEBOVITS ABE LEBOVITS BUILDING SOLUTION BUILDING SOLUTION SERVICES INC. SERVICES INC. 781 KENT AVENUE 781 KENT AVENUE BROOKLYN, NY 11205 BROOKLYN, NY 11205

ER UNIT@ STAIRS DETAIL ALL OTHER UNIT STAIRS

= 1'-0"

STAIR DETAIL

SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"

1 2"

STAIR DETAIL

SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"

T 718-782-1210 F 718-599-6636

1 2"

T 718-782-1210 F 718-599-6636

HORIZONTAL - VARIES HORIZONTAL - VARIES POWDER COATED STEEL, TYP. POWDER COATED STEEL, TYP. COLOR TBD. COLOR TBD.

R2"

DISCLAIMER:

52.2

COUNTER SUNK 5 8" COUNTER FLAT HEADSUNK HEX 5 8" FLAT HEAD HEX SOCKET BLACK OXIDE MACHINE SCREWS SOCKET BLACK OXIDE MACHINE SCREWS

52.2

1 STEEL FRAME X 2" FLAT WELDED 2" X 2" FLAT WELDED STEEL FRAME

RIE

FRAMED STAIR CASE TREADSTAIR CASE TREAD FRAMED BEYOND BEYOND

RIE

1 STOCK POWDER COATED FLAT STOCK 2" X 2" POWDER COATED 2" X 2"FLAT STEEL WELDED TO STEEL FRAMEWELDED TO FRAME

REVISIONS REVISIONS

R2"

1 2"

3'-0"

1 2" TYP. HORIZONTAL

R2"

STEEL BRACKET

111 3 A611

TYP.

FOR

DATE

9.16.2014 BOILER 111 REVISION 9.16.2014 BOILER REVISION

112 10.27.2014 UPDATE 112 10.27.2014 UPDATE

3 A611

113 11.04.2014 EASEMENT REV. EASEMENT REV. 113 11.04.2014

TYP. SOLID WOOD TREAD STAINED SOLID WOOD TREAD STAINED TO MATCH TO MATCH

STEEL BRACKET

FOR #

DATE

BLOCKING AS REQUIRED BLOCKING AS REQUIRED

DISCLAIMER:

THE ARCHITECT SHALL NOT HAVE CONTROL OR NOT HAVE CONTROL OR THE ARCHITECT SHALL CHARGE OF AND SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OF AND SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION MEANS, FORMETHODS, CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, DEVIATIONS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES OR DEVIATIONS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES OR PROCEDURES, OR FOR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS PROCEDURES, OR FOR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS AND PROGRAMS IN CONNECTION WITH THEIN CONNECTION WITH THE AND PROGRAMS WORK, FOR THE ACTS OR WORK, OMMISIONS OF THE FOR THE ACTS OR OMMISIONS OF THE CONTRACTOR, SUB-CONTRACTORS, OR ANY CONTRACTOR, SUB-CONTRACTORS, OR ANY OTHER PERSONS PERFORMING OF THEPERFORMING ANY OF THE OTHERANY PERSONS WORK, OR FOR THE FAILURE OF ANY OF THEM WORK, OR FOR THE FAILURE OF ANY OF THEM TO CARRY OUT THE WORKTO IN CARRY ACCORDANCE OUT THE WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ONWRITTEN THIS DRAWING SHALL ON THIS DRAWING SHALL DIMENSIONS HAVE PRECEDENCE OVERHAVE SCALED DIMENSIONS. PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. CONTRACTORS SHALL VERIFY AND BE CONTRACTORS SHALL VERIFY AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS ANDFOR ALL DIMENSIONS AND RESPONSIBLE CONDITIONS ON THE JOB AND THIS OFFICE CONDITIONS ON THE JOB AND THIS OFFICE MUST BE NOTIFIED OF ANY VARIATIONS FROMOF ANY VARIATIONS FROM MUST BE NOTIFIED THE DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS SHOWN AND BY CONDITIONS SHOWN BY THE DIMENSIONS THESE DRAWINGS. SHOP DETAILS MUST BE SHOP DETAILS MUST BE THESE DRAWINGS. SUBMITTED TO THIS OFFICE FOR REVIEW SUBMITTED TO THIS OFFICE FOR REVIEW BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH FABRICATION. BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH FABRICATION. NOT VALID FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS NOT VALID FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT AND BY THE ARCHITECT AND SIGNED AND SEALED APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS

BLOCKING AS REQUIRED BLOCKING AS REQUIRED

114 01.16.2015 UPDATE 114 01.16.2015 UPDATE 115 06.25.2015 UPDATE 115 06.25.2015 UPDATE 116 09.08.2015 UPDATE 116 09.08.2015 UPDATE

117 12.15.2015 LOBBY UPDATE 117 12.15.2015 LOBBY UPDATE

118 04.08.2016 AS118 BUILT - PAA 04.08.2016 AS BUILT - PAA

4 A611

1 2"

TYP.

1 2"

TYP.

134" MIN.

PROJECT:

DRAWING NAME:

DRAWING NAME: TYPICAL DETAILS TYPICAL DETAILS DUPLEX UNIT STAIRCASES DUPLEX UNIT STAIRCASES

134" MIN.

363 PROSPECT PLACE 363 PROSPECT PLACE BROOKLYN, NY 11238 BROOKLYN, NY 11238

3'-0" TYP. TREAD

SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"

R2"

STAIR ELEVATION -STAIR TYP. , ELEVATION LEFT HANDED STAIR SHOWN - TYP. , LEFT HANDED STAIR SHOWN

" R2

R2"

1 2"

3'-0" TYP. TREAD

VERTICAL - VARIES

4 A611

1" TYP.

VERTICAL - VARIES

TYP.

1" TYP.

1 2"

TYP.

1 2"

SOLID WOOD TREADS SOLID WOOD TREADS STAINED TO MATCHSTAINED WD1 TO MATCH WD1

" R2

SEAL & SIGNATURESEAL & SIGNATURE DATE

STAIR ELEVATION STAIR ELEVATION

: 06.22.12 DATE

: 06.22.12

JOB #

: 1114 JOB #

: 1114

DWG BY

: JY, ZC, MCBY DWG

: JY, ZC, MC

CHECKED

: CD CHECKED

: CD

DRAWING # :

A-612.0 A-612.0

SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"

Page 146 of 184 Page 146 of 184

1 2"

121" Ø PTD STL TUBE (PROVIDE 1'-0" EXTENSIONS TOP & BOTTOM)

EQ.

EQ. 1 2"

EQ.

3" 5/8"Ø STL HANDRAIL SUPPORT

3'-0" (TYP)

221"Ø x 41" STL PLATE W 2 BOLTS & CINCH ANCHORS PER PLATE, FASTENED TO WALL, MAX 3'-0" O.C. TYPICAL

1 2"

NOSING 1 2"

1 2"

FACE OF WALL FLOOR OR STAIR TREAD

HANDRAIL DETAIL @ ALL OTHER UNIT STAIRS

SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"

STAIR DETAIL

SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"

1 2"

STAIR DETAIL SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"

HORIZONTAL - VARIES

POWDER COATED STEEL, TYP. COLOR TBD.

BLOCKING AS REQUIRED

52.2

COUNTER SUNK 5 8" FLAT HEAD HEX SOCKET BLACK OXIDE MACHINE SCREWS

EQ.

EQ. 2"

X 2" FLAT WELDED STEEL FRAME

1 2"

121" Ø PTD STL TUBE (PROVIDE 1'-0" EXTENSIONS TOP & BOTTOM)

121"

5/8"Ø STL HANDRAIL SUPPORT

3'-0" (TYP)

FRAMED STAIR CASE TREAD BEYOND

1 2"

FACE OF WALL

1 2"

FLOOR OR STAIR TREAD 1 2" TYP. HORIZONTAL

2" X 2" POWDER CO STEEL WELDED TO

NOSING

1 2"

BLOCKING AS REQUIRED

1 2"

221"Ø x 41" STL PLATE W 2 BOLTS & CINCH ANCHORS PER PLATE, FASTENED TO WALL, MAX 3'-0" O.C. TYPICAL

3'-0"

121"

R2"

3 A611

TYP.

STEEL BRACKET

details of custom staircase featured in each of the multi-floor units

HANDRAIL DETAIL @ ALL OTHER UNIT STAIRS SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"

SOLID WOOD TREADS STAINED TO MATCH WD1

STAIR DETAIL SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"

TYP.

1 2"

1" TYP.

4 A611

TYP.

1 2"

T 718-752-1500 F 718-752-9404

NOSING 1 2"

1 2"

FACE OF WALL

1 2"

R2 "

3'-0"

RS & PER PLATE, CINCH ANCHORS PER PLATE, ALL, MAX 3'-0" TO WALL, MAX 3'-0" FASTENED O.C. TYPICAL

rendering of 3rd floor terrace

view of 3rd floor terrace during construction

st marks ave rear facade detail

rendering from roof terrace looking on to the finger portion of the building and the yard

st marks ave facade with hand painted branding

looking back at building from terraces at st marks end of building

renovations

west village townhouse 395 bleecker street new york, n.y.

s3arcitecture 8/2014 - 11/2018 3,500 square feet 2 units

PH PR EX 28 BR

phases; sd,dd,id,cd,ca landmarks

STR

MIC RV 126 BRO

prospect heights townhouses 218 & 220 park place brookyn, n.y.

