ENERGY MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION FOR SOLAR–WIND–BATTERY HYBRID POWER SYSTEMS USING MULTI-OBJECTIVE CON

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 13 Issue: 05 | May 2026

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

ENERGY MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION FOR SOLAR–WIND–BATTERY HYBRID POWER SYSTEMS USING MULTI-OBJECTIVE CONTROL STRATEGIES Deepak Kr. Singh1, Dr. Imran Khan2 1Master of Technology, Electrical Engineering (Power System), Azad Institute of Engineering and Technology,

Lucknow, India

2Professor, Department Electrical Engineering, Azad Institute of Engineering and Technology, Lucknow, India

---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------

Abstract - The increasing integration of renewable energy

power systems has significantly altered traditional generation paradigms, shifting from centralized fossil-fuelbased systems to decentralized and cleaner energy networks. However, the large-scale integration of renewables introduces operational challenges due to their inherent intermittency and dependence on environmental conditions (REN21, 2023).

sources such as solar and wind into modern power systems presents significant challenges due to their intermittent and unpredictable nature. Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems (HRES), incorporating solar photovoltaic (PV), wind energy conversion systems, and battery energy storage systems (BESS), offer a promising solution to enhance system reliability and sustainability. However, efficient energy management remains a critical issue, particularly when multiple conflicting objectives such as cost, efficiency, reliability, and battery lifespan must be addressed simultaneously. This paper proposes a multi-objective energy management optimization framework for a solar–wind– battery hybrid power system using advanced control strategies. The system is modeled using detailed mathematical representations of PV, wind, and battery components, and a Pareto-based optimization technique, specifically the Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), is employed to determine optimal operating conditions. The proposed approach integrates optimization with adaptive control to ensure real-time power balance and efficient energy dispatch.

Simulation studies conducted in MATLAB/Simulink under various operating scenarios demonstrate that the proposed method significantly reduces operational cost, improves system efficiency, enhances reliability, and extends battery life compared to conventional control methods. The results validate the effectiveness of the integrated multi-objective optimization framework for sustainable and efficient hybrid energy system operation.

One of the major technical challenges associated with renewable energy integration is the variability in power generation. Solar energy output fluctuates with irradiance and weather conditions, while wind energy is dependent on unpredictable wind patterns. These fluctuations can lead to power imbalances, voltage instability, and reduced reliability of the power system. To mitigate these issues, Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems (HRES), combining solar, wind, and battery storage, have emerged as an effective solution.

The complementary nature of solar and wind, along with the buffering capability of batteries, enables improved energy reliability and system stability (Lund et al., 2015).

1.2 Problem Statement Despite the advantages of hybrid renewable systems, efficient energy management remains a critical challenge.

Conventional control strategies, such as rule-based or priority-based methods, are widely used due to their simplicity. However, these methods are inherently limited as they rely on fixed decision rules and lack adaptability to dynamic operating conditions. As a result, they often lead to suboptimal utilization of resources, increased operational costs, and inefficient battery usage (Mohamed et al., 2018).

Key Words: Hybrid Renewable Energy System, Multiobjective Optimization, Energy Management, NSGA-II, Battery Energy Storage System, Solar–Wind Hybrid System

Moreover, energy management in hybrid systems involves multiple conflicting objectives, including minimizing operational cost, maximizing efficiency, ensuring system reliability, and extending battery lifespan. Traditional singleobjective optimization approaches fail to address these competing requirements simultaneously. Therefore, there is a need for advanced frameworks capable of performing multi-objective optimization to achieve a balanced and efficient system operation under varying conditions (Zhang et al., 2020).

1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background The global energy sector is undergoing a rapid transformation driven by increasing electricity demand, environmental concerns, and the urgent need to reduce carbon emissions. Renewable energy sources, particularly solar and wind, have gained widespread adoption due to their sustainability and declining installation costs. The increasing penetration of these renewable sources into

© 2026, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 8.315

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 715

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 13 Issue: 05 | May 2026

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

1.3 Research Gap

2. LITERATURE REVIEW

Although significant research has been conducted in hybrid renewable energy systems, several limitations persist. One major gap is the lack of tightly integrated optimization and control frameworks that can operate in real time. Most existing studies treat optimization and control as separate processes, which reduce system responsiveness and limits practical applicability in dynamic environments (Deb, 2001).

2.1 Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems (HRES) Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems (HRES) integrate multiple renewable sources, such as solar photovoltaic and wind energy systems, along with energy storage to provide reliable and efficient power supply. The architecture of HRES can vary depending on application requirements, typically categorized into grid-connected and standalone configurations. Grid-connected systems interact with the utility grid, allowing energy exchange, while standalone systems operate independently, often used in remote or offgrid areas (Bhattacharjee and Acharya, 2015).

Another important limitation is the insufficient consideration of battery degradation in energy management strategies. Many studies focus on immediate performance metrics such as cost and efficiency, while neglecting longterm battery health, which is critical for system sustainability and economic viability. Additionally, multiobjective optimization techniques, particularly evolutionary algorithms, often suffer from high computational complexity, making real-time implementation challenging. These issues highlight the need for a unified, computationally efficient framework that integrates optimization, control, and battery-aware decision-making (Yang et al., 2019).

The configuration of HRES enhances system reliability by leveraging the complementary characteristics of different energy sources. Solar energy is typically available during daytime, whereas wind energy may be available during night or varying seasonal conditions. The inclusion of battery storage further improves system flexibility by storing excess energy and supplying it during periods of deficit. This integrated architecture significantly reduces dependency on fossil fuels and enhances energy sustainability.

1.4 Objectives and Contributions

2.2 Energy Management Techniques

This research aims to develop a comprehensive multiobjective energy management strategy for a solar–wind– battery hybrid power system. The primary objective is to optimize system performance by simultaneously minimizing operational cost, maximizing energy efficiency, improving system reliability, and extending battery lifespan. To achieve this, advanced multi-objective optimization techniques are employed to identify optimal operating conditions under varying environmental and load scenarios.

Energy management strategies play a vital role in coordinating multiple energy sources within hybrid systems.

Conventional approaches, such as rule-based and prioritybased control methods, are widely used due to their simplicity and ease of implementation. These methods operate based on predefined conditions, such as prioritizing renewable energy over battery usage. However, they lack adaptability and are not suitable for dynamic and uncertain environments (Diaf et al., 2008).

A key contribution of this work is the integration of optimization algorithms with adaptive control strategies, enabling real-time decision-making and dynamic system response. Unlike conventional approaches, the proposed framework considers both short-term operational efficiency and long-term battery performance. This integrated approach enhances system robustness, improves energy utilization, and provides a scalable solution for modern hybrid energy systems (Kennedy and Eberhart, 1995).

In contrast, intelligent and predictive methods have gained significant attention in recent years. Techniques such as fuzzy logic, artificial neural networks, and model predictive control (MPC) enable dynamic decision-making by considering system uncertainties and future predictions.

These approaches improve system performance by optimizing energy distribution and enhancing adaptability to changing conditions, making them more suitable for modern hybrid energy systems (Camacho and Bordons, 2007).

1.5 Paper Organization

2.3 Optimization Techniques

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 presents a comprehensive literature review on hybrid renewable energy systems, energy management strategies, and optimization techniques. Section 3 describes the system modeling and problem formulation, including mathematical models and objective functions. Section 4 outlines the proposed multi-objective optimization and control strategy.

Section 5 discusses the simulation setup and test scenarios, while Section 6 presents the results and performance analysis. Finally, Section 7 concludes the paper and highlights future research directions.

© 2026, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 8.315

Optimization techniques are essential for improving the performance of hybrid energy systems by identifying optimal operating conditions. Traditional single-objective optimization methods focus on optimizing a single parameter, such as cost or efficiency. While these methods are computationally efficient, they are inadequate for handling the complex and multi-dimensional nature of hybrid systems (Coello, 2007).

Multi-objective optimization techniques address this limitation by considering multiple conflicting objectives

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 716

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 13 Issue: 05 | May 2026

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

simultaneously. Evolutionary algorithms, such as Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), are widely used due to their ability to handle nonlinear and complex problems. These algorithms generate a set of Pareto-optimal solutions, allowing decision-makers to select the best trade-off among different objectives (Deb et al., 2002).

3.2 Mathematical Modeling

2.4 Multi-Objective Control Strategies Multi-objective control strategies are designed to manage the trade-offs between different system objectives in hybrid energy systems. Pareto optimization forms the foundation of these strategies, where multiple optimal solutions are generated without prioritizing a single objective. This approach provides flexibility in decision-making and enables balanced system performance (Marler and Arora, 2004).

The solar PV system is modeled based on the relationship between solar irradiance and electrical power output. The generated power is directly proportional to solar irradiance and influenced by system efficiency and panel characteristics. Under ideal conditions, an increase in irradiance results in a proportional increase in output power. However, this relationship is affected by temperature variations, which impact the electrical characteristics of PV cells.

Adaptive and intelligent control techniques further enhance multi-objective control by enabling real-time system adjustments. These controllers can respond dynamically to changes in environmental conditions and load demand, ensuring optimal performance under varying scenarios. The integration of intelligent control with multi-objective optimization has proven to be highly effective in improving system efficiency, reliability, and robustness in hybrid renewable energy systems (Li et al., 2019).

Temperature plays a critical role in PV performance, as higher temperatures reduce the output voltage and overall efficiency of the system. This leads to a decrease in power output despite high irradiance levels. Therefore, both irradiance and temperature effects must be incorporated into the PV model to accurately represent real-world behavior and ensure reliable simulation outcomes.

3.

SYSTEM MODELING FORMULATION

AND

Mathematical modeling of system components is essential for analyzing system behavior and enabling optimization.

Accurate models of the PV system, wind turbine, and battery storage allow prediction of power generation and storage dynamics under varying operating conditions.

3.2.1 Solar PV Model

3.2.2 Wind Energy Model

PROBLEM

The wind energy system is modeled using the wind turbine power curve, which defines the relationship between wind speed and generated power. The turbine operates within specific wind speed limits, including cut-in, rated, and cutout speeds. Below the cut-in speed, the turbine does not generate power, while between cut-in and rated speeds, power increases rapidly with wind velocity.

3.1 Hybrid System Configuration The proposed hybrid energy system integrates a solar photovoltaic (PV) array, a wind energy conversion system, and a battery energy storage system (BESS) to ensure reliable and efficient power supply under varying environmental conditions. The PV system converts solar irradiance into electrical energy, while the wind turbine harnesses kinetic energy from wind to generate power. The battery storage system functions as an energy buffer, storing excess generation and supplying energy during periods of deficit. This coordinated architecture enhances system flexibility, reduces renewable curtailment, and improves overall energy utilization efficiency.

At the rated speed, the turbine reaches its maximum power output and maintains this level until the cut-out speed is reached. Beyond the cut-out speed, the turbine shuts down to prevent mechanical damage. This nonlinear relationship between wind speed and power output is essential for accurately modeling wind energy systems and predicting their contribution within the hybrid configuration.

3.2.3 Battery Model

The system is designed to operate in both grid-connected and standalone modes. In grid-connected mode, the hybrid system can exchange power with the utility grid, allowing surplus energy export and deficit compensation through import. In standalone mode, the system operates independently, relying solely on local generation and storage to meet load demand. This dual-mode capability makes the system suitable for both urban grid-support applications and remote electrification scenarios.

© 2026, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 8.315

The battery energy storage system is modeled using State of Charge (SOC) dynamics, which represent the available energy within the battery at any given time. SOC is influenced by charging and discharging processes and must be maintained within safe operational limits to prevent degradation. The charging process increases SOC, while discharging reduces it based on energy demand.

Charge and discharge equations incorporate efficiency losses, reflecting real battery behavior. These equations ensure that energy conversion losses are accounted for during storage and retrieval processes. Proper modeling of

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 717

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 13 Issue: 05 | May 2026

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

SOC dynamics is critical for designing effective energy management strategies that balance performance with battery lifespan.

ensure practical feasibility and safe operation of the hybrid system.

4. PROPOSED MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION AND CONTROL STRATEGY

3.3 Energy Management Framework The energy management framework governs the distribution and utilization of power within the hybrid system. A hierarchical power flow structure is adopted, where solar PV and wind energy are prioritized as primary energy sources due to their low operational cost and environmental benefits. The battery system acts as a secondary source, storing excess energy during surplus conditions and supplying energy during deficits.

4.1 Selection of Optimization Algorithm The selection of an appropriate optimization algorithm is crucial for solving the multi-objective energy management problem. Algorithms such as Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) are widely used due to their ability to handle nonlinear, multi-dimensional problems. NSGA-II is particularly effective in generating a well-distributed Pareto front, enabling efficient trade-off analysis among conflicting objectives.

In grid-connected mode, the grid serves as the final level in the hierarchy, providing backup support when local generation and storage are insufficient. This structured power flow ensures optimal utilization of renewable resources, minimizes energy wastage, and maintains system stability under dynamic operating conditions.

PSO, on the other hand, offers faster convergence and simpler implementation, making it suitable for real-time applications. The choice of algorithm depends on the tradeoff between computational efficiency and solution diversity.

These algorithms are capable of exploring a wide solution space and identifying optimal operating conditions for hybrid energy systems.

3.4 Problem Formulation The energy management problem is formulated as a multiobjective optimization problem that simultaneously considers multiple performance criteria. This formulation enables the system to achieve balanced performance under conflicting objectives.

4.2 Optimization Workflow The optimization process begins with the initialization of a population of candidate solutions representing different system operating conditions. Each candidate solution is evaluated using predefined objective functions to determine its fitness. The evaluation process considers cost, efficiency, reliability, and battery performance.

3.4.1 Objective Functions The primary objective is to minimize the operational cost of the hybrid system by optimizing the use of available resources and reducing dependency on expensive energy sources. At the same time, system efficiency must be maximized to ensure effective utilization of generated energy and minimize losses.

Following fitness evaluation, solutions are ranked using Pareto sorting techniques, where non-dominated solutions form the Pareto front. Selection, crossover, and mutation operations are applied to generate new candidate solutions and explore the search space. This iterative process continues until convergence criteria, such as stability of the Pareto front or maximum iterations are satisfied.

Another critical objective is to minimize battery degradation by controlling charge-discharge cycles and limiting deep discharge conditions. This enhances battery lifespan and reduces long-term replacement costs. Additionally, system reliability is maximized by ensuring that load demand is consistently met, thereby reducing the probability of power supply interruptions.

4.3 Multi-Objective Decision Making Since multi-objective optimization produces multiple Paretooptimal solutions, a decision-making process is required to select the most suitable solution. The weighted sum method combines multiple objectives into a single scalar value based on predefined weights, allowing easy comparison of solutions.

3.4.2 Constraints The optimization problem is subject to several operational constraints. The power balance constraint ensures that total generated and supplied power matches the load demand at all times. This is essential for maintaining system stability and avoiding energy deficits or surpluses.

Alternatively, fuzzy logic-based decision-making provides a more flexible approach by handling uncertainty and imprecise preferences. It evaluates solutions using linguistic rules and membership functions, enabling a more balanced selection of optimal operating conditions. These methods ensure that the final solution aligns with system priorities and operational requirements.

SOC limits are imposed to ensure safe battery operation, preventing overcharging and deep discharging. These limits protect battery health and enhance system longevity.

Furthermore, system operational limits, such as maximum generation capacity and converter ratings, are considered to

© 2026, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 8.315

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 718

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 13 Issue: 05 | May 2026

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

4.4 Energy Management Control Strategy

domain analysis of system behavior under varying operating conditions. HOMER is used as a complementary tool for system sizing, economic analysis, and validation of results.

The combined use of these platforms ensures accurate modeling, reliable simulation, and comprehensive performance assessment of the hybrid energy system.

The energy management control strategy ensures real-time implementation of optimized decisions by coordinating energy generation, storage, and consumption.

4.4.1 Control Objectives

5.2 System Parameters

The primary control objective is to maintain power balance between generation and load demand. This ensures stable system operation and prevents energy deficits. Another objective is cost minimization by prioritizing low-cost renewable energy sources and reducing reliance on grid power or excessive battery usage.

The simulation model is developed using realistic system parameters that define the operational characteristics of the hybrid system. The photovoltaic (PV) capacity determines the maximum solar power generation, while the wind turbine capacity defines the contribution from wind energy.

