Writing Pie Chart Reports

Writing Pie Chart Reports

Introduction

1. Write one sentence that paraphrases the question statement. 2. Write a trend sentence with TWO parts.

Paragraph Two

This paragraph must describe and compare the information in the FIRST part of your trend. Write sentences that describe, compare, and summarise the information connected to the first main part of the trend sentence in the introduction. Do not write any opinions! 1. Describe the highest amount and compare it to another part of the graph or chart. 2. Describe a part of the information that is the same level or amount and compare it to something else. 3. Describe a part of the information that shows the biggest increase or difference and compare it to something else. 4. Describe a part of the information that shows the lowest amount and compare it to something else and try to write about 6 or 7 sentences.

Paragraph Three

This paragraph must describe and compare the information in the SECOND part of your trend. Write sentences that describe, compare, and summarise the information connected to the second main part of the trend sentence in the introduction. Do not write any opinions! 1. Describe another amount and compare it to another part of the graph or chart. 2. Describe a part of the information that is the same level or amount and compare it to something else. 3. Describe a part of the information that shows a difference and compare it to something else. 4. Describe a part of the information that shows another amount and compare it to something else and try to write about 6 or 7 sentences.

Conclusion

1. Write one sentence that paraphrases your ideas in the trend sentence from the introduction.

Proportion of Carbohydrates, Protein, and Fat Pie Chart Sample

The pie charts compare the proportion of carbohydrates, protein, and fat in three different diets, namely an average diet, a healthy diet, and a healthy diet for sport.

Complete Report

The pie charts compare the proportion of carbohydrates, protein, and fat in three different diets, namely an average diet, a healthy diet, and a healthy diet for sport. The trend suggests that sportspeople require a diet comprising a significantly higher proportion of carbohydrates than an average diet or a healthy diet. The average diet contains the lowest percentage of carbohydrates, but the highest proportion of protein.

Carbohydrates constitute 60% of the healthy diet for sport. This is 10% higher than the proportion of carbohydrates in a normal healthy diet and 20% more than the proportion of an average diet. On the other hand, people who eat an average diet consume a greater amount of protein, at 40%, than those who eat a healthy diet, reported at 30%, and sportspeople at 25%.

The third compound shown in the charts is fat. Fat makes exactly a fifth of both the average diet and the healthy diet but then drops to only 15% for the healthy sports diet.

Overall, the charts explain that sport requires a diet of mainly carbohydrates, some protein, and less fat.

Annual School Spending Pie Chart Sample

The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991, and 2001.

Complete Report

The pie charts compare the expenditures of a school in the UK in three different years over a 20-year period. The trend shows that teachers’ salaries made up the largest proportion of the school’s spending in all three years for 1981, 1991 and 2001, and by contrast, insurance was the lowest cost for every year.

In 1981, 40% of the school’s budget went on teachers’ salaries. This figure rose to 50% in 1991 but fell again by 5% in 2001. The proportion of spending on other workers’ wages fell steadily over the 20-year period, from 28% of the budget in 1981 to only 15% in 2001.

Expenditure on insurance stood at only 2% of the total in 1981 but reached 8% in 2001. Finally, the percentages for resources and furniture or equipment fluctuated. The figure for resources was highest in 1991, at 20%, and the proportion of spending on furniture and equipment reached its peak in 2001, at 23%.

Overall, teachers’ salaries used most of the spending for the years mentioned, while insurance was the least.

Religions of Lebanon Pie Chart Sample

The graph below shows a breakdown of the various religious groups in Lebanon.

Complete Report

The pie chart illustrates the percentages of seven different religions in Lebanon. The trend suggests that Islam sees the largest proportion in this chart. Next come the Maronite Christians, and the rest including Greek Orthodox, Druze, Greek Catholic and other Christians, which constitute the least.

Islam in Lebanon, the mainly believed religion can be divided into Sunni Islam and Shi’a Islam, which show an equal figure at 27%. Maronite Christian acquires the second place at only 3% lower than those two ‘Nations of Islam’ and stands at 21% of the people in Lebanon. These three religions attract more than half of the national population at 75%.

On the other hand, the other four religions are considerably low with Druze and Greek Catholic at only 5%, and no more than 3 % higher than the people that believe in Greek Orthodox at 8% and Other Christian at 7%. The four main religions of the world Greek Orthodox, Druze, Greek Christian, and other Christians collectively account for 20% of the total amount of religions in Lebanon, which is still less than one of the two main Muslim categories.

