2 minute read

Cancer Care at Home

Pandemic Underscores Feasibility of Home-based Cancer Care

For many cancer patients, treatment means frequent trips to the clinic. When the novel coronavirus emerged in the United States, Americans were told to begin practicing social distancing and to try to stay home when possible.

The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center quickly took steps in order to minimize risks to patients and staff, including transitioning appointments to telehealth whenever possible. But what about patients who come in regularly for treatment? Many people were understandably concerned about visiting a hospital, and some even considered postponing appointments.

For some patients at SKCC, home care might be an option, such as infusions for supportive therapy, which are non-chemotherapeutic agents. Pharmacists, working with the Infusion Center, were able to move many of these patients to home infusions, according to Adam Binder, MD, Assistant Professor of Medical Oncology. Additionally, some patients are eligible for at-home chemotherapy with the assistance of home infusion nurses. For these patients, physicians need to confirm certain requirements including stable IV access, normal lab values, and minimal risk for infusion-related reactions.

Overall, Binder reports minimal concerns regarding home chemotherapy infusions. The home infusion service uses a different medical record system, so he found it can be challenging coordinating two different electronic records. Also, some patients experienced challenges with IV access and pump malfunctions – but nothing insurmountable.

Binder and colleague Nathan Handley, MD, MBA, Assistant Professor of Medical Oncology, hope to see an expansion of home-based cancer care at SKCC and beyond, even after the emergency of COVID-19 abates.

“COVID is providing us with clear evidence that managing patients virtually is feasible, and in many cases may be better for patients,” Handley said. “We know that patients with cancer are at higher risk for infections and complications associated with interacting with healthcare settings

even in the best of times, so thinking of ways to move more care into the home setting is something that is going to continue to be important.”

One barrier to home-based therapy is insurance coverage. “We know from a variety of studies that delivery of chemotherapy in the home setting is safe and can often be done at a lower cost than in the hospital or infusion center,” Handley said. However, Medicare and other insurers do not usually reimburse treatment given outside of the usual medical settings, although due to the health emergency of the pandemic, this is changing. New waivers by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) are further enhancing the feasibility of home-based treatments by making the reimbursement more streamlined, he explained.

Binder hopes to improve infrastructure to create a more robust home chemotherapy program for the future. “I think this will require some restructuring of the current home infusion model or the creation of a separate home infusion model that will allow for the same safety checks at home that occur in the infusion center.”

“COVID is serving as a catalyst for change in many areas of medicine, and cancer care is no exception,” Handley said. “It is forcing us to rethink what it means to deliver high-quality care and what it means to be engaged with patients.” 

“COVID is serving as a catalyst for change in many areas of medicine, and cancer care is no exception. It is forcing us to rethink what it means to deliver high-quality care and what it means to be engaged with patients.”

This article is from: