Revit + Dynamo Sample

ARCH507: THEORIES OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY ASSIGNMENTS COMPILATIONS INSTRUCTOR: KAREN KENSEK JONG JOO KIM FALL 19 MBS 19-21 Revit + Dynamo + Enscape

Arch 507 Final Project

2. Project Description a. Problem Description Revit is a BIM software that helps architects or designers digitally build their designs super-fast. However, when it comes to do interior designs or when users want to simply see the interior spaces, Revit doesn’t have functions directly doing those jobs. In most of the cases, users usually use Section box in 3D Views to cut walls, ceilings, roofs, etc. so that interior spaces are exposed or place Cameras on the spaces where users want to see in perspective view. This tedious way can lead to an annoying and time-consuming problem, especially, when users have many rooms and spaces to look at or to work with.

b. Proposed Solution The team adopted the category called Rooms to solve this problem. Rooms category contains useful information and hidden geometry. This hidden geometry feature of Rooms category can be visualized in Dynamo and can be utilized to make a bounding box containing the room geometry. Bounding box feature is especially required to make sections boxes in Dynamo.

Final Project Advanced View Functions of Rooms

First, the team located rooms in every space or program and, by using Dynamo, generated bounding boxes of each room. Then, the team used bounding box to make a Section box and placed cameras inside the bounding box.

Jong Joo Kim Zhequan Zhang

USC Fall2019

Arch 507

Section Box in Revit

Professor Karen Kensek 2

Arch 507 Final Project

Arch 507 Final Project

d. Sample Model Simple 2-story building with 11 rooms.

d-1. 3D Views

Floor Plan with a Camera

c. Project Goal The goal of this project is to find effective way of approaching to the internal spaces of digital models in order to increase the overall work efficiency. By using the proposed ways, users will have better interior design modeling experiences in Revit.

d-2. Floor Plans with Rooms

Also, users are expected to have faster communications with their colleagues or clients by visually demonstrating quick accesses into each program or room. Not just the users, people without architectural background can understand projects’ interior spaces through 3D views of each program or room.

3

4

Arch 507 Final Project

Arch 507 Final Project

3. Dynamo Script

b. Purple Groups b-1. Every 3D Views of Rooms with name

a. Overall Script

This script basically conducts Section Box to every room in the building. Also, Element.SetName nodes create the 3D view of each cropped room. The names of the 3D views are same as the Room name so that it is easier to find the room users want.

Default List of 3D Views

This script mainly allows users to generate cropped rooms in 3D views, cropped plans, and interior views of rooms. The whole script is composed of two main groups. The purple groups use every rooms in the model while the blue groups start with one selected room.

Purple Group: Every room will be used at the same time.

Blue Group: One selected room will be used.

Generated List of 3D Views with Room names

5

6

Arch 507 Final Project

Arch 507 Final Project

b-2. Visibility Setting

3D view of cropped Class 101

Every cropped room will be shown in Shaded visual style and depends on the generated section box sizes, roofs and ceilings can be presented, which prevent users to see the insides.

This script has 2 functions, change the visual style of the generate views and hide certain categories. Visual style will be changed based on the integer number connected to Visual Style Select nodes.

Also, now ceilings and roofs can be hidden by using View.SetCategoryOverrides node. This node hides any selected categories from the designated views. For the designated views, 3D view will be a proper choice.

Ceiling covers the 1st floor restroom

Shaded Kitchen and 1st Floor Restroom without ceiling and roof Roof blocks the vision to the Kitchen

7

8

Arch 507 Final Project

Arch 507 Final Project

b-3. Hide Everything Inside the Room

First of all, we get all the rooms, then turn the rooms into geometry. Then convert those geometry to bounding box. We used python script to get elements in the bounding box and hide them. The bounding box need to be scaled, so that the wall or elements on the wall won’t be included. Archi-lab has the original Hide.Elements node, but it doesn’t work. So, we rewrite it base on the original one.

This script can hide everything in inside the rooms, more specifically bounding box. The team couldn’t find any nodes for this operation and ended up making the first python script.

Python script to get all elements in the bounding box

Before and After view of Library 9

10

Arch 507 Final Project

Arch 507 Final Project

b-4. Interior Perspective View

PerspectiveView.ByEyePointTargetAndBoundingBox node helps users place Cameras in any place. The team used this script to place cameras in every room generated so that now users also don’t have to place cameras in every room manually. In this project, the team used BoundingBox.MinPoint as eyepoint and BoundingBox.MaxPoint as target.

Blue Points = BoundingBox.MinPoint

Blue Point = BoundingBox.MaxPoint

Grey boxes are room geometries and Every room has two points. The cameras will be placed on the BoundingBox.MinPoints and look at the BoundingBox.MaxPoints

Rewrited version the Hide.Element node in Archi-Lab 11

12

Arch 507 Final Project

Arch 507 Final Project

View from the camera placed on Class 201 Shaded Staircase 1

Unlock view

View from the camera placed on Staircase 1

The default Visual Style is always Hidden Line. This setting can be also controlled by the Visibility Setting script.

Views generated by PerspectiveView.ByEyePointTargetAndBoundingBox node are always locked. To unlock the views, users can simply find the house with lock icon on the bottom and click Unlock View.

View from different angle of Staircase 1 13

14

Arch 507 Final Project

Arch 507 Final Project

b-4. Plan Drawing

Plan drawing of each room can be generated by this script. This script also uses the bounding box to crop the room, and the SectionView.ByBoundingBox makes plan view of everything in bounding box. However, even though the node says section view and every view of plan will be generated under the Sections view, the drawings are not sections but plans.

Plan of Kitchen

Plan of Conference Room

List of plan drawings under the Sections

15

16

Arch 507 Final Project

Arch 507 Final Project

c-2. Visible Setting

c. Blue Group c-1. One 3D view with Room Name

The blue group scripts allow users to choose one room they want to specifically look at while the purple group scripts use every room. List of the rooms can be found from the Room.Name and Watch nodes.

Users can simply type the room name in String and connect it to the String.Contains node. Then, use List.FilterByBoolMask node to get the selected room element. Rests are same.

Visible Setting also needs to filter the views just to get one specific room information. The List.FilterByString node can filter out everything except the one connected to String in the list. Now, Match from the List.FilterByString node can be connected to setting nodes. In this way, Kitchen view will be only affected by Visibility Setting script.

Only cropped Kitchen view is created under the 3D Views.

17

18

Arch 507 Final Project

Arch 507 Final Project

c-3. Hide Everything Inside the Room

4. Future Works and Improvement a. Customizing View Type The team couldn’t find a way to customize View Type. One main problem of this project is that both cropped room model and camera views are generated under the 3D views. When both scripts are generated, the cropped rooms get their view names right, but camera views are generated with odd names. Also, each room plan drawings are generated under the Sections, not Floor Plans. It is necessary to change the plan drawings location in order to prevent confusion.

This script is almost same as the purple script. Users are asked to bring the view they are using from the List.FilterBySpring and plug that into IN[1] of the Hide node.

c-4. One 3D view with Room Name

List of 3D Views, when b-1 script and b-2 scripts are generated together.

b. Running every script at once Both Kitchen and Kitchen Interior under 3D Views

This script is also almost same, but because dynamo can’t run c-1 script and c-4 script together due to the their same View type, which is 3D Views, it is preferred to make another String containing a view name similar to the selected room’s name. In this case, the team wrote Kitchen Interior.

19

The team would like to increase the work efficiency by reducing the number of times users manually run scripts. The whole scripts can’t run at once. Sometimes it is required to run one script first, and then go back to dynamo, unplug the previous script and finally run the second script. For example, b-1 or c-1 script run first to crop rooms within newly generated 3D views, and then, users can use b-2 or c-2 to change the Visual Setting or hide curtain categories if they want. If users can run whole scripts at once instead of running scripts step by step, even more time will be saved.

20

Arch 507 Final Project

5.References a. Packages Archi Lab Clock Work Springs Steam Nodes

b. Online Source https://forum.dynamobim.com/t/graphic-styles-or-discipline/4651 https://forum.dynamobim.com/t/multiple-3d-views-from-rooms/16766/3 https://forum.dynamobim.com/t/list-elements-in-room-by-category-byroom/23527/3 https://forum.dynamobim.com/t/use-dynamo-to-create-3d-perspectives/11457

21

School of Architecture University of Southern California Due: 25 November 2019

Dynamo: Introduction to Visual Scripting Work Hours: 20 Hrs

Arch 507 HWK09 Jong Joo Kim

School of Architecture University of Southern California Due: 25 November 2019

Arch 507 HWK09 Jong Joo Kim

2. Scripts and Explanation a. Screenshot of Full Script:

1. Image of New Bridge:

The main idea of my bridge system is unbalanced cable stayed bridge. This bridge system usually has one huge support structure that dramatically leans to one side. And the weight of the slab and support structure are balanced so that either of these component do not fall.

Side View

Serreria Bridge, Valencia, Santiago Calatrava Instead of just making a solid structure, I thought of a ribbon shape structure, but to put more effort and experiment, I made it look folded.

Back View

I have created total 21 groups with 7 different colors. The colors tell what types of the groups are and do.

School of Architecture University of Southern California Due: 25 November 2019 • • • • • •

Arch 507 HWK09 Jong Joo Kim

Blue = Parameters Purple = Curves Pink = Points Peach = Cables Green = Slabs Cyan = Body

School of Architecture University of Southern California Due: 25 November 2019

Arch 507 HWK09 Jong Joo Kim

Purple is group of scripts that generate some sort of curves. And same logic for the pink groups, but they generate points. Point and curve are essential components for modeling. Points can make curves and can be made on curves.

And if I have more than two curves, then I can start to make surfaces.

The whole script starts off with some bunch of blue groups. They are values of starting points, and because I used number sliders, I can play around with each point and locate them in different places. For example, I can move the whole support structure back and forth or change the height of slabs. The Support structure is basically composed of three lines. Two side lines one the ground and one center curve floating in the air. And I can change length of each of them, and for the center curve, I can change the shape.

Since this project is about a bridge, cables are one of the main design parts. I have made main cables that connect the main slab and the support structure, rear cables that connect the starting part of the bridge and the top of the support structure, and spine cable that support the support structure like a spine. I can also change the radius of cables, but I used fixed numbers this time in order to make the script simple and organized.