347-

MEP

NICK TSF 200 P NEW

s3arcitecture 7/2012 - ongoing 14,450 square feet 7 units

212-2

LPC C

HIGGI & PAR 11 HAN NEW Y

phases; sd,dd,id,cd,ca landmarks

212-27

original condition of bleecker street facade

completed bleecker street facade

west village townhouse 395 bleecker street, nyc

PROJECT BREAKDOWN TYPE Gut Renovation - District CLASS Residential / Commercial LOCATION Manhattan N.Y. LOT AREA 1,425 SF PROJECT AREA 3,500 SF PROJECT HEIGHT 40â€™ (4 Stories) UNIT COUNT 2 (Commercial + Residential) PARKING SPACES 0 YEARS ACTIVE 8/2014 - 11/2018

My second foray into landmarks architecture was more straightforward. A nineteen and a half foot wide four story brick townhouse configured as a two family home; the building was originally designed with a commercial storefront at the ground floor. The wood framed glass storefront had been removed sometime in the 60â€™s when the commercial prospects in the city were in dire straights and had been infilled with brick and small windows when the space was converted to residential. This project came to us late in Bleecker streets Luxe retail renaissance and our client wanted to restore the commercial space at the ground floor along with the wood and glass storefront and then combine the upper three floors into a high end luxury triplex with a fully appointed roof garden. Another interesting bit of history was that at some point the building had entered into a co-op with the fourteen neighboring buildings that constituted a horseshoe at the end of the block, and formed a large communal garden space complete with reflecting pool. Each building retained the rights to the ten feet directly behind their building but all changes to that private space and the rear facade of the building would need to be voted on and approved by the garden co-op above and beyond the Landmarks Preservation Commission. The project began, like most projects in a Landmarks district, with research;. Digging up old tax photos, searching periodicals and city files for when 63

changes were made. We would need to establish a benchmark with the LPC as to what level / time period we would be restoring too. The changes to the facade had been well before the Landmark district was established so we were restoring to a point before landmarks. There was little to now information about our specific building, which was towards the western end of a block of six nearly identical brick townhomes, all of which had had their storefronts removed. Only the one building to the west of 395 had restored their storefront a year and half earlier. Having no actual historical documentation of the original storefront detailing, depth or cornice, LPC recommended we take cues from our neighbors newly restored storefront as well as other storefronts along bleecker street both original and ones that has been approved by LPC. We also extensively documented the original, though deteriorated, cornice at the roof line of the building which we would be restoring completely, and used many of those same details and proportions when designing our storefront. The front brick facade of our building had been painted a dark chalky blue decades earlier and we would be stripping that down, delicately exposing and sealing the original bricks without affecting or harming them. For this, along with many of our finer exterior details, we called upon a specifier that specialized in landmark restorations. original floor plans prior to renovation; cellar, ground, 2nd,3rd, 4th & roof

He guided us in many aspects; from the chemicals needed to clean and restore the brick to replacing the metal â€œreplacementâ€? windows with new landmark approved wood windows. He also consulted on new cast headers and sills for all the windows, brownstone matching and numerous other points. LPC gave us very little push back on this project, there were happy to see us restoring the original configuration to the building and basically helped to guide in the process and make sure all the necessary boxes were checked. The Client wanted us to maximize size of the retail space which they forecasted would account for basically 50% of the buildingâ€™s revenue. They wanted us to limit the residential use of the ground floor to just the front vestibule and stairs, and had hoped that we would be able to add an exterior stair at the rear of the second floor of the building so that the residential unit above could retain access to the large communal garden. This was a method used by several of the other buildings that shared the rear yard and we were all but certain that the co-op board would approve the move. We were wrong. The board had decided many years ago to no longer permit buildings along the shared garden to erect stairs from the second floor to the garden, even if the footprint of the staircase and landing sat completely with the 10 feet space directly behind the building. All of the staircases