To sum up, the three major religions in Lebanon are Sunni Islam, Shi’a Islam, and Maronite Christian with the other religions at no more than a proportion of a quarter.

Revenue and Expenses Pie Chart Sample

The graphs below show the total revenue sources and expenditures for a donation only food service program.

Complete Report

The two pie charts show both income and expenditure over several sectors The trend explains that there are many sources of revenue, while the expenditures are only used for program services, fundraising and other general services. It is clear that the total income is slightly higher than the total expenditure of approximately 300 thousand dollars. The money is mainly collected from donated food, which accounts for 86.6%. The second biggest part that accounts for 10.4%, is community contributions. Program revenue only makes up 2.2% and stands in third place. The rest includes investment income, government grants, and other income account for no more than 1%, which is very few. As for ‘expenditures’, the money is mostly spent on program services as stated at 95.8%. The percentage is almost nine times higher or almost 90 percent more than the other two categories labelled as ‘fundraising’ and ‘management and general’ which only account for 2.6% and 1.6% respectively. Overall, there are many ways to collect money, but the use of income is only spent in three areas.

Main Sources of Energy Pie Chart Sample

The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s.

Complete Report

The two graphs show that oil was the major energy source in the USA in both 1980 and 1990 and that coal, natural gas and hydroelectric power remained in much the same proportions. On the other hand, the trend identifies a dramatic rise in nuclear power, which doubled its percentage over the ten years. Oil supplied the largest percentage of energy, although the percentage decreased from 42% in 1980 to 33% in 1990. Coal in 1990 was the second-largest source of energy, increasing its proportion to 27% from 22% in the previous decade. Natural gas, the second-largest source in 1980, at 26%, decreased its share very slightly to provide 25% of America’s energy ten years later. There was no change in the percentage supplied by hydroelectric power, which remained at 5% of the total energy used. Nuclear power showed the greatest change because in 1990 it was 10%, which is twice that of the 1980s. Overall, the pie charts identify a significant increase in nuclear power, showing a percentage increase of 50 percent over the ten-year period of time.

Visitors to Scotland Pie Chart Sample

The pie chart below shows the proportion of visits to Scotland from overseas countries by age groups for 2005 only.

Complete Report

The pie chart clearly shows the percentage of visits made to Scotland from other parts of the world within specific age groups for just one year, 2005. The trend suggests that out of the total number of visits, which is calculated to be 2,392,000, more than half of these visitors to Scotland were between the ages of 25 and 54 years of age, whereas teenagers, young adults and the elderly recorded just under 50 percent of the total number counted.

The largest proportion of visitors to Scotland from overseas countries is reported by three middle-aged groups of visitors between the ages of 25 to 54. These three categories account for over 50 percent of the visitors to Scotland and they are about 10 percent more than the next largest categories.

The groups of teenagers, young adults, and the elderly, between the ages of 16 to 24, and 55 and over are the second largest group of visitors recorded in the pie chart. These groups of young adults and elderly people account for about 40 percent of the number of visitors to Scotland in all of the categories shown.

To sum up, this information suggests that most visitors to Scotland are between the ages of 25 to 54.

Two Pie Charts Sample

The two pie charts below show the total number of international students and homeschooled students for three different levels of tertiary study.

Complete Report

The two pie charts clearly show the total number of international students and homeschooled students for three different levels of tertiary study, Bachelor's, Master’s, and Doctorate’s degrees. The trend suggests that between these two charts, the majority of the students, whether or not they are international or home students, are at the master’s level.

In the first pie chart, the information regards internationals students. Almost 75 percent of these foreign students are currently studying for their master’s degree. This category is three times higher than the other two, which are bachelor and doctorate. The latter two categories only combine to represent roughly 25 percent of the student body for international students.

The second pie chart accounts for ‘home students’, or students who are not from other countries. In this pie chart, the highest amount is represented by the bachelor’s level. It accounts for four times the amount in the first pie chart, with a difference of 284,273 more students in the second chart. Yet, it is the master’s group, that when compared to the first pie chart, holds a significant number of students. When these two Masters’ categories are added together, they account for the highest number of students at a total of 1,164,145. To sum up, based on the information provided in these two charts the highest number of students, when both charts are considered, are studying at the master’s level.