The battery capacity represents the energy storage capability, which is crucial for balancing supply and demand.

Load demand is defined based on typical consumption patterns and represents the energy requirement that must be satisfied by the system. These parameters are carefully selected to reflect practical scenarios and ensure meaningful analysis of system performance.

Battery protection is also a key objective, as improper charging and discharging can lead to degradation and reduced lifespan. The control strategy ensures that the battery operates within safe SOC limits and avoids excessive cycling.

4.4.2 Control Logic The control logic is based on a priority-based dispatch strategy. Renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind, are given the highest priority and are used to meet load demand whenever available. During surplus conditions, excess energy is stored in the battery to prevent wastage.

5.3 Input Data Accurate input data is essential for realistic simulation of renewable energy systems. Solar irradiance data is used to model the output of the PV system and typically varies throughout the day based on sunlight availability. Wind speed data is used to simulate wind turbine performance and reflects the stochastic nature of wind resources.

Additionally, a load profile is defined to represent timevarying energy demand, including peak and off-peak periods.

These time-series inputs enable the evaluation of system performance under dynamic environmental and operational conditions.

During deficit conditions, the battery discharges to supply the required power. If the battery reaches its lower SOC limit, the system may rely on grid support in grid-connected mode. This hierarchical control ensures efficient energy utilization and reliable system operation.

4.4.3 Integration of Optimization with Control The integration of optimization with control enables realtime adaptive energy management. The optimization algorithm determines optimal operating conditions, which are then used by the control system to regulate power flow dynamically. This ensures that the system continuously operates at optimal conditions despite variations in environmental inputs and load demand.

5.4 Test Scenarios Multiple test scenarios are considered to evaluate the robustness and adaptability of the proposed energy management strategy. Under normal operation, the system is analyzed using typical environmental conditions and load demand to establish baseline performance. In the high renewable generation scenario, conditions with high solar irradiance and strong wind speeds are simulated to examine energy surplus management and battery charging behavior.

Adaptive control mechanisms update decisions based on real-time data, improving system responsiveness and robustness. This integrated framework enhances efficiency, reduces operational cost, and ensures long-term sustainability of the hybrid energy system.

Conversely, the low renewable generation scenario evaluates system performance under limited energy availability, where reliance on battery storage becomes critical. Peak load conditions are also considered to assess the system’s ability to meet high demand levels. These diverse scenarios provide a comprehensive evaluation of system performance across different operating conditions.

5. SIMULATION SETUP AND CASE STUDIES 5.1 Simulation Environment The performance evaluation of the proposed solar–wind– battery hybrid system is carried out using advanced simulation platforms, namely MATLAB/Simulink and HOMER. MATLAB/Simulink provides a flexible environment for dynamic system modeling, control design, and implementation of optimization algorithms. It enables time-

© 2026, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 8.315

5.5 Performance Metrics The performance of the hybrid system is evaluated using technical, economic, and battery-related metrics. Technical metrics include system efficiency, which measures the

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 719

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 13 Issue: 05 | May 2026

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

effectiveness of energy utilization, and Loss of Power Supply Probability (LPSP), which indicates system reliability.

Economic performance is assessed using Cost of Energy (COE) and Net Present Cost (NPC), which reflect the financial feasibility of the system.

coordinated operation ensures reliable and efficient system performance.

6.4 Comparative Analysis A comparative analysis between the conventional control method and the proposed optimization-based approach highlights significant improvements in system performance.

The proposed method achieves lower operational cost, higher efficiency, improved reliability, and extended battery lifespan. Conventional methods, due to their static nature, fail to adapt to changing conditions, resulting in suboptimal performance.

Battery performance is evaluated using State of Charge (SOC) and Depth of Discharge (DoD), which indicate battery utilization and degradation levels. These metrics provide a comprehensive framework for assessing system performance from operational, economic, and lifecycle perspectives.

6. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The results clearly demonstrate that the integration of multiobjective optimization with adaptive control provides superior performance compared to traditional approaches, making it suitable for modern hybrid energy systems.