School of Architecture University of Southern California Due: 25 November 2019

Arch 507 HWK09 Jong Joo Kim

I have made two slabs, one main slab and one rear slab, and they are grouped in green color. The rear slab is short and straight whereas the main slab is long and curved in the middle. And as mentioned, it is possible to adjust the slab width by using a parameter grouped in blue.

I describe the cyan colored group as body. This simply means the whole support structure. The way I used to make it look folded is that I put points on the curves that form the basic ribbon shape and move the points so that there are two groups of points. Then, I chose the points in even number among the first groups and odd number among the second groups. The next step is to make curves that connect the points in same number, and if I just loft all of the curves, it will be done.

School of Architecture University of Southern California Due: 25 November 2019

Arch 507 HWK09 Jong Joo Kim

School of Architecture University of Southern California Due: 25 November 2019 b.

Structure Design Process

Arch 507 HWK09 Jong Joo Kim

School of Architecture University of Southern California Due: 25 November 2019

3. Tutorial:

Arch 507 HWK09 Jong Joo Kim

School of Architecture University of Southern California Due: 25 November 2019

Arch 507 HWK09 Jong Joo Kim

Thank you.

School of Architecture USC 10 November 2019

Dynamo: Introduction to Visual Scripting

Arch 507 HWK08 Jong Joo Kim

School of Architecture USC 10 November 2019

Arch 507 HWK08 Jong Joo Kim

1. Adaptive Component: The very first step for this assignment is to create an adaptive component that transforms its shape in different values. I used the square based grid to get a component so that I could get four identical triangles on each side.

Those triangles are all right-angled triangles, and I set the length of the shorter sides of the triangles as L. The main idea of this design is that based on the values inserted into L, the triangles get larger and smaller, and the gap existing in the middle of overall component also gets bigger and smaller. The gap will work as an opening on the façade, and the amount of sun light getting into the building would be controlled by this opening.

A= Length of the default square grid. Default value is usually 10’ in Revit.

L= Shorter side of the right-angled triangle = A * 0.X (I can set the value of X manually) H= How much the triangles are rotated = 10 / L

A=10’, L=1’, H=10’

A=10’, L=6’, H=10/6’ So, when the L has a big value, H would have a small value and opening looks more closed.

Work Hours: 10 Hrs

A=10’, L=9’, H=10/9’

School of Architecture USC 10 November 2019

Arch 507 HWK08 Jong Joo Kim

2. Simple Façade Design:

Arch 507 HWK08 Jong Joo Kim

4. Result:

With the adaptive component I just created, now I can make it as a simple façade. I simply drew a semi-circle and extruded it so that I can get a curved surface. Then, I divided the surface into 12x12 rectangular grid. On the property panel, I can change the grid pattern to my adaptive component, and my façade is created.

However, every panel has same opening size, and this is where I need to integrate Dynamo script to generate parametric patterns.

Wide Openings

School of Architecture USC 10 November 2019

Now, I got a façade that reacts to the location of the sun. As shown in the images, during the summer, the openings are smaller than those in the winter. Also, it is shown that the openings are wider during the night.

Small Openings

3. Dynamo Script: Through the Dynamo script, I wanted to create a façade that changes its each opening size based on the location of the Sun. So, in the end, I wanted to achieve the patterns that generates smaller openings when they are hit by the direct sunlight. To achieve this operation, I simply got two types of vectors, one from the sun and the other ones from each pattern. Then, I calculated the angle between these two types of vectors and use that value as A. Because of the semi-circle shape, each pattern of the façade has different vectors pointing different directions, and as the result, each pattern could get its own value A. Based on that value, different sizes of openings are generated.

Dynamo Script

Summer: Day

Summer: Night

School of Architecture USC 10 November 2019

Winter: Day

Arch 507 HWK08 Jong Joo Kim

School of Architecture USC 10 November 2019

Arch 507 HWK08 Jong Joo Kim

Winter: Night

5. Rendering:

Winter: Day

THANK YOU Summer: Day

HOURS: ABOUT 13 HRS

HW 07: CONCEPTUAL MODELER ADAPTIVE COMPONENTS

Pro: I could come up with my own design and parameters.

Con: A lot of limitations.

THEORIES OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY

TILLAMOOK CREAMERY

INSTRUCTOR: KAREN KENSEK ARCHITECTURE 507 FALL 2019

EXHIBITION CENTER, TILLAMOOK, UNITED STATES ARCHITECT: Olson Kundig COMPLETED: 2018

JONG JOO KIM

https://www.tillamook.com

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERNCALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE

A00 / Cover Page

HW 07: Conceptual Modeler Adaptive Components DUE: 4 November 2019

DATE: 11/03/2019

Description: The base is a regular quadrangle and the top is triangle, which is considered as an opening. Each length of the quadrangle is defined as A, B, C, and D in the parameter. Please look at the attached images for the further details about each parameters. The main idea of this adaptive component is that two points of the top triangle can move back and forth so that the opening can be adjusted accordingly. The value that decides the size of triangle opening is F.