Multiple Pie Chart Sample

The two pie charts below show the main reasons for immigration and emigration to the UK for one year only - 2007.

Complete Report

The two pie charts show the main reasons for immigration and emigration to and from the UK in 2007 only. It can clearly be seen that there are six main reasons for moving to or leaving the UK for the year shown and that regardless if it is for immigration or emigration reasons the main purpose was jobs in both categories. The first pie chart shows the percentages for immigration and according to the information ‘definite job’ was recorded to be 30% which is 4% higher than the next category of ‘formal study’ at 26%. ‘Accompanying or joining’ a family member represented the next highest category at 15%. ‘Looking for work’ and ‘other’ is almost at the same amounts at 12% and 11% respectively. ‘No reason given’ is the lowest group, at 6%, which is five times lower than the highest amount in this chart. The second pie chart shows the percentages for emigration or leaving the UK. ‘Definite job’ recorded the highest amount of 29%. Compared to the ‘immigration’ amount, in the same category, it is only one percent lower than the former. ‘Looking for work’ accounts for the next highest percentage at 22%, and this amount is 10% higher than the previous number in the first pie chart. Finally, when comparing both pie charts ‘formal study’ is six times higher in the ‘immigration’ information compared to the lowest percentage of 4% in the ‘emigration’ category. This information shows that most people do not leave the UK to study, but instead come to the UK to do so. To sum up, these pie charts suggest that the main reason for coming to or leaving the UK is based on the ‘definite job’ category.

Cost of Living Multiple Pie Chart Sample

The pie charts below show the differences concerning the cost of living expenses for the years 1960 and 2010.

Complete Report

The pie charts show the differences concerning the cost of living expenses in six different categories for the years 1960 and 2010. It can clearly be seen that between 1960 and 2010 a large decrease has occurred concerning the cost of housing, while a somewhat larger increase has occurred concerning the cost of food. In 1960, 72% of the cost of living expenses was spent on housing. This was 50% lower in 2010 showing a dramatic decrease for this expense. In fact, this housing expense accounts for more than 2.5 times the combined percentages of the other five categories that are given for this year. Food is listed as the next biggest expenses, but this figure is comparatively low when compared to the percentage of 34% in the same category 50 years later. Interestingly, education was 7% in 1960 and only one percent lower in 2010, showing very little change. In 2010, food and housing comprise 56% of the total cost of living expenses that need to be spent. This combined percentage is almost the same amount for only housing in 1960. The housing expense has dramatically dropped, but the cost of food has risen significantly. The other main difference between the two pie charts is shown in the ‘other ‘category. In 1960 it was only 5%, but 50 years later it has risen by14%, to 19%. Overall, the two pie charts show the differences concerning the cost of living expenses in six different categories for the years 1960 and 2010.

Cost of Living Multiple Pie Chart Sample

The pie charts below show information concerning the cost of living expenses, for seven different categories for the years 1971 and 2001.

Complete Report

The pie chart shows information concerning the cost of living expenses, for seven different categories for the years 1971 and 2001. The trend suggests that cars and food amounted to the highest percentages for the cost of living expenses for both years presented. In 1971, the cost of food was the highest at 44%, which was four times higher than in 2001. Car expenses accounted for 22% of costs made and was 21% lower than 2001. The other five categories account for a combined expense total of 34%, which is lower than food expenses, but higher than car expenses. In 2001, the cost of car expenses was the highest at 43%, with food being 29% percent lower in the same year, but 1% higher than the car expenses 30 years before. Also, in 2001, the other five categories account for a combined expense total of 43% which is 11% higher than the other five lesser categories from 1971. Overall, the pie chart shows information concerning the cost of living expenses, for seven different categories for the years 1971 and 2001.

Multiple Pie Chart Sample

The pie charts below show a comparison of the percentages in energy for 1995 and 2005 in the UK.

Complete Report

The two pie charts show a comparison of the proportions of energy usage in the United Kingdom for two years only, in 1995 and 2005. It can clearly be seen that the energy consumption for both of these years is very similar, with not a lot of differences given in the percentages for coal and gas, and petrol to a lesser degree. In 1995, coal accounted for the highest percentage of 31%. This is only 2% higher than the next two highest categories of gas and petrol. When all three of these categories are combined together they account for 89% of all energy used in 1995. Nuclear energy and other sources of energy were the two lowest categories accounting for a combined total of only 11%. This is 8 times lower than the highest three groups and clearly shows that these two sources of energy were not highly produced. Ten years later in 2005, coal accounted for the same amount as 1995, at 31%. As for gas and petrol, in 2005, these two account for 50% of the production percentage which is 8% lower than 10 years before, when it was at 58%. Nuclear power and other sources of power did rise a little bit, by 4%, for each of these two categories. Overall, the pie charts show a comparison of the proportions of energy usage in the United Kingdom with very similar percentage results for both years that are shown.