ground floor living room prior to renovation

ground floor living & dining room prior to renovation

third floor living & dining room prior to renovation

we observed had either been constructed prior to the formation of the garden co-op or before the co-op changed the rules. This would severely impact the rentable commercial square footage as the client required that the residential unit above have access to the garden space. We would need to maintain an open residential corridor along the eastern side of the ground floor, stretching from the entry vestibule, past the stair leading to second floor, leading to the rear yard. Another clause of the garden co-op denied any commercial spaces to look out onto the garden space, so while we were replacing all of the ground floor windows looking out onto the garden with landmarks approved windows, they would need to be frosted, something that the LPC took no issue with. Finally the ground floor commercial space would also have storage space in the front half of the cellar along with a mechanical space shared by both units. The brief for the residential triplex was to create a rich and elegant contemporary townhouse that still held onto its historical charm. We wanted to strategically expose some brick where it felt natural and then provide clean contemporary treatments in juxtaposition. The ground serves as entry vestibule and access to the rear yard and has stacked stairs, one to the cellar and one to the second floors. In the cellar, we reserved the rear of the town house for the residence. There is a comfortable bedroom with an proposed renovation plans cellar, ground, 2nd,3rd, 4th & roof

ensuite bath perfect for a nanny, housekeeper or to be used as an office. There is also storage, a large laundry room with slop sink and access to the shared mechanical space. The second floor would serve as living / parlor floor. All the joists of the third floor were with replaced or reinforced so that we could remove all of the interior partitions on the second, providing a wide open clean space. After coming up the stairs from the ground floor, you would find yourself at the rear half of the town house, a small living /seating area with views to the communal garden and adjacent to the dining proposed elevation,street facade restoration

proposed short section

proposed long section, cut through stairwell

proposed elevation, rear facade restoration

area. The dining area, located at the center of the of the building sits between the new open riser steel stairs and the wet bar that also conceals storage and a water closet. At the front of the second floor you find a completely custom Smallbone of Devizes kitchen complete with subzero and wolf appliance, grand island and breakfast nook area.

rendering of proposed kitchen looking out on to dining area & staircase

S3architecture

rendering of proposed living room & dining area

S3architecture

The third floor has three bedrooms, one large bedroom complete with a walk-in closet and on suite bathroom at the street side and two smaller bedrooms at the rear, the smallest of whichKITCHEN could easily serve as a home RENDERING DESIGN PRESENTATION UPDATE 150129 office. In the center of the floors, across for the staircase is a 4 figure bathroom with a double vanity. The fourth and final floor is entirely reserved for the master suite. The master bathroom located at the street side of the building, completely marbled 220 square feet and features a double vanity, walkin steam shower with stone bench, a water closet, an apothecary style medicine cabinet, a freestanding stone tub and a working fireplace. LIVING ROOM RENDERING The center portion of the floors sees DESIGN PRESENTATION UPDATE 150129 a 100 square foot walk-in closet and the rear third of the floor is the bedroom, 235 square feet with three windows looking out upon the garden and featuring again a fully working fireplace. Continuing up to the roof, we built a glass stair bulkhead that opens up on to fully appointed roof terraces that occupies the back half of the roof, outside the line of sight from

the street to satisfy landmarks. Along with picturesque views of the west village and the communal garden below the roof terraces offers both lounging and dining areas as well as a complete kitchen with gas grille, sink and refrigerator. This project revitalized and transformed a classic west village townhouse, highlighting the best aspects of the original building, returning and repair lost details but organizing the program for a contemporary lifestyle that focuses on open plan.

completed kitchen with small bone millwork, looking back towards dining area & living room

completed kitchen, looking towards the front facade

detailing of new custom wood & steel staircase

completed dining area with built in bar

rendering of proposed master bathroom

chit ectu re

MAST DESIGN PR

completed master bathroom with double vanity, steam shower, floating tub, water closet & working fireplace

completed 2nd floor living room, long back towards the communal rear yard

completed 2nd floor living room, looking across the building

completed restored new â€œhistoricâ€? wood and glass storefront

original condition of park place facades

prospect heights town houses 218 & 220 park place, bklyn PROJECT BREAKDOWN

A set of old and ignored mismatched adjoining townhouses in Prospect Heights were picked up in a package deal that contained three other properties that were the main focus of the deal. The client had never seen the buildings before the purchase and wasn’t even certain where in Brooklyn they were located.

TYPE CLASS LOCATION LOT AREA PROJECT AREA PROJECT HEIGHT UNIT COUNT PARKING SPACES YEARS ACTIVE

Gut Renovation - Landmarked Residential Brooklyn N.Y. 6,480 SF (3,240 SF + 3,240 SF) 14,450 SF (4,810 SF + 9,640 SF) 54’ (5 Stories) 7 (218: 3 Units, 220: 4 Units)

0 7/2015 - Ongoing

Before the client came into possession the two buildings had been completely gutted, the projects stalled due to plans that were never reviewed much less approved by the Landmarks Preservation Commission. At this point the two buildings were mere shells, everything had been removed; from the plaster walls, floors, joists, and even the stairs. New steel had been installed before the projects stopped but only one of the buildings had had a new (not to code) stair installed, the other building required one to brave a series of ladders to get from floor to floor. 220 Park Place was built in 1884 and designed by Walter M. Coots. The project was developed by John V. Porter and 220 is the last remaining of three identical buildings. It stood as a four story single family townhouse originally owned by the Tea and Coffee importer John G. Turnball and his family. At some point a tasteful, delicate and respectful fifth floor addition was added in an almost seamless fashion. The building’s front facade features a warm red brick and is a mix of Neo-Greco style with incised brick detailing combined with the stained glass and bay windows more common to the Queen Anne style. The rear of the building had featured a mostly glass enclosed tea room at the parlor level, but the space had undergone a severe transformation when the building was converted to a 12 unit building in the 1970’s. None of the original detailing remained when we were handed the commission and a small addition on the second floor had been built atop of what remained of the “tea room”. 75

218 Park Place was built in 1881. It was owned, developed and designed by John V. Porter as the easternmost building of a three building set. 218 and 216 are identical Italianate/ Neo-Grec style five story brownstone townhouses with slate tile mansard roofs along with Second Empire elements. 214, the western most building of the three buildings is also a 5 story but without a mansard roof and featuring arched molded hoods over the windows. Lacking any stained glass or the unique detailing of 220 Park place, 218 Park Place stands as perfect example of a more typical Brooklyn brownstone. And while the tea room of 220 had essentially been lost to time and insensitive renovations and repairs, the tea room of 218, though in rough condition, still held on to much of its original detail and configuration. The other interesting elements to these two properties are their very deep lots; the average Brooklyn lot is about twenty feet wide and a 100 feet deep. These two properties boast lots that are twenty feet wide and 162 feet deep. That 38% increase resulted in 6,480 developable square feet, (which is 2,480 square feet more than the typical lot) and a lot coverage allowance of 1,944 square feet, (744 square feet more than typical lots). We could maximize our lot coverage and still have a sixty four foot deep rear yard on each lot, well over the minimum requirement of 30’. This would be an important factor in that both buildings were maxed out in terms of height for the zoning districts and

1940’s tax photo

220 PARK PLACE 1940

1940’S NEW YORK CITY TAX PHOTOGRAPHS

elevation of existing facades, including neighboring buildings to both the left & right

NEW YO

Prospect Heights Historic District Atlantic Avenue

820 826

671 680

662

552

574

585

531

Dean St

651 640

635

534

Bergen St

225 236

St Mark's Av

309

318

630

7 30

Our first concept was to simply extend each building across the Basement, First, Second, and Thirds floors, maxing out all the remaining available square footage. 220 and 218 had 1162 and 1640 square feet of unused bulk respectively to add to their existing size. We could remove the deteriorated tea rooms of each building and in the case of 220 add an addition of 24 feet by 20 feet wide on each of the first four floors and still be within our allowable bulk and still provide a rear yard depth of over 74â€™, 44 greater than the required minimum. On 218 we could add an addition of 24.5 feet deep by 20 feet wide on each of the first four floors in order to max out of square footage and in this case still provide a rear yard of over 73 feet. And in each instance the fourth floor would have an ample terrace on top of the proposed addition.

Prospect Pl

Grand Av

n gto shin Wa

Underhill Av

Vanderbilt Av

3 28

Carlton Av

3 27 115 122

118

561 565 555

546

even if they were not, Landmarks would never have allowed us to build any significant amount of square footage above the existing building height.

Pacific St

565

516

734 738

147

632A

1 32

655

165

Fla

Park Pl

180

235

261

248

262

421 426

Park Pl

Existing Historic Districts Prospect Heights Historic District

h us Av

Ste rlin

g Pl

9 37

697

5 37

213

183

251

268

288

Sterling Pl

340

431 446

Brooklyn

185

200

Bu tl

7 Av

er P

St John 's Pl

Pla

3 32

St John's Pl

Plaza St W

8 Av

Feet

E St

500

prospect heights historic district Be rke

ley Pl

Lincoln Pl

Grand Army Pz

tax map of adjoining properties D@I4DDE H,-0! H/,"#

H-+N#"&!&#,$!L ,-"1(&#"&!4!,HH/(",%&!L

"1-('&+H1#-!)(#-(2K!-,

S3 PQRSTUVRUWQV!//" D::!3!BA&1!'& '.(&#!@DED %#3!J+-0K!%J!!@EE@I A;A=F::=BEDB 333C'B,-"C"+$ 6(/(%2!-#H-#'#%&,&(G#!L H1(/(H!6#--,-, H-+6#''(+%,/ #5H#)(&(%2!//" DI>E!'1#//!-+,) *-++0/J%K!%J!@@DD; B;F=BF;=::>I