6.1 Model Validation The accuracy of the system models is verified by comparing simulation outputs with expected theoretical behavior. The PV model is validated by analyzing the relationship between solar irradiance and output power, confirming proportional variation under standard conditions. The wind energy model is verified using the turbine power curve, ensuring correct representation of cut-in, rated, and cut-out speeds. The battery model is validated through SOC variation during charging and discharging cycles, demonstrating realistic energy storage behavior. This validation process ensures the reliability of simulation results and the accuracy of system modeling.

6.5 Time-Series Analysis Time-series analysis provides insight into the dynamic behavior of the hybrid system over a typical operational period. The daily power profile shows that solar generation peaks during daytime, while wind energy contributes throughout the day. The battery charges during surplus conditions and discharges during deficits, maintaining system balance.

SOC variation reflects efficient battery utilization, with charging occurring during high generation periods and discharging during peak demand. Peak load analysis demonstrates that the system successfully meets high demand levels through coordinated operation of all components. This dynamic analysis confirms the effectiveness of the proposed energy management strategy in real-time conditions.

6.2 Optimization Results The multi-objective optimization process generates a set of Pareto-optimal solutions, representing trade-offs among cost, efficiency, and battery lifespan. The Pareto front illustrates that improving one objective often leads to compromise in another. For instance, minimizing cost may result in increased battery usage, while maximizing efficiency may increase operational expenses.

7. CONCLUSION This research presented a comprehensive multi-objective energy management optimization framework for a solar– wind–battery hybrid power system, addressing key challenges associated with renewable energy integration.

The study successfully developed detailed mathematical models for photovoltaic, wind, and battery systems, and formulated the energy management problem as a multiobjective optimization task considering cost, efficiency, reliability, and battery lifespan. By employing advanced optimization techniques such as Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) and integrating them with adaptive control strategies, the proposed approach effectively handled the dynamic and nonlinear nature of hybrid energy systems.

This trade-off analysis enables the selection of an optimal operating point based on system priorities. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the optimization algorithm in identifying balanced solutions that satisfy multiple performance criteria simultaneously.

6.3 Energy Management Performance The performance of the proposed energy management strategy is evaluated through power distribution analysis and load matching capability. The results indicate that solar and wind sources contribute the majority of the energy supply, while the battery provides support during deficit conditions. This demonstrates efficient utilization of renewable resources.

Simulation results demonstrated that the proposed method significantly outperforms conventional control strategies.

The system achieved reduced operational cost, improved energy efficiency, enhanced reliability, and extended battery life through optimal charge-discharge management. The

The system also exhibits strong load matching capability, successfully meeting demand under varying conditions.

Surplus energy is effectively stored in the battery, while deficits are compensated through controlled discharge. This

© 2026, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 8.315

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 720

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 13 Issue: 05 | May 2026

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

Pareto-based optimization enabled effective trade-off analysis among conflicting objectives, allowing selection of balanced operating conditions. Furthermore, time-series analysis confirmed the robustness of the system under varying environmental and load conditions, ensuring stable and reliable power supply.

Overall, the integration of multi-objective optimization with real-time control provides a scalable and efficient solution for modern hybrid renewable energy systems. The findings contribute to the advancement of sustainable energy management and support the development of intelligent and resilient power systems.

Future research can focus on real-time implementation of the proposed framework using hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) or embedded control systems to validate practical feasibility.

The integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques can further enhance predictive energy management and decision-making under uncertainty.

Additionally, incorporating stochastic modeling of renewable sources and battery degradation will improve model accuracy and reliability. The use of IoT-enabled monitoring systems can enable real-time data acquisition and remote control, improving system responsiveness. Expanding the framework to include electric vehicles, hydrogen storage, or multi-microgrid systems can further enhance flexibility and scalability for next-generation smart grid applications.

3.

Coello, C.A.C. (2007) Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems. 2nd edn. New York: Springer.

4.

Deb, K. (2001) Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

5.

6.

7.

13. Yang, X.S., Deb, S. and Fong, S. (2019) ‘Metaheuristic algorithms: optimal balance of intensification and diversification’, Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences, 13(3), pp. 355–364.

14. Zhang, Y., Wang, J. and Liu, Y. (2020) ‘Multi-objective optimization of hybrid renewable energy systems using improved evolutionary algorithms’, Applied Energy, 262, 114560.