Household Spending Pie Chart Sample

The charts below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1995 and 2010.

Complete Report

The four pie charts show household spending patterns in the UK and Canada for five different categories between 1995 and 2010. The trend suggests that people’s spending habits had changed over the 15-year period in both countries, more so in the UK, than compared to Canada. In 1995, in the UK, the vast majority of spending was spent on leisure time. This category was only 27%, while 15 years later, it had increased to 34%, showing a rise of 7%. The least amount was spent on “other” and was recorded at just 9%. In Canada, for the same year, most spending was recorded in the food and drink category, with 6% more being spent in Canada compared to the UK. The next highest category in Canada was for utility bills, which amounted to 1% more than the UK percentages. In both countries, an average of 16% was spent on transportation. In 2010, the highest proportions recorded in the UK were for leisure, at 34% and utility bills at 28%, while in Canada the top recorded amounts were for utility bills at 31% and food and drink at 25%. When these amounts are combined together for each country, the total in the UK was 62%, and the total amount in Canada was 56%. The lowest amount, in both countries, was recorded in the ‘other’ category at 11% respectively. Overall, for the 15-year period that is shown, household spending habits, in all categories, changed albeit only slightly in some of the groups.

Browser Usage Pie Chart Sample

The pie chart below shows the different browsers that were used for internet searches in 2011.

Complete Report

The pie chart shows six main browser search engines for Internet usage in the year 2011. The trend suggests that Firefox and Internet Explorer accounted for slightly more than half of all these Internet searches.

57.8% of the Internet searching that is shown in this pie chart was done so with either Firefox or Internet Explorer. This is significantly higher than the next highest amount which has been recorded for Google’s Chrome browser. The difference among these browsers is 37.2% in favour of the two former ones.

Safari, Opera and Android accounted for only 18.1% of these searches, which is comparable to the percentage given for Chrome. This is a far lower amount when compared to the combined amount of Firefox and Internet Explorer, showing a difference of exactly 39.7%. Interestingly, the Other category accounted for more than Android, with a percentage of 3.5, which shows an increase of 1.6% more traffic to these other browsers.

Overall, Firefox and Internet Explorer accounted for most of the online traffic shown in this pie chart.

Dangerous Waste Products Pie Chart Sample

The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.

Complete Report

The pie charts compare five different methods for the disposal of dangerous waste products in Sweden, South Korea, and the UK. It is clear that the main method used among these three countries to get rid of hazardous waste is by burying it. It can also be seen that the ways of dealing with these dangerous amounts of waste in Sweden are exactly the same as in South Korea.

In the United Kingdom, 88% of dangerous materials are buried underground, while this figure for Sweden and Korea are much less at 55% and 22%, respectively. Sweden burns about a fifth of its risky material, and this method is only 9% in Korea, and even less in the United Kingdom, at just 2%.

Korea recycles about 70% of its dangerous materials and this method is used for the treatment of about a fourth of these substances in Sweden. In contrast, Great Britain does not practice any recycling for its hazardous materials at all. Instead, chemical treatment and dumping at the sea are two additional methods that are practiced only in England, with a percentage of 8 for each.

Overall, the main method of hazardous waste disposal for all three countries is a burial.

Australian Household Energy Use Pie Chart Sample

The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.

Complete Report

The two pie charts show, firstly how energy has been used by an Australian household, and secondly how this same energy, per household, has resulted in greenhouse gas production. The trend suggests that refrigeration, heating, and water heating have combined to amount for the highest percentages in both charts. Refrigeration, water heating, and heating accounted for the highest percentages for household energy use in Australia, at 7%, 30% and 42%, respectively. When combined together, these energy suckers accounted for a whopping 79% of household energy use or four-fifths of the total usage per house. Heating the house was 12% higher than water heating, and significantly more than refrigeration, with a difference of 35%. Cooling, lighting, and other appliances accounted for only 21% of the energy use, and when this is compared to the three highest percentages, it shows a difference of 58% or more than half of the energy use was used by refrigeration, water heating, and heating. Greenhouse gas emissions were primarily highest for the same three categories in the first pie chart. Refrigeration has doubled to 14%, while heating has significantly decreased from 42% to 15%, showing a difference of 27%. Water heating remained relatively unchanged from 30% to 32%. The information shows that energy use and the resulting emissions can fluctuate based on the kind of energy being used. A significant change can be seen with other appliances. This category has increased from 15% to just under 30%, showing a difference of double. Lighting and cooling remained relatively the same at quite low percentages. Overall, refrigeration, heating, and water heating have combined to amount for the highest amounts in both pie charts.

Household Expenditures Pie Chart Sample

The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.

Compete Report

The pie charts show the proportion of money spent on various household expenses in Malaysia and Japan in 2010. The trend suggests that in both countries more than 50% of these household expenditures were spent on housing and other goods and services.

It can be seen that Malaysia had the greatest proportion of expenditures at 34%in the housing category, while Japan’s housing category only accounted for 21% of its total. In contrast, in Japan, the greatest single expense was other goods and services at 29%, compared with just 26% in Malaysia showing a slight difference of 3%. The food category in Japan was recorded at 24%, while in Malaysia the actual proportion was a bit higher at 27% showing only a 3% difference.

In Japan, another major expense was for transport. This was recorded at 20%, but this same category was much lower in Malaysia, with a percentage of only 10%. In both countries, the lowest percentage of expenditures were recorded in the healthcare category. These household expenditures indicate that in both cases food, housing, and other goods and services were the higher among the expenses, compared to the health care category which was the lowest in both countries at a combined total of only 9%, while in only 1% lower than the next lowest group of transport in Malaysia.

Overall, in both countries, more than 50% of these household expenditures were reported for the housing, and other goods and services categories.

Electricity Production by Fuel Source Pie Chart Sample

The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source for Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.

Complete Report

The pie charts illustrate the total production of electricity measured in units and divided by different sources of fuel in Australia and France in the years 1980 and 2000. The trend suggests that the major fuel sources used for electrical production were different in Australia and France.

First of all, there were considerably more units of electricity produced in Australia in 2000 at 170 units compared to only 100 units in 1980. The majority of electricity produced in Australia for both years was from coal, but there was a higher dependency on coal in the production of electricity in 2000 than in 1980. It is a difference showing 130 units to 50 units. There was an increase of 16 units of electricity produced by hydropower from 1980 to 2000, whereas the other sources, like natural gas and oil, contributed less to the electricity production in 2000 than in 1980.

Regarding the fuel sources in France, it is apparent that electricity production doubled in 2000 compared to 1980, which was at 180 units for the former and 90 units for the latter. The most striking feature is that there were only 15 out of 90 units of electricity produced by nuclear power in 1980. Nuclear production became the main fuel source of electricity production in France in 2000, which was reported at 70%. Not forgetting to mention that the use of other fuel sources in electricity production became less in 2000 than in 1980.

Overall, the fuel sources that were used in Australia and France were different, with coal being used in the former and nuclear being used in the latter.

Customer Service Pie Chart Sample

The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010.

Complete Report

The given pie charts compare the percentage of visitor's responses about the customer services at the Parkway Hotel in two separate years 2005 and 2015. The trend suggests that there was a significant improvement in customer services in 2010 compared to 2005 and the guests had appreciated these improvements in their responses.

In 2005, just 5% of the visitors surveyed considered the customer service to be excellent, while 14% rated this service as well. Visitors' responses changed dramatically in 2015, where a considerable number of guests, at 28% said that these services were excellent. Even more, at 39%, the respondents found these services to be good. In 2005, 45% of guests were in favour of satisfactory services at the hotel, while this figure fell to only 17% in 2015. These positive responses have shown an improvement in services for 2015.

In 2005, the figures for people who disliked customer services and labelled them as poor and very poor were 21% and 15%, respectively. These figures dropped significantly in 2010 to only 12% and 4%. These figures show a rise in the satisfaction of services five years later. The respondents in 2010 were more pleased with the customer service of this hotel when compared to 2005.

Overall, there was a significant improvement in customer services when the two years are compared.

Languages Spoken at a University Pie Chart Sample

The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.

Complete Report

The two pie charts show the percentages of university-level students, in the UK, who were able to communicate in English and other languages, over a span of 10 years, from 2000 to 2010. The trend suggests that in these two specific years most British students spoke English and only one other language.