THEORIES OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY

TILLAMOOK CREAMERY

INSTRUCTOR: KAREN KENSEK ARCHITECTURE 507 FALL 2019

EXHIBITION CENTER, TILLAMOOK, UNITED STATES ARCHITECT: Olson Kundig COMPLETED: 2018

JONG JOO KIM

https://www.tillamook.com

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERNCALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE

A01 /

HW 07: Conceptual Modeler Adaptive Components DUE: 4 November 2019

Description

DATE: 11/03/2019

Variation Diagram

Wide Opening

THEORIES OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY

Regular Opening

TILLAMOOK CREAMERY

INSTRUCTOR: KAREN KENSEK ARCHITECTURE 507 FALL 2019

EXHIBITION CENTER, TILLAMOOK, UNITED STATES ARCHITECT: Olson Kundig COMPLETED: 2018

JONG JOO KIM

https://www.tillamook.com

Small Opening

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERNCALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE

A02 /

Variation Diagram

HW 07: Conceptual Modeler Adaptive Components DUE: 4 November 2019

DATE: 11/03/2019

Eye Level Rendering

Small Opening

THEORIES OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY

TILLAMOOK CREAMERY

INSTRUCTOR: KAREN KENSEK ARCHITECTURE 507 FALL 2019

EXHIBITION CENTER, TILLAMOOK, UNITED STATES ARCHITECT: Olson Kundig COMPLETED: 2018

JONG JOO KIM

https://www.tillamook.com

Wide Opening

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERNCALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE

A03 /

Render View

HW 07: Conceptual Modeler Adaptive Components DUE: 4 November 2019

DATE: 11/03/2019

On Site Rendering

THEORIES OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY

TILLAMOOK CREAMERY

INSTRUCTOR: KAREN KENSEK ARCHITECTURE 507 FALL 2019

EXHIBITION CENTER, TILLAMOOK, UNITED STATES ARCHITECT: Olson Kundig COMPLETED: 2018

JONG JOO KIM

https://www.tillamook.com

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERNCALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE

A04 /

Render View 2

HW 07: Conceptual Modeler Adaptive Components DUE: 4 November 2019

DATE: 11/03/2019

Polystyrol View

Regular View

False Color View

HOURS: ABOUT 12 HRS

HW 06: RENDERING AND VR

Pro: I could learn different types of rendering and look forward to working on it more.

Con: The rendering qualities are unpredictable. The results are highly depending on the computer I used.

THEORIES OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY

TILLAMOOK CREAMERY

INSTRUCTOR: KAREN KENSEK ARCHITECTURE 507 FALL 2019

EXHIBITION CENTER, TILLAMOOK, UNITED STATES ARCHITECT: Olson Kundig COMPLETED: 2018

JONG JOO KIM

https://www.tillamook.com

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE

HW 06: BIM House: Rendering And VR DUE: 28 OCTOBER 2019

cover

COVER

DATE: 10/27/2019

Exterior View rendered by Enscape

Polystyrol View

Regular Exterior View

Illuminance View

THEORIES OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY

TILLAMOOK CREAMERY

INSTRUCTOR: KAREN KENSEK ARCHITECTURE 507 FALL 2019

EXHIBITION CENTER, TILLAMOOK, UNITED STATES ARCHITECT: Olson Kundig COMPLETED: 2018

JONG JOO KIM

https://www.tillamook.com

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE

HW 06: BIM House: Rendering And VR DUE: 28 OCTOBER 2019

Enscape Render

DATE: 10/27/2019

Interior View rendered by Enscape

Polystyrol View

Regular Interior View

Illuminance View

THEORIES OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY

TILLAMOOK CREAMERY

INSTRUCTOR: KAREN KENSEK ARCHITECTURE 507 FALL 2019

EXHIBITION CENTER, TILLAMOOK, UNITED STATES ARCHITECT: Olson Kundig COMPLETED: 2018

JONG JOO KIM

https://www.tillamook.com

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE

HW 06: BIM House: Rendering And VR DUE: 28 OCTOBER 2019

Enscape Render 2

DATE: 10/27/2019

Exterior Renderings by Revit

Exterior View 1

THEORIES OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY

TILLAMOOK CREAMERY

INSTRUCTOR: KAREN KENSEK ARCHITECTURE 507 FALL 2019

EXHIBITION CENTER, TILLAMOOK, UNITED STATES ARCHITECT: Olson Kundig COMPLETED: 2018

JONG JOO KIM

https://www.tillamook.com

Exterior View 2

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE

HW 06: BIM House: Rendering And VR DUE: 28 OCTOBER 2019

Revit Render

DATE: 10/27/2019

Illuminance View 1

Interior Renderings by Revit

View 1 Illuminance View 2

View 2

THEORIES OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY

TILLAMOOK CREAMERY

INSTRUCTOR: KAREN KENSEK ARCHITECTURE 507 FALL 2019

EXHIBITION CENTER, TILLAMOOK, UNITED STATES ARCHITECT: Olson Kundig COMPLETED: 2018

JONG JOO KIM

https://www.tillamook.com

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE

HW 06: BIM House: Rendering And VR DUE: 28 OCTOBER 2019

Revit Render 2

DATE: 10/27/2019

THEORIES OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY

TILLAMOOK CREAMERY

INSTRUCTOR: KAREN KENSEK ARCHITECTURE 507 FALL 2019

EXHIBITION CENTER, TILLAMOOK, UNITED STATES ARCHITECT: Olson Kundig COMPLETED: 2018

JONG JOO KIM

https://www.tillamook.com

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE

HW 06: BIM House: Rendering And VR DUE: 28 OCTOBER 2019

Virtual Reality

DATE: 10/27/2019

HOURS: ABOUT 21 HRS

HW 04: BIM SCHEDULING AND DETAILING

I want to start with the worst part first this time. The worst part is that I had to use the file from the last assignment and the worst part of the last homework was lack of the references. So I had to do this week homework without having enough iamges or information about wall, ceiling, and roof structures again.

