BBall Schedules

The Supreme Court has been unwilling to hear any case involving election fraud, however, this case is not about election fraud. It is about the duty of the elected official to defend the Constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic. It still seems unlikely they will hear the case due to the overwhelming shakeup of the American government system it would create.

Currently, there are two lawsuits identical to each other. The first one, filed by Loy Brunson is still held up in the Utah Federal Court. The second one, filed by Raland J. Brunson has made it to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), Docket #22-380, where nine Justices in conference will vote (only four needed) to move to a hearing.

The case was frozen at 10th Circuit Court, but eventually bypassed the court due to claiming a state of natural security interest SCOTUS Rule 11. Once bypassed, the Supreme Court Clerk called to speed up the process which seems they could be interested in accepting the case.

While it seems like a longshot to be heard and an even more longshot for a ruling because it means that it would virtually purge the US government by removing from office 385 members of Congress and a sitting president and vice president. But then again, if the Supreme Court is to rule based upon the US Constitution, then the case has legal standing and frankly has a strong chance.

THE QUESTION

How can you support, and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign, and domestic? Answer: You investigate. If there are claims that there is a threat, even if you don't believe there is a threat, you investigate. How else can you determine if there is a threat unless you investigate? You can't. Were there claims of a threat to the Constitution? Yes. Where did these serious claims come from? 100 members of Congress. What was the threat? That there were enemies of the Constitution who successfully rigged the 2020 election. Is this lawsuit about a rigged election? No, it's about the members of Congress who voted AGAINST the investigation thereby thwarting the investigation. Was this a clear violation of their oath? YES.

So, to remember what day this took place, it was January 6, 2021. Everyone knows “that day.” There were 100 members of congress set to request a 10 day investigation into possible election fraud. A few members spoke on the house floor, and then “January 6th” happened. When the congress reconvened late that night, they voted down the investigation into fraud that was introduced, they stated that no further election fraud concerns would be heard “in light of the day’s events,” they were pushing through to certify the election. And that is what they did. What remedy are they seeking? They are asking that all 385 defendants be charged with Treason for failure to uphold the US Constitution, they be incarcerated for a period no less than five years, be fined no less than $10,000, they be removed from their government seat, and banned from ever holding a political position ever again.

Loy, Raland, Deron, and Gaynor Brunson (the brothers) witnessed the 2020 election along with claims from members of congress that the election was rigged. What got their attention was when the proposition to investigate those claims was presented to Congress and put to a vote. What came as a shock to the four brothers is when they discovered that 387 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence actually voted against the proposed investigation, thus thwarting the investigation. Whether the election was rigged or not was no longer their main concern. What now became the concern was when those members of Congress violated their sworn oath by voting to thwart the investigation.

The brothers wanted to do something about this. Their brother Deron had quite a lot of experience in the legal field, which started out when he began suing banks in an attempt to show the corruption in that part of the financial world, so he had enough knowledge to file a lawsuit against the now current 385 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris. He already had experience with the SCOTUS by bringing two petitions to them, both of which were denied, but this experience gave him enough success along the way to give him the confidence that maybe, just maybe, he might be able to do something about this thwarted investigation.

Their brother Gaynor was heavily occupied with his audio/video television business(Rock Canyon Studios)so Deron got together with his other two brothers to plan out the strategy. They decided to have their oldest brother Loy to be the name on the lawsuit, which is called a "Complaint" and because he would be on the Complaint, the Court would refer to him as the Plaintiff. The 388 people being sued will now be called Defendants. Loy filed the complaint, which eventually got stuck in the Federal Court, so they got together and decided to have their brother Raland file the identical lawsuit with his name on it, in the Utah 2nd District Court. While Loy's lawsuit continued to be held hostage in the Federal Court, Raland's lawsuit eventually made it to the SCOTUS.

Loy Brunson first filed his suit in the Utah Federal Court on March 23, 2021, while Raland filed his in the Utah 2nd District Court on June 21, 2021. The court is still waiting for the court to make a decision on Loy’s suit while Raland’s is on to the SCOTUS to be voted on by the Justices on January 6, 2023. If four want to hear the case, they will officially judge the case and decide (by vote) if defendants should be removed from office).

We have never in history seen a case such as this. There is no precedent of this magnitude. What will SCOTUS do with this? Who knows.