15. Aghaei, J., Alizadeh, M.I., Niknam, T. and Amjady, N. (2016) ‘Multi-objective energy management in microgrids with renewable energy resources using robust optimization’, Energy, 116, pp. 318–331.

16. Banos, R., Manzano-Agugliaro, F., Montoya, F.G., Gil, C., Alcayde, A. and Gómez, J. (2011) ‘Optimization methods applied to renewable and sustainable energy: A review’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(4), pp.

1753–1766.

17. Bordin, C., Gordini, A. and Vigo, D. (2017) ‘An optimization approach for battery storage systems in microgrids’, European Journal of Operational Research, 262(3), pp. 1144–1155.

Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S. and Meyarivan, T. (2002) ‘A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II’, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2), pp. 182–197.

18. Dufo-López, R. and Bernal-Agustín, J.L. (2015) ‘Design and control strategies of hybrid renewable energy systems’, Renewable Energy, 82, pp. 1–10.

Diaf, S., Diaf, D., Belhamel, M., Haddadi, M. and Louche, A. (2008) ‘A methodology for optimal sizing of autonomous hybrid PV/wind system’, Energy Policy, 36(4), pp. 1214–1222.

19. Erdinc, O. and Uzunoglu, M. (2012) ‘Optimum design of hybrid renewable energy systems: Overview of different approaches’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(3), pp. 1412–1425.

Kennedy, J. and Eberhart, R. (1995) ‘Particle swarm optimization’, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks. Perth, Australia, pp.

1942–1948.

© 2026, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 8.315

Lund, H., Lindgren, J., Mikkola, J. and Salpakari, J. (2015) ‘Review of energy system flexibility measures to enable high levels of variable renewable electricity’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45, pp.

785–807.

12. REN21 (2023) Renewables 2023 Global Status Report.

Paris: Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century.

Bhattacharjee, S. and Acharya, S. (2015) ‘PV–wind hybrid power option for a low wind topography’, Energy Conversion and Management, 89, pp. 942–954.

Camacho, E.F. and Bordons, C. (2007) Model Predictive Control. 2nd edn. London: Springer.

9.

11. Mohamed, F.A., Koivo, H.N. and Al-Hinai, A. (2018) ‘Online management of microgrid with battery storage using multi-objective optimization’, Energy, 155, pp.

339–350.

REFERENCES

2.

Li, X., Hui, D. and Lai, X. (2019) ‘Battery energy storage station (BESS)-based smoothing control of photovoltaic (PV) and wind power generation fluctuations’, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 10(2), pp. 882– 892.

10. Marler, R.T. and Arora, J.S. (2004) ‘Survey of multiobjective optimization methods for engineering’, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 26(6), pp. 369–395.

8. FUTURE SCOPE OF RESEARCH

1.

8.

20. Hosseini, S.M., Carli, R. and Dotoli, M. (2018) ‘Robust energy management of microgrids using model

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 721

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 13 Issue: 05 | May 2026

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

predictive control’, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 95, pp. 357–368.

21. Kumar, N.M., Chopra, S.S. and Chand, A.A. (2020) ‘A review of hybrid renewable energy systems for sustainable development’, Energy Reports, 6, pp. 318– 332.

22. Liu, G., Starke, M., Xiao, B. and Tomsovic, K. (2017) ‘Microgrid optimal scheduling with stochastic renewable generation and load’, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 8(4), pp. 1733–1743.

23. Maleki, A., Pourfayaz, F. and Rosen, M.A. (2016) ‘A novel framework for optimal hybrid renewable energy system design using multi-objective optimization’, Energy Conversion and Management, 122, pp. 198–208.

24. Sinha, S. and Chandel, S.S. (2014) ‘Review of software tools for hybrid renewable energy systems’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 32, pp. 192–205.

25. Tazvinga, H., Zhu, B. and Xia, X. (2015) ‘Optimal energy management strategy for distributed energy resources’, Energy Conversion and Management, 97, pp. 52–62.

26. Wang, L. and Singh, C. (2009) ‘Multicriteria design of hybrid power generation systems based on a modified particle swarm optimization algorithm’, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 24(1), pp. 163– 172.

© 2026, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 8.315

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 722