6 minute read

In the Field

Next Article
Fresh Paint

Fresh Paint

BOUNCING BETWEEN FROZEN AND THAWED

There is a connection between the freeze-thaw cycle and runoff risks.

Advertisement

by Aaron Wunderlin and Laura Paletta

Over the years, the University of Wisconsin Division of Extension Discovery Farms Program has shared lessons learned from nutrient applications on frozen soil. The main takeaway is that applying nutrients, such as manure, to frozen ground shortly before runoff occurs leads to greater losses.

Frozen soils are more prone to runoff from rain and/or snowmelt events because it is much harder for water to infiltrate into the soil and percolate below the frost layer. Understanding how soils freeze and thaw provides insight on the development of soil conditions that are more susceptible to runoff and is important to consider when making decisions about nutrient applications.

The dynamics of how soils freeze and thaw throughout winter can strongly influence surface water runoff potential during snowmelt and early spring rains. The combination of physical and climatic variables in a local region can result in varying freeze dates, frost depths, and thaw dates.

The freeze-thaw cycle

The freeze-thaw cycle in a soil can vary based on several factors including: • Soil type • Soil structure • Landscape position • Temperature patterns • Soil moisture content • Geographic location • Ground cover • Timing/depth of snowpack • Rain/snowmelt on frozen soil • Frost depth

Discovery Farms collects soil temperature data at multiple depths throughout the year at each of the monitoring project areas to assess the soil conditions as it relates to runoff. For our purposes, “frozen soil conditions” are defined as a soil temperature below 32°F at any depth monitored. Depending on factors listed above, our data reveal that soil conditions can either fluctuate between frozen and nonfrozen throughout winter or freeze and stay frozen until spring.

As observed in Table 1 and 2, soil does not freeze and thaw at the same time each year, nor is the length of

time when soil is frozen the same. Within and between years, the factors listed above can influence timing at any given location.

As hard as concrete

The amount and type of frost present in the soil is one of the primary factors that influence the amount of surface runoff generated by snowmelt or winter rain events in any given year. These conditions in the soil vary widely across the state and even in your local area. A challenge that develops with surface thawing while frost remains deeper in the soil profile is water can still infiltrate to fill pore space above the frost layer and then refreeze when temperatures drop again.

“Concrete frost” is commonly used to describe the condition when most of the pore space at or near the surface of the soil is occupied by frozen water (Figure 1). This condition is often formed in mid to late winter when snowmelt or rain infiltrate soil that is still frozen at some depth below. This cold water percolates down to where the frost still exists in the soil profile and then freezes.

In some situations, the upper profile of the soil becomes saturated with water to the soil surface before freezing. Concrete frost takes longer to thaw than regular frost in the soil; therefore, once it forms, it is typically present for the rest of winter until the entire frost is pushed out of the soil and water can percolate through.

The development of concrete frost has been verified in data collected by both Discovery Farms and others where melting occurs at the surface but the frost is not fully removed from the soil. In this situation, melt or rain water percolates to the frost layer then refreezes (Figure 2). These studies have also shown that during concrete frost conditions, little to no infiltration occurs in the soil as pore spaces are full of ice.

The in-field study conducted by Melanie Stock and collaborators at the University of Wisconsin also found that frozen soils create significantly greater amounts of runoff than unfrozen soils. This study applied liquid manure at different timings throughout the winter and saw higher runoff and nutrient losses in January compared to December. They attribute this to the presence of a thick layer of concrete frost (20.1 inches deep) that developed in January (Figure 2).

Stock also found that another important factor to consider when applying manure on snow is the effect of albedo, which is the reflection and absorption of

continued on following page >>>

Table 1: Average freeze and thaw dates at monitoring locations in Wisconsin and average duration of frozen soil conditions

County Kewaunee* Kewaunee** Manitowoc* Average freeze date Average thaw date 12/1 3/29

12/6 3/19

12/18 3/27

Iowa* Lafayette* Dodge/ Waukesha* Rock** 12/5 11/28 12/14 12/15 3/30 3/31 3/23 3/12

Juneau/Sauk** 12/18 3/16

Langlade** 11/16

*Original core farms: Winter 2003-2004 through 2010-2011 **Current farms: Winter 2015-2016 through 2020-2021 4/9 Average freeze duration (days) 118 107 100 114 122 99 83 89 146

Figure 1. Concrete frost development in soils after thaw/refreeze events where the frost is not completely removed from the soil.

Concrete frost

Unsaturated frost

nonfrozen soilUnsaturated

Table 2: Observed freeze and thaw dates

Freeze Thaw Earliest 11/6 2/21 Latest 1/9 4/20

sunlight. Manure is dark in color, which raises sunlight absorption. This speeds up snowmelt and can cause rapid runoff. In a case where snow starts to melt but concrete frost is still present, the newly melted snow cannot infiltrate the soil and becomes surface runoff.

Avoid risky areas

Nutrients applied to soils during concrete frost conditions have a very high likelihood of loss via surface runoff. Avoid nutrient applications during concrete frost conditions to prevent nutrient loss, which degrades water quality. This is not always possible, so be sure to place your nutrient applications in areas of the least amount of risk.

During concrete frost conditions, utilize internally drained land (closed depressions) or low-sloped (flat) land, areas that are far from surface water features, and target those fields that have vegetative cover throughout the winter. Utilize your local conservation resources to assist you with your decision making when spreading manure this winter. ■

Wunderlin is with the University of WisconsinMadison Division of Extension’s Discovery Farms program. Paletta is an outreach specialist with the University of Wisconsin’s Agriculture Water Quality Program.

Figure 2. Snowpack and frost depth throughout two winter seasons in south central Wisconsin (Stock et al., 2019).

Snowpack (in.)

Frost depth (in.)

10 8 6 4 2 0 5 10 15 20 25 12/112/1112/21 12/311/10 1/20 1/30 2/9 2/19 2/29 3/10 3/20 3/30

Winter 2015-16

Snowpack (in.)

Frost depth (in.)

10 8 6 4 2 0 5 10 15 20 25 12/112/1112/21 12/311/10 1/20 1/30 2/9 2/19 2/29 3/10 3/20 3/30

Winter 2016-17

hayandforage.com

F1 1 Aug Sep 2022 Cover.indd 1

Our magazine and e-newsletter are FREE to qualified subscribers! Sign-up is fast and easy at hayandforage.com

August/September 2022

Published by W.D. Hoard & Sons Co.

Cutting edge, research-based information for livestock producers, custom operators, commercial hay growers, forage consultants, and educators.

• Headline news and field reports • Original features Low alfalfa yields can be tiring pg 10 • Market insight and crop updates • Event coverageShip hay or ship cattle? pg 12 Corn silage harvest errors pg 26 Stockers performed well on alfalfa-bermudagrass pg 30 • Direct to your inbox every Tuesday morning eHay WEEKLY

7/29/22 9:20 AM

This article is from: