Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) MDF

4 Environmental Product Declaration Medium Density Fibreboard (MDF)

Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) in accordance with ISO 14025 and EN 15804 EPD Registration No. S-P-00563 | Version 1.2 Issued 21 October 2015 | Revised 8 December 2017 | Valid until 8 December 2022 Geographical Scope: Australia

Environmental Product Declarations WoodSolutions has developed a suite of EPDs for industry-average, Australian-produced timber products.

These EPDs help to showcase the environmental credentials of Australian wood products. They also provide life cycle data for calculating the impacts of wood products at a building level.

EPDs include: #01 Softwood Timber

WoodSolutions is an industry initiative designed to provide independent, non-proprietary information about timber and wood products to professionals and companies involved in building design and construction.

WoodSolutions is resourced by Forest and Wood Products Australia (FWPA).

It is a collaborative effort between FWPA members and levy payers, supported by industry peak bodies and technical associations.

This work is supported by funding provided to FWPA by the Commonwealth Government.

978-1-925213-17-1 Researchers: thinkstep Pty Ltd, 25 Jubilee Street, South Perth WA 6151. Australia Stephen Mitchell Associates, PO Box 309, Earlwood NSW 2206 Australia Version history V1.0 Initial version based on 2005/06 data from CSIRO and produced by thinkstep Pty Ltd and the Timber Development Association (NSW) Ltd. V1.1 Revised version incorporating 2015/16 data from a new industry survey, as well as updates to Global Warming Potential (GWP) and fresh water indicators.

#02 Hardwood Timber

V1.2 - Revised version for correction of the validity period, documentation of the forestry carbon modelling assumptions and correction of minor typographical errors.

#03 Particleboard

Produced: December 2020

#04 Medium Density Fibreboard (MDF) #05 Plywood

© 2020 Forest and Wood Products Australia Limited. All rights reserved.

#06 Glued Laminated Timber (Glulam)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

These materials are published under the brand WoodSolutions by FWPA.

Whilst all care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication, Forest and Wood Products Australia Limited and WoodSolutions Australia and all persons associated with them (FWPA) as well as any other contributors make no representations or give any warranty regarding the use, suitability, validity, accuracy, completeness, currency or reliability of the information, including any opinion or advice, contained in this publication. To the maximum extent permitted by law, FWPA disclaims all warranties of any kind, whether express or implied, including but not limited to any warranty that the information is up-to-date, complete, true, legally compliant, accurate, non-misleading or suitable.

To the maximum extent permitted by law, FWPA excludes all liability in contract, tort (including negligence), or otherwise for any injury, loss or damage whatsoever (whether direct, indirect, special or consequential) arising out of or in connection with use or reliance on this publication (and any information, opinions or advice therein) and whether caused by any errors, defects, omissions or misrepresentations in this publication. Individual requirements may vary from those discussed in this publication and you are advised to check with State authorities to ensure building compliance as well as make your own professional assessment of the relevant applicable laws and Standards.

The work is copyright and protected under the terms of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cwth). All material may be reproduced in whole or in part, provided that it is not sold or used for commercial benefit and its source (Forest & Wood Products Australia Limited) is acknowledged and the above disclaimer is included. Reproduction or copying for other purposes, which is strictly reserved only for the owner or licensee of copyright under the Copyright Act, is prohibited without the prior written consent of FWPA. WoodSolutions Australia is a registered business division of Forest and Wood Products Australia Limited.

EPD Details An Environmental Product Declaration, or EPD, is a standardised and verified way of quantifying the environmental impacts of a product that is based on a consistent set of rules known as a PCR (Product Category Rules).

EPDs within the same product category from different programs may not be comparable. EPDs of construction products may not be comparable if they do not comply with EN 15804.

Declaration owner: Forest and Wood Products Australia Ltd Web: www.fwpa.com.au Email: info@fwpa.com.au Post: Level 11, 10-16 Queen Street, Melbourne VIC 3000, Australia EPD produced by: thinkstep Pty Ltd Web: www.thinkstep-anz.com Email: anz@thinkstep-anz.com Post: 25 Jubilee Street, South Perth WA 6151, Australia Stephen Mitchell Associates Email: steve@smassociates.com.au Post: PO Box 309, Earlwood NSW 2206, Australia EPD program operator: EPD Australasia Limited Web: www.epd-australasia.com Email: info@epd-australasia.com Post: EPD Australasia Limited, 315a Hardy Street Nelson 7010, New Zealand CEN standard EN 15804 served as the core PCR PCR: PCR 2012:01 Construction products and Construction services, Version 2.2, 2017-05-30 PCR review was conducted by: The Technical Committee of the International EPD® System.

Chair: Massimo Marino. Contact via info@environdec.com.

Independent verification of the declaration and data, according to ISO 14025: EPD process certification (Internal) ✓ EPD verification (External) Third party verifier Kimberly Robertson, Catalyst Ltd Web: www.catalystnz.co.nz Email: kimberly.robertson@catalystnz.co.nz Post: PO Box 37228, Christchurch 8245, New Zealand Verifier approved by: EPD Australasia Ltd

1

EPD for Medium Density Fibreboard

®

Introduction This Environmental Product Declaration presents the average performance of medium density fibreboard (MDF) manufactured in Australia from Australian grown wood residues by members of Forest and Wood Products Australia (FWPA). It recognises the importance of transparency by providing information on the raw materials, production and environmental impacts of Australian MDF. This EPD has been prepared in accordance with ISO 14025:2006, EN 15804:2013 and PCR 2012:01 (IEPDS 2017). It covers standard and moisture resistant MDF panels that have a decorative overlay produced in accordance with the following standards: • AS/NZS 1859.2:2004 Reconstituted wood-based panels – Specifications – Dry-processed fibreboard • AS/NZS 1859.3:2005 Reconstituted wood-based panels – Specifications – Decorative overlaid wood panels The environmental data presented in this document are primarily derived from a survey of industry members covering the 2015/16 financial year conducted by thinkstep and Stephen Mitchell Associates on behalf of FWPA. This updates an earlier survey conducted by CSIRO (2009) based on the 2005/06 financial year, which was used in the first version of this EPD. The current survey covers 100% of total MDF production in Australia.

The production of this EPD has been facilitated by FWPA with participation of its current MDF producer members (listed below) and the Engineered Wood Products Association of Australasia (EWPAA).

The following companies contributed to this EPD financially and by contributing data: Financial contributor

Data contributor

Alpine MDF Industries Pty Ltd

X

X

Borg Panels

X

X

The Laminex Group

X

X

Company

Description of the Australian MDF Industry The Australian MDF industry is an important contributor to the Australian economy – particularly to the regional economies where mills are based. The overall contribution of the wood products industries to the Australian GDP in 2015-16 was 0.5% [ABARES 2017]. In 2015-2016 Australian MDF manufacturers produced 615,708 cubic metres of MDF products in three different facilities.

Description of MDF Products MDF is a composite panel valued for its homogeneity that allows precision joinery work and finishing.

These properties have led to MDF being widely used to manufacture furniture, kitchen cabinets, doors and mouldings. MDF panels are composed of wood residues (from softwood plantation management thinnings, timber harvesting and softwood manufacturing), resin and wax.

2

EPD for Medium Density Fibreboard

Use of EPDs in Building and Infrastructure Rating Systems This document complies with the requirements for an industry-wide EPD under the Green Building Council of Australia’s Green Star rating system given that: 1. It conforms with ISO 14025 and EN 15804.

2. It has been verified by an independent third party.

3. It has at least a cradle-to-gate scope.

4. The participants in the EPD are listed (see Introduction).

It may be used by project teams using the Design & As Built and Interiors rating tools to obtain Green Star points under the following credits: • Materials > Product Transparency and Sustainability.

• Materials > Life Cycle Assessment: By providing data for an EN 15978 compliant whole-of-building whole-of-life assessment.

• Innovation Challenge > Responsible Carbon Impact: By providing embodied carbon impacts (i.e. data on Global Warming Potential) which can be used in the calculation and reduction of the total embodied carbon impacts of a project.

This EPD is also recognised for credits in the Infrastructure Sustainability (IS) rating scheme of the Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia (ISCA).

3

EPD for Medium Density Fibreboard

Scope Products This Sector EPD describes the following average products (declared units) manufactured in Australia by the FWPA members listed in the Introduction: • 1 m2 of MDF, 16 mm E0 & E1 standard melamine coated • 1 m2 of MDF, 18 mm E0 & E1 standard melamine coated • 1 m2 of MDF, 25 mm E0 & E1 standard melamine coated • 1 m2 of MDF, 16 mm E0 & E1 moisture resistant (MR) melamine coated • 1 m2 of MDF, 18 mm E0 & E1 moisture resistant (MR) melamine coated • 1 m2 of MDF, 25 mm E0 & E1 moisture resistant (MR) melamine coated Wood used in these products is from Australian native and exotic (non-native) softwood species grown in plantations. The dominant softwood species used to produce particleboard in Australia is Pinus radiata (radiata pine). Other softwood species used are Araucaria cunninghami (hoop pine), Pinus pinaster (maritime pine) and the Southern Pines: Pinus elliottii (slash pine), Pinus caribaea (Caribbean pine) and hybrids thereof.

The properties and material composition of these particleboard products are defined in Table 1 and Table 2 below.

Table 1: Properties of MDF products included in this EPD Properties

Std 16mm

Std 18 mm

Std 25 mm

MR 16 mm

MR 18 mm

MR 25 mm

Area density (kg per m2)

11.6

13.0

17.5

11.7

13.0

17.6

Density (kg per m )

724

722

701

732

721

705

Moisture content (dry basis)

7%

7%

7%

7%

7%

7%

Gross calorific value (MJ/kg)

20.6

20.5

20.6

20.7

20.7

20.6

Net calorific value (MJ/kg)

17.7

17.7

17.8

17.8

17.8

17.8

CO2 sequestered (kg CO2e)

17.5

19.8

26.1

17.5

19.4

26.1

3

Table 2: Composition of MDF products included in this EPD Materials

Std 16mm

Std 18 mm

Std 25 mm

MR 16 mm

MR 18 mm

MR 25 mm

Softwood (dry)

81.8%

82.4%

80.7%

80.8%

81.0%

80.3%

Urea formaldehyde

4.7%

7.2%

3.3%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

Melamine formaldehyde

0.8%

0.7%

0.6%

0.7%

0.6%

0.6%

Melamine urea formaldehyde

4.7%

1.9%

7.7%

10.3%

10.5%

11.5%

Paraffin wax

0.6%

0.5%

0.6%

0.7%

0.6%

0.6%

Lamination paper (dry)

0.7%

0.6%

0.5%

0.6%

0.6%

0.5%

Water

6.7%

6.6%

6.6%

6.8%

6.6%

6.6%

Total

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

The declared units above represent an entire product category rather than a specific product from a specific manufacturer. The values represent a production volume weighted average. As such, a specific product purchased on the market may have a lesser or greater environmental impact than the average presented in this EPD. Some products may also undergo further processing (e.g. sawing) before being used in a building.

4

EPD for Medium Density Fibreboard

Representativeness Market coverage: The data in this EPD are from detailed surveys of three of the three MDF plants in Australia. These plants collectively produced 615,708 m3 of MDF in 2015/16, which is 100% of total Australian production.

Temporal representativeness: Primary data were collected from participating sites for the 2015/16 Australian financial year (1st July 2015 to 30th June 2016). Following EN 15804, site-specific data are valid for 5 years (to 30th June 2021), meaning that these datasets are valid until the end of this EPD’s validity period.

Geographical and technological representativeness: The data are representative of the three sites surveyed, which collectively produce all Australian-produced MDF, thus the EPD is valid for all MDF produced in Australia. More detailed information can be found in the “Variation in Results” section later in this EPD. Industry Classifications Product

Classification

Code

Category

All

UN CPC Ver.2

31440

Fibreboard of wood or other ligneous materials

All

ANZSIC 2006

1494

Reconstituted Wood Product Manufacturing

5

EPD for Medium Density Fibreboard

LCA Calculation Rules System Boundary This EPD is of the ‘cradle-to-gate’ type with options. The options include the end-of-life stage, which is modelled through the use of scenarios.

Installation

Use

Maintenance

Repair

Replacement

Refurbishment

Operational energy use

Operational water use

Deconstruction / demolition

Transport to waste processing

Waste processing

Disposal

ReuseRecoveryRecyclingpotential

Benefits and loads beyond the system boundary

Transport to customer

End-of-life stage

Manufacturing

Use stage

Transport of raw materials

Construction process stage

Raw material supply

Product stage

A1

A2

A3

A4

A5

B1

B2

B3

B4

B5

B6

B7

C1

C2

C3

C4

D

X

X

X

MND MND MND MND MND MND MND MND MND MND MND

X

X

X

Key: X = included in the EPD MND = module not declared (such a declaration shall not be regarded as an indicator result of zero) Production The production stage includes growth and harvesting of wood inputs, production of resin and wax, blending of wood particles with resin and wax, pressing of the mixture to create the MDF substrate, cutting, sanding and then laminating a melamine-impregnated paper layer on the top and bottom surfaces.

Pulp logs from softwood forestry

Wood chips from sawmill

System boundary Electricity, water, thermal energy

Debarking, chipping and screening Combustion of residues

Pr imar y energy, water, raw material

Thermal energy

Drying

Resins, wax, electricity

Refining and blending

Electr icity

Mat forming

Chemicals, electr icity, thermal energy

Electr icity

Emissions Waste (recycling & landfill)

Pressing and curing Finishing

Cooling, trimming and sanding Combustion of residues

6

Paper, resin, thermal energy

Lamination

Packaging material, transport packaging

Packaging

EPD for Medium Density Fibreboard

Medium Density Fibreboard

End-of-Life When a wood product reaches the end of its useful life, it may either be reused, recycled, landfilled or combusted to produce energy. Landfill is currently the most common end-of-life route for wood products in Australia. Reuse is not included in this EPD as it is not common for MDF. All other scenarios are in use in certain regions (Forsythe Consultants 2007; National Timber Product Stewardship Group) and have been included within this EPD. Each scenario assumes that 100% of the wood is sent to that scenario. To create an end-of-life mix for a given region or end use, the reader should take a weighted sum of these scenarios. Where no data are available, the ‘landfill (typical)’ scenario should be used for 100% of the waste.

Landfill This EPD includes two scenarios for landfill, each with a different value for the degradable organic carbon fraction (DOCf) of wood. The two values are based on bioreactor laboratory research. This experimental work involves the testing of a range of waste types in reactors operated to obtain maximum methane yields. As the laboratory work optimises the conditions for anaerobic decay, the results can be considered as estimates of the DOCf value that would apply over very long time horizons (Australian Government 2014a, p. 17).

• Landfill (typical): DOCf = 0.7%. This is based on bioreactor laboratory research by Ximenes et al. (2013).

• Landfill (NGA): DOCf = 10%. This is the value chosen for Australia’s National Greenhouse Accounts (NGA) (Australian Government 2017). This is a reduction from the previous value of 23% (Australian Government 2014b) that was derived from early bioreactor laboratory research from the 1990s (e.g. Barlaz 1998) that investigated the degradability of wood tree branches ground to a fine powder under anaerobic conditions (Australian Government 2014a, p. 17). This DOCf value can be considered extremely conservative when compared to values from later research (as used in the typical scenario above) and effectively assumes that at least part of the wood waste is ground into a powder to accelerate degradation.

The impacts associated with the landfill are declared in module C4. All landfill gas that is combusted for energy recovery (module C4) is assumed to occur in a power plant with an electrical conversion efficiency of 36% (Australian Government 2014c, p.189) and the resulting electricity receives a credit for offsetting average electricity from the Australian grid (module D) in line with EN 16485:2014 (Section 6.3.4.5).

Both landfill scenarios assume the following for carbon emissions: • Of the gases formed from any degradation of wood in landfill, 50% is methane and 50% is carbon dioxide (Australian Government 2016, Table 43).

• All carbon dioxide is released directly to the atmosphere.

• 36% of the methane is captured, based on forecasted average methane capture in Australian landfills by 2020 (Hyder Consulting 2007). The year 2020 was chosen as landfill will take place in the future and this was the last year for which forecasts were available.

• Of this 36% captured, one-quarter (9% of the total) is flared and three-quarters (27% of the total) are used for energy recovery (Carre 2011).

• Of the 64% of methane that is not captured, 10% (6.4% of the total) is oxidised (Australian Government 2016, Table 43).) and 90% (57.6%) is released to the atmosphere.

• In summary, for every kilogram of carbon converted to landfill gas, 71.2% is released as carbon dioxide and 28.8% is released as methane.

7

EPD for Medium Density Fibreboard

Energy recovery This scenario includes shredding (module C3) and combustion with recovered energy offset against average thermal energy from natural gas (module D) in line with EN 16485:2014 (Section 6.3.4.5). Note that other options are also in use within Australia, including replacement of coal, replacement of electricity, and replacement of both electricity and thermal energy (via co-generation).

Recycling MDF may be recycled in many different ways. This scenario considers shredding and effectively downcycling into wood chips. Wood waste is chipped (module C3) and assigned credits relative to the avoided production of woodchips from virgin softwood (module D). The sequestered CO2 and the energy content of the wood are assumed to leave the system boundary at C3 so that future product systems can also claim these without double-counting (EN 16485:2014, Section 6.3.4.2).

Key Assumptions Energy: Thermal energy and transport fuels have been modelled as the Australian average (see thinkstep 2017 for documentation). Electricity for production (modules A1-A3) has been modelled as a state-specific split based upon the electricity consumption of the manufacturers who contributed data to this study.

Electricity at end-of-life (module C) has been modelled using an average Australian electricity mix as the location where the product reaches end-of-life is unknown.

Forestry: All breakdown of forest matter after harvest is modelled as aerobic and therefore carbon neutral as carbon sequestered is released as carbon dioxide. Any burning of forestry material left behind after logging is modelled as being carbon neutral, aside from the trace emissions of various organic gases (Commonwealth of Australia, 2016). All forestry is assumed to be sustainably managed and as such there are no carbon emissions associated with land use change. Loss of carbon from the soil is assumed to be zero (i.e. no significant erosion). It is assumed that all timber will be replanted (plantation forest) or will regrow (native forest) after bushfires.

Cut-off Criteria Environmental impacts relating to personnel, infrastructure, and production equipment not directly consumed in the process are excluded from the system boundary as per the PCR (IEPDS 2017, Section 7.5.4).

All other reported data were incorporated and modelled using the best available life cycle inventory data.

Allocation Upstream data: For refinery products, allocation is done by mass and net calorific value. Inventories for electricity and thermal energy generation include allocation by economic value for some by-products (e.g. gypsum, boiler ash and fly ash). Allocation by energy is applied for co-generation of heat and power.

For materials and chemicals, the allocation rule most suitable for the product is applied (see thinkstep 2017).

Co-products (i.e. different MDF products): Wood particles and energy are allocated per cubic metre of board produced. Decorative overlays are allocated by square metre applied. Resins and waxes are allocated based on the dry mass required in average recipes supplied by manufacturers.

Background Data Data for primary wood inputs (pulplog and wood chips from sawmills) use the same forestry and sawmilling data as FWPA EPD #01 for Softwood Timber, but with different economic allocation factors.

Data for all energy inputs, transport processes and raw materials are from GaBi Databases 2017 (thinkstep 2017). Most datasets have a reference year between 2013 and 2015 and all fall within the 10-year limit allowable for generic data under EN 15804 (Section 6.3.7).

8 EPD for Medium Density Fibreboard

EPD Results Note: these tables show the impacts associated with production and end-of-life.

Any potential credits to future products from recycling or energy recovery are presented in the Other Environmental Information section.

Environmental Impact Indicators An introduction to each environmental impact indicator is provided below.

The best-known effect of each indicator is listed to the right of its name.

Global Warming Potential (GWP) > Climate Change A measure of greenhouse gas emissions, such as carbon dioxide and methane. These emissions increase absorption of radiation emitted by the earth, intensifying the natural greenhouse effect. Contributions to GWP can come from either fossil or biogenic sources, e.g. burning fossil fuels or burning wood. GWP is reported as a total as well as being separated into biogenic carbon (GWPB) and fossil carbon (GWPF).

Ozone Depletion Potential (ODP) > Ozone Hole A measure of air emissions that contribute to the depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer, causing higher levels of ultraviolet B (UVB) to reach the earth’s surface with detrimental effects on humans, animals and plants.

Acidification Potential (AP) > Acid Rain A measure of emissions that cause acidifying effects to the environment. Acidification potential is a measure of a molecule’s capacity to increase the hydrogen ion (H+) concentration in the presence of water, thus decreasing the pH value. Potential effects include fish mortality, forest decline and the deterioration of building materials.

Eutrophication Potential (EP) > Algal Blooms A measure of nutrient enrichment that may cause an undesirable shift in species composition and elevated biomass production in both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. It includes potential impacts of excessively high levels of macronutrients, the most important of which are nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P).

Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP) > Smog A measure of emissions of precursors that contribute to ground level smog formation (mainly ozone O3), produced by the reaction of VOCs and carbon monoxide in the presence of nitrogen oxides under the influence of UV light. Ground level ozone may be harmful to human and ecosystem health and may also damage crops.

Abiotic Depletion Potential > Resource Consumption The consumption of non-renewable resources leads to a decrease in the future availability of the functions supplied by these resources.

Depletion of mineral resource elements (ADPE) and non-renewable fossil energy resources (ADPF) are reported separately.

9

EPD for Medium Density Fibreboard

Table 3: Environmental impacts, 1 m2 of 16 mm E0 & E1 standard melamine coated MDF. Production

Landfill (typical)

Landfill (NGA)

Energy recovery

Recycling

Parameter [Unit]

A1-A3

C4

C4

C3

C3

GWP [kg CO2-eq.]

-7.66

1.38

7.31

19.4

19.4

GWPF [kg CO2-eq.]

9.68

0.942

1.05

1.86

1.86

GWPB [kg CO2-eq.]

-17.3

0.438

6.26

17.5

17.5

ODP [kg CFC11-eq.]

3.72E-11

4.49E-13

4.49E-13

5.07E-15

5.07E-15

AP [kg SO2-eq.]

0.0396

0.00300

0.00339

7.40E-04

7.40E-04

EP [kg PO -eq.]

0.00798

0.00127

0.0129

1.73E-04

1.73E-04

POCP [kg C2H4-eq.]

0.0196

2.69E-04

0.00142

6.42E-05

6.42E-05

ADPE [kg Sb-eq.]

2.34E-06

1.86E-07

1.86E-07

1.47E-09

1.47E-09

130

13.5

13.5

1.53

1.53

3 4

ADPF [MJ]

Table 4: Environmental impacts, 1 m2 of 18 mm E0 & E1 standard melamine coated MDF. Production

Landfill (typical)

Landfill (NGA)

Energy recovery

Recycling

Parameter [Unit]

A1-A3

C4

C4

C3

C3

GWP [kg CO2-eq.]

-9.29

1.55

8.19

21.7

21.7

GWPF [kg CO2-eq.]

10.3

1.06

1.17

1.93

1.93

GWPB [kg CO2-eq.]

-19.6

0.491

7.02

19.8

19.8

ODP [kg CFC11-eq.]

3.45E-11

5.05E-13

5.05E-13

5.68E-15

5.68E-15

AP [kg SO2-eq.]

0.0454

0.00337

0.00381

8.30E-04

8.30E-04

EP [kg PO43-eq.]

0.00838

0.00136

0.0137

1.94E-04

1.94E-04

POCP [kg C2H4-eq.]

0.0225

3.02E-04

0.00159

7.20E-05

7.20E-05

ADPE [kg Sb-eq.]

1.84E-06

2.09E-07

2.09E-07

1.64E-09

1.64E-09

136

15.2

15.2

1.72

1.72

ADPF [MJ]

Table 5: Environmental impacts, 1 m2 of 25 mm E0 & E1 standard melamine coated MDF. Production

Landfill (typical)

Landfill (NGA)

Energy recovery

Recycling

Parameter [Unit]

A1-A3

C4

C4

C3

C3

GWP [kg CO2-eq.]

-7.90

2.13

11.1

29.3

29.3

GWPF [kg CO2-eq.]

18.0

1.47

1.65

3.16

3.16

GWPB [kg CO2-eq.]

-25.9

0.660

9.43

26.1

26.1

ODP [kg CFC11-eq.]

7.28E-11

7.01E-13

7.01E-13

7.66E-15

7.66E-15

AP [kg SO2-eq.]

0.0685

0.00467

0.00525

0.00112

0.00112

EP [kg PO -eq.]

0.0142

0.00214

0.0225

2.62E-04

2.62E-04

POCP [kg C2H4-eq.]

0.0308

4.13E-04

0.00216

9.71E-05

9.71E-05

ADPE [kg Sb-eq.]

4.92E-06

2.90E-07

2.90E-07

2.22E-09

2.22E-09

243

21.1

21.1

2.32

2.32

3 4

ADPF [MJ]

10

EPD for Medium Density Fibreboard

Table 6: Environmental impacts, 1 m2 of 16 mm E0 & E1 moisture resistant (MR) melamine coated MDF. Production

Landfill (typical)

Landfill (NGA)

Energy recovery

Recycling

Parameter [Unit]

A1-A3

C4

C4

C3

C3

GWP [kg CO2-eq.]

-5.20

1.39

7.38

19.6

19.6

GWPF [kg CO2-eq.]

12.1

0.944

1.06

2.11

2.11

GWPB [kg CO2-eq.]

-17.3

0.442

6.31

17.5

17.5

ODP [kg CFC11-eq.]

5.21E-11

4.49E-13

4.49E-13

5.12E-15

5.12E-15

AP [kg SO2-eq.]

0.0434

0.00300

0.00339

7.47E-04

7.47E-04

EP [kg PO -eq.]

0.00962

0.00138

0.0146

1.75E-04

1.75E-04

POCP [kg C2H4-eq.]

0.0192

2.70E-04

0.00144

6.48E-05

6.48E-05

ADPE [kg Sb-eq.]

3.89E-06

1.86E-07

1.86E-07

1.48E-09

1.48E-09

165

13.5

13.5

1.55

1.55

3 4

ADPF [MJ]

Table 7: Environmental impacts, 1 m2 of 18 mm E0 & E1 moisture resistant (MR) melamine coated MDF. Production

Landfill (typical)

Landfill (NGA)

Energy recovery

Recycling

Parameter [Unit]

A1-A3

C4

C4

C3

C3

GWP [kg CO2-eq.]

-3.55

1.55

8.20

21.7

21.7

GWPF [kg CO2-eq.]

15.7

1.06

1.19

2.33

2.33

GWPB [kg CO2-eq.]

-19.2

0.490

7.01

19.4

19.4

ODP [kg CFC11-eq.]

6.16E-11

5.05E-13

5.05E-13

5.67E-15

5.67E-15

AP [kg SO2-eq.]

0.0568

0.00337

0.00381

8.28E-04

8.28E-04

EP [kg PO -eq.]

0.0117

0.00155

0.0164

1.94E-04

1.94E-04

POCP [kg C2H4-eq.]

0.0221

3.02E-04

0.00160

7.19E-05

7.19E-05

ADPE [kg Sb-eq.]

4.61E-06

2.09E-07

2.09E-07

1.64E-09

1.64E-09

211

15.2

15.2

1.72

1.72

3 4

ADPF [MJ]

Table 8: Environmental impacts, 1 m2 of 25 mm E0 & E1 moisture resistant (MR) melamine coated MDF. Production

Landfill (typical)

Landfill (NGA)

Energy recovery

Recycling

Parameter [Unit]

A1-A3

C4

C4

C3

C3

GWP [kg CO2-eq.]

-4.67

2.14

11.2

29.5

29.5

GWPF [kg CO2-eq.]

21.2

1.47

1.66

3.38

3.38

GWPB [kg CO2-eq.]

-25.9

0.664

9.49

26.1

26.1

ODP [kg CFC11-eq.]

8.96E-11

7.01E-13

7.01E-13

7.71E-15

7.71E-15

AP [kg SO2-eq.]

0.0751

0.00467

0.00526

0.00113

0.00113

EP [kg PO -eq.]

0.0162

0.00225

0.0241

2.63E-04

2.63E-04

POCP [kg C2H4-eq.]

0.0304

4.15E-04

0.00217

9.76E-05

9.76E-05

ADPE [kg Sb-eq.]

6.66E-06

2.90E-07

2.90E-07

2.23E-09

2.23E-09

288

21.1

21.1

2.33

2.33

3 4

ADPF [MJ]

11

EPD for Medium Density Fibreboard

Resource Use Table 9: Resource use, 1 m2 of 16 mm E0 & E1 standard melamine coated MDF. Production

Landfill (typical)

Landfill (NGA)

Energy recovery

Recycling

PERE [MJ]

A1-A3 58.2

C4 0.852

C4 0.852

C3 0.0278

C3 0.0278

PERM [MJ]

183

0

0

-183

-183

PERT [MJ]

242

0.852

0.852

-183

-183

PENRE [MJ]

132

13.8

13.8

1.53

1.53

PENRM [MJ]

23.9

0

0

-23.9

-23.9

PENRT [MJ]

156

13.8

13.8

-22.4

-22.4

SM [kg]

0

0

0

0

0

RSF [MJ]

0

0

0

0

0

NRSF [MJ]

0

0

0

0

0

0.0438

1.43E-04

8.03E-04

1.68E-05

1.68E-05

Parameter [Unit]

FW [m ] 3

PERE = Use of renewable primary energy excluding renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PERM = Use of renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PERT = Total use of renewable primary energy resources; PENRE = Use of non-renewable primary energy excluding non-renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PENRM = Use of non-renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PENRT = Total use of non-renewable primary energy resources; SM = Use of secondary material; RSF = Use of non-renewable secondary fuels; NRSF = Use of non-renewable secondary fuels; FW = Net use of fresh water

Table 10: Resource use, 1 m2 of 18 mm E0 & E1 standard melamine coated MDF. Production

Landfill (typical)

Landfill (NGA)

Energy recovery

Recycling

PERE [MJ]

A1-A3 69.2

C4 0.958

C4 0.958

C3 0.0312

C3 0.0312

PERM [MJ]

207

0

0

-207

-207

PERT [MJ]

276

0.958

0.958

-207

-207

PENRE [MJ]

138

15.5

15.5

1.72

1.72

PENRM [MJ]

24.8

0

0

-24.8

-24.8

PENRT [MJ]

Parameter [Unit]

162

15.5

15.5

-23.1

-23.1

SM [kg]

0

0

0

0

0

RSF [MJ]

0

0

0

0

0

NRSF [MJ]

0

0

0

0

0

0.0434

1.60E-04

8.99E-04

1.88E-05

1.88E-05

FW [m ] 3

Table 11: Resource use, 1 m2 of 25 mm E0 & E1 standard melamine coated MDF Production

Landfill (typical)

Landfill (NGA)

Energy recovery

Recycling

PERE [MJ]

A1-A3 82.2

C4 1.33

C4 1.33

C3 0.0421

C3 0.0421

PERM [MJ]

273

0

0

-273

-273

PERT [MJ]

356

1.33

1.33

-273

-273

PENRE [MJ]

247

21.5

21.5

2.32

2.32

PENRM [MJ]

41.0

0

0

-41.0

-41.0

PENRT [MJ]

Parameter [Unit]

288

21.5

21.5

-38.7

-38.7

SM [kg]

0

0

0

0

0

RSF [MJ]

0

0

0

0

0

NRSF [MJ]

0

0

0

0

0

0.0845

2.18E-04

0.00121

2.54E-05

2.54E-05

FW [m ] 3

12

EPD for Medium Density Fibreboard

Table 12: Resource use, 1 m2 of 16 mm E0 & E1 moisture resistant (MR) melamine coated MDF. Production

Landfill (typical)

Landfill (NGA)

Energy recovery

Recycling

A1-A3

C4

C4

C3

C3

PERE [MJ]

50.8

0.852

0.852

0.0281

0.0281

PERM [MJ]

183

0

0

-183

-183

PERT [MJ]

234

0.852

0.852

-183

-183

PENRE [MJ]

167

13.8

13.8

1.55

1.55

PENRM [MJ]

27.3

0

0

-27.3

-27.3

PENRT [MJ]

195

13.8

13.8

-25.8

-25.8

SM [kg]

0

0

0

0

0

RSF [MJ]

0

0

0

0

0

NRSF [MJ]

0

0

0

0

0

0.0597

1.44E-04

8.11E-04

1.70E-05

1.70E-05

Parameter [Unit]

FW [m ] 3

Table 13: Resource use, 1 m2 of 18 mm E0 & E1 moisture resistant (MR) melamine coated MDF. Production

Landfill (typical)

Landfill (NGA)

Energy recovery

Recycling

A1-A3

C4

C4

C3

C3

PERE [MJ]

56.9

0.958

0.958

0.0311

0.0311

PERM [MJ]

203

0

0

-203

-203

PERT [MJ]

260

0.958

0.958

-203

-203

PENRE [MJ]

214

15.5

15.5

1.72

1.72

PENRM [MJ]

30.1

0

0

-30.1

-30.1

PENRT [MJ]

244

15.5

15.5

-28.4

-28.4

SM [kg]

0

0

0

0

0

RSF [MJ]

0

0

0

0

0

NRSF [MJ]

0

0

0

0

0

0.0759

1.60E-04

9.00E-04

1.88E-05

1.88E-05

Parameter [Unit]

FW [m ] 3

Table 14: Resource use, 1 m2 of 25 mm E0 & E1 moisture resistant (MR) melamine coated MDF. Production

Landfill (typical)

Landfill (NGA)

Energy recovery

Recycling

A1-A3

C4

C4

C3

C3

PERE [MJ]

77.8

1.33

1.33

0.0423

0.0423

PERM [MJ]

273

0

0

-273

-273

PERT [MJ]

351

1.33

1.33

-273

-273

PENRE [MJ]

292

21.5

21.5

2.33

2.33

PENRM [MJ]

43.9

0

0

-43.9

-43.9

PENRT [MJ]

336

21.5

21.5

-41.6

-41.6

SM [kg]

0

0

0

0

0

RSF [MJ]

0

0

0

0

0

NRSF [MJ]

0

0

0

0

0

0.105

2.19E-04

0.00122

2.56E-05

2.56E-05

Parameter [Unit]

FW [m3]

13

EPD for Medium Density Fibreboard

Waste and Output Flows Table 15: Waste categories, 1 m2 of 16 mm E0 & E1 standard melamine coated MDF. Production

Landfill (typical)

Landfill (NGA)

Energy recovery

Recycling

A1-A3

C4

C4

C3

C3

6.84E-08

4.98E-08

4.98E-08

2.54E-09

2.54E-09

0.438

11.5

9.70

1.06E-05

1.06E-05

RWD [kg]