The best part was I can tell that I am learning a lot and getting used to at Revit and that is the most essential purpose of this class.

Also my model looks a lot richier now. It is satisfying.

THEORIES OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY

TILLAMOOK CREAMERY

INSTRUCTOR: KAREN KENSEK ARCHITECTURE 507 FALL 2019

EXHIBITION CENTER, TILLAMOOK, UNITED STATES ARCHITECT: Olson Kundig COMPLETED: 2018

JONG JOO KIM

https://www.tillamook.com

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERNCALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE

A00 / COVER

HW 03: BIM House: 2D / 3D Coordination DUE: 14 OCTOBER 2019

DATE: 10/14/2019

Room Legend Cafe

1 15

Locker Room

2

14

Ice Cream Bar

7

Storage

8 10

11

A

Kitchen

A

Retail

74' - 0"

13

33 9 12

Cooler/ Freezer

9 32

36

35

30

Cheese Boxing Locker Room

8

31

Storage

7 44

42

Entry

34

Cooler/ Freezer

37

45

57' - 3 7/16"

Restroom Cheese Making

Restroom Packaging

10

Packaging

Retail

54

74' - 5 27/32"

4

53

51

41 5

52

3

3

A05 /

Cheese Boxing

Hallway

46

6

-

24

2

6 49 55

92' - 6"

28

29

11

56' - 6"

3

Cafe

1

Number

Ice Cream Bar

2

2

Ice Cream Bar Kitchen

899 SF

3 4

Retail

5683 SF

5

Entry

232 SF

6

Cheese Boxing Locker Room Storage

2281 SF

7 8

45' - 11 19/32"

45' - 6"

---

TILLAMOOK CREAMERY -

INSTRUCTOR: KAREN KENSEK ARCHITECTURE 507 FALL 2019

EXHIBITION CENTER, TILLAMOOK, UNITED STATES ARCHITECT: Olson Kundig COMPLETED: 2018

JONG JOO KIM

https://www.tillamook.com

Not Computed Not Computed Not Computed Not Computed Not Computed Not Computed Not Computed Not Computed Not Computed Not Computed Not Computed Not Computed Not Computed Not Computed

5558 SF

11

THEORIES OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY

Volume

Cafe

10

Level 1 1/16" = 1'-0"

Area

1

9

1

Name

1745 SF

27

Kitchen

Cheese Making

Room Schedule

5 23

47

Hallway

A04 / Entry

14

4

---

---

9' - 6 9/16"

12

---

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERNCALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE

Cooler/ Freezer Restroom

457 SF 1702 SF 1058 SF 1058 SF

12

Cheese Making Packaging

9130 SF 6879 SF

13

Offices

373 SF

14

Hallway

2677 SF

A01 / HWK 4-1

Perimeter 407' - 9 7/16" 149' - 4" 228' - 0 19/32" 335' - 3" 66' - 3 11/16" 246' - 1 31/32" 88' - 0" 174' - 9 25/32" 150' - 7 3/8" 240' - 10" 413' - 11 3/16" 433' - 2 5/32" 82' - 6" 328' - 8 3/32"

HW 03: BIM House: 2D / 3D Coordination DUE: 14 OCTOBER 2019

DATE: 10/14/2019

Door Schedule Type Mark 1 1 2 3 3

Family Door-Passage-Double-Flus h-Dbl_Acting Door-Passage-Double-Flus h-Dbl_Acting Single-Flush Door-Passage-Double-Flus h-Dbl_Acting Door-Passage-Double-Flus h-Dbl_Acting

Door Schedule Type

Image

Type Mark

68" x 80"

8

68" x 80"

9

34" x 84" 72" x 84"

9 9

72" x 84" 9 9

4 5

5

5

5

5

6

6

7

Door-Passage-Double-Flus 96" x 84" h-Dbl_Acting Door-Curtain-Wall-Single-G Door-Curtai lass n-Wall-Sing le-Glass Door-Curtain-Wall-Single-G Door-Curtai lass n-Wall-Sing le-Glass Door-Curtain-Wall-Single-G Door-Curtai lass n-Wall-Sing le-Glass Door-Curtain-Wall-Single-G Door-Curtai lass n-Wall-Sing le-Glass Door-Curtain-Wall-Single-G Door-Curtai lass n-Wall-Sing le-Glass Door-Curtain-Wall-Double- Door-Curtai Storefront n-Wall-Dou ble-Storefro nt Door-Curtain-Wall-Double- Door-Curtai Storefront n-Wall-Dou ble-Storefro nt Door-Exterior-Single-Two_ 36" x 84" Lite

9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 8

Door-Exterior-Single-Two_ Lite Door-Exterior-Single-Two_ Lite Door-Exterior-Single-Two_ Lite Door-Exterior-Single-Two_ Lite Door-Exterior-Single-Two_ Lite Door-Exterior-Single-Two_ Lite Door-Exterior-Single-Two_ Lite Door-Exterior-Single-Two_ Lite Door-Exterior-Single-Two_ Lite Door-Exterior-Single-Two_ Lite Door-Exterior-Single-Two_ Lite Door-Exterior-Single-Two_ Lite