'&-."&.-,/!#%2(%##-!L $("1,#/!-,*0(%K!H# -G!#%2(%##-' @DAB!H-+'H#"&!,G#K!@'&!6/K *-++0/J%K!%J!!@@D@I B;F=FIF=BBBI

$#H!#%2(%##-!L %("0!&.""(K!H# &'6!#%2(%##-(%2!H" DEE!H,-0!,G#!'+.&1K!'.(&#!>@A %#3!J+-0K!%#3!J+-0!!@EEEB D@D=D:B=FBEB

/H"!"++-)(%,&(+%!L 1(22(%'!X.,'#*,-&1 O!H,-&%#-'K!//" @@!1,%+G#-!'X.,-#K!@A&1!6/C %#3!J+-0K!%J!@EE:I D@D=DF;=>;AI

)-,3(%2!(''.#!L ),&#

M @ D

EICEBC@A @EC@EC@A

@ECDIC@A

;

@ECDIC@A

@DCD@C@A

H-+N#"&L

!"#$%$!!&$'()*$'+(,-

*-++0/J%K!%J!@@DBI )-,3(%2!%,$#L

elevation of proposed facade restorations

H-+H+'#)!6-+%&!#/#G,&(+%' '#,/!O!'(2%,&.-#

N+*!M )32!*J "1#"0#) )-,3(%2!M!!L!

,=@E@CEE

Having learned our lesson on the Clinton Hall we arranged preliminary planning meetings with the Landmarks Preservation Commission early in the process and this was very wise. When we presented our initial plans for the two buildings along with an extensive survey of the existing structures including plans, photographs, and history they were mostly pleased. The LPC was happy that we planned only to restore the existing street facades, preserve all 77

of the detailing including the stained glass windows, replace the existing windows with historically accurate wood frame windows as well as the fact that there was no vertical addition proposed. What troubled them was our plans for the rear facades. We had always been under the assumption that, for a building not specifically landmarked but within a landmarks district, the LPC was concerned only with what was visible from the street; the facade, the windows, preserving existing details, and the sight line impacts of any proposed additions. They soon corrected our understanding, while those things were major concerns of theirs, there were other historical aspects that they try to protect. One of these such aspects it turned out were tea rooms. They explained that over the years, while their attentions had been focused on the elements on the street, the city had lost many of its historic tea rooms, and that they now had a mandate to save and preserve as many as possible. This was a bit of a surprise for the entire team, including our landmarks consultant.

cellar plan

garden level floor plan

second floor plan

As we discussed our proposal further, laying out our allowable square footage as of right and the deteriorated condition of the tea rooms, a deal was struck. The advanced state of decay along with the lack of any original detail in the 220 tea room, coupled with that fact that itâ€™s two sister buildings to the east had long since been razed and replaced with a large non-contextual apartment building back in the days prior to the landmark district being established, lead the examiners at the LPC to sign off on our plans as they stood for the 220 Park Place. Since the tea room at 218 Park Place was in better condition retaining some of its original detailing, along with the fact that itâ€™s two sister buildings to the west still remained and their tea rooms were, to some extent, were mostly intact and further factoring in the impact the addition would have on the neighboring rear yards, the examiners would not permit us to increase the size of the 218 in any way.

third floor plan

fourth floor plan

fifth floor plan

Our client, unhappy with losing over 1650 developable square feet, asked us to reexamine the project. We returned to them with the “Back house” concept. We proposed combining the two lots and then building a brand new, ground up, building behind the two existing building. The extreme depth of the lots would allow us to build a three story, 40 foot tall, 26’-7” x 40 foot wide building with a 33.75 foot deep courtyard between this new building and the existing building and still provide a 30 foot deep rear yard. We proposed connecting the new building to the existing building via an enclosed ground floor corridor running along the eastern lot line, adjacent to the large apartment building that replaced 220’s sister buildings.

,!'K"C/I

D!''G*%.M$.%$663@> &!#+-.H$.#E"I

S3 ARCHITECTURE LLC

EXISTING BUILDING SECTION

220 park place building section prior to restoration & addition

( >2)&0 >-'<"C'$55E=E@<

,2)&>>( -'"HE:=E<4'9FE#5E<4

220 park place,proposed building section, with rear & vertical addition

220 PARK PLACE, BROOKLYN, NY 11238

"! !"#$

This plan was ultimately panned by both LPC and the client. While landmarks did appreciate that this plan left both of the original buildings, with their tea rooms intact, they did not like the effect that the new “back building” would have had on the neighboring rear yards, even though the rear of this new building basically aligned with rear wall of the very deep apartment building to the East, which also employed a courtyard scheme. The client appreciated that we maxed out the F.A.R., but felt that the construction of a new ground up building, whose site could only be accessed through the front buildings, would be too costly and take too long as no heavy machinery could be used for the excavation and construction.

In the end we accepted the LPC offer to renovate and enlarge the building at 220 while keeping 218 at itâ€™s existing size, renovating the complete interior and restoring the historic tea room in the back. There was just one variation, we decided to connect the two buildings internally allowing them both the use of a new elevator, secondary means of egress and a combined and more efficient mechanical space in the cellar. 220 would be extended to its maximum as of right size factoring in both lot coverage and allowable square footage, it would contain 4 units, the first and fourth of which would be duplexes. Units One and Two would share the rear yard; Unit One, which occupies the Basement and Cellar would access a recessed portion of the rear yard closest to the building through the cellar and Unit Two would access the back portion of the yard via a landing and stair coming down from the First Floor. Unit Three would be a floor through apartment with no allocated outdoor space but with access to the roof. The fourth and final unit, a duplex, would span the third and fourth floor and included a large outdoor terrace on the fourth floor, above the new addition. 218 would remain at its original size and be reconfigured into 3 duplex units, each unit occupying one and half floors. Each unit would have access to private outdoor space in the same manner as 220 with Unit 3 have private space on the roof. The completion of this project will see us breath new life in two old grand townhouses that were abused and neglected overtime. Creating contemporary living spaces with hints of historic detail.

218/2

PAR PLAC

EXISTING

PROJECT TEAM :

KEY PLAN

ARCHITECT / APPLIC

CHRISTOPHER DIERIG

S3 architecture L

255 W 36TH ST SUITE 1202 NEW YORK, NY 10018 646-755-3023

PARK PLACE

WWW.S3ARC.COM

FILING REPRESENTAT

PHILIP FERRARA PROFESSIONAL EXPEDITING LLC 2890 SHELL ROAD BROOKLYN, NY 11224

218 220 216

222

347-374-5598

STRUCTURAL ENGINE

MICHAEL RABKIN, PE RV ENGINEERS 1263 PROSPECT AVE, BROOKLYN, NY 11218 347-787-3338

MEP ENGINEER :

NICK TUCCI, PE TSF ENGINEERING PC 200 PARK AVE SOUTH NEW YORK, NEW YOR 212-253-7303

LPC COORDINATION :

3d massing of both buildings prior to design EXISTING

3d massing of proposed enlargement to 220 park place PROPOSED

HIGGINS QUASEBART & PARTNERS, LLC 11 HANOVER SQUARE NEW YORK, NY 10058 212-274-9468

REAR YARD PERESPECTIVE RENDERINGS

DRAWING IS #

DATE

FOR

project index REALIZED PROJECT NAME

ADDRESS

PROGRAM

BILLIARD FACTOR LOFTS

363 PROSPECT PLACE, BROOKLYN, NY

RESIDENTIAL

THE CLINTON HALL - WASHINGTON

269 WASHINGTON AVE, BROOKLYN, NY

RESIDENTIAL

THE CLINTON HALL - HALL

238 HALL STREET, BROOKLYN, NY

RESIDENTIAL

THE BROOKLYN ZINC

313 ST MARKS AVE, BROOKLYN, NY

RESIDENTIAL

PROSPECT HEIGHTS 3 FAMILY

730 BERGEN STREET, BROOKLYN, NY

RESIDENTIAL

HERMAN RESIDENCE @ THE BEEKMAN

414 E 52ND ST UNITS 7A+7B, NEW YORK, NY

RESIDENTIAL

CLINTON HILL APARTMENT BUILDING

596 WASHINGTON AVE, BROOKLYN, NY

RESIDENTIAL

LOWERY RESIDENCE @ THE BEEKMAN

424 E 52ND STREET UNIT 11A, NEW YORK, NY

RESIDENTIAL

MASCHARKA RESIDENCE

NORTH HEALY AVE, HARTSDALE, NY

SINGLE FAMILY

ENDELSON RESIDENCE

180 E 79TH STREET UNIT 12D, NEW YORK, NY

RESIDENTIAL

SERAFI ASSEF RESIDENCE @ THE BEEKMAN

433 E 51ST STREET UNITS 2B+2C, NEW YORK, NY

RESIDENTIAL

HISTORIC WEST VILLAGE TOWNHOUSE

395 BLEECKER STREET, NEW YORK, NY

MIXED USE

HISTORIC PROSPECT HEIGHTS TOWNHOUSE

218 PARK PLACE, BROOKLYN, NY

RESIDENTIAL

HISTORIC PROSPECT HEIGHTS TOWNHOUSE

220 PARK PLACE, BROOKLYN, NY

RESIDENTIAL

BEDFORD STUYVESANT TOWHOUSE

675 LAFAYETTE AVE, BROOKLYN, NY

RESIDENTIAL

BEDFORD CHEESE SHOP

265 BEDFROD AVE, BROOKLYN, NY

RETAIL

YAMPOLSKY RESIDENCE

146 SACKETT, BROOKLYN, NY

RESIDENTIAL

HISTORIC SOHO CAST IRON LOFT BUILDING

112 GREENE STREET, NEW YORK, NY

MIXED USE

UNBUILT

PROPOSED

ADDRESS

PROGRAM

815 BROADWAY, BROOKLYN NY

RESIDENTIAL

42-15 CRESENT ST, QUEENS NY

MIXED USE; RESI / COMM

153 4TH AVE, BROOKLYN NY

RESIDENTIAL

8 ST MARKS PLACE, BROOKLYN NY

RESIDENTIAL

1300 DECATUR, BROOKLYN NY

RESIDENTIAL

1215 FULTON STREET, BROOKLYN NY

MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT

26 EAST 19TH STREET, BROOKLYN NY

RESIDENTIAL

8 ST MARKS PLACE, BROOKLYN NY

RESIDENTIAL

1300 DECATUR, BROOKLYN NY

RESIDENTIAL

1215 FULTON STREET, BROOKLYN NY

MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT

26 EAST 19TH STREET, BROOKLYN NY RESIDENTIAL

PROJECT TYPE

CONVERSION / ADDITION

42,000 SF

•

UNITS

44 4

STORIES

DURATION AUG 2011 - SEPT 2016

LANDMARK NEW CONSTRUCTION

10,350 SF

•

10 4

NOV 2011 - DEC 2017

LANDMARK NEW CONSTRUCTION

10,530 SF

•

10 4

NOV 2011 - DEC 2017

NEW CONSTRUCTION

85,000 SF

•

75 4

FEB 2012 - FEB 2018

NEW CONSTRUCTION

7,492 SF

•

3 5

FEB 2012 - NOV 2018

APARTMENT RENOVATION

1,200 SF

•

1 1

OCT 2012 - APRIL 2013

NEW CONSTRUCTION

16,000 SF

•

16 8

MAR 2013 - APRIL 2018

APARTMENT RENOVATION

1,542 SF

•

1 1

SEPT 2013 - JAN 2015

RENOVATION / ADDITION

4,500 SF

•

1 3

OCT 2013 - JUNE 2015

APARTMENT RENOVATION

2,300 SF

•

1 1

DEC 2013 - JULY 2015

APARTMENT RENOVATION

2,800 SF

•

1 1

JUNE 2014 - FEB 2015

LANDMARK TOWNHOUSE RENOVATION

3,500 SF

•

2 4

AUG 2014 - JULY 2018

LANDMARK TOWNHOUSE RENOVATION/ ADDITION

4,810 SF

•

3 5

JULY 2015 - ONGOING

LANDMARK TOWNHOUSE RENOVATION/ ADDITION

9,640 SF

•

5 5

JULY 2015 - ONGOING

TOWNHOUSE RENOVATION

3,982 SF

•

4 4

OCT 2015 - SEPT 2017

INTERIOR BUILD OUT

1,845 SF

•

1 1

MAR 2016 - APRIL 2018

APARTMENT RENOVATION

1,200 SF

•

1 3

MAY 2017 - APRIL 2018

LANDMARK EXTERIOR RENOVATION

1,500 SF

•

1 1

JAN 2019 - ONGOING

210,191 SF

•

TOTAL DESIGNED:

180 UNITS

PROJECT TYPE

UNITS STORIES

DESIGN DATE

CONVERSION

41,900 SF

•

56 5

CONVERSION / ADDITION

101,946 SF

•

125 11

FEB 2012

NEW CONSTRUCTION

18,850 SF

•

18 12

APR 2012

NEW CONSTRUCTION

19,631 SF

•

15 8

DEC 2013

NEW CONSTRUCTION

21,804 SF

•

32 5

JAN 2014

NEW CONSTRUCTION

200,000 SF

•

NA 10

APR 2015

NEW CONSTRUCTION

23,301 SF

•

26 7

MAY 2016

NEW CONSTRUCTION

19,631 SF

•

15 8

DEC 2013

NEW CONSTRUCTION

21,804 SF

•

32 5

JAN 2014

NEW CONSTRUCTION

200,000 SF

•

NA 10

APR 2015

NOV 2011

NEW CONSTRUCTION 23,301 SF • 26 7 MAY 2016 TOTAL DESIGNED:

427,432 SF

•

272 UNITS