Skip to main content

The Silent Strategic Loss

Page 1


The Silent Strategic Loss: How the Embargo

Isolates the U.S. and Hands Over Cuba to Its Competitors (2014–2024)

Executive Summary

While the U.S. held on to its embargo against Cuba, countries like China and Russia stepped in with billions in strategic investments. Far from weakening Cuba, the embargo has weakened the U.S. itself economically, politically, and diplomatically across Latin America. In an increasingly multipolar world, this outdated policy acts as a self-imposed penalty.

I. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): China and Russia take the lead

$12B+ in FDI entered Cuba (2014–2024)

 China: 42%

 Russia: 18%

 U.S.: <1% (limited to remittances and narrow exceptions)

Explanation: American companies were legally banned from investing, while rivals secured key assets in Cuba’s economy.

Participation in Strategic in CUBA (2023)

II. Strategic Sectors Lost

Sector

Energy

Tourism

Infrastructure

Biotech

$2.5B Havana 300 MW Solar Plant No bids allowed

$1.8B Joint Venture

Hotels

U.S. cruises blocked

$1.2B Port of Santiago modernization Caterpillar excluded

$900M Abdala vaccine expansion Pfizer/Moderna blocked

Explanation: U.S. innovation and capital were sidelined. China now dominates the infrastructure once tied to U.S. supply chains.

III. Trade: Stagnation vs. Expansion

 China–Cuba trade: +141% growth

 Russia–Cuba: +260% growth

 U.S.–Cuba: Stagnant at ~$150M/year (limited to food/meds)

Explanation: While Cuba’s economy globalized, U.S. trade was politically handcuffed despite clear mutual benefit.

IV. Infrastructure Dominated by Rivals

 Mariel Port (ZEDM): $1B from China

 5G rollout: Huawei, not Cisco

 Oil: Rosneft in, Chevron out

Explanation: Cuba’s most critical national assets are controlled by global competitors. The embargo created a vacuum others filled.

V. Cost to the U.S.

Impact Value

Jobs lost/year 12,000+

Missed exports $1.2B annually

Strategic losses Cuba trades more with China

Winners: China, Russia

Losers: U.S. farmers, manufacturers, long-term influence

✅ Strategic Conclusion

The embargo did not protect American interests. It harmed them. It didn't isolate Cuba it isolated the U.S.

In a multipolar world, nostalgia is not strategy.

The U.S. must:

1. Lift embargo restrictions in strategic sectors

2. Reinvest in the Americas

3. Support AURO as a counterbalance to rising Chinese influence

This is not appeasement. It is survival. It is renewal.

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
The Silent Strategic Loss by Hojeteol - Issuu