7.82E-04

9.74E-05

9.74E-05

9.21E-08

9.21E-08

CRU [kg]

0

0

0

0

0

MFR [kg]

0

0

0

0

11.6

MER [kg]

0

0

0

11.6

0

EEE [MJ]

0

0.119

1.70

0

0

EET [MJ]

0

0

0

0

0

Parameter [Unit] HWD [kg] NHWD [kg]

HWD = Hazardous waste disposed; NHWD = Non-hazardous waste disposed; RWD = Radioactive waste disposed; CRU = Components for reuse; MFR = Materials for recycling; MER = Materials for energy recovery; EEE = Exported electrical energy; EET = Exported thermal energy

Table 16: Waste categories, 1 m2 of 18 mm E0 & E1 standard melamine coated MDF Production

Landfill (typical)

Landfill (NGA)

Energy recovery

Recycling

A1-A3

C4

C4

C3

C3

7.55E-08

5.59E-08

5.59E-08

2.85E-09

2.85E-09

0.421

12.9

10.9

1.18E-05

1.18E-05

RWD [kg]

7.26E-04

1.10E-04

1.10E-04

1.03E-07

1.03E-07

CRU [kg]

0

0

0

0

0

MFR [kg]

0

0

0

0

13.0

MER [kg]

0

0

0

13.0

0

EEE [MJ]

0

0.134

1.91

0

0

EET [MJ]

0

0

0

0

0

Parameter [Unit] HWD [kg] NHWD [kg]

Table 17: Waste categories, 1 m2 of 25 mm E0 & E1 standard melamine coated MDF Production

Landfill (typical)

Landfill (NGA)

Energy recovery

Recycling

A1-A3

C4

C4

C3

C3

9.45E-08

7.64E-08

7.64E-08

3.84E-09

3.84E-09

NHWD [kg]

0.660

17.4

14.7

1.60E-05

1.60E-05

RWD [kg]

0.00149

1.52E-04

1.52E-04

1.39E-07

1.39E-07

CRU [kg]

0

0

0

0

0

MFR [kg]

0

0

0

0

17.5

MER [kg]

0

0

0

17.5

0

EEE [MJ]

0

0.180

2.57

0

0

EET [MJ]

0

0

0

0

0

Parameter [Unit] HWD [kg]

14

EPD for Medium Density Fibreboard

Table 18: Waste categories, 1 m2 of 16 mm E0 & E1 moisture resistant melamine coated MDF. Production

Landfill (typical)

Landfill (NGA)

Energy recovery

Recycling

A1-A3

C4

C4

C3

C3

6.62E-08

5.01E-08

5.01E-08

2.57E-09

2.57E-09

NHWD [kg]

0.505

11.6

9.79

1.07E-05

1.07E-05

RWD [kg]

0.00108

9.74E-05

9.74E-05

9.30E-08

9.30E-08

CRU [kg]

0

0

0

0

0

MFR [kg]

0

0

0

0

11.7

MER [kg]

0

0

0

11.7

0

EEE [MJ]

0

0.120

1.72

0

0

EET [MJ]

0

0

0

0

0

Parameter [Unit] HWD [kg]

Table 19: Waste categories, 1 m2 of 18 mm E0 & E1 moisture resistant melamine coated MDF. Production

Landfill (typical)

Landfill (NGA)

Energy recovery

Recycling

A1-A3

C4

C4

C3

C3

7.44E-08

5.59E-08

5.59E-08

2.84E-09

2.84E-09

NHWD [kg]

0.478

12.9

10.8

1.18E-05

1.18E-05

RWD [kg]

0.00126

1.10E-04

1.10E-04

1.03E-07

1.03E-07

CRU [kg]

0

0

0

0

0

MFR [kg]

0

0

0

0

13.0

MER [kg]

0

0

0

13.0

0

EEE [MJ]

0

0.134

1.91

0

0

EET [MJ]

0

0

0

0

0

Parameter [Unit] HWD [kg]

Table 20: Waste categories, 1 m2 of 25 mm E0 & E1 moisture resistant melamine coated MDF. Production

Landfill (typical)

Landfill (NGA)

Energy recovery

Recycling

A1-A3

C4

C4

C3

C3

9.45E-08

7.67E-08

7.67E-08

3.87E-09

3.87E-09

NHWD [kg]

0.694

17.5

14.7

1.61E-05

1.61E-05

RWD [kg]

0.00182

1.52E-04

1.52E-04

1.40E-07

1.40E-07

CRU [kg]

0

0

0

0

0

MFR [kg]

0

0

0

0

17.6

MER [kg]

0

0

0

17.6

0

EEE [MJ]

0

0.181

2.59

0

0

EET [MJ]

0

0

0

0

0

Parameter [Unit] HWD [kg]

15

EPD for Medium Density Fibreboard

Interpretation Understanding the Life Cycle of MDF

Life cycle of medium density fibreboard (MDF) Life cycle carbon footprint in kg CO2-equivalent per m2 of 18 mm thick E0 & E1 standard, melamine coated MDF (7% moisture content), including biogenic and fossil carbon

6.99

3.24

0.235

CO2

Wood residues

Landfill

typical scenario

8.19 -0.510

Landfill

NGA scenario

N SI

CO2

-0.0357

0.0154

CO2

CO2

1.55

RE

Resin & wax

-19.8

21.7

Packaging

Manufacture

chipping, screening, defibration, drying, blending, mat forming, pressing and finishing

Energy recovery

-12.7

Sequestration

Where...

Grey = environmental impact

Green =

21.7 *

impact avoided in next product system (credit)

Recycling

-2.55

* While carbon is not released directly through recycling, it is passed to another product system and is therefore counted as being released

Variation in Results The variation between sites used to create the average shown in this EPD are given in Table 24 below for the environmental impact indicators in modules A1-A3.

Table 21: Inter-site variability for standard MDF (modules A1-A3).

Standard 16 mm

Standard 18 mm

Standard 25 mm

Parameter [Unit]

Min

Max

CV

Min

Max

CV

Min

Max

CV

GWP [kg CO2-eq.]

-2.1%

+47.8%

±19.7%

-8.9%

+46.4%

±15.9%

-26.5%

+46.6%

±30.9%

GWPF [kg CO2-eq.]

-3.7%

+38.6%

±15.8%

-8.9%

+42.5%

±15.0%

-10.3%

+25.3%

±16.4%

GWPB [kg CO2-eq.]

-1.2%

+1.4%

±1.1%

-0.5%

+2.1%

±1.2%

-3.3%

+3.8%

±3.0%

ODP [kg CFC11-eq.]

-29.1%

+33.7%

±26.9%

-14.8%

+62.2%

±32.0%

-34.0%

+16.8%

±23.3%

AP [kg SO2-eq.]

-6.5%

+37.7%

±20.5%

-8.5%

+33.3%

±19.3%

-16.7%

+29.2%

±20.9%

EP [kg PO -eq.]

-18.7%

+22.5%

±17.8%

-13.2%

+27.6%

±18.2%

-23.8%

+17.4%

±17.0%

POCP [kg C2H4-eq.]

-3.8%

+3.7%

±3.1%

-5.6%

+1.6%

±3.0%

-5.1%

+5.9%

±4.5%

ADPE [kg Sb-eq.]

-44.9%

+56.9%

±45.5%

-22.1%

+124.4%

±63.5%

-55.6%

+27.3%

±38.7%

ADPF [MJ]

-3.2%

+37.0%

±16.7%

-3.2%

+42.5%

±16.1%

-15.6%

+23.9%

±16.7%

3 4

Min = (minimum - average) / average; Max = (maximum - average) / average; CV = coefficient of variation = standard deviation / average

16

EPD for Medium Density Fibreboard

Table 22: Inter-site variability for moisture resistant MDF (modules A1-A3).

MR 16 mm

MR 18 mm

MR 25 mm

Parameter [Unit]

Min

Max

CV

Min

Max

CV

Min

Max

CV

GWP [kg CO2-eq.]

-36.5%

+62.9%

±40.9%

-124.8%

+37.3%

±66.8%

-83.1%

+47.4%

±54.1%

GWPF [kg CO2-eq.]

-14.5%

+24.6%

±16.0%

-25.9%

+7.5%

±13.7%

-22.5%

+12.9%

±14.5%

GWPB [kg CO2-eq.]

-0.8%

+1.8%

±1.2%

-1.9%

+0.7%

±1.2%

-2.0%

+3.4%

±2.3%

ODP [kg CFC11-eq.]

-13.7%

+10.8%

±10.1%

-18.3%

+5.0%

±9.6%

-13.6%

+5.4%

±7.8%

AP [kg SO2-eq.]

-13.4%

+33.6%

±22.1%

-25.7%

+14.7%

±19.0%

-24.0%

+21.9%

±21.2%

EP [kg PO -eq.]

