I Hsin Huang Design Portfolio 2019

Industrial Design

I Hsin, Huang

Portfolio 2019

I -H s i n Hu ang 19 9 6 / 8/ 1

E du c a t i on al Back g ro und 2 0 14. 9 - 2018. 6

Tatung University

Awa rds 2015

Bachelor of Design

Taiwan International Student Design Competition Brand SpeciďŹ ed

Gold Prize

2017

iF DESIGN TALENT AWARD

Nomination

2018

Taiwan International Student Design Competition

Major in Industrial Design

E m p l oy me n t H ist o ry 2 0 18. 7 - Curren t

Flywell International Corp Product Development

Product Design

Nomination

Skills

In te re sts

Illustrator Photoshop Rhino ProE Alias Keyshot

Reading, Watching Movie and Drama, Mountain Climbing

A c ti v i t i e s Graduation Exhibition of TTU- Probabil ity

Huashan Social Welfare Foundation

Public Relations Department

Volunteer

Leader

2017.7~2017.9

I’m a

optimistic, friendly and

compassionate girl who is enthu-

2017.9 - 2018.6

siastic about solving problems through

design

to

bring

happiness to everyone.

Design Thinking Workshop of TTU

Final Exhibition of Smart Aging Design

Sta (Photographer)

Coordinator

2017.9 - 2018.3

2017.4~2017.6

Human Landscape Planning of Neihu Workshop

+8 8 6 9 3 3 4 0 6 2 4 0

Participate

cano n8 5 0 8 1 @gmail.co m

2017.8.5 - 8.6

the

Content

Gr a d u a t i on P r o jec t

I n t er disc iplin ar y Design P r o j ec t

De sign Re se arch Proje ct

Re e ve si

iPet

C lo th e s Wash ing Br

Assistive Device for Mountaineer

Travel Carriers For Pets

Brush Design for Intellectu

I Hs in Hu ang P o rt f o lio 2 0 19

P r o d u c t Pro jec t

Ot h er s

us h

Ca or i

O th e r W o rks

ual Disability

Perpetual Calendar Design

Product, Graphic Design and Sketch

Assistive Device for Mountaineer

On mountains ranging from 2600m to 4000m in height, the air pressure becomes lower than on the plain so that it’s possible to not only have acute mountain sickness but also to possibly die. We designed Reevesi to assist climbers to breath normally through lung expansion by lowering internal pressure, hence lowering the risk of HAPE. T e am Mem b er : Yu a n T i n g W a n g

Design Background Taiwan is a mountainous island. Climbers have plenty of chances to go mountain climbing. However, climbers tend to get acute mountain sickness (AMS). According to a study conducted by Yushan National Park, AMS is correlated with high altitude trekking experience. When the altitude is higher than 3000m, the AMS prevalence rates are 27%. Therefore, we wanted to design a product that would reduce the chances of climbers getting AMS.

The Process of HAPE

Problem Setting Being short of breath is the first symptom

H2O

H2O

x O2

Blood Flow to Brain

Increased Vascular Permeability

Water Penetrates Cell

when people have low oxygen. However, HACE

H2O

systolic

H2O

Over-breathing

Blood-flow Rate Increases

Water Penetrates Lungs

over-breathing causes pulmonary arterial

HAPE

pressure

and

increases

the

blood-flow rate. When vasoconstriction happens, water penetrates lungs easily.Those are vital factors to bring to HAPE.

Problem Solving Through principles of negative pressure ventilation, Reevesi compresses air pressure covering the chest which becomes negative while assiting the lungs expansion during inhalation. It can allow people to inhale more air, and get oxygen into the body. Because of this, it slows people’s breathing rate and solves the problem which increases mountain sickness.

Respiratory Capacity While Using Negative Pressure Ventilation 1.7

Intrapulmonic Pressure

Before Inhale

Pressure(mmhg)

1.0

Negative Pressure Ventilation

Inhale 1.0

Normal Respiration

0.8

+2

Exhale

+1

Inhale

0 Inhale: -7cmH2O

-1 6.1

After Inhale

5.9 6.0

5.0

4.0

3.0

2.0

1.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

-2

Exhale: -4cmH2O Time(s)

0.0

Unit:(cm H2O)

Design Concept From the point of view of prevention, we hope to adjust the climber’s breathing rate throughout the whole process of climbing. The climber can inhale more oxygen actively from the air they’re breathing without using an oxygen cylinder.

Prototype In order to fit around a person’s chest and retain enough space to change the pressure inside, we tested, modified and redesigned the shape many times. With the coloured stripes, the device would match the clothing of the climbers, creating a sporty and functional design that is different from other mountain climbing equipment.

Mechanism design According to Boyle's law, the value dierences between pressure and volume have an inverse relationship in our product. If volume increases, then pressure decreases. Reevesi uses a motor controlled by our breathing movements to compress space and change the pressure value.

Negative Pressure

Positive Pressure

Function

Button

Motor

Unidirectional Valve

Rubber Edge

Bending Sensor Measures the Circumference Unidirectional Valve Compresses the space to exhaust air

of the Chest Motor compress space by rotation

Rubber Edge

Pressure Sensors

Stitched with clothes

Measures the pressure inside

USB Charge Socket Vent

Rotating Cap

Soft Material

Bending Sensor

Scenario The climber wears Reevesi outside of their base layers before climbing. After that they adjust the Reevesi for the perfect ďŹ t and buckle it. When the climber feels unwell on the road, they push the button and start the machine. It expels the air automatically by detecting the changes in breathing movement. Throughout the change in volume, Reevesi creates a space where is negative pressure so that reduces pressure and increase the inspiration capacity. It is an eective way to regulate breathing.

Step 1

Step 2

Step 3

Wear it before climbing

Buckle up and adjust it

Push the button

Advisor

Organizer

Co-organizer

In Collaboration With

Travel Carriers For Pets

Product Story Traveling is a very exciting for dogs and we found that travel carriers are widely used. As pets spend lots of time in it; we designed iPet. It can be folded up and out fast according like a paper bag. iPet is not only just easy to carry and store, it is also comfortable and secure while dogs are being carried. It gives dog a comfort space to rest .The modern shape and well-designed detail of iPet let users Group Project

can travel with pets in style.

Field Research Q1: Would you bring travel carriers when you go out with your pets?

Q2: Which features of travel carriers will let you want to buy it more?

7%

Q4: What are your key consideration while buying travel carriers?

7%

6% No 57%

Q3: Which type of the travel carriers is your favorite?

8% 8% 27% Wheeled 44%

Yes 43% Easy To Carry On 53%

Hand-carried 45%

Detachable 11%

Comfort 17%

8% Price 25%

Portable 25% 9%

Easy to clean up

Appearance

Weight

Useful

Easy to store on

Not Buying

Others

Accordance with Animal Boarding Establishments

Idea: 360-degree camera for dog Concept: Inspired by people favorite leisure activities, we found people nowadays like to record things by photos and videos.

Focus on recording dog facial expressions while activating. By recording on video camera,

Breaking Points

we redefined the connection of people and pets and the meaning of traveling together.

2016.12.09

2016.11.11 Presentation in the middle of semester Topic: User Research Have conversation of user, understanding their need Focus on our user persona

Rethink & Define

- user’s emotion was our main design feature - innovative product - redefine the meaning and scenario of traveling with pets

Second Presentation of idea In depth investigation of traveling with dogs, we redefined our target of design. To bring more emotions into our design, we focus on relationship between owners and dogs.

First idea: Double Layer, storable

Rethink & Define

and multifunctional travel carriage

- product positioning and user persona was unclear - the difficulty of production - consideration of team member’s major

2016.12.09

Second idea:

First Presentation of idea

Storable Folding dog travel crate.

User’s Problem: Cleaning, Dog Behavior Problems

Our Problem: 1.Could not achieve our goals in this semester.

2. Our design is different product line

and storage of travel carriers

from our collaborative company.

Focus on user’s equipment

New idea:

and dogs' biological needs

Storable folding dog travel carriage

Market Survey

Price：NTD 2,100

Folded To Size Of A3

W41 x D25 x H28

Lots Of Pockets

RWL：7 kg Foldable

Hand / Shoulder-carried Fold Before Unzip All Zipper Detachable Base Only Small Dog Breeds

Price：NTD 3,600 W55 x D45 x H42 RWL：15 kg Foldable

Lots Of Pockets Dragged To Save Labour Small and medium-sized Dogs Folded To Size Of Laptop Bag

Price：NTD 595

Folded With Simple Method

W43 x D25 x H20

Hand / Shoulder-carried

Foldable

3 Sizes To Fit Tiny Dogs To Giant Breeds

Much Heavier Wheeled Base Couldn’t Fold With Bag

No Pocket Not Comfortable Separated Easily

Target

Easy to carry and store:

Easy to clean up:

Ventilation and waterproof:

- Without unfoldable fixed base

By the fabric choice of carriage, it

Mash on both sides letting pets to see

- Fastened construction by tough

could be washed and dried easily

outside world to ease their anxiety and

to keep it clean and extend the

breeder could also notice its emotion

- Be firm enough and foldable

fabric and strong seams

lifetime of bag even though it had

anytime.

- More functional to many kind of

no pee pad inside at all.

Inconsideration of rainy weather and

occasion like transportation and

different situations, waterproof fabrics

tourist attractions

and the mesh cover were necessary.

3

Folding Steps 1

2

Prototype

We set up our design targets to be folded in and out fast, that was dierent from the normal storage steps of dog travel carriage.

Hand-carried

Design Concept

Shoulder-carried

According to our research, the travel carriers would only be used on public transportation and particular places that they have to follow the rules. Therefore, we designed iPet.

Foldable

 

T.

i

P E

Design For Needs Design For Pets

Final Exhibition

It can be fold up and out fast refer to the folding way of paper bag. Also, iPet is very just easy to carry and store. Dierent from existing product, we redesigned travel carriers in a new point of view.

Design Research Project

Clothes Washing Brush Design for Intellectual Disability in Perspective of Universal Design

College Student Research Project of Ministry of Science and Technology

This

p r oj e c t

would

fo c u s

on

the

research

the

posture the disabled using the scrubbing brush b e t te r,

and

redesign

the

scrubbing

as

to

the

o u tc o m e o f t h e r e s e a r c h , i n c r e a s i n g t h e c o m f o r t i n u s a g e w e r e t h e m a i n t a r g e t o f t h i s p r oj e c t.

T h r o u g h t h i s r e s e a r c h , I h o p e d to h e l p t h e d i s a b l e d to b e c o m e m o r e i n d e p e n d e n t a n d h a v e a s e n s e o f a c c o m p li s h m e n t.

Field Research - Syinlu Community Home I found that the disabled find it hard to launder their underwear properly, which was the major issue encountered by the teachers.

Therefore,

this

project

would

redesign

clothes brush that using in their daily life by the principals of universal design.

The Generic Laundering Process

Put underwear in bucket

Go to laundry room on roof

- Put underwear on washboard - Smear soap on it by hand - Wash it with clothes brush

Background My aunt suffers severe intellectual disability.

Except

learning

and

cognitive

problems,

Problems Observed

her

behavioral disability influences her daily life a lot.I wanted to improve her daily life to let her have more sense of accomplishment from the life.

- Didn’t know how to flatten underwear before washing it - Couldn’t swing arm out so that the brushing distance was shorter than others

Respondent Data

Research Process Respondent Data

- Five Intellectually Disabled females (from moderate to severe)

Gender

Resp 1

Resp 2

Resp 3

Resp 4

Resp 5

Average

Female

Female

Female

Female

Female

-

Age

37

49

37

49

34

41.2

Height

158

159

151

147

151

153.2

Dominant Hand

Right

Right

Right

Left

Right

-

Palm Width(cm)

7.5

6.9

6.2

6.8

6.7

6.82

Resp 1

Resp 2

Resp 3

Resp 4

Resp 5

Average

6cm Grip Span

21.1

15.7

11.6

3.7

9.2

12.26

5cm Grip Span

19.4

10.8

11.6

1.6

9.0

10.48

4cm Grip Span

16.1

11.6

7.9

2.1

10.2

9.58

Experiment

First Stage of Experiment

Data Analysis

Experiment Conclusion

Design Grip Strength (kg)

Level DeďŹ nition (Key Indicator Method for Brushing)

Redesign Brushes

Experiment

Second Stage of Experiment

Data Analysis

Research Conclusion

Design Target Base on the problem of handling brush and weak strength while washing - I would integrate clothes brushes that were commercially available

Primary Variable Redesigning The Brush

Secondary Variable

- Secondly, design clothes brush for the disabled and

The Posture Of Gripping Scrubbing Brush

evaluate their washing movement

The Angle Of The Washboard And Sink

Dependent Variables The Amount Of Force Wasted Value Of Grip Strength He Speed Of Brushing

Washing Environment

Experiment Subjects

[1]

Angle (angle of washboard and horizontal plane)

Brushes Classification Grip Directly

Grip on Handle

Sample

New Design

(3 clothes brush samples) cuboid

cylinder

cube

curved shape

semicircular handle

handle shank

new martial construction

1

Grip Strength

2

Washing Force

3

Hand Posture

4

Wasting Speed Respondents would use 3 samples to do these 4 test subjects in three different angles.

[1]

Angle:

Grip Strength and Washing Force:

Hand Posture:

Brush the underwear in the angle of 20, 30, and 45

Measure the washing force and the wasting grip

Videotaping the change in posture under

between washboard and horizontal plane to under-

strength of respondent in the washing process

different angles and different brushes, in

stand how the angle of arms and horizontal plane

by different angle of arms and horizontal plane

order to understand how the brush may

effect the washing movement. The whole movement

and different types of the scrubbing brush.

affect the hand posture.

of respondent would be record on the video camera.

Standard of Washing Effect

1

KIM-MHO

The Samples of Experiment

[2]

(Key Indicator Method- Manual Handling Operations)

Smaple

Dimensions

Description

Sample 1

H4 x W5 x D13 cm

The most normal type of clothes brush, also the t ype that they used in Syinlu Communit y Home

Sample 2

H7.5 x W15 x D6 cm

The most normal type of clothes brush with handle, fit ting in with the hand shape

Key Indicator Method for Brushing Washing Speed x (Washing Force + Wasting Grip strength + Hand Posture) = Washing Effect Score

2

handle: H4 x W11 x D2.5 cm

The Preference Survey

Sample 3

H8.5 x W5 x D5 cm

The clothes brush with round handle, conforming the principals of universal design

According to the shape and the method of gripping, I classify the brushes those were commercially available and choose the three normal types to be the sample of the experiment.

[2]

Washing Speed:

KIM-MHO:

The Preference Survey:

To find out how variant angles have an effect on

Time rating point x (type of force exertion(s) in the

I would interview the respondentsto know which

performance of the washing: by limiting the number

finger-hand range + Force transfer/gripping conditions +

brushes they liked the most and the reasons for it.

of brush cycle and record the time taken, additionally

Hand/arm position and movement + Work organization +

The survey was based on the existing one used in

with assistance of videotaping to calculate total

Working conditions + Posture) = risk score

the community home and modified it.

distanced the hand has moved in order to calculate the time required for each laundering process.

Grip Strength

Average Data of Experiment

Washing Force

Wrist Deviation

Wasing Speed Total Distance (in video)

Total Distance (actual proportion)

Time(s)

Speed

377.46mm

4.03

78.052cm/s

3145.5mm 3

68 5 1 2 4

7

1

1

Flexion

Angle 3

0.30

0.26

0.24

angles while using three samples

0.60 0.17

0.15

0.3805

0.40

3 8 2 4 5 6

7

1’1’

2’ 2’

4

4

7 7 8

5 5 66

3’3’ 4’4’ 5’ 6’ 5’ 6’

8

8’ 7’

7’

ulnar: 15°

64.238

0.90

0.5328

60.00

8.47°

0.60

0.20

0.30

5.6°

2.53° 2°

55.11

54.62

20°

30°

57.989

40.00

4.91° 3.73°

0.00

0.00

0.5440

Extension

3 3

ulnar

0.6738

the average value of

ulnar: 15°

2 2

2.76°

20.00

E

0.00 cm/s

radial

0.00

-0.15 the angle between washboard

20°

and horizontal plane

0.67°

30°

45°

AVG

0.00 20°

30°

45°

average

using

3

value

of

samples

in

three angles

0.30

0.60 0.17

0.00 -0.13

-0.15 S1

S2

S3

F

E

30°

F

E

F

45°

AVG

45°

AVG

ulnar

0.24

0.15

E

20°

0.39

Sample the

F

AVG

0.60

0.3792

0.30

0.00

0.00 S1

S2

S3

Level 1

60.00

E

2.76°

S1

F

E

S2

N F

0.73° E

S3

F

E

AVG

F: the value in flexion E: the value in extension

Washing Force Level 0.1 >

1

57.104

57.989

4.91°

2.33°

F

63.193 53.671

40.00

5.07° 3.87°

AVG

Value: the average of three highest values in 8 times

40 <

9.67°

0.90 0.5328

0.20

Speed (cm/sec)

The Level of Key Indicator Method

0.5715

0.40

AVG

Value: difference in grip strength between washing process (After - Before)

0.6477

20.00 0.00 cm/s

S1

S2

S3

AVG

Value: the value of distance was scaled up from video size to their actual size

Grip Strength (Kg)

Level

Ulnar/Radial

Level

0

37 < / 20 <

0

0.5 - 1.5

1

20-37 / 15-20

1

20 > / 15 >

2

1.5 <

40 - 50

2

0.1 - 0.5

2

50 - 60

3

0.5 - 1

3

(-0.5) - 0.5

2

60 - 70

4

1 - 1.5

4

(-1.5) - (-0.5)

3

70 - 80

5

1.5 - 2

5

-1.5 >

4

80 >

6

2 <

6

T h e Key I n d ic a to r M e t h o d f o r b r u s h i n g

Sample 1

Sample 2

Sample 3

The Result of Experiment

Average

The posture of griping I noticed that every respondent had different posture of griping

Angle: 20°

three samples in the experiment. Referring their posture to the

Speed

51.367(3)

50.856(3)

63.963(4)

55.395(3)

Washing Force

0.648(3)

0.429(2)

0.555(3)

0.544(3)

new design of scrubbing brush, I hoped the shape could fit in

Grip Strength

-0.3(2)

-0.3(2)

0.76(1)

0.05(2)

their habits.

Hand Posture

1.9

1.8

1.8

1.8

19.2

16.3

23.2

19.6

49.958(2)

58.579(3)

55.324(3)

54.620(3)

Score

Sample 1

posture 1

posture 2

Angle: 30° Speed Washing Force

0.643(3)

0.173(2)

0.326(2)

0.381(2)

Grip Strength

0.3(2)

0.06(2)

0.92(1)

0.43(2)

Washing Force

Resp 1

Resp 2

Resp 4

Hand Posture

1.7

2

2

1.9

Hand Posture

Resp 1

Resp 2

Resp 4

Resp 5

Resp 3

18.7

13.7

18.2

16.9

Grip Strength

Resp 1

Resp 2

Resp 4

Resp 5

Resp 3

Score

Sample 2

Angle: 45° 60.544(4)

61.877(4)

70.293(5)

64.238(4)

0.652(3)

0.535(3)

0.834(3)

0.674(3)

Grip Strength

-0.7(3)

0.52(1)

-1.32(3)

-0.5(2)

Hand Posture

1.6

1.8

2

1.8

25.8

23.6

34.6

28

Speed Washing Force

Score Average

53.956(3)

57.104(3)

63.193(4)

58.084 (3)

Washing Force

0.648(3)

0.379(2)

0.572(3)

0.533(3)

Grip Strength

-0.23(2)

0.09(2)

0.12(2)

-0.01(2)

Hand Posture

1.7

1.9

1.9

1.8

21.2

17.9

25.3

21.5

Speed

Score

posture 1

Resp 3

Resp 5

posture 2

posture 3

Washing Force

Resp 1

Resp 3

Resp 5

Resp 2

Hand Posture

Resp 1

Resp 3

Resp 5

Resp 2

Resp 4

Grip Strength

Resp 1

Resp 3

Resp 2

Resp 4

Resp 2

Resp 3

Sample 3

posture 1

posture 2

Resp 4

posture 3

( ): the score of the subject

Washing Force

Resp 1

Resp 4

Resp 2 (45°)

(20,30°)

Score: the average score of Key Indicator Method for Brushing

Hand Posture

Resp 1

Resp 4

Resp 5

Resp 2

Resp 3

Grip Strength

Resp 1

Resp 4

Resp 5

Resp 2

Resp 3

Resp 5

Resp 5

The Result of Experiment

The Best Angle Of Every Types of Brush

The Best Types of Brush of Every Angle

The average performance of respondent

The average performance of respondent

Sample 1

Sample 2

Sample 3

Sample 3

Sample 3

Resp 1

Resp 2

Resp 3

Resp 4

Resp 5

Score

45°

45°

30°

20°

45°

Score

Sample 3

Sample 2

Sample 3

Sample 3

Sample 2

Speed

45°

20°

45°

Same

30°

Speed

Sample 3

Sample 2

Sample 3

Sample 3

Same

Washing Force

45°

Same

20°

30°

Same

Washing Force

Sample 3

Same

Sample 1

Same

Sample 1

C

45°

45°

Same

20°

45°

C

Sample 3

Sample 2

Sample 3

Sample 3

Sample 1、2

Same: the value in this three was same

Same: the value in this three subjects was same

C: the consequence of average data in this three subjects

C: the consequence of average data in this three subjects

Score: the average score of Key Indicator Method for Brushing

The performance of every respondent

The performance of every respondent

Resp 1

Resp 2

Resp 3

Resp 4

Resp 5

Sample 1

45°

Same

20°

30°、45°

45°

Sample 2

45°

20°

30°

20°

Sample 3

45°

45°

Same

20°

Resp 1

Resp 2

Resp 3

Resp 4

Resp 5

20°

Sample 3

Sample 2

Sample 1

Sample 3

Sample 2

20°

30°

Sample 1

Sample 2

Sample 3

Sample 3

Sample 2

30°

45°

Sample 3

Sample 3

Sample 3

Sample 1

Sample 1

Resp: respondent

Same: the value in this three subjects was same

Same: the consequence of average data in speed, washing force and score of Key Indicator Method for Brushing

C: the consequence of average data in this three subjects

N ew D e s ig n 1

Type 1

2

Type 2 Cur ved Handle

Concave Sur face

Cur ved Griping Sur face

Convex Sur face

Convex Sur face

Concave Sur face Concave Sur face

Concept 1

Concept 2

lateral symmetr y

lateral symmetr y

cur ved griping sur face - fit the hand shapes

cur ved handle - fit the hand shapes

concave sur face - could put index finger on

c o n v e x s u r f a c e - i m p r o v e d g r i p s t r e n g t h、s l i p p i n g o ff

c o n v ex s u r f a c e - i m p r o v e g r i p s t r e n g t h、s l i p p i n g o ff

concave sur face - could put their fingers on

C o n c e p t 1’

Concept 2’

s i m i l a r to C o n c e p t 1

s i m i l a r to C o n c e p t 2

g r i p i n g s u r f a c e l e a n o f 25°

g r i p i n g s u r f a c e l e a n o f 25°

a s y m m e t r y - r e d t r i a n g l e i c o n to m a r k t h e f r o n t w a r d

a s y m m e t r y - r e d t r i a n g l e i c o n to m a r k t h e f r o n t w a r d

N ew D e s ig n 3

Type 3

C 1

C 1’

C 2

C 2’

C 3

C 3’

Equitable Use

v

v

v

v

v

v

Flexibility in Use

v

-

v

-

v

-

Simple and Intuitive Use

v

-

v

-

v

-

Tolerance for Error

v

v

v

v

v

v

Low Physical Effort

v

v

v

v

v

v

v

v

v

v

v

v

The Principle of Universal Design

Cur ved Griping Sur face

R o u n d e d Tr i a n g l e S h a p e

Size and Space for Approach and Use

Concept 3 rounded triangle shape - improve controlling and griping cur ved griping sur face - fit the hand shapes

Concept 3’ s i m i l a r to C o n c e p t 3 g r i p i n g s u r f a c e l e a n o f 25° a s y m m e t r y - r e d t r i a n g l e i c o n to m a r k t h e f r o n t w a r d

T h e C o n c e p t s o f t h eT il t S u r f a c e Af te r a d d i n g t h e a n g l e o f w a s h b o a r d a n d s i n k n o w (20°), i t w o u l d c r e a te t h e a n g l e o f 4 5° b e t w e e n h a n d a n d h o r izo n t a l p l a n e t h a t w a s t h e b e s t a n g l e a c c o r d i n g t h e fi r s t s t a g e ex p e r i m e n t.

C: new design of scrubbing brush

Grip Strength

Average Data of Experiment

Washing Force

Wrist Deviation

Wasing Speed Total Distance (in video)

Total Distance (actual proportion)

Time(s)

Speed

377.46mm

4.03

78.052cm/s

3145.5mm 38 7 6 5 1 2 4

1

1

Flexion

0.00

-0.03

-0.59

-0.50 -1.15

-1.00

0.3014

0.30

2 surface design

0.20

0.2567 0.2119

AVG

Tilt

0.00 Level

AVG

Tilt

0.3862

Sample 0.00

7

1’1’

2’ 2’

5 5 66

3’3’ 4’4’ 5’ 6’ 5’ 6’

7 7 8

8

8’ 7’

7’

-0.50

-0.59

0.20

E

F

E

Level

F

E

F

E

AVG

Tilt

0.2252

43.639

43.375

Level

Tilt

AVG

15.00 0.00 cm/s

18.4°

15.00 0.2567

-0.33

5.3°5.8°

F

43.111

30.00

2.93° 0.53°

ulnar

0.30

-0.08

10.07° 8.67°

5.00

0.00 Level

types of brushes

3 8 2 4 5 6

4

ulnar: 15°

45.00

15.00

10.00

0.10

-1.50

the average value of 3

Extension

4

ulnar

Angle the average value of

ulnar: 15°

2 2

3 3

45.00

46.022

43.977

12.7°

10.00

40.127 43.375

30.00

0.1585

-1.00

0.10

5.3°5.8° 3.4° 2.9° 1.9° 0.08°

5.00

-1.24

-1.50

0.00 T1

T2

T3

AVG

Value: difference in grip strength between washing process (After - Before)

0.00 T1

T2

T3

AVG

Value: the average of three highest values in 8 times

F

E

T1

F

E

T2

F

E

T3

F: the value in flexion E: the value in extension

F

E

AVG

15.00 0.00 cm/s

T1

T2

T3

AVG

Value: the value of distance was scaled up from video size to their actual size

M ove m e n t o b s e r va tio n s Using type 2 C o n c e pt 1 a n d C o n c e p t 2 - a c c o r d e d w i t h p r e d i c ti o n

R e s p o n d e n t 1, 2, 3 (w i t h fi n e m oto r s k il l s) - s a m e a s i n fi r s t ex p e r i m e n t

B r u s h e s w i t h til t s u r f a c e - h a r d l y r e c o g n iz e d i r e c ti o n

R e s p o n d e n t 4 , 5 - w a s h e d w i t h t h e s i d e o f t h e b r u s h (C o n c e pt 2’)

T h e Key I n d ic a to r M e t h o d f o r b r u s h i n g

T h e B e s t B r u s h o f Eve r y R e s p o n d e n t

Type 1

Type 2

Type 3

Average

41.929(2)

46.496(2)

40.909(2)

43.111(2)

Washing Force

0.139(2)

0.177(2)

0.319(2)

0.212(2)

Grip Strength

0.44(2)

-1.1(3)

0.76(1)

0.03(2)

Hand Posture

1.1

1.5

1.8

1.5

Score

9.8

18.7

9.4

12.6

51.915(3)

41.457(2)

39.346(1)

44.239(2)

C: the consequence of average data in this three subjects

Washing Force

0.311(2)

0.140(2)

0.453(2)

0.301(2)

C + number: the new design of scrubbing brush

Grip Strength

0.22(2)

1.52(0)

1.72(0)

1.15(1)

Hand Posture

1.5

1.6

1.5

1.5

15.9

9.5

8.3

11.2

46.922(2)

43.977(2)

40.128(2)

43.675(2)

0.225(2)

0.159(2)

0.386(2)

0.257(2)

Grip Strength

0.55(1)

0.21(2)

1.24(1)

0.59(1)

Hand Posture

1.3

1.6

1.7

1.5

12.9

14.1

8.9

11.9

Level Surface Speed

Tilt Surface Speed

Score

Resp 1

Resp 2

Resp 3

Resp 4

Resp 5

Score

C 1’

C 1’、2

C 3

C 1

C 2

Speed

C 2

C 1’

C 2

C 1’

C 3

Washing Force

C 3

C 3’

C 3’

C 1

C 2’

Same

C 1’

C 3、3’

C 1

C 2

C

Same: the value in this three subjects was same

Average Speed Washing Force

Score

E m o tio n O b s e r va tio n s

[3]

t h e r e s p o n d e n t ’s d e g r e e o f p a r ti c i p a tio n d e c r e a s e d s ig n i fi c a n t l y

( ): the score of the subject Score: the average score of Key Indicator Method for Brushing

[3]

R e s p o n d e n t 1 - w a n t to e a r n i n d i v i d u a l a t t e n t i o n needed more reminder and assistance R e s p o n d e n t 2 - ke p t t h e i n a c o n s i s t e n t l e v e l

Respondent 3 - less passion than the first stage still reach the requested movement but not s t r i v i n g to s h o w h e r s e l f a g a i n Respondent 5 - distracted her at tention from the test easily

R e s p o n d e n t 4 - d i d n’t h a v e g o o d fi n e m o to r s k i l l s

ke p t t h e i n a c o n s i s t e n t l e v e l

T h e Ave r a g e Va l u e s o f N ew D e s ig n

T h e E x p e r i m e n t R e s u l t s o f Tw o S u r f a c e D e s i g n s

C 1

C 1’

C 2

C 2’

C 3

C 3’

41.929

50.1146

46.4962

41.4572

40.909

39.3456

Tilt sur face > Level sur face

Washing Force

0.139

0.3114

0.1774

0.1954

0.3192

0.4532

leaning sur face

Grip Strength

0.44

0.22

-1.1

1.52

0.76

1.72

Score

20.6

15.9

18.7

9.5

9.4

8.3

Speed

Wa s h i n g F o r c e:

- c o u l d p r o d u c e a n a c ti v e d o w n w a r d fo r c e a t e a s e to i m p r ov e w a s h i n g fo r c e - c o u l d a d d t h e w a s h i n g d i s t a n t , fo r c e a n d s p e e d

Same: the value in this three subjects was same C: the consequence of average data in this three subjects C + number: the new design of scrubbing brush

Wa s h i n g S p e e d , F o r c e: C o n c e p t 1’ > C o n c e p t 1

T h e E x p e r i m e n t R e s u l t s o f T h r e e D i ff e r e n t Ty p e s o f B r u s h D e s i g n

I f g e t ti n g u s e d to t h e s a m p l e, t h e til t g r i p i n g s u r f a c e b r u s h c o u l d h e l p t h e m to w a s h f a s te r a n d h a r d e r.

Ty p e 1 - f a m ilia r f e e li n g to t y p e 1 l e d b e t te r s p e e d - washing speed occupied high percentage of the method for brushing Ty p e 3 - s m a l l vo l u m e c o u l d b e c o n t r o l l e d e a s il y a n d increase the value of washing force more Ty p e 2 w a s h i n g s p e e d: t y p e 1 > t y p e 2 > t y p e 3 (s p h e r i c a l s h a p e) l o n g g r i p i n g s u r f a c e b r u s h c o u l d i m p r ov e w a s h i n g s p e e d - h a n d l e w o u l d o b s t r u c t u s e r s o t h a t w a s h i n g fo r c e d e c r e a s e d

Testing the Prototype

T h e S u r vey o f Pe r s o n a l P r e f e r e n c e

Research Conclusion

s a ti s f a c tio n s c o r e o f 1 to 5 w a s v i s u a liz e i n to t h e f a c e o f s m il e to c r y i n g

Resp 1

Resp 2

Resp 3

The Design of Scrubbing Brush

Resp 5

Type 2

Type 1, Type 3

Controlling with Handle

Controlling Directly

SS

Rank

SS

Rank

SS

Rank

SS

Rank

Sample 1

5

1

4

3

2

3

4

1

Concept 1

4

2

4

2

4

2

3

2

Concept 1’

1

3

5

1

5

1

1

3

Sample 2

5

1

5

1

3

-

5

1

Type 1 > Type 2 > Type 3

Type 3 > Type 1

Concept 2

4

2

3

-

5

1

3

2

I n Wa s h i n g S p e e d

I n Wa s h i n g F o r c e

Concept 2’

1

3

4

-

2

-

3

3

- Rectangular Griping Sur face

- S m a l l e r Vo l u m e

Sample 3

5

1

5

1

5

1

5

1

- Controlling Directly

Concept 3

4

3

5

3

3

3

4

2

Concept 3’

4

2

5

2

3

2

2

3

[6]

[5]

Type 1 > Type 3 I n M e t h o d fo r B r u s h i n g , Wa s h i n g S p e e d

SS: the satisfaction score of respondents (1 to 5)

- Familiar Feeling

Rank: the rank of scrubbing brush based on satisfaction score

- High Percentage

T h e C o n c l u s io n O f R e s p o n d e n t ’s Pe r s o n a l P r e f e r e n c e

[7]

[4]

- n o d i r e c t r e l e v a n c e to t h e r e s u l t (t h e i r s t a n d a r d: a p p e a r a n c e)

[5]

[6]

Therefore, the score of new design would

Rectangular griping surface

Smaller volume that could

- Familiar feeling o

be lower than others. However, we could

and controlling directly could

be held easily and thus

- Washing speed o

find out that the respondents still thought

increase washing speed

increased washing force

[4] - No direct relevance between satisfaction and the method for brushing - The personal preference was based on appearance of brush(color, shape)

it was useful from the oral interview.

[7]

of the Key Indica

The Definition of Clothes Brush for Intellectually Disabled The Design of Tilt Griping Sur face Brush

Level

[8]

T il t

Condition

The Guideline Of Brush Design

Faster Speed

Lo n g G r i p i n g S u r f a c e B r u s h

Controlling Easily

Without Handle H av i n g S m a l l Vo l u m e

poor fine motor skills

- C o u l d n’t c o n t r o l til t b r u s h e s w e l l

of Type 1

occupied high percentage

bet ter fine motor skills

- Wa s h i n g D i s t a n t , F o r c e and Speed increased - P r o d u c e a n a c ti v e d o w n w a r d f o r c e to u s e r

Increase Wa s h i n g F o r c e

Less Area of Brush Sur face

Increase Wa s h i n g D i s t a n c e

T h e T il t G r i p i n g S u r f a c e B r u s h

Wa s h i n g F o r c e

Es p e ciall y to th e o n e H a d B et te r Fin e Motor Skills

I m p r ov e

T h e T il t G r i p i n g S u r f a c e B r u s h

H a n d Po s t u r e

E s p e c i a l l y t h e B r u s h w i t h S m a l l Vo l u m e

[8] - Didn’t have the same brushing effect in the angle of 45°

ator Method for brushing - Might because that it related to the ability of hand controlling

Supplement

C o l o r c o u l d i n c r e a s e t h e r e s p o n d e n t ’s d e g r e e o f p r e f e r e n c e fo r t h e b r u s h a n d b e m o r e li ke l y to w a s h w i t h i t.

Ca o r i

Perpetual Calendar Design

We usually notice time flowing visually. To let user experience time flow through other senses, I designed Caori. Combined with aroma essential oil diffuser, user can feel time by smelling.

Serenity

Sense

Time Flow

Concept

You can pour diďŹ&#x20AC;erent essential oil into little boxes which present each week of a month.By

Color

Concept

Shape

turn it every week, user can smell diďŹ&#x20AC;erent aroma every week and experience time goes by through the wonderful smell.

Simple

Upright

Smooth

Complicated

Prototype - Cut the PU into the shape by using lathe

- Using the PU form model formed the ABS by vacuum forming

- Scrub the surface and spray painting

Detail

Top Cover

Incase the mixture of smell

DiďŹ&#x20AC;erent essential oil

Let the essential oil in

Water Tank

HumidiďŹ er

Scenario

Emotional Connection

The Caori lets users experience time and the important days of their life through smelling.

In this way, it connects an aroma with the userâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s memory to create a deeper connection.

Caori also gives people a unique way to remember their memories.

pour essential oil in

chose the date If it is your birthday week or special festivals, you can choose your favorite essential oil to pour in.

turn on

O t hers

Circury

Calla

Driver Protector

Leaf Light

Table of Library

Night Lamp Design

Prevention Device of

Street Light Design

Collapse

Totema Folding Screen I F De sign T al e nt Award

Mao Kong

Rice

Together

Branding Design

Logo and Package Design

Red Envelope Design Tai w an I nt ernat i o nal S t u d ent D es i gn Co m p et i t i o n

Sk e tch

Thanks for Your Time

I Hsin Huang canon85081@gmail.com +886 933-406-240