36" x 84" 36" x 84" 36" x 84" 36" x 84" 36" x 84" 36" x 84" 36" x 84" 36" x 84" 36" x 84"

9 9 9 9 9 9 9 10 10

Family Door-Exterior-Single-Two_ Lite Door-Passage-Single-Cold _Room Door-Passage-Single-Cold _Room Door-Passage-Single-Cold _Room Door-Passage-Single-Cold _Room Door-Passage-Single-Cold _Room Door-Passage-Single-Cold _Room Door-Passage-Single-Cold _Room Door-Passage-Single-Cold _Room Door-Passage-Single-Cold _Room Door-Passage-Single-Cold _Room Door-Passage-Single-Cold _Room Door-Passage-Single-Cold _Room Door-Passage-Single-Cold _Room Door-Passage-Single-Cold _Room Door-Passage-Single-Cold _Room Door-Passage-Single-Cold _Room Door-Passage-Single-Cold _Room Door-Passage-Single-Cold _Room Door-Passage-Single-Cold _Room Door-Passage-Single-Cold _Room Door-Passage-Single-Cold _Room Door-Passage-Single-Cold _Room Door-Passage-Single-Cold _Room Door-Passage-Single-Cold _Room Door-Passage-Single-Cold _Room Door-Passage-Single-Cold _Room Door-Passage-Single-Cold _Room Door-Double-Glass Door-Double-Glass

Window Schedule Type

Image

48" x 84" 30" x 84" no opening 30" x 84" no opening 30" x 84" no opening 30" x 84" no opening 30" x 84" no opening 30" x 84" no opening 30" x 84" no opening 30" x 84" no opening 30" x 84" no opening 30" x 84" no opening 30" x 84" no opening 30" x 84" no opening 30" x 84" no opening 30" x 84" no opening 30" x 84" no opening 30" x 84" no opening 30" x 84" no opening 30" x 84" no opening 30" x 84" no opening 30" x 84" no opening 30" x 84" no opening 30" x 84" no opening 30" x 84" no opening 30" x 84" no opening 30" x 84" no opening 30" x 84" no opening 30" x 84" no opening 72" x 84" 72" x 84"

Type Mark

Family

Type

A

Fixed

36" x 72"

A A A A B

Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed 2ndFloorwi ndow 2ndFloorwi ndow 2ndFloorwi ndow 2ndFloorwi ndow 2ndFloorwi ndow 2ndFloorwi ndow 2ndFloorwi ndow 2ndFloorwi ndow 2ndFloorwi ndow 2ndFloorwi ndow 2ndFloorwi ndow 2ndFloorwi ndow

36" x 72" 36" x 72" 36" x 72" 36" x 72" 2ndFloorwi ndow 2ndFloorwi ndow 2ndFloorwi ndow 2ndFloorwi ndow 2ndFloorwi ndow 2ndFloorwi ndow 2ndFloorwi ndow 2ndFloorwi ndow 2ndFloorwi ndow 2ndFloorwi ndow 2ndFloorwi ndow 2ndFloorwi ndow

B B B B B B B B B B B

Image

TYPE 1 DOOR

TYPE 6 DOOR

TYPE 2 DOOR

TUYPE 7 DOOR

TYPE A WINDOW

TYPE 5 DOOR

TYPE 10 DOOR

TYPE 9 DOOR

TYPE BE WINDOW

36" x 84" 36" x 84" 48" x 84"

THEORIES OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY

TILLAMOOK CREAMERY

INSTRUCTOR: KAREN KENSEK ARCHITECTURE 507 FALL 2019

EXHIBITION CENTER, TILLAMOOK, UNITED STATES ARCHITECT: Olson Kundig COMPLETED: 2018

JONG JOO KIM

https://www.tillamook.com

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERNCALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE

DOOR/WIN

A02 / HWK 4-2

HW 03: BIM House: 2D / 3D Coordination DUE: 14 OCTOBER 2019

DATE: 10/14/2019

44

34

Lighting Fixture Schedule Lamp

37 45

Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe )

Retail

4

Retail 1 1/8" = 1'-0"

2

Model

Lighting Fixture Schedule

Luminous Intensity

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

Lamp Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe ) Lystofrør (eller glødelampe )

Model

Luminous Intensity

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

H+M Pendant ø380mm

4838 cd

Level 2 1/8" = 1'-0"

THEORIES OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY

TILLAMOOK CREAMERY

INSTRUCTOR: KAREN KENSEK ARCHITECTURE 507 FALL 2019

EXHIBITION CENTER, TILLAMOOK, UNITED STATES ARCHITECT: Olson Kundig COMPLETED: 2018

JONG JOO KIM

https://www.tillamook.com

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERNCALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE

A03 / HWK 4-3

HW 03: BIM House: 2D / 3D Coordination DUE: 14 OCTOBER 2019

DATE: 10/14/2019

Steel roof Beam 18x58 Glass Panel

Rigid Insulation

Steel Truss - Insulation on Metal Deck Roof 28' - 0"