In 2000, the highest category was reported for “Spanish only” spoken, at 30%. This is exactly 20% higher than the lowest category which was “two other languages” spoken, at only 10%. All the remaining four languages that were included in this pie chart were reported at between 10 and 20 percent. In 2010, the “Spanish only” category had risen by 5%, which is exactly the same amount of rising seen in the “two other languages” category. The most significant change over these two years can be seen in the “no other language” spoken category which had decreased by 10%. The figures for “German only” remained the same, while “French only” dropped by 5%, and “another language” rose by 5%.

Overall, in 2000 and 2010, most British students used English and only spoke one other language when they spoke

Water Use Around the World Pie Chart Sample

The pie charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.

Complete Report

The pie charts show the proportion of water that has been used in six continental areas all over the world in terms of three different categories. The trend suggests that agriculture and industry have used a vast majority of water in all six places globally. It can also be seen that the dominant purpose in the distribution of water consumption in North America and Europe was used by industry, and the remaining areas tended to use water for agricultural reasons. The pie charts report that more than 70% of water usage in Africa, South America and the Asian regions was highest in the agricultural sector, with the highest proportion in this category being 88% which was recorded in Central Asia. The second highest agricultural water use can be seen in Africa and South East Asia at 84% and 81%. The lowest amounts of water used were seen in Central and Southeast Asia for domestic purposes, at only 7% for each one. Interestingly, there was an opposite trend reported in Asia for industrial and domestic water use when these categories are compared to North America and Europe. By far the greatest percentage of industrial water usage was seen in Europe at 53%, with agricultural water use only being recorded at 32%, which was the lowest of all the other categories. Again, in Europe, the second-highest proportion of water consumption was allotted to domestic use, at 15%. Only South America recorded more in the domestic water use category, at 19%. Likewise, there was a similar situation in North America with industrial water use standing at 48%. This was followed by agricultural and domestic water use with figures of 39% and 13%. To conclude, the pie charts show that agricultural and industrial water use was the highest in the categories that are shown.

Water Usage Pie Chart Sample

The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California, and the rest of the world.

Complete Report

The pie charts show information about the percentages of water that has been used in three sectors by the county, state, and global level. The trend suggests that water is primarily used for residential purposes in San Diego and California, while the agriculture sector consumes the lowest amount of water. However, the global trend is completely reversed. It is also noticeable that water consumption is relatively similar for different usages in California.

Domestic water use accounted for the largest amount in San Diego and California, at 60% and 39%. Interestingly, at the state level, residential water use was about 40% lower when specifically compared to San Diego County. Also, by contrast, only 8% of water was used for the same purpose in other parts of the world, as was shown as the lowest figure in the worldwide pie chart.

People who were living outside of San Diego County and California utilized 69% of water for agriculture, which was the highest figure for all three pie charts. San Diego County and California, as a whole, consumed the lowest amount of water for farming, at only 17% and 28%, respectively. The figures for industrial consumption were the same in San Diego County and the rest of the world, with only 23% of water being used.

Overall, residential, and agricultural water usage accounted for the majority of the water that was used in these three pie charts.

Car Ownership in Canada Pie Chart Sample

The pie chart below shows the proportions of adults in Canada who own one car, two cars, more than two cars, or who do not own a car.

Complete Report

The pie chart shows the percentage of adults in Canada who own one car, two cars, more than two cars, and no car at all for 2015. The trend suggests that most Canadians own one or two cars.

According to the information, 80% of Canadians owned one or two cars in 2015. This amount is significantly higher than those Canadians who owned more than two cars, or no car at all. People who had one car were reported at exactly 55% which is 30% more than those people who owned two cars. Interestingly, more people had no car at all compared to those Canadians who owned more than two cars. Car ownership for no car was reported at 17% which is 14% higher than those people who owned more than two cars. The biggest difference noted in this chart showed that 52% more people owned one car compared to two or more cars. Overall, most Canadians owned one car, and in fewer cases, two cars.

Distribution of Visitors to Canada Pie Chart Sample

The pie chart below shows the distribution of visitors to different tourist attractions in Canada in 2015.