-17.8%

+15.7%

±13.8%

-24.1%

+7.0%

±12.8%

-20.5%

+10.3%

±12.8%

POCP [kg C2H4-eq.]

-3.5%

+3.5%

±3.0%

-5.6%

+1.2%

±2.9%

-4.8%

+2.5%

±3.2%

ADPE [kg Sb-eq.]

-11.9%

+10.9%

±9.6%

-16.8%

+5.0%

±9.1%

-12.3%

+5.9%

±7.6%

ADPF [MJ]

-12.7%

+23.5%

±15.5%

-23.4%

+7.8%

±13.4%

-19.5%

+12.3%

±13.6%

3 4

Carbon Dioxide Sequestration During growth, trees absorb carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere through the process of photosynthesis and convert this into carbon-based compounds that constitute various components of a tree, including wood.

On average, half the dry weight of all wood is made up of the element carbon (Gifford 2000).

All major Australian production forests and plantations are independently certified to one or both of the internationally recognised forest management certification systems: the Australian Standard for Sustainable Forest Management (AS 4708), which is recognised under the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC), and/or one of the Forest Stewardship Council’s (FSC®) interim forest management standards. It is therefore appropriate to include biogenic CO2 sequestration in this EPD in line with EN 16485 (Section 6.3.4.2).

17

EPD for Medium Density Fibreboard

Other Environmental Information Module D: Recycling, Reuse and Recovery Potentials Table 23: Module D, 1 m2 of 16 mm E0 & E1 standard melamine coated MDF. Parameter [Unit]

Landfill (typical)

Landfill (NGA)

Energy recovery

Recycling

GWP [kg CO2-eq.]

-0.0319

-0.455

-11.2

-2.27

GWPF [kg CO2-eq.]

-0.0319

-0.455

-11.2

-2.17

GWPB [kg CO2-eq.]

-6.51E-07

-9.30E-06

0.0283

-0.1000

ODP [kg CFC11-eq.]

-9.10E-16

-1.30E-14

4.33E-13

-1.89E-13

AP [kg SO2-eq.]

-1.40E-04

-0.00201

0.00725

-0.0167

EP [kg PO43--eq.]

-1.19E-05

-1.69E-04

0.00155

-0.00386

POCP [kg C2H4-eq.]

-7.32E-06

-1.05E-04

0.00238

-0.00686

ADPE [kg Sb-eq.]

-2.37E-09

-3.38E-08

-7.49E-07

-4.12E-07

-0.363

-5.19

-226

-27.7

PERE [MJ]

-0.0408

-0.583

0.150

-40.1

PERM [MJ]

0

0

0

0

PERT [MJ]

-0.0408

-0.583

0.150

-40.1

PENRE [MJ]

-0.363

-5.19

-226

-27.8

PENRM [MJ]

0

0

0

0

PENRT [MJ]

-0.363

-5.19

-226

-27.8

SM [kg]

0

0

0

11.6

RSF [MJ]

0

0

183

0

NRSF [MJ]

0

0

23.9

0

-1.88E-04

-0.00269

0.00537

-0.00853

HWD [kg]

-4.79E-11

-6.85E-10

-1.69E-08

-8.14E-09

NHWD [kg]

-9.27E-05

-0.00132

0.515

-0.285

RWD [kg]

-4.48E-08

-6.40E-07

4.96E-05

-1.00E-05

CRU [kg]

0

0

0

0

MFR [kg]

0

0

0

0

MER [kg]

0

0

0

0

EEE [MJ]

0

0

0

0

EET [MJ]

0

0

0

0

Environmental Impact

ADPF [MJ] Resource Use

FW [m ] 3

Wastes and Outputs

18

EPD for Medium Density Fibreboard

Table 24: Module D, 1 m2 of 18 mm E0 & E1 standard melamine coated MDF. Parameter [Unit]

Landfill (typical)

Landfill (NGA)

Energy recovery

Recycling

GWP [kg CO2-eq.]

-0.0357

-0.510

-12.7

-2.55

GWPF [kg CO2-eq.]

-0.0357

-0.510

-12.7

-2.44

GWPB [kg CO2-eq.]

-7.29E-07

-1.04E-05

0.0319

-0.113

ODP [kg CFC11-eq.]

-1.02E-15

-1.46E-14

4.60E-13

-2.12E-13

AP [kg SO2-eq.]

-1.57E-04

-0.00225

0.00760

-0.0188

EP [kg PO --eq.]

-1.33E-05

-1.90E-04

0.00159

-0.00434

POCP [kg C2H4-eq.]

-8.21E-06

-1.17E-04

0.00265

-0.00771

ADPE [kg Sb-eq.]

-2.65E-09

-3.79E-08

-8.40E-07

-4.63E-07

-0.407

-5.82

-253

-31.2

PERE [MJ]

-0.0457

-0.653

0.157

-45.1

PERM [MJ]

0

0

0

0

PERT [MJ]

-0.0457

-0.653

0.157

-45.1

PENRE [MJ]

-0.407

-5.82

-253

-31.2

PENRM [MJ]

0

0

0

0

PENRT [MJ]

-0.407

-5.82

-253

-31.2

SM [kg]

0

0

0

13.0

RSF [MJ]

0

0

207

0

NRSF [MJ]

0

0

24.8

0

-2.11E-04

-0.00302

0.00574

-0.00959

HWD [kg]

-5.37E-11

-7.67E-10

-1.89E-08

-9.16E-09

NHWD [kg]

-1.04E-04

-0.00148

0.581

-0.321

RWD [kg]

-5.02E-08

-7.17E-07

5.27E-05

-1.13E-05

CRU [kg]

0

0

0

0

MFR [kg]

0

0

0

0

MER [kg]

0

0

0

0

EEE [MJ]

0

0

0

0

EET [MJ]

0

0

0

0

Environmental Impact

3 4

ADPF [MJ] Resource Use

FW [m3] Wastes and Outputs

19 EPD for Medium Density Fibreboard

Table 25: Module D, 1 m2 of 25 mm E0 & E1 standard melamine coated MDF. Parameter [Unit]

Landfill (typical)

Landfill (NGA)

Energy recovery

Recycling

GWP [kg CO2-eq.]

-0.0481

-0.688

-16.7

-3.54

GWPF [kg CO2-eq.]

-0.0481

-0.688

-16.7

-3.38

GWPB [kg CO2-eq.]

-9.84E-07

-1.41E-05

0.0424

-0.156

ODP [kg CFC11-eq.]

-1.37E-15

-1.96E-14

7.75E-13

-2.95E-13

AP [kg SO2-eq.]

-2.12E-04

-0.00303

0.0133

-0.0261

EP [kg PO --eq.]

-1.79E-05

-2.56E-04

0.00297

-0.00603

POCP [kg C2H4-eq.]

-1.11E-05

-1.58E-04

0.00367

-0.0107

ADPE [kg Sb-eq.]

-3.58E-09

-5.11E-08

-1.12E-06

-6.44E-07

-0.549

-7.84

-342

-43.3

PERE [MJ]

-0.0617

-0.881

0.274

-62.6

PERM [MJ]

0

0

0

0

PERT [MJ]

-0.0617

-0.881

0.274

-62.6

PENRE [MJ]

-0.549

-7.84

-342

-43.4

PENRM [MJ]

0

0

0

0

PENRT [MJ]

-0.549

-7.84

-342

-43.4

SM [kg]

0

0

0

17.5

RSF [MJ]

0

0

273

0

NRSF [MJ]

0

0

41.0

0

-2.85E-04

-0.00407

0.00921

-0.0133

HWD [kg]

-7.24E-11

-1.03E-09

-2.55E-08

-1.27E-08

NHWD [kg]

-1.40E-04

-0.00200

0.767

-0.445

RWD [kg]

-6.76E-08

-9.66E-07

8.82E-05

-1.57E-05

CRU [kg]

0

0

0

0

MFR [kg]

0

0

0

0

MER [kg]

0

0

0

0

EEE [MJ]

0

0

0

0

EET [MJ]

0

0

0

0

Environmental Impact

3 4

ADPF [MJ] Resource Use

FW [m3] Wastes and Outputs

20

EPD for Medium Density Fibreboard

Table 26: Module D, 1 m2 of 16 mm E0 & E1 moisture resistant (MR) melamine coated MDF. Parameter [Unit]

Landfill (typical)

Landfill (NGA)

Energy recovery

Recycling

GWP [kg CO2-eq.]

-0.0322

-0.460

-11.2

-2.27

GWPF [kg CO2-eq.]

-0.0322

-0.460

-11.2

-2.17

GWPB [kg CO2-eq.]

-6.58E-07

-9.40E-06

0.0284

-0.1000

ODP [kg CFC11-eq.]