Wood Joint 8" Partition Wall

Concrete Steel Bar Level 2 13' - 0"

Wall Foundation Level 1 0' - 0"

2

1

Section 1 1/4" = 1'-0"

WALL SECTION

THEORIES OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY

TILLAMOOK CREAMERY

INSTRUCTOR: KAREN KENSEK ARCHITECTURE 507 FALL 2019

EXHIBITION CENTER, TILLAMOOK, UNITED STATES ARCHITECT: Olson Kundig COMPLETED: 2018

JONG JOO KIM

https://www.tillamook.com

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERNCALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE

A04 / HWK 4-4

HW 03: BIM House: 2D / 3D Coordination DUE: 14 OCTOBER 2019

DATE: 10/14/2019

Roof Material Takeoff Material: Name

Steel Roof Wood Finish

Roof 28' - 0"

Laminate, 12"outerroof Blue, Matte Laminate, 12"outerroof Blue, Matte Metal Deck Steel Truss - Insulation on Metal Deck - EPDM Rigid Steel Truss - Insulation insulation on Metal Deck - EPDM Structure, Steel Truss - Insulation on Metal Deck - EPDM Steel Bar Joist Layer Roofing, Steel Truss - Insulation EPDM on Metal Deck - EPDM Membrane Metal 3"INNERROOF Painted Grey Maple 3"INNERROOF Glossy Metal 3"INNERROOF Painted Grey

W shaped 12x26 Beam

1

Roof Structure 1/4" = 1'-0"

2

Type

Roof Structured

Roof Material Takeoff Material: Name Maple Glossy Steel, Paint Finish, Blue Steel, Paint Finish, Blue Asphalt, Pavement, Light Grey Metal Deck

Type 3"INNERROOF 3" METAL INNERROOF 3" METAL INNERROOF street

Steel Truss - Insulation on Metal Deck - EPDM Steel Truss - Insulation on Metal Deck - EPDM Steel Truss - Insulation on Metal Deck - EPDM

Rigid insulation Structure, Steel Bar Joist Layer Roofing, Steel Truss - Insulation EPDM on Metal Deck - EPDM Membrane

Rigid Insulation Roof 28' - 0"

Steel Bar Roof 28' - 0"

Insulation Truss

Wood Structure

Wall Material Takeoff Material: Name Structure, Wood Joist/Rafter Layer, Batt Insulation Structure, Wood Joist/Rafter Layer, Batt Insulation Structure, Wood Joist/Rafter Layer, Batt Insulation Structure, Wood Joist/Rafter Layer, Batt Insulation Structure, Wood Joist/Rafter Layer, Batt Insulation Structure, Wood Joist/Rafter Layer, Batt Insulation Structure, Wood Joist/Rafter Layer, Batt Insulation Structure, Wood Joist/Rafter Layer, Batt Insulation Structure, Wood Joist/Rafter Layer, Batt Insulation Structure, Wood Joist/Rafter Layer, Batt Insulation Structure, Wood Joist/Rafter Layer, Batt Insulation Structure, Wood Joist/Rafter Layer, Batt Insulation Structure, Wood Joist/Rafter Layer, Batt Insulation Structure, Wood Joist/Rafter Layer, Batt Insulation Structure, Wood Joist/Rafter Layer, Batt Insulation

Structural Framing Material Takeoff

Material: Area 735 SF

Material: Name MSR MSR

237 SF MSR 262 SF

MSR

1247 SF

MSR MSR

586 SF

526 SF

MSR MSR MSR

108 SF

408 SF

MSR MSR MSR

339 SF

663 SF

MSR MSR MSR

85 SF

745 SF

MSR MSR MSR

40 SF MSR 186 SF

199 SF

MSR MSR MSR MSR MSR MSR MSR

Level 2 13' - 0"

Level 2 13' - 0"

MSR MSR MSR MSR MSR MSR

3

Wall Structure 1/4" = 1'-0"

4

Wall + Truss Structure

5

Section2 1/4" = 1'-0"

MSR MSR MSR

THEORIES OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY

TILLAMOOK CREAMERY

INSTRUCTOR: KAREN KENSEK ARCHITECTURE 507 FALL 2019

EXHIBITION CENTER, TILLAMOOK, UNITED STATES ARCHITECT: Olson Kundig COMPLETED: 2018

JONG JOO KIM

https://www.tillamook.com

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERNCALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE

Structural Material

Family and Type Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel Construction_Frames_RedBuilt_Openweb_R ed-L-Red-W_Parallel: Red-L_Parallel

A05 / HWK 4-5

HW 03: BIM House: 2D / 3D Coordination DUE: 14 OCTOBER 2019

DATE: 10/14/2019

Roof

Wood Finish Ceiling

Steel Beams Curtain Wall

Truss Ceiling

Steel Column

1

Exploded View

THEORIES OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY

TILLAMOOK CREAMERY

INSTRUCTOR: KAREN KENSEK ARCHITECTURE 507 FALL 2019

EXHIBITION CENTER, TILLAMOOK, UNITED STATES ARCHITECT: Olson Kundig COMPLETED: 2018

JONG JOO KIM

https://www.tillamook.com

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERNCALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE

A06 / HWK 4-6

HW 03: BIM House: 2D / 3D Coordination DUE: 14 OCTOBER 2019

DATE: 10/14/2019

Hours: About 28 hours

HW 03:some BIMcomponent HOUSE:and 2D/it was 3D COORDINATION Best Part: I had to customize fun and painful Worst Part: Lack of references THEORIES OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY

TILLAMOOK CREAMERY

INSTRUCTOR: KAREN KENSEK

EXHIBITION CENTER, TILLAMOOK, UNITED STATES

ARCHITECTURE 507

ARCHITECT: Olson Kundig

FALL 2019

COMPLETED: 2018

JONG JOO KIM

https://www.tillamook.com

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERNCALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE

A000 / COVER

HW 03: BIM House: 2D / 3D Coordination DUE: 07 OCTOBER 2019

DATE: 10/06/2019

1

PERSPECTIVE 1

2

THEORIES OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY

TILLAMOOK CREAMERY

INSTRUCTOR: KAREN KENSEK

EXHIBITION CENTER, TILLAMOOK, UNITED STATES

ARCHITECTURE 507

ARCHITECT: Olson Kundig

FALL 2019

COMPLETED: 2018

JONG JOO KIM

https://www.tillamook.com

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERNCALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE

PERSPECTIVE 2

A101 / Exterior

HW 03: BIM House: 2D / 3D Coordination DUE: 07 OCTOBER 2019

DATE: 10/06/2019

52

3/4" / 1'-0"

53 1 1/2" / 1'-0"

54 55 56 57 58 59

-

-

1 A104 /

414243 44 45 464748 495051

1

Site 1/64" = 1'-0"

THEORIES OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY

TILLAMOOK CREAMERY

INSTRUCTOR: KAREN KENSEK

EXHIBITION CENTER, TILLAMOOK, UNITED STATES

ARCHITECTURE 507

ARCHITECT: Olson Kundig

FALL 2019

COMPLETED: 2018

JONG JOO KIM

https://www.tillamook.com

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERNCALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE

A102 / Site

HW 03: BIM House: 2D / 3D Coordination DUE: 07 OCTOBER 2019

DATE: 10/06/2019

45' - 0"

57' - 3 7/16"

25' - 6" 57' - 3 7/16"

65' - 2 9/16"

45' - 11 19/32"

1

56' - 6"

9' - 6 13/32"

74' - 6"

170' - 6" 27' - 6" 112' - 0"

74' - 0"

Level 1 1/64" = 1'-0"

THEORIES OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY

67' - 7 31/32"

27' - 6"

68' - 0 13/16"

UP

2

TILLAMOOK CREAMERY

INSTRUCTOR: KAREN KENSEK

EXHIBITION CENTER, TILLAMOOK, UNITED STATES

ARCHITECTURE 507

ARCHITECT: Olson Kundig

FALL 2019

COMPLETED: 2018

JONG JOO KIM

https://www.tillamook.com

94' - 0"

DN

94' - 0"

76' - 6"

76' - 6"

170' - 6"

67' - 6"

139' - 8 1/2"

92' - 6"

139' - 8 1/2"

45' - 6"

74' - 6"

74' - 0"

Level 2 1/64" = 1'-0"

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERNCALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE

A103 /

HW 03: BIM House: 2D / 3D Coordination DUE: 07 OCTOBER 2019

DATE: 10/06/2019

19' - 0" 13' - 6"

27' - 0"

27' - 0"

24' - 0"13' - 5 11' 19/32" - 8 27/32" 22' - 11"

17' - 0" 16' - 0"

Roof 28' - 0" Level 2 13' - 0" Level 1 0' - 0"

1

South 1/32" = 1'-0"

19' - 0" 7' -13' 0" - 8 1/16" 20' - 11 27/32" 20' - 11 27/32" 27' - 11 27/32"

27' - 0"

Roof 28' - 0" Level 2 13' - 0" Level 1 0' - 0"

2

Section 1 1/32" = 1'-0" 16' - 0" 17' - 0"

22' - 11" 11' - 8 13' 27/32" - 5 19/32"24' - 0"

27' - 0"

27' - 0"

13' - 6" 19' - 0"

Roof 28' - 0" Level 2 13' - 0" Level 1 0' - 0"

3

Section 2 1/32" = 1'-0"

THEORIES OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY

TILLAMOOK CREAMERY

INSTRUCTOR: KAREN KENSEK

EXHIBITION CENTER, TILLAMOOK, UNITED STATES

ARCHITECTURE 507

ARCHITECT: Olson Kundig

FALL 2019

COMPLETED: 2018

JONG JOO KIM

https://www.tillamook.com

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERNCALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE

A104 Site / Elevation

HW 03: BIM House: 2D / 3D Coordination DUE: 07 OCTOBER 2019

DATE: 10/06/2019

Main Entry

Outdoor

Outdoor 2 THEORIES OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY

TILLAMOOK CREAMERY

INSTRUCTOR: KAREN KENSEK

EXHIBITION CENTER, TILLAMOOK, UNITED STATES

ARCHITECTURE 507

ARCHITECT: Olson Kundig

FALL 2019

COMPLETED: 2018

JONG JOO KIM

https://www.tillamook.com

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERNCALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE

Interior

A105 / Render

HW 03: BIM House: 2D / 3D Coordination DUE: 07 OCTOBER 2019

DATE: 10/06/2019