Complete Report

The pie chart shows the distribution of visitors to seven different tourist attractions in Canada in 2015. The trend suggests that the majority of visitors to Canada went to museums, galleries, and theme parks. The number of visitors to theme parks was the highest at 38%. Followed slightly behind, were visits to museums and galleries at only 1% less. When combined, museums, galleries and theme parks accounted for one-third of all tourist visits to Canada in 2015 at 75%. Out of the seven different categories that are presented in this information two out of every three visitors to Canada went to museums, galleries, or theme parks. Only 9% of these visitors went to wildlife parks and zoos. This is 66% lower than the combined total percentage of visitors to museums, galleries, and theme parks. Historic houses and monuments fared no better, with only 16% of visitors. This is only 5% higher than wildlife parks and zoo showing an amount that is not much higher than the lowest category. And in fact, when these categories are all added together they only account for 25% of the total number of visitors to Canada in 2015. That is only one out of four people visiting these places. Overall, the majority of the visitors who went to Canada in 2015 visited museums, galleries, and theme parks.

Population Predictions Pie Chart Sample

The charts below give information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.

Complete Report

The pie charts compare the proportions of Italian and Yemeni citizens in three age groups in 2000 with projections for 2050. The trend suggests that Yemen had a younger population in the year 2000, and the same is predicted for the year 2050. As well, the populations of both countries are predicted to get older over the 50-year period.

In 2000 just over half the Yemeni population was under 14, compared to just over 14% of Italians in the same age group. Only a very small percentage of people in Yemen were over 60 at 3.6%, in contrast to nearly a quarter of the Italian population. The two largest groups of both Italy and Yemen fell into the 15 to 59 age group with just over 60% and 46.3% respectively.

Yemen’s average age is set to increase with the proportion of over 60s increasing by just over 2%, with the middle age group rising by 11%, leaving the youngest group with a decrease of nearly 13%. It is predicted that by 2050 the number of people in Italy over 60 years of age will jump to 42.3%, the percentage of those in the youngest bracket will drop to 11.5%, and the percentage of 15 to 59-year-old individuals will decrease to 46.2%.

To conclude, Yemen was shown to have a younger population in the year 2000, and the same can be said for future predictions.

Owned and Rented Housing in the UK Pie Chart Sample

The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1991 and 2007.

Complete Report

The pie charts compare housing that was owned and rented for two years only in 1991 and 2007 in terms of percentage. The trend suggests that the majority of homes in the UK were owned and that in the rental sector most homes were categorized in the social renting market.

In 1991, homeownership was the most popular type of housing, accounting for 60%, or more than half of all homes. The next largest sector was social rented homes, amounting to 23% or nearly one-third of homes. The remaining homes were mostly privately rented at 11% with a tiny fraction being social housing at 6%.

Sixteen years later, in 2007, the number of homeowners had risen to 70% or almost threequarters of all homes. This was an increase of 10% compared with 1991. Much of the increase in homeownership can be explained by the decrease in social rented homes, which had dropped from 23% to 17%. The percentage of privately rented homes had remained unchanged at 11%. However, there were five million more homes in 2007 compared with 1991 so the number of rented homes had increased despite the same percentage. Social housing has decreased three-fold from 6% in 1991 to 2% in 2007, and it remains the least popular type of housing.

Overall, most homes for these two years were owned by their occupants.

Meal Type Nutrients Pie Chart Sample

The pie charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Complete Report

The pie charts show the number of nutrient types such as sodium, saturated fat and added sugar that was consumed for four meals per day these being breakfast, lunch, dinner, and snacks in the United States. The trend suggests that if these nutrients are eaten in mass quantity it could potentially be unhealthy and that the percentage of sodium was the highest amount at dinnertime, with snacks holding the largest percentage of added sugar. It can be clearly seen that 23% of added sugar was reported at dinner. The percentage of sodium in snacks is similar to breakfast time at only 14%. This amount is much lower than lunchtime which was reported at 29%. Both saturated fat and added sugar have the same percentage at 16% at breakfast time. People in the USA consume about 26% of saturated fat for lunch, with this amount being higher than the percentage of sugar added in the same meal which was reported at 19%. It is also shown that Americans add more sugar in their snacks because the highest percentage is 42% added sugar at snack time, while only 21% of saturated fat is consumed at lunch. Sodium and saturated fat are ranked first with reported percentages of 43% and 37% respectively. In contrast, only 21% of saturated fat was consumed in snacks.

In conclusion, people in the USA consume a large amount of these three nutrients at dinner, compared to a lesser amount at breakfast.