-9.20E-16

-1.31E-14

4.87E-13

-1.89E-13

AP [kg SO2-eq.]

-1.42E-04

-0.00203

0.00847

-0.0167

EP [kg PO --eq.]

-1.20E-05

-1.71E-04

0.00188

-0.00386

POCP [kg C2H4-eq.]

-7.41E-06

-1.06E-04

0.00243

-0.00686

ADPE [kg Sb-eq.]

-2.40E-09

-3.42E-08

-7.55E-07

-4.12E-07

-0.367

-5.25

-229

-27.7

PERE [MJ]

-0.0413

-0.590

0.174

-40.1

PERM [MJ]

0

0

0

0

PERT [MJ]

-0.0413

-0.590

0.174

-40.1

PENRE [MJ]

-0.368

-5.25

-229

-27.8

PENRM [MJ]

0

0

0

0

PENRT [MJ]

-0.368

-5.25

-229

-27.8

SM [kg]

0

0

0

11.7

RSF [MJ]

0

0

183

0

NRSF [MJ]

0

0

27.3

0

-1.91E-04

-0.00272

0.00592

-0.00853

HWD [kg]

-4.85E-11

-6.92E-10

-1.71E-08

-8.14E-09

NHWD [kg]

-9.37E-05

-0.00134

0.514

-0.285

RWD [kg]

-4.53E-08

-6.47E-07

5.61E-05

-1.00E-05

CRU [kg]

0

0

0

0

MFR [kg]

0

0

0

0

MER [kg]

0

0

0

0

EEE [MJ]

0

0

0

0

EET [MJ]

0

0

0

0

Environmental Impact

3 4

ADPF [MJ] Resource Use

FW [m ] 3

Wastes and Outputs

21

EPD for Medium Density Fibreboard

Table 27: Module D, 1 m2 of 18 mm E0 & E1 moisture resistant (MR) melamine coated MDF. Parameter [Unit]

Landfill (typical)

Landfill (NGA)

Energy recovery

Recycling

GWP [kg CO2-eq.]

-0.0358

-0.511

-12.4

-2.55

GWPF [kg CO2-eq.]

-0.0358

-0.511

-12.4

-2.44

GWPB [kg CO2-eq.]

-7.30E-07

-1.04E-05

0.0315

-0.113

ODP [kg CFC11-eq.]

-1.02E-15

-1.46E-14

5.50E-13

-2.12E-13

AP [kg SO2-eq.]

-1.58E-04

-0.00225

0.00964

-0.0188

EP [kg PO --eq.]

-1.33E-05

-1.90E-04

0.00215

-0.00434

POCP [kg C2H4-eq.]

-8.22E-06

-1.17E-04

0.00271

-0.00771

ADPE [kg Sb-eq.]

-2.66E-09

-3.80E-08

-8.36E-07

-4.63E-07

-0.408

-5.82

-254

-31.2

PERE [MJ]

-0.0458

-0.654

0.197

-45.1

PERM [MJ]

0

0

0

0

PERT [MJ]

-0.0458

-0.654

0.197

-45.1

PENRE [MJ]

-0.408

-5.82

-254

-31.2

PENRM [MJ]

0

0

0

0

PENRT [MJ]

-0.408

-5.82

-254

-31.2

SM [kg]

0

0

0

13.0

RSF [MJ]

0

0

203

0

NRSF [MJ]

0

0

30.1

0

-2.11E-04

-0.00302

0.00664

-0.00959

HWD [kg]

-5.38E-11

-7.68E-10

-1.89E-08

-9.16E-09

NHWD [kg]

-1.04E-04

-0.00149

0.570

-0.321

RWD [kg]

-5.02E-08

-7.18E-07

6.34E-05

-1.13E-05

CRU [kg]

0

0

0

0

MFR [kg]

0

0

0

0

MER [kg]

0

0

0

0

EEE [MJ]

0

0

0

0

EET [MJ]

0

0

0

0

Environmental Impact

3 4

ADPF [MJ] Resource Use

FW [m ] 3

Wastes and Outputs

22

EPD for Medium Density Fibreboard

Table 28: Module D, 1 m2 of 25 mm E0 & E1 moisture resistant (MR) melamine coated MDF. Parameter [Unit]

Landfill (typical)

Landfill (NGA)

Energy recovery

Recycling

GWP [kg CO2-eq.]

-0.0485

-0.693

-16.6

-3.54

GWPF [kg CO2-eq.]

-0.0485

-0.693

-16.7

-3.38

GWPB [kg CO2-eq.]

-9.90E-07

-1.41E-05

0.0425

-0.156

ODP [kg CFC11-eq.]

-1.38E-15

-1.98E-14

8.25E-13

-2.95E-13

AP [kg SO2-eq.]

-2.14E-04

-0.00305

0.0145

-0.0261

EP [kg PO --eq.]

-1.80E-05

-2.58E-04

0.00329

-0.00603

POCP [kg C2H4-eq.]

-1.11E-05

-1.59E-04

0.00373

-0.0107

ADPE [kg Sb-eq.]

-3.60E-09

-5.15E-08

-1.13E-06

-6.44E-07

-0.553

-7.90

-345

-43.3

PERE [MJ]

-0.0621

-0.887

0.297

-62.6

PERM [MJ]

0

0

0

0

PERT [MJ]

-0.0621

-0.887

0.297

-62.6

PENRE [MJ]

-0.553

-7.90

-344

-43.4

PENRM [MJ]

0

0

0

0

PENRT [MJ]

-0.553

-7.90

-344

-43.4

SM [kg]

0

0

0

17.6

RSF [MJ]

0

0

273

0

NRSF [MJ]

0

0

43.9

0

-2.87E-04

-0.00410

0.00973

-0.0133

HWD [kg]

-7.29E-11

-1.04E-09

-2.56E-08

-1.27E-08

NHWD [kg]

-1.41E-04

-0.00201

0.767

-0.445

RWD [kg]

-6.81E-08

-9.73E-07

9.43E-05

-1.57E-05

CRU [kg]

0

0

0

0

MFR [kg]

0

0

0

0

MER [kg]

0

0

0

0

EEE [MJ]

0

0

0

0

EET [MJ]

0

0

0

0

Environmental Impact

3 4

ADPF [MJ] Resource Use

FW [m ] 3

Wastes and Outputs

23

EPD for Medium Density Fibreboard

Water Consumption The “FW” indicator in the EPD results tables reports consumption (i.e. net use) of ‘blue’ water (which includes river water, lake water and ground water). This indicator deliberately excludes consumption of ‘green’ water (rain water).

PCR 2012:01 (Section 16.1) states that all water loss from a drainage basin is considered consumption, including any net loss of rain water. According to the PCR, net loss should be interpreted as any additional water loss beyond what would occur in the original, natural system. For plantation softwood forestry, the natural system might be a native forest or a grassland (Quinteiro et al. 2015).

The initial version of this EPD (v1.0) included estimated losses of rain water in the main results tables, labelled as green water consumption. These values were based on calculated differences in water flow between plantation forests and a base case land use (pasture) from the original CSIRO LCI study (CSIRO 2009).

Table 39 reports green water consumption calculated by CSIRO using 2005-08 data. These values have not been updated and are now reported here rather than in the main results tables to reflect their uncertainty. At the time of writing, there is no internationally agreed method for calculating green water consumption due to evapotranspiration relative to a hypothetical natural state (Manzardo et al. 2016). As such, different calculation methods may yield significantly different results, introducing a high level of uncertainty.

The reader should also be aware that water consumption does not account for relative water stress in the catchment(s) where the forest is located, meaning that it provides no information about the potential impacts of any water consumption that does occur.

Table 29: Green water consumption estimates for modules A1-A3 following CSIRO (2009).

Std 16 mm

Std 18 mm

Std 25 mm

MR 16 mm

MR 18 mm

MR 25 mm

Parameter [Unit]

A1-A3

A1-A3

A1-A3

A1-A3

A1-A3

A1-A3

Green water consumption [m3]

1.24

1.25

2.03

1.49

1.66

2.22

Timber & Forest Certification Many Australian timber and reconstituted wood products are certified to a forest certification scheme.

This certification is an independent auditing process that provides: • Assurance that the timber is from well-managed forests certified to internationally and nationally accepted forest management standards • Assurance that the timber is from legally harvested sources • Chain of custody (CoC) certification extending from the forest to the end user, which is traceable throughout the supply chain.

Two schemes apply to Australian wood production forests. One is administered by the Australian Forestry Standard Ltd (AFS). The AFS scheme is also endorsed by the international Programme for Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC). The other scheme is administered by Forest Stewardship Council (FSC®) Australia.

If a Green Star project elects to use the timber credit as part of their Green Star submission, the Green Building Council of Australia recognises PEFC-endorsed forest certification schemes (such as the Australian Forest Certification Scheme, AFCS) as well as FSC®. Compliance with the chain of custody certification rules of either forest certification scheme for at least 95% by value of timber products used in the project will meet the requirements for this credit point (GBCA 2014).

As of 2017, there are more than 26.7million hectares of native and plantation forests certified under AFS (AFS 2017) and 1.2 million hectares certified under FSC® interim national standards (FSC 2017).

All Australian MDF manufacturers are chain of custody certified so they can supply certified products.

24

EPD for Medium Density Fibreboard

Land Use and Biodiversity Like other land uses, forestry operations for timber and wood production can have both positive and negative effects on biodiversity. However, as biodiversity varies considerably by region and as data are often limited, assessing potential biodiversity impacts within LCA is challenging.

An Australian study completed shortly before initial publication of this EPD (Turner et al. 2014) demonstrated a new method – BioImpact – to discern the biodiversity impacts of different land uses. A trial of this method was conducted using case studies in three different regions and four production systems in New South Wales: native hardwood forestry, plantation softwood forestry, mixed cropping and rangeland grazing. Managed forestry resulted in biodiversity impacts equivalent to or better than those of cropping/grazing systems.

Indoor Environment Quality – Formaldehyde Emissions Minimisation Formaldehyde is a colourless, strong-smelling gas that occurs naturally in the environment. It is present in the air that we breathe at natural background levels of about 0.03 parts per million (ppm) with recent studies showing formaldehyde concentrations often up to 0.08 ppm in outdoor urban air (EWPAA 2012). Formaldehyde is used as an ingredient in synthetic resins, industrial chemicals and preservatives, and in the production of paper, textiles, cosmetics, disinfectants, medicines, paints, varnishes and lubricants.

MDF manufactured in Australia uses one of two low formaldehyde emitting amino plastics: urea formaldehyde (UF) or melamine urea formaldehyde (MUF) (EWPAA 2012).

To assure end users that they are using MDF with the lowest possible formaldehyde emissions, an industry-wide formaldehyde testing and labelling program is run by the Engineered Wood Products Association of Australasia.

All mills are required to forward samples to EWPAA’s National Laboratory on a regular basis for formaldehyde emission testing. On the basis of laboratory tests, all Australian MDF mills are permitted to brand a formaldehyde emission class on their MDF products as detailed in Table 30 below.

Table 30: Formaldehyde emission classes for Australian manufactured MDF Emission Class

Emission Limit (mg/litre)

Emission Limit (ppm)*

E0

Less than or equal to 0.5

Less than or equal to 0.04

E1

Less than or equal to 1.0

Less than or equal to 0.08

* Based on a test chamber volume of 10litre, zero airflow during the 24hr test cycle, molecular weight of formaldehyde 30.03 and the number of microlitres of formaldehyde gas in 1 micromole at 101KPa and 298K.

All Australian manufacturers listed in this EPD can supply test certificates that support the Emission Class.

MDF with formaldehyde emissions of less than or equal to E1 are compliant with the Green Star Formaldehyde credit. To achieve credit points, all engineered wood products such as particleboard, MDF and plywood used in the project must be in accordance with these requirements.

25

EPD for Medium Density Fibreboard

References ABARES. [2017] Australia’s Forests at a Glance 2017. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics. Available at http://www.agriculture.gov.au/abares/forestsaustralia/australias-forests-at-a-glance AFS. (2017) Australian Forestry Standard Ltd. Available at http://www.forestrystandard.org.au/ Australian Government. (2014a). National Inventory Report 2012, Volume 3: Australia data for waste, recalculations, improvements and Kyoto Protocol accounting requirements. Australian National Greenhouse Accounts. Available at http://www.environment.gov.au/climate-change/greenhouse-gas-measurement/ publications/national-inventory-report-2012 Australian Government. (2014b). National Greenhouse Accounts Factors – December 2014.

Department of Environment.

Australian Government. (2014c). Technical Guidelines for the Estimation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions

by Facilities in Australia. Department of Environment.

Australian Government. (2015). Forest Certification in Australia. Department of Agriculture. Available at http://www.agriculture.gov.au/forestry/australias-forests/certification Australian Government. (2016). National Greenhouse Accounts Factors – August 2016. Department of Environment.

Barlaz, M. (1998). Carbon storage during biodegradation of municipal solid waste components in laboratory scale landfills. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 12 (2), 373–380.

Blue Environment. (2013). Analysis of landfill survey data. Final report prepared for Waste Management Association of Australia. Available at http://www.environment.gov.au/protection/national-waste-policy/ publications/analysis-landfill-survey-data Carre, A. (2011). A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Alternative Constructions of a Typical Australian House Design. Melbourne: Forest & Wood Products Australia. Available at http://www.fwpa.com.au/images/ marketaccess/PNA147-0809_Research_Report_Comparative-LCA_0.pdf Commonwealth of Australia. (2016). National Inventory Report 2014 (revised) Volume 2.

CSIRO. (2009). (Prepared by Tucker, S.N.; Tharumarajah, A.; May, B.; England, J.; Paul, K.; Hall, M.; Mitchell, P.; Rouwette, R.; Seo, S. and Syme, M.) Life Cycle Inventory of Australian Forestry and Wood Products. Prepared by the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation on behalf of Forest and Wood Products Australia. Project number PNA008-0708.

EN 15804:2012+A1:2013. Sustainability of construction works — Environmental product declarations — Core rules for the product category of construction products. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.

EN 16449:2014. Wood and wood-based products – Calculation of the biogenic carbon content of wood and conversion to carbon dioxide. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.

EN 16485:2014. Round and sawn timber - Environmental Product Declarations - Product category rules for wood and wood-based products for use in construction. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.

EWPAA. (2012). Facts About Formaldehyde Emissions from EWPAA Certified Products. Engineered Wood Products Association of Australasia. Available at http://www.ewp.asn.au/library/downloads/ewpaa_ formaldehyde_facts.pdf Forsythe Consultants. (2007). Mapping the Timber Waste Stream from Building Demolition. Available at http:// www.timberstewardship.org.au/images/pdf_documents/demolition_waste_barriers_final.pdf 26 EPD for Medium Density Fibreboard

FSC Australia. (2017) 2016 Annual Report. Available at https://au.fsc.org/en-au/newsroom/events/id/286 GBCA. (2014). Revised Timber Credit. Green Building Council of Australia. Available at https://www.gbca.org.au/ green-star/technical-support/materials-category/revised-timber-credit/2693.htm Gifford, R. (2000). Carbon Contents of Above-Ground Tissues of Forest and Woodland Trees.

Technical report No. 22. National Carbon Accounting Scheme. Australian Greenhouse Office. Available at http:// pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/23322/20020220-0000/www.greenhouse.gov.au/ncas/files/pdfs/tr22final.pdf Hyder Consulting Group. (2007). Review of Methane Recovery and Flaring from Landfills.

Australian Greenhouse Office, Department of Environment and Water Resources.

IEPDS. (2015). PCR 2012:01, Construction products and Construction services, Version 2.0, 2015-03-03.

Stockholm: International EPD® System. Available at: http://www.environdec.com/en/PCR/Detail/?Pcr=8098 ISO 14025:2006. Environmental labels and declarations — Type III environmental declarations Principles and procedures. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.

National Timber Product Stewardship Group. (2015). Available at www.timberstewardship.org.au Manzardo, A., Mazzi, A., Loss, A., Butler, M., Williamson, A. and Scipioni, A. (2016). Lessons learned from the application of different water footprint approaches to compare different food packaging alternatives.

Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, pp. 4657-4666. thinkstep. (2014). GaBi life cycle inventory database documentation. Leinfelden-Echterdingen, Germany: thinkstep AG. URL: http://database-documentation.gabi-software.com/support/gabi/gabi-database-2014lci-documentation/ Turner, P., Ximenes, F., Penman, T., Law, B., Waters, C., Mo, M. and Brock, P. (2014). Accounting for biodiversity in Life Cycle Impact Assessments of forestry and agricultural systems – the BioImpact metric.

Research report for Forest & Wood Products Australia Limited. Available at http://www.fwpa.com.au Wang, W., Padgett, J., De La Cruz, F. and Barlaz, M. (2011). Wood biodegradation in laboratory-scale landfills.

Environmental Science & Technology, 45(16), pp. 6864-6871.

WoodSolutions. (2012). Timber Service Life Design Guide. Available at https://www.woodsolutions.com.au/ Articles/Resources/Timber-Service-life-design WoodSolutions. (2015). Timber Preservation. Available at http://www.woodsolutions.com.au/Articles/ Resources/Timber-Preservation Ximenes, F., Brooks, P., Wilson, C. and Giles, D. (2013). Carbon Storage in Engineered Wood Products in Landfills. Forest and Wood Products Australia. Available at http://www.fwpa.com.au/rd-and-e/processing/ 181-carbon-storage-in-engineered-wood-products-in-landfills.html

27 EPD for Medium Density Fibreboard